Slashdot Mirror


Turn Right at the Burger King: Google Maps Begins Using Landmarks To Help With Guidance (techcrunch.com)

Most navigation apps give you instructions based on streets or distance. But it's arguably in contrast to how people usually provide directions -- some usually point to landmarks that are easier to spot. Google sees some merit in that. The idea is that Google Maps is highlighting some landmarks and other points of interest (fast food restaurants) to help with guidance. TechCrunch reports that some users are already seeing this on Google Maps. And maybe to Google, this opens door for some business opportunities as well. Only time will tell.

135 comments

  1. Your mama is so fat, by Spy+Handler · · Score: 5, Funny

    Google Maps use her as landmark!

    1. Re:Your mama is so fat, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your mama marks the land when she sits down

    2. Re:Your mama is so fat, by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      In New Orleans, they will need to use BARS as the landmarks.

      ;)

      That's how we do it anyway by word of mouth....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    3. Re:Your mama is so fat, by dasgoober · · Score: 1

      Google Maps use her as landmark!

      Yo mamma so loose, Google marks her twat as a parking lot!

    4. Re:Your mama is so fat, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Google Maps uses her ass as a landmark!

      Corrected that for ya.

  2. Maybe? by tomhath · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And maybe to Google, this opens door for some business opportunities

    Seriously? Of course that's the plan. Google is an advertising platform.

    1. Re:Maybe? by swillden · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And maybe to Google, this opens door for some business opportunities

      Seriously? Of course that's the plan. Google is an advertising platform.

      This Maps feature actually came out of work to make directions useful in countries and regions where street addresses don't really exist, notably much of India. Apparently someone thought that now that Maps supports navigation by landmarks, maybe it could be applied to make directions easier to follow even in areas that do have street addresses.

      I doubt that anyone has given serious thought to how landmark navigation could be used for advertising purposes. Not saying it couldn't happen, but it seems unlikely to me.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    2. Re: Maybe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe I just think differently than most, but I don't think my idea of advertising would be to pay to tell people to drive PAST my establishment.

    3. Re:Maybe? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Seriously? Of course that's the plan. Google is an advertising platform.

      I'm sure you are right, but this still seems like a great idea from a driver's point of view. If I'm in an unfamiliar area, it's going to be a lot easier to identify a Burger King at a distance than it is to read street signs. I just hope this change also makes it to Waze.

      A few months ago, I made my first trip to a new, unfamiliar location in a town I don't know very well. I've since had to go there multiple times - and pretty quickly I found my self remembering to "turn left at the Les Schwab" rather than remembering the particular street number. I can see the Les Schwab from many blocks away - but I can't read non-major street signs until I'm almost to them.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    4. Re: Maybe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's about building brand recognition and keeping it fresh in your mind all the time. That way when you do want a burger you think "oh yeah, there is a McDollars up the street. I'll go there!"

    5. Re:Maybe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You doubt? Just take a left at Dunkin where you can get 2 for $2 today.

    6. Re:Maybe? by BlackSupra · · Score: 2

      This is a step towards mapping the physical 'sign skyline' and integrating and overlaying the data in Mixed Reality.

      We are on track for this user experience: 'Hyper-Reality' https://www.youtube.com/watch?... *sound warning*

    7. Re:Maybe? by Solandri · · Score: 2

      Actually, studies have found that people prefer to use landmarks to get around rather than street names. When I first learned that (in the 1990s - before Google Maps and GPS), I began giving people directions with both names and landmarks. e.g. Turn right on Main St. That's the one with the Shell gas station on the corner. Once I began doing that, I noticed that the number of people who were late arriving at my house or to events I planned because "we got lost" dropped almost to zero.

    8. Re:Maybe? by ClarkMills · · Score: 2

      I doubt that anyone has given serious thought to how landmark navigation could be used for advertising purposes.

      Seriously?

    9. Re:Maybe? by tomhath · · Score: 1

      And if you ever need to drive in Pennsylvania you'll appreciate this feature even more. Marking roads is an afterthought, whether a street is named or numbered seemingly changes at random depending one which direction you are travelling, and the signs are usually so close to the intersection that their only use is to inform you that you just missed the turn.

    10. Re:Maybe? by bain_online · · Score: 2

      This Maps feature actually came out of work to make directions useful in countries and regions where street addresses don't really exist, notably much of India.

      Yeah here in India this feature has been on for long time and is quite useful, Indian streets are not visibly named at all and many have no discernible numbering system. Its hardly a new feature just new to US probably

      --
      BAIN http://www.devslashzero.com
    11. Re:Maybe? by swillden · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I doubt that anyone has given serious thought to how landmark navigation could be used for advertising purposes.

      Seriously?

      Seriously. Most of the teams in Google basically never think about advertising... or even about monetization. It's all about user impact and engagement. Monetization is the Ads team's problem. I was in the industry for 20+ years before joining Google, so it struck me as very odd when I was hired at Google, because drawing a straight line from your work to the bottom line is a big part of life in most software shops. Most of Google seriously never thinks about it; we know that ads fund 90% of our paychecks, but our focus is on the users of whatever product we're building. Further, development of everything is rather bottom-up, not top-down. Features almost never start with some executive directing that something be built, they start with engineers convincing their own managers that something would have strong user impact (which is needed for good performance reviews, promotion, etc.). Direction of one organization to do something to help another is fairly rare; cross-organization cooperation is common, but it's driven by the interested organization reaching out to the other organization and asking for help (which is usually given quite freely).

