Slashdot Mirror


Slashdot Asks: How Do You Like the New Gmail UI? (vortex.com)

Earlier today, Google pushed out the biggest revamp of Gmail in years. In addition to a new material design look, there are quick links to other Google services, such as Calendar, Tasks, and Keep, as well as a new "confidential mode" designed to protect users against certain attacks by having the email(s) automatically expire at a time of the sender's choosing. Long-time Slashdot reader Lauren Weinstein shares their initial impressions of Google's new Gmail UI: Google launched general access to their first significant Gmail user interface (UI) redesign in many years today. It's rolling out gradually -- when it hits your account you'll see a "Try the new Gmail" choice under the settings ("gear") icon on the upper right of the page (you can also revert to the "classic" interface for now, via the same menu). But you probably won't need to revert. Google clearly didn't want to screw up Gmail, and my initial impression is that they've succeeded by avoiding radical changes in the UI. I'll bet that some casual Gmail users might not even immediately notice the differences.

The new Gmail UI is what we could call a "minimally disruptive" redesign of the now "classic" version. The overall design is not altered in major respects. So far I haven't found any notable missing features, options, or settings. My impression is that the back end systems serving Gmail are largely unchanged. Additionally, there are a number of new features (some of which are familiar in design from Google's "Inbox" email interface) that are now surfaced for the new Gmail. Crucially, overall readability and usability (including contrast, font choices, UI selection elements, etc.) seem so close to classic Gmail (at least in my limited testing so far) as to make any differences essentially inconsequential. And it's still possible to select a dark theme from settings if you wish, which results in even higher contrast.
Have you tried the new Gmail? If so, how do you like the new interface?

137 comments

  1. Not seeing it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not seeing the new UI in either the gee sweet account of my workplace or of my alma matter.

    1. Re:Not seeing it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not seeing it either. I access my Gmail account with Thunderbird over POP3. I don't give two shits about their "new UI".

    2. Re:Not seeing it by Excelcia · · Score: 0

      Not seeing the new UI since I have stopped using gmail long ago due to the draconian and pervasive privacy invasions. I'm honestly surprised that a UI change at gmail is even news.

    3. Re:Not seeing it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can hear my mother now "oh come quick I have a problem with my email", what's wrong with it I ask, "It looks different and I can not use it as I don't know where anything is"

    4. Re: Not seeing it by Macfox · · Score: 1

      G Suite is a separate code base. And it often lags Gmail developments. There are some exemptions to this, but it's a common complaint.

      --
      Area51 - We are watching...
    5. Re:Not seeing it by mysticgoat · · Score: 2

      I found that I could switch to the new UI in the Settings dropdown. I looked at it. I switched back to "Classic" mode.

      I'll probably explore the new UI more fully later on. My first impression is that other than some font tweaking, it seems unchanged. Except that now some of the controls are harder to see since the font color almost disappears into my background image.

    6. Re: Not seeing it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations - you've got the worst of both worlds! All the Big Brother surveillance of Google, and all the inconvenience and shitty UI of Thunderbird. You're a WINNER!

  2. 'HTML' mode. by ElectraFlarefire · · Score: 4, Insightful

    'Basic HTML' mode still works for me.. So I'm happy with the UI.. :)

    1. Re:'HTML' mode. by razorh · · Score: 1

      I just discovered this looking at the 'new' gmail. I love it! The only downside is that I've gotten used to having everything split between Primary/Social/Promotions. I can probably do without that to get away from all the cartoony BS.

  3. what you getting paid, beau? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    love that signal to your benefactors that you're promoting engagement like they asked

  4. similar by jemmyw · · Score: 2

    It is so similar to the last theme I'm not sure I'd have even noticed the change. Why is this slight graphics refresh a news story?

    1. Re:similar by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      I think there is some unsend magiks and "cannot print/forward this email" data privacy feature, probably primarily for enterprise/business/premium users

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    2. Re:similar by AlanBDee · · Score: 2

      I was thinking the exact same thing. Then I saw screenshots of what the new UI looks like and mine doesn't look like that. Maybe I'm still using an older version of it.

    3. Re:similar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the Internet is the new Hollywood. They've run out of ideas and now they're recycling the same BS with a crisper and sharper resolution. In this case they haven't really bothered with that!

    4. Re:similar by AlanBDee · · Score: 2

      Figured it out. I had to "Try the new Gmail". They didn't automatically force me to use the new UI, that's how it's done folks. I can't decide if I like the new or old better. I have to try it out for a few weeks to get past the change before I can make a true assessment. My criteria is pretty basic. If I get pissed off for any reason then the new UI sucks and I'll switch back to the old.

    5. Re:similar by jrumney · · Score: 2

      These features are a scam like many similar features in Outlook/Exchange. Corporate users will get used to relying on them, not understanding that if the recipient is not under Google's control, the "confidentiality" features are useless.

