Slashdot Mirror


President Trump Pledges To Help China's ZTE, After Ban (usatoday.com)

President Trump said Sunday that he and Chinese President Xi Jinping are working to put the troubled Chinese telecom manufacturer ZTE back in business. From a report: "President Xi of China, and I, are working together to give massive Chinese phone company, ZTE, a way to get back into business, fast," Trump said in a message on Twitter. "Too many jobs in China lost. Commerce Department has been instructed to get it done!" ZTE, maker of Android phones popular with budget-minded consumers, said Wednesday that it would cease "major operating activities," raising questions not only about its survival, but the impact on U.S. consumers who have previously bought or were thinking of buying ZTE phones. The announcement followed a decision last month by the U.S. Commerce Department, which banned American companies from exporting products to the Shenzhen, China-based telecom firm for seven years.

132 of 230 comments (clear)

  1. MCGA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Really, how does this help America? It only makes me suspicious that Trump or some of his buddies want to swoop in and get the stock for pennies on the dollar.

    1. Re:MCGA? by 110010001000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You must be kidding. Trump isn't out to help America. He is out to help himself. Morally and ethically bankrupt.

    2. Re: MCGA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Elect a clown, get a circus.

      Hire incompetent devs, get broken Unicode support.

      Some things never change.

    3. Re: MCGA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yep, he's really draining the swamp (by installing a pipeline leading directly to the Oval Office) and disrupting the status quo (by chucking grenades around randomly, forcing everyone to panic regardless of political alignment). #MAGA

    4. Re:MCGA? by Joce640k · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Really, how does this help America? It only makes me suspicious that Trump or some of his buddies want to swoop in and get the stock for pennies on the dollar.

      Yep, he probably bought up gazillions of shares last week when they collapsed. Now he's using his position as President to boost his personal retirement fund.

      --
      No sig today...
    5. Re:MCGA? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Really, how does this help America? It only makes me suspicious that Trump or some of his buddies want to swoop in and get the stock for pennies on the dollar.

      Yep, he probably bought up gazillions of shares last week when they collapsed. Now he's using his position as President to boost his personal retirement fund.

      More likely, the last person who spoke with him (or a Fox News commentator) already owns a bunch of ZTE stock, was getting soaked and advised him to help out -- Headline to read: "Trump Saves Chinese Company" (ignoring why they needed saving)

      Trump doesn't read anything (longer than 140 characters, anyway), doesn't really know (or care to know) anything, has no moral compass, and has the attention span of a goldfish, so he's easily swayed by the last thing he hears. (I love to be proven wrong, but don't think I am)

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    6. Re: MCGA? by cunina · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hey, now â" I wouldnâ(TM)t call the Unicodeâ support âoebroken.â More like, itâ(TM)s a mélange of character sets that donâ(TM)t render the same on every device. The handful of people using iOS should wait until the trusty developers at Slashdot finish their jalapeño tamales and AÃaà bowls, then theyâ(TM)ll fix it.

    7. Re:MCGA? by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 2

      Really, how does this help America? .

      Its a great way to gain some leverage with China. We'll help ZTE if they agree to other stuff that helps the US, like cracking down on other unfair trade practices.

    8. Re:MCGA? by Luckyo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Concessions he gets in return. This seems to be something forgotten by generations raised post Cold War era. Power politics are not just about negotiating. They're about negotiating from the position of power.

      CCP's primary reason for economic development is employment, as employment reduces social unrest. Social unrest is the primary boogie man of CCP, which is terrified of its own people. That is why they maintain the steel production in otherwise poor northern China in spite of massive oversupply it is causing on the world markets, and all the anti-China tensions that go with it. Can't afford mass unemployment and unrest it will cause.

      Same applies here. Trump has shown once again that he understands power politics. He has CCP by the balls on this one, and now, he can actually negotiate.

    9. Re:MCGA? by willy_me · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, it is probably why China allowed him to register the "Trump" trade name right after being elected despite being denied for so many years. It is a decision that is quite easy to reverse. If this were about buying and selling stock there would be a paper trail and China (not Trump) is too smart for that.

      This is why sitting presidents should forgo all their business interests when taking on the position of president. Otherwise, it is impossible to not have conflicts of interest. There will always be the desire to work for oneself at the expense of the country they serve.

    10. Re:MCGA? by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 1

      Trump doesn't read anything (longer than 140 characters, anyway), doesn't really know (or care to know) anything, has no moral compass, and has the attention span of a goldfish, so he's easily swayed by the last thing he hears.

      No, seriously -- how do you really feel about him?

    11. Re: MCGA? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Actually I'm with Slashdot on this one, Unicode itself is so broken that it's either bad but functional rendering, or the users can completely break the layout and pull all kinds of shinnanigans.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    12. Re:MCGA? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Informative

      http://www.bbc.com/news/busine...

      "Beijing has made resolving the situation with ZTE, which employs about 80,000 people, one of its demands for striking a broader trade agreement with with US."

      Trump has no choice, other than to burn the whole deal. We know he doesn't like to lose.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    13. Re:MCGA? by RubberDogBone · · Score: 1

      This oversupply situation just kicks the problem into the future, when the markets finally collapse for different goods and none of it can sell. When the layoffs finally DO come, China can blame it all on foreign manipulation, rather than their own overproduction, and all those angry workers could be massaged into a force to go out and fight these horrible foreign countries and companies. Rioting, burning foreign companies, stores, factories, etc, and if a lot of those workers die in the process, it merely culls people who were a burden anyway.

      Meanwhile, it will wreck all sorts of businesses that depend on China and motivate them to come begging with hat in hand for some sort of relationship that will work.

      China is going to come out of it all smelling like a rose and with vastly more clout. And a lot of populace thinking they are a big patriotic force.

      --
      Sig for hire.
    14. Re: MCGA? by Pitt64 · · Score: 1

      Flat Earthers are Trump supporters DUCY

    15. Re:MCGA? by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

      One possible way that Trump could help ZTE is if they made their phones with American chipsets.

      Ahem. The whole source of LTE's problems is that they made their phones with US components they cannot get anymore, due to an embargo that was specifically issued against LTE. The reason is violations by LTE against the Iran embargo, the embargo against LTE is meant to be a punishment for that.

