Slashdot Mirror


Bad iPhone Notches Are Happening To Good Android Phones (theverge.com)

The Verge's Vlad Savov argues that Android smartphone manufacturers are copying the iPhone's design (specifically, the iPhone X's notch) with more speed and cynicism than ever before: I've been coming to Mobile World Congress for close to a decade now, and I've never seen the iPhone copied quite so blatantly and cynically as I witnessed during this year's show. MWC 2018 will go down in history as the launch platform for a mass of iPhone X notch copycats, each of them more hastily and sloppily assembled than the next. No effort is being made to emulate the complex Face ID system that resides inside Apple's notch; companies like Noa and Ulefone are in such a hurry to get their iPhone lookalike on the market that they haven't even customized their software to account for the new shape of the screen. More than one of these notched handsets at MWC had the clock occluded by the curved corner of the display. Asus is one of the biggest consumer electronics companies in the world, and yet its copycat notch is probably the most galling of them all. The Zenfone 5 looks and feels like a promising phone, featuring loud speakers, the latest Sony imaging sensor with larger-than-average pixels, and a price somewhere south of $499. I should be celebrating it right now, but instead I'm turning away in disgust as Asus leans into its copying by calling Apple a "Fruit Company" repeatedly. If you're going to copy the iPhone, at least have the decency to avoid trying to mock it.

It would be stating the obvious to say that this trend is not a good one. I'm absolutely of the belief that everyone, Apple included, copies or borrows ideas from everyone else in the mobile industry. This is a great way to see technical improvements disseminated across the market. But the problem with these notched screens on Android phones is that they're purely cosmetic. Apple's notch at the top of the iPhone X allows the company to have a nearly borderless screen everywhere else, plus it accommodates the earpiece and TrueDepth camera for Face ID. Asus et al have a sizeable "chin" at the bottom of their phones, so the cutouts at the top are self-evidently motivated by the desire to just look -- not function, look -- like an iPhone X.

260 comments

  1. Oh, please by Lisandro · · Score: 2

    The Essential Phone had that useless notch thing even before the iPhone X came out.

    1. Re:Oh, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple also copied the original iPhone design from the LG Prada.

      https://www.gsmarena.com/compa...

    2. Re:Oh, please by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      And it was mocked just as much as the iPhone X is. That doesn't mean we shouldn't be disappointed that companies are copying useless shit from each other.

    3. Re:Oh, please by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      As end users it does give us a point of attack though to get better phones. Just pile on Apple to get them to design better phones and once done, the rest will copy them. So mass meme attacks on Apple with better phone design ideas to give us a better phone pool to choose from, heh, heh.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    4. Re:Oh, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you seriously claiming that between the 12th of Dec 2006, and 9th Jan 2007, apple was able to completely design a new phone (hardware and software) from scratch just by looking at pictures of an unreleased phone?
      Even adding the extra 3 months that the lawsuit claimed Apple had, this seems like a big stretch to me.

    5. Re:Oh, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      *facepalm* ...because products are only seen or known about beginning right from the date of release...

      The Prada won a design award when it was unveiled in September of 2006. That's plenty of time for Apple to copy the design. Just look at the two next to each other. You're either blind or stupid if you think there was no copying going on.

    6. Re:Oh, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because this looks just like the iPhone:

      https://gizmodo.com/261172/settling-this-iphone-vs-lg-prada-nonsense

      If by "copy the design" you mean that the Prada is a phone, Apple made a phone, the iPhone is therefore a copy, then you're a fucking retard. Other than the earpiece cutout, there is NOTHING similar between them.

    7. Re:Oh, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be a little kid who wasn't alive before phones all started looking like the Prada.

      They look very similar. Go look at the non-grainy, official product pictures on GSMA.

    8. Re:Oh, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They aren't doing it to emulate the Essential Phone. They're doing it because some customers want cheap phones that look like an iPhone. So whether Essential did or didn't have the feature before iPhone has no bearing on the issue.

    9. Re:Oh, please by Xenx · · Score: 1

      The notch in android phones, or at least the big name ones doing it, isn't (just) a matter of ripping off the design to look like the essential or the iPhone X. The bezel-less trend is real. The notch allows for a higher screen ratio. Further, for what it's worth, the only downside to the notch is when a game or movie isn't designed for it correctly. The only problem I have had is when watching a movie, with their higher ratios. Anything recorded for 4:3 or 16:9 is just fine.

    10. Re:Oh, please by sexconker · · Score: 1

      In a world where Apple thinks it can sue over rounded corners and "slide to unlock", then yes. They absolutely copied the design. In the real world, it's also a yes.

    11. Re: Oh, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The thing I like about Android is that there is no one single Android phone. It's a platform in a marketplace where a dozen companies try to sell their ideas. Don't like Samsung? Get an LG. Don't like LG? Get a Huawei. Don't like Huawei? Get a Sony. Or a Blackberry. Or an HP. Or a Google Pixel. Or whatever phone you like that has the features or design you want. There's a rugged ip67 phone with a massive battery and a shatterproof screen and a headphone jack I'm looking at for my next phone. Fits my lifestyle. Probably wouldn't fit everyone's.

      By contrast: want an iPhone? You have one vendor and their limited decisions.

      If a bunch of vendors are copying iPhone, no problem. I can avoid those phones and focus on the phones I do like. That's the beauty of a marketplace, and competition.

    12. Re:Oh, please by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Don’t think of it as a notch in your screen, but 2 extensions to your screen. With out the notch there will just be blank space not utilized for anything. I would think a geek site would like more uses in available space.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    13. Re:Oh, please by sad_ · · Score: 1

      obviously it is used for something, because tfa mentions that it 'occluded the clock'.

      --
      On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
    14. Re:Oh, please by BorgDrone · · Score: 1

      Oh come on, that thing was nothing like an iPhone. If you had ever used one you'd know how different they were.

    15. Re:Oh, please by sebrk · · Score: 1

      that is not what this is about. It's about the Android camp constantly bashing Apple for everything and THEN copy it. Even when they don't need it because they don't even have the sensors or whatever. So I'm going to say it like it is: Android manufacturers knows that iPhone is the more sought after phone. They know it makes so much more money than their thing. So they want it to look as an iPhone as a selling argument. "Look buy our great Android phone. It even looks like an iPhone".

    16. Re: Oh, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will just leave this here:

      https://www.apartmenttherapy.com/apple-design-doesnt-fall-far-from-brauns-tree-176668

    17. Re:Oh, please by DarkEdgeX · · Score: 1

      Except the only reason they're "copying" it isn't because of the iPhone, it's because to do a nearly bezel-less display, it's one of the best solutions. I still think how Samsung handled it with the S8 and Note 8 made more sense, but I suppose if you want all the display you can squeeze into a device, it works. But I really don't think customers wanting an iPhone X copycat makes that big of a impact.

      --
      All I know about Bush is I had a good job when Clinton was president.
    18. Re:Oh, please by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      What has Android copied from iOS?

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    19. Re:Oh, please by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The bezel-less trend is real.

      Yes and it was started by people who knew how to make them practical before curving the display edge and taking a chunk out of it.

    20. Re:Oh, please by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      In a world where Apple thinks it can sue over rounded corners and "slide to unlock", then yes. They absolutely copied the design. In the real world, it's also a yes.

      If you think that Apple copied the Prada in 3 months, then what do you think Samsung did?

      https://gizmodo.com/261172/set...

      vs.

      http://money.cnn.com/2015/09/1...

    21. Re:Oh, please by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      that is not what this is about. It's about the Android camp constantly bashing Apple for everything and THEN copy it. Even when they don't need it because they don't even have the sensors or whatever. So I'm going to say it like it is: Android manufacturers knows that iPhone is the more sought after phone. They know it makes so much more money than their thing. So they want it to look as an iPhone as a selling argument. "Look buy our great Android phone. It even looks like an iPhone".

      Precisely.

    22. Re:Oh, please by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      What has Android copied from iOS?

      R U Sirius?!?

      http://appleinsider.com/articl...

      http://money.cnn.com/2015/09/1...

    23. Re: Oh, please by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      The thing I like about Android is that there is no one single Android phone. It's a platform in a marketplace where a dozen companies try to sell their ideas.

      ...And ALL of which are falling all over themselves to copy Apple, LOL!!!

    24. Re:Oh, please by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      The notch in android phones, or at least the big name ones doing it, isn't (just) a matter of ripping off the design to look like the essential or the iPhone X. The bezel-less trend is real. The notch allows for a higher screen ratio. Further, for what it's worth, the only downside to the notch is when a game or movie isn't designed for it correctly. The only problem I have had is when watching a movie, with their higher ratios. Anything recorded for 4:3 or 16:9 is just fine.

      That's hilarious!

      When the iPhone X Debuted, these pages were CHOCK-FULL of people deriding the "Notch". Hell, Samsung even parodied it in one of their TV ads!

      Now that Android's doing it, it's the greatest thing since Penicillin!!!

    25. Re:Oh, please by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Except the only reason they're "copying" it isn't because of the iPhone, it's because to do a nearly bezel-less display, it's one of the best solutions. I still think how Samsung handled it with the S8 and Note 8 made more sense, but I suppose if you want all the display you can squeeze into a device, it works. But I really don't think customers wanting an iPhone X copycat makes that big of a impact.

      That's just a happy coincidence, right?

    26. Re:Oh, please by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Link 1: There's no way they laid all the groundwork for switching from Java to the Java-derived DALVIK and whipped together the Android API and SDK based on DALVIK (which would have needed to be created from scratch given that Danger used native Java APIs and the Java SDK) in the handful of months between the iPhone being unveiled and the first Android phone coming to market. There wasn't even enough time to get FCC approval and tool for production in that time, and the addition of a touch interface would have necessitated both re-approval and re-tooling.

      Link 2: That's Samsung, not Android. Samsung could well have done the same with Windows Phone, or even their own OS.

      I feel like we've had this conversation before.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    27. Re: Oh, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But but but fruit company.

    28. Re:Oh, please by Xenx · · Score: 1

      For what it's worth, I think we'd be better off without the notch and just having at least one bezel be larger to house the components. It just isn't as bad as people think it is. Also, I was talking about my experience with the notch on the iPhone X. So, if you're trying to say I'm defending one over the other.. you're mistaken.

    29. Re:Oh, please by Xenx · · Score: 1

      First, I'm not saying I'm a fan of the notch. I'm only stating it's not some big affront. Strictly speaking, the notch means more screen. One edge of the phone has to house the camera and everything on the front. There are only two options. The first option is one edge is dedicated to the components and the screen to body ratio is smaller. The other option is the notch. They're not taking a chunk out of the screen. They're expanding the screen around the notch. They're not removing something that you would have otherwise.

    30. Re:Oh, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are an idiot if you think they couldn't have knocked together a preview unit within the 4 months that they had. If Intel and Nvidia can pump out new microprocessor architectures every 6 months, Apple could have easily done an external design mock-up for their iPhone demo in 4 and had a working product for release in 9.

      Fact: Apple ripped off the design of the iPhone from LG, no argument, full stop.

    31. Re:Oh, please by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 0

      [...] So I'm going to say it like it is: Android manufacturers knows that iPhone is the more sought after phone. They know it makes so much more money than their thing. [...]

      That's because the iPhone is a status symbol and priced accordingly. I buy Android phones because I want a good phone for the price I'm paying. I do not want the hardware version of the I Am Rich app, regardless of if it is an iPhone or just an overpriced technically-not-a-counterfeit of their stuff.

      I hear that iPhones are actually doing pretty damn poorly on the market right now because most people are quite happy with their old phone or a refurb, and are overall considering at least the newest models to be overpriced. I'm not sure it's a good time to be copycatting iPhones, or at least the newest one--it might be a good time to offer a nice cellphone with an appearance inspired by the more classic models of iPhone, built to go after the people who don't like the current models' price but don't want the older tech of a refurb,

    32. Re:Oh, please by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

      Don’t think of it as a notch in your screen, but 2 extensions to your screen. With out the notch there will just be blank space not utilized for anything. I would think a geek site would like more uses in available space.

      I've generally considered that blank space as there to serve as a place to put fingers safely when doing things like using the phone as a camera. A bit of texture or the like to help with grip would be nice, but I think all the phone manufacturers have some strange fetish for making phones as difficult to grip without a case as they can.

    33. Re:Oh, please by Do+You+Smell+That · · Score: 1
      Or, option 3. Drop the front camera entirely. As an Essential owner, I've considered constantly lately how I haven't used the front camera on any of my last few phones.

