Slashdot Mirror


Slashdot Asks: How Do You Like the New Gmail UI? (vortex.com)

Earlier today, Google pushed out the biggest revamp of Gmail in years. In addition to a new material design look, there are quick links to other Google services, such as Calendar, Tasks, and Keep, as well as a new "confidential mode" designed to protect users against certain attacks by having the email(s) automatically expire at a time of the sender's choosing. Long-time Slashdot reader Lauren Weinstein shares their initial impressions of Google's new Gmail UI: Google launched general access to their first significant Gmail user interface (UI) redesign in many years today. It's rolling out gradually -- when it hits your account you'll see a "Try the new Gmail" choice under the settings ("gear") icon on the upper right of the page (you can also revert to the "classic" interface for now, via the same menu). But you probably won't need to revert. Google clearly didn't want to screw up Gmail, and my initial impression is that they've succeeded by avoiding radical changes in the UI. I'll bet that some casual Gmail users might not even immediately notice the differences.

The new Gmail UI is what we could call a "minimally disruptive" redesign of the now "classic" version. The overall design is not altered in major respects. So far I haven't found any notable missing features, options, or settings. My impression is that the back end systems serving Gmail are largely unchanged. Additionally, there are a number of new features (some of which are familiar in design from Google's "Inbox" email interface) that are now surfaced for the new Gmail. Crucially, overall readability and usability (including contrast, font choices, UI selection elements, etc.) seem so close to classic Gmail (at least in my limited testing so far) as to make any differences essentially inconsequential. And it's still possible to select a dark theme from settings if you wish, which results in even higher contrast.
Have you tried the new Gmail? If so, how do you like the new interface?

69 of 137 comments (clear)

  1. 'HTML' mode. by ElectraFlarefire · · Score: 4, Insightful

    'Basic HTML' mode still works for me.. So I'm happy with the UI.. :)

    1. Re:'HTML' mode. by razorh · · Score: 1

      I just discovered this looking at the 'new' gmail. I love it! The only downside is that I've gotten used to having everything split between Primary/Social/Promotions. I can probably do without that to get away from all the cartoony BS.

  2. similar by jemmyw · · Score: 2

    It is so similar to the last theme I'm not sure I'd have even noticed the change. Why is this slight graphics refresh a news story?

    1. Re:similar by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      I think there is some unsend magiks and "cannot print/forward this email" data privacy feature, probably primarily for enterprise/business/premium users

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    2. Re:similar by AlanBDee · · Score: 2

      I was thinking the exact same thing. Then I saw screenshots of what the new UI looks like and mine doesn't look like that. Maybe I'm still using an older version of it.

    3. Re:similar by AlanBDee · · Score: 2

      Figured it out. I had to "Try the new Gmail". They didn't automatically force me to use the new UI, that's how it's done folks. I can't decide if I like the new or old better. I have to try it out for a few weeks to get past the change before I can make a true assessment. My criteria is pretty basic. If I get pissed off for any reason then the new UI sucks and I'll switch back to the old.

    4. Re:similar by jrumney · · Score: 2

      These features are a scam like many similar features in Outlook/Exchange. Corporate users will get used to relying on them, not understanding that if the recipient is not under Google's control, the "confidentiality" features are useless.

    5. Re:similar by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      not understanding that if the recipient is not under Google's control, the "confidentiality" features are useless

      or if the recipient uses the only usable Gmail UI (ie, IMAP)

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    6. Re:similar by caseih · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually no, the "confidentiality" feature works regardless of recipient's email address. The recipient simply gets a link that opens in a browser to a site that Google has control over. This does force the recipient to create a Google account, of course, but it need not be a gmail account. And how they expect to prevent the end user from printing out the screen I don't know! If the recipient does use gmail and the gmail web interface then this "feature" is integrated into Gmail.

    7. Re:similar by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 2

      > I'm not sure I'd have even noticed the change

      I posted screenshots and descriptions of what has changed. To the untrained eye changes would probably seem subtle -- but the changes stick out like a sore thumb to me.

      > Why is this slight graphics refresh a news story?

      Reasons.

      /sarcasm Because it is the latest shiny from Apple / Google / Microsoft / etc.

