Slashdot Mirror


Apple iMac Pro Goes on Sale December 14th (engadget.com)

Apple vowed to ship the iMac Pro in December, and it's making good on that promise. From a report: The company has confirmed that its workstation-grade all-in-one will be available on December 14th. It has yet to reveal the exact configuration options, but the $4,999 'starter' model ships with an 8-core Xeon processor, 32GB of RAM, 1TB of solid-state storage and a Radeon Vega graphics chipset with 8GB of RAM. You can option it with up to an 18-core Xeon, 128GB of RAM, a 4TB SSD and a 16GB Vega chipset, although video creator Marques Brownlee notes that you'll have to wait until the new year for that 18-core beast.

13 of 278 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Hahahahaha by Sarten-X · · Score: 5, Informative

    Legally run OS X.

    For some folks, that's justification.

    --
    You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
  2. Re:Overpriced by Hawks · · Score: 4, Informative

    According to Apple's web site the iMac pro has:
    4xThunderbolt 3(USB-C), suppotring 2 additional 5K kmonitors
    1X10Gb ethernet (Nbase-T 1,2.5,5,10Gb support)
    4XUSB 3
    SDXC card slot
    and a mini-headphone jack

    --
    in anima Apparatus
  3. Re:Overpriced by tbuddy · · Score: 5, Funny

    It has 8 USB ports so I kind of look at it as $625 per port. My Mac Pro was $4800 and only has 4 USB ports, so I'd say this is a significantly better value than what I have. I'll be waiting outside the Apple Store on Thursday to pick one up.

  4. Re:Overpriced by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 4, Funny

    No FireWire 400.

    Lame.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  5. Re:Overpriced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Is it?

    Xeon W-2145 - $1113
    Cheapest LGA-2066 board available with 10Gb ethernet - $650
    32GB DDR4 - $400
    1TB 3.2GB/s PCIe SSD - $500
    Radeon Vega 56 - $600
    5k 27" monitor - $1300
    PSU, WiFi + Bluetooth card, wireless keyboard, wireless mouse, thunderbolt card, CPU cooler, case - ~$400

    Total - $4963

    Seems like it's pretty much in line with how much it would cost to build the same system yourself.

  6. Re:Good night by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    No, the CPU (Xeon W-2145) alone is more expensive than your 1/5th estimate for building it yourself.

    Here's a rough sketch of what you'd need to buy to match this system:
    Xeon W-2145 - $1113
    Cheapest LGA-2066 board available with 10Gb ethernet - $650
    32GB DDR4 - $400
    1TB 3.2GB/s PCIe SSD - $500
    Radeon Vega 56 - $600
    5k 27" monitor - $1300
    PSU, WiFi + Bluetooth card, wireless keyboard, wireless mouse, thunderbolt card, CPU cooler, case - ~$400

    Total - $4963

  7. Re:Overpriced by LordKronos · · Score: 4, Funny

    and a mini-headphone jack

    They didn't eliminate it? What a bunch of cowards.

  8. Re:Overpriced by dhaen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Very few people have any use for a system like this though, particularly if it's not running Windows.

    I fail to see what "running Windows" has to do with the argument. It's obviously aimed at a market point that you have no knowledge of. Multiple 5K displays are most likely of use to people in moving image processing, this relatively big data needs this spec as an absolute minimum nowadays.

    I doubt very many will be bought for gaming.

  9. A faster horse by sjbe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Xeon CPUs and powerful GPUs inside a pointlessly thin computer with a built-in display? What for? Who the fuck asked for this?

    Henry Ford said it best when he said "If I asked my customers what they wanted they would have said a faster horse". Perhaps you are right and nobody wants this but Apple does have a pretty good track record of making products people didn't know they wanted. We'll know soon enough.

    Either the internal heat will kill components prematurely or the thing will make even more jet noise than an old PowerPC G4 tower.

    I'm glad you could clear that up for us without ever having seen the product.

  10. Re:Hahahahaha by pastafazou · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A Dell Precision 5720 All-in-one workstation costs $3900, has a Xeon E3-1245, a 4K 27" display, and Radeon Pro WX 7100 graphics. The video upgrade alone on the iMac is $500. Factor in the better processor and display, and they're very comparable price wise. The iMac Pro also has an A10 coprocessor. I don't think the iMac is overpriced at all, considering what you're getting. Obviously your "mission-critical" servers aren't shipping with a 5K display or a $1000 video card, and probably don't have a 1TB SSD drive either. BTW, I call BS on your 1/20th cost, unless you're buying old off-lease servers.

  11. Re:Imagine by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Needs beefy machine.

    Runs 2011 MBP.

    Well, I've been struggling with what I have for a number of years....and right now, the old system doesn't do what I need.

    Not to mention, for big purchases, I like to save my nickles and dimes and buy what I want/need with cash and have no buyers remorse...therefore rather than make lots of small purchases, I save up and buy big and best as I can periodically.

    Currently, I can bog the little systems down for DAYS at a time with a heavy After Effects render.

    And I can't do much with Resolve before it halts things to a snails pace.

    So, yes, I'm looking for dropping some coin on a high end workstation type unit, that will hopefully get my preferred workflows going at a manageable speed, and hopefully, last me for a few years to come.

    Again, I've looked at something comparable, as recommended by Blackmagic Design, for running Resolve (linux or windows) with the HP Z840...which also get $$$ very quickly.

    I did a very quick comparable on the HP z840 to the base iMac pro and it was about $4665...it isn't exact, but is close to what Apple purports the base iMac pro to be. And also, the iMac pro includes the 5K 27" monitor which you would have to add to the HP or other comparable unit.

    No, not everyone needs this type of workstation, but if you are wanting to do a good bit of quality video, SPFX and even some high end photography compositing, etc....a nice high end system can make your day and workflow work for you.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  12. Re:$5,000? by fyngyrz · · Score: 4, Funny

    What's a "forth" mistake?

    Two pops and one push. Or two pushes and one pop.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  13. Re:Imagine by ilsaloving · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I believe it's actually ECC RAM, which is much more expensive than the conventional desktop variety.

    The thing between Microsoft and Apple is, with Apple, you know right from the beginning that they're going to gouge you, but after that they're pretty good. Quality is good. Reliability is good. You don't have to deal with bullshit. (Well, historically this has been true... this past year Apple has done a fantastic job of shoving their reputation through a woodchipper).

    Microsoft, on the other hand, will screw you each day, every day, and you will either learn to accept it or throw your hands up and switch to something else. Their quality is shit. Their QA is shit. They demand that they have control of your machine, but they don't want to take responsibility for your machine, with the end result that your computer can go tits up one day through no fault of your own.

    As obnoxious as Apple is, there has never been a report, for example, where all Macs across an entire continent were suddenly yanked off the net due to a bad dhcp update. Microsoft has had so many bad updates that have hosed entire fleets of machines, that it's shameful. But because Microsoft has a monopoly, they can get away with it.

    Of course, I shouldn't speak too soon because so far I am very unimpressed with High Sierra, iOS 11. They have been buggy messes. And don't get me started on what they've done to their macbooks in recent years. The only reason I haven't gone back to Windows is because Apple and Microsoft seem to be in a "Hold My Beer" competition, and I can't predict how things are going to shake down, so I'll stick with the costs I have already sunk.