Slashdot Mirror


China Lays Claim To Four Great New Inventions That Have Existed Elsewhere Before (bbc.com)

dryriver writes: The BBC has an interesting story about Chinese state media increasingly touting "4 Great New Inventions" in modern China that were not invented by Chinese inventors or in China at all. The original term "four new inventions" harks back to the "four great inventions" of ancient China -- papermaking, gunpowder, printing and the compass. The new claim, however, appears to be that China actually invented high-speed rail, mobile payment, e-commerce, and bike-sharing, which is not true at all -- all 4 were invented or pioneered in other countries, all of them decades ago. The provenance of the claim appears to be a Beijing Foreign Studies University survey from May 2017, which asked young people from 20 countries to list the technology they "most wanted to bring back" to their country from China. The respondents' top answers were high-speed rail, mobile payment, bike sharing, and e-commerce. Since then, Chinese media and officials have drawn on this to promote these technologies as China's "four new great inventions" in modern times.

China has certainly adopted these "4 great inventions" on a bombastic scale of late. China now has the world's largest high-speed rail network -- about 25,000 kilometres (15,500 miles) -- and aims to double it by 2030. China's total mobile payments in the first 10 months of 2017 stood at $12.7 trillion, the world's largest volume, according to China's Ministry of Industry and Information Technology. And with more than 700 million internet users, China is also the biggest and fastest growing e-commerce market in the world, according to a 2017 study by PricewaterhouseCoopers. In February, the vice minister of China's Ministry of Transport said that there are 400 million registered bike-sharing users and 23 million shared bikes in China. That much is true. But did these 4 great new inventions emerge from China itself? It would appear that that part is untrue.

193 comments

  1. 1984 by Atmchicago · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is straight out of 1984.

    Everything melted into mist. Sometimes, indeed, you could put your finger on a definite lie. It was not true, for example, as was claimed in the Party history books, that the Party had invented aeroplanes. He remembered aeroplanes since his earliest childhood. But you could prove nothing.

    --

    You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it dissolve.

    1. Re:1984 by AHuxley · · Score: 2

      Think of it from the Communist Party perspective.
      High speed rail existed as TGV https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... , Intercity-Express https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... , Transrapid https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... and Shinkansen https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Only China could bring all the advanced tech together and make it in China as a low cost export.

      People from 20 countries see the absorbed foreign tech working in China and like what they see. A company in China presents the tech as innovations.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:1984 by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Funny

      Or Steve Jobs -

      "Good artists copy, great artists steal."

      China does seem to have a thing about Apple.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:1984 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, yes, hugely insightful, absolutely (- sarcasm, if you haven't already guessed).

      It is of course absurd to claim that China invented those four things - but it is different from so many absurd claims made in the West, really? The combination of lack of real insight in your subject and wishful thinking almost invariably leads to this sort of embarrassing nonsense. Like when people spot the image of Jesus in a piece of toast or a skidmark, or see the number 666 in everything. Or for that matter, when they see sinister connotations in anything that happens in China.

      - Pollution levels are soaring in Chinese Cities: The Communist government ruthlessly pursues heavy industrialisation with no regards for people's health
      - Pollution levels are falling in Chinese cities: The Communist government ruthlessly oppresses industrial development and free enterprise
      - Silly boasts in Chinese news: The Communist government ruthlessly oppresses free thought and lies to people

      I mean, seriously. By all means criticise if criticism is due, but try to have a bit of self respect and stop being stupid and paranoid.

    4. Re:1984 by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Hey you ignorant sloth! High speed trains are invented by Ze Gemansz!
      ICE's predate TGVs! and those french suckers stole the technology from Ze Germansz! Everyone knows that
      But I love to ride a TGV from Karlsruhe to Paris ... 2:30h ... in a car it is 5:30 :D /s just kidding

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    5. Re:1984 by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I feel like they made mobile payments work too.

      The e-commerce (pretty universal) and bike sharing (I'm assuming Copenhagen invented that) are pretty rediculous claims.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    6. Re:1984 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like the Democrats (who're essentially being led by communists at this point).

      Tell a big enough lie, tel it often enough. And SOME idiot will believe it and mistake it for truth.

      And historical revisionism is at the heart of the communist doctrine.

    7. Re:1984 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or Steve Jobs -

      "Good artists copy, great artists steal."

      China does seem to have a thing about Apple.

      Maybe they'll adopt Jobs' attitude about suing others too. I hope so.

    8. Re:1984 by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      China's high speed rail isn't even innovative though. They imported all the technology from Japan, and tried to build their own but it proved too unreliable. They have some domestic models now, but much of the tech is still Japanese and some European, and their trains are not actually any better. They run a little faster than the Japanese ones, but the Japanese ones are only limited to that speed due to noise concerns.

      To be fair their did build the Shanghai maglev, which was quite impressive for the time. But for some reason they decided not to go with maglev technology for the nationwide networks, probably cost or reliability concerns. It's actually a little bit sad to ride it now, the cabin is worn and a little neglected it seems.

      The rate at which they built the network is incredible, but it's old established tech and really maglev is the only way it's going to get any faster now, which would mean ripping up all the track...

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re:1984 by quanminoan · · Score: 2

      The Shanghai maglev was purchased from Germany, China just built the track:

      "The train set was built by a joint venture of Siemens and ThyssenKrupp from Kassel, Germany and based on years of tests and improvements of their Transrapid maglev monorail."

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    10. Re: 1984 by orlanz · · Score: 1

      I would say Sweden, Switzerland, Norway, and Japan were leaders in mobile payments. They had it before the iPhone came out!

    11. Re:1984 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also I'll add to my previously posted comment anonymously, the reason why people don't use maglevs isn't due to the difficult engineering, but the economics involved. In the future with cheap high temp superconductor at LN2 temps it might be economically viable, but until then it's just showing off - exactly what the Chinese wanted.

    12. Re:1984 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is the same as the US schools and news media who preach that the US is the centre of the universe and the world leader in everything. The USians are just jealous now.

    13. Re:1984 by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      AC the next step is to export that tech to other nations as made in China.
      Invite advance nations to show their products.
      Study methods as part of an evaluation.
      Export a copy.
      Decades of hard work done in Germany, France, Japan is lost in a few years to China.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    14. Re:1984 by JeffOwl · · Score: 1

      I'll be more worried when I hear China threaten to go "Thermonuclear" than I was with Jobs.

    15. Re:1984 by quanminoan · · Score: 1

      It's a shame, really. Should be laws against exporting of certain technologies IMO. The MBA spreadsheet warriors love these agreements to boost short term profits, while long term the company completely fails.

    16. Re:1984 by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      If you think this is bad, just imagine what it's like for the average citizen in North Korea.
      ..but yes, it's bad, and with China now having a de-facto dictator, it'll just get worse.
      Again I ask: how much more crap can the Chinese citizens take before there's a revolution?

    17. Re: 1984 by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Alipay was SMS based in the early 2000's, right?

      I'm not entirely sure, because I'm working from memory of articles from around then.

      It's likely an example of simultaneous invention in many places, once the tech hit, many places did it. The non US world far earlier, because in the US, Visa cards were ubiquitous, and we were slow to adopt SMS.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    18. Re:1984 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like the Democrats (who're essentially being led by communists at this point).

      Tell a big enough lie, tel it often enough. And SOME idiot will believe it and mistake it for truth.

      And historical revisionism is at the heart of the communist doctrine.

      And you believe the other side haven't done the same? Please, stop being a hypocrite when both are the same in many major ways.

    19. Re:1984 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Again I ask: how much more crap can the Chinese citizens take before there's a revolution?

      maybe after the Chinese government invade oil rich foreign country whose name starts with the letter "I" and ends withe letter "Q" with two letters in between, under the false flag of weapons of mass destruction?

