Slashdot Mirror


ZTE Exports Ban May Mean No Google Apps, a Death Sentence For Its Smartphones (arstechnica.com)

New submitter krazy1 shares a report from Ars Technica: The U.S. government is going after another Chinese Android device maker. After shutting down Huawei's carrier deals and retail partners, the government is now pursuing ZTE. The U.S. Department of Commerce has banned U.S. companies from selling parts and software to ZTE for seven years. ZTE was caught violating U.S. sanctions by illegally shipping telecommunications equipment to Iran and North Korea. The company then made things worse by "making false statements and obstructing justice, including through preventing disclosure to and affirmatively misleading the U.S. Government," according to the Department of Commerce.

The latest news from Reuters raises even bigger issues for ZTE, though. A source told Reuters that "The Commerce Department decision means ZTE Corp may not be able to use Google's Android operating system in its mobile devices." Android is free and open source and will probably remain free for ZTE to use without Google's involvement. Reuters' source is probably referring to the Google apps, which aren't sold to device makers but are carefully licensed to them in exchange for other concessions. The Google apps package includes popular services like Gmail and Google Maps, and it also unlocks the Play Store, Google Play Services, and the entire Android app ecosystem. For a market-viable Android device, the Play Store is pretty much mandatory in every country other than China. So while ZTE could conceivably source hardware components from non-U.S. sources, being locked out of the Play Store would devastate ZTE's smartphones worldwide.

139 comments

  1. Corporate deatch sentence? by Carewolf · · Score: 1

    Cool, I guess.. Though I would have used to on other companies first.

    1. Re: Corporate deatch sentence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This 'sentence' could also crack Google's monopoly. You can install the Amazon app store and never, ever log onto your new phone with a Google account. This sort of severe 'sentence' will force this vendor, but also make it more visible and attractive to others. Google-free is a viable option. Amazon does not need to identify where users install the apps they buy in their store.

      Also, killing a Chinese company probably is going to elicit a response fron China. Google needs to wisely choose sides.

    2. Re: Corporate deatch sentence? by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 2

      They can't ship with Google apps installed, but the customer could install them during setup. They could probably include the link in the setup process and legally be compliant.

    3. Re: Corporate deatch sentence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All China needs is a WeChat phone. Done!

    4. Re: Corporate deatch sentence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also many people donâ(TM)t want google apps and will take extreme measures to rid their phones of them.

      It isnâ(TM)t much use to threaten someone with what they want anyway.

      Plus China uses own app stores.

    5. Re: Corporate deatch sentence? by GeLeTo · · Score: 5, Informative

      Unless your phone comes with it - there is no legal way to download the Google Play Store and there is no legal way to download the google apps outside the Play Store. Some custom ROMs ship with the google apps, which is illegal, but Google turns a blind eye on this practice. This will not be the case with ZTE.

    6. Re:Corporate deatch sentence? by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 2

      Well, 93 million people die EACH DAY from gun violence;

      Where did you get that figure from? If it were accurate, then almost 34 billion people die per year from gun violence.

    7. Re: Corporate deatch sentence? by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      I guess I didn't fully appreciate that restriction. As I understand you can install GApps for individual use legally. But the more I think about it, its not a simple APK install, so not necessarily something that would 'idiot proof' for customer install.

      Thanks

    8. Re: Corporate deatch sentence? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      ...They get better.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    9. Re: Corporate deatch sentence? by darthyoshiboy · · Score: 1

      Almost no custom roms these days ship with Gapps. http://opengapps.org/ has made that unnecessary and often undesirable (as many custom rom users opt to go Googleless.)

      It's not illegal to host or download the Gapps suite. It only becomes trouble if you attempt to use the apps on a non OHA certified device. At which point you have violated the license of the software, but the legality of that matter would depend on your jurisdiction (though this is probably illegal for anyone in the states.)

      I don't know if ZTE can remain OHA certified under these new limitations, but I don't think the OHA is a strictly American concern. Assuming that ZTE can maintain their OHA certification, they should have no problem shipping devices sans-Gapps and just providing instructions on how to visit http://opengapps.org/ to acquire your own copies of the software. It's pretty easy to do.

    10. Re: Corporate deatch sentence? by BlueStrat · · Score: 0

      They can't ship with Google apps installed

      Sure ZTE can. It can ship phones with anything they like. The US DoJ/FTC is not going to go to China and arrest anyone for copyright infringement. Is the US going to sink Chinese ships carrying ZTE phones on the way to NK, Iran, etc because they 'pirated' Google apps? I don't think so.

      Hell, as big a market as China is, Google and many other Silicon Valley giants could decide to relocate and become Chinese companies themselves, drop services/sales to Western nations, and end up with a larger market and more money in the long run as the US keeps sinking into decline and irrelevance on the world stage.

      Strat.

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    11. Re: Corporate deatch sentence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope the first thing they do is release the stock roms, it almost a constant issue that repairers, timkers and modders all have issues with ZTE refusing to release the stock images.

      I love my ZTE for its price and it does all i need but since they never issue updates and package some questionable hardcoded apps like "Launcher3"? "PacProcessor"? 6 apps with location or gps in the name? and of course the 15ish "TouchPal" apps that seem useless and unremoveable. But with a stock image im sure someone would have me running on a later android, with none of this junk, and id be able to flashback to stock should it all mess up. for now as with most phones were stuck.

