Slashdot Mirror


ZTE Exports Ban May Mean No Google Apps, a Death Sentence For Its Smartphones (arstechnica.com)

New submitter krazy1 shares a report from Ars Technica: The U.S. government is going after another Chinese Android device maker. After shutting down Huawei's carrier deals and retail partners, the government is now pursuing ZTE. The U.S. Department of Commerce has banned U.S. companies from selling parts and software to ZTE for seven years. ZTE was caught violating U.S. sanctions by illegally shipping telecommunications equipment to Iran and North Korea. The company then made things worse by "making false statements and obstructing justice, including through preventing disclosure to and affirmatively misleading the U.S. Government," according to the Department of Commerce.

The latest news from Reuters raises even bigger issues for ZTE, though. A source told Reuters that "The Commerce Department decision means ZTE Corp may not be able to use Google's Android operating system in its mobile devices." Android is free and open source and will probably remain free for ZTE to use without Google's involvement. Reuters' source is probably referring to the Google apps, which aren't sold to device makers but are carefully licensed to them in exchange for other concessions. The Google apps package includes popular services like Gmail and Google Maps, and it also unlocks the Play Store, Google Play Services, and the entire Android app ecosystem. For a market-viable Android device, the Play Store is pretty much mandatory in every country other than China. So while ZTE could conceivably source hardware components from non-U.S. sources, being locked out of the Play Store would devastate ZTE's smartphones worldwide.

67 of 139 comments (clear)

  1. Corporate deatch sentence? by Carewolf · · Score: 1

    Cool, I guess.. Though I would have used to on other companies first.

    1. Re: Corporate deatch sentence? by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 2

      They can't ship with Google apps installed, but the customer could install them during setup. They could probably include the link in the setup process and legally be compliant.

    2. Re: Corporate deatch sentence? by GeLeTo · · Score: 5, Informative

      Unless your phone comes with it - there is no legal way to download the Google Play Store and there is no legal way to download the google apps outside the Play Store. Some custom ROMs ship with the google apps, which is illegal, but Google turns a blind eye on this practice. This will not be the case with ZTE.

    3. Re:Corporate deatch sentence? by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 2

      Well, 93 million people die EACH DAY from gun violence;

      Where did you get that figure from? If it were accurate, then almost 34 billion people die per year from gun violence.

    4. Re: Corporate deatch sentence? by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      I guess I didn't fully appreciate that restriction. As I understand you can install GApps for individual use legally. But the more I think about it, its not a simple APK install, so not necessarily something that would 'idiot proof' for customer install.

      Thanks

    5. Re: Corporate deatch sentence? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      ...They get better.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    6. Re: Corporate deatch sentence? by darthyoshiboy · · Score: 1

      Almost no custom roms these days ship with Gapps. http://opengapps.org/ has made that unnecessary and often undesirable (as many custom rom users opt to go Googleless.)

      It's not illegal to host or download the Gapps suite. It only becomes trouble if you attempt to use the apps on a non OHA certified device. At which point you have violated the license of the software, but the legality of that matter would depend on your jurisdiction (though this is probably illegal for anyone in the states.)

      I don't know if ZTE can remain OHA certified under these new limitations, but I don't think the OHA is a strictly American concern. Assuming that ZTE can maintain their OHA certification, they should have no problem shipping devices sans-Gapps and just providing instructions on how to visit http://opengapps.org/ to acquire your own copies of the software. It's pretty easy to do.

    7. Re: Corporate deatch sentence? by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      Obviously I meant to ship for sale in the US. You don't need to stop a ship to severely limit the ability to sell something in the US.

  2. Life Imprisonment by mentil · · Score: 1

    In the EU, sure, the Google Play store is gonna be expected. However, I imagine there are scores of 3rd-world countries where most buyers never touch the Google Play store, and only run pirated apps via sideloading or sketchy 3rd-party stores (ya know, the ones filled to bursting with malware.) Remember back in the days of feature phones, when every carrier had their own software shop? ZTE could roll their own; it could have a few big names so they can say "we have X!", but otherwise be a ghost town.

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    1. Re:Life Imprisonment by jonwil · · Score: 1

      They can't get the big names in their alternate store either since most of the big names are American and would likely be prohibited from supplying their software to the ZTE store under the sanctions.

  3. They knew what the rules were... by Viol8 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... and whether you agree with them or not they broke them. If you want to trade with the US you don't break US sanctions, its pretty clear, and lying on top of it was just the cherry on the cake. Serves them right frankly.

    1. Re:They knew what the rules were... by iCEBaLM · · Score: 1

      ...and so do I. A full commitment is what we're looking for. We wouldn't get this from any other guy.

