Slashdot Mirror


Kids In 'Netflix Only' Homes Are Being Saved From 230 Hours of Commercials a Year, Says Report (exstreamist.com)

With more kids than ever using streaming services like Netflix for their entertainment, Exstreamist wanted to see what this means for the advertising industry. They were able to determine that kids in "Netflix Only" homes are saved from just over 230 hours of commercials a year when compared to traditional television viewership homes. From the report: We pulled numbers from the National Institute of Health, and found that children are watching 2.68 hours of television a day (in some cases, up to nine hours). In homes with more technology devices like tablets and kid-accessible computers, screen time jumps by approximately one hour per day. Currently, the average hour of television contains 14.25 minutes of commercials, or about 24% of airtime. Networks are even speeding up shows to cram more commercials into each episode. With that in mind, if a kid were watching traditional television, they would be seeing 230 hours of commercials a year, or 9.6 days. Netflix, and other services with kid-specific offerings like Amazon Video and Hulu, make it much easier for parents to control their kids' entertainment options. They offer an easy way to keep a child entertained with no commercial interruption.

118 comments

  1. YUP by zlives · · Score: 1

    before that dvr everything

    1. Re:YUP by quenda · · Score: 1

      before that dvr everything

      Before that VHS everything. But so much easier with PVR, especially since TV went digital.
      My children grew up without ever seeing a TV ad, except at friend's houses. And they never complained.
      It helps that we have a national broadcaster with lots of good children's content.

  2. Not just kids! by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Although it's probably great that kids are being shielded from ads, frankly I find it even more useful being an adult! These days I just don't watch any programming that has ads - I watch content either on Netflix, Prime Video (now that they have an AppleTV app), Starz, HBO Go, or purchase seasons of some shows on iTunes. I cannot even watch YouTube much the commercials are so grating now.

    The funny thing is I think kids ads are less harmful. I remember them fondly from when I was a kid...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Not just kids! by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 2

      >I cannot even watch YouTube much the commercials are so grating now.

      Same solution. Pay for YouTubeRed and the commercials go away. I tend to use youtube all day for music streaming and hobby related stuff, so it's a reasonable deal. If you subscribe to something else for music, then maybe not so much.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    2. Re:Not just kids! by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      The funny thing is I think kids ads are less harmful. I remember them fondly from when I was a kid...

      The current generation of kids will have fond memories of watching their favorite YouTube Let's Play or Twitch videogame streams.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    3. Re:Not just kids! by wardrich86 · · Score: 2

      YouTube RED isn't available everywhere yet. I've personally solved the problem by using adblockers. Once and a while I'll turn it off for the channels I really care about.

    4. Re:Not just kids! by Woldscum · · Score: 1

      Yep. Run ad blockers on a real browser. FF or Chrome. Or for the non technical look at the Brave browser. It has blockers from the EFF built in. This is what I shifted my parents onto. It dropped my required tech help by 90%. Avoid the black boxes (Apple TV, Roku) and their apps. Because of no ad blockers available. You can run Brave on android phone/pad to chromecast and have ad blockers.

      https://brave.com/
      " Brave Software was co-founded by Brendan Eich, co-founder of Mozilla and creator of JavaScript, and Brian Bondy, formerly of Khan Academy and Mozilla. "

    5. Re:Not just kids! by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      You kind of failed to mention the impact of seeing an ad now. When you grew up with them, you became used to them, but be cut off from them for a few years and wow, you can watch one every now and then (at least a week apart or month or more) and it is kind of weird but any more than that and it is offensive, actually offensive. It feels like some arsehole has wandered into your home screaming that you buy crap and after the advertisement, instead of buying that crap, you now hate the product and company that did the advertisement. Make no mistake in the modern household advertisements should be seen and not heard.