    12. Re: Corporate deatch sentence? by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      Obviously I meant to ship for sale in the US. You don't need to stop a ship to severely limit the ability to sell something in the US.

    13. Re: Corporate deatch sentence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure ZTE can. It can ship phones with anything they like.

      Sure they can, but it will be useless because Google will block the access.
      https://hardware.slashdot.org/story/18/03/26/2220259/google-starts-blocking-uncertified-android-devices-from-logging-in

  2. Life Imprisonment by mentil · · Score: 1

    In the EU, sure, the Google Play store is gonna be expected. However, I imagine there are scores of 3rd-world countries where most buyers never touch the Google Play store, and only run pirated apps via sideloading or sketchy 3rd-party stores (ya know, the ones filled to bursting with malware.) Remember back in the days of feature phones, when every carrier had their own software shop? ZTE could roll their own; it could have a few big names so they can say "we have X!", but otherwise be a ghost town.

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    1. Re:Life Imprisonment by jonwil · · Score: 1

      They can't get the big names in their alternate store either since most of the big names are American and would likely be prohibited from supplying their software to the ZTE store under the sanctions.

    2. Re:Life Imprisonment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China already blocks Google services within China. So what, pray tell, do all those ZTE device users use today for a "play store?"

      I predict very little impact. This is all a bunch of media hype by the folks that are usually against free trade, unless its a case that gives them an opportunity to complain about US policy.

      China is now getting a dose of the the shenanigans it has been doling out to non-Chinese companies for many years.

    3. Re:Life Imprisonment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With Google banned from China, I don't see how the loss of GApps will affect ZTE in their domestic market. In other countries, it might have a slight impact, but ZTE should have thought of complying with the laws of countries they do business in.

      People are wising up to China, from the fact that they demand 51% local ownership of any ventures, to high tariffs on incoming goods. Couple this with the fact that transportation costs via ship are increasing due to more emissions laws and higher fuel prices. It looks like China just might have to wind up playing fair.

    4. Re:Life Imprisonment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      APKPure is a sketchy third-party store for you?

    5. Re:Life Imprisonment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been on /. long enough to be wary of anything with APK in the name

  3. If only companies supported alternate OSes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was Ubuntu, MeeGo, Tizen, WebOS, FirefoxOS and others but everyone sucked the green robot’s cock.

    1. Re:If only companies supported alternate OSes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those alternatives were mediocre, they didn't had good devices avaliable and their app offer was a joke. That's why they failed.

      Customers aren't going to jump in your mediocre platform just because you are waving your arms yelling "freedom! freedom! give me your moneys and I'll give you shitty devices and freedom!"

    2. Re: If only companies supported alternate OSes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ubuntu phone failed due to absolute poor management and stupidity. Otherwise, they had a great following and they couldn't meet demand. Their expectation of how many would sell was way short. Then for some stupid reason, they decided to give up.

    3. Re:If only companies supported alternate OSes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      MODDOWN! ; useless creimer youtube spam post again!

      creimer wants you to click on his youtube channel, then click on his stupid amazon affiliate link spam on Youtube. There is nothing of value on creimer youtube channel. Only creimer click-bot goes there.

      CREIMER' SUBMISSIONS UPDATE:
      Note also that creimer is trying to regain karma by getting his submissions published as articles on /. so make sure to go to:
      https://slashdot.org/~__aaclcg...
      https://slashdot.org/~IDrinkFa...
      https://slashdot.org/~_sharp'r...
      https://slashdot.org/~crreimer
      https://slashdot.org/~cdreimer
      https://slashdot.org/~criss69
      https://slashdot.org/~Anonymou...
      https://slashdot.org/~FatCashe...
      https://slashdot.org/~ILoveFat...
      https://slashdot.org/~IHateFat...
      https://slashdot.org/~IAteFatC...
      https://slashdot.org/~ITapeFat...
      https://slashdot.org/~IApeFatC...
      https://slashdot.org/~IPrayFat...
      https://slashdot.org/~FatCashe...
      and mod down his submissions as well. The great thing is that you don't even need mod points to mod down a submission, just click on the "minus" icon!

      Yes, believe it or not, creimer owns all the above sock puppet accounts. It is a mystery why Slashdot management tolerates it!

      creimer wrote:

      I don't bother with mod points. I'm doing something much more sinister. It took ten story submissions ? I'll have to double check the number ? to move cdreimer's karma from neutral to excellent without ever being exposed to the capricious mods. Mmmmmwwwwahahahahahahaha!

      https://slashdot.org/comments....

      Danger, Will Robinson, Danger! Creimy is posting more than 2 posts a day. Hurry! mod down otherwise /. will go to hell again!

      Note: you can mod down even if already at -1 to lower karma and to prevent lost /. users to accidentally mod up.

      creimer wrote:

      All you need to do is find a website with a permissive TOS, say, Slashdot, create a Python script to scrape your own comments, sprinkle Amazon affiliate links in various posts, and then re-post past links whenever possible. Won't be long before you start making "coffee money" each month.

      https://slashdot.org/comments....

      C.D. Reimer is a renowned Slashdot collaborator, as he puts it himself; "Because of the quality of my posts and my article submissions, I'm a highly rated commentator and moderator."

      But does anybody ever wondered what "C.D." stands for? Well, it stands for Creimy Dumpty of course!

