Slashdot Mirror


Apple's iPhone Throttling Will Reinvigorate the Push for Right To Repair Laws (vice.com)

Jason Koebler, writing for Motherboard: The news that Apple throttles iPhones that have old batteries will reinvigorate the right to repair debate as the movement enters a crucial year. Third party repair shops say they've already seen an uptick in customers asking for battery replacements to speed up their slow phones, and right to repair activists who are pushing for state legislation that will make third party and self repair more accessible say Apple's secrecy about this behavior will give them a powerful rallying message. "If Apple were serious about battery life, they'd market battery replacements," Gay Gordon-Byrne, executive director of Repair.org, told me in an email. "Apple clearly has a big financial benefit when people decide their phones are too slow and head to the Apple Store for a new phone." Repair.org is a right to repair advocacy group that is made up largely of small, third party repair shops, which is spearheading the effort to get states to consider legislation that will make it easier to repair electronic devices.

158 comments

  1. Plugged in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I noticed they still throttle old iphones even when plugged in and 100% battery. There goes that excuse.

    1. Re: Plugged in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Tim, is that you?

    2. Re: Plugged in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 funny

    3. Re: Plugged in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10 watts (5.1 volts @ 2100 mA) is all that charger provides. If the CPU needs more then that a peak load, it stands to reason the battery acts as a supplemental capacitor of sort while plugged in. If true, I could understand the need to still cripple the CPU with a failing battery

    4. Re: Plugged in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      I'm sorry, but you are just making excuses...and incorrect ones at that.

      The iPhone battery capacity is around 1900mAh (src) at 1.2V.

      At 10W the battery will discharge entirely in 10 minutes.

      I can't imagine any system designer ever allowing a mobile device to run to peak power consumption that would do this, especially since there is no guarantee that the system will come out of its peak state. Sure, you can do it, but it's a stupid design choice.

      So what power does the iPhone run at?

      Doing a little bit of research, iPhone (and most other computer phones) uses around 1 to 1.5W (src).

      I'm sick of reading Apple themed threads on Slashdot because of the sheer number of mindless apologists that just ruin the discussion with their allegiance/belief in the mighty Apple corporation. It's crazy! Can't we all just stick to the facts? The fact being, in this case, Apple is a slimy corporation that has implemented policies that go against the interests of their customers, and employ an elite PR department who are working hard (but very effectively) to put some spin on it.

    5. Re: Plugged in by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      You mean if the CPU needs more than the combined power provided by its old battery and the 10 watts provided by the charger.

    6. Re:Plugged in by mschwanke97402 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Do a little reading. They are doing it for three year old phones because even though it may be charged to 100% the old battery can't deliver enough current and has been observed causing the phone to glitch.

      This all seems to be a bit of a made up issue to me. All of the high-end, WATER RESISTANT smartphones have internal batteries. Apple offers free battery replacement to those under warranty or having AppleCare+. They offer battery replacement to everyone for $79 otherwise. No is being forced to buy a new phone because of the battery. If you can afford a $700 phone you probably won't blink at $80 for a battery replacement.

    7. Re: Plugged in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Have you never played CSR2 on an iPhone. Screen brightness consumption in addition to a maxed out CPU/GPU (SoC) chip that is the A series, pulls close to maximum draw as it gets

    8. Re: Plugged in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ****Errata: sorry, the iPhone 4 and 4S will draw up to 3W during peak consumption. My point still stands, the wall charger (10W) is *more* than enough to run the device and to charge the battery full-pelt at the same time.

    9. Re: Plugged in by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Additional errata: 1900mAh at 1.2V is 2.28Wh, the battery would take 22.8 minutes ti run flat at 10W. Not that it affects your point in any way but, if you're gonna post corrections...

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    10. Re: Plugged in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's see: 2.28 Wh is enough energy to deliver 2.28 W for 1 hour, or 1 W for 2.28 hours.

      At 10 W, the consumption is 10/2.28 times faster than at 1 W, so it's 2.28 hours divided by 4.39. Converting this to minutes for simplicity, we get 2.28 hours = 137 minutes. Dividing by 4.39 we get 31 minutes.

      Sorry mate, you're absolutely correct. While making this post I reworked my calculation and found I had used "1.28" rather than the correct value of "2.28".

    11. Re: Plugged in by BronsCon · · Score: 2

      Ah, actually we were both wrong. We both fell victim to bad math; mine too simple and yours too complex. I realized my error half way through reading your post.

      A battery that can deliver 1W for 2.28hr would, as you correctly stated, lat 137 minutes (136.8, but I digress). At 10x the power draw, the battery life would actually be 1/10th as long, or 13.7 minutes.

      I shouldn't do math with a head cold... and I dare say you were closer to right the first time (3.7min under) than I was (9.1min over). In actual practice, the battery won't be allowed to run flat, so 10 minutes is probably spot on.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    12. Re:Plugged in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are doing it for three year old phones because even though it may be charged to 100% the old battery can't deliver enough current and has been observed causing the phone to glitch.

      Then Apple batteries must be even shittier than we thought. I used the same LG smartphone (P765) for almost 4 years. While the battery life grew somewhat shorter over time, it never glitched, locked up, or otherwise malfunctioned while the battery still had a charge. Haven't had that experience with ANY of the 4 smartphones I've owned. But then again, I never buy Apple.

    13. Re: Plugged in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks mate, so easily done. Good thing we weren't performing brain surgery, or launching a rocket today :)

    14. Re: Plugged in by Demena · · Score: 1

      Nope, they do not. Tested it before I posted. Maybe you should think about doing the same, otherwise you are just making noise.

    15. Re:Plugged in by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      "If you can afford a $700 phone you probably won't blink at $80 for a battery replacement."

      And what if you can't afford a $700 iPhone? Why, you buy a USED one at a significant savings. AppleCare won't cover a used phone that you bought from anyone other than Apple. A new battery in a used phone will give it so much life, it will feel like new. If apple doesn't like that, then there are plenty of Android phones for which we would be happy to replace the batteries...

    16. Re: Plugged in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shitty CSR is built with shitty buggy Unity, which besides rendering runs tons of stupid analytics, obscure reporting on multiple threads, and phones mothership to report all your activity.

      Next time find a game that does exactly what it claims, no shady shit.

    17. Re:Plugged in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes you are.

      Apple forces an iOS update if you want your battery replaced by them. There is no way around this. Even if your phone is working 100% on some older version of iOS (and why upgrade if it is?), they will not replace your battery without first updating iOS.

      Once you go upgrade, you can't go back. If the new version of iOS contains features detrimental to the performance of your phone (or other shoddy programming that happens to slow down the device), you're screwed. You now have exactly one option: buy a new phone, and wait until all this happens again in 3-4 years.

    18. Re:Plugged in by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      My original iPhone (no suffix) pooped out with a screen problem after two years, so I bought an iPhone 4. I retired mine after two years, but my wife gave hers to her sister, who kept it for another three years, no replacement battery, no problems. My wife and I got 5Ss when they came out, so they're a little over four years old. No replacement batteries, no problems. My anecdotal evidence is more impressive than yours.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    19. Re:Plugged in by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      You can get the battery replaced for $80 from Apple, which is not a serious expense every three or four years. You can find third parties who will do it for significantly less money.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    20. Re:Plugged in by doccus · · Score: 1

      Doesn't matter.. what just gets me is i still remember the old 1984 ad campaign, and it's a sad irony that Apple is careening headfirst into implementing that very same super controlling behavior. It's pretty clear to me that apple does things that make apple happy, and to hell with the users. They're too locked into the apple "experience" to disentange themselves now, anyways, that switching to a non-apple alternative would mean starting from scratch.This applies to both their devices and OSX machines, as well. I keep saying I'm switching to linux or windows if they keep destroying evereything that made apple great.. but hey, I'm still using it, and lately windows has lost any appeal it might have had, what with Win 7 being deprecated in just 2 years. :sigh:

  2. Ought to be criminal! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slowing down customer's phones without a choice with the apparent reason being to push them to buy more stuff sure seems criminal to me!

