Slashdot Mirror


Meet the Interstitium, the Largest Organ We Never Knew We Had (thedailybeast.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Daily Beast: A study published in Scientific Reports on Tuesday suggests that a previously unknown organ has been found in the human body. More astonishingly, the paper puts forth the idea that this new organ is the largest by volume among all 80 organs -- if what the researchers found is, in fact, an organ. The new organ, [pathologist Neil Theise] explained, was a thin layer of dense connective tissue throughout the body, sandwiched just under our skin and within the middle layer of every visceral organ. The organ also made up all the fascia, or the thin mesh of tissue separating every muscle and all the tissue around every vein and artery, from largest to smallest. What initially seemed to be a solid, dense, connective tissue layer was actually a complex network of fluid-filled cavities that are strong and flexible, yet so tiny and undiscerning that they escaped the attention of the brightest scientific minds for generations. In fact, Theise expanded, this "interstitium" could explain many of modern medicine's mysteries, often dismissed by the establishment as either silly or explainable by other phenomena. Take acupuncture, Theise said -- that energetic healing jolt may be traced to the interstitium. Or perhaps the interstitium acted as a "shock absorber," something that protected other organs and muscles in daily function. Also, the space is in direct communication with the lymphatic system as the origin of lymph fluid -- which means the interstitium's system of fluid-filled backroads could explain the metastasis of cancer cells and their quick spread beyond the limits of the organ in which the cancer started.

208 comments

  1. Dick jokes in 3...2...1... by Tablizer · · Score: 0, Troll

    0.5...

    1. Re:Dick jokes in 3...2...1... by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      Either when Emacs won Best Editor award, or when Duke Nukem revision finally came out.

    2. Re:Dick jokes in 3...2...1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i love watching my wife ride a big black uncut interstitium :) The best part is, I get sloppy seconds afterwards!

  2. Largest organ? by TimMD909 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The desire to make dick jokes when seeing "largest organ" is too much... Must... Walk... Away...

    1. Re:Largest organ? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I was going to say "hands", you bigly loser! #SoSad

    2. Re:Largest organ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried to walk, but my my foreskin drags on the ground, now I'm almost circumcised!

    3. Re:Largest organ? by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 4, Informative

      In any case it's complete bollocks, the Boardwalk Hall Auditorium Organ is the largest organ. Everyone knows that.

      Well, everyone should know it.

    4. Re:Largest organ? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Didn't know that. But I have to say that's one helluva big organ.....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    5. Re:Largest organ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I once knew a ten-foot pianist :/

    6. Re:Largest organ? by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      Nonsense. According to Wikipedia, AARP The Magazine is the largest organ.

    7. Re:Largest organ? by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      Damn, 11 minutes in and already the thread is Trumpwin'd.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    8. Re:Largest organ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have seen this played by a giant spider.

  3. Get ready for a new bad analogy! by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Funny

    What initially seemed to be a solid, dense, connective tissue layer was actually a complex network of fluid-filled cavities that are strong and flexible

    I propose:

    The interstitium is the body's internet.

    After all, it's a very small layer of tubes that transmits through the entire body...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Get ready for a new bad analogy! by smithmc · · Score: 1

      I propose:

      The interstitium is the body's internet.

      After all, it's a very small layer of tubes that transmits through the entire body...

      ...and it's mostly used for porn?

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
  4. Top Tier publishing at its finest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah shitty Editorial Review. Proving yet again if you wait 40 years then revisit a topic people investigated then moved on to more interesting topics you too can have a crappy article in a top tier journal. I have a 20 year old histology text book that goes into more detail then the article does.

    1. Re:Top Tier publishing at its finest by VeryFluffyBunny · · Score: 0

      Lost me with the bit about acupuncture. It's pseudoscience. What kind of self-respecting scientist speculates about something that's been effectively disproved, i.e. they've failed to disprove the null hypothesis?

      --
      Debate is a form of harassment. Do not question my truth.
    2. Re: Top Tier publishing at its finest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as I know, acupuncture is more effective than many placebo treatments for pain killing, at least. They've also showed that in contrast to the traditional treatment, you ring actually need to penetrate the skin, just applying pressure at those points seems sufficient.

    3. Re: Top Tier publishing at its finest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scientific Reports is a decent journal, but I wouldn't call it top tier. Looking at e.g. the impact factor, it's far behind the other journals published by the Nature group. (On the positive side, they have a policy of not rejecting papers on grounds of negative results, perceived impact, or novelty; as long as the science is rigorous, it's okay.)

    4. Re:Top Tier publishing at its finest by religionofpeas · · Score: 2

      Why don't you show us a random controlled trial that demonstrates that true acupuncture is actually working better than placebo acupuncture where you stick the needles in random places ?

    5. Re: Top Tier publishing at its finest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/11783809/

      And right below it, more links to studies of the same thing, conducted independently and in other countries.

      Were you too busy stroking your ego to bother doing this yourself, asshole?

    6. Re: Top Tier publishing at its finest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Acupuncture is real. You can self test it and probably have. Ever pinch yourself just so somewhere and feel a twinge somewhere else? Like pinching your chest and feeling a pain in your foot. Acupuncture is basically the study of the nervous system back roads.

      Now as a cure for anything unrelated to that its bullshit of course, beyond hypochondriac stuff.

    7. Re: Top Tier publishing at its finest by another_twilight · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Who marked this insightful?

      The link is to a study that compared acupuncture to sham acupuncture (needling anywhere) to conventional therapy and found that both acupuncture and sham acupuncture had the same effect.

      The GP specifically asked for evidence that acupuncture works better than random needling.

      Were you too busy seeing what you wanted to see to actually read either the GP or the link you think disproves them?

      Needling has been shown to help some chronic pain, most probably through release of endorphins and similar. That's a far cry from acupuncture's claims of meridians or acupuncture points and acupuncture's claims to be able to treat a range of other ailments.

    8. Re:Top Tier publishing at its finest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a dick.

    9. Re: Top Tier publishing at its finest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does the sudden realization that you believe in magic upset you, asshole?

    10. Re: Top Tier publishing at its finest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That does seem to be true, but it also seems to be the case that there's no actual valid technique for acupuncture. An amateur just sticking a bunch of needles wherever turns out to be just as effective as a trained professional expertly applying needles to pressure points/energy centers/whatever. As long as the patient doesn't know that the amateur is not actually a professional.

    11. Re:Top Tier publishing at its finest by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Because I'm pretty sure that you don't read mandarin. 90% of the literature over the last 3000 years is unfortunately not english or available as translation. And I have not the time to search for you english literature.
      If you were actually interested in that topic you had informed yourself long ago.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    12. Re:Top Tier publishing at its finest by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      If you have disproven acupuncture, I would like to have some links, idiot.

      It's not been disproven, it's just never been proven.

      Until you prove it works, it is, by default, unproven.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    13. Re: Top Tier publishing at its finest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It may seem more effective, but you need to account for the effect of the therapist administering it as part of the placebo effect. The way the therapist interacts with the patient significantly effects the size of the placebo effect.

      With double-blinded studies, where the needle is sheathed so that the therapist doesn't know if the needle is piecing the skin then there is no effect.

      If you want to argue that piecing the skin isn't necessary, then you might as well be getting a massage rather than acupuncture.

    14. Re:Top Tier publishing at its finest by denzacar · · Score: 1

      90% of the literature over the last 3000 years is unfortunately not english or available as translation.

      Nearly 100% of literature on Atlantis over the last thousands of years isn't in English either.
      Same goes for various gods, angels, witches, wizards, jinns, devils, demons...

      And why bother with thousands of years? Wouldn't a modern, scientifically proven, examples suffice?
      It's not like it's something that USED TO WORK but now the magnetic poles have shifted, ice caps have melted, we're on Mars...
      You know... like magic and dragons.

      If you were actually interested in that topic you had informed yourself long ago.

      I don't know... sound's a lot like that onus probandi thing, which is also originally not in English...

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    15. Re: Top Tier publishing at its finest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. On the cock-n-ball torture forums I frequent, one of the most common questions for newbies is "why does my leg/foot/arm/etc hurt when I squeeze my testicles?"

    16. Re: Top Tier publishing at its finest by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      both acupuncture and sham acupuncture had the same effect.

      It's a pity that both cost nearly the same, else I might have been able to save some money with that information.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    17. Re: Top Tier publishing at its finest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not saying acupuncture works by healing, but remember reading a study that it has some short term pain relief effects.. probably because of the endorfin release

    18. Re:Top Tier publishing at its finest by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      And why bother with thousands of years? Wouldn't a modern, scientifically proven, examples suffice?

      It would.
      But unfortunately it is forbidden to do experiments on prisoners of war. Also, we have no 10,000ds of POWs in modern times.

      On the other hand you simply can read if a illness you suffer from has a an acupuncture treatment and try it. For that you do not need any outside party to make a study first ...
      And it would cost next to nothing, compared with modern medicine costs for pills.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    19. Re:Top Tier publishing at its finest by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      The second Emperor of China made acupuncture experiments on over 10,000 POWs.
      About half or even a full dozen of my friends are MDs/PhDs in medicine and practice acupuncture.

      I rather believe them than a random /. poster who never ever bothered to read anything about the topic.
      About half the planet uses acupuncture as a traditional medicine. On top of that: in Europe we have about 500M inhabitants. And every health insurance pays for acupuncture treatment.

      So: I go with the mass ... but you are right, just because 10 billion flies eat shit, it does not mean that shit is good for you.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    20. Re:Top Tier publishing at its finest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Acupuncture is great because some Chinese dude violated the human rights of thousands of POWs by medically experimenting on them. I have to wonder if you're just trolling us to put out such a ridiculous statement as an argument in favor of a medical practice.

    21. Re: Top Tier publishing at its finest by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Make it the last one hundred years? The millenia before modern printing and typewriters made publication very tedious, so you can easily limit yourself to the past century or so and still come up with a rather close approximation of how many books are actually available in English. And right now, English-speaking countries *still* print more books than China, apparently.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    22. Re:Top Tier publishing at its finest by another_twilight · · Score: 1

      And I have not the time to search for you english literature.