      I'm guessing there's really no need for a phone company to consider the use case that some people don't ever take selfies.

      --
      I'm not good at making signatures...
    34. Re:Oh, please by Xenx · · Score: 1

      Except, it's better to include a camera on the front so users have the option if/when needed... from a business standpoint. Also, there are other things than a camera to include there, like the ambient light and proximity sensor. There is also the earpiece to consider.

    35. Re: Oh, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even TFA says that there are companies focusing on their own innovations rather than copying apple.

      Nice troll, though.

    36. Re:Oh, please by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Link 1: There's no way they laid all the groundwork for switching from Java to the Java-derived DALVIK and whipped together the Android API and SDK based on DALVIK (which would have needed to be created from scratch given that Danger used native Java APIs and the Java SDK) in the handful of months between the iPhone being unveiled and the first Android phone coming to market. There wasn't even enough time to get FCC approval and tool for production in that time, and the addition of a touch interface would have necessitated both re-approval and re-tooling.

      Link 2: That's Samsung, not Android. Samsung could well have done the same with Windows Phone, or even their own OS.

      I feel like we've had this conversation before.

      1. They HAD the Android OS together in some form with a Keyboard-based Interface before the iPhone debuted. All they had to do is re-tool the GUI bits. Heck, they didn't even really have to source ANYTHING. Who's the "They"? Android doesn't spec HARDWARE, per se. So, if the "They" is Google, THEY didn't even BUILD the first Nexus phone (the Nexus 1), that would be HTC. And THAT wasn't available until THREE YEARS after the first iPhone was shown to the Public. PLENTY of time for HTC to source a touchscreen, work with Google on the GUI, and apply for and receive "Agency Approvals":

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      As for Point #2, fair enough. But Samsung was a VERY important "partner" for Google in the Android world, even BEFORE the iPhone. They would have received first-class access to Google's UI engineers. And that, paired with the fact that Samsung is one of the few actual Touchscreen OEMs in the world, gave them a jump on almost everyone. But even with THAT advantage, their first Touchscreen phone, the romantically-named SGH-T919 (which looks pretty much nothing like their iPhone-clone), wasn't released until "late in 2008", almost 2 years after the first iPhone was revealed.

      As near as I can determine, Samsung's 100% iPhone-clone depicted in my "Link #2" is the Galaxy S, which was announced in March 2010, again, THREE YEARS after the debut of the first iPhone (February 2007). PLENTY of time to "copy the iPhone, pixel for pixel.":

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Have we had this discussion before? Yes. And we will have it again; so long as you keep taking the entirely indefensible position that phones like the Galaxy S are not 100% cold-copies of the iPhone.

    37. Re:Oh, please by BronsCon · · Score: 0

      The first Android phone was the HTC Dream (neigh T-Mobile G1), released in September 2008. That's not 3 years after the iPhone, but I'll grant you that it is a little over a year.

      I didn't even dispute your claims against Samsung, though; I merely pointed out that Samsung is not Android and that they could have made the same phone with a different OS and it would have been just as much of a "copy". However, since you chose to push the issue, the Galaxy S looks a lot more like the Behold (which you also linked to) than the iPhone.

      What were they gonna do, put razor-sharp 90 degree corners on every edge and cover the friggin' thing in buttons? No, that would be extremely uncomfortable to hold and unwieldy to use, so they rounded the corners and reduced the buttons to what they thought were necessary (in the Behold), because those choices, simply put, were just logical. They then reduced the buttons further based on market research and seeing how their phones were actually used, resulting in the Galaxy S. Natural progression, my friend.

      If they were going to copy the iPhone, they would have done so in 2008 when they released the Behold, not in 2010 with the Galaxy S.

      I'm not exactly what you'd call a Samsung fanboy; the first time we went over this, I actually quite disliked the Galaxy line but I did quite enjoy the Nexus 6 I had at the time. That changed with the Galaxy S7, of course; then, there's the Galaxy S8 which, of course, you'll say copied the iPhone X's no home button design more than half a year before the iPhone X even came out.

      What you don't see is that Apple and Samsung are the leaders here for a reason. For every example you can come up with of Samsung (which, I'll repeat, is not Android) copying something from Apple, I can provide an example in the other direction as well. They work together, they "steal" from each other (neigh, they have back room agreements) and sue each other for show. Fanboys on both sides love it, so it really is good marketing. Samsung knows that most people prefer Android (look at sales numbers, this is a fact, not an opinion and, certainly, not an attack on iOS or Apple) so they won't be hurt by "losing" a handful of lawsuits to Apple and the pricing they offer Apple on parts they can't really get from anyone else in the quality or quantity that they need reflects the settlements and judgments Samsung ends up paying as part of this process. Apple knows this, as well; they know they paid $584 million more for parts from Samsung after the settlement than they otherwise would have, and they know they paid $1.05 billion more for parts from Samsung after the judgment than they otherwise would have. And both parties are fine with it, because it's just marketing. Samsung gives Apple almost $1.6B and Apple gives it right back because it's all for show.

      Do you think the iPhone would be what it was without Samsung RAM and displays? Every time Apple has tried to move away from Samsung for some part or another, be it in the iPhone, iPad, or MacBook lineup, they come back because people complain about the inferior quality of the new part. Think pink screens. That's what happened when they tried to source displays form LG. You think Samsung doesn't know they could destroy Apple by refusing to sell them parts anymore? And it would be a small (and temporary) hit for Samsung because, with Apple gone, their customers would have to go elsewhere and they'd either use those parts in their own consumer products or sell them to smaller competitors. Of course, Apple knows this; they know the iPhone wouldn't be competitive with an inferior display, they know the Mac wouldn't be competitive with an inferior display, they know they can edge a bit more performance out of their soldered-in RAM at a slightly lower voltage if they use Samsung DRAM instead of, say, Micron (look at the the GPU overclocking community discussing the current generation of nVidia cards for an example of this). So

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    38. Re:Oh, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ignore him. He's a blind Apple fanboi spewing misinformation.

    39. Re:Oh, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Link 1: There's no way they laid all the groundwork for switching from Java to the Java-derived DALVIK and whipped together the Android API and SDK based on DALVIK (which would have needed to be created from scratch given that Danger used native Java APIs and the Java SDK) in the handful of months between the iPhone being unveiled and the first Android phone coming to market. There wasn't even enough time to get FCC approval and tool for production in that time, and the addition of a touch interface would have necessitated both re-approval and re-tooling.

      Just look at the first time Google demoed it's touch enabled Android almost a year after Apple demoed the iPhone - you could only drag around stuff on the screen with horrible lag, you couldn't even click links or zoom in the browser by touch and had to use the hardware buttons to do so.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1FJHYqE0RDg

    40. Re:Oh, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first Android phone was the HTC Dream (neigh T-Mobile G1), released in September 2008. That's not 3 years after the iPhone, but I'll grant you that it is a little over a year.

      Yeah, and that didn't copy the iPhone but was clearly a BlackBerry clone. Exactly his point. At that time Google wasn't far enough in copying iOS to build device on that.

    41. Re:Oh, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was presented to iF in September of 2006, you fucking moron.

  2. Copycat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What ? Android manufacturers don't copy Apple ? Blasphamy

    1. Re:Copycat by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 0

      Tim Cook is slipping.

      For the good of humanity he should have design-patented the heck out of the notch!

    2. Re: Copycat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tim Cock patented her proprietary butt plug. Enjoy, icocksuckers.

    3. Re:Copycat by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      No, Apple copied the Essential PH-1, the original "notch phone".
      Now all the Chinese phone manufacturers are copying the copier.

    4. Re:Copycat by viperidaenz · · Score: 1
  3. Sadly, probably brilliant rather than stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "No one in this world, so far as I know — and I have searched the records for years, and employed agents to help me — has ever lost money by underestimating the intelligence of the great masses of the plain people." — H. L. Mencken

    1. Re: Sadly, probably brilliant rather than stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For a second, i thought this was thing to be Trump quote.

    2. Re: Sadly, probably brilliant rather than stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My god, is there anything in the world that isn't Trump-related in your head?

      Do you open an article about a weather delay at a baseball game expecting to find out that Trump caused it with his DARPA weather control lasers?

    3. Re: Sadly, probably brilliant rather than stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My god, is there anything in the world that isn't Trump-related in your head?

      Do you open an article about a weather delay at a baseball game expecting to find out that Trump caused it with his DARPA weather control lasers?

      No, no, no. Sports related weather delays are clearly an "I blame Obama" problem. Problems with wars in the MidEast (and the recession) didn't exist until late 2008. The economy was absolutely horrible from 11/2008 until 11/2016 when it magically became good again despite the statistics being unchanged.

      Also, Jeff Sessions is an incompetent shill and Trump should fire whatever idiot hired him.

    4. Re:Sadly, probably brilliant rather than stupid by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      Rot bilong kago. Apparently it's now a design principle for Android phones.

  4. Seen all of this before by Maury+Markowitz · · Score: 1

    > so the cutouts at the top are self-evidently motivated by the desire to just look -- not function, look -- like an iPhone

    The cargo cults of the modern world.

    1. Re: Seen all of this before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People are more keen on the look than they are on Face ID anyway. If it's *features* you're after, there is little reason for an iPhone.

    2. Re: Seen all of this before by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      If it's *features* you're after, there is little reason for an iPhone.

      There is if you have a Macbook. I have an iPhone (a four year old iPhone-6 refurb), and a Macbook-Pro. The phone integrates seamlessly with the apps on my laptop, for calendars, alarms, text messages, photos, iCloud documents, etc.

      Another advantage of iPhones over Android is regular software updates that "just work".

    3. Re: Seen all of this before by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      There is if you have a Macbook. I have an iPhone (a four year old iPhone-6 refurb), and a Macbook-Pro. The phone integrates seamlessly with the apps on my laptop, for calendars, alarms, text messages, photos, iCloud documents, etc.

      Android does this wonderfully as well, FWIW.

    4. Re: Seen all of this before by phayes · · Score: 1

      You must have a different definition of the word wonderfully than we do.
      I have a Mac as well as both an iPhone and an android phone. ShanghaiBill is correct in that iPhones integrate wonderfully with a Mac. Android does integrate with the Mac but nowhere near as well or as easily, iMessage being an example where android is unable to integrate.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    5. Re: Seen all of this before by thewebsiteboy · · Score: 1

      #team android for life.

    6. Re: Seen all of this before by Teun · · Score: 1

      You just mentioned reason to stay clear of Apple, their software integrates less well with software of other companies.
      It's called a "walled garden".

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    7. Re: Seen all of this before by west · · Score: 1

      > It's called a "walled garden".

      Which is exactly why I *go* with Apple.

      I want my phone to be a phone, and my computer to be my computer. I've no more interest in paying the flexibility tax on my phone than I do on my toaster. I am willing to pay that tax for my computer.

      Obviously personal needs vary completely. Trying to recommend one phone/OS/toaster over another without fully understanding the needs of the user is proselytizing, not advising.

      (Not that you were doing so.)

    8. Re: Seen all of this before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Wonderfully" is here being used as a splash adjective, like "insanely great."

      Please ditch the 1990's hype marketing shuck. It's so tiresome.

    9. Re: Seen all of this before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you want your chair and credenza to match your desk.

      Boring. This is Slashdot. We don't like your sort here. K'bai?

    10. Re: Seen all of this before by war4peace · · Score: 1

      I think it's quite the other way around.
      See, I can pair an Android with another Android, Linux or Windows machine (through Bluetooth, NFC, Wireless etc) and copy files from one to the other. Bring an iPhone and it's the only one that doesn't sync, unless you have that dreaded iTune or 3rd party alternative installed.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    11. Re: Seen all of this before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Facial recognition that can't be fooled by someone's facebook profile sounds pretty good to me.

    12. Re: Seen all of this before by war4peace · · Score: 1

      You can't be seriously choosing Apple because they prevent you from copying a file without iTunes.
      You can't be seriously choosing Apple because they only allow you to connect to approved headphones through a gimped Bluetooth stack.
      You can't be seriously choosing Apple because it can't sync with your PC seamlessly unless it's a Mac.

      Come on, I've heard plenty reasons to choose Apple, some good, some not so good, but yours makes top 5 worst easily.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    13. Re: Seen all of this before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google has their own walled garden, except they provide a ladder to allow other crap to get in.

