Slashdot Mirror


Trump Says He Wants Skilled Migrants But Creates New Hurdles (apnews.com)

An anonymous reader shares an Associated Press report: It may be a while before President Donald Trump gets another chance at creating a new, "merit-based" immigration system, a keystone of his four-part plan that Congress rejected last month. In the meantime, his administration is busy making it harder, not easier, for skilled migrants to come work in the United States. The State Department has ended an Obama-era program to grant visas to foreign entrepreneurs who want to start companies in the United States. It is more aggressively scrutinizing visas to skilled workers from other countries. And it is contemplating ending a provision that allows spouses of those skilled workers to be employed in the U.S.

The administration and its backers contend it's trying to fix flaws in the existing, employer-centric skilled immigration system while advocating for a complete overhaul of America's immigration system. "The stuff that they're actually doing is not so much restricting skilled immigration as enforcing the law," said Mark Krikorian of the Center for Immigration Studies, which supports reducing immigration. "They're rolling back some of the extralegal measures that other administrations have taken." A primary avenue for skilled immigrants to enter the United States is the H1B visa for specialty workers, which is heavily used by the technology industry. About 85,000 visas are issued annually in a lottery system. Some critics argue they are a way for companies to avoid hiring U.S. citizens; Trump himself has said H1B recipients shouldn't even be considered skilled.
Further reading: On Easter Sunday, Trump threatens to end DACA and 'stop' NAFTA.

38 of 327 comments (clear)

  1. ...but creates new hurdles. by Type44Q · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Good.

    1. Re: ...but creates new hurdles. by nomadic · · Score: 5, Informative
    2. Re: ...but creates new hurdles. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, America never benefited from immigration!

    3. Re: ...but creates new hurdles. by Bruha · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Social security funds have been stolen. If they were allowed to sit and grow interest as intended then there wouldnâ(TM)t be an issue.

    4. Re: ...but creates new hurdles. by AC-x · · Score: 2

      Except we're talking about legal H1B recipients, not illegal immigrants.

    5. Re: ...but creates new hurdles. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Lol slashdot cuts the url at just the right length to know it's a partisan site.

      Nitpicking at someone else's citation, while providing none of your own, is tantamount to admitting that you lost the argument.

    6. Re: ...but creates new hurdles. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      Kids go to school? Yes.

      Schools are paid for with property tax, not social security taxes. Illegal aliens pay rent, which landlords use to pay property tax. So they are paying to educate their kids.

      The justification for public funding of education is that we all benefit from an educated populace. The children of many illegals were born in American, and are American citizens. They have just as much right to go to school are your kids do. Even for children not born here, we are all better off with them in school and learning.

    7. Re: ...but creates new hurdles. by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The Atlantic? Really? You might as well have cited Kos or the daily beast. Why not use CNN net time? Same biased shit.

      I'm so tired of this, Anonymous Coward.

      If something is factually wrong in the article, point it out. State what is incorrect.

      Don't just say "The Atlantic is biased." Base that opinion on facts from the cited article. We'd have a lot more respect for this statement that way.

      When someone posts a Breitbart story it's usually pretty easy to find what's factually wrong in it. If The Atlantic is biased it should be the same here.

    8. Re: ...but creates new hurdles. by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      America benefits from legal and skilled immigration. No country has ever benefited from illegal mass immigration of unskilled labor.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
  2. Re:Xenophobes gonna xenophobe by Dan667 · · Score: 3, Funny

    which is pretty hilarious as trump marries foreigners and has had a lot of anchor babies with them.

  3. Re:Xenophobes gonna xenophobe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Interesting! So since nearly every single country on this planet restricts immigration and makes getting a job nearly impossible without being a legal resident, does that mean the governments and leaders of each and every country are xenophobes?

    Or do you restrict your criticism to only major white countries. Just making sure you are not the racist one.

  4. What ever. by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If he cracks down on H1B abuse, that's a good thing in both the short and the long run, regardless of what the vested interests that are big media and big tech have to say on the subject. And given past reporting on the economics of H1B, it is fair to say that much of the program is abuse. Good on Trump.

    As to the rest of it...that's right: Congress needs to change the law in order for the law to be changed. I understand why this may come as unexpected news given the previous administration's looser interpretation of the separation of powers and big media's unabashed cheerleading of that loose interpretation but it is indeed the case that if we want merit-based immigration, then we need to change the law from what we have now to what we would like to have.