    6. Re:similar by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      not understanding that if the recipient is not under Google's control, the "confidentiality" features are useless

      or if the recipient uses the only usable Gmail UI (ie, IMAP)

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    7. Re:similar by caseih · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually no, the "confidentiality" feature works regardless of recipient's email address. The recipient simply gets a link that opens in a browser to a site that Google has control over. This does force the recipient to create a Google account, of course, but it need not be a gmail account. And how they expect to prevent the end user from printing out the screen I don't know! If the recipient does use gmail and the gmail web interface then this "feature" is integrated into Gmail.

    8. Re:similar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not understanding that if the recipient is not under Google's control, the "confidentiality" features are useless

      or if the recipient uses the only usable Gmail UI (ie, IMAP)

      Or if the recipient uses alt-printscreen, or if that is blocked the recipient takes a picture with their cell phone.. At best it deters some.

    9. Re:similar by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 2

      > I'm not sure I'd have even noticed the change

      I posted screenshots and descriptions of what has changed. To the untrained eye changes would probably seem subtle -- but the changes stick out like a sore thumb to me.

      > Why is this slight graphics refresh a news story?

      Reasons.

      /sarcasm Because it is the latest shiny from Apple / Google / Microsoft / etc.

    10. Re:similar by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This sort of security measure isn't any more absolute than a lock on your front door. I think it mostly just protects against clueless users who accidentally forwards sensitive documents to the entire company instead of the intended recipients. And a real benefit is to provide evidence that anyone who breaches confidentiality has obviously done so deliberately. You can't really "accidentally" take a screenshot and then forward it to others.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    11. Re:similar by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The specific threat it is designed to protect against is hacked email accounts. If someone gets into the recipient's email account then they can see every email you ever sent to them, unless it was one of these links to an expiring web page.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    12. Re:similar by afgam28 · · Score: 1

      Why is this slight graphics refresh a news story?

      Because it's more than just a "slight graphics refresh". The new Gmail UI brings in features from Inbox, such as snoozing emails and smart replies, and some new features like "confidential" mode, and add-ons on the right-hand-side (like Calendar, Tasks, etc).

    13. Re:similar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Win+Shift+S to capture region of screen to clipboard
      2. Ctrl+V to paste

      1. Ctrl+PrtScn
      2. Ctrl+V to paste

      I would say that it can be fairly accidental to do that...

    14. Re:similar by AlanBDee · · Score: 1

      I've switched back. Ultimately it's the speed the of the new UI that I don't like. It seems sluggish. I like simple and plain. I'm glad they give is the option; at least for now.

  5. I haven't notice any change at all by franzrogar · · Score: 1

    Maybe because I wipe out years ago any "tab" other than "mail" and used "compact" view always.

    My gmail is exactly the same as always. No visual change at all.

    1. Re:I haven't notice any change at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to enable it under settings.

  6. It's different? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It looks exactly the same.

    1. Re:It's different? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Need to change it under settings to the new version

  7. New UI is crap by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 5, Funny

    Almost instantly reverted. The new UI wastes so much screen space -- and I'm running in compact mode (in both Classicy and New modes)

    * Tabs (Primary, Social, Promotions, Updates, Forums) no longer have a vertical line separating them. You HAVE to mouse over them to see where each button ends.
    * The left column of Inbox, Important, Sent Mail, etc. is wider.
    * The 2nd column which showed the Senders and the number of emails in a thread no longer shows (#) but just the # number by itself.
    * The middle columns are now less wide
    * A new right column which shows vertical icons of Calendar, Keep, Tasks now wastes space
    * The number of lines in the Inbox is now less due to the spacing between threads being increased.

    Lauren Weinstein is a corporate shill who thinks ad blockers are unethical :

    For the record, I don't run any ad blockers. Basically, I consider them unethical

    /sarcasm Who knew that going to the bathroom during an ad is "unethical" !

    1. Re:New UI is crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the same idiots who put the flat UI on Youtube.
      Flat UI has been proven via studies to be less intuitive and harder to use, yet UI designers think they look cool so they keep trying to put them in.

      Morons.

    2. Re:New UI is crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's part of the trend of catering to casual finger users at the expense of productive mouse users.

      I wonder how Photoshop is dealing with this trend. Their traditional UI is not conducive to it.

    3. Re:New UI is crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I tried it on Firefox. It froze for a few seconds, I tried to revert but the menu wasn't responding to my clicks. I F5'd and got to intro popup again, accidentally clicked an email. It froze again, then I disabled it. That pretty much killed my willingness to even try it out.

    4. Re:New UI is crap by bugi · · Score: 1

      Also:

      * High contrast theme is even less high contrast than the prior iteration. In the list of emails, read emails have a slight grey tinge compared to the blinding white of unread emails.

      * Zooming to 200% changes the list of emails from one line to two lines, even with compact density setting.

      * Changing the theme doesn't change the blinding white background of emails. Go to the dark or terminal theme, let your eyes adjust, then try to read an email. Instant retina burn.

      It's like they're progressively trying to sabotage usability ever more with each UI iteration. Google, please bring back the original, even if just as a theme.

      I guess I'm going to have to find a real email application again and use imap. Gmail was wonderful when it first came out, but now it's just sad.

    5. Re:New UI is crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good luck in getting a real email app. I'm trying to restore an old throwback: mutt with getmail, just so I can have keyboard only email. (mouse optional)

  8. It hasn't rolled out universally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The story I read, it was not available to everyone yet, and going out in chunks...

  9. I POP it by Stan92057 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So i can careless, i POP all my email to Thunderbird until i cant. then will create my own email server but as long as i can POP it im happy.

    --
    Jack of all trades,master of none
    1. Re:I POP it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried IMAP but google has fucked that up so badly it isn't usable.

    2. Re:I POP it by JamesNorton · · Score: 4, Informative

      So i can careless, i POP all my email to Thunderbird until i cant. then will create my own email server but as long as i can POP it im happy.

      I think you mean "I couldn't care less". :-)

    3. Re:I POP it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      We could care less what you think.

    4. Re:I POP it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much less?

    5. Re:I POP it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's cause gmail has no concept of folders. Everything just gets tagged in some way and jumbled into one folder. Pretty much your only hope for finding something more than a few days old is hoping it turns up in a search. It's a fucking mess for productivity. I just started a job where they use gsuite and it fucking blows for productivity. Thankfully they are making a move to to office and I should be able to use outlook again. Say what you will about outlook but an actual email client is far more productive than anything that any web mail can do when dealing with an endless torrent of emails.

    6. Re:I POP it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't really found a POP/IMAP email client I actually like. Gmail's new UI revamp is actually pretty nice. It's much better than that Inbox garbage they tried a little while back (and it's still available for those that want to try it at https://inbox.google.com).

    7. Re:I POP it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's put it this way, we'd have to go into training.

    8. Re:I POP it by Sporkinum · · Score: 1

      Thunderbird on PC, and Nine for android.

      --
      "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
    9. Re:I POP it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tagging email is the important thing, throwing all to just boxes is not productive.

      Once the email gets tagged, you can filter and find them and place them to corresponding folders. That is possible with GMail. You create filters and you get them to side and they work just like any inbox etc you have! Only difference is that you can later search them far more faster and easier with global search!

      But, we fucked up the email!

      Email should have stayed forever as text-only formatting or maybe a simple RTF formatting. Without any HTML! Without any embedded images, sounds, music, files etc!

      It should be easy to read and easy to write and have just super simple and basic delivery for documents as attachments.
      Writing a email should be as easy as opening a notepad and writing a letter with pen.
      Write a receiver, write a subject, write the email and attach the attachments and send. Nothing really fancy things.
      Simple connectivity over IMAP. Have push notification and that's it!

  10. I wouldn't know. by sconeu · · Score: 4, Informative

    I use an IMAP client to read my Gmail

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    1. Re:I wouldn't know. by old_kennyp · · Score: 1

      Same here, IMAP via Thunderbird client on my PC or app on the phone.
      Just tried to log in to the website and it wil not let without my phone to authenticate! WTF, I never set up 2 factor authentication for mail!
      if i need my phone to allow me to open a website, i might as well just us the gmail app on the phone !

  11. Looks largely the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aside from being able to have your calendar or other Google services in a side frame, I doubt most people even noticed the difference.

  12. What? by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My IMAP interface with gmail remains unchanged. I have never been infected with the desire to use any webmail, especially Google's. As long as they allow IMAP or POP connections, I will continue to use gmail, but not for anything important.

    --
    Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    1. Re:What? by houghi · · Score: 1

      I go a step further and not evenb use Gmail. I have my own domwin name and use Roundcube on my own server for webmail and also have IMAP for my Android.

      As an addition to that, I have limitess aliasses. When a new website needs my email address I use a specific email address. e.g. for slashdot.org that would be slashdot.org@example.com.

      That way not only do I know if an email really comes from the company and is easy to filter.

      If I get an emnail from my bank to a generic email adress I also use, I will know it is spam. If I get email from somebody that is not my bank to my banking adress, I know that that address is somehow compromised and probably other data from that company as well. Either by being hacked or having sold anything.

      To be fair, till now only Ebay has done this and I assume because I have not unclicked not to have the email not being given to others on each page I visited.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    2. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google does not want us to use IMAP. In G-Suite admin it is not possible to enable imap for all accounts on a domain. You need to login on each account on the webmail interface and "allow unsecure apps" (Thunderbird, Outlook) in the settings. Imagine doing that for 200 users.

  13. Why are the new UI designs allowed ? :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We have monochrome designs where we previously had full colour designs (Android, etc) with all the associated loss of valuable information.

    We have flat designs where we can't see what's clickable.

    We have thinner fonts and lines which are harder to read unless you have perfect vision.