      So it's proof by assertion, then?

    23. Re:Top Tier publishing at its finest by another_twilight · · Score: 1

      The second Emperor of China made acupuncture experiments on over 10,000 POWs

      Link please? No? Proof by assertion

      About half or even a full dozen of my friends are MDs/PhDs in medicine and practice acupuncture

      Appeal to authority with just a hint of appeal to popularity.

      I rather believe them than a random /. poster

      You're not good with irony, are you.

    24. Re:Top Tier publishing at its finest by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you like to look up what 'appeal to authority' actually means: https://www.logicallyfallaciou...

      For starters: if I recitate from a known authority about a certain subject, then it obviously can't be an appeal to authority.

      More explicitley: a MD practicing acupuncture obviously knows more about it than you do. Good luck in refuting this simple statement.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    25. Re:Top Tier publishing at its finest by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I don't get your point, what do you want me to prove?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    26. Re: Top Tier publishing at its finest by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Serious question: why would I?
      If you are interested into the topic, do your own research.
      If you are not, fine for me.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    27. Re: Top Tier publishing at its finest by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Then maybe making such claims as above without doing your homework is inappropriate?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    28. Re: Top Tier publishing at its finest by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I made no claims ...
      So what would be inappropriate in a discussion forum?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    29. Re:Top Tier publishing at its finest by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      a MD practicing acupuncture obviously knows more about it than you do.

      There are more MDs and researchers in the medical sciences who say that it is bogus than there are MDs and researchers in the medical sciences who say it isn't bogus.

      Good luck in refuting this simple statement.

      Done.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    30. Re:Top Tier publishing at its finest by denzacar · · Score: 1

      On the other hand you simply can read if a illness you suffer from has a an acupuncture treatment and try it. For that you do not need any outside party to make a study first ...
      And it would cost next to nothing, compared with modern medicine costs for pills.

      Yeah... If we exclude personal health... time... followed by exclusion of money paid to all those "genuine" hacks willing to stick needles in you for money cause "it can't hurt... and it costs nothing to try... for certain values of nothing".
      And if it doesn't help... well... you're probably holding it wrong.
      Or the Moon is in the wrong house of the chakra and your feng shui is off because of sunspots and shifting of magnetic poles.

      OR... we can simply look at all the people whom it didn't help... which is everyone whose problem wasn't psychosomatic.
      In which case there's a far simpler and cheaper alternative. It fixes everything from bad eyesight, through parasites and bacteria - to aging.
      I'm currently running the reverse aging one like a motherfucker.
      Then I'm gonna do some wealth, telepathy, love... ah screw love... where's the one that will enlarge my penis? Hmm... here's one for a thinner nose... maybe that's some kinda code?

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    31. Re:Top Tier publishing at its finest by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I guess you lost track somewhere ... why should acupuncture help against parasites or aging or bad eye sight?
      Are you an idiot?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    32. Re:Top Tier publishing at its finest by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      There are more MDs and researchers in the medical sciences who say that it is bogus than there are MDs and researchers in the medical sciences who say it isn't bogus.

      Extremely unlikely.
      First of all acupuncture is not a hot research topic.
      Secondly, half the world has medicine where acupuncture is a basic treatment.

      You are an idiot.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    33. Re:Top Tier publishing at its finest by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      Extremely unlikely.

      Well, it's your claim so you provide the proof.

      half the world has medicine where acupuncture is a basic treatment.

      Yeah. Half the world also believes in an invisible man in the sky. Doesn't mean that there is one.

      You are an idiot.

      Maybe so, but that's still better than believing in magic.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    34. Re:Top Tier publishing at its finest by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      What exactly has acupuncture to do with magic?

      Next time you want to tell me your body has no reflex zones? Massage does not work? What is next, surgery does not work either?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  5. The Value of Walking by rtb61 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The Interstitium would help to explain the value of walking, shifting around the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/..., providing background circulation of fluids. It would help to explain why people find comfort in a peace amble, especially those suffering from mental conditions https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... could be a form of internalised therapy, to make up for stress affecting other fluid flows. Got nothing better to do, walk around you home to keep circulation going, whilst waiting for water to boil for a cuppa, or while roasting a steak, just a peaceful amble about to home to stimulate Interstitium fluid flows, the expansive and contracts of major muscle groups would certainly move that fluid around the body.

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    1. Re:The Value of Walking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The one way valves in veins would help explain this all by themselves without some phony, made up "organ". Simply moving your muscles compresses veins and forces blood around your circulatory system. During heavy exercise, this can be responsible for as much as 30% of your blood flow. Which is one of the reasons that warm-down exercises can be important. If you're exercising very hard and just stop, it's like you just turned off the auxiliary pumping system that was assisting your heart. Also, just shifting around if you're sitting or lying down will end up unblocking some blood vessels that are held closed by pressure. So, basically, the value of such activities can be explained by the conventional circulatory system.

  6. Old As Fuck News by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

    I remember reading about this on /. about a decade ago.

    1. Re:Old As Fuck News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try the 1600s

    2. Re:Old As Fuck News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's older than that. Chinese medicine recognized what they are now calling the interstitium as the connective tissue responsible for the flow of "chi" in the body and that "chi" had an interconnectedness that was important for overall health. Movement in general and patterned movement was important to the flow of "chi" through the body to nourish the organs and tissues. Now science finally caught up to what ancient physicians understood centuries ago.

  7. New insight on diseases and aging? by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Now that this structure of what appears to be the container for the extracellular fluid and a major shock absorber for tissues has been identified, it will be interesting to see what disease processes might be the result of degradation of its function.

    I'd expect examination of breakdowns in this system to result in the causes of several diseases, currently dismissed as psychosomatic or as real but mysteries, to be identified.

    I'd also expect that the structure might degrade in old age, and that this might be another source of age-related problems.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:New insight on diseases and aging? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately this "organ" appears to be psychosomatic itself. Neil Theise is a bit of a quack. He's also involved in some pretty bizarre unfounded theories about the origin of consciousness with Deepak Chopra.
      Here's an excerpt from his personal website:

      Subsequently, while continuing laboratory and clinical research, he has extended his work to areas of theoretical biology and complexity theory, defining a "post-modern biology." These ideas suggest that alternate models of the body, other than Cell Doctrine, may be necessary to understand non-Western approaches to the body and health. Current laboratory investigations focus on nerve-stem cell interactions in human livers, melatonin-related physiology of human liver stem cell and regenerative processes, and aspects of human liver stem cell activation in acute, fulminant hepatic failure.

      While Dr. Theise's basic science research continues, sometimes proceeding into fairly rarified realms of investigative biology, his clinical and consulting work remains the foundation of his professional efforts. He is Director of Liver Pathology at Beth Israel, responsible for liver biopsy diagnosis of all the hospitals of the Continuum Health Partner's Network as well as for his clinical consultation practice, while continuing to participate in general surgical pathology diagnostic efforts of his department several days each month. He also continues to publish on clinical research interests which derive from this aspect of his career.

      Overall, it looks like he's one of those high-functioning quacks like Ben Carson who appears to have been a good neurosurgeon, but also believes that the pyramids are grain silos built for Joseph's prophesied famine. That would require the pyramids to all have been built at the same time, and also within seven years (to actually be useful probably three years maximum). It would also require that all the writings of the Egyptians explaining what they're for to be false, and for bunch of Egyptian kings to have decided: "Hey, I think I'll have a grain silo emptied out and be buried in one!". Oh, also it would make Joseph a moron for ordering the construction of a grain silo weighing nearly 6 million tons that's less than 5% empty space for holding grain. Other examples of such quacks include Fred Hoyle, who was indeed brilliant and played a very important role in understanding where elements come from (and named the Big Bang, although he didn't believe in it). He also, however, insisted that Archeopteryx was a fake, based on some serious misunderstandings of how fossilization works.

      Basically, you can be very smart in one field, but still be essentially a nutty crackpot in another field, even a related one.

    2. Re:New insight on diseases and aging? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coming in 2019 - New Orange Titanium Powder for better Interstitium Health.

      It's been proven by scientific study that low titanium levels adversely effect your interstitium. That's why Nature's Way developed Orange Titanium Powder to provide the levels of this important nutrient your body needs to sustain your health.

      Here's a chart we had the art department throw together that seems to show the Orange Titanium Powder is 30% more effective at sustaining titanium levels in your interstitium than regular titanium.

      Here's a list of things your interstitium might (or might not do): Keep you skin elastic and young looking. Prevent infections. Help with preventing dementia.
      It's possible that low titanium levels in your interstitium might lead to fibromyalgia, irritable bowel syndrome, chronic fatigue syndrome, electromagnetic hypersensitivity, skull shivers, green flu, and the flesh that hates.

      Nature's Way does not provide a guarantee of effectiveness. Consult your doctor before taking any medication. The flesh that hates has not been proven to exist.

    3. Re:New insight on diseases and aging? by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      but also believes that the pyramids are grain silos built for Joseph's prophesied famine

      As opposed to the guy who thinks they were hydraulic rams for pumping irrigation water (high volume, low rise, for a long run to the fields) and has working models to show for it. B-)

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  8. We need a "I am Joe's Interstitium" to explain it by Babel-17 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I grew up on those "I am Joe's ..." articles as featured in Readers Digest. :)

  9. So itâ(TM)s basically bubble wrap? by marciot · · Score: 1

    So weâ(TM)re basically little air bags all surrounded by bubble wrap. Once we become a space faring civilizations, aliens will find us, cut us open, and wonder why someone shipped empty parcels all over the universe.

    1. Re:So itâ(TM)s basically bubble wrap? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

      So weâ(TM)re basically little air bags all surrounded by bubble wrap..

      From which some people gain inner peace by popping bits of the bubble wrap with pins. THIS is what explains acupuncture.

  10. cue ./ "engineers" on acupuncture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spent too much time posting links to legit scientific papers on possible effects of acupuncture here in the past. I finally realized that many of the authors had gasp Chinese names and that's gonna be a deal breaker when the 'merican "engineers" here start shrieking DOUBLE BLIND TEST.

    google acupuncture nitric oxide to get started if interested. And, no, this isn't about homeopathy and/or crystal power so spare the straw men.