    Enforcing the letter of the existing laws to highlight their inadequacy is about the only thing the President can do to force the issue. That's what happened with terminating DACA. The lefties couldn't stomach actually having to vote on amnesty for an ever-changing and open-ended number of illegal immigrants so they sued in a friendly court where an Obama-appointed judge made the curious ruling that the Trump administration could not terminate DACA on the grounds of its illegality because only a court could find something illegal. We'll see what sort of contortions the left will make in their inevitable court challenge. Perhaps they will find a judge who is willing to rule that only even-numbered presidents may issue executive orders while odd-numbered presidents are obliged to keep on enforcing them, on the grounds that no one wants odd governance and an even-handed approach is more mathematically beautiful.

    1. Re:What ever. by walterbyrd · · Score: 5, Informative

      > You need H1B workers.

      No we don't.

      > The visa kids are the ones who have their name on patents, and have a stupidly disproportionate number of phd candidates among them

      No they are not. We already have the O-1 visa for the exceptional talented.

  5. There have to be a lot of hurdles... by DeplorableCodeMonkey · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The amount of capital B, grade A Bullshit you have to deal with with screening Americans is bad enough. The amount of fraud you get from the developing world is just unbelievable. "Why yes, I have 20 years of experience with writing Hadoop applications in Go with a UI written in Rust."

    Oh really, it say you graduated from a diploma mill 3 years ago...

  6. Fix H1B Visas by rossz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Currently, H1B visas are being abused by the employers. They have, effectively, a slave. Complain, get fired, lose your visa. It's a simple fix. Tie the H1B visa to the worker, not to the company. Make it easy for the visa holder to change jobs. It shouldn't be any more difficult than updating an online form with new employment information. This will eliminate the worst of the abusers. One other change I would make. H1B visa holders should be barred from working for a contracting company.

    --
    -- Will program for bandwidth
    1. Re:Fix H1B Visas by currently_awake · · Score: 2

      One more change: Add a minimum wage, say above $100,000 per year, and entitle them to Citizenship after 2 years. If they are worth that money then they are clearly a good deal for America and should be kept. You could even get rid of the limited numbers and lottery, since you'd only be importing "Valuable" people.

  7. Re:Liberal position by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You're saying he didn't sit down with Pelosi and Schumer to try to work out a deal?

    Is that the deal he worked out and then reneged on the next morning? Because if that's how you are framing your argument, you need to find a new one.

  8. Re:Employer Algorithm for keeping a deep tech benc by volodymyrbiryuk · · Score: 2

    IndentationError: expected an indented block

    --
    sudo rm -r -f --no-preserve-root /
  9. Meanwhile by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Stop the lies. End all immigration.

    Don't tell Trump this. His businesses hire lots of immigrants, legal and otherwise.

    https://www.vox.com/2018/2/13/...

    "A Vox analysis of hiring records for seasonal workers at three Trump properties in New York and Florida revealed that only one out of 144 jobs went to a US worker from 2016 to the end of 2017. Foreign guest workers with H-2B visas got the rest. The H-2B visa program allows seasonal, non-agricultural employers — like hotels and ski resorts — to hire foreign workers when they can’t find American ones. The Trump administration temporarily expanded this guest-worker program in 2017 while restricting other avenues of legal immigration, including the H-1B program for high-skilled workers."

    [Note: this article is from last month]

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Meanwhile by jwhyche · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The Vox isn't a credible source. Come back when you have a reliable source.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    2. Re:Meanwhile by wolfemi1 · · Score: 2

      The Vox isn't a credible source. Come back when you have a reliable source.

      This crap gets modded +5 Insightful?

      Has Slashdot always been right-wing biased and I didn't notice?

  10. Re:Liberal position by bayankaran · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What is the Liberal position on immigration, and how will that position benefit America?

    Birth rates are declining in the West as a whole. (Look at Europe, Russia and the classic case of Japan.) Even some of the states in India have stabilized. For economy to keep growing you need more consumers. Immigration helps that. (Unless you want folks of your own skin color.) Any counter argument about jobs being lost - at least today you have the least unemployment in decades.

    May be you can make a case about "when automation comes they immigrants will be a financial burden". I guess a huge subset of the population will require some sort of UBI.

    Canada has a sensible (you can call it progressive as well) immigration policy. They take in 1% of their population - about 350K migrants - an year. (I was a Canadian immigrant once, now an American immigrant.) For an American immigrant, your primary identity is of an American, and that's the whole point of United States of America.

    --
    Tat Tvam Asi
  11. Re:USA doesn't want skilled workers by walterbyrd · · Score: 2

    The vast majority of H1B workers are far from exceptional.

    Why does the H1B specifically allow replacing an American worker, with a cheaper H1B?

  12. Re:Of course by walterbyrd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    > The State Department has ended an Obama-era program to grant visas to foreign entrepreneurs who want to start companies in the United States.

    The companies those entrepreneurs start are staffing companies. Those staffing companies specialize in bringing over visa workers to take US jobs.

    Staffing companies do not actually create jobs, they are just middle-men.