    Why isn't there massive pushback from all these changes which reduce usability instead of enhancing it ?

    1. Re:Why are the new UI designs allowed ? :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why isn't there massive pushback from all these changes which reduce usability instead of enhancing it ?

      Because modern UI design is a crypto-fascist plot. Think about it. Have you ever met a UI designer? No one has. They don't exist.

      UI tweaks are a control mechanism. The NSA, working with MI6 and former KGB expats, have infiltrated Silicon Valley. Internet is the new mass media. Control the internet population and you control the world.

      These UI changes are part of a long game to degrade people's ability to absorb accurate information. Pretty soon everything will be eggshell colored text on an ivory background. At that point, who's to say who is right? Fake news, real news, it all reads the same when everything is illegible. The CIA wins.

      There is a resistance movement. We render everything as green text on a black background, just as god intended. Our callsign is ][. Look for us in the dark places on the interwebs, where mortals fear to tread.

    2. Re:Why are the new UI designs allowed ? :-( by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You forgot:

      We now have light gray on white visual elements, because high contrast, easy to spot UI elements are so gauche.

      We have mystery meat navigation elements (text doesn't show up until you mouse over), because even though designers 15 years ago figured out that was bad, a new generation apparently has to relearn the same lessons.

      Sigh... Generally speaking, the new UI looks prettier and more professional / polished (the old UI was admittedly ugly), but it actually looks slightly less usable to me. It's a shame we can't get both.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    3. Re:Why are the new UI designs allowed ? :-( by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      We have thinner fonts and lines which are harder to read unless you have perfect vision.

      The first thing I noticed about the new Gmail is that the fonts are heavier weight than the old ones.

      We have flat designs where we can't see what's clickable.

      This is a consequence of touch interfaces. When browsing the web on a phone you only have a big fat finger, no precision single pixel pointer, so all the hit boxes have to be enlarged. This people have become used to tapping in the general area of what they want and not worrying about hitting it precisely. Making the user try to aim at a visible hit box is considered bad now.

      Unfortunately this does lead to Cheeseplant Syndrome, where the user is sometimes unsure what they can click on. Material design tries to alleviate that through the use of colour hints, and on desktop mouse-over highlighting.

      Note I'm not endorsing any of this, just explaining it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:Why are the new UI designs allowed ? :-( by Voyager529 · · Score: 2

      You forgot:

      We now have light gray on white visual elements, because high contrast, easy to spot UI elements are so gauche.

      We have mystery meat navigation elements (text doesn't show up until you mouse over), because even though designers 15 years ago figured out that was bad, a new generation apparently has to relearn the same lessons.

      And it will be harder for them to learn it.

      Designers in the 80's and 90's had to give people a reason to use their software, which meant it HAD to be easy to use, it HAD to make sense, and it HAD to convince the money men so business workflow needed to be the core selling point. UIs were still just as likely to be done by programmers as they were by artists who were only then making the migration to DTP software, but had made a career out of doing things by hand. Finally, the lack of broadband meant ship-then-patch was simply not an option so everything had to be done right the first time.

      This generation ships software with UIs made by art majors. Everyone already has their data in $SOME_PROGRAM, meaning that moving to a competitor is commonly not an option. Seriously, when was the last time that a software UI change was so bad, users left it based on the UI? When was the last time a UI complaint managed to make its way up to the desk of someone with the ability to do something about it? With no repercussions for undesirable UIs, accolades for pretty art projects, and the realization that declaring a UI "basically finished" means UI designers declare themselves out of a job, there is zero disincentive to having UIs that make it abundantly clear that style matters more than substance.

    5. Re:Why are the new UI designs allowed ? :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong.

      Touch interfaces forces the clickable thing to be large - to match finger size. So, fewer 'things' in a limited area.

      Touch do not in any way prevent the good old 3D highlight that made a button so different from any rectangular text field.

      Touch does not make it necessary to be unsure 'what is clickable', the larger elements have even more room for a 3D highlight. Heck, they could make the highlight much thicker, and have large crude buttons like some 60's terminal keyboard. Surely they want something nicer looking, but absolutely no need to hide the difference between clickable and non-clickable. And so, no need for mouse-over highlighting either. Make the buttons look like obvious buttons permanently.

    6. Re:Why are the new UI designs allowed ? :-( by jmarkantes · · Score: 1

      So true. UI and UX was pretty much figured out around 1999, and the website useit.com (now defunct) by Jakob Neilson and others was the go to for articles and research for web design. How the fuck has it gone downhill since? Fucking bullshit.

    7. Re: Why are the new UI designs allowed ? :-( by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      +1 insightful

    8. Re: Why are the new UI designs allowed ? :-( by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      Almost all American software has declined in quality since that period.

      Probably due to tech brain drain. Because of the massive drop in inflation-adjusted pay, and ensuing proletarianization of the tech industry. Facilitated by the H1-B program. And inbred venture capitalist twats spending QE money on thousands of loss-making "startups", who see their users as products to be sold, not customers to be served.

