Slashdot Mirror


Trade War Or Not, China is Closing the Gap on US in Technology IP Race (reuters.com)

China's rising investment in research and expansion of its higher education system mean that it is fast closing the gap with the United States in intellectual property and the struggle to be the No.1 global technology power, according to patent experts. From a report: While U.S. President Donald Trump's threat of punitive tariffs on high-tech U.S. exports could slow Beijing's momentum, it won't turn back the tide, they say. Washington's allegation that the Chinese have engaged in intellectual property theft over many years -- which is denied by Beijing -- is a central reason for the worsening trade conflict between the U.S. and China. Forecasts for how long it will take for Beijing to close the technological gap vary -- though several patent specialists say it could happen in the next decade.

And China is already leapfrogging ahead in a couple of areas. "With the number of scientists China is training every year it will eventually catch up, regardless of what the U.S. does," said David Shen, head of IP for China at global law firm Allen & Overy. Indeed, IP lawyers now see President Xi Jinping's pledge earlier this week to protect foreign IP rights as projecting confidence in China's position as a leading innovator in sectors such as telecommunications and online payments, as well as its ability to catch up in other areas.

149 comments

  1. Will the tables turn? by TimMD909 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does this mean all the other countries of the world can start stealing their intellectual property soon? It's been a bit one sided so far...

    1. Re:Will the tables turn? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 5, Insightful

      U kidding? They're going to protect their computer systems, unlike America who left critical systems that should have been air-gapped on the public internet. A little-known fact is that the Great Firewall isn't just for keeping Chinese from accessing foreign sites, it also does a great job of keeping snooping foreigners out of Chinese sites. China has a mostly safe, secure playground for its own people. Don't be absurd, they won't fall for the same mistakes their opponent stupidly committed.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re:Will the tables turn? by sinij · · Score: 4, Funny

      Does this mean all the other countries of the world can start stealing their intellectual property soon? It's been a bit one sided so far...

      What do you mean start? I have been pirating Maoist porn at least since cultural revolution.

    3. Re:Will the tables turn? by klingens · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not been one sided. The young US did exactly the same to the technologically most advanced nation of the 18th/19th century, the UK:
      E.g. https://www.pri.org/stories/20...

      A developing nation will always "steal" the knowledge about technology and manufacturing from other, more advanced, nations. This is the normal course of history, it has happened many times before and will happen in the future. Not only the US did it back then, but also Germany stole from the UK for example. In more recent times, Japan did it as well.
      Just like you can't protect the latest blockbuster from getting torrented, you cannot keep tech to yourself, same unsolvable problem.

    4. Re:Will the tables turn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's hard to feel bad about this.
      How many US companies went through the effort to patent their tech in China?
      US patents only protect in the US. EU patents protect in the EU.

      Don't expect people to respect patents outside of their domain.

    5. Re:Will the tables turn? by ctilsie242 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Not just China, other countries either have Great Firewalls in place, or will. The Aussies have one, Iran does, and I'm sure there are many others. By keeping the attackers limited to what is physically in the country, this cuts down greatly on what attacks can be done, and what succeed.

      The US's worst problem is that C-levels of corporations can greatly profit when their companies are hacked. This will ensure that breaches, and egregious ones, will continue for a long time to come. The top company brass finds about the hack, short their stock, makes an announcement that their customers are hosed, and laugh all the way to the bank.

    6. Re:Will the tables turn? by Mr.+Mash · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't expect people to respect patents outside of their domain.

      Then don't expect countries to allow you to sell your products in their country if it is breaking the patent laws of their country.

    7. Re: Will the tables turn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's kinda how it works.

      USA did the same thing to the UK when they were a developing natiion too.

      When you think about IP it's a relatively new concept and stupid unless you are trying to develop monopolies.

      The current IP structure of laws allow abuse and essentially indefinite IP ownership instead of the original 4yrs Monopoly inventors were allowed to make some profits.

    8. Re:Will the tables turn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The winners become protectionists once they are at the top. That is how Capitalism works.

    9. Re:Will the tables turn? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      The nations that are most economically free, meaning they can respond to market demands without kowtowing to officials are the ones at the top.

      As China becomes economically freer, they should take this lead.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    10. Re:Will the tables turn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You gotta be kidding if you think The U.S. and other nations haven't poked holes in China's firewall. You have been able to VPN out in many ways only up until recently in China, and even then there are workarounds.

      And IP theft is blatent, and not done very well. Most Chinese knockoffs are sub-par and only tend to damage a brand's reputation, not actually complete on a level of "I get the same quality for cheaper." This is a different type of IP theft than trade secrets of Microprocessors, which you are implying (without evidence, just like me!)

    11. Re:Will the tables turn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I'm looking forward to is the USA giving up on explosives , writing and toilet paper on the grounds that the Chinese invented them (actually, writing likely appeared first in Europe or Africa but "intellectual property" is always full of bull so we'd probably have to give that to them).

      I'm sure China will be happy to give up on using a particularly stupid out of office system

    12. Re:Will the tables turn? by datavirtue · · Score: 1
      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    13. Re:Will the tables turn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Certainly.
      Don't violate a patent on its home turf or there will be trouble.

    14. Re:Will the tables turn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, if they're willing to learn and master Mandarin.

    15. Re:Will the tables turn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not been one sided. The young US did exactly the same to the technologically most advanced nation of the 18th/19th century, the UK:
      E.g. https://www.pri.org/stories/20...

      A developing nation will always "steal" the knowledge about technology and manufacturing from other, more advanced, nations. This is the normal course of history, it has happened many times before and will happen in the future. Not only the US did it back then, but also Germany stole from the UK for example. In more recent times, Japan did it as well.
      Just like you can't protect the latest blockbuster from getting torrented, you cannot keep tech to yourself, same unsolvable problem.

      Just as the UK and the European empires themselves "stole" IP and technology from China and other Asian empires before the 19th century ...

    16. Re: Will the tables turn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moist porn? That's gross.

    17. Re:Will the tables turn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not been one sided. The young US did exactly the same to the technologically most advanced nation of the 18th/19th century, the UK:
      E.g. https://www.pri.org/stories/20...

      This. I hear this all the time, especially from young nationalist Chinese (I live in Hong Kong). There are several problems with the statement:

      (1) You are drawing a moral and legal equivalence over 100 years of history. Do you have any idea of what IP law was like in the late 1800's, which is what you are referencing? By your logic, anything that was legal or acceptable then should be now as well... I can think of quite a few things that would generally be unacceptable or appalling by today's standards.

      (2) The US wasn't the only developing country in the 18th/19th century, all other countries were developing together. As such, everyone was copying everyone else and simultaneously improving upon each other's inventions, too. UK's textile industry was based on copying Italian technology for instance (for some reason, everyone always remembers that the US copied, not others...). China made the mistake of closing its borders (and eventually going the Communist route) when it had a chance to progress with the reset of the World. The rest of the world shouldn't have to pay for their mistake. Further, the same rationale (the US did it 100 years ago, so we can do it...) is used by China to justify every questionable action (e.g., these islands were on our map 100 years ago, so they belong to us...). The world does not work this way, or we'd be redrawing a lot of borders and re-patriating a lot of IP.

      (3) Neither the US (nor the UK) deny or were bold enough to claim the stolen inventions are their own. History books have been written and no one is denying that this took place. China, however, has the audacity to claim stolen technology as their own original invention. They then pretend to be experts and sell that technology to the world. See, for example, what happened with Japan's Kawasaki and the Shinkansen. Thankfully Japan learned a (difficult) lesson and won't license next-gen Shinkansen technology to China. Let's see how advanced China's trains are in a few years, without a cooperative source of IP...

      Enough is enough...

    18. Re:Will the tables turn? by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 2

      The US's worst problem is that C-levels of corporations can greatly profit when their companies are hacked. This will ensure that breaches, and egregious ones, will continue for a long time to come. The top company brass finds about the hack, short their stock, makes an announcement that their customers are hosed, and laugh all the way to the bank.

      The companies with enough technology to even matter for that purpose are watched like a hawk by institutional investors. You're a total moron if you think both them, and financial institutions that are inevitably part of the shorting process, would allow that to happen, ESPECIALLY when they're the ones who were conned.

    19. Re:Will the tables turn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, please let us know when they have something worth stealing.

    20. Re:Will the tables turn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Real, genuine IP, or the fake ever-greened obvious IP accepted by a for fee USPTO, that may have prior art.
      The first US IP lesson is don't go looking for prior IP - let the lawyer do that.

    21. Re: Will the tables turn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many counties have reciprocal patent treaties, meaning a patent in the U.S. applies in the E.U. China has been repeatedly chastised for not complying with such treaties.

    22. Re:Will the tables turn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China has a mostly safe, secure playground for its own people.

      Ahahahahahaha. What the fuck is wrong with you? Have you ever been to China? I was there about 5 years ago and nearly every computer I saw was running Windows XP (pirated) and full of malware and viruses. It's not safe, nor secure. And you should be ashamed for lauding it, because it certainly isn't free.

    23. Re:Will the tables turn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Intel? There were mentions of allegations (the veracity of which is debatable, but the point was raised) about people higher up shorting stock before the Spectre/Meltdown announcement. However, because 6+ months have elapsed, there isn't any insider trading issues.

  2. The answer is by Kohath · · Score: 1

    Not. There aren't even any tariffs except on steel and aluminum, and those don’t apply to some of the biggest US trading partners. Talk is not a tariff. A tariff is not a "trade war".

    News media should report the news when it happens, not before it happens — as they imagine it might someday happen.

    1. Re: The answer is by SirSlud · · Score: 2

      Your should read the news then. The reported news isn't that there is a trade war. It's that there is fear and talk of trade war. You need to ignore this nuance to make the point you wish you could make.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    2. Re: The answer is by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      You have a better understanding than most not familiar with the topic. The way it is reported, most people think that tariffs are part of trade wars and that Trump has already started the trade war by himself.

      And it's reported that way on purpose - to scare people.

    3. Re:The answer is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're such a good apologist. Good little doggie.

    4. Re: The answer is by DavidHumus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, no trade war except the one China thinks they are in: https://www.washingtonpost.com... .

    5. Re: The answer is by Kohath · · Score: 1

      Your should read the news then. The reported news isn't that there is a trade war. It's that there is fear and talk of trade war. You need to ignore this nuance to make the point you wish you could make.

      The nuance is opposite the facts.

    6. Re: The answer is by Kohath · · Score: 1

      Note how "talk" and "fear" are headlined in the stories while actual concrete facts might get a brief mention somewhere near the end. Or they might not.

    7. Re:The answer is by Kohath · · Score: 1

      Congrats on arguing for lying to people. No one will want to be called out as an "apologist" by focusing on mere facts.

  3. Well, yeah by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, yeah. When you can steal until you don't need to anymore, I guess that is kind of convenient ...

    1. Re:Well, yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you mean exactly like the US did?

    2. Re:Well, yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't it "Information wants to be free"? "Copying isn't stealing"?

      So when it is someone you didn't like doing the copying, it is "stealing" now?

  4. Wrong metric by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is being measured entirely by patents. This is the wrong metric to use, although I'm sure the usual suspects are creaming in their pants to see another "America is going to get it" article. They hate our guts and dream of the day we'll be humiliated. What can I say, we deserve it, we're horrible people. Patents in the USA, particularly regarding software, are total bullshit. They shouldn't even be granted, and when they are, they're either for totally obscure ideas or for ideas obvious to anyone in the art. Patents in China are bullshit too, they don't have anything to do with actual progress. Hey, who cares though, journalists aren't experts and they love to distill complex topics down to a single number that they mistakenly regard like a sports score.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    1. Re:Wrong metric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stage one: Denial.

    2. Re:Wrong metric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We aren't terrible people, we're indoctrinated and fluoridated. Chickens in a factory farm aren't terrible chickens.