    1. Re:Ought to be criminal! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      apple has been doing questionable illegal shit for years. A lot of people are not surprised.

  3. Remember who we're talking about here by DeplorableCodeMonkey · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The company that professes sustainable living, equality, environmentalism and then...

    Gave birth to the touchbar MBP.

    QED.

    The devil himself probably golf-clapped and wiped a tear away when witnessing the birth of this product for how it almost exists as a Manichean opposite of Apple's professed values.

    1. Re:Remember who we're talking about here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or it was just a design mistake that will be short-lived, like many other mistakes Apple made along the way. But your obnoxious post will surely be the one that fits most people's confirmation bias around here.

    2. Re: Remember who we're talking about here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't get it. I haven't bseen it but isn't the touchbar like a long touchpad above the keyboard? What does it have to do with the aforementioned values ?

    3. Re:Remember who we're talking about here by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

      Apple pushes environmentalism for a bunch of reasons. The first is that smaller packaging decreases their logistics cost and gave them some free environmentalism creds. Then Greenpeace decided to target them for no obvious reason (they weren't noticeably worse than their competitors for anything that Greenpeace complained about), so they did a bunch more visible stuff. Finally, they realised that if they provide a free recycling service then a lot of people will use it rather than selling their stuff second hand and so they can reduce the size of the second-hand market (which competes with their new product market).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  4. We're glued and screwed - we can no longer unscrew by dublin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Most modern super-thin phones and other devices are glued together in such a way that it's difficult or impossible for even a fairly careful, experienced person with small nimble fingers to get them apart without destroying some expensive component, usually, the screen/digitizer/glass assembly.

    This isn't just a problem for phones, but tablets and many modern computers (Surface, cough, cough), too.

    Checkout the reviews on sites like teardown.com, and you can see that most (thin) modern electronic devices are held together with glues that are clearly selected with no concern for the device ever coming apart again.

    There is no punishment too severe for Apple for deliberately degrading the performance of devices after they have been sold. (This is argualbly far worse than the hardware/software tying & lying that got IBM put under antitrust consent decree back in the 1960's!)

    I've uncomfortably used Apple phones for the last several years, but I'm done with that - replaceable batteries and expandable storage are on the required list for my next phone!

    --
    "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
  5. Fuck the environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just buy endless more iPhones.

    --Tim

  6. Time for the war chest.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of all the times they needed to use the enormous cash reserves they have, they will probably lobby hard to prevent this.

  7. They do market battery replacement... by unimacs · · Score: 5, Informative

    "If Apple were serious about battery life, they'd market battery replacements," Gay Gordon-Byrne, executive director of Repair.org, told me in an email. "Apple clearly has a big financial benefit when people decide their phones are too slow and head to the Apple Store for a new phone."

    Apple offers battery replacement as part of their services. Cost is $79 which is not cheap but certainly much cheaper than a new phone.

    1. Re:They do market battery replacement... by zlives · · Score: 1

      or 25 bucks if you want to do it yourself...

    2. Re:They do market battery replacement... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or $10 if you bought a phone with user swappable batteries and buy one off ebay.

    3. Re:They do market battery replacement... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah .... because buying fake battery replacements from a scammer on eBay is a great way to save money.

    4. Re:They do market battery replacement... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, where did you get an iPhone with swappable batteries?

    5. Re:They do market battery replacement... by ortholattice · · Score: 2

      I think the point is that they were hiding the fact that slowness could be cured with a battery replacement. I would guess they hoped users would buy a new model phone after seeing how much faster it was compared to their purposely impaired old one, which is a lot more profitable than a battery replacement.

      Anyway, soon Apple will probably tell us that their battery-impaired phones aren't slow, they are just differently throttled.

    6. Re:They do market battery replacement... by dublin · · Score: 1

      Note a couple of substantial caveats: 1) Like everything else, Apple charges super-premium prices for their replacement batteries, and 2) I happen to live 10 minutes away from an Apple store here in Austin, but there are lots of folks just in other parts of the state, who are *several hours* away from one. Lubbock or Midland/Odessa, for instance, get to choose between Fort Worth or El Paso: about 4-1/2 to 5-1/2 hours!

      And most of the time you can't just walk in - you have to have an appointment, which no one expects the first time.

      --
      "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
    7. Re:They do market battery replacement... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I buy ones on ebay for about that which are sold by the company that made my phone. No need for fakes.

    8. Re:They do market battery replacement... by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Or buying a phone that takes a fairly standard and readily available battery. Yes, phones do still exist that use the same battery design Nokia was using in the mid '00s. Those can be had, new and from reputable manufacturers, for around $10.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    9. Re:They do market battery replacement... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and what they don't tell you is that they MUST update your phone to the latest version of iOS to replace said battery.

      If you have an older device that's working fine (because you didn't upgrade to the latest shitfest iOS release chalk full of bugs and what not), you're screwed yet again. In order to replace the battery, they need a bunch of log files generated by their diagnostics toolkit, and their spare parts system literally will not authorize a new battery unless said logs come from the latest version of the diagnostics software- which, you guessed it- is only based on the most recent version of iOS.

      There is literally no way to convince them to replace the battery WITHOUT touching the phone's software. I tried with my iPhone 4S (which was happily running iOS 7 and did everything I wanted it to). I spent at least 2 months going around and around with the official Apple store. I literally offered to buy the part itself for full pop (whatever that was) and they wouldn't do it. The old part had to be shipped back to Apple (because they want to control the second hand parts market) and they couldn't order in a new part without the diagnostics log that said the battery was worn down.

      I also tried going through all the local authorized service centers- same thing. One guy even ran the older version of the diagnostics on my phone (while I was watching), then attempted to upload it to Apple- the system immediately borked and said he had to run the latest version of the diagnostics instead. There was literally no way to order a replacement battery unless that happened. For obvious reasons, they weren't willing to upload the diagnostics for another device instead as that could threaten their service contracts with Apple.

      So, yeah. This is fucking bullshit.

      Apple may offer a battery replacement service, but it's NOT just a battery replacement service. You'll get a "free" iOS upgrade whether you want it or not, regardless of what that does to the performance of your device. With certain handhelds, the performance loss of upgrading iOS is greater than the performance gained by getting a new battery. Either way, you're fucked, unless you replace the battery yourself (which isn't too hard to do, but it's not the safest procedure out there- you really have to fight against their glue, and without the right tools you run the risk of rupturing the pack).

    10. Re: They do market battery replacement... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chock full.

    11. Re:They do market battery replacement... by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Note a couple of substantial caveats: 1) Like everything else, Apple charges super-premium prices for their replacement batteries, and 2) I happen to live 10 minutes away from an Apple store here in Austin, but there are lots of folks just in other parts of the state, who are *several hours* away from one. Lubbock or Midland/Odessa, for instance, get to choose between Fort Worth or El Paso: about 4-1/2 to 5-1/2 hours!

      And most of the time you can't just walk in - you have to have an appointment, which no one expects the first time.

      Well, you can buy the stuff you need online to replace the battery yourself. It only takes a few minutes - Apple has made battery changes super easy to do it yourself. Buy a kit for around $25.

      If you don't want to do yourself, you can take it to your local cellphone repair shop - not one of those run by the big guys, but you know the place - a little hole in the wall in some oddball shopping center or strip mall and pay them. Hell, it probably will be $25 as well. Unlike screen repairs, battery replacements require no Apple touchy-feely calibration or anything.

      Oh yeah, those are the places that advertise phone screen repairs, too.