    20. Re:1984 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah sure because Hussein was such a great guy why would anybody want him removed from power? STFU faggot.

    21. Re:1984 by yooy · · Score: 1

      >They imported all the technology from Japan, And Germany (ICE) > To be fair their did build the Shanghai maglev They bought the technology from Germany. I love trains. I think public transport is a great idea. The maglev never was a great idea. Maybe the Chinese were the only one dumb enough to buy it? * Not much faster than a train. A train can run reasonably at 300 km/h. Maglev can run reasonably at 400 km/h (most of the time it runs 300 km/h in Shanghai) * Maglev Requires new infrastructure * Maglev requires new technology (switches have never been built) * Maglev is not meant for cargo. This means you would have to sustain two different infrastructures. TLDR: Maglev offers few advantages but at the same time having many disadvantages.

    22. Re:1984 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think that's scary. Go do a Google Image search for "white american inventors" or just "american inventors".

      It seems China isn't the only one trying to rewrite history.

      (Also go look up that recent story where some woman tried to claim she came up with the term "open source" in 1998, even though it had been in verifiable use years beforehand)

    23. Re:1984 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah sure because Hussein was such a great guy why would anybody want him removed from power?

      Such a great guy that Ronald Reagan sold him the chemical weapons technology.
      You saying Reagan was a faggot Rick Schumann?

    24. Re:1984 by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      A government in the EU buys back their own rail tech from China years later at full costs.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    25. Re:1984 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just asked your mom, she said he was.

    26. Re:1984 by ChoosyBeggar · · Score: 1

      I rode a maglev train in Yokohama way back in 1989 at the Minato Mirai Expo. Old technology.

    27. Re:1984 by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

      Americans*. USians is never correct.

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
  2. Do they feel a need to... by DrTJ · · Score: 0

    ... trump Trump?

    1. Re:Do they feel a need to... by ichthus · · Score: 1

      Nice. I think Xi Jinping is taking lessons from Little Rocket Man.

      --
      sig: sauer
    2. Re:Do they feel a need to... by stabiesoft · · Score: 1

      Except in the meeting it was Rocket Man taking notes for Xi.

    3. Re:Do they feel a need to... by gtall · · Score: 1

      Xieesh, you'd think he'd get a flunkie for that.

  3. What a shame... by Bearhouse · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That the current leadership so desperately plays the "nationalist" card at every opportunity; China has invented many things in the past, (gunpowder...) but of course that was under different management.

    1. Re:What a shame... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh dear. These nationalist Chinese aren't being all inclusive and cosmopolitan like I wanted them too. If they keep up this nationalism I'll have to stop citing them whenever I want to disparage my own country. Why didn't someone tell me the Chinese were like this? All those years I spent imagining the Good Chinaperson, welcoming the world and being open minded and everything, when actually they're the same knuckle-dragging nationalists on whom I blame the fall of every sparrow.

    2. Re:What a shame... by houghi · · Score: 1

      Well, the times that inventions are claimed to be from the US, even if they where not, are not that rare.

      Oh and they won WW2 all alone, apparently.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    3. Re:What a shame... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Funny

      If I remember my history correctly, World War Two was won largely on the efforts of five Allied prisoners of war operating as an underground sabotage group out of Luft-Stalag 13, right in the heart of Germany.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    4. Re:What a shame... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No Americans I have met think they won WWII alone. Americans never have to worry about being too proud of anything they do or accomplish... the British and the Europeans are always there to ensure they know that the UK and Europe are soooo much better than them in every way.

    5. Re:What a shame... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oddly enough, as a child in the 70s in the US, I was taught it was a group effort between the allies, with Russia coming in with huge amounts of blood.

      Whereas my English friends constantly remind me how they would have singlehandedly won the war had the US not came late to the game. One even keep stating as fact that the D day invasion was carried out by five British beach landings and one US beach landing.

    6. Re:What a shame... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe that this is a serious historical narrative in FRANCE, as they were entirely 1/5 of the operating force.

  4. China invented copyright piracy by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 0

    Maybe China also invented copyright piracy and stealing intellectual property.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  5. It doesn't really matter if they INVENTED them... by Mnemennth · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...they have the resources and the drive to perfect them and make them a part of daily life for their citizens, thereby changing the current paradigm and effectively OWNING the idea for the foreseeable future as they infect those around them with the same new minimum "standards of living".

    Gee, I wonder where they learned THAT from?!?

    mnem
    I am not my pants. No, I am not your pants either.

  6. Mass Surveillance, Reef Construction, MitE, by huckamania · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Bike sharing? Come on China. I know I want my country to import facial recognition technology so I can be tracked all day. I also think my country is falling behind in turning coral reefs into mini-military bases to secure oil rights. I also like how you've managed to build out an internet that allows Man in the Everywhere attacks.

    Don't be ashamed of who you are. Be proud of your accomplishments. You have a huge fan base in the 'I'm a citizen of the World but have yet to leave my own country' crowd.

    1. Re:Mass Surveillance, Reef Construction, MitE, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I also think my country is falling behind in turning coral reefs into mini-military bases to secure oil rights.

      Oh please, Shah of Iran? Iraq invasion? Blind eye to "good buddy" Saudis?...and that's just off the top of my head.
      This is like Hitler calling out jaywalkers.

      I also like how you've managed to build out an internet that allows Man in the Everywhere attacks.

      Definitely China bullshit on this invention.
      Patent goes to NSA, GCHQ and company.

    2. Re:Mass Surveillance, Reef Construction, MitE, by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

      >> 400 million registered bike-sharing users and 23 million shared bikes in China

      If they were good Communists it would be 400 million shared bikes. So yeah...I'll give them "we invented bike sharing" unless the Soviets want that honor.

    3. Re:Mass Surveillance, Reef Construction, MitE, by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      They are good communists. That's why they need to share bikes rather then producing enough for everyone to have one cheaply. This is changing...as they stray from communism.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    4. Re:Mass Surveillance, Reef Construction, MitE, by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's changing. But what are they about anyway?

      https://www.theatlantic.com/ph...

      I'm not sure just what this says about where China is or is going but at least they put some muscle into it.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  7. Re:It doesn't really matter if they INVENTED them. by retchdog · · Score: 1

    "perfect them"

    hahahahahaha, you've got to be kidding. it might seem that way, but it's only because any negative criticism is censored. rofl

    --
    "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
  8. Think of it as splitting the difference. by hey! · · Score: 3

    How many companies (or countries) shoot themselves in the foot, denying themselves the benefit of an idea because it was "not invented here"?

    If vanity stands in the way of doing the sensible thing, you can either learn to be humble, or you can confabulate a rationalization. Maybe America should do the same thing; we can even claim it's our own idea.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    1. Re:Think of it as splitting the difference. by jellomizer · · Score: 2

      The problem is nationalism. Everyone is trying to show that they are superior to the other because of X.
      However most innovations are not made in a bubble.
      Ford didn't invent the Automobile, he mass produced that automobile better then the others at the time. The automobile was made and perfected and changed over hundreds of years, across many countries. Then other countries had picked up Fords ideas and made it better for their needs.

      Today with a more global environment it is even harder to say someone invented something, because we are now influenced globally.
       

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:Think of it as splitting the difference. by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      The problem is nationalism. Everyone is trying to show that they are superior to the other because of X.

      That's not nationalism.

    3. Re:Think of it as splitting the difference. by hey! · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Japan is a counter-example. Nationalism never stopped them from adopting something foreign if they think it's good.

