Slashdot Mirror


Windows 10 Is Adding an Ultimate Performance Mode For Pros (engadget.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Engadget: When you're creating 3D models or otherwise running intensive tasks, you want to wring every ounce of performance out of your PC as possible. It's a good thing, then, that Microsoft has released a Windows 10 preview build in the Fast ring that includes a new Ultimate Performance mode if you're running Pro for Workstations. As the name implies, this is a step up for people for whom even the High Performance mode isn't enough -- it throws power management out the window to eliminate "micro-latencies" and boost raw speed. You can set it yourself, but PC makers will have the option of shipping systems with the feature turned on. Ultimate Performance isn't currently available for laptops or tablets, but Microsoft suggests that could change.

75 of 151 comments (clear)

  1. You can do this on older version too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Simply disable Windows Defender.

    1. Re:You can do this on older version too by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      You know what I'm gonna do?
      I'm gonna get myself an Alienware gamer laptop
      Hot pink, with whale skin hubcaps
      And all leather cow interior
      And big brown baby seal eyes for head lights (yeah)
      And I'm gonna drive in that baby in Ultimate Performance Mode
      Gettin' 1 mile per gallon
      Sucking down Quarter Pounder cheeseburgers from McDonald's
      In the old fashioned non-biodegradable styrofoam containers
      And when I'm done sucking down those greaseball burgers
      I'm gonna wipe my mouth with the American flag
      And then I'm gonna toss the styrofoam containers right out the side
      And there ain't a goddamn thing anybody can do about it

  2. LOLZ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    As if performance problems on Windows were caused by micro-latencies...
    Right, let's reclaim those 1-2% of performance, all while the antivirus is using half of the CPU cores to continuously scan the machine for viruses...
    For performance, the best fix would be to simply use something else.

    1. Re:LOLZ by Cederic · · Score: 1

      You use AV on performance sensitive machines?

    2. Re:LOLZ by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      2% isn't going to help much when the Meltdown patch just hit you for 50%.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:LOLZ by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      2% isn't going to help much when the Meltdown patch just hit you for 50%.

      Exactly.

    4. Re:LOLZ by Bobrick · · Score: 1

      This. My video editing workstation has an AV installed for the duration of a scan, once per month, the rest of the time its resources are kept where they're needed and free of constant scanning, memory hogging and unwanted pop-ups.

    5. Re:LOLZ by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Except the meltdown patch just hit even worst case users by a fraction of that. 2% for many workloads is a significant portion of the meltdown dramas.

    6. Re:LOLZ by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Have you considered leaving the servers unpatched? In order to actually be affected, you would need to allow people to run arbitrary code on the servers. So it comes down to what the the servers do. It's a threat to desktop PCs because that's an actual use case if you browser the web with Javascript enabled, but if the servers are just serving up content they should, in theory, be fine.

      Of course, if you're doing something like hosting other people's websites or something like then you should probably patch.

  3. Why wasn't this an option before? by theraptor05 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I want my computer to run slow. Please leave Ultimate Performance off, maybe insert some extra latency in a few places just because... This is hardly a new requirement. For the work I do, Windows has always been looked past because it couldn't get out of it's own way when running high-performance or near real time code. It will never do actual real time (Microsoft could make that, but it wouldn't be called Windows), but why has this "Ultra Extreme Actually Fast" mode been so impossible in the past?

    1. Re:Why wasn't this an option before? by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 2

      I want my computer to run slow. Please leave Ultimate Performance off, maybe insert some extra latency in a few places just because... This is hardly a new requirement. For the work I do, Windows has always been looked past because it couldn't get out of it's own way when running high-performance or near real time code. It will never do actual real time (Microsoft could make that, but it wouldn't be called Windows), but why has this "Ultra Extreme Actually Fast" mode been so impossible in the past?

      I'm sorry; most CPU cycles are needed to check your Windows license validity every nanosecond.

    2. Re:Why wasn't this an option before? by goose-incarnated · · Score: 3, Informative

      I want my computer to run slow. Please leave Ultimate Performance off, maybe insert some extra latency in a few places just because...