      Apple offers it at a higher price, and there are very market solutions to it as well. In fact, one could argue Apple is stuck - if they wanted to offer it at $35, they couldn't because they'd put all the little guys out of business, which is generally a very bad thing to do.

      So there you have your options, and there are literally thousands of them. You shouldn't have to exit your city because almost all of them have at least a dozen. Pay Apple $80. Do it yourself for $25-35 (I'm sure Amazon sells you a kit with free Prime). Or visit (almost always Asian run) shop doing cellphone repairs for the same price. Best part is those store almost always congregate together so if one person is rude to you, you walk out and go next door. You'll often get better-than-Apple-store treatment.

      Oh, they advertise too - usually in local newspapers or Craigslist. Go for the ones that give you the address right there in the ad - there's no reason you must call them to "make an appointment" or "get the address". It will be there right in the ad, if not, move on to the next guy.

    12. Re: They do market battery replacement... by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      Your definition of super easy must be different to mine. My old Note 2 was super easy. Unclip the back, replace the battery and reattach the back. No special tools, heat guns or gaskets involved. I don't see having to pay £79 to do the same 5 years on as a good thing. What's wrong with having a screw at each corner you can undo to remove the back?

    13. Re: They do market battery replacement... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha! I buy a new iphone evertime my battery reaches 80% because I can! What do YOU do to please Apple? You think they are proud to have a poor customer like you who gets repairs? You shame Apple. They will never love you like they love me! They know I will buy what they say because I can! Go buy an Android like the rest of your friends in the favela.

    14. Re: They do market battery replacement... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      The iFixit kit is $25 including tools (at least for my phone), although I don't know that it's available in Australia. If you want an easily openable phone, buy one. Don't complain that another manufacturer's phone is a little more difficult.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    15. Re:They do market battery replacement... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Replacing the battery is not something that will be necessary every year. Convenience isn't really necessary. If you don't like the Apple facilities, get your own battery replacement kit and do it yourself.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    16. Re: They do market battery replacement... by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      Why should anyone have to pay any money and risk damaging their phone to replace the battery. You fanbois are pathetic.

    17. Re:They do market battery replacement... by dublin · · Score: 1

      So tired of fanbois...

      --
      "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
    18. Re:They do market battery replacement... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the anti-Apple fanbois are some of the worst.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    19. Re: They do market battery replacement... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Because batteries grow on trees, and the tree for your particular phone grows near your house? Because it's all done by little battery fairies who live on sunshine and rainbows? No, I don't know why you'd have to pay anything.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    20. Re: They do market battery replacement... by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      Let me spell this out for you because appear to be a little simple. The battery is a separate component to the rest of the device. It should not require spending any money on special tools and risking damage to the device to replace. This applies to devices by any manufacturer where battery replacement has been made unnecessarily difficult for purely commercial reasons, not just the one you so pathetically worship and defend.

  8. Law suit?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The only reason I upgraded to iPhone 8 from 6s was the slowness. The 6s more than met my needs with both iOS 10 and 9. 11 killed it. Can I sue?

    1. Re: Law suit?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sure, you can sue. Just hire a lawyer. Winning is a different question.

    2. Re:Law suit?? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you have a case, since had you known about this flaw you would have spent 1/10th as much on a new battery.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:Law suit?? by brantondaveperson · · Score: 0

      You installed an OS upgrade, because you wanted the phone to do more than it did when you bought it. Revert back to the older iOS version, and it'll perform just like it did when it was new. The older iOS version IPSW files are easy to download, and installing them is just a matter of holding down option (or shift on a PC) when you click "update" in itunes.

    4. Re:Law suit?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Last I checked you can't revert iOS updates on the iPhones anymore.

    5. Re:Law suit?? by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Revert back to the older iOS version, and it'll perform just like it did when it was new.

      Absent the battery-age-based throttling being discussed here, perhaps...

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    6. Re:Law suit?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      doesn't work.. the new ipsw files need to be verified by an apple server before itunes allows the phone to be flashed. apple deliberately blocks downgrading via older ipsw files.

    7. Re:Law suit?? by Bearhouse · · Score: 1

      You should have learned the lesson with iPhone 4s and last-gen iPads; the fuckers did exactly the same thing then...NEVER take the "last" upgrade for your device from Apple - it is ALWAYS designed to nerf the device.

    8. Re:Law suit?? by Bearhouse · · Score: 1

      No, but you can jailbreak them, then do what you like...

      http://iphonejailbreakguide.co...

    9. Re:Law suit?? by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      Given that iOS 10 (specifically 10.2.1) introduced this feature to your phone and you admit it ran fine under iOS 10, you'd have a tough time making a case against Apple (iOS 11 only added the feature for models after yours). Moreover, you'd have a tough time arguing that you suffered any sort of wrong, given that the alternative behavior (which you ostensibly would have to claim was preferable) was that your phone would randomly shut off when the battery was incapable of supplying the necessary current.

      But hey, you can sue anyone for any reason at all, no matter how flimsy the case, so feel free.

    10. Re:Law suit?? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      So, instead, you can spend thousands of dollars on a lawsuit that might get you several hundred dollars back.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    11. Re:Law suit?? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      It isn't always going to nerf the device. Wait a bit after the OS version is released, and you can easily find reviews on what the upgrade does for your device. Then, make up your own mind.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  9. Apple offers battery replacement by pushing-robot · · Score: 1

    If the phone is under warranty Apple will replace the battery for free.

    If it's out of warranty, Apple charges $79 to replace it. Granted, it should be $39 or $49, but it's not like people have no choice but to buy a new phone.

    There are also plenty of third party batteries and iPhone repair kits so you replace your own, or offer the service at your shop. Granted, this would void the warranty, but devices under warranty would get free replacements from Apple anyway.

    I'm 100% in favor of the right-to-repair laws; cracked glass, water damage, and hard-to-source parts could and should be replaceable by small shops for a fraction of what the OEMs charge. Many hardware failures could be fixed with a $0.50 component and a soldering iron instead of a $800 replacement logic board. But iPhone batteries seem an odd rallying cry for the movement.

    --
    How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    1. Re:Apple offers battery replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you'll pay to replace the battery, and then your device will still be slow due to the OS upgrade.

      Don't buy the "protect the battery" line, since it's just smokescreen BS. As another poster pointed out, the phones are still throttled even when plugged in, or the battery is at 100%.

    2. Re: Apple offers battery replacement by guruevi · · Score: 1

      The OS throttling follows the battery chip so replacing the battery correctly should reset that back. So if the chip says the battery is degraded, it slows down to keep the phone going longer.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    3. Re: Apple offers battery replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm highly skeptical of this claim. Any links to evidence?

      Also, what guarantee is there that the new battery is not "too old" that it triggers the throttling anyway?

    4. Re: Apple offers battery replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds extremely sophisticated, yet they don't disable the throttling when plugged in?

    5. Re: Apple offers battery replacement by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      It's a portable device, using it while plugged in would be using it wrong.

      I wouldn't be surprised if they also throttled while it was charging. Charging a battery heats it up. High CPU/GPU usage heats up things sitting right next to it too.
      Hot batteries don't like being charged and will degrade much quicker if you do.

    6. Re:Apple offers battery replacement by dublin · · Score: 1

      Many hardware failures could be fixed with a $0.50 component and a soldering iron instead of a $800 replacement logic board. But iPhone batteries seem an odd rallying cry for the movement.

      I call BS - there is virtually nothing that can be fixed with even nice home soldering equipment on a modern smartphone logic board - everything is super fine pitch SMA components, which have moved to mostly BGA-like packages and contacts over the past few years. I became an expert at super-fine high-temp soldering as a kid (soldering a half dozen or more 40 ga wires to 1/8" strain gages down inside a 1/2" hole for my Dad's instrumentation company), and repairing high-density SMA boards just isn't really doable without the right tools. You need very specialized equipment to do this sort of thing right.

