YouTube Kids App Still Showing Disturbing Videos (bbc.co.uk)
YouTube says it is "very sorry" after more disturbing videos were found on the YouTube Kids app. From a report: BBC's Newsround found several videos not suitable for children, including one showing how to sharpen knives. Another had characters from children's cartoon Paw Patrol on a burning plane. YouTube has been criticised for using algorithms rather than human curators to decide what appears on YouTube Kids. In 2015, two child safety groups complained after disturbing videos were found on the YouTube Kids app. YouTube said it needed to "do more" to tackle inappropriate videos being seen by children. Newsround had arranged for five children to meet Google's Katie O'Donovan. They spoke about distressing videos they had seen on the main YouTube website and app. The videos included images of clowns with blood on them, scary advertisements and messages telling them someone was at their door.
And this is unsuitable for children how?
Is a useful skill. The earlier to learn the better.
Why is that disturbing?
More bubble wrap! Won't somebody please think of the children?!
They DID say they were sorry. It isn't like you are paying for it, or anything.
That's just awful!
It should be the creators.
Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
YouTube, and all social media platforms, are going to have to eventually make a decision.
Do they want to be a marketplace of ideas, with all the noise, discomfort, falsehoods, unpleasant opinions, disagreement, and flat out nastiness that goes along with all the good that comes from having an open forum of ideas, viewpoints, and worldviews?
Or do they want to be a "trusted source and safe place", where content is highly vetted, viewpoints limited, and certain biases encouraged and others discouraged so that nothing unexpected or unpleasant is encountered?
It seems like they're trying to have it both ways at present, but the two goals, as far as I can tell, are mutually exclusive.
Check your premises.
If you want programming that is vetted and safe for kids, then you need to pay money to people who do the vetting.
Make a subscription channel that is guaranteed safe for kids, and use the subscription money to keep that promise.
If parents are too cheap to subscribe to that, then they can instead get more involved in their kid's entertainment decisions. Their choice.
I really don't know what to say to someone that thinks sharpening a knife isn't safe video content for a kid. Hell I sharpen my kitchen knifes on wet stones in the dining room. My kids will watch for the first couple minutes then get bored and do something else.
You are joking, I hope, but where I live there are actually attempts to ban clowns and clown costumes because some children are afraid of clowns.
Never underestimate illogical stupidity of soccer moms high on protect the cub instincts.
Hell, I would rather the kids know how to handle the knives properly than not!
-=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
That would depend on the age of the children. Sharpening knives is not a task any responsible parent would assign to a pre-schooler; and pre-schoolers are the target audience of the YouTube Kids app. Older children can easily figure out how to get to the real YouTube and find all the cutlery-based entertainment they want.
Support Right To Repair Legislation.
Wait, they showed the firefighter dog saving a burning airplane? What's next, are they going to do the big reveal on where exactly the paw patrol's favourite bones comes from? Hint: They aren't picked from The Bone Tree in The Great Bone Orchard!
Since Hollywood reboots the same movie plots for every generation, why is it a shock the advertisers do it as well?
"We traced the texts. They are coming from inside/right outside the house!!!"
The only form of clown-banning I support is ignoring the boring things so they go out of business.
I don't find them scary, but I don't find them interesting or entertaining either, just... lame ... and boring...
where I live there are actually attempts to ban clowns and clown costumes because some children are afraid of clowns.
Would it likewise be justifiable to attempt to ban Romani traditional dress because some children are afraid of Romani? Watch clowns fight back by calling whiteface makeup "traditional sunscreen" and oversized clothes "protective loose clothing for the climate change era", in effect painting coulrophobia (fear of clowns) as a xenophobia.
Leftist ideology requires there to be a large, passive, dependent population that is ruled over by a relatively small leftist elite.
That's weird because leftist ideology calls for abolishing said elite. One might speculate as to how realistic that is in the real world but there it is.
Ezekiel 23:20
I still think phone and tablet use should be metered out to young children. Kids being glued to a screen while missing out on social interaction is going to be a bad thing. I see kids out in public watching phones the entire time they are out. I guess it comes down to lazy parenting and them being satisfied their child is busy and not having to interact with them. Will these kids ever be shocked when they get a job somewhere and be expected to have an attention span.
Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
Yes, I am joking. In reality I grew up in a period when it was thought important to teach children about the Nazis. As a result, at school, we were shown film of mass graves, concentration camp liberations, executions by firing squad, and even a very, very short clip of Hitler's generals hanging from the piano wire after the failed assassination attempt.
And, to be fair, I didn't grow up to be a Nazi.
"Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
I really don't know what to say to someone that thinks sharpening a knife isn't safe video content for a kid. Hell I sharpen my kitchen knifes on wet stones in the dining room. My kids will watch for the first couple minutes then get bored and do something else.
You are deciding what's appropriate for your kids. You are creating a safe teaching environment. The same thing could be accomplished by screening instructions on regular You Tube and watching that video later with your kids. As a father of 2 toddler boys, I'd want my wife present to help keep the kids within viewing distance without trying to touch the knives. The difference is the age of my kids and yours. You Tube Kids markets itself to parents of toddlers and preschoolers. If you could create filters per child on You Tube Kids, you could decide. As it stands, You Tube Kids doesn't know who's watching - just the email of the parent.
Did they show hunters going after Barney the Dinosaur? Tim S.
Even on Netflix there was pictures of penises on one episode of a kids show. Unless every video is manually approved something will happen, and even then a rogue employee can sneak something in.
In that particular case, Netflix trusted the producers of Maya the Bee which somehow missed it. Your comment sounds kinda defeatist: since we can't get 100% every time, we shouldn't even try. It became a big deal because parents made a big deal, so the media made a big deal, so more parents made a big deal, so children wanted to see what the hoopla was all about. Labeling it as dirty gave it the same appeal as the forbidden fruit.
Wow. You really have some extremist views of the left.
Replace "left" with "progressive", or more honestly "Post-Modernist", and I agree with him. This is a problem the right in the US struggles with: there's this very small, but very vocal, part of the US left that active works to destroy America, or at least what we stand for. It's far too easy to attribute that motive to the left as a whole, but that's nonsense on par with calling all Trump supporters racists.
I think an important part of healing the current cultural rift in America is to distinguish between the actual fringe and the 80-90% of Americans left and right who are just normal people, without crazy views.
Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
...even in the wimpy formerly-great Britain, knives are tools, and sharpening them is how you take care of them. Why, exactly, is that disturbing? It's something I learned to do at the age of 9 or 10.
Enjoy life! This is not a dress rehearsal.
Aww, but strawmen are so easy to beat.
I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
Does someone want to tell this particular leftist what "post-modernist" actually means? I know that 'progressive" has turned into an insult among right-wingers, although you'd think progress would generally be a good thing. (Current Western civilization is the best ever, in many ways.)
One thing you need to understand is that people with all sorts of politics can be patriots. Their ideas as to what's good for the country may differ wildly, and their ideas about how to get there will differ more, but the country was founded partly on freedom of expression and encouraging diverse ideas.
I'm more concerned with the small but currently vocal right-wingers who want to drag us into fascism, right now. They're being more successful at this time.
"When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
The first thing that occurred to me was, "Has anyone read traditional fairy tales?".
"When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
The solution being, don't let your kids on the Internet unsupervised !!!
Had a look at one of these a few weeks ago and couldn't stop laughing.
Soooo good.
You need to use the approved "My Little Pony Whetstone".
Or at least I hope it's a parody, and not a remnant of a time when people paid random hobos to entertain their kids.
Lately, through services such as Lyft, Uber, Fiverr, and Airbnb, the piecework service economy has become the new normal. Thus the era of the hobo, an itinerant who goes from place to place for work, is now.
Does someone want to tell this particular leftist what "post-modernist" actually means?
Post-Modernism grew out of Stalinist/Maoist Communism, and is sort of a super-set. Communism focused on tearing down people's beliefs in anything but the state, and keeping people against each other on Marxist class warfare lines. Post-Modernism widens to use identity politics to set everyone against everyone else, and tears down not just peoples beliefs, but the idea of individual merit (anyone more successful than you must have cheated the system or oppressed you, because merit is a myth/social construct), and logical reasoning as a whole ("logic is a tool of the patriarchy" and "mathematics embodies Whiteness" are actual papers, plus replacing reasoning with credentials).
