Slashdot Mirror


Russia Is Attacking US Forces With Electronic Weapons In Syria, General Says (yahoo.com)

john of sparta shares a report from Yahoo: American forces in Syria are increasingly facing attacks from Russian and Syrian electronic warfare weapons, as Moscow uses the conflict to test its future arsenal. General Raymond Thomas, head of the U.S. Special Operations Command, said that Syria has become "the most aggressive electronic warfare environment on the planet," Breakingdefense.com reported. Speaking at a geospatial intelligence conference in Florida, Gen. Thomas said that Russian and Syrian regime forces "are testing us everyday, knocking our communications down, disabling our [EC-130 aircraft]."

The Lockheed Martin EC-130 Compass Call is one of America's most advanced electronic warfare weapons. Based on the C-130 Hercules, the plane was developed to disrupt enemy communications, radar and command operations. The craft's presence in Syrian skies gives Russia the chance to test its weapons against the best the U.S. has to offer, whether directly or through its Syrian allies. Earlier this month, four anonymous officials told NBC News that Russia has also been regularly targeting smaller U.S. surveillance drones. One of those quoted said Russian operations were having a significant impact on U.S. capabilities. The sophisticated attacks were even successful against encrypted signals and anti-jamming devices, the official said.
Slashdot reader john of sparta adds, "Well, it's war; not a surprise..."

249 comments

  1. Re:What, how could this be? by gavron · · Score: 2

    Well now, they're also jamming ENCRYPTED communication!
    That doesn't just piss off Trump... it also pisses off all the sex traffickers that weren't on backpage.

    Seriously, sometimes the press releases the military puts out are so stupid.

    "We had a really good supply caravan. With hidden stuff under blankets. And then the Russians blew it all up,
    even the stuff under blankets!!!!!"

    Encryption is of no value when the underlying medium is sufficiently attacked.

    E

  2. Bloody hypocrites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The British and US military and governments are a bunch of bloody hypocrites. :-(

    BTW, I'm British.

    1. Re:Bloody hypocrites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The British and US military and governments are a bunch of bloody hypocrites. :-(

      BTW, I'm British.

      ALL governments are a bunch of bloody hypocrites, goes with the territory.

    2. Re: Bloody hypocrites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I could tell by your use of bloody, Ivan.

    3. Re: Bloody hypocrites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be to sure the poster was Russian. You know "britain" contains a huge fraction of muslims which probably is not too excited about "their" PM

    4. Re: Bloody hypocrites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grumpy old man yells at cloud.

    5. Re: Bloody hypocrites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are Russian.

    6. Re: Bloody hypocrites by Cederic · · Score: 1

      If you know anything at all about Britain then you'll know that disparaging the PM is a national pastime. Doesn't matter who the PM is either.

      The current incumbent seems to be pretty fair and reasonable towards muslims. She doesn't seem to hold biases towards or against any particular group, she wants authoritarian control over everybody.

  3. Not only there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ""are testing us everyday, knocking our communications down,"

    They also knocked a moron as president down your throats.

    1. Re: Not only there by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That was in 2008. Get with the times. Those years are over.

    2. Re: Not only there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Palin was only the VP candidate. Now granted, it was stupid for McCain to select her, because it cost him the Presidency by a HUGE margin, it is quite possible he was suffering from brain cancer, so technically not moronic.

    3. Re: Not only there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He's referring to Hillary being knocked out of the election she tried to steal.

    4. Re:Not only there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Your map says it all: Look at all that red! It's commies, commies I tell you. They've taken over all those counties, and are on the way to impurify our precious bodily fluids!

    5. Re:Not only there by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      ""are testing us everyday, knocking our communications down,"

      They also knocked a moron as president down your throats.

      Ah, if only we had more "moron" presidents. Reagan, Trump ...

      I've been around long enough to recognize domestic propaganda too.

    6. Re: Not only there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      The whole Trump Russia connection a tired democrat narrative. Only a moron would believe this shit at this point.

    7. Re: Not only there by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      Just curious - in your worldview how do you reconcile the âoeTrump is a Russian stoogeâ fantasy narrative with the âoeRussia is fighting us in proxy warsâ reality?

    8. Re: Not only there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      She didn't try to steal it, she bought it fair and square!

    9. Re: Not only there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The theory is that a tiny number of truthful messages can bring down an elaborate building of lies.

      That is what Hillary and her Marxist, globalist, warmongering friends say.

    10. Re: Not only there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Russia tries to control both sides of any situation they are involved in. That way, even if it doesn't make any sense, they are still in control.

    11. Re:Not only there by FudRucker · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      and all the big blue spots are centered over sanctuary cities where illegals are allowed to vote, but those sanctuary cities forget that illegal aliens dont qualify to vote in a federal election, maybe the electoral college ignored a lot of votes from blue areas that could not be verified

      --
      Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    12. Re: Not only there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think Reagan was a good President then you probably think the "war on drugs" was a good idea, too ... and that makes you an idiot. Sorry to break it to you.

    13. Re: Not only there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for clearing that up, Cozy Bear.

    14. Re: Not only there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He didnâ(TM)t have glioblastoma 10 years ago. He chose her because he was an idiot suffering from hubris.

    15. Re: Not only there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alex?

    16. Re: Not only there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So everybody in the Justice Department and US military intelligence are idiots? You are the fucking idiot. You get your news from a propaganda outlet that portrays itself as a news outlet. Cohen gave Hannity legal advise. He didnâ(TM)t disclose it to his viewers. Fox didnâ(TM)t punish him for breaking the cardinal rule of good journalism. Fox is a propaganda outlet that exists to make money off of the least educated Americans.

      As a wise man onnce said. Nobody ever lost money betting against the intelligence of the American people.

      Think of how dumb the average American is. Now understand that half of the American people are even dumber than that.

    17. Re:Not only there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump is a traitor and morons don't regret being morons, so yeah.

    18. Re: Not only there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So it is no longer reptiles, but now Russians?

    19. Re:Not only there by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "This narrative that Russia got him elected.. take a look at this map of voting by county i"

      Thanks for the link, I got confirmation that the morons in this country live exactly where I thought they would.

    20. Re: Not only there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The whole Trump Russia connection a tired democrat narrative. Only a moron would believe this shit at this point.

      Within a few days of the Watergate break-in on June 17th, 1972, the Democrats filed a $1 million lawsuit and accused the GOP Committee to Re-elect the President as a co-conspirator.
      But neither the press nor the public believed them. On June 21st, NBC's David Brinkley snarkily referred to it as a novel method of fundraising and that if they were so certain, why not sue for $9 million and erase the DNC's existing campaign debt at the GOP's expense.
      Throughout that year the Dems kept updating the lawsuit with stronger allegations and moving ever closer to pinning Watergate's tail on Nixon's , er, donkey, they weren't getting a lot of public traction and Nixon was re-elected in a historic landslide, garnering 61% of the popular vote in a devastating 520-17 victory over the hapless & forgotten George McGovern who a decade previously had said of Vietnam "The current dilemma in Vietnam is a clear demonstration of the limitations of military power ... [Current U.S. involvement] is a policy of moral debacle and political defeat ... The trap we have fallen into there will haunt us in every corner of this revolutionary world if we do not properly appraise its lessons"
      It was long rumored and now accepted that Nixon undermined LBJ's efforts to broker peace talks in 1968, hoping to secure that as a political victory for himself.
      https://www.nytimes.com/2016/1...

      Months after the Saturday Night Massacre of Oct 1973 and the infamous "I'm not a crook" speech of Nov 17, 1973 at his final SOTU address, Nixon thundered "1 year of Watergate is ENOUGH".
      Barely 6 months later Nixon resigned in disgrace. That same day, his re-election committee settled with the DNC for $775k.

      https://www.nytimes.com/1974/0...

    21. Re:Not only there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "This narrative that Russia got him elected.. take a look at this map of voting by county i"

      Thanks for the link, I got confirmation that the morons in this country live exactly where I thought they would.

      yeah, there is a lot of blue indeed.

    22. Re: Not only there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your god-emperor Putin will arrive in Washington shortly. On your knees heretic!

    23. Re: Not only there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump is neither a stooge nor a moron. He's a fascist, pure and simple. Mussolini or Franco would have welcomed him with open arms too.

      Fascists in different countries don't necessarily get along all the time, but they still find it easier to deal with one another than with leaders who actually give a shit about their voters.

    24. Re: Not only there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > So everybody in the Justice Department and US military intelligence are idiots?

      No, just terribly corrupt aparatchiks.

    25. Re: Not only there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Russia tries to control both sides of any situation they are involved in. That way, even if it doesn't make any sense, they are still in control.

      How conviniently unfalsifiable a statement.

    26. Re: Not only there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He had nothing going for him and ran a low energy shitty 'gentlemanly' campaign. She was the only good thing about his campaign. It was refreshing to vote for someone who loves her country.

    27. Re: Not only there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, Obama told them all they were allowed to vote, so it is slightly understandable.

    28. Re: Not only there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Validated citation needed. Not - Infowars, Fox News, RT etc. Something that shows the record of the statement.

    29. Re: Not only there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meanwhile, and entirely unlike that:

      - There was never any evidence of Trump/Russia collision
      - Neither Trump nor Putin has an OUNCE to gain by colluding, even via proxy; any agreement reached would be absolutely unenforcable, and what both parties desire is transparent to all
      - The house committee just closed their case, finding nothing pointing to collusion
      - The Mueller commission, while nabbing a few people on process crimes, has entirely given up on anything related to collusion. Now they are just fishing for stuff to use against Trump, such as interpreting the times he got upset about disloyal coup plotters by citing obstruction of justice.

      Pretty much all exactly unlike watergate

    30. Re: Not only there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't fool me young man; it is Russians all the way down!

    31. Re: Not only there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh. Only US sources of propaganda are okay? NPR, PBS, CNN, MSNBC, etc?

    32. Re: Not only there by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      It sucks when you pay for something and then due to unforeseen circumstances you cannot take delivery.

    33. Re: Not only there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stay tuned. This hasn't fully played out yet.

      There are a lot of links between Russians & Trump; if there was a similar history with Clinton or between Obama and any bunch of Muslims, the rightwing would never stop shouting about it.
      It's telling that both Sessions & Rosenstein are either staying out of it or not obstructing Mueller.