      Batteries are a rallying cry because they and the display assembly and the entire logic board(s) are essentially the only components large enough to be replaceable by an ordinary tech-competent person.

      --
      "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
    7. Re:Apple offers battery replacement by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Because Apple started this glued together difficult to replace battery crap, way back with the original iPod. In fact the "iPod's dirty little secret" site is still up, and you can hear the service rep telling the customer to just buy a new iPod because the repair is $250.

      In other words Apple wouldn't even offer the overpriced replacement service if they hadn't been shamed into doing it.

      Other companies do it too now, but Apple was the first and worst, so is the focus of criticism.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re: Apple offers battery replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "using it while plugged in would be using it wrong."

      People like you are the worst.

      DO NOT tell me how to use MY PROPERTY.

      For fuck sake.

    9. Re:Apple offers battery replacement by inflex · · Score: 1

      You're not going to fix modern high density logic boards with a "home iron" or equipment, but if you pick up stuff like this...

      $180~$300 Microscope
      $200 Soldering station (Hakko FX951 and JS02 tip to start)
      $250 Hotair station (Quick 951DW or even a $65 analogue)
      $100 assorted hand tools ... then yes, they're fixable with a good dose of learning/experience/practice.

      So sure, it's about a $1k investment in tools but it's still quite doable. Places like UnionRepair are making it cheaper every day, coupled with YouTube binge watching of people like iPadRehab, Louis Rossmann, Jason STS Telecom etc and you might succeed in fixing things like blown filters and perhaps a Tristar failure after a couple of attempts.

  10. No, it won't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you been paying attention to politics at all?

  11. Corporate lobby group by Tanktalus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Repair.org is a right to repair advocacy group that is made up largely of small, third party repair shops, which is spearheading the effort to get states to consider legislation that will make it easier to repair electronic devices.

    In other words, a corporate lobby group.

    Just remember that the next time you see a lobby group you disagree with that happens to be funded by other corporations. Who funds the lobby group does not inherently change the value of the lobbying. Debate the issue on its merits.

    In this case, as a right-winger, I agree with this lobby group, at least on the issue presented here in the way that it is presented. The right to purchase a good, and thereby own it, is a fundamental aspect of a fair, open and free market. If I cannot repair that which I own, then I don't really own it. Now, granted, as we shrink our circuits to the point of ICs, we may not be able to replace individual resistors or diodes or anything, but there does need to be some level of repair available, especially for parts that can wear out. Batteries, even rechargeables, definitely fall under that category. Screen glass probably as well, based on the number of cracked phone screens I've seen over the years.

    1. Re:Corporate lobby group by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      Sooo... you as a consumer have the right to repair the things you buy.. gotcha, i'm with you on that. Encryption, or other means to explicitly defeat your repairing of the device seems like a really dick move -- but legislating that will absolutely lead to unforeseen consequences.

      (as a right winger, you're okay with the government stepping in and telling businesses how to design their products? how do you reconcile that?)

      The sane option here is don't support apple by continuing to buy their products. It sucks, and it's not as a satisfying.. but .. yeah.

    2. Re:Corporate lobby group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In this case, as a right-winger .....

      You should embrace your right to purchase only those devices that meet your needs, rather than telling others what they should purchase. And if no one offers you what you want, you should embrace the free market to encourage someone to build that device.

    3. Re:Corporate lobby group by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      And if no one offers you what you want, you should embrace the free market to encourage someone to build that device.

      Apple buys legislation to permit them to do what they do, which is predicated upon dodging taxes. There is no free market involved here.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Corporate lobby group by blahplusplus · · Score: 1

      he right to purchase a good, and thereby own it, is a fundamental aspect of a fair, open and free market.

      It's too bad most right wingers are ignorant that the free market doesn't exist and is a myth preached to the stupid masses. The rich have never subscribed to the ideology they preach, your society has never worked how you believe it does.

      Testing theories of representative government - shows the rich get whatever policies they want, the rest have no impact. AKA no rule of law for the average person.

      https://scholar.princeton.edu/sites/default/files/mgilens/files/gilens_and_page_2014_-testing_theories_of_american_politics.doc.pdf

      Our brains are much worse at reality and thinking than thought.

      Science on reasoning:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYmi0DLzBdQ

      Energy subsidies

      https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/survey/so/2015/NEW070215A.htm

      Protectionism for the rich and big business by state intervention, radical market interference.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WHj2GaPuEhY#t=349

      US distribution of wealth

      https://imgur.com/a/FShfb

      http://www2.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/power/wealth.html

    5. Re:Corporate lobby group by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      (as a right winger, you're okay with the government stepping in and telling businesses how to design their products? how do you reconcile that?)

      Probably with the It's Different For Me exception that right-wingers have always used.

    6. Re:Corporate lobby group by Tanktalus · · Score: 1

      There are a few government interventions I'm in favour of. But they are mostly to do with the purist view of minimal government.

      I am in favour of government interventions that:

      • * protect my life, my freedom, my property. This includes everything from the US bill of rights (I'm not American, so I'll just gloss over the fact that I don't have this much) to outlawing murder and theft and operating police and military.
      • * protect the functional workings of a free market (which, as someone else pointed out, even the US doesn't have today). This includes outlawing coercion and fraud. I have a broad-based definition of fraud - basically, lying to someone to entice them to trade. I am in favour of transparency, especially with the government, but also in transactions. I also think that implying untruths ("misleading advertisements") probably should fall under the term "fraud" based on the value I place on transparency. Selling vitamin water as vitamin water is one thing, selling vitamin water with claims it "might help" cure cancer is fraudulent.

      I am not in favour of subsidies or bailouts to any business, whether that's fossil energy, green energy, big banks, or car manufacturers. I'm not in favour of targeted tax exemptions (normally known as "loopholes" - which is itself a false name, but I'm still against them) - while I can understand some of them, the problem is that we keep adding all sorts of stupid exemptions, and then they distort the market in inefficient ways. And most bailouts would be better spent as direct welfare to newly-unemployed than to bail out the business that should have failed (not that I'm promoting the growth of government-based welfare, but merely pointing out that, as far as I can tell, neither the left nor the right should like them).

      I don't want the government telling Apple how to design their products. Only to ensure they participate in a truly free market. I bet Apple can come up with a way to design their products such that it still looks the same way but has serviceable parts where reasonably possible. It likely would involve the courts a few times to help define "reasonable" in practical terms, but the default should be, and the direction in law should be, to permits owners access to their own devices that they legally purchased.

    7. Re:Corporate lobby group by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      In this case, as a right-winger, I agree with this lobby group

      As a left-winger, I strongly disagree. It's not like there's no competition in the smartphone market, so, if a company produces something with a feature you don't like, you can buy something else. You nanny-state right-wingers can just go ahead and ask for government meddling where it doesn't belong, I guess.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    8. Re:Corporate lobby group by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I bet Apple can come up with a way to design their products such that it still looks the same way but has serviceable parts where reasonably possible.

      I'm not an electronics engineer specializing in smartphones, so I wouldn't make that bet. In particular, starting from a state of ignorance, I wouldn't want the government enforcing a bet like that.

      It's a free market with lots of competition. Buy what you want. I'm about as leftist as they come here, and even I know that much.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    9. Re:Corporate lobby group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Probably with the It's Different For Me exception that right-wingers have always used.

      For myself, it's pretty simple: regulation should have some degree of popular support. It's unfortunate what's happened with Net Neutrality (though it's mostly a bandaid and there are bigger problems), I do believe in regulating trade and immigration.

      Speaking of hypocrisy, a lot of liberals screech endlessly about evils of businesses/corporations, but are silent when those business interests act in their political interest (immigration, mass illegal immigration, and a free speech crackdown on social media).

