Slashdot Mirror


ICE Is About To Start Tracking License Plates Across the US

Presto Vivace shares a report from The Verge: The Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency has officially gained agency-wide access to a nationwide license plate recognition database, according to a contract finalized earlier this month. The system gives the agency access to billions of license plate records and new powers of real-time location tracking, raising significant concerns from civil libertarians. The source of the data is not named in the contract, but an ICE representative said the data came from Vigilant Solutions, the leading network for license plate recognition data. While it collects few photos itself, Vigilant Solutions has amassed a database of more than 2 billion license plate photos by ingesting data from partners like vehicle repossession agencies and other private groups. ICE agents would be able to query that database in two ways. A historical search would turn up every place a given license plate has been spotted in the last five years, a detailed record of the target's movements. That data could be used to find a given subject's residence or even identify associates if a given car is regularly spotted in a specific parking lot. Presto Vivace adds, "This will not end well."

83 of 167 comments (clear)

  1. Cool by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    I wanted a new license plate anyway.

    I guess I won't be the only one.

    1. Re:Cool by Fly+Swatter · · Score: 2

      There are plenty available for free, just make sure no one is looking - good luck with latter part.

    2. Re:Cool by sl3xd · · Score: 2

      What good would a new plate do you?

      Much like a new driver's license, or even a new car, it still identifies you, and it's not hard to query every license plate of every vehicle you've used (including rentals) since tracking began.

      Unless you're a billionaire and decide to take Steve Jobs's example and buy a new car every few weeks so you never have to get a license plate. (Granted, California recently closed that loophole)

      Cardinal Richelieu would be proud:

      If you give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest of men, I will find something in them which will hang him.

      In this case, they just have to wait for a crime that happens conveniently close to you.

      --
      -- Sometimes you have to turn the lights off in order to see.
    3. Re:Cool by msauve · · Score: 2

      So, state law requires a valid registration plate. But there's nothing preventing someone from putting a dozen other, different ones, on their car as long as the legit one is displayed (free speech!). Wanna do each other a favor? Let's crowd source a variety of license plate stickers. Fun times!

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    4. Re:Cool by HornWumpus · · Score: 1, Funny

      Poison the well.

      Undersized 'license plate' looking magnetic stickers, with rearrangeable #s. Different enough the cops can't fuck with you, but big enough to be readable.

      Also: Light machine oil on your plates and no car washes. Dirt will collect...sorry officer, I'll fix that right now.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    5. Re:Cool by HanzoSpam · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That sounds like a good way to end up making the license plates.

      --

      Progressivism: Parasites helping parasites to help themselves - to other people's stuff.
    6. Re:Cool by Ichijo · · Score: 2

      Much like a new driver's license, or even a new car, it still identifies you

      Not exactly. It identifies the owner, who may or may not be the driver.

      Now if the rental agencies and taxis promised not to release customer information without a court order, this could end well for them.

      And if you really don't want to be tracked, you can take mass transit or ride a bike. E-bikes are quite practical in many cases.

      There was a time when most people could go to the store and buy a gallon of milk without carrying any government ID on them, but since then we've zoned the small corner stores out of our neighborhoods. Now most people drive to the grocery store, and that means carrying a driver license. Like a boiling frog, the surveillance state really crept up on us!

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    7. Re:Cool by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 2

      Actually, I bet there is something preventing someone from doing this - the law. Even if there's not, your license plate will still be part of the group - I'm not sure the software cares which is the 10 is you if they're trying to track you or any specific plate.

    8. Re:Cool by msauve · · Score: 1

      Citation needed. 50x.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    9. Re: Cool by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      It as always going to end like this, and I suppose might be a good thing, criminal activity and criminals can be much more easily identified and dealt with.

      The problem isn't with this technology as its just an automated mechanism of doing what cops might do if they had the resources to direct at it. Its with the people who get to decide what constitutes criminal activity.