      Everyone is missing the point - they aren't offering a slow and fast version of Windows, they are offering "meltdown-patch/no-meltdown-patch" versions.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    3. Re:Why wasn't this an option before? by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      It's a bit like the help function. No matter what you are looking for, it always thinks you want to find out whether your copy of Windows is genuine.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:Why wasn't this an option before? by m.alessandrini · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, they're needed to run "svchost.exe".

    5. Re:Why wasn't this an option before? by edtice1559 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Congratulations on your +4 and I hope you get to +5. Even "high load" applications generally have very brief periods of CPU idle time. Maybe they are waiting for a page swap or to write out the result of some calculation to disk. If the CPU power manager sees 100ms of idle time, what should it do? Seems reasonable to cut the clock down as, for many (most) workloads, this would indicate that the CPU-bound portion is over. If CPU demand picks up, you can pick up the pace again. But how many ms of load do you need to see in order to decide that this is another high-workload period? For almost everything that normal people do, the latency to pick the clock rate back up when CPU demand rises is immeasurably small. For those specific situations where it would make a difference, it's not possible to tell the power manager to never slow the CPU even if completely idle for decades. The actual use for this is probably close to zero but you'll probably see people turn it on for the same reasons you see giant wings strapped to the back of 90 horsepower sedans.

    6. Re:Why wasn't this an option before? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It was never impossible. You've always been able to tell Windows not to change the power state.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Why wasn't this an option before? by jwhyche · · Score: 3

      You want a slow computer? I got a nice intel processor I can sell you.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    8. Re:Why wasn't this an option before? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Because most people are happy to trade a few percent performance for lower power consumption (including corporate users, for whom 10% less power consumption across 1000 machines is noticeable, and if the performance hit doesn't affect productivity then it's well worth it).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    9. Re:Why wasn't this an option before? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      but why has this "Ultra Extreme Actually Fast" mode been so impossible in the past

      It's not been impossible. It's just been completely irrelevant. Chalk up another feature I'll never turn on because a 1% boost in performance isn't worth the battery life hit.

      As for being a realtime OS, you're right it never was, never will be and is not even remotely a design consideration. The same can be said about all desktop OSes except for those specifically designed for the purpose.

    10. Re:Why wasn't this an option before? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      It doesn't know when they blocking even is going to finish. Sure, it'll get an interrupt from the DMA controller when DMA request is complete after instructing the SATA controller to fetch some data.
      The problem is, changing the clock frequency takes time.
      The system doesn't know how much processing the application is going to do before another blocking event happens either. It needs to make a compromise between keeping the current low speed clock and doing the work or increasing the the core voltage, waiting for that to stabilise, increasing the clock multiplier, waiting for the PLL to stabilise, then do the work.

      It may only be in the order of a few microseconds to change clock speeds, but that's thousands of cycles when you're talking about GHz speeds.

      Or you could keep the core at full voltage and speed and waste a lot of power, but gain those lost microseconds.

  4. But Telemetry will still be turned on by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Still gathering a ton of data, which at the very least will impact network throughput.

    --
    So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
    1. Re:But Telemetry will still be turned on by SuricouRaven · · Score: 4, Informative

      Try stopping it - run a traffic monitor and take a look. It takes a ridiculous amount of effort to disable all the spyware. It's not just a matter of changing a few buried registry settings, you have to deliberately break services that can't be disabled and use an external firewall because the Windows internal one has hard-coded exceptions.

    2. Re:But Telemetry will still be turned on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Is there a place that lists all the ways that it phones home? Preferably in a format that can be inserted into an open source firewall?

    3. Re:But Telemetry will still be turned on by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      MS ain't stupid, it uses the same systems for updates that it uses for spying. If you want updates, you have to allow the spying.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:But Telemetry will still be turned on by iampiti · · Score: 2

      Obviously the intent is making it so hard to disable so that few users will bother. They use a similar strategy (reverting default programs to Windows built ins from time to time) to get you to use the included apps.
      This is disgusting behaviour. That's the price we pay for Windows being the dominant desktop OS. If their marketshare was 50% or less they wouldn't dare to do that

    5. Re:But Telemetry will still be turned on by Bobrick · · Score: 1

      Perfect example of a win-win scenario.