      Now Trump could certainly revoke that embargo, but it would make him look weak. Something politicians really don't like.

      --
      C - the footgun of programming languages
    16. Re:MCGA? by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      I'm genuinely curious why it is that you think that "propaganda efforts" would be unsuccessful if this didn't happen in a country with central control over all media?

    17. Re:MCGA? by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Because ZTE uses American technology, under license, in order to make their shit? Because Google is an American company, which gets a taste of app purchases through the Google Play store, made from ZTE devices? Because the Qualcomm processor and radio inside each ZTE device was manufactured for and sold by an American company to ZTE?

      Do you think that ZTE grows it's phones on trees, or that there might be a logistics operation behind sourcing their parts, and licensing software and technology - of which a good slice goes to American corporations, which dodge^H^H^H^H^H pay American taxes, and create jobs.

      Also, probably because someone told Trump that if he keeps fucking over China with his trade war horseshit, China is in a pretty good position to economically anal rape him and make sure he's a 1-termer. Some tariffs are expected, and just the cost of doing business - China factored that in long ago and was probably surprised it hasn't happened until now. But setting one off underneath one of their biggest electronics companies and essentially forcing them to shut down - that's too far and would result in very ugly retaliation that doesn't play well with the narrative he's trying to build - that he's a 'dealmaker' who is the only one that can make good deals and put these other countries where they belong.

      China closes up and starts turning American goods away at the harbor and all that turns into the rankest horseshit you've ever smelled, even to his blissfully ignorant base.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    18. Re:MCGA? by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      Your whole argument falls flat on it's face when you realize Trump had NOTHING to do with the ZTE sanctions. The initial sanctions were enacted by the Obama admin and when ZTE violated the consent agreement it was the Bureaucracy that reacted and put in place the ban for violating the consent degree, not Trump.

      I actually think the opposite happened here, after the bureaucracy reacted Xi called and threatened Trump and he buckled under just like he did the last time Xi talked to him. Hell maybe the Chinese have the same stuff on him that the Russians do.

    19. Re:MCGA? by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      So by your own admission, he has everything to do with actual sanctions. He just has nothing to with with events that started the chain which now resulted in sanctions.

      Bending logic backwards like this just so that you can produce an expected outcome of "Trump is [negative descriptor]" is a good sign of Trump Derangement Syndrome.

    20. Re: MCGA? by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      Wtf?

  2. WTF? by TiberiusKirk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Literally, What The Fuck?!!! He's a fucking buffoon with no coherent plan for anything.

    1. Re: WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, it is not a win/win.

      He is like the big bully in the playground. Razing other kids sandcastles and then takes all the credit when they have to rebuild a brand new one.

      The fact that he has to reverse something means that he did it wrong the first time. If he wanted ZTE to do what they now are doing, he could have THREATHENED with a ban to put them out of business.

      Trump isn't offering olive branches. He is setting peoples houses on fire and then he is "greeting" them when they come running out. "Look what a welcoming and nice guy, giving you a hug when you come running towards him."

    2. Re:WTF? by Kohath · · Score: 1

      When there’s a detour because of road construction, do you continue to drive straight ahead at full speed, mowing down the road crew, because that was your original plan?

    3. Re: WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Good cop, bad cop doesn't work when its only one cop. Trump is playing both sides as if he has split personality disorder. Actually, it is his pathological lying that is the problem.

    4. Re:WTF? by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

      Dumpsterfire would. Fuck anything but his wallet and his praise. The Chinese must be paying him well.

      Drain the swamp my ass.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    5. Re:WTF? by Peter+P+Peters · · Score: 2

      Literally, What The Fuck?!!! He's a fucking buffoon with no coherent plan for anything.

      You say that like it's a surprise?

    6. Re: WTF? by CaffeinatedBacon · · Score: 1

      He could have just threatened them,and maybe they would ignore the threat and assume he was bluffing. Now they know he wasn't,and fully realise how much power he has over them.

    7. Re: WTF? by CriticalYetLazy · · Score: 1

      Of course mindless destructive measures should always be favored above diplomatic measures. Right.

    8. Re:WTF? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Trump is many things but neither a buffoon nor an animal associated without a coherent plan. He's intelligent and out for blood. Better described in the animal world as a weasel.

      Don't confuse his ramblings as senseless or incoherrent. He's never said anything that hasn't been solely for his own personal gain. The trick is understanding what he cares about (Hint: Not Americans .... unless they can increase his wealth).

    9. Re: WTF? by CaffeinatedBacon · · Score: 1

      I didn't claim it was the best strategy, or even a good one. But the Chinese definitely know he means business, and is't just carrying a big stick. He proved he can wield it effectively.

  3. Well, he did promise... by GerryGilmore · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...JOBS, JOBS, JOBS! He just didn't mention that they would be Chinese jobs.

    1. Re:Well, he did promise... by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      Whether it is Trump or Obama, but either way, currently jobless rates in the US are very low.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  4. Excuse... excuse... by hackingbear · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Making up excuse to punish ZTE in the first place. And now making up excuse to back down failing to get more from negotiation.

  5. ZTE knows the magic numbers... by MostAwesomeDude · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...specifically, the routing numbers for Michael Cohen's checking account~

    But seriously, did any money have to change hands, or is this just Trump showing his admiration for Xi's continuing march towards tyranny?

    --
    ~ C.
    1. Re:ZTE knows the magic numbers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ...specifically, the routing numbers for Michael Cohen's checking account~

      But seriously, did any money have to change hands, or is this just Trump showing his admiration for Xi's continuing march towards tyranny?

      I remember quite clearly how he complimented Putin, who is apparently responsible for various deaths of his political opponents, while at the same time insulting Obama, claiming Putin was just so much better than Obama.

      He truly does seem to have a fascination for strong men. I don't think its because the examples are unethical. I just don't think Trump thinks in terms or right and wrong. He seems to care more about whether or not it worked. If it worked, and didn't put him in jail, then obviously it was a correct decision.

      I'm guessing this is similar to the North Korean thing. Basically if buttering up a questionable leader gets him what he wants, even if it is mostly just splash without substance, then he will do it. Once again, it is not about ethics. It is about it advancing Trumpism and Trump himself. Oh he probably does actually want to "make American great again" on some level, but his definition of great seems to be somewhat close to my definition of ruin.

