Slashdot Mirror
YouTube Is Removing Some Nootropics Channels (vice.com)
According to Wikipedia, nootropics are drugs, supplements, and other substances that improve cognitive function, particularly executive functions, memory, creativity, or motivation, in healthy individuals. Many of them are not regulated by the Food and Drug Administration, and some have reported addiction and harm, as well as uncomfortable side effects. These concerns may be behind YouTube's recent decision to delete at least three nootropics channels over the past three days. Motherboard reports: The nootropics YouTubers don't know why YouTube penalized them. YouTube's community guidelines prohibit harmful or dangerous content, including "hard drug use," which seems like the most likely reason. [Ryan Michael Ballow, a YouTuber whose channel "Cortex Labs Nootropics" was deleted] believes it's either "pharmaceutical industry influence" or some other elements within YouTube's leadership decided to target nootropics specifically. "It's all extremely fishy, and demonstrates a continued censorship trend with YouTube," he said in an email. [Jonathan Roseland, another YouTube that recently had their channel "Limitless Mindset" deleted] guessed his channel got flagged because he made videos about kratom, an opioid-like substance that has been linked to deaths and is coming under increased government regulation. Other kratom videos have apparently been removed. But Ballow said he's never posted a video about kratom, and a search for "kratom" on YouTube pulls up countless results, including reviews. Similarly, searching for nootropics, magnesium, aniracetam, oxiracetam, and Modafinil showed no shortage of videos, including reviews.
It's hard to know why the channels were removed since YouTube declined to clarify specifics with the creators and did not respond to a request for comment. YouTube allows creators to appeal enforcement decisions, but Ballow's appeal was rejected. The rejection notice did not clearly state which guidelines were violated, but it pointed to another potential violation. YouTube "included a paragraph that states that if the sole purpose of your YouTube videos is to drive people off of the platform, said videos break the rules," Ballow said. He interpreted this to mean the fact that his videos directed viewers to other websites to buy products.
It's hard to know why the channels were removed since YouTube declined to clarify specifics with the creators and did not respond to a request for comment. YouTube allows creators to appeal enforcement decisions, but Ballow's appeal was rejected. The rejection notice did not clearly state which guidelines were violated, but it pointed to another potential violation. YouTube "included a paragraph that states that if the sole purpose of your YouTube videos is to drive people off of the platform, said videos break the rules," Ballow said. He interpreted this to mean the fact that his videos directed viewers to other websites to buy products.
Quoth Eddie Bravo: "Look into it."
Google is only allowed to deal drugs on THEIR platform.
"if the sole purpose of your YouTube videos is to drive people off of the platform"
You're only allowed to deal clickbait back to YouTube, or else you sleep with the fishes.
Did any videos mention micro dosing LSD? That is a hard drug that would violate the terms of service. Probably the next drug in line to be legalized after marijuana but until that time....
YouTube removes videos without an explanation aside from an implied "because fuck you, that's why". News at 11.
YouTube rejects the appeal for reason given above. News is still at 11.
"Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
right through the fall.. some still calling this 'weather'? cease fire stand down... there are innocent moms & babys all around..
This is why ad-supported media can never address the harms caused by the pharmaceutical industry and the very powerful pharmaceutical lobby in the US. All those advertising dollars influence the stories covered, the news promoted, and the videos allowed to be distributed on platforms.
"Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
--- Jerry Garcia
Move very slowly and keep your hands visible at all times while you're being arrested tomorrow.
It can decide who it wants on its platform.
They don't owe you anything.
Maybe because YouTube has too much power, and not enough competition?
They were giving out medical advice without a license?
Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
What the fuck is happening to my country? Is no one above the influence of big pharma? The idea that they're taking these videos down because they're making false claims about any product is an absolute bullshit excuse. Search 'flamethrower diy' and you'll find heaps of videos that have much more severe ramifications than someone discussing nootropics would.
Is there a video platform that is less interested in censorship and jerking off corporate interests?
and I am one to talk
Just buy a domain (which I presume most of these people already have) and publish the videos there.
Those who are interested in that topic will certainly find them. Monetarization will be more difficult, but I'm sure the channels were made solely in the interest of science anyway. So nothing changed.
Windows 2000 - from the guys who brought us edlin
The owners think of them as private spaces, but sell them to the public as public spaces. At some point they become de-facto monopolies or oligopolies (which see), and we end up having to create trust-busters, just like after the previous great depression.
davecb@spamcop.net
There's tremendous liability here. Telling people to try drug X without a medical license and the drug not coming through a properly regulated distribution channel likely leads viewers to buy it on the internet. No telling whether the drug contains what it says, perhaps just enough fentanyl to kill a rhinoceros. The danger is more in how the viewer might obtain the drug rather than the danger of the drug or advice itself. At least that's my take.