    6. Re:But Telemetry will still be turned on by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      I can disable Microsoft spyware in three easy steps:
      Step #1: Backup important files
      Step #2: Install {your favorite flavor of} Linux
      Step #3: Restore important files
      See? Wasn't that easy?

    7. Re: But Telemetry will still be turned on by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      I don't have a favourite flavour of Linux - all of them suck in subtly different ways. I don't know what happened - around 2003 Linux looked almost ready for the desktop, but then it became really uncomfortable to use.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    8. Re:But Telemetry will still be turned on by Kjella · · Score: 1

      That's the price we pay for Windows being the dominant desktop OS. If their marketshare was 50% or less they wouldn't dare to do that

      Microsoft was a dominant OS for a long time without doing any di.... without doing these dirty tricks. This is a direct consequence of Win10 becoming "free", though they still charge OEMs a few bucks for powerful machines. Since getting consumers to upgrade is no longer what brings in cash it's all about monetizing the users you have. It'll probably work too, Facebook is "free". Gmail is "free". Windows is "free". The vast majority seem to like it that way.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    9. Re:But Telemetry will still be turned on by iampiti · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's obvious Google-style user monetization. The problem is that they haven't given an option to opt out of that by paying money. Even apps for smartphones most of the time let you choose between free with ads and paid without.

    10. Re: But Telemetry will still be turned on by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Well, then I guess you learn to enjoy having Microsoft own your computer, and additionally having Microsoft up your ass every single time you use it. Sucks to be you.

    11. Re: But Telemetry will still be turned on by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Still beats using Linux, though. And I say that as someone who develops Linux applications for a living.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  5. Double overhead gofasters by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    I used to work with a sales manager who talked about selling the quote-unquote double overhead gofasters to Rubes who did not understand that a working product was a standard feature. This sounds like something similar.

  6. I want crappy performance mode by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ultra performance... meh...Wake me up when there is an ultra crappy performance mode.

    I like my computers like I like my women, slow and full of viruses.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    1. Re:I want crappy performance mode by the_skywise · · Score: 1

      lol - I want crappy performance mode so I can run my old windows games properly!

  7. Microsoft has been slowing down computers? by QuietLagoon · · Score: 2

    And now wants money to turn off that "feature"?

  8. Re:Does it come with a spoiler? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, but you can get aftermarket flames on Slashdot.

  9. Here's how you could boost performance even more! by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Disable data collection and spying on us. Frees up CPU resources as well as network resources.

    And I'd dare say that it would be easy to implement, no tweaking necessary. All it takes is flipping a few compiler switches...

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  10. Forced reboots make this meaningless. by mukinrestak · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It doesn't matter how much performance they can wrangle when the OS still forces reboots for updates in the middle of compiling, encoding, rendering, etc.

    You can't "just save" some things.

    1. Re:Forced reboots make this meaningless. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Oh you're getting forced reboots during your code compiling? I'm genuinely impressed you can get any code to compile at all if you can't even change you settings to prevent the scenario you describe.

      I can recommend a good book for programmers: "How to change windows settings for dummies".

    2. Re:Forced reboots make this meaningless. by theCoder · · Score: 1

      My corporate supplied computer at work doesn't have many settings to change.

      And I have never associated Windows with performance. Unless it is "poor" performance. As a simple example, the software I develop at work takes about 4 hours to completely build and test on Linux. It takes about 60 hours to do the same on Windows. And that is after copying every single needed file to the local hard drive (while Linux gets almost everything from the network). By the time Linux is done, Windows is about half way through cleaning. Now a lot of this poor performance is probably from the shear amount of spyware installed on the system (by corporate) to monitor everything that goes on. But since you have to run that sort of monitoring software on Windows, even if it is only a virus scanner, Windows will always be slower than Linux. So "Ultimate Performance" of Windows just seems like a bad joke.

