Slashdot Mirror


Hot-Air Dryers Suck In Nasty Bathroom Bacteria, Shoot Them At Your Hands (arstechnica.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: Hot-air dryers suck in bacteria and hardy bacterial spores loitering in the bathroom -- perhaps launched into the air by whooshing toilet flushes -- and fire them directly at your freshly cleaned hands, according to a study published in the April issue of Applied and Environmental Microbiology. The authors of the study, led by researchers at the University of Connecticut, found that adding HEPA filters to the dryers can reduce germ-spewing four-fold. However, the data hints that places like infectious disease research facilities and healthcare settings may just want to ditch the dryers and turn to trusty towels. Indeed, in the wake of the blustery study -- which took place in research facility bathrooms around UConn -- "paper towel dispensers have recently been added to all 36 bathrooms in basic science research areas in the UConn School of Medicine surveyed in the current study," the authors note. The researchers speculated that "one reason hand dryers may disperse so many bacteria is the large amount of air that passes through hand dryers, 19,000 linear feet/min at the nozzle. The convection generated by high airflow below the hand dryer nozzles could also draw in room air."

133 comments

  1. Always suspected this. by whoever57 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think that the Dyson dryers are the worst. There is usually a small pool of water in the device, just ideal for bacteria to grow in, then the air blows, potentially taking tiny droplets of this bacteria-infected water into your face.

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    1. Re:Always suspected this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I knew it.
      I also hate mystery pink soap, over germ foam or goldish dettolish what McD's mostly use.

      I usually save my germy hand towels inside out after reusing when I get caught at bathrooms with only air dryers, them dump them, even if they are binless.

      Sometimes they open the bathroom door handle, and get chucked in an office bin -until some bight spack decided to save on cleaning and abolish cubicle bins!

        If not they get 2nd chance for spotting road tar off my car paintwok.

    2. Re:Always suspected this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The other thing about the Dyson dryers are they gap to put your hands is so narrow, you can't help but touch it spreading your germs / picking up the germs of others. Even if you can manage to not touch it, when the strong fan turns on it pretty much pushes your hand against it.

      Let's keep paper towels in the bathroom! We can always grow more trees or make them out of hemp or something...

    3. Re: Always suspected this. by Alan+Evans · · Score: 1

      Yes! Sespool at the bottom of the Dyson hand dryer creeps me out. I think the strategy is to gross people out so they'll just air dry thus saving paper and electricity.

    4. Re: Always suspected this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Dysons aren't even very good at drying your hands in my personal experience. Under standard units you can rub your hands to speed the process

    5. Re:Always suspected this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      I carry around a small bottle of hand sanitiser (Purell) when I'm out and I keep a larger pump dispenser bottle on my desk to use before and after using someone else's computer, using the toilet, touching door handles, shaking hands with anyone or eating.

      Couldn't the problem with these air dryers be solved by having the units suck air from outside of the toilet?

    6. Re:Always suspected this. by AbRASiON · · Score: 2

      Also the opening for your hands to fit through is narrow add you endlessly bump into the casing of the unit.

      I hate the things

    7. Re:Always suspected this. by thesupraman · · Score: 3, Informative

      Congratulations.
      You are contributing the the development of stronger strains of bacteria, while doing absolutely nothing positive for your own health.
      This has been well researched, and hand sanitizers are nothing but detrimental, except to the bank balance of the manufacturers.

    8. Re:Always suspected this. by AxeTheMax · · Score: 3, Interesting
      You're paranoid. What about ATM's, hand rails, door bell buttons, hire cars? Everyday life in other words.

      Rinsing is fine in most cases, except when your hands may have come in touch with faecal matter. Eating out is probably a greater hazard to you.

    9. Re:Always suspected this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ethanol attacks susceptible bacteria in many strong ways that are difficult to develop resistance to. Common consensus is bacteria cannot evolve resistance to ethanol. This differs from antibacterial soaps and antibiotics.

    10. Re:Always suspected this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, it's dyson's fault you're a retard.

    11. Re:Always suspected this. by arth1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That ethanol kills many germs isn't disputed, but it doesn't kill enough of them to really sanitize, and leaves the bacteria's food source, just smeared around.
      It's like if you scrape off most of the mold on a piece of cheese, smearing it around a bit in the process. What do you think happens then?
      The main difference is that bacteria multiply a heck of a lot faster than mold.

      The best you can do for your hands are wash and rinse. And in public facilities, turn off the tap with a paper towel, not your hand, and open the door with your foot or elbow, not your still moist hand.

    12. Re:Always suspected this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a fucking moron. I suppose you think all ethyl alcohol should be banned. If you or someone you know ever go in for surgery, be sure to tell the doctors to not disinfect your sorry ass because they're "contributing the[sic] the development of strong strains of bacteria", because clearly, you know more about medicine than doctors do.

      I use hand sanitisers so that I don't get sick and I don't make anyone else sick. Maybe you're a negligent fuck who likes to wipe their germs all over other people but I'm much more responsible than you, kid.

      You go play in the sewer and pretend it makes you stronger all you want. When you're dying of multiple infections, I'll be sure to point at you and laugh. Just make sure you stay away from other people in the mean time, you anti-vaxxer fuck.

    13. Re:Always suspected this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're paranoid.

      And you're an idiot.

      What about ATM's

      Welcome to 2018, Mr. Van Winkle. We have credit cards, debit cards and smartphones. ATMs are ancient tech that nobody but dinosaurs like you use any more.

      hand rails, door bell buttons, hire cars

      And you're a pedant too. Obviously all of those are included, but a child like you would have to try to nitpick because you're fucking miserable and have to find fault in everything, even good things, like what I do to keep myself and others around me sanitary.

      Rinsing is fine in most cases, except when your hands may have come in touch with faecal matter.

      Ah, you'll have to show me this magical, portable faucet technology that I can just carry around at all times.

      Eating out is probably a greater hazard to you.

      Unlike you, I care about my health. I make my own food, I don't eat out.