    3. Re:Wrong metric by hAckz0r · · Score: 1

      This is being measured entirely by patents.

      Yes, you know China is no longer a backwards country anymore when you can measure them in the "total patent lawyers" metric. China, welcome to the 21st Century!

    4. Re:Wrong metric by k6mfw · · Score: 2

      This is being measured entirely by patents. This is the wrong metric to use,

      Reminds me about 25 years ago at a presentation I heard most patents are never used, the ones that are very small percentage of those make any money. Presenter also said "Patents don't prevent others using your idea, it only gives you the right to litigate."

      --
      mfwright@batnet.com
    5. Re:Wrong metric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Responding to tone.

    6. Re:Wrong metric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Regardless of what you think. The fact that the Chinese are registering more and more patents, means two things. One, they believe that likelihood of enforcing a patent is more than the cost of registering, meaning that the trend is up for the rule of law (at least for commercial law). Two, they believe that they have something to protect. These are two positive developments for China.

    7. Re: Wrong metric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Patents are sue fuel, and thus have corporate use. Whether that increases aggregate innovation is another matter. But more patents gives China power to buy tech and sue away competition.

  5. China has more HONORS students... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...than the US has regular students. China also has a larger english speaking population than the US. Of course a couple of silly tariff's aren't going to slow their eventual rise.

    1. Re:China has more HONORS students... by FFOMelchior · · Score: 1

      Yep. It's totally obvious. You want to win a technology race? Then have more and smarter people researching. Time after time we see how little the US and the average citizen cares about their education system. After decades of neglect, we're now reaping what was sown.

    2. Re:China has more HONORS students... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 4, Interesting

      China has TONS of internal problems. They have 300 million "modern" people, and one freaking billion poor peasants that they're responsible for. They have a Communist system that we know for a fact fails. The only reason they held it together after Tiananmen is that the USA stupidly admitted them to the WTO, thinking that for some reason democracy would break out in China. China has zero tradition of democracy and has always been ruled by emperors or chaos. Unsurprisingly, it didn't happen.

      The Communist Party is scared shitless of the people. If the people knew what had been done in their name, they would rise up overnight and kick the bastards out. There are tons of restrictions on public gatherings, surveillance everywhere, and no free speech. These are enormous problems that can never be solved, not without destroying the Party's rule.

      Then there is China's horrible strategic situation. They are hemmed in by three rings of American defenses in the Pacific, hostile neighbors, and the vastness of Asia. Who cares if they dominate the South China Sea, it's their backyard, it's like complaining that the Americans dominate the Gulf of Mexico. The US Navy sits on the Strait of Malacca, China's jugular vein. Cut that and China is cut off from its sources of energy in the Middle East. One Belt One Road I hear someone say? It's 15 times more expensive to transport goods by land than by sea. They're doing OBOR because they literally have no other choice. Africa I hear someone else say? Again, no other choice. All the good spots in the world were taken long ago by the West. We're not in Africa because China forced us out, we're not in Africa because it's hopeless, you can't help them, their elites steal everything that's not nailed down and return with crowbars to steal the rest.

      China is utterly dependent on foreign trade and American tariffs can really throw a monkey wrench into their plans. Besides, the tariffs are less about slowing China's rise than assisting America's re-rise. China would trade their honor students and their (poorly) speaking English population in a heartbeat for any other country's situation.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    3. Re:China has more HONORS students... by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Time after time we see how little the US and the average citizen cares about their education system. After decades of neglect, we're now reaping what was sown.

      This is almost an irrelevancy.

      Then have more and smarter people researching.

      And this was the money shot. When all's said and done, China has four times our population. Absent something significant (WW3 scale), in the long run, they'll tend to always have more people researching, and they'll tend to be the dominant nation in the world.

      Mind you, I expect they'll find a way to screw that up if they try hard enough, but the odds are in their favour, and will remain so, no matter what we do.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    4. Re:China has more HONORS students... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0

      If the people knew what had been done in their name, they would rise up overnight and kick the bastards out.

      You could say that about many Western countries too, including (if not especially) the United States.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    5. Re:China has more HONORS students... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Several thoughts ran through my head as I read your post.

      a) Random internet guy is found to be world's leading expert on foreign policy, world trade, and politics. World can sleep peacefully now that all problems have been explained.

      b) Random internet guy opens his mouth so the whole world can see how stupid he is.

    6. Re:China has more HONORS students... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      It's comments like this that utterly baffle me. It's like the poster lives in an entirely different universe where American education is not the best in the world. Chinese send massive numbers of students to America for the superior education. How many students does America send to China? Hell, people will advise you NOT to get a degree from a Chinese school because it's worthless (unless you want to spend the rest of your life in China). They cheat on their grades and the professors are worthless layabouts.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    7. Re:China has more HONORS students... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      You didn't actually address any of my points. Instead you used a logical fallacy known as "ad hominem". Care to try again? Here's another argument:

      China is a trade manipulator. Right now China enjoys the status of a developing country under the WTO rules, granting it the right to trade protections not available to developed countries. Sure, China is still developing--in parts--but is highly developed in other parts (the developed city centers of China now constitute a middle class as large as that of the U.S.). The consequence is China has essentially hacked the WTO to its advantage.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    8. Re:China has more HONORS students... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Congratulations for completely not addressing anything I said and changing the topic - once again - to America's perceived shortcomings. Your comment is literally whataboutism.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    9. Re: China has more HONORS students... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are talking about HIGHER EDUCATION. iE: paid education. Aka college.

      The OP was talking about PUBLIC EDUCATION.

      Big difference. Our public school system is currently fucked. It's run by administrators who go on spending sprees to hire more administrators. The students get a poor education since laws were passed like (no child left behind). It's basically a day care center now.