      Take ramen -- we think of it as quintessentially Japanese food, but in fact it's actually Chinese -- or at least the all-important noodle is. The Chinese in the 1500s developed an alkaline noodle that remains chewy in hot broth rather than falling apart. These only started to appear in Japan about a hundred years ago, and it was only about thirty years ago that it reached its current status as an iconic national dish.

      This is something I really admire about Japan: it's ability to adopt things from elsewhere and make them their own. Ramen are Japanese because the Japanese took Chinese lamian and transformed it into something new through their mania for refinement. It's a lesson other cultures could learn.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    4. Re:Think of it as splitting the difference. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know it is possible for things to be invented in multiple places independently, and you make some pretty big claims without providing any citations. Something like a noodle that doesn't fall apart in broth isn't exactly beyond what a single person could manage, and I'll need some evidence that it only appeared in Japan 100 years ago. Hell, I've been eating American crap ramen for 30 years so claiming it an iconic dish for only that long is again going to need some evidence.

    5. Re:Think of it as splitting the difference. by hey! · · Score: 1

      The history of ramen is pretty well documented; wikipedia has a good article on it. Ramen started out being served in Chinese restaurants -- yes, Chinese restaurants have been popular in Japan for centuries, the oldest continually operating Chinese restaurant is over a 130 years old. But it really took off with Japanese soldiers returning from WW2.

      Anyhow, Japan did the same thing with curry -- an unspeakable British take on the various sauced dishes found around the Indian subcontinent. It's now the Japanese equivalent of mac and cheese; your mom makes you kar served over short-grained Japanese rice with a panko-crusted katsu. It's a far cry from the British schoolboy take on curry, which feature raw "curry powder" (a bowdlerized garam masala) and rutabagas. The Japanese very sensibly decided to cook their spice mixture in a roux, and then figured out that you could precook the roux mixture and package it in shelf-stable form.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    6. Re:Think of it as splitting the difference. by hey! · · Score: 1

      Oh, and by the way "ra-men" is the Japanese transliteration of the Chinese la mian -- note the characteristic Japanese consonant shift. Chinese languages have "r" and "l" sounds which are precisely equivalent to their English counterparts. Japanese has a single consonant that's in between, which is why Japanese English speakers often have difficulty with these two sounds in English. Chinese speakers (despite what you've heard in movies) do not.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    7. Re:Think of it as splitting the difference. by gtall · · Score: 1

      The automobile was made and perfected over hundreds of years? Errr....I presume you intend to include yer basic ox-drawn cart as an automobile. Hell, why stop there, go back to chariots and Egyptians...although they probably stole the idea from Assyrians...who stole it from the Persians who stole it from...what do you know, the Chinese.

    8. Re:Think of it as splitting the difference. by maestroX · · Score: 1

      Japan is a counter-example. Nationalism never stopped them from adopting something foreign if they think it's good.

      How convenient, but in what way exactly is that different from refusing something foreign you do not like?

      Japan used to be extremely isolated and wary of outside influences pre-1850s, many novels till 1970s exhibit hostility towards other cultures/races, extremely tough asylum conditions exist as of today.

      Assimilate I can agree, Japanese society rarely accepts foreign customs and you make it sound it easily adapts which is far from true in such a disciplined culture; Japan has never been an open country,

    9. Re:Think of it as splitting the difference. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know it is possible for things to be invented in multiple places independently, and you make some pretty big claims without providing any citations. Something like a noodle that doesn't fall apart in broth isn't exactly beyond what a single person could manage, and I'll need some evidence that it only appeared in Japan 100 years ago. Hell, I've been eating American crap ramen for 30 years so claiming it an iconic dish for only that long is again going to need some evidence.

      You live to eat American crap ramen for only 30 years but talk big about knowing it being invented outside China. I sort of believe you. -_-;

  9. Communist dictatorship lies, bigly.

    Some people shocked, oddly.

    Next you'll be telling me that "republic" doesn't mean real voting and stuff there ...

    1. Re:uh by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Actually republic does not mean real voting.
      Only some small group is voting on stuff that matters ...
      We are not in a fucking democracy, you should have noticed that by now.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    2. Re:uh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oooh so edgy. So brave. So wise. Please tell me oh wise one. Who votes for the "small group" that votes on the stuff that matters? Please compare and contrast how these systems are different in practice between America and China. Stand in front of the White House protesting and then go stand in front of a tank in Tienanmen square and protest. I need not give any further instructions, thank you for your organ donations comrade.

    3. Re:uh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since you don't actually vote for what your politicians do (you accept they are all lying weasels and their promises are worthless), and that all of the law and how you are affected is outside your vote, you are not a democracy, you vote in someone to make your vote for you. That means, oh idiotic one, you read but did not understand.

      You are not a democracy.

    4. Re:uh by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      "Republic" only means there's some alternative to a king or emperor. It does not mean there's a representative democracy. You know how there's often political partisian strife and people argue over things? At one point the debate was "Should we have a king? Should the nation be his, with everything in it being his property?" Now, any sort of alternative is going to have the power a little bit more spread out that one guy, and to that effect it'll be a little more democratic. But an alternative system where 5 barons run the whole shindig would still qualify.

      However, if enough people start to use a term to mean something other than it's original meaning, and do so for long enough, it gains that new meaning. It's a very "nice" system.

      We are not in a fucking democracy,

      Is that where you vote for the future with your penis? Because that's just called having kids. Other than some immigration, the next generation is still mostly dictated by who has kids. /s

      But overall we're still pretty democratic. No we're not a pure democracy, don't be silly. But if you really want to look for a silver lining to the current political clusterfuck, hey! it turns out that a motivated and fired up voter base CAN indeed have their long-shot political candidate succeed over the monetary and political establishment. Shocking, I know. And sadly they were "fired up" in part by foreign influence. And after this mess we likely won't have another political outsider in power for decades.

    5. Re:uh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When the Japanese started westernizing, they had to coin words for Western concepts like Gravity and Republic. The word they chose for 'Republic' (kyoowakoku) referred to a period in Chinese History when it was a 'regency', no emperor, the Gonghe Period. (Gonghe being the Chinese word, Kyoowakoku the Japanese, but both written using the same Chinese characters ) The idea being that there was no Emperor or King in that period. Since it was written in Chinese characters it was easily ported to Chinese as well. This happened with a lot of Western terms; the Japanese came up with a translation first, and that was picked up in other parts of East Asia.
      The word republic comes from Latin Res Publica (public 'thing'). An old translation of the Latin into English is Commonwealth.

      This is so nerdy and trivial that I'm gonna post as an AC.

    6. Re:uh by dremon · · Score: 1

      Communist dictatorship lies

      I am afraid to break your liberty bubble, but during the whole history of 20th century the western governments were absolute champions on lies and propaganda.

  10. Apple and America Invented... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Apple invented the mp3 player, the smartphone, music production on computers, the tablet computer

    America of course saved everyone's ass in world war 2, invented the computer, won the space race, founded a nation based on freedom (black slaves, ethnic cleansing of native americans?) , invented free speech, invented american food like Pizza, Hamburgers and French fries.

    Oh wait they didn't...

    1. Re:Apple and America Invented... by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

      And Al Gore invented the Internet. And ManBearPig for good measure.

    2. Re:Apple and America Invented... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Your later examples I'll agree with, but the whole world knows the US pioneered computers after Turing, landed on the moon, and helped considerably in WWII. To say otherwise is ardent anti-americanism. This isn't elitism; we just have a long history of taking the best and brightest away from their home countries to a place you can actually get shit done. Not so optimistic this will be the trend going forward though...

      (But also, we did improve substantially on the food items you listed)

    3. Re:Apple and America Invented... by Major+Blud · · Score: 1

      won the space race

      Why is this in the list? If the "winner" isn't the U.S., who is?

      --
      If you post as Anonymous Coward, don't expect a reply.
    4. Re:Apple and America Invented... by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 2
      If the "winner" isn't the U.S., who is?

