Slashdot Mirror


Facebook Plans To Create Its Own Cryptocurrency: Report (cheddar.com)

Facebook is "very serious" about launching its own cryptocurrency, news outlet Cheddar reported Friday. It's not the first time the idea of a Facebook coin has been floated, but it seems more apparent now in wake of Facebook's reshuffled executive structure and newly formed blockchain group. From the report: Facebook started studying blockchain almost a year ago, when a member of its corporate development team, Morgan Beller, began looking at how the social platform could use the emerging technology. At the time, Beller was the only Facebook employee devoted to studying blockchain, the digital and decentralized ledger that underpins cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum. Her work was thrust into the spotlight this week when Facebook announced that the vice president in charge of the Messenger app, David Marcus, would lead a new team to "explore how to best leverage blockchain across Facebook, starting from scratch."

45 of 90 comments (clear)

  1. In the words of Michael Scott by nwaack · · Score: 4, Funny

    Noooooooooooooooo!!!!! God nooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!

  2. What the what? by Monkey-Wrench-Inc · · Score: 1

    Sooo, FarmVille on steroids?

  3. There's something wrong with a species by rsilvergun · · Score: 1, Troll

    who exerts this much effort and energy (literally, it's a ton of electricity) for yet another made up currency (and one mostly used to purchase illegal drugs because heaven forbid somebody smoke a little pot and not go to jail). It's not like Crypto currencies even fix the problems with fiat currencies. They're even easier for central bodies to manipulate to the detriment of the working class. Heck, by all accounts there's 4 guys out of China playing the price of Bitcoin like a fiddle. And that's before the likes of Goldman Sach's (who are a defacto arm of the US Government) step in.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:There's something wrong with a species by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      They're even easier for central bodies to manipulate to the detriment of the working class.

      Currencies are not manipulated to the detriment of the working class. Lower classes tend to be debtors while upper classes tend to be creditors. Debtors benefit from inflation, while creditors benefit from deflation. Nearly all governments are debtors, and they also benefit from inflation. Most governments and central banks have inflation policies of at least a few percent. The Federal Reserve's QE programs were strongly opposed by "Country Club Republicans", and I doubt if their concerns were the welfare of the working class.

    2. Re:There's something wrong with a species by SirMasterboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      who exerts this much effort and energy (literally, it's a ton of electricity)

      Who says it's going to be proof of work? Maybe it will be a proof of stake coin. There are already other proof of stake coins out there that work.

    3. Re:There's something wrong with a species by Sigma+7 · · Score: 1

      for yet another made up currency (and one mostly used to purchase illegal drugs because heaven forbid somebody smoke a little pot and not go to jail)

      No, this cryptocurrency is used to purchase Zynga credits, or whatever is the P2W thing de jour.

  4. Zuckerberg must want to be King of Facebookland by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 2

    What's next? Facebook housing? Zuckerberg buys an island (or a small country somewhere), renames it "Zuckerbergland" or "Facebookland" or something, and everything there is Facebook owned and Facebook branded? Cameras and microphones everywhere, including in your bedroom and bathroom, so everything you do 24/7/365 is posted automatically on Facebook? Your entire life logged and tracked and sold to 'partner companies'? And, of course, Facebook money, in the form of cryptocurrency. Fuck that, fuck all that sideways with a rusty chainsaw. Facebook and Zuckerberg and the whole gods-be-damned mess needs to die and go away forever, and all of 'social media' with it. It's a CANCER infecting our entire species.

    1. Re:Zuckerberg must want to be King of Facebookland by TFlan91 · · Score: 1

      Black Mirror ... "98% match making" ... Not too far off

    2. Re:Zuckerberg must want to be King of Facebookland by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      This is already happening. I'd be surprised if Facebook hasn't jumped on the 'Smart Cities' bandwagon in some regard.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    3. Re:Zuckerberg must want to be King of Facebookland by yuriklastalov · · Score: 1

      WE WUZ MIRRORS 'N SHIEEET!

  5. What could possibly go wrong? by Locke2005 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Or, to put it differently, how could Facebook possibly get any worse?