      --
      "Save the whales, feed the hungry, free the mallocs" -- author unknown
  11. performance levels explained. by nimbius · · Score: 5, Funny

    for some of the more linux-savvy slashdotters performance levels might seem abstract and vague. as a Microsoft engineer, I can explain these pretty quickly.

    regular performance: Windows performs per normal with some features and functions disabled. this is for your protection, as the tome of windows cannot be simply 'closed' once opened.
    high performance: eliminates microlatencies caused by the thin veil of reality that separates you from pure, raw windows. High performance mode switches cortanas voice to Vin Diesel, and the background to a moistened and slightly unstable steve ballmer who has a random chance to shout 'DEVELOPERS' when clicking any item.
    ultimate performance: God is dead and you now sit upon the throne in this wasteland of pure and unadulterated windows. The seals have been unlocked and the runes aligned as you see once and for all the true blistering power of Minesweeper. Cortana is replaced with a cursed portrait of W.E.B. Du-Buois into which you whisper your darkest desires (and save your passwords.) The startup sound is the entire 16 hour watergate deposition. the shutdown sound is a sacrosanct quote of your last words before you die as theyve been divined from the future.
    Also, SSH is enabled.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:performance levels explained. by vux984 · · Score: 1

      "ultimate performance: God is dead and you now sit upon the throne in this wasteland of pure and unadulterated windows. The seals have been unlocked and the runes aligned as you see once and for all the true blistering power of Minesweeper. Cortana is replaced with a cursed portrait of W.E.B. Du-Buois into which you whisper your darkest desires (and save your passwords.) The startup sound is the entire 16 hour watergate deposition. the shutdown sound is a sacrosanct quote of your last words before you die as theyve been divined from the future."

      Ah, so it just boots to Windows 95 then. Gotcha. ;)

    2. Re:performance levels explained. by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

      *Golf Clap*.

      --
      Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  12. This will be good for Teams by SalsaDot · · Score: 1

    Finally Teams will be able to get all the CPU it needs just tor me to type in a message. Damn thing spins up my i7 NUC's fan per keystroke.

  13. Does this mean Black Viper is out of a job? by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

    I've been tweaking any box I run that requires Windows using recommendations from Black Viper for YEARS! It's a handy resource. It's amazing seeing everything that is running in the background.

    --
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
  14. Does this disable OneDrive? by hackertourist · · Score: 2

    Because OneDrive has replaced antivirus as the single biggest performance drain on my computer. I regularly find OD pegging one of my cores at 100% load.

  15. What an idea! by GoTeam · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's a good start Microsoft. Now they need to invent a way that you can toggle this feature on and off with a physical button. They could put the button on the case, but they'd have to put a word above it to describe what it does... Maybe "Turbo"? Yes, they should invent the turbo button. That's forward thinking!!!!

    1. Re:What an idea! by zifn4b · · Score: 1

      Nice try. The turbo button was a way to change the FSB multipler which is a hardware feature not an operating system feature.

      --
      We'll make great pets
  16. cpu mining is dead and GPU is not so hot as well by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    cpu mining is dead and GPU is not so hot as well.

  17. Re:Better Idea by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    Everybody you know is a problem. Neither of my Windows 10 machines have had update troubles for a year or more. One has never blue screened in over two years. The other, after installing an unusual compiler for an ARM project, it hated me for a day. My Surface Pro 3 fingerprint bug turned out to be a bad type cover.

    Fix the people you know, buddy. You need better clients.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  18. What a joke by Murdoch5 · · Score: 1

    If Windows isn't already tuned to give you raw horse power and performance, then switch to Linux based OS.

    1. Re:What a joke by zifn4b · · Score: 1

      If Windows isn't already tuned to give you raw horse power and performance, then switch to Linux based OS.

      As soon as Linux runs all the games and apps we know and love, it will be the end of Microsoft.

      --
      We'll make great pets
  19. Meanwhile, for the plebs running Windows Home... by Joce640k · · Score: 2

    "Whatâ(TM)s new in Build 17101 & Build 17604
    Input Improvements

    Emoji design updates: Based on your feedback and to improve consistency, we've made adjustments to the design of some of our emoji.

