Slashdot Mirror


US Keeps China, Puts Canada on IP Priority Watch List (reuters.com)

The Trump administration on Friday labeled 36 countries as inadequately protecting U.S. intellectual property rights, keeping China on a priority watch list and adding Canada over concerns about its border controls and pharmaceutical practices. From a report: The U.S. Trade Representative's annual report on global IP concerns is separate from the "Section 301" report on Chinese technology transfer practices that has led the world's two largest economies to threaten each other with tariffs. The so-called "Special 301 Report on Intellectual Property Rights" calls out China for its "coercive technology transfer practices" and "trade secret theft, rampant online piracy, and counterfeit manufacturing." It was the 14th straight year that China was placed on the "Priority Watch List." U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer is due to travel to China next week along with other senior Trump administration officials for talks on U.S. demands for changes in Beijing's trade and intellectual property policies.

183 comments

  1. That's OK ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's, OK, you're on our "assholes to try to stop doing business with" list.

    So sorry we won't put our national sovereignty and our own legally enshrined rights behind those of asshole corporations -- as much as that's what they've paid your leaders to try to do.

    It won't be long before the US shoots themselves in the foot and starts losing trade as other countries decide putting up with your bullshit isn't worth the effort.

    But keep on trying to act like we all need you and are willing to sign terrible deals to have the privilege of trading with you.

    1. Re:That's OK ... by BlueStrat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's, OK, you're on our "assholes to try to stop doing business with" list.

      maximum lol
      you go ahead and stop doing any business with the us and see how long you last

      [MIB 'Bug' voice]

      "Your proposal is acceptable."

      [/MIB 'Bug' voice]

      Just remember who the nations are that own all the US debt. If enough nations call a sufficient amount of those securities etc in, the US is in very serious trouble. There's already a strong push on to switch to the Chinese Yuan as the international currency of trade as well. The US needs to be very careful right now. The US Dollar, the economy, stocks & bonds, etc...are all built on fiction.

      Reality must and will come one way or another in the not-too-distant future. It's going to be messy, as at this point it's nearly certain, and in addition, even if those in power cared and tried to do something, the best they could do at this point is soften things a tiny bit.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    2. Re: That's OK ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Enjoy getting your lumber from Mexican deserts.

    3. Re:That's OK ... by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Funny words from a citizen of a has-been country that is trying desperately to preserver its former wealth.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    4. Re:That's OK ... by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 2

      Foreign nations don't own all the US debt. Most of the debt is actually borrowed against the future value of social security, or some such financial nonsense.

      Honestly I don't understand how it works but as of February only $6trillion or so is owed to foreign countries.

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
    5. Re:That's OK ... by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      That’s not how bonds work mr dumass

    6. Re:That's OK ... by neilo_1701D · · Score: 3, Informative

      Foreign nations don't own all the US debt. Most of the debt is actually borrowed against the future value of social security, or some such financial nonsense.

      Honestly I don't understand how it works but as of February only $6trillion or so is owed to foreign countries.

      Considering that the 2017 annual US tax revenue is $1.9 trillion, calling 6 trillion dollars of debt means big problems for the US.

    7. Re:That's OK ... by crunchygranola · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Considering that the 2017 annual US tax revenue is $1.9 trillion, calling 6 trillion dollars of debt means big problems for the US.

      According to that link annual US tax revenue is $3,340.4 trillion. Income tax is not the only Federal tax revenue as that table makes painfully obvious.

      But your point is well taken, it is a good thing that the Republicans cut tax revenue further in December so that debt well pile up even faster. MAGA!

      --
      Second class citizen of the New Gilded Age
    8. Re:That's OK ... by eutychus · · Score: 1

      I think you misread the chart. The 3,340.4 is in billion, not trillion... that's mostly income tax plus social security.

    9. Re:That's OK ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mr dumass

      You owe me a new irony detector!

    10. Re:That's OK ... by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 1

      But your point is well taken, it is a good thing that the Republicans cut tax revenue further in December so that debt well pile up even faster. MAGA!

      Exactly. People keep blaming Presidents for the debt, even though it has pretty steadily increased under 3 different administrations with 3 fairly different economic policies.

      The one constant throughout most of that time is Congress. They are to blame for the debt, plain and simple. Until we get a Congress that begins to pass surplus budgets, the debt will continue to increase. It's basic math.

      Congress constantly deflects that responsibility to the Presidency, and because many people don't understand how the government works, they follow right along.

      Trump is not to blame. Obama was not to blame. Bush was not to blame. Congress is to blame.

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
    11. Re:That's OK ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is why the US has a large military.

    12. Re:That's OK ... by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 1

      I was merely contesting BlueStrat's use of the word "all". It's a common piece of misinformation that many people believe and is simply not true.

      Frankly, to me it is FAR more worrisome that we are somehow able to owe most of our national debt to ourselves. That. Is. Fucked.

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
    13. Re:That's OK ... by EETech1 · · Score: 1

      The name... Is Doomasss

    14. Re:That's OK ... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 2

      If enough nations call a sufficient amount of those securities etc in, the US is in very serious trouble.
      If the US simply refuses to pay, who is gonna force them?

      There's already a strong push on to switch to the Chinese Yuan as the international currency of trade as well.
      Unlikely, first of all the Yuan is bound to the dollar. Secondly Euro is the second biggest trade currency.

      However you are right, the US is going downhill since 50 years or longer, but they are to stupid to realize it. On the other hand "downhill" in a world where most nations go uphill is perhaps a bit exaggerated. Perhaps the US is simply frozen in their 1050th world view.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    15. Re:That's OK ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the US simply refuses to pay, who is gonna force them?

      Nobody will fight a war to collect - obviously. The US will find it hard to trade after defaulting though. They will see US property (i.e. branches of corporations) confiscated to make up for part of the debt. There is the risk of loosing anything on foreign soil. Also, forget about anything like 'intellectual property' or 'patents'. And then, the dollar get to enjoy the same status as the rubel did in the 1970's. That means not buying anything (esp. oil/gas) from other countries without paying in advance - in some other currency than dollars.

      Such a situation won't break the US - similar to how it didn't break the Soviet Union. A large country can go on with nonconvertible currency - it merely won't be as fun as it used to be.

    16. Re:That's OK ... by taustin · · Score: 1

      There's already a strong push on to switch to the Chinese Yuan as the international currency of trade as well.

      Thanks for saying that. I haven't had that good a laugh in a long time.

      The US needs to be very careful right now. The US Dollar, the economy, stocks & bonds, etc...are all built on fiction.

      And the Chinese economy is build on badly written, self published fan fiction. Which we can shorten to "house of cards." That's why Trump scares them so much they're bullying North Korea into behaving. A trade war between the US and China will hurt both countries. But the US will recover, while China has food riots.