He who forgets will be destined to remember. - EV
And if they don't want to host a video of a gay wedding that is fine too.
Oh wait...
Can we stop using this excuse about private companies can do what they want? Or can they do what they want as long as liberals say its ok? Fascism much?
I haaVE USSed Nootropics in thE TRoPiCs for Yeaars with NoO adveerse sidee Effects at ALL. Thay ARE Gud and maKe your bRain woRk GOOD>.
You don't know what you had until it's gone. YouTube is now censoring their users' content at an alarming rate. People who just swear or even talk about sex jokingly see their channels demonetized at the least and deleted at worst. Free speech on the YouTube is limited now as they play thought police, judge, and executioner.
All this bullshit YouTube is doing to building towards their demise. If no competitor comes in then we are looking at full scale unions between YouTube's. This is peoples jobs and when YouTube can take away your years of hard work with a click and never offer an explanation they have way too much power. Much much more money flies though YouTube than Uber and the state of California was debating considering Uber drivers employees. It's only a matter of time before YouTube realizes by taking full control of their users they are going to be forced to call them employees as well.
If it was that easy, do you think Google would have forked out the billions they paid for YouTube ??
I have to assume the people who are vetting all these YouTube channels must be taking some of these nootropic supplements themselves. Who could stand doing that job otherwise?
This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
We can probably guess why the channel was removed. Some of the videos seemed to be making medical claims about the drugs, and the descriptions had links where you could buy them... So basically a bunch of infomercials making claims not backed up by medical science.
Is this all we are left with?
I'd like to point out that we started with "everyone c'mon in, the service is free!",
Are we there yet?
If you don't like YouTube's policies, build your own video website, pay for the bandwidth yourself and host it all on your own. YouTube is a private entity, if they want you off their soapbox, thats your problem, not theirs. YouTube isn't a government agency, they aren't "censoring" you. They're just telling you to get off their soapbox.
What's the big deal? Just use some of your own products and come up with a better way.
> likely leads viewers to buy it on the internet.
Not just "the internet", but the videos had links to the publishers site, and instructed viewers to buy there. So plain old illegal drug advertising.
The person on YouTube may have been an advertising affiliate for the site, or may have owned it outright. I don't see much difference.
Watch. They crack down on this and in exchange big pharma buys a ton of YouTube ads. Get ready for non stop baldness and boner pill ads.
Q. Why is JewTube suddenly obsessed with stamping out "nootropics"? A. Alex Jones
No, seriously. It's what funds InfoWars, and JewTube has a very obvious vendetta against Jones.
Of course I'll be modded down for pointing this out, but... Think about it. Super Male Vitality anyone? Why, he literally sells a nootropic called "The Real Red Pill"!
It's just fine and dandy to have a bunch of creepy sexual videos with Spiderman and Elsa, clearly targeting kids... It's just fine and dandy to have "...children" be the auto-complete suggestion for "how to have sex with", but supporting Trump, pointing out mainstream media lies and manipulation? Well... They'll stop at NOTHING to stamp *that* out.
Trump supporters; proving Poe's Law every day.
The use of nootropics by engineering types reminds me very much of the use of "supplements" by body builders. There actually are things that work -- in fact there's a remarkable amount of overlap in the things mental and physical jocks need to do to maximize performance. Get plenty of high quality sleep. Good diet. Daily exercise. Caffeine. In fact if you include coffee and tea, the use of nootropics is nearly universal among desk workers.
The marketing of nootropic products to mental jocks looking for an edge is remarkably similar to the snake oil marketing aimed at athletes. Take a substance where an (typically very minor) effect has been seen in a couple of studies and conflate evidence with proof. Now if you think about what the brain is, the idea that there is a single non-food molecule that will make it work better is pretty-far fetched. What exactly is this magical formula supposed to be doing in the brain? And by "exact", I mean which specific brain structures are being changed and how? The answer is, usually, nobody knows, but they have some promising studies, or sometimes just a single promising study.
Here's the thing about complex systems like the brain, or the troposphere for that matter: they are rich sources of contradictory evidence and statistical outliers. A single study or even a handful of studies is evidence, but it's not proof.