    1. Re: cue ./ "engineers" on acupuncture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You know what they call traditional medicines that work? Medicine. Acupuncture has not been demonstrated to work on any large scale n>100 for any specified disease. It does, however, work demonstrated wonders on psychosomatic illnesseses.

    2. Re: cue ./ "engineers" on acupuncture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/17893311/?i=3&from=/11783809/related

      Sample size over a fucking thousand, done 11 years ago you lazy fuck that couldn't spend even four seconds performing a basic search.

    3. Re:cue ./ "engineers" on acupuncture by another_twilight · · Score: 1

      Spent too much time posting links to legit scientific papers on possible effects of acupuncture here in the past

      Really? If you logged in, I might be able to verify that, otherwise it's just you saying so.

      I finally realized that many of the authors had gasp Chinese names and that's gonna be a deal breaker when the 'merican "engineers" here start shrieking DOUBLE BLIND TEST

      Thinly veiled implication that a request for a study that meets the standards of other forms of medicine is based on some kind of racism.

      google acupuncture nitric oxide

      How about you make a point and then provide proof or links to back it up. What you've delivered so far is a complain that you've provided information in the past but that it's been ignored or denied because of racism. I'm prepared to accept that this might be the case, but the burden of proof is on you. And on acupuncture.

      What exactly are you claiming acupuncture can do? What are the studies or trials that you think support this?
      It may very well be that we agree (AFAIK acupuncture has been shown to be effective in treating some forms of chronic pain through endorphin release) but I don't know because all you've done is complain that no-one believes you and that American engineers are racist.

      If this is the standard of 'proof' that you consider sufficient to support your 'argument', then your claims that there are 'legit' papers is suspect.

    4. Re: cue ./ "engineers" on acupuncture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your bullshit fake medicine doesn't work so it must be because of white nerd racism.

      Is that really what you're saying?

      Yes. It is.

    5. Re: cue ./ "engineers" on acupuncture by another_twilight · · Score: 1

      Yup. Pity it has nothing to do with 'nitric oxide' which was what the GP (you?) told people to look for.

      Did you read the result? No difference between acupuncture and sham where here the sham was just needling anywhere that wasn't an 'acupuncture point'.

      So the study shows that needling people works. Other studies that have tested with endorphin inhibitors have shown a reduced effect, so the primary mechanism for the analgesic effect of acupuncture is likely to be the release of same.

      Needling anywhere reduces pain. No meridians. No acupuncture points. No effect on anything other than some forms of chronic pain.
      I've acknowledge in another post that I'm aware of the studies that have shown that needling has an effect on some chronic pain. I've still got no idea what you think except that people don't believe you 'because racism'.

    6. Re: cue ./ "engineers" on acupuncture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      From the linked article:

      "RESULTS: At 6 months, response rate was 47.6% in the verum acupuncture group, 44.2% in the sham acupuncture group, and 27.4% in the conventional therapy group. Differences among groups were as follows: verum vs sham, 3.4% (95% confidence interval, -3.7% to 10.3%; P = .39)"

      pretty weak tea. And that's a single study. Given publication bias and a single study I'm less than convinced (though conceivable: please provide better evidence)

    7. Re: cue ./ "engineers" on acupuncture by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Acupuncture is not based on 'points' on meridians. That is only a training and memorization tool. (Invented by a frensh doctor 200 years ago) Points and meridians are related or overlapping, but different concepts.
      The areas are most often as big as the size of the palm of patient.
      Also there are plenty of 'points' that have the same effect.

      If layman do a 'double blind' study it is most likely that both needles are at the wrong point :)

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    8. Re: cue ./ "engineers" on acupuncture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you ACs even read your linked studies?
      "CONCLUSIONS: Low back pain improved after acupuncture treatment for at least 6 months. Effectiveness of acupuncture, either verum or sham, was almost twice that of conventional therapy."

      Short version is that "stabbing people randomly" is just as effective as "real" acupuncture (which is presumably not stabbing people randomly, but seems dubious).

      The placebo effect is real, powerful, and at work here. That isn't to say that the lives for those people subject to sham acupuncture (in the same way that sugar pills for cancer can ease pain), but that the general technique is not effective.

  11. Yep. Dupe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I knew it had looked familiar.

  12. Old news ... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Everyone who practices Chi Gong or other internal arts knows that ... since millennia.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    1. Re:Old news ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then maybe they should have scientifically demonstrated some of their claims under controlled, reproducible conditions instead of waiting until now, yeah?

    2. Re:Old news ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol, arts, you don't know how right you are. They're arts, just like magic shows and illusionists. Nothing more than entertainment to anyone with half a brain.

    3. Re:Old news ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Qi Gong is right up there with homeopathy, anti-vaccination, and is often literal bedfellows with traditional medicine made up of ground endangered species penises to make the Qi Gong practitioners more virile.

    4. Re:Old news ... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 0

      You seem not to know what Chi Gong is, hint: google.
      Or would you extend your idiotic claims to Yoga, Massage, Swimming or going into a gym, as well?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    5. Re:Old news ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe they did demonstrate their claims using the most empirical method of all: "Does it work?"

    6. Re:Old news ... by Roger+Lindsjo · · Score: 2

      Chi Gong is good as an exercise form because exercise is good for you. That Chi Gong is good because it "cultivates and balances your qi (life energy)" is nonsense .

    7. Re:Old news ... by ThomsonsPier · · Score: 1

      It depends on the qigong. Those who teach it as some kind of mystical healing energy promoting exercise are talking nonsense. When viewed as the gentle physical exercise that it is, though, it's extremely effective in maintaining health simply because it's far easier on the body than most western methods, which tend to be more harsher and more destructive, and is therefore ideal for those who can't (or don't want to) participate in higher intensity workouts and can be maintained over a long period. In addition to that, it teaches correct posture, movement, and breathing. It doesn't, however, provide any benefits that can't be gained another way, by, say, a combination of bodyweight resistance exercise and Alexander Technique.

    8. Re:Old news ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This!

      I studied Shaolin Kung Fu for years... and as part of that to a lesser extent Qigong. There are many facets to Qigong, but I think of it more like most Americans think of Yoga or Taichi. Good stretches, good meditation, promoting awareness of health and balance in one's life. There is a religious component to it (just like Yoga), but on the whole it is a very good way to stay in shape. You can ignore the mysticism as harmless.

      My wife took it up while suffering from several ailments. Her ailments are much better after about two years. Her knees were to be operated on they were so bad, she was told to expect degradation in all her joints from arthritis. Her bones were dangerously weak. But instead she refused the surgery, took up Qigong and now goes on 20 mile hikes without complaints! After going back to the doctors for bone density tests, they can't believe the earlier test were accurate as she is now on the low end of normal. I credit the exercises for helping her a lot. Changing her diet likely helped as well. It could be doing nothing would have had the same effect. But the surgery would have had certain negative effects. Her back muscles have also improved dramatically improving her life quality.

      Now she is into Pilates... we'll see.

    9. Re:Old news ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chi Gong is an Americanized term. Literal shaping of magical forces, or Chi.

      Become educated.

    10. Re:Old news ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because being against the forced injection of mercury, aluminum or misc. monkey parts is somehow not science?

      When did Slashdot become so leftist/communist/kill off the 99%?

    11. Re:Old news ... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      That Chi Gong is good because it "cultivates and balances your qi (life energy)" is nonsense
      And why would that be?
      Exercising your Facia and have it in good shape is nonsense, but exercising your muscles is good? Does not really make sense to me ...

      But no worries ... if you exercise in the proper context you exercise your Qi/Chi/Ki/Facia automatically ... regardless if you "believe in it" or dismiss it as nonsense.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    12. Re:Old news ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      knows

      Not sure you know what "knows" means.

    13. Re:Old news ... by another_twilight · · Score: 1

      If, when injured, we reduce exercise to avoid either pain or aggravating the injury, our bones will become weaker and more porous, lean muscle mass will drop and consequently the metabolism will slow (slowing healing). This can lead to a vicious spiral where the inactivity compounds the pain and damage. Even in healthy adults who become more sedentary as they age, this is noticeable and many of the effects that we attribute to age are more correctly attributed to an increasingly sedentary lifestyle.

      Consequently, if you can find a low-impact exercise that will allow you to continue to be active while injured, you are much less likely to suffer from the degenerative effects of inactivity.

      Cliff Young (an ultra marathon runner from the early 80s in Australia) reports that he 'ran off' arthritis 'a couple of times'. He was 61 when he won his first ultra marathon (When he was asked how long he could run, he reported that he could fun for about five or six days. Reporters thought he meant stopping to sleep. He thought they meant continuously. Awesome guy.)

      It's easier to maintain than regain. It's easier to regain than gain. Stay active.

      Thanks for sharing.

    14. Re:Old news ... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Let's be charitable. Acupuncture, properly done, has few or no adverse effects. The only way it's likely to be harmful is if someone relies on it instead of getting effective medical treatment. You can't say nearly the same about anti-vaxx movements.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  13. Connective Tissue by tquasar · · Score: 1

    Nerds, please explain how that is an organ.

    1. Re: Connective Tissue by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Explain how skin is an organ.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    2. Re: Connective Tissue by religionofpeas · · Score: 5, Funny

      Explain how a machine that makes noise by blowing air through pipes is an organ.

    3. Re:Connective Tissue by Phillip2 · · Score: 1

      The definition of organ has changed a bit over time. Originally, the organs were separable things that you can chop out with a knife. Most of them still are, but over the years the definition has been extended to include skin (which you can cut off with a knife, but is pretty diffiuse), and things like blood (which is a liquid).

      Is this an organ? Well, the daily beast says that the author of the paper says that it is. But the paper that they reference does not claim this at all. And given that they are describing an anatomical feature which was "previously undiscovered", and that they are using a single microscopic technique to do this, I would say this is a bit early to claim that they found a new organ.

      There are two possibilities here: the daily beast is bigging it up so that they can get a funky headline: or the author is doing this. I don't know which. The claims that this could "explain acupuncture" leaves me a bit worried that this is going to turn into another piece of pseudoscience built off one paper. Hopefully, this is not the case. We will see in a few years time.