      Simply put you can't have a country based on common values if all the politicians are lying or supporting liars. It's like trying to build a house on a hill of sand. It may look good from a distance, but sooner or later the foundation is going to crumble.

      As far as ZTE specifically go, I tend to think they are somewhat not that important in the grand scheme of things. What I'd like to see is to have cell phones like personal computers, where at any time I can easily, without any special hoops replace the core OS. Sure, maybe there is a hypervisor and some non user accessible code to deal with the software defined radio, but the bulk of it should be easy to replace by booting from a usb device. Once you have that, it is easier to screen the rest for backdoors and such, though by no means is it easy.

    2. Re:ZTE knows the magic numbers... by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      But seriously, did any money have to change hands, or is this just Trump showing his admiration for Xi's continuing march towards tyranny?

      Um ... China is already a communist dictatorship, and has been for many decades.

  6. Smells like BS by fred911 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ZTE had been a major international producer long before entering the US market. I doubt elimination from the US market makes it insolvent by any means. Whereas the US market may have possibly been the most profitable, they didn't play nice and got kicked off the playground. Boohoo, wake up, they're just another arm of the party.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    1. Re:Smells like BS by postmortem · · Score: 4, Informative

      It is not about US market, it is about now being illegal for US companies to license software (like Google Play) and hardware (like CPU chips) to ZTE.

    2. Re:Smells like BS by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      Illegal for any US company to do business with them period.

    3. Re:Smells like BS by PPH · · Score: 1

      Some object lessons here:

      1. Foreign manufacturers need to secure alternate sources for components.

      2. Software manufacturers need to hold their licenses overseas.

      Exposing your business to the vagaries of totalitarian regimes is not a viable strategy.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    4. Re:Smells like BS by Kohath · · Score: 1

      US companies can't do business with them. It's impossible to make telecom equipment without inputs from US companies.

    5. Re:Smells like BS by quantaman · · Score: 1

      ZTE had been a major international producer long before entering the US market. I doubt elimination from the US market makes it insolvent by any means. Whereas the US market may have possibly been the most profitable, they didn't play nice and got kicked off the playground. Boohoo, wake up, they're just another arm of the party.

      The problem is if you're going to build high end tech it's really hard not to have some of your supply chain come from US companies.

      For the hardware they might be able to circumvent the sanctions with resellers but I suspect the US companies would be reluctant to sell to them and circumvent the sanctions so blatantly.

      And the software is even tougher since you can't exactly sell a phone full of pirated software.

      I'm a bit curious about the whole sanctions punishment in the first place, it sounds like the charge of "selling US goods to Iran" is based on the fact that ZTE sold products containing US components, but does that mean the moment the US announces sanctions on a country they now extend downstream to everyone using US components?

      I wonder if this plan to help ZTE has more to do with helping US companies, if I was a big international firm I'd be looking at contingencies in case I was told I could no longer use US components. Trump might be realizing that he also sanctioned the US.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    6. Re:Smells like BS by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      Exposing your business to the vagaries of totalitarian regimes is not a viable strategy.

      But where? Panama or some other tax haven? Are you sure those can be relied upon?

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    7. Re:Smells like BS by PPH · · Score: 1

      The EU, Britain, Switzerland. Pretty much any one of those has more respect for a rule of law, a more equitable tax system and less inclination to bully other nations around.

      ell, maybe not Britain. They have a bad habit of crippling their domestic R&D and handing it over to the USA. Because we bailed them out in some stupid war 70 years ago.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    8. Re:Smells like BS by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      a more equitable tax system

      Those large companies with IP portfolios to move don't want a more equitable tax system. They want the option to pay zero or close to zero taxes.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    9. Re:Smells like BS by PPH · · Score: 1

      more equitable tax system ... zero or close to zero taxes

      Same thing. At least the rest of progressive western society (with the notable exception of the USA) has settled on a flat tax rate.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    10. Re:Smells like BS by jrumney · · Score: 1

      3. Politicians need to realize that their kneejerk actions have diplomatic consequence, and they're probably going to be forced to eat their words later.

    11. Re:Smells like BS by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

      I'm a bit curious about the whole sanctions punishment in the first place, it sounds like the charge of "selling US goods to Iran" is based on the fact that ZTE sold products containing US components, but does that mean the moment the US announces sanctions on a country they now extend downstream to everyone using US components?

      The US seem to think so. At least, EU countries (at least Germany) are now worried about the US business of EU companies who are trading with Iran.

      --
      C - the footgun of programming languages
    12. Re:Smells like BS by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      1. Foreign manufacturers need to secure alternate sources for components.

      Any clever suggestions? Specifically we're looking for chips that are compatible and act as a PHY interface to a world of technology locked behind US patents. Got a list of alternative suppliers?

    13. Re:Smells like BS by PPH · · Score: 1

      Good point. So I guess I'll have to add:

      3. Remember back when you (China) were just getting into the mobile phone business. And you proposed developing your own standards. And the US threw a hissy-fit because you weren't going to use theirs? You should have told them to go shove it up their bum.

      Lesson learned. Maybe it's not to late to re-start that effort.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    14. Re:Smells like BS by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Exposing your business to the vagaries of totalitarian regimes is not a viable strategy

      So when you stated that you were just kidding. It seems you're actually a backer of totalitarian regimes such as China, and want them and their enterprises to succeed. Well then. . . that would seem to make you a fan of bum ideas. . . in more than one sense.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    15. Re:Smells like BS by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Exposing your business to the vagaries of totalitarian regimes is not a viable strategy.

      ZTE is a Chinese company, and China ...CHINA is the totalitarian country in this discussion. It is a little late for ZTE, although selling to other totalitarian countries under sanction was a bad idea. Is that why you seem so agitated to try to prop them up?

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  7. Makes sense! by forgottenusername · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ZTE repeatedly violated the US sanctions against Iran, and lied to the government while in remediation. Now that the US has broken it's international agreement w/Iran & is threatening sanctions against our global partners who were also part of the agreement, the only logical 5d chess move is to get ZTE back in the business of selling security-compromised devices to Americans. Using the Dept of Commerce, paid for by American tax dollars.