      In a case like this, if there were some initiative to use advertising to monetize landmark navigation, it would come from the Ads team, not the Maps team. And it's likely that the Ads team knows nothing about landmark navigation. Until they read about it on slashdot or similar.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    12. Re:Maybe? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      "Turn right at the White Castle with the prostitute sitting on the big rock out front." -- Two-Fisted Tales of Robot Cars

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    13. Re:Maybe? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Sat navs have been doing this for at least 15 years. Maybe they didn't speak the name of the landmark, but they would display it on the screen.

      I distinctly remember seeing Japanese models with 3D maps that had brand names on the textures around 2004/2005. Japan doesn't really have street names...

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    14. Re:Maybe? by spun · · Score: 2

      The only landmark Google mentions in my city is Firestone. Every single time I drive by a Firestone. "Keep going straight past the Firestone I didn't even need to mention because you don't need a landmark to go straight." Don't try to paint Google as some saintly, charitable organization. That "Do no evil" ship sailed years ago.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    15. Re: Maybe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's far more likely you are simply unaware of those conversations.

    16. Re:Maybe? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Most of the teams in Google basically never think about advertising... or even about monetization.

      really? Know them all personally, do you?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    17. Re:Maybe? by swillden · · Score: 1

      Most of the teams in Google basically never think about advertising... or even about monetization.

      really? Know them all personally, do you?

      I know a decent cross section, yes. I interact with lots of different teams across the company.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    18. Re:Maybe? by swillden · · Score: 2

      Don't try to paint Google as some saintly, charitable organization.

      I didn't. I just describe how things work.

      That "Do no evil" ship sailed years ago.

      Its "Don't be evil", and it's still considered a key principle.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    19. Re:Maybe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Japan doesn't really have street names...

      They use "grids" I.e. 1 Chome, 2 Chome, followed by either alpha numeric, or simply numeric designation. I.e. If you're in a town, 1 Chome 22-28 Ando, is easy to figure out. District Chome 1, streets 22-28 in sub-district Ando. If you lived on a particular street, you would give direction: City name(unless they live in the same city), District, Street #, subdistrict(if applicable), house number. Major highways have names though. This isn't really any different then the US or Canada which uses 1st mile road. Or N 22nd street these are also "grids" and usually determined from a major land mark like city hall. You would give city name, subdistrict(if there is one), then the numeric street number(north/south/east/west), followed by the home number.

    20. Re:Maybe? by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      I saw a good writeup on Japan vs European addressing which boiled down to this:

      US/Europe: Streets and roads have numbers or names. Blocks are those unnamed pieces of land between the streets.
      Japan: Blocks are numbered. Streets are those unnamed pieces of land between the blocks.

    21. Re:Maybe? by msauve · · Score: 1

      "Most of the teams in Google basically never think about advertising..."

      You should have simply stopped at "...never think." Like how the maps group never thinks about how people actually use it for navigation while driving, so feel free to make major UI changes on a whim. Or, forcing you to interact more than necessary to actually begin navigating (press "directions," then press "start.").

      "development of everything is rather bottom-up, not top-down. "

      That explains it - no adult supervision.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    22. Re:Maybe? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's basically it. You get a block and building number, but it can be tricky to find the right building. They seemed to be one of the first to get detailed mapping and 3D building models though.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    23. Re:Maybe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's how I navigate when I'm in a new city. Street names are just too vague and ambiguous especially when they can stretch for one or more miles. Sometimes they get split up called Something Street North and Something Street South with a shopping mall or pedestrian zone inbetween. Even the taxi drivers don't know the difference and drive me to the wrong end. Some neighborhoods just use the same name like Sunnyside Road, Sunnyside Lane, Sunnyside Avenue, Sunnyside Crescent, Sunnyside Close and all the buildings look the same too. In a city it's easier to remember the relative location of buildings and what they look like, then just seeing a single picture I can tell which part of the city it is in.

    24. Re:Maybe? by spun · · Score: 1

      Key marketing principle, maybe. Are you saying you honestly think Google is a good and moral corporation? Not for over a decade, if it ever was. Okay, maybe you work there, and you aren't a bad guy, and nobody you work with is a bad guy. But Google exists for one purpose, to make its shareholders money. If it comes down to losing money or doing a bad thing, Google does the bad thing, like every corporation. Don't be brainwashed just because they pay the bills for you.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    25. Re:Maybe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And maybe to Google, this opens door for some business opportunities

      Seriously? Of course that's the plan. Google is an advertising platform.

      This Maps feature actually came out of work to make directions useful in countries and regions where street addresses don't really exist, notably much of India. Apparently someone thought that now that Maps supports navigation by landmarks, maybe it could be applied to make directions easier to follow even in areas that do have street addresses.