    34. Re: Not only there by haruchai · · Score: 1

      Russia tries to control both sides of any situation they are involved in. That way, even if it doesn't make any sense, they are still in control.

      How conviniently unfalsifiable a statement.

      "conviniently" Is that the Russian spellink, Komrad?
      Unfalsifiable is not the same as false.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  4. This cuts two ways... by Freischutz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The craft's presence in Syrian skies gives Russia the chance to test its weapons against the best the U.S. has to offer...

    At the same time it also gives the US a sample of the best Russia can throw at them and the effect that has on US tactics which have relied on battlefield networking, large numbers of remote controlled drones and the apparent assumption that these communications will never be significantly disrupted or even completely disabled. Let's just hope that this lesson will be better heeded than those learned by the Americans who fought the Japanese in the run-up to WWII. Their reports were filed away or ignored by the Pentagon which ignored the threat because the reports contradicted their preconceptions about the Japanese.

    1. Re:This cuts two ways... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      At the same time it also gives the US a sample of the best Russia can throw at them..

      Hah, keep thinking that..
      This isn't (yet) a full on war between the US and Russia, both sides are *not* deploying 'the best' as they'll be needing them in the event that they do directly engage each other.
      As an example, at no point (according to a ex-colleague who worked on them) have any of BMEWS systems been run at 'full capability', the point being to try 'steer' Russian tactical planning in specific directions based on observed capabilities. Now, this is not to say that the Russians don't know this, they do, so any overt display of their tactics in regards to this have to be taken with a large pinch of salt.
      Ditto re this story, the Russians deploy various EW tactics, the USians bleat 'Nasty Russians, their EW degrades our ability to function..' both countries analysts then sit and try figure out by how much the other lot are taking the piss..

      Oh!, the games people play....

    2. Re:This cuts two ways... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I really doubt that the Russians are using their best tech here. They will just be testing how practical electronic warfare is for their soldiers to use. It has to be usable by low skill front line troops.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:This cuts two ways... by Freischutz · · Score: 1

      I really doubt that the Russians are using their best tech here. They will just be testing how practical electronic warfare is for their soldiers to use. It has to be usable by low skill front line troops.

      Maybe you are right, maybe you are wrong, it is immaterial. Even if you are right and the Russians are already disrupting US comms, drone control and battlefield networking without even really trying or deploying their best assets it should be a wakeup-call to the Pentagon.

    4. Re:This cuts two ways... by Freischutz · · Score: 1

      At the same time it also gives the US a sample of the best Russia can throw at them..

      Hah, keep thinking that.. This isn't (yet) a full on war between the US and Russia, both sides are *not* deploying 'the best' as they'll be needing them in the event that they do directly engage each other. As an example, at no point (according to a ex-colleague who worked on them) have any of BMEWS systems been run at 'full capability', the point being to try 'steer' Russian tactical planning in specific directions based on observed capabilities. Now, this is not to say that the Russians don't know this, they do, so any overt display of their tactics in regards to this have to be taken with a large pinch of salt. Ditto re this story, the Russians deploy various EW tactics, the USians bleat 'Nasty Russians, their EW degrades our ability to function..' both countries analysts then sit and try figure out by how much the other lot are taking the piss..

      Oh!, the games people play....

      I'm pretty sure that to hurt the US the Russkies are not using re-conditioned 1970s vintage Soviet era EW equipment in Syria that they borrowed from a a museum. They must be using at least SOME of their best stuff to mess with one of the best equipped high tech armies on earth even if they are not be using their best stuff to its full capacity. Basically I don't really care whether they have thrown all of their best stuff at the US forces in Syria at full capacity or if they are holding back, for me this is a warning bell. I've always had severe doubts about the vulnerability networked battlefield concept and the idea of replacing the entire USAF an USNAS with remote controlled drones and those doubts are due to EW and hacking. The networked army is nice while it works and when you are using it against the Taliban or the badly trained private armies of dictators using upgraded Soviet era equipment. However, those forces are meant to look good during military parades, they are not meant to perform on a battlefield.They are not the reformed Russian army and they most especially aren't anything like the opponent China would be. When US planners planners structure their networked 21st century army they'd better upgrade their expectations from what Saddam's armies could do to them to considering what countries on the level of Britain/Germany/France could do to disrupt their operations and conduct manoeuvres with these allies bearing that in mind (that's assuming Trump hasn't already ruined relations with these US allies beyond repair). The US forces need to be able to survive a complete breakdown in all of these networked systems and if there is one thing that recommends manned tanks/aircraft/choppers it's that a crew on board the vehicle driving/flying it manually can neither be jammed nor hacked.

    5. Re:This cuts two ways... by Streetlight · · Score: 1

      So, what kind of communications will be used when EW equipment is totally compromised and put out of commission? There's not much one can do to communicate with unmanned vehicles and even autonomous ones can be disabled. For communication with manned vehicles (planes, trucks, etc.) or individual groups of troops does the military drop back to smoke signals, semaphores, or very, very long wires? Pilots and ground forces may have to depend on individual initiative to get the job done. The battle field will become even more dangerous than it already is.

      --
      In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
    6. Re:This cuts two ways... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The thing about EM communications is that you can't totally compromise the medium. You can always make trade-offs of cost, logistics, bit-rates, and risk of detection. It's always going to be cat-and-mouse because you can always use spread-spectrum and frequency-hopping techniques, beam-forming, or more raw energy to jam and evade jamming.

      Of course, the more energy you transmit, the more likely you are producing your own beacon for an incoming anti-radiation projectile. You may make different choices depending on whether you are a carrier group with a strong air-defense perimeter, a forward base that is visible to the enemy, or a covert mobile unit who needs to be invisible. Also, the more likely that a unit will be lost/captured, the more careful you want to be about provisioning your very best equipment. You don't want to leave copies all over the landscape for an enemy to study.

      Along the lines of smoke signals and semaphores, there are also point-to-point beam systems like microwave, infrared, or even visible laser. You could even imagine something crazier like x-ray or other high-energy beams. At the other extreme, they used to use extremely long-wave radio to talk to submarines and that might also be possible between forward bases? For nearby communication, you might also consider sound waves. You might use infrasound like elephants do, or you might do some kind of pulse-coding of shock waves. Could you make an automatic rifle that shoots out a pulse train of carefully timed bullets and let the receiver decode the sonic booms as the bullets whiz past?

      What about a mortar shell or magic bullet that has a radio embedded in it? You could load it with some data, fire it towards your recipient to physically bypass a jamming cordone, and then it squirts out a very short broadcast before self-destructing.

    7. Re:This cuts two ways... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The thing about EM communications is that you can't totally compromise the medium. You can always make trade-offs of cost, logistics, bit-rates, and risk of detection. It's always going to be cat-and-mouse because you can always use spread-spectrum and frequency-hopping techniques, beam-forming, or more raw energy to jam and evade jamming.

      My biggest fear would be the Russians cracking the encryption on the battlefield network and then quietly listening in and never overplaying their hand by making it obvious they cracked your comms. That's basically what the British did to the Germans during WWII and it can be argued that it (thankfully) cost the Nazis the war.

    8. Re:This cuts two ways... by Solandri · · Score: 1

      Another possibility is you leak a story to the press whining about how the Russian electronic warfare has successfully crippled your most sophisticated electronic warfare assets. When in reality they're able to operate just fine despite the jamming, and you just want to lull the opposition into a false sense of having succeeded. Those of you who grew up after the Cold War have no idea just how convoluted the disinformation game can become.

    9. Re:This cuts two ways... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Construction of the Pentagon was begun in 1941 and it was dedicated in 1943.

    10. Re:This cuts two ways... by Spamalope · · Score: 1

      You also report things like this when you want the Gov't contract feeding trough to be topped up. It's turtles all the way down.

    11. Re:This cuts two ways... by Cederic · · Score: 1

      They must be using at least SOME of their best stuff to mess with one of the best equipped high tech armies on earth even if they are not be using their best stuff to its full capacity.

      I'd agree neither side are likely to be going full capability, but that also means that the Russians aren't necessarily using any of their best stuff. ECW technologies dating back to WWII will compromise drone control and it'll be useful to Russia to find out how they respond to that type of attack.

      The US forces need to be able to survive a complete breakdown in all of these networked systems and if there is one thing that recommends manned tanks/aircraft/choppers it's that a crew on board the vehicle driving/flying it manually can neither be jammed nor hacked.

      Well, even that's not necessarily true. Given A10 pilots' tendency to shoot friendly forces even when not under electronic countermeasures I can only imagine how US forces will respond when they're receiving false and misleading signals from their equipment.

    12. Re:This cuts two ways... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've always wondered how they hardened their aircraft to prevent this.
      Well, no we know. They haven't. They just assumed that it was all cave dwelling goat fuckers and didn't bother.

  5. What is an electronic weapon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where they beaming creimer ebooks at them? That should be against the Geneva convention!

    1. Re: What is an electronic weapon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happen to the fat boy? He isn't spamming slashdot anymore? Guess YouTube warned his ass. Spam get TOSd. Glad I reported his ass. I will anytime I see a spam link from him.

    2. Re:What is an electronic weapon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wasn't he writing about having sex with his uncle, or a tree? something faggy nonetheless.

    3. Re:What is an electronic weapon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      MODDOWN! ; creimer useless post again!

      CREIMER' SUBMISSIONS UPDATE:
      Note also that creimer is trying to regain karma by getting his submissions published as articles on /. so make sure to go to:
      https://slashdot.org/~__aaclcg...
      https://slashdot.org/~IDrinkFa...
      https://slashdot.org/~_sharp'r...
      https://slashdot.org/~crreimer
      https://slashdot.org/~cdreimer
      https://slashdot.org/~criss69
      https://slashdot.org/~Anonymou...
      https://slashdot.org/~FatCashe...
      https://slashdot.org/~ILoveFat...
      https://slashdot.org/~IHateFat...
      https://slashdot.org/~IAteFatC...
      https://slashdot.org/~ITapeFat...
      https://slashdot.org/~IApeFatC...
      https://slashdot.org/~IPrayFat...
      https://slashdot.org/~FatCashe...
      and mod down his submissions as well. The great thing is that you don't even need mod points to mod down a submission, just click on the "minus" icon!