    10. Re:China has more HONORS students... by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      Eh..

      Fail in the US (particularly SV): lick your wounds, dust yourself off, and try again
      Fail in China: I'm not sure, but it probably involves a firing squad, and/or your entire family being disgraced for generations. (hyperbole or fact, you decide)

      That's why we shouldn't worry too much about 'chinese innovation' .. not sure they're culture is really tolerant of what it takes to truly innovate (steal/borrow/iterate -- sure, but that just guarantees always being at least a step behind)

      And besides, how many of the tech leaders in the past 60 odd years were the product of formalized, top-down education and control?

    11. Re:China has more HONORS students... by larryjoe · · Score: 1

      China would trade their honor students and their (poorly) speaking English population in a heartbeat for any other country's situation.

      China the people might sorta maybe, but China the leaders absolutely wouldn't. Preservation of party power is the prime objective, and economic prosperity is encouraged/tolerated because it furthers the prime objective. From an external perspective, this prime objective has one good side-effect. China will not risk an external war because such a war potentially threatens the prime objective. Saber rattling on the other hand furthers the prime objective, as long as an actual war doesn't start.

      As far as trading China's strengths for the strengths of other countries, well, I'm sure there are some things that they would like and some things they wouldn't. Educational excellence has been a China value for a very long time and is unlikely to be "traded" for a very long time.

    12. Re:China has more HONORS students... by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      *their.

      What is preview, and how does one use it effectively?

    13. Re:China has more HONORS students... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lots of opinion, close to zero facts.

      Sure, I'll go along with China's economic espionage -- its been pretty well established. But I'm really not sure what bizarro world you live in where China is utterly dependent on foreign trade. Yeah, they manufacture cheap and sell a lot of goods in the US. And they fund our growing debt (not a cheap proposition and we depend on them to keep doing that). They also have a fast growing domestic market. You know, the one that is growing so fast that US corporations bend over backwards just to try and get a foot in the door knowing that the Chinese government will kick them out at the drop of a hat.

      The *only* corporation to not kowtow to China's demands for access to their market was Google -- and they got over being pissed about the Chinese hack of their systems and are back to wheedling for their share of the market.

      The US is, sadly, diminishing in world-wide significance. China is only growing. As their economy grows they will care less and less about us. This stupid trade war will only accelerate things.

    14. Re:China has more HONORS students... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0

      Congratulations for completely not addressing anything I said and changing the topic - once again - to America's perceived shortcomings. Your comment is literally whataboutism.

      But honestly, if you're going to make some very specific statements about China as some outlier from the norms of modern societies, and those statements describe properties that most Western governments embody, are you really saying anything at all?

      China has TONS of internal problems."

      Oh my god, not internal problems! How can they possibly compete with the West who have no internal problems??

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    15. Re:China has more HONORS students... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe because you didn't really have any points, just opinions?

      You do realize that "developing" status is discretionary? Meaning, other countries are free to ignore it, its really more of a request to be nice to them. The only thing it really does is relaxes rules about time lines (which China has had no trouble making, they just like poor-mouthing themselves).

      China didn't "hack" the WTO -- the WTO just realized that creating a definition for 'developing nation' was unworkable so it doesn't actually mean very much, other than it helped get things going in terms of attracting members.

      Are they really "developing"? Define developing -- their domestic market is definitely still quite young and developing at a rapid rate. Bottom line, there is no actual accepted definition for what constitutes a developing nation. You are free to think that it is silly to characterize China as a developing nation and before this reflection I would even have agreed with you. Their market is definitely developing in the sense of being in early stages of growth.

      But for a country as proud of its ancient history as China it *is* rather silly to claim the title of "developing". For a country with the resources and capabilities of China to poor-mouth itself as "developing" is -- at best -- misleading.

      Really, you shouldn't be so thin-skinned as to be upset when someone rejects your opinions. Its nice for them to be more pointed as to your attempt to substitute opinions for facts, but don't let it get to your head.

    16. Re:China has more HONORS students... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China has four times our population. Absent something significant (WW3 scale), in the long run, they'll tend to always have more people researching, and they'll tend to be the dominant nation in the world.

      China has had a greater population than the USA ever since the USA came into being. Has China been the dominant research nation during that period?

      Time after time we see how little the US and the average citizen cares about their education system. After decades of neglect, we're now reaping what was sown.

      This is almost an irrelevancy.

      On the contrary, it is the crux of the issue and the key to US future success. The advances and developments that one smartie can produce are likely to always outweigh those produced by a thousand imbeciles. Now capitalizing on advances is a different matter...

    17. Re:China has more HONORS students... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Random internet guy that claims the Texas National Guard has as much firepower as the whole of the European nations of Europe, which would mean one member of the Texas National Guard would be able to take on a 2500 strong regiment of Europeans.

    18. Re:China has more HONORS students... by Kjella · · Score: 1

      The Communist Party is scared shitless of the people. If the people knew what had been done in their name, they would rise up overnight and kick the bastards out. There are tons of restrictions on public gatherings, surveillance everywhere, and no free speech. These are enormous problems that can never be solved, not without destroying the Party's rule.

      Well there's two ways of interpreting that, one is what you say. The other alternative is that the Communist Party got the people wrapped around their little finger and in fact feel very confident they can suppress any dissidents, malcontents and anyone else negative of their agenda.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    19. Re:China has more HONORS students... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      China is not a "developing country" ... that was 40 years ago.

      Why don't you travel there for once instead of spreading your american ignorance, hate and fear?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    20. Re:China has more HONORS students... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Democracy isn't the solution to everything.

      You need a commitment to the rule of law, social standards against corruption, and a few other things first.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    21. Re: China has more HONORS students... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duhhhh..

      The US imports its brain power. Once those brains decide to stay at home then the US is fucked sideways.

      https://youtu.be/NK0Y9j_CGgM

    22. Re:China has more HONORS students... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China has zero tradition of democracy and has always been ruled by emperors or chaos.

      This DNS guy gets it, look at how well democracy worked out for India...now if only China could be as advanced as India...