      I doubt that anyone has given serious thought to how landmark navigation could be used for advertising purposes. Not saying it couldn't happen, but it seems unlikely to me.

      Waze, a popular Google owned navigation app, has been popping up ads for nearby businesses for years. When it detects you've stopped at a light, it will sometimes even pop up mini-surveys asking if you've heard an advertisement for XYZ lately.

      What planet have you been living on where you can sincerely say you doubt Google has thought about using one of their services for advertising purposes? IT'S WHAT THEY DO.

    26. Re:Maybe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why he's so richly earned the moniker "Shillden."

    27. Re:Maybe? by larryjoe · · Score: 1

      Most of the teams in Google basically never think about advertising... or even about monetization. It's all about user impact and engagement.

      If Google is really doing the best it can for user impact and engagement, then you'd think there would be at least some noticeable effort toward ... well engaging the user. However, as anyone who has frustratingly tried to send in bug reports, suggestions, and complaints has known for many years, user engagement is not only not easy, I'm not sure it's possible.

      I think what you meant to say was that Google is all about **customer** impact and engagement. Non-paying user (NPU) impact is only important as a means to the real end. I suppose that it's possible that some Google employees are actually trying to positively impact the NPU, but it's obvious that such beneficence doesn't include communicating with the NPU. It would be trivial to significantly improve NPU experience by simply implementing the myriad of trivial and obvious suggestions in the NPU forums, but most suggestions get ignored for years, implying that this non-engagement has to be policy because no company could actually be that incompetent at managing user input. You might think I'm exaggerating, but just read the forums. It's mind-blowing.

    28. Re:Maybe? by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Well, that, and the fact that the landmarks are visible long before the street name is. Plus, most street signs are in low contrast colors (e.g., white lettering on green background), and the lettering is very small. Much easier to see a Shell station from a long way away and get yourself into the correct lane, slow down, and look at the street name at the last minute to confirm you're at the correct Shell station.

      The way I would explain how to get to my house to an out-of-town visitor minimizes the number of turns and includes landmarks. The way I would explain it to another local just references a nearby intersection and tells them how to get here from that. The way I explain it to someone who lives within a mile starts with "you know where the flashing light is that warns you of a car coming over the hill?".

    29. Re:Maybe? by larryjoe · · Score: 1

      Another data point for how well Google engages users:

      Tesla isn’t the only Silicon Valley tech giant with a bad BBB rating. Google currently has a “D.” But last week it had an “F.” The Mountain View company typically responds to complaints periodically, so its rating goes up and down, McFarland said.

  3. of course you can pay to be a landmark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's in adwords beta

  4. Never understood why they don't use time reference by JoeyRox · · Score: 1

    Instead of saying "turn right in 1/2 mile", why not calculate the time it would take to reach that point from the current speed and say "turn right in 1/2 mile, or 45 seconds based on your current speed". I find myself doing this calculation in my head whenever I'm following turn-by-turn instructions.

  5. Yes, people are that stupid by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    They did a test years ago. They found that women are better at directions based on color, buildings, names etc and men were better with left/right/street names. I use to dispatch 911, and it was comical sometimes, before the ability to know the address location before even picking up the phone, trying to wrestle the location of the person in a rural area. 1 mile could be anywhere from a couple hundred feet, to several miles. Left/right depended on which way they THOUGHT you would be coming. It's just habit for me. I always still to this day, say take road x south, turn west, or right on road y, and it will be the 3rd house on the north, or left side of the road. Also, I will give the description of a location, and anything like a fence, cars, color or anything else because it just makes it easier.

    1. Re:Yes, people are that stupid by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      That's a good observation. Wife tends to give directions based on landmarks, ambiguous direction like "go over to" and vague distances like "go down a bit" where I use street signs and compass points and distance in miles or blocks. (But that, I'm told is because I'm a Mansplainin' a$$h0le.) We often can't understand each other's directions. ("WEST. You know where WEST is! It's where THE SUN GOES DOWN. See, it's right there. Behind us, now.")

      Landmarks are fine if there is enough detail to make it work. "Left after the train station" is fine. "Left where the church used to be" is not fine. I still remember this conversation, sitting in the driveway, all ready for a day of mindless wandering:

      "So, where is this store?"

      "It's by the freeway"

      (This is the SF bay area...) "Which freeway?"

      "The one that goes past the big building." [1]

      "What big building?"

      "The one on the way to the store."

      Ok, now we're in a hard loop. I really want to ask "is there someone else I can talk to?" but I know that wouldn't do any good.

      [1] For a moment I thought I had that one, but turns out she *was not* talking about the Blimp hanger at Moffett.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    2. Re:Yes, people are that stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use to dispatch 911, and it was comical sometimes....

      go on....

      I always still to this day, say take road x south,

      ...ok so far...

      turn west, or right on road y

      ...I'm still following you...

      , and it will be the 3rd house on the north, or left side of the road.

      I bet you helped save plenty of lives with your precise and confusion-free directions.

    3. Re:Yes, people are that stupid by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      Oh sure, but where's the adventure in that?