    10. Re: Cool by bobstreo · · Score: 1

      Mass transit? The quasi-government agency with cameras that record everybody boarding the train/bus?

      Biking isn't much better, with the city putting cameras at every intersection. It's only a matter of time until they ID every face they see in real time.

      Wear a motorcycle helmet.

    11. Re:Cool by NettiWelho · · Score: 2

      Poison the well.

      Undersized 'license plate' looking magnetic stickers, with rearrangeable #s. Different enough the cops can't fuck with you, but big enough to be readable.

      Also: Light machine oil on your plates and no car washes. Dirt will collect...sorry officer, I'll fix that right now.

      Do you also leave your cellphone at home?

    12. Re:Cool by alvinrod · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why take someone else's when you can just make your own instead. It seems to be working really well for all of these people. Just make sure to keep yelling "I do not consent" or inform the police that you are an article 4 free inhabitant when you get pulled over. Works like a charm.

    13. Re:Cool by alvinrod · · Score: 2

      Most people won't even get the pat down at an airport even though they talk about caring about government invasion of privacy. If you think people are going to go to this much trouble to screw with the government, especially when it's going to draw unwanted attention of law enforcement, I've got a bridge to sell you.

    14. Re:Cool by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      But there's nothing preventing someone from putting a dozen other, different ones, on their car as long as the legit one is displayed (free speech!).

      Nothing other than the law that says you can only have one license plate on the back of your car, you mean?

    15. Re:Cool by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 4, Informative

      But there's nothing preventing someone from putting a dozen other, different ones, on their car as long as the legit one is displayed (free speech!).

      Except state laws?

      For example here is the law around license plates in my state:

      (a)A person commits an offense if the person attaches to or displays on a motor vehicle a license plate that:

      (1)is issued for a different motor vehicle;

      (2)is issued for the vehicle under any other motor vehicle law other than by the department;

      (3)is assigned for a registration period other than the registration period in effect;

      (4)is fictitious;

      (5)has blurring or reflective matter that significantly impairs the readability of the name of the state in which the vehicle is registered or the letters or numbers of the license plate number at any time;

      (6)has an attached illuminated device or sticker, decal, emblem, or other insignia that is not authorized by law and that interferes with the readability of the letters or numbers of the license plate number or the name of the state in which the vehicle is registered; or

      (7)has a coating, covering, protective substance, or other material that:

      So since you can't legally get multiple valid license plates for your car and thus you would either have fictitious license plates or ones that were issued for a different vehicle which violates the law.

    16. Re: Cool by negRo_slim · · Score: 1

      As a Sovereign Citizen I can say this is great advice.

      --
      On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
    17. Re: Cool by Time_Ngler · · Score: 1

      GVMTSRTYRNTS

    18. Re:Cool by currently_awake · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If the police follow you around for 5 years, you would expect they require a warrant. Interesting how using technology to achieve the same result is suposedly legal. This appears designed to bypass judicial oversight.

    19. Re:Cool by pslytely+psycho · · Score: 1

      Thank you. Had a shitty day at work, clicked your links and got a helluva good laugh.

      Thank (insert deity of choice or none) I''m only Pslytely Psycho and not nearly as nuts as these fucks.

      --
      Donald Trump, on a crusade to make Nixon look respectable
    20. Re: Cool by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      We're reasonably good at putting together hands, elbows, knees and other assorted extremities.

      Brains, not so much.

      Would you rather be in a cast?

      Or a nursing home?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    21. Re: Cool by unrtst · · Score: 1

      Wearing a helmet on a bicycle is rather pointless to begin with. The head is rarely the body part injured in bicycle accidents. Hands, elbows and knees are much more vulnerable.

      When I was a kid, no one wore helmets while riding their bikes. However, these days, it's rare that I ever see anyone on a bike without a helmet. The only people I see without them are on Citi Bikes (the bike sharing ones in my city).