    14. Re: Always suspected this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I found hand sanitizer from the office bathroom dispenser is a great deodorant if I have to go somewhere directly after the work day. Kills all the stink making germs. Just wipe the wet stuff beforehand and you can make it a few more hours (with a fresh shirt :))

    15. Re:Always suspected this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Here is a Mayo Clinic article regarding hand sanitizers which says you don't know what you are talking about.

      "Alcohol-based hand sanitizers, which don't require water, are an acceptable alternative when soap and water aren't available."

    16. Re:Always suspected this. by Bongo · · Score: 1

      There’s been a lot of people off sick at work recently, so I got a bit worried, so I made a habit of, after the commute in on the bus, washing my hands (due to grabbing all the hand rails, and touching seats etc on the bus). Likewise after visiting anyone else’s desk and computers.
      After about six months of this, seems to have helped, so far. No illness.
      And thankfully the toilets at work dispence paper towels.
      Anecdotal, but if I’d caught several colds then that would have kinda disproved it all.

    17. Re:Always suspected this. by Highdude702 · · Score: 2

      I had read about hand dryers years ago, there is a statistic somewhere along the lines of, when you dry your hands with clean paper towels afterwards, it remove a low percentage of other germs and crap that the soap and water didn't get off completely or some crap like that. But when you use the air dryer you add on average 70% more germs and crap because of the recycled air in the bathroom that the hand dryer uses. I forget the exact numbers. But now when I use a public restroom, like home depot which only has hand dryers I just don't dry my hands and let them air dry or use my shirt. Still cleaner than the hand dryer.

    18. Re:Always suspected this. by BronsCon · · Score: 2

      Resistance isn't the issue, the issue is that you're spreading the bacteria you don't kill around along with its food source. Since it now doesn't have to compete with the bacteria you did kill, that stronger bacteria will now multiply faster and there will be more if it spreading around every time you touch something than there would have been had you washed your hands or done nothing at all.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    19. Re:Always suspected this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about ATM's

      I think the cash they dispense would contain far worse than anything on the surface of the few buttons you touch

    20. Re:Always suspected this. by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

      Yep, same thing with bleach. There will never be bleach resistant bacteria because chlorine completely breaks down the chemicals that pretty much all living things consist of.

    21. Re:Always suspected this. by Solandri · · Score: 1

      That ethanol kills many germs isn't disputed, but it doesn't kill enough of them to really sanitize, and leaves the bacteria's food source, just smeared around.
      It's like if you scrape off most of the mold on a piece of cheese, smearing it around a bit in the process. What do you think happens then?

      It's not supposed to sanitize. That would be just silly. Your body is completely covered in bacteria, and any process which could get rid of all of them would kill you. And you can't get rid of the food source because that would also kill you (it literally is you).

      All the ethanol is supposed to do is knock the bacteria population down enough to where it'll take them a while to build up enough in numbers again to spread every time you touch something. That's why they advertise things like "kills 99.99% of germs." Not 100%. You're trying to keep the bacteria population in the flat bottom portion of the exponential growth curve. That maximizes the time when their population is low, and thus minimizes the chances of spreading them around. It's impossible to reduce them to zero, but there's a lot to be gained by reducing them close to zero.

      I agree the extent to which marketers have pushed hand sanitizers onto OCD people is ridiculous, and that washing is more effective. But there isn't always a faucet and soap handy, and hand sanitizers are a good second line of defense.

      And in public facilities, turn off the tap with a paper towel, not your hand, and open the door with your foot or elbow, not your still moist hand.

      That's a pet peeve of mine. Most bathroom doors are designed backwards - they open inward. That forces you to grab the handle to open them when you leave.

      Another are those tongs for picking up bread at cafeterias. I always avoid them and pick up the bread with my hand. If I accidentally brush another piece of bread with my hand while doing this, that's one person whose bacteria has gotten onto someone else's bread. But if everyone uses the tongs, then everyone's bacteria has gotten onto everyone else's hands. And since most people eat bread with their hands, that means everyone's bacteria has gotten onto everyone's bread. Unless you wash your hands before eating your bread (or eat your bread with a knife and fork), tongs are much more effective at spreading bacteria around than just having everyone pick up a bread with their hand.

    22. Re:Always suspected this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      also don't touch your face, or pick your nose, or use a keyboard, or shake someone's hand, or breathe, or do any human things and you'll be fine.

    23. Re:Always suspected this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The obsession with washing hands leaves a gaping hole in your face.
      To be sure also wear a suitable non-pathogenic face-mask. Also works great for robbing banks.
      https://www.atzlabs.com/pdf/Airborne-microbe-list.pdf

      Washing is a procedure for dilution. Soap and water dilutes the contaminants on your skin and the towel removes, not all, but a large volume of diluted contaminants. Some will remain.

      Licking your fingers while eating and touching your eyes and face is always a bad idea. Open doors with your foot or elbow is better. Open that bathroom door with a paper towel works too. In public spaces be suspicious of telephones, salt shakers, ketchup bottles, or anything anyone has touched. The biggest risk for getting a load of "bad stuff" into your body is the food. Chicken is ripe with salmonella, how well has it been heated? Veggies may have fertilizer residue, dilute the poo in multiple baths. Dry it off with paper.
      The immune system can handle a certain amount of crap, overload it and you get sick. After all your gut contains trillions of bacteria, fungi, etc, you cannot exist without.

      Bon Appetite!

    24. Re: Always suspected this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My only use for ATMs is that the pot shops are cash only.

    25. Re:Always suspected this. by bane2571 · · Score: 0

      The problem is that the hand sanitisers people are now using in their home - yourself included - are on par or even the exact same as those that the doctors will use to sanitise you before surgery. If you use hand sanitisers frequently, the only microbes that will survive on your skin are those that are immune to the sanitiser. This means that in a situation where you absolutely must be sterile - say for example when a doctor is cutting you open - there is no way to sterilise your skin because you've nurtured a culture of immune microbes there. It is a developing problem that is similar to antibiotic resistance.