    23. Re:China has more HONORS students... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      STFU with the whataboutism already. Nobody wants to hear your anti-American whining crap.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    24. Re:China has more HONORS students... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      They're still treated as a developing country by the WTO. Did you read what I wrote before you started expressing your America-hate?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    25. Re:China has more HONORS students... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      STFU with the whataboutism already. Nobody wants to hear your anti-American whining crap.

      Says you. How come I'd never heard the term "whataboutism" up until a few weeks ago, and now every turd burglar on the Internet feels the need to inject it into their shitty dialog whenever someone points out they're being a massive hypocrite?

    26. Re: China has more HONORS students... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The decisve Advantage of China is Patriotismus of her Elite.

      America meanwhile worships the freedom of the Elite to screw their own Nation for Personal gain.

      Just look how Clinton showed contempt for American workers. That's terminal decadence.

    27. Re:China has more HONORS students... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Well,
      then they changed the definitions, I was not aware of that.

      However, actually they have no definition ...

      "There are no WTO definitions of âoedevelopedâ and âoedevelopingâ countries. Members announce for themselves whether they are âoedevelopedâ or âoedevelopingâ countries. However, other members can challenge the decision of a member to make use of provisions available to developing countries."

      How do you come to the stupid idea that I hate America? I most likely will never visit it, but hate, no.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    28. Re:China has more HONORS students... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "We're not in Africa because China forced us out, we're not in Africa because it's hopeless, you can't help them"

      We=USA in your post, right ? The reason USA have never been to Africa is because you basically already control Europe, that includes France who control some important regions in Africa: Morocco, Algeria, Mali, Ivory Coast, Congo (was belgian but is french speaking), Togo, Sénégal, Cameroun, Libya (when under Khadafi), ...
      France is used as a proxy conqueror of Africa for the USA. We do what we are told to do by our american masters. See what happened to Khadafi, etc

      The US of A conquered South America in the 1900 (from Spain, see Cuba), Europe and its colonies (Africa, Australia, NZ, ...) in 1945. Japan is an american dominion, and gave Korea is the process.
      The only resistance was coming from Soviet Russia and China decided for autarky.
      The question now they abandoned communism is : "will they pledge allegiance to our American Master ?"

    29. Re:China has more HONORS students... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to fix your problem with logical thinking. 'Nobody' is strong quantification. Want to try that again?

    30. Re:China has more HONORS students... by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      World domination?

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    31. Re: China has more HONORS students... by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      It has always been a day care center and indoctrination project. Generations of people went through it, saw the value, and didn't really care that it withered away. The centralized institution is a relic that we still cling to out of ignorance and fear. We are finding over and over that distributed, fluid collaboration and loose coupling will lead to the next advances in freedom, human understanding, and prosperity. Information networks are microcosmic representations of natural systems such as our brains. Every tool we fashion is a microcosmic representation or likeness of a macrocosm in nature. Tools keep improving...don't get bent out of shape because we don't need a particular tool (institutionalized schools) any more.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    32. Re:China has more HONORS students... by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Let's rephrase it then. China has a lot of internal problems that other countries don't have that preclude them from advancing to the point where they can organically control their situation and a global empire.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    33. Re:China has more HONORS students... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Let's rephrase it then. China has a lot of internal problems that other countries don't have that preclude them from advancing to the point where they can organically control their situation and a global empire.

      Such as? If you haven't noticed, they're already doing both.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  6. WHEN USA STEALS 99% OF 'ITS' IP FROM CHINA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then China can crow if it likes.

    Hahahaahahah

    1. Re:WHEN USA STEALS 99% OF 'ITS' IP FROM CHINA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a Canadian, I can say they do not steal it all, in some cases it is willingly sold to them despite warnings from the intelligence community and our Allies.

      But young Mr Trudeau knows better and would hate to disappoint his billionaire Chinese dinner guests making donations to his campaign. He basically approves whatever they desire from tech to resources to large corporations

      It is easier to buy and it is legal

      Thanks Mr Trudeau for selling us all down the river, again and again

    2. Re: WHEN USA STEALS 99% OF 'ITS' IP FROM CHINA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      False. They probably read all communications if the CEO of your biggest company, Nortel, before it went under.

      The Chinese are very flexible, pragmatic and have objectives. Patriotic objectives, not bankster objectives.

    3. Re: WHEN USA STEALS 99% OF 'ITS' IP FROM CHINA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder why you famed comint spies never found that out for years.

      Maybe even your spies are corrupt by now.

  7. Let's try this again, sorry if re-post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last I checked... china has more HONORS students graduating each year than the US has TOTAL students. China also has a larger english speaking population. It only seems natural that, no matter how many tariffs we impose, they'll rise to the top eventually.

    1. Re: Let's try this again, sorry if re-post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Possible, but the wild card is whether their attempts to control their population will make a culture where innovation is so difficult that their sheer numbers can't overcome it.

  8. Re:Chinese Scientists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop believing that the crap you see on TV is real science. There is ZERO chance of a "rogue internet" having any kind of success anywhere in the world.
    Reason: Internet is not just software and software is not even 1% of what is needed for a working internet.

  9. Chinese stealing right stuff, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The Chinese are stealing the right stuff - like solar and other green tech.

    And in the meantime, our policies are to go back to the 19th century and use coal.

    When we lose our energy independence to China will be some tough soul searching.

    1. Re: Chinese stealing right stuff, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry about energy. Just search YouTube for magnet motor free energy. None of those videos are from China, so we're all good.

    2. Re: Chinese stealing right stuff, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably because you should have searched Tudou for ç£ä½"èç"±èf½ instead? :)

    3. Re: Chinese stealing right stuff, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, unicode chinese on slashdot...

    4. Re: Chinese stealing right stuff, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you talking about? I read it just fine.

  10. The unavoidable consequence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is that there are ten fat Chinese creimers out there...

  11. China has a lot of engineers, duh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Duh. Chinese government is focused on funding STEM education, not on psychology degrees or law.

    So right now China has more engineers in training than the US has in total. Chinese engineering traditions are nothing to brag about, but quantity has a quality of its own.

  12. Re:Chinese Scientists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop believing that the crap you see on TV.

    I can't or I will have to face questions on meaning of my life. God is dead. If Tube also dies, I will have to move to Facebook.

  13. well we need an WAR to over ride the EPA by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 0

    well we need an WAR to over ride the EPA.

    1. Re: well we need an WAR to over ride the EPA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, because the USA isn't losing international credibility and poisoning its land and water supply fast enough, is it?

  14. Re:Chinese Scientists by ctilsie242 · · Score: 1

    Unless you can make a cheap, point to point solution (laser beams) that work over distances, the biggest problem with another "internet" will be who lays the pipe, which tends to be the government, with private companies handed that privilege as a proxy.

  15. U.S. Scientists & Engineers Are Underused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How many scientists and engineers do you know who are unemployed, struggling to make a decent living, or doing something unrelated to their academic training? How many more do you know who are languishing at jobs they hate and that underutilize their talent? How many do you know who are wasting their time and talent writing cell phone apps or something equally menial?

    The U.S. technology sector is trading innovation for short term profits and temporary capital gains. Silicon Valley is more about venture capital than science these days. Meanwhile, China is recognizing the importance of science and technology more than ever. It's no wonder China is closing in on us fast.

    With China's massive population advantage and our apathy, we'll be a distant number two in no time. Our problems are only going to get worse as people stop pursuing science and engineering careers because the jobs suck.

    1. Re:U.S. Scientists & Engineers Are Underused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It has certainly been my impression that there are far more people trained up and wanting to do a career in science than available jobs. But unless/until the coal miners of Pennsylvania are willing to vote in politicians who will tax away the money that rich people are spending on luxury watches and designer handbags and use that money to fund things like cancer research, I don't see much of a solution.

    2. Re:U.S. Scientists & Engineers Are Underused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or wasting their talent for working for the biggest ads company in the world (Google), to get people to click the ads. Same thing with facebook.

    3. Re:U.S. Scientists & Engineers Are Underused by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Most people are in a job that under-utilizes their talent. Institutions are not very good at, or designed, to maximize individual contribution.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  16. Re:Chinese Scientists by DesertNomad · · Score: 1

    ...the biggest problem with another "internet" will be who lays the pipe, which tends to be the government, with private companies handed that privilege as a proxy.

    Citations please.

  17. Re:Chinese Scientists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, you're right. Man will never fly, much less, faster than sound. In fact going faster than 35mph will suck all the air out of your lungs! Bet you didn't know that

  18. No collusion! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No collusion! LIES LIES LIES! Democrat party kills america! NO COLLUSION!

  19. Re:Chinese Scientists by ctilsie242 · · Score: 1

    Cable and telcos? The governments granted them the land, making them natural monopolies. If someone could make a reliable mesh system using lasers, this would allow some type of interconnected ad-hoc network to exist without having to have a dedicated ISP.

  20. I wonder where they got it from by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Oh, wait, no, I know exactly where they got it from.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  21. Not surprising by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    They've been spending on STEM while we've been cutting back in favor of tax cuts (83% for the top 1%, but I guess the 99% got 17% of them).

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, when it comes to space science the US is still number 1. We have sent probes to all the planets and out of the solar system. We have the biggest telescope in space and will soon launch an even bigger one. We've launched several rovers to Mars, one still going after 13 years. China hasn't sent anything past the Moon. It's one lunar rover died after a month.

  22. US tech hegemony is artificial. by hey! · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The US represents about 4% of the global population. China is 19%. If China ever got its political head out of the wrong end of its anatomy it would crush us. Even if they only manage not to be stubbornly stupid they'll be tough to keep up with in the 21st Century.

    So how can the US maintain it's scientific and technological preeminence? The same way it got it in the first place: immigration. US 20th century STEM preeminence is built mostly by people who came here looking for religious and political toleration, especially around WW2.

    No immigrants means no Manhattan Project or US space program. No Admiral Hyman Rickover, so no US nuclear navy. No Sikorsky helicopters. No US Steel, Bell Telephone, or Westinghouse Electric. Just excluding John von Neumann alone would leave a huge hole in US scientific prestige. And today, if you waved a magic wand and eliminated all immigrants in the US, more than half of the scientists and engineers working in the US would disappear.

    Immigration doesn't bring the worst people here, it brings the best, or at least the most enterprising. Nearly half of US fortune 500 companies were founded by immigrants or children of immigrants.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    1. Re:US tech hegemony is artificial. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How many people live in Islamic nations? A lot. Yet ZERO contribution to technological progress since Islam took over.

      Population does not translate to ability to innovate. Culture plays much bigger role.

    2. Re:US tech hegemony is artificial. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the became a free society to do so, it wouldn't be a problem.

      But that takes time, because it is not just government, but culture. On the other hand, south korea seems to be doing fine, and has a heavy amount of christians, so maybe that works apart from western culture.

    3. Re:US tech hegemony is artificial. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right. It seems America can't do anything on its own, but somehow walks like it and constantly accuses others of stealing their "American innovation". Funny.

    4. Re:US tech hegemony is artificial. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US represents about 4% of the global population. China is 19%. If China ever got its political head out of the wrong end of its anatomy it would crush us. Even if they only manage not to be stubbornly stupid they'll be tough to keep up with in the 21st Century.

      So how can the US maintain it's scientific and technological preeminence? The same way it got it in the first place: immigration. US 20th century STEM preeminence is built mostly by people who came here looking for religious and political toleration, especially around WW2.

      No immigrants means no Manhattan Project or US space program. No Admiral Hyman Rickover, so no US nuclear navy. No Sikorsky helicopters. No US Steel, Bell Telephone, or Westinghouse Electric. Just excluding John von Neumann alone would leave a huge hole in US scientific prestige. And today, if you waved a magic wand and eliminated all immigrants in the US, more than half of the scientists and engineers working in the US would disappear.

