Slashdot Mirror


German ICO Savedroid Pulls Exit Scam After Raising $50 Million (techcrunch.com)

German company Savedroid has pulled a classic exit scam after raising $50 million in ICO and direct funding. The site is currently displaying a South Park meme with the caption "Aannnd it's gone." The founder, Dr. Yassin Hankir, has posted a tweet thanking investors and saying "Over and out." TechCrunch reports: A reverse image search found Hankir's photo on this page for Founder Institute, and he has pitched his product at multiple events, including this one in German. Savedroid was originally supposed to use AI to manage user investments and promised a crypto-backed credit card, a claim that CCN notes is popular with scam ICOs. It ran for a number of months and was clearly well-managed as the group was able to open an office and appear at multiple events.

200 comments

  1. Vigilante justice by sgage · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I predict that, at some point, vigilante justice is going to kick in. These twats just rip people off and make light of it, well, sooner or later someone's gonna snap.

    1. Re:Vigilante justice by Pezbian · · Score: 1

      People get scared so no.

      It's a nice wish, though.

      --
      In a world of the blind, the one-eyed man is king--and the two-eyed man is a heretic.
    2. Re:Vigilante justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      honestly if you are stupid enough to fall for this scam then you probably don't have the mental capacity to find the people involved (even if you had their name and address).

    3. Re:Vigilante justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A fool and his money are soon parted. what do you want, a neon sign above their head saying "I am a scammer", everyone pointed out these guys were a scam and most other ICO's as well. The scam rate for ICO's is somewhere north of 80%, buying into one you should expect it is like buying a lotto ticket, most likely you have just flushed money down the toilet as it is most likely a scam and even if it isn't the chance of success is so small a lotto ticket is probably a better ROI.

    4. Re:Vigilante justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People get scared so no.

      No, not all people allow themselves to be screwed over without any consequences.

      I have taken matters into my own hands before.

      It is immensely satisfying, trust me on that.

      The one key principle is to abide by the "best served cold" rule, without exception. Failure to do this can muddle your thinking and result in being caught or worse.

      I won't be providing any more details, so don't bother asking.

    5. Re:Vigilante justice by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1
      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    6. Re: Vigilante justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you explain governments?

    7. Re:Vigilante justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seconded. To do this you have to be patient, wait, and accept that you may not get to gloat to the dickwad you are revenging on. Personally, when I'm slighted, I just wait a while and then cause them insufferable personal losses via a number of means. I never confront them, they never know it was me, but fuck it feels good.

    8. Re:Vigilante justice by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Maybe these morons should just stop falling for scam after scam just because the scammers use blockchain and cryptocurrency in the pitch?

    9. Re: Vigilante justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does he expect to remain hidden in today's world of face recognition and people posting pics on social media? Only safe place is North Korea ... Oh wait

    10. Re:Vigilante justice by Bobrick · · Score: 1

      Seriously. If I had the money to invest in such a thing, the last thing I'd put my money in is -such a thing as an ICO-.

    11. Re:Vigilante justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You underestimate just how much money some people have. So much they have no idea what to do with it so they just throw it in all directions.

    12. Re: Vigilante justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you explain governments?

      How do you explain the idiotic attempt at a question you wrote ?

      Could you be any more vague or any more stupid ?

    13. Re: Vigilante justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not a cool vigilante, you're a pretty miserable person

    14. Re: Vigilante justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wait... asshole steals $50m, you think thatâ(TM)s the fault of those that fell for his venture pitch and got scammed. They deserve to be scammed, and if one goes after the scammer, that makes you a miserable person.

      Sorry, Iâ(TM)m not buying any of this. Access to investors money makes technology advancement possible. Accountability to your investors is important. Scams without punishment make for systemic failure, doesnâ(TM)t matter if itâ(TM)s coins, cute Stanford dropout Theranos CEOs or run of the mill mismanagement.

    15. Re: Vigilante justice by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      It is an Immoral act to let a sucker keep his money!

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    16. Re: Vigilante justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Fuck you.

      It is the original arseholes that did the wrong deed to begin with. Want justice in the modern world? Be rich, hire a lawyer, and ruin someone's life through the sanctioned channels - win or lose in court it doesn't matter. What if you can't afford to fight the legal fight? Then you have to go after them yourself. Note how in either case the decision to seek revenge is completely arbitrary and people do suffer by either means quite equally.

    17. Re:Vigilante justice by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      A fool and his money were lucky to get together in the first place.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    18. Re:Vigilante justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You never hear about it if its done right. People just think they vanished with the money.

    19. Re: Vigilante justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It is an Immoral act to let a sucker keep his money!"

      Spoken like a true American.

    20. Re:Vigilante justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Internet Tough Guy detected.

    21. Re:Vigilante justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, you'd think that APK would read that and learn something from it.

      His address and other info is really not at all hard to find online.

      He'll vanish one day, there will be an "interesting" news story coming out of Syracuse NY, and we'll know he finally pissed off the wrong person.

    22. Re:Vigilante justice by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      "Hurry and get in on the ground floor now--before your government bans ICOs, too!"

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    23. Re:Vigilante justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The fetid wog who perpetrated this scam is actually a mud-man, Dr. Yassin
      Hankir, one of the untermenschen who have a temporary mail drop inside
      of German borders. He is a genetic defect, and not a German.

    24. Re: Vigilante justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How do you fish bananas?

    25. Re:Vigilante justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, aren't we glad anonymous "justice" isn't quite THAT fast, now?

    26. Re:Vigilante justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, his genetic defect allowed him to pull off a great marketing stunt for better ICO regulation. That's something an internet nazi like yourself probably couldn't accomplish.

    27. Re:Vigilante justice by sigmundur · · Score: 1

      Good thing anonymous internet "justice" doesn't work THAT fast. Someone might've got hurt by "vigilantes".

    28. Re: Vigilante justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is a cow?

    29. Re:Vigilante justice by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      How many Kickstarter scams have there been now and all of them seem to have gotten away with it. There is never any real come-back.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    30. Re: Vigilante justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because God.

    31. Re:Vigilante justice by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      And yet all those “superior” Germans fell for an obvious scam. Hahaha.