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:What could possibly go wrong? by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      at this point about the only thing that would make them even more evil is if they somehow positioned themselves as the gatekeeper for online voting. (i'm sure they've tried.)

  6. The real news by Topwiz · · Score: 4, Funny

    The real news here is that Facebook has a female employee whose work is valued by upper management.

    1. Re:The real news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Everyone at Facebook has vast experience with imaginary value.

    2. Re:The real news by iriecolorado · · Score: 2

      Oh boy, more identity politics. That's so fresh.

    3. Re: The real news by Alok · · Score: 1

      The person exploring a new technology is usually a developer. If their PoCs (proofs of concept) etc. work out and the company decides to put together a team to further work on it; then ofc. it will be headed by a managerial type who is more in touch with business considerations and leads a group of techies.

      Also, I like how everyone is assuming the initial researcher is female based on a single 'Her' pronoun, it could very well be a typo - maybe its a dude like Morgan Freeman :)

  7. Sign of Facebook getting too big by xack · · Score: 1

    If Facebook is getting to the point where it can print money (which is why it wants it’s own cryptocurrency). Then it’s time for an investigation from the SEC.

    1. Re:Sign of Facebook getting too big by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Which is what this story basically is, an attempt at a Facebook share price pump up, after much bad news. Of course Facebook do a ponzi crypto currency and although the potential is there for Facebook to specifically target their users that are the most vulnerable to that kind of manipulation and what hooks and triggers to mist effectively use against them, problem is pressure to ban unbacked crypto would become immediately immense, do to the manipulative nature of Facebooks gambit, targeting the gullible poor.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  8. Decentralized Database by PmanAce · · Score: 1

    I'm actually curious what "service" they will offer us that needs a decentralized database.

    --
    Tired of my customary (Score:1)
  9. Monetizing Users by Thelasko · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I see this as yet another way for Facebook to monetize its user base.

    "Your friend sent you a message. To read it, please mine 0.05 FBCoin."

    I'm giving them too much credit, they won't even ask...

    --
    One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
  10. Facebook's business model is selling you out by GrumpySteen · · Score: 2

    But you can totally trust them to handle your money, right?

    1. Re:Facebook's business model is selling you out by yuriklastalov · · Score: 1

      It would presumably be a way to monetize their service, although why anyone would want to trade Zuckerbucks for USD is beyond me.

  11. the Mark of Desperation by swschrad · · Score: 1

    not going to fall for the Zucker, or AngryCoin, or whatever bilious nonsense scheme they are into here. all cryptocurrency is a scam, existing only to buy crap on the darknet. I don't intend to friend Tor, either.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
    1. Re:the Mark of Desperation by Daneel+Olivaw+R.+ · · Score: 1

      not going to fall for the Zucker, or AngryCoin, or whatever bilious nonsense scheme they are into here. all cryptocurrency is a scam, existing only to buy crap on the darknet. I don't intend to friend Tor, either.

      sigh... you do know that all transactions in bitcoin ( and most other crypto) are open and everyone can see everything right? (Posted again after logging in)

    2. Re:the Mark of Desperation by KMnO4 · · Score: 1

      Agreed. The issue with cryptocurrencies is any set of, ohhh, 2 or more masters level cryptographers can get together and create one. There's no reason to think these algorithmic widgets won't keep flowing off the assembly line until the whole investment class becomes a joke. That being said, like everyone else, I sure wish I bought some bitcoins back in 2010!

    3. Re:the Mark of Desperation by torkus · · Score: 1

      Well I leveled up to master last week but i'm waiting on my friend to get a few more crypto XP so we can start crafting crypto. Do you know how much gold they're selling for in the auction house these days?

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
  12. No plans to integrate the coins with their apps by religionofpeas · · Score: 2

    Marcus said Facebook didn’t have plans to integrate cryptocurrency into its apps anytime soon.

    What ? That seems to be only logical use case for them, and they're not doing it ? Makes no sense.

    "Payments using crypto right now is just very expensive, super slow, so the various communities running the different blockchains and the different assets need to fix all the issues, and then when we get there someday, maybe we'll do something,” Marcus said.

    That's stupid too. Facebook can slash transaction costs by keeping them off-chain, just moving virtual balances from one account to the other, and then only occasionally settle on-chain.

    1. Re:No plans to integrate the coins with their apps by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      Exactly, large entities do NOT need blockchain for this. Sure, banks are using blockchain now? My guess is that they want to try new - perhaps highly mobile - financial services, and they use clockchain to get around their existing cumbersome infrastructure with 1 year development cycles.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  13. They're going all in by EndlessNameless · · Score: 1

    Facebook is not content with spying on your behavior on their web site, your mobile device, and "partner" web sites. Now they want your lifetime purchase history---in full or in part, whatever they can get.

    Hell no.

    This is pretty ballsy, especially after the way they flailed around publicly in response to the Cambridge Analytica fiasco.

    I've got three words: Fuck the Zuck.

    --

    ---
    According to the latest ruleset, this post should be modded as Vorpal Flamebait +5.
  14. Crumbling Facebook ? So what ? by DrYak · · Score: 1

    Yeah, and once Facebook crumbles : where are you going to run to ?

    Instagram ?
    WhatsApp ?

    At most, Mark is going to say "meh", and make a mental note to make another attempt at buying Snap, to be ready for the up-coming next crumbling after the facebook's one.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Crumbling Facebook ? So what ? by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah, and once Facebook crumbles : where are you going to run to ?

      I'll do the same thing I'm doing right now: sitting back with a beer and some popcorn, watching all the fools who participate in so-called 'social media' make worse fools of themselves, flitting here and there like dry leaves in the wind to whatever the next 'social media sensation' is. So they can be exploited some more, getting nothing of value in return. It's great entertainment in a schadenfreude sort of way, but also very, very sad.

  15. Stock pumping by Fly+Swatter · · Score: 1

    Gotta regain all that stock value lost with the recent fiasco. Hey, it worked for other companies.

  16. It actually makes a good deal of sense by Jeremi · · Score: 1

    Concerns about Facebook taking over the world aside, this makes some sense.

    The biggest problem any virtual currency has is the onboarding problem -- how do you get people to actually start using your currency, and to assign any non-zero value to it?

    Facebook already has millions (billions?) of users "onboard" so it has a big head start in that area, which it could use to its advantage.

    My hope is that Facebook doesn't just try to create "yet another virtual currency", however; that's been done to death already, and I don't think anyone really wants their money to be controlled by Facebook anyway.

    The real potential use-case for Facebook would be in social authentication -- e.g. if they could use the blockchain to help the platform authenticate genuine posts and automatically filter out trolls, scammers, etc. I'm not sure if that's doable or not, but that would be of much more value to the world than "Facebook Flooz".

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  17. A sure thing. by jbr439 · · Score: 1

    Didn't seem to work for Pied Piper, why should it work for Facebook.

  18. True by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    but one of the main arguments for ending fiat currencies is they can be manipulated in ways that hurt workers. I'm not saying any of that's true (I kinda like the stability that comes from a fiat currency), just that a lot of the Crypto currency cheerleaders list it as a feature.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:True by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      How many of these "cheerleaders" are working class? Just because an argument is made, doesn't mean it is a valid argument.

      America's currency was deflationary from the end of the Civil War until the outbreak of WW1. This was the "Gilded Age", as wealth became concentrated. Most of the 20th Century was inflationary, with a dip into deflation during the Great Depression of the 1930s. The working class mostly prospered, home ownership soared, and we had far more economic equality.

      It is best to have a stable currency with mild inflation of 1-2%. Excessively strong currencies (deflation) hurt the poor more than the rich. Excessively weak currencies (inflation) hurt the rich more than the poor.

      The conspiracy theory that "the rich" are scheming to oppress the working class by debasing the currency is absolute nonsense. It is completely backwards and makes no sense at all.

  19. If you cut the work needed by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    you'll either get hyper inflation as an unlimited supply is created instantly or you'll get a heavily manipulated currency that a few players control by handling out stakes. The point of "proof of work" is to make things more egalitarian, which is one of thing features crypto currency proponents champion. Take that away and all you've got is a pyramid scheme or an out of control loop spewing coins.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  20. Paypal doesn't need one and neither does Facebook by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

    Facebook has no more use for a cryptocurrency than PayPal ever has. The currency is controlled by a single entity so there's no trust problem to solve, and therefore no potential gain from the immense amount of resources that would need to be expended to run a blockchain (storage at best, and also heaps of processing power at worst). The relatively glacial pace of blockchain transactions would also be for naught.