Now for bodybuilding there are two, or maybe three supplements that are safe and have evidence for useful effect, but I'd argue that there are unlikely to be any true nootropic compounds. That include caffeine. People use caffeine to offset the effects of inadequate sleep and meals heavy on refined carbohydrates that trigger insulin brain fogs. They also use caffeine to interfere with a natural brain function that promotes our survival: boredom. Boredom evolved so you don't waste too much time on things that aren't going to get you fed or laid in the near future -- a category of tasks that includes most desk work. So in a way, caffeine is actually an anti-nootropic.
Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
Do these fucktards not know that they're trashing their protection as a "common carrier" by censoring things? That goes for Google, Facebook, etc. I say throw the book at them. Sue them for every bit of libel or whatever else they display. They clearly exhibit the will and ability to censor whatever they feel like, so they're responsible for what they *don't* censor.
Btw, #FuckZuck. fuckzuck.com.
Down with the corporate gatekeepers
Youtube is private property. They can censor anything they want.
Now, if Trump wanted all the videos that he didn't like removed, that would be a different story.
Then again, if Trump told Google "Take these videos down." and Google complied because it is their property after all, I'd like to see that in the SCOTUS.
There's tremendous liability here. Telling people to try drug X without a medical license [...]
This is argument by misdirection.
1) Google should bear no liability for what it's users say, and
2) Google should not be making legal decisions.
Once you go down the path of "it's the carriers' responsibility", it's really very easy to suppress all kinds of speech. Make one flashy arrest very public, and watch how the "chilling effect" causes all the carriers to clamp down on everything even remotely related, out of fear.
It's very, *very* clear that the current situation is untenable and unfair to the population.
The situation is now so bad that there is a grassroots movement calling for the breakup of the big players (google, facebook, twitter, and so on) on monopoly/antitrust grounds.
Google could be smart, recognize the growing trend, and go back to a "public commons" mode before that happens.
Or, they could continue to try to adjust public thought, try to "bring home" the election for their preferred candidates, and then get chopped up like so much cordwood.
(OTOH, that would probably be good for the users. Google has turned decidedly evil over the past few years, and "not being evil" is a competitive advantage that the smaller pieces could use to compete against each other.)
Christ, you are an illiterate, uneducated turd.
We need to start moving to the distributed blockchain platforms as fast as possible. Check out steemit, busy.org, d.tube and the others coming around and on top of stuff like ipfs. Central platforms need to be phased. Im not saying current platforms are the way to go, but definitively, we need to empower distributed storage and services on blockchains transparent contracts, very much away of centralized palaces like alphabet's offers.
NO SIG
I don't quite understand why no one in the open source world has built a distributed youtube already.
We have the perfect peer to peer technology to distribute the videos.
Youtube comments is a feature no one really wants.
The indexing bits looks a bit more complicated, but that is what DHTs are for.
Recommendation, subscription can be built as an overlay service.
I am surprised we haven't seen that happen already.
The slippery slope argument doesn't hold much water in this case as far as I'm concerned.
For one thing, this is regulating something obviously geared at making money. Even if we were to try to make this a First Amendment issue, that guarantees "free speech" not "I should be able to get paid for what I say".
Commercial speech should absolutely be regulated. Businesses are not citizens.
what the first amendment says
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Since when is YouTube the same as congress?
Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
As the world just witnessed last 4 April, CNN story https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/04/us/youtube-hq-shooting/index.html
More than likely we need to move over to a torrent style video system and nas boxes with quick erase functions in case of raids. We will undoubtedly be labeled terrorists for wanting to watch non approved content.
I'm still waiting for the next gen torrents with anonymous cloud storage and with soloman tech and xor pieces such there is no content unless you have all the pieces. And pieces are shared among torrents of different content. It's all split across opaque cloud storage. (Imagine you xor a video of barney the dinosaur with a video on hacking an xbox.) In exchange for you donating storage and bandwidth you get to upvote content.
I'd like to point out that the previous post was the opinion of a single person.
While what he says is true, his explanations and descriptions are "correct, but not complete".
Firstly, there definitely are many nootropics one can take that enhance mental ability. As an example of this, a bottle of "5-hour energy"(*) is mostly Taurine and Tyrosine (and a little caffeine), two amino acids that you would get normally in your diet. There are quite a few things you can get that will have an effect,
Secondly, saying "the idea that there is a single non-food molecule that will make it work better is pretty-far fetched" is science by rationalization, it's how Aristotle came up with his laws of motion. A better way is to look at the evidence. What do the studies actually say?