    8. Re:similar by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This sort of security measure isn't any more absolute than a lock on your front door. I think it mostly just protects against clueless users who accidentally forwards sensitive documents to the entire company instead of the intended recipients. And a real benefit is to provide evidence that anyone who breaches confidentiality has obviously done so deliberately. You can't really "accidentally" take a screenshot and then forward it to others.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    9. Re:similar by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The specific threat it is designed to protect against is hacked email accounts. If someone gets into the recipient's email account then they can see every email you ever sent to them, unless it was one of these links to an expiring web page.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    10. Re:similar by afgam28 · · Score: 1

      Why is this slight graphics refresh a news story?

      Because it's more than just a "slight graphics refresh". The new Gmail UI brings in features from Inbox, such as snoozing emails and smart replies, and some new features like "confidential" mode, and add-ons on the right-hand-side (like Calendar, Tasks, etc).

    11. Re:similar by AlanBDee · · Score: 1

      I've switched back. Ultimately it's the speed the of the new UI that I don't like. It seems sluggish. I like simple and plain. I'm glad they give is the option; at least for now.

  3. I haven't notice any change at all by franzrogar · · Score: 1

    Maybe because I wipe out years ago any "tab" other than "mail" and used "compact" view always.

    My gmail is exactly the same as always. No visual change at all.

  4. New UI is crap by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 5, Funny

    Almost instantly reverted. The new UI wastes so much screen space -- and I'm running in compact mode (in both Classicy and New modes)

    * Tabs (Primary, Social, Promotions, Updates, Forums) no longer have a vertical line separating them. You HAVE to mouse over them to see where each button ends.
    * The left column of Inbox, Important, Sent Mail, etc. is wider.
    * The 2nd column which showed the Senders and the number of emails in a thread no longer shows (#) but just the # number by itself.
    * The middle columns are now less wide
    * A new right column which shows vertical icons of Calendar, Keep, Tasks now wastes space
    * The number of lines in the Inbox is now less due to the spacing between threads being increased.

    Lauren Weinstein is a corporate shill who thinks ad blockers are unethical :

    For the record, I don't run any ad blockers. Basically, I consider them unethical

    /sarcasm Who knew that going to the bathroom during an ad is "unethical" !

    1. Re:New UI is crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I tried it on Firefox. It froze for a few seconds, I tried to revert but the menu wasn't responding to my clicks. I F5'd and got to intro popup again, accidentally clicked an email. It froze again, then I disabled it. That pretty much killed my willingness to even try it out.

    2. Re:New UI is crap by bugi · · Score: 1

      Also:

      * High contrast theme is even less high contrast than the prior iteration. In the list of emails, read emails have a slight grey tinge compared to the blinding white of unread emails.

      * Zooming to 200% changes the list of emails from one line to two lines, even with compact density setting.

      * Changing the theme doesn't change the blinding white background of emails. Go to the dark or terminal theme, let your eyes adjust, then try to read an email. Instant retina burn.

      It's like they're progressively trying to sabotage usability ever more with each UI iteration. Google, please bring back the original, even if just as a theme.

      I guess I'm going to have to find a real email application again and use imap. Gmail was wonderful when it first came out, but now it's just sad.

  5. I POP it by Stan92057 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So i can careless, i POP all my email to Thunderbird until i cant. then will create my own email server but as long as i can POP it im happy.

    --
    Jack of all trades,master of none
    1. Re:I POP it by JamesNorton · · Score: 4, Informative

      So i can careless, i POP all my email to Thunderbird until i cant. then will create my own email server but as long as i can POP it im happy.

      I think you mean "I couldn't care less". :-)

    2. Re:I POP it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's cause gmail has no concept of folders. Everything just gets tagged in some way and jumbled into one folder. Pretty much your only hope for finding something more than a few days old is hoping it turns up in a search. It's a fucking mess for productivity. I just started a job where they use gsuite and it fucking blows for productivity. Thankfully they are making a move to to office and I should be able to use outlook again. Say what you will about outlook but an actual email client is far more productive than anything that any web mail can do when dealing with an endless torrent of emails.

    3. Re:I POP it by Sporkinum · · Score: 1

      Thunderbird on PC, and Nine for android.

      --
      "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
  6. I wouldn't know. by sconeu · · Score: 4, Informative

    I use an IMAP client to read my Gmail

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    1. Re:I wouldn't know. by old_kennyp · · Score: 1

      Same here, IMAP via Thunderbird client on my PC or app on the phone.
      Just tried to log in to the website and it wil not let without my phone to authenticate! WTF, I never set up 2 factor authentication for mail!
      if i need my phone to allow me to open a website, i might as well just us the gmail app on the phone !

  7. What? by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My IMAP interface with gmail remains unchanged. I have never been infected with the desire to use any webmail, especially Google's. As long as they allow IMAP or POP connections, I will continue to use gmail, but not for anything important.

    --
    Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    1. Re:What? by houghi · · Score: 1

      I go a step further and not evenb use Gmail. I have my own domwin name and use Roundcube on my own server for webmail and also have IMAP for my Android.

      As an addition to that, I have limitess aliasses. When a new website needs my email address I use a specific email address. e.g. for slashdot.org that would be slashdot.org@example.com.

      That way not only do I know if an email really comes from the company and is easy to filter.

      If I get an emnail from my bank to a generic email adress I also use, I will know it is spam. If I get email from somebody that is not my bank to my banking adress, I know that that address is somehow compromised and probably other data from that company as well. Either by being hacked or having sold anything.

      To be fair, till now only Ebay has done this and I assume because I have not unclicked not to have the email not being given to others on each page I visited.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  8. Why are the new UI designs allowed ? :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We have monochrome designs where we previously had full colour designs (Android, etc) with all the associated loss of valuable information.

    We have flat designs where we can't see what's clickable.

    We have thinner fonts and lines which are harder to read unless you have perfect vision.

    Why isn't there massive pushback from all these changes which reduce usability instead of enhancing it ?

    1. Re:Why are the new UI designs allowed ? :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why isn't there massive pushback from all these changes which reduce usability instead of enhancing it ?

      Because modern UI design is a crypto-fascist plot. Think about it. Have you ever met a UI designer? No one has. They don't exist.

      UI tweaks are a control mechanism. The NSA, working with MI6 and former KGB expats, have infiltrated Silicon Valley. Internet is the new mass media. Control the internet population and you control the world.

      These UI changes are part of a long game to degrade people's ability to absorb accurate information. Pretty soon everything will be eggshell colored text on an ivory background. At that point, who's to say who is right? Fake news, real news, it all reads the same when everything is illegible. The CIA wins.

      There is a resistance movement. We render everything as green text on a black background, just as god intended. Our callsign is ][. Look for us in the dark places on the interwebs, where mortals fear to tread.

    2. Re:Why are the new UI designs allowed ? :-( by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You forgot:

      We now have light gray on white visual elements, because high contrast, easy to spot UI elements are so gauche.

      We have mystery meat navigation elements (text doesn't show up until you mouse over), because even though designers 15 years ago figured out that was bad, a new generation apparently has to relearn the same lessons.

      Sigh... Generally speaking, the new UI looks prettier and more professional / polished (the old UI was admittedly ugly), but it actually looks slightly less usable to me. It's a shame we can't get both.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    3. Re:Why are the new UI designs allowed ? :-( by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      We have thinner fonts and lines which are harder to read unless you have perfect vision.

      The first thing I noticed about the new Gmail is that the fonts are heavier weight than the old ones.

      We have flat designs where we can't see what's clickable.

      This is a consequence of touch interfaces. When browsing the web on a phone you only have a big fat finger, no precision single pixel pointer, so all the hit boxes have to be enlarged. This people have become used to tapping in the general area of what they want and not worrying about hitting it precisely. Making the user try to aim at a visible hit box is considered bad now.

      Unfortunately this does lead to Cheeseplant Syndrome, where the user is sometimes unsure what they can click on. Material design tries to alleviate that through the use of colour hints, and on desktop mouse-over highlighting.

      Note I'm not endorsing any of this, just explaining it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:Why are the new UI designs allowed ? :-( by Voyager529 · · Score: 2

      You forgot:

      We now have light gray on white visual elements, because high contrast, easy to spot UI elements are so gauche.

      We have mystery meat navigation elements (text doesn't show up until you mouse over), because even though designers 15 years ago figured out that was bad, a new generation apparently has to relearn the same lessons.

      And it will be harder for them to learn it.

      Designers in the 80's and 90's had to give people a reason to use their software, which meant it HAD to be easy to use, it HAD to make sense, and it HAD to convince the money men so business workflow needed to be the core selling point. UIs were still just as likely to be done by programmers as they were by artists who were only then making the migration to DTP software, but had made a career out of doing things by hand. Finally, the lack of broadband meant ship-then-patch was simply not an option so everything had to be done right the first time.