    If Facebook were just using cryptocurrency buzzwords to generate hype around yet another plain-jane online payment system, that would actually make a lot more sense.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  21. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  22. Blockchain is different from Cryptocurrency by kingradar · · Score: 2

    The headline is misleading. It sounds like Facebook actually wants to leverage blockchain technologies to accomplish tasks, and provide value/security for their services. That is distinct from a "cryptocurrency." The latter makes use of a distributed ledger (typically a blockchain, more in a second) to create a medium of exchange. This medium of exchange is essentially a commodity, like gold (difficult to acquire, with a limited supply), which is traded to settle debts (i.e. buy stuff), a function typically performed using money. In other words a cryptocurrency is a commodity being used as money. For whipper snappers this is a foreign concept. For old farts like myself, we still recall the days when gold was used as a common medium of exchange in the barter system. "Money" was invented to make payments easier, because large amounts of gold are bulky, and heavy. Instead paper was traded, initially the paper notes were issued by "banks" (I use that term loosely), and that paper could be redeemed from said issuer for gold. That function was eventually taken over by governments, first state, then federal. The US dollar was backed by gold from 1879 to 1933. A cryptocurrency is the electronic equivalent of this system.

    What makes cryptocurrencies possible is the invention of "blockchain" technology. A blockchain is essentially a public ledger that has been distributed. What's unique is how the blockchain uses cryptography to ensure a consensus among untrusted parties over what transactions are on the blockchain, and thus valid. That is the "proof of work" idea, whereby the network only accepts blocks which included the requisite proof of work. Cryptographic signatures are used to create transactions, where a signed transaction transfers a given unit from one private key to another. The holder of the associated private key is in essence the holder of the units, as anyone with access to the private key can create valid transactions which transfer (or spend) that unit. The blocks themselves are linked together cryptographically, using hashes, such that a modification to a given block would invalidate all of the blocks that follow it. That is why we talk about confidence in transactions, which that confidence governed by the number of blocks which follow it.

    It's worth noting that many cryptocurrencies don't use true blockchains to record transactions. They only use cryptographically signed transactions to validate transfer. These are essentially gift cards, as the ledger can be altered, modified, etc, if the group in charge wants it.

    Like I said above, with bitcoin, and most cryptocurrencies, you can see every transaction that has ever been made, and how much was transferred. If you determine who controlled the addresses (aka private keys), you know who was behind a transaction. This is incredibly easy. That is why, I exclusively hold and use Monero, which is an improvement on the original blockchain concept (aka bitcoin) which makes use of cryptography to validate, but also mask transactions. This provides significantly more privacy.

  23. Why? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    There's already plenty of crypto-currencies out there, some are even targeted toward social networks usage such as Reddcoin.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  24. There is no "coin" by jbmartin6 · · Score: 2

    All the talk in this article is about blockchain, not any coin offering. A coin isn't required to use blockchain for something.

    --
    This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
  25. Name by wbr1 · · Score: 1

    It should be named Facebook Universal CryptoKoin or FUCK on the exchanges.

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
  26. Cryptocurrency mention in TFA is clickbait by Alok · · Score: 1

    ... or a red herring perhaps.

    Companies are trying to leverage the decentralization of blockchain tech for stuff that is unrelated to mining - cf. https://cointelegraph.com/news/walmart-is-ready-to-use-blockchain-for-its-live-food-business . Facebook is probably looking to do so as well, maybe something like use blockchain voting to evaluate its news articles and sift thru the fakes better ;-)

    There doesn't seem much point to them jumping into actual crypto mining, unless there is some new tie-up with nVidia and they get a cut of every graphics card bought by FB accounts for FB credits ... hmm ....

  27. Social networks by DrYak · · Score: 1

    What did we do before facebook?

    A significant part was doing MySpace.

    Why do we have to run to anything?

    Mostly because of FOMO.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]