Slashdot Mirror


Amazon Employee Explains the Poor Working Conditions of An Amazon Warehouse

Earlier this week, James Bloodworth, a former UK Amazon employee that worked undercover in the "fulfillment center" for six-months, released a book detailing the mistreatment of warehouse employees at the commerce company. He described the work culture as a prison after discovering that Amazon warehouse staff were peeing in bottles to avoid taking too many breaks. Since the report first broke, many Amazon employees have come out to share their thoughts on the working conditions, including one Reddit user who claims that "the post is pretty spot on": They don't monitor bathroom breaks, but [your] individual rate (or production goal) [doesn't] account for bathroom breaks, or... let's say there is a problem like you need [two] of something and there's only one left, well you have to put on your "andon"... wait for someone to come "fix" for you, all the while your rate is dropping. The [two] most common reasons [people] get fired are not hitting rate, and attendance. They don't really try to help you hit rate, they just fire and replace.

My first week there [two] [people] collapsed from dehydration. It's so [commonplace] to see someone collapse that nobody is even shocked anymore. You'll just hear a manager complain that he has to do some report now, while a couple of new [people] try to help the guy (veterans won't risk helping [because] it drips rate). No sitting allowed, and there's nowhere to sit anywhere except the break rooms. Before the robots (they call them kivas) pickers would regularly walk 10-15 miles a day, now it's just stand for 10-12 hours a day. [People] complain about the heat all the time but we just get told 80 degrees (Fahrenheit obviously) is a safe working temp. [Sometimes] they will pull out a thermometer, but even when it hits 85 they just say it's fine. There's been deaths, at least one in my building... Amazon likes to keep it all hush hush. Heard about others, you can find the stories if you search for it, but Amazon does a good job burying it...
Amazon has denied the allegations, saying: "Amazon ensures all of its associates have easy access to toilet facilities which are just a short walk from where they are working. Amazon provides a safe and positive workplace for thousands of people across the UK with competitive pay and benefits from day one. We have not been provided with confirmation that the people who completed the survey worked at Amazon and we don't recognize these allegations as an accurate portrayal of activities in our buildings."

160 of 318 comments (clear)

  1. competitive pay and benefits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yeah, to a sweat shop in India. Oh well, without sufficient resistance, don't expect any improvement. People have to stand up and defend themselves,

    1. Re:competitive pay and benefits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why don't you understand that as soon as they "stand up and defend themselves" they're all fired?
      Walmart was/still is like that. Unionize? They'll close the whole store and rebuild it across town!

    2. Re:competitive pay and benefits by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 2

      Fired? You mean like just like when you sat on a customer's seat at that car wash that I worked one summer, vacuuming 1 car/minute for 8 hours when it was 46C out, and we only got one 30 minute water break?

    3. Re:competitive pay and benefits by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Walmart was/still is like that. Unionize? They'll close the whole store and rebuild it across town!

      That is not why union votes fail at Walmart. If a Walmart store unionized, the workers would be better paid and have better working conditions, but they would also be DIFFERENT PEOPLE. For $15 per hour, Walmart could hire a different class of workers from what they get now for $10 per hour. My local Walmart has elderly employees, an employee in a wheelchair, and two workers that appear to be siblings with Down's Syndrome. Walmart has created productive employment for these people by scraping the bottom of the workforce barrel. Higher wages will push these people out. By voting against the union, they are not as dumb as you think they are.

    4. Re:competitive pay and benefits by Billly+Gates · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah, to a sweat shop in India. Oh well, without sufficient resistance, don't expect any improvement. People have to stand up and defend themselves,

      Do that and a robot takes over.

      I got fired last year which is embarrassing for an employee who is not entry level. Why? My metrics on cases per day for a successful software company were not high enough. I busted my butt off and did fine in the final month. But during the first 2 to 3 months I was slower as I got used to the products I was working with. I got 1 1 star rating out of 320 customers. It was not even my fault. It was her system. Yet that was enough to tank me and 5 other people on our team when a new manager came in and wanted to show how cool he was by firing the lower metric folks.

      It happens and welcome to the 21st century. I deserved to be fired and employed for 5 months later. I was .6 cases per day to low and even if we were not call center employees the customer like high productivity.

      You can't defend yourself if the customer wants this. The customer will go to a competitor instead and the bosses job is to keep his at all costs so the burden is on you. That is just the way it is. If no one can do that then a computer program or robot should be doing it to make the customer happy.

    5. Re:competitive pay and benefits by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      What other kind of fired is there? The only one I know is where they tell you you are no longer employed; don't bother coming to work tomorrow.

    6. Re:competitive pay and benefits by badpool · · Score: 1

      That's messed up. Sorry about that. I fully expect my job to become automated within 10 years. Hopefully I can retire in the woods by then, shooting drones out of the sky for fun.

    7. Re:competitive pay and benefits by dryeo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Unions can be more then about the pay. There is also working conditions, things like a break every 2 hours and not spending 12 hours standing on your feet, something that'll fuck you in the long run. The local grocery store here only lets their cashiers stand at the till for 4 hours before having them do something else that involves movement, but then they're interested in stopping unionization by treating the workers well, and it's working.
      Businesses can be insanely cheap. One of the longest strikes, for health reasons, in Canada involved an Asbestos plant. Workers went on strike with some simple demands, 2 lockers, one for their street clothes, one for their work clothes, showers to wash the asbestos off after work, car wash for the same reason, and a clean lunch room. Sounds pretty reasonable but the company didn't think so.
      http://www.cbc.ca/archives/ent...

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    8. Re:competitive pay and benefits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, actually, Unions are run out of Walmart even if they have to close the entire store. Anyone from Windsor, Ontario, Canada, knows this. There was a Walmart in the East end (off Lauzon and Tecumseh), it was for the longest time the ONLY Walmart to ever have a Union and they made damn sure employees knew how "bad" unions were. You were terminated if you ever spoke of it.

      Labour laws are a fucking joke white collar people laugh at. It wouldn't at all surprise me if Amazon ran their warehouses like cattle farms too. There's no way in hell any manager would come out and admit that either.

      Kind of funny Walmart hasn't been in the news much any more for their labour abuses. Then again I stopped shopping there many, many years ago.

      It's really simple, slave labour is slave labour regardless of who does it. You can't sit back and dismiss it because X group of people whom you dislike, happen to fill the positions (immigrants for example). It's a slimeball way to avoid the real issue.

    9. Re:competitive pay and benefits by superdave80 · · Score: 1

      Unions can be more then about the pay.

      They can be, but they almost never are...

    10. Re:competitive pay and benefits by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2

      So, surrender is the only option then? Nice future to leave for the kids...

      Drones should be the next battle bots for entertainment

      FYI the last job has recruiters emailing me and the pay is now in the 40K range?! LOL. They are desperate and can't find qualified applicants who are willing to meet the insane metrics and work cheap so they are lowering the pay so the famous software company (under NDA here) won't penalize the company.

      Look who has the gold makes the rules. If the big companies want to save money they will. You can't fight em. The customer will always win a battle with your boss. However, the flipside is there is cost to being cheap. You get inferior performance and employees.

      They try to treat this by hiring inferior employees and then laying down metrics and micro manage them to get better results. In the end you get accuracy and a bad reputation.

      AMazon is one place I refuse to work at. My brother could get hired there tomorrow but he won't either. None of the Amazon Echo/Alexia team are still there. They all jumped ship after the product was built. Now they have no one who knows the product and will have to pay more to relearn what the experts left.

      The only way you can win as the small guy is to be a bigger guy. Gain some skills and kiss ass with more work experience and job titles. That way if an employer tries to jerk you around you have someone else who is willing to pay you more and be a better employer. Have your kids learn they too can be homeless if they don't do their homework when you drive past one in a box under a bridge. Let them know when you drive past a nice home they too can also choose to live here if they emulate what he or she does over a long period of time.

      Also let the kids work at McDonalds or the grocery store in highschool. They learn FAST how nice a corporate job is and the value of hard work and money as well as the unfairness of life as well.

      Whining on slashdot will not make the world better and employers do not care what you all think anyway.

    11. Re:competitive pay and benefits by jgardner100 · · Score: 1

      That is a really nice rose coloured view you have there, but for some more details of how Walmart actively suppresses unions, try something like http://www.upworthy.com/6-cree...

    12. Re: competitive pay and benefits by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      #Tool

    13. Re:competitive pay and benefits by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Mess it up enough and it won't matter.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    14. Re:competitive pay and benefits by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      This is the argument currently being made in Ontario Canada in regards to the proposed increase of minimum wage to 15$. What is being said is since the increase to 14$, the employment of special needs people is way down, so by increasing the wage you are putting some of the most vulnerable out of work.

      While they might right as to the result, I think I would argue back they perhaps you shouldn't treat anyone, let alone people with special needs like slaves.

      A similar argument is about cheap child labor in foreign countries. The argument has been made that by not allowing it to happen, you are further impoverishing those children and their families because that was the only work they could get. Again, the counter argument is that it is morally wrong to treat people like slaves.

      Anyway, as I said, I don't fundamentally disagree in the result, but at the same time I don't think those kinds of arguments really hold much water.

    15. Re:competitive pay and benefits by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      Also the reason why union votes fail is because Walmart is very anti-union. When a store does unionize successfully, they simply shut it down and move elsewhere. This happened in Quebec, Canada. Walmart made up some BS reason to do so, but it was ultimately to break the union, and send a message to anyone else thinking about it.

      There was a court case where the union and employees took Walmart to court about doing this illegally, which they won in 2014. However Walmart is able to drag out the proceedings, so the actually case took like 10 years to complete. On top of that, the next phase is to determine the damages to be awarded, which I believe is currently still in court and will be probably dragged out as long.

      Bottom line meaning that Walmart is sending the message that if you unionize you will all lose you jobs, and while you might take it to court and win, you wan't get anything for decades, which isn't going to exactly help out your immediate needs for you and your family.

    16. Re:competitive pay and benefits by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      So, you wrote all those words to repeat that surrender is the only option. Resistance is futile. Personally, I don't give a damn, whatever floats your boat is fine with me, but you should at least acknowledge your own position. Denial is also futile, but the effort is a spectacle in itself. Just put up the white flag and enjoy your beatings.

      What do you suggest I do?

      History lesson here. George Washington is considered a military genius. He lost several battles in a row at the beginning of the revolution by retreating and not fighting. When he arrived in New York with 2,000 troops the British sent 6,000. He fled. He fled more in New Jersey while the British kept chasing him and he almost lost his command. Washington was smart not to get involved in battles he couldn't win.

      What is not as known is the first elaborate spy network was not the CIA or MIS in World War 2. It was Washington's spy network secretly formed in New York. Each spy had a number for his name and even George doesn't know the identities.

      You see Washington placed them when he fled on purpose to spy on the new British stronghold headquartered there

      He played with whitts and defeated the Germans and British offguard during Christmas with a lesser force to win the next 2 battles with less men.

      My point is not give up but be smart how you play. That includes not fighting in battles you cant win as there are consequences to loosing. I knew there was high turnover when I applied. Not so smart but wanted a risk for more skills.

      People work at Amazon or McDonald's because they lost and can't win. Playing smart is to gain value so you can negotiate better options

    17. Re:competitive pay and benefits by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      In the union labor action I was closely involved with (as in Mom was in the union), the union was primarily demanding better working conditions, since they managed to more or less agree on the pay. The newspapers presented it as all about the pay, and mentioned only the brackets where management was offering the largest wages.

      Remember, most of what mainstream media declares to be fact is. They have their own interpretations, and can be selective about facts.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  2. Re:veterans? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2, Insightful

    are people that lazy to find another job?

    Most likely there are people who see the job very differently from the author. For everyone paid less or fired for being slow, there is someone else willing to hustle, and getting paid more.

  3. Captain Obvious Predicts: by shanen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Caption Obvious makes his predictions for Amazon:

    (1) Improve working conditions? No.

    (2) Improve screening of new hires? Yes.

    (3) PROFIT!

    Bibliophile that I am, I will NOT ever buy another book from Amazon. I reached that conclusion more than 15 years ago, and I've resisted every temptation since then. Amazon is just Walmart on steroids--and I never shop at Walmart.

    How long until they starve me into submission?

    Anyway, remember the creed of the corporate cancers that have killed capitalism and communism and that are now working (AKA bribing and lying and scheming) to kill the last vestiges of socialism, too:

    "There is no gawd but profit, and Amazon is gawd's #1 prophet!"

    That's calling it on market cap in relation to the current proprietor, but on profit alone it should be Apple. Top 10 for gross profit (and I do mean gross) includes a bunch of gigantic casinos pretending to be banks.

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    1. Re:Captain Obvious Predicts: by shanen · · Score: 1

      Whoops, forgot two of the predictions from the Cap'n:

      (4) Make sure the book doesn't become a best seller on Amazon.

      (5) Alert the trolls, even on Slashdot. (Not a real prediction. I already saw their comments.)

      Actually, I was rather surprised to find that Amazon even carries the book, but not surprised to see that they're down to their last copy. Some kind of glitch in the book ordering system, I'm sure. Not like Amazon to try to be out of stock and route customers to other books about people being treated badly at other companies, eh? Of course not!

      And no, I wasn't tempted to shop Amazon, but I'm pert' shure I won't be able to find this book in any local bookstore.

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    2. Re:Captain Obvious Predicts: by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Typically places like this can't improve employee screening because the turnover is so high.

      What most people who never worked in such hellish environments do not realize is HR metrics in your office include turnover and retention rates. At Walmart or the warehouse? NOPE. They use contractors to hide these numbers because if you want less turnover you need to pay more and better working conditions as we know that won't be happening at Amazon.

  4. Slashdot Poster Explains the Poor Working Conditio by sexconker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Slashdot Poster Explains the Poor Working Conditions of An Amazon Warehouse

    It's a warehouse.

  5. Re:veterans? by epine · · Score: 2

    For everyone paid less or fired for being slow, there is someone else willing to hustle, ...

    P. T. Barnum said as much one night in deep philosophical debate over several rounds of beer.

    The next morning, in slept in, and was in a terrible rush, and didn't have time to explain this in so many turgid words, and in his impatience, his legendary aphorism simply tumbled out of his mouth.

    He was actually talking to his personnel director at the time, but the phrase later became useful at the front gate as well.

  6. Re:veterans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Right, because it's as easy as walking into any random office building and saying, "I want a job, give me one!" and they say, "Yes, sir/ma'am! Right this way, we'll get the paperwork started immediately!" Or if you're living paycheck to paycheck, taking even a single day off to go to an interview at another place can send your precarious finances off the cliff.

    Consider yourself very fortunate if you have the luxury of being able to take your time in finding a new job. There are a lot of people out there who are not.

  7. Return to the Victorian era in the US and UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Waiting for the next Triangle Shirtwaist Fire incident to happen in the United States.

    Profit Uber Alles

  8. Yeah right by 110010001000 · · Score: 2

    "There's been deaths, at least one in my building... Amazon likes to keep it all hush hush. Heard about others, you can find the stories if you search for it, but Amazon does a good job burying it..."

    Uh, huh. Deaths. But its all "hush hush".

    1. Re:Yeah right by PCM2 · · Score: 2

      At least they, um, bury their dead. Apparently.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    2. Re:Yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Oh if they work like all the other big companies, the death did not happen in the building. No doctors there to make a declaration, they'll do that at the hospital that way they avoid insurance issues. SOP for over 40 years, looks like it's news today.

  9. Re:Prison??? by DaMattster · · Score: 2

    "He described the work culture as a prison"

    If he think's it is prison then he has no concept of prison. He is free to leave any time. Poor man's deluded and should seek professional help.

    You're misinterpreting what he's saying. The Amazon work culture feels like a prison because you are made to feel like an inmate with no say in your work conditions.

  10. Sounds just like the now defunt TOYsMart.com by virtualXTC · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sounds nearly identical to the working conditions of being a 'picker and packer' at toysmart.com. The only way to meet their quotas was to F-over everyone else / leave a mess / steal boxes from the people next to you so you wouldn't have to walk to the restocking station.

    1. Re:Sounds just like the now defunt TOYsMart.com by Waccoon · · Score: 3, Informative

      My life in a nutshell when I was working in a medical warehouse. With the introduction of voice picking, the company decided to raise our minimum quota to 87% of whatever the computer told us we should be doing. That's like failing a class if you get a B.

      Nobody was getting 100% even under the best of conditions, and it was hard to work at all with mandatory 14-15 hour shifts every day. That's especially hard with voice recognition so bad the system couldn't tell the difference between "yes" and "no". The headphone volume would dynamically change on its own, so the speaker constantly varied between a whisper to a lawnmower-like scream. The dynamic volume adjustment (to account for background noise) pissed me off the most. The computer would scream so loud I was afraid it would literally damage my hearing. There was no way to configure the system to have a consistent volume.

      After 10 years with the company, I was told my performance was below 87%, and I had two weeks to improve it or I'd be fired. I quit on the spot.

  11. WOrked undercover? by tomhath · · Score: 2

    James Bloodworth, a former UK Amazon employee that worked undercover in the "fulfillment center" for six-months, released a book detailing the mistreatment of warehouse employees at the commerce company.

    He was undercover for what reason? It sounds like he went looking for some anecdotes to put in the book he was writing.

    1. Re:WOrked undercover? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      If you had read the full article, that is explained. As in he went undercover for his book about low-paying jobs.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    2. Re:WOrked undercover? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In other words: He had a vested interest in the stories he chose, not all the stories he heard.

    3. Re:WOrked undercover? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, it's a standard technique for gathering information when writing a book. You hear that there are problems at Amazon, so decide to verify it for yourself and gain a greater insight than you can get just from talking to other people. It also gives you an opportunity to test the limits of the system, to ask for better conditions to see what the reaction is and so forth.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:WOrked undercover? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      You still failed at reading the article, and so did the people that modded your stupidity up.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  12. 8 Years of experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I worked at Amazon for eight years, starting as a temp warehouse worker doing cycle counts in the Inventory department going through the entire IT department then ending my career there back in the Inventory department doing development for data dashboards and various ETL work.

    I have no formal education other than high school, everything else has just been through hobbies and self learning. I managed about one "promotion" every 18 months or so, traveling the country, to other countries, moving to new states. I say "promotion" because you get the fancy new job, etc but the pay is worthless. Depending on where you join Amazon that is the benchmark of where you will go due to policies on pay raises etc, and yes those apply to promotions too, not just yearly reviews.

    Since I started as a temp that basically sealed my fate, after 8 years and 6 or so promotions I was making 23 dollars an hour, with about 20 shares of stock included (which vest after 2 years with a 40% tax) - building custom apps for one of the largest companies in the world. When I was an IT Engineer I was given $20.50 an hour and 3 shares, to launch new buildings, train new IT teams, manage servers, manage site wide DNS, phone systems, the expansive network. Yet a new peer hired from outside the company would come in and make 27-28 an hour plus stock.

    I think the problem with Amazon isn't the grueling work conditions, etc. As I've had far worse jobs (that were union even), and it's fairly easy to transfer or promote into an "easy" position but that they are constantly dangling the carrot, you always feel like one day you'll make it, and even if you do you'll have nothing to show for it.

    SK

    1. Re:8 Years of experience by HornWumpus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Eight years is too long.

      You were doing it right, but the trick is that after you acquire new skills and experience, you change employers and get the money.

      Most employers will always remember what you made when you started there. It's one of the main reasons to job hop somewhat regularly. At some level they are always calculating the % of your initial pay that a raise represents. You want to get good money when you come in the door, if you don't, you WILL need to job hop.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:8 Years of experience by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Even $27 an hour for a system engineer is shit pay. That pays for a 1 bedroom apartment in most cities exclusing San Fransisco. You got ripped off. No offense man as I am sorry.

      But I would have left to join another company long ago if I were 38 making a mere $45,000 a year for a job that pays up to $70,000 elsewhere and wanted to not have room mates and sub $3,000 beater cars.

    3. Re:8 Years of experience by King_TJ · · Score: 1

      Yep... I would mod you up if I could.

      There are exceptions, but you're basically correct. Employers know if you were willing to accept $X as your pay to work for them in the beginning? They feel like you should stick around and be satisfied with relatively small, incremental bumps in pay from there on out. (All of your managers have their annual budgets calculated with that assumption too.) It's easier for them to justify a big pay increase for a brand new hire when the time comes and they want someone who possesses whatever special skills they're seeking. They can roll that in as part of the cost of whatever new systems, software, or initiative they're trying to deploy.

      When they try to explain why an existing employee should get that kind of salary to do something new or additional? That's a much tougher sell. (No matter what lip service companies pay to the value of hiring from within -- there's still a deep seated hope that hiring a talented outsider will be a better ROI. After all, the new hire might have previously worked for a place that spent big bucks sending them to training classes that they never wanted to pay for themselves? Or maybe they have a lot of sales contacts that could lead to the company growing their business into brand new areas?)

      I'd say that the vast majority of the time, companies ONLY prefer to promote people from within because they think they're getting that savings of not having to pay the person as much as a new, outside hire. So it really becomes a situation where you just accept that if you're comfortable and like other aspects of the job (location and hours, maybe?). But you'll change jobs to leverage new skills, if your main goal is maximizing your pay.

    4. Re:8 Years of experience by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 2

      It's not just the pay. Your managers and co-workers tend to think of you as the job you were hired for, not the next job you might now be qualified for. It's extremely difficult, in my experience, to break through that ceiling at many companies. But if you jump companies, you can often negotiate a substantial pay boost AND position improvement.

      Naturally, you can't jump too often, as that makes you look like a flight risk, but these days, I think having some breadth of experience looks good on an IT resume.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
  13. Mr. Daisey and the Amazon Factory by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 1

    So now the conditions at Amazon are getting to be like the conditions at Foxconn.

    --
    Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
  14. Re:Slashdot Poster Explains the Poor Working Condi by OzPeter · · Score: 1

    Slashdot Poster Explains the Poor Working Conditions of An Amazon Warehouse

    It's a warehouse.

    Maybe. But Amazon also employs people for software/tech jobs to keep all their automation running. I have a fulfillment center near near and I have always heard stories about how crap the pay and conditions were for even the tech jobs.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  15. I'm not saying he's lying, but... by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 4, Informative

    Earlier this week, James Bloodworth, a former UK Amazon employee that worked undercover in the "fulfillment center" for six-months, released a book

    Not that I'm saying he's lying, or even exaggerating, but you've got to at least acknowledge the fact that he went in with an agenda, and is coming out with a book to sell.

    Though he obviously didn't think it through. If he'd gone undercover somewhere else, he could've sold the book on Amazon. D'oh!

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    1. Re:I'm not saying he's lying, but... by Moof123 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What? Do you think that journalists just sit around until stories fall in their lap? Of course you have to have an idea, investigate it, write about it, and finally promote your work so you can get paid. In what alternative way do you suggest journalists operate?

    2. Re:I'm not saying he's lying, but... by Major+Blud · · Score: 1

      Of course you have to have an idea, investigate it, write about it, and finally promote your work so you can get paid. In what alternative way do you suggest journalists operate?

      I'm calling this fake news :-)

      --
      If you post as Anonymous Coward, don't expect a reply.
    3. Re:I'm not saying he's lying, but... by dinfinity · · Score: 1

      Yeah, these goddamn investigative journalists with their extensive premeditated research having the fucking gall to publish their findings!
      I only trust people on Youtube pulling unfounded conspiracy theories out of their ass very very loudly whilst whoring for likes and subscriptions.

    4. Re:I'm not saying he's lying, but... by doconnor · · Score: 1

      What happens if you spend all the effort to investigate and find things are working reasonably?

  16. Amazon.. a company you hate to love by alaskana98 · · Score: 1

    *Reads post with furrowed brow and hand cupped over mouth, slowing shaking head all the while. Then proceeds to order 2 Echos and a Firestick*

  17. Re:veterans? by guruevi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is the UK it’s talking about, not a third world country. Not only are a lot of companies in Europe required to give paid time off for various reasons, there is a lot more time off to begin with. Also, if you think the US has a lot of regulatory overhead, workers can join a union that isn’t tied to a job, doesn’t cost dues and actually has political power. I worked in IT and I had a union.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  18. Re:veterans? by aphelion_rock · · Score: 5, Insightful

    so how exactly are there "veterans" of the workplace there?

    are people that lazy to find another job?

    If you haven't been given an education or your IQ prevents you from getting an adequate education then these people are usually stuck with this sort of work.

    This is performance based workplace at it finest, where the company is managed by numbers on spreadsheets. The workers are just numbers (expenses really) and the focus is on getting the most productivity out of these expenses. Managers are rewarded on the performance they can extract leading to this sort of treatment.

  19. The same happens at Tesco. (read on) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    When I jumped countries and came to live in the UK I was forced to take the first available job just to get going. I ended up in a large Tesco distribution centre which supplies the whole North West from Manchester to Liverpool and Wales.

    Here's what I witnessed:
    - 80% of the staff consisted of agency workers, most of them foreign.
    - Rota was a myth; you were informed about the hours you were expected to work 2 to 4 hours before the beginning of your shift by a text or a call if you failed to respond within an hour.
    - No guaranteed hours. The weakest workers could be told to go home after as little as 2 hours of work...
    - ...but most days the strong ones were expected to work at least 10 hour shifts and it was a common practice for supervisors to ask for 12.
    - Everyone had to wear a wrist-mounted scanner (AMT - arm-mounted terminal) which also tracked your performance. You were not given any extra time for toilet breaks.
    - Agency workers (who, again, were the majority) were paid wages based on their performance. 80% - minimum wage (£7.50 p/h at that time), 100% - £8.10p/h and 110% (upper threshold) - £8.60 p/h.
    - Your performance was often affected by random events. Sometimes one issue was enough to wreck your performance for the entire day. Crowded lanes, missing products, missing pallets, spillages, oversized products, jammed or damaged printers, random restarts of your AMT.
    - If the above wasn't enough, supervisors were allowed to "steal" your performance by reassigning your already completed tasks to extremely low performers to bump their stats so that the agency as a whole looked better before the client (Tesco). Sadly, this is a fact and not a personal speculation (and common knowledge/practice).
    - Agency workers who worked with frozen food in -21C were not given any additional protection equipment. They were expected to work in very thin gloves and suffered from frost burns daily. They usually happened to be the same people over and over again until they quit are replaced with other lucky ones.

    1. Re:The same happens at Tesco. (read on) by illtud · · Score: 1

      Have you reported your experience to your MP? The best mechanism in the UK for fixing this kind of exploitation is via the democratic process. If your MP is not interested, then report to your MP's opposition candidates and the Work and Pensions Committee. It may not get your issue fixed, but they will be interested in your testimony and will feed into future improvements.

  20. Re:Prison??? by youngone · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why do you think so much of the world hates us?

    Not for the reason you've given.

    Usually they hate you because your government overthrew theirs, and made their lives even more miserable, or your military dropped bombs on their house and killed their children.

    Those of us who live in places not being bombed by Americans don't hate you, because we have met some of you and you're usually really nice people.

    We do look at your weird, corrupt, childishly petulant government however and hope we never do anything to piss them off.

  21. Re:Prison??? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Much of the world is Islamofascist, and their religion tells them to hate us. Tyrants need an enemy, and if they don't have a real one, they make one up.

    The United States is the primary mover of mass production in the world, and the world would be a much poorer place without the U.S..

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  22. Re:Prison??? by Ichijo · · Score: 1

    Poor man's deluded and should seek professional help.

    Not just him but anybody who has or is currently being abused.

    --
    Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
  23. Re:veterans? by crunchygranola · · Score: 5, Insightful

    are people that lazy to find another job?

    Ah, spoken like a RWNJ. It is amazing to see right-wingers constantly label people who work grueling hours -- probably much tougher work conditions than they have ever endured -- as "lazy".

    Here is a hint buttercup:

    The [two] most common reasons [people] get fired are not hitting rate, and attendance

    It is tough to go out looking for another job when any time away from work is liable to get you fired from your present one. This is not infrequently a deliberate strategy of the employer.

    --
    Second class citizen of the New Gilded Age
  24. Re:veterans? by crunchygranola · · Score: 5, Insightful

    are people that lazy to find another job?

    Most likely there are people who see the job very differently from the author. For everyone paid less or fired for being slow, there is someone else willing to hustle, and getting paid more.

    Because in Libertarian World there are no bad working conditions, only lazy employees who are not sufficiently grateful to the 'job creators' for giving them 'opportunity'. Dead end job? No such thing!

    --
    Second class citizen of the New Gilded Age
  25. Re:veterans? by ckatko · · Score: 1

    Wait, I thought progressives told us IQ is meaningless.

  26. Re:Then quit! by fluffernutter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, taking a day off to go to job interviews might mean not eating for the next month... so how free are they to move around, really. Last time I checked, human beings needed to eat more than once a month.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  27. So what, try working for XPO Logistics by boundandgaggedwomen · · Score: 1

    So what, try working for XPO Logistics

  28. Capt. Obvious won't accomplish much .... by King_TJ · · Score: 2

    Seriously, when has a boycott of ANY nationwide or multinational chain really accomplished anything? In a best case scenario, you get so much media attention that the company decides it's a good P.R. move to do some token thing to show how "good" they are. When the furor subsides, they go back to business as usual.

    With WalMart for example? So many people claim to hate them, but they provide employment for the relatively unemployable. If there's one thing I *really* dislike about them? It's the way they're able to work our welfare system, so they pay people JUST low enough wages so they qualify for govt. assistance while working full time for them. That's something that government itself really needs to address though. If they leave the loophole there, companies will come along and take advantage of it. IMO, those assistance programs should be there as TEMPORARY help for people who are in-between jobs. It shouldn't be supplemental income that allows someone to accept a job at a wage they'd normally consider unacceptable.

    With these reports about Amazon's warehouses, I think you've got a similar situation. Most people with the ability and knowledge to do better would just quit a job in those conditions, and do something that pays at least as well to work in a better environment. If you're risking passing out and peeing in bottles to avoid bathroom breaks, you're basically trying to stay employed as a simulated robot. Amazon and others trying to run things this way are sending a clear message; we would really rather just use robots. And IMO, that's inevitably where this will all lead.

    The unions want you to think they can fix this, by FORCING employers to give you better pay and better conditions doing these same tasks. But that only works when the employer still needs HUMAN labor. It used to be, that was a given. But today, it's not.

    1. Re:Capt. Obvious won't accomplish much .... by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Well, it *has* had an impact in various times and places. But it needs the support, if not participation, of not only most of the populace, but many of those handling the distribution of power. It was effective, over time, in Ireland, India, Union of South Africa, a few other places.

      But I'll admit that those were extreme cases. I, personally, boycott Amazon and Walmart for my own well being. I prefer to practice what I believe to be "right livelihood". And no, I'm not a vegan. Perhaps I should be, but I've never wanted to be. I have a sister who's some sort of vegetarian, but I don't know what sort. (Oddly, it's not the sister that's a Buddhist.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    2. Re:Capt. Obvious won't accomplish much .... by shanen · · Score: 1

      Basically ditto, even including the eating of meat, though whoever changed it to "won't accomplish much" with presumed reference to yours truly probably has a vicious streak and will accomplish even less.

      In non-ad-hominem terms, I would put it that I'm primarily an idealist. Most people are strong in various dimensions. Perhaps the most important are the idealist dimension for ideals, the materialist dimension for things (or tokens like money), and the humanist dimension for people. There is also a dimensional weighting thing, but I put ideals way too high. The people who do impact things tend to be much more balanced, with strengths in multiple dimensions and also among the weighting of the dimensions.

      Seems to me that Bezos is strong in two, but not the humanist dimension. Certainly not down to the lower levels of his money machine.

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  29. Re:Slashdot Poster Explains the Poor Working Condi by sexconker · · Score: 2

    There are at least 7 things wrong with that.

    I'm not a faggot.
    I didn't cry as Trump was imprisoned.
      - Trump isn't imprisoned.
      - I wouldn't cry about it if it were to happen.
    News of Trump being imprisoned wouldn't wait until 11.
      - My crying about it (which wouldn't happen) wouldn't be newsworthy.
      - - If it somehow did make the nightly news, my local market (most likely to air my crying / not crying) runs nightly news at 10 PM.

  30. Have you seen the rust belt? by rsilvergun · · Score: 3, Informative

    or large swaths of the Southern United States? You just plain get trapped. It's got nothing to do with your abilities. There just isn't much work unless you're rockin' a college degree and then you probably get out of Dodge because the schools suck and the water's full of lead.

    Walmart hasn't been scrapping the bottom since the .com boom. Stop blaming the victim. GP is 100% right. Any attempt to Unionize it met with the full force of their corporate legal team plus every lobbyist they can muster.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re: Have you seen the rust belt? by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      Neoliberal public policy created a thirty year ongoing economic depression in the Rustbelt.

      Advocates of said policies ("capitalist stooges"), when confronted with the manifest failure of their program, invariably react one of two ways. They pull an ostrich - stick their heads in the sand, shout "la la la!", and pretend they can't see what's right in front of their face. Or they blame the victims of their deeply anti-popular policies - they bought it on themselves, they deserve it, those deplorable unionized rednecks.

  31. Warehouse's used to be decent work by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    when the Teamsters ran them.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  32. No shit by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    Karl Marx talked about how capital would flow to where ever labor was cheapest in a never ending race to the bottom but all anybody can remember about him is that a couple of fascists borrowed his books for rhetoric.

    Here's a crazy idea: Instead of the folks in the UK getting worse lives how about the rest of Europe get _better_ lives?

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:No shit by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 1

      "capital would flow to where ever labor was cheapest"

      That's a feature, not a bug. It creates the most wealth overall and helps the poorest people first. It's how the global extreme poverty rate has been cut in half over the last 30 years.

      Once the Chinese have improvements in their life from investments competing to pay them more for their labor, then the Indians got some, then after that the Philippines, etc...

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    2. Re:No shit by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 1

      Try telling that to the people who are no longer in extreme poverty. With the people who now live lives beyond basic subsistence. Giving it some actual thought, they might all disagree with your analysis.

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
  33. And you thought ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... that was the hipster Chai tea you ordered.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  34. Re:veterans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful


    Most likely there are people who see the job very differently from the author. For everyone paid less or fired for being slow, there is someone else willing to hustle, and getting paid more.

    Exactly. Just like for every child laborer in the 1800s that complained about needing to go to "school", there was another hard worker willing to risk his tiny, efficient fingers in the machines!

    Then the frackin labor laws ruined everything! Now where's my monacle?

  35. We're at each other's throats by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    30 - 40 years of declining wages mean we're all doing whatever we can to hang on. The most obvious thing is buying cheap stuff from China through online retailers.

    It saves me a couple grand a year, which has just barely kept my income ahead of inflation these last few years. I'm just trying to make it until the kid's out of college. I know full well the human cost of it all, but I'm a pretty weak guy. I can barely hang on myself. I know logically that if we'd all stand together we'd be saved but I also know that's just not what happens. I'm an American, and I can't even more than 60% of us to agree that we should all get healthcare. And most of that 60% is in two out of 50 States.

    I think the race to the bottom is just going to accelerate. We could stop it whenever we want, but it would mean accepting the occasional guy like this. From what I'd see folks would rather starve to death in the streets than see a guy like that get food stamps and health care.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:We're at each other's throats by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 1

      It's funny how your own Google link contains an article which also refutes your contention.

      Wages don't equal Total Compensation. Wages are only one component of how people are compensated for their work. Total Compensation is up compared to productivity.

      Inflation doesn't account for qualitative improvements in products, i.e. a $500 computer now vs. one 30 years ago.

      It's amazing how you get better results when you use the correct stats (per economic theory) instead of cherry-picking just part of them in the form of wages.

      Also, even your own link doesn't pretend that there are "30-40 years of declining wages". That's just a flat out lie you made up. They're talking about not increasing as fast as they thought they should, not declining. Nice try on the propaganda front, though.