      To say that the head is rarely the body part injured these days doesn't really support the notion that helmets are rather pointless. It seems to support the opposite... wearing helmets has reduced the risk of head injury so much that it's now rare to find a head injury in a bicycle accident (Please note, I don't know whether or not it's actually true that the head head is rarely injured in bicycle accidents; I'm only noting that the logical conclusion of that was potentially wrong).

      The important stat is whether or not the number of head injuries per capita is significantly lower in groups that are wearing helmets versus those without them. It is, which is why you're wrong.

    22. Re: Cool by Bruha · · Score: 1

      Register a blind LLC and have the car registered to it.

    23. Re: Cool by jbengt · · Score: 1

      Wearing a helmet on a bicycle is rather pointless to begin with.

      My son fell while riding and hit his helmet on a short post sticking out of the ground. The helmet split but his head was fine. So I would advise against actually believing that wearing a helmet is pointless.

    24. Re:Cool by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      You’d expect that, yet they’re able to go to someone like your cell phone carrier and request historical data for your calls and locations without a warrant. The carrier may or may not give it without the warrant, but it can if it wants to.

    25. Re:Cool by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      I wonder if they would interpret #6 to cover reading via mechanical means, or only via human eye.

      If mechanical means aren't covered then perhaps a license plate frame with very bright IR LED's would be possible. And maybe such a frame could include a bright white flash that is triggered by detecting another flash going off.

  2. I find your lack of faith disturbing by zippo01 · · Score: 1

    Foolish public, you don't think this isn't already being done by some other government agency.

    1. Re:I find your lack of faith disturbing by Known+Nutter · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but that's the NSA and that's yesterday's news and it was bad.

      Now, we're talking about ICE and getting rid of the Dirty Mexicans, which is so 2018 and so hot right now and so good.

      --
      Beware of the Leopard.
    2. Re:I find your lack of faith disturbing by Hal_Porter · · Score: 2

      ANPR has been going on in the UK for ages

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  3. Temp plates? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What about all the fake temp plates? In Texas we are having a major problem with them, some one just buys a bunch of temp plays and that is not going to track to any one. So again great idea, but would only work if every ones plays by the rules, but if every one plays by the rules we would not need this.

    1. Re:Temp plates? by sl3xd · · Score: 1

      It won't be much longer before it's worthwhile to develop and install automated readers to flag & track every car with a suspicious plate, and then direct the police to them.

      Given the number of Police dashcams, it could even be a selling point should a new camera hit the market with the ability.

      --
      -- Sometimes you have to turn the lights off in order to see.
    2. Re:Temp plates? by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      Pretty sure (like 99.99% sure) police already have cameras on their car which auto-recognize nearly license plates and look them up to alert them to anything which has been flagged.

    3. Re:Temp plates? by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      So if you don't need any judicial permission to use a plate reader, we can install our own and keep track of the rich and powerful?

    4. Re: Temp plates? by sl3xd · · Score: 1

      Steve Jobs was apparently worried about that, and made use of a loophole in California Law specifically to fly under the radar: it wasn't required to install plates for the first 60 days of getting a new car.

      A man of his resources had no problem getting a new car every couple months, so all of his cars had no plates.

      --
      -- Sometimes you have to turn the lights off in order to see.
  4. Missing Option by Moof123 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I ride my bike and garage my car most of the time you insensitive clod.

    Can't wait till get have to have our papers on us every time we travel. Maybe we can give arm bands to identify those we are supposed to be scared of?

    1. Re:Missing Option by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      Maybe we can give arm bands to identify those we are supposed to be scared of?

      Why do they need arm bands? They already wear badges.

    2. Re:Missing Option by sl3xd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You do leave your home with your face, right?

      That's a pretty big clue, all by itself. From there, it's just a matter of combining footage from omnipresent security cameras -- which is really just a matter of effort.

      Combining all security camera footage was pretty effective in getting pictures of the suspects and timeline of the Boston Marathon bombing. London's panopticion is a regular feature on /.