      Remember - if you hate America, and want to see even more Americans impoverished - then we need to import more H1-B indentured laborers, and give even more public QE money to cretinous upper class twits.

    9. Re:Why are the new UI designs allowed ? :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Usability researches are the least decorated and mentioned people.
      Industry designers who work with usability researches produced the best HIG (Human Interface Guidelines) back in the days because it was all about empirical research and testing.

      GUI advantage over CLI was that you could see what were your options, without remembering the commands or search for them.
      So at some point screen sizes sake it was required to do a small compromise by doing a drop-down menus (or more like pop-up menus in text editors where they appeared) by groups of the context, like File, Edit and so on. But most used ones were always at once visible in the GUI at glance.

      Fairly many thing went right for long time until Microsoft wanted to do the Office 2007 and their "Ribbon" GUI. Or maybe it was Windows XP and Windows Vista with all glare and such. Then even Apple joined with their iOS 2016 or so when they let Ive to design the interface. Hell you don't know what is a text and what is a link and what is a button and what is where when everything is just white, blue and thin!

      But what did happen on other side? GNOME pushed something idiotic "Hey, here is full screen app menu!" and KDE ran after in 5.x series And Canonical got the Unity idea with "global menu" etc.
      Google was still in good track with the Android when Holo was out, like who remembers the old YouTube Holo applications? They even changed the GUI once a week for few months!
        But even before holo the settings were great https://lh6.ggpht.com/CVSkLBNG5zT3lJaMi4i2yvB22ka5mD4gpNmqZinoO2nzoGRXbOh-O-byyozMTWu6Uck=h310

      You could see what is ENABLED and what is DISABLED. No you have a f*ng virtual switch that you can't tell is it On or is it Off, and why to heck it needs to be such? Tick in a box is best!

      Everytime I hear someone states they are user interface designers, I want to punch them because they start to tell how they learned all in one 2 week college class and how they love to design great interfaces and do them, and all look crap and behave like crap as they just think what they see as cool.

  14. Re:"Their" inital impressions? by Barny · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's not plural in this case.

    Their is a gender-neutral pronoun, singular.

    Not going into the politics of it, I'm just a writer.

    --
    ...
    /me sighs
  15. There's a new UI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I haven't noticed anything new.

  16. on my Android-based BB - little differeance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It wasn't easy to re-send. Still isn't. I've turned-off the O/S spell-checker, but it still wants to suggest what it thinks I want to type, as opposed to what I actually am typing. Still wants to correct me. New? OK. Better? Meh.

  17. meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I haven't switched back yet, which is saying something. But it does feel a bit unpolished and unfamiliar...

  18. Blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It makes me want to throw up in my mouth.

  19. Visual differences comparing Classic and New by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 5, Informative

    Since the bloody article can't even show the visual differences here are screenshots comparing the old and new:

    * The left column/sidebar of Inbox, Important, Sent Mail, etc. is wider. Number of unread are now in their own sub-column instead of immediately after the Folder name.

    Old left Sidebar
    New left Sidebar

    * Tabs (Primary, Social, Promotions, Updates, Forums) no longer have a vertical line separating them. You HAVE to mouse over them to see where each button ends.

    Old Tabs
    New Tabs

    * The 2nd column which showed the Senders and the number of emails in a thread no longer shows (#) but just the # number by itself making this harder to read.

    Old senders
    New senders

    The Topic column is less wide, meaning you can't see entire short emails now.

    Old subject
    New subject

    Do. Not. Want.

    --
    "Get off my LAN." -- Grumpy old programmer

    1. Re:Visual differences comparing Classic and New by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree... I do say, as far as re-writes go, it isn't that bad. But it's not for me.

    2. Re:Visual differences comparing Classic and New by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      Excellent post - these are the EXACT reasons I reverted to the old version.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    3. Re:Visual differences comparing Classic and New by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the left sidebar, you can use the hamburger button (main menu) to toggle between fixed column (wider than previously) or icons only (technically narrower) until you hover over it.

    4. Re:Visual differences comparing Classic and New by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellent post - these are the EXACT reasons I reverted to the old version.

      Likewise! I immediately hit the Send Feedback button and commented on the exact differences that were pointed out here. Then I promptly switched back to classic view. Hopefully their auditing tools track how many tried the new UI and for how long before they switched back to classic where they felt things were right in the world.

  20. If this was a /. poll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd go for the none/cowboyneal option...
    Ditched google entirely and went to protonmail

  21. Web consoles suck by fluffernutter · · Score: 2

    Web consoles suck, period. They take twice as long to access and experience severe limitations in the way with which you can interact with them, even for something as simple as an email client.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  22. Re:No internet in prison, sad! COMEY'S FAULT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which president would that be? "200 million more migrants" Macron?