      "After you leave the pavement, you go down the road a bit 'till you see three big rocks. You can ignore them, they just let you know you're on the right road. If you get to the base of a mountain without seeing the three big rocks, you're on the wrong road... So, a ways after the three big rock you'll get to the place where Billy Bob's trailer used to be parked, make a left there. If you hit a pothole so big you think you may have damaged something, that's the road you want. In awhile you'll get to a motor home that looks and smells like a meth lab, don't slow down, it's a meth lab. A bit after that you will see a fence with some cows behind it, we are on the other side of that field but you have to drive around it 'cause there's a bull in there and he's not friendly. Just follow the fence 'till the road dead ends and follow the ruts going down the side of the fence, Look back and make sure no one from the meth lab is following you, those folks are a bit twitchy... When you get to the end of the ruts you'll be in our back yard. Park anywhere but stay away from all the old cars 'cause of snakes. Just knock on the back door or holler, the dogs don't bite but they might knock you down..."

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    4. Re:Yes, people are that stupid by David_Hart · · Score: 1

      Oh sure, but where's the adventure in that?

      "After you leave the pavement, you go down the road a bit 'till you see three big rocks. You can ignore them, they just let you know you're on the right road. If you get to the base of a mountain without seeing the three big rocks, you're on the wrong road... So, a ways after the three big rock you'll get to the place where Billy Bob's trailer used to be parked, make a left there. If you hit a pothole so big you think you may have damaged something, that's the road you want. In awhile you'll get to a motor home that looks and smells like a meth lab, don't slow down, it's a meth lab. A bit after that you will see a fence with some cows behind it, we are on the other side of that field but you have to drive around it 'cause there's a bull in there and he's not friendly. Just follow the fence 'till the road dead ends and follow the ruts going down the side of the fence, Look back and make sure no one from the meth lab is following you, those folks are a bit twitchy... When you get to the end of the ruts you'll be in our back yard. Park anywhere but stay away from all the old cars 'cause of snakes. Just knock on the back door or holler, the dogs don't bite but they might knock you down..."

      Yeah. Directions where I grew up always seem to reference at least one landmark that hasn't existed for decades. For example, "take the road up the hill behind the old Zellers building". Never mind that Zellers closed over 20 years ago and it's had several other department stores in it since....

    5. Re:Yes, people are that stupid by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Directions where I grew up always seem to reference at least one landmark that hasn't existed for decades. For example, "take the road up the hill behind the old Zellers building". Never mind that Zellers closed over 20 years ago and it's had several other department stores in it since....

      Yup, we get those. Turn where the double-wide used to be...
      I like the subjective ones even better, "After a couple of miles you'll see a rock that looks kind like a bear..." if you get to Phoenix you missed it...

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    6. Re:Yes, people are that stupid by mikael · · Score: 1

      One of the things I was told was that if you asked for directions in a rural area, you should just follow the instructions they gave you by what you thought they felt meant than trying to logically deduce what they meant. So if someone told you, "go along the road, go over the hill, turn right after passing the two lanes, take the road that leads to the valley, then continue on until you cross the railway lines and can see the trees." it was better just to follow instinct that try and figure out what they meant by the two lanes (is that a lane crossing the road or two adjacent lanes on the same side, or the pair that are different distances along the road on eah side).

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  6. Turn right at the Burger King by olsmeister · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But first, wouldn't you like to stop for a tasty Whopper? Mention ad code 3XCDF8578S and receive a $1 discount at this Burger King, valid for the next 20 minutes only.

    1. Re:Turn right at the Burger King by roc97007 · · Score: 2

      It'll probably make the offer first, and won't tell you which way to turn until you buy something or touch a nearly invisible "no thanks" link.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    2. Re:Turn right at the Burger King by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "$1 off for 20 minutes only. It's already been 3 hours and 42 minutes since your breakfast, and based on your credit card transaction the cheese omelet you had, if it was typical, had only 742 calories . A 203 pound man such as yourself needs 1,450 more calories today. The last time you ate at Burger King was 52 days ago. 14 of your friends have eaten at this Burger King in the last month and the average duration of visit was 28 minutes, which is 3 minutes longer than similar restaurants within 6 mile radius."

      ...

      "You are now approaching Red Lobster. This month is unlimited shrimp..."

    3. Re:Turn right at the Burger King by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      Google is an ad company, but they're smart, and wouldn't go that far. Mentioning BK several times is enough to imprint the brand into your brains, without involving a cumbersome obvious ad message.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    4. Re:Turn right at the Burger King by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but we are not already on a full-blown dystopia right?

  7. So let me guess... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 3, Insightful

    For a fee, your business can be a landmark used to help give directions on Google Maps.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    1. Re:So let me guess... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      For a slightly higher fee, it'll insist you really want to go through the drive-thru before it gives you the next direction.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  8. Want to bet that it's paid for? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    "Turn right at the Dunkin' Donuts"

    Misses turn because Dunkin' Donuts shop is hidden behind the Eiffel Tower.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Want to bet that it's paid for? by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      ...or was replaced by a Starbucks six weeks earlier....

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    2. Re:Want to bet that it's paid for? by slinches · · Score: 1

      I actually just had this happen in San Diego.