    10. Re:Corporate lobby group by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      For myself, it's pretty simple: regulation should have some degree of popular support

      That's a given, unless it's regulation passed at the behest of crony capitalist campaign donors.

      Speaking of hypocrisy, a lot of liberals screech endlessly about evils of businesses/corporations, but are silent when those business interests act in their political interest (immigration, mass illegal immigration, and a free speech crackdown on social media).

      Except the liberals you speak of are just another variety of conservative. Just one that likes to lie to himself and others as to how right-wing he is.

      immigration, mass illegal immigration

      I'm sensing a theme here. Question though: can you name a single South American country that hasn't been overthrown by the United States at least once? In a just word, the United States would owe trillions in restitution from every country from Mexico to Argentina. Or, you could let the victims of your foreign and trade policies to cross the border and work at a gas station.

  12. Re:We're glued and screwed - we can no longer unsc by rtb61 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not a problem. Simply legislate that any device over say $250 be designed, actively designed to be repairable ie easy example, user replaceable batteries, no ifs not buts, don't give a crap, user replaceable batteries and screens at minimum. This asking and begging for stuff from greedy corporations are you nucking futs, no asking, no begging, grind on politicians until they legislate and fines, a fine per device that is not essentially consumer repairable. Want super thin (bullshit I know) glued together phones sell them for less than $250, suck it up. Every phone more expensive than that and the user themselves have to be able to repair the most likely to break elements of the phone, screen and battery and probably connectors. Think it is not a pretty, basically bugger off, how stupid do you think we really are.

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  13. Re:We're glued and screwed - we can no longer unsc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I have a thin, modern phone which, coincidentally I just ordered a replacement battery for from ebay for eleven Washingtons. The back comes off easily and I can swap out the battery in about 30 seconds.

    The push towards non-replaceable batteries has excuses given by the companies, but it's really designed to extract more $ from your pocketbook. And since most shee^h^h^h^hpeople will put up with it, there's no reason not to.

  14. Sorry, you don't own it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's contains Apple's intellectual property. You have no right to repair it if Apple doesn't want you to.

  15. Re:We're glued and screwed - we can no longer unsc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Taxes? Tax the everloving hell out of anything that is not at the very least service friendly.

  16. We voted against such things by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Come on, we want the government to be small enough to be drowned in the bathtub.

    We want to get rid of job killing regulations

    We don't want a bunch of unelected Washington bureaucrats telling us what to do and what not to do

    On second thoughts, it is a good idea to pass such laws. The right thing to do is to cut funding and cut the balls of the regulatory agencies. We get the credit for passing the laws and photo ops and all the great campaign sound bites. Then we get to blame the dysfunctional government and stupid government bureaucrats. It is a great formula we have invented. We should continue to milk it.

    It is a democracy. You will get the government you deserve.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:We voted against such things by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Come on, we want the government to be small enough to be drowned in the bathtub.

      Who's this "we"? I'm certainly not in that group, nor is at least half of the nation.

    2. Re: We voted against such things by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Who's this "we"?

      That would be a small group of people who've studied history and actually understand some of it.

    3. Re: We voted against such things by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      As opposed to a larger group of people who've studied history and actually understand some of it, and disagree with you.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  17. Not a repair by JohnFen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Replacing the damned battery shouldn't be something considered a "repair". It's only the greed and asshole nature of phone manufacturers than make it that way.

    1. Re:Not a repair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well as soon as you find out how to make flagship phones with a removable battery surely you'll be a billionaire. The reality is you almost never need to replace a battery and it's trivially easy to do when you need to do it every two years (or more).

    2. Re:Not a repair by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      I don't need to figure it out. They already exist. They're just getting fewer over time. Manufacturers aren't omitting replaceable batteries because there's a technical need to do so, they're omitting them because it reduces manufacturing costs and encourages replacing perfectly good phones.

    3. Re:Not a repair by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      You mean more like a service than a repair?

    4. Re:Not a repair by Graymalkin · · Score: 1

      The issue of replaceable batteries has nothing to do with manufacturing costs or wanting people to replace phones. Lithium polymer batteries are the only way to offer decent battery life in current phone designs.

      All the things that make the last few iterations of smart phones worth owning all suck power. Bright high density displays? Lots of power. High bandwidth LTE? Lots of power. High density storage? Lots of power. For all the power saving tricks used on phones they are very power hungry yet.

      Traditional lithium ion cells have bulky packaging and are heavy. The market has routiney chosen lighter and thinner over heavier and bulkier when it comes to phones. Using traditional LiIon cells in current phone form factors would result in really terrible battery life.

      Because of this phones have used lithium polymer batteries for the past decade or so. The big difference is they pack a lot more power in the same volume. The downside is lithium polymer batteries are fairly fragile and if mistreated in the slightest can be very dangerous. Older phones with replaceable lipoly batteries packed them in tough plastic cases so they were safe to handle. This did not provide optimum power density for the volume.

      Non-replaceable batteries do away with the plastic casing in order to fill that volume with power storage. Without having to worry about a hard casing lipoly batteries can have more conformal shapes to the phone chassis to pack yet more power into the device. They also need room to expand as they heat (as Samsung learned) from charging or heavy draw.

      In order to get some sort of insurance underwriting certification lipoly batteries need cases that eat usable volume inside phones. So most companies are forgoing user replaceable batteries so they donâ(TM)t get sued when theyâ(TM)re punctured and burn a house down since in normal use untrained users wonâ(TM)t be fiddling with them.

      In short there is a technical need to use non-replaceable batteries. In order to offer marketable features manufacturers need to use as much interior volume of a phone for power storage as possible. Replaceable batteries need volume âoewastingâ casing to make them safe to handle.

      --
      I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
    5. Re:Not a repair by dublin · · Score: 1

      This is a good point - until relatively recently, replacing a battery (even in pre-iPhone smartphones like my old Treo) was easily accomplished with just fingers...

      BTW, the Treo 755P is still better as a phone, contact manager, and calendar than ANY modern IOS or Android phone. It totally sucks as a browser, though...

      --
      "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
    6. Re:Not a repair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In short there is a technical need to use non-replaceable batteries.

      BS, it's a business need, not a technical one. Adding 2 or 3 mm to the thickness of the phone will deter only the most hardcore fashionistas from buying the phone. Most people won't care and will opt for replaceable batteries because of practical issues -- you can replace the battery if you run out of juice. You can also replace the battery if it's damaged/used up.

      Phones are expensive, more expensive than laptops which are more expensive than desktops. So we are talking about huge profit margins for phone manufacturers. The manufacturer wants to further improve their profit margins by forcing the user to upgrade their phones using these two techniques:

      a) phone battery is used up or damaged and needs replacement. User would rather buy a new phone than spend a $50 - $100 bucks replacing a stupid battery on an old, obsolete phone.

      b) OS upgrades: Each OS upgrade slows down the phone forcing the user to buy a new phone after a couple of years.

      Do we really need to upgrade a simple phone every 1 to 3 years. That's retarded and due to the extreme greed of phone manufacturers.

    7. Re:Not a repair by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      The issue of replaceable batteries has nothing to do with manufacturing costs or wanting people to replace phones.

      The technical argument makes no sense to me. It's all about cost and marketing. My current phone has a replaceable battery, has all the whiz-bang features, and is about a millimeter thicker than the thinnest phone on the market. If it were impossible to do, then my phone would not exist.

      The only argument that seems to hold water is manufacturing costs and planned obsolescence.

    8. Re:Not a repair by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      The technical argument makes no sense to me.

      Then read AD's excellent comment again and again until it does make sense.

      has a replaceable battery, has all the whiz-bang features, and is about a millimeter thicker than the thinnest phone on the market

      Believe it or not, that millimeter affects marketability. Besides, if it wasn't a replaceable battery, that millimeter could go towards more battery.