    32. Re:Vigilante justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The mob has money they wish to invest - preferably someone who don't ask where the money came from. They know an investment might fail - but don't like being ripped off.

    33. Re: Vigilante justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because covers that.

    34. Re: Vigilante justice by mrclevesque · · Score: 1

      "It is an Immoral act to let a sucker keep his money!"

      All depends on who you'd call a sucker and what you mean by 'unkeeping' someone from his money.

    35. Re:Vigilante justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I predict that, at some point, vigilante justice is going to kick in. These twats just rip people off and make light of it, well, sooner or later someone's gonna snap.

      I think where you've gone wrong is in not realising that, in this case, the people who are being ripped off are the twats.

      Nobody is going to "snap" because if they had the wherewithal to "snap" in a way that would be consequential to anyone else, they would not have been suckered in by this shit in the first place. The Venn diagram of "scam ICO victims" and "people anyone needs to worry about" is two entirely separate circles. And one of the circles is full of twats.

    36. Re: Vigilante justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you.

      It is the original arseholes that did the wrong deed to begin with. Want justice in the modern world? Be rich, hire a lawyer, and ruin someone's life through the sanctioned channels - win or lose in court it doesn't matter. What if you can't afford to fight the legal fight? Then you have to go after them yourself. Note how in either case the decision to seek revenge is completely arbitrary and people do suffer by either means quite equally.

      sgage, there aren't really enough British people on Slashdot that you can use "twat" while logged in, and then "arsehole" a minute later anonymously.

    37. Re: Vigilante justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Immoral sukka?? Not if he smashes yo face ... so you never talk again ... and smashes yo kneekap so you never walk again ... and smashes yo fingers so you never type again. VigilanT be dem BIGMAN and smartypantz bitcoinboi-B-viktum crippled and sad and BooHoo ...

    38. Re: Vigilante justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a fellow American, this is why people outside our country view us as assholes, worthy of nothing but contempt.

      Don't forget that you can't take it with you. Whether you believe in God, Rules of Three, or whatever, this is what builds bad karma, and it is only a matter of time before those dollars obtained by screwing someone else won't mean much when sitting in a refugee camp, or when they bills are worth less than the paper they are printed on (a la Zimbabwe).

      We in the US learned (and forgot) the lesson of not being an asshole. We are heading for a 1929 pretty quickly at this rate.

    39. Re:Vigilante justice by hey! · · Score: 1

      Rubbing peoples' noses in it was a mistake. The smartest thing would be to stage a crisis and shut down the business. Even if people saw through it, I suspect they'd be less angry if they weren't openly mocked.

      And the thing about scamming people is that if you do it nicely, you can even scam them more than once. It goes like this, "Just to show there's no hard feelings, I'll let you in on this scam I'm running on that other guy over there." Of course, to get in the scam they'll have to put a little skin in the game...

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    40. Re: Vigilante justice by nnull · · Score: 1

      The sad thing is, I've seen and watch this constantly happen. Meanwhile, legitimate people trying to accomplish good get sued to oblivion because some investor didn't make his ROI, calls them scammers.

    41. Re: Vigilante justice by nmo.marques · · Score: 0

      Deploy 'Ersatszonderkommando Siegfried'. Untermensche termination ETA: 24 hours.

    42. Re: Vigilante justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed.

      Tax the ever-loving shit out of them. Stupidity should be HEAVILY taxed

    43. Re:Vigilante justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least this was in Germany. Hell, in the U.S. he'd probably become the next Republican nominee.

    44. Re: Vigilante justice by another_twilight · · Score: 1

      Mu

    45. Re: Vigilante justice by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      No. THAT is spoken like a true grifter though. You're above all that money nonsense.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    46. Re: Vigilante justice by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Karma means everybody I'm screwing did something bad in a previous life. Hence they deserve it.

      I'm a utilitarian, not a social utilitarian, a personal utilitarian. Whatever outcome has the most utility for me is the most moral.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  2. Emo Phillips by fibonacci8 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "I lent a friend of mine $10,000 for plastic surgery and now I don't know what he looks like."

    --
    Inheritance is the sincerest form of nepotism.
    1. Re:Emo Phillips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Emo in Telugu language means Don't know. Hahaha, fits perfectly

    2. Re:Emo Phillips by mydn · · Score: 2

      She just propositioned you in a bar. Go with it, for maximum ROI.

    3. Re:Emo Phillips by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 3, Funny

      now I don't know what he looks like."

      Or what she looks like.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    4. Re:Emo Phillips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are not enough mod points in the world to award you for an Emo Phillips reference!

  3. Guess my radar was right. by Pezbian · · Score: 1

    It was a Shitcoin.

    Now 4 more Doge.

    --
    In a world of the blind, the one-eyed man is king--and the two-eyed man is a heretic.
  4. My surprised face. by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    It's almost like the entire idea of an "initial coin offering" is a complete scam, designed to cash in on cryptocurrency hype!

    Also, some might be surprised to learn that water is wet.

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    1. Re:My surprised face. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's almost like the entire idea of an "initial coin offering" is a complete scam, designed to cash in on cryptocurrency hype!

      It's an entirely unregulated financial market. You don't get the protections of the banking industry.

      The problem is people are failing to realise they're playing in an unregulated financial market, and then put on their sad faces when they get ripped off.

      Until such time as this stuff is regulated, and people start going to jail, this is the most extreme example of "buyer beware" you're going to find.

      If it wasn't for the magical unicorns people think cryptocurrency is powered by, this would be covered under existing bank/stock regulations.

      It is no longer possible to feel sympathy for people getting ripped off like this, because a fool and his money were parted.

      Stop treating some company who says "yarg, we're gonna have teh crypto and we're all gonna be teh rich" as credible. Someone got rich here, but it sure wasn't the people who got conned by this.

    2. Re:My surprised face. by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that straight-up fraud is illegal regardless of if it's a 'regulated' financial market or not.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  5. What annoys me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only thing that annoys me is I don't know how to join in and rip some people off myself. Seriously, how do people keep falling for these?

  6. My money! by 110010001000 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Crap. I invested a lot here. He was using deep learning and AI to manage investments. Since AI and deep learning are totally a thing (I read about it in Slashdot) I figured I couldn't lose.

    1. Re:My money! by sgage · · Score: 2

      And I just ran out of mod points. Well, +1 FUNNY anyway.

    2. Re:My money! by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      Hem... there are probably more stories about ICO scams than about deep learning ;-)

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    3. Re:My money! by sinij · · Score: 2

      Don't worry, you can make up for that with profits from my new autonomous driving green energy organic ICO.

    4. Re:My money! by pr0nbot · · Score: 1

      You may be interested in my ICO, "ModCoin". We have found a novel way to mine mod points using AI, deep learning and graphene, and by investing you will be helping us to bring this innovation to market.

    5. Re:My money! by Zephyn · · Score: 1

      What if the AI decided that the easiest way to make money was to disappear with the investments and frame the founder?

  7. Yep by apoc.famine · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why does anyone fall for this anymore? There was some survey recently where more than 80% of ICOs were scams.

    --
    Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    1. Re:Yep by 110010001000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, 20% are TOTALLY legit, because cryptocurrencies are TOTALLY legit things. Just like AI and Deep Learning Neural Nets and autonomous driving. This is totally the future!

    2. Re:Yep by sgage · · Score: 2

      Because of something for nothing magical thinking. Very prevalent in America, and probably most parts of the world. It's what drives the system.

    3. Re: Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agreed with your scarcasm up to autonomous driving because, well, thatâ(TM)s like totally a thing thatâ(TM)s rapidly evolving and damn near working. Donâ(TM)t listen to the naysayers, it will be obvious in 10 years that human drivers are the dangerous element.

      Mark my anonymous words!

    4. Re:Yep by gravewax · · Score: 2

      no 20% are just really bad investments, well meaning people running poorly thought out schemes whereas the other 80% are well thought out schemes to fleece you of money from your wallet. at this point you would have to be braindead to be "investing" anything in an ICO.

    5. Re:Yep by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 0

      Very prevalent in America

      Since this was a German company, America has very little to do with it. ... other than the South Park cartoon the dweeb posted on his "company" website. That's American.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    6. Re: Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In 10 years time, truly autonomous driving will still be 10 years away...

    7. Re:Yep by sgage · · Score: 1

      That's why I said "and probably most parts of the world". I live in the USA, and that's what I know. I specifically didn't say it was only an American issue. Clearly it is not, which was my point.

    8. Re: Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Itâ(TM)s been damn near working for 30 years...

    9. Re:Yep by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Good job shoehorning America in there, even though it's totally unrelated. You Americans always have to change the subject to yourselves, don't you? Every story, every day, every time is always about you. Ever wonder why the world despises you so much?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    10. Re:Yep by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Same reason idiots continue to perpetuate the scam crypto-economy.

      Because they think they're smart enough to avoid being part of that 80% that gets fucked.

      As we see, they are obviously not that smart.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    11. Re:Yep by crunchygranola · · Score: 1

      Why does anyone fall for this anymore? There was some survey recently where more than 80% of ICOs were scams.

      When you combined the major fraction which are straight-up scams with the majority of the non-scams that nonetheless fail, your chances of ending up with nothing was 92%, and of the remainder the only criterion was that you weren't left with nothing. Your odds of actually making a profit, or breaking even, were roughly the same as getting double boxcars on one throw of a pair of dice.

      --
      Second class citizen of the New Gilded Age
    12. Re: Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume itâ(TM)s moon landings and integrated circuits that make people hate us. Or maybe my big house, nice car, and stocked fridge. Maybe being gracious with our defeated enemies in the the Berlin Airlift or revitalizing Japan? Thereâ(TM)s a lot to choose from if youâ(TM)re a jealous weenie.

    13. Re:Yep by fustakrakich · · Score: 3, Funny

      This is totally the future!

      Yeah well, as long as it stays there, we have nothing to worry about.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    14. Re:Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever wonder why the world despises you so much?

      Does it? Or are you just making shit up? Well, if it's true, I would blame the 70s. They were tough times for all of us.

    15. Re:Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      more than 80% of ICOs were scams.

      20% of ICOs aren't known to be scams yet.

    16. Re:Yep by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      100% of ICOs are scams. If the cryptocurrency did anything new and had any intrinsic value anticipated over time the developers wouldn't offer an ICO, they would say "mine it yourself and trade when you want" then hold all they could for as long as they could.

    17. Re:Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call bullshit. You don't actually remember the Seventies, either.

    18. Re: Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      near being the critical point, 30 years ago it was 10 years away, 20 years ago it was 10 years away 10 years ago it was 10 years away, today it is still 10 years away from being actually road ready.

    19. Re:Yep by sigmundur · · Score: 1

      Many do because mostly it's still amazing ROI. A collague started with small five figures and took home small six figures only a couple months later. Of course it's amazing ROI as long as the bubble is growing, but whatever. It still is.

    20. Re:Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People from the USA can't give money to a German ICO?

    21. Re: Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the Berlin Airlift (which was a multinational effort) was more about not letting Stalin take all of Berlin rather than any particular generosity. Overall treatment of Germany was magnanimous, yet also Realpolitik, as it applied to strategically useful locations.

    22. Re:Yep by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Why does anyone fall for this anymore?

      Are you asking why stupid and/or ignorant people exist? Because we put too many damn warning labels on things that's why!

    23. Re:Yep by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Yeah, 20% are TOTALLY legit, because cryptocurrencies are TOTALLY legit things. Just like AI and Deep Learning Neural Nets and autonomous driving. This is totally the future!

      You do realise that there are actual cryptocurrencies being used for actual transactions right?
      Just like Deep Learning is an actual thing which you likely assist in training multiple times a day and underpins pretty much most of the internet services you use. Incidentally one of the biggest companies into this also has over 5 million miles of unassisted autonomous driving under its belt.

      I do agree with one part of your sarcasm though. Whey you say "This is totally the future!" sarcastically, I agree. It's not the future.

      It's the now.

    24. Re: Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, the actual self driving car has been SCIENCE FICTION for all that time, NEVER has it been claimed previous to this decade to be "in the near future". Your whining bs, and the whining bs from all the other self satisfied pricks wanking over a meme, is based on the fact that you're too lazy to look but LOVE the idea that you're smarter than those arrogant uppy engineers and scientists with their money and knowledge and humility. Fuck you, asshat.