    14. Re:Seen all of this before by PPH · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of the story (not sure if it's actually true) about the Soviets copying a B-29 to produce their TU-4 bomber. They duplicated it right town to a riveted patch over some old battle damage.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    15. Re: Seen all of this before by nullchar · · Score: 1

      I have a MacBook pro laptop, 2x Linux desktops (work + home) and Android phone.

      I have never signed in to icloud or itunes, but use gapps for personal calendar. I run my own mail sever (linux, hosted). Rsync runs on all platforms.

      Thus, all my shit works, with browsers or apps (oss preferred). It is seamless and not painful. I might be missing out on features (that I blissfully don't know exist).

      I recommend people buy platforms if they need them. If you want to be self reliant and secure, it's easy, but takes time to learn. Up you you.

      (I don't have time to fuss with things, I have a great job and family, but the basics are truly easy with only an up-front investment in time, if you care to learn.)

    16. Re:Seen all of this before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The TU-4 was a reverse-engineer (not a straight copy) of the B-29, but I highly doubt that the battle damage patches were replicated.

    17. Re: Seen all of this before by phayes · · Score: 1

      I never said that you couldn't jump through hoops to make things work, just that using android & a Mac is far from as wonderfully easy as using an iPhone. Given that you say "takes time to learn" with your android setup, you agree.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    18. Re: Seen all of this before by phayes · · Score: 1

      yeah, because copying files to/from your telephone is the only important thing people want to do when linking it to your Mac & solutions to do so effortlessly like iExplorer don't actually exist... /s

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    19. Re: Seen all of this before by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Which is exactly why I *go* with Apple.

      I want my phone to be a phone, and my computer to be my computer.

      Then you don't want a smartphone. You want one of those old Nokia phones that does nothing but make calls and send messages. You certainly don't want an iPhone.

    20. Re: Seen all of this before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I run my own mail sever (linux, hosted).

      Rsync runs on all platforms.

      ...it's easy, but takes time to learn.

      ...with only an up-front investment in time, if you care to learn.

      Or by simply signing into iCloud, I can sync files, photos, email, contacts, calendars, reminders, browser (bookmarks, history, current tabs), notes, passwords, text messaging, device location, instantly login (Apple Watch), etc.

      Yeah, your way is soooo much better.

    21. Re: Seen all of this before by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      And there is an easy setting in the phone's configuration to allow it to download apps instead from Amazon's app store. Or other third party app stores if you want.

    22. Re: Seen all of this before by rwven · · Score: 1

      As someone who recently (two weeks ago) dumped PC & Android for all-mac (iPad, iPhone X, MacBook Pro), I can say definitively that the android ecosystem has nothing whatsoever on the apple ecosystem where "seamless integration" is concerned. Apple products are far from perfect, but the way the devices integrate with one another is phenomenal.

    23. Re: Seen all of this before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, I thought we were on a tech website, not babbies first phone and computer website. How 'easy' shit is out of the box shouldn't really matter for 'us'.

    24. Re: Seen all of this before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, using Google's cloud services that Apple pays for..

    25. Re: Seen all of this before by west · · Score: 1

      Don't be snide.

      If you don't understand that flexibility has a cost, then you have failed to learn one of the most basic principles of user interfaces.

      If you *do* understand that flexibility has a cost, but cannot conceive of their beings more than two settings - yours and the far end of the spectrum, then you have failed to understand human beings.

      I understand the urge to evangelize - whether it be your God or your phone's OS. But realize when you are doing so.

    26. Re: Seen all of this before by west · · Score: 1

      My response was to the author's assertion that a walled garden is a bad thing.

      It is *a* thing.

      Whether it's bad or good depends upon the needs of the user. And frankly, for me, the walled garden is, overall, an advantage. For my use case, disadvantages of Apple's walled garden (which you listed some - there are of course many more) cost me very little, and the advantages of a walled garden (mostly I don't have to care about updates, security, malware (mostly), etc.) are significant to me. My time is precious - I don't want to waste it on my phone.

      Obviously the opposite applies to you. Very good.

      But if you cannot imagine a set of needs that vary sufficiently from your own that a walled garden is actually an advantage, I fear for your paucity of imagination.

    27. Re: Seen all of this before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux is a shitshow of outdated documentation, unpatched software (the dev is a uni student working towards a Masters.. graduated and the app dies on the vine) and NONE of it is MADE to work together.

      The OS is easy enough... but things like Windows and IOS just plain work. doing it yourself with linux is an endeavor in free time that will NEVER integrate as well as the other two.

      Sure, suffer with Libre-crap and apps that were never meant to be compatible or use say, Office 365 and get your shit on multi platforms with a dozen mouse clicks.

    28. Re: Seen all of this before by msauve · · Score: 1

      "using android & a Mac is far from as wonderfully easy as using an iPhone."

      You get what you pay (exorbitantly) for. Until you need something different, when you'll pay for the lock-in.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    29. Re: Seen all of this before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't need a "solution". Because it just works.

    30. Re: Seen all of this before by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      You mean all of my computers quit working in 2005 and I never knew it until some AC shill trolling Slashdot told me just now? Thanks!

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    31. Re: Seen all of this before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows 7 just works.

      Windows 10 is a disjointed mess, a chimera of windows 7 and a half baked phone OS that is painful to use as either.

      Microsoft fucked up hard. Most mainstream linux distributions are presently easier to use than Windows 10. Simple things like connecting a Bluetooth speaker or changing your IP address can usually be done in an integrated way in linux, but under windows 10 you've got a choice to make: is the thing I want to do in a metro app, or a win32 app?

      Apple does a great job of integration, for the most part. Just don't stray from the beaten path or it's worse than linux for random command line work.

    32. Re: Seen all of this before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "shuck" and "tiresome" are here lazily being used for their connotation.

    33. Re: Seen all of this before by The123king · · Score: 1

      People who pay for a new phone are idiots now. Thyere's so many perfectly functioning phones out there thaqt there's no reason to buy a new phone unless you've got more money than sense

      --
      If you gave me a choice between a printer and a giraffe with explosive diarrhoea, i'll get my ladder and my raincoat
    34. Re: Seen all of this before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      None of the positive things have something to do with a walled garden. At best the malware thing has to do with an app store.
      Walled garden only helps if somehow having e.g. root access makes you unable to resist installing random crap from the internet, but then I would say a better impulse control would on your side would be a worthy thing to strive for instead.
      Security and updates you can mostly get from select vendors on Android as well, though admittedly it is a big issue because most smartphone companies are a sad joke when it comes to software competence, and the little they have they decide to spend on useless crap.

    35. Re: Seen all of this before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, Google does that too.

      You just sign in those same services with Google, and you're in business. Pretty sure all of those have clients you can install in place of whatever you need to install it sign in to

    36. Re: Seen all of this before by phayes · · Score: 1

      I find the money spent in purchasing well integrated solutions to be worth every penny but then my time is clearly worth more to me that yours is to you.

      As for being constrained by iOS, other than not having an application that lets one easily determine which cellular network one is on and having to use the Apple Music app, Apple's walls have never limited anyone I know in any reasonable way.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    37. Re: Seen all of this before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why buy a high priced phone when you can steal one?

    38. Re: Seen all of this before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, flexibility comes at a cost... You have to install an app! Alternate music players just requires using the app once for controls to take over (copied by i OS)

      Most other replacements? You just have to click "use always" when the prompt appears.

      Oh man, such a high investment! Unless there's something that I'm not aware of using it as my primary phone.

    39. Re: Seen all of this before by RavenLrD20k · · Score: 1
      If you use Google Suite on Chrome, Android phones have all of that available on any PC too, except for text messages. One of the biggest blunders Google did with their phone apps was drop support for Hangouts to handle sms text messages where they could be sent to the phone and logged in PC. Another one was when they dropped the ability to link my cell number to google voice, so I could get transcribed voicemail messages in my gmail.

      But for everything else (google suite in chrome = related app on phone): calendar.google.com = Calendar (also handles alarms), mail.google.com = Gmail, photos.google.com = Photos, docs.google.com = Google Docs

      And since google went over to providing Android updates via Google Play Services instead of relying on the manufacturers and carriers to push out the OS updates and patches, I've been getting regular updates and patches at least every 3 months, but usually more often than that. And they too, "just work".

      Besides the integrated SMS, What's the advantage of iPhone again?

    40. Re: Seen all of this before by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      If you want your phone to be a phone, Apple has never made a phone you would buy.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    41. Re: Seen all of this before by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      People are more keen on the look than they are on Face ID anyway. If it's *features* you're after, there is little reason for an iPhone.

      There's little reason for Anonymous Cowards, either.

    42. Re: Seen all of this before by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      You just mentioned reason to stay clear of Apple, their software integrates less well with software of other companies.

      It's called a "walled garden".

      No.

      It's called an "ecosystem".

    43. Re: Seen all of this before by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      You can't be seriously choosing Apple because they prevent you from copying a file without iTunes.
      You can't be seriously choosing Apple because they only allow you to connect to approved headphones through a gimped Bluetooth stack.
      You can't be seriously choosing Apple because it can't sync with your PC seamlessly unless it's a Mac.

      Come on, I've heard plenty reasons to choose Apple, some good, some not so good, but yours makes top 5 worst easily.

      You're so full of shit it's coming out of your ears.

      Who needs iTunes to copy a file?

      What are "approved headphones"?

      What do you mean "Sync with your PC"? Sync WHAT?

      On my not-so-new iPhone (iPhone 6+) and ancient iPad (iPad 2), I gave the Mail App my login credentials for my work Office 365 Mail Account.

      Not only did my Mail Sync, with all my custom Folder-Structure, but so did my Calendars (and if I used them), I am sure my Outlook Contacts would have Synced too. Both my iPhone and iPad remind me of Meetings scheduled in Outlook, without me EVER lifting a figure to make it all happen.

      Just one example; but it neatly blows a hole in your bullshit allegations.

    44. Re: Seen all of this before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "APples walls have never limited anyone".

      LUL, you sir are a liar.

      Typing this from my iPhone 6 +

    45. Re: Seen all of this before by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      None of the positive things have something to do with a walled garden. At best the malware thing has to do with an app store.
      Walled garden only helps if somehow having e.g. root access makes you unable to resist installing random crap from the internet, but then I would say a better impulse control would on your side would be a worthy thing to strive for instead.
      Security and updates you can mostly get from select vendors on Android as well, though admittedly it is a big issue because most smartphone companies are a sad joke when it comes to software competence, and the little they have they decide to spend on useless crap.

      "Random crap from the internet"?!? Boy, THAT's rich!!!

      HOW many reports of Malware have their been regarding APPROVED Apps from the Google Play Store?!?

      https://9to5google.com/2018/01...

      https://www.cnet.com/news/goog...

      http://www.zdnet.com/article/p...

      http://fortune.com/2017/09/14/...

      https://www.digitaltrends.com/...

      https://blog.malwarebytes.com/...

      https://www.wired.com/story/go...

      Genuinely sorry if there are (likely are) dups in the above list. But you get the picture.

      And if you say "Well, but Google REMOVED these Apps, proving the system works!" It begs the question, how many people downloaded and had their information stolen, etc. BEFORE an App was removed?!?

    46. Re: Seen all of this before by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Yup, flexibility comes at a cost... You have to install an app! Alternate music players just requires using the app once for controls to take over (copied by i OS)

      Most other replacements? You just have to click "use always" when the prompt appears.

      Oh man, such a high investment! Unless there's something that I'm not aware of using it as my primary phone.

      I can stick inFuse or VLC Player or any number of alternate Music Players on my iOS Devices.

      So, what's your point?

      Oh, that's right; you don't HAVE one!

    47. Re: Seen all of this before by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      If you want your phone to be a phone, Apple has never made a phone you would buy.

      IOW, Apple doesn't make "feature phones"?

      Is that your great revelation?!?

      Wow, let me write that down!!!

    48. Re: Seen all of this before by war4peace · · Score: 1

      I just checked today, with a friend's iPhone 6.

      "Who needs iTunes to copy a file?" - I was talking about copying a sound file to use as a ringtone using drag-and-drop from a PC. It still won't work.

      "What are "approved headphones"?" - those who work with Apple's Bluetooth stack. Every other device (not only headphones) that connects to Android devices but no Apple are arguably "not approved" through the Apple Bluetooth stack. I remember an OBD II device made for an Opel Zafira. There were two readily available on the market. One was around 40-ish dollars but was not compatible with Apple phones (worked under all three Android phones I tested), and the "Apple compatible" device was 120 dollars and had similar feature set.