      The Klingons?

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    5. Re:Apple and America Invented... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've not experienced Shakespeare until you have read him in the original Klingon.

    6. Re:Apple and America Invented... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He never said that.

  11. Big country does lots of stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the reasons given for them claiming it is the scale of their use?
    China is a massive country, it's hardly a surprise is it?

    1. Re:Big country does lots of stuff by spth · · Score: 1

      China may be big, but not as big as the level they reached in those technologies might suggest.

      China has more than twice the length of high-speed rail lines than the rest of the world combined.

  12. No, the USA invented that long ago. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ask the estate of Charles Dickens, the USA didn't have a bookselling industry so didn't allow copyrights of books. When they did start to have their own industry however...

    Oh and Hollywood is based and there entirely and solely because of their abuse of patent and cipyright. The current plethora of tiny production companies "federated" to big companies is based on that past: by the time a film using Edison's patents was spotted and the law sent to California to bring them to justice, the company folded after having made enough cash off the movie, and tarted up a new company to do it all over again.

    How come you whine about them pretending they invented stuff when you did it first yet you want to believe that they stole stuff before you when the opposite was true?

    1. Re:No, the USA invented that long ago. by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      How come you whine about them pretending they invented stuff when you did it first

      I have never pretended to invent anything.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  13. Just plain propaganda is all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    During the Cold War, the USSR had stuff saying they invented all kinds of stuff. China is doing just the same. This is just repressive governments doing what they do best, which is historical revisionism.

    1. Re:Just plain propaganda is all... by VitrosChemistryAnaly · · Score: 1

      What's that a running joke in Star Trek? Chekov would claim that you hadn't really heard Shakespeare until you'd heard it in the original Russian version or the like.

      --
      "It's a tarp!" -- Dyslexic Admiral Ackbar
    2. Re:Just plain propaganda is all... by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 0, Troll

      This is just repressive governments doing what they do best, which is historical revisionism.

      You mean like the way liberals took over US universities and started teaching that Christopher Columbus was a slaver driven only by his lust for gold who's only real act (along with the rest of Europeans) was the use of biological warfare to genocide a bunch of 100% peaceful forest hippies fully at one with nature who definitely never drove species to near extinction. That he not only didn't discover the Americas, but that before he ever set foot in the new world there was a thriving utopian civilization of tens of millions of Haitians who just magically teleported across the Atlantic Ocean from Africa were wiped out by him?

      And yes, this is shit they actually teach in colleges today, there is no /s, sadly.

    3. Re:Just plain propaganda is all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      During the Cold War, the USSR had stuff saying they invented all kinds of stuff. China is doing just the same. This is just repressive governments doing what they do best, which is historical revisionism.

      Great, now they will lay claim to inventing historical revisionism.

    4. Re:Just plain propaganda is all... by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Russia wouldn't just claim invention -- they would wait until after someone invented it, then claim they invented it first.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    5. Re:Just plain propaganda is all... by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      You mean like...

      No. Not like that at all. Just because you were told one thing as a child some decades ago doesn't mean the information is still current or complete.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    6. Re:Just plain propaganda is all... by argStyopa · · Score: 2

      But let's be honest, this is not merely an exercise of a totalitarian regime; both the left and right in US politics are constantly involved in trying to rewrite historical facts for their own purposes.
      What's wrong with China doing it is their effective MONOPOLY on the flow of information to their people, meaning obvious bullshit isn't revealed for what it is.
      The problem is somewhat mirrored in the US however by the excessive number of information sources, meaning discerning actual authority worth listening to is its own problem...

      --
      -Styopa
    7. Re:Just plain propaganda is all... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Funny

      I keep telling kids that taking drugs during school hours is a really bad idea.

      This is why.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    8. Re:Just plain propaganda is all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And in Star Trek VI, there's this gem:
      "You haven't truly read Shakespeare until you've read it in the original Klingon"

    9. Re:Just plain propaganda is all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yes, this is shit they actually teach in colleges today, there is no /s, sadly.

      Can you provide some sort of proof for this? Not outright disbelieving you, but I am interested.

    10. Re:Just plain propaganda is all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many countries claim that they invented things that people in or from that country didn't invent, although in most cases the failure to invent first is generally close to the actual first invention. To some extent it depends on what you consider to be the first example - is it the first of any sort, or the first practical one, the first one to be widely adopted? An example would be TV - Logie Baird gets credit for the first TV, but the method used was a dead-end, or another example would be the transistor. Then there's RADAR, telephones, possibly aircraft, mass production via assembly lines, etc.

    11. Re:Just plain propaganda is all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yes, this is shit they actually teach in colleges today, there is no /s, sadly.

      No, it's not.

    12. Re:Just plain propaganda is all... by gtall · · Score: 1

      Hmmm....why does that ring a bell? Why, why, why?

    13. Re:Just plain propaganda is all... by MiniMike · · Score: 1

      Great, now they will lay claim to inventing historical revisionism.

      The best part about this is that they can claim it over and over...

    14. Re:Just plain propaganda is all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As opposed to claiming they invented something before anyone invents it?

      I'm somewhat confused as to how they could do anything but wait until someone invents something before claiming they invented it first.

    15. Re:Just plain propaganda is all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well think about this. A century has passed and those who were fed false information believe that the information is true. What would happen? Yes, China will be the greatest country in the world. It may not impact anything else much but rather a bragging right that they want to have. It is all about "face" as usual. China is still believing that they are the biggest nation (population wised) in the world. Wait until India surpass them and it wouldn't be that long at all from now.

    16. Re:Just plain propaganda is all... by dremon · · Score: 1

      the USSR had stuff saying they invented all kinds of stuff

      What stuff, exactly, they claimed to have invented?

    17. Re:Just plain propaganda is all... by rfengineer · · Score: 0

      I'm surprised that no one has mentioned that Al Gore invented the internet...

    18. Re: Just plain propaganda is all... by Miamicanes · · Score: 2

      Quick, who invented "the telephone"? Alexander Graham Bell? Nope. He was just a CEO with the connections & persistence to get approval to string wires over public right-of-ways. The 19th century's equivalent of today's Arduino & RasPi-using "Makers" had been sending sound over wires for YEARS. They were just unusable, impractical, or useless as commercial products.

      Ditto for "electric light". Arc lights existed in France at least 50 years before Edison was born. What Edison "invented" was "the electric company" (and bulbs that could be affordably mass-produced & used by someone without the resources to buy, maintain, and operate his own dynamo).

      "The Soviets" arguably have a strong partial claim to inventing cell phones... CDMA (which forms the basis of modern 3g and LTE) was invented by Leonid Kupriyanovich. In the SIXTIES, he built a CDMA phone that could fit in your pocket. In 1970, the Soviet Union arguably had better mobile telephone service than the US did (not as a consumer service, obviously... but IMTS in the US was a technological dead end with 5+ year waiting lists for service in NYC & LA).

      The point is, "inventions" rarely happen in a vacuum. Someone invents new components, others find new ways to combine & use them, and others eventually figure out how to make money with them.

      Another example: stadium-sized LED TVs. No great surprise... everyone with an EE degree in the 1970s knew you could build a big TV using red, green, and blue LEDs... the catch was, blue LEDs didn't exist commercially, and red LEDs were dim. Then blue LEDs existed, but were dim. Then they were bright, but cost $5 apiece... and you needed at least 16,000 of them to show a reasonable NTSC-resolution image. So, who truly "invented" the big LED tv? Sony was (AFAIK) first to sell one commercially, but as a concept, it was an inevitable no-brainer just waiting for the parts to become affordable.