    25. Re: Yep by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      "Near working" doesn't mean "working". The first 80% of any idea can be easily to implement, but the last 20% can make it impossible. This is how people get fooled. Commercial fusion is another example.

    26. Re: Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya, so other than buying drugs and underaged prostitutes, exactly what can you purchase with cryptocoin?
      Answer: Other kinds of coin, and foolish peoples real money.

    27. Re: Yep by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      Autonomous driving predictions from an AC who can't even get their phone to enter proper text. I'm not sold.

    28. Re:Yep by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      20% are cases where the entity offering the ICO is really trying to create a crypto-currency. The other 80% are cases where there is pure intent to defraud. Even if the outcomes end up the same (losing all of the invested money), they are much different situations.

    29. Re:Yep by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      Everything old is new again. It's pretty much the same sort of thing that happened in the early days of modern joint stock companies in UK and the Netherlands. I read about one case in those days, the company ran an ad saying they wanted investors for an enterprise they could not name or describe due to fear of competitors. There was such a rage back then they got people off the street handing them cash.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    30. Re:Yep by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Ever wonder why the world despises you so much?

      You're getting ahead of yourself. The people who despise us have not taken over in Europe yet, though as this story shows they are well on the way to getting their Caliphate.

    31. Re:Yep by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      It's pretty much the same sort of thing that happened in the early days of modern joint stock companies in UK and the Netherlands.

      Especially in the Netherlands, but at least they ended up with fields of beautiful flowers.

    32. Re:Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't actually remember the Seventies

      Despite my best efforts, I'm afraid I still do. The drugs aren't working...

    33. Re: Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF? it has constantly been claimed to being in the near future, they had prototypes in the 80's and 90's

    34. Re: Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      which was a multinational effort

      LOL. Yes, yes it was. So was the first and second Iraq war.
      Come on, dude.

    35. Re:Yep by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Having a stock offering was also apparently good for having wealthy and highborn women spend the night with you. "Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds" - still useful reading.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  8. The guy sounds like a sleazy ... by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    ... third grade con-man 30 seconds into the presentation. LOL. This whole "I built my own crypto currency" bullshit is totally off the hook - feels like 2000 all over again, doesn't it?

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:The guy sounds like a sleazy ... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      ... third grade con-man 30 seconds into the presentation. LOL.

      The reason con-men continue to sound like con-men is because it works to sound like a con-man. That is the sound that people.....trust.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:The guy sounds like a sleazy ... by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      It sure as hell got Trump elected.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    3. Re:The guy sounds like a sleazy ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and almost got Hillary elected.

    4. Re:The guy sounds like a sleazy ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So people who were D voters were less gullible to con men than R voters is what you're saying.
      Being an R voter (or pretending to be "independent"), are you sure that's what you meant to tell everyone?

    5. Re: The guy sounds like a sleazy ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The voters who were more gullible were the ones who would have voted Hillary, but didn't bother because CNN was projecting a 90% win for her.

    6. Re:The guy sounds like a sleazy ... by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Advice for moderators: "Off-Topic" is *not* synonymous with "It sounds like he said something mean about the object of my hero-worship. BAWW."

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  9. I'd just like to take a moment to thank by rsilvergun · · Score: 5, Funny

    the CEO of Savedroid for helping lower the price of graphics cards.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  10. Fraud? Can anyone prove it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With a flamboyant exit like this, it may have been actual fraud from the beginning.

    Proving it will be hard, but if it can be proven, the guy behind it may be singing a new song: "My freedom: Aannnd it's gone."

    Unfortunately for the prosecutors, actual fraud can easily be disguised as incompetence/wishful thinking, and incompetence - at least in non-regulated businesses - is rarely a criminal offense.

  11. All cryptocurrencies are scams! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Are (any) fiat-currency and (any) cryptocurrency really equivalent, as cryptocurrency fans claim?
    For example, US Dollar and Bitcoin are really equals?
    Value/validity/authorization of US dollar is provided/guaranteed by US Government (and in-turn whole US Public)!
    Also, not to mention, US Dollars in any US Bank is insured by US Government!
    What authorization/guarantee/insurance is behind Bitcoin? Nothing!
    Sorry but that is the end of discussion then!

    Why do you think Satoshi Nakamoto is really hiding his identity, if Bitcoin is really such a great innovation?
    He is just someone does not like media/fan attention?
    Or, could it be really because Bitcoin (and all cryptocurrencies followed it) are actually Ponzi Schemes?
    (So he knew very well that law enforcement would come after him sooner or later?!)

    If so-called cryptocurrencies are really good innovation, why they attract so many criminals/criminal activity?
    Could it really be because, all cryptocurrencies themselves are scams, and that is why they attract all kinds of criminals/criminal activity?

    If so-called cryptocurrencies are really currency, why no company/store can use Bitcoin as currency anymore?
    Because the price of Bitcoin proved to be extremely unstable to use as a currency?
    Would the result be different, if Bitcoin replaced by any other "cryptocurrency"?
    Aren't all work the same way?

    If so-called cryptocurrencies are really money; isn't people issuing their own money, illegal already, in all countries?
    If so then, why they are still not banned in all countries?

    Or, they are not actually virtual currency but virtual investment?
    But, if they are actually investment, why we need/want them?
    What would happen to world economy, if people invested in virtual investments, instead of real investments?

    Or, all so-called cryptocurrencies are actually just a modified (made decentralized and paying variable interest) Ponzi Schemes?
    (Price of cryptocurrencies would keep increasing in the long term (by their design), so it is equivalent of paying variable interest to all long term investors.)

    As more and more people invest in cryptocurrencies, it will become harder and harder to ban their trading everywhere!
    All cryptocurrencies need to be banned globally before it is too late!

    1. Re:All cryptocurrencies are scams! by TheMiddleRoad · · Score: 1

      No shit, AnonSherlock

  12. Re:Fraud? Can anyone prove it? by gravewax · · Score: 1

    If it was intended fraud from the start I would bet on him having an exit strategy and that by the time it was posted on his website he and the money were already long gone to a nice country with difficult extradition laws, 50 million is enough to quietly retire in luxury in a lot of very safe places. really comes down to how smart he is.