      "What do you mean "Sync with your PC"? Sync WHAT?" - anything really, you name it. Ringtones, music, documents, pictures, whatever. I plug my Android devices to my PC through USB and I can do whatever I want on its storage, even advanced stuff if I enable Developer mode. I wasn't talking about e-mail really.

      As for transfers between iPhones and Android devices, forget bout trying that. I lost count of the times I had to resort to alternative transfer methods to send some documentation from my phone to a colleague's phone. really, the two devices were next to each other and we had to upload the files to the cloud and share links.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    49. Re: Seen all of this before by war4peace · · Score: 1

      It depends how often you do that. I do it almost on a daily basis on various PC machines, where I dump some config files or portable applications. With a 128 GB storage on my phone, I found it easier to ditch the USB stick and simply use a device which I am sure to have with me at all times instead.

      Let's say some colleague needs a Sysinternals set of tools, or pscp or my Ninite config file, I happen to be around, pull out my phone, sync through Bluetooth and send over the files. Job done. And yes, some of those machines are disconnected from the Internet and sometimes even from the local network.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    50. Re: Seen all of this before by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      I was just pointing out that a smartphone probably isn't the best choice for someone who just wants their phone to be a phone. Apple has never made any other kind of phone, so if that's what someone truly wants (as west claims he does), they wouldn't want any of Apple's offerings. Of course, they also wouldn't want Android, but most Android manufacturers still make basic dumbphones, as well.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    51. Re: Seen all of this before by phayes · · Score: 1

      Given how much one pays for iPhone flash it’s clearly more economical to use the iPhone’s flash for the content you need it for: apps, pictures, music, videos, podcasts, books, etc and just carry around a $25-$50 USB key all the time (like I do) to copy files when needed.

      I once overheard a Bentley salesman make a sale on a $300,000 car by touting “and when you’re on a highway it shuts off two cylinders to get better mileage”. Your using an iPhone as a glorified USB key sounds a lot like that did.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    52. Re: Seen all of this before by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm not because I can't.
      However, price can't be an argument for lack of features. You're basically saying "it's more expensive therefore it's normal it doesn't have the features cheaper alternatives to". Sounds illogical, doesn't it?

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    53. Re: Seen all of this before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Walled garden is only a bad thing. Choice is always better.

      I can have a walled garden with android too - go google only. But if I *want* something google does not endorse and don't want in their appstore, I *can* have it. My choice, not theirs.

    54. Re: Seen all of this before by phayes · · Score: 1

      You're not What because of What?

      My argument is that the use of iPhones as a glorified USB key is a very minor use case which is better served by carrying around and using a much cheaper USB key.

      You seem to be in the "It has to be a dessert topping AND a floor wax camp" which is often the case coming from Android fans who confuse being able to do something with it being a good idea to do so.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    55. Re: Seen all of this before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like starship troopers: "until you die, or we find something better"

    56. Re: Seen all of this before by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      I just checked today, with a friend's iPhone 6.

      "Who needs iTunes to copy a file?" - I was talking about copying a sound file to use as a ringtone using drag-and-drop from a PC. It still won't work.

      "What are "approved headphones"?" - those who work with Apple's Bluetooth stack. Every other device (not only headphones) that connects to Android devices but no Apple are arguably "not approved" through the Apple Bluetooth stack. I remember an OBD II device made for an Opel Zafira. There were two readily available on the market. One was around 40-ish dollars but was not compatible with Apple phones (worked under all three Android phones I tested), and the "Apple compatible" device was 120 dollars and had similar feature set.

      "What do you mean "Sync with your PC"? Sync WHAT?" - anything really, you name it. Ringtones, music, documents, pictures, whatever. I plug my Android devices to my PC through USB and I can do whatever I want on its storage, even advanced stuff if I enable Developer mode. I wasn't talking about e-mail really.

      As for transfers between iPhones and Android devices, forget bout trying that. I lost count of the times I had to resort to alternative transfer methods to send some documentation from my phone to a colleague's phone. really, the two devices were next to each other and we had to upload the files to the cloud and share links.

      Who cares about ringtones? What are you, 12 years old? You said "a file". Not "A ringtone." Kind of a different thing.

      What are you talking about with the "not approved through the Apple Bluetooth stack?" Are you talking about iOS not supporting the PROPRIETARY AptX protocol? No, they support the INDUSTRY-STANDARD (and far superior) AAC Protocol, as well as the shitty standard Bluetooth Protocol.

      Wait! First you're talking Headphones, then you switch to talking about a Car Diagnostics Device?!? Make up my mind!!!

      I can tell I'm never going to reach a conclusion with this discussion; because you will just keep topic-hopping.

    57. Re: Seen all of this before by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Actually we're very much on topic.
      Android can readily do $STUFF which Apple can't. Maybe I wasn't truly specific, because examples are examples and they abound,

      - I don't give a shit if Protocol A is an "industry standard", if Phone 1 supports protocol A only and Phone 2 supports more than that, Phone 2 has more features, period.
      - Saying only a 12-year old wants personalized ringtones is a retarded ad-hominem. Anyway, yes I have an extensive collection of personalized ringtones which I created myself from music (my own as well as favorite bands' music), I have been using personalized ringtones since the Nokia 3300 and it's helpful to me to know exactly who's calling me without having to see on a phone display. To each his own. Point remains, though: Phone 1 can't do it, Phone 2 can. Advantage: Phone 2. Maybe you don't need it, that's fine. It's still a feature.
      - I was talking headphones AS WELL AS data connections through Bluetooth. one doesn't exclude the other. Point remains here as well. Phone 1 only accepts a limited number of "approved", more expensive devices, Phone 2 doesn't care. Advantage: Phone 2.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    58. Re: Seen all of this before by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Dude, look. I know it's hard to grasp, but, for example, configuration files need to be pulled from a content server pretty often. When a patch hits, I pull out my phone, download the config files and I'm ready to share them with whoever needs them at the location. One device used.
      If I had an Apple phone AND an USB stick, I would have TWO devices and would need a THIRD with Internet connectivity to be able to load those files to an USB drive.
      It's blatantly obvious the second solution is more cumbersome, requires more devices and makes me less productive.

      Yes it's a minor use case, but very useful to me.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    59. Re: Seen all of this before by phayes · · Score: 1

      So you've abandoned the use of a Mac/PC have you? All you use day in/day out is your phone to access CMS systems & do the rest of your job is your phone which you then connect to servers to transfer the contents over to whatever it is you're updating. What a brave new world you live in, dweebkins using only a _phone_ to do all your work...

      As for the rest of the world, well we still need our PC's/Macs to perform other duties like updating the documentation, answering RFP's and other minutia so carrying around a USB key or two isn't a hardship, it's what we need to do to perform our jobs. In particular, for me and my colleagues, it's installing & updating network & security hardware & VMs, often through GB sized ISO updates and more than occasionally needing to convert those ISOs into bootable USB keys to boot the devices from them.

      Now I could _try_ to use a phone to download an ISO, but connecting it to a router/firewall/Load balancer really wouldn't do anything now would it? And I've yet to see a phone that will take an ISO you have downloaded to it and render the phone usable to boot another device off of, but perhaps in your brave new Phone-only world you may have a reference to how you do this?

      The truth is, I doubt that your use case of downloading content to a phone because you don't have a PC+USB key available is anything other than you seeing your phone as a hammer and looking for screws to hammer down with it. Call that a failure of imagination on my part if you must.

      Meanwhile, my iPhone+Mac+USB keys are all necessary to perform my work and integrate wonderfully well as I said so far upthread.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    60. Re: Seen all of this before by war4peace · · Score: 1

      You're really hard-headed, aren't you?
      A config file is between 1 and 200 kilobytes large. Scripts push updated config files to a CMS server, which I access and download them as necessary. My phone can handle them just fine and I can keep them with me at all times.

      And who the fuck said anything about ISO files?

      My method works best in one specific part of the job. For other situations, I'm sure the generally agreed method (using an USB stick) is best. What are we arguing here about, anyway?

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
  5. How about copying these features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Removable battery, microsd card slot, headphone jack, unlocked bootloader, updates for years, no bloatware, uncapped and unthrottled data connection.

    1. Re:How about copying these features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Copying them from whom?

    2. Re: How about copying these features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay that last one isn't even part of the phone. My service is unlimited, though I may get knocked down to 3G(which is truly unlimited) if I go over 32 GB. But that's only if they need to. I usually still get 4G after the cap has been met.

      It's got nothing to do with my phone itself or it's features.

    3. Re: How about copying these features by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      And snacks... smokehouse almonds are always nice.

    4. Re: How about copying these features by Megane · · Score: 1

      And a pony.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  6. FakeID by Speare · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Honestly, not incorporating FaceID into an Android phone is a selling point for me. Only the owner can open it. And their brother. And anyone in China. And a cop who holds your phone up to your face. Unless a few other people look at your phone, in which case it won't even try.

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
    1. Re:FakeID by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      Honestly, not incorporating FaceID into an Android phone is a selling point for me.

      FaceID is an optional feature, that is off by default. If you don't like it, just don't set it up on your phone.

    2. Re:FakeID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think OP's point is, nobody _should_ like it (even if they think they do). Because it's completely insecure by default. It's like Apple is copying authentication schemes from "futuristic" spy movies even though the authentication schemes are stupid and will never work, but because it seems cool uneducated people will enable it. Apple is preying off of the gullibility of the masses, and it's kinda disgusting.

    3. Re:FakeID by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      Maybe it’s just because they couldn’t get the fingerprint scanner under the screen to work. Which is too bad, the scanner in the home button of older model iPhones works quite well.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    4. Re:FakeID by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think OP's point is, nobody _should_ like it (even if they think they do). Because it's completely insecure by default.

      It has a false positive rate of 1 in 50,000. That is plenty good enough for most people. I don't store nuclear launch codes on my cell phone, and I am not too worried about the NSA seeing my grocery list.

    5. Re: FakeID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1 in 50,000 when there's over 7 billion of us is about as secure as a keypad that only beeps when you get the right digit.

    6. Re: FakeID by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      1 in 50,000 when there's over 7 billion of us ...

      The number of people on earth is completely irrelevant. The phone would be no more or less secure if there was only 1 billion people, or 70 billion.

      is about as secure as a keypad that only beeps when you get the right digit.

      Nonsense. Many Android phones use a four digit code, which has a 1:10,000 chance of being cracked on each attempt, assuming that codes are selected randomly. They are not, with codes representing dates being far more prevalent. That is far less secure than FaceID, but still "good enough" for most people.

    7. Re:FakeID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Everyone and zy'r brother.

      FTFY

    8. Re:FakeID by swillden · · Score: 1

      I think OP's point is, nobody _should_ like it (even if they think they do). Because it's completely insecure by default.

      It has a false positive rate of 1 in 50,000. That is plenty good enough for most people. I don't store nuclear launch codes on my cell phone, and I am not too worried about the NSA seeing my grocery list.

      That's the false accept rate (FAR) when presented with another person's face. Several people have demonstrated that if you show it a 3D mask of the owner's face that is approximately the right temperature, the FAR is very high.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    9. Re: FakeID by swillden · · Score: 1

      Many Android phones use a four digit code, which has a 1:10,000 chance of being cracked on each attempt, assuming that codes are selected randomly. They are not, with codes representing dates being far more prevalent. That is far less secure than FaceID, but still "good enough" for most people.

      Those raw numbers are pretty meaningless without taking into account brute force mitigation strategies.

      In the case of Android passcodes (which includes PIN, pattern or password), there's an exponentially-increasing delay after failed attempts. It's basically impossible to get more than a couple hundred attempts[*], even if you're very dedicated and persistent. So, assuming the PIN is random and you don't have any information about it (e.g. didn't shoulder surf part of it), the probability of getting into a device is about 2% -- and that will take you a year or so.

      I'm not sure what brute force mitigation is in place for FaceID, but I'm sure there is some and that like TouchID it falls back to requiring a PIN.

      As a practical matter, I don't think brute force is a viable attack strategy for either. It's such an obvious attack that it will have been mitigated. What's more concerning about FaceID is the level of effort required to make a mask of the owner that will do the job. Note that fake fingerprints can absolutely be used to fake out every fingerprint scanner in existence, so as long as the difficulty of making a fake face is comparable to that of making a fake finger, overall security is probably about the same. Actually, face has a small advantage over fingerprint in that if you find a lost phone you may not be able to get a scan of the owner's face, but you can almost certainly find a copy of their fingerprint on the device.