      First it was "terrorists", then "immigrants". We already have prosecutors subpoenaing Alexa and Google Home for murder trials, and people are willingly putting surveillance devices in their homes.

      Hey, Siri, how screwed are we?

      Interesting question, sl3xd

      --
      -- Sometimes you have to turn the lights off in order to see.
    3. Re:Missing Option by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I ride a bike quite a bit too, friend, and I'll tell you this: if and when the day comes that we're all either prohibited (in one way or another, or to one degree or another) from riding bicycles anywhere, or are required to have some sort of gods-be-damned license plate on them so they can track us, then we'll know that it's time for Civil War II to start, because things will have officially Gone Way Too Far, and "government by the people for the people" will no longer have any meaning, we'll be living in a full-on police state and have no rights anymore.

    4. Re: Missing Option by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 2

      "Bread and circuses"

    5. Re:Missing Option by swb · · Score: 1

      If you travel anywhere near the Mexican border you already have to stop at mandatory Border Patrol checkpoints, even though you're not crossing the border.

      I've been through several in Arizona and they feel fairly paramilitary although the "stop" generally involves just stopping for about 5 seconds and getting waved on. I figured being white and over 50 had something to do with the getting waved on part, however, I've seen the same wave-through thing happen with cars with Mexican plates in front of me and I've never seen anyone pulled off to the side when I've been through one.

      Surprisingly, a vast part of the US (I think it's like hundreds of miles near any border) is in what I'd call a "reduced Constitution" zone where CBP has enhanced ability to stop and search US citizens. I'm a resident of Minnesota, but I haven't seen any evidence of this near the Canadian border, it seems more more intensive in the Southwest.

    6. Re:Missing Option by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      Day has already come and gone, license plates were normal for bikes at one time and there would be no problem reintroducing them in a society that considers government monitoring of plastic bags and soda to be "progress"

    7. Re:Missing Option by burningcpu · · Score: 1

      I encountered this, while traveling to Az in a U-Haul filled with my family and all belongings.

      I had recently, within the previous 30 minutes, had a vehicular incident that elevated my anxiety, and was already having a rough time. It was something like hour 13 on day 3 of a 2000 mile drive.

      Anyway, I crest a hill and once I do, I see that the highway has been modified to include a 'checkpoint.' Now, this thing was impressive. I noted radiation and many other sensors arranged about the entrance to the inspection areas. The entire highway, both sides, is forced through this thing!

      I was terrified. My wife was in the cab with me, along with my 3 cats. The dog instantly 'alerted,' barking and jumping on the cab, inches from my face. The officers stared at me nearby, some with rifles, all in heavy armor.

      Keep in mind, this military installation is within the US, separating two US states.

      To further my fear, I was armed and had a weapon within sight of the officers.

      The officers directed us to the 'extended investigation' area, under rifle aim. We sat within the vehicle for maybe 5 minutes, and were allowed to leave.

      I thanked the officers! So much fear. Stockholm syndrome is real.

    8. Re:Missing Option by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Guess I'll get arrested then, because I wouldn't play along with that bullshit for a single minute.

  5. Oh fuck off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You track my every financial transaction to protect me from unfair something something. You want to give the whole Internet an anal exam to protect me from Russian propaganda. But let ICE try to enforce immigration laws and it's "oh noes!11 they're spying on me."

    Selective outrage. Nothing more.

  6. What that really means by SPopulisQR · · Score: 1

    What that really means is that license plates have been tracked for several decades and they decided to do some centralization upgrades and to make it official. That also means license plate databases have been used for several decades and at some point it became painful to use it the court of law, since some judges may decide that such tracking is not "appropriate".

  7. Violation of Washington State Constitution by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 3, Funny

    We have a specific Right of Privacy in this state.

    You can't even put a GPS locator on a car without a specific INDIVIDUAL court order by a JUDGE here.

    This is a clear violation.

    Expect to be sued - successfully - by our State Attorney General.