      Immigration doesn't bring the worst people here, it brings the best, or at least the most enterprising. Nearly half of US fortune 500 companies were founded by immigrants or children of immigrants.

      You are conflating Einstein with an illiterate illegal alien. Immigration is not all good or all bad. It depends on who is coming in. Skilled law abiding immigrants are a good thing on balance. Unskilled law breakers are bad on balance. This is painfully obvious. - posting AC because I already moderated

    5. Re:US tech hegemony is artificial. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chinese culture is actually far superior to the US in that respect too, the work ethic and desire to get ahead is something long since lost in the US. You only have to look at the success of similar cultures like japan and south korea to see the potential.

    6. Re:US tech hegemony is artificial. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just can't help being racist, can you?

    7. Re:US tech hegemony is artificial. by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      That STEM dominance was built by already-educated people fleeing Europe to a similar culture with which they shared many values. Adding millions of low intelligence third-world peasants who are illiterate in their own native languages, much less English, is not a secret to success for any nation. Other countries wonder aloud what we think we're going to accomplish by it.

      Because immigration was good in the past does not mean it's good in the present, or the future. That's a logical fallacy, I forget which one. Absolutely keep stealing badly-needed educated people from other countries so that these other countries never go anywhere. We need to keep them down by denying their ability to self-improve, that's very profitable for us. But the commoners, the morons, the deplorables? We don't want them and they don't benefit us at all.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    8. Re:US tech hegemony is artificial. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geez. what a stupid comment. You do realize that it's mainly immigrants whether poor or not who are more likely to start businesses here in the US? To desire to immigrate requires a different mindset, which include an increased likelihood to take risks, hence the reason why a large percentage of immigrants are business owners.. Unfortunately in the US, too far many citizens sit on their laurels and refuse to take risks these days.

    9. Re:US tech hegemony is artificial. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a fucking psycho, in case you didn't realize.

    10. Re:US tech hegemony is artificial. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no, no, immigrants are all rapists and killers. Because if you're a rapist and killer, naturally the first place you want to go is the country with 5x more guns per capita than any other nation in the world.

      But once the Wall is complete, US innovation will be able to keep pace with China. China already has a Wall, that's why they're catching up.

    11. Re:US tech hegemony is artificial. by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      And it's a good thing that we're starving other countries of these people. They'll never get ahead while we rob them blind of their best people. This is very profitable for us and will ensure American dominance for a long time to come.

      They can keep the illiterate ones, though. Nobody wants them. It's not America's job to be the world's toilet.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    12. Re:US tech hegemony is artificial. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's hopeless trying to reason with SJW open borders nutjibs. They can't understand that most people don't see all immigration as bad. I live in the UK... and my attitude is this:

      * Doctor from South Korea... come right in

      * Illiterate Ethiopian with an 80 IQ and HIV... no thanks.

      One option will improve my nation. The other will drain the NHS, benefits system and almost certainly lead to chain migration, crime and add nothing in return.

      I'll be screamed at as someone who hates all immigrants.

    13. Re: US tech hegemony is artificial. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They go to the US because they know its full of girlymen phaggets who are pushovers to dominate.

      The little bitches practically beg for the immigrants to come and take all they want.

    14. Re:US tech hegemony is artificial. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can keep the illiterate ones, though. Nobody wants them. It's not America's job to be the world's toilet.

      This guy gets it.
      Too bad our system does not weed out the third world street shitters that arrive at our borders every year. Ergo, America has in fact become the world's toilet.
      Why aren't there more patriots like DNS inciting riots on the streets of America!!!
      Fuck all those all those fucking n1ggers, sp1cs, gyps1es, pak1s...!!!

    15. Re: US tech hegemony is artificial. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly and this is why Trump is wrong. Keep immigration open and even raise it.

    16. Re:US tech hegemony is artificial. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You said that like you have magic crystal ball or something. It's not obvious really. You didn't address the GP's 'children of immigrants' and 'people who came here looking for religious and political toleration' parts. But of course you can't, can you?

    17. Re:US tech hegemony is artificial. by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      "or children of immigrants."

      So...not immigrants.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  23. Of course they are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they are smarter than the Americans, and they have a population 4x the size, and are embracing technology much faster than the paranoid USA.

    It's funny however that the pathetic USA is seeing this as a threat, when China has proven to be the most peaceful super-power the world has ever seen.

    Unlike the U.S, China are very unlikely to use their technology for wars and wrongs.

    1. Re: Of course they are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LUL

  24. US Sabotaged Itself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is how all empires end. The Turks became overconfident in their technological advantage of mounted knights, and ignored guns. The US is overconfident and actively sabotaging its own research ability with policies directed at buttressing the psyches of the smallest segment that used to dominate it.

    1. Re:US Sabotaged Itself by sinij · · Score: 1

      No, Ottoman empire converted to Islam and redirected all their energy into studying Koran. Their technology suffered as a result, yet they managed to keep going on inertia for many hundred years.

      If US redirects all energy into studying Bible, then the same thing going to happen here.

    2. Re:US Sabotaged Itself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about all those "unborn babies"? Who will care for those guys?

    3. Re:US Sabotaged Itself by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      ... redirected all their energy into studying Koran. Their technology suffered as a result ...
      How do you come to that brain dead idea?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  25. When they copy US guys like me? Sure... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ÃPK Hosts File Engine 10++ SR-1 32/64-bit https://www.google.com/search?source=hp&ei=ZYrPWpW_H-ykggel7JLwBg&btnG=Search&q=APK+site%3Astart64.com/

    Ads/script/malware rob speed/security/privacy/bandwidth.

    Hosts add speed (via hardcodes/adblocks), security (vs. bad sites/malware/poisoned dns), reliability (vs. dns down), & anonymity (vs. dns requestlogs/trackers).

    Less power/cpu/ram + IO use vs. DNS/routers/addons/antivir + less security bugs/complexity & faster vs. av/addons/routers/remote dns!

    Avoids DNSChangers in routers/IP settings & dns redirect (99++% of ISP DNS != patched vs. it) + DNS tracking & lighten DNS load & resolve faster via local RAM!