      Creimy Dumpty sat on the wall,
      Creimy Dumpty had a great fall.
      All the king's horses
      And all the king's men
      Couldn't put Creimy Dumpty
      Together again.

      Creimy's siblings video and theme song, very realistic, especially the pants, just like Creimy's:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      With "Vice President Pence Vowing US Astronauts Will Return To the Moon", we are sure they will need miracle workers up there, here is what it would look like. Note that Creimy

  4. They knew what the rules were... by Viol8 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... and whether you agree with them or not they broke them. If you want to trade with the US you don't break US sanctions, its pretty clear, and lying on top of it was just the cherry on the cake. Serves them right frankly.

    1. Re:They knew what the rules were... by iCEBaLM · · Score: 1

      ...and so do I. A full commitment is what we're looking for. We wouldn't get this from any other guy.

    2. Re:They knew what the rules were... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Breaking agreements, laws and rules? That's an American prerogative. America First!

    3. Re: They knew what the rules were... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Single point of catastrophic failure complete dependency of a single company. In this case Google. At least Ubuntu OS where completely open source and not tied by any particular service exclusively controled arbitrary by Canonical.

    4. Re:They knew what the rules were... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to trade with the US

      But they don't want to trade with the US. They want to sell to private individuals who just happen to live within the US borders. Since when did you people start living behind an economic Iron Curtain?

    5. Re:They knew what the rules were... by AlwinBarni · · Score: 2

      At first the company was just warned and requested to discipline it's management (firing 4 and reducing bonuses for about 30), the company agreed and ... didn't do it, then came the ban - it's hard to feel sorry in this case, if at all then only for the not involved workforce.

    6. Re:They knew what the rules were... by JThundley · · Score: 1

      It's great that we're actually punishing a business for their wrongdoing, but I think it's only happening because they're a Chinese company. What's the country that only punishes foreign companies while giving their own a pass again?

    7. Re:They knew what the rules were... by guacamole · · Score: 1

      There was an American company that sold sanctioned goods to Iran and went unpunished?

    8. Re:They knew what the rules were... by JThundley · · Score: 1

      I'm talking about corporate crime in general.

    9. Re:They knew what the rules were... by Rakarra · · Score: 0

      Since Day 1, when the US Government made itself responsible for international trade with the USA?

    10. Re:They knew what the rules were... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it was the US Government. You may have heard about it referred to by the name of Iran-Contra.

  5. a Death Sentence For Its Smartphones ? by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 5, Interesting

    No Google Apps, a Death Sentence For Its Smartphones

    Seriously?

    Where can I get a phone that is sentenced to death? I sure as hell wish I could easily replace the too-instrusive and never asked for Google junk for better alternatives. And tell my mom how to do it for her phone as well.

    I mean yes, I know that there is lineage OS, but that is not exactly mom-friendly. And installing F-droid is easy, but removing the Google junk is not. And every Android update brings more unwanted Google junk.

    --
    Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
    1. Re:a Death Sentence For Its Smartphones ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > Where can I get a phone that is sentenced to death?

      Seconded. Usually, I'd pay premium for some gadget if it is Google-free.

    2. Re:a Death Sentence For Its Smartphones ? by RandomFactor · · Score: 1

      There -are- no better alternatives.

      Doesn't mean you can't have a perfectly functional phone however.
      They can use alternative main apps and app-stores (Amazon, F-droid), so that things look good enough on display, but reviews will be brutal. Google apps could possibly be sideloaded also.

      --
      --- Mercutio was right.
    3. Re:a Death Sentence For Its Smartphones ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So buy an iPhone and STFU

    4. Re:a Death Sentence For Its Smartphones ? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      You may get your wish now. ZTE isn't a small company and Chinese manufacturers have been shipping their own AOSP based systems for years. Maybe this is just the push they need to go world wide with them.

      It also seems to have screwed Google's Go launch in the US pretty badly. Maybe they will look for a way around it, like moving their intellectual property to their Irish HQ so they can continue selling it to ZTE.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:a Death Sentence For Its Smartphones ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can do so with a new or factory-resetted phone and not accepting google's EULA. Yes, it'll still be installed in rom memory, but not active, will not update itself, in effect giving you the google-play-and-other-services-free phone you're after.

      You could also root your phone and remove them (find an easy rootable phone) or install another OS altogether. Also, if i'm not mistaken, there's various (Chinese) phones that come without google services pre-installed.

      I'm sure you can find what you are after by searching around a bit and informing yourself.

    6. Re: a Death Sentence For Its Smartphones ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Out of the toilet bowl and down into the sewer?

    7. Re:a Death Sentence For Its Smartphones ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fdroid?.

    8. Re:a Death Sentence For Its Smartphones ? by m00sh · · Score: 1

      No Google Apps, a Death Sentence For Its Smartphones

      Seriously?

      Where can I get a phone that is sentenced to death? I sure as hell wish I could easily replace the too-instrusive and never asked for Google junk for better alternatives. And tell my mom how to do it for her phone as well.

      I mean yes, I know that there is lineage OS, but that is not exactly mom-friendly. And installing F-droid is easy, but removing the Google junk is not. And every Android update brings more unwanted Google junk.

      Exactly! Google loses by someone not using their system, not the other way round.

      ZTE will use Taiwanese chips and create its own version of android and store.

      If ZTE plays it right, this might just be the right amount of disruption to create a new ecosystem for their phones.