      You want to successfully market your product in the modern era, sponsor stuff and show you branding and product. Banner ads, just quietly reminding people of you products and services. Sponsor content and have you company and product in that content, keep in mind how long that content can last, many years and continually promote you brand and products, well, keep in mind the content will last longer than that particular product line so adjust accordingly. Align ads with content, forget Googles bullshit, that was a scam targeted at advertisers, they straight up were marketing the fuck out of you, suckers. Ads must align with content, not the user, don't try to sell the user what they bought yesterday (exactly what happens with targeted ads), target them with what they want to buy next month, they are looking at that content because they have real interest in that product range represented by that content. For others that can not really align, there is news, current affairs, documentaries et al but be very, very polite in your presentation.

      As for the lie ads are less harmful for children, straight up lie. Ads targeted at children inherently target peer pressure to get children with the product to target and deride children without the product. Push the bullshit idea into children heads, that they are shit without the product, Repeatedly attack and attack and attack the psychology of children to damage their minds with total disregard to enrich grown adults. It is disgusting and extremely damaging to the whole of society, there should be a total ban on targeting children with advertisements. Think about complete filthy animal cunt adults are targeting children to manipulate them into buying products to enrich those adults, fucking adults are scamming children out of their pocket, fucking adults are manipulating children to put pressure onto the parents to buy stuff, and they do it by convincing the children they are shit unless they have it. Truly disgusting stuff, done by truly disgusting, psychopaths, fucking child molesters.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    6. Re:Not just kids! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Youtube has ads?

    7. Re:Not just kids! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      These days I just don't watch any programming that has ads - I watch content either on Netflix, Prime Video (now that they have an AppleTV app), Starz, HBO Go, or purchase seasons of some shows on iTunes. I cannot even watch YouTube much the commercials are so grating now.

      I've noticed that on the rare occasion I do see a commercial come up, it's really jarring. When I watch a basketball game or something it's like I don't even know how to act any more. I'm unable to just sit through them. Anyway, all the commercials now seem to be stuff for people who are really old or have some disease.

      Regarding YouTube and commercials, I don't know if you're a big music fan or not, but I signed up for Google Play music when an update to Spotify made the interface wonky, and a subscription to YouTube Red comes included, so I never see an ad on YouTube. I write a music blog and embed a lot of YouTube videos and sometimes I forget that most of my readers don't get the same ad-free experience.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    8. Re:Not just kids! by quenda · · Score: 1

      I don't watch enough youtube to pay, but they keep offering 4-month free trials with google music, so its not an issue.
      Adblock works well too, except on Android.

    9. Re:Not just kids! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Same solution. Pay for YouTubeRed and the commercials go away.

      Fuck that sideways. Google is taking Youtube off of Amazon devices, and I'm supposed to pay for the privilege of having to purchase another media player? Google can eat every bowl of dicks up.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:Not just kids! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm using firefox with adblocker on Android, works perfect!

    11. Re:Not just kids! by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      Same solution. Pay for YouTubeRed and the commercials go away.

      Fuck that sideways. Google is taking Youtube off of Amazon devices, and I'm supposed to pay for the privilege of having to purchase another media player? Google can eat every bowl of dicks up.

      It works fine on a real computer.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    12. Re:Not just kids! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It works fine on a real computer.

      There is a lack of enthusiasm among 50% of the members of my household for using a PC to do this job.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re:Not just kids! by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      It works fine on a real computer.

      There is a lack of enthusiasm among 50% of the members of my household for using a PC to do this job.

      Kids these days.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    14. Re:Not just kids! by computererds · · Score: 1

      If I had all the mod points, I'd have given them all to you, Sir.

  3. Think of the Children by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How in the world are the kids today going to a stupid jingle stuck in their heads if they don't watch commercials.

    1. Re:Think of the Children by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its cute that you think simpleton, stupid melodies are limited to commercials. they're EVERYWHERE. kids tv shows are rife with them.

    2. Re: Think of the Children by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Donâ(TM)t forget about knowing which sugary breakfast cereal of negligible nutritional value they should beg their parents for, or how most Saturday morning cartoons are just giant advertisements for cheap toys made in China, probably by kids the same age.

