Slashdot Mirror


Emotion Recognition Systems Could Be Used In Job Interviews (techtarget.com)

dcblogs writes: Emotion recognition software identifies micro-expressions through video analysis. These are expressions that may be as fast as 1/25 of a second and invisible to the human eye, but a close analysis of video can detect them. These systems are being used in marketing research, but some employers may be interested in using them to assess job candidates.

Vendors claim these systems can be used to develop a personality profile and discover a good cultural fit. The technology raises concerns, illustrated earlier this year who showed that face-reading technology could use photographs to determine sexual orientation with a high degree of accuracy.

One company has already added face recognition into their iPad-based time clock, which the company's CEO thinks could be adapted to also detect an employee's mood when they're clocking out. Yet even he has his reservations. While he thinks it could provide more accurate feedback from employees, he also admits that "There's something very Big Brother about it."

145 comments

  1. Finally! by nospam007 · · Score: 3, Funny

    A real use for those Botox injections.

    1. Re:Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      A real use for those Botox injections.

      Hey, be nice!

      It's the only thing Nancy Pelosi has ever been ahead of the curve on that didn't cost US citizens money or freedom!

    2. Re:Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Finally... A real use for those Botox injections.

      Oh, really?

      Wait until you get rejected, because the system didn't sense enough desperation on your part.

    3. Re:Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks to my full face tattoo, I don't need to worry about it at all.

  2. Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People laugh when I'm so focused on retiring early and not keeping up with the Joneses. But at least I'll be getting out before this shit goes mainstream.

    1. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm 47 and I quit six months ago. I've never been happier. Working is horrible. No one should be subjected to that.

    2. Re: Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think this shit is hilarious. It's almost like a contest how much humiliating bullshit will people go through to work at these so-called "prestigious" companies.

      Personally I would not want to be surrounded by people who eagerly pass these "tests", and I'm okay with the fact that these jobs are not for me.

    3. Re: Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Run your own business instead if you want. Much more fun! At least for me, i run a hooker house.

    4. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm 47 and I quit six months ago. I've never been happier. Working is horrible. No one should be subjected to that.

      Although eating regularly and sleeping under a roof are pretty good.

  3. Applicant-freshly squeezed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lovely. As if job interviews aren't high pressure enough.

    1. Re:Applicant-freshly squeezed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my experience it's all "know someone on the inside". The results of the interview are decided before you even start it.

  4. Fake it til Big Brother realizes its fake! by Monster_user · · Score: 1

    Fake it til you make it! Classic advice from a time before "expert" computerized lie detectors in the form of emotion recognition. Now its fake it until Big Brother is sufficiently advanced enough, and commodotized enough to see through you.

    1. Re:Fake it til Big Brother realizes its fake! by postbigbang · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There used to be a box, sold sometimes in kit form, that detected micro-tremors in your voice. Some believe that the microtremors, mostly sub-audible, were a sign of deception. There were phone-attachments for them, too. It didn't even take a computer to detect these tremors, or for the device to be thought of as a lie detector.

      This was thirty years ago. This is nothing new. Facial recognition is the same way-- finding twitching muscles could be a toothache or a rebuke. Pick one.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    2. Re:Fake it til Big Brother realizes its fake! by gtall · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sound's like a management wet dream. I have a better idea, we put management through one of these detectors every morning. If their attitude isn't one of helpfulness to employees, they get sent home with no pay for the day. We'll test them regularly through the day as well just to make sure the attitude is constant.

    3. Re:Fake it til Big Brother realizes its fake! by postbigbang · · Score: 2

      You mean 1984 is here?

      Why bother when you can buy a prospective candidate's browser history, and typify him/her/whatever against various desirable/undesirable profiles/? Why not have a bot do it and save yourself time?

      "Siri/Cortana/Alexa, dig up the dirt on social security #504-22-5555. Map profile against StockDesirable#11442. Grade. Display."

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    4. Re:Fake it til Big Brother realizes its fake! by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      Everyone with anxiety issues shall be made permanently unemployed by this technology.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    5. Re:Fake it til Big Brother realizes its fake! by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      The time clock that can detect micro expressions is a set fee.
      The time clock that can match home browser logs to a face is extra to rent.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    6. Re:Fake it til Big Brother realizes its fake! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Management will use them against you, not the other way around. Wonderful wishful thinking there.

      That kind of naivete is painful.

    7. Re:Fake it til Big Brother realizes its fake! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fads like this all suffer from the same problem that antivirus vendors have: the bad guys can use virus scanners too, to try their stuff out on before releasing it into the wild.

      Emotion detectors? If they become ubiquitous enough then people will simply train with them until they reveal nothing, or better yet, what they want revealed.

  5. Seriously? by Jfetjunky · · Score: 0

    Darn near every example quoted could be argued as some time of hiring discrimination. "Good cultural fit"? Haha, might as well get your lawyers on speed dial.

    MAYBE just MAYBE you could try to argue that it would allow you to detect a candidate who is full of it, but this idea overall sounds like a legal nightmare.

    1. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Good cultural fit"? Haha, might as well get your lawyers on speed dial.

      Not really. There are a small number of protected classes against whom it is illegal to discriminate. Outside those, employers are generally free to hire or not hire based on whatever criteria they like.

      Of course, it's unclear if this technology does what it says on the tin, or whether it's going to select for sociopaths.

    2. Re: Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a place doesn't think you're a good cultural fit, do you really want to work there?

      I got that response and they asked 0 behavioral questions. They likely wanted to hire the much cheaper Indian I was going up against. I don't want a job where they are they constantly looking to replace me with someone that costs half as much, yet who put down similar experiences (lies) on his resume.

    3. Re: Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Soon only Indian-born Indians will be able to get a job in Silicon Valley. It's already 100% legal to systematically discriminate against working class white men. Soon it will be just as legal to discriminate against working class Asian men.

    4. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, it's unclear if this technology does what it says on the tin, or whether it's going to select for sociopaths.

      So, are they selecting for sociopaths to hire or to screen out?

    5. Re: Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Soon only Indian-born Indians will be able to get a job in Silicon Valley. It's already 100% legal to systematically discriminate against working class white men. Soon it will be just as legal to discriminate against working class Asian men.