The rise of identity politics in America, and the rise of this malicious mental conditioning to take offense at every little thing, are direct results of Post-Modernists growing in power.
BTW, the right-wingers you're worried about will seem much less threatening if you study how Hitler rose to power. These losers are neo-Nazis, and the difference is important: all they offer is hate and rage, which really isn't very compelling. The actual Nazis had far more mainstream appeal as they rose to power, selling order and stability in a very chaotic Germany, and amped up the hate and rage mostly after they had power. I.e., the current losers are missing any bait and offer only hook. (Let's hope their never smart enough to figure that out).
Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
Abolishing due process, limiting free speech, and overt retaliatory discrimination aren't progress, and that's what 'progressives' stand for.
Abolishing due process? I see that a lot with "law and order" types.
Limiting free speech? People all over the political spectrum want to limit it. They just differ in what speech to limit.
Overt retaliatory discrimination? You mean like pretending Christians are persecuted in this country, and trying to make them more equal than other religions?
There's idiots all over the political spectrum, but you only seem to see one kind. I wonder why.
"When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
Communism wasn't trying to tear down people's beliefs in things other than the state (it was generally anti-religion), and the idea was to get people in one class so everybody was part of the same group. Communism (and Socialism in general) tended to want to eliminate identity politics by having people share the same identity. I've seen very little in the way of post-modernism as you describe, and it's easy to ignore.
The rise of identity politics in America was on racial lines. White males were on top, white females should be subservient, blacks were inferior, and the natives were to be genocided. It's been around ever since. The only reason you don't perceive it is that the people you identify with were on top. Currently, there are various identities, and the old white male Christian supremacy is challenged, so some white male Christians have to attack the changing situation. Taking offense at little things is the reverse of carelessly insulting and disrespecting people. There are also too few post-modernists that fit your description to enforce any of that.
I have studied Hitler's rise to power, and I'm worried. Trump certainly isn't Hitler, but a lot of his supporters look a lot like Hitler supporters in their mindset. The neo-Nazis, as you say, don't have the numbers or appeal to be successful, but the right wing as a whole has numbers, and seems to want to follow a fickle authoritarian leader and believe or disbelieve as he says. If the hard-core Trump supporters were under 10%, I wouldn't be worried.
"When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
You're talking about some ideal of Communism. I'm not. I'm talking about what Stalin and Mao actually did as part of murdering 160 million people between them The "lost generation" in China is a direct result of tearing down all belief systems other than the state, starting with encouraging everyone to kill their teachers (and, heck, just anyone with a degree).
The rise of identity politics in America was on racial lines.
Seems like you've bought into the post-modernist song and dance. It's not psychologically healthy, and it's not good for the country.
lot of his supporters look a lot like Hitler supporters in their mindset.
Do you mean the people who want a stable economy, clean factories, universal halth care, social security, and all the similar stuff the Nazis rose to power on? I don't think you do. I think you're talking about the hate agression that became the focus after Hitler took power, and murdered all the Nazi leaders who cared about all the early stuff. Do you see the difference?
Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
Communist regimes have always placed a lot of emphasis on the state in practice, but not just the state. Stalin, for example, appealed to patriotism.
If you would like to provide some evidence that white males staying dominant and favoring policies that support them is any less identity politics as another racial group trying to achieve equality, please do. Until then, it would appear that "identity politics" is politics based on racial or ethnic or religious groups that you don't approve of.
I mean the people who get their information from Party-approved lies, and who are willing to believe the wildest things about their Party's opponents. It was obvious to all that Trump was the biggest liar in the race. His supporters disregarded that. Trump appealed to his supporters by emotion and lying, promising people what they wanted far more flagrantly than other candidates. He didn't campaign on universal health care or social security (introduced by Otto von Bismarck, neither a Nazi nor any sort of socialist). His message was xenophobia and jobs, and that's quite reminiscent of Nazi propaganda.
"When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes