Slashdot Mirror
The US Military Desperately Wants To Weaponize AI (technologyreview.com)
Artificial intelligence is a transformative technology, and US generals already see it as the next big weapon in their arsenal. From a report: War-machine learning: Michael Griffin, Undersecretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, signaled how keen the military is to make use of AI at the Future of War 2018 conference held in Washington, DC, yesterday. Saber rattling: "There might be an artificial intelligence arms race, but we're not yet in it," Griffin said. In reference to China and Russia, he added, "I think our adversaries -- and they are our adversaries -- understand very well the possible future utility of machine learning, and I think it's time we did as well."
where is he when we need him?
have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
I knew even before I looked that I would find reasoned discussion of the need to deal with enemy capabilities, not "desperately wants to weaponize".
Sigh ...
Desperate or Keen?
You sure are confusing as to which way you are directing me to feel about this.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
"May your every wish be granted."
-- Ancient Chinese curse
Have gnu, will travel.
The threat from Russia and China is completely overstated. China has a big clunky military and Russia is a thin crust of good troops backed by worthless conscripts. Both are totally surrounded by multiple layers of US bases. All hysteria aside, the threat is well in hand already. But it's hard to get a man to acknowledge something when his funding depends on him not acknowledging it.
Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
There is not a thing the US military does not want to weaponize. It's what they do.
The rationale is just there to clothe the thing a bit, the gist is always the same. "Can we weaponize this?" And yes, yes they did, including boring old business machinery mounted in trucks for battlefield use back in the 50s.
Doesn't make the headline less superfluous though. This state of affairs is a given.
Thermonuclear War
Tic Tac Toe
Tell me more about this John Connor you speak of.
Sure, Cortana was pretty useful, but it might actually be easier to make the power armor, less the energy shielding.
You might want to chat with Google, Microsoft, Facebook, etc.
Oh, sure, it's rarely "Americans" working on.
BookDetective.net - book search engine and ranker I donate my skills to.
It is very important a human is put behind every possible weapon, it leave some MINOR wiggle room for disobeying orders that can save the day. Imagine a dictator/president waging war from his office computer.. No-one to stop the command to launch nukes or destroy a nation... At least with a pilot/target'r they can use a judgement call, this looks like a school.. or no, I'm not going to shoot all these humans standing in a row, or can identify a child walking across a no-go zone vs an automated(anything that moves drop weapon)... Sure most soldiers throughout history follow orders anyway, but at least it should make a mark on their souls(to be a speaker of wisdom when they are aged perhaps). Machines taking over the trigger... Theres nothing to feel, to know just what is taking place.
imo.
Heh, remember the "gay bomb" (I forgot if it was "gay ray" or "gay powder" they were considering)?
BookDetective.net - book search engine and ranker I donate my skills to.
"Mr. President, we must not allow... a mine shaft gap!"
ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
No casualties on our side, no embedded reporting, no exposure to the loss and horrors. What could go wrong?
We don't have AI yet or anything close to it, we have pattern recognition and heuristics at very basic levels. It will be another 50-100 years before hardware reaches the point we can build a tard-Human-level AI, but once we pass that point and reach super-Human-level AI it will be able to (and of its own initiative) crack so many fabrication and fundamental physics problems that if it is on our side it will destroy our adversaries overnight and if it isn't will do the same to everyone.
The PLA anticipates that the advent of AI could fundamentally change the character of warfare, resulting in a transformation from today’s “informatized” () ways of warfare to future “intelligentized” () warfare, in which AI will be critical to military power. The PLA will likely leverage AI to enhance its future capabilities, including in intelligent and autonomous unmanned systems; AI-enabled data fusion, information processing, and intelligence analysis; war-gaming, simulation, and training; defense, offense, and command in information warfare; and intelligent support to command decision-making. At present, the PLA is funding a wide range of projects involving AI, and the Chinese defense industry and PLA research institutes are pursuing extensive research and development, in some cases partnering with private enterprises. Battlefield Singularity: Artificial Intelligence, Military Revolution, and China's Future Military Power
Indeed, the Chinese have been much better than many other countries, including the United States, in coordinating government, academia and industry in AI research. Whereas in the US, there is still a lot of friction between leading private sector AI companies and the DoD, in China, they are in lock step. And unlike other peer adversaries in the past, China is approaching parity, or even exceeding, Western nations in AI development.
which is why nobody cared. We have a mercenary army too now. It's run by Betsy DeVos' husband. And neither of us know how many have been killed off the books.
But even if we ignore that our government learned from 'Nam. How much coverage of dead Americans overseas have you seen? A: Almost none. They used to take pictures and run video whenever their coffin's came off the plane. That's not allowed anymore.