    3. Re: Think of the Children by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who lives in a pineapple under the sea? Sponge bob square pantsssssss!!!!!!!

    4. Re:Think of the Children by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      How in the world are the kids today going to a stupid jingle stuck in their heads if they don't watch commercials.

      Jingles are kind of thing of the past. Now, commercials just use some 80s rock song.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    5. Re:Think of the Children by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In general I hate them, but I have discovered some good music from car commercials.

  4. I don't see ads any more. by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Funny thing, I don't see, process, or store commercials from any media any more. I mute the sound, I go do something else, switch to another window, slide the screen so the adds are off of the monitor, but mainly I think my brain has developed strong anti-advertising routines.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    1. Re:I don't see ads any more. by waspleg · · Score: 4, Informative

      pfsense + pfblockerng + DNSBL + multiple good sources = no ads.

      I don't have to do anything but press play on youtube on my tv and never see anything but the video I came to see.

    2. Re:I don't see ads any more. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly, but sometimes I need to use other people's computers. If I had to endure the web as other people see it, I would simply stop using it. That stuff is caustic. There should be warning labels: Don't look at the web without ad blocking!

    3. Re:I don't see ads any more. by Mitreya · · Score: 1

      I don't see, process, or store commercials from any media any more.

      Every time I stay at a hotel, turning on a TV is quite a shock.
      The ads are obnoxious and long (In 70s shows used to have 26 minute per episode, current ones have 22, for the same half-hour slot).

    4. Re:I don't see ads any more. by MerlTurkin · · Score: 1

      Yup, 'tis true!

    5. Re:I don't see ads any more. by dwywit · · Score: 2

      PiHole is your friend:
      https://pi-hole.net/

      It intercepts advertising domains so that they never even download the ad to be blocked.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    6. Re: I don't see ads any more. by houghi · · Score: 1

      I bet when you look, you will see plenty of company logos on items around you, see billboards and what not.
      Yes, logos are ads. Even icons with branding are ads I rather see them thank think I don't and absorb them.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    7. Re:I don't see ads any more. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I think my brain has developed strong anti-advertising routines.

      That's good, mine too. But children's brains haven't, and very young children are incapable of telling the difference between commercials and shows.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:I don't see ads any more. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't understand that. Why would you turn on TV in a hotel?

      When I stay at a hotel I take my own entertainment with me.

    9. Re:I don't see ads any more. by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

      I did that as well, it became an automatic process. Now I PVR TV shows that get dumped on my PC where a script removes the ads automatically and then we watch at our leisure.

    10. Re:I don't see ads any more. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about the ads within the content?

    11. Re:I don't see ads any more. by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Well you have a good point!

      My daughter tells my grandkids, "That's real" and "That's not real".

      And she doesn't reward commercials with purchases so they didn't learn to pay attention to commercials.

      And they watch a lot of commercial free stuff on Netflix (tho TBH, the lego movies used to be commercials for legos- tho I'm not sure they are any more).

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    12. Re:I don't see ads any more. by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      not sure. not aware of them at a concious level.

      I think ads work better on younger people who are still forming their preferences.

      And ads for young people definately don't work as well on older people. LOL!

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  5. record and comskip everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    record OTA and comskip everything. For network TV here, that saves 22min per hour show. OTOH, if parents are so stupid as to let their children watch commercials, then they will end up with good little fast-food consumers demanding everything they see in those commercials.

    No netflix, hulu (with/without commercials) or any other service needed. Just an antenna in the attic pointing towards the closest city.

    1. Re:record and comskip everything by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      So you skip out parts of the show, or your TV network has 64 minute time slots for "one hour" shows?
      The regular programme time for a 1 hour time slot is 42 minutes, with 18 minutes of ads.

  6. "Madmen" got me back into smoking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I didn't see a single damn advertisement as I was watching it on Netflix back when.

    I'd visited another country where cigs were 25cents a pack, and thought I'd just do it on vacation... lol. Got home, started watching madmen, and all of the sudden I really wanted a cigarette again.