  2. I used the bathroom after creimer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and all the hand dryer shot out was skinny vanilla latte!

    1. Re:I used the bathroom after creimer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one welcome our new I.T. closet cleaner latte overlord.

  3. So what? by Kohath · · Score: 0

    It's for the environment. You should be happy to sacrifice your health to save the Earth.

    For that matter, why aren't you collecting your poop and taking it home and composting it?

    Shame!

    1. Re: So what? by q_e_t · · Score: 2

      Composting public toilets would make more sense, given the economies of scale. Unless they become like music festival toilets... Eww.

    2. Re:So what? by lucm · · Score: 1

      It's for the environment. You should be happy to sacrifice your health to save the Earth.

      They did a study about paper towels usage a few years ago. They installed two kinds of trash cans in different public bathrooms; plain ones, and blue ones with the recycling symbol on it. Turns out that people use a lot more paper towel when they see the recycling logo.

      That's always the problem with people. We tend to forget the first part of the "reduce, reuse, recycle" slogan and make up for it by binging on the other two.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    3. Re:So what? by Kohath · · Score: 1

      They did a study about ...

      Science is irrelevant. Environmentalism is a religion. They want to "save the Earth", not accomplish anything specific or achievable.

  4. Yes, millennials and younger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everything in existence was designed to kill you. Thanks to your sheltered upringings, you have immunity to absolutely nothing. Please stay in your rooms and never leave for the rest of your days. The rest of us express our eternal gratitude.

  5. Air dry, the old-fashioned way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This isn't new news. Other studies have been done and reported (here too) years ago.

    Back then, in a quandary about what to do about it, I discovered that washing my hands and shaking the water off, they were dry in less than 2 minutes. So as long as the faucet and door allow me to use my elbow to shut off the water and open the door, I'm good.

    Since then I've been pleasantly surprised by the number of places that have automatic faucets. I'm thinking of putting them in at home, too.

    In a future ideal world, there will be no reason to even think about touching faucets and door handles. Or PIN pads, Veriphone styli, or touchscreens of any flavor. We will all be much healthier then.

    1. Re: Air dry, the old-fashioned way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about hookers?

    2. Re: Air dry, the old-fashioned way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Feminists would have outlawed them by then.

    3. Re: Air dry, the old-fashioned way by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1

      Dyson will probably produce a machine that squirts hookers in your face! (Or at least one that costs so much you expect it to!)

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  6. USA = shithole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I never use hot air dryers. Something about them is just not hygienic.

  7. Watch out or the germs are gonna getcha! by Fortis+McMannus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There are dangerous germs in and on most things. Our germophobic culture is doing more harm than good in the long run.

    1. Re: Watch out or the germs are gonna getcha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The next time you're out eating and you touched the door handle going into the place or touched the chair as you pulled it out or even touched the salt shaker, look around the room and ask yourself if you would still touch your food after touching their genitals.

    2. Re: Watch out or the germs are gonna getcha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why forks and chopsticks were invented, so you could handle the salt shaker and then put food into your mouth without touching it with your hands. It works splendidly, even though the people who invented them had no idea about bacteria and viruses at all.

    3. Re:Watch out or the germs are gonna getcha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      exposure to a moderate amount of germs is healthy and helps boost your immune system, living in a sterile world means you aren't equipped to deal with real dangers when you inevitably encounter them

    4. Re:Watch out or the germs are gonna getcha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      exposure to a moderate amount of germs is healthy and helps boost your immune system, living in a sterile world means you aren't equipped to deal with real dangers when you inevitably encounter them

      And thank you for entirely not addressing my point. My point is precisely that people don't live in a sterile world and even extreme germophobes are regularly exposed to moderate amounts of germs because germs are everywhere and hence unavoidable. Efforts like washing your hands, sneezing into your shoulder, etc merely enforces that the level of germs is moderate and less likely to be of the dangerous kind. All this talk of "living in a sterile world" is utter bullshit used by people wanting to justify their anti-social assholic behavior.

    5. Re:Watch out or the germs are gonna getcha! by Khyber · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "So, please explain to me your two paradox statements?"

      You appear to have failed basic high school biology or human anatomy, so I'll try to make this simple for you.

      Dangerous things are in the environment. What really makes them dangerous is when they get out of control. If we don't exercise our immune system against tiny amounts of these things, then when a huge amount become present inside of us we won't have the ability to fight it quickly and efficiently.

      Did you even take biology in high school?

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    6. Re:Watch out or the germs are gonna getcha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get AIDS anytime faggot.

    7. Re:Watch out or the germs are gonna getcha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who makes lots of money selling dangerous and completely unnecessary germ killer products I would kindly ask you to shut up!

    8. Re: Watch out or the germs are gonna getcha! by thesupraman · · Score: 3, Informative

      1 - Unless I am doing it wrong (tm) the parts of their genitals they are likely to touch are not the parts that are likely to contain large numbers of bacteria (unless they are doing something rather odd in the bathroom...).
      2 - Genitals are, pretty typically, kept in a reasonably clean place, out of the way of the general rough and tumble of life.

      Personally I see a lot of logic in the wash your hands BEFORE going to the toilet way of thinking, because you are more likely to be putting bacteria ON your genitals than taking them off.

      Why would I be more worried about bacteria, etc combing from genitals, as opposed to bacteria coming from lets say handling the money they may pay for their meal with? the steering wheel of their car?

      Ah, sorry I forgot, you are an American right? such strange people..

    9. Re:Watch out or the germs are gonna getcha! by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      There are dangerous germs in and on most things. Our germophobic culture is doing more harm than good in the long run.

      And yet cleanliness is something that has caused us to overcome uncontrolled transmission of quite nasty disease. We're not talking about an alcohol swab every time someone looks at you here. We're talking about public facilities with lots of varied traffic bringing in all sorts of nasties.

      I haven't washed my keyboard in about 5 years. But I still don't use Dyson airblade driers that don't look like they are perfectly dry already. There's a difference between being a germophobe and not wanting a bacterial cloud sprayed at your face just after washing your hands.