    4. Re: Connective Tissue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's due to a (relatively) recent change to the definition of "organ"

      "Organs are collections of tissues with a similar function."

      The skin as a whole is made of layers, and each layer consists of a very specific type of tissue.
      As those tissues work together to make a layer of skin, and the different layers work together to make "the skin", that fits the definition.

      In fact this new organ isn't so much new and unknown, as surgeons are pretty familiar with it, but sort of like the skin itself the only new thing is that it is now being defined as an organ instead of just tissues that are there.

    5. Re: Connective Tissue by GrumpySteen · · Score: 1

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Organs are collections of tissues with a similar function. Skin is a collection of tissues which all perform a similar function.

      Explain how you do not know what an organ is. This is one of the first things that comes up in basic grade school biology.

    6. Re: Connective Tissue by Lije+Baley · · Score: 1

      Did you mean "a series of tubes"?

      --
      Strange things are afoot at the Circle-K.
    7. Re:Connective Tissue by tquasar · · Score: 1

      Thanks Phillip2.

  14. Wait, I don't get it by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    how does this relate to and compare with cars?

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Wait, I don't get it by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      how does this relate to and compare with cars?

      When you are sick, it's like your interstitialian is a highway that's jammed with traffic.

      Alternately, you could say if the human being were a car, the interstiliarium is roughly equivalent to the rich Corinthian leather covering the seats and dash.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    2. Re:Wait, I don't get it by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      Since the bloodstream and lymphatic system also connect different tissues together in an already well demonstrated fluid transfer network of blood vessels, the transfer of cancerous cells from one organ to another would not seem to require explanation. And since acupuncture consistently fails double blind experiments, that would seem to be another "mystery of modern medicine" that would seem to be already explained, as a placebo effect.

    3. Re:Wait, I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, first off, it's not a big truck. That's really all I have on that matter.

    4. Re:Wait, I don't get it by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You can not really test accupuncture with double blind studies, or how should the one poking you not know, kr know if he is really poking you? And how can you mot know if you get poked or not?
      There where attempts with double blind studies, where they used kind of electrodes to cause a fake sensation: turned out that electric stimulation had the same effect as a real needle. Hence we have since 30 years electronic and even laser based self accupuncture aparatus.
      And accupuncture works quite fine, no idea why americans are so anti to thousands of years old proven working technologies, that basically cost nothing und rarely have side effects.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    5. Re:Wait, I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's true that mostly acupuncture is fine,better than western treatments with side effects. It's just that occasionally the side effect is death because you actually had something serious wrong with you.

    6. Re:Wait, I don't get it by eggstasy · · Score: 2

      Because everything ELSE has evolved, and everything ELSE in our lives has been created based on solid scientific evidence, statistics, causality, and logic.
      With acupuncture people pulled an idea out of their hat and tried to shoehorn it under a microscope looking for evidence that it may have some logic or causality other than the placebo effect, selection bias and sampling errors etc.

    7. Re: Wait, I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The problem is that acupuncture rarely has effects either. In every test it has shown to only be as effective as a placebo. Even in China it was recognized as quackery and outlawed.

    8. Re:Wait, I don't get it by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 4, Informative

      > You can not really test acupuncture with double blind studies, or how should the one poking you not know, kr know if he is really poking you?

      It's testable by "poking" somewhere else than where the practitioner would plan. As I understand it, Different practitioners have different patterns for what disorders or issues are treated by different acupuncture points. If there is no verifiable association between the acupuncture points and the disorders, if it doesn't matter which acupuncture points are used, then that indicates it's a placebo effect.

    9. Re:Wait, I don't get it by Tom · · Score: 4, Informative

      And accupuncture works quite fine, no idea why americans are so anti to thousands of years old proven working technologies, that basically cost nothing und rarely have side effects.

      Replace "americans" with "rational people" and you will get an answer.

      For example, you will learn that the whole
      "thousands of years" is bullshit.

      Oops.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    10. Re:Wait, I don't get it by Buchenskjoll · · Score: 1

      And accupuncture works quite fine, no idea why americans are so anti to thousands of years old proven working technologies, that basically cost nothing und rarely have side effects.

      So, eating ground tiger penis is better than viagra?

      --
      -- Make America hate again!
    11. Re:Wait, I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can not really test accupuncture with double blind studies, or how should the one poking you not know, kr know if he is really poking you? And how can you mot know if you get poked or not?
      There where attempts with double blind studies, where they used kind of electrodes to cause a fake sensation: turned out that electric stimulation had the same effect as a real needle. Hence we have since 30 years electronic and even laser based self accupuncture aparatus.
      And accupuncture works quite fine, no idea why americans are so anti to thousands of years old proven working technologies, that basically cost nothing und rarely have side effects.

      They've proven through experiment that acupuncture is worthless. It doesn't matter at all whether the acupuncturist uses the "correct" points or if they make up locations to stick in the needle, or whether they pierce the skin or just poke you with a pointy tool.

      The double blind is that the person recording the experiment and tallying results, and the patient, doesn't know if the "professional" used the right point or not. Or if the skin was pierced. They just confirm the report from the patient on their symptom relief and how long it allegedly lasts, with no chance of introducing bias due to knowing whether the patient was properly acupunctured or was a control.

      The benefit of acupuncture has been proven to be 100% placebo effect. It's true the placebo effect is cheap and has no side effects. It even works. That's why it's the placebo effect. The problem is using it in place of actual real effective proven medicine. Go ahead and use it for pain relief or to stop smoking; it's just as effective as pills. Just don't use it to treat cancer.

    12. Re:Wait, I don't get it by denzacar · · Score: 1

      or how should the one poking you not know, kr know if he is really poking you? And how can you mot know if you get poked or not?

      Easy.
      Leave the poking to the assistant who doesn't know jack shit about where he/she SHOULD poke - just how to stick the needle into a predesignated spot marked on a drawing.
      Compare results of "real acupuncture" to "randomly poking with needles" and "deliberately wrong acupuncture" - giving patients "cures" which would promote their illness.
      If it works - it'll show.

      As for the subject not knowing... there are several ways.
      Subject could be just poked, without actually being stuck with a needle.
      Subject could be given a local or general anesthetic.
      Subject could be asleep.
      Subject could have severed nerves.
      Subject could have spinal injury.
      Subject could be in a coma.
      Subject could be given acupuncture without knowing which kind is it ("right", "wrong", "fake") - while being informed that the choice will be random.
      Same goes for subject being informed that the choice will be one of the three - while actually being given a random choice.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    13. Re:Wait, I don't get it by nospam007 · · Score: 3, Funny

      "So, eating ground tiger penis is better than viagra?"

      No, that's pure bullshit, rhino horn is the only thing that works.

    14. Re:Wait, I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the interstiliarium is roughly equivalent to the rich Corinthian leather covering the seats and dash.

      But only if you're a Chrysler

    15. Re:Wait, I don't get it by jonniesmokes · · Score: 1

      Double-blind means that the person administering the treatment or placebo does not know the difference (in addition to the patient). So if you are being poked in a place other than where the practitioner would plan, then you might have a problem being able to do a double-blind study. In general, if a procedure or theory is not falsifiable (testable) then its probably a sham.

    16. Re:Wait, I don't get it by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      And how do you know that?
      Any evidence for it?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    17. Re:Wait, I don't get it by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 2

      As I understand it, Different practitioners have different patterns for what disorders or issues are treated by different acupuncture points.
      Actually they don't have.

      If there is no verifiable association between the acupuncture points and the disorders, if it doesn't matter which acupuncture points are used, then that indicates it's a placebo effect.
      Yes, but first of all: that is not a double blind study :D
      Secondly: there is no such study, but if you know one, a link would be interesting. To see what they actually tried to do.

      Anyway, kinda funny that adults dismiss simple stuff, that they could have tested themselves, because of magazine articles.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    18. Re:Wait, I don't get it by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately the famous Oetzi has most interesting acupuncture points tatooed on his body, he is about 5,000 years dead.

      The early emperors of China did mass studies with POWs ... killed a few 10,000 people in that process in the attempt to find deep in the body acupuncture points on the "Facia skin" around organs.

      That is all well documented and can still be read in modern libraries, in China. Unfortunately you have to be able to read "old school" Chinese characters or trust your translator.

      Oops!!

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    19. Re:Wait, I don't get it by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Subject could be just poked, without actually being stuck with a needle.
      Does not really work, as poking is enough in most cases.

      Subject could be given a local or general anesthetic.
      That is interesting ... but I guess it only would work if the subject does not notice the poke.

      Subject could be asleep.
      If you do not wake up from that, I guess you have a problem that requires more hard core treatment.

      Subject could have severed nerves.
      Subject could have spinal injury.
      Subject could be in a coma.

      That is actually done. But not as "test" but as therapy.

      Subject could be given acupuncture without knowing which kind is it ("right", "wrong", "fake") - while being informed that the choice will be random.
      That is not what a double blind study is about. The subject has to be convinced that it gets the real thing.
      (At least that is it, how it is done right now, however you have a point, because that would "encourage" 'negative placebo effects' ... uh uh, do I really get the real thing?)

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    20. Re:Wait, I don't get it by abies · · Score: 1

      Double-blind means that the person administering the treatment or placebo does not know the difference (in addition to the patient).

      Double-blind study means that neither patient or person _compiling the results_ knows if this was placebo or real treatment. In many cases outside of simple medicine switch, person executing the experiment (as it goes outside of just medical subjects) is very well aware if it is real or not, he just labels it in secret which will get revealed after all the single measurements and compilations on A/B (rather than placebo/real) are finished.

    21. Re:Wait, I don't get it by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      >> As I understand it, Different practitioners have different patterns for what disorders or issues are treated by different acupuncture points.
      > Actually they don't have.

      There is, as best I can tell, no master map used by all or even most practitioners. The Google images for acupressure points show this: The variety of needle locations for ear, foot, or hand to treat the same disorders provides a good sense of the lack of consistency among these practitioners.

      https://www.google.com/search?...