Thirdly, not knowing the mechanism of action is not evidence of... well, it's not evidence of anything, really.
(I'm always astonished that our current medical field requires knowledge of the mechanism of action before allowing a drug on the market. I've come across treatments and potential cures that appear to work when based only on the evidence, yet can't be marketed because their mechanism of action is unknown.)
Medical research has stagnated, for about the last 30 years. The backlash from this is that people are trying things on their own in an attempt to find cures and to make their lives better. Supplements are only one of the ways people are responding.
Medical studies and the guidance of your local doctor would be nice, but the system is simply not set up for curing people or even trying something new.
Go online, look at what people recommend, and do some research:
a) Is the company selling the supplements of good reputation? (ie - do they stand behind the product, do they delist products that are poor quality?) There are definitely companies out there that value their reputation and standing within the community.
b) Is the supplement backed by studies? Lots of supplements actually *do* have studies, and while they may not show the complete picture, it will at least tell you how well the product is tolerated, and whether it has side effects.
c) Does the supplement have recommendations by doctors online? Lots and lots of doctors out there recommending one product or another, but beware of fake doctors. Many doctors will claim to be giving a supplement to their patients, which (if the claims are legit) would be further evidence of an effect, and of safety.
d) Are product reviews favorable? It's possible to fake a couple of reviews, but if something has over a hundred reviews and is received favorably, it's probably legitimately good. Check out the 1-star ratings and see if it's complaints about the product, or about the service.
e) Has the product been out long enough that side-effects would be reported? If something's been out for 5 years and lots of people are taking it... this is fair evidence that it's safe to try.
Do some research and try a "$30 experiment", see if it eases your "fibromyalgia" a little. Done right, there's really very little risk, and it's cheaper than going to a doctor.
(*) There are a lot of knock-off energy drinks that use other mechanisms, such as high sugar content. I'm talking specifically about the product "5-hour energy".
Private company. They can censor all they want. You dumbass millenials think you're entitled. You're why the US sucks so bad now.
If you are bored at work you should be trying to find a new job. There is nothing worse that hating your job because it makes you bored or is work you dislike.
If you continue in a job you dislike you will inevitably have an awful midlife crisis when you finally realize life is far to short to spend 80% of it doing a job you hate.
" He interpreted this to mean the fact that his videos directed viewers to other websites to buy products. "
Isn't that what Google is doing with their advertising? Perhaps they don't want competition on YouTube.
I'm always astonished that our current medical field requires knowledge of the mechanism of action before allowing a drug on the market.
First off your statement is factually false. There is NO requirement that we understand the mechanism of action of a drug before bringing it to market. But there is a HUGE benefit to understanding the mechanism of action first. If you don't know how a drug works then you are basically doing science by guess and check which is usually stupid, slow, and frequently counterproductive. If you don't know how it works then you can't predict what sort of effects and side effects it might have on the body. You can waste huge amounts of money, brains, and time trying to test treatments that have no chance of success because you don't understand the underlying mechanism of action. Science is based on understanding what is happening so you can make testable predictions. Without that information you are basically trusting to luck.
There are many drugs on the market for which we do not have a complete understanding of their mechanism of action. Most drugs aimed at treating mental disorders fall into this category. We don't actually know why many of them work, just that they do. There is NO legal requirement that we understand the mechanism of action prior to approving a drug. Furthermore drugs can be used for off label purposes by a physician.
I've come across treatments and potential cures that appear to work when based only on the evidence, yet can't be marketed because their mechanism of action is unknown.
No you haven't because that isn't a requirement by the FDA. What cures? What "evidence"? Stop making up strawmen to support your bogus claims.
Medical research has stagnated, for about the last 30 years.
Complete bullshit. Medical research has made astonishing gains in the last thirty years. You could only believe this if you have not bothered to look for actual facts or if you are making an argument from ignorance.
You should discuss why all these people rely on a service for income without any contractual guarantee.
The vast majority of people in any job are "at will" employees which means they have no contractual guarantee of continued employment. Ever give a tip to the waitstaff at a restaurant? There is no contractual guarantee there. Why should people using YouTube have guarantees? They knew what the deal was when they signed up. If the deal changes they can't pretend that they didn't know that was a possibility.
I'm not really against the concept of nootropics, I'm just against trusting marketers to solve your problems for you.
Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
The difference between medicine and alternative medicine, is that medicine actually works.