    10. Re:Watch out or the germs are gonna getcha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I blame Hitler.

    11. Re: Watch out or the germs are gonna getcha! by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Arguably, forks came about because food was served steaming hot, not luke warm, and in big enough chunks that it needed to be cut while eating. Holding a sizzling piece of meat or boiling turnip with your hand is a bad idea.
      Chopsticks serve a different purpose - the peasantry was not allowed knives, so food was pre-cut. Plates were lacquered, and chopsticks damaged the precious plates less than other utensils did.

    12. Re:Watch out or the germs are gonna getcha! by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      A 'sterile world' can also be referred to as a death zone.

      Our bodies are teeming with life, and always will be. Most of it is symbiotic life forms like beneficial bacteria. Without all those life forms crawling all over us, we would die.

    13. Re:Watch out or the germs are gonna getcha! by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Why are you talking to your bassoon?

    14. Re:Watch out or the germs are gonna getcha! by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "I'm guessing you haven't?"

      No, I did, and in fact exercise such knowledge across the globe when it comes to protecting plants against pathogens, cultivating plants, and more.

      But you probably wouldn't know how bacterial imbalances, even on the surface of your skin, can trigger illness.

      Go back to school, child. You failed comprehension and critical thinking.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    15. Re: Watch out or the germs are gonna getcha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is not true. Knives and edged tradesman's tools, including pocket knives and kitchen knives were allowed in Japan. The samurai didn't consider them credible weapons to begin with. And lacquer was expensive and peasants initially used plain wooden or ceramic tableware.
      No, it's because the Japanese used chopsticks that they had to cut their food into bite-sized chunks before serving. So the chain of causality runs in the opposite direction.
      By the way, I get the feeling from your post that you consider chopsticks an inferior replacement for cutlery driven by necessity. Having grown up in Europe using western cutlery and and having gradually switched almost exclusively to chopsticks and spoons (for soups and and deserts) I can say that the opposite is true. If you still need to cut your food when it's on your plate, it isn't fully prepared yet, so if the cook has done his job properly, the table-knife should be useless. And chopsticks are much better at picking up food than a fork and (if bamboo or wooden) leave no metallic after-taste.

    16. Re: Watch out or the germs are gonna getcha! by arth1 · · Score: 1

      That is not true. Knives and edged tradesman's tools, including pocket knives and kitchen knives were allowed in Japan. The samurai didn't consider them credible weapons to begin with. And lacquer was expensive and peasants initially used plain wooden or ceramic tableware.
      No, it's because the Japanese used chopsticks that they had to cut their food into bite-sized chunks before serving.

      Except that chopsticks didn't originate in Japan, but in China. They became commonplace during the Han dynasty, and spread from there to Japan. And the Han dynasty is when lacquered wooden plates really took off, and wooden utensils with them.

      I can say that the opposite is true. If you still need to cut your food when it's on your plate, it isn't fully prepared yet,

      Food that's served uncut stays hot far better than pre-cut food, for one thing. And a steak isn't cut (or even handled with a fork) before served so it preserves the juices.
      As for preparation, tossing everything in a wok for a couple of minutes and serving vegetables half-cooked is the laziest cooking I can think of.
      You dare say that a cassoulet isn't fully prepared?

      And chopsticks are much better at picking up food than a fork

      Sauce Bearnaise? Jambalaya? Button mushrooms in gravy? Peas in aspic? Devilled eggs?

      Forks double as both a spade that you push foot onto with the knife, and as a spear (except for American forks, which are blunt, because Americans are risk-averse sissies).
      And Western spoons also have semi-sharp edges so you can cut with them, unlike the Eastern ceramic spoons that only work as mini-ladles. Try to eat French onion soup with one of those...

  8. PRESS BUTTON by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For Short Speech from President Trump

  9. What a unit of measurement! by TimKyle · · Score: 1

    Measuring flow in Linear Feet Pet Minute? Really?

    1. Re: What a unit of measurement! by q_e_t · · Score: 1

      Are there non-linear feet?

    2. Re: What a unit of measurement! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are there non-linear feet?

      yeah. cubic feet, the more sensible measurement in this context. but, that's likely a much less impressive number.

  10. not really new news by chromaexcursion · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Various studies have been published on this in the past few years.
    The "sanitary" air driers are anything but. The more powerful they are the worse they are.
    A little wasteful, but paper is better. If people wouldn't use far more than is necessary to dry their hands it would be less wasteful.
    The small waste of paper is far less that one what's used to treat one person's infection.
    Pay me now, or pay me later. Paper towels are less wasteful.

    1. Re:not really new news by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1
      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    2. Re:not really new news by beckett · · Score: 1
    3. Re:not really new news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus you can use the paper towels to grab the door knob if they keep the wastecan close to the door. Paper towels should be the standard, maybe mark the watecan as paper towel only then have a second general wastecan. They should be recyclable.

  11. Press button Receive bacon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What I want to know is why the bacon dispenser is always empty.

  12. Why have dryers at all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So blow dryers spread disease, and disposable towels are an environmental nightmare. I just shake my hands after washing and they're dry in less than a minute. In the rare case that I need them dry immediately I can wipe them on my shirt.

    1. Re:Why have dryers at all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or carry a handkerchief... oh wait, no one in the US uses them.

    2. Re:Why have dryers at all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they're disgusting.

  13. Seriously, this isn't the whole story by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

    Maybe women's bathrooms are different, but - man, some guys are just pigs.

    I work at a university - so with an above-average educated population - and what I see in the men's bathroom sometimes makes me sick. Guys (not just students - faculty too!) come out of stalls all the time without washing their hands afterwards... but that's not the worst. What's even worse is the guys who come out of the stall, do a quick fake pass through the sink (1-2 seconds max), then paw at the paper towel dispenser.

    You really think the germs spread by an air dryer are worse than the feces being physically deposited on the towel dispenser?