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    2. Re:We're at each other's throats by n3r0.m4dski11z · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "I think the race to the bottom is just going to accelerate. We could stop it whenever we want"

      Everybody knows that it's now or never
      Everybody knows that it's me or you
      And everybody knows that you live forever
      When you've done a line or two
      Everybody knows the deal is rotten
      Old Black Joe's still pickin' cotton
      For your ribbons and bows
      And everybody knows

      and everybody knows

      --
      -
    3. Re:We're at each other's throats by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Yes and no.

      I am a globalist and a Hillary supporter. GASP! Oddly Trump is the more socialistic and liberal one in terns of economics but I regress going to China may have short term hit us as in the bottom 60% temporarily. Long term the Chinese buy more American products. Pepsi gets only 15% of their revenue in the US today! If the US government got in a trade war Coke and Pepsi would leave the US entirely to not loose greater revenue in China.

      Chinese work for alot more money than 20 years ago. They are rich. They buy multiple cars to avoid gas lines. Housing is on par with the US in most major cities. Chinese are outsourcing to Vietnam to cut costs but Vietnam is going up in wages too.

      As each country goes up in the value the less American companies can get up and leave as easily. Also your 401K, stocks, and employers revenue keeps going up as well. Assume the shareholders are retired folks like our parents, disabled people, pensioners, etc?

      Meanwhile we raise billions out of poverty. THe last countries are Russia and the multitudes in Africa. Once they get outsourced then you can't outsource anymore and by 2050 this will be about done.

      Remember western Europe, Australia, Canada, and the US also had very poor people too if you didn't own land. The industrial revolution took about 100 years to complete and look what it left the average person? The revolution will continue in addition to the computer/information one as well in these countries.

      I do believe Amazon is too powerful. I was against them being broken up for awhile as they innovate and Walmart is still around but my brother works for FedEX. He is worried that in 15 years from now he will be out of a job and his 401K turned into a 201K with his customers all using Amazon through forced partnerships in it's own shipping services.

      But anyway I think the hit on the lower and middle class is lessening as China is rising up. Even cheap Vietnam doesn't have the customer base of 1/5th of the worlds population at China has so the pull they can extort is less.

    4. Re:We're at each other's throats by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 1

      Total compensation isn't a mystery. It's how much the company spends in exchange for your services as an employee.

      Your employer doesn't get an advantage if they spend that money paid into your bank account, or to the government or to a hospital. If you don't like where your compensation is paid to, either negotiate a different arrangement if legally allowed, or else convince the politicians to repeal laws designed to have them pay it to somewhere other than directly into your bank account.

      The employer doesn't care, nor benefit. To them it's just an expense associated with having an employee.

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
  36. Re:veterans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Do you believe everything you are told?

    IQ obviously isn't meaningless, it measures how well you perform on an IQ test. It perhaps is not a great measure of intelligence, though I don't think we have anything better, but is certainly a correlate of intelligence.

  37. Re:Prison??? by segin · · Score: 1

    Preach!

  38. Re:veterans? by HiThere · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you're working at a job like that, do you think you'll be *able* to look for another job after work?

    I worked at a place much less worse (I don't want to say better) than that during a summer vacation during college, and after a shift I wasn't up for much of anything. I sure couldn't have looked for another job. If you haven't done a job like that, you have no idea how draining it can be.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  39. Re:Slashdot Poster Explains the Poor Working Condi by dryeo · · Score: 1

    Warehouses used to be a not bad job for someone without much education or skills, at least according to the people I've known that worked in them. Nothing fantastic but not shitty like this is described.

    --
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  40. Re:Slashdot Poster Explains the Poor Working Condi by HiThere · · Score: 1

    That's a interesting thought. There was a time when US legislator (I forget whether Senator or Representative) went to prison and continued to hold his office. Would the same be true of a President? It's not the same as impeaching him. Would the Vice-President be allowed to sign and veto bills if the President were in prison? Or would someone need to cart the bill over to the prison for me to sign?

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  41. A POX ON LACK OF EDITING!!! by HiThere · · Score: 1

    would someone need to cart the bill over to the prison for him to sign?

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    1. Re:A POX ON LACK OF EDITING!!! by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      How about a pox on people that don't use the handy Preview button?

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    2. Re:A POX ON LACK OF EDITING!!! by HiThere · · Score: 1

      I did use it, but I didn't catch the slip on first read-through.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  42. Re:Prison??? by rtb61 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Don't like it, form a union, go on strike and shut down the fulfilment centre until conditions change. Don't forget, collect evidence and get your union to sue the crap out of Amazon, fight, fight, fight, fuck em! Don't beg for nothing, you are a citizen, fight for your rights, to a decent job and a decent wage or choose to be fucked up the arse by your employer and allow your cowardice to pass the privilege onto future generations. It boils down to this, you simply have no other choice than to fight, else conditions and wages will just get worse and worse and worse.

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  43. Re:veterans? by NoobyNoobyDoo · · Score: 1

    By attendance... Do they mean absences without using leave? If that's the case, they should be fired.

  44. Re:veterans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Amazon's vacation offerings are garbage until you've been there at least a year, then they merely suck. If someone is working in a physically demanding environment for long hours with lost sleep (and meals - I used to work at Amazon and was constantly pressured to work through my lunch) isn't the healthiest lifestyle. Sometimes the body just breaks the fuck down. I don't know if it's consistent everywhere, but the facility that I worked at offered vending machines and as long as you worked the day shift you could maybe find one of three area restaurants to get food from. Otherwise it's gas station food - and that's IF you're not working alone (you can't leave the facility unmanned, so if you work alone it doesn't matter what's open, you're not going anywhere). Employee considerations are garbage. Turnover is high, and amazingly enough most people get fired/let go/asked to leave about three months before they become vested in their stocks. During my year and half at Amazon I went from "98% of Amazon Employees have been here longer than you" to "62% of the employees have been here longer than you" (there's an internal tool that calculates that for you, which should also tell you something). 18 months and 30% of Amazon staff had been replaced - that's a pretty fucking big number.

    Having worked there (although not at an FC), I can say that the allegations really don't surprise me despite them being a departure from what I experienced. I was 'lucky' enough to have a desk job there, so the physical demands were not particularly bad. The problem is that "shit rolls downhill" and the managers there would prefer to manipulate their staff and be lazy than do their own job - every aspect of the managers' position is handled by the employees themselves. Self-reviews, self-promotions, self-pay-resolution, and figure-it-out-yourself training. You "manage" your own vacation time through a tool; managers are essentially there for two reasons: 1) Protection for the managers above them (giving them someone to fire when *they* can't keep up) and 2) to hire/fire through a revolving door. They don't get paid well enough to do the job to begin with and with many people it teaches them to be lying douchbags because they need to keep their job and feed their family as well. The only real function that I ever saw them provide to anyone during my time there (and this was fairly consistent, although there were a couple of managers that tried to do the job properly) was "finding the person to engage when the employee had a problem that they couldn't fix by themselves". Absofuckinglutely useless.

    I would like to say that there's no "easy" solution, but honestly if they stripped out about 6 layers of management they could "afford" (lol) to hire enough people to do the real work that the people currently there struggling could have enough time to do the job properly instead of rushing through quite literally everything. During the last year and a half there I helped to train no fewer than a dozen different TPMs, and knew of only two that had been there longer than me.

    You can call me a bleeding heart liberal all you want, but I do not "live to work", I "work to live". I worked way too hard for the last 20 years to be treated like a fucking volunteer, especially by a company that somehow can't offer competitive rates or enough staff to perform the work yet rakes in quite literally billions in revenue.

  45. South's unemployment is above average by denzacar · · Score: 1

    The South has lower unemployment than the national average.

    According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, US national average unemployment rate is 4.1%.
    From that same source, average unemployment rate for Southern states only, comes out to 4.18%.

    For the average to be below the national, more than half of the Southern states would have to be discounted, concentrating only on Tennessee (3.4), Virginia (3.5), Alabama (3.7), Arkansas (3.8), Florida (3.9) and Texas (4.0).
    Of the rest, only Oklahoma and Kentucky are at national average, while the remaining 50% of Southern states average out to 4.55%, with their range spanning from Maryland (4.2) all the way to West Virginia (5.4).

    And that's seasonally adjusted. With raw data, average unemployment in the South is higher, at 4.35%.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  46. It doesn't matter if you provide a safe workspace by hey! · · Score: 2

    ... if you set standards that require the workers to use it unsafely.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  47. Re:veterans? by VeryFluffyBunny · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is the UK it’s talking about, not a third world country. Not only are a lot of companies in Europe required to give paid time off for various reasons, there is a lot more time off to begin with. Also, if you think the US has a lot of regulatory overhead, workers can join a union that isn’t tied to a job, doesn’t cost dues and actually has political power. I worked in IT and I had a union.

    But Thatcher and successive governments since have gutted union legislation to leave unions essentially toothless. Governments can seize or freeze unions' bank accounts and have all kinds of ways of outlawing strikes.