Just sayin'
Careful. If that research is a few slick websites with results-are-not-typical testimonials this feeds the woo-verse that is filled with supplements, homeopathy, acupuncture, chiropractic and natural remedies all getting rich off $30 experiments while distracting people from what actually works.
If traditional medicine "actually worked", as you put it, people wouldn't need to desperately search for alternatives.
Just 'sayin...
What do we call alternative therapies that are shown to have efficacy?
Medicine.
A great example is acupuncture*, it was demonstrated to have efficacy that exceeded placebo and now many insurances cover it. My local physical therapist office even provides it.
*specifically sham acupuncture, turns out where you place the needles doesn't matter. Simply randomly placing them around the affected area was shown to reduce pain. Magical chakra points performed no better.
We can probably guess why the channel was removed. Some of the videos seemed to be making medical claims about the drugs, and the descriptions had links where you could buy them...
It might also have something to do with what happened to Google back in 2011 , where they settled a case with the US Department of Justice regarding advertisements for rogue online pharmacies, for $500m.
Followed by a shareholder lawsuit regarding the same issue, which they settled for something like $250m.
If traditional medicine "actually worked", as you put it, people wouldn't need to desperately search for alternatives.
Just 'sayin...
If you find a lump on your testicle, I highly recommend you show it to an oncologist rather than a witch-doctor. Even metastasized testicular cancer has a survival rate of 73% with modern treatments; early stage cancer survival rates are close to 100%.
On the other hand, if you have stage IV pancreatic cancer, by all means consult the witch doctor. At the very least he's got as good a shot as anyone at treating the existential dimension of what you're going through.
The fact that medicine acknowledges that it can't do everything is the reason it advances so rapidly. Witch-doctoring traditions also improve over time, to the point that healing traditions are well worth looking into for scientists, but what science does in years takes generations of trial and error.
Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
The difference between medicine and alternative medicine, is that medicine actually works.
Just sayin'
Having my car repaired "just works".
Traditional medicine is more like: "try this and see if the symptoms go away".
There are 4 possible combination :
1- both medicine and alternative medicine work
2- only medicine works
3- only alternative medicine works
4- nothing work
"3" is extremely rare, and in the case of "1", doing nothing at all and letting your body recover may be all that's needed. The reason it simple: when alternative medicine work, it is studied and soon enough, if the risks aren't too great, it becomes medicine. Medicine is just alternative medicine that work.
The advantage alternative medicine has is that quite often, the human care is much better than what we have in hospitals or at the doctors office. While a doctor will just treat your disease like he does with the dozen people waiting in line behind you, your "alternative doctor" will take the time to teach you a healthy lifestyle (sleep well, eat well, exercise, ... the usual obvious stuff no one does). In fact the reason homeopathy was successful isn't because of the sugar pills, it is because Samuel Hahnemann, the father of homeopathy also imposed strict lifestyle rules to his patients, some of them like limiting smoking and drinking alcohol are scientifically tied to health improvement today.
That is only one of the many problems that drive people to supplements. As you elude to there are the promises from their marketing department that the supplement works. They can almost claim anything, literally snake oil. Meanwhile pharmaceuticals that are regulated to by the FDA must disclose side-effects and must have scientific data the supports their claims. This ends with a perception of supplements working when in reality its more deception.
But that's not the only issue, cost is another huge issue. Recently while I was getting a prescription filled I scoffed to the pharmacists at the price of the generic medication. He asked if I had a high deductible plan and then explained that if I never get close to hitting my deductible then it'd be cheaper to pay out-of-pocket and not process it through my insurance. It's was like a quarter of the cost. He basically said, "Yep, it's that's big a pain to deal with the insurance companies" He also recommend that I check websites like GoodRx.com to price shop across different pharmacies. What I found was the of the two medications I regularly take the price difference is huge between pharmacies. This is how screwed up the pharmaceutical market is.
When someone tries supplements, homeopathy, acupuncture, chiropractic and natural remedies after their cancer is no longer responding to the chemotherapy treatments, it's because they desperately want to live, not because the alternatives have a proven track record. Hell, it's why people even resort to prayer in those situations when they haven't been religious otherwise. The desperation is understandable, but the decisions made in desperation are not necessarily rational.
And, yet, Youtube has no problem constantly spamming me with ads about sensual condoms in pre-roll or, worse, three minute long advertisements trying to recruit people into Scientology.
Youtube cunts can fuck right off.
So let's say someone does go the IndieWeb route to replace YouTube. What means would you recommend for a small-time video producer to sell preroll ad time and promote the videos to people who have watched videos with similar subject matter?