    He's 22 for 22 so far.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re: Violation of Washington State Constitution by Wovel · · Score: 1

      Good luck with that.

    2. Re:Violation of Washington State Constitution by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      Generally there's some suspension of a right to privacy when in public, otherwise it would make public photography of most any kind illegal as it may be infringing on someone's privacy. Installing a tracking device on someone's vehicle is an entirely different can of worms compared to governments tacking lots of pictures.

      I personally think the latter is far more creepy and fucked up than the first as at least in that case they need to convince a judge they already have a good reason to want to watch what you're doing where as the second is catching everyone in the same giant drift net. However, I'm not sure if it's as likely to violate any state laws, especially depending on how they're worded. If you've already got traffic cameras, I don't think any lawsuit is going to be as easy as you seem to think.

    3. Re:Violation of Washington State Constitution by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      I'm moving to the state of Washington. but what about breakfast tacos and inexpensive high speed internet?

      There's a taco truck on every corner and Comcast has Gigabit internet statewide.

      Hope you don't mind sleeping in a tent.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    4. Re:Violation of Washington State Constitution by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Our state police and county police and port police and municipal police don't work for ICE.

      And you can put cameras on federal ports of entry but not anywhere else.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    5. Re:Violation of Washington State Constitution by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      You have no right to privacy of your license plate

      Ever been stopped a red light with a police car behind you? Glanced in your rearview mirror and seen him typing into his computer? That's the cop running your plate. Happens all the time.

    6. Re:Violation of Washington State Constitution by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      They're only using publicly available information (what can be seen by driving down the road,) it's no different from Google Maps (Hell, Google's analytics tech is probably far more invasive.)

    7. Re:Violation of Washington State Constitution by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      They're only using publicly available information (what can be seen by driving down the road,) it's no different from Google Maps (Hell, Google's analytics tech is probably far more invasive.)

      They tried that argument during the GPS lawsuit and they lost. Our State Constitution is very clear on this expectation of Privacy.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    8. Re:Violation of Washington State Constitution by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      Actually, the constitution has been suspended in every regard within 100 miles of every border (including coast.) It's still abided by for the most part, but it isn't actually enforceable.

    9. Re:Violation of Washington State Constitution by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Nope. You're entitled to add cameras to your ICE vehicles, and your federal customs facilities, but our Constitution prevails the second you walk out of the federal buildings.

      Posse commitatus, my friends. It works both ways.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    10. Re:Violation of Washington State Constitution by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      A GPS involves attaching something to a car. To ban what you are suggesting would make any form of public photography illegal.

    11. Re:Violation of Washington State Constitution by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      State law doesn't trump federal law.

    12. Re:Violation of Washington State Constitution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's when you get out, tap on his window, and educate him on the dangers of distracted driving. Be sure to emphasize that despite being stopped at a traffic light, he is still expected to devote his full attention to the operation of his motor vehicle. You can also take this opportunity to chastise him for failing to wear his safety belt, if applicable. He won't be running your plate anymore.

    13. Re:Violation of Washington State Constitution by 110010001000 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not sure what you are smoking but https://www.seattletimes.com/s...

      This has been happening for years. Adorable that you think your llicense plate is private though!

  8. Re:The right license plate will fool them... by thebes · · Score: 1

    Obligatory xkcd

    https://xkcd.com/1105/

  9. My license plate was just deported by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    ICE agents just pulled my car over and seized my license plate. Apparently it didn't pass inspection. It's in the mail back to Canada now.

  10. Re:How Fortunate by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

    Yeah but bear in mind nobody really cares if you go to those places... your local politician however....

  11. Jackbooted thugs with badges by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 2

    That's what some of (not all*) of our law enforcement in this country is turning into, and I in part** blame Trump for this. Haivng the Pussy-grabber-in-chief sitting in the Whitehouse has brought some of the worst kinds of people out of the shadows, emboldened them.