    19. Re:Just plain propaganda is all... by nukenerd · · Score: 2

      the USSR had stuff saying they invented all kinds of stuff

      What stuff, exactly, they claimed to have invented?

      I knew an old guy, soldier in WW2 who spoke to Russians in Berlin in 1945. They were using a lot of Western equipment which had been sent to them, Jeeps for example. They had been told that Russia had made it all and refused to believe my friend otherwise..

    20. Re: Just plain propaganda is all... by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      Stop! Stop! Before you tell me that Bill Gates didn't invent computers.

    21. Re:Just plain propaganda is all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In Europe there are already schools that teach that it were the Ottomans who discovered America and that there was a peaceful Islamic country. Columbus was not an explorer but a warlord. He just crossed the ocean to invade that Islamic country to destroy all mosques. This is a story I've heard from quite a few 'well integrated' Turks at work who completely embrace the theories of the revisionist, Turkish-Islamonationalism. Of course part of that revisionist theories you see the same thing about evolution and the young earth like in the American radical Christian theories.

    22. Re: Just plain propaganda is all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bill Gates invented computer software. Steve Jobs invented the computer.

    23. Re: Just plain propaganda is all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most migrants of last century came to America already educated elsewhere. So, technically America didn't invent shit.
      This century on the other hand most migrants are shitty sand monkeys out of caves and jungles.

    24. Re:Just plain propaganda is all... by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      It's an "alternate history textbook" they use in some of the mandatory electives designed to make you read through the whole thing and disregard everything you've read prior. The alternative electives in the same category are things like women's studies and the struggle of minorities in modern society (picked it because it seemed the least politically-charged from the ambiguous description.)

    25. Re:Just plain propaganda is all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so russia can claim to have invented claiming to invent things that other people invented. and now perhaps china can claim that they actually invente it. inception.

    26. Re: Just plain propaganda is all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and Homer didnt write the Iliad and the odyssey. it was a different guy named Homer.

    27. Re:Just plain propaganda is all... by Maritz · · Score: 1

      Russia wouldn't just claim invention -- they would wait until after someone invented it, then claim they invented it first.

      Is that what you meant to say? I'll be charitable and assume not.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    28. Re:Just plain propaganda is all... by Maritz · · Score: 1

      Hey, dumb fuck. Make your sentences shorter, that way it'll not be quite so obvious how stupid you are.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    29. Re:Just plain propaganda is all... by Maritz · · Score: 1

      It's an "alternate history textbook" they use in some of the mandatory electives designed to make you read through the whole thing and disregard everything you've read prior. The alternative electives in the same category are things like women's studies and the struggle of minorities in modern society (picked it because it seemed the least politically-charged from the ambiguous description.)

      You were asked for proof, and this is what you provide?

      Well, I'm convinced.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    30. Re: Just plain propaganda is all... by Maritz · · Score: 1

      Most migrants of last century came to America already educated elsewhere. So, technically America didn't invent shit. This century on the other hand most migrants are shitty sand monkeys out of caves and jungles.

      Must hurt bad when you have to reflect on their superiority to you.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    31. Re:Just plain propaganda is all... by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      You were never going to be convinced.

    32. Re:Just plain propaganda is all... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      So you claim that there are one or more colleges that have "mandatory electives" (whatever the heck those would be) that use "alternative history textbooks" to say things that you paraphrase and claim are false?

      How about providing some specifics. What books are these? Can you give title(s) and author(s)? What courses require these, and how do they fit into the degree requirements? What colleges require these courses? (I will note that my son recently went through the University of Minnesota, getting a BS in Computer Science, specializing in Software Engineering, and did not take any of those courses.) Without specifics, it's impossible to verify what you're claiming, and your description of what the books say does rather sound like a rant.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    33. Re:Just plain propaganda is all... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Probably because he never claimed that.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    34. Re:Just plain propaganda is all... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Did that soldier talk to the Russians where they might be overheard? If the official line was that the equipment was Soviet-made, I'd expect the soldiers to pretend to believe it.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    35. Re:Just plain propaganda is all... by rfengineer · · Score: 1

      "During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet. I took the initiative in moving forward a whole range of initiatives that have proven to be important to our country’s economic growth and environmental protection, improvements in our educational system." Spin this however you want. The quote is real and the sentiment behind "creating" stands for itself.

    36. Re: Just plain propaganda is all... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      In Europe there are already schools

      Where, and what schools?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    37. Re:Just plain propaganda is all... by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      Biotech program, "mandatory electives" are "there is a mandatory requirement of x elective credits" and you have a group to choose from, not going to give more details than that as the instructor uses a ~300 page PDF of it and it could be too many details (not trying to doxx myself to a bunch of anonymous liberal extremists of the type this thread would attract, giving you the benefit of the doubt and assuming you came from the other conversation we were having.) The description is what the book says (didn't actually exaggerate a thing, sadly,) but it will have to remain an anecdote.

    38. Re:Just plain propaganda is all... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      He took the initiative, presumably in providing funding. I don't know for sure, but that's perfectly believable. He doesn't claim any invention credit for anything in that quote, just that he pushed high-tech projects in Congress.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  14. E-mail? Open Source? The Internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine the nerve of some people! Claiming they have done shit they have not done!

  15. Invented? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did Clockboy move to China?

  16. Re:It doesn't really matter if they INVENTED them. by Mnemennth · · Score: 1

    Yes, I do fully understand that this is known as "cultural imperialism". And yes, I do also understand the irony as I type this from the comfort of my air-conditioned home in the heartland of America on a PC built from 99% China-manufactured components.

    mnem
    " "(Holy Testicle Tuesday!)

  17. No face by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

    China has no face. No face at all.

    1. Re:No face by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck off WindBourne

  18. China in the invention of High-Speed Rail by spth · · Score: 2

    The article states "According to the Worldwide Rail Organisation (UIC), the first high-speed train service began in 1964 - Japan's Shinkansen or bullet train. There had been significant speed records set before in Europe "

    However, invention is not the same as regular service. And while most of the development happened in Europe (such as the 210 km/h German EMU record in 1903, the 1930s German and British steam records, the 1950s electrical engine records in France), the South Manchuria Railway was the fastest in Asia, and the Japanese high-speed system was initially built on experiences from (and by people with a background in the) South Manchuria Railway, run mostly by Japanese in China.

    1. Re:China in the invention of High-Speed Rail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, everything is up for interpretation. TGV had only 1 line, maybe china thinks it must be 3000 km long to be considered railway network. Who knows...

      What is not up for interpretation is that ISS is the peak performance of humanity and China is denied of it. And it hurts them lol...

  19. China doesn't need to make up lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Post-Maoist China has lots of "modern" things to be proud of. It doesn't need to exaggerate.

    Embarrassing yourself with exaggerations is supposed to be America's job, at least as of January 2017.

  20. Re:It doesn't really matter if they INVENTED them. by Mnemennth · · Score: 0

    Absolutely... in exactly the same way as we in the USA have "perfected" the economy in general, and "perfected" elections, and "perfected" the justice system, and "perfected" mass media, and continue working "to form a more perfect union" tailored to the only people who matter. [Insert sarcastic emoji of choice here]

    mnem
    With six you get egg roll!

  21. Nineteen Eighty-Four by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    1984 was a year. Nineteen Eighty-Four was a warning mistaken for an instruction manual.

  22. But, to the citizens OF China by p51d007 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They will believe THEIR country invented it. Just as with any repressive non open government, the people only know, what they are told if they cannot seek information from outside of her country. I remember, after the collapse of the USSR, some reporter was asking a newly freed person that came to the USA about his experiences. He said when he went to an American supermarket for the first time, he knew that his government, had LIED about the United States, his entire life. North Korea, thinks their "leaders" are Gods, because they know NOTHING else. China is a more open place in places like Hong Kong, and areas around Peking/Beijing, but, they have state controlled media, limited access to news OUTSIDE of their country, so, it's understandable that many in their nation, would believe they invented a lot of things, which we know is incorrect.