      I've not been able to find a reliable report of using alternative needle placements to verify acupuncture effectiveness: I also admit to being surprised it wasn't tried, simply to ease the difficulty of a more traditional double blind test. I'd hope that the double blind could be done this way by having someone _other_ than the acupuncture expert place the needles. The non-placebo needle locations could be selected by the practitioner, and a double blind method applied to give the person applying needles a randomized but distinct set of alternative, safe needle locations. It could be particularly easily done with needles in places like the ear, which has a very close set of locations for different disorders in the maps shown on Google, and which the recipient cannot easily see or distinguish among.

    22. Re:Wait, I don't get it by JezmundBerserker · · Score: 1

      So the link you provided is specifically addressing animal acupuncture. Can you provide a link that involves humans? My ex-wife used acupuncture for migraines.. kinda worked. I'm not sure it was placebo effect or actually doing anything. It is weird that we are using time as a way to validate if something is legitimate or not. It'd be interesting if there was more scientific backing and if this organ plays some kind of role.

    23. Re:Wait, I don't get it by another_twilight · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately the famous Oetzi has most interesting acupuncture points tatooed on his body,

      Oetzi had tattoos. You need to show that they are acupuncture points. I have friends with similar designs that have nothing to do with acupuncture and everything to do with following body features.

      That is all well documented ... Unfortunately you have to ... trust your translator.

      Joseph Smith of the Mormons used a similar argument.

      Oops!!

      TL:DR "I have this really compelling evidence that I can't show you"

    24. Re:Wait, I don't get it by another_twilight · · Score: 2

      A quick google. Maybe you should do some more reading

      Subject could be just poked, without actually being stuck with a needle.
      Does not really work, as poking is enough in most cases.

      Acupuncture Just As Effective Without Needle Puncture

      Subject could be given acupuncture without knowing which kind is it ("right", "wrong", "fake") - while being informed that the choice will be random.
      That is not what a double blind study is about. The subject has to be convinced that it gets the real thing.

      Sham acupuncture may be as efficacious as true acupuncture: a systematic review of clinical trials

    25. Re:Wait, I don't get it by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I don't have to prove anything.

      We have thousand years old mummies, with tattos at/around acupuncture points.

      If you want to prove that it has nothing to to do with acupuncure, you are my guest.

      Ever heard about Occams Razor?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    26. Re:Wait, I don't get it by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 0

      The points don't mark 'special disorders'. Sigh ... how do you come to that idea?
      Just because a point at the ear is called 'liver point' does not mean it improves your liver, (*facepalm*)

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    27. Re:Wait, I don't get it by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      The idea that specific points treat specific ailments comes from every acupuncture map published, and the acupuncturists themselves. What precisely makes you think that they do not associate specific points with treating specific disorders?

    28. Re:Wait, I don't get it by Tom · · Score: 1

      I checked up on Oetzi since my ancient Chinese is a bit rusty.

      The acupuncture hypothesis is that exactly, and it is brought forth by acupuncture people (main claim "these tattoos are at the locations which I would prick today"). Even they admit that a third or so of the points don't make sense to them.

      Fact is that we don't know. People who believe in acupuncture have thrown up a theory that these tattoos are related to acupuncture.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    29. Re:Wait, I don't get it by Tom · · Score: 1

      If you want to prove that it has nothing to to do with acupuncure, you are my guest.

      Easy.

      Take a random sample of people and drive them down the same country road. At the end, ask them individually for the landmarks along the way that they remember.

      There is a good chance that you will have a considerable overlap, wouldn't you agree?

      Same with the human body. If you are looking for interesting places to prick, or to paint, you will likely end up with similar locations. Especially with a large sample.

      Ever heard about Occams Razor?

      Yes, and now you have, too.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    30. Re:Wait, I don't get it by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      Not a major problem - build an acupuncturing robot. Position sensor for the needle tip position ; force sensor ; some system to aim the machine at a target. Get the patient marked up by competing practitioners with different ideas of where the needle should go - maybe with different sensitivities of UV fluorescing dye so they can't see each other's markers.

      You can double-blind these things, if you think it it's worth the effort.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    31. Re:Wait, I don't get it by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      The points simply get names.
      E.g. if you look at a 'reflex zone map' of your foot, you see it is organized like a cut up body. Liver at some point, stomach anove, then the heart, lungs around it etc.
      But it does not mean that stimulating the liver point improves the liver function. It basically is a simple mapping method to allow teaching and memorizing.
      If you want to know when and for what to massage the liver point, you have to google for that. I guess one thing are sleeping problems, but not sure.
      I only know the very basics of all those things, I'm not a 'healing practitioner'.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    32. Re:Wait, I don't get it by The+Raven · · Score: 1

      My roommate has a masters in oriental medicine. She got a full time job as an acupuncturist a year ago, and surprise surprise... the owner there followed a different acupuncture school, and they use different acupuncture points for the same symptoms.

      I'm not an acupuncturist, so I don't know HOW different they are, but she spent a month learning her new bosses' methods because that's how you keep a job.

      --
      "I will trust Google to 'do no evil' until the founders no longer run it." Hello Alphabet.
    33. Re:Wait, I don't get it by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      That is what I wrote in a different post.

      The "spots" are usually areas. And not just a single spot. On the other hand there are hundreds of spots for the same symptoms or treatment. One school uses more of that kind and another school ore of the other kind.

      But would be interesting to hear her success stories, or failures.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    34. Re:Wait, I don't get it by denzacar · · Score: 1

      Does not really work, as poking is enough in most cases.

      So needles are just a placebo then?

      That is actually done. But not as "test" but as therapy.

      If "therapy" - why not cure? If it actually works, curing the patient would be evidence of it working. Not "therapy".
      Everything can be a "therapy". Jumping up and down on a trampoline and drinking a bottle of Jim Beam can both be "therapy" for anything from toothache to cancer.
      Neither is cure for either, though. Though Jim Beam has measurable effects with dulling of pain and increased sensation of not giving a fuck.

      That is not what a double blind study is about. The subject has to be convinced that it gets the real thing.

      Ummm... That phrase... it does not mean what you think it means.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      In these double-blind experiments, neither the participants nor the researchers know which participants belong to the control group, nor the test group. Only after all data have been recorded (and, in some cases, analyzed) do the researchers learn which participants were which.

      because that would "encourage" 'negative placebo effects'

      Good thing then there's no such thing as a "negative placebo".
      Term for "negative placebo" IS placebo.
      Same goes for "green placebo", "blue placebo" and other flavors of placebo including but not limited to "fluffy placebo".

      Also... that's not how double-blind trials work. Or studies. Or statistics. Or science.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    35. Re:Wait, I don't get it by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Therapy is the way to be cured.

      Makes no sense to play with words here ...

      Good thing then there's no such thing as a "negative placebo".
      That is nonsense.
      It is pretty well established that patients that get a valid treatment but believe they are beyond hope often have no effect from the treatment.

      "Placebo" effects go both ways. Even in double blind studies as the participitiants know: "perhaps I'm in the control group and don't get the real thing".

      One reason why double blind studies are meanwhile often considered unethical and in live threatening situations are no longer done. There are no double blind cancer or HIV studies anymore since minimum a decade.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    36. Re: Wait, I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm no expert but that sounds bunk to me, the idea of double blind is that no one can sway the blind patient either consciously or subconsciously. So with that goal in mind, surely anyone who interacts with the patient would also have to be blind, for it to be a true double-blind study.

    37. Re: Wait, I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have it on good authority that the tattoos mark the prime cuts of the human body. And you can believe me, because I'm a cannibal.

  15. Get ready for a new benefactor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And to think Al Gore is responsible for all this?

  16. That's what she said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At first, it was, "where is it?"

    So I lifted a layer or two of muscle and out it fell. She marbled, "how is it sooo big and long and I want it in me now!".

    But then I let my muscle back down and then she said, No way!"

  17. Does it detect clickbait? by Kohath · · Score: 1

    Your doctor doesn't want you to know about it.

    1. Re:Does it detect clickbait? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

      This one weird organ was discovered by a stay at home mom who now earns $3,453 per week working part-time!

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:Does it detect clickbait? by mrbester · · Score: 1, Funny

      She does 10 things to earn that money. You won't believe #6!

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    3. Re:Does it detect clickbait? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like a #2 ..

    4. Re:Does it detect clickbait? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stay young forever with Orange Titanium, the secret to interstitium health.

    5. Re:Does it detect clickbait? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She does 10 things to earn that money. You won't believe #6!

      Won't believe #6? GP IS #6. AND #9.

  18. Lost wme with one line by aepervius · · Score: 1

    Take acupuncture, Theise said -- that energetic healing jolt may be traced to the interstitium

    there is no "healing jolt" (shame acupuncture works as well as acupuncture - both can be explained with placebo and similar effects - there is demonstrably no healing compared to control group, just in some cases lesser perception of pain).

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
    1. Re:Lost wme with one line by sheramil · · Score: 5, Funny

      there is no "healing jolt" ...

      You may know it better as the backhand, or the bitchslap.

    2. Re:Lost wme with one line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      http://www.neiltheise.com/pdfs/Theise-Menla-Complexity.pdf - Theise seems to be completely unaware that acupuncture has been adequately explained by "western" medicine: it doesn't work. https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/acupuncture-doesnt-work/

    3. Re:Lost wme with one line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "..shame acupuncture works as well as acupuncture .."

      Was that intentinoal genius, to write that? Acupuncture does work! Try it some time. Or just read documents claiming it doesn't. Your choice.

    4. Re:Lost wme with one line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    5. Re:Lost wme with one line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You clearly don't know how science works. Come back to us when you do.

    6. Re:Lost wme with one line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, people from the balkans consider beating someone up as constructive and curative (especially against mild depression)

    7. Re:Lost wme with one line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am too lazy to find a reference, but there was an FDA study that showed that acupuncture performs worse than placebo. That is to say, acupuncture causes harm and no benefit.

      I't just Chinese voodoo bullshit.

  19. Medichlorians? by nsl41288 · · Score: 1

    Seems like an early April Fools Day post to me. You could just about replace Interstitium with The Force or Medichlorians and it all makes sense.