      [*] I'm not particularly happy with how slowly the Android delays grow, or with the fact that they're capped at one day per attempt. I've argued hard for a more aggressive delay schedule, but got shut down by UX. Note that device makers are free to use a more aggressive schedule, and some do. The Android Compliance Definition Document just says they can't use a less aggressive one.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    10. Re:FakeID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FaceID is not a security feature, it is a convenience feature.

    11. Re:FakeID by shilly · · Score: 1

      TouchID is 1:50k. FaceID is 1:1m

    12. Re: FakeID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Android had face unlock in like, 2011.

      Hell, even Microsoft supports it fully in windows 10.

    13. Re:FakeID by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Some demo phones with fingerprint scanners under the screen have appeared, with release dates later this year. They are a bit slower than normal fingerprint readers. They only work with LCD screens as well, not OLED.

      They look kinda cool actually. The screen under the sensor has to flash white to illuminate your finger, and on the demo I saw they made that into a nifty looking fingerprint scanning animation like in some Hollywood movie.

      Personally though I'm happy with the fingerprint scanner on the back. It's in the perfect position when I pick the phone up and it's extremely fast. Would be even better if they made it into a scroll pad as well.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    14. Re: FakeID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. And they were roundly mocked for it because it is fairly trivial to duplicate someone's face and it's an incredibly stupid authentication method.

      Then Apple does the exact same thing in the exact same way, and suddenly it's "revolutionary." And, what a surprise, Apple's version was also almost instantly broken by people with printed photos.

    15. Re:FakeID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My X will not unlock if I close my eyes (so no unlocking while asleep) or make funny faces. I haven't tried my brother or anyone in China.

      I figure if a cop tries to unlock it I can make funny faces until it's disabled. (Assuming I don't have enough time to hit the key combination to disable FaceID.) I'm not sure how cops can force me to not make a funny face or open my eyes. Legally anyway. But they can compel me to give them my passcode illegally as well (threaten my children, for example), so I don't see a difference.

      But ultimately I am comfortable with the risk that I will be in a situation where illegally unlocking my phone results in a bad outcome outweighs the convenience. I'm not saying the risk is non-zero, but it's acceptable to me.

      captcha: habeas

    16. Re:FakeID by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Didn't they claim better than 1:1,000,000 at launch? I see they've revised that now...

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    17. Re:FakeID by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Didn't they claim better than 1:1,000,000 at launch? I see they've revised that now...

      Care to document where it has been "Revised"?

    18. Re:FakeID by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      AFAIK they haven't. I was being a bit snarky.

      You got a bug up your butt today buddy? I don't hear from you for a while, then this?

      But really, how have you been? I've missed this...

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    19. Re:FakeID by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      AFAIK they haven't. I was being a bit snarky.

      You got a bug up your butt today buddy? I don't hear from you for a while, then this?

      But really, how have you been? I've missed this...

      Sorry! I am fine, but getting more worn-out by the day.

      I need a vacation, BAD!!!!

      We just haven't crossed-paths on /. threads, lately. Nothing personal, I assure you... ;-)

      Hope you are doing more wonderful-er than me!!!

    20. Re:FakeID by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Ugh... Had the flu last month. I need like a year off, work is getting tiring.

      A month in the Bahamas is sounding really good right now. You down? I kid, of course, but only because there's no way I could afford to miss the work right now.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    21. Re:FakeID by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Ugh... Had the flu last month. I need like a year off, work is getting tiring.

      A month in the Bahamas is sounding really good right now. You down? I kid, of course, but only because there's no way I could afford to miss the work right now.

      Yeah, I ABSOLUTELY hear you!

      I had the flu last month, too... Took almost a month to get over it, and I feel like I've even had a slight relapse last weekend. Yeah, I feel like I am forcing thoughts out of a very tiny hole in a tube of really thick brain-paste. Doesn't help that work is a little slow right now.

      A month in the Bahamas sounds REALLY tempting; but I can't do the logistics, either... ;-)

      Sigh. We're just Work-Bots; you and I. MidaSwell face it.

  7. Do people still carry smartphones?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aside from your grandma, I mean.

  8. Notch = Temporary Fad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The on-screen fingerprint sensors already demonstrate it is possible to capture an image through an OLED screen. How soon until the front camera can do the same? My guess is it may require a sapphire front glass for optical quality, but little more.

    There are many advantages of an in-screen camera, especially if it is kept small and located near the center of the screen: Skype calls will be able to get MUCH closer to making eye-contact!

    1. Re:Notch = Temporary Fad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wont require sapphire glass because today's phones are already shooting pictures from the front camera though the same glass as that which covers the screen.

      What it will require though its a dead spot in the screen large enough for the camera to peer though it. If done right to where such hole appears between where notification icons would typically be displayed it would probably be completely unnoticeable with a dark status bar or wallpaper. You might have a black dot in the screen for a lighter colored status bar or wall paper though.

      Or i dont know just stop with this bezeless crap. There is nothing wrong with a half cm bezel at the top of the screen. Same thing with the curved corners, as seen with the example in the article companies half ass it. and it is just chopping off content. If you've seen screenshots from phones with the curved corners or even the iphone with its notch. The OS is still rendering parts that would be displayed there. They are literally just dead pixels not displayed on the screen itself.

    2. Re:Notch = Temporary Fad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Adding on to my previous post. Curved corners are just BS. They bring back an era of the CRT where content producers had to have a safe video area because of CRTs generally over scanned the content. Content producers had to assume that the average viewer could not see about 10% of the pixels along the edge of the screen.

      Now we are going back to the same BS. Viewing video where say a network logo would have appeared in the bottom corner is going to be cut off by the curve. Content producers are going to have to go back to the same thinking again because of curved corners and notches. Assuming that the viewer may not be able to view around 10 or so % of the edge of their screens.

    3. Re:Notch = Temporary Fad by Megane · · Score: 1

      What curved corners (in the video signal) came before the original Macintosh/Lisa? Apple was doing that back in 1984, and the screen was most definitely under-scanned.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    4. Re:Notch = Temporary Fad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the curved corners and usually 10% of over scan that CRTs had. until some of the last gen CRTs that had squared off corners and very little over scan

      NTSC has always been a rectangular image, but early CRTs were round, all the corners were cropped off by the tube. As time went on CRTs got more rectangular but even into the 80's still had curved corners. Then into the late 90's we got squared off corners and minimal overscan.

      With old school CRTs they were doing the exact same thing that today's phones with curved corners are doing. The OS is generating and sending a rectangular image to the screen. The screen is displaying whatever it can, cropping off rounded corners or notches. If you ever see screen shots from these devices with curved corners or notches the screen shots are perfectly rectangular with no curved corners or notches.

      This is why you see shit like the cropped off time on that one demo phone. as far as the OS is concerned it is sending an image to a rectangular screen. The screen is displaying what it can.

      We went from unpure garbage over scanning and cropping in the analog era to pixel perfect with no over scan in the digital era, just to have retards bring back an artifact of the analog era.

    5. Re:Notch = Temporary Fad by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      No, the curved corners and usually 10% of over scan that CRTs had. until some of the last gen CRTs that had squared off corners and very little over scan

      NTSC has always been a rectangular image, but early CRTs were round, all the corners were cropped off by the tube. As time went on CRTs got more rectangular but even into the 80's still had curved corners. Then into the late 90's we got squared off corners and minimal overscan.

      With old school CRTs they were doing the exact same thing that today's phones with curved corners are doing. The OS is generating and sending a rectangular image to the screen. The screen is displaying whatever it can, cropping off rounded corners or notches. If you ever see screen shots from these devices with curved corners or notches the screen shots are perfectly rectangular with no curved corners or notches.

      This is why you see shit like the cropped off time on that one demo phone. as far as the OS is concerned it is sending an image to a rectangular screen. The screen is displaying what it can.

      We went from unpure garbage over scanning and cropping in the analog era to pixel perfect with no over scan in the digital era, just to have retards bring back an artifact of the analog era.

      Some of your pedantic diatribe is correct; but the Macintosh and Lisa PRODUCED an image with rounded-corners, and the image was WAY underscanned. It had NOTHING to do with the CRT's geometry or scan-pattern or ANYTHING. IIRC, if you cranked the brightness up on the Lisa's screen so you could see the actual scan-pattern, it extended BEYOND the rounded corners of the IMAGE.

  9. That is why apple makes lion share of profits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More than one of these notched handsets at MWC had the clock occluded by the curved corner of the display.

    Now he's starting to understand why Apple devices sell at a premium. Apple puts in the hard work to make features work nicely. They don't have feature for feature sake.

    People are willing to pay a premium for a premium experience, which is why Apple makes the money while others have the volume.

    Copying Face ID is hard, so the knockoffs don't do that.

    1. Re:That is why apple makes lion share of profits by Cederic · · Score: 1

      People are willing to pay a premium for a premium experience, which is why Apple makes the money

      What the fuck is premium about a shitty black block where your screen should be?

      I wont pay for an Android version either.

    2. Re:That is why apple makes lion share of profits by omnichad · · Score: 1

      They can make the phone shorter, with less room for battery. That way, they'll have an easier time throttling your phone in 3 years to sell you a new one.

    3. Re:That is why apple makes lion share of profits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather they omit the front camera and use the entire space for more screen. I use the rear camera on my phone with some frequency, but I have never used the front camera.

    4. Re:That is why apple makes lion share of profits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is a non-starter commercially. Most who owns a smartphone uses the front camera for selfies on a daily basis.

    5. Re:That is why apple makes lion share of profits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most? Somehow I doubt that. Most smartphone owners probably don't even use the cameras at all.

    6. Re:That is why apple makes lion share of profits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, you're showing your cluelessness with yours. You claim that most people take selfies, which just proves you only hang around 16 year olds.

  10. Doesn't matter by Lije+Baley · · Score: 1

    After peak smartphone, it's all downhill from here.

    --
    Strange things are afoot at the Circle-K.
    1. Re:Doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After peak smartphone, it's all downhill from here.

      My grandpa still carries a smartphone. I wouldn't be surprised to see everyone on here anxiously unwrapping their new AOL disk.
      Have fun being spied on all day you old coots!

    2. Re:Doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Peak smart phone was the Note 4, Its all been downhill since

  11. There's too much copying, everywhere. by AbRASiON · · Score: 2

    I'm a slashdotter, so I'm somewhat of a luddite stuck in old times, for many many technical things. (Or perhaps I just don't like /unnecessary/ change, in design, especially when the end result is worse)

    I have a Samsung Note 5, the size, weight, fantastic, it has a FLAT screen, no stupid goddamn 'can't put on a protector' curve. It has a home button, a REAL button. The fingerprint scanner is on the front, on the home button in a convenient location.

    Admittedly, it still works pretty well, but one day, I'd like to replace it. *ALL* I would like is an identical phone that's faster, better camera, more storage and more network features, maybe USB C, more battery life if possible.

    I do not want a curved display.
    I do not want fingerprint scanner on the back.
    I do not want a smaller phone.
    I do not want one particularly larger.
    I DO want a /physical/ home, back and multitask button

    At the current pace of 'innovation' (read: wank factor) by the time my phone needs replacing, I will not be able to purchase a phone that matches my needs. OR the phone I want will be the 'budget edition' phone from the company, with a weak CPU / features that barely exceeds the Note 5 I had.

    I'll say one thing, these guys sure are curing my phone upgrade itch. The Note 8, iPhone X can go to hell as far as I'm concerned. The One Plus 5T can join them (although good on them for the price and flat display)

    1. Re: There's too much copying, everywhere. by j33px0r · · Score: 1

      I bought a note 8. Screen protector is curved and fits like a glove. Fingerprint sensor is in perfect location. Case is minimal in size.

      Not trying to convince you to buy one but those arguments don't hold up when you see one properly set up. It really is fantastic.

    2. Re: There's too much copying, everywhere. by AbRASiON · · Score: 2

      Curved displays distort the image, they are easily accidentally pressed with palm of hands. Curved displays are basically proven to break, SIGNIFICANTLY easier on dropping.

      GLASS screen protectors (to my knowledge) do not exist for them.
      If you wanted to protect it, properly, the case would need to be significantly 'deeper' the whole thing is unnecessary when I'm content / more than content with a flat phone.

      No home button is ....... just no.

    3. Re:There's too much copying, everywhere. by blahbooboo · · Score: 1

      You forgot to mention you want a 3.5mm headphone jack, which wont be a available by the time you upgrade.