    I was, eventually, able to fully stop... just pointing out that I'm sure product placement in tv shows has sky rocketed.

    1. Re:"Madmen" got me back into smoking by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      So you watched people smoking, it had no effect.
      You started smoking then quit again
      You watched people smoking and wanted a cigarette.

      The only difference before and after was you, not what you were watching.

    2. Re:"Madmen" got me back into smoking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When tempted to over-indulge, reach for a Lucky Strike instead!

      Your protection against throat irritation against cough. 20,679 physicians agree, Luckies are less irritating.

      Lucky Strike, It's Toasted

    3. Re:"Madmen" got me back into smoking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're called Tarrlytons now.

  7. So there is no product placement in Netflix? by ffkom · · Score: 1

    I must have missed we news were Netflix vowed to only show content that did not contain product placement or was sponsored by some company.

    1. Re:So there is no product placement in Netflix? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Product placement is little different from 14 odd minutes of hardout in-your-face advertising per hour.

  8. What about radio? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I had the unfortunate incident of running shotgun in my partners car the other day and counted 16 commercials before I begged her to switch it off. Completely off the shelf, obnoxious, poisonous brainwashing drivel. Unfortunately there are no realtime radio or "TV" adblockers...

  9. Best Table in the Report - Have Yard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The mean area of the houses was 181.9 ± 85.4 m2, ranging from 50 to 550 m2. There were 166 (88.80%) families who had yard in their houses and 134 (80.70%) of the families reported that their children could play in the yard. The group differences on the basis of the number of hours of TV watching were statistically significant, favoring those who did have yards.

    Table 4

    Having a yard
    Yes - 2.58 hr/day
    No - 3.48 hr/day

  10. And 1000s of hours of headaches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Every 30 second commercial targeted to kids leads to minutes of "can I have this? no you can't". 2 days after our daughter started noticing the commercials and asking for what she was seeing we cancelled cable and starting streaming only. It's been 3 years of pure bliss and saved $1000s over Comcast.

    Our kids only see Netflix and anything else we might rent through Google or Amazon. They don't get exposed to Hulu and their erectile dysfunction or other pharma ads. They only get maybe 30 minutes of tv time a day during the week and a few hours on the weekend. Other than that we have music playing in the house all other waking hours.

    Myself, before we cut the cord, I haven't actually watched or listened to a single full commercial for a couple of decades. Commercial break would make me mute the TV and do something or just ignore what was on the screen for the break. I am an advertisers worst nightmare, no amount of advertising has worked on me for well over 30 years.

    1. Re:And 1000s of hours of headaches by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      as an interesting aside to this:
      As a cord never I haven't seen ads in forever (I only have had cable / uverse when there was zero cost to me). Interestingly this has led me to forgetting that ads are skippable on DVR'd content I may watch elsewhere.

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    2. Re:And 1000s of hours of headaches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      can I have this? no you can't

      A little different in our case - about 25 years ago. After the 5 yr old daughter was "buy me that" I'd say sure and wait for the boy's commercial. Then I'd hit her up with an even more annoying over the top buy-me-that whine. It became a game to see who could be more dramatic.

    3. Re:And 1000s of hours of headaches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm with you. The gas station near my house just got new gas pumps installed. On them, there is a nice big color touchscreen that plays ads at loud volume throughout the duration of your fill up. I pressed all the buttons. You cannot lower the volume. You cannot pause or stop it.

      I'm going to drive further away next time, to a competitor that doesn't have that crap. Screw the environment.

      I. Do. Not. Want. To. See. Any. More. Ads.

      I'll burn this world to the ground to avoid them.

  11. Best Decision! by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    Was to cut the cord and get my entertainment from netflix!

    1. Re:Best Decision! by GNious · · Score: 1

      Can't help thinking back to when it was, "Yay, we got satellite Pay TV, no more ads!" ... couple of years later, there were ads.

    2. Re:Best Decision! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Can't help thinking back to when it was, "Yay, we got satellite Pay TV, no more ads!" ... couple of years later, there were ads.