      The only argument that seems to hold water is manufacturing costs and planned obsolescence.

      Apple offers replacement batteries, and therefore is not forcing planned obsolescence. As far as manufacturing costs go, manufacturers cut those as much as they can, consistent with what the customers want. They have no obligation to produce something to your exact specs.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  18. Re:We're glued and screwed - we can no longer unsc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Simply legislate that any device over say $250 be designed, actively designed to be repairable"
    Good luck getting TV, dvd/bluray, speaker, microwave, washing machine, dryer, smartphone, dumbphone, tablet, monitor, manufacturer to do that. They'd be more likely to pull out of the US market.

  19. Well, actually ... by jon3k · · Score: 4, Informative

    "If Apple were serious about battery life, they'd market battery replacements," Gay Gordon-Byrne, executive director of Repair.org, told me in an email.

    They do.

    1. Re:Well, actually ... by Aero77 · · Score: 1

      "$79, plus $6.95 shipping, subject to local tax". Surgically removing the phone from your hand and therapy for smart phone withdraw is not included.

    2. Re:Well, actually ... by StormReaver · · Score: 1

      They do [market battery replacement].

      Paying to replace a battery (aside from a reasonable price [emphasized because this is Apple] for the battery) is ridiculously stupid. The battery needs to be end-user serviceable: remove an easily removable cover, easily remove the battery, easily insert a new battery, easily replace the cover.

    3. Re:Well, actually ... by jon3k · · Score: 1
      You can pay $25 for a complete kit (including tools!) to replace a battery yourself. Takes about 10 minutes (check youtube for thousands of examples).

      The battery needs to be end-user serviceable: remove an easily removable cover, easily remove the battery, easily insert a new battery, easily replace the cover.

      No, it doesn't, as literally every flagship phone has shown us. You replace a battery every year or two and it takes a few minutes. It's not the big deal people make it out to be and it's the reason all the major manufacturers have adopted Apples model. Having a very thin form factor was more important than the extremely irregular battery replacements.

      Let it go, it's a non-issue. It hasn't mattered since phones lasted 1-2 (or more) days on a charge.

    4. Re:Well, actually ... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      The battery needs to be end-user serviceable:

      Why?

      If you want to buy a phone with an easily replaceable battery, go ahead. I'm sure they're out there. You're saying that everyone should want what you want, and that manufacturers should only make and sell things you approve of.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  20. No they wonâ(TM)t. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And no amount of title-cased clickbait will convince me otherwise.

  21. Re:We're glued and screwed - we can no longer unsc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good luck getting TV, dvd/bluray, speaker, microwave, washing machine, dryer, smartphone, dumbphone, tablet, monitor, manufacturer to do that. They'd be more likely to pull out of the US market.

    Ok. What about that, doesn't sound fucking fantastic?

    All the shitty ones are distractions and it makes it harder to find the decent ones. I have even sometimes bought shitty unmaintainable products by mistake because it didn't even occur to me to spend a lot of time researching whether or not I would be able to repair it.

    (How many people bought an iPhone and only later learned they couldn't replace the battery? Tech people know, but laymen?)

    If the shitty ones pulled out of the market, that'd make things easier for everyone.

  22. meeh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    don't buy their stuff ... you empower and support them to do that kind of stuff by buying their latest shiny toys ...

  23. Re:We're glued and screwed - we can no longer unsc by whoever57 · · Score: 2

    but I'm done with that - replaceable batteries and expandable storage are on the required list for my next phone!

    Good luck finding your next phone. LG G5 user here, but my next phone?

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  24. Re:We're glued and screwed - we can no longer unsc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've uncomfortably used Apple phones for the last several years, but I'm done with that - replaceable batteries and expandable storage are on the required list for my next phone!

    Well, you pissed in the pool and now expect it to be filled with potable water. Thanks for steering the industry in the wrong direction, buddy.

  25. Re:We're glued and screwed - we can no longer unsc by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

    I've uncomfortably used Apple phones for the last several years, but I'm done with that - replaceable batteries and expandable storage are on the required list for my next phone!

    This is what you want because you won't get it from the big corps.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  26. Haha "short lived" by DeplorableCodeMonkey · · Score: 1

    Or it was just a design mistake that will be short-lived, like many other mistakes Apple made along the way.

    That must be why Apple is soooo butthurt about right to repair legislation.

  27. Brick phones by bl968 · · Score: 2

    Apple is also known for bricking phones with non-apple batteries. So right to repair should prohibit any means of restricting the right to do so.

    --
    "GET / HTTP/1.0" 200 51230 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; Setec Astronomy)"
    1. Re:Brick phones by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Apple is also known for bricking phones with non-apple batteries.

      Really? Sure that, whenever that occurred, it wasn't because the battery was out of spec? Sure they were bricked, and not recoverable by putting a real battery in? If you've got examples of this, please share.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  28. Corporations only exist for we the people !!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We give such monsters a license to exist , they are not people with inherent rights!!!
    We have the authority to tell them to exist only for our good or else. Because
    when shit hits the fan, when a major evil is done even if its spread out over the whole
    populace one penny or dollar at a time, or worse like ecological disaster,
    does anyone go to jail as a person would in a criminal felony would ? raerly if ever.

    So lets regulate them like the monsters that they are , they have no right to exist
    unless they serve us ! You can have your profits! But you better make sure you
    do not undermine us at every fucking step with an army of lawyers , lobyists and
    congressitters . How about a separate constitution just for corporations in what
    they can and cannot do , and how much insurance should they have for down the road
    screwups , after they folded and went bankrupt?

    but then again i am just dreaming of this world being rational.

  29. Re:We're glued and screwed - we can no longer unsc by Solandri · · Score: 1

    There is no punishment too severe for Apple for deliberately degrading the performance of devices after they have been sold. (This is argualbly far worse than the hardware/software tying & lying that got IBM put under antitrust consent decree back in the 1960's!)

    (Note: I have no love for Apple.) The performance degradation is actually a service to the customers. Lithium-ion batteries can't deliver as many amps as they get older. Not only does their capacity drop, but their voltage under load drops as well. Try to draw as many Amps as you could when the battery was new, and the voltage drops more than it used to - sometimes so low that the device stops working. You may have experienced this with a laptop with an old battery. It'll work fine until it hits around 30%, and suddenly it'll power off. There actually was 30% battery life left, it's just that the laptop was trying to draw more Amps than the aged battery could deliver, resulting in the system acting like the plug was pulled.

    By limiting the max performance of the phone, Apple is limiting the maximum amperage the phone tries to draw from the battery. This prevents the instant shutdown scenario, allowing you to use that remaining 30% of battery power. The you pay is that you lose the top end of the phone's performance,

    The more elegant solution of course is a user-replaceable battery, and the customer simply buying a new battery. But that went the way of the dodo thanks to Apple and hundreds of drooling fanboy reviewers criticizing phones with "flimsy" backs which hid user-replaceable batteries. The masses wanted their phone to have a solid metal shell. They got it, and all the drawbacks that come with it. It always confused me why people would want their phones to be metal like it was a durable good, but they were ok with giving up a replaceable battery like it was disposable.

  30. Re: We're glued and screwed - we can no longer uns by ytene · · Score: 1

    I was in an Apple store in the UK this week to have my Mac Mini un-fcsked after the High Sierra update screwed it up. An Apple employee was trying a very hard sell on a customer who had a problem with their iPhone 6. The Apple employee said that the battery could be replaced for 70 pounds and that it would take an hour or so. They pushed hard on an up-sell though.

    Degrading the handset performance in an attempt to promote a sale - I.e. failing to detect a new battery and instead keeping performance degraded - would fall foul of The Sale of Goods and Services Act in the UK...