      Instead of creating low end, low margin phones, they might actually be forced to innovate and create something unique.

    9. Re:a Death Sentence For Its Smartphones ? by lexman098 · · Score: 1

      What? Lineage is basically stock android. Why is that not "mom-friendly"? Install F-droid on lineage and you're done. You answered your own question but kept on bitching.

    10. Re: a Death Sentence For Its Smartphones ? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      To be charitable, installing Lineage isn't mom-friendly but no OS replacement can be, so he really is just bitching.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    11. Re:a Death Sentence For Its Smartphones ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is a set of compromises... none quite as good as the real thing. Just like using Linux as a desktop replacement.

    12. Re:a Death Sentence For Its Smartphones ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how do you install Lineage on your mom's phone?
      I have an old phone that's super compatible with lineage, but couldn't get the flashing tool to see it (in fact maybe USB is broken but I don't know how to verify it)
      I have a newer phone that would take a beta unsupported lineage, but I think it's soft-locked?
      I have another phone which doesn't have a lineage build but I may flash some AOSP Android 4.4 ROM.

      Since nothing works, it might as well be easier to switch your mom to GNU/HURD or NetBSD or ReactOS

    13. Re:a Death Sentence For Its Smartphones ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Apple worst than competition

    14. Re:a Death Sentence For Its Smartphones ? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Where can I get a phone that is sentenced to death?

      China, India, online from many places. Seriously look around. There are MANY devices out there that don't qualify for Play Services. The fact you haven't already got one just shows how much your post is more about hyperbole than actually caring about Google.

  6. I wonder whom this will hurt more in the long run by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 2

    I think the Chinese market is large enough to support a few major telecom equipment makers through domestic sales. Enough western companies are making huge concessions to be allowed to sell there.

    So I guess if there is not already a flourishing market for non-Android phones, there will be one eventually. There goes one source of revenue from exports to China. In short, the Chinese can make do without us.

    --
    C - the footgun of programming languages
  7. So, politics is the reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the real reason Google is blocking uncertified devices. In general, I don't have a big problem with this, but they also need to make it possible to get devices certified. In the past, Google has purposefully made it impossible to get GMS certification for any device, unless you are Samsung or Sony.

    https://www.xda-developers.com/google-blocks-gapps-uncertified-devices-custom-rom-whitelist/

  8. their own store by sad_ · · Score: 2

    they keep using android, and just add their own store, which just copies over all the apk's from the google play store and done.

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
    1. Re:their own store by mentil · · Score: 1

      That could technically 'work'... except that'd open them to a massive class action copyright lawsuit. Also they'd have to remove some DRM and that'd mean violating the DMCA. They'd never do business in the USA again, basically; worse than the 7 year ban they're currently subject to.

      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    2. Re:their own store by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      they keep using android, and just add their own store, which just copies over all the apk's from the google play store and done.

      Sounds easy . . . so that is why the US export laws are written to catch that.

      If HP sells computers to folks in France, and those folks later sell them to Iran . . . HP is still on the hook.

      By a coincidence out of the "Theater of the Hard to Believe" . . . I got a company internal email instructing us to review and obey US customs laws.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    3. Re:their own store by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Google would be legally required to block them. Same as if ZTE set up another company to buy Google services and sell them on to ZTE.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:their own store by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      That's known as a "re-export", and HP would be on the hook only if they had any knowledge that the French were going to take that action.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    5. Re:their own store by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realise they have a much larger market in their own country, also if you knew anything about China you would realise that google store is pretty useless over their anyway, whether it's iOS or android they use their own stores or install an app from the native store which is essentially a portal into their own store... that's why iPhones aren't so much of an attraction in China, there is no lockin with the Apple store because they don't use it.

    6. Re:their own store by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      Can’t sell that outside of china

    7. Re:their own store by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

      It seems that the rest of the world increasingly has to choose if they want to do business with the US or with others. In loosely related news, Huawei has been excluded from US government business and is considering leaving the US market entirely.

      In some cases, I guess US customs laws will just drive a wedge into US/Asian business relations. Without a winner.

      --
      C - the footgun of programming languages
  9. 'murican gov, yeah. by weedjams · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Lifeline program was established by the Reagan Administration in 1985 to provide discounted phone services to low-income Americans. The program was expanded by the George W. Bush Administration in 2005 to include wireless services. Typically, these involve a modest prepaid service requiring no deposit, which includes a free cell phone, free minutes, and free texting. This program provides a basic need that many low-income individuals would not have access to otherwise.

    In 2015 there were 12.6 million households enrolled in the program, most of them on Safelink, part of Tracfone.

    Guess what brand phone they give out?

    yup, ZTE

    Soylent green is poor people!

    1. Re:'murican gov, yeah. by mentil · · Score: 1

      The Lifeline program doesn't pay out money for hardware, only for service. The recipient has to obtain their own phone. Many Lifeline service providers do give away cheap phones (ones that are ancient and won't sell, and/or recycled) however.

      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    2. Re:'murican gov, yeah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The Lifeline program was established by the Reagan Administration in 1985 to provide discounted phone services to low-income Americans. The program was expanded by the George W. Bush Administration in 2005 to include wireless services. Typically, these involve a modest prepaid service requiring no deposit, which includes a free cell phone, free minutes, and free texting. This program provides a basic need that many low-income individuals would not have access to otherwise.