  13. Re:Liberal position by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    https://www.cnbc.com/2017/10/09/schumer-pelosi-say-trumps-immigration-demands-cant-be-serious.html
    "The top Democrats in the Senate and House criticized those terms, saying they strayed from the outlines of a deal they discussed with Trump last month. Democrats had said Trump would not insist on border wall funding in an agreement to shield roughly 800,000 young immigrants from deportation. "

  14. Re:Can we be honest for a minute by walterbyrd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    > The whole idea if merit based immigration is based on the false racist assumption that somehow those classified as belonging to a White race are superior

    No it is not. Please stop lying.

  15. This is just pro H1B propaganda by walterbyrd · · Score: 5, Informative

    The H1B program is designed to replace Americans with cheaper offshore workers.

    Unlike most visas, the H1B specifically allows companies to replace Americans with cheaper H1Bs, even if the American worker is doing a good job.

    The program is a complete scam.

    1. Re:This is just pro H1B propaganda by Zakharevich1988 · · Score: 2

      There is a slight bit of misinformation here. Most anti H1B people think all H1B's == the types working in sweatshops like Infosys. There are workers on that visa in places like Google,Facebook and many start-ups where : 1) The foreign worker has to pass multiple rounds of technical interviews just like an American hire. Whereas the interviews in H1B abuse sweatshops like Infosys are a complete joke. 2) The foreign worker in these places is paid 6 figure salaries which correspond to the highest bracket for entry level wages in tech in that area, the American worker at the entry level at these places gets the exact same pay. For people like these H1B's make sense, for people like the ones at Infosys , no it doesn't. I saw your comment on the O-1 visa in this thread, and I'd like to say O-1's are very, very hard to get, and if we went by that then it be just very few people coming in to the US. What Trump seems to be doing is wanting to eliminate the Infosys types workers that are coming in droves on the H1B visa. The money these companies put in into lobbying is making it harder to make any reasonable changes to the program and these companies are responsible for things like Disney workers losing their jobs to H1B's. There have been some positive changes recently like mass issues of RFE's to companies to prove to USCIS that the job indeed requires specialization and is paying top dollar, since most of the sweatshops type H1B's I see are paid 60000-65000$ compared to H1B's in top companies being paid 120,000-150,000$. A lot of the companies who are unable to pay top dollar have stopped hiring H1B's as result, since USCIS is demanding a lot of paperwork to approve or extend an H1B visa. I talked to an Indian worker at a well known Silicon Valley company about this last month , he welcomed it saying "It's good for people like me because we are truly skilled workers and makes immigration easier for us, since companies that abuse H1B's have completely clogged up work based immigration in the US".

    2. Re:This is just pro H1B propaganda by Walter+White · · Score: 5, Informative

      Got a citation for that? Or is it just more racist bullshit from the likes of Breitbart, Fox News, etc.?

      Disney did that on a large scale. That they forced the employees they were firing to train their replacements was particularly galling. The same thing likely happens frequently on a smaller scale that does not make the headlines.

      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...

  16. Partner jobs are critical to skilled migration by nicolaiplum · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The most significant part of this is an intent to prevent spouses from working.

    The most common reason for failure (i.e. return to origin country) of expatriation or immigration of skilled workers is the partner being unhappy. For people from most developed countries, their husband or wife also expects a career - the time of househusbands or even housewives living on a one income family and being happy about that is over. In academia, this is known as the two-body problem: if you hire an academic from another country, there are two bodies to please, not just one.

    So if Trump makes it impossible to get a work permit for a spouse when a highly skilled migrant moves to the USA, all those from countries where men and women have approximate equality will just not come. Try telling your partner you're moving to different country for a great professional opportunity but they can't work when they're there, so they have to give up their career and can't start another job or another occupation. It won't go well for most of you, and that's particularly true if you're higher skilled and globally mobile because such people tend to have partners or spouses who are also higher skilled and globally mobile.

    Of course, this won't discourage people who are in large company H1B visa schemes used to supply more generic mid-skilled workers for contracts in the USA, especially as they are usually younger and less likely to have spouses and children.

    But the university professors, top engineering talent, top management talent - that will all go "My wife can't work? My husband has to lose his career? No thanks - I'll take that job in another country instead." Trump won't understand or even notice, but universities, tech corporations, engineering corporations, and even orchestras will notice.

    --
    "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled"
  17. Why pay taxes for schools, when H-1B are cheaper by SysEngineer · · Score: 2

    Teachers in West Virginia went on strike, teachers in Oklahoma and Kentucky are going to strike because they do not get paid enough. Companies want more profit so they push for reduced taxes and lower wages. This removes a tax base for paying teachers.