    I would be shocked if this was a backroom quid pro quo deal with China to expand the Trump brand business interests. Shocked I say.

    tl;dr Jobs Jobs Jobs!

    1. Re:Makes sense! by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      Could also be a quid-pro-quo deal in this tariff crap.

    2. Re:Makes sense! by mrclmn · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's almost as though Trump thinks ZTE is a Russian company.

    3. Re:Makes sense! by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1, Insightful

      ZTE repeatedly violated the US sanctions against Iran, and lied to the government while in remediation. Now that the US has broken it's international agreement w/Iran & is threatening sanctions against our global partners who were also part of the agreement, the only logical 5d chess move is to get ZTE back in the business of selling security-compromised devices to Americans.

      I'm sorry, but the U. S. government's behavior is just getting schizophrenic.

      I can understand banning ZTE because it went against US sanctions.

      I can understand banning ZTE if there was evidence of Chinese backdoors in the hardware (even if it isn't released, if releasing the evidence may compromise US security issues).

      I can understand banning ZTE to help promote other non-Chinese brands, particularly US and allies brands.

      The only way trying to help ZTE makes any sense is if the US government finally realized the global supply chain involved and the loss of US jobs when a company like ZTE goes under. That being said, this is an awful time to do this, as the US is going to re-initiate sanctions against Iran.

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    4. Re:Makes sense! by Duds · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The giveaway here is that Breitbart have chosen to pretend it never happened. If even they can't spin it, you know he screwed up.

    5. Re:Makes sense! by forgottenusername · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I saw someone comment asking how the WH was going to spin this. Simple, they don't have to. A couple "I'll get back to you on that" from Sanders and the next nutty thing will have caused everyone to forget.

      It's nearly impossible to remember all the totally nutso things that have happened. Part of a strategy, one would imagine.

    6. Re:Makes sense! by hey! · · Score: 1

      Possibly ZTE is an Essential Consultants client?

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    7. Re:Makes sense! by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but the U. S. government's behavior is just getting schizophrenic.

      You expect rational and long-term planning from the current president of the USA? I have a bridge to sell you.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    8. Re:Makes sense! by shanen · · Score: 1

      Can you explain the joke? I seem to be missing it.

      For all we really know, Putin might be one of the largest shareholders in ZTE... His dark fortune is mostly unknown, with estimates ranging from $20 billion to $200 billion.

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    9. Re:Makes sense! by shanen · · Score: 1

      Good points, especially the last one, and I lament the lack of mod points to give you.

      You did make me wonder how owners of ZTE phones feel about this mess. Maybe they were never popular? I've considered getting a ZTE a couple of times, but never did...

      Hmm... Perhaps I should snatch one up in a liquidation sale? Out-of-production sales are usually the best prices, though the normal push is from the new models coming in.

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    10. Re:Makes sense! by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      Under China rules, all companies doing business in China must be mostly owned by chinease nationals. Foreign companies must construct local companies to do business there. ZTE is based in China, therefore it is mostly owned by chinease nationals.

    11. Re:Makes sense! by shanen · · Score: 1

      Are you saying there is a parent company somewhere else? I always thought it was a Chinese company?

      Let me see what Wikipedia says... Near as I can tell, it's as Chinese as it gets (though I didn't know how high it ranked). So the joke was that Trump didn't know that?

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    12. Re:Makes sense! by GrimSavant · · Score: 1

      You're overcomplicating it a bunch, it's simply a joke that Trump is too nice to the Russians. Not that ZTE is actually a Russian company, he's just acting inexplicably favorably towards them like with the Russians.

    13. Re:Makes sense! by cold+fjord · · Score: 2

      . . . the only logical 5d chess move is to get ZTE back in the business of selling security-compromised devices to Americans. Using the Dept of Commerce, paid for by American tax dollars.

      I would be shocked if this was a backroom quid pro quo deal with China to expand the Trump brand business interests. Shocked I say.

      I take it you're not a big 5d chess player either.

      We now know why Trump suddenly reversed course on sanctions against a Chinese tech giant

      President Donald Trump’s decision to reverse sanctions on Chinese telecom giant ZTE was part of a larger trade agreement, according to a new report.
      - In exchange for easing the restrictions on ZTE, the Chinese government will not impose tariffs on US agricultural products like pork and wine.
      - The agricultural tariffs were imposed by China in response to Trump’s steel and aluminum tariffs.
      - The deal is not finalized yet and details still need to be worked out.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    14. Re:Makes sense! by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      It seems the thinking and operation of real estate investor/developers is beyond your ken.

      We now know why Trump suddenly reversed course on sanctions against a Chinese tech giant

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    15. Re:Makes sense! by cold+fjord · · Score: 2

      You got me curious with that statement, so I checked. It seems you're wrong in more than one respect. Breitbart carried a story on it, and there seems to be a bigger game at play.

      Kudlow on Administration’s China Trade Actions: ‘Don’t Blame Trump, Blame China’

      We now know why Trump suddenly reversed course on sanctions against a Chinese tech giant

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    16. Re:Makes sense! by Duds · · Score: 1

      Fair enough, I scrolled their entire front page at the time of posting and either it was not there, or I didn't spot it.

  8. Follow the money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Who shorted ZTE before the ban?

    And now who has long positions?

    Could it be Trump? Or any of his buddies?

    The Shadow knows.

  9. Backroom Deals by Stomper_Stoddard · · Score: 2

    This has backroom deal written all over it, although I am not sure why Putin wants ZTE propped up.

    Trump is not draining the swamp, he is drinking from the swamp.

    1. Re:Backroom Deals by Stomper_Stoddard · · Score: 1

      Okay, fair enough, so explain to me why the President wants to now prop up a company that we know was illegally selling banned products to Iran? Isn't Iran the enemy? Aren't companies that ignore trade sanctions by definition bad actors? Don't we want them to go out of business as a lesson to other companies considering doing the same thing? From a geopolitical stand point, this makes no sense. But from the stand point of a Corrupt President is making money off the deal, it makes plenty of sense.

      You can make all the conspiracy comments you want, but just remember, you guys are the ones who still think Hillary Clinton murdered Vincent Foster and runs a child slavery ring out of pizza joint.