    2. Re:They knew what the rules were... by AlwinBarni · · Score: 2

      At first the company was just warned and requested to discipline it's management (firing 4 and reducing bonuses for about 30), the company agreed and ... didn't do it, then came the ban - it's hard to feel sorry in this case, if at all then only for the not involved workforce.

    3. Re:They knew what the rules were... by JThundley · · Score: 1

      It's great that we're actually punishing a business for their wrongdoing, but I think it's only happening because they're a Chinese company. What's the country that only punishes foreign companies while giving their own a pass again?

    4. Re:They knew what the rules were... by guacamole · · Score: 1

      There was an American company that sold sanctioned goods to Iran and went unpunished?

    5. Re:They knew what the rules were... by JThundley · · Score: 1

      I'm talking about corporate crime in general.

  4. a Death Sentence For Its Smartphones ? by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 5, Interesting

    No Google Apps, a Death Sentence For Its Smartphones

    Seriously?

    Where can I get a phone that is sentenced to death? I sure as hell wish I could easily replace the too-instrusive and never asked for Google junk for better alternatives. And tell my mom how to do it for her phone as well.

    I mean yes, I know that there is lineage OS, but that is not exactly mom-friendly. And installing F-droid is easy, but removing the Google junk is not. And every Android update brings more unwanted Google junk.

    --
    Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
    1. Re:a Death Sentence For Its Smartphones ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > Where can I get a phone that is sentenced to death?

      Seconded. Usually, I'd pay premium for some gadget if it is Google-free.

    2. Re:a Death Sentence For Its Smartphones ? by RandomFactor · · Score: 1

      There -are- no better alternatives.

      Doesn't mean you can't have a perfectly functional phone however.
      They can use alternative main apps and app-stores (Amazon, F-droid), so that things look good enough on display, but reviews will be brutal. Google apps could possibly be sideloaded also.

      --
      --- Mercutio was right.
    3. Re:a Death Sentence For Its Smartphones ? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      You may get your wish now. ZTE isn't a small company and Chinese manufacturers have been shipping their own AOSP based systems for years. Maybe this is just the push they need to go world wide with them.

      It also seems to have screwed Google's Go launch in the US pretty badly. Maybe they will look for a way around it, like moving their intellectual property to their Irish HQ so they can continue selling it to ZTE.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re: a Death Sentence For Its Smartphones ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Out of the toilet bowl and down into the sewer?

    5. Re:a Death Sentence For Its Smartphones ? by m00sh · · Score: 1

      No Google Apps, a Death Sentence For Its Smartphones

      Seriously?

      Where can I get a phone that is sentenced to death? I sure as hell wish I could easily replace the too-instrusive and never asked for Google junk for better alternatives. And tell my mom how to do it for her phone as well.

      I mean yes, I know that there is lineage OS, but that is not exactly mom-friendly. And installing F-droid is easy, but removing the Google junk is not. And every Android update brings more unwanted Google junk.

      Exactly! Google loses by someone not using their system, not the other way round.

      ZTE will use Taiwanese chips and create its own version of android and store.

      If ZTE plays it right, this might just be the right amount of disruption to create a new ecosystem for their phones.

      Instead of creating low end, low margin phones, they might actually be forced to innovate and create something unique.

    6. Re:a Death Sentence For Its Smartphones ? by lexman098 · · Score: 1

      What? Lineage is basically stock android. Why is that not "mom-friendly"? Install F-droid on lineage and you're done. You answered your own question but kept on bitching.

    7. Re: a Death Sentence For Its Smartphones ? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      To be charitable, installing Lineage isn't mom-friendly but no OS replacement can be, so he really is just bitching.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    8. Re:a Death Sentence For Its Smartphones ? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Where can I get a phone that is sentenced to death?

      China, India, online from many places. Seriously look around. There are MANY devices out there that don't qualify for Play Services. The fact you haven't already got one just shows how much your post is more about hyperbole than actually caring about Google.

  5. I wonder whom this will hurt more in the long run by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 2

    I think the Chinese market is large enough to support a few major telecom equipment makers through domestic sales. Enough western companies are making huge concessions to be allowed to sell there.

    So I guess if there is not already a flourishing market for non-Android phones, there will be one eventually. There goes one source of revenue from exports to China. In short, the Chinese can make do without us.

    --
    C - the footgun of programming languages
  6. their own store by sad_ · · Score: 2

    they keep using android, and just add their own store, which just copies over all the apk's from the google play store and done.