      Nothing funnier than listening to crackers whine about perceived racial discrimination.

    6. Re: Seriously? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Well, beats listening to racists like you dismissing racism.

    7. Re: Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      âoelistening to crackers whine about perceived racial discriminationâ

      Well, ainâ(TM)t that all racist. Replace âoecrackersâ with âoeni**ersâ and see how long you can hold on under the mortar fire and SJW fury. See how long you stay alive and breathing after that.

      Notice the difference in reaction? Thatâ(TM)s the same discrimination you just dismissed idly.

  6. yeay. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the world is a cold place and it is getting colder.

    1. Re:yeay. by Scarletdown · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I may only be 50 (or will be the 20th of next month), but even I can remember when the biggest qualifications for getting hired were a desire to work and either an aptitude for the job or willingness to be quickly trained and brought up to speed for the tasks.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    2. Re:yeay. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is where I would fail any interview. Desire to work ??? Duh ! I need to work!! In fact I just need the money. So if faking enthusiasm is not possible anymore, I'm doomed !!!

    3. Re:yeay. by Cederic · · Score: 1

      I need to work!! In fact I just need the money.

      I don't interview for enthusiasm to work for a living. I want to hire people though that want to work for a living with me, helping my company, rather than somewhere else (or anywhere).

      I could earn a good living at most companies in the country. I don't want to work at most of them. I can articulate easily why I would prefer to work for any potential employer than their competition or other local companies. That's where the enthusiasm and interest comes in.

      Working for a living isn't great, but given that's going to happen, working somewhere you can find the work engaging and interesting, achieve personal satisfaction through individual and shared outcomes, and retain your integrity by demonstrating the value you add are all important to me and easy to convey at interview.

    4. Re: yeay. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Climate change beg to differ...

  7. Even more psychopaths in corporations, then by blind+biker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    One thing psychopaths are great at, is simulating emotions. The rest of us get nervous and stumble under certain pressures. Not psychopaths. They will have an even greater advantage if such software is utilized for recruiting.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    1. Re:Even more psychopaths in corporations, then by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      So? Do you have any evidence that psychopaths make worse employees? For many jobs, moral and ethical qualms can be a major impediment to performance.

      As the old saying goes: "Never hire a salesman that you'd want your daughter to marry."

    2. Re:Even more psychopaths in corporations, then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a backwards hypothesis. If anything the computer would be more likely to catch them.

    3. Re:Even more psychopaths in corporations, then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The company I work for has a psychopath as a CEO/President.

      Besides me hating being in the same room as him (that fake smile, that he points out any sign of weakness or simple guffaws like dropping something on the floor or having a food intolerance, and he specifically draws out shy people to put them on the spot). Oh, and I suppose he performed accounting tricks to overvalue the company when it changed equity group hands.

      Naturally the new equity owners want these impossible profit margins, something about a "bank covenant". Now the employees are all paying dearly for it with a hiring freeze on even replacement positions, no raises let alone any bonuses, zero dollars to be spent on R&D, and no office improvements or maintenance unless absolutely trivial like light bulbs.

      Oh, and he overpays his dark triad sales buddies. The get a base salary of like $80K, plus almost 16% commission on sales. One machine $750K * 16% = $120K !!! And I'm like, do you want to shave a percent off of that to help the company out? I was laughed at.

    4. Re:Even more psychopaths in corporations, then by PPH · · Score: 1

      If anything the computer would be more likely to catch them.

      Why? By definition, they don't have the same emotional responses as normal people*. So there would be nothing to detect. Or the wrong thing. A guy might be happy about being shafted by the boss because he's on his way out to his truck to fetch his 12 gauge.

      *I'd like to see some tests of this technology conducted on people with various diagnosed personality disorders. If it can pick them out of a crowd it could keep them out of the workplace**.

      **Why hasn't anyone from marketing come in this morning?

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    5. Re:Even more psychopaths in corporations, then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Always write your code as if it is to be maintained by a psychopath who knows where you sleep.

    6. Re:Even more psychopaths in corporations, then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No Einstein, they'd see that someone wasn't matching up with the normal baseline. Derp, very basic.

    7. Re:Even more psychopaths in corporations, then by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2

      No kidding.

      I just got turned down from a job failing a background check. It turns out I worked for a project with CompuCom 6 years ago but totally forget another headhunter brought me in. So the name of the 2 contracting companies got reversed ... and I was off by 2 months since it was awhile back.

      The employer assumed I lied for 2 years on 2 different occasions. It pissed me off as when I got the offer before it was rescinded I turned down 2 other employers and waiting for over a month.

      To make matters worse I just turned 40 and now am denied unemployment benefits because I turned down work! ... blowing off some steam here.

      HR needs to realize people are not perfect and not to assume anyone over 30, who has a medical bankruptcy or delinquency (I was injured at work in a previous job and it's still on my credit report), a mom who God forbid wants to take care of her new kid until preschool, or someone who once had a DUI after a New Years Eve party are not unemployable losers.

      I wish I got into the software development side of things as employers don't care about these things for the listed stuff above. But for system administration and support work you can be kicked out of your field for any of the offenses above.

      This is just another way to weed people out. What companies fail to realize is employment is a two way street. If you demand everyone sit around and beg to be hired and wait for 40 days for an answer and be treated like this then do not surprised if we turn down the job offers and work for someone else. I have learned a few lessons in this and one of them is if I ever owned a company or were a manager I may hire people with ... gasp ... gaps on their resume if it is a good reason (jail obviously not) as I would have tremendous negotiating power over and can get someone grateful to have a job and has years of experience all thanks to how they are treated by the bigger companies who demand perfection.

    8. Re:Even more psychopaths in corporations, then by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      So? Do you have any evidence that psychopaths make worse employees? For many jobs, moral and ethical qualms can be a major impediment to performance.

      As the old saying goes: "Never hire a salesman that you'd want your daughter to marry."

      Would you want to work for such people? I have and one of them almost succeeded in getting me fired when I asked HR for an investigation. It turns out he called security and claimed I did an authorized investigation and I was not a lawyer to do so and CCed the chief legal officer.

      He kept his job, I got a write up initially and was about ready to be shown the door when I explained I wanted to see if he was stealing and asked security simply to check the videos on that day to our back room YIKES!