      This time is different because the content is unbundled from the transport, so there is choice. At least, until the carriers take advantage of the new lack of net neutrality laws to kill Netflix.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  12. You are probably right, but I resist by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I've considered it but there's not quite enough content on YouTube I care about to make that worthwhile - and I really hate giving money to Google (but not so much that I don't host my business email with them, sigh). I probably should just bite that bullet.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:You are probably right, but I resist by originalGMC · · Score: 1

      and I really hate giving money to Google (but not so much that I don't host my business email with them, sigh). I probably should just bite that bullet.

      1.) use an ad blocker if you don't like giving money to google.
      2.) google get's most of its money from ads.
      3.) subscriptions for zero adverts are a cop-out - if you're going to subscribe, do it for any exclusive content.

  13. So what? by DalM · · Score: 1

    Can anyone please provide me to a well cited peer-reviewed study that demonstrated that watching ads had any negative effect on a human of any age at all?

    1. Re:So what? by mspohr · · Score: 1

      Well, you could jut googleit:
      https://scholar.google.com/sch...

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    2. Re:So what? by DalM · · Score: 1

      Or you could, you know, read your own google results. None of those results actually say anything about negative effects of advertising.

    3. Re:So what? by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      It's somewhat tangential to what I believe the intent of your question is but:
      https://www.omicsonline.org/op...
      http://healthland.time.com/201...

      And this link (Ads for sugared products leading to obesity) is generally accepted as a ground truth of advertising to children. I fully accept the inevitable counter argument of "parenting", but as a parent I will also say, there are times when you cave just to get the kids to STFU and give you a moment of peace.

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    4. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You didnt even look at them did you slugger?

      Grow up.

    5. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If ads had no effect no one would pay to make them.

    6. Re:So what? by mspohr · · Score: 1

      I'm impressed that you read all 2.8 million results and didn't find anything.
      Here's another one for you. Maybe you'll have better luck here (only 1.6 million results)
      https://scholar.google.com/sch...

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    7. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the time lost spent watching the ads isn't a negative, I don't know what is.

    8. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have a kid, wait until they are about 3 or 4 and get back to us. No study needed and never will be needed, like so many other stupid ass things people waste time and money on studying, this doesn't need a study. You'll see the negative impacts the second they start asking for the stupid, useless shit that gets advertised. No amount of energy you expend will teach them that it is useless, pointless junk and they just won't even start to get that until they are in their teens at the very least.

      I'd like to see how advertising of any sort has any positive impact because I don't believe any sort of advertising has any positive impact on society or the environment. You see this stupid slogan at the movie theater all the time "without advertising, a terrible thing happens. nothing" However, I believe that without advertising a wonderful thing happens, people buy less junk. I'd like to see a study on the negative impacts advertising has on the environment and society. So much shit we buy just ends up in a land fill, wasting resources that will never be recovered or advertising is used for big pharma for the benefit of nobody other than their pockets or it's used to sling lies and mud at each other during political campaigns. Look at all the toys we have available today. If you look at overall amounts of toys on the market today and compare with 100 years ago we have 1000s of times of stuff today. Each Toys R Us literally has 100s of tons of toys, all destined for a landfill anywhere from 2 months to 10 years after being purchased.

    9. Re:So what? by DalM · · Score: 1

      Yup. Read every one of those too. Not a one says what you think it says.

    10. Re:So what? by DalM · · Score: 1

      It's somewhat tangential to what I believe the intent of your question is but: https://www.omicsonline.org/op... http://healthland.time.com/201...

      And this link (Ads for sugared products leading to obesity) is generally accepted as a ground truth of advertising to children. I fully accept the inevitable counter argument of "parenting", but as a parent I will also say, there are times when you cave just to get the kids to STFU and give you a moment of peace.

      So the result is that advertising makes kids want things. No kidding. That's not harming them.

    11. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not harming them.