      Yes, believe it or not, creimer owns all the above sock puppet accounts. It is a mystery why Slashdot management tolerates it!

      creimer wrote:

      I don't bother with mod points. I'm doing something much more sinister. It took ten story submissions ? I'll have to double check the number ? to move cdreimer's karma from neutral to excellent without ever being exposed to the capricious mods. Mmmmmwwwwahahahahahahaha!

      https://slashdot.org/comments....

      Danger, Will Robinson, Danger! Creimy is posting more than 2 posts a day. Hurry! mod down otherwise /. will go to hell again!

      Note: you can mod down even if already at -1 to lower karma and to prevent lost /. users to accidentally mod up.

      creimer wrote:

      All you need to do is find a website with a permissive TOS, say, Slashdot, create a Python script to scrape your own comments, sprinkle Amazon affiliate links in various posts, and then re-post past links whenever possible. Won't be long before you start making "coffee money" each month.

      https://slashdot.org/comments....

      C.D. Reimer is a renowned Slashdot collaborator, as he puts it himself; "Because of the quality of my posts and my article submissions, I'm a highly rated commentator and moderator."

      But does anybody ever wondered what "C.D." stands for? Well, it stands for Creimy Dumpty of course!

      Creimy Dumpty sat on the wall,
      Creimy Dumpty had a great fall.
      All the king's horses
      And all the king's men
      Couldn't put Creimy Dumpty
      Together again.

      Creimy's siblings video and theme song, very realistic, especially the pants, just like Creimy's:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      With "Vice President Pence Vowing US Astronauts Will Return To the Moon", we are sure they will need miracle workers up there, here is what it would look like. Note that Creimy takes care of bringing a lot of food to the moon as depicted below:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      Creimy's real pictures:
      Before the sex change:

    4. Re:What is an electronic weapon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't seen one in three days since they provoked APK

      That's funny I haven't seen a view in three days on your junk youtube channel last time I checked!

      It almost made me do a double-take!

      CROFLOL!

      Also, you seem to view APK with much admiration and respect, don't you? Maybe there is some truth to the rumors that you are indeed APK, who knows?
      --
      Balena!

    5. Re:What is an electronic weapon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, Ethell his one and only tree girlfriend once reported it here, see the end of the post:

      There you are spamming amazon and youtube affiliate links with yet another fake account, you revenue stream hogging disgusting fat sexist tube of lard, Christopher Dale Reimer!

      You can be sure I will be watching this fake account too. I know this is you because you told me you were working on your freepass 11 file server and you are so dumb that you can't even masquerade yourself properly.

      Now, I told you I was out of meds last week and you didn't even care to contact me you lazy fucker.

      How many times do I have to express the emergency of the situation??????

      The python click script you wrote for my pheromone revenue stream web site suddenly stopped to work!!!!!!

      You fucking incompetent python script writer!!!

      When it works, I get 4000+ clicks a day on my pheromone revenue stream web site but only 5 or 6 without it!!!!

      Now, it seems like you dont care and that you have abandoned me you heartless fucking pig!

      Bonus:
      Here is a story that creimer told me when convincing me what a hard life he had:

      The tree was him and the tree knot was his butt hole!

      So, his uncle packed his fat ass with lard and with his cock! Not that it makes much of a difference but anyway, there it is!

      Signed:
      Ethell, The girl that used to love you and now hates you, burn in hell where you belong you sexist pig!

    6. Re:What is an electronic weapon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey creimer! How is your new video doing with clickbots/spam links filtered out in realtime? With your account status, it isn't like we really care about false positive,

      Disclaimer: I work for YouTube.

    7. Re:What is an electronic weapon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy shit man!

      I told the fat fucker that youtube was much smarter than slashdot in dealing with spammers that bring no value but as usual, the bastard doesn't listen to anybody but himself!

      Oh well, I believe creimer youtube adventure is coming to an end soon...

    8. Re:What is an electronic weapon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah! This!

      Google is big brother so they already know everything about creimer, what he eats, what porn he watches, etc.

      It is unbelievable that the inflated head creimer figures that he is going to fool them.

      The only thing that helps creimer and he knows it and takes advatage of it, is that creimer is a retard handled by the Special Education for the Santa Clara County office of Education. So, creimer is a headache for the lawyers of those organizations.

      But creimer will never manage to fool them, they are sneaky bastards too. Creimer doesn't stand a chance with his 8 year old brain abilities.

    9. Re:What is an electronic weapon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly,

      Bit it seems like Chris is a victim here. He keeps on reading those SEO, youtube algorithm, basically get rich quick sites. He doesn't realize that he is the fish for them since they make money off him with their own schemes. Then, he wastes his time trying to implement what those sites suggest and he ends up disturbing people.

      I mean, those crooks tell Chris that he has to build personal brands and he goes on the Internet and makes everything about himself public!

      I believe we should bring this up at our next meeting. He might not be our only patient victim of such on-line abuse.

      --
      Nancy Guerrero
      Director
      Special Education
      Santa Clara County Office of Education

    10. Re:What is an electronic weapon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes! That's the story where the bees come to his rescue!

      To thank them, he later made a video about a bee resting on his jacket at the bus stop while he was looking for second hand lottery tickets!

    11. Re:What is an electronic weapon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chris' case is getting worse, he spends all day replying to himself as AC on /. and now, on YouTube in order to grab attention!

      The tests we ran on Chris have shown that Chris has the intelligence of an ameba:
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      So, technically, he is able to conceive some kind of agenda but it will be silly or impossible to follow on a human scale.

      For example, Chris had an agenda to post anything he felt like on Slashdot which did not work well because it was based on his false beliefs that he had an infinite number of karma points as he wrote here several times.

      Several people here explained to Chris that karma maxed out at some level like 50 or so but Chris kept on insisting that his python script had confirmed that he had millions of karma points!

      Oh well, as I wrote before: "It isn't Chris' fault if he is the way he is. We do the best we can do with him and he is partially integrated into society. We try to cure his abnormal need for attention but he is kind of stubborn and won't listen to anybody."

      For the valuable /. users that might already have read the following, please note that there is an important update.

      IMPORTANT UPDATE:
      Special Education for the Santa Clara County Office of Education has invested money to buy Chris a new chair:
      http://www.keynamics.com/image...

      Information about Christopher Dale Reimer and autistic people:

      Autistic people have obsessions about things normal people don't care. For example, one of our autistic patient went haywire when he realized that there was a penny missing in his pocket change.

      To calm him down, one of our educator pretended to have found it on the floor and gave a penny to him.

      The autistic patient condition went even worse because he realized it wasn't the same penny!

      Chris has an obsession with budgeting every penny. He doesn't understand that most people do not budget to the penny and have a flexible amount they allow for miscellaneous items.

      I am Nancy Guerrero and I am Director of Special Education for the Santa Clara County Office of Education. We use Chris' (a.k.a. creimer,cdreimer) picture in our document because he is the hardest case we have ever had to handle:
      http://www.sccoe.org/depts/stu...

      Our artists were inspired by the low carb diet that Christopher follows scrupulously for the small lunch box and by the picture linked below for the rest. I am sure that you will notice the similarities such as the bump on the side of his chest and more:
      https://ibb.co/gVad65

      Please be easy on Christopher although, I am aware that some of our staff handling Chris post joke comments here and obvoiusly, the Santa Clara County Office of Education disapprove that behavior vehemently:
      http://ibb.co/mRVSaG

      But it isn't Chris' fault if he is the way he is. We do the best we can do with him and he is partially integrated into society. We try to cure his abnormal need for attention but he is kind of stubborn and won't listen to anybody.

      Thank You dear users,
      ---
      Nancy Guerrero
      Director
      Special Education
      Santa Clara County Office of Education

    12. Re:What is an electronic weapon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you are dumber than dumb creimer! Worker bees don't rest! That one was feeding on your sweat and spit all over your jacket,

    13. Re: What is an electronic weapon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like everything you do creimer, making fun of the President of the United States of America is definitely a smart move, especially since you pretend to be working for a 3 letter agency as a "government IT worker".

      Brilliant creimer!

    14. Re: What is an electronic weapon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL!

      creimer is only a crackpot on retard welfare checks paid by you and me. He even got a retard welfare check bonus for trying to launch his own personal brands!

      Enjoy!

    15. Re: What is an electronic weapon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Poor creimer, that's why he still lives in Silicon Valley since moving would get his welfare checks cancelled. It all makes sense now after all.

    16. Re:What is an electronic weapon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, it's tardreimer! I haven't seen one of your fifteen alts in three minutes since you've started pretending you aim your soft yogurt-like poop back to YouTube.

    17. Re: What is an electronic weapon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What happen to the fat boy?"

      What happen, Chris, is that you're so fat you absorb neutrinos!

    18. Re: What is an electronic weapon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey Chris, in reality our concerted efforts finally triumphed and we got rid of you, despite your claims of "never leaving".

      You're nothing but an anonymous fat nobody middle-aged loser that no one misses either online or in real life: the Incel Emperor.

      Go crash your bus into oncoming traffic, you thick-tongued hairy-palmed toothless mongoloid.

    19. Re: What is an electronic weapon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strange, where are the logged-in cdreimer or creimer posts? Where are the links to his repulsive blog or whiny YouTube channel?

      We got rid of him like we scrape splattered bugs off a radiator grille.

    20. Re:What is an electronic weapon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      creimer has been too busy the past few days screwing APK in the ass and bludgeoning him with household items. It is a match made in heaven.

    21. Re:What is an electronic weapon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " Still got 60+ videos to make this year."

      Yeah, not your MS certifications or anything like that. No, make low-value digital e-waste. That's the ticket!

    22. Re:What is an electronic weapon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Certification is professional. YouTube is a hobby. One is work, the other is fun. Are you bitter that creimer is having fun while living in Silicon Valley on a government salary?

    23. Re:What is an electronic weapon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Silicon Valley Comic Con 2018 is over after 20+ videos, 4K+ views and 8 new subscribers. Things are returning to normal with a weekly schedule. Still got 60+ videos to make this year.

      Yeah, things are back to normal alright; minus 65 views. Not only is youtube now filtering out your spam posts and clickbot views in real time, they are still removing your fake views from the comic con era.

      CROFLOL; creimer is dumber than dumb! Next thing you will know, they will simply bar your channel access :)

    24. Re:What is an electronic weapon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      creimer hobby is to spam the planet and to generally be a nuisance.

      Silicon Valley Comic Con 2018 is over after 20+ videos, 4K+ views and 8 new subscribers. Things are returning to normal with a weekly schedule. Still got 60+ videos to make this year.

      Yeah, things are back to normal alright; minus 65 views for today! Not only is youtube now filtering out your spam posts and clickbot views in real time, they are still removing your fake views from the comic con era.

      CROFLOL; creimer is dumber than dumb! Next thing you will know, they will simply bar your channel access :)

    25. Re:What is an electronic weapon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CROFLOL buddy!

      I just checked and you are right; minus 65 views for today so far :)

      https://socialblade.com/youtub...

      As another poster have said, creimer is incredibly stupid to think that he can fool youtube!
      --
      Balena!

    26. Re:What is an electronic weapon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's been downgraded to a hobby? Before it was "passive income" that was the basis of your retirement strategy.

      You have basically no retirement savings, no children to support you in your old age, and income history between nil and low, and so you will be an obese, unhealthy man (with corresponding medical bills) forced to live on about $1,000/month Social Security. Your only real option is live on the street. Seriously, you can't even afford living in a camper in New Mexico for $1k/month, or a junkie hotel in the Tenderloin.

      But at least you can think: "Hey! I had a lot of fun posting recordings of a nerd convention I went to, and then spamming the link to get a hundred views!"

    27. Re:What is an electronic weapon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha creimer! Now is really the the time to go get the popcorn!

      Oh, a creimertard! I haven't seen one in three days since they provoked APK in a foolish bid to bring creimer back from YouTube. I need to make some more popcorn.

      Silicon Valley Comic Con 2018 is over after 20+ videos, 4K+ views and 8 new subscribers. Things are returning to normal with a weekly schedule. Still got 60+ videos to make this year.

      Yeah, things are back to normal alright; minus 65 views for today. Not only is youtube now filtering out your spam posts and clickbot views in real time, they are still removing your fake views from the comic con era.

    28. Re: What is an electronic weapon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sharper is a world class retard who would have his own encyclopedia dramatica article in the nets better days but I highly doubt he's creimer

      As for creamers apk fixation..... We can give apk a handicap for being schizophrenic, a hard case to deal with. You, however could have easily been a productive human being except you were raised by irresponsible cave people.

    29. Re:What is an electronic weapon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chris is too busy with YouTube

      That, I can imagine...

    30. Re:What is an electronic weapon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chris I have been mailing you several times previously but you did not answer me.

      I have AI bots that don't get detected by youtube and I can make them available to you :)

      Contact me ASAP please, see you soon :)

      Dear Team Creimer,

      I just noticed that the Humpty-Dumpty video has ~375 millions views, that should make you salivate!

      I have plenty of ideas to make the views on your own youtube channel skyrocket but you didn't contact me yet. Is it because I am a lady? Ethell says that you are sexist but I hope it isn't true.

      Anyway, I will give you a free hint anyway: Dress-up as Humpty in your videos, you shouldn't need that much makeup making this a money saving situation in your own case.

      My YouTube channel has 222K subscribers and many videos with hundreds of thousands of views:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      Now, with some slight adjustments, I think that together, we could make the view count skyrocket on your very own Team Creimer youtube channel :)

      Please feel confident to contact me if you want me to coach you, we aren't living so far away from each other so we could even easily meet.

      Love XX,

      --
      -Granny

    31. Re:What is an electronic weapon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's the same copy and paste, uninformed bullshit that I've read dozens of times...

      Thanks Chris! At last, after all those years, we have managed to make you feel like you made us feel.

      Thanks again, this is a great step in your slow evolution process.

       

    32. Re:What is an electronic weapon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chris is indeed making progress!

      I could swear that it is the first time I see him talking about himself in the first person!

      He goes:

      Chris is too busy with YouTube and playing Fortnite to bother reading your drivel...

      But then, oh surprise, a sign of progress:

      I no longer pass the highlights...

      Chris uses "I", wow!

      Maybe you slashdotters managed to teach Chris something we didn't manage to.

      Congratulations!
      ---
      Nancy Guerrero
      Director
      Special Education
      Santa Clara County Office of Education

    33. Re:What is an electronic weapon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      APK is not scary if anyone felt he was an actual threat it wouldn't be hard to find something threatening to report to the authorities. They'd be obliged to do some cursory investigation and since APK is clearly schizophrenic they'd throw him in the hospital for a meds adjustment.

    34. Re:What is an electronic weapon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you keep rehashing this shit? No one cares. - Creimer :p

    35. Re:What is an electronic weapon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      APK is just a weirdo on the internet who swears a lot. Why would anybody be scared of him? He's a walking joke, same as you.

      Nobody believes you are 30 year old girl who passes notes on Slashdot to your old friend Creimer who lives on the other side of the country, so why persist in the fiction? It's bizarre, even by Creimer standards.

      Remember the time somebody said you were creepy, so you suggested he molested his own children? That was weird.

    36. Re:What is an electronic weapon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This "shit" are your own words, Tardchris. And YOU care! You jigglypuff!

    37. Re:What is an electronic weapon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tardchris can not afford the talk therapy and medication he needs.

      But it's Tardchris' birthday soon! Maybe we can get him a Shillary coffee mug!

      I really like how that reputation slider sliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiides all the way down to 1.5.

    38. Re:What is an electronic weapon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's highly unlikely that Tardchris can maintain an erection, or have enough space in his 475 square foot storage locker to bludgeon anyone!

    39. Re:What is an electronic weapon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I care!
      This was one of my all time favorite creimer threads, like a good movie I pick up something new every time I read it!
      On Thursday August 31, 2017 Creimer said:

      My stock portfolio is now concentrated in dividend-paying stocks and the dividends are reinvested to buy more shares. Since so many of my stocks are trading at historic lows, they're largely immune to the ups and downs of the general stock market and whatever tweet fart made by Trump.

      Let that sink in. Even during the leadup to a potential stock market bubble, even issuing dividends, most of creimer's stocks were doing awful.
      Earlier in the thread he implied he had lots and lots of money stuffed away in the stock market so this means creimer had a bunch of near-penny stocks that he bought thinking they were a good deal because of their low market price per share.
      If you have 10k invested in 100 stocks that seem to have nowhere to go but up and they drop from a dollar a share to 50c a share.... you've lost 5k!!

      If you'd done something sensible like stuck 10k into a vanguard 2030 and then split that money into a bond fund and large cap fund to ride out these talks of trade wars you'd have made 25% since august with however much work it takes you to do 3 trades, read slashdot headlines and glance at your portfolio dashboard every trade day. Probably less than 2 hours of work for the whole year vs buying individual stocks on the verge of being delisted in hopes that one of them pays like a winning lotto ticket.

    40. Re: What is an electronic weapon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Sharper is a world class retard who would have his own encyclopedia dramatica article in the nets better days but I highly doubt he's creimer"

      The confusion is understandable.

    41. Re:What is an electronic weapon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember the time somebody said you were creepy, so you suggested he molested his own children? That was weird.

      I remember the time he said "Child Brides are as American as apple pie"? That was also weird. Not sure why he hoped to gain by saying something like that.

    42. Re:What is an electronic weapon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear Anonymous Cashews,

      I can't get access to creimer since he left Slashdot. Since you are obviously able to get in touch with him, could you let him know the following please?

      Chris, your videos are really taking off now! :)

      For the last week, you have less daily views than the number of videos on your channel but soon, you will reach an average of 1 view a day for each video!

      Keep on the good work Chris!

    43. Re:What is an electronic weapon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Your reading comprehension is shit."

      You think your writing is not feces-based?

      "will to no longer inform him"

      Check that again, Moby Thick. "will to no longer".

  6. Same thing in Ukraine by quonset · · Score: 4, Informative

    From the beginning of the Russian attack against Ukraine, the Russian military has been using and testing its electronic warfare capabilities. They were even able to track an app Ukrainian artillery units were using to calculate their fire and use it to target the units.

    The OSCE monitors routinely report their UAVs are being jammed while over Russian-occupied territory. Also, these monitors report on a regular basis the presence of Russian mobile electronic jamming vehicles.

    Fortunately, as was stated further up, this jamming has given us a look into Russian procedures and allows us to find ways around it or at the least, to mitigate it. As a result, Ukrainian military units are able to communicate and coordinate their activities to target Russian military personnel on Ukrainian territory.

    1. Re:Same thing in Ukraine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They were even able to track an app Ukrainian artillery units were using to calculate their fire and use it to target the units.

      Oh my god, you're saying they hacked an Android app written by some random guy in the Ukrainian army? Wow!!!!

    2. Re:Same thing in Ukraine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like, some idiot repeatedly used Google Earth to know where his targets were and how to fire on them, and they locked on the 3G signal?

    3. Re:Same thing in Ukraine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps he wrote an app for Windows Phone, hit "publish", and it's still in the Windows Store.

  7. Turns out... by puddingebola · · Score: 1

    Turns out the Russian's secret weapon (in the best tradition of Russian engineering) is just a giant magnet.

    1. Re: Turns out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Russia's biggest weapon are fly-over country american voters. And they didn't even need to bribe them in the first place. 40 years of public education defunding gets you an idiot citizenry. All hail to the GOP America's greatest traitor.

    2. Re: Turns out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moron

    3. Re: Turns out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like I told my American colleagues back in 2017... Better an insane clown than a psychopathic vampire. Sometimes you just have to back the least bad option.

  8. Re:What, how could this be? by AndyKron · · Score: 2

    It's all FAKE NEWS!

  9. Syria & allies don't attack,they defend mother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    > American forces in Syria are increasingly facing attacks from Russian and Syrian electronic warfare weapons

    Impossible, for the simple reason that Syria is well, syrian. Thus Syria and their official russian and iranian allies can only DEFEND against US, saudi and zionist invasion forces. It's the capitalist-greater-zionist-imperialist, YHWH-satan worshipping side who is the attacker in Syria. The supposedly secular (1st Amendment) America is actually "dog on chain" of jewish zionism and christian zionism, which want to burn Damascus just because some 3000 year old horror story called Isaiah 17:1 says so.