      They eventually fired him but still it left a damage to my reputation for a few years.

      Remember when shit hits the fan sharks bite when they smell blood.

    9. Re:Even more psychopaths in corporations, then by PPH · · Score: 2

      they'd see that someone wasn't matching up with the normal baseline

      Maybe not. That's what makes psychopaths very difficult to detect in day to day interactions. They are very good at matching up with normal baselines. It's one reason they are difficult to catch with lie detectors.

      The question is whether micro-expressions go beyond the characteristics measured by lie detectors in that even a psychopath can't control them. There are tricks that normal people can be trained to fool the machines. Such as messing with the baseline b.p. heart rate and respiration. But that is pretty easy to detect. And that's not how psychopaths beat lie detectors. They do so by basically convincing themselves that there is nothing wrong with giving an incorrect answer or misleading an interviewer. And so there is no negative emotion attached to the act that would trigger a physiological response.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    10. Re:Even more psychopaths in corporations, then by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The company I work for has a psychopath as a CEO/President.

      Just because you don't like the guy doesn't mean he isn't an effective CEO. Being effective is not the same as being popular.

      Psychopaths often make better leaders because they can ignore the emotions, look at the big picture, and make clear utilitarian decisions. This is especially true for military leadership, where a callous and aggressive push for victory will often result in far fewer casualties than cautious dithering.

    11. Re:Even more psychopaths in corporations, then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As much as I hate sales people, I have no idea how to sell $750k computers to governments and schools. I've worked at government bureaucracies where I couldn't even convince management to buy stuff we actually needed, so how these dudes from outside the org swoop in and sell a bunch of bullshit no one needs is fairly impressive to be honest.

    12. Re: Even more psychopaths in corporations, then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ShanghaiBill is a sociopath who is quite "effective" at offshoring American tech jobs. Ask him about it! He's proud of his role in destroying our national industry.

    13. Re:Even more psychopaths in corporations, then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a hiring manager, you are preaching to the converted. However hiring is a process, and large companies inevitably adopt a consensus-based approach, combined with veto power. This tends to produce a process which avoids risk - it minimises individual mishires rather than maximising total delivery capability.

    14. Re:Even more psychopaths in corporations, then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're completely different test methodologies and your premise is wrong. Sociopaths are not mimicking the emotions, they're mimicking the output. Presumably this scan can tell the difference, which is the whole point.

    15. Re:Even more psychopaths in corporations, then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, wrong. Psychopaths never look at the bigger picture, they only see things which are in front of them and people often fall fo them because they fall for short term positive changes. In the long term they are never good at leading, also they destroy the image of the firm and get almost no loyality from the workers.

    16. Re:Even more psychopaths in corporations, then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have years and years of exemplary employment history, not a single boss or co-worker has a negative word to say about me or my peformance. Excluding people like me because I got caught doing something a good part of your coworkers are doing anyway excludes good candidates for no good reason. Why someone was in jail matters since we haven't moved past charging felonies for Petty vice crimes.

    17. Re:Even more psychopaths in corporations, then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Derp,

      Gesundheit.

    18. Re:Even more psychopaths in corporations, then by Cederic · · Score: 1

      I wanted to see if he was stealing and asked security simply to check the videos

      How to avoid damaging your career: Always tread very carefully on matters like these. Most companies (certainly ones with over a thousand employees) will have a process that can be followed, and/or whistleblower hotlines.

      Use these. Stick strictly to them, always approach it from, "I'm concerned the company may be at risk here" and never mention personalities or personal impacts, and always plan carefully before doing or saying anything.

      It's an odd thing but companies and managers will always tell you they want these things reporting/investigating, but it's also so painfully easy to get shafted by doing so improperly.

    19. Re:Even more psychopaths in corporations, then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Psychopaths often make better leaders because they can ignore the emotions, look at the big picture, and make clear utilitarian decisions. This is especially true for military leadership, where a callous and aggressive push for victory will often result in far fewer casualties than cautious dithering.

      It might not be wise to ignore emotions though. Especially in these modern times where people are just so way more social. I actually wonder if these human emotions are indeed....the big picture.

    20. Re: Even more psychopaths in corporations, then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem very knowledgeable about this technology. Could you give us some technical details on how it works? And also the research you've done on micro expressions for individuals with psychopathy?

    21. Re: Even more psychopaths in corporations, then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree with some of what ShanghaiBill posts, and we both are not without fault, but a personal attack against him is unwelcome, IMO.

      His claim that psychopaths "can ignore the emotions, look at the big picture, and make clear utilitarian decisions" is obviously wrong (and that his support comes from The Economist is somewhat of a red flag). Psychopaths can ignore the emotion (which is the famous part of their madness), but there is nothing about them to suggest that they can successfully "look at the big picture" as a result of their derangement, and that they can "make clear utilitarian decisions" is easily disproven by looking at the track records of psychopaths overall.

      Had you made that argument, you might have been listened to. Since you chose to devolve the level of conversation to personal attacks, I hope your post is deleted.

    22. Re:Even more psychopaths in corporations, then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with psychopaths is that they only care about bettering themselves, even if this is detrimental to the company and all its share holders.

      Have fun with your stock portfolio.

    23. Re:Even more psychopaths in corporations, then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is just crap. There's a whole mythology around psychopaths, based on the idea that they're all smart and that you need ruthless people to get stuff done. It's damaging society more than it can take. You might as well say you wish you'd married a psychopath because they get things done, and they'll be on your side. It's just unutterably stupid.

    24. Re:Even more psychopaths in corporations, then by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      The impression I get from AC is that he's not a good CEO. He managed to get the company into real trouble. The equity group wants impossible profit margins, and they will put a lot of pressure on the company. In the meantime, people who can get another job are likely to, and their positions won't be filled, so the staff will steadily become less effective.

      Eliminating R&D can make this quarter's profit margins look better, but it will likely kill or cripple the company in a few years. Most companies rely on being able to produce improved products every so often, and in the tech field you do need to remember that your competitors will be producing improved products.

      Presumably he intends to pull the golden ripcord before the effects of his decisions become apparent.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  8. Don't even go their. by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    If you tell me I am tormenting a turtle, I am likely to punch you in the face.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    1. Re:Don't even go their. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you tell me I am tormenting a turtle, I am likely to punch you in the face.