    2. Re:Backroom Deals by cold+fjord · · Score: 1
      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  10. I don't know what's worse by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    the rampant corruption, the back pedaling on all his campaign promises (backed down on Carrier, supports Guest Worker programs & TPP, just gave Big Pharma a big present, filled his cabinet with Goldman Sach's folks that embody the swamp... I could go on) or the fact that no matter what his poll #s don't budge from 38-40%.

    The first year of this crap I could chalk up to the news cycle catching up with folks who don't watch politics. But at this point folks are sticking with him out of either stubbornness or a desire to see those "coastal elites" mad. That's some mighty fine face spiting right there, Lou.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:I don't know what's worse by whoever57 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I am convinced that Trump supporters will continue to support him, irrespective of what he does, as long as he enables their xenophobic and racist tendencies.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    2. Re:I don't know what's worse by Stomper_Stoddard · · Score: 1

      I still haven't figured out how you endured the same 8 years of crap from the Obama administration (rampant corruption, back pedaling, outright lies AND selling out the US) and YOU continued sticking with him.

      Perhaps you should look in the mirror.

      Admittedly Obama did back pedal on on some campaign promises when it became obvious he would not be able to get them done, but other than that, everything else you said is BS. But you will probably not except that truth because you are likely one of those people who still believes Obama was born in Kenya, was a secret Muslim who attended a radical Christian church, Michelle was actually a man and they kidnapped their children.

    3. Re:I don't know what's worse by GrimSavant · · Score: 2

      We've always been at war with Eurasia.

      I also find it remarkable how stable the level of support is in face of this madness. The administration has told us that 2+2=5 so many times that the opposition can't believe anything it says anymore, and so when you get reversals like this on ZTE's violation of the Iran sanctions the conclusion jumps straight to corruption, because even if there is a reasonable justification for playing nice with the Chinese there is absolutely no apparent coherence to what Trump is doing.

      And on the other side, his supporters seem to love him shouting at us that 2+2=5 because that triggers snowflakes, and nothing seems to matter anymore. Rather depressing since sometimes reality likes to assert itself in extremely unpleasant ways, whether it be after a trade war with China starts blowing up businesses both here and there, or worse if it leads to shooting war with someone like Iran.

    4. Re:I don't know what's worse by GrimSavant · · Score: 1

      Even if you didn't like what Obama was doing, at least it made sense. This stuff just does not make sense.

      I mean, Trump was trying to start a trade war with China, just busted out of the Iran nuclear deal, and now he is talking about how bad it is that ZTE's troubles as a consequence of such sanctions is causing too many Chinese jobs to be lost? Might as well start talking about Chewbacca.

    5. Re:I don't know what's worse by shanen · · Score: 1

      You got me to look at the AC comment. What are the opposite of congratulations?

      Why are you feeding the troll? Your closing sums up the situation well enough, but you're not even likely to earn any funny mods in that context.

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    6. Re:I don't know what's worse by Stomper_Stoddard · · Score: 1

      except = accept

      I spell like caveman most days.

    7. Re:I don't know what's worse by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      I know, right? I mean its like, whatever.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    8. Re:I don't know what's worse by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Rather depressing since sometimes reality likes to assert itself in extremely unpleasant ways. . .

      Agreed.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  11. This makes no sense by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let me be clear - I do not agree with Trump’s short-sighted and backwards-thinking trade war. But isn’t the whole point of a trade war to put the hurt on the companies and consumers based in the other country, which increases the pressure on the other government to make concessions?

    Trump is basically giving away his leverage - so instead of both countries being hurt by the trade war, now it’s Americans who’ll take the brunt of the pain. Good job, “master” deal maker.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:This makes no sense by squiggleslash · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The ZTE ban has little or nothing to do with any trade war. It's a straightforward consequence of the pre-existing sanctions against Iran. ZTE sold US technologies to Iran.

      Whether we should be sanctioning Iran, or trying to build a better relationship with them (they're horrible, but in some ways they're one of the least horrible regimes in that region - still, compared to Saudi Arabia, who isn't moderately better?) is another question. But it makes little sense to have sanctions and then say "Hey, it's OK, no biggie" when someone actually violates them.

      Also worth noting: ZTE is also implicated in some spyware stuff, that's bad enough to ensure ZTE phones are banned by the US military. It's not like a friendly company committed an oopsie.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    2. Re:This makes no sense by hey! · · Score: 1

      Well, this is a different war. It's about Iran sanctions. I think the reason this is happening is they're actually trying to contain a possible Chinese trade war.

      It's brinksmanship, and when you're on the brink shutting down a billion dollar Chinese company with 75,000 employees might send you over the edge. He needs China's leadership to swallow its pride and make some trade concessions.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    3. Re: This makes no sense by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Sometimes you don't have to hurt them, you just have to show that you have the power to hurt them.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    4. Re:This makes no sense by Peter+P+Peters · · Score: 1

      Trump is basically giving away his leverage -

      No he's giving away America's leverage, probably in exchange for a new hotel deal

      Good job, “master” deal maker.

      Well if you take the view that he personally will gain (which has been his life story) then yes it's a good deal for him.

    5. Re:This makes no sense by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      Let me be clear - I do not agree with Trump’s short-sighted and backwards-thinking trade war. But isn’t the whole point of a trade war to put the hurt on the companies and consumers based in the other country, which increases the pressure on the other government to make concessions?

      There may well be something about this that you and I don't know.

      If this were a story about NASA, and you had posted "WTF, why didn't they design their rover this way instead, blah blah", someone (quite possibly me) would be replying "whew, thanks, I'll get right on the phone to NASA and straighten this out".

      We don't have all the facts.

    6. Re:This makes no sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Also, exporting to North Korea. Also, actively redacting the fact that they did so in internal records. So not only did they do the criminal thing, they knew it was criminal and hid the fact that they did it in order to gain business.

      Then, after agreeing to a settlement agreement, which suspended the ban, they violated the terms of the settlement agreement, which made the ban immediately come into force.

      It's almost like Martin Shkreli, but with enforced penalties for the actual crime.