  20. YOU have to show it works, asshole! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Typical. A moron's only strategy.

    If you make up a hypothesis, YOU have to back it up and convince US. Until you do so, nothing is established, and hence nothing exists that could even be argued against in the first place.

    Otherwise anyone could just declare that YOU do not exist, and say "Go ahead. Prove that you exist!" (and simply ignore your arguments too, spew more of the same bullshit, and declare himself the winner. Nevermind that the premise is already invalid).
    BTW: YOU'd say you think, therefore you exist. I'd reply that your comment is simply made up by my brain. :P

  21. I'm a therapist, yup- it's real by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    I work on people with disorders of this type all the time.

    It can cause intense migraines, unexplained pain & weakness, it can put hundreds of pound of pressure on bones and underlying tissue and yet it responds to gentle pressure over time much better than strong pressure. It behaves bit like oobleck in that regard.

    I just think of it as fascia mainly but I think of fascia different than most other people. Sort of like the Eskimos and snow.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    1. Re:I'm a therapist, yup- it's real by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Pressure of force?

      If pressure how much pressure?

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    2. Re:I'm a therapist, yup- it's real by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      It's a tradeoff of pressure and time.

      Given long enough, even light pressure from your socks will melt and deform it.
      As a therapist, I need to use heavier pressure but only enough to effect change in about 30 to 60 seconds.

      For migraines, you can start at the base of the skull and "iron" from the base to the crown one strip as wide as 4 fingers in about 45 seconds. If the pressure is correct, then an ache should spread out from the area (referred pain). Problem areas you can stay on for no more than 10 seconds before moving on.

      It's kinda hard to communicate this in a text medium so please feel free to ask follow up questions if that isn't clear enough.

      I'd say about 1-2 pounds?

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    3. Re:I'm a therapist, yup- it's real by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Oh, I thought of another measure I use.

      I ask the client how much pain they feel from 1-10. Pain level they self judge to be '3' is usually most effective unless they have been in extreme pain in their life (like passing a kidney stone- knocked unconcious in a car accident, etc.) .

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    4. Re:I'm a therapist, yup- it's real by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I just meant when you said hundreds of pounds of pressure, if you meant pressure or force (pounds being force).

      It sounds like what you do is take the hundreds of pounds in a small area and diffuse it over a larger area, reducing pressure but not force?

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    5. Re:I'm a therapist, yup- it's real by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Yea... we don't share a common vocabulary and text has it's limits.

      Read these and then try to read my statement below them in light of them.

      https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/p...

      https://www.sciencedirect.com/...

      https://www.fasciablaster.com/...

      https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2...

      https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/p...

      Note especially:

      Massage Treatment

      Each subject received a total of eight 30-minute massage therapy sessions during the 4-week treatment period. Two massage therapy sessions were administered each week and were separated by at least 48 hours. Massage therapy treatments were conducted by certified massage therapists, each with a minimum of 1000 hours of training and with 3 to 21 years of professional practice. A standardized, precise 30-minute massage treatment protocol was developed, refined, and practiced by each therapist for 4 weeks before the study began. The treatment protocol consisted of 6 distinct phases within the 30-minute time frame; brief descriptions of each phase follow.

      Phase 1â"preparatory tissue warm-up

      (3 minutes) included bilateral pressure moving from the lower cervical region to the occiput. This procedure was repeated, with completion of 3 passes bilaterally.

      Phase 2â"myofascial release

      (5 minutes) included 3 palmar glide passes each over the deltopectoral, deltoid, and posterior deltoid regions bilaterally. Additionally, 3 passes with a soft fist contact were made from the occiput to the lateral shoulder along the upper trapezius bilaterally.

      Phase 3â"axial cervical traction

      (2 minutes) included application of manual axial traction with 1 hand under the head and neck and the other hand on the forehead. Gentle traction was applied with the head first slightly flexed, then with slight right lateral flexion, and finally with the head in slight left lateral flexion. Traction was held for 15 seconds in each position.

      Phase 4â"trigger point therapy procedure

      (15 minutes) consisted of scanning palpation of the upper trapezius, sternocleidomastoid, suboccipital, splenius capitis, levator scapulae, and temporalis muscles to locate and manually treat trigger points.16 When located, active trigger points were treated by pincer or flat palpation with just enough pressure to elicit referred pain or autonomic referral phenomena. That pressure was maintained on the trigger point until the client reported that the referral pain had dissipated or for a maximum of 2 minutes. Pressure on the active trigger point was then slowly eased to elicit a vascular flushing. This procedure was repeated 3 to 5 times on each trigger point. Typically, 6 active trigger points were treated in the time allotted.

      Results
      A decrease in both frequency and duration of chronic headaches.

      (But also notice a small sample size for this study. /shrug)

      https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/p...

      ----

      Okay, so in light of those:

      Imagine your entire body is enclosed by a layer beneath your skin of soft leathery material which can become less flexible in certain directions and put tremendous pressure on underlying tissues. Pressure applied in directions different than that of the pressure can soften, lengthen, and extend the soft leathery material, reducing pressure on the underlying tissues.

      Especially in the case of chronic headaches and migraines this can reduce the duration and intensity of headaches and migraines ( migraines having nausea, light sensitivity, and visual distortion in addition to pain). In my personal experience, the migraines f

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  22. western medicine discovers chi? by js290 · · Score: 1

    Is this what the eastern medical traditions call chi?

    --
    "Tempers are wearing thin. Let's just hope some robot doesn't kill everybody." --Bender
    1. Re:western medicine discovers chi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No

  23. Medicine not Science by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Needling has been shown to help some chronic pain, most probably through release of endorphins and similar.

    Isn't this the point though? Medicine is all about curing and treating medical conditions. Whether or not it is wrapped up in some pseudo-scientific BS if the process actually works and relieves a medical condition without causing harm then surely it is good medicine even though it may be appalling science.

    1. Re:Medicine not Science by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      Isn't this the point though? Medicine is all about curing and treating medical conditions. Whether or not it is wrapped up in some pseudo-scientific BS if the process actually works and relieves a medical condition without causing harm then surely it is good medicine even though it may be appalling science.

      The placebo effect is well known about and remarkably powerful. Is it good medicine to give people sugar pills, since that is surprisingly effective?

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    2. Re:Medicine not Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Needling has been shown to help some chronic pain, most probably through release of endorphins and similar.

      Isn't this the point though? Medicine is all about curing and treating medical conditions. Whether or not it is wrapped up in some pseudo-scientific BS if the process actually works and relieves a medical condition without causing harm then surely it is good medicine even though it may be appalling science.

      The problem is when people with serious medical conditions get taken in by the pseudoscience. Consider a cancer patient who goes to an acupuncturist who convinces them that chemotherapy is nasty and dangerous with serious side effects (it is, but it can be emperically shown to work, on average) but acupuncture is simple and safe without serious side effects, and that it can cure cancer too. Given the choice between a traumatizing cure for cancer, or a mild one, the credulous person who believes the pseudoscience will pick the mild one. Then they'll die of cancer, unless it goes into spontaneous remission, at which point they'll shout to anyone who listens about the failure of western medicine and the victory of mysticism (or "alternative science", if they buy into the garbage in this article).

      This isn't just a hypothetical. This actually happens. A lot. Consider Steve Jobs, for example, who turned to alternative medicine first for his cancer. It's possible that he would have been saved if he hadn't delayed actual medical treatment for nearly a year. I have an uncle who was wearing copper/magnetic bracelets for what he thought was arthritis pain. It turned out that the pain was probably due to his metastasized melanoma. Of course, I don't know to what degree he actually sought real medical treatment as well. It's entirely possible that he went to doctors who told him that it was just arthritis and offered him only meager palliative treatment. Modern medicine is certainly far from infallible. As much as I'm a fan of evidence based medicine over quackery, the modern medical system still fails people with regularity. Of course, in his case, the cancer was probably largely hopeless before any noticeable symptoms. It certainly couldn't be treated with magnetism and whatever the copper was supposed to do though.

    3. Re:Medicine not Science by Tom · · Score: 2

      Yes and no.

      Some help is better than no help.

      But - if you don't understand or misunderstand the actual process of the healing, you won't have much success in improving it, or estimating its side effects, or understanding where it will and where it won't work.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    4. Re:Medicine not Science by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

      Yes but I understood that needling had been shown to be more effective than placebo. What has not been shown is that acupuncture, with all its associated mumbo jumbo, is any better than random needling.

    5. Re:Medicine not Science by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

      I completely agree that there is a whole ton of quackery out there which has been scientifically disproven and which can result in people avoiding necessary medical treatment based on false promises. However, acupuncture is in a slightly different category in that it has been shown to relieve pain. That does not mean that it isn't still rife with quackery - the only thing that has been shown to my knowledge is pain relief - but it does suggest that there is some mechanism there which we do not yet fully understand.

      This is why science is useful to medicine: it provides the tools to separate the mystic BS from what actually works. It can then go further and help determine why something works so it can be improved upon. Acupuncture seems to be at the first stage and so, provided it is only used for pain relief, we should not stop people from using just because we have not yet figured out how it works. That's the key difference between medicine and science: it's good medicine if the treatment works but it's only good science if you know how the treatment works.

    6. Re:Medicine not Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok. Let's do an experiment.
      You have fallen. Your finger is very sore and swollen. You can't bend it. You come to me, a doctor, and I examine you. I determine that you have bruised your interstitium and prescribe a dose of Orange Titanium Powder (tm) to cure it, along with some ibuprofen and ice. You go home and take the powder, the ibuprofen and put ice on the finger. The swelling goes down and you feel better.
      After a month you notice you still can't move your finger and you return. Another doctor sees you and takes an X-ray. He says the finger was broken and now you need five thousand dollars in surgery to treat the finger.
      Do you A) send a letter to me thanking me for making you feel better and get on with treating the other parts of the illness, or B) sue the ever-loving fuck out of me for giving you a false treatment?
      Think carefully.