      Looks like you're pining for a dictionary from here, with that comment title.

    2. Re:Don't even go their. by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Isn't the standard practice to bluff through that question then react somewhat more strongly when he asks you to tell him about your mother?

  9. I Love A Little Voight-Kampff In A Job Interview by dryriver · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Interviewer: You are in a desert. You: Ok. Interviewer: Bill Gates is also there. He's torturing a little turtle. You: Ok. Interviewer: What do you do? You: I help Bill Gates torture the turtle. Interviewer: Welcome to Microsoft!

    --
    Why did the chicken cross the road? Because Elon Musk put an AI chip in its head.
  10. Oh great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The thing it will detect 99% of the time is people being nervous.

  11. end the rain of terror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We are people not {expletive} work units. Employers need to address their own insecurity's and need to control everything!

    I for one will be walking out of any such testing/interview. I recommend you all also take a stand and do the same.

    1. Re: end the rain of terror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time for the workers to seize the means of production?

    2. Re:end the rain of terror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop giving fucks about job that uses invasive procedures like this. Good time to get creative with answers.

    3. Re: end the rain of terror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite a leap there, Orwell.

  12. Clocking out? by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 5, Informative

    "One company has already added face recognition into their iPad-based time clock, which the company's CEO thinks could be adapted to also detect an employee's mood when they're clocking out"

    Shouldn't they be a bit more concerned about their mood while clocking in?

    1. Re:Clocking out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they're annoyed when clocking out, it's probably a sign of low job satisfaction...

    2. Re:Clocking out? by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 1

      If they're annoyed when clocking out, it's probably a sign of low job satisfaction...

      And if they're annoyed while clocking in they just might say fuck it and "rm -rf /."

    3. Re:Clocking out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sudo dd -if /dev/urandom -of /dev/sda bs=1M

    4. Re:Clocking out? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Re "Shouldn't they be a bit more concerned about their mood while clocking in?"

      Three unemployed men find themselves in the same bar in an American town. They ask each other why they lost their jobs.
      The first unemployed man says that he used to arrive at work everyday looking sad. He was fired for wanting to start a union.
      The second unemployed man says that he used drive to work looking happy everyday. He was fired for accepting a bribe.
      The third unemployed man says, "I used to walk into work looking the same every day."
      "What sort of a mood is that?" the other two unemployed men ask.
      "I was accused of been a well-disciplined Russian spy."

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  13. Re: I Love A Little Voight-Kampff In A Job Intervi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh, so close! The correct answer was "roll onto your back and let Bill torture you when he's ready"

  14. Just cut to the chase and bring back slavery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your employer (owner) should be able to do anything they want with their property.

  15. Wrong company - Uber alles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft is big and benign.. No, it's the "move fast and break things" kinds of companies you'll have to watch out for. Like Uber

    1. Re:Wrong company - Uber alles by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Working for "move fast and break things" companies can work, provided your superiors are aware that you're going to break things and not blame you for them.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  16. Big Brother is watching by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

    "There's something very Big Brother about it"...

    Yeah, no shit. Seriously, people?

    A better application: use this in MMOs to shape the current expression of your avatar. Another idea: use to auto-select emoji in messaging apps on request. Yet another application might be when doing in-house beta software testing. Testers are often recorded in an attempt to gauge reaction to the software they're using. Detecting emotion might be very helpful here, and in fact, less intrusive than the typical "keep talking about your thought process" approach. There's typically no expectation of privacy in these situations - gauging reactions is the entire point.

    It's fine if people deliberately opt-in to this in a transparent manner. It's creepy as hell if you're doing it without their knowledge or consent. If a company was actually using this on me during a job interview, they'd immediately be placed on the "only if I'm in danger of starving to death" list.

    --
    Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    1. Re:Big Brother is watching by Godwin+O'Hitler · · Score: 1

      That statement is a euphemism. It's more like Big Brother's wet dream.

      --
      No, your children are not the special ones. Nor are your pets.
  17. welcome to the future, rad times! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Is this testing whether I'm a replicant or a lesbian, Mr. Deckard?

  18. what's a tortoise? by guygo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "You're in a desert, walking along in the sand when all of a sudden you look down and see a tortoise. It's crawling toward you..."

    1. Re:what's a tortoise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds so much like TES/Fallout character creation process. LOL

    2. Re: what's a tortoise? by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      A tortoise is a kind of large sailing yacht, usually equipped with an avocado-powered diesel teapot. You didn't know that??

  19. I'd like to think it'd be as an objective measure by NotSoHeavyD3 · · Score: 1

    Basically a way to gauge applicants without the biases of the interviewer and give everyone a fair chance regardless of anything. However I then remember how often I've seen them screw up something simple and straightforward like variations of the fizz-buzz test that I figure it's not damn likely they'll use this remotely correctly. (But hey, I'm cynical)

    --
    Did you know 80 to 90% of the moderators on slashdot wouldn't recognize a troll even if one dragged them under a bridge.
  20. "Hire-Vue" does this by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I applied for an awesome-sounding "general-purpose nerd" job (i.e. "handle all the IT and helpdesk stuff for a small-mid-sized company") for a local company, their HR executive sent me a link to do one of these one-way online improvisational-acting interviews through "Hire-Vue" (they present you, one at a time, with around 5-10 of those now-standard screening-questions, e.g. "What do you know about this company?" or "How would you describe the color yellow to someone who was blind?", etc., then you get 30 seconds to think about the question, then 3 minutes to answer it on video. No advance warning of what the questions might be, nor do you get to re-take.). Then afterwards you get a typical automated "someone will contact you if Hire-Vue decides you're good enough at doing whatever the heck Hire-Vue's algorithms are looking for in your face and voice" email and wait. Unless HR is kind enough to tell you (probably not), you'll never have any idea how you did, and will have a difficult time ever getting better at it without that feedback.