    Emoji search comes to more languages: Earlier in RS4, we updated the Emoji Panel to support browsing and picking emoji in many new locales. With today's build, we're bringing search support to more locales too! Now you can find an emoji by keyword in over 150 locales, including English (Great Britain), French (France), German (Germany), Spanish (Spain), and more. This will help you get the emoji you want easily and quickly."

    So there's valuable improvements for ordinary users, not just the Pros.

    --
    No sig today...
  20. Re:Meanwhile, for the plebs running Windows Home.. by bondsbw · · Score: 2

    I don't know that I've seen a product update in the past couple of months that doesn't have emoji updates.

    --
    All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
  21. Windows officially goes to 11! by Megol · · Score: 1

    It's one faster.

    1. Re:Windows officially goes to 11! by zifn4b · · Score: 1

      No it really doesn't. It shipped at about 8-9 and now disables its own bloatware so it can actually go to 10.

      --
      We'll make great pets
  22. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  23. "Quit the Finder" by Chaset · · Score: 1

    Option available on some ancient mac programs in the System 6-9 era. You can force quit the Finder (vague analogous to Windows Explorer, the standard built-in file browser) so that you can run those programs that need just a little bit more memory and processor time.

    This reminds me of that.

    --
    -- "This world is a comedy to those who think, a tragedy to those who feel."
    1. Re:"Quit the Finder" by subanark · · Score: 1

      Not really processor time. MacOS back then didn't have a thread interrupts. Once your application's thread is running it keeps going until it gives back control to the OS or you hit the debug button.

  24. Re:Will it still reboot randomly all the time? by ArtemaOne · · Score: 1

    Sounds like you have Malware. I put 32 GB in my system back home and rarely see it get above 8 GB in intense games even.

  25. Need "Ludicrous Speed" by grumpy-cowboy · · Score: 2

    Let me know when you support Ludicrous Speed! ;)

    --
    Will $CURRENT_YEAR be the year of the Linux Desktop?
  26. Or back to 7 by DarkRookie · · Score: 1

    You could always roll back to 7. 7 is a lot faster on my rig than 10. YMMV thou

    --
    The millennial that doesn't like most of the stuff designed for millennials.
  27. Engadget Article is junk by zifn4b · · Score: 1
    No real content and then in an article titled "Windows 10 Is Adding an Ultimate Performance Mode For Pros", we have this paragraph at the bottom as extra filler because there wasn't really any content:

    There are additions for people using everyday PCs. Like Samsung, Microsoft is moving toward more familiar emoji. It also helps you search for those emoji in more languages, and provides you more control over file system access for Universal Windows Platform apps. As a rule, though, this preview is aimed at pros who want to see how well a workstation can run when there's nothing holding it back.

    --
    We'll make great pets
  28. Windows high performance by linear+a · · Score: 1

    I've seen those words before, but never in the same sentence.

  29. Wouldn't be necessary if by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 2

    Microsoft would turn off or disable all the silly unnecessary bullshit running in the background.

    Cortana, all the Telemetry crap, and probably a big chunk of all the running processes that are enabled by default.

  30. Re: creimer spam alert! by ModernGeek · · Score: 1

    Does the youtube auto subscribe button actually work? Youâ(TM)d think theyâ(TM)d be smart enough to check the relevant headers.

    --
    Sig: I stole this sig.
  31. Re:There was more than one turbo button. by zifn4b · · Score: 1

    There are all kinds of turbo buttons. What's your point?

    --
    We'll make great pets
  32. Laptops by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

    In case anybody's wondering why the mode is disabled for laptops, it's because quite a few literally *can't* run for extended periods of time at full-bore speed without overheating. For YEARS, companies like Toshiba were advertising specs based on CPU specs, but underclocking them behind the scenes to reduce heat. Most current laptops can (mostly) run at full-speed without crashing, but will gradually cook their electrolytic capacitors & other components to death if you insist.

    Now, the big question is... what's Microsoft's definition of "laptop", and how does Windows decide? Is a mini-ITX "desktop" with mobile i5 a desktop or a laptop? How about a Clevo-made gaming beast with a "desktop" i7 & discrete (but semi-proprietary) graphics card that -- electronically -- is still PCIe (with nonstandard form factor)?