    7. Re:Medicine not Science by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Yes, sugar pills would be a decent first round of treatment, except for they'd stop working if everybody knew that was what was happening.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    8. Re:Medicine not Science by VeryFluffyBunny · · Score: 1

      Two points to address:

      That acupuncture works better than placebo: This is not the case. You have to look at more than a single study. At a bare minimum, studies have to be replicated and then aggregates taken from several replicated studies have to be weighed and analysed in meta-studies before coming to tentative conclusion. Also, it's necessary to establish durations and intensities of treatment, side effects, risks, etc., in order for doctors to calculate/estimate whether it's going to be worthwhile for each particular patient/s conditions.

      That acupuncture is scientific: Apart from the failure to conclusively disprove the null hypothesis, generally speaking, there's also the issue that acupuncture doesn't have a disprovable hypothesis in the first place. The whole idea of acupuncture is incoherent and falls firmly into the category of magical thinking.

      Acupuncture is bunk, plain and simple. Believers are entitled to their own opinions but not to their own facts. Public funds should never be diverted away from evidence-based, effective treatments to hocus pocus quackery "cures." Those peddling snake-oil and deceiving gullible members of the public need to be taken to task over this. It's not always provable fraud but often it is but victims are usually unwilling to prosecute for a variety of reasons, including shame or denial.

      We're supposed to be living in the 21st century, right?

      --
      Debate is a form of harassment. Do not question my truth.
    9. Re:Medicine not Science by VeryFluffyBunny · · Score: 1

      Yes, sugar pills would be a decent first round of treatment, except for they'd stop working if everybody knew that was what was happening.

      You'd think so but that's not actually true. Even when patients know that they're taking a placebo, their bodies usually produce the expected physiological responses as if it were the treatment. The effect is stronger when applied in a medical clinic, by people who look and sound like doctors, and the treatment is very expensive. Additionally, if the placebo is a pill, red placebos are more effective than blue placebos, unless you're Italian, in which case blue placebos are more effective. The placebo effect is a weird thing.

      --
      Debate is a form of harassment. Do not question my truth.
    10. Re:Medicine not Science by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      However, acupuncture is in a slightly different category in that it has been shown to relieve pain.

      Acupuncture hasn't been shown to relieve pain. Random needling has been shown to relieve pain. You can do random needling without doing acupuncture.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    11. Re:Medicine not Science by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Well, that's insane.

      WTF is wrong with us as a species.

      But thanks, that's fascinating.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    12. Re:Medicine not Science by dpidcoe · · Score: 1

      However, acupuncture is in a slightly different category in that it has been shown to relieve pain. That does not mean that it isn't still rife with quackery - the only thing that has been shown to my knowledge is pain relief - but it does suggest that there is some mechanism there which we do not yet fully understand.

      The mechanism is fairly well understood, it's a placebo effect. Pain is one of those few things that really is all in your head, and therefore one of the few things that's probably treatable with snake oil and quackery (given that the treatment of the underlying causes of the pain aren't being ignored, assuming they actually are treatable).

    13. Re:Medicine not Science by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      WTF is wrong with us as a species.

      Fun fact: placebos are more effective when the patient thinks they're more expensive.

      In conclusion, I agree with your statement wholeheartedly. And yet, I merrily chow down on expensive placebos whe nI have a cold because they make me feel better.

      And science supports that :)

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    14. Re:Medicine not Science by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      The more expensive part doesn't shock me.

      It's the knowing it's a sugar pills that does.

      I'm all about placebos too FWIW. Like if someone does a weird (but ultimately healthy) diet, I'm all for it.

      1) placebo is strong
      2) any mindfulness about what one eats will lead to a healthier person.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    15. Re:Medicine not Science by VeryFluffyBunny · · Score: 1

      any mindfulness about what one eats will lead to a healthier person

      That's true up to a point. The placebo effect isn't magical and it can't do anything that isn't medically possible, e.g. making consumed calories disappear, thereby not making you gain weight, or compensating for unbalanced diets where there are insufficient nutrients, e.g. not enough micro-nutrients in some commercial weight-loss diets. Placebos only trigger physiological responses that our bodies have evolved to give.

      --
      Debate is a form of harassment. Do not question my truth.
    16. Re:Medicine not Science by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I mean more of the gluten free fad. Though gluten sensitivity is starting to look real, and everyone that throws shade about it seems to be ignorant to the fact that Celiac's wasn't even identified until the 40s.

      More of a "I'm on the blah diet and I feel better because thaetons" is what I meant.

      Or even a damned clense if it isn't being done to dangerous extent.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    17. Re:Medicine not Science by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

      You can do random needling without doing acupuncture.

      True, but you cannot do acupuncture without doing the equivalent of random needling hence if random needling works so too does acupuncture albeit for some as-yet-not-understood scientific reason and not because of whatever mystical mumbo jumbo acupuncturists claim.

  24. Really an organ? by vossman77 · · Score: 1

    Common definitions of an organ, Webster:
    > a. differentiated structure (such as a heart, kidney, leaf, or stem) consisting of cells and tissues and performing some specific function in an organism.
    > b. bodily parts performing a function or cooperating in an activity the eyes and related structures that make up the visual organs.

    Wikipedia:
    > Organs are collections of tissues with a similar function.

    Britannica:
    > a group of tissues in a living organism that have been adapted to perform a specific function.

    Oxford:
    > part of an organism which is typically self-contained and has a specific vital function.

    These newly discovered channels, do not seem to consist of either cells or tissues and does not appear to be self-contained. I just feel like the authors thought, "if we say it might be a new organ we'll get bigger headlines."

    1. Re:Really an organ? by dafradu · · Score: 1

      FTA:
      "The characteristic histological features of this bile duct submucosa structure (spaces filled with fluid and with collagen bundles lined asymmetrically by flat cells) are readily visualized in other tissues."

      This fits all definitions you posted, it is a a structure or group of tissues with some particular function that is part of the human organism. It is as much as an organ as the skin, it fits the same definition.

    2. Re:Really an organ? by Daetrin · · Score: 1

      I'm not a medical anything, but calling skin an organ always seemed like cheating to me.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  25. So, the lymphatic system? by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

    Can you really just rename the lymphatic system, declare it is a new organ, associate it with woo and pat yourself on the back? In that case, I've discovered a new organ I'd like to call the sanguitium... it explains the mysterious medical benefit of bloodletting and balancing the humors.

  26. Science vs acupuncture by sjbe · · Score: 2

    Acupuncture is not based on 'points' on meridians.

    Acupuncture is pretty much not based on anything at all. Certainly not based on scientific evidence. The evidence regarding its efficacy is thin and it clearly is being used to "treat" far too many conditions for which there is no evidence that it has any effect. There appears to be some evidence that it can help certain pain conditions (though this is still being evaluated) but the mechanism of action is unclear and the clinical practice guidelines are inconsistent to put it mildly. The NIH has been researching acupuncture and until they can show with appropriate studies evidence of effectiveness beyond placebo and a mechanism of action acupuncture should be regarded with skepticism.

    If layman do a 'double blind' study it is most likely that both needles are at the wrong point :)

    Most double blind studies of acupuncture to date show that it is nothing but a placebo under most circumstances and for most conditions.

    1. Re:Science vs acupuncture by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Actually there are no modern double blind studies about acupuncture.

      I really wonder why intelligent people like you claim that. Hint: you can not double blind (neither the applyer of the needle nor the receiver know where he needle is placed) manual treat a human body.

      Double blind studies only work with medicals etc. where neither the guy handing out the stuff nor the receiver know if they are getting the real stuff or not.

      Half the planet is using acupuncture and related medical treatment like Shiatsu and Thai Massage (or similar things like Romiromi, Mirimiri or Lomilomi massage) or Moxa or simply "pressure point" therapy on acupuncture points. You want to tell me that you have a study in the US that proves that 4 billion people outside of the USA are treated wrong? I guess it is easily up to 5 billion people who have access to acupuncture and other similar treatments, and guess what?
      a) you need a medical diploma to practice it
      b) the health insurance is paying it

      Sorry, it is really hard to believe that:
      i) a treatment I try is working
      ii) the doctors applying it need a MD/PhD
      iii) more than half the planet has it as basic therapy and not as "alternative"
      iIii) health insurances are paying it
      v) dozens of variations of the same principle exist (independent developed on different parts of the world)
      And: all that is "fraud". Sorry, I don't think so.

      It is much more plausible that the US pharm. and health care industry simply is funding fraud studies and dismisses simple treatments because they rather like to sell pharmaceutics instead.

      On the other hand: from an intelligent guy I would expect to simply try it and make up his mind instead of repeating stuff he has heard somewhere or read somewhere :D

      E.g. if you are a smoker and like to quite, acupuncture support is one of the most successful therapies.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  27. New? What? This is not newly discovered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember reading about this structure at least 30 years ago when I was doing AI research. In fact I believe it was even called the same thing. I imagine the knowledge existed long before that.

    If you search the term you get literally millions of hits. That stuff could not have popped up overnight.

    I guess what's "new" is some AW made a Facebook page about it or something and is claiming the fame. Or could be a pharma company claiming it for business use (patent, drugs, or some shit).

  28. Fake medicine by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Everyone who practices Chi Gong or other internal arts knows that ... since millennia.

    Oh do they now? Are you seriously claiming that QiGong is anything more than a mild form of exercise? In spite of the fact that there is little evidence to support its efficacy for any specific health benefit.

    You know what they call alternative medicine that is shown to actually work? Medicine.

    1. Re:Fake medicine by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Yes,
      I have thousands of cases of evidence that QiGong is a very healthy thing.
      And those who practice know about "how it works", the "modern word" is Facia.
      Assuming that QiGong is a mild exercise is idiotic. It is a martial art and healing system.
      E.g. you might look at this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?... probably you find better videos, but I'm to lazy to do your work for you.

      Medicine helps in situations where medicine helps ... e.g. a common cold. It does not really help when you have a slipped disc. Qi/Chi Gong does not help you either, but it might prevent getting a slipped disc.

      No idea what you mean with "alternative medicine" ... your country seems to only have wackos in that section of "medicine" :D

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  29. Prove it by sjbe · · Score: 1

    maybe they did demonstrate their claims using the most empirical method of all: "Does it work?"

    If it actually works it should be straight forward to actually prove it. Placebos "work" (sometimes) but we don't rely on them for treatment for good reasons.