    Hire-Vue's schtick seems to be that their mysterious proprietary algorithm does magical "machine learning" analysis of your face and voice in the video answers it took, then it generates a magical "insight score" to tell the HR people whether or not you suck, along with how "confident" and "enthusiastic" and who knows how many other attributes Hire-Vue thinks it can detect (seems to also be special proprietary information, so I don't even really know what it was looking for.) I expect most people get marked down for not making "eye contact" with the webcam (rather than looking at the "person" - i.e. your own live video - on the screen like a normal human being.)

    I will say that the process was more fun than I expected, but I'm not at all confident that Hire-Vue's robot won't sabotage my attempt to find gainful employment.

    Also note that this format just coincidentally makes it easy to conveniently get an idea of whether you're "old", what your racial background and gender may be, etc., so if they are so inclined, HR can conveniently throw out your application if there's something there that they don't feel like talking to.

    It's only been a week, so no idea yet how it went. Job-hunting these days is itself one of the worst jobs right now.

    1. Re:"Hire-Vue" does this by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Well did you get the job?

      I have been on many interviews and these are far from fun and I find them insulting and demeaning to desperate candidates who just want to work and have to jump thru hoops and be walked and weeded like cattle. I typically find companies who do this are old fashioned and have a terrible and power hungry HR department and do not have high regard to employees and assume we are all just black boxes.

      So what if you are not the most confident or pause with an odd question? That does not mean you cannot perform the job. As stated psychopaths and those with narcissism such as Trump as an example would excel. As you can see that may not be someone you want to work with. Especially in a managerial position.

    2. Re:"Hire-Vue" does this by HornWumpus · · Score: 3, Informative

      There have been interviews where about a half hour in, I decided I would rather starve than work there.

      After that, it was all about fucking with them. Times already wasted, might as well make something of it.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    3. Re:"Hire-Vue" does this by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      There have been interviews where about a half hour in, I decided I would rather starve than work there.

      After that, it was all about fucking with them. Times already wasted, might as well make something of it.

      Be careful what you wish for my friend.

      But yes the point of the interview should be a 2 way meeting, but when you have no job you have little options. What really gets me also is those stupid Taleo Applicant tracking systems that can take well over 1 hour to fill out only to never hear back. HR LOVES these as the program does the recuiting for them.

      Many big companies have updated them not to be so soulless or use LinkedIn now to respect the applicants time more. I think after reading this and seeing the stuff that the best companies to work for are smaller businesses or startups. They are to the point and not tainted with old executives trying to find blame for mediocre hires by not waiting people and treating them like numbers who should be beg to work there.

    4. Re:"Hire-Vue" does this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also note that this format just coincidentally makes it easy to conveniently get an idea of whether you're "old", what your racial background and gender may be, etc., so if they are so inclined, HR can conveniently throw out your application if there's something there that they don't feel like talking to.

      Twenty-five years ago it was the same shtick, but using handwriting "analysis" as the means to deduce personality traits. I ran into it a couple of times while job searching during my 20s. It was so curious to me that a company would use something so akin to astrology in the 1990s as part of the employment process, so I had to inquire at the time. On both occasions, it was the VP of HR for the company that had added this to their hiring process. On both occasions, the head of HR was said to be in a relationship with the President/CEO. In other words, some crazy person got elevated to a position because she was good in bed and nobody wanted to point out her craziness at work..... presumably because her nuttiness didn't cause enough damage to risk upsetting the President or CEO.

    5. Re:"Hire-Vue" does this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bollocks. No-one hiring you would give up that information.

    6. Re:"Hire-Vue" does this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the warning. If I get wind of one of these machine-interviews as I search for a new role, I now know to cancel the application at the outset. Use of such technology tells me one thing for clear, which is that HR is completely inept AND corrupted and that the company culture is incompatible with my employment.
      I'd rather flip burgers than give the machine extra data, which could effectively short-circuit EVERY job application I make in the future. Once they have that "data", they can sell it how they please, and you can be sure that their security is bumph and it's only matter of time before it's hacked and public knowledge.
      Fuck that shirt. I am NOT going to voluntarily or knowingly contribute to the panopticon any more than is incidental.

    7. Re:"Hire-Vue" does this by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      The best time to look for a job, is when you've already got one. Than you can just laugh about the bad ones, recreate 'Monty Python' skits ('Management trainee interview') in the HR office.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    8. Re:"Hire-Vue" does this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Bollocks. No-one hiring you would give up that information."
      You then do not know how to ask such questions.

    9. Re:"Hire-Vue" does this by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      After that, it was all about fucking with them. Times already wasted, might as well make something of it.

      That sounds like fun. Any stories?

      I wonder what would happen if you manipulated your appearance to try to fool this device? Maybe draw two dots below my eyes to confuse the algorithm.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
  21. Gesture Recognition by Neuronwelder · · Score: 1

    Can they also recognize the middle finger?

  22. Voigt-Kampff machine by VeryFluffyBunny · · Score: 2

    "Capillary dilation of the so-called blush response? Fluctuation of the pupil? Involuntary dilation of the iris?" - Dr. Eldon Tyrell, Blade Runner

    --
    Debate is a form of harassment. Do not question my truth.
  23. The dark side of automation bites back by Neuronwelder · · Score: 1

    If they can build something as complicated as an emotion detector. It would be easy street to get rid of the brainless big boys.. Interviewers and accessors.. why not managers - maybe more :) Heck, why am I sad about this?? I want to see the TOP tier lose their jobs in a corporation! BYE BYE CEO's!! Here's your negative automation!! Your golden parachute turned to lead.. Happy landings!!

    1. Re:The dark side of automation bites back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because they'd never be stupid enough to allow themselves to end up in front of one of these infernal machines.

      there is literally no power on earth or elsewhere that can unseat one of the priests of the status quo if they do not wish to be unseated.

    2. Re:The dark side of automation bites back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there is literally no power on earth or elsewhere that can unseat one of the priests of the status quo if they do not wish to be unseated.

      Rebels in Libya dragged Muammar Gaddafi out of drainage pipe where he was hiding, impaled him through the anus, shot him in the chest and then dragged his body behind a truck. By all accounts it was a painful, dirty and humiliating death. Do you think that he wanted that to happen?

    3. Re:The dark side of automation bites back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there is literally no power on earth or elsewhere that can unseat one of the priests of the status quo if they do not wish to be unseated.

      All men are mortal.