    17. Re:That's OK ... by BlueStrat · · Score: 2

      Most of the debt is actually borrowed against the future value of social security, or some such financial nonsense.

      Honestly I don't understand how it works

      They print some documents essentially stating they're borrowing money from one pocket to put in the other and then saying they're now that much richer. It works the same as suddenly adding a bunch of new coins to a fixed-coin-number cryptocurrency after people have bought in.

      It essentially robs everyone holding that currency of some amount of it's actual value. The beauty for governments is they can create money like this and use it for whatever, and they don't have to pass a tax increase and the people aren't required to write a check or even have money in a bank or other institution, etc. It robs the money straight from their wallet by devaluing the money in it, largely without them even being aware of the theft.

      Money and value are separate. A $20 1-ounce gold coin from around 1860 would buy a fine suit. Today, that ounce of gold will still buy a fine suit but is now worth many, many more dollars as is the fine suit. The money is now worth far less. It's one of the biggest reasons Kleptocracies *love* fiat currencies.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    18. Re:That's OK ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It really is amazing how stupid people are.
      It's in plain language in th US Constitution that all bills having to do with money must be started in Congress.

    19. Re:That's OK ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was a great commercial.

    20. Re:That's OK ... by crimson+tsunami · · Score: 1

      Who is going to keep lending it to them next time?
      The whole financial system is based on the concept of US Federal debt being 'risk free'. I wonder what will happen if that is no longer the case.

    21. Re:That's OK ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would China have food riots when they are self sufficient in food?
      America will have wall-mart riots. When they realise they import everything and the stores are now empty.

    22. Re:That's OK ... by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      Just remember who the nations are that own all the US debt.

      I was merely contesting BlueStrat's use of the word "all".

      Obviously I meant all the foreign debt, other nations being...uh...foreign, and all.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    23. Re:That's OK ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > MAGA!

      What's that stand for, "My Attorney Got Arrested" ?

    24. Re:That's OK ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's in plain language in th US Constitution that all bills having to do with money must be started in Congress.

      Citation needed. Here, I will provide some:

      Article I, Section 1: All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.

      This means that only Congress may introduce bills or vote on them. Anyone else who wants to introduce legislation must convince a Congressman, of either chamber, to introduce the legislation on their behalf. In other words, all bills, "having to do with money" or not, must be "started" in Congress.

      Article I, Section 7: All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills.

      Any bill that increases taxes or introduce new taxes (raising Revenue) must originate in the House of Representatives, as opposed to the Senate. The reason being the entire House is reelected every two years, so there is short turnaround on a potentially unpopular action.

      Bills that "have to do with money" but do not raise taxes may originate in the Senate.

    25. Re:That's OK ... by sa1lnr · · Score: 1

      Buy a little red cap and all will be clear.

    26. Re:That's OK ... by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 1

      No, it's not obvious. OK so you knew, and a possible interpretation of what you said is correct.

      But most people actually believe we owe $20 trillion to China. I have had this conversation many times with people I consider to be very intelligent and well informed.

      It is a rampant misconception, and one that I myself held until someone else corrected it for me.

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
    27. Re:That's OK ... by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      No, it's not obvious. OK so you knew, and a possible interpretation of what you said is correct.

      Now that you point it out, I can see where somebody might misinterpret.

      A good portion of US debt is money "borrowed" from things like Social Security, the Federal Reserve, and other federal programs and funds, etc, effectively leaving them with just an IOU.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    28. Re:That's OK ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must think those offshore holders of US Govt Debt are idiots. They would never dump it - that would wreck the market and give them a small fraction of what their debt is worth. They very easily could be disposing of it, slowly, right now. Once their holdings are down to a level where it's not a problem should they get hammered, they could try something like refusing to buy more. Since the debt needs to be rolled over fairly frequently, simply not buying more would have much the same effect as dumping what they already have. Looking for that to happen before Trump is done.

      On the plus side, I do see the Trump-as-Dictator thing being fairly short-lived. There's some grumbling in the (R) ranks already, and besides he's not that spring a chicken. Only real question is whether we get somebody just as bad next time around (if there is a next time around).

    29. Re: That's OK ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh wow. Another I hate America thread and it gets upvoted by other god damn slashdot cucks. Burn in Hell you cock sucking fuck monkey

  2. Blame Canada! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    M others
    A gainst
    C anada

    1. Re:Blame Canada! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're not even a real country anyway...

  3. Re:Badge of Honour by Train0987 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Ironically enough the countries on the list don't innovate anything, they just steal other's work. Developing drugs costs money. None of the breakthoughs would exists without a profit motive.

  4. Re:Badge of Honour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In the case of Canada's pharmaceutical practices, they result in prices so cheap that many Americans travel to Canada to obtain drugs. This smacks of corporate cronyism steering Trump's decisions. Drain the swamp... my ass.

  5. Cheap drugs, expensive country. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "Pharmaceutical practices"? As in cheap drugs crossing border into profitstan.

  6. Canadian Pharmaceutical Practices? by foxalopex · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm going to assume this has something to do with generic drugs? I guess drug companies in the US are more concerned about making a buck than actually helping people. In Canada, most essential drugs have a generic or no-name equivalent which is often cheaper than the brand name drug and works just as well. I sure hope that isn't their complaint because that particular law makes drugs cheaper for the folks who need it.

    1. Re:Canadian Pharmaceutical Practices? by sinij · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I guess this more to do with refusal to implement Mickey Mouse laws. Many things go into public domain much earlier in Canada than in USA. Also, there are Canadian laws that cap consumer liability for pirating to $5K or so, as a result RIAA bankrupt-you lawsuits are not possible.

    2. Re:Canadian Pharmaceutical Practices? by foxalopex · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually when it comes to downloaded pirated videos, there's almost no way for content providers to come after you in Canada. In Canada, content providers are never provided the address or personal information of a subscriber because doing so would be a breach of Privacy. They actually need to be granted a search warrant first which is expensive and time consuming. All ISP's do is forward any warning messages from Content Providers to subscribers but there's no real obligation for a subscriber to do anything other than to toss it in the trash.

    3. Re:Canadian Pharmaceutical Practices? by KixWooder · · Score: 2

      We have plenty of generic drugs and for most every condition. There are a few (very few) drugs in the US that have absolutely no generic or biosimilar counterpart. I would easily say that 95% of the brand-name drugs you hear about or see advertised are designer or a slight tweak to a previous med. There are virtually no novel drugs in the pipeline. Source: I'm a clinical Pharmacist.

      --
      I hate fat people.
    4. Re:Canadian Pharmaceutical Practices? by Frederic54 · · Score: 0

      I read that Star Trek TOS is public domain in Canada, some execs in USA must fumes!

      --
      "Science will win because it works." - Stephen Hawking
    5. Re:Canadian Pharmaceutical Practices? by thomst · · Score: 4, Insightful

      foxalopex posited:

      I'm going to assume this has something to do with generic drugs? I guess drug companies in the US are more concerned about making a buck than actually helping people. In Canada, most essential drugs have a generic or no-name equivalent which is often cheaper than the brand name drug and works just as well. I sure hope that isn't their complaint because that particular law makes drugs cheaper for the folks who need it.

      That's certainly part of it. Their Supreme Court's intolerance of patent abuse, and its willingness to punish it appropriately is, I suspect, also a non-trivial consideration ...

      --
      Check out my novel.
    6. Re:Canadian Pharmaceutical Practices? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess drug companies in the US are more concerned about making a buck than actually helping people.

      'Is curing patients a sustainable business model?'
          -- Goldman Sachs

      Your observation would be a big 10-4, there, buddy.

    7. Re:Canadian Pharmaceutical Practices? by i_ate_god · · Score: 1

      I printed one out and put it in my bbq.

      still use a vpn though

      --
      I'm god, but it's a bit of a drag really...
    8. Re:Canadian Pharmaceutical Practices? by mark-t · · Score: 2

      Continued extensions are no longer necessary for that now that Disney has finally gotten around to trademarking the Mouse and its image. Trademarks do not have an expiry, and last for as long as the company is willing to protect them.

      This doesn't technically stop people from freely copying old works whose copyright has expired, even if they feature the trademarked character, but it does stop anyone from being able to utilize the character in their own work, even if that work was derived from one that was now in public domain.

    9. Re:Canadian Pharmaceutical Practices? by AnthonywC · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No shit that US drugs companies care more about $ than helping people, in fact I would say they prefer to make a killing (pun intended) on it. To a greater extent, the same argument goes for/against universal health care as it is really about how much a country values about its citizen's health versus profitability of the its medical/drug industry.

    10. Re:Canadian Pharmaceutical Practices? by mark-t · · Score: 3, Informative

      The ISP can terminate your account if the problem persists enough though.

    11. Re:Canadian Pharmaceutical Practices? by AnthonywC · · Score: 5, Informative

      Because in Canada they actually care more about the common people interests versus big corporations; which is what democracy should strive to be, politicians voted in by the public should actually look after common people's interest. I'd argue it is even common sense that RIAA or whatever big corporation interest group should not have the power to bankrupt an average consumer who is not commercially profiting, but again in Canada it is also quite unheard of for someone to go bankrupt due to medical issue either.

    12. Re:Canadian Pharmaceutical Practices? by mark-t · · Score: 2

      You have been misinformed. Star Trek, even TOS, is still definitely covered by copyright in Canada.

    13. Re:Canadian Pharmaceutical Practices? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Copyright is not the same at patent. Geez, you people are really dense here. And who the hell is giving mod points to non-thinking pond scum?

    14. Re:Canadian Pharmaceutical Practices? by tlhIngan · · Score: 4, Informative

      We have plenty of generic drugs and for most every condition. There are a few (very few) drugs in the US that have absolutely no generic or biosimilar counterpart. I would easily say that 95% of the brand-name drugs you hear about or see advertised are designer or a slight tweak to a previous med. There are virtually no novel drugs in the pipeline. Source: I'm a clinical Pharmacist.

      One thing Canada doesn't allow is direct-to-consumer drug advertising. US commercials are filled with "Are you feeling XXX? Perhaps you have condition YYYY. Consult your doctor and see if ZZZZ is right for you!". This is one way to bypass generic drugs - if you're asking for them by name, there's no option to buy the generic version of the same drug.

      And pharmacists here are generally quick to ask if you'd want a generic or the branded stuff - it can affect things like extended health drug coverage -

    15. Re:Canadian Pharmaceutical Practices? by Strider- · · Score: 3, Informative

      One thing Canada doesn't allow is direct-to-consumer drug advertising. US commercials are filled with "Are you feeling XXX? Perhaps you have condition YYYY. Consult your doctor and see if ZZZZ is right for you!". This is one way to bypass generic drugs - if you're asking for them by name, there's no option to buy the generic version of the same drug.

      Well, it's a little more complex in Canada. You're allowed to advertise a drug name, but not what it treats, or you can advertise a condition but not a drug to treat it. This is how you get some rather cheeky Viagra and Cialis advertisements, and a lot of advertisements on various conditions that just say "talk to your doctor if you feel this way".

      --
      ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
    16. Re:Canadian Pharmaceutical Practices? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm going to assume this has something to do with generic drugs?

      I doubt it, Canada has relatively high prices for generic drugs.

      In most cases, the USA has far more companies competing for generic drugs, and you have many companies (Walmart, Target, Walgreens, etc.) selling common generics for $4.

      Yes, $4 is the total cost.

      You won't find a pharmacy in Ontario where the pharmacy's dispensing fee (let alone the cost of the medication) is less than $4.

      I guess drug companies in the US are more concerned about making a buck than actually helping people.

      You are mixing up pharmacies with drug companies (although they are sometimes related).

      Canada has a Patented Medicine Prices Review Board ( http://www.pmprb-cepmb.gc.ca/a... ) which regulates the price of medications for which there are no generic equivalents. These drugs are often much cheaper in Canada than the USA. Generics are often cheaper in the USA though.

      There have been a number of scandals in Canada where drug companies have been caught paying "professional allowances" (ie, bribes) to pharmacies to carry their product and not the competition.

      In Canada, most essential drugs have a generic or no-name equivalent which is often cheaper than the brand name drug and works just as well.

      That is the case in most countries, including the USA.

    17. Re:Canadian Pharmaceutical Practices? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're close. it's all about canadian *pharmacies* and their sales to u.s. patients... if we buy cheap canadian drugs, that hurts the drug companies' profits.. it hurts the big chain stores' profits (cvs, walmart, walgreens, etc)... and it even hurts the insurance companies, too.

    18. Re:Canadian Pharmaceutical Practices? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One thing Canada doesn't allow is direct-to-consumer drug advertising. US commercials are filled with "Are you feeling XXX? Perhaps you have condition YYYY. Consult your doctor and see if ZZZZ is right for you!".

      I see those here in Canada, but probably because it is a US channel...

    19. Re:Canadian Pharmaceutical Practices? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Walt Disney is dead (or at least frozen). It's time to let the 1928 copyright on an 8 minute short expire. This doesn't mean they've lost copyright on every Mickey Mouse cartoon. They've got enough newer movies and cartoons that they won't become bankrupt. It's idiocy to keep going on this way.

    20. Re:Canadian Pharmaceutical Practices? by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      if you're asking for them by name, there's no option to buy the generic version of the same drug.

      I don't know where you are getting that from. Your doctor can easily prescribe the generic even if you ask about a drug under its brand name. You can demand "no generics", but that doesn't mean you can't buy a generic if you prefer.

      And pharmacists here are generally quick to ask if you'd want a generic or the branded stuff

      Yep. So you can ask your doctor about Floqueezy all you want, but that won't prevent you from buying the cheaper generic.

    21. Re: Canadian Pharmaceutical Practices? by Brockmire · · Score: 0

      I stopped reading after first sentence. That is blatantly not true, unfortunately.

    22. Re:Canadian Pharmaceutical Practices? by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      All ISP's do is forward any warning messages from Content Providers to subscribers but there's no real obligation for a subscriber to do anything other than to toss it in the trash.

      Recurrence rates are claimed to be low, so just forwarding warnings "seem to be helping", so I'm hoping that's enough to keep content providers at bay. Some try to add shady text and links to their notices, to trick people to identify themselves.

      HBO seems to be the most active, and target Torrents, so I just make sure I download their shows from streaming services, or through a VPN.

    23. Re:Canadian Pharmaceutical Practices? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't gotten a notice in over seven years and I need to upgrade the storage in my server up from 6TB because it's just about full.

    24. Re: Canadian Pharmaceutical Practices? by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      My wife finds that generic T3s dont work as well for her migraines, we just pay the difference for the real thing.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    25. Re: Canadian Pharmaceutical Practices? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You stopped reading because you are just beyond ignorant and would rather just deny the truth.

    26. Re:Canadian Pharmaceutical Practices? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In addition, civil settlements are generally limited to real damages. If you are hit for downloading a movie damages would be, say, $50.

    27. Re: Canadian Pharmaceutical Practices? by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      Ignorant? Do you even live in Canada? Have you ever been to court against big corporations? Against the government? It was a big blanket statement with nothing to back it up. There's numerous things that come to mind in seconds. That's why it was not going to be based on any fact, just emotional wishing. I'm a proud Canadian, but I'm not delusional and not going to believe in bullshit.

  7. Re:Badge of Honour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GXtHd25RyV4

  8. Canada's border controls? by dstyle5 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Which country is letting large numbers of immigrants illegally cross the border into Quebec and Manitoba the past few years? President Trump doesn't seem to concerned about stopping that from happening. Our current government is also part of the problem.

    As for the "pharmaceutical practices" I don't know about IP issues, but I know the cost of drugs here isn't nearly as ridiculous as things are becoming in the U.S. Sorry we aren't letting drug companies rip off people as badly as they do in your country, Mr. President.

    1. Re:Canada's border controls? by fred6666 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Canada should build a wall and send the bill to Trump.

    2. Re:Canada's border controls? by c · · Score: 5, Funny

      Canada should build a wall and send the bill to Trump.

      Nice try, but we'll wait until you elect someone who actually pays his bills.

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    3. Re:Canada's border controls? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      The cost is the thing that got Canada on the watch list. The price disparity is so great that people are smuggling drugs across the border. Cheaper to pay a shady black market dealer to buy your life-saving medication as a generic in Canada and sneak it through the post than to buy exactly the same substance as a brand-name drug in the US.

    4. Re:Canada's border controls? by Piata · · Score: 2

      I have a feeling by "border controls" they mean the extremely low $20 limit allowed on imports before duty fees kick in. The US has very openly criticized Canada for having one of the lowest import limits in the world, essentially blocking US companies from the Canadian market.

    5. Re:Canada's border controls? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Any deal where we have to pay what we owe is a bad deal!

    6. Re:Canada's border controls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... letting large numbers of immigrants illegally ...

      It is not the job of France to perform UK immigration control. Nor does the USA have to perform Canada immigration control.

      ... Special 301 Report ...

      Since most countries don't allow the corporate abuses that US congress does, this is purely a political move, which they've done before. Expect a state department celebrity to do a whirlwind tour of the G20 countries in the next 2 years. Alas, most countries succumb to their demands for subsidizing US corporations.

    7. Re:Canada's border controls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seconded

    8. Re:Canada's border controls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a burglar broke into your house from your neighbour's property whilst your neighbour watched, would you just say "darn it, I should have had a better lock"?

    9. Re:Canada's border controls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why do Canadians do bus tours to shopping malls in US border cities? Presumably the $20 limit would apply to them too, but I suspect they're bringing back more than $20 worth of stuff.

    10. Re:Canada's border controls? by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      Which country is letting large numbers of immigrants illegally cross the border into Quebec and Manitoba the past few years? President Trump doesn't seem to concerned about stopping that from happening. Our current government is also part of the problem.

      As for the "pharmaceutical practices" I don't know about IP issues, but I know the cost of drugs here isn't nearly as ridiculous as things are becoming in the U.S. Sorry we aren't letting drug companies rip off people as badly as they do in your country, Mr. President.

      You know, you're right. I think Canada should be like nearly every other country in the world and shoot to kill any illegals coming into Canada. Especially if they are from California.

    11. Re:Canada's border controls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. The $20 limit is for shipped goods; i.e. I can't buy something from amazon.com (at the USD price) worth > $20 before duty is likely to be charged
      2. The limit is $200.00 for a > 24h stay, so if the bus is staying overnight, excluding alcohol and tobacco
      3. Sometimes even with duty, currency conversion, and the cost of the 'bus trip', some large purchases can still end up being cheaper in the long-run than buying it here; although with the low rate of CAD/USD conversion right now that's getting less and less the case. I remember ~10 years ago when we were on-par with USD I saved over $1000 buying a laptop shipped from california, even after paying ~$600 in shipping costs and duty on the US MSRP, vs what I would have paid in Canada for the same

  9. Re:Badge of Honour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Ironically enough the countries on the list don't innovate anything, they just steal other's work. Developing drugs costs money. None of the breakthoughs would exists without a profit motive.

    I call bullshit - many many breakthroughs were made by scientists doing 'pure' science. We would NEVER have had, for one random example, lasers, if there had been a profit requirement behind the scientists doing the fundamental science that made it possible.

  10. Re:Badge of Honour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and the government money funding the universities that make a lot of the basic breakthroughs.

  11. In other news... by Sebby · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The U.S. has now been added to the list of #shithole countries.

    --

    AC comments get piped to /dev/null
    1. Re:In other news... by will_die · · Score: 2

      That had already happen under obama
      https://www.washingtonpost.com...

    2. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That had already happen under obama

      Correction: it happened the moment GWB took the reins.

    3. Re:In other news... by gweihir · · Score: 1

      And long overdue.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  12. Only Trump would put Canada on this list by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Seriously, Canada, along with the UK, are our closest allies.
    In addition, neither of them deserve the treatment that Trump has given them.
    I now know how an East Germany felt.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  13. Re:Badge of Honour by C0R1D4N · · Score: 1

    China is one of the leading investors in Hollywood films. It's why garbage like The Transformers movies keep getting made.

  14. Re:Badge of Honour by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

    Never? As in all capital letters never?

    No one would have smelt a profit to be made from lasers?

  15. Re:I don't see why they still keep the list by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

    OK ! We can throw off the shackles of rewarding people who invent new stuff !!

  16. A rule of thumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The US isn't any better at economic output than any other developed nation -- what the US is better at is trapping, tricking, decieving, and wringing every last cent out of consumers. IP law is one big part of that.

  17. Re:Badge of Honour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Completely agree. Developing drugs cost money, so why cure anything? Just "fix the symptoms" and keep the person alive but dependent on them for the rest of their life - PROFIT!

  18. Border Control in Canada? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bitch please, with all the "migrants" coming illegally into Canada, from US, we're the ones who should be putting the US on a border control watchlist. You just let them pass through to Canada without doing anything.

  19. Re:Badge of Honour by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not at the time they were invented, no. Lasers were originally conceived and the foundation for them laid down in the 1920s. It took until the 1980s when they were actually something you could market.

    You think any company invests into something with a 60 years development period?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  20. Re:I don't see why they still keep the list by darkain · · Score: 1
  21. USA calls kettle black by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    #1 source of cocaine entering Canada: USA
    #1 souce of illegal guns entering Canada: USA

    Eat cock Trumptards. Everyone knows youre morans. Everyone.

  22. honestly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just get rid of that idiot already

  23. Re:Badge of Honour by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Informative

    We would NEVER have had, for one random example, lasers, if there had been a profit requirement

    Lasers were developed at Bell Labs and Hughes Research Lab, which were both operated by for-profit companies. They funded research labs in the expectation that the R&D would be profitable.

  24. Re:Badge of Honour by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

    China is one of the leading investors in Hollywood films. It's why garbage like The Transformers movies keep getting made.

    The lack of dialog makes them easier to internationalize.

  25. Go fuck yourselves. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  26. Re:Badge of Honour by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    The lack of dialog makes them easier to internationalize.

    Like Star Wars, then?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  27. pesky job killing regulations by sdinfoserv · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is yet another tale of corporate oligarchy extracting their government sponsored payola.
    A pain killer that as $138 in 2013 is now $2979 (http://money.cnn.com/2018/02/15/investing/drug-prices-vimovo-horizon-painkiller/index.html )
    https://www.chausa.org/publica...

    This is how they (the GOP) will ultimately kill medicare.
    If we ever want to bring health care costs, and being care to the masses, these companies must be broken. This is no longer about profit but gouging. The only way to get this country back is campaign finance reform.

    1. Re:pesky job killing regulations by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      America should simply wake up.
      One of the best health care on the planet you get in ....
      CUBA!

      Ah ... there are stupids laws that you may not fly as an american to Cuba ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    2. Re:pesky job killing regulations by sdinfoserv · · Score: 1

      Americans can't "wake up". We no longer posses the ability to think for ourselves. By vilifying and subsequently defunding education the GOP accomplished 2 goals:
      First - it frees up cash to give back to the oligarchy,
      Second - undermine education to remove critical thinking and reasoning skills which harbor the ability to challenge the oligarchy and implement positive change.
      Need proof, just look at the US global rankings
      http://hechingerreport.org/u-s...
      http://www.pewresearch.org/fac...

    3. Re:pesky job killing regulations by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      They the GOP? No, try they the (mostly) DNC. Democrats are thrusting all of this on us. Look at the Sony Bono bill, he was a Democrat. Then the "affordable care act" (ACA) also known as Obamacare though he had nothing to do with it other than signing the bill. It was the same bad bill from the 1990s that they couldn't get passed then.

      The funny thing is you blame one side or another. It's some rich people that get these things through. They'll play with either party to keep their money coming in. It's just that the Democrats have no morals (largest hate group in the world, hate white people? Hate non gays? ... and so on) so they will play a lot easier than the Republicans will.

  28. nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Canada's been on that list for years. Heck, what was news is that we got off it for a while.

  29. NAFTA by Comboman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Trump is also currently in the process of renegotiating NAFTA with Canada and is prone to slinging a little mud at his opponents during negotiations (right out of "The Art of the Deal").

    --
    Support Right To Repair Legislation.
  30. Simply perfect! by higuita · · Score: 1

    That Sir, was simply perfect!

    --
    Higuita
  31. Re:I don't see why they still keep the list by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    I saw article. Russian not use article, ever.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  32. Re:Badge of Honour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Nonsense. The "301 report" is, and always has been, crooked.

    See: http://www.michaelgeist.ca/2017/03/canadian-government-on-u-s-special-301-we-dont-recognize-validity-of-flawed-report/
    (begin excerpt of Professor Michael Geist's excellent article)
    The Canadian government stance is described thus:

    [Author] recently obtained documents under the Access to Information Act that confirm the Canadian government’s rejection of the Special 301 process. Canada will not bother appearing today largely because it rejects the entire process. According to a memorandum drafted for Canadian Heritage Minister Melanie Joly after last years’ report:

    The Government of Canada does not recognize the validity of the process as the findings tend to rely predominantly on allegations from U.S. industry stakeholders rather than on objective analysis.

    Media lines go even further:

    Canada does not recognize the validity of the Special 301 and considers the process and the Report to be flawed. The Report fails to employ a clear methodology and the findings tend to rely on industry allegations rather than empirical evidence and objective analysis.
    (end excerpt)

    Oh, and while you're injecting your next insulin shot to keep from dying because of diabetes, try to remember that Frederick Banting, the medical researcher and doctor and Nobel Prize winner who figured out how to keep your obese ass alive, was CANADIAN!

    ALSO note: http://clinchem.aaccjnls.org/content/48/12/2270

    "On January 23, 1923, an American patent on both insulin and Toronto’s method of making it was awarded to Banting, Collip, and Best. For $1.00 to each, the three discoverers assigned their patent rights to the Board of Governors of the University of Toronto."

    Back then the researchers weren't so greedy! Mind you, Martin Shkreli wasn't born yet.

  33. Re:Badge of Honour by gweihir · · Score: 1

    Ironically, you are full of it. You cannot just "steal" a drug. You basically have to invent it yourself, just a bit later. There is no rational reason to give all to the first to then rip everybody else off.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  34. Re:Badge of Honour by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    An expectation that the department, as a whole, might produce something commercially successful is not the same thing as requiring that every individual experiment comes with a business plan.

    I'd have thought a captain of industry like you would know that.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  35. Re:Badge of Honour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But the fundamental theory, the basic physics, on which lasers were based - without which Bell Labs would have had nothing to develop from, was laid down by Einstein in 1917. Bell Labs did amazing work, but they did not set out 'Hey, I bet we can make money making coherent light pulses, lets go work out the basic physics to support that' - they took existing physics, and figured out how to do something useful with it. If all science were driven by profit, that first step would disappear, there would just be incremental improvements, no more fundamentally new stuff.

     

  36. Re:Badge of Honour by Train0987 · · Score: 1

    Banting made a fortune off of that invention. Thank you for pointing that out.

  37. Re:Badge of Honour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like "Elementary" with a chinese Dr Watson. That is so fucking retarded.
    Next, chinese n1gger hip hop bullcrap. Americans have no culture and this shit proves it.

  38. Re:Badge of Honour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Train0987, Not only do Canadians have a longer average lifespan and universal healthcare, they also have organizations like Toronto SickKids which is actually an international leader in the treatment of children with life threatening and/or rare conditions. SickKids is also a research institute that has developed many new and highly advanced treatments.

    So when you say that none of those countries creates anything, you are clearly just talking out of your ass. Typical ignorant American prat that thinks America creates everything and is the best at everything. You sir are a fucking moron.

  39. Re:Badge of Honour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    many many breakthroughs were made by scientists doing 'pure' science for FREE? They worked for No Pay? Pan handled for food? I call bullshit Too.

  40. Re:Badge of Honour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're trying to get culture out of your television, you are a fucking moron.

  41. Re:Badge of Honour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One dollar is not a fortune, stupid.

  42. campaign finance reform by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    The problem with campaign finance reform is it is only applied to non-DNC parties.
    The list of campaign finance laws broken by the Clinton campaign is long and no charges (ask Bernie Sanders for details of some of them)...
    Meanwhile Muller is claiming Cohen (who wasn't part of any campaign, administration, or election) broke campaign finance laws by paying a porn star and had all of his residences raided in the middle of the night for it.

    Yea, we know what campaign finance laws meant, censorship of DNC opposition, nothing else.

    1. Re:campaign finance reform by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol u r ghey

  43. Illegal immigrants to Canada? by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 1

    Which country is letting large numbers of immigrants illegally cross the border into Quebec and Manitoba the past few years? President Trump doesn't seem to concerned about stopping that from happening. Our current government is also part of the problem.

    How is this even happening? Manitoba and Quebec share a border with one nation - the USA. Is this a bunch of hyperbole? Is your country letting questionable people in on tourist visas who aren't leaving and for some reason are finding Manitoba and Quebec to be extra welcoming?

    1. Re:Illegal immigrants to Canada? by dstyle5 · · Score: 4, Informative

      No hyperbole, it is people crossing the border illegally. I have no problem with people legally immigrating to Canada, the neighborhood I live in is 40% immigrants. But when both US and Canadian governments allow it to happen it is an affront to the people who are legally immigrating, IMHO.

      "Roughly 75 per cent of the 25,000 asylum seekers who crossed into Quebec last year did so illegally and the government is anticipating a surge in migrants arriving again this year."

      https://globalnews.ca/news/415...

      "Officials said Monday it is expecting about 400 people to cross the border through forests and wooded areas every day this summer — up from 250 each day last year."

      https://globalnews.ca/news/414...

  44. It's complicated by Comboman · · Score: 2

    It's complicated. Copyright term in Canada is life of the author plus 50 years for written works and 50 years from first broadcast or recording for other works. If TOS was broadcast in Canada at the same time as the US, the broadcast would be in the public domain, but the scripts would not be (which would prevent anyone from using them without authorization). Gene Roddenberry didn't die until 1991, so anything written by him would be protected until 2041. That's sooner than in the USA but still 23 years away. The 50 years from broadcast rule would probably only apply to unscripted things like sports broadcasts (IANAL).

    --
    Support Right To Repair Legislation.
    1. Re:It's complicated by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Copyright in Canada has been life of author + 70 years for quite some time now. The copyright on TOS won't expire in Canada until after 2061.

    2. Re: It's complicated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only on new creations. The extension is not retroactive.

  45. Re: Badge of Honour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Captain of industry LUL.

    Bill is a Chinese bootlicker.

  46. Re: Badge of Honour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have Jerry's kids.

  47. Re:Badge of Honour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    America just kicked your ass...

  48. Re:Badge of Honour by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

    I call bullshit - many many breakthroughs were made by scientists doing 'pure' science. We would NEVER have had, for one random example, lasers, if there had been a profit requirement behind the scientists doing the fundamental science that made it possible.

    Yes, many breakthroughs happen with ah-ha moments and pure science happens at many non-profits. The problem is going from the fundamental science to something you can actually sell. Most of the cost in developing the drugs is not the pure science, it's the clinical trials, safety tests, etc... that have to be done before you can legally sell it. It's the same thing with programming or engineering. Creating a prototype usually takes less time than going from a prototype to a finished product. Drug testing is 10 times worse. You could probably argue that we could streamline that process but even with the current drawn out process we still end up having to pull drugs all the time that had some unknown side effect that didn't show up during trials.

  49. Copyright 17 years patent 17 years by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2

    Stick to the Constitutional requirement, not this insane LIFETIME plus 90 years fake US version of copyright and patent that includes "business processes".

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  50. Re:Badge of Honour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So R&D is only profitable if you're research multiple things, but never ever if you're researching just one?

    https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0387808/?ref_=nv_sr_1

  51. Bully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, so Canada doesn't want to be your bitch. Deal with it.

  52. Re:Badge of Honour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Drain my swamp ass.

  53. Re:Badge of Honour by crunchygranola · · Score: 1

    This is an example of someone so trapped in an ideological bias that they insert things they imagine must be true into what they read.

    Bantling did not get $1.00 per shot (which is what you presumably imagined), but $1.00 total, or the princely sum - accounting for inflation of $14.85 in 2018 money.

    --
    Second class citizen of the New Gilded Age
  54. IMITATION = sincerest form of flattery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My hosts prog's only 1 of its kind doing hardcoded favs where you spend most time (I did it 1st & only hosts prog that does) speeding you up + protecting you vs. DNS security issues like redirect poisoning & being down + TRACKING You (via dns request logs) by avoiding slower remote DNS!

    * I did it LONG BEFORE the Chinese per http://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/04/26/boffins_supercharge_the_hosts_file_to_save_users_plagued_by_dns_outages/

    So YES the Chinese IMITATED "lil' ole' me" & I also did a BETTER JOB of things hosts file than any other hosts file mgt. program has, ever, by doing it more thoroughly & effectively!

    APK

    P.S.=> Imitation = sincerest form of flattery - what can I say other than that, eh? apk

    1. Re:IMITATION = sincerest form of flattery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep telling yourself that APK and someday you might actually believe it, too bad no one else believes you fantasy.

  55. Re: Badge of Honour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Canada also has a lengthy wait list for quality of life restoring surgeries. Lengthy as in people age out of their careers and working life before being able to get surgery. I have at least two more years on the wait list for a spinal surgery which will make it five years out of my career, rendering a decade plus of experience and education irrelevant. Thanks, Canada.