      Head west on Mission Bay Drive ...
      in 1/4 mile turn right at the Starbucks

      Never mind that giant fucking wooden roller coaster across the street.

      --
      Knowledge Brings Fear
    3. Re:Want to bet that it's paid for? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Jokes lose all impact if they turn out to be real. It's kinda bizarre...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  9. Re:More like landfills by Richard+Stalin · · Score: 3, Funny

    I wonder how much Booger King and Diarrhea Queen are going to pay for brand placement now.

    (*ducks*)

  10. Turn Left At The Cow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure thing Google.. what happens if they eat the cow??

    1. Re:Turn Left At The Cow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thatz y u need to EAT MOR CHIKIN!

  11. About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Only 5 years behind my Garmin. I definitely prefer the convenience of my cell phone, so I'm glad they are finally bringing this

    1. Re:About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. I don't use the Garmin anymore just because the phone is much more convenient and has some better features, but I sure do miss some of the things the Garmin had. For one, I wish Google Maps would show current speed and speed limit. I could use Waze for that, but Waze sucks in many other ways that I can't stand.

  12. Is this a good idea? by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    I wonder if we'll eventually see "go down the road a piece, and turn left where the market used to be. Then go summat further and turn right where old man Smith's barn was before it burned down. Caint miss it."

    Um, can you give me directions using landmarks that actually exist now?

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:Is this a good idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, this may not be very helpful depending on the landmarks they choose. There was a pizza hut next to me that closed yet remained in google maps for many months.

  13. They should have landmarks for when you miss too. by jellomizer · · Score: 2

    In general for driving it is handy, because often road signs are hard to see (Upscale neighborhoods love to make them earth tones, often with flower pots having them hang over them.) , And sometimes are placed rather confusingly Sure the sign for the street is at a right Angle of the street, but your street is approaching it at a 45 degree angle. Or it forks into 2 other streets.

    Also things like a major fast food chain, has nice big signs, that you can see a quarter mile away (further if you live in a flat land area) So you know to keep at speed limit until you get close enough to look for the street.

    However if you miss a crazy street it would be nice to say if you see this, you probably had missed your turn.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  14. Landmark for a fee... by GregMmm · · Score: 1

    Give me a break. This is all about the ad money for Google. It might be easier to give directions if you're writing it down, but you have a map with the roads on it and it's speaking to you. How more dummy down do you need?

    Next it will be:
    Turn right at the Burger King, Home of the Wopper, 2 for 6$!!

    Money.

  15. I see problems with this approach... by bogaboga · · Score: 1

    Turn Right at the Burger King...

    What if the Burger King can't be located because it's been moved or simply demolished?

    I can see a fella looking for the Burger King, failing to see one ( because it doesn't exist), then igniting mayhem for those following behind.

  16. Re:Never understood why they don't use time refere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead of saying "turn right in 1/2 mile", why not calculate the time it would take to reach that point from the current speed and say "turn right in 1/2 mile, or 45 seconds based on your current speed". I find myself doing this calculation in my head whenever I'm following turn-by-turn instructions.

    yes indeed now google can predict in advance exactly how long it will take for the old man with the walker to cross the street so that you can just turn the wheel blindly without even looking

  17. Re:Never understood why they don't use time refere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because the time it takes to get somewhere is much more volatile than the distance it takes to get somewhere.

  18. Advertising makes these directions useless by sinij · · Score: 1

    Turn right at the Burger King, Woopers just $1.99, turn left at Best Buy...

  19. Re:Never understood why they don't use time refere by linuxguy · · Score: 1

    Distance is fixed. Time to travel is not. It might take driver A 5 minutes to cover a distance, driver B might make it in 3. The distance is the same for both. Also, changes in traffic pattern may also alter the time. But distance will remain the same. I can totally see why Google Maps prefers to give you the distance to your turn.

  20. Re:Never understood why they don't use time refere by xevioso · · Score: 1

    Because people don't navigate like this. No one estimates when they need to turn by time passed. People look for streets or landmarks from their current spot. It's easy to overengineer this though.

  21. I can see this being useful by Tempest_2084 · · Score: 1

    I can see this being useful in specific circumstances like places without street signs. Around here there are numerous streets that seem to be without street signs for some reason (either stolen, fallen down and not replaced, or so faded they're illegible) so when the directions say "Turn left on West St." but the sign for West St. hasn't existed in 5 years, that's a problem. Of course the odds that something like a Burger King is going to be there forever are pretty slim, so maybe they'll have to update it to "Turn left at the thing that used to be a Burger King but is now a Coney Island" or something like that.

    1. Re:I can see this being useful by David_Hart · · Score: 1

      I can see this being useful in specific circumstances like places without street signs. Around here there are numerous streets that seem to be without street signs for some reason (either stolen, fallen down and not replaced, or so faded they're illegible) so when the directions say "Turn left on West St." but the sign for West St. hasn't existed in 5 years, that's a problem. Of course the odds that something like a Burger King is going to be there forever are pretty slim, so maybe they'll have to update it to "Turn left at the thing that used to be a Burger King but is now a Coney Island" or something like that.