    1. Re:But, to the citizens OF China by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 2

      Well,
      in eastern germany we had this kind of joke:
      A customer is entering a department store, looking around he is approaching a clerk and asks: "Do you have no shirts?"
      The clerk answers: "Oh, Sir, you are completely wrong here. Here we have no shoes. No shirts you can find on second floor upstairs"

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    2. Re:But, to the citizens OF China by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      Good joke, but kind of difficult to tell in English. It is easier in German ?

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    3. Re:But, to the citizens OF China by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I guess in german it makes more sense as looking at an empty shelf and asking a clerk "Habt Ihr kein Brot mehr?" (You have no bread anymore?) is a kind of idiom. Obviously not very smart when you look at a empty shelf in a bakery.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  23. A lot of Trumpsters think Obama invaded Iraq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you prove that he didn't?

  24. Re:It doesn't really matter if they INVENTED them. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2
    Exactly. Railways were invented[1] in the UK, yet today we have one of the worst rail systems in Western Europe. Of the original 'four great inventions', China was famous for not really doing anything with gunpowder other than making fireworks (Chinese science was severely hampered by failing to invent glass, which is a prerequisite for a lot of chemistry and therefore metallurgy).

    [1] Somewhat debatable, depending on what you regard as the original railway, but mostly true.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  25. Re:It doesn't really matter if they INVENTED them. by AvitarX · · Score: 1

    Real questions (not rhetorical, I don't know the answer).

    How have they perfected e-commerce beyond what I do in the US?

    How have they perfected bike sharing beyond dozens of European cities?

    --
    Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  26. Bicycles by pz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've been to Shanghai recently. They have bicycle sharing on a scale that is vast. They are incredibly popular, to the point that there are large heaps of bikes --- heaps, not neat rows --- at the front gates of factories where workers have left them as they report in the mornings to their job. The bikes are everywhere. Two years ago, when I visited the same location, this was not the case.

    In my home town in the US, we have bike sharing as well. Nice neat rows of locking stands that are prissy in comparison. The stand across from our apartment seems to have a service truck pull up to it each week, so they appear to need frequent maintenance, too. With the Chinese version of the system, you scan a QR code on each bike and off you go. The bikes in China are basic, utilitarian kinds. Sure, you could steal one, disable the locking mechanism (a simple angle grinder would suffice) and try to keep it as personal property, but then you'd have to go to significant measures to prevent someone else from taking yours as a rental. The place is saturated with them, at least in the part of Shanghai where I was.

    Did they invent bike sharing? No, clearly not. But they figured out how to do it on such an immense scale that it has changed society there.

    --

    Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    1. Re:Bicycles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's pretty easy to do things on an immense scale when you have over a billion people in a relatively small space.

      Also, many others have figured out how to do it on an immense scale. And a medium scale. And a small scale. They're not even the first to have a successful business model, let alone invent it.

    2. Re:Bicycles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been to Shanghai recently. They have bicycle sharing on a scale that is vast. They are incredibly popular, to the point that there are large heaps of bikes --- heaps, not neat rows --- at the front gates of factories where workers have left them as they report in the mornings to their job. The bikes are everywhere. Two years ago, when I visited the same location, this was not the case.

      In my home town in the US, we have bike sharing as well. Nice neat rows of locking stands that are prissy in comparison. The stand across from our apartment seems to have a service truck pull up to it each week, so they appear to need frequent maintenance, too. With the Chinese version of the system, you scan a QR code on each bike and off you go. The bikes in China are basic, utilitarian kinds. Sure, you could steal one, disable the locking mechanism (a simple angle grinder would suffice) and try to keep it as personal property, but then you'd have to go to significant measures to prevent someone else from taking yours as a rental. The place is saturated with them, at least in the part of Shanghai where I was.

      Did they invent bike sharing? No, clearly not. But they figured out how to do it on such an immense scale that it has changed society there.

      Does your hometown have a population of 25 million? Maybe that's why its such an immense scale. You could invest in enough bikes to rent to a population of 25,000,000 in your hometown but I doubt it'd be very efficient or cost effective.

    3. Re:Bicycles by Luthair · · Score: 2

      Did they invent bike sharing? No, clearly not. But they figured out how to do it on such an immense scale that it has changed society there.

      I don't believe china figured out a magical formula for it - its more that its filling a void that no longer exists in the west. Our societies are already heavily setup for cars and public transport which has left limited need for bicycle sharing. Probably would have been great for my grandfather 80-years ago.

      For bicycles in particular we also have an issue with drivers not being used to having bicycles on the road and often believe they don't have a right to be there making it dangerous.

    4. Re:Bicycles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1965 28th of July, Amsterdam - The Netherlands. Witte fietsenplan (white bicycle plan)

      It was a bike sharing system, where people would paint bikes white and would not be locked, so anyone could take them anywhere and someone else could take if he saw one.

      However it was illegal to not lock a bike, so the police took them all. Although it was a failure immediately, many people remember it, and it did evolve in other bike sharing programs at the time.

      https://hart.amsterdam/nl/page/49069/witte-fietsenplan

      The white bicycle plan was done by Provo an anarchistic movement: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provo_(movement)

    5. Re:Bicycles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but then there are also all of the unshared bikes...

    6. Re:Bicycles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China has a problem with bike sharing: https://www.theatlantic.com/photo/2018/03/bike-share-oversupply-in-china-huge-piles-of-abandoned-and-broken-bicycles/556268/

    7. Re:Bicycles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, they certainly invented the new way of "dockless" sharing where you use a phone to rent one.

      In Melbourne, Australia a Chinese company has blanketed the city in such bicycles and here in San Francisco in the last couple of weeks a couple of local startups have copied the model with electric razor scooters. $1 a ride plus 15c per minute and they get around 20 miles per charge. People come out and scoop them up at night to recharge and then put them back out on the streets based on where usage shows they're most in demand.

      After taking one for a ride across the city on the weekend to try them out, I have to say I'm rather enamoured of the idea and it's some new competition for Uber and Lyft. I'd use one to get to work, but instead I use that as an opportunity to get a run in each day.

  27. Lame choice of rip offs... by aicrules · · Score: 2

    What a lame choice of inventions to rip off credit for...I mean if it's supposed to harken back to the "four great inventions" this does those actual inventions a HUGE disservice. High-speed rail is at least somewhat interesting, but compared to papermaking? Gunpowder? Forget about it.

  28. Ridiculous chinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah soooo . me inventy MOW! MOW!

  29. This is internal propaganda... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The people spreading it know it's false or don't care, because It doesn't matter, this is China's internal monologue that 99% of residents will have no way of verifying, and those that do will not be able to communicate it on a large scale effectively. Those 99% of residents aren't all naive either, but their only choice is to be suspicious of every bit of news or accepts it - based on nothing more than gut feeling, either way it works as a subconscious "we are great" propaganda.

  30. APK will be along shortly to claim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    APK will be along shortly to claim that the chines copied him too.

  31. A lot of Trumpsters think Obama is still President by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who is Obama? Some fake President made up by the fake media?

  32. Re:It doesn't really matter if they INVENTED them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Nobody that matters has ever claimed that the USA has "perfected" any of those things.
    In fact, you're the first person I've ever heard suggest that anyone has ever said such a thing.

  33. Still way behind us by PPH · · Score: 1

    They haven't caught on to the trick of patenting prior art by appending "using the Internet" yet.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  34. Did we have it backwards? by macraig · · Score: 1

    Do the re-writers of history do so first and then later become victorious because of that?