      In 2015 there were 12.6 million households enrolled in the program, most of them on Safelink, part of Tracfone.

      Guess what brand phone they give out?

      yup, ZTE

      Soylent green is poor people!

      That's disingenuous, deliberately misleading BULLSHIT

      A short history of the ‘Obamaphone’

      During the 2012 election, a viral video concerned something call the “Obamaphone.” A woman in Cleveland exclaimed she and all her friends were given “Obamaphones.” Free cellphones from the government! It registered in my mind as an oddball concept, but I never followed through. The term somehow got creatively twisted to sound as if Obama — the administration, or the campaign maybe — was buying votes with cellphones.

      So what is the etiology of “Obamaphone”?

      ...

      During the Obama administration, the FCC’s approach to universal service expanded. Congress in 2009 enacted a law ordering the FCC to develop its National Broadband Plan. The Obama administration, well into the internet and wireless age, agreed that broadband and cellular services are essential. So, yes, citizens of various federal programs could qualify for a cellphone — a basic one, not the latest iPhone or Galaxy — with a plan they receive under Lifeline.

      The program has come back into the news in recent days, principally on conservative sites, because of a Government Accountability Office study of Lifeline, one of four FCC programs funded by the Universal Service Fund.

      The fund itself has reached about $10 billion ...

      So, cell phones weren't given out until Obama.

      So, yeah, they're appropriately called OBAMAPHONES. And the program is rife with fraud - again appropriate for an Obama initiative designed to curry favor/buy votes.

    3. Re:'murican gov, yeah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 'ol 'bamaphones!!!! lie remains a lie.

      "2005- Wireless telephone service (cellphones) is included into the Lifeline Assistance Program."

      http://www.regulatorystaff.sc.gov/Documents/Lifeline/Revised%20History%20of%20Lifeline.pdf

    4. Re:'murican gov, yeah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The phones that are given away are absolute shit. If Obama wanted to curry favor with the masses he shouldn't have given away phones full of chinese spyware and crash half the time when you try to even make a call. You are FAR better off getting BYOD and getting a used Moto E for $20 or something.

    5. Re:'murican gov, yeah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean an Obama initiative to provide an essential service? Or do you not agree that cell phones are an essential service? That's the issue, not whether Obama tried to "buy votes". There are arguments both ways; e.g., elderly people have cell phones so they can call for help if they get stuck somewhere or fall down and can't get up. Before cellphones they were SOL. Should they be SOL now? That's a values/political question, which is precisely what elected officials are supposed to make decisions on. Making a decision one way or the other is not "buying votes".

    6. Re:'murican gov, yeah. by weedjams · · Score: 1

      You an millions of other internet dweebs believe this crap.

      Get the facts, please.

      https://www.factcheck.org/2009/10/the-obama-phone/

  10. Pretty much guarantees ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Set up their own app store and if they make the effort they can out Google Google. Can't see that being a net loss for China inc. personally.

    1. Re:Pretty much guarantees ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe china can just block/ban the google store altogether?

      That will give ZTE some breathing space, as well as further cement Apples dominance over google in china.

      Brave move nevertheless. It will either kill off a competitor or make that competitor set up a competing app--shop in the worlds largest market.
      Brave.

    2. Re: Pretty much guarantees ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China already blocks using Google Maps from IT providers, they require use of state run maps.

  11. America: World Police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the United States government decides what countries a Chinese company can and can't sell products to. So much for sovereignty!

    And the U.S. wonders why the world has a bit of a problem with them.

    1. Re: America: World Police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Internet has some routing around to do.

    2. Re:America: World Police by jabuzz · · Score: 2

      The US government absolutely gets to decided what countries a Chinese company can sell products to that contain *US* parts. If ZTE didn't like that they should not have used US parts then they would be free to export to whoever they liked, subject to other similar export restrictions.

    3. Re:America: World Police by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      In this case, the restrictions are on US companies.

      It's no good having an embargo on Iran and North Korea, and then have it so you can sell to an intermediary that sells to Iran and North Korea. ZTE can do what they want, but if they do, US suppliers can't supply them.

    4. Re:America: World Police by PPH · · Score: 1

      In this case, the restrictions are on US companies.

      This.

      Time for everyone to pack their bags and move their corporate home to Ireland.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    5. Re: America: World Police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the same reasons, the RIAA can decide what you can do with the songs of a CD you bought.

  12. As crude as you put it, you put your finger on it. by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    As crude as you put it, you put your finger on it. (so to speak).
    Seems like three alternatives might be possible
    1. this is could be the day when china forks android, bases it on red star linux, and comes out with an embedded ChinaOS ending the Alphabet hegemony.

    2. NVidia fills the gap. Less likely, Tizen or firefox.

    3. ZTE just sells it's assets to a buyer, either an existing cell maker or to a start-up. and then continues making phones. only thing that dies is the corporate name.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  13. Trade war could break out too by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    I suppose china might reply in kind.

    1. Stop allowing exports of parts from foxcon to the USA.

    2. End export of computer components to any company that sells to google unless they open source their entire OS.

    that would tank the US stock market.

    Food fight!

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:Trade war could break out too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Taiwanese government might not care about ZTE, but I wonder what they would say if China tired blocking Foxconn (Hon Hai).