  12. What an asshole. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What an asshole.

  13. Yes you do. by skam240 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "When there’s a detour because of road construction, do you continue to drive straight ahead at full speed, mowing down the road crew, because that was your original plan?"

    You do if the whole point of driving by the detour was to smash into the road crew.

    These sanctions were supposed to have the effect they are having on ZTE. They were supposed to hurt them a lot. Now he's reversing course because the sanctions actually worked? What type of example is that supposed to set for the future? "Sure, the US might put crippling sanctions on us over our actions but if we apologize they'll make it all better!"

    --
    I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    1. Re:Yes you do. by Kohath · · Score: 1

      These sanctions were supposed to have the effect they are having on ZTE. They were supposed to hurt them a lot. Now he's reversing course because the sanctions actually worked? What type of example is that supposed to set for the future?

      You don’t know what conditions ZTE will have to abide by to get back in business.

    2. Re:Yes you do. by skam240 · · Score: 1

      So did we just win the trade war with China?

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    3. Re:Yes you do. by Kohath · · Score: 2

      There was no trade war. It’s a negotiation.

    4. Re:Yes you do. by skam240 · · Score: 1

      I realize this is happening completely separate from Trumps clearly announced trade wars (including the repeated naming of China as a primary target) but it sure seems incredibly odd put in that context.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
  14. Let me translate from the original by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The bribery check cleared, Trump is now our friend.

  15. America first ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    ... after China.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  16. On the plus side, don't think a chinese agent. by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    I think russia has something bad on President Trump so it colors my reaction to his actions which favor russia and literally meeting with Putin and his staff without another u.s. citizen present (not even an interpreter).

    But in this case, I think he just adores dictators/strongmen and china flatters Mr. Trump and he sucks it up. At least I don't suspect he's a chinese agent.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    1. Re:On the plus side, don't think a chinese agent. by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      The Russians are paying his bills. So long as he keeps them friendly he doesn't go bankrupt while in office.

  17. Visible part of Deals going on by DejaBu · · Score: 1

    Interesting to see what deals are going in the background. It will be a bit of a tightrope renegotiating the 800 billion+ yearly deficit with China. We have manufacturing jobs returning to America, though it's been historically very difficult to do deals within China without having to sign over IP etc. While that seems to be changing, I don't think we have enough 'high-margin' areas yet-opened up with China, either in terms of reciprocal tax rate or being able to have substantial ownership of Chinese side companies. p.s. Seems to be a bit of a poltical DNC advocate storm on this page - If you're simply posting 'drumpf bad', don't bother.

  18. It's the whiplash with a touch of insider trading by shanen · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Where is the insight in that tiny bit of fluff? There is an obvious peculiarity here: "Trump says America first, but NOT if it will hurt ZTE!" Not that the lie or self-contraindication is peculiar as regards Trump. The peculiar question is "Why?" Two obvious answer candidates:

    (1) Trump is begging Xi to lean on little Kim Jong-Un to play nice next month. I do think Kim is insane, but not nearly insane enough to trust Trump, and it is possible that Trump realizes how embarrassing this fiasco could become. Libya model indeed.

    (2) Someone is making money on this scam. Who did Trump telephone about this course reversal? Hint: Look for "sharp" investors who suddenly bought up a bunch of ZTE shares. In this case, we're back to the question of whether or not Trump got his own beak wet.

    Actually reminds me of the ongoing Cohen fiasco. Was Cohen keeping all the loot, or was he kicking some back to Trump? In either case, it's going to be really hard to pardon him (which means Cohen is going to flip and drag ALL of Trump's skeletons out of the closet).

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  19. Maybe this is brilliant? by MobyDisk · · Score: 2

    Maybe this is a brilliant move to show China that the US can win a trade war. He found an opportunity to bring a bring Chinese company to the edge of disaster, then calls up his counterparts in the Chinese government and says "Ya know, I *could* save ZTE, and those of us in the know could make a lot of money now that the stock sank, but here's what I want in return..."

  20. Re:It's the whiplash with a touch of insider tradi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    > Who did Trump telephone about this course reversal? Look for "sharp" investors who suddenly

    The trump crime family has a lot of business in china (for example, most of ivanka's merch is sourced from china). The "sharp" investor here could be trump himself, fishing for bribes that will be routed through his subsidiaries in country. It would not be unprecedented, almost immediately within a month of inauguration, china granted his family trademarks that they had been stalling on.

    Also, it should be pointed out, that ZTE was banned because they violated the sanctions on Iran. That's about the most damning proof that Benedict Donald DGAF about actually containing Iran.

  21. European countries take notes. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    So, from various news sources, the U.S. Commerce Department banned American companies from exporting products to ZTE for seven years because:

    The U.S. government accused ZTE of violating a March 2017 settlement in which the firm pleaded guilty and agreed to pay $1.19 billion for illegally shipping telecommunications equipment to Iran and North Korea.

    Now, after Trump pulled out of the Iran nuclear deal, he threatens European countries with sanctions if they continue the nuclear deal with Iran (w/o the US). Is he going to stand by that or fold if/when companies complain? How about if ZTE starts shipping things to Iran again? (Of course ZTE isn't a country or in Europe, but Trump doesn't know that.)

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  22. Re:It's the whiplash with a touch of insider tradi by Kohath · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hint: Look for "sharp" investors who suddenly bought up a bunch of ZTE shares. In this case, we're back to the question of whether or not Trump got his own beak wet.

    ZTE stock has not traded since April 17th, when the ban was announced.

    Also, you should grow up and stop making up stories.

  23. Re:It's the whiplash with a touch of insider tradi by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, it should "remind" you of the Cohen fiasco. That is what I was referring to. This is more of the same. He is out to help himself TO America.

  24. Public masturbation of 38547 by shanen · · Score: 1

    Z^-1

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  25. Re:It's the whiplash with a touch of insider tradi by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    It helps America because China made it a condition of the new trade deal. That deal will benefit America.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  26. Re:It's the whiplash with a touch of insider tradi by shanen · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I still think Trump's primary focus (and desperate hope) is to get Xi to lean on Kim. I read Trump as desperate to get something out of the June 12th meeting, but the most likely scenario is that Kim is teeing Trump up for a YUGE punt. Actually, Trump already defined a game of reverse chicken, by claiming he will "win" by walking out if he can't get what he wants. Under the terms of Trump's own game, I'm expecting Kim to walk out first and claim the win. China's next response to Trump will go along the lines of "Tut, tut, tut, Little Donald. Let's not do anything rash."