    --
    Debate is a form of harassment. Do not question my truth.
  48. Re:Slashdot Poster Explains the Poor Working Condi by Billly+Gates · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How many people from the original Amazon Elexa team still work there? NONE. Seriously every single scientist, engineer, and expert quit as soon as the contract was up with the Amazon echo. The current team probably was flown in from India on the cheap.

    They treat everyone but board members like shit. I was going to apply as a senior desktop and jr system engineer and the recruiter told me $35K a year as a contractor ... I hung up the phone. Sorry, employers have shown me not trust them if they promise you the world and will give you promotions or job security.

    They simple do not care and will simply fire and replace until they find someone willing to work below value.

  49. Re:veterans? by VeryFluffyBunny · · Score: 2

    Do you believe everything you are told?

    IQ obviously isn't meaningless, it measures how well you perform on an IQ test. It perhaps is not a great measure of intelligence, though I don't think we have anything better, but is certainly a correlate of intelligence.

    You'l be pleased to find out that there is something better than IQ tests - Working memory capacity tests: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/p... They're accurate and reliable, i.e. predictive of performance on a range of tasks, and have greater validity than IQ tests.

    --
    Debate is a form of harassment. Do not question my truth.
  50. Re:Slashdot Poster Explains the Poor Working Condi by Billly+Gates · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Warehouses used to be a not bad job for someone without much education or skills, at least according to the people I've known that worked in them. Nothing fantastic but not shitty like this is described.

    The problem is freaking metrics. I hate them!

    Call centers are horrible too ans run by them. Literally if you give yourself a break more than 3 seconds the team leader RUNS right behind you and freaks out and points to a watch. It was crazy.

    THey hurt Dell, GE, and others. I have been let go from a job over them and it was rediculious as it was not a call center or warehouse. It was an MBA from a customer who only saw the numbers in one area that is measurable. GE and Dell came up with firing 15% every year. As a result no one can retire as you are eventually fired. As a result Dell lost alot of good people and many refuse to work under these conditions.

    You always need to be careful with them. They ruined product quality and employee morale.

  51. Stallman has long pointed to relevant stories by jbn-o · · Score: 1

    There are informative links to relevant stories about Foxconn and Pegatron (the sweatshops Apple switched to after Foxconn) on Richard Stallman's website. Some on Amazon's worker exploitation as well.

  52. Re:Prison??? by Bert64 · · Score: 2

    Well it depends, if amazon is no longer able to operate warehouses this way they're not going to just shut up shop and go home... They still need to operate their warehouses, so they will start offering better conditions.

    The downside is that complying with all these regulations increases costs, which are then passed onto the customers, labour in third world countries is cheaper largely because they don't have the same regulatory hoops to jump through.

    The increased costs also push companies to explore cheaper alternatives, in a lot of third world countries everything is done manually while in richer countries machines will be used, parking meters for example aren't common in third world countries where someone will be sitting in a booth collecting your parking fees.

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  53. Re:Prison??? by Bert64 · · Score: 1

    The examples given are in the UK, the UK government provides all kinds of welfare systems including education programs. There are many people in the UK who never work and claim welfare their entire lives.

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  54. Re:veterans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... managed by numbers on spreadsheets.

    Technically, all businesses are managed by spreadsheets.

    In my experience, problems occur when an arse-licking manager thinks that replacing anyone who doesn't fit 'the numbers', will improve the numbers. That may work in labour-intensive jobs but in the back-office, faulty machines don't get replaced and productivity continues to plummet.

    Union demarcation of the 1970s meant a lot of lost productivity waiting for someone to do their job but it helped misfits find a niche skill/task in the organisation. Now that everyone needs to be a extroverted, multi-skilled team-player, the number of misfits is a lot higher but businesses just fire and replace.

    ... when it hits 85 they just say it's fine.

    Why aren't employees calling government Health and Safety?

    There's been deaths ...

    How did the government fail to investigate this?

    ... veterans won't risk helping ...

    Why wasn't some manager arrested for not ensuring first aid is given?

  55. Re:Slashdot Poster Explains the Poor Working Condi by AaronW · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I know several people that work or have worked at Amazon in tech and it's almost as bad with management and incompetence. A Friend of mine who's working as a contractor describes what he's running into with the Echo team and the incompetence he's running into there. I also have a close relative who spent quite a long time there. Managers are basically at each other's throats and the politics are insane from what everyone tells me. My friend who's a contractor there working on the Echo keeps telling me horror stories about the incompetence he runs into daily from lead developers. Another friend of mine who left told me that most of the competent people leave.

    --
    This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
  56. Re:veterans? by sheramil · · Score: 1

    There are only lazy employees. Perhaps they should take their laziness to the max and reduce their pulse rate to zero. Useless fucks.

    It would seem that a few of them have.

    "Why was this man dismissed?"

    "He was dead."

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_62Nk8KiQaU

  57. Re:veterans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ... when it hits 85 they just say it's fine.

    Why aren't employees calling government Health and Safety?

    There's been deaths ...

    How did the government fail to investigate this? ... veterans won't risk helping ...

    Why wasn't some manager arrested for not ensuring first aid is given?

    Because MOST of the post is quoting some rando-anon reddit user, and not the investigative journalist.

    many Amazon employees have come out to share their thoughts on the working conditions, including one Reddit user who claims that "the post is pretty spot on":
    They don't monitor bathroom breaks, but [your] individual rate (or production goal) [doesn't] account for bathroom breaks, or... let's say there is a problem like you need [two] of something and there's only one left, well you have to put on your "andon"... wait for someone to come "fix" for you, all the while your rate is dropping. The [two] most common reasons [people] get fired are not hitting rate, and attendance. They don't really try to help you hit rate, they just fire and replace.

    TL,DR; random reddit user fits my agenda. Let's quote him instead.

  58. Re: ShanghaiBill = fake name massive human fail by CoolDiscoRex · · Score: 1

    you took the words right out of my mouth

  59. Staffing agencies helped Amazon dodge things. by edgedmurasame · · Score: 1

    "Amazon ensures all of its associates have easy access to toilet facilities which are just a short walk from where they are working. Amazon provides a safe and positive workplace for thousands of people across the UK with competitive pay and benefits from day one."

    All of *Amazon's* associates, not necessarily the contractor's associates (like Integrity Staffing in the US)

    "We have not been provided with confirmation that the people who completed the survey worked at Amazon and we don't recognize these allegations as an accurate portrayal of activities in our buildings."

    They worked for a contractor, which allows Amazon to wash the blood off their hands, rinse, and repeat with another agency.

    --
    "Forget the engineers." -Carly Fiorina, briber of MIT Technology Review.
  60. Re: Prison??? by CoolDiscoRex · · Score: 1

    right, because someone who works in a warehouse can afford 'professional' help

  61. Re:veterans? by q_e_t · · Score: 1

    UK employment law is very different. You do not get fired for being slow, although a short-term contract may not be renewed. It is also not piece work, so working harder will not immediately increase pay.

  62. Re: veterans? by q_e_t · · Score: 1

    What an absurd set of cartoon characterisations.

  63. well by Torvac · · Score: 1

    you dont get to be one of the richest man on earth without some dead bodies

  64. Re:veterans? by thsths · · Score: 3, Insightful

    > Because in Libertarian World

    Yes, but in a Libertarian World, nobody would be forced to take a *specific* job in order to keep their home, as it done in the UK. People are forced into job with benefit sanctions, and that (intentionally) enables the exploitation of workers.

    That being said, the case is clearly more complicated, because there are both happy and unhappy workers at Amazon. They also pay significantly above national average, which would indicate that it is not a "minimum wage dead end job". Maybe they pay more because the conditions are so terrible, and that is cheaper than fixing the conditions? It is worth asking those questions, and whether laws (such as the duty of care towards employees) were broken.

  65. Re:Prison??? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    This isn't the USA. You don't just go suing for shits and giggles, that'll just likely end you broke. You also forget that industrial action goes both ways. You want to shutdown the fulfillment centre, can you make your next rent payment if you do?

    Sometimes it cuts both ways good and proper. I remember working at a place where a whole lot of people went on strike. The following week there was a performance review and a whole lot of new faces everywhere, and this was in Australia where workers rights are pretty damn well protected.

  66. Heat by Daralantan · · Score: 1

    I seem to recall a few years ago someone who had quit retail for amazon warehouse work... quit the warehouse and went back to hating retail due to it being too physically demanding. This was before the picking robots and whatnot, so they basically were almost running around to pick orders fast enough. She had to quit due to health issues that started popping up and the recommendation of her doctor. I don't think it was her, but someone else that told me the next part. Something about some of the hotter locations in summer would just have emergency vehicles outside because now and then people would pass out from heat exhaustion during the hotter summer days.

  67. Re:Slashdot Poster Explains the Poor Working Condi by indytx · · Score: 1

    Warehouses used to be a not bad job for someone without much education or skills, at least according to the people I've known that worked in them. Nothing fantastic but not shitty like this is described.

    Do you know what you're talking about? More than 20 years ago I worked in a shipping warehouse in college for a company that only hired college students for those jobs. It paid pretty well compared to other crummy jobs available in a student saturated college town, but the conditions were not great and because it was a shipping company it was all about the numbers. The company kept an account at the doc-in-the-box down the street for the injuries which happened ALL THE TIME. Ever loaded a trailer that's been sitting out in the sun in the South for hours when it's 100 degrees outside and 95% humidity?