    4. Re:There's too much copying, everywhere. by AbRASiON · · Score: 2

      Christ yes! This too, very much so. Stupid @#%ers, seriously? One of the most ubiquitous plugs on the planet?

      Disgusting.

    5. Re:There's too much copying, everywhere. by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      I replaced an older iPhone with a similarly sized iPhone 8s, which to my surprise doesn’t have a physical home button. It has a recessed pressure sensitive area, which “clicks” when you push it hard enough. Not quite like a physical button but close enough once you get used to it.

      Sadly they also replaced the aluminium back with a glass one, which makes for a seriously slippery phone. If I leave it on the arm rest of my lounge chair, it will slowly (over the course of 15 minutes or so) slide off and fall to the floor. It’s the first iPhone for which I bought a case, I never dropped one before and I am fairly careful with them, but this one is just too slippery. I’m sure the glass backside looks nice, but I can’t tell with the damn case on.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    6. Re:There's too much copying, everywhere. by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      To my surprise I am not missing that one as much as I thought I would. I picked up a pair of AirPods... now there’s something you’d expect of the good old Apple company, good looking, well built, practical, and of high quality. And they work equally well on my Windows laptop. Not going back to wires anytime soon, so they can keep the 3.5mm jack.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    7. Re:There's too much copying, everywhere. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why I keep buying Sony phones. They stuck to a pretty consistent design up until the XZ2 was announced, which steps away from their flat sided monolith designs a little, but even it is still the same screen size.

    8. Re:There's too much copying, everywhere. by ProzacPatient · · Score: 1

      I have a Note 4 and I refuse to upgrade much to the dismay of the reps at one of my carrier's store. None of the new Note phones seem to do anything that justifies an expensive upgrade to me and even if they did I still prefer Note 4 for the fact I can swap out the battery while on the go. An ideal phone to me would be basically a Note 4 with newer, faster, hardware but instead Samsung keeps coming out with the same rehash of the hipster paper thin phone with a non-replaceable battery that explodes.

    9. Re:There's too much copying, everywhere. by jecowa · · Score: 1

      Bluetooth headphones are nice and freeing, except when latency matters or when the battery in my headphones need to be recharged. Fortunately I can still use dongles to solve that (at least until the Lightning port gets axed, which is looking more likely now that we have inductive charging.)

      --
      my opportunity to freely express myself with the potential persecution and hangings and such
    10. Re:There's too much copying, everywhere. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty much this here too, but I guess I'm an older luddite because I lost the desire to upgrade somewhere in the early smartphone era.

      I look at pretty much all "innovation" or anything described as (yawn) "exciting" and my auto-response is "OK, what have they messed up now?" Occasionally I'm wrong and the feature is actually innovative and/or interesting, but usually it's just re-inventing the wheel ("now available in hexagonal!"), major over-hype, or some imbecilic crap that only the most dedicated fanboi could like.

      I still like the technical side of tech but when it comes to version n+1 of the i-gadget/samsung note/whatever I actively try to avoid updating (short of unrepairable breakage) because I know the new model will be just that little bit sh*tter and more annoying than the version that came before.

    11. Re:There's too much copying, everywhere. by Cloud+K · · Score: 1

      8+? Yeah I just got one too. I always put a case on anyway and found aluminium slippery too, and am glad for wireless charging as it means I don't get a bunch of marks around the connector where I've tried to put it on a charging stand in the dark / when drunk / etc when going to bed.

      I love that because Apple keep the updates coming, I won't have to worry about FaceID or notch BS for a good 3-4 years, by which time hopefully there will be better solutions.

    12. Re:There's too much copying, everywhere. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About the same here. I started looking for an Android phone at ANY price which MUST have

      - replaceable battery (mine died after 14 months)
      - 3.5mm audio jack

      and SHOULD have two or three of

      - USB OTG
      - MHL (HDMI out)
      - dual SIM
      - stylus

      and SHOULD NOT have

      - fingerprint sensor
      - face recognition

      Time and again, the closest result was the Samsung Galaxy Note 4. Which is FOUR YEARS OLD and probably does not get security patches anymore.

      WTF??? I'm keeping my lowly LG Stylo 2 for another year.

    13. Re:There's too much copying, everywhere. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reconsider the rear fingerprint scanner. I was extremely skeptical but it's actually way more ergonomic, and having a dedicated scanner separate from the home button eliminates the issue of accidentally hitting the home button when you expected to see a fingerprint prompt.

      It'll take you a few days to stop going for the home button for a scan, but once you're over that it's great.

    14. Re: There's too much copying, everywhere. by Bill+Hayden · · Score: 1

      But the fingerprint sensor is on the back -- I wouldn't call that properly set up. Maybe I'm an anomaly, but the majority of the time I unlock my phone, it's sitting flat on a surface.

      --
      Protect your browser with the Force Safe Search add-on
    15. Re:There's too much copying, everywhere. by ageoffri · · Score: 1
      I don't notice any distortion on my Pixel 2 XL, though the curved screen wasn't a selling point for me. I actually hesitated because of the curved screen. The reality is for me it doesn't matter.

      Glass screen protectors are very common for curved screens, I have a Zagg on mine and quick look shows S7 and S8 have them available.

      The case is slightly deeper, but not noticeably deeper. Again for me, I don't even notice the curve and case being awkward.

      The fingerprint scanner on the back is perfect. I pick up my phone and naturally my finger hits the scanner. It is a smooth motion. A front scanner seems like it would be several extra steps and contortions to get to.

      As far as the home button, I can't imagine going back to a physical button. I had to be kicked and dragged into no more physical keyboard and the home button was the same way.

      With the exception of the glass screen protector, everything is opinion but give a modern phone a try for a couple weeks would be my advice.

      --
      -- Slashdot, making the Left look conservative since 1997.
    16. Re:There's too much copying, everywhere. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't know there was an XZ2.
      XZ2 compact is 18:9 5"! (too bad it's 1080p and not 720p)
      That's good, 5" 16:9 is ugly and big, so 5" 18:9 which is smaller would be good.

      What if it had a notch, though? I don't think I would care, if the phone has jack, FM radio, flat screen and supports alternate OS.
      hum, no jack and no FM radio on XZ2 C! Assholes.

      I can't afford either (XZ1 Compact or XZ2 Compact) anyhow. But the form factors are possible at least

    17. Re:There's too much copying, everywhere. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Phones aren't created for YOU. YOU are not the intended customer and frankly there's not enough of YOU for ANYONE to give a damn. Quit acting like you're special. Here's an idea: go out and create the phone YOU want. When it doesn't sell YOU'LL know why.

    18. Re: There's too much copying, everywhere. by j33px0r · · Score: 1

      I hear you. For me its when i pull the phone out of my pocket and the placement is perfect as the phone is unlocked before i look at it.

    19. Re:There's too much copying, everywhere. by dinfinity · · Score: 1

      I feel you, buddy. Welcome to the world of people who like hardware keyboards on their mobile devices. Get ready to be mocked for being old-fashioned by everybody.

  12. Apple Sucks! by MpVpRb · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Stop copying Apple!

    We need analog output, replaceable batteries, removable storage and easy repairability, not thinner copies of iphones

    1. Re:Apple Sucks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And lower profits to go with that list of last century technology.

      Awesome, gramps.

    2. Re:Apple Sucks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awesome, apple shareholder corporate cock sucker.

    3. Re:Apple Sucks! by sharkbiter · · Score: 1

      Yep, nothing like those new fangled high priced exploding wireless earbuds, eh? What a cool idea!

    4. Re:Apple Sucks! by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      If it ain't broke, don't fix it. If it is, then it's awfully nice to be *able* to fix it.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    5. Re:Apple Sucks! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I don't buy Samsung phones any more, but I was really happy to see that the Galaxy S9 has a headphone socket, an SD card socket, USB C, is waterproof, has a fingerprint scanner and wireless charging.

      If nothing else it debunks all the bullshit reasons for removing those things.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:Apple Sucks! by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      And lower profits to go with that list of last century technology.

      Awesome, gramps.

      I love it. The features that work better, lead to better device usability, repairability, and value, are all "last century technology" for old folks. That's a really damning condemnation of the smart phone industry, though one that's well-deserved.

  13. That's why we have journalists by petes_PoV · · Score: 1

    they haven't even customized their software to account for the new shape of the screen.

    It's no big deal. So long as the publicity given freely (or at least having the junkets paid for) and duly pushed out to the media lackeys results in sales of what looks like a competitor, the deficient software can be pushed out later.

    Or not. Because once the phone company has got the money from the sale, what is the point of giving stuff away for free?
    And of course those phones will only be a success if all the corrupt, wined and dined (at the very least!!!) journos who sing the praises of these half-ready devices hold up their end and give them the 5-star reviews and enthusiasm that they don't deserve. Which of course they will, for fear of not being invited to next year's little get-together, and all the freebies they will have showered on them for playing the game and misleading the public.

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
  14. Split personality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Android users have split personality:

    -- Non-removable battery is bad: Few years later they have it
    -- SD-card is good: Few years later it is gone
    -- 3.5 mm jack is a must: A year after iPhone removed it, it is gone from Android
    -- notch is ugly: A year later they will happily get it

    Not a single of the above features were forced upon them by Apple. Complete voluntary choices by Android manufacturers.

    1. Re:Split personality by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      Just the other day someone here ranked the Samsung Galaxy Note 4, released 3.5 years ago, as the best phone ever and that it's been downhill ever since.

      And with every article we have a series of apologists who discredit the mourners of lost features with epithets such as granddad and who would ever want X when we have Y?

      (Still using my 2012 era LineageOS 14.1 device after cracking the back cover to replace the battery twice)

    2. Re:Split personality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Android users have split personality:

      -- Non-removable battery is bad: Few years later they have it
      -- SD-card is good: Few years later it is gone
      -- 3.5 mm jack is a must: A year after iPhone removed it, it is gone from Android
      -- notch is ugly: A year later they will happily get it

      I just bought an Android phone. It has a removable battery, sd-card slot, and 3.5mm phone jack. It does not have a notch. Hey, guess what? Choice is great! Being an Apple fanboi, though, I guess you wouldn't understand anything about that.

      Not a single of the above features were forced upon them by Apple. Complete voluntary choices by Android manufacturers.

      Wait, who's copying Apple? The users or manufacturers? Seriously, you can't even keep your argument consistent across a single paragraph?

      Idiot.

    3. Re:Split personality by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Just the other day someone here ranked the Samsung Galaxy Note 4, released 3.5 years ago, as the best phone ever and that it's been downhill ever since.

      You did that on purpose didn't you?

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    4. Re:Split personality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm still rockin my Note 4 with lineageos 14.1 as well. After seeing where the industry is headed, I now have another NIB note 4 for whenever the inevitable happens to this one.

      The Note 4 was peak smart phone. Still has a mostly flat screen that you can apply a glass screen protector to, In my case i use a glass privacy filter. No notch, curved corners or rounded edges. Has a removable battery so unlike friends who have to carry around a charger and hunt down an outlet they can plug into after a long day out, I can just pull the spare battery out of my bag, swap it out and be at a 100% charge again in as much time as it takes for my phone to boot up again. I have a stand alone charger for said spare batteries at home. I almost never actually plug my phone in to charge, since i can just swap batteries. I have a wireless charging addon, so at night I can just plop my phone on the pad on my night stand and wake up with it fully charged. Still has a higher megapixel count camera than almost all the phones out there, not that mega pixels really matter on such a small sensors found in phones. Still has a headphone jack. Not really that usable, but has an IR blaster for playing pranks. Turning TVs off and on a bars, changing channels.

    5. Re:Split personality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Target market for these models is Apple fans who can't afford the latest iPhone anymore but still like their phones crippled. In case you didn't notice, there are plenty of Android phones without these "features".

    6. Re:Split personality by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      Sorry? September 2014 - 3 and a half years, to the month.

      I haven't worked out how to type the 'half' character in ASCII.

    7. Re:Split personality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You wrote 3.5, which is the correct time period, but I'm guessing that's not the point.

      I'm pretty sure the number 3.5 in the context of cellphones is right now a sore point for many people here due to some companies stupidly omitting the 3.5mm headphone jack from their current phone offerings.

      Either that or the GP has a thing for 3.5 inch floppy disks.

  15. Android bankrupt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no more clear sign of the bankruptcy of the Androidist cabals than this bankrupt theft of a design idea without the effort to provide the benefit Apple provides for the notch.

    Android is dead by the hand of its own supporters.

    1. Re:Android bankrupt by Stormwatch · · Score: 2

      They're Chinese companies. They don't do creative designs, they just copy whatever trends they see.