  31. Re:We're glued and screwed - we can no longer unsc by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    Except all the non-portable devices you've named are generally all repairable.
    TVs and monitors are not economical to repair if you break the screen though, since all they are is a power supply, control board and case for the panel. Replacing power supplies in them is pretty straight forward though

  32. Re:We're glued and screwed - we can no longer unsc by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    You can't buy one.
    They don't sell the old one anymore and they haven't released the new one.
    Yet to be seen if they still sell the spare parts for the old one once the new one is available.
    The Fairphone 2 is going to come with Android 6... that's a bit shit for something not yet available.
    Powered by a SoC from 2014, one that Qualcomm doesn't provide support for Android 7, so good luck with any updates. It's the same one used in my Moto X 2014, which is why that's also stuck on Android 6.

  33. There should be a class action... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Apple has deliberately slowed the older iPhones in order to sell more new iPhones, they deserve hell.

  34. Re:We're glued and screwed - we can no longer unsc by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    and to top it all off, at 529 euros it's going to cost more than my Moto X did 3 years ago.
    The only real differences are it has a crappier screen, FM radio, dual sim, an SD slot and no NFC so it won't even work with Android Pay.

    And they don't sell the Fairphone 1 battery in their online shop anymore, only the Fairphone 2 one.

  35. Re:We're glued and screwed - we can no longer unsc by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

    replaceable batteries and expandable storage are on the required list for my next phone!

    You'll be pretty lucky to find one - especially one that actually integrates the expandable storage with the phone's storage, so that you just magically have more space for everything. I'm not sure these even exist.

    If you wanted to make a law around device performance, which I think might be a fairly sensible idea, then it should be that OS upgrades do not degrade performance of your device, and the OS upgrades must be available for some period of time after purchase (say, I don't know, five years - looking at you, Android). This is the trouble with the argument - that OS upgrades invariably bring new features to your device, but often at the expense of performance, people expect their device to keep getting more and more features the longer they own it. It's my view that the camera app, for instance, has no business whatever getting slower and slower to launch on each iOS update - and that is the kind of thing that could potentially be covered by consumer protection laws.

    I don't see what it all has to do with "right to repair" though. The right to repair is long, long gone, it pretty much went away once we got microscopic surface mount components, and parts that you simply can't get your hands on.

  36. Re:We're glued and screwed - we can no longer unsc by guruevi · · Score: 2

    You're adding 100s of dollars in overall cost to manufacture a "repairable" machine while 99% of us don't really care. You're talking access hatches, extra electronics and larger/heavier plastic stuff, more screws just so 1 in 100 people can tinker with it, and half of those actually screw it up during "repairs" making the repair irrelevant or more expensive.

    When I was young, I loved to repair stuff, nowadays, I just want it to work, I actually pay extra for on-site replacement on the server hardware. Sure, I can replace a hard drive, but for $180 Apple will do it free of charge and come on-site for the next 3 years. I don't have to worry about screwing up, spending an hour reading up on the various parts and disassembly procedures (if they're even available) and then waiting for days for replacement parts.

    How many times have you actually repaired a washing machine? Ever even opened one? There isn't much to it these days, a circuit board and a motor. Replacing any of those costs more than the cost of a new machine in shipping alone, and that's if you get the motor off the pulley without damaging anything. Same goes for the iPhone, after 3-4 years when your battery actually is low enough to be bothersome, your iPhone is worth $50. You want to sink in $50-100 for a repair to extend the lifetime what, a year, maybe two which is exactly the amortized cost of the device.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  37. Re:We're glued and screwed - we can no longer unsc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > pull out of the US market.

    Ah-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha. If the election of Trump has taught as anything, these globalist corporations and open borders libertarians are full of shit.

  38. Re:We're glued and screwed - we can no longer unsc by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 3, Insightful

    sounds like you own stock in LANDFILLS.

    why do you hate the earth so much?

    (repairing is GOOD FOR EVERYONE. its fucking evil that companies have convinced idiots like yourself that we should live in a throw-away world.)

    designing things to be repairable is NOT hard. NOT HARD. but the reason they don't do is is JUST for the cash gab.

    sorry, but that's just too selfish a reason; and it hurts everyone but the company. really sucky attitude and I find it very common with younger people. sucks!

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  39. Or you could... by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 1

    ...just not buy proprietary garbage the manufacturer won't let you actually own, modify and/or repair. Geeze, not rocket science folks. And a pointless battle. You think after what, 30+ years of doing business in this fashioned, the manufacturers are gunna change? Vote with your wallet.

    Feel free to replace 'The Manufacturer" with whatever you see fit.

  40. Re:We're glued and screwed - we can no longer unsc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody want anything over 2 years old, it has no use or value?
    Thank you for the first world viewpoint and analysis.

  41. Re: We're glued and screwed - we can no longer uns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many LG flagships have adoptable storage, just pop in a microSD and choose to use it as internal storage
    Source: Used a marshmallow phone with adoptable storage, missing it in my Xiaomi

  42. What Apple Won't Tell You by turkeyfish · · Score: 1

    What Apple won't tell you is that they now have plans to make all of their new products become obsolete for work poorly unless you buy their latest and most expensive upgrade. Take that consumers. Under Trump, you have no right to fight back.

    1. Re:What Apple Won't Tell You by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Why won't Apple tell you that? My guess is that it isn't true, and you're pulling the story out of your ass. Got a better source?

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  43. Re: We're glued and screwed - we can no longer uns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Designing things for longer lifetime then most people use them is extremely wasteful. Designing things to be repaired while they will never be repaired in significant numbers is extreme waste of resources. Looks like you actually hate the Earth and want people to waste resources for your selfish reasons.

  44. But its an Apple Battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple enthusiast pride themselves on overpaying for a complete un-modifiable environment. Apple is simply trying to give them the same service with their Apple Battery; otherwise, it would just be some generic Android battery that costs ~$20...

  45. Re:We're glued and screwed - we can no longer unsc by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Most modern super-thin phones and other devices are glued together in such a way that it's difficult or impossible for even a fairly careful, experienced person with small nimble fingers to get them apart without destroying some expensive component, usually, the screen/digitizer/glass assembly.

    Sorry but that's just flat out wrong. The vast majority of modern phones are easy enough to disassemble for even a first timer with the right tools (which are often delivered in a kit with replacement batteries).

    IFixIt has a good rundown on repairability: https://www.ifixit.com/smartph...

    Of note is that the only popular high-end smartphones that are an issue are those with fancy curved edges on the display or glass all over front and back. iPhone generally rank quite well, and even many of the devices that rank poorly don't get their rank from difficulty of replacing the battery, but rather general construction of the rest of the phone. Glue isn't really an issue, most of them weaken with just a basic and very safe amount of heat applied, and in the kits you'll get a fresh gasket to re-glue your device together.

    Your assessment of the tablets is right though. The glue and large surface of the screens make them especially easy to crack.

  46. Re: We're glued and screwed - we can no longer uns by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

    100s of dollars? By that light then phones should be way cheaper now that they don't have those hugely expensive small screws. Except they're actually more expensive.

    I don't see it as unreasonable to allow the user of a phone to change their own battery rather than having to pay someone else to do it. It wasn't that long ago that we could, this glued together bullshit is about ripping consumers off pure and simple.

  47. Re: We're glued and screwed - we can no longer uns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course, they donâ(TM)t tell you that they are slowing your phone due to the battery, thus giving you a chance to replace the battery. No, instead they tell you nothing, hopping youâ(TM)ll assume that the phone itself is just too old to run the latest OS. And this is a service to the customer because it results in in them paying $800 for good performance again instead of $800. Okay, I can see that. Along with the flaming monkeys that are currently shooting out of my ass. Just kidding, Apple loves us. We donâ(TM)t need to know these kind of details, you know, like the amount of RAM in our devices. Let go and let Apple, people. If they donâ(TM)t want us to know, they have a good reason. Take off your tin foil hats and learn to accept Apples love into your heart. You know itâ(TM)s true, everything they do, they do it for you.