  35. Neurodevelopment and Culture by ScooterComputer · · Score: 1

    Given my experience working with Asian and Indian colleagues, I have noticed certain "differences" in language and logic/reasoning skills that I can only attribute to neuro-development (aka: how the brain develops while learning specific language mechanics and cultural normatives). So I have to ask, not knowing a Chinese-language: how does "invent" and "invention" translate between actual Western languages?
    Because I've seen a lot of empirical evidence to the effect that Asian peoples (Oh, boy, here comes the stereotypes, right?? Not intended, merely trying to understand.) often don't -believe- that taking somebody else's idea and improving upon it is "wrong". (Which is rather the simplistic version of the "Western" notion we're discussing.) Sometimes, I've attributed this behavior to malice, because sometimes the "thief" "tipped their hand" and basically admitted they knew it was copyright violation and they just didn't care. But often enough the attitude has been somewhat more to the Steve Jobsian "Great Artists Steal" concept, where it was not malice but "awe, coupled with an intense passion to improve" the idea. Can we fault that? There have been many times in history where the "inventor" of a product, although genius in that incarnation, was not capable of seeing the much more profound "bigger picture" of that invention's possibilities. If, in the Chinese language/mindset "invent" infers a certain amount of implicit iteration, e.g. "there is nothing new, only the newest thing improved upon", then perhaps what is really being said is "Our 'invention' is 'perfecting' these things, like only China can." In short, they always mean "reinvention".

    I'm not disputing the propaganda perspective, nor the arrogance/brashness in which the Chinese governmental regime has historically flat-out lied; but I hold out that with such drastic cultural differences there may be a bit more complexity at work here. Maybe. Enlighten me!

    --
    Scott
    "Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid."
    1. Re:Neurodevelopment and Culture by AnthonywC · · Score: 1

      The source article is written in English; you can try reading it.

  36. Did anyone actually read the article? by AnthonywC · · Score: 1

    It just looks like a mistake in their title; the actual article just talks about innovation. Of course, the BBC has to blow it out of proportion and the typical response from the sheep is just .. typical.

    1. Re:Did anyone actually read the article? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Relevant quote:
      `It was most recently repeated at China's National People's Congress (NPC) by Pony Ma - an NPC delegate who's better known as the chief executive of the Chinese internet giant Tencent. He's also the richest man in China, according to the Hurun Global Rich List.

      "We have a new phrase called the 'new four great inventions' in China, including high-speed railway, online shopping, mobile payment and sharing bikes," he told journalists at the NPC.`

      We can only conclude that it is the opinion that CEO that the 4 things discussed are "inventions". That BBC would present his opinion as the opinion of all Chinese is disappointing but not surprising.

  37. any chance this is a mistranslatin? by superwiz · · Score: 1

    I freely admit that I don't speak Chinese, but I find BBC to be a questionable source as well. Could it be some Chinese word that means both "inventions" and "advancements"?

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    1. Re:any chance this is a mistranslatin? by AnthonywC · · Score: 1

      The source article is written in English.

    2. Re:any chance this is a mistranslatin? by superwiz · · Score: 1

      So? It discusses claims made in China. Presumably these are claims made in Chinese.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    3. Re:any chance this is a mistranslatin? by superwiz · · Score: 1

      Just as I suspected: BBC is trolling. Using Google Translate to translate "invention" from English to Chinese and then back to English, shows that the Chinese word for "invention" also means "creation" and "contrivance". Certainly the claim that the bullet train (built in China) is a Chinese "contrivance", it would not be nearly as controversial.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    4. Re:any chance this is a mistranslatin? by AnthonywC · · Score: 1

      It is not, the original source article is written in English. My point is that as usual, ./ didn't read the article and whoever at BBC made a bigger deal when it is clearly that the original article talked about innovation throughout the article.

  38. That's comforting by HeckRuler · · Score: 2

    It's comforting to know that while we may have a clusterfuck on our hands with our political system in shambles, partisan conflict tearing the nation apart, clusterfucks of healthcare, retirement, and education... other nations have their own problems and are generally just as fucked up as we are.

    China certainly had "The Bad Old Days" of dictators leading to starvation and cultural purging. I thought they were passed all that. They were growing like mad once they finally accepted capitalism. But with Winnie the Pooh now having a president-for-life position, it looks like the nation is starting to rot. And wow is it fast. To sustain this level of delusion that they're re-writing RECENT history... they'll simply have to silence not only the intellectuals who know better, but god-damn near anyone who looks outside their borders. Hopefully they won't force the intellectuals to the western farms. Again. If so, hey, there's a post-doc position waiting for you over here.

    Or is this just all propaganda?

  39. FIVE great inventions by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    You forgot about quatro-triticale.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re: FIVE great inventions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the fifth greatest invention from China was Coca-Cola. As the great Confucius said: "Me Chinese, me play joke..."

  40. Left off the list? by MiniMike · · Score: 1

    I expected to see "small Pacific islands" on the list too.

  41. Meanwhile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This morning at New York, Al Gore was reported staring at the Chinese embassy with a face portraying a complicated mixture of feelings.

  42. Citations needed!!! by hackingbear · · Score: 1

    I read Chinese news everyday. I do not recall the state media or social media there claim these four technologies were invented in China. They did claim there are numerous improvements to high-speed train such as laying high-speed tracks on hash terrain and that's likely true too.

    Even the example cited in this story, I do not see that they were claiming the tech is invented in China. It is like nothing wrong that people would want to bring back rocket tech from the US even though (rudimentary form of) rocket was invented by Chinese.

    Where are the large scale evidence of this claim?

    All I read here sounds more of China bashing?

  43. Brazil invented the airplane!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as a result of Santos-Dumont work. Ask *any* Brazilian.

  44. Re:It doesn't really matter if they INVENTED them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Being the inventor and first to implement has problems, much as you point out with UK railways. As soon as the first implementation goes into use, other countries get to learn from what the first one did and improve their copies.

  45. Re:A lot of Trumpsters think Obama is still Presid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who is Trump? A fake President made up by real media?

  46. Chinese people are becoming unbearable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am married to a chinese woman. Starting 2 years ago, her behavior worsen to the point of being racist with French people while living in France. This includes her own children (8 and 10 years old) which she started to annoy with sentences like "you french people are lazy" "what you learn at school is dumb, and chinese children are cleverer" "french language is useless" "your country is garbagge".
    Well as usual there is a part of truth in her words; but ... you understand the point.
    I noted a change in the behavior of her friend also when in vacation last year in China; a sense of condescension and irritation that they reserve to poor people.
    Even the people in the street started to call be xinjiangren which means Ouighour, the muslim people in western, usually poor and illiterate.
    The key event was the huge Quantitative Easing that saved the chinese economy in 2010, like Greenspan in 2001 it went to the real estate. Now they are rich with apartments valued at millions in Shanghai, Beijing, Shenzhen.
    Trump is wrong, Yuan is overvalued and if it would have been free floating, it would have been devalued by the huge money creation of the QE. But in that case it would have destroy even more western industry, buying even more technology freely and claiming to have invented it...
    We westerners are basically fucked by the chinese (well myself obviously given my situation) and our only hope is being coordinated between free countries: EU, USA, Japan, Philipinne, India, Americas, some of Africas and ... maybe Russia if we can give them a fair proposal to join.
    Without that, China will preempt the World Economy and something very bad can happen: wars, starvations, chinese conquests (colonies), end of democracy, ...
    So with all its flaws I wish good luck to Trump.

    1. Re:Chinese people are becoming unbearable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am married to a chinese woman. Starting 2 years ago, her behavior worsen to the point of being racist with French people while living in France. This includes her own children (8 and 10 years old) which she started to annoy with sentences like "you french people are lazy" "what you learn at school is dumb, and chinese children are cleverer" "french language is useless" "your country is garbagge".