  23. How to activate the new UI by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here are step-by-step instructions to try out the new UI:

    1. Click on Gear top right

    2. Click on the first menu choice Try the new Gmail
    If you don't see "Try the new Gmail" menu choice -- it hasn't been rolled out to your account (yet).

    3. Select the layout Default, Comfortable, Compact
    Don't worry if you picked the wrong choice. You can click on gear icon in the top right and the non-descript Display density to choose between the three.

    Thankfully we can Go back to classic Gmail for now -- until Google rams it down our throats, whether we want it or not.

    1. Re: How to activate the new UI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Logged in to see if it's any better than my POP client.
      I can't figure out how to create folders to sort my mail. Any tips?

    2. Re: How to activate the new UI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gmail doesn't believe in Folders - it uses a Tags concept instead.

      Tags get faked as Folders over IMAP connections but unless you're IMAP client is Gmail-aware you're likely adding tags to messages when you move them between folders (as opposed to replacing tags).

    3. Re:How to activate the new UI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note that you may need to do this in Chome. For me, the "Try the new Gmail" link did not appear in either Safari or Firefox, only Chrome. Once I enabled with Chrome, the option to switch back and forth (which I promptly switched back...) was there for me in other browsers.

  24. Love the calendar but not the tooltips by zaphod · · Score: 2

    I think it's great having the option to always have the calendar up within the Gmail screen. It's something I've wanted for a long time.

    The one really annoying piece for me is that the main window tooltips stay up too long (like the Refresh button). If you hover over an icon too long and move the cursor away, the tooltip stays up for over a second. Sounds short but it's way too long. The tooltips for the icons on the right side are timed correctly though.

    I use the compact option with a dark theme so I don't see a lot of wasted space.

    --
    Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they're not after you!
    1. Re:Love the calendar but not the tooltips by quintus_horatius · · Score: 1

      The one really annoying piece for me is that the main window tooltips stay up too long (like the Refresh button).

      I didn't notice that until I read your comment, and now it's making me nuts.

  25. Material Design Is Trash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone knows skeuomorphism is a tool of the Cisnormative White Supremacist Patriarchy.

  26. Haven't noticed by VeryFluffyBunny · · Score: 1

    Gmail's changed something? I haven't noticed any differences in my email client.

    --
    Debate is a form of harassment. Do not question my truth.
  27. How to disable Snooze in Gmail phone app? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's awful.

  28. Dont fret. Its like Pittsburgh weather. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    If you don't like the change, dont fret, dont sweat. Just wait for a few minutes. It will change, it is like Pittsburgh weather.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Dont fret. Its like Pittsburgh weather. by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 1

      That may be, but if you don't like the weather in Pittsburgh, you should probably just leave.

  29. sucks balls. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    already got a call from an elderly neighbor. hates the new gmail so much, wishes she could go back to charter's webmail*

    *(for those unfamiliar: on a scale of 1(love) to 10(hate), gmail scores about 908490584958049584958 on her hate scale. charter's webmail sucks that bad)

  30. UI Research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Companies used to follow published HCI research guidelines when developing their interfaces. What research is Google providing that demonstrate these new changes are in the best interests of everyone using them?

  31. Depressing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That anyone here would use webmail over a real mail client let alone Gmail is deeply depressing.

    Even HRC who is old enough to be you all's great grandma has an email server in her basement and she doesn't know anything about computers.

    1. Re:Depressing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not depressing nor surprising. People like to access the same view of their email across their desktop computer, mobile phone(s) and tablet(s) and there is a dearth of free IMAP providers out there.

      Hint: most ISPs only provide POP3 access to customer email so anyone who's a packrat or wants to organize their mail into folders needs somewhere that provides IMAP service. People are already paying their ISP too much for internet access - why should they pay even more for IMAP mail?

  32. Lauren Weinstein is on the Google payroll by alfino · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've no evidence for this, but the way he keeps defending big-G in the wake of all the privacy problems we've seen and continue to feel, he's been touting them as being stellar about privacy and that they would never, and bla.

    Maybe it's true that unlike Facebook, Google doesn't sell your data. But the main reason for that is that they want to monetise you all by themselves. Also, nothing would stop them from doing so tomorrow.

    Gmail innovations here or there, your best bet is to get rid of Google and Facebook, use plugins like uMatrix and Cookie AutoDelete and navigate the Web without splattering your fingerprints everywhere.

    --
    echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:" net@madduck
  33. Apps accounts? by binarybum · · Score: 2

    It doesn't seem to be pushed to apps accounts / G Suite unfortunately.

    --
    ôó
    1. Re:Apps accounts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has to be enabled in domain advanced gmail settings by the g-suite admin, but it is available for users to choose after this is done.

  34. OK... But by johnsnails · · Score: 1

    Too much emphasis on say the attachments which clutters the whole page and not on say the top tabs. Not too bad in compact mode I guess.