      Maybe as a philosophical non-parent, you think that as long as the advertiser isn't physically hitting the child, there's "no harm done".
      A normal parent can see plenty of harm from advertising that:
      - drives kids to do things that harm their health (obesity, cavities, peer shaming)
      - drives kids to want things they can't have, so either harming their attitude and relationship with their parents (rich kids) or harming their self-image (poor kids)
      - drives families to waste time fighting useless battles over useless things

    12. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously? You've never noticed the carpet-bombing brainwash regimen that any girl aged 6-12 is subjected to, via years of Disney movies? The "Disney Princess" corrosive effect on parents' wallets and girls' sense of self is well-documented; as is the turn-on-a-dime switch to hyper-sexualized teen-girl Miley Cyrus style role models right after that (12+ market).

      One doesn't need peer reviewed studies (though there are actual studies on the Disney Princess effect) to see how bad it is.

    13. Re:So what? by DalM · · Score: 1

      But I'm not asking what "a normal parent can see", I'm asking for empirical evidence of any of this. The title report is about how Netflix only homes watch less commercials, my question is why does that matter? What empirical evidence is there that watching too many commercials causes negative effects over watching commercial-free tv? Commercials are annoying, but you people talk about them like they cause cancer or something.

    14. Re:So what? by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      The first link I provided had empirical data of increased advertising to children of sugared food products directly correlated with increased obesity.

      QED harm.

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    15. Re:So what? by DalM · · Score: 1

      You need to check your QED. That's harm from eating junk food not from watching commercials. And you earlier acknowledged the applicability of the argument that this is a fault of parents buying the junk food, debunking your own QED. Either way, it's not literally the commercials causing the harm as is often believed.

  14. Don't know what to put on Christmas list by mspohr · · Score: 1

    My grandkids don't watch OTA TV and watch Netflix instead.
    This Christmas, they couldn't think of any $nameBrand stuff to put on their Christmas lists.
    I'm quite happy about this.

    --
    I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    1. Re:Don't know what to put on Christmas list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about a nice football?

  15. Replaced with 230 hours of My Lil Pony by DukeToma · · Score: 2

    Unfortunately that was replaced with 230 hours of My Lil Pony. My poor daughter is like, "Dad you've seen this episode a thousand times!" Whatever, Rainbow Dash is the boss!

    1. Re:Replaced with 230 hours of My Lil Pony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have an upvote from me fo that.

    2. Re:Replaced with 230 hours of My Lil Pony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, yeah, that show is actually pretty good.

      I don't mind watching it with my kids. I've actually been tempted to watch it without them.

    3. Re:Replaced with 230 hours of My Lil Pony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Lil Pony is okay, but Rainbow Brite is where it's at. She could take out Rainbow Dash any day of the week.

  16. Traditional TV is nearly dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stream is nice, because it doesn't have Ads, I did stop to watch TV long ago and just waching movies for over a decade now, if one day I have to pay for a stream (believe me, I will never get a free one) and it still have ads, I will simply stop to pay and neve ruse the service again, life is much more than stay in front of TV. BTW we already have those terrible ads everywhere we look lately.

  17. Not relevant for kids by larryjoe · · Score: 1

    My kids watch only so-called commercial-free kids shows on Netflix and YouTube. Shows like Pokemon and Lego Ninjago/Chima/Nexo Knights. In reality, they get bombarded with a commercial-to-airtime ratio of 100% instead of 24%. The difference between Netflix et al. and shows with explicit commercials is the mix of commercials and not the total commercial exposure time.

    1. Re:Not relevant for kids by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      I don't know if that's really such a bad thing. Kids like playing with toys and characters they see on TV, which is fine if the toys themselves stimulate their creativity or imagination...like Lego. And kids seem to like these shows even if they don't care for the toys; my nephews and nieces loved the Lego Ninja cartoons but they never asked for them on their christmas lists, they always wanted Lego from the 'generic' or Technic range or other toys. The shows that I've seen don't push the toys onto kids either, it's ok kiddie programming as long as you don't fill their day with it.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  18. My kids freak out at hotels... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when they see commercials. Since we don't see commercials at home, when my kids run across commercials at other places they get upset. "Hey, I asked for my show. I don't want to watch this!"