  10. Re:What, how could this be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yes, that is why the News is the enemy of the people, as we are told daily in our reports from the only trusted source in news.

  11. corepirate nazi media hypenosys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    like swimming in a cesspool & complaining/reporting that everybody else smells bad.. cease fire stand down,, there's moms & babys in every town.. thanks

  12. How dare they by melted · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How dare they interrupt our electronic weapons with their own electronic weapons!

    1. Re:How dare they by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      We'll have to fight back using Psychic communication links!

    2. Re: How dare they by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      That sentiment would be reasonable if we were at war with Russia, but we're not. We're in Syria to fight Isis. Russia's public position is that they're in Syria to fight Isis too. The problem is that Russia is leaving Isis alone, and is kind of supporting Isis by interfering with us.

    3. Re: How dare they by reanjr · · Score: 1

      We're there to fight ISIL? ISIL is pretty much where we want them: out of Iraq and focused on Assad. Sunni extremists attacking our Shia allie in Iraq? Terrorists. Sunni extremists attacking Alawites in Syria? Freedom fighters.

    4. Re: How dare they by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both Russia and the US are guilty of hitting targets that do not belong to ISIS. I would much prefer diplomacy to proxy wars.

    5. Re: How dare they by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think your buying to much of the official line. The way things are I wouldn't be surprised if ISIS works for the US. We say that we are fighting ISIS but it seems that ISIS is just an excuse to be in Syria. Russia says they are there to fight ISIS but are actually there to protect Syria. Somehow we keep accidentally keep dropping supplies for ISIS and supporting other groups that are really just al qaida with a different name.

    6. Re: How dare they by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      nope, you need to research whom we're fighting and arming in Syria. We have no good purpose in Syria

    7. Re: How dare they by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got a diplomacy proposal: nuke the Russians from orbit. It's the only way to make sure!
      If we hit fast and hard, most of the Russian nukes will be destroyed on the ground. Western casualties could be kept to the bare minimum.

    8. Re: How dare they by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Russia is fighting radical Islamic groups. The US was supporting such groups in their fight against Assad because they were seen as the lesser evil.

      Al Nusra, which was in control of Aleppo, is a branch of Al Qaida. Yet it was supported by the West.
      Following a broader range of news we saw Russia and Syria attacking one radical Islamic group after the other. Now they are nearly finished with that and the rebels have very little territory left.

    9. Re: How dare they by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      The Peshmerga aren't a radical islamic group, and neither are the SDF or FSA.

      Russia is against anyone who isn't Assad, because even though he's an asshole he's their asshole. They want a naval base in the Med and Syria has a few decent candidates.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    10. Re: How dare they by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      isis has been done for a while now. They are down to a few ragheads in the desert terrorizing village people. Everyone should pull out of Syria. You either assassinate Assad or leave him alone. Muslims love their dictators.

    11. Re: How dare they by Xest · · Score: 2

      Actually the FSA kind of are now that Turkey has folded the extremist Sunni's they back into the FSA and turned them on the Kurds to do Turkey's ethnic cleansing for them. We can't really view the FSA as moderate anymore.

      This is partly our (the West's) fault too of course for letting them get repeatedly slaughtered by barrel bombs, chemical weapons, and indiscriminate attacks by the Russians as that led to them becoming more extreme and left them with no ally other than Turkey (and a handful of other gulf nations). By not supporting the FSA we lost them wholly to Turkey's influence, and Turkey just wants some people they can arm to kill Kurds and kill Assad and his forces.

      Interestingly Russia isn't really against the Kurds per-se. We're now in a weird situation where Russia is neutral to the Kurds, Assad is loosely supportive of them (because they're effective against ISIS and Turkey's incursions into Syria), and the US fully supports them - the only one killing them and refusing to recognise the fact they're the only capable and moderate force in Syria who want nothing more than peace in their slice of Syria and Iraq is Erdogan who has made a career out of blaming Kurds for his inability to run a country well in much the same way Hitler blamed the Jews to achieve the exact same thing.

      Allegiances have shifted therefore - the Kurds and the SDF are the only good guys who just want peace, democracy, and secularism. The FSA now want something akin to Morsi's Islamic Brotherhood in Egypt (and we all saw how badly that went) as proxies for Turkey, and Assad and Russia just want to continue the legacy authoritarian dictatorship of the Assad dynasty exactly as you say, so Russia can maintain it's port and Assad can live a life of luxury off the suffering of his people.

      Right now we should simply be doing everything we can to support the Kurds. Let's not forget, that when Sinjar in Iraq was overrun by ISIS and thousands of men, women, and children were chased up Mt Sinjar and murdered and raped, Turkey was at the time funding and arming them, and it was the Kurdish YPG from Syria on one side and the Kurdish Peshmerga from Iraq on the other that moved into Sinjar to pursue ISIS and rescue the Yazidis. That was a genuinely heroic and selfless action to save people whom the Kurds had no cultural or religious link to by the very people Erdogan dares to call terrorists.

      I get the impression that were the war to end now, that Assad would if nothing else give the Kurds autonomy in North East Syria in return for keeping ISIS at bay. The Russians would back that, as would the Americans and the Iraqis - the only one with a problem with it is Erdogan because it runs counter to his programme of using Kurds as a phantom enemy. Given the FSA are now acting on Turkey's behalf in this regard and killing Kurds, we should either target directly, or allow Assad and Russia to target directly the FSA, because they are no longer a moderate force at the behest of Turkey and so in turn deserve to be wiped out as much as ISIS does.

      The best outcome in Syria right now due to the failure by the West to act against Assad before Russia intervened is now to accept Assad in the West of Syria, with autonomy for the Kurds and the SDF in the East of Syria, with Turkey and it's proxies sent running with their tail between their legs with a severe military loss back into their own territory.

    12. Re: How dare they by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nope, Russia is fighting ISIS. The US is fighting Assad, who was trying to defend his country against ISIS.

    13. Re: How dare they by Cederic · · Score: 0

      Wait? An ally of the government of a country is helping to defend that country against military interference from another country, and yet the narrative is that they're the aggressor?

      Fuck that. Russia is helping defend Syria against the US. Be glad they're only using electronic countermeasures and not anything more lethal.

      Personally I hope Russia shoot down Turkish jets to stop those cunts genociding the Kurds. Luckily they can do this as a defensive measure against Turkish aggression and thus not draw the rest of NATO into an unjustifiable conflict.

  13. Free strategy by king+neckbeard · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If this is such a concern, I've got a strategy the US can use to combat this: Get the hell out of Syria.

    It's ridiculous to be offended/upset that someone is using countermeasures against the drones being used against them or their allies.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    1. Re:Free strategy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this is such a concern, I've got a strategy the US can use to combat this: Get the hell out of Syria.

      Why?

      It's ridiculous to be offended/upset that someone is using countermeasures against the drones being used against them or their allies.

      According to the President, Russia is our ally, our great friend, who we should respect and celebrate.

    2. Re:Free strategy by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      Why?

      Because staying in Syria kills people, and allows the big bad Rooskies to attack our expensive drones.

      According to the President, Russia is our ally, our great friend, who we should respect and celebrate.

      He's got a funny way of showing it, bombing on of their most important strategic allies.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    3. Re:Free strategy by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      According to the President, Russia is our ally, our great friend, who we should respect and celebrate.

      So, why is he attacking them in Syria ?

    4. Re:Free strategy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to the President, Russia is our ally, our great friend, who we should respect and celebrate.

      Oh, congratulations on awakening from your two-year coma! You may be surprised, but the year is no 2018, and Obama is no longer the President of the United States.

    5. Re:Free strategy by butchersong · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I think in a sane world we would need to articulate a very detailed and compelling reason to go to war. In this world the onus would not be on those skeptical of actions like this to justify not going to war. Doesn't that seem like a world worth working towards if most of the cost to each of us is simply pausing to take a breath and honestly listen to the other side?

      Here are a few reasons I believe this should not be happening 1) congress has not approved it. 2) the refugee crisis in Europe caused by this and our previous actions in Libya. 3) What reason do we have to think that overthrowing another secular ruler will result in anything other than the crap we've seen in Iraq and Libya? A rather comprehensive list of our work to date: master list

    6. Re:Free strategy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why?

      Because staying in Syria kills people, and allows the big bad Rooskies to attack our expensive drones.

      Staying out of Syria kills people.

      If you haven't noticed neither Assad nor Putin cares that much for human lives and have no problem killing innocents just to keep people in line.

    7. Re: Free strategy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Strange that Syrians are so stupid that after assad wipes out AL qeda in controlled cities that residents move back in. Don't they know assad will kill them?

      Stop spreading propoganda bs. We killed more Iraqi civilians than saddam, so extending our war in Syria is not going to save people from big bad assad. We'll end up killing more civilians than assad ever would.

    8. Re:Free strategy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this is such a concern, I've got a strategy the US can use to combat this: Get the hell out of Syria.

      Why?

      Sovereignty.

      It's ridiculous to be offended/upset that someone is using countermeasures against the drones being used against them or their allies.

      According to the President, Russia is our ally, our great friend, who we should respect and celebrate.

      Like NK, had he said anything else the media would have ripped him a new ass anyway. It's called politics.

      Fitting capatcha: bulldogs

    9. Re:Free strategy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's quite ironic how the situation has turned out. All those little gopniks trolling our media loved Trump for his rather positive attitude towards Russia and quickly jumped to his defence whenever he was criticized with their almighty whataboutery.

      I wonder if they still like him now.

      Don't get me wrong. It's a terrible situation for everyone involved, but I can't react any different but with a little smile, which is actually very sad. You reap what you sow, I guess.

    10. Re: Free strategy by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      The reason for the Syrian war is to have a pipeline from Qatar to Europe. The US is fighting a war for oil. Literally. For the ungrateful nations of Europe. Fucked up, eh?.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    11. Re:Free strategy by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      Yes, people will die under Assad, but we're acting as the air force of ISIS, who also kills innocents. You know, those guys that were former members of the that other dictator we overthrew.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    12. Re:Free strategy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > If you haven't noticed neither Assad nor Putin cares that much for human lives

      Putin the psychopath is one thing, but the current syrian leader Basher el-Assad is actually a medical doctor specializing in opthalmology. He had studied, settled and practiced in London, that's why his wife is a white lady. He wasn't supposed to be in politics, but his elder brother, the designated successor to previous syrian dictator Hafez el-Assad, was assassinated by the Mossad in a faux car accident. Thus Basher was called home to take over upon death of his elderly father.