    4. Re:The dark side of automation bites back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah- and psycho Hillary was looking and giving them money- "We Came, We Saw, He Died" (Gaddafi)

  24. White House by Neuronwelder · · Score: 1

    How come AI hasn't replaced politicians. Most of them don't even have one good thought in their head or think at all.. We could save billions!!

  25. good cultural fit by Osgeld · · Score: 1

    doesnt mean much, some of the people that grate my cheese are some of the best people in their jobs, most of the people that fit in well with everyone else are functionally useless

    I mean its cool I can talk star trek over lunch, but I needed that dwg like 2 weeks ago and I just sent it to your dumb ass for the 3rd time cause its garbage

  26. Summary Report by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Candidate 1: Nervous

    Candidate 2: Nervous

    Candidate 3: Nervous

    Candidate 4: Calm, but high

    1. Re:Summary Report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I laughed out loud. Thanks.

  27. my interview would go something like this... by gaaah · · Score: 1

    interviewer: I thought we established there would be no smoking during the interview. me: I'm not smoking, it's your stupid little emotion detection machine over there.

    1. Re:my interview would go something like this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      interviewer: I thought we established there would be no smoking during the interview. me: I'm not smoking, it's your stupid little emotion detection machine over there.

      Didn't Harrison Ford clearly state that smoking wouldn't effect the outcome of the Voight-Kampff test?

  28. As if job interview didn't suck hard enough ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Seriously, make it easier to get people hired not harder.

  29. Re:I Love A Little Voight-Kampff In A Job Intervie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Correction:

    "Make it a penguin, and I'll help him."

    "Welcome to Microsoft!"

    [Disclaimer: I've worked at Microsoft, but I prefer Linux.]

  30. This is terrible! by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

    What will happen to me if they discover I'm really a malfunctioning smart blender?! ;)

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  31. Unfortunately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Emotions in the moment are inly relevant to that moment. They indicate nothing representative. Even if it were put into use, it wouldn't be very useful, and I doubt it would be used for long.

  32. Impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People tell me they know what I'm thinking all the time. Every time they actually tell me, they're wrong. Especially HR people. These are the same sort of people who will be training these systems, and letting a machine reinforce their beliefs.

    1. Re: Impossible by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      The know-nothing power-mad culture of American HR departments is one of the many reasons China is beating us at absolutely everything.

    2. Re: Impossible by blindseer · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure China is beating us where they are beating us (which I believe is not everything) is because they have a nation with a national IQ of about 105 and staying there as immigrants must be returning Chinese nationals or people with enough intelligence and money that they will not be a burden on the state. In the USA we've got a national IQ of about 98 and we'll let any fucker stay in that can jump the border and have a kid before getting caught.

      I don't care what anyone says, these people are not coming here for the jobs, schools, and health care. They are coming for the welfare, publicly funded schools, and government subsidized medicine. And I'm not so sure about the schools.

      Even borderline third world nations like Mexico will jail people for jumping the border. They don't care if you've had a kid born there. If you don't have enough money to bribe the police then you will be imprisoned. If you do bribe the police then they might let you stay but that might just be enough to buy you a ride to the closest border rather than a prison sentence.

      If we're going to blame anything on American HR departments then it's following "sanctuary city" policies of not checking employment documents. They might also look for "diversity" rather than actual work ethic, skill, intelligence, and education. China doesn't have an immigration problem, maybe a few hundred thousand out of over a billion. They also don't have a "diversity" problem, everyone working (officially at least, there's off the books people that work on "visitor" visas) is an ethnic Chinese.

      If we want to stop getting beaten by China then we need to kick out the border jumpers. If they want in then they need to show that they have something to offer. Having a kid in the USA should not automatically mean the parent can stay. They child is free to stay, as well as free to go with the parent. The parent will have to go and if anyone complains about "breaking up families" then that's the fault of the parent. This is no different than "breaking up families" for parents sent to prison. It's sad and damaging to the family but if we do not punish anti-social behavior then we simply get more and more of it. This breeding of criminal behavior is bad on families too. Especially when we have illegal aliens driving drunk and/or without a license and killing people.

      I hear these cries of "but they didn't break the law!" They broke the law when they jumped the border. They broke the law when they took a job. They broke the law when they sent their kids to school. They broke the law by driving without a license. Best chance we got to keep them from killing someone is to catch them for a petty crime and have them deported before some SJW police chief lets them go based on their "sanctuary city" policy. They need to be charged as an accessory to a crime for doing that, and the cities need to lose federal police funds. They've been getting that money on the promise of cooperation on enforcing federal law. If they don't hand over illegal immigrants then they are not holding up their end of the deal.

      We'll catch up to China and surpass them as soon as we close our borders to these leaches.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
  33. Just say no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To be honest, if interviews and jobs started using emotion recognition, I'd bow out or not complete the interview.

    My own company just this year started requiring full physicals with blood work and nicotine tests. Failure to comply results in an insurance premium hike penalty for both.

    I'd rather cut grass with the illegal immigrants than subject myself to something that violates my convictions.

    1. Re: Just say no by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      They won't hire you to cut grass.

      The jobs done by the illegal immigrant servant class are not open to citizens, even citizens willing to work for a pittance. That's how the California Apartheid system works.

    2. Re: Just say no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Texas here, not California. I see plenty of whites cutting grass here. You are right, the pay is utterly hideous at the base hourly wage for most, a full ten an hour for team leads. I've enquired. There is very little personnel oversight with these companies. They just need a warm body. However, the teams that work neighborhood lawns never seem to have enough people and they are constantly hiring. They all pay north of 10 and hour. Again, not glamorous work, but if you're free doing it, then you're free. I will not subject myself to draconian BS. I simply won't do it. Again, I'd rather work physically for a living for far less than to capitulate to a draconian system that is dehumanizing.

  34. Re: I'd like to think it'd be as an objective meas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bet you can't write fizzbuzz worth a shit.

  35. Already been done. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A regular camera is useless when they need thermal vision to read emotional feedback. You see the body tenses and prepares for subconscious scenarios so you read the thermal output and you can see what parts its post testing.