      This generation ships software with UIs made by art majors. Everyone already has their data in $SOME_PROGRAM, meaning that moving to a competitor is commonly not an option. Seriously, when was the last time that a software UI change was so bad, users left it based on the UI? When was the last time a UI complaint managed to make its way up to the desk of someone with the ability to do something about it? With no repercussions for undesirable UIs, accolades for pretty art projects, and the realization that declaring a UI "basically finished" means UI designers declare themselves out of a job, there is zero disincentive to having UIs that make it abundantly clear that style matters more than substance.

    5. Re:Why are the new UI designs allowed ? :-( by jmarkantes · · Score: 1

      So true. UI and UX was pretty much figured out around 1999, and the website useit.com (now defunct) by Jakob Neilson and others was the go to for articles and research for web design. How the fuck has it gone downhill since? Fucking bullshit.

    6. Re: Why are the new UI designs allowed ? :-( by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      +1 insightful

    7. Re: Why are the new UI designs allowed ? :-( by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      Almost all American software has declined in quality since that period.

      Probably due to tech brain drain. Because of the massive drop in inflation-adjusted pay, and ensuing proletarianization of the tech industry. Facilitated by the H1-B program. And inbred venture capitalist twats spending QE money on thousands of loss-making "startups", who see their users as products to be sold, not customers to be served.

      Remember - if you hate America, and want to see even more Americans impoverished - then we need to import more H1-B indentured laborers, and give even more public QE money to cretinous upper class twits.

  9. Re:"Their" inital impressions? by Barny · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's not plural in this case.

    Their is a gender-neutral pronoun, singular.

    Not going into the politics of it, I'm just a writer.

    --
    ...
    /me sighs
  10. Visual differences comparing Classic and New by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 5, Informative

    Since the bloody article can't even show the visual differences here are screenshots comparing the old and new:

    * The left column/sidebar of Inbox, Important, Sent Mail, etc. is wider. Number of unread are now in their own sub-column instead of immediately after the Folder name.

    Old left Sidebar
    New left Sidebar

    * Tabs (Primary, Social, Promotions, Updates, Forums) no longer have a vertical line separating them. You HAVE to mouse over them to see where each button ends.

    Old Tabs
    New Tabs

    * The 2nd column which showed the Senders and the number of emails in a thread no longer shows (#) but just the # number by itself making this harder to read.

    Old senders
    New senders

    The Topic column is less wide, meaning you can't see entire short emails now.

    Old subject
    New subject

    Do. Not. Want.

    --
    "Get off my LAN." -- Grumpy old programmer

    1. Re:Visual differences comparing Classic and New by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      Excellent post - these are the EXACT reasons I reverted to the old version.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  11. Web consoles suck by fluffernutter · · Score: 2

    Web consoles suck, period. They take twice as long to access and experience severe limitations in the way with which you can interact with them, even for something as simple as an email client.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  12. How to activate the new UI by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here are step-by-step instructions to try out the new UI:

    1. Click on Gear top right

    2. Click on the first menu choice Try the new Gmail
    If you don't see "Try the new Gmail" menu choice -- it hasn't been rolled out to your account (yet).

    3. Select the layout Default, Comfortable, Compact
    Don't worry if you picked the wrong choice. You can click on gear icon in the top right and the non-descript Display density to choose between the three.

    Thankfully we can Go back to classic Gmail for now -- until Google rams it down our throats, whether we want it or not.

  13. Love the calendar but not the tooltips by zaphod · · Score: 2

    I think it's great having the option to always have the calendar up within the Gmail screen. It's something I've wanted for a long time.

    The one really annoying piece for me is that the main window tooltips stay up too long (like the Refresh button). If you hover over an icon too long and move the cursor away, the tooltip stays up for over a second. Sounds short but it's way too long. The tooltips for the icons on the right side are timed correctly though.

    I use the compact option with a dark theme so I don't see a lot of wasted space.

    --
    Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they're not after you!
    1. Re:Love the calendar but not the tooltips by quintus_horatius · · Score: 1

      The one really annoying piece for me is that the main window tooltips stay up too long (like the Refresh button).

      I didn't notice that until I read your comment, and now it's making me nuts.

  14. Haven't noticed by VeryFluffyBunny · · Score: 1

    Gmail's changed something? I haven't noticed any differences in my email client.

    --
    Debate is a form of harassment. Do not question my truth.
  15. Dont fret. Its like Pittsburgh weather. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    If you don't like the change, dont fret, dont sweat. Just wait for a few minutes. It will change, it is like Pittsburgh weather.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Dont fret. Its like Pittsburgh weather. by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 1

      That may be, but if you don't like the weather in Pittsburgh, you should probably just leave.

  16. Lauren Weinstein is on the Google payroll by alfino · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've no evidence for this, but the way he keeps defending big-G in the wake of all the privacy problems we've seen and continue to feel, he's been touting them as being stellar about privacy and that they would never, and bla.

    Maybe it's true that unlike Facebook, Google doesn't sell your data. But the main reason for that is that they want to monetise you all by themselves. Also, nothing would stop them from doing so tomorrow.

    Gmail innovations here or there, your best bet is to get rid of Google and Facebook, use plugins like uMatrix and Cookie AutoDelete and navigate the Web without splattering your fingerprints everywhere.

    --
    echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:" net@madduck
  17. Apps accounts? by binarybum · · Score: 2

    It doesn't seem to be pushed to apps accounts / G Suite unfortunately.

    --
    ôó
  18. OK... But by johnsnails · · Score: 1

    Too much emphasis on say the attachments which clutters the whole page and not on say the top tabs. Not too bad in compact mode I guess.

  19. Last time Google pulled this shit with G+ by blind+biker · · Score: 1

    ...I abandoned G+ never to go back. I used G+ until it allowed me to use the old interface. G+ would revert back to the new, flat version every once in a while in spite of me going back to the classic version. One day I could not go back to the classic version, and that's when G+ lost a user.

    I don't mind doing the same with the Gmail web interface. It's harder to abandon the e-mail system, but it is not difficult to abandon the WEB UI.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  20. don't see any changes by swell · · Score: 2

    There it is in Thunderbird along with all my other email accounts. They all look alike in their little windows and they all function the same- no learning a different interface for each account. Some of these accounts date back to the last century and all the emails I want to keep are preserved here and on their servers. Never understood the concept of using a browser to read email.

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
  21. Re:"Their" inital impressions? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1, Informative

    Actual writers know that, in Standard English, the gender-neutral third-person singular possessive is his.

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  22. *My* UI still looks just fine, thanks by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 2

    IMAP/Thunderbird here. Web-based mail is so very Eternal September.

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  23. Gaaah, those tabs! by Radical+Moderate · · Score: 1

    Idiotic. Oddly, gmail UI hasn't changed. not sure why.

    Thanks for posting the pics.

    --
    Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
  24. Only morons and clueless newbies see it by nospam007 · · Score: 1, Informative

    The rest of us uses mail programs to read their mail and couldn't care less.

  25. No changes here? by evlkind · · Score: 1

    There's no changes to my gmail, perhaps because it's through another domain, just using gmail as a backend? /shrug

  26. Re:"Their" inital impressions? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

    That depends a lot on the style manual that you read. My publisher (Pearson - owns InformIT and the several imprints including Prentice Hall, Addison-Wesley) recommends alternating male and female pronouns for gender neutral terminology, but permits using the plural. I find the alternating horribly confusing (if you're talking about a single person and switching from he to she every use then it seems like you're talking about two people). I believe that the last two revisions of the Chicago Manual of Style also now endorse use of they and their as gender-neutral pronouns (though earlier editions were strongly against it). I think the Oxford style guide now also recommends 'they' as a gender-neutral pronoun, though that was a more recent change.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  27. Re: Not seeing it by Macfox · · Score: 1

    G Suite is a separate code base. And it often lags Gmail developments. There are some exemptions to this, but it's a common complaint.

    --
    Area51 - We are watching...
  28. Searching: Maybe I'm doing it wrong, but... by pipingguy · · Score: 1

    When using the search function, the old interface does not highlight the previously-chosen (guessed) message in the search results when you return to it, making it difficult to pick up where you left off.

    It's such a minor detail and so useful that I don't know why it is not this way.

  29. No strong opinion either way but... by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

    ...it still doesn't fix one of the number one flaws with GMail which is this: if GMail is going to group everything into conversations, why does it still have separate Inbox and Send Items folders? Basically, Inbox now just means "Everything where someone has sent you something", and "Sent Items" means "Mostly the same as the Inbox, plus a few times you sent an email but never got a reply."

    The look and feel? It's OK. It doesn't show off MD to its best potential, but it's good enough. I had no problems finding anything, and some of the features, such as associating actions with the emails themselves, were well done.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  30. Re:Not seeing it by mysticgoat · · Score: 2

    I found that I could switch to the new UI in the Settings dropdown. I looked at it. I switched back to "Classic" mode.