      On my in-car GPS it shows the streets and the turns on the dash. I hardly ever look at road signs, just the cross streets when I come to an intersection to make sure that I am following the highlighter route. In other words, as long as the GPS is accurate, you can navigate using it without road signs.

    2. Re:I can see this being useful by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      Of course the odds that something like a Burger King is going to be there forever are pretty slim, so maybe they'll have to update it to "Turn left at the thing that used to be a Burger King but is now a Coney Island" or something like that.

      YMMV, but around where I am Google Maps is kept way more up to date than our street signage.

    3. Re:I can see this being useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How badly do you get lost when in a vehicle without GPS?

  22. Burger King signs are larger than street signs by linuxguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I was using Google Maps yesterday to navigate and when it said I should go past Taco Bell, I was surprised. I hadn't heard that before. But overall I was pleased. Signs for Taco Bell and Burger King are much larger than road signs. It is a good move.

    1. Re:Burger King signs are larger than street signs by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      I was using Google Maps yesterday to navigate and when it said I should go past Taco Bell, I was surprised. I hadn't heard that before. But overall I was pleased. Signs for Taco Bell and Burger King are much larger than road signs. It is a good move.

      And sometimes road signs aren't there at all. I don't know why, but I encounter even major intersections where at least one of the roads has no signage.

      Yet another reason I use Google Maps (or Garmin) all the time, not just when I don't know where I'm going. I like to learn all the street names, or at least be exposed to them.

    2. Re:Burger King signs are larger than street signs by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      it said I should go past Taco Bell

      That's the beginning. Then it'll say "Stop first at Taco Bell, that's almost lunch time!".

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  23. Next step by Kohath · · Score: 1

    Turn right where the Burger King used to be before it burned down in 2015.

    Please Google, make it happen.

  24. Re:Never understood why they don't use time refere by JoeyRox · · Score: 2

    Distance is fixed. Time to travel is not. It might take driver A 5 minutes to cover a distance, driver B might make it in 3. The distance is the same for both. Also, changes in traffic pattern may also alter the time. But distance will remain the same. I can totally see why Google Maps prefers to give you the distance to your turn.

    Hence the "at your current speed" proviso included the verbal time reference. And it could use a rate of progress calculated via a running average of speed per unit of distance relative to the distance remaining to be traveled. And it can use the rate of progress of other drivers for the same segment this driver is traversing to make the calculation even more precise - Google already uses this information for their color-coded traffic maps.

  25. Re:Never understood why they don't use time refere by wizkid · · Score: 2

    Distance is fixed. Time to travel is not.

    Not if you have a TARDIS

    --
    I take no responsibility for what I say. Even though I'm never wrong :)
  26. Re:Never understood why they don't use time refere by Calydor · · Score: 2

    The above reasons, and because your suggestion takes so long to say that the time changes drastically (is it 45 seconds from starting to speak, from saying "forty ... five ...", or from finishing the sentence?), and if you're navigating particularly narrow streets you might overshoot because the GPS wasn't done yakking.

    KISS applies to what the GPS should be saying.

    --
    -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
  27. Only good if you know the area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Next left" is much easier when you're in a new location, which is where you'd most likely need directions.

  28. We've had this for years in the UK... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Straight to pub X then left and straight to pub Y, then right after the second pub on your left. It's called Global Pubs System Navigation.

  29. Pizza Hut by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

    Turn left at the place that used to be a pizza hut
    http://usedtobeapizzahut.blogs...

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  30. Re:Never understood why they don't use time refere by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    I absolutely agree. I'd also like to see something like "turn right in 1/2 mile / 45 seconds, and then turn left in 3 miles". I like to think two or three steps ahead to cover things like being in the correct lane for turns, and Google Maps does that part really badly. If you miss a turn because there were five lanes of traffic to cross and you only got 10 seconds of notice, the directions have failed.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  31. Re:Never understood why they don't use time refere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd just love it if they could say "Take the *next* right" rather than tell me how far away it is. They do that with rotaries/roundabouts/traffic circles. Why not with normal streets?

  32. State dependent by mplax · · Score: 1

    I was in California on vacation and I heard it much more frequently. I imagine that's a testing ground since it's close to home. I immediately refused to go to any location that they mentioned to punish them for advertising to me like that. Also, they told me to turn at some fast food place that was tucked behind other buildings so I would have missed my turn if it wasn't for their more conventional reminders like distance or street names. Boo...

  33. Inappropriate landmarks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about turn left at the next memorial for some event that you personally don't like?

  34. streetview by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

    I already do that. I look at streetview, and then I tell myself to make a right turn as soon as I see the white cat sitting on the garbage can.

  35. Like a woman by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    I find it interesting that women seem to give directions based on landmarks where's men seem to give distance and Street names.

    Yes landmarks are easier to see but far wise when you're trying to figure out where and how you took a wrong turn.

    1. Re:Like a woman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      where's men

      WTF is that supposed to be?

  36. Re:Never understood why they don't use time refere by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    I find myself doing this calculation in my head whenever I'm following turn-by-turn instructions.

    I can barely do those calculations when I'm sober. How am I supposed to do them when I'm driving?