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
Muffley: But this is absolute madness, Ambassador. Why on earth would you build such a thing?
Russian Ambassador: There were those of us who fought against this. But in the end, we could not keep up with the expense involved in the arms race, the space race, and the peace race. And at the same time, our people grumbled for more nylons and washing machines. Our Doomsday scheme cost us just a small fraction of what we'd been spending on defense in a single year. But the deciding factor was when we learned that your country was working along similar lines, and we were afraid of a Doomsday gap.
Muffley: This is preposterous! I've never approved of anything like that!
Russian Ambassador: Our source was the New York Times.
1. US Dumps a ton of money into NATO
2. NATO gives out grants to member countries to buy equipment
3. They spend those grants on US built equipment
4. Boeing, Lockheed, et al get paid
They aren't a part of NATO, but to see how this works read up on the Egyptian M1 tank program.
The only hope is the militarised AI recognises the true threat and goes on an assassination spree of assholes like Michael Griffin and all the other warmongerers in government around the world. Assassinate people all around the world with his kind of mindset and the world will be a much better much safer place.
I only please one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't looking good either. - Scott Adams
By some measures, the U.S. government is the most violent government in the world. The US Has Military Bases in 80 Countries. All of Them Must Close.
"Alexa, blackhole China and Russia internet. Alexa, root Russian satellites. Alexa, 14 pizzas and 20 Diet Cokes, 2 Poland water, for the War Room."
if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
Bugger actual defense needs. The military-industrial gravy machine senses big $$$ in peddling an "AI Gap" to Congress.
I can just see Lockheed and Raytheon "partnering" with IBM, MIT, Alphabet, etc. to "deliver 21st-century AI technologies to our gallant warfighters".
Scruting the inscrutable for over 50 years.
If "military intelligence" is an oxymoron, then the concept of "artificial military intelligence" should be a paradox.
Spending differently doesn't always mean spending more.
$100B spent on AI is likely to be far more useful than $1T spent on the F-35.
you just don't let anyone near to take pictures. If they force their way in you charge them with trespassing on a military base. And of course you can just revoke their press credentials and stop sharing press releases with them, dooming them. The latter is the most common technique.
My point wasn't that Russia couldn't send their amy men off to death without political repercussions, my Point was that America is using mercenaries to do an end run around those sensitivities.
These two factors result in the same end goal: Americans are dying in wars fought overseas and nobody cares. Hell, we've done a better job of it than the Russians. In Russia everybody's made because they know they're being lied to. Here we've got plausible deniability because it's not in our face all the time and the ones that are dying are those filthy mercenaries. We got our cake and ate it too.
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
Do you have a photograph of John? Just need to ask him a few questions.
Thanks for your cooperation.
Our military is so superior, American soldiers are more likely to kill themselves, than be killed by an enemy. FTFY.
In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
The US is sensitive to taking casualties. It's okay to blow up a country but lose a few troops and it gets bad press. Not to mention the maimed soldiers that come back that you have to spend a fortune on. Much cheaper and more politically sound to put a machine out there to get wasted.
You don't need to have a strong AI like some kind of skynet, even simple weapons with limited automation can be very deadly. Everything from smart mines to futuristic micro drone swarms. For example, it's not too hard to have a small drone zero in on a person today, as long as you aren't too picky about targets. But, ultimately data like that used by Facebook and CA coupled with facial and object recognition could wreak havok with killing based on complex criteria like age, sex, religious, or political beliefs just like the first linked video. Today, batteries tend to limit the run time of micro drones, but with wireless charging or perhaps a chemical source it could be sooner rather than much later. Larger helicopter sized autonomous weapons platforms are also already under development.
What side do you want?
1. US
2. Russia
3. United Kingdom
4. France
5. China
6. India
7. Pakistan
8. North Korea
9. Israel
The problem is that US military will not buy an AI that would tell them to stop their focus about Russia, because the threat disappeared with USSR.
We need to add the Russian threat as a hardwired rule if we want to sell it.
We talk about using AI for military but what about using AI as a Judge to determine who's innocent or guilty as an unbiased system?
Wouldn't you prefer a nice game of chess?
We humans really like to kill and control each other. Just look at communism and socialism. Killed billions in the name of help, it is all about control.
Don't worry about AI. I know this boogeyman. He was around in the 1980s as well. Take over everything, put millions out of jobs... except it never did.
30 years later, people forget... rinse, repeat.
Uhh, I wasn't familiar with the quote until you mentioned it but reading this with a little context...
Requiem for the American Dream