  56. Canada should put US on Data Security watchlist by wardrich86 · · Score: 1

    Canada should put US on Data Security watchlist... considering their shady as fuck snooping laws and practices.

  57. Trump Drained The Swamp! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...he replaced all the alligators with crocodiles! That was Yuge, Bigly, So Much Winning we Beg Him To Stop!

    Seriously, just stop.

  58. Bell Labs, profits, and research ROI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    We would NEVER have had, for one random example, lasers, if there had been a profit requirement

    Lasers were developed at Bell Labs and Hughes Research Lab, which were both operated by for-profit companies. They funded research labs in the expectation that the R&D would be profitable.

    Bell Labs was operated as by a regulated monopoly whose profits and expenses were fairly static until the break up in the 1980s. Given that the laser was created in the 1950s, when Ma Bell didn't have to worry about competition, saying that it was a "for-profit company" is technically correct but misses the point.

    Bell could throw many millions of dollars are research which may or may not be fruitful because ROI was generally irrelevant to them. (Ditto for the transistor, also developed at Bell Labs.)

  59. Re: Badge of Honour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Really? Breakthroughs like penicillin didnâ(TM)t happen because of a pure profit motive, and the world would be a very different place if it had. http://www.abc.net.au/science/slab/florey/story.htm

  60. Re:Badge of Honour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Congratulations, you've just described in a nutshell how the pharmaceutical industry currently works.

  61. Re:Badge of Honour by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    Ironically enough the countries on the list don't innovate anything, they just steal other's work. Developing drugs costs money. None of the breakthoughs would exists without a profit motive.

    I call bullshit - many many breakthroughs were made by scientists doing 'pure' science. We would NEVER have had, for one random example, lasers, if there had been a profit requirement behind the scientists doing the fundamental science that made it possible.

    No it is true. Life existed at only single cell level until Capitalism was invented. Now, there are no Barriers - except Canada. Sad.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  62. Re: Badge of Honour by Brockmire · · Score: 1

    Trump wants Americans to die. No life saving drugs for you!

  63. Next time he holds up a paper ... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    Show him a map.
    I guess he believes Canada is a province of Syria or something ...

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  64. Most of us Canadians by Kernel+Kurtz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    have just come to expect Mr Trump to be what could charitably be called erratic.

    I'd think that is similar to the view from the rest of the world as well.

    1. Re:Most of us Canadians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gently put and confirms the reputation of Canadians as polite and well mannered. In Australia we are less charitable.

      Reaching for the right word does take some care. Hereabouts we turn to PT Barnum's famous dictum for the vocabulary to describe those who voted for Mr Trump.

    2. Re:Most of us Canadians by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      That would be who voted for Hillary. Really big suckers. See how she is now? Imagine if that bitch were president. We'd be in a big war by now.

    3. Re:Most of us Canadians by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      His style. He gets things done. He managed to make China back down without imposing any terriffs. Looks like he'll get peace with North Korea which is absolutely amazing and he deserves a Nobel Peace Prize for that one, instead of Obama who got it for not being George Bush (i.e. nothing). He has been a very effective President even with all the crying from the left and constant attacks.

      I still run into stupid people that believe in the collusion delusion. They are all really big suckers.

  65. Re:Badge of Honour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever hear of forestry?

  66. Good! by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    "over concerns about its border controls and pharmaceutical practices."

    Exactly, we can't have those Canadian fuckers sell meemaw and peepaw their much needed drugs for a reasonable price.

  67. publicly subsidized/privately profitable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It wouldn't be so bad if the research at publicly funded universities wouldn't end up being privately profitable. If the drugs were made in America, they should be the cheapest in America.

  68. "negotiate" away by FeelGood314 · · Score: 1

    There are a number of things the Canadian government wants to "negotiate away" at these talks. We have market quotas for chicken and milk that cost consumers millions but have been politically impossible to remove. The Canadian government would love to give these away as concessions for something. There are probably some US politicians that would like to make "concessions" on some stupid American law that is politically difficult to remove. Canada can't be the only country with dumb laws for rich special interest groups.

  69. Shame on Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shame on Canada for trying to make advanced drugs affordable to people that need them.

  70. Re:Badge of Honour by Insanity+Defense · · Score: 2

    Ironically enough the countries on the list don't innovate anything, they just steal other's work. Developing drugs costs money. None of the breakthoughs would exists without a profit motive.

    Bullshit. Where do you think the U.S. gets their medical isotopes from? It happens to be Canada mostly. When NASA needed an "arm" for the Space Shuttle who do you think designed and built it? A Canadian Corporation. Know any diabetics taking insulin? Thank Canada for their being alive. How about babies eating Pablum? Invented at the Toronto Hospital for Sick Children. And so on and so forth. I'm sure other countries on the list have their own discoveries.

  71. Re:Badge of Honour by Insanity+Defense · · Score: 1

    many many breakthroughs were made by scientists doing 'pure' science for FREE? They worked for No Pay? Pan handled for food? I call bullshit Too.

    You don't know much of the history of science do you? A lot of the early work on which modern science was based was from Scientists who were independently wealthy doing research because they wanted to KNOW. Then again Einstein came up with the theory or relativity as a patent clerk and his employers weren't paying him for that.

  72. Re: Badge of Honour by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    No one is stopping you from paying for it in the US.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  73. Re:Only Trump would put Canada on this list -WRONG by Insanity+Defense · · Score: 2

    Seriously, Canada, along with the UK, are our closest allies.
    In addition, neither of them deserve the treatment that Trump has given them.
    I now know how an East Germany felt.

    Canada has been on these U.S. lists for a LONG time. As to the treatment consider how post 9/11 Bush kept thanking the countries that helped and backed the U.S., the only time he mentioned Canada was when questioned by the press for his omission to which he responded "You don't thank family". How dysfunctional is the the Bush family? So yeah we have had this treatment by a lot more than just Trump.

    It isn't even just the politicos like Bush and Trump but also can be the people as in the incident where 3 playoff games played in the U.S. had the Canadian anthem booed but when after the 3rd U.S. game in the 3rd Canadian game the Canadian fans booed back and we got the "HOW DARE YOU!" treatment from Americans for finally booing the American anthem after being provoked 3 times (and this was the final Canadian game in the series so it was the last chance). So yeah we are used to it.

    I myself in my Canadian home town was harassed by a pair of Americans, when I told them off their response was "Here in the U.S.A they had the right to do whatever they wanted". They didn't even know enough to understand that Canada isn't in the U.S.A.

    Answer me this. Why is it that so many Americans come to Canada to celebrate your 4th of July independence from the British Empire? I ask because not only are they really obnoxious when they do but it seems wrong to visit a foreign nation that was Loyalist to that empire when you rebelled (and took in many of your loyalists when you won) to celebrate independence from that Empire. It just seems wrong.