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  37. Starbucks. by Zorro · · Score: 1

    Take a Right at Starbucks. No not that one. No Farther down.

    Like the fifth one from the next one on the right.

  38. Wait till they go New England style by nerdonamotorcycle · · Score: 1

    and use landmarks that aren't there any more. "Well, ya go about a mile down the road, then take a right where that big tree blew down last summer. Go about another three and a half miles, and take another right where the schoolhouse used to be. Then in about three quarters of a mile, take a left at the old Johnson place. Name on the mailbox says 'Palmer' but those are the new people who bought it 20 years ago, everyone still calls it the Johnson place. Then go kinda-sorta-right but not hard right at the kid selling flowers, and you're there."

    1. Re:Wait till they go New England style by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Turn right after the third Dunkin Donuts, then left two Dunkins down. Your destination will be next to the Dunkin on the right. If you pass Honeydew, you've gone too far."

  39. two points by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    1. This has been in Google Maps for awhile now, and

    2. Garmin was doing it before

  40. Will it say ...? by nomad63 · · Score: 1

    Will it say the folksy names for the landmarks. As an 8 years long Atlanta GA dweller, I'd like to hear google maps utter the words "Turn right at the Big Chicken on to Cobb Parkway", as I was told many, many times by the old timers, when I lived there. I did not notice that it was a KFC location, for a long long time.

    --

    __________
    The more I know people, the more I love animals
  41. Will be interesting to see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...how long until they start misusing landmarks. I mean if 'south two blocks, then east two blocks' gets you there the same as 'east two blocks then south two blocks', but the business one one corner has paid a cent more in ad revenue than the other??? Or worse, you get routed out of your way just to pass a higher ad revenue block?

  42. Re: They should have landmarks for when you miss t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's no point to missed-it directions. As soon as you miss it, the GPS recalculates and gives you new instructions.

    I'd never consider this before, but I wonder how google handles misses turns in very far out areas. Usually it just routes you to the next street or exit, but if that's really far off and u-turns are legal on that road, I wonder what it suggests.

  43. Reminds me of Bangkok by WinstonWolfIT · · Score: 1

    Got instructions to turn left at the (live) elephant. Apparently there all day every day.

  44. Please don't use Starbucks as alandmark! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree with most, this is a useful feature, and yeah obviously it's for advertising. Please, though, do not use Starbucks as a landmark! There are way too may of them too close to each other and it will get confusing!

  45. Re:Never understood why they don't use time refere by Junta · · Score: 1

    I think you may be fairly unique, I've never heard anyone else say they do this or heard any human give humans directions in terms of estimated time..

    As others mentioned, while you could extrapolate a guess, particularly at 1/2 mile away the likelihood of an unpredictable momentary traffic condition completely ruining that guess is very high.

    I personally glance at the map to get a sense for whether or not it's the very next available road in that direction, or if it's the second or third intersection. This also involves some fudging, as I have to make a judgement call about whether the intersection I see is a road that would be on the map or some minor private road-looking thing. This can cut both ways, an unassuming dirt road that I would have guessed would not be mapped would be mapped as well as a nice looking road turning out to be some high end house's driveway. So I'm more looking at the rough general shape than counting or anything I suppose.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  46. Can't wait for the *advanced version by Provocateur · · Score: 1

    "If you see the Burger King, you are getting close. The cat lady standing on the corner only starts hanging around after sunset. The naked lady, on the other hand, with the tattoo on her left forearm has the number for the precinct. When you hear the call to prayer, and it's late at night, that prayer is for you, and that's a polite way of saying that you really shouldn't be in these parts so late at night. The google mapper vehicle had all four wheels taken, and it was up on cinderblocks next to a chalk outline. Don't ever stop to ask for directions because the last guy that did, well let's just say they didn't even take the canoli.

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    1. Re:Can't wait for the *advanced version by q4Fry · · Score: 1

      You could have just linked the oblig

    2. Re:Can't wait for the *advanced version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the LOL

  47. How about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    âoeProceed for four miles. Then, at Plugging Pussies Gentlemenâ(TM)s Club make a right. Proceed for one mile. At the heroin dealer Doctor Bob, turn left. Proceed for five hundred yards to Allahu Akbar. Make a right turn and the destination is in your right.â

  48. The technical term for this is 'chick navigation' by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    As in "Turn left at the big green building with the Circle K next to it, the one that burned down in '93..."

  49. Re:They should have landmarks for when you miss to by Junta · · Score: 1

    If you see fish swimming by your window, then you've gone too far.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  50. DO NOT..... by meglon · · Score: 2

    .... turn right at Albuquerque.

    --
    Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
  51. Exactly like Portland, OR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and the signs are usually so close to the intersection that their only use is to inform you that you just missed the turn.

    Portland, Oregon is exactly like that - I only live near Portland, not in it, and I hate navigating around with out a moving map so I know when the street I need to turn on is coming up.

    It is exactly like you said: you can't even read the street sign until you are so close to the intersection you must pass through it. It's absurd and nearly useless.