      (Not saying the people are incapable, but the socioeconomic context is not an incentive for them. I mean, if Apple comes up with something crazy, they have the ad budget to convince people it's actually a cool thing - even if it's completely retarded like that notch. The Chinese companies usually don't have the same persuasive power, so they just follow.)

    2. Re: Android bankrupt by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      They're Chinese companies. They don't do creative designs, they just copy whatever trends they see.

      That's a pretty absurd generalisation. While there are plenty of Chinese companies which just copy the most popular models, there are also many which innovate and serve less popular markets. If we are speaking about phones specifically, US manufacturers/companies seem to have completely given up on creating ruggedized phones with large battery capacity, in favour of ever slimmer and more fragile models. Whereas several Chinese companies have recently come out with modern phones featuring a sturdy design and 6,000+ mAh batteries.

      The next time I need to replace my phone I won't be looking for trendy western models; nobody outside of China makes the kinds of phones which appeal to me.

    3. Re:Android bankrupt by danomac · · Score: 1

      They're Chinese companies. They don't do creative designs, they just copy whatever trends they see.

      Apple copied the look of their first iPhone.

  16. Just supply & demand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These companies don't do a lot of in house manufacturing so they just pick up components that are readily available. Because there is a lack of market for the iPhone X, Samsung has a surplus of those notched OLED screens. This a case of companies capitalizing on the availability of cheap screens more than anything.

  17. Does anybody really care what Apple is doing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm amazed at the number of apple fanboys who've found there way to slashdot. It's unfortunate- because Slashdot used to be a decent place to get news and interact with other like-minded techies. It wasn't a place for "hip" or "power" users. It was about tech, liberty, and free software. It's been more about what Dell and Apple are doing and fraudsters (ie looking at you pureisn't).

    1. Re:Does anybody really care what Apple is doing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll give you the only reply you geeks always give other people, and the only reply you understand:

      You don't like what Slashdot has become ? Fork it.

    2. Re:Does anybody really care what Apple is doing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "THEIR" way...

    3. Re: Does anybody really care what Apple is doing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Already happend bunk.

      See soylent news.

  18. It's not a notch by dbraden · · Score: 1

    Why is everyone so negative by default? The other makers aren't copying a "notch" (small part of screen missing), they're copying "ears" (two new additional areas of screen).

    You're all just looking at it the wrong way!

    1. Re:It's not a notch by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Jokes aside, this is really how it works in practice.

      I just switched from Android on a Nexus 6P to iOS on an X, for business interoperability (you can't send a message to more than 10 people if they're not all iMessage users, and 28/30 in my group were, so guess who was the last to hear any news?). Pros: great battery life, works as a device to send and receive messages and phone calls, has WiFi Calling and iMessage (so I can still get calls/texts when in the bowels of the Faraday-cage hospital I work in). Cons: notifications are not as slick as Android, I miss the fingerprint scanner on the back, and Bluetooth sucks. On Android Bluetooth, you can rename devices (handy when your workplace buys the same Bluetooth speakers for every room), and you can specify which of the available services you want to connect to (e.g., my car has built-in Bluetooth for calls, but not audio, so I added a Bluetooth receiver to the aux port; unfortunately, almost all small Bluetooth receivers want to be your hands-free calling as well. On Android, I just told it not to connect the phone services to the audio receiver; on iOS, I have to select the preferred Bluetooth device after connecting to both.). Also, you can't rename your personal hotspot/WiFi tethering on iOS without renaming the phone.

      Oh, and as bad as Swype on Android has gotten in the last few iterations, it's still an order of magnitude better than any similar keyboard for iOS. Punctuation, capitalization, and editing were far superior to what you get with SwiftKey or GBoard.

  19. To Bad, so Sad; Windscreens by aberglas · · Score: 1

    Once something becomes fashionable, everyone does it. If I was a pointy haired manager, I'd do it too.

    My pet peeve is the trend some years ago for very horizontal windscreens. Makes the car very hot on even mild days, and amplifies the effect of any dirt. Also reduces fuel efficiency because people need air con most days, and does nothing for aerodynamics (look at an aeroplane -- pointy at back, not front).

    But once it became fashionable, every car manufacture does it. The more horizontal the cooler the car looks and the better it will sell.

    Phones will mindlessly follow Apple. Live with it.

    1. Re:To Bad, so Sad; Windscreens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once something becomes fashionable, everyone does it. If I was a pointy haired manager, I'd do it too.

      My pet peeve is the trend some years ago for very horizontal windscreens. Makes the car very hot on even mild days, and amplifies the effect of any dirt. Also reduces fuel efficiency because people need air con most days, and does nothing for aerodynamics (look at an aeroplane -- pointy at back, not front).

      But once it became fashionable, every car manufacture does it. The more horizontal the cooler the car looks and the better it will sell.

      Phones will mindlessly follow Apple. Live with it.

      The plane comparison is silly because planes seldom weave through traffic or parallel park. It's not that it is/not fashionable. It makes for better viewing at multiple angles if you lean forward/down, for example, you can look up. With a 90* vertical angle your forehead bangs into the glass and you can't see straight up. Plus i makes the car "feel" roomier even if the practical impact was minor. I happen to like a wide open dash, but my desk is also a meter deep at home so YMMV.

      Aircon is the wrong thing to bitch about on hot summer days. Running the car equivalent of a PV powered ceiling fan while parked in the hot sun would have a much higher improvement on interior temps. Vent it back out the rear and you don't even have rain infiltration worries.

    2. Re: To Bad, so Sad; Windscreens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bollocks.

      On a hot day, I don't want it to be the same temperature as outside, I want it to be cooler than outside. Often substantially so.

      If it's 45C out, I want to be 20C. (If it's -45C out, I still want to be 20C)

    3. Re:To Bad, so Sad; Windscreens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and does nothing for aerodynamics (look at an aeroplane -- pointy at back, not front).

      Huh?

      https://i.stack.imgur.com/sgaEN.jpg

      Since a glider doesn't have any thrust, I'll look there for aerodynamic features, and yet I haven't seen one that looks like the front of a school bus.

    4. Re: To Bad, so Sad; Windscreens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is stupid. If it's 45C out I'll want at least 30C inside. I didn't bring winter gear with me for the massive drop in temperature. Though I can accept supermarkets sell food and I'll adapt to cold 20C air there.

      If it's -45C you'll be clothed like a fucking spacesuit. Must be a hassle to strip naked and put back everything all the time. I'm sure 5C in a car will be fine, 10C if you're such a sissy.

    5. Re: To Bad, so Sad; Windscreens by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      This is stupid. If it's 45C out I'll want at least 30C inside

      Most people will still want it to be closer to 20C because they're not trying to be in the hot sun. Outside, in the 45C? You try to spend as little time in THAT as you can. You'll be going from the 20C car to the 20C office or store that you'll be spending most of your time at.

      Well, most people, anyway. I want those stores to be at least 30C as well, but I never get my way with that unless I'm in Hawaii.

  20. uhmm... by SuperDre · · Score: 1

    Actually it's the other way around, Apple has been copying Android phones for a long time.. The notch? Not Apple's invention...

    1. Re:uhmm... by avandesande · · Score: 1

      It's kind of like going to dentist to have them grind a gap between your front teeth.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
  21. copy of a copy of a copy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Problem is, with how garbage apple's hardware and software is these days compared to the golden age of Ive and Forstall, people are just making even crappier clones.

    Apple is now the one that is at risk of disruption by a new, smaller and savvier player.

    "Oh how the turn tables", as one famous idiot once said...

  22. Idiots. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'nuff said.

  23. Someone PLEASE copy the N900 and make a slider by sombragris · · Score: 1

    Hey phone makers, instead of copying all the stupid antifeatures crap (nonreplaceable batteries, glass enclosures, no 3.5 mm headphone jack, notches, absurd thinness, etc..) I got an idea for you: Copy the Nokia N900.

    Yes! Please copy it and make a decent phone with a sliding physical keyboard where one can actually type and write! I don't care if the resulting phone is some milimeters thicker but GIVE US A PHYSICAL KEYBOARD!

    --
    -- Look to the Rose that blows about us--"Lo, Laughing," she says, "into the World I blow..."
    1. Re:Someone PLEASE copy the N900 and make a slider by xlsior · · Score: 1

      You can still get physical keyboards on many modern phones by using a keyboard case: e.g. https://www.amazon.com/Samsung...

    2. Re: Someone PLEASE copy the N900 and make a slider by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blackberry has models with a physical keyboard that run Android.

    3. Re:Someone PLEASE copy the N900 and make a slider by Parafilmus · · Score: 1

      You may be interested in the Gemini... a new android device with a very nice keyboard.

      Seems pretty close to what you're after, although it's a clam-shell rather than a slider.

      https://www.indiegogo.com/proj...

    4. Re:Someone PLEASE copy the N900 and make a slider by sombragris · · Score: 1

      I know about them. But you are confined to selected models only and this is an aftermarket solution. Nice but not ideal.

      --
      -- Look to the Rose that blows about us--"Lo, Laughing," she says, "into the World I blow..."
    5. Re: Someone PLEASE copy the N900 and make a slider by sombragris · · Score: 1

      how many of them are portrait-sliding phones?

      --
      -- Look to the Rose that blows about us--"Lo, Laughing," she says, "into the World I blow..."
    6. Re: Someone PLEASE copy the N900 and make a slider by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      I miss my G1 phone with QWERTY keyboard. My ex "borrowed" it, then sold it to someone else. I've been waiting for someone to make a similar phone, that you can touch type instead of having to look at the screen to make sure your finger is in the right place.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  24. It's more secure than fingerprints by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I think OP's point is, nobody _should_ like it (even if they think they do). Because it's completely insecure by default.

    it's an order of magnitude (yes, really) more secure than fingerprints. It's just that not so many people have tried to let multiple people work the fingerprint sensor....

    Do you similarly think TouchID is bad and should be removed from all phones? 99% of people on Earth disagree.

    FaceID is not only more secure than TouchID, it's also way, way more useful because it happens without conscious thought mostly. You are just looking at your phone and whatever unlocks whereas before you would have had to respond for a request to use TouchID to get into an app or whatever.

    The people who are claiming it are not secure not only do not know what they are talking about, they do not know what they are missing... I would never buy a mobile device for myself that does not include FaceID. I would never buy a device for any family member that does not include FaceID going forward. FaceID is simply that much better a system and idea.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:It's more secure than fingerprints by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much does Apple pay you to shill for their broken products?

      Face ID was entirely broken two weeks after the iPhone X was released. All an attacker needs is a photograph of your face and they can figure out how to break it with an incredibly high chance of success.

      It's a bad feature and provably worse than Touch ID.

    2. Re:It's more secure than fingerprints by bug_hunter · · Score: 1

      I'm going to guess Apple pays $0 to SuperKendall, more likely actually checked the facts.

      When you say Face ID was easily broken, do you mean easily broken with a $200 3D printed mask as long as the user turns off liveness detection?
      Also not using just a photo but also a depth recording of your face

      https://www.wired.com/story/ha...
      http://bgr.com/2017/11/12/face...

      I'm pretty damn sure Touch ID is way easier to crack than that.

      --
      It's turtles all the way down.
    3. Re:It's more secure than fingerprints by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Breaking Touch ID requires getting a fingerprint, something you can't just get off someone's Facebook profile.

      Breaking Face ID just requires grabbing a bunch of pictures and having access to a 3D printer.

      Using something that by definition is publicly viewable as authentication is braindead. It's essentially requiring a username and then the username again. It's fundamentally broken and can never be fixed.

      You do realize those articles are from when the technique was first created, right? They've had four months to refine it.

      Face ID is completely broken at this point and can't be fixed. It's a dumb idea by a dumb company.

    4. Re: It's more secure than fingerprints by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But but but superkendall said it's the bees knees and he will never buy another phone without it. That's gotta account for something right? A geek being duped by marketing then turns around and spreads that marketing FUD into others.

      No?

    5. Re:It's more secure than fingerprints by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Breaking Touch ID requires getting a fingerprint, something you can't just get off someone's Facebook profile.

      Breaking Face ID just requires grabbing a bunch of pictures and having access to a 3D printer.

      Using something that by definition is publicly viewable as authentication is braindead. It's essentially requiring a username and then the username again. It's fundamentally broken and can never be fixed.

      You do realize those articles are from when the technique was first created, right? They've had four months to refine it.