  19. Coming soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Commercials on Netflix. Seriously, I wouldnâ(TM)t be surprised if Netflix does something like Hulu and offers a âoefreeâ service with ads.

  20. Re:Young Trumps will never grow up in this environ by easyTree · · Score: 1

    Strawman - facebook have ads now.

  21. about 24% of airtime. by whoever57 · · Score: 1

    Currently, the average hour of television contains 14.25 minutes of commercials, or about 24% of airtime.

    BBC America is working hard to increase that percentage, judging by the obnoxious amount of commercials in the broadcasts of Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency.

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  22. My kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My kids don't watch 4 hours of TV /day. To me, that's a lot more important than whether they get too many advertisements in.

  23. Ads by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    My kids had watched maybe 10 commercials by the time they were 8. We just made sure we showed them ad-free kids channels and videos we had purchased.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  24. My Little Pony deficiency by Arzaboa · · Score: 1

    I have never seen a "good" commercial for children.

    These commercials create a sense of want where there should be none to start with. Kids aren't *insert new toy* deficient, as they think they are, after seeing a commercial for what they don't have. All this does is create tension where there should be none to start with.

    --
    My little pony and me -- Little girl from My Little Pony commercial

    1. Re:My Little Pony deficiency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand, if kids are shielded from ads, how are they going to build resistance?

    2. Re:My Little Pony deficiency by thecombatwombat · · Score: 1

      I have never seen a "good" commercial for children.

      Counterpoint:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    3. Re:My Little Pony deficiency by Arzaboa · · Score: 1

      Hah! Touche!

  25. Don't be so sure by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    Netflix households are also YouTube households, which bring the ads back.

    1. Re:Don't be so sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Netflix households are also YouTube households, which bring the ads back.

      Ads on Youtube? I can assure you there are no ads on Youtube in my household.

  26. So can we let Saturday Morning Cartoons happen aga by jader3rd · · Score: 1

    I find it sad that busy bodies decided to defend children by making it so bothersome for broadcast channels to show fun kids shows that none of them exist on broadcast channels anymore.

  27. But the downside is ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... they wouldnâ(TM)t be able to sing songs like âoeMy Bologna has a first name ..â forty years later, either.

  28. This is bad by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

    I mean, how will these kids know what products they need if they can't watch commercials?

  29. Watch PBS kids, it's better for you by maybe111 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's free with an antenna and there isn't really any ads ... and there is cartoons 24/7... and it is usually educational.

    1. Re:Watch PBS kids, it's better for you by vandamme · · Score: 1

      If you just watch PBS, you miss the ads on commercial TV, which is usually the best part. It's like the Super Bowl.

  30. The ads just moved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We now get 230 hours more slashvertisements,

  31. Re:Young Trumps will never grow up in this environ by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    Strawman - facebook have ads now.

    Kids don't use facebook, grandpa.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  32. Yeah because a DVR is so hard to use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never understood why Netflix is so popular..their library is fucking garbage...

  33. Re:Young Trumps will never grow up in this environ by MerlTurkin · · Score: 1

    Yes they do. Observe much?

  34. Mr Rogers by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    and a bunch of other children's television folks campaigned against child advertising in the 70s. Fat lot of good it did. Still, I'm not sure this new world of no commercials will last. As I recall Cable TV didn't have commercials at the start...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Mr Rogers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course it did, stop believing every lie you read on the internet. Cable started off as a way for people with poor reception to watch tv, it had all the same ad slots. If they took the ad slots out none of the shows would line up on the hour and half hour.

  35. Re:Young Trumps will never grow up in this environ by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    Yes they do. Observe much?

    No, they really don't. Your "observations" are meaningless when we have actual statistics. Kids really aren't using Facebook, they're going to other social media.

    https://www.statista.com/stati...