  74. "Special 301" is like "Special needs" by davecb · · Score: 1

    The authors need to work in "sheltered" employment: in a world containing facts, they're at a distinct disadvantage (;-))

    --
    davecb@spamcop.net
  75. Arrrr ... what's a Saskatchewan pirate to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... when the river is frozen and the crops are buried under ice and snow? Tis online we go to take what we desire:

    (apologies to the Arrogant Worms)

    http://www.lyricsfreak.com/a/arrogant+worms/the+last+saskatchewan+pirate_20009381.html

  76. Re:Badge of Honour by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

    Corning.

  77. Can Be Odd by BrianMarshall · · Score: 1
    The Canadian health care system has its aspects. I am not sure about the details, but one effect is that Canadians cannot use private hospitals in Canada. There are facilities that amount to private clinics/hospitals, but they are for visiting American business people, Canadians cannot use them.

    I am fortunate to have a great physician. He works half-time at one of these private clinics, where he can spend the time to do medicine the way he thinks it should be done. I gather that he makes enough money doing this that he can spend the other half of his time being a family physician (for Canadians) in which he does 15 minute appointments - again, doing medicine how he thinks it should be done.

    I would guess that most family physicians do 10 minute appointments and some do even shorter -- they can make big money if they give enough patients a few minutes of time. My doctor doesn't do this.

    --
    "When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro" -- HST
    1. Re: Can Be Odd by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      Nothing stopping Canadians from going to private hospitals (stopping people from seeking help? Umm no), just that provincial insurance may not cover services. I could get an MRI from my local hospital with 8 month wait for free, or I could drop something like $1200-1800 and get one in 3 days in Vancouver. Also, family doctors have limits on what they charge compared to American family doctors. If your doctor isn't working as often, it's likely he's getting paid a lot more than someone younger but seeing more patients.

    2. Re: Can Be Odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are certainly correct about the MRIs.

      i am sorry I wasn't clear. I am Canadian. My doctor makes good money half-time in a private clinic. He can then afford to spend the other half of his professional time doing family medicine in a clinic in the community doing 15 minute appooingments (which make him less money than 10 minute appointments would).

  78. Re:Badge of Honour by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    The difference maybe being that it's not a groundbreaking research endeavor to plant a tree. You know that it will grow and you know, barring disease or disaster, that you will eventually be able to monetize it. Research is a VERY different beast.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  79. You post so much FUD I'm going to have to check. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You post so much FUD I'm going to have to check.

  80. Re:Badge of Honour by SeattleLawGuy · · Score: 1

    many many breakthroughs were made by scientists doing 'pure' science. We would NEVER have had, for one random example, lasers, if there had been a profit requirement behind the scientists doing the fundamental science that made it possible.

    Sure (at least generally--I'm not sure about the history of lasers specifically). But someone still has to pay for it, assuming you want full-time scientists. Sometimes it's students paying tuition. Sometimes it's grants from government or nonprofits. But someone has to pay for it.

    We could have a better system--one that prevents things like the epipen markup. But we still need to pay for the basic drug development and for the human trials, and for reasonable salaries and profits for everyone involved in or bankrolling that. Otherwise nobody will invest in it and many fewer people will work in the field and the drugs won't get made. It costs a lot to bring a drug to market.

    --
    Real lawyers write in C++
  81. Re:Badge of Honour by q_e_t · · Score: 1

    Scientists in the USSR did a lot of the preparatory work in the 1950s, ironically based on work from Canada. Other preparatory work was done in the UK. I was taught by one of the UK researchers who related having the latest paper translated from Russian, only to discover it was his own paper.

  82. Don't Mess With Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which country is the source of most of the US' imported oil? Canada! By far and for a long time. Saudi Arabia and Mexico have long been in a little spat for #2, but combined they don't come near the flow from Canada. I.P. == Imported Petroleum?

    1. Re:Don't Mess With Canada by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      Eh? We should just take Canada over. Make them states 51-58. Be done with it all. We're happy, Canadians will be happy... everyone wins. You can also get rid of your looney money. I know... it just fit so well. Not often a country makes it so easy for them to be the butt of a joke like that.

  83. Canada and its contributions to mdidine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember EBOLA???? The caccime for it was developed in Canada. The EDMONTON protocol for diabetes. It was developed in CANADA. I am not expert on medical research but I can assure the readers that our Canadian researchers are on bleeding edge developments in medicine and physics and many other areas of interest and need and they are not doing it to become fat assed corporate dudes either but to help humanity and if you think I am whistling out of my decaying poorly maintained dentition and my semi paralyzed infirm body from Canadian terrible 3rd world universal health care, let me assure you we are living longer, healthier and without the stress and worry that you Americans suffer. Feel free to actually look up the stats and see the US is turning third world. Know the difference between an honest socially minded Canada and the Trumpist mafia state you folks have inherited or have been talked into believing is the best of the best. There are many countries doing much better than the US and I don't wish it more bad years of terrible corporate governance but the US is not going up but going down and down. One day people will call bullshit on the priorities of war and invasion and terrible citizen care at home and maybe, just maybe it can change. I don't personally hold much help for it myself as if writers in slasheot don't get it Ma and Pa Kettle surely won't. Somebody voted for the individual who is watching Fox every day to run the US further and faster into the ground so what can I say? Advice..you can laugh all you want at President 'Jimmy' but he has it right in terms of priorities. He is a great man and this is said by me, an atheist who knows decency when he sees it. The intolerable arrogance and self delusion of Americans as to their country is a very dangerous and self destructive abscess and had people considered the priorities of what a nation ought to strive towards..asCarter did and does, perhaps you folks can survive without turning into a total dystopia with its rise of Nazism, racism, dangerous military decisions and just plain redneck religious craziness. Oh right...I don't think owning an AR 15 is going to make you more secure.. universal Canadian style healthcare will.

  84. Re: Only Trump would put Canada on this list -WRON by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Sorry to hear that. That is just plain wrong. I really can not imagine that coming from average Americans, but the rest of us, I'm sorry.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  85. Re:Trump's a Hoser by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

    +1 Funny

    Moderator's sense of humor is busted and needs to have sarcasm explicitly spelt out.

  86. Re:Badge of Honour by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

    Ever hear of AI ?

  87. Re:Badge of Honour by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    I'm fairly sure they expect results from the current research in that field within the next decade. If that long.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  88. Re:Badge of Honour by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure AI has been researched since the 1950's without much to show for it.

    Not only is nothing NEAR Turing complete ... people don't seem to like Alexa / Siri that much.

  89. Re:Badge of Honour by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    And you'll notice that only recently the research has become interesting for investors and to people outside of universities.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.