    There really is something called "hard work." It's hard. Some people--like college students--only have to do those jobs for a little while. Some people are stuck in those jobs. I can't imagine waking up everyday and knowing that my college job was the best it was going to be for the rest of my life. These jobs have been pretty tough for a long time.

    --
    Make love, not reality television.
  68. Re:Slashdot Poster Explains the Poor Working Condi by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    Having seen their hiring process and the kind of questions they ask during interviews, I'm pretty sure I wouldn't want to work there for any amount of money.

    I have a feeling it's actually a kind of age discrimination. Ask university exam style questions that no-one with a few years of experience remembers any more. Make the fresh graduates think they are good because they answered it, and then run them into the ground until they quit.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  69. Re:Slashdot Poster Explains the Poor Working Condi by Daralantan · · Score: 1

    Years ago I remember reading someone saying Red Venture was a great company to work for. I was still in retail and thought I'd try them out. Then I started reading employee reviews and saw people saying stuff like: "You have to raise your hand to use the bathroom, usually you have to wait 15 minutes and they might tell you that you can't go and to wait til break time." Decided not to bother.

  70. Re:veterans? by mjwx · · Score: 3, Funny

    After Brexit the UK may be applying for admission to the Third World community.

    Look, there's no way things in the UK are going to improve that much after Brexit.

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  71. Re:veterans? by mjwx · · Score: 4, Informative

    so how exactly are there "veterans" of the workplace there?

    are people that lazy to find another job?

    If you haven't been given an education or your IQ prevents you from getting an adequate education then these people are usually stuck with this sort of work.

    This

    Those who believe this "oh, just go find another job" malarky have never worked a real job in their lives. They were probably given a cushy job in a large firm straight out of university (which they barely studied at) by one of daddy's contacts.

    As someone who didn't have a rich daddy and worked shit jobs when they were young, there are no better jobs if you don't have a good education. You can quit your warehouse job for another job in another warehouse that is just as shit as the one you came from.

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  72. Re:Prison??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    We do look at your weird, corrupt, childishly petulant government however and hope we never do anything to piss them off.

    I'm an American, and I look at my weird, corrupt, childishly petulant government and hope *I* never do anything to piss them off.

  73. Re:veterans? by sinij · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It is worth asking those questions

    Absolutely. Say a warehouse worker gets paid above national average salary, but working conditions are outright hellish. Is this acceptable? What about paying a starvation wage but providing great on-the-job benefits and working conditions?
    Morally, I would say both are not acceptable. There is no moral reason Amazon couldn't pay less and then introduce mandatory 5 minute bathroom/rest breaks every 2 hours. I suspect the reason Amazon doesn't do this is because it reduces their profits by marginally reducing per hour productivity. So in my mind Amazon is at least amoral.

  74. Rules of Acquisition by sinij · · Score: 1

    "Never spend more for an acquisition than you have to."

    -Jeff Bezos

  75. Re: veterans? by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

    Lick those boots!

  76. Re: Prison??? by pubwvj · · Score: 1

    The "professional" help is free under his state mandated health care.

  77. Re:Prison??? by pubwvj · · Score: 1

    "How "FREE" are you to leave when you have little-to-none job skills"

    That issue is his fault, not Amazon's.

  78. Re:Prison??? by pubwvj · · Score: 1

    "Professional Help" is provided free as part of his state backed health care. Observe where he is located before you make false statements.

  79. Calling OSHA by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    Well, considering that until President Trump was elected, the unemployment rate was rather high,. I'd suggest laziness was the least of their worries in finding another job.

    But my question is, do we not have some rather stringent regulations for Occupational Health and Safety? How does Amazon get a pass on OSHA?

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  80. Can confirm by AntronArgaiv · · Score: 1

    My son briefly worked as a "manager" in a warehouse in Seattle/Tacoma several years ago. His stories to us about a "driven" work environment correspond with what's in the article. Needless to say, he's not there any more. It wasn't a voluntary departure.

  81. Re:Prison??? by Type44Q · · Score: 1

    We do look at your weird, corrupt, childishly petulant government

    So, in other words, exact like your government (i.e. all fucking governments) but with its mask removed.

  82. Re: veterans? by Jadecristal · · Score: 1

    I call BS.

    Defining an employee as exempt has a test, and in no way will all employees meet it.

    Additionally, labor law requires that if an exempt and salaried employee works ANY hours in the period, they get paid salary (with some exceptions involving benefit-defined days off).

    What you're talking about would have a state employment office all over them like a cured diabetic on chocolate cake.

    *Suppose* that this were one particular franchise, and you'd be doing the world a favor by reporting them. Yesterday.

  83. Doesn't really by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    you're adding in health care, the cost of which has long since spiraled out of control and is several times inflation. That's not more wages because it's not more wealth. My company might be paying $2000 a month for my health care on top of the $500 I pay but that doesn't mean I get $2500 worth of value. That money just gets filtered back up to the 1% in the form of stock dividends. It's another trick to keep wages low. Nothing more, nothing less.

    Cheap electronics I rarely buy don't solve the wage decline problem. You need to consider what I call "Real" inflation, which is the rising cost of necessities (food, shelter, healthcare, education, transportation & retirement savings). As those things become an increasingly large percentage of your expenses your actual buying power goes down. This is why a woman who got laid off from K-Mart recently after 44 years started at $3/hr ($16/hr inflation adjusted dollars) and ended at $10.50. She lost a third of her pay over her career.

    You don't get better results by cherry picking your stats, you get the Establishment's results. The funny thing is your sig rails against that same establishment but you're falling in line with their narrative. Wake up and go watch some clips from Bernie Sanders. You've been had.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  84. Re: veterans? by barakn · · Score: 1

    Why are you a liar?

    --
    "I'm so moist I'm sticking to the leather." -Kermit the Frog on The Late Late Show
  85. Re:veterans? by guruevi · · Score: 1

    If you WANT to have or change jobs, finding a job should be considered a full time job. So if you need to "work two jobs", yes, get some PTO and go to an interview. This isn't skilled labor either, it's not like the job interview is going to take more than a walk in and a conversation.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  86. Re:veterans? by datavirtue · · Score: 1

    Obligatory attack on libertarians before they even show up. This is turning into a slashdot inside joke. Rip on libertarians that don't even exist. WTF?

    --
    I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  87. Re:veterans? by datavirtue · · Score: 1

    The national average is like $24 an hour.

    --
    I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  88. Re:veterans? by datavirtue · · Score: 1

    " You do not get fired for being slow"

    Most of the time you don't get fired in the US either. the good employees pick up your slack and they get paid more..if they are smart enough to wrangle the money out of the bosses hands.

    --
    I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  89. Re:veterans? by datavirtue · · Score: 1

    Then again...for most of the people walking into an Amazon fulfillment center it is the first time they have ever had to really work in their life. There is a very small amount profit in each fulfillment and the worker adds little value. Perhaps Amazon should call out fulfillment costs instead of burying them out of site and mind? Perhaps amazon should stream video of the fulfillment process across the world? I would like to see Wal-Mart post video of the factory right next to their clothing as well.

    --
    I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  90. Oh, it's too hot by volmtech · · Score: 1

    I guess none of these people ever worked outside in the summer or were in the Navy. Temperatures in the engine room of the WWII era destroyer I was on easily reached 110 degrees F. It was 10 degrees hotter in the boiler rooms. I do not remember anyone collapsing, much less dying.

    As a farm owner in the South I have worked under a pole barn with the thermometer at 104 F all day. You just drink plenty of water and keep going.

  91. Re: Prison??? by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

    So you mean you should go see the pharma dealer. And get so zonked out that he's no longer aware of or bothered by his horrible exploitation.

  92. Re:Prison??? by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 1

    You have part of the effects (i.e. who pays for it), but you're missing that if you force a company to make a job "better", via pay or working conditions, or health benefits, or whatever means, then it's not the same people who end up in that job over time. Once the job gets better, then people who are "worth more" in the job are more willing to take that job instead of a different one, displacing the people who would previously have been the best candidate for the job.

    As an extreme example for illustration purposes (not knowing your actual job), if your employer decided to be crazy and pay 100 million a year for your job, you would be very unlikely to be the one getting that salary. You'd get the absolute best qualified people in the world wanting the job and the employer would pick one of them to do it, not you. So the "job" gets better, but the person currently doing it as the best job they can find doesn't end up in it, they go somewhere else which now matches their qualifications better.

    --
    The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
  93. Re:veterans? by Pubstar · · Score: 3, Informative

    In California all workers are required to take the following breaks - less than 2 hours us no break. 2:01 to 5:59 is 1 10 minute break. Over 6 hours is 1 10 minute and 1 unpaid 30 minute break to be taken before the 5th hour of a shift. 8 hours is 2x 10 minute and 1x 30 minute unpaid. 10 hours is 3x 10 minute and 1x 30 minute unpaid. 12 hours is 3x 10 minute and 2x 30 minute unpaid brakes before the 5th and 10th hour of a shift. Works fine down here and I think it's fairly reasonable allotment of breaks.