    That's predicated on the theory that China basically likes things as they are now. I think China sees a strong and unified Korea as a probable nuisance and possible threat. Unless China sees some substantial advantage in an actual peace treaty, they might as well leave things as they are. Meanwhile Bolton keeps braying about the "Libya model" and Kim knows exactly how that one worked out. No sane dictator would give up his nukes to follow Qaddafi's lead.

    My reasoning certainly could be flawed. I actually expected China to make a move before this. I figured the Chinese would offer Trump a deal of North Korea for Taiwan. I still think China is confident that they can integrate Taiwan with little problem and enormous profit, while South Korea would be kept busy for decades trying to heal and integrate North Korea. The lack of official peace in Korea has been mostly harmless, but the establishment of an independent Taiwan would really piss them off.

    However the troll did raise an interesting point regarding the insider trading, though I certainly can't take it on his say so. So how else could smart insiders profit from their phone calls with Trump if they don't want to be so obvious as playing with ZTE? Future contracts? Gambles on related companies, both suppliers and customers?

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  27. Re:It's the whiplash with a touch of insider tradi by Peter+P+Peters · · Score: 1

    I still think Trump's primary focus (and desperate hope) is to get Xi to lean on Kim.

    Seems like a foolish move. North Korea is the jewel in China global strategy crown. It is is one of the main reasons they can get away with Taiwan, Tibet, Spratly Islands, Africa etc. and give them a big security lever to allow their expansion plans. They will not give that up easily, and they already have Taiwan so it's not a big enough carrot.

  28. Re: Lol, only morons never change their views. by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    Oh, yeah. All the Chinese people who were buying ZTE phones will go 'huh' and buy an American brand phone instead.

  29. Re: It's the whiplash with a touch of insider trad by CaffeinatedBacon · · Score: 1

    Everyone's merchandise is sourced from China, it's kind of their thing.

  30. Re:It's the whiplash with a touch of insider tradi by currently_awake · · Score: 1

    The crackdown on China phones could be to force them to install surveilance and bugging software for the NSA. Once that is accomplished the pressure would be removed.

  31. Re:It's the whiplash with a touch of insider tradi by shanen · · Score: 1

    I'm kind of unclear on your point. Most of your comment seems to be about the relative value of Taiwan versus North Korea (and I think I agree with your assessment there), but you quoted the part of my comment that was narrowly focused on the meeting next month.

    Let me clarify that I think Xi could put enormous pressure on Kim to do various things, but I'm pretty sure he won't. In fact, one possible explanation for what is happening is that Xi wants to reduce Trump to Kim's level on the world stage, sort of a noisy nuisance that no one takes too seriously. (Same as Trump always was, but he never understood that and Trump is now living in total denial of reality.)

    However I am sure I disagree with you on the last part. China does not "have Taiwan" the way they want to have it. The trade ties are important, but they know they could get a much better deal with a few divisions stationed there. Also that would take care of any mumbling about independence.

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  32. Re:It's the whiplash with a touch of insider tradi by shanen · · Score: 1

    I think that theory has crossed into conspiracy terrain. It would be much easier to get the malware integrated into the components at the American end. Actually, they probably wouldn't add the malware itself, but the hidden capability to trigger the installation of malware at some later date. That way they could avoid exposing anything to the Chinese, but all of the devices made with the components would be ready to go whenever needed.

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  33. Re:It's the whiplash with a touch of insider tradi by LostInTaiwan · · Score: 3, Informative

    Given China lackluster record in "integrating" the hearts and minds of the Hong Kong residents, who were basically tossed to the wolves by the British after 99 years of dutifully generated revenues for the British Empire. Despite some last minute electoral reforms by the British prior to the 1997 hand over to China, Hong Kong was basically a colonial subject of the Crown without a tradition of electing its own executives.

    Taiwan, on the other hand, thanks to continuous US intervention since WWII, has blossomed into a fractious democracy, along with the requisite shares of protests, counter-protesters, counter-counter-protests.... and etc. Streets protest is almost a national past time, enjoyed by all demographic, from the young to the old, regardless of sexual orientation, or ethnic origin. Not to mentioned that unlike Hong Kong, Taiwan has its own military.

    Whether or not Taiwan's military that is being rapidly eclipsed by the Chinese military can hold its own against the Chinese is a vexing question for the island residents. However, the strategic value of loosing Taiwan to China mean loosing our pave paws radar in Taiwan, loosing our first island of defense against China and allowing China to control the sea lane that connects Japan and Korea to the half the world and their oil supply.

    Taiwan also has a fairly globalized semiconductor sector. Any disruption will be felt across the world. Any damage to Taiwan's infrastructure means rapid price inflation for anything good with semiconductor inside. Fab equipment aren't usually the type people can buy in quantities immediately.

    Given the rise of authoritarian China, the long term strategic and short term financial importance of a democratic Taiwan to people who enjoy free speech, especially in the digital medium, cannot be overstated.

    Sadly, to our smarter-than-thou president, it's all tl;dr. He is just happy to have found his NK mini-me.

    SAD . . .

  34. Trumo pledges to help Qualcomm by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

    There, fixed the title for you.

    ZTE wasn't banned from doing anything, Qualcomm and Intel were banned from selling stuff to ZTE.

    Memo to non-American companies: If you don't want to get fucked around by Trump don't buy American.

    MAGA: Make America Grate Again.

    --
    Watch this Heartland Institute video
  35. Re:Interesting the unpredictability of Trump by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

    People forget that Trump is not a politician he is a business man

    Failed.

    He is a failed businessman, who clearly demonstrates that he doesn't know how business works.

    --
    Watch this Heartland Institute video
  36. Re:It's the whiplash with a touch of insider tradi by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

    My reasoning certainly could be flawed. I actually expected China to make a move before this. I figured the Chinese would offer Trump a deal of North Korea for Taiwan. I still think China is confident that they can integrate Taiwan with little problem and enormous profit, while South Korea would be kept busy for decades trying to heal and integrate North Korea. The lack of official peace in Korea has been mostly harmless, but the establishment of an independent Taiwan would really piss them off.