  35. Last time Google pulled this shit with G+ by blind+biker · · Score: 1

    ...I abandoned G+ never to go back. I used G+ until it allowed me to use the old interface. G+ would revert back to the new, flat version every once in a while in spite of me going back to the classic version. One day I could not go back to the classic version, and that's when G+ lost a user.

    I don't mind doing the same with the Gmail web interface. It's harder to abandon the e-mail system, but it is not difficult to abandon the WEB UI.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  36. don't see any changes by swell · · Score: 2

    There it is in Thunderbird along with all my other email accounts. They all look alike in their little windows and they all function the same- no learning a different interface for each account. Some of these accounts date back to the last century and all the emails I want to keep are preserved here and on their servers. Never understood the concept of using a browser to read email.

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
    1. Re:don't see any changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, I'm all out of "aren't you clever" stickers - I used up the entire roll on the people who posted the exact same thing before you did.

    2. Re:don't see any changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you post on every thread about 'x' to say how you don't use 'x'?

  37. Re:"Their" inital impressions? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1, Informative

    Actual writers know that, in Standard English, the gender-neutral third-person singular possessive is his.

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  38. *My* UI still looks just fine, thanks by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 2

    IMAP/Thunderbird here. Web-based mail is so very Eternal September.

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  39. Gaaah, those tabs! by Radical+Moderate · · Score: 1

    Idiotic. Oddly, gmail UI hasn't changed. not sure why.

    Thanks for posting the pics.

    --
    Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
  40. Only morons and clueless newbies see it by nospam007 · · Score: 1, Informative

    The rest of us uses mail programs to read their mail and couldn't care less.

    1. Re:Only morons and clueless newbies see it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only morons and clueless people make wide ranging statements about other people being morons and clueless. [/Irony not lost]

  41. Gmail UI is shit by MrL0G1C · · Score: 0

    Gmail UI is moronic shit, stands to reason that they're not going to change it much this time.

    --
    Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
  42. Gmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Friends don't let friends use gmail.

  43. UI sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's almost identical to the old UI, which also sucked. This is what you get when you design by committee: crap.

  44. Re:"Their" inital impressions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in the old days "they" was used, but probably the post-sputnik educational pile-on left it behind.

  45. No changes here? by evlkind · · Score: 1

    There's no changes to my gmail, perhaps because it's through another domain, just using gmail as a backend? /shrug

  46. Re:"Their" inital impressions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every time you use the the singular they, God kills a kitten.

  47. Re:"Their" inital impressions? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

    That depends a lot on the style manual that you read. My publisher (Pearson - owns InformIT and the several imprints including Prentice Hall, Addison-Wesley) recommends alternating male and female pronouns for gender neutral terminology, but permits using the plural. I find the alternating horribly confusing (if you're talking about a single person and switching from he to she every use then it seems like you're talking about two people). I believe that the last two revisions of the Chicago Manual of Style also now endorse use of they and their as gender-neutral pronouns (though earlier editions were strongly against it). I think the Oxford style guide now also recommends 'they' as a gender-neutral pronoun, though that was a more recent change.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  48. The god damned font size by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can read the text on the left sidebar without my glasses now, and I'm blind as a bat.

  49. Searching: Maybe I'm doing it wrong, but... by pipingguy · · Score: 1

    When using the search function, the old interface does not highlight the previously-chosen (guessed) message in the search results when you return to it, making it difficult to pick up where you left off.

    It's such a minor detail and so useful that I don't know why it is not this way.

  50. How do I like it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck Gmail and Fuck Google!

  51. Re:"Their" inital impressions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That hatred-filled, vindictive God.

  52. Can't See Any major Changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but since I only use the regular receive/send features, i guess i wouldn't.

  53. No strong opinion either way but... by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

    ...it still doesn't fix one of the number one flaws with GMail which is this: if GMail is going to group everything into conversations, why does it still have separate Inbox and Send Items folders? Basically, Inbox now just means "Everything where someone has sent you something", and "Sent Items" means "Mostly the same as the Inbox, plus a few times you sent an email but never got a reply."

    The look and feel? It's OK. It doesn't show off MD to its best potential, but it's good enough. I had no problems finding anything, and some of the features, such as associating actions with the emails themselves, were well done.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  54. Re:"Their" inital impressions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every time you use an incorrect gendered pronoun when referring to a trans person, you get lambasted for it. Given the choice, I'd rather slightly irritate grammar nerds than open the gender politics can of worms.

  55. There are... differences. by zarmanto · · Score: 1

    Personally, I'm not overly impressed by the changes... but those changes aren't so horrible as to make me want to run away and hide in the old interface, either. In fact, the only difference which seems even remotely noteworthy to me, is that the entire interface appears to have become ever so slightly more sluggish -- but even that isn't horrific; it's just mildly annoying. The reality is, the new interface is going to be rolled out to all Gmail users eventually anyway, likely with little or no change from the current state... and ultimately, we'll all just get used to it. Eventually.