    2. Re:Trade war could break out too by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Screwing over the US economy would only end up meaning that China would never be paid back the debt owed by the US. I don't think they want to shoot themselves in the foot.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    3. Re: Trade war could break out too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They donâ(TM)t need to be âoepaid backâ. They'll just come over and CONTINUE claiming large chunks of real estate and other assets with their "US tax stamps" the locals so desperately crave.

    4. Re:Trade war could break out too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Agreed here. I feel like if either the US or China attacked the other's economy it would just be mutually assured destruction.

    5. Re:Trade war could break out too by gtall · · Score: 2

      The U.S. will pay back its debt, otherwise it would go into default and take down the entire world's finances. As of 2017, China held $1.7 Trillion in U.S. out of about $21 Trillion total U.S. debt. Much of that debt is held by entities in the U.S. including the SS account (and I believe Medicare, but I'm unsure about that one). The problem going forward is not the debt owed by China (or Japan), although they could cause problems if they wanted to stick it to the current alleged American administration. The problem going forward is Congress and the alleged president having no problems with further diving into more debt. Sooner or later, those chickens will come home to roost and every budgetary account of the Fed. Gov. will take a hit.

      And taxes will necessarily go up.

    6. Re:Trade war could break out too by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      1) I can't see China stopping exporting to the US. That would hurt them as much if not more than hurt us.

      2) I doubt China cares about open source

    7. Re:Trade war could break out too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes you don't want the dept paid back, but prefer to take over the entity that owes you money during bankruptcy negotiations.

      "The United States of America - now under new management".

    8. Re:Trade war could break out too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      21 trillion used to sound like alot, but there are now multiple investment funds at about ~5 trillion, 20 trillion could be paid back in a year, the only problem with that is the realisation of the true inflated value of the currency, here the chinese simply cheat and manipulate their currency, so we must use this Borrow and Spend mechanism to compete, because the capital is being unfairly(push towards inflationary devaluation) funnelled to China .... TLDR the rich got alot richer, and when the totaly value of the market is realized they will be even richer. You're only worried about money because for you it is a static thing, but the value of money has always gone down, which is a good thing as it has to balance the forever growth of the markets. What i think is funny is that everyone knows the value of the dollar is lower then stated, but it'll only ever drop once the debt is paid, so everyone just keeps the debt going forever and pretends the dollar is worth more then it is, because otherwise all you country bumpkins would be complaining about your 401k's. Now, the local governments indebtness to banks should never reach beyond the certain ratio at which that loan becames a permanent fixture on the balance... and tinkering with this ratio is how we get al;l the dramatic politics because at any point in time there is a certain population of old people retiring. And now the greedy boomers turn, so ofc they fucked the system in their favour. (protip: look how they treated the older generation), bu now they demand this largess

    9. Re:Trade war could break out too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The U.S. will pay back its debt, otherwise it would go into default and take down the entire world's finances.

      When push came to shove and we had a chance to choose between a competent but flawed leader and a lying sack of shit that should have been laughed off the stage, we choose poorly.

      When we have to face the choice between default and the alternative, well, I do not predict a better outcome. Saying that a decision we make has to make sense is, well, obviously not true..

    10. Re:Trade war could break out too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This only will hurt the Chinese market. India is making iPhones now, and the US still is a manufacturing world leader, so that stuff can be made domestically as easy as it is in Asia. Rare earths may be an issue, but it is because China is actively mining, while other countries are not, and that can be rectified.

      Foxconn is also building plants on US shores. If China decides to take the gloves off, it would be bumpy, but it would not cause the US economy to tank.

      China needs the US more than vice versa. They won't do blanket bans, but will attack specific things from states that support the people in power, like agriculture or products from red states. This way, those sub-markets tank, people vote the existing boffins out, and more China-friendly politicians get seated come 2019.

    11. Re:Trade war could break out too by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      How is 120% or so of GDP capable of being paid off in a year?

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    12. Re:Trade war could break out too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. The US will hurt from dearth of Chinese imports more than the other way around.
      2. It's not all exports, just smartphone parts.

    13. Re: Trade war could break out too by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I want to point out that the US has defaulted twice on its debt in the last hundred years. History says they will default again.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  14. The one thing I do not need on an A phone by ReneR · · Score: 0

    are those stupid Google apps. Do not even use their email client, you never know if they send my imap credentials into the USA NSA PRISM et a. database for later use. No thanks.

    1. Re:The one thing I do not need on an A phone by gtall · · Score: 1

      Stop watching T.V., it is bad for you.

    2. Re:The one thing I do not need on an A phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes I'm sure the Chinese version is much more secure and respectful of your privacy. Your intended recipients probably don't even care what's in your e-mail, why do you think the NSA cares?

    3. Re:The one thing I do not need on an A phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't need to worry about that, the Google e-mail client stopped supporting non-gmail accounts years ago.

      The version by Shield tablet came with supported IMAP, but after an update it stopped doing so. So the choice was to force downgrade the app (after updating Android), or pick a different e-mail app. So far I've been pretty happy with K9.

    4. Re:The one thing I do not need on an A phone by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

      If back doors in general are a concern to you, and you cannot fully ensure their absence, it would make sense to have them "with" the entity least likely to create problems for you.

      For instance, if you live in the western world, a back door for Chinese intelligence services might be less of a problem than one for the NSA. Because even if the Chinese know your darkest secrets, how likely do you think it is they will share with your local law enforcement?