      (No, democracy proven doesn't work in the 3rd world, not even in a secular country like Syria. BTW, the syrian ruling elite tribe, the alawite are too few in numbers to install their half-muslim, half-gnostic ezoterics as a state religion, so the regime cultivated religious multi-culture to supress sunni numerical superiority and based the nation's ideology on pan-arabism and anti-zionism versus the jewish militarily occupying the syrian territory of Golan heights.)

      If anything, the 7-year old ongoing (not-so)-internal armed struggle in Syria owes a lot to Basher's incompetence as a 3rd-world compatible dictator. He remained too passive in the beginning, allowing the rebellion to gain steam quickly, weapon stockpiles were looted from garrisons, many officers defected, etc.. His father Hafez faced the same situation in the 1980's, when the neighbouring zionist entity tried to stir up a civil war for the breaking up of Syria, as prescribed by the infamous Yinon-plan. Hafez immediately ordered the secret police militia to round up and shoot ~ 20000 men from politically suspicious neighbourhoods of Damascus and other major cities and the whole disorder was over in 9 months. In contrast, Basher's indecisive loser of a dictator manners led to many hundreds of thousands of dead.

    13. Re:Free strategy by Solandri · · Score: 2

      Ostensibly, the U.S. and Russia are in Syria with the same goal - to fight ISIS. But behind the curtains, the U.S. is supporting Syrian rebels who want to overthrow al-Assad, while Russia is backing al-Assad and his government forces. They tolerate each others' presence in Syria because they both agree that an ISIS-controlled Syria is worse than either an al-Assad-controlled or rebel-controlled Syria. But neither will pass up a chance to "accidentally" lob a bomb at government forces, or a rebel-held city.

      In that respect, it's more akin to the U.S./UK and Soviets spying on and testing each others' capabilities during WWII. Both were fighting to defeat Hitler, but behind the scenes they had very different ideas for the future of Europe and knew they'd likely end up as adversaries after the war.

    14. Re: Free strategy by pezezin · · Score: 1

      For the ungrateful nations of Europe? We didn't ask for this war who is killing thousand of innocents and sending us a crapton of refugees. Nobody in Europe want this fucking war, so fuck off.

    15. Re:Free strategy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this is such a concern, I've got a strategy the US can use to combat this: Get the hell out of Syria.

      It's ridiculous to be offended/upset that someone is using countermeasures against the drones being used against them or their allies.

      Hi Ivan

      In essence you've just admitted that ISIS is your ally? Because that's who the drones are being used against.

    16. Re:Free strategy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The issue isn't the "poor syrians" that concerns the US. The issue is the Syria government stands in the way of american oil corporations getting middle east natural gas to european markets. First was Iraq and afganistan. Now syria is the last obstacle.

    17. Re:Free strategy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this is such a concern, I've got a strategy the US can use to combat this: Get the hell out of Syria.

      Oh hell no! I'll tell you what (as somebody who worked in the field in a previous life): I hope the Russians hit us with everything they've got over there; the ELINT guys from the military and various agencies will going nuts tearing everything apart. Talk about electronic warfare sensors out the ass, the place will (and probably is) crawling with nerds, although with remote platforms nowadays maybe not. It's like a test lab! In addition, neither side will be operating at full capacity for such a shitty little skirmish.

      It's ridiculous to be offended/upset that someone is using countermeasures against the drones being used against them or their allies.

      Spoken like a civilian. Who gives a fuck about taking offense; it's the job. The Russians have theirs, we have ours. 'Taking offense' is something a politician would do.

    18. Re:Free strategy by nasch · · Score: 1

      Good points, but between Assad and ISIS, there would have been a refugee crisis without our help.

    19. Re: Free strategy by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      It's for your goddamn energy independence so you don't have to rely on Russia. Moreover you're not diverse, so you're welcome for introducing diversity to your societies. Again, no thanks to the people who give you everything.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    20. Re: Free strategy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US is fighting a war for oil.

      We're producing 10 million plus barrels per day right here in the United States and the number is climbing as more and more shale oil comes online to meet demand as needed. We've drilled and pumped ourselves such a glut that right now West Texas Intermediate (WTI) is one of the cheapest oils sold into the world marketplace. We have over 300 billion barrels of oil potentially available in our vast shale oil reserves and the extraction technology gets cheaper and better all of the time. To suggest that United States needs to be in Syria "for the oil" is laughable.

    21. Re:Free strategy by Cederic · · Score: 0

      I don't recall the US attacking Russia in Syria since Trump was elected. Could you perhaps highlight a key incident of which I should be aware?

    22. Re:Free strategy by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Am I allowed to find it deeply ironic that the media and many others collectively berated Trump for risking WW3 due to his comments on North Korea and now, just a few weeks later, the Korean War has finally ended.

      I think the historians are going to have a fucking field day on this one.

    23. Re: Free strategy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's for your goddamn energy independence so you don't have to rely on Russia. Moreover you're not diverse, so you're welcome for introducing diversity to your societies. Again, no thanks to the people who give you everything.

      Perhaps we're fine with Russian supplied energy? Just because the US hates the shit out of them, doesn't mean everyone has to.

  14. Re: What, how could this be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    In the New Amerika, ignorance is strength!

  15. Fear Not Fellow Americans. We Have TRUMP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And Trump says,

    "Why can't we just all get along?"

    "Why can't we have golden showers?"

    "Why can't we launder for Russian crooks?"

    "There was no COLLUSION! It was a Hoax!"

    Rocket Man! Burning out his fuse up here, alone!"

    1. Re:Fear Not Fellow Americans. We Have TRUMP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hillary lost, get over it.

  16. Re:Syria & allies don't attack,they defend mot by butchersong · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sadly.. this isn't far off the mark. The thing is most of the people around me are beginning to wake up. Everyone I knew supported the original Iraq war. I haven't really spoke with anyone that supports this crap in Syria and I live in rural America. Most everyone including me is Republican.

  17. And Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeh, and Trump warns them by twitter before each air strike. Lasts years airstrike blew holes in concrete... about 1000 bucks of cement. This year they hit empty targets because he tweeted.

    Get the soldiers out because he'll undermine the soldiers.

    1. Re:And Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aircrafts were flying out of the bombbed base literally hours after the American attack.

  18. Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This cannot be possible because there is no provision enacted under international law that would allow a foreign power to station troops in the sovereign nation of Syria without explicit permission of the government.

  19. How dare they fight back when attacked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because the U.S. is supposed to be allowed to attack not only Russia, a dozen weak 3rd world countries who can't defend themselves, but also Europe and other "allies" with electronic and cyber weapons. But if anyone fights back, then they are terrorists!

    The U.S. actions in Syria are entirely self-serving, they have no interest or care for the Syrian people just as little as they had for the people in Libya, or Iraq, or Afghanistan, or Jemen. The U.S. is the axis and pivot of evil, not all the other smaller countries they accuse and lie about.

    1. Re:How dare they fight back when attacked by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The US actions in Syria aren't self serving, it only tried to serve Israel/Saudi Arabia and their self fulfilling paranoia vis a vis Iran. It would have been far cheaper for the US to just stay out of it and only fight Isis in Iraq (and actually fighting them straight from the start). Arming ISIS and then subsequently "bombing" them and then finally actually bombing them when their former pet dogs became a little too rabid has done nothing but bring grief to the US. It didn't even help their Sunni allies, Saudi Arabia is off worse in some ways.

      In the end only Israel is laughing as it's hold on the Golan is strengthened. The US was played.

    2. Re:How dare they fight back when attacked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hint : selling 100 trilliibions dollars in weapons to all the usual clients, plus all the under the radar smuggling organized by the US to various "freedom fighters".

      The US also had that policy of "containing", "rolling back" etc. any independent country that might better itself and challenge US supremacy i.e. ignore the "international institutions" like IMF and World Bank, trade using some other currency than the US dollar, or not have a MacDonald's restaurant.

      We may wonder what are "US interests" though : the interests of the government, the administration, the political donors? bored people that don't know what else to do maybe?

    3. Re:How dare they fight back when attacked by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

      The weapons shipped to Isis&co are almost all Russian made, so an economic loss and economic aid to a supposed rival. Operation Inherent resolve costs 10 Million per day, slightly increased weapon sales don't really help. If your weapons are superior they will sell regardless and Saudi Arabia&co will be paranoid about Iran regardless, so they'll buy weapons regardless.

      The US is a national entity, if traitors work to oppose that entity it's still not self serving for the US. Globalist institutions add little to the bottom line for the US and the trade deficit is a double edged sword at best ... not that there is a realistic alternative to the dollar, the Eurozone is a basket case and no one is going back to gold.

    4. Re:How dare they fight back when attacked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you believe me if I said, hum, 10 millions a day, this looks pretty cheap.
      Not saying it is, not having some moral judgement, just to say that the US accustomed us to a wee bit more than this

    5. Re: How dare they fight back when attacked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Banksters and Corporate Managers are globalists. They dont care about Average Americans.

    6. Re:How dare they fight back when attacked by gibbsjoh · · Score: 1

      Hahah I was waiting for the "Israeldidit" reply. smh...

      --
      -- "...I'm a bad guy because I, well, I sing some rock-and-roll songs." M. Manson
    7. Re:How dare they fight back when attacked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ISIS only got into Iraq after we whacked Sadam. Sadam was not going to allow some pesky organization like ISIS. No if we wanted to do something, we would have kicked them out of Afghanistan. But Chaney wasn't interested in that, and Bush's family was threatened by Sadam not the Afghan's.

    8. Re:How dare they fight back when attacked by labnet · · Score: 1

      Wish I could mod you 6 insightful.

      I would also add that ISIS was created by the USA from the leftover Saddam Baathists after their pointless invasion of IRAQ. It's crazy to think that the 9/11 terrorists came mostly from Saudi Arabia, but bush attacks Saddam who himself was an ex CIA asset.
      Saudi Arabia is a nasty country, promoting extreme Islam, but I hear they get a pass because they promised to support the petro dollar in exchange for protection.