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
    1. Re:their own store by mentil · · Score: 1

      That could technically 'work'... except that'd open them to a massive class action copyright lawsuit. Also they'd have to remove some DRM and that'd mean violating the DMCA. They'd never do business in the USA again, basically; worse than the 7 year ban they're currently subject to.

      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    2. Re:their own store by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      they keep using android, and just add their own store, which just copies over all the apk's from the google play store and done.

      Sounds easy . . . so that is why the US export laws are written to catch that.

      If HP sells computers to folks in France, and those folks later sell them to Iran . . . HP is still on the hook.

      By a coincidence out of the "Theater of the Hard to Believe" . . . I got a company internal email instructing us to review and obey US customs laws.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    3. Re:their own store by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Google would be legally required to block them. Same as if ZTE set up another company to buy Google services and sell them on to ZTE.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:their own store by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      That's known as a "re-export", and HP would be on the hook only if they had any knowledge that the French were going to take that action.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    5. Re:their own store by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      Can’t sell that outside of china

    6. Re:their own store by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

      It seems that the rest of the world increasingly has to choose if they want to do business with the US or with others. In loosely related news, Huawei has been excluded from US government business and is considering leaving the US market entirely.

      In some cases, I guess US customs laws will just drive a wedge into US/Asian business relations. Without a winner.

      --
      C - the footgun of programming languages
  7. 'murican gov, yeah. by weedjams · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Lifeline program was established by the Reagan Administration in 1985 to provide discounted phone services to low-income Americans. The program was expanded by the George W. Bush Administration in 2005 to include wireless services. Typically, these involve a modest prepaid service requiring no deposit, which includes a free cell phone, free minutes, and free texting. This program provides a basic need that many low-income individuals would not have access to otherwise.

    In 2015 there were 12.6 million households enrolled in the program, most of them on Safelink, part of Tracfone.

    Guess what brand phone they give out?

    yup, ZTE

    Soylent green is poor people!

    1. Re:'murican gov, yeah. by mentil · · Score: 1

      The Lifeline program doesn't pay out money for hardware, only for service. The recipient has to obtain their own phone. Many Lifeline service providers do give away cheap phones (ones that are ancient and won't sell, and/or recycled) however.

      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    2. Re:'murican gov, yeah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The Lifeline program was established by the Reagan Administration in 1985 to provide discounted phone services to low-income Americans. The program was expanded by the George W. Bush Administration in 2005 to include wireless services. Typically, these involve a modest prepaid service requiring no deposit, which includes a free cell phone, free minutes, and free texting. This program provides a basic need that many low-income individuals would not have access to otherwise.

      In 2015 there were 12.6 million households enrolled in the program, most of them on Safelink, part of Tracfone.

      Guess what brand phone they give out?

      yup, ZTE

      Soylent green is poor people!

      That's disingenuous, deliberately misleading BULLSHIT

      A short history of the ‘Obamaphone’

      During the 2012 election, a viral video concerned something call the “Obamaphone.” A woman in Cleveland exclaimed she and all her friends were given “Obamaphones.” Free cellphones from the government! It registered in my mind as an oddball concept, but I never followed through. The term somehow got creatively twisted to sound as if Obama — the administration, or the campaign maybe — was buying votes with cellphones.

      So what is the etiology of “Obamaphone”?

      ...

      During the Obama administration, the FCC’s approach to universal service expanded. Congress in 2009 enacted a law ordering the FCC to develop its National Broadband Plan. The Obama administration, well into the internet and wireless age, agreed that broadband and cellular services are essential. So, yes, citizens of various federal programs could qualify for a cellphone — a basic one, not the latest iPhone or Galaxy — with a plan they receive under Lifeline.

      The program has come back into the news in recent days, principally on conservative sites, because of a Government Accountability Office study of Lifeline, one of four FCC programs funded by the Universal Service Fund.

      The fund itself has reached about $10 billion ...

      So, cell phones weren't given out until Obama.

      So, yeah, they're appropriately called OBAMAPHONES. And the program is rife with fraud - again appropriate for an Obama initiative designed to curry favor/buy votes.

    3. Re:'murican gov, yeah. by weedjams · · Score: 1

      You an millions of other internet dweebs believe this crap.

      Get the facts, please.

      https://www.factcheck.org/2009/10/the-obama-phone/

  8. As crude as you put it, you put your finger on it. by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    As crude as you put it, you put your finger on it. (so to speak).
    Seems like three alternatives might be possible
    1. this is could be the day when china forks android, bases it on red star linux, and comes out with an embedded ChinaOS ending the Alphabet hegemony.

    2. NVidia fills the gap. Less likely, Tizen or firefox.

    3. ZTE just sells it's assets to a buyer, either an existing cell maker or to a start-up. and then continues making phones. only thing that dies is the corporate name.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  9. Trade war could break out too by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    I suppose china might reply in kind.