  36. the sexula orientation study was flawed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it used photos from a dating site, where gay men would be most likely to post photos that were clearly indicative of their orientation, as opposed to a neutral photo, like a driver's license photo

  37. Wat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless the person is acting hostile and belligerent in the interview what is the purpose other than discrimination? Everyone has to learn how to cooperate, if you shelter your workforce they won't be able to handle it when real life happens.

    1. Re: Wat by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      The purpose is discrimination. Duh.

  38. Re: I'd like to think it'd be as an objective meas by NotSoHeavyD3 · · Score: 1

    If by "I can't write an answer" you mean one that has no syntax errors at all, with absolutely no bugs of any kind, that is the specific answer the interviewer was looking for, and in some arbitrary time frame which he or she has made up then guilty as charged. What you're supposed to do is give the test to a couple of co-workers that you know can code to see their results as a baseline. You know so you can see how often they make syntax errors and logic bugs and also how long it really takes someone to solve your particular issue. They have a word for this in science, it's called a control and you could compare an interviewee with a control sample. Of course if you actually use fizzbuzz correctly to just check to see if the person can code at all, IE can work toward an answer, understands what a function is, conditionals, for loops, etc then I'd pass that test.

    --
    Did you know 80 to 90% of the moderators on slashdot wouldn't recognize a troll even if one dragged them under a bridge.
  39. Why would it just be for the interview? by Average · · Score: 1

    The point of a computerized system is scale. I.e., the bot would be monitoring your displayed emotion every second of the day.

    Crazy? When you're distinguishing your commodity through affective labor (a Pret a Manger), it almost seems inevitable.

  40. Big brother is fine... everyone says so! by Aristos+Mazer · · Score: 1

    Why worry about Big Brother systems? Everyone we've talked to who has one says the system is great! Surely that many people can't all be wrong... or coerced...

  41. Excellent! by J-1000 · · Score: 2

    One more way for me to filter out bad potential employers.

  42. IQ Tests by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They banned IQ tests but are going to allow this?

    1. Re:IQ Tests by blindseer · · Score: 1

      Who are "they"?

      I remember taking a test for an electrician apprenticeship. They didn't test anything on knowledge of electrical code or Ohm's law. I remember reading an interesting story on the history of road building and having to answer questions about it. I think there was a pattern match portion and a mathematics portion but I don't remember them as well. It was an intelligence test, no doubt.

      I took an intelligence test for the US Army, called the ASVAB or AFQT, scored in the 99th percentile too. Every branch of the US military has been doing this for 100 years or so.

      I had a job interview for working at a call center to support sales people at a large advertising company. The intelligence test was a bit more oriented specifically for the job at hand but still an intelligence test. I had to listen to some prerecorded verbal instruction, and answer questions on how to respond. I didn't do as well as I wished and felt some of the questions were a matter of opinion or company policy than a purely logical action. There was a typing test, not precisely a test of intelligence again but it was certainly geared to separating those with an attention to detail and speed from those that did not. I thought I failed since I had not met the minimum score given at the beginning but I guess a lot of people must have failed too, with even lower scores.

      I took a test called something like "National Career Readiness Assessment" that was paid for by the state employment service. If you registered in their database for a job they wanted you to take this test. I scored in the 90th percentile only because they take the lowest score of the three tests to give your rating, my average would have put me in the 95 or higher percentile.

      In other interviews I was asked questions on logic, nothing formal really, but they wanted to see how the applicants would act when presented with a problem. I've interviewed with companies famous for their logic puzzle interviews, which left me with the thought of this being a very poor method of assessing an applicant. My suspicions were verified not because I wasn't called back for and interview but how an article was written on how such an interview process can be a turn off for intelligent people. So maybe I was too smart, maybe I was too dim, either way I was not terribly upset for not being called back.

      The IQ test has long been replaced with high school diplomas and college degrees. These are very flawed intelligence tests unless some care is made to compare where the diplomas and degrees came from, topics studied, and to some extent the scores achieved. I suspect employers have seen the flaws in using formal schooling and grades to filter out applicants, which is why so many have returned to "employment assessments" instead. Colleges have been caught inflating grades and high schools have been known to graduate people for merely showing up for the entire four years.

      You see they can ban an IQ test but they can't (yet) ban "employment assessments".

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
  43. Marketing hype? by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 3, Informative

    Different people express emotions differently. That's why it's so hard to guess what someone is feeling.

    For example, for some people, pausing before responding to a question means they don't know the answer, for others, it means that the person is carefully considering the nuances of a response.

    In order to properly understand expressions, context is key. This is true of understanding spoken language as well. Computers are getting pretty good at understanding spoken language, but certainly not better than humans themselves. My guess is that this will be true of understanding emotions for some time.

    All this leads me to believe that this is, at least in part, marketing hype.

  44. Brave New World ahead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... detect an employee's mood when they're clocking out.

    Then they'll be ready to make those chairs from Brave New World which tell the user, his mood.

  45. Have applicants take an IQ test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm no expert on this but I've heard some experts speak on the matter of finding good employees. There's two things that correlate well to success in employment, intelligence and personality.

    There's all kinds of tests for intelligence, many of them inexpensive. ACT Inc. offers such a test. They offer a college entrance exam, for which they are known, but they also offer their WorkKeys exam for testing basic work skills. This isn't an endorsement of the test, only that it's one example I've heard of. A quick Google search tells me it's about $20 to take, assuming you don't live in a state where it's paid for by the government. I assume other such testing exists.

    Personality testing is a bit more difficult but intelligence does correlate somewhat to being well behaved, so an intelligence test may still be sufficient. Most employers already test for severe cases of anti-social behavior with a check for a criminal record. Other indicators of anti-social behavior is a bad credit score or dropping out of high school. Having a college degree used to be a fair assessment of intelligence but grade inflation, lowered entrance requirements, and just plain bullshit degree programs, can mean completing college, or not getting in to college in the first place, means little. Good grades can be an indication of a good work ethic, but it can also mean sleeping with the instructors or having threatened them with violence if given poor marks.

    The article explained on how emotional testing is possible but, at least from what I could tell, they didn't really explain the value. It might be a kind of lie detector but I'd think that there are more reliable ways to test for that. Emotional state is also quite fleeting but intelligence and personality are fairly stable. Catching a person in a good or bad mood that day could only prove the person to be borderline bipolar. It read more like a sales pitch than anything, and I'm not sold.