      --
      C - the footgun of programming languages
  15. Re: I wonder whom this will hurt more in the long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It will hurt the company that is currently known as ZTE.

    Everyone ITT needs to stop trying to build this into more than it is.

    China already bans any IT organizations that refuse to host servers in China.

    China as a country is not a victim and they continue to enjoy a superior position when it comes to trade and rights.

    This ZTE shite changes nothing.

  16. Aptoide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aptoide is an alternative to the play Store and is open source so is not subject to the same regulations, from there you can install all google services.

  17. Boost to Sailfish? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Russian companies are already adopting it. I can feel ZTE and Huawei will go down the same path.

    1. Re:Boost to Sailfish? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very much possible.

  18. Let's pray this goes through ... by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    ... and ZTE moves to Sailfish OS as a fallback and we finally get more than one iteration of relyable non-Gooapple Touchscreen Smartphones. That would be so cool. Lineage is neat, but I would rather use Sailfish and some Phone that officially uses it. And not just as a side-project.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re: Let's pray this goes through ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wolnt't be a such bad ideea of switching to Sailfish OS offering in the same time official support as a big smartphone maker and international player to cut ties to USA.

    2. Re: Let's pray this goes through ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From Sailfish.org
      The true INDEPEDENT OS

      Sailfish OS, developed and licensed by the Finnish mobile company Jolla, is the open source based alternative to dominant mobile operating systems. Based on Nokia’s Meego Linux and with no strings attached to Google Android, Sailfish OS offers a rock solid platform for independent mobile needs.

      Project & objective:
      In 2016, the Russian Ministry of Communications publicly expressed support for the Sailfish OS agenda in Russia, which is part of Russia’s long-term objective to create a more independent IT ecosystem for the country. Jolla’s licensing customer, Open Mobile Platform Ltd. was formed to deliver on this objective, and to develop tailored solutions for Russian corporations and state-owned companies.

    3. Re:Let's pray this goes through ... by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      ZTE's sales are 95% in the US, they won't be able to sell in the US for 7 years. This is a corporate death sentence and it's well deserved based on what they did.

  19. Foxcon in Schenzen by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    Foxcon may have it's headquarters in Taiwan but it manufactures and ships from PRC. So China has control of Foxcon exports and it's just gravy if Taiwan is forced to align itself with china against the US.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  20. Death sentence, or premium? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would lack of Gapps be a death sentence? Most people I know spend a large effort trying to remove Google's spyware apps from their phones. There's oodles of non-spyware alternates. Plenty of other app stores to use. If you sold Gapps free phones OOTB that would command a premium in some circles.

  21. Antitrust laws in EU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't witholding access to google services be anti-competitive practice in EU? It's up to google to figure out how to do it and avoid fines, most likely by moving their mobile software branch to offshore branch.

    1. Re:Antitrust laws in EU by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. Only problem is ZTE won't be able to make a phone to sell in Europe, so it won't impact anyone there.

  22. ZTE is stupid ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ZTE relies too much of its products on US technologies

    Unlike Huawei, which has made its own version of ARM chips, ZTE has none

    Plus, ZTE relies too much on components from US companies, from antennas to chips and such

    What has happened to ZTE is a reminder for everyone else --- do not base your products on US companies' products, or you might be meeting the same fate as that of ZTE

    I suspect that lesson will be well learned by all companies outside the U. S. of A., and it gonna push China to re-double its efforts into developing a full spectrum of technologies to rival that of the United States (or that from anybody else)

    End result is that China might become even stronger, and products from US companies might have fewer buyers

    1. Re:ZTE is stupid ! by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      ZTE relies too much of its products on US technologies

      And also apparently needed the meager sales it must have had in North Korea, and thats before getting this ban hammer.

      Looks to me like ZTE may be going out of business shortly, unable to compete anywhere on anything.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
  23. Play Store is dead... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....long lve Open Play Store...

  24. Chinese business paradigm by freeze128 · · Score: 1

    When other Chinese companies run afoul of their customers, they just pack up shop and re-incorporate under a different name, and then sell the same damn thing again. What's to keep ZTE from doing this?

  25. Googless Android Phone?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where can I get one!!!!

  26. Belts and Roads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The point when China will not need the US, but furthermore will influence/control a very sizeable part of the world, is approaching fast...
    Maybe not this time, but soon one of these punitive US decisions will just sputter and backfire. The company will roll out its own solution, deploy it in China and half of the world, and be done with it. The US solution will then be seriously weakened by the move.

  27. Dang... by PortHaven · · Score: 1

    I got my kids some ZTE ZMax Pro. These have been great phones. Decent screens, and fair amount of memory for a $179 phone. Best of all, USB Type-C which means I am not needing to buy replacement charging cables for my kids every two months. Way faster charging, way way way more durable.

    Zero problems... which when you have 6-10 year olds using regularly, is pretty darn amazing.

    1. Re:Dang... by luther349 · · Score: 0

      yep got myself one on black Friday sad to see them go over political bs.

  28. An Opportunity for Windows! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they can't have Google stuff, how about Microsoft? Doesn't MS already sell a special version of Windows in China? RT (OK, Win10 for ARM) for ZTE!!