      This coming from a people that mere 20 years ago wallowed in their own feces. Nuke them for orbit!

    2. Re:Chinese people are becoming unbearable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The best possible thing that could happen is a nice big war. The US and the rest of the Western world has been at peace too long; layers of upon layers of stupid, useless bullshit have accumulated as comfortable, care free idiots have invented new problems to fill the vacuum left behind by decades and generations of peace. So lets have an aggressive, hate filled Chinese people start some shit. Please.

  47. Re:It doesn't really matter if they INVENTED them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Phone payment is ubiquitous, even for dollar shops by the road. Same goes for online shopping. Some people even buy groceries online. And delivery is typically very fast with no extra cost. In major cities, same day delivery is not uncommon. The smartphone has become the single most important device in everybody's life. You can leave home without your wallet but not without your phone. I don't know if you can call these "perfecting", but e-commerce is much more widely adopted in China compared to the west, and it's still spreading to every aspect of life in China.

  48. China GDP is $13 trillion in 2017 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how is it possible that they calculated 12.7 trillion mobile payment during the first 10 months of the year.
    A payment to a shop is a revenue which, accumulated is a mean to evaluate the GDP (with investment, expenditure, etc).
    - they are lying with the numbers ? I already notice that they include any mobile payment to the share of internet in commerce: for instance paying the local fruit seller by scanning a QR code is considered e-commerce for them. It is like saying using a bank card with a terminal is e-commerce because the terminal is connected to the internet...
    - the payment are the true numbers, while the GDP only takes into account the declared revenues (avoiding taxes in China is an art)
    An explanation ?

  49. Re:It doesn't really matter if they INVENTED them. by Luckyo · · Score: 1

    The easier thing to answer the first one would be to go around it the opposite way. They have almost nothing that is worse than what you do in US when it comes to e-commerce, and almost everything better. Wechat payments are universal and easy, deliveries are extremely fast taking hours rather than days within major cities, availability is "everything you see on aliexpress, amazon, etc and then some" and prices are excellent.

    It's economy of scale, and China has incredible megacities and produce most of the things locally, so many of your orders that have "x days to deliver" because they're not in storage - they go straight from manufacturer's storage output in China with minimal logistical overhead.

    About the only thing that is worse is availability outside major cities. Especially in rural China in the poorer regions, lack of paying customers causes problems with deliveries. And of course you have to watch out for crappy fakes, but there's the exact same problem on amazon.

    As for bike sharing, they have so many of them, they literally have to clear them out to make room for new ones. There are huge landfill-style dumps full of nothing but those bikes of older models, supplanted by the newer ones. They're completely universal, and this universality is actually a problem, because they tend to get dumped anywhere and everywhere. Forbes had a good story on the problem here: https://www.forbes.com/sites/y...

  50. Re:It doesn't really matter if they INVENTED them. by nukenerd · · Score: 1

    Being the inventor and first to implement has problems, much as you point out with UK railways. As soon as the first implementation goes into use, other countries get to learn from what the first one did and improve their copies.

    Exactly. The first British railways were built for carrying coal short distances and made too small for the long term as a result, both in the gauge between rails and the overall loading gauge. George Stephenson has a lot to answer for. Even British engineers building railways elsewhere built bigger (usually except the track gauge as it was hard to source wider wheelsets).

  51. Re:It doesn't really matter if they INVENTED them. by AvitarX · · Score: 1

    You're listing things that feel like they are here, or what I'd consider mobile payments and not necessarily e-commerce. Though I can see where you're coming from saying mobile payments is a subset of e-commerce.

    In the US mobile payments basically don't work, I got that.

    --
    Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  52. Technologies Actually Invented In China by cstacy · · Score: 1

    Email, Bitcoin, XOR, ...

  53. Re:It doesn't really matter if they INVENTED them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm just giving you examples that are most visible from the view point of an average person's daily life. I think it's a good hint on macro level but you're free to interpret however you want.

  54. Asians and lying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Few people understand lying is an integral part of their passive aggressive culture. That is the mechanics of how "Face" works. Upon being told the the Pyramids are 4,000 years old, the then Chinese President proclaimed Chinese history 5,000 years old for no reason. The Japanese are so indirect one of their own politician's told them they had to take responsibility for the well earnt nickname "sneaky Japs".

  55. So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Weak claims about inventing a few shitty buzzwords, what they seeking?

  56. Antikythera Mechanism by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 1

    Antikythera Mechanism supported e-commerce and mobile payments. So they're clearly talking bollocks.

  57. But Putin .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    stole my bike ....

  58. Same as the old list by sfcat · · Score: 1

    Lets see here, Printing was invented in Korea. Papermaking was invented in Egypt. 2 out of 4 aint bad I guess...better than 0 for 4.

    --
    "Those that start by burning books, will end by burning men."
  59. bike sharing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bikesharing? seriously? i know its what students wanted, but the state media are idiots. that isnt even something to be proud of if you DID invent it. its just a thing.

  60. Re:It doesn't really matter if they INVENTED them. by ComputersKai · · Score: 1

    >than making fireworks
    This isn't exactly true; the Chinese had used it for much more than fireworks-see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huolongjing, for example (the usages also included flavoring and as an ingredient in elixirs and stuff).

  61. Time to get the popcorn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been eating popcorn non-stop for 18 months and now have diabetes. THANKS OBAMA

  62. Re:Ah, so what IS your native tongue? Russian? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    Because it otherwise makes no sense. Either you know what "you did it first" means your moronic bunch of merkins OR you know that *China* isn't claiming anything. Contries have no vocal chords and can say nothing to humans.

    But I guess your butthurt needed distracting.

    I'm not American and regardless you should probably double check grammar when calling someone a moron.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  63. My hosts prog's only 1 that does fav sites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: Of a dozen imitators & YES, the chinese imitated that feature from me in hosts per evidence @ http://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/04/26/boffins_supercharge_the_hosts_file_to_save_users_plagued_by_dns_outages/ vs. downed or redirected DNS (happens a LOT on both accounts) & it also lets you resolve favorite sites you spend most time @ FASTER vs. local OR remote DNS!

    * Mine's the BEST & 1st of its kind - accept NO substitutes!

    APK

    P.S.=> You LOSE motherfucker (as always) as you try to "put me down" & often BEHIND MY BACK when I am not around - you WISH you were me & that you were capable of such feats (but "your kind", inferior losers, never can be)... apk

  64. President Xi Claims... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    President Xi claims to have invented the question mark. He sometimes accuses chestnuts of being lazy!

  65. Long Live Oceania by tmjva · · Score: 1

    And all four inventors were also heroes of the state!  (Until purged.)

    --
    Tracy Johnson
    Old fashioned text games hosted below:
    http://empire.openmpe.com/
    BT
  66. USA in WWII by huckamania · · Score: 1

    Without lend-lease, it's possible that England would have fallen and doubtful the Soviets would have blunted the Nazi invasion of Russia as quickly as they did.

    Without the Marshall plan, it's possible that WWIII would already have taken place.

    Still, haters gotta hate.

    1. Re:USA in WWII by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      By the time lend-lease was providing significant materiel to Britain, Hitler had changed his focus, and Britain was not seriously threatened with defeat.

      Similarly, the Soviets resisted the most dangerous offensives without significant equipment from the West. The Soviet counteroffensives would have been much less effective without Lend-Lease. Providing that stuff to the Soviet Union saved lots and lots of Western lives.

      The Marshall Plan did a tremendous amount of good.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  67. Apple Invented the Notch and Touchscreen Phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Greatest inventions of all time!

  68. China also invented... by iq145 · · Score: 1

    ...Overpopulation!