  94. Re:veterans? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    Not in my lifetime, and I'm getting up there. At some point, you really have to stop slinging old insults.

    Also, the people who weren't progressives didn't have a great civil rights record either.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  95. Re: veterans? by Pubstar · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately one of those tests is met if you directly manage 3 or 4 people (I forget) as 51% of your job duties. So basically you just have 4 non exempt regular employees and say everyone else is a manager to get around that.

  96. Re: veterans? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    Remember the vile misogynistic assault on Sarah Palin? It was OK to do it to her, but as soon as Hillary ran, it was wrong.

    C'mon. Don't leave us in suspense. Explain who determines "OK" and why nobody pays attention.

    Calling Palin incompetent is reasonable, while calling Clinton incompetent isn't.

    You do realize that women are actually human, and have normal human variations in things, I hope.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  97. Re:Prison??? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

    So you said it yourself be a coward or be brave, your choice, less so for the next generation because you are making the choice much harder for them. They used to publicly shoot to kill unionist in the street, they paid a high price with their courage, so that this generation could now sell out with cowardice. A temporarily empty pocket now is better than the next generation having to fight back when they are being shot in the streets because we let it get so bad. Look at the silence in main stream media with Israel purposefully shooting unarmed protesters (the Ghandi types, the leaders, they shoot in the head), how silent will main stream media be, should they start shooting unionists, elsewhere in the world, shh, don't say anything you might lose your job, so what is other people are losing their life.

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  98. Re:Then quit! by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    So pay, easily, 10K to move (long distance moving is expensive) and hope you get a job in a place with a more depressed economy.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  99. Re:Then quit! by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    Grocery stores don't give away food for free. Most people live paycheck to paycheck. No job means no money means no food.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  100. Re:veterans? by HiThere · · Score: 1

    You clearly don't understand difficult working conditions. I've worked at several different jobs, and yes, after work I was always tired. That's not the same. I once worked 4 24 hour days as a programmer. (Well, I was in my late 20's, and didn't realize how poorly I was probably performing at the end of it. Walking home the last day I literally fell asleep while crossing the street. Fortunately it was a small quiet street, and nobody drove by.) But that wasn't as draining as the job in that factory warehouse. And the job in the factory warehouse was constant stress rather than constant work. The work wasn't the problem, exactly. If I could have done the same amount of work in four hours (well, maybe five) it would have been a lot easier, but you can't work either faster or slower than the stage ahead of you. (I didn't have a stage behind, as I was loading pallets, but that might have made things worse.)

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  101. Re: veterans? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

    So the vile assault on Palin wasn't misogyny? And calling Hillary a criminal was misogyny? You're just making my point for me, that when We The Good People engage in disgusting misogyny, it's OK because we're doing it to The Other. When The Other does it to us, it's wrong because they're not Us.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  102. Re: veterans? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    Calling someone incompetent when they are is neither vile nor misogyny. It could be a misjudgment, but nothing about Palin ever screamed "competence" to me. Calling Clinton a criminal is not necessarily misogyny, but seems to fall short on the question of evidence. The only real rap against her is the classified material in the email, and I've never seen a plausible argument that she did it deliberately. I haven't found a case of anyone who faced criminal prosecution for non-deliberate mishandling of classified material.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  103. Shitty workers by Brockmire · · Score: 1

    I've seen it a number of times, shitty employees put up with this because they don't want any light shed on them. Or they just don't know what the fuck proper hygiene is. In manufacturing, I'd see 2-3 competent people run the floor, and a dozen people who would stand around and need to be told every fucking thing. The competent people get promoted, leaving just shitty people. Then some new person gets hired and again, bests the shitty dozen. If it takes you 50% longer to do your job than the person next to you, you should be fired. Whenever I hear of people working 50+ hours a week (and not getting paid overtime) more than once or twice are just hiding the fact they're not capable of doing the job. The other year when I was at a contract manufacturer, I was there to setup test laptops for programming the devices. The employees would operate slowly, forcing overtime (part covered by us, part eaten by the company) because they fucked up so often and needed rebuild and repairs, not counting damaged components. It drove us nuts how much they chatted mindlessly instead of concentrating on doing their fucking jobs. Companies need a way to weed out shitty workers. If companies don't meet the labour laws, complain to the government. If there's no labour laws to protect you, fucking make them.

  104. Re: veterans? by Brockmire · · Score: 1

    I've never heard this before about special privilege. Never. Who exactly is going to complain? The slower students who can now not feel as dumb and get further help when needed or the gifted student who wasn't being challenged? It's usually for social reasons when skipping grades. My middle and high school and many others split classes into difficulty levels when there's enough students. Two people can be in grade 10 and one does regular math and another do advanced grade 11. You can graduate early since you can satisfy graduatation requirements earlier.

  105. Re: veterans? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

    The only reason the Clintons were not frog marched in cuffs for numerous felonies over the years was the swamp and the fact that the elites in both parties have been covering for each other for decades. Ask any active duty military. If they had done what Hillary did with her email sever and classified emails, they would be in jail. Nearly all politicians are crooked, but to try to claim that the Clintons are not outright mobsters is laughable to anyone who has been paying attention. Hell, Bill Clinton straight up raped several women and got away with it.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  106. Re:Slashdot Poster Explains the Poor Working Condi by asc99c · · Score: 1

    I write warehouse control systems, have spent a lot of time in, and talked to plenty of people working in many of the large warehouses featured in some of these articles (although not this particular one, as I think Amazon make their own software).

    I don't honestly believe they are as bad as is made out. It's never going to be thrilling work, it will always be monotonous for the pickers and packers, and I suspect many working there would wish they could get a different type of job. But people I've met generally seem OK with life there. Particularly out in the warehouse diagnosing issues, I can often see/hear people chatting away at adjacent workstations while they do the job, or short chats with people on pick walks as they pass each other. It's not exactly a hellish environment anywhere I've seen.

    One warehouse I commissioned back around 2004, one of the warehouse workers got to grips with our software really well. I've come across him a few more times since then gradually moving into the IT world, last time he was on the CAB committee for changes across all their sites. Someone has posted their own first hand equivalent story elsewhere I've seen. I've seen plenty of similar situations.

  107. edits by matushorvath · · Score: 1

    [This][post][originally][said][something][completely][different][.]

  108. Re: veterans? by segin · · Score: 1

    Bootlickers tend to support the government subsidizing those that are less capable. Your rejection of my argument would, therefore, make you the bootlicker, and your comment thus is projection.

  109. Re: veterans? by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

    Mmmm, mmmm, mmmm - how's that bootleather taste, broham?

  110. Re: veterans? by q_e_t · · Score: 1

    Ah, whataboutism.

  111. Re: veterans? by q_e_t · · Score: 1

    Remember the vile misogynistic assault on Sarah Palin?

    You won't get any support for that sort of misogynism from this liberal. It is not OK.

    It's not exactly an absurd set of characterizations to say that the American Left despises the working class. They voted for Trump!

    You can dislike someone's choice without despising someone. You are making a leap of logic to vilify a group.

    It's because the Left regards the Right as "The Other" and doesn't feel that the rules of civilized discourse apply.

    That is true of a small minority, hence pointing out your absurd characterisations. I am liberal but have conservative friends and will debate with them. As long as they are honest and their hearts are in the right place and aren't suggesting something awful, that is fine as I don't believe I have some monopoly over 'the truth'.

  112. Re: veterans? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    You seem to have three problems there.

    First, there's what I mentioned about the emails: nobody who inadvertently mishandled classified materials was criminally prosecuted. Go ahead and find someone, or (ideally) shut up. That may not be what they tell people in the military, but it's how things work in practice, including for people with no significant political clout.

    Second, there's a distinct lack of evidence for your claims, not to mention a distinct lack of specificity. The rape claims are unproven (I've seen evidence that Clinton might have raped one woman), and rape is difficult to prove. Lots of people get off rape charges. It's not a good thing, but that's how things go. I have no idea how many politicians have committed rape, or at least sexual harassment.

    Third, the Clintons have been extensively investigated for a number of things by hostile investigators, and have come out fairly clean.

    It's very clear that the Clintons are not particularly good people, and the Paula Jones case established that Bill is a real jerk at minimum, but when I try to track down specific accusations, they always turn out to be trumped-up (pun unintentional, but I'll take it) or outright stupid. Hillary Clinton, as far as I can tell, was accused of nothing specific substantially wrong over Benghazi, but the accusers were loud.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  113. Re:Prison??? by i286NiNJA · · Score: 1

    I can tell you don't get out much. Americans are no longer conspicuous consumers compared to the rest of the world.
    People do think we have it good here but your average joe sixpack wouldn't know the difference if you transplanted him across a dozen random countries excluding the poorest ones.

    In america it's extremely important that we keep our underclass convinced that no matter what their situation they should be happy to have a roof and a frozen pizza because believe you me it's worse everywhere else.

    People from other countries have often told me that america is a disappointment.

  114. Re:Prison??? by i286NiNJA · · Score: 1

    "it's just as bad or worse everywhere else.. trust me this is normal"

    Yeah unless you travel time back to 1978 nowdays watergate is quaint.