    Interesting. If the Chinese could pull off such a deal, it would be quite brilliant. Getting rid of the embarrassment of Kim, while getting Taiwan which they always wanted.

    There are a few caveats though:
          -It would require Trump to betray Taiwan big time. Possible, but even Trump might think twice about that. Breaking agreements with an opponent (Iran) is one thing. Throwing a long term ally under the bus is another.
          -It presumes that Kim does not panic and attack everything in range. That is, with nukes and the artillery North Korea has still aimed at south Korea. Some of that can reach downtown Seoul.
          -Integrating Taiwan might take decades. But I think China is capable of taking the long view on that, they strike me as thinking longer-term than western politicians.

    --
    C - the footgun of programming languages
  37. Why even have laws with that president? by MoarSauce123 · · Score: 2

    So this means as a company you can break trade embargoes, then whine loud enough, and then Trump will bail you out? Why bother with laws and abiding to them if they become utterly meaningless under this president?

  38. Re:It's the whiplash with a touch of insider tradi by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 1

    Given China lackluster record in "integrating" the hearts and minds of the Hong Kong residents, who were basically tossed to the wolves by the British after 99 years of dutifully generated revenues for the British Empire. Despite some last minute electoral reforms by the British prior to the 1997 hand over to China, Hong Kong was basically a colonial subject of the Crown without a tradition of electing its own executives.

    This is quite right. Wish I could mod this up instead of having to comment. The UK wasn't interested at all in letting Hong Kong people have a big say in their own government and tried to get that snuck into the handover agreement where China rightly pointed out that it was kind of late in the game for the UK to want Hong Kongers to have a say in their local government because the UK sure wasn't interested in that at all prior to having to negotiate the handover.

    Taiwan, on the other hand, thanks to continuous US intervention since WWII, has blossomed into a fractious democracy, along with the requisite shares of protests, counter-protesters, counter-counter-protests.... and etc. Streets protest is almost a national past time, enjoyed by all demographic, from the young to the old, regardless of sexual orientation, or ethnic origin. Not to mentioned that unlike Hong Kong, Taiwan has its own military.

    This is quite right as well, not to mention that Ronald Reagan, patron saint of the Republican Party, stated during his presidency that the USA would not negotiate between China and Taiwan to settle the question of Taiwan. So frankly, Taiwan is not Trump's to bargain away. Taiwanese people are mostly not interested in joining China at any price and would rather live with their fractious democracy than enjoy the bliss of a one party state.

  39. Re:It's the whiplash with a touch of insider tradi by shanen · · Score: 1

    There seems to be some confusion here. I am NOT advocating that the Chinese communist form of corporate cancerism is superior to any other flavor. This is actually a separate topic, but I would argue that both capitalism and communism are dead and might as well be buried. Actually, there's a good argument that Taiwan is closer to capitalism than most countries these days, but it's the cancers that rule now.

    My point is about the real-world politics of power-based negotiations. Trump wants to "win" against North Korea, which is not likely even though North Korea is objectively extremely weak. Kim is basically holding two cards: (1) All the hostages in Seoul, and (2) China's support. Trump is trying to offer ZTE's survival to Xi as an inducement to lean on Kim, and I don't think it's going to work. Yes, Xi is probably pissed about the ZTE fiasco, but it isn't that important to him. It might even be to his advantage to blame Trump for the declining growth rate in China rather than admit the uglier reality that high rates of growth are never sustainable.

    Then again, maybe someone isn't talking to me. Some parts of this discussion seem pretty confused, even if I started the branch.

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  40. Re:It's the whiplash with a touch of insider tradi by shanen · · Score: 1

    I can speculatively address your second point. I was speculating that China would invade BOTH of them. As long as the US stayed out of it, I think China could overwhelm and control the little ones. After the fact was accomplished, they would just take the nukes and leave North Korea for South Korea to clean up, while focusing their own cleanup on Taiwan.

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  41. Wrong Question by prefec2 · · Score: 1

    How much as ZTE payed to Cohen?

  42. Ah. So trump helps china more than usa by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Seriously, trump does more for china and Russia than he does for America. We layoff here and too bad. China business layoff because Chinese gov owned business was giving American secrets out all over, and trump has to save them.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  43. Re:It's the whiplash with a touch of insider tradi by mikael · · Score: 1

    A Chinese company suspected of putting spyware in their mobile phones, sells those phones to Iran. I could see some benefits here.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  44. Re:It's the whiplash with a touch of insider tradi by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

    ZTE was not publicly traded. You can trade stock off the exchange. And if you were arranging a payoff to a Trump associate, that's exactly how you would do it.

    I'm not accusing anyone of that happening in this case, but I'm saying if it did, your counterargument is pretty nonsensical.

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
  45. damn autocorrect by CaffeinatedBacon · · Score: 1

    and it isn't just

  46. Re: It's the whiplash with a touch of insider trad by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

    Short on the way down, go long at the bottom. It's the insider trading / market manipulator way.

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  47. Re:It's the whiplash with a touch of insider tradi by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

    Two obvious answer candidates:

    Three actually:

    (3). It's Trump. He'll say one thing one day, the opposite the next, and something else again on the third day.

    How long has he been president and you still haven't noticed this?

  48. Re:It's the whiplash with a touch of insider tradi by shanen · · Score: 1

    I've noticed. Actually, I think one of Trump's most amazing characteristics is what a terrible liar he is. It's kind of like political humor. The joke depends on understanding the reality, and Trump can't lie well because he can't recognize such basic concepts as truth and reality upon which to base more sophisticated lies.

    Time for my little ontology of lies, but let me see if I can just dig up a link... That's extremely interesting. I know exactly what to look for and I know that I've published it in many places on the Web, and yet the google doesn't return ANY link to my writing. I even pushed it by adding my name to some of the searches, and still came up dry. However, one of the early hits is from someone else, who is an Internet acquaintance and who is citing my ontology as the first part of his comment.

    https://plus.google.com/104092...

    Hey, if the search engines [I double-checked with Bing] can't find it, then that's the same as never having written it these days.

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.