      You couldn't make this nefarious shit up.

      --
      46137
    9. Re:How dare they fight back when attacked by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

      I didn't say Israel did it, Israel is the only one who came out ahead.

    10. Re:How dare they fight back when attacked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're forgetting all the US defense contractors that benefit from all those new munitions the US needs to buy from them to restock.

  20. What's the answer? $$$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not to sound pessimistic, but this is how the military works. SOmebody says "America, Mom, Apple-pie, RUSSIANS ARE WINNING, give me $100B to get better weapons!" These reports may all be true, but it seems like perhaps the answer ought to start with thinking instead of spending.

  21. GPS jamming has been around a long time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GPS jamming has been around a long time. Shifting the signals so that GPS receivers are off 1500ft is VERY useful. The US allies do the same things.

    RF jamming has been around even longer.

    Modern war should assume these systems have been compromised. They can be unavailable or tainted.

    And this is why driving assist in vehicles shouldn't trust GPS.

  22. Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see no reason at the US forces should be in Syria in the first place. They were not invited by the legitimate regime. Maybe it was Israel who invited them just like US was invited to WW1.

    1. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you implying that Israel invited the US to join WW1? That is by far the craziest conspiracy theory I've seen today, although about as factual as any other weird conspiracy theory I've seen about Israel (i.e. mostly 9/11 stuff).

      Also, like the US needs to be invited to intervene...

    2. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Are you implying that Israel invited the US to join WW1?

      Yes. In 1911 Great Britain entered state bankrupcy due to their excessive battleship (dreadnought) building programme. (They wanted to be stronger than the next 3 navies combined...) In order to avoid collapse baron Rostchild purchased the debt, effectively making Britain jewish private property. In late 1916 Britain and France was losing the Great War, both on the seas (U-boot front) and on the land, as tsarist Russia was collapsing under german attacks and about to ask for a ceasefire on the the Eastern Front, while Italy proved worhtless against the Habsburg empire on the southern front, requiring a lot of french and british expeditionary corps to stabilize the alpine front line. In this situation the world zionist elite offered London to manipulate and bring USA into the war against the Central Powers, on condition of giving the whole Holy Land (british colony at the time) to the jews. That request was a bit problematic, since the arabs had already got a promise for a palestinian country in the same place, in exchange for fighting the german-alligned ottoman turkish empire.

      Anyhow, the Balfour declaration happened and the entirely jewish-run US press and the fledging movie industry made a lot of noise about the Lusitania case (even though the ship was carrying contraband arms supply for Britain). USA entered the war and the spanish flue epidemic was started and the Central Powers lost. Than a suprise happened: France, which had insane high losses in WW1 (over 4m soldiers and uncountable many civilians), demanded some colonial land grab to compensate for her grievances. About half of the Holy Land became their administration, the rest remained with Britain, so the "zionist entity" couldn't be realized immediately. It took WW2 to destroy France as a great power, but there was a little side effect at that time which the jews didn't expect in their master plan and about half of them were exterminated during the Endlosung.

    3. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The tin foil hat is very strong with this one.

      Fucking idiot....

    4. Re:Good by Cederic · · Score: 1

      This is excellent, do you have a whole book?

      I love alternative histories, they open so many thought experiments.

  23. We get to study their capabilities too.

    1. Re:And by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      yes, it's actually a good thing for the USA's ability to stay on top of ECC. Some people have no critical thinking skills....

  24. EMP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Time for EMP and direct laser weaponry to wipe out the Russian forces in Syria. It is time for them to retreat.

    1. Re:EMP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if EMPs are overrated. Ever heard of lightning strikes? Unplug your computer from the mains, unplug the phone line from your DSL modem.
      If you're operator mobile radars and command centers, stopped stealing power from a lamppost.

    2. Re:EMP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If you're operator mobile radars and command centers, stopped stealing power from a lamppost."

      You have either experienced a stroke while typing this, or good morning Chris!

    3. Re:EMP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I must have got a small EMP from the wires and shit around me!

    4. Re:EMP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what's the plan for today, Chris?

    5. Re:EMP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not the entire story of how EMP works.
      An EMP itself is a very strong pulse of electromagnetic energy like the name implies. It can come in different forms like an extremely strong and short electrical current which requires a conductor or other forms that do not require a medium for propagation like an electric field, magnetic field or electromagnetic radiation.
      So what we do when we unplug our devices during a thunderstorm is to product us against that one case of EMP - very strong electrical current.
      When when latter three meet a properly attuned antenna, which it will since the frequency spectrum of an EMP is by definition extremely wide so that practically anything metal becomes an antenna, it will induce strong currents in that conductor, which when connected to electronics will almost certainly fry them.

      Of course you can and probably should unplug your devices, which reduces the risk of getting a current surge from the electrical grid. You can also remove the power cables, which make excellent antennas. But what can you do about the radiation that will be caught by metal parts in your devices? You can build an antenna around your sensitive electronics which then acts like a Faraday cage that greatly reduces the energy of an EMP. Think of wrapping them into tin foil or something similar. That should dampen the incoming energy by a considerable amount and do the trick.

  25. Re:What, how could this be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, sometimes the press releases the military puts out are so stupid.

    The US military is becoming more and more like CRY BABIES

  26. Illegal occupiers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By what legal authority is the US flying over Syrian territory? Does it have an invitation to be there from the government of Syria? Is there a security council resolution authorising the use of force?

    No?

    Then they're there illegally. Forget jamming them, I'd be shooting them out of the sky.

    1. Re:Illegal occupiers by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Well, while the US are attacking enemies of the Syrian state then it's beneficial to let them get on with it.

      You'll notice that the attack on the Syrian state was made with missiles fired from outside Syrian airspace, and defended nonetheless.

  27. US in Syria illegally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While we are on the subject of Syria....anyone else notice the US is in Syria illegally, while Russia was invited by the Syrian government.

    1. Re: US in Syria illegally by reanjr · · Score: 1

      That depends on which government you recognize. The entire point of the civil war is there are large swaths of Syria that do not recognize Assad's government.

    2. Re: US in Syria illegally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By other governments you are referring to the Suni terrorist that the US and Saudi money help setup? I think they are mostly defeated by now... Also the Kurds up north have not wanted to setup their own government as the Turks would quickly bring that to an end.

      Again not sure what other internationally recognised government exists in Syria.

    3. Re: US in Syria illegally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol, there's only one legitimate government in Syria and that is Assad. Just because you found some terrorists on US payroll that do not support Assad doesn't make Assad's government any less legitimate. Likewise, in US, just because some Hillary voter screams #NotMyPresident doesn't make Trump any less legitimate. Go fuck yourself.

    4. Re: US in Syria illegally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That depends on which government you recognize. The entire point of the civil war is there are large swaths of Syria that do not recognize Assad's government.

      The Syrian government is the only legitimate one recognized by other nations.

  28. Re:What, how could this be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are right, but sometimes in military speak they refer to transmission security also as encryption. For example, you could change the transmission frequency frequently based on the output of a cryptographic algorithm to make jamming more difficult to someone without the key.

  29. Enemy actually hits you back in a war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    C-130 Hercules, the plane was developed to disrupt enemy communications, radar and command operations.

    So it is ok for the US to put a bigass electronic weapon in a foreign country.

    Russia has also been regularly targeting smaller U.S. surveillance drones

    But they are pissed that the other side do the same thing to a few drones?!

    The headline should be "US General Surprised That Enemy Actually Hit Back"

  30. Re:What, how could this be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is ROT13 from WW-II useful for military now?

  31. Yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because in Soviet America, voters must vote for the candidate sponsored by GS and Lockheed Martin.

  32. EMP the hell out of the place by FudRucker · · Score: 1

    make it so hot that not anything electronic works anymore,

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:EMP the hell out of the place by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Umm. Why? What would be the benefit, and how the fuck do you even think it could be achieved without committing war crimes?

  33. Should we be outraged? by biggaijin · · Score: 1

    The author of the article makes it sounds as though some outrage is being visited on American troops in Syria. All that is happening is the the Russians and Syrians are using electronic tools to counter our own electronic surveillance. It's a little difficult for me to get upset about this.

  34. Re: What, how could this be? by Type44Q · · Score: 2

    Let's go have the beer

    All the beer are belong to us.

  35. Re:What, how could this be? by MiniMike · · Score: 1

    Is ROT13 from WW-II useful for military now?

    No, now they have to use double ROT13 encryption. I read somewhere that quad-ROT13 encryption is in development.

  36. Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And they are doing it with tools they have now, not 'OMG AI!' that will never exist. Silicon Valley is a special kind of blind, and is the first world bullshit epicenter of the entire planet.

  37. ISIS is defeated, so Russia wants us to leave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Iraq and Syria declared ISIS defeated in December. Russia and Iran are telling the USA that it is now time to leave Iraq and Syria. A lot of people in the USA govt, France, Saudi Arabia, and Israel want the USA to stay.

    1. Re: ISIS is defeated, so Russia wants us to leave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought we were fighting Syria because Assad. And the Russians because of oil and gas pipelines. Sure seems we are killing them around oil installations.

    2. Re: ISIS is defeated, so Russia wants us to leave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If ISIS have already been defeated then who in hell are the Russians, Syrians and Iranians still bombing?

  38. Re:Syria & allies don't attack,they defend mot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which goes on the show that people have a really short memory.

    Doing nothing is exactly what the west did in Afghanistan between 1989 and 2001, before or after the Taliban took power in 1996. Far away. Not my problem. Do you need me to remind you how that ended?

    Fact is, the west certainly does have a legitimate interest in what happens in Syria. ISIS might be a shadow of its former self, but let's not forget that this is a group that preached holy war not against the Turks, Iranians or Russians who had boots on the ground in Syria, not against the same plus mainly Saudi Arabia and the other gulf states who where bankrolling their opponents, but against the west.

    As for the chemical weapons strikes, well it's one of two things: either you have a convention that forbids them and consequences if you cheat it (like Syria did), or you have nothing. Would you be happier to live in a world where any state has chemical weapons at the ready? Including ones with Syria's history when it comes to supporting terrorists? Or maybe you think a strongly worded letter is consequences enough?