    Plus we used to have the old fashioned kind of paper towel dispensers - the ones with a hand lever. At least with those you could use a forearm or elbow to advance the paper. But now we've got "eco-friendly" dispensers that don't really work 50-75% of the time. When they work, you pull on the protruding paper to get a small section of towel - that's fine. But when they don't work, the only way to get paper is to manually rotate the little disk on the side of the dispenser - something you can't do with anything but your hands.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Seriously, this isn't the whole story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I spent years cleaning bathrooms - the wrong (or overpopulated) degree will do that to a guy. Let me tell you, people always think for some reason that men are disgusting, nasty pigs. Well. I already had a clue from having had a female flatmate in college, but cleaning toilets was a far more abysmally enlightening experience. Let's leave what happens when drunks and druggies get into a toilet, since that'll be horrible no matter their shape or size...

      Men's washroom have droplets from shaking things off too much around the urinal. Once in a while (we're talking per-day here) there'll be a bit of piss on the floor too somewhere.

      Both sexes tend to have people who don't flush and/or don't wash their hands. It's unfortunately pretty even. Same with drug paraphernalia.

      And then, then there's the women's bathrooms. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy (Obi-wan couldn't have known since he was a man and had never been a toilet-scrubber). First, take all of the problems of a man's bathroom. Yes. All of them. ALL of them. Look at me. Look at me in the eyes. ALL. OF. THEM. Men are not the only ones who piss onto the wall, but at least there was a urinal in the vicinity. Women have no such excuse.
      Now add menstrual artwork. Pads and tampons stuck to the fucking ceiling or 'padding' the doors so to speak. Sometimes things clog and you discover someone in the fancy office has been dumping theirs in the actual "fancy normal house toilet" reservoir and at that point you might need the plumber to come by.
      Add in maybe one stillborn or miscarriage every... probably once a year back where I worked. It was an office, but would be a lot worse for whoever cleans things up over at a walmart or a mall.
      Makeup. On the mirrors, on the dryers, on the toilets, on the floor, it's like a thick incense sometimes and it'll deposit on everything. You don't have dust in women's bathrooms, it's just foundation settling on anything.
      Fake eyebrows (eyebrows?!?), the one time I found a fresh placenta hidden behind one of the toilets, half eaten pizza, condoms, so many condoms (maybe twice as much as the men's), sometimes with the zucchini still inside... trails of blood, dropped "mooncups", vomit, so much more vomit than the men...

      This was in a relatively professional setting mind you. The guys who work at stadiums and other massive public venues I've talked to had that same distant look that you'd expect from someone with severe PTSD from spending years in a war zone.

    2. Re:Seriously, this isn't the whole story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a study. Women's restrooms have more germs and Men's restrooms have more smells. The Women's is worse because they place their bag on the floor then move it to the counter when they're at the sink. So all the floor germs are spread over everything. The same thing doesn't happen in the Men's. Pissing further through the air and splashing from uncovered urinals cause more fumes to end up in the air.

    3. Re:Seriously, this isn't the whole story by gravewax · · Score: 1

      My Wife assures me the womens bathrooms are infinitely worse. Sometimes to the point where she says you wonders if some just stand over the seat and let all go.

    4. Re:Seriously, this isn't the whole story by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Man, I'm having flashbacks of when I had to clean up after ITT in the building they rented. Ho-lee SHIT the women's bathrooms were just utterly awful.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    5. Re:Seriously, this isn't the whole story by thegarbz · · Score: 0

      This was in a relatively professional setting mind you.

      Professional working girls by any chance?

      Also can someone help me unread something, I don't feel quite right.

    6. Re:Seriously, this isn't the whole story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure they are finitely worse. And certainly not exponentially worse.

    7. Re:Seriously, this isn't the whole story by swb · · Score: 2

      I cleaned 6 women's bathrooms in a college dorm, 5 days a week for a couple of years in college.

      I found their toilet habits to be pretty good. The sinks and the shower were hairy, and the sinks often had a lot of makeup residue.

      They also had a habit of puking in the sinks instead of the toilet, which was much harder to clean because you had to scrape the puke out since the sinks had a fairly fine steel mesh over the drains.

      This was in the 1980s at the peak of the Bartles & James wine cooler phenomenon, so their trash on Mondays also smelled like sickly sweet vinegar.

      The one weird day was trying to finish a bathroom when a girl walks in drunk (at about 3 PM) and says she needs to shower. I'm just finishing the last sink and only need to mop the floor, I ask if she can wait about 5 minutes or go downstairs (which was like a total distance of less than 40 feet). Since she's drunk, she's chatty and also doesn't care her robe isn't staying closed. I'm trying like hell to get out of there before someone sees what's happening because I worry the story will be "pervert janitor".

      I'm basically mopping my way out and she says she's gonna shower now, so off comes the robe. She reaches in and starts the shower, turns and says bye, and then gets into the shower.

      I ran into her a week later and she laughed about the shower, but she also turned out to be kind of a tragic figure who unloaded some pretty ugly sex assault stories on me.

    8. Re:Seriously, this isn't the whole story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Came here for this. Worked maintenance in high school/college.

      Shit on the seats in an endless cycle. It starts off with, "EWW GERMS R GROSS IMMA HOVER", which leads to shit on the seats, which leads to more animals hovering instead of sitting their asses down like civilized creatures, because "EWWW THERE WAS POOP ON THAT SEAT, IMMA HOVER".

      Blood. Oh god, the blood. Look, I've dated women. I've Hunted for Red October; I've earned my red wings; I've parted the Red Sea. And mere periods don't explain what can only be some bizarre ceremony meant to summon a Bloodthirster of Khorne.

      And my all time favorite: Shit on the ceiling. How? Just, how?

      In closing, homosexuality is a factor of genetics, and choice has nothing to do with it - because if seeing what walking biohazards and bearers of plague women are doesn't turn a man gay, nothing can.

    9. Re:Seriously, this isn't the whole story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is why the so-called co-ed shared restroom facilities in such shows like Ally McBeal remain fantasy; this should be the only mention of that TV show in this column for nerds.