    1. Stop allowing exports of parts from foxcon to the USA.

    2. End export of computer components to any company that sells to google unless they open source their entire OS.

    that would tank the US stock market.

    Food fight!

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:Trade war could break out too by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Screwing over the US economy would only end up meaning that China would never be paid back the debt owed by the US. I don't think they want to shoot themselves in the foot.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    2. Re:Trade war could break out too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Agreed here. I feel like if either the US or China attacked the other's economy it would just be mutually assured destruction.

    3. Re:Trade war could break out too by gtall · · Score: 2

      The U.S. will pay back its debt, otherwise it would go into default and take down the entire world's finances. As of 2017, China held $1.7 Trillion in U.S. out of about $21 Trillion total U.S. debt. Much of that debt is held by entities in the U.S. including the SS account (and I believe Medicare, but I'm unsure about that one). The problem going forward is not the debt owed by China (or Japan), although they could cause problems if they wanted to stick it to the current alleged American administration. The problem going forward is Congress and the alleged president having no problems with further diving into more debt. Sooner or later, those chickens will come home to roost and every budgetary account of the Fed. Gov. will take a hit.

      And taxes will necessarily go up.

    4. Re:Trade war could break out too by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      1) I can't see China stopping exporting to the US. That would hurt them as much if not more than hurt us.

      2) I doubt China cares about open source

    5. Re:Trade war could break out too by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      How is 120% or so of GDP capable of being paid off in a year?

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    6. Re: Trade war could break out too by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I want to point out that the US has defaulted twice on its debt in the last hundred years. History says they will default again.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  10. Re:America: World Police by jabuzz · · Score: 2

    The US government absolutely gets to decided what countries a Chinese company can sell products to that contain *US* parts. If ZTE didn't like that they should not have used US parts then they would be free to export to whoever they liked, subject to other similar export restrictions.

  11. Let's pray this goes through ... by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    ... and ZTE moves to Sailfish OS as a fallback and we finally get more than one iteration of relyable non-Gooapple Touchscreen Smartphones. That would be so cool. Lineage is neat, but I would rather use Sailfish and some Phone that officially uses it. And not just as a side-project.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:Let's pray this goes through ... by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      ZTE's sales are 95% in the US, they won't be able to sell in the US for 7 years. This is a corporate death sentence and it's well deserved based on what they did.

  12. Re:America: World Police by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    In this case, the restrictions are on US companies.

    It's no good having an embargo on Iran and North Korea, and then have it so you can sell to an intermediary that sells to Iran and North Korea. ZTE can do what they want, but if they do, US suppliers can't supply them.

  13. Foxcon in Schenzen by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    Foxcon may have it's headquarters in Taiwan but it manufactures and ships from PRC. So China has control of Foxcon exports and it's just gravy if Taiwan is forced to align itself with china against the US.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  14. Re:Antitrust laws in EU by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    Absolutely. Only problem is ZTE won't be able to make a phone to sell in Europe, so it won't impact anyone there.

  15. ZTE is stupid ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ZTE relies too much of its products on US technologies

    Unlike Huawei, which has made its own version of ARM chips, ZTE has none

    Plus, ZTE relies too much on components from US companies, from antennas to chips and such

    What has happened to ZTE is a reminder for everyone else --- do not base your products on US companies' products, or you might be meeting the same fate as that of ZTE

    I suspect that lesson will be well learned by all companies outside the U. S. of A., and it gonna push China to re-double its efforts into developing a full spectrum of technologies to rival that of the United States (or that from anybody else)

    End result is that China might become even stronger, and products from US companies might have fewer buyers

    1. Re:ZTE is stupid ! by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      ZTE relies too much of its products on US technologies

      And also apparently needed the meager sales it must have had in North Korea, and thats before getting this ban hammer.

      Looks to me like ZTE may be going out of business shortly, unable to compete anywhere on anything.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
  16. Re:The one thing I do not need on an A phone by gtall · · Score: 1

    Stop watching T.V., it is bad for you.

  17. Chinese business paradigm by freeze128 · · Score: 1

    When other Chinese companies run afoul of their customers, they just pack up shop and re-incorporate under a different name, and then sell the same damn thing again. What's to keep ZTE from doing this?

  18. Dang... by PortHaven · · Score: 1

    I got my kids some ZTE ZMax Pro. These have been great phones. Decent screens, and fair amount of memory for a $179 phone. Best of all, USB Type-C which means I am not needing to buy replacement charging cables for my kids every two months. Way faster charging, way way way more durable.