  39. Re:Syria & allies don't attack,they defend mot by skam240 · · Score: 1

    Just wait until some one brings back the "support our troops" bumper stickers because some how you cant support the troops if you're against the war.

    --
    I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
  40. Get the hell our of the Middle East by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go for full energy independence. Unleash solar, natural gas, nuclear, and hydro. Once we do that, who gives a rat's ass what happens over there, wherever "over there" is.

  41. Re:What, how could this be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So in other words, the real communists are pointing at the fake communists and saying "look! over there!" while they continue the slow unraveling of western society.

  42. Re:What, how could this be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > According to the Great President Comrade Trump the Glorious, Russia is being our friend! No way Jose! Must be Capitalist Running Dog Propaganda! Let's go have the beer and watch a baseball instead of reading this story! No collaboration!

    Not that I disagree with you, but I think you're barking at the wrong tree.

    While kids are dying in Syria, some nations (i.e. Russia *and* USA) seize the opportunity for a joint weapons improvement program.

    It reminds me of a situation which occurred 70 years ago and that we're (more or less) solving only now... it took like forever, many died because it was not your mother, your kids or your friend. Don't be silly. The USA reputation is so bad now that you get a hardliner President and we still think he is a fool (albeit dangerous).

    Also, when the Sparta guy says "no surprise, it's war", I cannot help but wonder what is his understanding about the situation. It's not just war, like "oh, look those poor fellows; good thing it is far from here"... it's uppercase WAR between Russia and USA troops. I fail to see how that can end well (at least "well" from a world peace point-of-view).

  43. Incoming! by Joe+Branya · · Score: 1

    Budget season. Public presentation by a four star screaming "Crisis! Give me more money!"

  44. Electronic counter measures by VeryFluffyBunny · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Do electronic counter measures qualify as attacks, especially when the US military are flying war planes in sovereign Syrian airspace? Oh the US military are such poor, delicate victims of these evil Syrian radio waves. Why won't the Syrian military stop?

    --
    Debate is a form of harassment. Do not question my truth.
    1. Re:Electronic counter measures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in sovereign Syrian airspace

      Syria under Assad no longer deserves that dignity. The United States ought to cease recognition of the Syrian government as legitimate and treat them as such until Assad and his gang of criminals are gone.

    2. Re:Electronic counter measures by VeryFluffyBunny · · Score: 1

      Syria is still recognised as a sovereign country by the international community. As yet, no legal basis for de-legitimising the Syrian regime or any of its members has been presented in an international court of law. Declarations from poorly informed politicians and pundits are just hot air.

      Under a diplomatic framework and international oversight, the Syrian regime agreed to controlled, supervised destruction of all their chemical weapons stockpiles and facilities. That doesn't sound like an illegitimate regime to me, as much as we may deplore their actions in the Syrian conflict.

      Additionally, there is insufficient verifiable evidence on what chemical weapons attacks have taken place and who is responsible for them. At the moment, conjecture points to both the Syrian regime and the US/Saudi-backed militias being culpable. Note that the accusations and condemnations from the US and its allies came before any verifiable evidence could be gathered, e.g. hearsay and apparently staged video evidence from the 'white helmets' operating among the US/Saudi-backed militias alone cannot be regarded as reliable sources. They need corroboration.

      I also suspect that US intelligence personnel have a good idea of who's culpable but that what they know doesn't align with the US and its allies' public narrative against Syria, Iran, and Russia: "'Truth,' it has been said, 'is the first casualty of war.'" -- Philip Snowden, 1916.

      They're going to keep this conflict going at all costs. There's $billions in US tax-payers money to be siphoned off into the US military to support it and US arms suppliers are doing very well, thank you very much.

      --
      Debate is a form of harassment. Do not question my truth.
  45. Re: What, how could this be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please post a referenced quote where Trump said Russia is our friend.

  46. Israelis Monitoring? by Artagel · · Score: 2

    I suspect the Israelis are somehow monitoring this with great interest. They have the capabilities to have good performance in this area on both sides of the EW battle. And they would not be tipping their hand to either side.

  47. Trump still tryingto pullout?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    USAamericans are such pussies when it comes to war. Stop hiding in your planes and get down to killing Russian "contractors" on the ground already.

    Good thing Trump has no conflicts of interest with Russian money. Good thing indeed. Only a pussy democrat would run from a fight right gais??

  48. Re: Thats Diebold's decision pleb. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You vote for whoever the machine.

    Voting "machines".. lol! What a shithole cuntry!

  49. If the attacks were having no real effect... by RhettLivingston · · Score: 1

    If the attacks were having no real effect and the existence of any technology used to thwart them was secret, our personnel would be committing treason not to complain about how it is shutting us down. They might even crash or blow up a drone or have an EC-130 leave the scene or otherwise pretend to be jammed. With more critical techs, they wouldn't even be allowed to turn on the secret capabilities unless the situation was critical. For that reason, this article isn't worth reading. It is as likely to be propaganda written for the opponent's eyes as truth.

  50. Re: What, how could this be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The movie?

  51. Pffff by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

    Syria, much like Iraq, is simply a testing ground for both sides to see how well their new toys perform outside of a controlled environment.

    Neither side can show what they're really holding though lest they spoil the surprise.

    As a result, these are the minor, expendable assets they're playing with atm.

    Albeit, at the expense of Syrian lives.

  52. Deep state lies and deceptions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am American and many people are saying that this story is almost totally fakes by the liberal mainstream media to continue to try to make Russia sound like bad guys when it is USA and deep state network run by Hillary Clinton and Gorge Soros who are behind this kind of corruption and evil.

    1. Re:Deep state lies and deceptions by Cederic · · Score: 1

      You're embarrassing other Americans with this pathetic paranoia and stupidity.

  53. Re:Syria & allies don't attack,they defend mot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > consequences if you cheat it (like Syria did)

    Syria destroyed their chemical weapons on 2013. There were consequences. How do we go about countries that break important treaties like the ABM prohibition one?

  54. I suspect that EW will not remain a closed system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I expect the US to issue an EW version of the Monroe Doctrine in the next few years with the full support of EU allies. Basically saying what was said almost 200 years ago: EW against the US and its allies will be "the manifestation of an unfriendly disposition toward the United States."

    Si vis pacem, para bellum.

  55. Endless bitch-fight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... Russian and Syrian regime ...

    Remember, the USA got involved to punish Assad for using chemical weapons. For some reason, the USA decided that regime-change was (once again) the answer. It was obvious when Russia joined the war, that regime-change by remote-control was no longer possible. The Korean war taught the USA to not invade the enemies of their allies, so the USA won't escalate the conflict and can't abandon their allies; thus leaving it stuck in another endless bitch-fight.

    ... against encrypted signals and anti-jamming devices ...

    Translation: Americans helpless now they don't have the biggest 'gun'.

  56. Red scaremngering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Seeing that a) the US is an invader in Syria and b) Russia is there at the invitation of the invadee a correct headline should be "Russia Is Defending against Attacking US Forces With Electronic Weapons In Syria, General Says"

  57. Re: What, how could this be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even switching To chaotic waveforms does little in the face of broadband signal interference.

    Course there is a ready solution. Anti jamming missiles but that would start a real war.

    Time to push for quantum entanglement as a communications medium. Seems we can transmit waveforms across it. Nobody could jam or intercept that.

  58. Keep showing us your cards by wolfheart111 · · Score: 1

    Thank YOu. :)

    --
    [($)]
  59. So, it's true? by mackul · · Score: 1

    Those reports about the US battle ship blinded "electronically" by one (older) Russian military plane in the Black Sea and the suspicions, a similar technique was used by Russians and/or Chinese to make US battle ships crash into commercial ships in South-East Asia had been caused by electronic weapons and/or infiltration of the US systems seem to be true? Someone with business connections to Russians developing such systems told me 6 months ago that the Russians had such a system and/or remote access to the software of US weapon systems and even to some databases with personal data of all US military staff The Russians only would only be "kind" enough not to demonstrate that power in full size against the US because they think the US army is still somewhat useful for the unstable stability of the world: Imagine what would happen if the Russians would demonstrate that the US army is the emperor without clothes and that they can bring down any US weapon system easily from the distance? A world-wide "anarchy" would breakt out that would be even worse than everything the US caused since 1945.

  60. They are taking them babies out of the incubators! by xxxLCxxx · · Score: 0

    Oh my Gawd! They are taking them babies out of those incubators again!

    Nayirah Kuwaiti girl testimony

    Our weekly propaganda to keep the shit rolling... :-P

    They left the children to die on the cold (it snows regularly in Kuwait) floor! Oh my Gawd, oh my Gawd!

  61. Re: What, how could this be? by KingBenny · · Score: 1

    nobody would ever fly , i'm still not sure how quantum transmission is going to change the world other than instant data mirroring (which is probably already quite hardcore, i dont want to sound like the expert) over vast distances. I mean , i can imagine how it would help to build a colony somewhere round proxima centauri if you had matter synthesis handy AND a first ship to fly all the way there with the 3D printer (in a manner of speaking) as you could build a copy here and the exact same data would exist there but thats still way beyond star trek i think. If one side has access to quantum computing (which is gonna hack EVERYTHING, right) then how long will it take for all major players to have it, unless the first side strikes first and HARD (but not so hard as to destroy the whole planet) in order to eliminate all potential future opposition in some kind of quantum-blitzkrieg? Why wouldnt they be able to intercept with technology that doesn't exist yet and nobody really understands, do they ? I see more irony in the fact that they assume that it's safe to repeat afghanistan because in this case there's already an al-qaeda clone active so they dont have to worry about creating one, the big mistake from last time ... when has it ever been that the eagle and the bear go playing on a foreign court without actually poking at each other while both simply levelling the place as if their name was Dalek ? they're doing it again

    --
    Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?
  62. Re: What, how could this be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Freq hopping a confidentiality technique not an availability technique.

  63. But the U.S. is not at war in Syria by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

    But the U.S. is not at war in Syria, right?

    No boots on the ground, so it doesn't count.

    Just like the first Sunday in December, 1941, at Pearl Harbor.

    --
    There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.
  64. LOL by SuperDre · · Score: 1

    So the US is bitching about Russia for doing to them what they are doing to the russians, but the russians seem to be better at it.. hahaha..