  52. Re:Never understood why they don't use time refere by grahamsz · · Score: 1

    It's harder still since my car seems to add about a second of buffering delay when i'm using bluetooth audio, and even that second is quite hard to get used to when you are driving in a city environment.

  53. Coming Soon by cstacy · · Score: 1

    "In 1.3 miles, turn right up where the Piggly Wiggly used to be."

    "Continue (on down the road apiece) for about 10 minutes,
        -- THEN -- turn right at the big tree."

    "In .4 miles, slight right.
        -- THEN -- turn left at Old Man Gaskin's road.
        Warning: Old Man Gaskin has a gun."

    "At the intersection, take the dirt road on the left."
    (already implemented)

    "You can't get there from here."

    OK Google, Navigate to CVS.
    "In one mile, Start thinking about your destination.
      In a half mile, You'll get a real fixation.
      In a half mile, Soon enough you'll be turning left
      In a quarter mile, Your destination will seem like theft
      In a quarter mile, Your destination will let you save
      Your destination is on the left: buy Burma Shave."

  54. Re:Never understood why they don't use time refere by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Hence the "at your current speed" proviso

    Why do you assume that the current speed will be maintained?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  55. This Right Turn is Brought To You By McDonald's by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

    You deserve a Right Turn Today(tm)

  56. Not new in maps.google.co.in by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    I have used google maps in India. There the directions have always been like, "Turn left at Ganesha Temple, turn right at the Punjab Bank, ..." kind. Was glad it did not end in, "after turning left at the Geetha Cafe, stop, ask the boy Appu selling peacock feather fan, how to proceed". No north, south, road number business.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  57. Turn Right where the Andersons used to live by goombah99 · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's just past the intersection where the old blinking light used to be.
    When you get to the bottom of the hill it's the one that's falling apart next door to the hideous purple painted house.
    You should see the crack dealer lookouts hanging out on the corner.
    You have arrived at your destination.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re: Turn Right where the Andersons used to live by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. On my last trip to Costa Rica, I learned the hard way that directions are often given in reference to long gone landmarks: the old fig tree, the Coke plant, the bus station. And that was in the big city. The most comical was when I was actually looking for the bus station, I was sent to the old bus station (point of reference) instead of the actual bus station.

      Most places outside of the cities donâ(TM)t even have road names so they hold onto anachronistic point nets of reference as if it were yesterday.

  58. Am I The Only One That Read That As "Landmine"? by rsmith-mac · · Score: 1

    n/t

  59. Re:Never understood why they don't use time refere by duguk · · Score: 2

    Hence the "at your current speed" proviso

    Why do you assume that the current speed will be maintained?

    Newton's first law?

  60. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  61. Re:They should have landmarks for when you miss to by mikael · · Score: 1

    Conspiracy theorists used to think the maintenance barcodes on the back of street signs were some secret code for FEMA trucks to find their way around.

    But when you think about it, why not have those 2D barcodes on street signs so that they could be scanned by a smartphone.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  62. Re:They should have landmarks for when you miss to by mikael · · Score: 1

    There was an Amish guesthouse / hotel with turret bedrooms that each had different themes. One was "Swimming with the fishes" and had trunks, fishing nets, boat lamps and other items.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  63. Brands competition by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

    Or "Turn right after the Mac Donald's - nope sorry - Taco Bell - nope sorry again - Burger King, I meant".

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  64. Re: Never understood why they don't use time refer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because then you'll get into an argument about this right or the next right and miss all your rights entirely.

  65. Re:More like landfills by rtb61 · · Score: 1

    Perhaps they should have altered the term from 'landmarks' to 'advertising marks'. It just never ends with these asshats

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  66. Keep it real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Turn right at Pimp Jim's beat-down corner, avoid the Po Po substation on the next light, then hang a right until you get to the Best Little Ho House In Tejas... the destination is on your left!"

  67. lol by Hugh+Jorgen · · Score: 1

    I don't think Google would use Burger King after they were trolled so hard last year.

  68. Re: They should have landmarks for when you miss t by gman003 · · Score: 1

    I was in the suburbs once, in an area I know well (I was using Maps to get home), deliberately missed a turn so I could stop for gas, and Google Maps told me to take a U-turn at the next light, despite there actually being a fast backup path by going further up the road.

  69. Adjustment for human navigation styles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is some research on human navigation styles, such as whether landmark or route based, that are exhibited in various human groupings (not necessarily male/female).

    Though the biggest innovation in car navigation systems was automatic route recalculation on the fly. Now, there is less screaming between drivers and passengers over missed turns, if you screw up it will still try to get you to your destination, assuming you didn't make an epic mistake...

  70. Re:Never understood why they don't use time refere by Cederic · · Score: 1

    I have a friend that does. The problem is that when he says, "ten minutes away" it tends to be somewhere between 15 and 45 minutes away.

    Don't ask how accurate his 'about an hour away' is..

  71. navigation by pubs by Cederic · · Score: 1

    There exist in the UK an entire cohort of men that can give you directions to any destination within 40 miles (and sometimes beyond) without referencing anything other than the pubs you'll pass on the way.

    My former manager is one, it was a marvel to listen to him give directions. Never tried following them mind..