    Zero problems... which when you have 6-10 year olds using regularly, is pretty darn amazing.

  19. Re:America: World Police by PPH · · Score: 1

    In this case, the restrictions are on US companies.

    This.

    Time for everyone to pack their bags and move their corporate home to Ireland.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  20. Can be installed by DrYak · · Score: 2

    there is no legal way to download the Google Play Store and there is no legal way to download the google apps outside the Play Store.

    There no legal ways to download those, yes.
    There's a bout a gazillion of (illegal under US law) ways to download those.
    Those ways are illegal in the US, but are very unlikely to be illegal in any country (like China) that doesn't give much fucks about anything intellectual-property-related (like copyrights, in this case).

    An URL that links to some Chinese website hosting APKs for the above software and sideloads them is all about it takes.

    Some custom ROMs ship with the google apps, which is illegal, but Google turns a blind eye on this practice. This will not be the case with ZTE.

    But unlike the custom ROMs, ZTE's solution could be hosted outside of any legal reach from google.
    A sideloadable APK hosted on a service located in a jurisdiction where Google is unable to file a complaint is all it takes.

    And that's completely ignoring legal alternatives like Micro G - an opensource re-implementation of the services that Google provides in closed blobs. (And all the various APK downloaders that could then be used to side-load apps that normally are only hosted on Google Play)
    (But let's be serious, ZTE is more likely to take the pirate route and provide an "otherwise considered illegal in the US" installation option of the real Google deal, than to take the route of financially support microG developers and maintain legally compatible services)

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  21. Re:The one thing I do not need on an A phone by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

    If back doors in general are a concern to you, and you cannot fully ensure their absence, it would make sense to have them "with" the entity least likely to create problems for you.

    For instance, if you live in the western world, a back door for Chinese intelligence services might be less of a problem than one for the NSA. Because even if the Chinese know your darkest secrets, how likely do you think it is they will share with your local law enforcement?

    --
    C - the footgun of programming languages
  22. How bonds work by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Screwing over the US economy would only end up meaning that China would never be paid back the debt owed by the US. I don't think they want to shoot themselves in the foot.

    Sigh... That's not how it works. China holds treasury bonds which are readily sold in the open market unless you hold them to term. China can sell them on any bond exchange in the world or directly to third parties any time they want and there isn't a damn thing the US can do about it. The only problem really is finding buyers for that many bonds. Furthermore it would be absolutely insane of the US to try to not repay their debt. The value of the US dollar rests on the belief that the US (like a Lanister) always repays its debts.

  23. Tax Cut and Spend all the Way!!!! by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

    Tax Cut and Spend all the Way!!!! GOP 2018!

    1. Re:Tax Cut and Spend all the Way!!!! by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, tell me how far the previous administration sunk the US into debt before you spout off.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  24. WW3 cancelled by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 2

    Sanctions with actual teeth is why North Korea is in the process of negotiating denuclearization. Supply NK, get the Corporate Death Sentence.

    1. Re:WW3 cancelled by luther349 · · Score: 2

      actually yes it proved we where not all talk. thats been the issue for a decade now we talked a big game and did very little.

  25. Gotta keep the Apple/Samsung duopoly going! by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    ANYONE who even thinks of challenging the stranglehold in the USA, gets taken down one way or another. Look what happened to Huawei, now ZTE. If I were a lot of these manufacturers, I wouldn't even bother trying to break into the USA market. Bunch of fools in the USA think you HAVE to buy a phone from a carrier store, which means you are pushed toward the apple/samsung brands. Oh, but they offer zero down, zero interest!!! Yeah, they got rid of the 2 year phone contract, now lock you into the no money down no interest (unless you pay off the phone early) 2 year contract. Then tag you for this fee, that fee, etc...jacking up your bill. There is a whole world of great phones out there, but, unless you search them out, pay full retail (sometimes you can get 2 for the price of the iphone/samsung stuff), you'll never hear of them. Oh, but they spy on users bla bla bla. Gee, you don't think Apple, Samsung, the CIA, FBI, NSA etc...don't?

  26. Simples by maroberts · · Score: 1

    ZTE sells the company under a rebadged name, and they don't have a problem as long as major ZTE shareholders don't control the new company

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

  27. Just as well... by martinfb · · Score: 1

    Just as well. My ZTE smartphone ignores my settings anyway.
    The more notifications and auto-whatever settings I disable, the MORE start running!

    Now I have to turn my cell phone off when I sleep because I keep getting these STUPID notifications about stuff I disabled; thinking it is an emergency call!
    W T F ? ! ? ! ?

    --


    Self-importance and self-indulgence is the root of ALL evil.