      Face ID is completely broken at this point and can't be fixed. It's a dumb idea by a dumb company.

      Go to Hell, Anonymous COWARD.

      It's a LOT more than just "anyone with access to a 3D Printer", fucktard.

      I guess you can just load a 2D picture of something up into Photoshop, hit "Print", and out pops an accurate 3D representation of the picture.

      Yeahrightsure.

      Fucktard.

    6. Re:It's more secure than fingerprints by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you can just load a 2D picture of something up into Photoshop, hit "Print", and out pops an accurate 3D representation of the picture.

      No, you need at least two to get depth perception. You know, that thing that Apple does with their "magic" double camera? The more pictures you can get, the better the 3D model you can make.

      Given how frequently Apple users post selfies to social media, it's pretty trivial to get a very accurate 3D model of their head. It's not new tech.

    7. Re:It's more secure than fingerprints by bug_hunter · · Score: 1

      Yeah but breaking into someone's phone requires physical access, and if you have physical access to the phone you might be able to copy their fingerprint using $1 of glue https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      And yes I do realise those articles are from when it was first created, now it might only take $150, a slightly cheaper 3D printer and several hours to perfect a face that will fool it.

      So do you really fear someone is going to nab your phone without you knowing and have a well made cast of your face ready to go?

      > Face ID is completely broken
      Nope, it's not perfect, it doesn't intend to be, but it's much more secure than Touch ID.

      --
      It's turtles all the way down.
  25. Masks DO NOT WORK with FaceID by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    What's more concerning about FaceID is the level of effort required to make a mask of the owner that will do the job.

    I'm not sure what you mean by "more concerning" because it has been shown in multiple videos that even extremely accurate masks made from professional molds of the face DO NOT WORK with FaceID.

    Apple itself stated that they built FaceID not only against faces from all cultures around the world, but also they tested against masks as well to make sure such an obvious attack vector would be denied.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Masks DO NOT WORK with FaceID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Took two weeks after the iPhone X launch for a security company to 3D-print a mask that would unlock an iPhone X based on nothing more than photographs of the person's face. Not even a 3D scan, they just grabbed a few photographs and that was enough to make a mask that tricked Face ID.

      It was covered on Slashdot so I know you saw it.

      Masks may not work, but 3D-printed heads do, no matter how much Apple pretends otherwise. Security researchers completely broke Face ID in under a month.

    2. Re:Masks DO NOT WORK with FaceID by swillden · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what you mean by "more concerning" because it has been shown in multiple videos that even extremely accurate masks made from professional molds of the face DO NOT WORK with FaceID.

      A colleague of mine did it. Got a high-quality mask of his own face made, and another colleague was able to unlock the test device while wearing it.

      Several other groups have done it as well, and published about it.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    3. Re:Masks DO NOT WORK with FaceID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds interesting. Got any links to published research?

  26. Please, Please copy the good idea, not the bad ide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please, Please copy the good idea, not the bad idea, like the ugly notch.

    I will NOT buy any phone with a notch on the screen.

    ANY phone!

    When you are viewing photo, movie, youtube, playing game, the notch on the screen is a big ass hole.

  27. You're a what so you're a WHAT? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I'm a slashdotter, so I'm somewhat of a luddite stuck in old times

    WTF does that even mean. I'm a Slashdotter from the old times (read for a while before I even created an account, much to my everlasting shame) and I am firmly in the progress camp. In fact I would way MOST of Slashdot used to be in favor of technological progress until the last decade or so, when we started to see a spike in luddthargy creeping through the user base. But I still don't think it's prevalent.

    Everything that you want is there in the iPhone X. Except for physical home buttons - but trust me, the gesture system is SO MUCH BETTER than any physical arrangement has been to this point. I did not think I would like that aspect either but it's just way better having no home button at all. FaceID is also WAY better than TouchID in all respects.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:You're a what so you're a WHAT? by mccalli · · Score: 1

      Hmm - I'm also from the olden days, lost password to my original account but it's in the 12k range. I'm more luddite than ever. I keep seeing things being rehashed and recycled and often get worse too.

      The X - I have it, I like it but it feels a bit beta. FaceID is not better than TouchID in every way, it's better in one way only - no physical button. Other than that it's slower and more error prone. It can be more transparent in general use because you're already looking at your phone, but in other cases it's worse - try to unlock a phone that's lying flat on a table for instance.

      That said I still like the X overall and mostly agree with you about the gestures vs button. I would completely agree if they'd not made a silly UI choice and changed the "kill app" from swipe upwards to "press and hold, then active this tiny tiny little button that we've made out of purest elemental tiny". But that's a software UI blunder, not an indictment of the whole thing and I much prefer it overall.

      Anyway, point of post was luddite'ism - yes, it's alive and well in the old school like me. And growing too.

    2. Re:You're a what so you're a WHAT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everything that you want is there in the iPhone X. Except for physical home buttons - but trust me, the gesture system is SO MUCH BETTER than any physical arrangement has been to this point.

      You know that this SO MUCH BETTER of yours is nothing more than your take on it. I don't think a happy SNote5 user is going to agree with this, let alone with all the other bizarro world perks you get with IOS.

    3. Re:You're a what so you're a WHAT? by theArtificial · · Score: 1

      (read for a while before I even created an account, much to my everlasting shame)

      This is funny!

      I agree with you on the gestures, I didn't think I would like them and quickly got used to it. The lack of a TouchID was concerning since I still really like being able to have the phone accessible by the time I look at it. So for example let's say you're in a meeting, yes yes you should be paying attention, Face ID isn't as optimal since you need a specific angle for it to get your face whereas the Touch ID just needs a finger. Besides that, easily the best phone I've owned.

      --
      Man blir trött av att gå och göra ingenting.
  28. The intersection of Tech And Liberty by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    It was about tech, liberty, and free software

    It still is - that's why Apple has been on Slashdot so much in recent years.

    They've always been advancing tech (like being at the forefront of getting rid of the floppy, getting rid of the CD drive, advancing USB-A, now advancing USB-C). Now it's FaceID causing waves. Even if you do not like it can you not admit it is a technical advancement over simple camera facial imagine recognition? And now tens of millions of people are using it, every day...

    They've always been at the forefront of liberty as they are currently the only large company embracing actual user privacy. Can you imagine how utterly fucked we would all be without Apple showing there is value to privacy? They were even at the outset extremely careful with allowing the user to specify what apps could get to things like location when the Android OS was generally letting all apps get by with a blanket request for all system resources up front.

    Lastly Apple has ALWAYS been about free (if not Free) software, moving from a proprietary OS to one based on BSD. Moving from some crappy browser to fully supporting and pushing WebKit which MANY other companies base browsers on. Pushing languages that are truly open source and community driven (like Swift).

    So tell us again why Apple does not belong on Slashdot? Come at me, Cowardly Tech-Bro.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  29. Weren't these phones preproduction models & mo by kriston · · Score: 1

    Interesting article, but weren't these phones preproduction models and mockups?

    From how the author describes the vendors' phones at the conference, these are preproduction models and mockups. That's why the stupid "notch" was not handled well by the software.

    --

    Kriston

  30. Mmm, Asus by DivineKnight · · Score: 1

    They are having enough problems with their current line of motherboards...basically, if your RAM is Hynix-based, you're SOL.

  31. Still using my Moto G by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is a phone. You can store numbers on it. For me the rest is just eye candy. One of the first things I did was to remove 'apps' that I was never going to use, which oddly was most.
    I see people dazed, sitting eating, drinking and driving texting. I've seen a women so engaged she drove off the road! She didn't have the good sense to pull over, stop her car and then text. I hope the property damage was significant enough to teach her that lesson as it looked like a rough landing.
    Texting might be one of the worst inventions ever. I have half a dozen text messages now; they are not important. My life does not revolve around them. Likely I will just clear the lot without looking at them. You want to talk to me 'call'. Show a commitment to a relationship.
    The modern phone helps you disconnect yourself from the people around you. Sometimes more isn't better. As for the notch thingy. Doesn't look very good. But Apple locked themselves in so ... their sales of the X are low; no one was 'impressed'. Which is remarkable as any fool ready to pay a thousand dollars for a phone is ... well a fool. I think Apple will be dipping into the cash horde they store overseas to not pay taxes, to pay dividends soon. I can't wait for them to get rid of that stupid connector at the base. A USB would work just as well and not cost so much.
    And don't get me started on Facebook. Thankfully their subscriber numbers are dropping percentage points every month. In three years they will be 'MySpace'; anyone remember them?

  32. Why is it *just* copying iPhone X? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a trend for bigger screens and larger display to phone area ratio. Whether that is a good trend is a slightly different question.

    To put more screen real estate to the front of the phone, some things have to go. Home button, notably, has been getting removed for a while. Now the focus is on the top of the phone but there are things you just cannot remove or hide behind the screen - speaker, sensors, camera. The same things you really cannot move around much either. This leaves the "notch" solution as easiest. Iphone X was not the first with that but it was just the most high profile one so far.

  33. Status symbol by iTrawl · · Score: 1

    Now having a black spot on your screen counts as a status symbol. Coming up next: pyrite-plated anything.

    --
    "Everybody's naked underneath" -- The Doctor
  34. Mic drop .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  35. What is a "notch" by mjwx · · Score: 1

    OK I'm curious enough to ask, but too lazy to care if Google doesn't give me an immediate answer (seriously, I googled "notch" and most of the results were clickbait or about Markus Persson). So WTF is a notch?

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    1. Re:What is a "notch" by Lisandro · · Score: 1
    2. Re:What is a "notch" by mjwx · · Score: 1

      https://cdn0.tnwcdn.com/wp-con...

      Thanks.

      OK, much ado over nothing. I'm looking at the Nokia 8 (Android One) for my next phone when the ol' Nexus 5x gives up the ghost so I'm not affected.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  36. ...than the NEXT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    each of them more hastily and sloppily assembled than the next.

    THAN. THE. LAST.

    ...last here, meaning PREVIOUS.

    You sound like a fucking moron when you say it wrong. "...(comparative) than the next..." implies a DECREASING successive amount of whatever the referent property is. "Each more exciting than the next!" means that as time goes on, each successive next one is LESS exciting than the previous. It's like "I could care less." COULD YOU? Well, that means you must at least care a little bit, or else you'd say, "I COULDN'T care less," indicating that you could NOT in fact care less, on account of not caring at all.

    This may of course strike you as pedantic, grammar-NAZI bullshit, but fuck you, I'm trying to help you not sound like you're a fucking moron, okay? You're welcome.

  37. Note 4 was better due to removeable batery! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    N/T

  38. Brilliant! by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    Here we see a brilliant strategy by Apple: put a useless "feature" into a phone, watch all the Chinese manufactures rush to copy that feature, then discontinue your own phone with that useless feature and leave the copycats with millions of units they can't sell! How many months before Apple ships the replacement for the iPhone X, without the notch and and with a headphone plug?

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  39. Yes, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... do they have the courage to remove the headphone jack?

    I thought not.

    Courage, man. It's what separates the Apple fanboys from the Google SJWs.

  40. Now I hope more aren't using the stupid 16:9 ratio by filesiteguy · · Score: 1

    I do use the Iphone 10, and find it a great - if a bit small - device. While I much preferred my 950xl, that's useless now. I actually have no issue with the notch and the face ID. The real issue is the move from 4:3 ratio on all good devices to the less friendly 16:9 ratio. I have a Galaxy S8 as well that has that stupid ratio. It is very difficult to perform work on.

    I hope the Android fanbois at MWC don't move more towards that useless form factor.

  41. The cancer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mainly.

    ALL mobile OSes today share that utter retardedness.

  42. Fun fact: He lied. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the joke is that you were so stupid that you believed him. THEREBY proving the statement.

    In reality, dumbing down harms us all indirectly. But since we are then stupid, wr are too stupid to notice or tell.

  43. Better Example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The much better example was "Concordski", a much mocked derivative of the Concorde design.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tupolev_Tu-144

    Not an exact duplicate of Concorde, nearly all of the design variations actually made the plane worse. The Tu-144 was a terrible plane and an object lesson on how not to copy stuff.

  44. "Fruit Company" comment by McFortner · · Score: 1

    ... Asus leans into its copying by calling Apple a "Fruit Company" repeatedly. If you're going to copy the iPhone, at least have the decency to avoid trying to mock it."

    That's probably done more for avoiding Apple's knee-jerk response of suing anybody who dares mention their name when making comparisons to their products rather than mocking.

    --
    Beware of Sales Reps bearing gifts.