  13. Its like the IT version of "the producers" by voss · · Score: 1

    You can make more money with a flop than with a success.

    1. Re:Its like the IT version of "the producers" by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      Don't know about that. The ratio [ money from scam ] / [ money from legit ideas ] might tell otherwise.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    2. Re:Its like the IT version of "the producers" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probability that a new business survives first year is what? 10% max. The guy did not plan for that but for gathering the money and running away. So far so good. If he does not disappear somewhere w/o trace because some mafia bozo finds out who he is - well that is another story entirely. I guess there stats are also not good for first time criminals. Not everybody can do what the RAF trio did in Germany few years back. I do not condone what they did but I have to admire their skill and their motivation - the media laughed at them at the time, police seems to know quite some about them but they are still on the run.

  14. Re: So, How Is Hannity Behind This? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lool the downs syndrome kids are getting more and more desperate

  15. Re:Fraud? Can anyone prove it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    50?

    I'll do it in 5 million. Please send me some e-monies.

  16. Andy Fastow by Bobrick · · Score: 1

    When someone promises you investing into something will make you a millionaire, what they're really trying to say is "Invest in me so I can be a millionaire." That's all there is to it. The fine print reads: "Go fuck yourself".

    1. Re:Andy Fastow by vux984 · · Score: 1

      That's not a useful discriminator.

      When someone promises you investing into something will make you a millionaire, what they're really trying to say is "Invest in me so I can be a millionaire." That's all there is to it.

      Everyone pitching for money wants to get rich themselves, that's a given. There is nothing wrong that.

      If its a legit opportunity, you both get rich. That's why people invest.

    2. Re:Andy Fastow by Bobrick · · Score: 1

      Key point being a legit opportunity. An ICO is not a legit opportunity, not in 2018 and onwards.

    3. Re:Andy Fastow by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      As long as it is not forbidden by law, it is legit.
      Get a damn clue.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    4. Re:Andy Fastow by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      As someone said: an ICO is at best the purchase of a gift card for a shop that doesn’t exist yet, and may or may not actually be built. When someone issues an ICO (even a legit one) they are saying: “I want to raise capital but without any of the usual oversight, without any guarantees, and without having to give away any control or ownership of my company.” With an ICO you are not investing in a startup, you are subsidising them.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    5. Re:Andy Fastow by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      That's why it's never a legit opportunity.

      Only a few people get rich. (For "rich" to have any meaning, this has to be true.) They have to have something going for them more than the average person. They may be very lucky, or come from a wealthy family, or very talented, or have an unusually good idea. (Hard work can help, but there's far more hard workers than there are rich people.)

      So, when anyone tells you you're going to be rich, ask yourself what is so unusual about you that you're going to get rich. If it's nothing, then that anyone is lying to you. It takes some humility to be good at this, and that's not something everyone has. (Personally, I'm much better than most of the rest of you at humility.)

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    6. Re:Andy Fastow by vux984 · · Score: 1

      "So, when anyone tells you you're going to be rich, ask yourself what is so unusual about you that you're going to get rich. If it's nothing, then that anyone is lying to you"

      It's never what is unusual about me that matters. Its what is special about *them* that matters.

      Basically, its kind of like 'dragons den'. I'm going to speculate that very few on that show are "lying"; they all really think they have great ideas, and with some investment to realize them they'll be rich, and the investors ... well... richer.

      So those are all legit investments... but most of them would fail. Not because of fraud, they're just not good ideas. And then in the real world, yeah... in addition to legit investments that are bad ideas, you've also got actual fraudsters.

      The point being you can't tell a fraud from a real investment that will succeed from a real investment that will fail by asking yourself what is special about you, nor by checking whether they are promising that it will succeed. Because in all 3 cases they are identical.

      You have to assess them and their idea. And in the case of dragons den for example, they aren't throwing their money at the wall like a kickstarter -- if they invest they'll usually want management oversight and control etc so that bad management skills etc don't tank even the good ideas.

    7. Re:Andy Fastow by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      No, it's about you. Are you a known angel investor or venture capitalist? If so, people come to you with investment ideas as a matter of course. If you aren't, why is this person trying to get money out of you? Again, relatively few people get rich, so why you?

      I misused the word "legit", sorry. What I meant is that offers like that are not going to be good opportunities, unless there's something special about them - and, by extension, you.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  17. Well managed? by hawguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It ran for a number of months and was clearly well-managed as the group was able to open an office and appear at multiple events.

    If this is the kind of due diligence people do before investing(*) in crypto-currency, I see why so many people get scammed. "Well, they have an office, this company is clearly well-managed, must be legit".

    (*) And when I say "investing", I mean in the same way that someone feeding their paycheck into slot machines is "investing"

    1. Re:Well managed? by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      I am heavily invested in lottery tickets, but now I'm worried. I should have checked to see if they have an office somewhere.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
  18. Finally a good use for Facebook by Archfeld · · Score: 1

    Wow, finally a potentially good use for Facebook and their photo tagging technology. Someone needs to upload and tag this guy in a photo and some where, somehow he will get tagged, bagged and hung out to dry. Once he is located, and the info gets out his days will be numbered, and I'd bet the number will be less than 50 million.

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    1. Re:Finally a good use for Facebook by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      Maybe you'll find nothing on Facebook. I heard Zuckerberg just got 50 m richer.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    2. Re:Finally a good use for Facebook by IsThisNickTaken · · Score: 1

      Given that 50 million days is ~137,000 years, I don't think anyone will take your bet...

  19. @*#scamdriodalphabet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's my new bidcoin replacment, it will cause all other blockchain, synirgies enough said its like dock com 3.0 invest now! it replaces alta vista!

  20. "Aannnd it's gone." by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

    Not sure about what investors thought about that message, but, as a non-investor, that's pretty funny.

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  21. Angry people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
  22. Re: Not German at all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real defect is on full display with your post--from its inception, to its whimpering demise.