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  36. Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When broadcasters recut and speed up shows to make shorter air times, I wonder if they actually are breaking IP laws - surely customers have a reasonable expectation that the show will be shown in full, show owners would expect the show to be shown properly, and creators would require their credits to be shown? So how is it that I keep seeing shows with scenes cut short, credits sped and shrunk to unreadability, and noone seems to compain? Is this down to broadcasters having too much power, people doing what they want and to hell with the consequences, or what?

  37. LEGO by jemmyw · · Score: 1

    That'll be why LEGO has branched out into TV shows. Extremely clever move, they got the timing just right.

  38. The kids of today... by jennatalia · · Score: 0

    Just one more thing they'll never know the trials and tribulations we had to deal with. They will, however, miss out on some great commercials. -Dilly Dilly

  39. Re:Young Trumps will never grow up in this environ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That graph isn't very useful without an overall demographic breakdown for the USA.

  40. how can I sign up 300 households in my district? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At cost to myself, this is how to save the world.

  41. What's interesting... by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 1

    is when you screen commercials from your environment, and then end up somewhere where you can't avoid it, it's astounding how incredibly annoying they are-- like standing without earplugs next to someone operating a jackhammer... Makes a ready reminder as to why you were avoiding them in the first place.

  42. That's a lot of time saved by CptJeanLuc · · Score: 1

    If you consider children sleep about 10 hours per night, then 230 hours represents 5% of their waking time. If you instead look at their 'available time' which is not locked up in school etc, that number increases to over 10%.

    Spending 10% of children's time watching commercials during the formative period of their life when they learn at the most accelerated pace, they learn motor-, social and mental skills which are key for later life, as well as having their personality 'set', is incredibly wasteful.

    1. Re:That's a lot of time saved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spending 10% of children's time watching commercials during the formative period of their life when they learn at the most accelerated pace, they learn motor-, social and mental skills which are key for later life, as well as having their personality 'set', is incredibly wasteful.

      It's not just incredibly wasteful, it's stealing a portion of somebody's life, morally no different than if somebody were to kidnap them. Further, people have a right to not be forced to have garbage injected into their lives by others. All unsolicited advertising violates fundamental human rights - and should be viewed as criminal conduct.

      We need to move away from the current unethical legal model of contract law, copyright law, patent law, and so forth superseding basic human rights (and hence - in the USA - violating fundamental rights "under the colour of law", as well as violating the 9th and 10th Amendments of the US Bill of Rights). No company should be able to force goods and services to only be available with bundled advertising - and the price difference between a version with advertising, and one without, should be nominal and regulated. The fact that we haven't corrected this situation is simply one more example (of so many) of how the unethical US legal profession has done has done enormous harm to US society.

  43. % of airtime by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    That should come as no surprise. TV Series made by Netflix go for an hour per episode, those made by cable TV companies go for about 45min.

  44. It's a start by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

    Now we just need to save kids from the actual programs, many of which are absolutely awful and/or commercials in themselves.

    --
    This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
  45. Will this continue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is interesting in the context of Net Neutrality. Do think this will be allowed? I can see a future were with no ad sites like Netflix IPs will force you to watch a stream of adverts every 300Mb or so.

  46. Unlikely claims made without evidence by jbn-o · · Score: 1

    It's not clear to me how the article for this story or any of the articles the story links to accounts for ads that are a part of the show. I'm guessing the claim of "being saved" from advertising is flatly not true because the alleged surveying doesn't account for these ads.

    I also question the veracity of the nameless source who allegedly said "Netflix is a godsend. We try to prevent our kids from watching too much TV, but we love being able to put them in front of a Netflix show and know weâ(TM)re mostly in control of what theyâ(TM)re seeing. We donâ(TM)t need our kids seeing repetitive ads for new toys or sugary cereals." partially because I don't trust anonymous sources in contexts where anonymity is unnecessary and partially because the whole article is indistinguishable from what I'd expect Netflix to say if they were advertising for themselves via an article.