    But honestly, this feels to me like nothing more than an exercise in change for it's own sake. Basically, they had one or two minor new features which they wanted to roll into the interface, but instead of just shoehorning them into the existing interface -- which almost certainly would have worked just fine -- they decided to use this as an excuse to throw a whole new coat of paint at a wall that really only had a few scratches that nobody even noticed anymore -- except of course for the guy who threw that original coat of paint on, eons ago. (Little known fact of life: That old adage about artists being their own worst critic can be equally applied to just about every skilled worker, anywhere.) And of course, everyone knows that any good interior designer never lets their client choose the same color scheme that they already had... the designer has to justify their sky-high invoice at the end of the day, after all! ("I've got it! Let's change everything from yellow to cyan! Trust me -- I promise it'll be fantastic!")

    In addition, the developers who had spent countless hours implementing scads of features that are never used, have doubtless been pressuring those designers to help them justify their existence, as well. (All of us old-timers have seen the results of that quite a few times, in the form of the various feature reshuffles which have been thrust upon Microsoft Office users. "Hey -- what's this button? Is it a new feature?" "Huh? Oh... nah. I've used that feature a couple of times before. It's really not as useful as you might think, though...") The all-too-predictable results are, the new Gmail interface compresses and de-emphasizes features that most people use on a daily basis, expands (and surfaces) a few features that very few people care about or will ever use, alongside squeezing in those one or two actual new features... that last of which had in reality driven the entire venture in the first place.

    To wit: much work was done, to accomplish little.

  56. Re:"Their" inital impressions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Fortunately, the 'correct' gender pronoun is easy because there in only two genders. Men & women. Now, some men & women don't want to live in the traditional gender roles. That's fine, they can dress however they like - but they are still men and women. The gender classification apply to what you look like naked. What anyone 'think' or 'feel' doesn't matter. Classification must work even for dead people who don't think.

    Pronouns is still easy.

  57. It's never going to beat a dedicated mail client by plazman30 · · Score: 1

    Google can do what they want with the UI to try and make it better, but I don't think it will ever compete with a full on dedicated mail client like Thunderbird of Geary. I find I can get most tasks done faster with a thick client than I can with the Gmail website.

  58. Labs removed by bobbomo · · Score: 2

    Due to the removal of Labs, I no longer have an upcoming calendar events on the left side. I can open a today view on the right, but not just a list of upcoming events.

  59. Only morons and clueless newbies use email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The rest of us uses real paper mail and couldn't care less.

  60. How to fix the new UI by Daetrin · · Score: 2

    I asked about disabling some of the changes on the Google Product Forums, and the "official" members told me there was no way to change them and to "Please use the in-app 'Send feedback' link to submit your request/issue directly to Google. You will not receive a response from Google."

    ("You will not receive a response from Google" seems like it ought to be their new motto.)

    However a heroic stranger happened along and developed a number of CSS hacks usable via Stylish that cleans up almost all the most annoying elements of the new UI! So i now share my good fortune with you!

    CSS Fixes for new Google UI

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  61. Collapsed threads by biggaijin · · Score: 1

    I don't see any noticeable difference on the web version. But, in the Android version on my phone, the program now collapses email threads into a single long concatenated message with portions hidden. It makes the replies in the thread, particularly the later ones, very hard to read.

  62. I don't use Google for Mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go ahead if you like your messages scanned.

    Me and my GPG encrypted messages are just fine on my own mail host.

  63. Won't even display emails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I swapped over to the new layout yesterday and left the tab in firefox open for most of the work day with several forced cache refreshes of the page. For hours I was receiving emails to my phone but the "Inbox" would never display anything but "No New Emails" I'm baffled as to how a redesign can break such a vital part of the design. The rest of the UI loads properly but the one crucial section fails to load at all and just displayed it's placeholder.

  64. Different by DaFallus · · Score: 1

    Its different, so I'm sure the vast majority of /. hates it even if they haven't seen it. Some will say they access Gmail through Lynx so it doesn't impact them, and the rest will chide everyone else for not running their own mail server inside of a Faraday cage only accessible through a VPN based on the moon.

    --
    No one cares what your captcha was

    Houston TX, USA
  65. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  66. No sir, I don't like it by DeAxes · · Score: 1

    No Sir, I don't like it.

  67. Don't use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never used GMail. Haven't you heard, it is google spyware?

  68. Re: No internet in prison, sad! COMEY'S FAULT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are a lot of things to dislike about Putin, but I don't think he's a traitor to the Russian people. Why do you say that, Ivan?

  69. They've broken the scrollbar, is one thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The new design has a column of icons down the right – Calendar, Notes, Tasks – meaning that when you slam the mousepointer to the right edge to try to use the scroll bar, you don't get the scroll bar.

    As a UX designer myself, I would hesitate to break scrolling. (British Understatement.)

  70. Re:"Their" inital impressions? by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 1

    It would be even weirder to use *his* for Lauren than *their* - unless you know something I don't.