  23. Practically no risk by aepervius · · Score: 2

    I mean let us be honest, most if not all people which were taken have no resource to search for somebody like that world wide. And with 50 million, even washed down to 25 million, a team of 10 person can live a well financed live anywhere in the world without worry. The probability from a mafia guy being taken out of his money, is very low : mafia probably are the one organizing some of those scam to begin with. So i would say vigilant justice won't happen.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  24. heck look at those post on coin forums by aepervius · · Score: 1

    Some of those EVEN after the scam is revealed, responded to a user which told"hell am waiting it is on a legit exchange - and I was right", the answer was "yes but you risk missing a 667% markup" ==== this is the type of "easy money" thinking which taken people taken for their money. Stupid.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  25. Re:Not German at all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But he sure pulled one over on all those fine Aryans, didn't he.

    Your racist butthurt is delicious. May we have another helping?

  26. Re:Fraud? Can anyone prove it? by gravewax · · Score: 1

    5 million is no where near enough. Hell that is my target number at the moment to provide a modest retirement, certainly couldn't do luxury on that, at least not without having to be very selective on your location

  27. "Investor" by demon+driver · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Investor" is just a euphemism for a stupidly rich person who lives off others producing something valuable, making him even more stupidly rich just by waiting and making no big mistakes.

    "Crypto currency" is a scheme of some people who weren't stupidly rich before to become stupidly rich in the process, without anyone producing anything of real value at all.

    "Investors" investing in "crypto currency" getting scammed do indeed get what they deserve and what sooner or later will happen to virtually all investments in crypto currencies. They should even be thankful if it went quick this time. Although there's not much hope the intelligence-greed-coefficient of those who invested in the discussed case might let them learn something from it.

    1. Re:"Investor" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Insightful" when "someone" on "slashdot" is talking about "crypto currencies" is just a euphemism for some smug asshole who, even with the opportunity of 20/20 hindsight, still can't seem to cobble together a moral framework that would allow them to identify theft and say "that is bad."

    2. Re:"Investor" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Investors lose money quite often.
      If you automatically picture Buffet or Icahn or Thiel you are biased yourself towards successful investors.

    3. Re:"Investor" by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      An "investor" is simply a person who isn't stupid enough to spend every penny they make.

  28. How this works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A friend of mine is into ICO startups & sh!t. No scamming that I know of, legitimate businesses.

    The basic idea is (1) that you're visible to investors, and (2) that you realise that there are people with more money than they can spend, and they need to piss away a *lot* because (...reasons? probably taxes or something.)

    Meeting people in (2) is usually easy, they're all over the place at startup "accelerator parties" etc. The trick is to have them listen to you. So essentially the hardest part is (1).

    It helps to know that investors are incredibly rich, but otherwise mediocre thinking people. They gamble a lot, but also don't actually, really do enjoy *pissing* money away. So they'll employ some heuristics when assessing risk and deciding whether to give you money. But to most of them it's all a game, so the heuristics will be fairly simple. In this order, this is what matters:

        - Having a team that provably, flashingly cuts it.

        - Building a validated product for a validated market.

        - Building an interesting, promising product.

    So essentially the surest thing is to have a team and a name already associated with bullsh*t-bingo startups. It helps lot if it's the same BS as the scam you're preparing. Previous startups don't even have to be particularly successful, just flash enough to be popular. If you have a really good team,
    you stand a decent chance of getting money just for the asking. (I'm pretty sure the Theranos chick will get whatever money she wants for future ventures, whatever those are.)

    If you additionally have a product that already sells good (e.g. by a competitor), that's gold. Doesn't matter that somebody else is doing it already, this only means that the market is well validated.

    Worst thing you can have and still have a chance of success is a new, innovative product, with a presumably excellent, but otherwise unknown team. Pretty risky. You'll probably get you 25-50k to prove yourself, make a name, then you can try again with a different idea in 1-2 years to get the good grease.

    This is what it takes for serious people with serious money to listen to you carefully. From there it's on you. It obviously helps a lot of you're good with people, charismatic, can "pitch" well etc. But chances are pretty good (I'd say 10-20%) that you get what you're looking for once you've come this far. So try this 4-5 times and you're set.

    Takes some effort and probably 4-5 years of hard work. And a certain kind of self-marketing mindset, which I don't have.

  29. An honest bloke! by demon+driver · · Score: 0

    More honest at least than all those others who keep up the scam by pretending that cryptocurrencies and blockchains had a real value. (There may be some applications of the "blockchain" concept which aren't completely stupid, but even then the most interesting question is whether conventional, proven technologies wouldn't serve the purpose just as well.)

    1. Re:An honest bloke! by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      The ultimate honesty was the founder of PonziCoin. Even with that name and openly admitting it, they still got takers.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
  30. Hold the pitchforks a moment by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    You might want to actually click the link to their page first.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  31. Aaaaand it's not gone! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Brilliant marketing stunt for their ICO advisory project. Make it seem like they've done an exit scam, then release a promo video once they've gotten all the buzz. Simply brilliant!

  32. Re:Fraud? Can anyone prove it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    once you are on the run your money rapidly decreases in value as you have to use other organisations that are willing to hide or process it for you so you can have it as relatively clean spendable funds that won't get you arrested at the first bank you walk into. That is expensive, VERY expensive, expect to lose half your ill gotten gains in this process if not more. Then you have to keep you and your money easily mobile, you are now down to well under 2 million, yes you can retire frugally on that, assuming you aren't forced to flee again in which case you have to go through that whole process again. personally if I was going to go for a big score that would make me such a huge target to be chased down I would never settle for as little as 5 million.

  33. AND IT'S NOT GONE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Looks like there's an update on the website: https://ico.savedroid.com/

  34. Buzzword bingo by DrYak · · Score: 3, Funny

    Need to somehow find a way to fit "3D Printing" into this and we win the buzzword bingo (and a sudden inrush of VC investements)

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Buzzword bingo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You still need drones and gig economy (even though those, and also 3d printing, start to get a bit long in the tooth).

  35. Re:Fraud? Can anyone prove it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    5 million goes a long way in Central America. I guess it depends how you define luxury.

  36. Update: Not gone by schure · · Score: 4, Informative

    The site has been updated with a message about the danger of ICO scams, the need for reform, and apologies for the scam simulation.