    10. Re:Seriously, this isn't the whole story by WallyL · · Score: 1

      I used to work at a quick service restaurant (read: fast food restaurant), and the women's restroom was normally a little bit dirtier than the men's room. I didn't experience anything quite as extreme as the parent post author, but I did notice the men were not the grossest people in the bathrooms...

  14. Bacteria. by fredrated · · Score: 1

    Yum!

  15. Obligatory Simpsons by godel_56 · · Score: 1

    "I didn’t think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows." -Bart Simpson

    1. Re:Obligatory Simpsons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bart is a ten year old boy. Of course he doesn't know vacuum cleaners both suck and blow. Marge does the vacuuming.

  16. You're drying it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Once you know how to use them, they're brilliant and don't blow anything your face.

    Take your wet hands, put them down the SIDES of the dryer (not the top!) and bring them into the dryer from the side. Draw them upwards slowly. That's it. The water sheets off the hands downwards and nothing goes upwards. Usually one draw is enough to make them bone dry, if you need to, repeat the in-at-the-side-draw-upwards action a second time.

    DO NOT:
    Stick your hands in the top, thrusting downwards, because the water will sheet up your arms and into the air.

    Water doesn't fly up into your face, and the water going down is drained down.

    1. Re:You're drying it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except where we work there are too many curry butts. Open the bathroom door and you can already taste the 'extra goodies in the air'. At least we don't have to worry it being blown on the hands by the dryer when we already enjoy the taste. Bottom line (pun intended) is don't go at work after 9:30am ... you'll be breathing it all day.

  17. Mythbusters already "proved" this by MarkTina · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Mythbusters already "proved" this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Bookface link? It would be insulting to real morons to call you a tard.

    2. Re:Mythbusters already "proved" this by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      OK, here's a Wikipedia link, but you probably won't like THAT either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/..."Down_and_Dirty/Earthquake_Survival"

      ".On average, the paper towels removed 71% of the bacteria on the volunteers' hands, while the hand dryers only removed 23%,"

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
  18. It took researchers to ... by Hugh+Jorgen · · Score: 0

    Confirm common-fucking-sense? This desire for more education is over-rated.

    1. Re: It took researchers to ... by q_e_t · · Score: 1

      They didn't do much prove it as quantify it. In any case common sense (e.g. cold causes colds) is often wrong.

  19. Cleaning is to get rid of the places germs live by FeelGood314 · · Score: 1

    The point of washing your isn't to kill germs. It's to get rid of the places harmful bacteria can live in and multiply in. This applies to not just your hands but hospital floors, walls and hell almost everything. Bacteria are everywhere. If you bleached everything but don't actually remove the stuff the bacteria thrive on, they will be back. If you use anti bacterial hand wash you are really just giving the harmful bacteria an advantage over the good bacteria on your skin. So wash, actually clean and call out your hospital on all the ick and bodily fluids that they just spray with disinfectant.

    1. Re:Cleaning is to get rid of the places germs live by mentil · · Score: 1

      If you want to eliminate the possibility of there being harmful bacteria on your hands, you should amputate them. Problem solved. Or install a HEPA filter in your airways; just yank out a section of your throat to replace it, and don't forget to do this before going to sleep.

      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    2. Re:Cleaning is to get rid of the places germs live by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point of washing IS to get rid of germs. If you want to just get rid of the places, you would just wipe off moisture from your hands with dry paper. No need to wash. But that won't get rid of germs on your hands. By scrubbing your wet hands with soap, you are lifting the germs off your hands while also killing them.

    3. Re:Cleaning is to get rid of the places germs live by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a black and white world though, nor is there only one type of bacteria. There's definitely some in the bathroom you don't want around, and drying your hands is part of the cleaning process. Just try wiping your hands on white pants after washing them, there's always a little more to wipe off.

    4. Re:Cleaning is to get rid of the places germs live by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2

      The point of washing your hands is to dislodge a reasonable amount of germs, and perhaps to wash off fecal matter.

      Urine is sterile in most people (but not everyone).

      We encounter a large amount of germs constantly. But we get sick if we are weakened or we don't recognize the signature of the illness so our immune system is slow to react.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    5. Re:Cleaning is to get rid of the places germs live by rgbatduke · · Score: 1

      Yeah, what you said. Tidal volume of human lungs (the amount we actually breath in and out per breath) is a bit over 0.5 liters. We breathe 12-20 times per minute, say 16. Thus we breathe in roughly 8 liters of air per minute just being inside a bathroom. A typical bathroom stay is (very roughly) 2 minutes or so if you are only urinating and are male, 4 or 5 minutes if you are urinating and are female (based on observations, not experience), and if you defecate anywhere from 5 to 15 minutes or even longer. Hence just using a bathroom for any purpose has you moving 16 to 120 liters of bathroom air through your lungs. When you smell bad smells in a bathroom, your olfactory system is literally reacting to microparticles of toilet water, urine, and feces in the air that are in the very ACT of being deposited on soft, wet, warm tissue.

      One reason we have an evolved aversion to certain smells is that yes, just the act of breathing can nucleate you with bad bacteria or viruses, although our noses and sinuses are also evolved to at least try to protect us by trapping bad stuff before it reaches the lungs per se and flush it via nose drip either down to where it is swallowed (the stomach is a pretty good sanitizer for non-intestinal bacteria with a pH around 1) or blown or dripped out the nose itself. That runny nose you hate is your body trying to protect you from stuff riding along with the pollen and dust mites and human ejecta you are breathing all the time, although (of course) some bacteria and viruses make their living riding along with precisely that drip. It's a war between the collection of cells that somehow becomes "you" and every other cell or replicating molecule or oxidative/toxic molecule in the Universe, and life is one long holding action in the war.