    * I am not going to claim that all police are jackbooted thugs; some genuinely believe in law-and-order, and want to help people.
    ** I'm also not going to lay 100% of the blame on Trump; many of his predecessors have contributed to this problem and/or set the stage for things that are manifesting now. Trump however appears to be the catalyst in many cases.

    1. Re:Jackbooted thugs with badges by rmdingler · · Score: 2

      ...brought some of the worst kinds of people out of the shadows...

      Hmmm... perhaps, and not necessarily, a bad thing.

      Maybe it turns out in hindsight the Trump election was a good thing, as it forced America to look at itself in the mirror.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    2. Re:Jackbooted thugs with badges by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 2

      This has been posited to me before, and I admit there is a logic to it -- but just like uncovering a nest of cockroaches, you find yourself disgusted and nauseated, and you still have to clear it out and clean it up. Not happy about any of the above. It'll take decades to undo the damage the traitor in the Whitehouse has done so far.

  12. Re:Okay, California, here's your chance by 101percent · · Score: 1

    Anonymous Stallman?

  13. Re:How Fortunate by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

    for now...

  14. _NOT_ going after State Registrations ! by redelm · · Score: 2

    The interesting thing about this news is the datasource is not the State Registrations as one might expect. ICE is using "private" scans most likely because a significant number of state laws prevent them "fishing" and require probable cause for access. I bet much of those "private" DBs are from toll authorities, AFAIK all of which have enabling legislation. Watch for new laws restricting toll authorities, much like public outcry clamped down of State Registration searches.

  15. For the people, by the people, of the people. by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    I know in California the plate goes with car, so if you sell your car and buy a new one, you will have a new plate number that is not in the database. I don't know if that works for other states, but probably most of them are like this. So if you can afford it, buy a new car every year. If you buy a used car you at least reset the tracking done on you buy perhaps inherit some stale data of the previous owner. Which might be good if you find the idea of SWAT and ICE busting into your home to be thrilling.

    Another thought is rent a car or only use ride sharing apps. Also bicycles aren't plated in the US, at least not with ids that can be easily spotted by these camera systems. Electric-assist bicycle today can go 30mph+ without pedalling if you illegally unlock their simple limiters.

    Most complete solution would be not to elect fuckwits who think spying on every American citizen is acceptable. Our legislature controls the purse strings of these departments, as well as the general rules that regulate businesses collecting and selling this information. They have the power to fix this, but choose a pay off instead. I guess because businesses are people too, and every dollar you contribute is worth a vote.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:For the people, by the people, of the people. by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1, Insightful

      conservatives love authority. conservatives will keep voting these assholes in because they are 'tough on crime' and that rings with the church goers who simply do what they are told (they are not very smart, generally, and are easily manipulated if done by the right people).

      we will never break free of this. the ruling parties know this trick and use it against us *constantly*.

      good luck having a representative goverment when the morons will never be able to think for themselves and always vote against their own best interests. EVERY FUCKING TIME.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    2. Re:For the people, by the people, of the people. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Wait, what?

      What about vanity plates? If I like the car you're selling do I have to keep the 'ILUVPONY' plate?

      I know California is a bit weird, but that seems over the top even for them.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:For the people, by the people, of the people. by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      You put the original plate back on it and keep your vanity plate, since you paid extra for it.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    4. Re:For the people, by the people, of the people. by marcel_in_ca · · Score: 1

      Not quite: you can keep the personalized plate, but you have to pay a fee to keep it (it's the California DMV: there's *always* a fee): https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/... However, if you keep 2 plates, the state will not ever issue another pair of plates with the same number (they don't want 2 vehicles with the same plates), so in the past, you just kept the plates.

  16. Is it legal to restrict license plate visibility? by Optic7 · · Score: 1

    For example, make it visible/readable from car-level only, so that cops can see it, but block out cameras on poles above and from the sides? For instance, a deep louver system would probably do the trick. Or perhaps some of those wild stickers to at least fool computer vision like was reported on a story here a couple of weeks back, so that this couldn't be automated?