  33. Re: Every ounce of performance by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

    Not really. For typical desktop use running apps that don't necessarily TRY to be optimized for multithreading, Windows generally "tries harder" to put multiple cores to good use ANYWAY.

    The traditional Linux attitude has been, "if you want to take advantage of multiple cores, write your software properly." Windows just assumes (correctly) that most apps DON'T try, and does its best to at least multithread the *rest* of the system (including libraries). It doesn't always succeed, but it tends to get accidentally-good results more often than Linux does.

    Where Windows USED to fuck up badly was memory usage. Simply put, older versions were WAY too eager to swap out to virtual RAM, even if you had 16+ gigabytes. As a practical matter, without registry-tweaking in semi-undocumented ways, it was almost IMPOSSIBLE to get Windows to use more than a gig of RAM for any one app, or 4 gigs system-wide, without having Windows start aggressively paging out virtual memory, unless you disabled paging altogether.

    I believe it happened because the logic for virtual-memory handling was intertwined with the logic for implementing PAE. Prior to ~Win8, there were two operating modes: one for low-memory systems whose history went all the way back to Windows95 (and allowed it to limp with a mere 4mb of ram), and one for high-memory systems where PAE was assumed to be used (even though Microsoft ultimately disabled PAE in most systems).

    When 64-bit Windows arrived, Microsoft started with the "high-memory" code, ripped out the PAE-implementation logic, but ran out of time/developers and left the PAE-imposed LIMITS in place. It wasn't until ~2014 that Microsoft finally got around to refactoring it to remove those limits. And even now, many of those limits still exist by default unless you disable them via registry keys because some popular older apps crash if they're disabled.

    Don't believe me? Do a virgin-install of 64-bit Windows 10 on a new PC with 32gb of RAM, then TRY to get Windows to physically use more than 4 gigs of it without swapping (and without registry-hacking or disabling virtual memory altogether). What Windows NOW does by default is to swap pages to UPPER ram, with slightly better logic to decide when it needs to swap those "paged pages" to the ssd/hard drive. I think it also now can do most of it via register-manipulation instead of copying. But at the end of the day, Windows STILL defaults to treating your glorious 32gb ocean of ram as a glorified ramdisk unless you force it to do otherwise.

  34. It's the '80s Turbo Button all over again by woobieman29 · · Score: 1

    Some of you might remember the PC/XT and AT clones back on the day that had the flashy "TURBO" button on the front that would increase or even double your processor clock speed, and was marketed as something of an upgrade. The reality of it was that this switch actually cut your clock speed in half. Tons of old DOS programs used to just run as fast as the processor would let them, so older games would run at ridiculous speeds on these newer machines with their sweeet 16mhz processors or whatever. Manufacturers needed a way to slow the processor down to make the older programs usable, so they added the switch. Normal position had the clock speed set to half of maximum, or similar, while pressing that big TURBO button didn't really do anything except let the processors use it's full speed. I know this is different, but it just sort of seems like the same type of bs.

    --
    \/\/oobie
  35. -o- by easyTree · · Score: 1

    How about dealing with the basics first, like that ability to walk away from the computer with your multi-application state arranged as you see fit and return WITHOUT FINDING THAT ALL YOUR PREPARATION HAS BEEN LOST BECAUSE WINDOWS USES A DEAD-MAN SWITCH METAPHOR when asking for permission to reboot to install updates!

    What the hell is wrong with you people?

  36. Re:creimer spam alert! by easyTree · · Score: 1

    You know things are bad when you're trolling yourself...

  37. Re:There was more than one turbo button. by zifn4b · · Score: 1

    Aweeeee... you're such an adorable sociopath with all your insults. How's that superiority complex treating you? Did you get your daily quota of insults to make your fragile ego feel better? Maybe you should call your Mommy?

    --
    We'll make great pets
  38. Re:Better Idea by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    "everybody I know" being such a more credible sample. Yeah. I quantified my sample.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.