Apple iMac Pro Goes on Sale December 14th (engadget.com)
Apple vowed to ship the iMac Pro in December, and it's making good on that promise. From a report: The company has confirmed that its workstation-grade all-in-one will be available on December 14th. It has yet to reveal the exact configuration options, but the $4,999 'starter' model ships with an 8-core Xeon processor, 32GB of RAM, 1TB of solid-state storage and a Radeon Vega graphics chipset with 8GB of RAM. You can option it with up to an 18-core Xeon, 128GB of RAM, a 4TB SSD and a 16GB Vega chipset, although video creator Marques Brownlee notes that you'll have to wait until the new year for that 18-core beast.
A beowulf cluster of these
$5,000 for the starter model? That is 10% of what I make in IT in Silicon Valley per year!
$5K and only an 8 core Xeon and32 GB of RAM?
Still under-powered and overpriced. I wonder how many ports will be eliminated as well.
I pay less for mission-critical servers. Significantly less. And our workstations cost 1/20th of what these cost. I can't imagine what these things do that justify that price tag.
I don't respond to AC's.
A single 'cloud' port should suffice.
Xeon CPUs and powerful GPUs inside a pointlessly thin computer with a built-in display? What for? Who the fuck asked for this?
Either the internal heat will kill components prematurely or the thing will make even more jet noise than an old PowerPC G4 tower.
#DeleteFacebook
Comment removed based on user account deletion
That's what, 5x what it would cost to put those parts into a regular pc case?
I never minded paying some extra for nice machines but that's laughable. 2x maybe for a real nice, elegant, powerful and well made all in one... For some reason I doubt these machines will be all of that. Had macs since 1984, seriously, and don't think that's going to carry on much longer. iApple sux.
It's an overpriced rip off but Apple will sell thousands of them to their indoctrinated masses.
What sane budgeting department would pay for this? Everyone knows that Apple machines aren't made for actual productive work, and $5k for the most basic model seems like a hilarious waste for a device that will mostly be used for cobbling together some video clips/Garageband tracks.
The trash can mac doesn't count. Ah well, guess Apple doesn't want my money any more...
"Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
Legally run OS X. For some folks, that's justification.
You may be joking but that is actually 100% correct. Steve Jobs himself pointed out that Apple is a software company. Their hardware is nice but nobody would pay a premium for it if it ran Windows or if the iPhone ran Android. The hardware for a Mac or an iPhone is not meaningfully different from any number of their competitors. So that means that the reason people seek out Apple products is based in what they do differently and that is software.
People get confused about what sort of business Apple is because they won't sell you most of their software without bundling it with a piece of hardware. But a company is what they actually make and what they actually make is software.
32GB to 64GB $800 and no you don't get keep the 32. Big rip off when for $800 you can get an 64GB ECC kit.
https://www.newegg.com/Product...
Xeon CPUs and powerful GPUs inside a pointlessly thin computer with a built-in display? What for? Who the fuck asked for this?
Henry Ford said it best when he said "If I asked my customers what they wanted they would have said a faster horse". Perhaps you are right and nobody wants this but Apple does have a pretty good track record of making products people didn't know they wanted. We'll know soon enough.
Either the internal heat will kill components prematurely or the thing will make even more jet noise than an old PowerPC G4 tower.
I'm glad you could clear that up for us without ever having seen the product.
enterprise needs easy to remove storage. Dell and HP let them DESTROY HDD's under warranty as well.
Just wait for some movie in post production getting leaked out of the apple repair shop when they can't remove the local storage.
Comment removed based on user account deletion
But I suppose it will be all we get.
Why do you suppose that? Apple has already said they are working on an updated Mac Pro as well. The iMac pro is just for people that want a more contained unit they never messed with.
In theory we should see the new Mac Pro in 2018, but I'm thinking maybe the end of 2018... but in the meantime if you need more performance from the Mac the iMac Pro seems like a pretty good system.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
Comment removed based on user account deletion
Can get an dual AMD EPYC system for $1000 more with X4 the ram and in a rack mount case.
This is for people who want "the best" meaning the expensive status symbol of buying something expensive and better than other people can buy.
Most the people buying this will not have a practical need. Those that do, they would buy a tower... if there was one.
Apple used to know what Pro meant as far as one can expect for their industry. But today it is 100% pure marketing. I'm frankly surprised they are putting in server grade hardware-- that is a big deal and justifies the cost but everything else they do is not PRO.
Anything PRO has to be reliable because TIME IS MONEY for a pro. No expensive downtime makes the extra cost worth it. That includes not having to carry the awkward thing over to WAIT in an Apple store to deal with RAM, Storage, or GPU problem. (All of which I've had to deal with in server hardware.) Having a service plan for business needs also matters. Somebody who justifies a machine this expensive also can justify a quick hardware test with overnight shipped replacement parts; or same-day fix involving a storage swap into a loaner computer.
That different model also allows for long-term use of the same machine--- many don't need the fastest newest computer anymore. Like copy machines, it's more about the service plan than the performance. It is more like this with computers than ever before. For some, they justify the cost for constant upgrades... then a leasing plan makes sense.
Apple only gets more out of touch with business and they have dedicated people for that now; ironically.
don't need wireless in a desktop and reuse my screen.
amd has more pci-e lanes so for pci-e storage systems it's better. Hell if not needed to be redundant one system loaded with pci-e disk can power a full VM stack.
Comment removed based on user account deletion
Comment removed based on user account deletion
Hey I got a question.
ya know that Maxi-pad-pro commercial the one with the androgynous being??
Is that a Boy or a Girl, further more Why does apple insist on hiding the fact that regardless of the form or "Ohhh its shiny apple goodness" its still a computer.
Why to that Force that Human Being to propagate the connotation that t's not.
further more, Is that HumanBeing the recepticle of whats left of JOBS's intelligence/essence? Is that thing in the commercial actually whats left of MR. Jobs (im referring to the bad of skin, liquid, and other things with may constitute a human being), if so it makes sense why, its so easy to spread falsely stoopid apple shit.
fuck-pads versus tampax maxipads, who will retain value.. The maxi pad of course, it will allways be useful and wil never end up in some land fill unused, unlike ALL aPpLe products..
if ya think about it, there really is some truth to that. Shame that we can derrive more value from a device that sopps -up human female blood as a primitive function versus the Higher level functions touted by the aPpLe product, and yet the weak are tricked into investing so much $ in these toys.. It's almost like the lottery, or Vegas.. Fucking stoopid..
Horray,,
A new WinTel Baux With Icing on it..
Fucking stoopid..
All the Sheep are lame.
HP-Z apples mac pro needs to be kick ass and priced at the same level as Dell and HP pro workstations.
Starting at $1499 - $1700 (desktop cpu class) (lower end pro / gamer system)
Starting at $1999 (workstation cpus)
With choices like
UP TO High end CPU's (maybe duel) with lower rage video.
Lower end CPUs starting point with UP TO high end WORKSTATION CARDS (room for duel X2 wide video cards)
As low as 256GB flash storage (boot / os / apps) with UP TO 4TB-6TB+ 3.5 HDD's storage SAS / SATA at least 2 bays. Can also take SAS / SATA SSD's (costs less then pci-e storage)
At least 2 M.2 slots with up to 4 slots.
E-SATA or room to install your own bracket.
Maybe on board dual sfp+ with an sfp+ to e-net transceiver (some new server boards have SFP+ on board)
We got one of them for testing about 5 days ago (it was the 18 core version). Nobody is impressed.
First off, they're only "quiet" if you're not using it. The moment you load it down, the fans spool up, and dear god- are the turbines inside that thing noisy as all fuck. Think of a server with 40mm dual turbine fans installed inside it- that's what our iMac Pro sounded like while we were testing it with a small Arnold workload (36 threads).
If you're using the CPU and GPU at the same time, weird shit starts to happen. It seems to be hit and miss, but either the CPU or the GPU gets throttled down- it seems like the system tries to do some sort of intelligent detection to pick which one, but it's a 50/50 chance that at least one of them is going to get downclocked HARD to keep the system from overheating (during one test, we saw the CPU throttle down to less than 30% of it's nominal speed, during another, the GPU downclocked itself so much that the OS X GUI was virtually unusable).
All in all, these aren't "Pro" machines. I don't even know why they threw a Xeon in there when Intel has the i9. I can only assume they're trying to play off the whole "OMG XEON R PROFESSIONAL" thing. Because clearly this is a "pro" level machine- especially when the whole thing runs around like headless chicken trying to throttle various internal components when placed under full load.
We have to send ours back soon, but we're sure as shit not going to be buying any. IT is already pushing hard to ditch all our Apple products throughout the entire organization due to the recent root exploit (which has pretty much shown us where their priorities lie software wise). Some of the graphics guys were hoping that maybe the iMac Pro would be something special, but it's not- it's just more of the same design bullshit with an Apple logo on the back.
HP-Z apples mac pro needs to be kick ass and priced at the same level as Dell and HP pro workstations.
Why? People shopping for this machine probably aren't in the market for a Dell or HP. If they wanted a Windows machine they would buy one.
I have no idea if this new Apple Pro machine will sell well or not. Nor do I really care. But it's hardly inconceivable that it might sell very well. Time will tell if there is a market for it or not. Anyone pretending they know if it will succeed or fail right now is simply guessing.
and clones are better for apple workstations. Then this thin and looks that apple has been doing.
The old mac pro tower was ok (hold over from the old g5 that needed the monster heat syncs.) but HP and dell have made cool towers that may not have the best looks but are easy to work on. Also pro users will put up with an loop back cable to route video card DP out to an ADD in TB card.
this was apples idea to replace the mac pro.
high cpu workloads do not need an 8GB video card.
apples start points are too high and like the 2013 mac pro to much on the video side at the base level.
I feel like running a Mac has been nothing but a series of compromises.
“Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
Still no touch screen.
And yes I would use it if it were there. For scroll/zoom if nothing else.
Show of hands, please:
How many of you believe that the people who buy this $5000 iMac will be the same people who actually need a $5000 iMac?
I'm thinking nah.
You are welcome on my lawn.
Comment removed based on user account deletion
But then it probably isnâ(TM)t.
Comment removed based on user account deletion
n/c
Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
While there will certainly be a few people who will use up all that CPU and graphics power, for many it will be complete overkill.
One month ago I was offered a job as Drupal web developer, and as all others in this hip startup had Macbooks varying from MacBook 12" to MacBookPro they offered me a fresh MacBookPro too. I declined and said I wanted a PC one-third of that price. Curious, they agreed.
What did I order? An Intel NUC (half the size a a MacMini), with a Core i3, 16 GB memory and a 256 GB SSD, with a 43" 4k monitor. Running Linux Mint 64bit Cinnamon, the most boring and most productive Linux flavour around. It costs ~EUR 1200. It can't do what this new Mac can do, but I don't have to do that anyway. Like so many Apple fanboys who won't either but will still buy this new Mac. Buying what you need can save you 75% versus what you want. Most of the software you use is Cloud-based, or Linux-capable.
My 43" monitor is the absolute sweetspot for 4k display. I do not have to zoom in because at this size it's just like 4x 22" HD monitors without the monitor edges cutting up the view. We do our weekly Trello sessions on my system because it feels like a whiteboard with Post-It notes. In PhpStorm it shown me a lot of code lines vertically. That 27" 5k monitor is way too small for that resolution, All-in-ones are not for professionals but for marketing people. But they do not need the processing power in that new Mac. So it will be a commercial success, selling more than twice the amount of units actually needed in this world.
I have a late 2013 iMac that where I selected the fastest CPU and a GPU with 4 GB RAM. Via iStat I can see that it often uses all the GPU memory when rendering videos.
I'd rather not buy a new iMac. The old one still performs well with a external RAID cabinet for work files, but now I really hate that I have to replace everything to upgrade the machine.
Since there's no proper new workstation(and when it comes, I doubt that I can afford it), I have built a Hackintosh with a GTX1080 and a I7-7700K. It seems to render 3 times faster than the old one, all I need is a compatible bluetooth adapter(I use a mouse in one hand and magic trackpad with the other to scroll fast)
But there's a lot of time wasted getting it to boot the first time, and I'll bet that future updates will break the machine.
I am guessing in the long run, I will either use Premier Pro(had it not been for the subscription license) or perhaps DaVinci Resolve.
Oh well, it's just a hobby.
L'Idiot
Comment removed based on user account deletion
This has 10 bit by dithering? Seriously? TVs have had 10 bit displays for a while now. Useless to video pros.
apple just had that root password issue with an bad update that had it come it come back after installing it.
I know, AC, but i just built a machine that beat the turd out of this one for $500 less.
AMD Threadripper 1950X (16 core)
64GB DDR4 RAM (3200)
GTX 1080Ti with 11G video RAM
1TB SSD (2 x Samsung Pro 960 512MB RAID 0)
2TB HDD (2 x Toshiba 7200RPM 2Tb RAID 1)
27" 4K monitor
Price, ~$4,500
We tested this against a Dual, 10Core Xeon with 128GB ram and a GTX 1080Ti that was around $10K from Dell (Video card seperate). The AMD rig was on average 20% faster in every test(rendering and compiling type tests). I can't wait till AMD's EPIC server chips come out...They are going to give Intel a run for the money!
Comment removed based on user account deletion
And if customers ask for a new Mac Pro because they DO know what they want, Apple tells them to fuck off.
So does every other PC maker. No company can be all things to all people and Apple knows this better than most. Apple has never even pretended to try to accommodate every market niche. If you want something they don't offer then seek it elsewhere. I own some Apple products but I also own several PCs and other non-Apple devices based on what best suits my needs.
This isn't the 1980's. The PC industry is a mature market, and Macs are not competing with horses, they are competing with other PCs built out of the same damn hardware.
So if you like something else then buy that. Why is Apple under any obligation to make a product specific to your desires? Just because you think something is a good idea doesn't mean there is enough margin in it for Apple to make it worth their while.
I bought a Mac Mini a while ago, and it indeed sounds like a jet when it gets hot.
I have one too. Yes the fan does get louder when under load. Personally I prefer this to throttling the speed of the computer (or worse failure) all other things being equal. In practice it is seldom an issue for me. If it did it a lot I'd buy something faster but 99.9% of the time it's a non issue for me.
If only they would make the one thing I'm interested in:
I could say that about nearly every PC maker in addition to Apple. No company can be or should try to be all things to all people. I understand why you want what you want but Apple has never pretended to try to serve every market niche. Users such as yourself who seeking expandibility are comparatively rare and it's pretty clear that they aren't the market segment Apple is targeting.
The good news is that there are good options out there that aren't from Apple.
Holy effing Christ. $5k for a new iMac?
No amount of "courage" is worth that price.
Thanks Apple, but I think I'll go with a *nix box next time around.