    1. Re:Have applicants take an IQ test by blindseer · · Score: 1

      Stefan Molyneaux (I think that's how it's spelled) had a series of videos on this a year or three ago. He's had a few more since. The best one in the last few months was with Dr. Jordan Peterson (also not sure on spelling).

      I keep hearing about "Flynn Effect" when IQ comes up so I rewatched some interviews Stef did with Dr. James Flynn and some of his supporters and detractors. Even Dr. Flynn admits that there is a genetic limit to intelligence and that the testing we have is highly accurate across cultures. The debate is if the IQ of a person or population is 50/50 upbringing and genetics or more like 80% genetics and 20% upbringing.

      Even if the Flynn Effect accounts for 50% intelligence there's still evidence that the best we can do is raise IQ scores by maybe 20 points. That might seem like a lot but there are entire nations with an average IQ below 70. Improved nutrition might add 10 points, improved childhood environment might add another 10 points, but you'll still have a national average IQ of maybe 85 or 90. The average IQ score of an American high school graduate is 105.

      With an IQ of 75 we can expect a 50-50 chance of reaching the 9th grade. Those with graduate degrees, like MD, JD, DDS, MBA, or what not, have an average IQ of 120. What does that mean for a nation with an average IQ of 85? 75? Or even 65? There's near certainty that there are people able to achieve being dentists, pharmacists, surgeons, lawyers, engineers, and so forth. The problem is that such people will be such a small portion of the population that they cannot meet the needs of the nation. Each surgeon needs technicians and nurses. A judge needs prosecutors and bailiffs.

      Assuming the IQ of these nations can be raised by education and medicine then we need the people intelligent enough to teach and provide health care to stay in those nations. Importing these intelligent people to the USA leaves them at a far greater loss than we in the USA could gain. If they are coming to the USA then we could at least test their IQ so that their coming here doesn't lower the IQ of both nations.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
  46. A use for my TENS unit by mnemotronic · · Score: 0

    A better use for my TENS unit. It ain't getting rid of the beer gut or hemorrhoids. I'm going to stick the pads to either side of my face and have it going during the interview. Could be interesting. I should probably use new pads too.

    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
  47. Jobs are a thig of the past anyway. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks to automation, we already have enough wealth to give everyone a comfy life. It just all goes to exactly those few, who do not work one bit, except to avoid working and to make others work: Fatcats/managers / the new old nobility of today.

    I reseached how this started: Nobility took all their families' money, used that to lend all the money of their rich pals, and used all of that, to lend >10 times more than that from the banks (which themselves metely made it up).
    That is what they used to make others build "their" first factories with, and make others work to make money for *them*. And it kept being the same old boys club it has ever been, since the days of kings and queens.

    Nobody would have a problem with automation, if he would not need a job to survive, and the wealth that that automation creates would go to them.
    Which it should, given that they were the ones doing all the actual work.

    Also, obciously, nobody would be stopped from still working (e.g. a real profession), to offer something that is not automated or on principle not something one would want a robot to do. For vastly better pay too.

    We need to start a Kickstarter, and make our own automated supply chains! Let's start with food prodiction and robotics!

  48. Managers are the most useless jobs anyway. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They can be replaced by a very short shell script.
    I know, because that is what I literally did in my former company. (Not mine. I just handled the business automation.)
    Now yes, we already had a good planning and scheduling tool, and a good culture of employees being nearly like independent contractors (but with all the securities and benefits), but still.

    It was in Germany, of all places, in case you wonder.

  49. Interview questions by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

    You're in a desert walking along in the sand when all of the sudden you look down, and you see a user, it's crawling toward you. You reach down, you flip the user over on its back. The user lays on its back, its belly baking in the hot sun, beating its legs trying to turn itself over, but it can't, not without your help. But you're not helping. Why is that?

    Describe in single words, only the good things that come into your mind about your mother.

    with apologies to

    http://www.allthetests.com/qui...

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  50. How can it not know what it is? by cstacy · · Score: 1

    A: Is this the test now?
    Q: You look up and you see a programmable relative cursor on a Cartesian plane...
    A: What's that?
    Q: Know what a LOGO turtle is?
    A: I've never seen a turtle -- But I understand what you mean.
    Q: Same thing.
    A: Do you make up these questions, Mr. Holden, or do they write them down for you?
    Q: You're watching some source code scroll by. Suddenly you realize there's a bug...
    A: I'd kill it.
    Q: You're surfing a StackOverflow and you come across a flaming fullpage answer utilizing Common Lisp.
    A: Is this testing whether I'm a replicant or a multi-paradigm programming language aficionado?
    Q: Just answer the questions, please -- You show it to your manager. He likes it so much he hangs it on your cubicle wall.
    A: I wouldn't let him.
    Q: Why not?
    A: Python should be enough for him.

    1. Re:How can it not know what it is? by No+Longer+an+AC · · Score: 1

      This deserves to be modded up.

      Well done.

  51. Mystery-leads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mystery-leads promote your site. You need for Marketing, Seo, New Site? Welcome https://www.mystery-leads.com/ .

  52. likely illegal in the UK by Cederic · · Score: 1

    This would almost certainly discriminate against protected groups - e.g. people with learning disabilities such as Aspergers.

  53. I kinda get nervous when I take tests by veron.claudio · · Score: 1

    Is this the one about tortoises?

  54. Scanning for “cultural fit?” by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having an automated scanner for the troubling and generally discrimination producing cultural fit will no doubt be abused by companies which think it will insulate them, while still getting the bro culture they desire.

  55. Cue obligatory Monty Python skit by sydbarrett74 · · Score: 1
    --
    'He who has to break a thing to find out what it is, has left the path of wisdom.' -- Gandalf to Saruman
  56. blade runner in reverse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if the tests prove you are NOT a replicant, you are killed.only robotic workers are wanted, as they dont display free will or any time wasting idiosyncrasies.

  57. I read the title as "Emoticon" recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    :-) LOL -- I kan haz job?

  58. Stop worrying about AIs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The AI book that everyone should get is available for pre-order. "Artificial Intelligence For Dummies" by John Paul Mueller and Luca Massaron.