    It is cheaper to hire workers from with $8000 university degrees and no student loans than to pay taxes to support education.

    The H-1B program was started in 1996 as a temporary solution for tech shortages. 22 years later there is still a tech work shortage because America schools are getting the funding they need to produce low cost education for the young people in America.

  18. Re:Liberal position by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So you're saying that he didn't make his position clear about immigration before the election? Or after the election?

    Correct because he doesn't have a position. What he has is the position of playing to whatever his base wants.

    You're saying he didn't sit down with Pelosi and Schumer to try to work out a deal?

    No, he didn't. What he did was sit down with Schumer and work to not make a deal to so that the government would shut down. He then proceeded to message that Democrat didn't care and the government shutdown was entirely their doing. He even bragged that he was going to do that back in September.

    You're saying he didn't send a 70-point immigration wish-list to congress right before the Omnibus bill?

    He sent a wish list but he really doesn't care one way or the other, as long as it's what his extreme-right base wants. If they were insisting on amnesty for all illegal immigrants then he would have sent a wish list about that.

    You're making shit up. The truth is... you're making shit up.

    I'd be laughing if this wasn't such a serious situation. Our president is a malignant narcissist and doctors have been trying to warn you.

    This is a standard liberal practice - just make shit up about the other side and then say how bad that shit is.

    Now that is rich. If you look at the situation objectively then you would see that the White House is in chaos and our president is guilty of many very serious felonies. There isn't a special council appointed when everything is fine.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  19. That won't fix anything by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    it'll marginally raise the wages but it won't eliminate the main reason companies want H1-Bs: zero training. They don't even have to maintain the school system anymore. Other countries do it for them. Worse, those countries churn out employees with highly specialized skills. When tech changes those employees either fall by the wayside or they work 90/hr/week on their own time/dime to keep their skills current.

    You'd need to increase the cost of an H1-B by a factor of 5-10x to account for the full scope of training (well funded and subsidized high schools and colleges, continual uptraining during working hours, extra employees to cover while you're out training, etc, etc).

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  20. It's not just xenophobia by rsilvergun · · Score: 2, Insightful

    there's been a lot of job losses to immigration. Yes, immigrants contribute heavily to the economy, but unless you own your own business employing those immigrants you're not benefiting from that. Now with our supply side economic system. Maybe if we had single payer healthcare, a fully funded social security and a proper safety net you'd there's be a point. But for the vast majority of native born workers the immigrants don't help, they hurt.

    Ignoring that fact is what got Trump into the Whitehouse. It's why the Dems keep losing seats (1000 in the last 8 years) in all major government races. Right now both parties are heavily in favor of whatever helps the mega corps most. That means supply side economics, low taxes, war profiteering and cuts to social services.

    All of these things mean a winner take all economy where the only determining factor in your quality of life is your job. And therefore anything that gets in the way of a good job is pretty much the worst thing ever. It's a twisted system to be sure, but we're not accomplishing anything by failing to acknowledge the reality of it and writing people off as xenophobes.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  21. What's funny is that article by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    points out that they've contributed billions but may never reap the benefits. Just like everybody in this country...

    Seriously, if you want people to stop fighting immigration you need to make it so that some of the wealth they generate makes it into their hands too. Right no immigrants contribute a lot to the economy but all that wealth winds up concentrated at the top.

    What I"m saying is this: Kicking the immigrants out will hurt a sector of the economy that your average Trump voter is completely isolated from (Wallstreet mostly). Meanwhile their entire quality of life is dependent on getting jobs. Fewer immigrants means more demand for their labor. That's just supply and demand. They're making a perfectly rational decision given a completely irrational world.

    tl;dr. Fix our screwed up supply side economic system or expect more twisted distortions like this.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  22. Re:Liberal position by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The truth is... you're making shit up.

    This is a standard liberal practice - just make shit up about the other side

    I like how you twisted the discussion to be us vs them. The other side. We're us and you're them and our politics is pure team sport. Party first country second, Putin is proud.

  23. Re:USA doesn't want skilled workers by AHuxley · · Score: 2

    That the problem.
    All the US gov system does if anything is consider if the person wanting work in the USA is "university" educated.
    Another nation prints out "rocket surgeon" qualifications after 3 years at their low cost national university.
    All the ads in the US media for "rocket surgeon" not getting filled? Thats how US brands sneak in their cheap workers legally.
    The US gov accepts that "rocket surgeon" is part of another nations educational system with further question. That the USA is totally lacking in skilled "rocket surgeons"
    . A low cost worker from a low wage nation walks into the USA to a waiting job.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  24. Re:Xenophobes gonna xenophobe by gtall · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Trump probably is a racist, but that isn't why he's playing the racist card. He's playing it because his base is racist, and hence, he's playing them.