    I'll probably explore the new UI more fully later on. My first impression is that other than some font tweaking, it seems unchanged. Except that now some of the controls are harder to see since the font color almost disappears into my background image.

  31. There are... differences. by zarmanto · · Score: 1

    Personally, I'm not overly impressed by the changes... but those changes aren't so horrible as to make me want to run away and hide in the old interface, either. In fact, the only difference which seems even remotely noteworthy to me, is that the entire interface appears to have become ever so slightly more sluggish -- but even that isn't horrific; it's just mildly annoying. The reality is, the new interface is going to be rolled out to all Gmail users eventually anyway, likely with little or no change from the current state... and ultimately, we'll all just get used to it. Eventually.

    But honestly, this feels to me like nothing more than an exercise in change for it's own sake. Basically, they had one or two minor new features which they wanted to roll into the interface, but instead of just shoehorning them into the existing interface -- which almost certainly would have worked just fine -- they decided to use this as an excuse to throw a whole new coat of paint at a wall that really only had a few scratches that nobody even noticed anymore -- except of course for the guy who threw that original coat of paint on, eons ago. (Little known fact of life: That old adage about artists being their own worst critic can be equally applied to just about every skilled worker, anywhere.) And of course, everyone knows that any good interior designer never lets their client choose the same color scheme that they already had... the designer has to justify their sky-high invoice at the end of the day, after all! ("I've got it! Let's change everything from yellow to cyan! Trust me -- I promise it'll be fantastic!")

    In addition, the developers who had spent countless hours implementing scads of features that are never used, have doubtless been pressuring those designers to help them justify their existence, as well. (All of us old-timers have seen the results of that quite a few times, in the form of the various feature reshuffles which have been thrust upon Microsoft Office users. "Hey -- what's this button? Is it a new feature?" "Huh? Oh... nah. I've used that feature a couple of times before. It's really not as useful as you might think, though...") The all-too-predictable results are, the new Gmail interface compresses and de-emphasizes features that most people use on a daily basis, expands (and surfaces) a few features that very few people care about or will ever use, alongside squeezing in those one or two actual new features... that last of which had in reality driven the entire venture in the first place.

    To wit: much work was done, to accomplish little.

  32. Re:"Their" inital impressions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Fortunately, the 'correct' gender pronoun is easy because there in only two genders. Men & women. Now, some men & women don't want to live in the traditional gender roles. That's fine, they can dress however they like - but they are still men and women. The gender classification apply to what you look like naked. What anyone 'think' or 'feel' doesn't matter. Classification must work even for dead people who don't think.

    Pronouns is still easy.

  33. It's never going to beat a dedicated mail client by plazman30 · · Score: 1

    Google can do what they want with the UI to try and make it better, but I don't think it will ever compete with a full on dedicated mail client like Thunderbird of Geary. I find I can get most tasks done faster with a thick client than I can with the Gmail website.

  34. Labs removed by bobbomo · · Score: 2

    Due to the removal of Labs, I no longer have an upcoming calendar events on the left side. I can open a today view on the right, but not just a list of upcoming events.

  35. How to fix the new UI by Daetrin · · Score: 2

    I asked about disabling some of the changes on the Google Product Forums, and the "official" members told me there was no way to change them and to "Please use the in-app 'Send feedback' link to submit your request/issue directly to Google. You will not receive a response from Google."

    ("You will not receive a response from Google" seems like it ought to be their new motto.)

    However a heroic stranger happened along and developed a number of CSS hacks usable via Stylish that cleans up almost all the most annoying elements of the new UI! So i now share my good fortune with you!

    CSS Fixes for new Google UI

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  36. Collapsed threads by biggaijin · · Score: 1

    I don't see any noticeable difference on the web version. But, in the Android version on my phone, the program now collapses email threads into a single long concatenated message with portions hidden. It makes the replies in the thread, particularly the later ones, very hard to read.

  37. Different by DaFallus · · Score: 1

    Its different, so I'm sure the vast majority of /. hates it even if they haven't seen it. Some will say they access Gmail through Lynx so it doesn't impact them, and the rest will chide everyone else for not running their own mail server inside of a Faraday cage only accessible through a VPN based on the moon.

    --
    No one cares what your captcha was

    Houston TX, USA
  38. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  39. No sir, I don't like it by DeAxes · · Score: 1

    No Sir, I don't like it.

  40. Re:"Their" inital impressions? by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 1

    It would be even weirder to use *his* for Lauren than *their* - unless you know something I don't.