    1. Re:Update: Not gone by idontgno · · Score: 1

      Or maybe the site was updated with a message designed to delay pursuit while the miscreants continue to skedaddle.

      How would you know? At least, until some time had passed.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  37. Apparently "not" scam but "PR stunt"... by Varcain · · Score: 2

    So the CEO made a video explaining that this was just a stunt to increase ICO scam awareness, and they are offering ICO advisory now (http://anditsg.one/)... seriously you couldn't make this s**t up!

  38. "AND IT'S NOT GONE" by kkoo · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's back, with the boss giving a big speech on how it was meant as a warning to investors to watch for scams, and since his isn't then you should invest in his scheme.

    1. Re:"AND IT'S NOT GONE" by quenda · · Score: 1

      If with all the publicity from this stunt, he raises another $100mil, and then posts "AND THIS TIME IT'S REALLY GONE. SUCKERS!", I will pee myself with schadenfreude.

    2. Re:"AND IT'S NOT GONE" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Up until that point, whoever was the leader behind this was my hero, and I mean that honestly.

      Now I just don't know what to think.

  39. how do you explain PATRIOT act? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do you explain the frenzy about FEMA camps when a black man was in power and the frenzy FOR FEMA camps now they're to hold black men? And how they don't preclude anything but complaints.

  40. Just a bad PR Stunt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like it was just a really bad PR stunt, more info:
    https://cryptoticker.io/savedroid-back-online-exit-scam-to-send-a-message/

  41. Sign up now! by Tom · · Score: 1

    Invest in my ICO where you can invest in a mutually funded community pool to secure ICO insurance in to cover all your other ICO investments that you are afraid will go away, too.

    Not a scam. Promise(*)

    (*) limited term offer, null where void, not applicable in your jurisdiction

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  42. Nothing to do with Bitcoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The icon on slashdot articles makes no sense, this is nothing to do with Bitcoin.

    Such things need some new icon... it's not even crypto-currency, ICO are ICO. At best a virtual share, but usually a scam (99% of the time probably).

  43. Not "German" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He is one of these Arabs who want to turn Germany into Arabia.

  44. Congrats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope you will enjoy SHARIA as soon as your nice immgrants have imposed it. This is only a matter of time in Germany, Britain and France. Do the math.

    1. Re:Congrats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here in the US, we have extensive experience staving off attempted Shari'a.
      It's pretty much a pillar of the Republican Party's platform. Sure, different branch of neo-Abrahamism, but that same refusal to get rid of the nasty old Mosaic law.
      I'm far more bothered by the religious-legislative synergy of the Republican party than I am of American muslims.

  45. Not a scam FWIW by cristiroma · · Score: 2

    The site is back online and he did explain actually that was an experiment showing how easy was to manipulate.

  46. Hmm, their website says it's not gone by gotan · · Score: 2

    Their explanation is, that this was a PR-Stunt.

    Make of it what you will.

    --
    "By the way if anyone here is in advertising or marketing... kill yourself." -- Bill Hicks
  47. Amazing pr gag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Supposedly was a pr gag

  48. obCasablanca by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    I am shocked, shocked that fake "currencies" would attract anything less than totally honest characters.

    (Your cryptocurrency winnings sir)

    Thank you.

  49. Re:Fraud? Can anyone prove it? by Whibla · · Score: 1

    150 thousand a year (from a no risk investment of 5 million) is a modest retirement?

    Wow! I sometimes wonder if I live on the same planet as some of the posters here. :-/

  50. has anyone clicked on the link to their site? by rbgnr111 · · Score: 4, Informative

    This looks to me more like a promotional stunt. Going to their site it looks like they are trying to use this to promote their token. The video there looked to me more like they were warning about the risks of many ICO's and the type of exit that many take.

    I'm not promoting them in any way, I do think that a lot of these ico's are very scammy, and like any investment you need to do your own work to verify that it actually is a good investment.

  51. hiding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So Dr. Yassin Hankir is hiding for his life right now I suppose

  52. APK gets no respect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The joke is on anyone going after APK for wasting their time on that feckless coward. It's hard to be offended by a keyboard jockey that has his life in a shambles.

    1. Re:APK gets no respect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has he been having problems recently? Just the other day I spent a few minutes trying to remember what his name was and looked for an obituary, but didn't find anything.

    2. Re:APK gets no respect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's lowered himself to harassing someone each week as revenge for some perceived slight.

    3. Re:APK gets no respect by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Lowered himself...as opposed to what he was doing before?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    4. Re:APK gets no respect by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      He hasn't lowered himself, he can't possibly go any lower than where he has been for who knows how long. Here's an example. It only takes him 3 messages to start calling people fools, idiots, fleas, and making random all-caps threats. That was 18 years ago. So, no, he hasn't lowered himself anywhere because he's been at that same level for about 2 decades, if not his entire 55 or so year life. If he replied to this message, he would no doubt have words to say about the people in that thread still today, because he does not emotionally progress. His emotional development stopped somewhere in elementary school and hasn't gone anywhere. Incidentally, that's also why he doesn't get any respect. He's worked very hard at not having any respect, he's earned that. He was earning it 18 years ago in that thread, and whenever I see him here he still makes an effort to earn it.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    5. Re:APK gets no respect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have a choice to make, and I'd like you to make the right one by learning from the criticism your actions are generating.
      -- Minstrel, Posted: Sat Nov 18, 2000 11:45 pm

      Over 17 years and he still doesn't get it. Every slight he received in life is entirely his own doing.

      Show me YOU are capable of better!
      -- APK, Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2000 8:39 am

      A retort APK have clung to for decades. Yet every single time I challenged him, he dismissed my significant engineering accomplishments in favor of his batch files and Delphi GUI wrappers. APK is a blight on Slashdot, as undesirable as the unwashed drunkard with an appalling odor that harasses you every time you go to the convenience store.

      ZIP

  53. ICO was a great game! by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

    The PS2 game Ico was great. It even got remastered for the PS3.

    Oh wait, you mean ICO = Initial Coin Offering.

    Hey, fucktard /. editors, how about doing your fucking JOB and describing an acronym the first time it is used. Oh wait, that would involve actual work.

    After 20+ years you STILL can't do this?