  48. Re: We're glued and screwed - we can no longer un by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That you get your mac mini fixed instead of buying two new ones to replace it means that your canâ(TM)t afford a Mac. Iâ(TM)m sick and tired of your poors trying to claim a piece of the identity I paid good money for. Real iPeople donâ(TM)t get repairs. They purchase replacements. And they care about social justice and climate change. Youâ(TM)re out of youâ(TM)re league. Stick to Android or Windows and stop trying to social climb beyond your value to corporations that matter.

  49. Re: We're glued and screwed - we can no longer uns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you poor people and your repairs. real ipeople laugh at you. you canâ(TM)t afford a mac so stop trying. i can afford a mac so People know i matter. unlike you. iâ(TM)m better than you. and happier. and more successful. iâ(TM)m secure in my identity too. it takes talent to own a mac. talent that only i have.

  50. Re: We're glued and screwed - we can no longer uns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except they'd even pay MORE to make something not last as long, if it still meant more in a margins*sales equation.

    In practice, it wouldn't be unreasonable for reuse of materials that cost 10% more to reduce consumption overall, by 100%+.

  51. Re: We're glued and screwed - we can no longer uns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There have actually been some huge complaints from the recycling industry, especially in China about this kind of nonsense. Inks that make paper harder to recycle, plastics not clearly marked (or cleaned - rinse your stuff, consumers!), to point where there's talk of adding cost of recycling to some goods beyond the obvious electronics!

  52. Huh? by wardrich86 · · Score: 1

    I thought Right To Repair was a hardware thing. If anything, it should invigorate the need for Apple to give users more access to the OS.

  53. Re:We're glued and screwed - we can no longer unsc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You whine like a clueless child. It's not so easy to do the extra engineering to everything, unless you're a self professed genius.
    Why do you hate people so much?

  54. Re:We're glued and screwed - we can no longer unsc by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    There is no punishment too severe for Apple for deliberately degrading the performance of devices after they have been sold.

    Good thing they aren't doing that, then. What they are doing is making the device run more smoothly with a degrading battery, avoiding possibly worse glitches. If you get the battery replaced, you'll get that performance back.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  55. Re: We're glued and screwed - we can no longer uns by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    Looks like I can spend $20-$25 to replace my iPhone 5S battery at iFixit. The extra $5 is if I want a complete replacement kit as opposed to just the battery. I don't know why you're complaining about not being able to change your own battery when it's fairly inexpensive to do so.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  56. Re: We're glued and screwed - we can no longer uns by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    Have you any evidence that it would fail to detect a new battery and go back to top performance?

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  57. Re:We're glued and screwed - we can no longer unsc by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    If you wanted to make a law around device performance, which I think might be a fairly sensible idea, then it should be that OS upgrades do not degrade performance of your device, and the OS upgrades must be available for some period of time after purchase (say, I don't know, five years - looking at you, Android).

    How do you measure performance degradation? Is this going to evolve into accusations and selected benchmarks? What if a function becomes slightly slower because it does more?

    If you legislate that OS upgrades must be available, the manufacturer may just say that there are no upgrades for that device, and that the later OSes are for later devices. If you try to rule that manufacturers must provide upgrades that apply to similar devices, you need to define "similar". Is a 32-bit phone similar to a 64-bit phone?

    This stuff really can't be covered by useful laws. You need to buy phones that suit your purposes from manufacturers that will supply them. If no manufacturer sells one you like, that's too bad for you.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  58. Slow Down Software Probably Buggy by herbierobinson · · Score: 1

    Twice now since the upgrade, my iPhone6 has gone into a mode where it got warmer and chewed up the available battery in about an hour or two (when I wasn't doing anything with it, except and occasional e-mail check). Usually, I can go two or three days without recharging if I have to. After a recharge, it worked fine.

    This makes me think that there is a bug in the slow down mechanism which causes it to occasionally eat power instead of saving it...

    --
    An engineer who ran for Congress. http://herbrobinson.us
  59. Re:We're glued and screwed - we can no longer unsc by dublin · · Score: 1

    No, as someone who's designed battery charging systems for mobile devices, I can tell you that there are FAR better ways of dealing with this problem than what Apple did. Don't let any tech handwaving fool you - the PRIMARY purpose of this code in iOS is to make old phones so annoyingly slow that users are more or less forced into buying a new one. This only confirms what's been widely suspected for years - that Apple's updates continually slow down their phones and iPads, and the only way to avoid that is to not upgrade - a process that is became far harder with 10.3.3.

      (For those who don't know - you really can't turn down an iOS "upgrade" any more - it insists on downloading and trying to install it. Even "declining" the installation just postpones it to the upcoming night. You have to do that, then go an manually delete the update through Apple's deliberately clunky "Manage Storage" interface in Settings. This will work for about a week or two, until it decides for you that you really do need to upgrade, since it's their phone, not yours, and the whole customer-pissing-off process begins again...)

    The deliberate slowdown of all but the newest hardware, in conjunction with the new policy of effectively forcing "upgrades" is in my mind, prima facie evidence of an antitrust violation far worse than the one that got IBM slapped for decades. I'm as done with Apple as I am with the NFL. Never again. Ever.

    --
    "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
  60. Re:We're glued and screwed - we can no longer unsc by dublin · · Score: 1

    I stand by my comment. While the glue problem isn't as bad with the phones, it's bad enough to cause a great many screens to break in the process of trying to open the phones. (The only reason this isn't seen as a bigger problem is that screen replacement is a more common reason than battery replacement for taking the phone apart in the first place.)

    I'm well familiar with iFixit, and have used their guides. And yes, tablets and 2-in-1s are a true nightmare.

    --
    "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
  61. Re:We're glued and screwed - we can no longer unsc by dublin · · Score: 1

    Agreed. You certainly can't come up with technical mandates in law that will make any sense. (And we should all be opposed to further government intrusion into our lives anyway - we've gone far too far down that road already...)

    That said, it does seem to me that what Apple has done here clearly and flagrantly violates several significant Federal laws around antitrust and warranty issues. The sad thing is that, like Hillary, they will almost certainly get away with it because they are the darlings of the "in" crowd...

    --
    "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
  62. Re:We're glued and screwed - we can no longer unsc by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    That said, it does seem to me that what Apple has done here clearly and flagrantly violates several significant Federal laws around antitrust and warranty issues

    Would you like to tell me what these laws are? What should Apple have done to stay legal? Allowed phones to crash? Shipped unicorn-ion batteries that don't degrade? Put a "crash your phone when it's busy" option in the Settings?

    I haven't heard of Apple doing anything to stop iFixit from selling battery replacement kits, so I have no idea why you're mentioning anti-trust.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  63. Re:We're glued and screwed - we can no longer unsc by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    Ah, you have some real knowledge about this? Great! What would be a better technological way for Apple to handle battery degradation? You appear to have left that out of your posting, in favor of speculation about Apple's motives.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  64. Re:We're glued and screwed - we can no longer unsc by sjames · · Score: 1

    So you're saying the washing machine I got rapaired under warrenty simply doesn't exist? I've been piling my clothes on the utility room floor for 2 hours and then throwing them in the dryer all these years?

    It shouldn't have taken as much effort as it did to find the repair manual for future reference, and the spare parts should be a lot easier for end users to order.

  65. Re:We're glued and screwed - we can no longer unsc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My parents 30 year old washing machine (Maybe even older) is running currently thanks to elbow grease, and a Born-in-the-Depression mentality that you should be able to fix things. Does everything a modern washer needs to do: Wash Clothes. Who needs one I can stream Rick and Morty on?