      Our immune systems do, in fact, get stronger with use. My wife is a physician -- she sees sick people, sometimes very sick people, almost every day. Sure, she practices hygiene to the point where the VA hospital where she works had a hard time fingerprinting her when she started there -- doctors actually wash their hands so frequently that they wash their own fingerprints nearly off -- but there is no way to eliminate a perpetual rain of contact with sneezed, breathed, coughed bacteria and viruses. My wife almost NEVER gets sick. She has the metaphorical immune system of a rhinoceros, kept strong by constant, daily use.

      The truth is that we all tend to develop herd immunity to the bacteria and many of the viruses that are local to our community. E coli is at the same time bad, but also a normal resident of the human gut. Your family and probably most of your friends and co-workers have more or less the same strains of "tolerated" enterococcus. Your gut contains lots of other "pathogenic" bacteria -- notably streptococcus. A nice figure is here:

      https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/p...

      Your stool IS almost entirely bacteria. The problems arise when you hit doses of e coli from DIFFERENT human herds, or different species. If you travel to mexico, or india, you are likely enough to get "Delhi Belly" -- a nasty infection arising from your body meeting perfectly normal bacteria from a DIFFERENT herd. Amazingly, people travelling from India to the US for the first time are not that unlikely to have the exact same thing happen to them even though our water supply is for the most part pretty clean and reasonably sterile, because you can't avoid being exposed to the principle herd bacteria of the place you live. You'll breathe them in in any public restroom, make contact with them on every doorknob, every dollar bill, every restaurant table, every human hand you shake, every breath you breathe in a public space where people are talking, laughing, coughing, sneezing.

      The entire article misses this point. The more you protect yourself from your environment, the more difficult it is to develop and maintain the critical herd immunity that KEEPS you

      --
      Even when the experts all agree, they may well be mistaken. --- Bertrand Russell.
  20. No ozonator? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, ozonators are not that pricey and ozonated air would probably do more to sanitize your hands than the soap and water you scrubbed up with. Just make sure the restroom has good ventilation.

  21. Pipe in fresh air. by berchca · · Score: 1

    So spreading bathroom germs is bad, for sure, but we shouldn't give up on air dryers, because paper towels are straight up wasteful on several levels. HEPA filters will reduce the air flow, causing a hand dryer to use _a lot_ more electricity, but a reasonable fix isn't that difficult: bathrooms are already plumbed, so just run another pipe to bring in fresh air--even from a nearby closet would probably be good enough

  22. I never use dryer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As an evil racist homophobic trump supporter I believe in letting the ambient air dry my hands. I accept the fact that this is a racist act. I should instead be using the hell out of hand dryers made in China shipped across an ocean, and powered by photovoltaics.

  23. Simple way is the clean way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wipe them on your jeans.

  24. Because its green... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...slime.

  25. As the husband of a germaphobe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As the husband of a germaphobe... I have to say that these stories are getting ridiculous and contributing to a paranoid delusional culture where susceptible gullible people fear innocuous objects.

  26. Re:Pipe in fresh air: from fungus ridden closet? by BoRegardless · · Score: 1

    People worry about the oddest things like blowing air, when they ignore handling the door knob or lever with a bare hand which has who knows what on it along with god & I know is on the bottom of the shoe on your foot that you track into your car, home and workplace.

  27. so what ? by geekymachoman · · Score: 1

    Nothing wrong with bacteria.

  28. Bacteria, so what? by Cyberax · · Score: 1

    Newsflash: your skin is ALREADY covered in bacteria from your GI tract and all of your household members' GI tracts. Getting several more won't affect anything. It only makes sense in institutional and clinical settings where you might not want to get infected with someone else's bacteria. But that should be easy to fix - just place the laundry room away from lavatories.

    1. Re:Bacteria, so what? by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      GI tracts and other people's GI tracts are not the only source of bacteria. Look up "nosocomial" infections. These are the ones that are caused by strains of bacteria that exist in hospitals, institutional and clinical settings (and only there ... you will never find them in your home). Bacteria are everywhere and there are far too many types to be explained by hand dryers.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
  29. What should be obvious.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are loud and damage hearing. They should be banned.

  30. Volatile by DrYak · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you pay attention to the article (yes, I know, /. , never RTFA), the mostly are interested in what is floating in the air.
    As in spores that at some point of time got air born (TFS mentions "flushing" as something that might launch spores in the air)

    The whole idea of the article, is that specifically exposing plates to the air flow of the air dryer gives much more bacteria colonies than anything else (sample the nozzle of a turned off air dryer, leaving the plate in an currently unused toilet room, blowing air with a less powerful small fan, etc.)
    Their proposed explanation is that this contamination is due to the sheer amount of air that goes out of the dryer (there aren't that many microbes in the air, but when the whole atmosphere of the toilet room is cycled and blown to your plate in a few seconds, you're bound to catch a few microboes).

    From that point of view :
      - Dysons have always been louded for their extremely powerful air flow and insanely efficient fan motors. That doesn't help the "blowing the whole room's worth of air to your hand" problem.
      - Dysons have a pool of water accumulating at the bottom, which will get blown at the exact moment when the dryer is used, helping the "getting microbe airborne" a tiny bit (would be as if someone did flush their toilet exactly in sync with a classical dryer, given TFS. Here the pool is smaller, but closer, but the effect should be tiny).
      - Touching the wall isn't a problem (sampling the nozzles of turned off dryer didn't produce much. Again, it's not that dryers are dirty. It's the fact that almost any particule currently in the air will end up being blown on your hands at some point of time in the cycle of these air blowing monsters. Unless dysons have HEPA filters, there's no reason to suspect they are any different from other dryers)
      - The direction where sheets of water flow isn't relevant to the perspective of this study.

    Funnily though, even if TFS reports that paper towel were added to toilet rooms as a consquence of the study, at point during the study did they test the paper towel surface for microbes...

    Tin foil hat ! Conspiracy theory time !! THEY WERE PAID BY THE "BIG SOFT TISSUE" !!!~~

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Volatile by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Mythbusters did an episode where they tested the "toilet aerosol" theory. Okay, it's Mythbusters, not exactly rigorous science, but they found zero evidence for it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  31. If this helps us get rid of them, I'm all for it by hackertourist · · Score: 1

    especially the newer ones (Dyson Airblade and its copies) that blast air at high speed (instead of using hot air at low speed). They're bloody loud, and air dryers never manage to get your hands dry within their set time limit. I always seem to have to use them twice (and yes, I shake out my hands beforehand).