Try this and see if the symptoms go away is the best choice in many cases. The doctor *could* treat a minor injury that will heal itself with steroids, but it's not worth the risk.
Most things people complain are best left to get better on their own. Or they require interventions that people don't want to go along with. People don't want to restrict calories, they want a magic pill that makes the pounds melt away. There are drug treatments that will do that, but they're dangerous enough that gastric bypass surgery is a less radical choice.
Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
YouTube has a bad case of stage IV PC cancer, with no chance for recover. Other platforms are going to mine its corpse for valuable resources (i.e. producers and viewers), and Google is going to scratch its head over how to bury the monstrous skeleton that's gonna be left behind.
When homeopathy et al troll intentionally confuses "actually works" with "just works".
The nootropics YouTubers don't know why YouTube penalized them.
Obviously the nootropics don't work well enough to give the users/advocates tthe cognitive ability to figure it out.
There is a narcotic drug that has been out there awhile and it is plaguing our society, often used most by STEM types, and it causes; tremors, anxiety, irritability, sleep deprivation, over active bladder and racing thoughts among other things. It is so addictive that many cannot function without it and withdrawal symptoms are severe. We need to do something about trimethylxanthine before it is too late! Someone please think of the children!
How do you get a one armed APK(polock) out of a tree?
Wave to him. o/
Making tea from willow bark to cure a headache is alternative medicine. Doing so also works. It's where acetaminophen occurs outside of chem labs.
Half of all medications originate in nature. Big Pharma loves selling to you for big money what grows in your garden for free and denounces the latter as alternative medicine.
After 3 months of 4x a week 500mg a day I had withdrawals. Mainly some anxiety and complete inability to sleep for 4 days. And so I learned a lesson about Gaba drugs to be repeated with diclazepam twice weekly a few months later although in milder form. If you take them to go to sleep for extended periods of time, expect to pay for it later.
But ALL drugs, OTC, from the doctor, etc will have negative side effects and we're not little children to be withheld cookies so we don't spoil our dinner. If you RTFM, you should be able to purchase/use anything because often time the medical professionals are stabbing the dark just like you are.
the idea that there is a single non-food molecule that will make it work better is pretty-far fetched.
It's like you haven't heard of caffeine, nicotine, adrafinil, or adderall. Or aren't aware of SSRI's, SNRI's, MAOI's, where a molecule can have significant brain changes (although not in a nootropic way.)
Maybe nootrope users are largely deluding themselves, but a lot of them subjectively report success with different substances. It would be like ignoring the experieces reported on Erowid because "the drug users were expecting to get a high."
"Try this and see if the symptoms go away" is literally the non-scientific medicine mantra.
At least scientific medicine is "this helps relieve symptoms in up to 40% of patients taking it, so try this and see if the symptoms go away."
How the fuck do people not understand this by now?
As someone who had spent a lot of time using "proper" mental medicine I can tell you that it's no better than these nooptics. Nobody, not even the scientists that discover the compounds, know exactly how they work. NONE of them.
Medicine works for those who benifit from the powerful guildes it has created to defend the corporate funded drug trials that are anti-science because of the inherent conflict of interest fallacy of double-blind experiments that are discarded and unpublished because sciencism only works when the results are marketable by the owners of the means of production. Medicine still does much research on ignorent people in countries like India. And they still coerce children into involuntary and non-consensual experiments. Slashdot had a story about this a few months ago. Quackery and snake oil are discriptors of medical practitioners. And medical doctors are over-represented in penitentiary systems. Most doctors are being replaced by Google and science. An appeal to authority doesn't work very well when knowledge is cheaper with the increasing capacities of transisters.
It's easy to sound smart;
it's challemging to do smart.
Doctorism is just another religious belief like scientism. Just ask Tom Cruise.
- UTW
No effective Nootropics? SCIENCE, not your Broscience reply, begs to differ.
Keep licking those boots, you sniveling sycophant.
When a monopoly corporation owns the public square and only the anointed can rent their soapbox, it's a problem. Break them up, force them to act to the benefit of society whom they are abusing and exploiting.
But taking a pill with no active ingredient is also alternative medicine. Only scientific tests can separate what works from what doesn't, and what is likely to work from what's snake oil.
Actually, youâ(TM)re why the country sucks so much now.
Iâ(TM)m fine with private companies censoring contents that doesnâ(TM)t meet the image they want(like Nazi hate videos), but at some point individual private companies become big enough they essentially become public and probably should be subject to oversight.
Stimulants, every last one.
Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.