  29. MAGA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Make America Google Again!

  30. China's punitive action will be either... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Creating its own 'Google Store' for Apps, while using AOSP or LOS to provide 'android-like feel' to undercut Google's dominance in the market. Or worse yet, this will spur China to create their own whole phone OS to compete in the international market. Either solution, China will win, and everybody else will lose on sheer manpower available. Furthermore, by doing so they will control any exploits or backdoors directly instead of giving the NSA first stab at it by using an OS primarily developed in the US on the majority of cellphones globally.

    An even bigger threat may be what happens when/if ZTE/Huawei/etc are cut off from Qualcomm chips as a result of this moratorium leading to either a focus on MediaTek chips, or a focus on Chinese domestically produced chips for all future cellphone products. None of these options will be good for international trade and all will be bad for the profitability of Qualcomm, Samsung, Intel, AMD, and others who might soon find themselves in an even more disadvantageous position with China than they have been in the past.

  31. Can be installed by DrYak · · Score: 2

    there is no legal way to download the Google Play Store and there is no legal way to download the google apps outside the Play Store.

    There no legal ways to download those, yes.
    There's a bout a gazillion of (illegal under US law) ways to download those.
    Those ways are illegal in the US, but are very unlikely to be illegal in any country (like China) that doesn't give much fucks about anything intellectual-property-related (like copyrights, in this case).

    An URL that links to some Chinese website hosting APKs for the above software and sideloads them is all about it takes.

    Some custom ROMs ship with the google apps, which is illegal, but Google turns a blind eye on this practice. This will not be the case with ZTE.

    But unlike the custom ROMs, ZTE's solution could be hosted outside of any legal reach from google.
    A sideloadable APK hosted on a service located in a jurisdiction where Google is unable to file a complaint is all it takes.

    And that's completely ignoring legal alternatives like Micro G - an opensource re-implementation of the services that Google provides in closed blobs. (And all the various APK downloaders that could then be used to side-load apps that normally are only hosted on Google Play)
    (But let's be serious, ZTE is more likely to take the pirate route and provide an "otherwise considered illegal in the US" installation option of the real Google deal, than to take the route of financially support microG developers and maintain legally compatible services)

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  32. How bonds work by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Screwing over the US economy would only end up meaning that China would never be paid back the debt owed by the US. I don't think they want to shoot themselves in the foot.

    Sigh... That's not how it works. China holds treasury bonds which are readily sold in the open market unless you hold them to term. China can sell them on any bond exchange in the world or directly to third parties any time they want and there isn't a damn thing the US can do about it. The only problem really is finding buyers for that many bonds. Furthermore it would be absolutely insane of the US to try to not repay their debt. The value of the US dollar rests on the belief that the US (like a Lanister) always repays its debts.

    1. Re:How bonds work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does it work when the US economy goes to shit and can't pay off those bonds? How does it work when China can't find a buyer for them? The other option won't be palatable either...the US just prints more money, effectively making the "investment" useless. That's why I'm not concerned with them attempting a "trade war". They've effectively been screwing with everyone for years, and why I'm not concerned with them pushing back on tariffs.

  33. Tax Cut and Spend all the Way!!!! by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

    Tax Cut and Spend all the Way!!!! GOP 2018!

    1. Re:Tax Cut and Spend all the Way!!!! by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, tell me how far the previous administration sunk the US into debt before you spout off.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  34. WW3 cancelled by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 2

    Sanctions with actual teeth is why North Korea is in the process of negotiating denuclearization. Supply NK, get the Corporate Death Sentence.

    1. Re:WW3 cancelled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you really believe that after US went trigger happy on Syria, they would risk denuclearization?

    2. Re:WW3 cancelled by luther349 · · Score: 2

      actually yes it proved we where not all talk. thats been the issue for a decade now we talked a big game and did very little.

  35. Gotta keep the Apple/Samsung duopoly going! by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    ANYONE who even thinks of challenging the stranglehold in the USA, gets taken down one way or another. Look what happened to Huawei, now ZTE. If I were a lot of these manufacturers, I wouldn't even bother trying to break into the USA market. Bunch of fools in the USA think you HAVE to buy a phone from a carrier store, which means you are pushed toward the apple/samsung brands. Oh, but they offer zero down, zero interest!!! Yeah, they got rid of the 2 year phone contract, now lock you into the no money down no interest (unless you pay off the phone early) 2 year contract. Then tag you for this fee, that fee, etc...jacking up your bill. There is a whole world of great phones out there, but, unless you search them out, pay full retail (sometimes you can get 2 for the price of the iphone/samsung stuff), you'll never hear of them. Oh, but they spy on users bla bla bla. Gee, you don't think Apple, Samsung, the CIA, FBI, NSA etc...don't?

  36. Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Software source code is protected under the first amendment... this better not suffice.

  37. Adios China. Go build an artificial island somewhe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Adios China. Go build an artificial island somewhere.

  38. Simples by maroberts · · Score: 1

    ZTE sells the company under a rebadged name, and they don't have a problem as long as major ZTE shareholders don't control the new company

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

  39. Just as well... by martinfb · · Score: 1

    Just as well. My ZTE smartphone ignores my settings anyway.
    The more notifications and auto-whatever settings I disable, the MORE start running!

    Now I have to turn my cell phone off when I sleep because I keep getting these STUPID notifications about stuff I disabled; thinking it is an emergency call!
    W T F ? ! ? ! ?

    --


    Self-importance and self-indulgence is the root of ALL evil.