  32. Units. Linear feet/min? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's not an amount of any sort. Just a rate. I need more to determine the amount. Duct cross section and the time the dryer is running.

  33. I just air dry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who cares if my hands are wet for 3 minutes until body heat makes it evaporate... Just shake off in the sink and go.

  34. Paper towels are becoming rarer by Eravnrekaree · · Score: 1

    I hate air dryers and prefer using paper towels for many reasons. Much to my irritation paper towels are becoming rarer and rarer. Most restrooms seem to now only have an air dryer rather than paper towels. I cant stand it as the air dryer makes a loud noise. Also, its a good idea to use paper towels to open the door as you go out (many people do not wash hands and you are touching the same handle they did). There should be a law to require paper towels in all restrooms.

  35. Re:Pipe in fresh air: from fungus ridden closet? by rgbatduke · · Score: 1

    Yeah, or what you get owning a dog or cat. Which I do. I laugh at your silly blowing air and its bathroom flora -- do I hold my breath while I'm in the bathroom? Of course not. Do I not pet my dog in spite of the fact that my dog has far more bacteria on it than are being discussed in this article? No, I pet my dog, I snuggle with my dog, my dog licks my very face. Do I grade papers that have been handled by literally hundreds of students while eating a doughnut (and not washing my hands after every paper)? I do. Do I eat the doughnut even if it falls on the floor, according to the five, or even the ten second rule (brushing off any actual dog hair that might adhere)? I have been known to.

    Do I get sick all the time? No, I hardly ever get sick -- I've got great, and well maintained, HERD IMMUNITY!

    I'm not worried about bacteria, or dirt, from normal sources. The things that will get you are that salmonella-laced cow manure you are handling while you garden. The flu virus you contract just breathing as you walk past somebody that is shedding the virus with every breath. That raw oyster that just happened to harbor vibrio. The plate served to you by a waiter with hepatitis. Some diseases are virulent and readily transmitted, and the air of a bathroom is way, way down the list. In actual fact, I'm at more risk of stuff like norovirus FROM the fact that no, I don't wash my hands after touching every paper a student ever hands me, and I touch my pens, and I loan them pens, and I sit at the front of a classroom filled with all of those disease vectors right after they return from spring break laden with new bacteria I do NOT have herd immunity to -- yet -- and breathe, while they are all coughing and sneezing over themselves and each other. Two weeks later, we all have herd immunity again and things quiet down.

    --
    Even when the experts all agree, they may well be mistaken. --- Bertrand Russell.
  36. The solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have air intakes from outside...

  37. cobalt-60 hand dryer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's best to use a gamma ray source in order to sterilize the hand dryer.

  38. Just adjust the usage pattern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love these things for warming up my post-carpal tunnel hands after driving in the freezing Michigan cold.

    Stop in at lunch, hit the restroom, 2 cycles of the dryer and my hands are good as new again.

    Then I wash my hands and grab a paper towel from the dispenser.

    Anyone who has had carpal tunnel knows your hands feel like they were submerged in snow and dexterity is diminished. After a quick warm up in direct heat, things are back to normal.

    Now once again I can't have nice things.....

  39. Hate em by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    Never have liked them. Prefer paper towels that actually DRY your hands instead of having to wipe them on your pants after the stupid hand dryers.

  40. This isn't news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is OLD news. Why would anyone be surprised of this.

  41. The authors watch The Big Bang Theory by quonset · · Score: 1

    Sheldon already told people how bad hot air dryers are. Apparently the authors of the study simply regurgitated what he said and added a few pieces so it doesn't sound exactly the same.

  42. LOL Doom And Gloom by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

    Ya and as soon as i touch the bathroom door handle i get germs as well. walking out the door will stir them up too then OMFG we go outside where gazillions of them float in the air going down our lungs along with fumes from cars,trucks and airplanes,smoke from the chimneys from people who burn fuel oil/wood/coal to heat their homes..guess what, were ALL going to DIE..go cure cancer you will get more funding money that way.

    --
    Jack of all trades,master of none
  43. Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It would be more sanitary to have a plague-infested gibbon sneeze my hands dry

  44. But The Air Is HOT! by Toad-san · · Score: 1

    No one has noticed that, invariably, the air blown by one of those blowers is quite hot, surprisingly so. There's a damned hot surface or wire mesh somewhere inside that blower that I suspect is doing a real job on the bacteria flowing through there.

    Surely that has something to do with the problem, ne? Has anyone passed an ordinary Petri dish through the airflow of one of these heaters and then waited to see what grew? That would be a LOT better than all these woeful, disgusting tales about people and dirty bathrooms, I would think. Very simple to do, would make a lovely college Biology 101 experiment, maybe even a grad paper!

  45. Re: Dysons also *suck* by jabuzz · · Score: 1

    Except the high speed air flow from a Dyson blasts the germs off ones hands and into the air which them circulates around the room ready for you to breath in. There was a Slashdot story about a study on this a couple of years ago now. High speed air hand dries of *ANY* description are basically perfect germ spreaders. Normal air hand dryers are better by a cpuple of orders of magnitude, and disposable paper towels the best by another order of magnitude. I am keep looking for an advert for the Dyson hand dryers so I can complain tk the ASA here in the UK that they are not the most hygienic dryers but jn fact the most hygienic in existence and force Dyson to remove the false claim.

  46. Easy solution by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

    Don't set the intake to the drying from the bathroom. Pull it from a separate vent outside of the bathroom. Not hard to do. Could pull it from the canteen break room now that people aren't allowed to smoke in there anymore.

  47. Re:If this helps us get rid of them, I'm all for i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the final touch, to remain clean: Use your shirt sleeve to grab the doorknob, if you can't elbow a swing-latch-type door handle.