    * Viâ what u NATIVELY have in a FASTER kernelmode IP stack (does more w/ less).

    APK

    P.S. - See subject: Imitation IS the sincerest form of flattery http://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/04/26/boffins_supercharge_the_hosts_file_to_save_users_plagued_by_dns_outages/

  26. Wow, thinking is a matter of quantity not quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, thinking is a matter of quantity not quality. Just need to put more people on it like an assemble line, and ideas pop out. There is no creativity, no individual initiative, no genius. creativity has been liberated from the people who hoarded it unfairly!

    This is exactly the thing of a communist, collective society that had a culture revolution to get rid of thinkers. It's also why they are always copying other ideas and presenting it as their own - not just the society, but the people who have to show their authoritarian bosses output. Because no one wants to create anything under those conditions.

    pure bs propaganda

  27. To study it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Why are there US interests in Asia?
    2. Can they unlink these US interests in Asia now?
    3. What're the alternatives to move these US interests?
    4. Excluding Asia, then where?
    5. Are there cheaper labors for these US interests? ...
    Economy First, America Later.

  28. Yeah but... by mark_reh · · Score: 1

    we're bringing coal back! #MAGA!

  29. 'new' IP by bigtreeman · · Score: 1

    developing 'new' IP based on others old IP is easy
    coming up with fresh new ideas is hard

    --
    Go well
  30. I was thinking the exact same thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We've all seen the news stories. Regardless of how much research goes on in China, there's no doubt they have no problem with stealing from us too in order to get ahead of us. Maybe we should return the favor?

  31. What a China-fellating load of bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a China-fellating load of bullshit.

    1. China is not closing the technological gap on their own. They STEAL the technology for themselves whenever an outside country is stupid enough to pass the documentation along to Chinese (government controlled) manufacturing companies to get the stuff made, or are required to GIVE the technology (and a commanding share of the company) to China as a condition to even operate there. Remember the Apple key codes? If outside companies would STOP playing by China's rules, China would fall behind once again where they belong.

    2. China is not independently capable of being the global economic leader. They IMPORT all the raw materials they need from outside countries. America has the technology companies AND the resources it needs to build things. Again, if outside companies would STOP dealing with China, China's manufacturing industry would completely collapse, and they'd fall behind technologically. I mean look at their pitiful "space station". That was the best they could do, even with all our resources and stolen tech... pfft. Even when commies cheat, they just can't compete.

    Wake up and realise: we don't need them for technological advancement and we don't need them for resources, their starved workforce and low standards can't maintain quality, so if we went got back to doing our own manufacturing, we wouldn't need them at all. This would solve the "muh feels" whenever you are reminded that the workers there who made your latest iMsoSpecialButMuhPrivacy selfie-taking tracking device are treated like slaves, bring those manufacturing jobs back HERE probably in factories with far better environmental and humane standards, and give people REAL employment opportunities and a sense of pride again so they don't have to waste their time smoking crack and protesting about their made up SJW bullshit.

  32. Re:Chinese Scientists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -1 Flamebait

    ... and to free ourselves from the tyranny of the fascist moderators!

  33. Re:Chinese Scientists by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

    If someone could make a reliable mesh system using lasers, this would allow some type of interconnected ad-hoc network to exist without having to have a dedicated ISP.

    Good luck with that.

    The US government would never permit the existence in the US of any communications network they did not control and could not collect bulk surveillance data on and trace/track any and every user at will. Authoritarian regimes don't operate like that.

    After all, one does not allow their livestock/slaves the tools to be able to communicate securely and organize to free themselves.

    Strat

    --
    Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
  34. Re: You are a bit too one sided... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1B poor peasants? I think you have that wrong. After all, the term peasant usually refers to nongmin, or those who work in agriculture. The urbanization rate is 56%, with a target of 60% by 2020. With a population of 1.4B, that's more at least 700M are not nongmin.

    Secondly, China can have a democracy of sorts, just not necessarily the same system with find in the west. Instead one can easily see a system enforced where the best and brightest are voted for in village elections, and then move up the scale. There are other ideas of even having a three house congress that would include "Confucians".

    You also do realize China is rapidly building ports that bypass the Malacca straits. E.g. in Myanmar, Bangladesh, Pakistan. You should also realize that Russia is now one of China's largest exporters of energy (larger than S. Arabia). Also note that contrary to thought China is sitting on a lot of oil/gas that could potentially fracked (if I remember right estimates of reserves were higher than the US). The only problem is that current tech fracking requires a lot of water, and locations of these oil fracking areas are in places which are relatively arid. I think you may be quite wrong about Africa. Africa is growing a rapid rate, and one of the biggest problems was transportation. Namely how to do you get countries that have no roads or even a coastline's exports out of the country. China is already moving a lot of light industry into places like Ethiopia.

    Perhaps China is depended on foreign trade, although they are really trying to get rid of that dependency. Perhaps Trump is assisting in that matter. That said, don't think that US isn't depended on China. I wouldn't be surprised to find that many goods are economically "inelastic", and that China could easily simply crash the whole US market by rapidly increasing interest rates by simply purchasing less US bonds.

  35. Knowledge cannot be stolen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Knowledge cannot be stolen, it just exists. The expectation that knowledge can be kept private is ignorance

  36. Yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tell that to these unemployed Nortel, Lucent, Alcatel, SEL, Nokia engineers.

    All the good work of Huawei and ZTE.

  37. Kai-Fu Lee on China's VC ambitions by epine · · Score: 1

    Edge: A Conversation With Kai-Fu Lee [3.26.18]

    After the boring stuff (a who's-who of artificial intelligence research, including one Bob Mercer) and the "~ ~ ~ ~" article divider, this one-way-mirror interview is all about the technological VC ambitions arising in China now.

    1. Re:Kai-Fu Lee on China's VC ambitions by Chris+Coles · · Score: 1

      Just to thank you for putting up this link to Edge; very useful and well worth reading.