  30. Lazy by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Nerds, please explain how that is an organ.

    If you aren't a nerd yourself then slashdot isn't the place for you. Go figure it out yourself.

  31. Re:We need a "I am Joe's Interstitium" to explain by kalpol · · Score: 1

    I am Jack's complete lack of surprise... That was a fun moment in Fight Club when I recognized the references to the Reader's Digest articles.

    --
    12:50 - press return.
  32. I guess I won't submit anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My submission that I volunteered to be the Largest Organ Donor by signing off on everything I have within me, to medicine, has only recently increased the total number of ogans, by 1.

  33. GOOD, so we have been... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...tossed around, groped, punctured, slapped, by physicians with their immense ego, without them knowing exactly what they were doing all along. So much for medical sciences proficiency... ;/

  34. How about looking at football players. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If we find damage, shrinkage, etc in football players with that traumatic encephalopathy or whatever it is called, that would be a good starting place for working out what the Interstitium is and isn't doing as a shock absorber.

  35. Evidence based medicine by sjbe · · Score: 1

    I really wonder why intelligent people like you claim that. Hint: you can not double blind (neither the applyer of the needle nor the receiver know where he needle is placed) manual treat a human body.

    Not true at all. You can simulate the needle placement with other stimulus. An electric shock can feel like a needle prick as long as the patient cannot see it. And there have been studies about the effectiveness of double blinding for acupuncture specifically.

    You want to tell me that you have a study in the US that proves that 4 billion people outside of the USA are treated wrong

    First off there are NOT 4 billion people receiving acupuncture so lets dispense with that nonsense right away. Acupuncture is used by a small percentage of the population - most of whom are inclined towards "alternative medicine" which for the most part is a PC term for quackery. Second, there are studies on the effectiveness of acupuncture as a treatment and they mostly find that it is no better than placebo. So YES, I am saying EXACTLY that people are being treated wrong. People take all sorts of folk remedies all over the globe that have no evidence of efficacy.

    Half the planet is using acupuncture and related medical treatment like Shiatsu and Thai Massage

    More than half the planet also believes that there is an invisible man in the sky who created them and that they should obey despite there being precisely zero evidence for the existence of such a being. Just because a lot of people believe something doesn't equal evidence. There are quite a number of treatments that insurance pays for for which the evidence of effectiveness is scant to non existent. They pay for it because the evidence there is limited evidence for or against its effectiveness. Most insurance in the US will not cover acupuncture under normal circumstances. Some insurance companies will turn a blind eye to it with a prescription from a doctor but this is the exception rather than the rule.

    It is much more plausible that the US pharm. and health care industry simply is funding fraud studies and dismisses simple treatments because they rather like to sell pharmaceutics instead.

    Only to an idiot who is inclined to believe conspiracy theories over scientific studies. Are you seriously arguing that modern medicine does not work despite the ample proof that it does.

    1. Re:Evidence based medicine by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      An electric shock can feel like a needle prick as long as the patient cannot see it.
      Which has the same effect as a needle.

      First off there are NOT 4 billion people receiving acupuncture so lets dispense with that nonsense right away. Acupuncture is used by a small percentage of the population
      China has about 2 billion inhabitants, India is now over a billion, .thailand is close to 100million .... should Ii continue?

      most of whom are inclined towards "alternative medicine"
      That is nonsense and the wrong term. Nonsense because they are not inclined to anything and wrong term because it is standard medicine there.

      Only to an idiot who is inclined to believe conspiracy theories over scientific studies.
      There are plenty of scientific studies that show acupuncture works. Many of them are over 3000 years old, so what is your point?

      Are you seriously arguing that modern medicine does not work despite the ample proof that it does.
      No, why would I? And where did I imply that?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    2. Re:Evidence based medicine by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Which has the same effect as a needle.

      Which is consistent with the placebo effect, FWIW. However, acupuncture is done by putting needles into significant points. For a double-blind study, you teach someone how to insert needles, acupuncture-style, without knowing more about it. You tell that person to insert needles at specific points. Some of these are traditional acupuncture points for the desired effect and some aren't. That eliminates cues to the patient. The blind scoring of results is normal.

      China has about 2 billion inhabitants, India is now over a billion, .thailand is close to 100million .... should Ii continue?

      How many of these use acupuncture? (I really don't know.)

      There are plenty of scientific studies that show acupuncture works. Many of them are over 3000 years old, so what is your point?

      The Wikipedia article gives references to studies in which acupuncture is not found to be more effective than putting needles in random places, and it isn't clear that random needling is better than placebo. Pain control is difficult to evaluate, since pain is self-reported, and it's not possible to do a blind test with the control group not being poked and the experimental group getting acupuncture.

      I'm not really interested in millennia-old scientific studies. It's too hard to check for faked data, improper experimental techniques, or selection bias.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    3. Re:Evidence based medicine by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      People who receive acupuncture usually know enough about it, to know if the needle is close enough to the point or far off.
      So no, I don't think that your way of 'doing a double blind study' works.

      Pain control is difficult to evaluate, since pain is self-reported, and it's not possible to do a blind test with the control group This is bssically true for all acupuncture treatments. It is impossible to set up a decent control group.

      Anyway, instead of hunting examplrs of studies that try to disprov its effectiveness, why not simply read a bit about it and find some studies that support it?

      I mean: in case you are interested in the topic.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    4. Re:Evidence based medicine by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      We don't have to pick experimental subjects from acupuncture recipients. If acupuncture has objective effects, it should be possible to take people with various symptoms who are unfamiliar with acupuncture, and train someone how to stick pins in who doesn't know where the points are. Then we tell the experimenter where to stick pins in for each individual person, and nobody is qualified to see if those are acupuncture points or not. Double blind.

      I wasn't hunting for studies one way or another. I went to the Wikipedia article and read up on studies there. Although I think it would be cool if acupuncture worked, I really don't care that much.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    5. Re:Evidence based medicine by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      it should be possible to take people with various symptoms who are unfamiliar with acupuncture,
      They usually don't want to be treated/tested that way.

      and train someone how to stick pins in who doesn't know where the points are.
      It is not that easy, how do you find the correct point if you are only "trained" for an experiment?

      You could mark three spots on the test subject of course, and let the tester pick one by random.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  36. Credulous fools by sjbe · · Score: 1

    I have thousands of cases of evidence that QiGong is a very healthy thing.

    No you do not. You certainly do not have an proper studies of such nonsense.

    Assuming that QiGong is a mild exercise is idiotic. It is a martial art and healing system.

    It is neither a martial art nor is there any evidence that it is a healing system. There is nothing martial about it. I've been involved in various martial arts my whole life and QuGong is exactly the sort of fraudlent crap that guilible people like yourself get sold. I'm betting you think tai chi is a fighting art too. Most of the so called martial arts are really stylized dance classes with a bit of mythology tacked on. Fun, maybe healthy but most don't teach anything about fighting. Just exercise, usually in funny looking costumes. If you want to see what a real martial art looks like, go to an MMA gym, a college wrestling room, or a jiu-jitsu class. Go see what the armed forces do. THOSE are martial arts.

    As for it being a "healing system" put down the cool aid. It's been studied and there is NO evidence it has any effect on health aside from that of mild exercise. If you want me to believe you then present the evidence.

    Medicine helps in situations where medicine helps ... e.g. a common cold. It does not really help when you have a slipped disc. Qi/Chi Gong does not help you either, but it might prevent getting a slipped disc.

    Welcome to the logical fallacy post hoc ergo propter hoc. We're done here.

    1. Re:Credulous fools by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Lease send me a link that shows that someone studied if QiGong is a healing system.
      I really doubt any westerner ever cared to make a study about it.

      That it is a martial art is obviously without doubt. If you don't know that, you should probably realy consider to stop posting about topics you have no clue about?

      Your MMA reference spoiled it completely, there is no martial art called MMA. MMA is a entertaining competitive fighting event where people who do diverent Martial arts (the second M) can be Mixed (the first M) against each other.

      Hint: unlike you, I do martial arts since over 30 years ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  37. Non-news by nachtelfjeiu · · Score: 1

    This is so funny to someone who knows basic histology. They discovered that you can get a whole lot of attention by reframing well-known tissue as a new organ. And hopefully some research grants. That's the real discovery.

  38. I'll save you the clicks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An infamous quack scientist makes a bold attention-grabbing claim in a predatory pay-to-play low-tier academic journal.

    It's bullshit.

  39. What...? by martinfb · · Score: 1

    What? You mean you did not know about this?! This is old news.

    --


    Self-importance and self-indulgence is the root of ALL evil.
  40. judi online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://7asiabet.com
    http://7asiabet.com/sports
    http://7asiabet.com/casino
    http://7asiabet.com/multiplayer
    http://7asiabet.com/slots/provider/popular
    http://7asiabet.com/live-game
    http://7asiabet.com/promotion
    http://7asiabet.com/register
    http://7asiabet.com/password/reset
    http://7asiabet.com/contact-us
    http://7asiabet.com/page/syarat_&_ketentuan
    http://7asiabet.com/page/link_alternatif
    http://7asiabet.net
    http://asiabet7.com
    http://7asiabet.com/page/bank_offline
    http://7asiabet.com/page/f_a_q
    http://dutaprediksi.com
    http://maxbet338.asia
    http://flashbet338.com
    http://www.flashbet338.com/Images/theme/v1/promo/promo.html?v=3
    http://max338.com
    http://flash338.com
    http://maxbets88.com
    http://www.maxbets88.com/Images/theme/v1/promo/promo.html?v=3
    http://goal4d.com
    http://www.goal4d.com/contactus
    http://www.goal4d.com/registration
    http://www.goal4d.com/index/casino
    http://www.goal4d.com/index/sportsbook
    http://www.goal4d.com/index/games
    http://www.goal4d.com/index/togel
    http://www.goal4d.com/index/pokerdomino
    http://www.goal4d.com/index/cockfight
    http://www.goal4d.com/pages/index/code/promotion
    http://goal4d.info
    http://goal4d.net
    http://model18plus.com
    http://dutaprediksi.com