    It seems high time for someone to start working on devices to do this, if it's not already illegal to install one.

  17. Re: Show me your papers, citizen. by Time_Ngler · · Score: 1

    Trump's always to blame for anything and everything, right? I see your conditioning by the media has worked flawlessly.

  18. Re:Great news by PoopJuggler · · Score: 1

    So in other words, you're an asshole.

  19. ICE is about to start tracking license plates by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    How can an internal combustion engine track license plates?

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  20. Re: Show me your papers, citizen. by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    I blame Trump for everything Trump does.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  21. Re: Great news by PoopJuggler · · Score: 1

    No, deporting people and breaking up families is pathetic. Is that the best solution your tiny little brain can come up with?

  22. Relevant by burningcpu · · Score: 2

    I spent an uncomfortable day in court, because a seller had placed a license plate on a truck that did not belong to it, and I did not remove it prior to driving it home post purchase. I was 16. I was stopped by an officer, and given tickets for a 'stolen license plate, stolen license tags,' and hilariously, a fine for the 'stolen' registrations being expired. I was also given a ticket for failing to have registered the vehicle and providing insurance.

    During court, the judge determined that yes, I was guilty of the driving a vehicle under the above conditions. However, the judge determined that the law allows one to drive a vehicle home post purchase, and this conflicts with the requirement of having posted registration information.

    The critical error on my part, had been to leave the old markings on the vehicle. Therefore, I was fined $1 for each transgression. These did not add 'points' to my license.

    I do not suggest putting any false information on your vehicle, to further the parent's message.

  23. wow. THis is a mess by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Seriously, what value does ICE tracking LP give America's ability to secure itself? Absolutely NONE.
    I do not mind giving SOME help to LEOs by POTENTIALLY hurting our rights, but only when it is about national security.
    This is not. There is little to nothing in this that helps national security.
    This should absolutely not be allowed.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  24. Re: Great news by blindseer · · Score: 1

    No, deporting people and breaking up families is pathetic. Is that the best solution your tiny little brain can come up with?

    By that logic we couldn't put anyone in jail for any crime, as that would break up families too.

    Who broke up the family? It wasn't the law enforcers, it was the family member that broke the law. The law is clear, if you break the law then you will be detained. This is not a secret, they knew this possibility beforehand. If these people don't want to see their family broke up then DO NOT BREAK THE LAW!

    In the case of deportation the solution of keeping the family together is far simpler, they can all go together. If a family member is a US citizen, such as a child of immigrants born here or an illegal alien marrying a citizen, then they are free to leave the country too. If for some reason the nation that the immigrant is from will not allow the family to enter then I'd suggest finding a different nation to immigrate to. They don't have to go home, but they can't stay here.

    Is "think of the children" all your little brain can come up with?

    We can think of the children and deport those that immigrated illegally. If the parent is so irresponsible and careless of their child's future to come to the USA illegally then it may be best for the child to be removed from the parent. Put the child up for adoption. Living in constant fear of deportation, evading the law to get employment, and generally living every day as a criminal is not setting this child up for success. Again, the parent put the child in this situation, it's not the fault of the government if enforcement of the law breaks up the family.

    --
    I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
  25. Time for some civil disobedience by blindseer · · Score: 1

    How long will such tracking continue before people decide to rip off their license plates in mass numbers? The government can only track license plates if they exist.

    People will make the claim that we need license plates, licenses to drive, and so on, so that if someone runs over some kid on a bicycle then we can track them down and have them arrested. Well, this is the price you pay for those tiny fractions of crimes that might go unsolved, you have a government that can track you everywhere you go, every dollar you spend, and every breath you take. The government claims these license plates are for our safety, that if we didn't have them then unsafe drivers could not be removed from the road.

    Make up your minds. Do you want freedom or safety? You can't have both.

    --
    I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.