    You had ONE job ... *facepalm*

    Yes, I'm not new here -- and I'll keep kvitching about their incompetence.

  54. Ponzi Scheme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well managed for a couple of months? Yes that's the build-up phase of a Ponzi Scheme. While you're growing you pay out "profits" with new incoming money, until reality hits and than suddenly the company goes up in smoke.

  55. Re:Fraud? Can anyone prove it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then there are the local natives who just can't stand foreigners on the lam, and will rat them out. For example, the pizza delivery guy calling the Mexican authorities on Mr. Affluenza and his mother.

    If someone comes in that everyone knows is fleeing justice, it only is a matter of a few hours before it hits international places that said person is living there, perhaps days before the bounty hunters come after them.

    Five million to be on the lam for the rest of my life, always watching my back? No thanks.

  56. Bitcoin Shenanigans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have to admin I've been to busy to look very deeply into bitcoin and it's ilk, but I'm never seeing anything positive.

    It fees like someone saying '1% of rabid bears are just misunderstood. Let's go hug that one.' and for some reason people keep trotting toward that bear...

  57. Aaaaand ... It's NOT! by Toad-san · · Score: 1

    Just checked the "currently displaying" link, South Park image is gone, new image saying it's NOT gone, "check this space", etc.

    Who knows? But you can bet your bottom dollar (if you have one left) that I won't be sending them any money :-)

  58. I guess if his picture is floating around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess if his picture is floating around, soon he will be too - in a lake.

    captcha: hacksaw

  59. Wait for it - https://ico.savedroid.com/ by gx5000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    AND IT'S NOT GONE

    https://ico.savedroid.com/

    savedroid was here, is here, and will be here. Aaand savedroid is all in for establishing high quality ICO standards.

    --
    End of Line.
  60. Re:Fraud? Can anyone prove it? by Pascoea · · Score: 1

    150 thousand a year (from a no risk investment of 5 million) is a modest retirement?

    Wow! I sometimes wonder if I live on the same planet as some of the posters here. :-/

    It's all relative. In 2038 150k/year is the equivalent of a 90k/year salary today (using 2.5% inflation. I used this site: here) Which for Podunk may be a good number, Minneapolis I would barely call that a modest income, if you are looking at New York City that's pretty much barely scraping by.

  61. And slashdot just got trolled... by CoolCash · · Score: 1

    AND IT'S NOT GONE https://ico.savedroid.com/

  62. Yassin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just a Mohammedan collecting his Jizya from the kuffar. Nothing to see see here, move on.

  63. Not quite by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    Crypto Currencies value is predicated on black market goods and services. e.g. Drugs, Prostitution, Ransomware and money laundering. People buy crypto currency to purchase illegal things. These things are highly desirable so the person buying is willing to take the risks. As for the seller, the product's cost is negligible but an artificially constricted supply means they can charge so much for it that the risk of getting stuck with worthless currency can be mitigated by charging 3, 5 or even 10 -20 times the raw cost of the product.

    The black market created a floor of value for crypto currency. Once that grew large enough speculators moved in and drove up the value.

    The real risk is that the government will clamp down on the illegal activity or (worse) make the activity legal (e.g. legalize drugs and prostitution, the latter two examples aren't likely to be legalized).

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  64. Re:Fraud? Can anyone prove it? by gravewax · · Score: 1

    if you are on the run you won't have 5 million, you have to have it laundered and in highly mobile non siezable investments. you won't be getting 150k a year from it.

  65. Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not gone, it was a publicity stunt.

  66. Re:Fraud? Can anyone prove it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I sometimes wonder about some of the morons here to, if you think you are getting 150k a year from 5 million that will need to be laundered while you are on the run you have no clue. You will be getting less than half that.

  67. Re:Fraud? Can anyone prove it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not really, in central America you will need to spend a large chunk of that just in payoffs locally to keep people quiet about where you are as you will stick out like a sore thumb and their will be a long list of people looking to turn you in for a reward. The reality is you want to live somewhere that the money doesn't make you stand out and their isn't anywhere you can afford to do that on just 5 million in stolen funds.

  68. "Man, that guy had the utmost confidence..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: "... in his ability & w/ THAT kind of ability? U SHOULD have that confidence" as amicusNYCL goes 'splat' https://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=8694351&cid=51429541/ due to YOUR OWN F'up, bigmouth (lol)!

    * You're wrong now too you know - why?

    You are lower as you're down in the dirt (& have been since vs. me @ every turn, lol) after what's in the link above PUT YOU THERE vs. me, which yes, makes you LOWER than me (by far).

    APK

    P.S.-> As always - You LOSE "amicusNYCL fake name FOR YOUR FAKE LIFE & arseholetechnica? Bah - I totalled them years ago, totally https://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12013911&cid=56483367/ ... apk

  69. Give up -- spam coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More trash talk from a weak spam coward.

    Proof that I utterly destroyed you. Of course we know how you never give up, even when you have been beaten.

    ZIP

  70. "ZIP", destroying yourself != destroying me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & you live up to your name & named yourself well (zip = zero/nada/squat) lol https://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12013911&cid=56486019/ as you've done nothing like that link shows that SHOT YOU DOWN IN FLAMES (you do that to yourself, it's all "your kind" is capable of in SELF-DESTRUCTION).

    * You wish you were me instead of being a "ne'er-do-well" DO-NOTHING nobody "jealous jowie" that impersonates me, stalks me, abuses downmods on me, or just plain harasses me...

    (Additionally - Based on your posting times, you ARE Zontar The Mindless - & I KNOW he has mental issues having admitted to being in treatment for "depression" (aw, poo' baby) + on drugs).

    APK

    P.S.=> Thanks for the circular reference in this post that shows you led me to where "your kind" is talking behind my back (vs. harassing me as usual)... apk

  71. more like Zero effort required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ahh the delicious gasps of a dying flailing spam coward.

    ZIP

    P.S. => victory is sweet

  72. Except the victory is MINE, lol... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: You're the one gasping & dying the 1,000 deaths of a "ne'er-do-well" DO-NOTHING ZERO, lol https://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12013911&cid=56499549/ vs. me...

    APK

    P.S.=> You FAIL/LOSE - it's all you & "your kind" KNOW HOW TO DO... apk