Slashdot Mirror


President Trump Pledges To Help China's ZTE, After Ban (usatoday.com)

President Trump said Sunday that he and Chinese President Xi Jinping are working to put the troubled Chinese telecom manufacturer ZTE back in business. From a report: "President Xi of China, and I, are working together to give massive Chinese phone company, ZTE, a way to get back into business, fast," Trump said in a message on Twitter. "Too many jobs in China lost. Commerce Department has been instructed to get it done!" ZTE, maker of Android phones popular with budget-minded consumers, said Wednesday that it would cease "major operating activities," raising questions not only about its survival, but the impact on U.S. consumers who have previously bought or were thinking of buying ZTE phones. The announcement followed a decision last month by the U.S. Commerce Department, which banned American companies from exporting products to the Shenzhen, China-based telecom firm for seven years.

38 of 230 comments (clear)

  1. MCGA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Really, how does this help America? It only makes me suspicious that Trump or some of his buddies want to swoop in and get the stock for pennies on the dollar.

    1. Re:MCGA? by 110010001000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You must be kidding. Trump isn't out to help America. He is out to help himself. Morally and ethically bankrupt.

    2. Re: MCGA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Elect a clown, get a circus.

      Hire incompetent devs, get broken Unicode support.

      Some things never change.

    3. Re: MCGA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yep, he's really draining the swamp (by installing a pipeline leading directly to the Oval Office) and disrupting the status quo (by chucking grenades around randomly, forcing everyone to panic regardless of political alignment). #MAGA

    4. Re:MCGA? by Joce640k · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Really, how does this help America? It only makes me suspicious that Trump or some of his buddies want to swoop in and get the stock for pennies on the dollar.

      Yep, he probably bought up gazillions of shares last week when they collapsed. Now he's using his position as President to boost his personal retirement fund.

      --
      No sig today...
    5. Re:MCGA? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Really, how does this help America? It only makes me suspicious that Trump or some of his buddies want to swoop in and get the stock for pennies on the dollar.

      Yep, he probably bought up gazillions of shares last week when they collapsed. Now he's using his position as President to boost his personal retirement fund.

      More likely, the last person who spoke with him (or a Fox News commentator) already owns a bunch of ZTE stock, was getting soaked and advised him to help out -- Headline to read: "Trump Saves Chinese Company" (ignoring why they needed saving)

      Trump doesn't read anything (longer than 140 characters, anyway), doesn't really know (or care to know) anything, has no moral compass, and has the attention span of a goldfish, so he's easily swayed by the last thing he hears. (I love to be proven wrong, but don't think I am)

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    6. Re: MCGA? by cunina · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hey, now â" I wouldnâ(TM)t call the Unicodeâ support âoebroken.â More like, itâ(TM)s a mélange of character sets that donâ(TM)t render the same on every device. The handful of people using iOS should wait until the trusty developers at Slashdot finish their jalapeño tamales and AÃaà bowls, then theyâ(TM)ll fix it.

    7. Re:MCGA? by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 2

      Really, how does this help America? .

      Its a great way to gain some leverage with China. We'll help ZTE if they agree to other stuff that helps the US, like cracking down on other unfair trade practices.

    8. Re:MCGA? by Luckyo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Concessions he gets in return. This seems to be something forgotten by generations raised post Cold War era. Power politics are not just about negotiating. They're about negotiating from the position of power.

      CCP's primary reason for economic development is employment, as employment reduces social unrest. Social unrest is the primary boogie man of CCP, which is terrified of its own people. That is why they maintain the steel production in otherwise poor northern China in spite of massive oversupply it is causing on the world markets, and all the anti-China tensions that go with it. Can't afford mass unemployment and unrest it will cause.

      Same applies here. Trump has shown once again that he understands power politics. He has CCP by the balls on this one, and now, he can actually negotiate.

    9. Re:MCGA? by willy_me · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, it is probably why China allowed him to register the "Trump" trade name right after being elected despite being denied for so many years. It is a decision that is quite easy to reverse. If this were about buying and selling stock there would be a paper trail and China (not Trump) is too smart for that.

      This is why sitting presidents should forgo all their business interests when taking on the position of president. Otherwise, it is impossible to not have conflicts of interest. There will always be the desire to work for oneself at the expense of the country they serve.

    10. Re:MCGA? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Informative

      http://www.bbc.com/news/busine...

      "Beijing has made resolving the situation with ZTE, which employs about 80,000 people, one of its demands for striking a broader trade agreement with with US."

      Trump has no choice, other than to burn the whole deal. We know he doesn't like to lose.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  2. WTF? by TiberiusKirk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Literally, What The Fuck?!!! He's a fucking buffoon with no coherent plan for anything.

    1. Re: WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Good cop, bad cop doesn't work when its only one cop. Trump is playing both sides as if he has split personality disorder. Actually, it is his pathological lying that is the problem.

    2. Re:WTF? by Peter+P+Peters · · Score: 2

      Literally, What The Fuck?!!! He's a fucking buffoon with no coherent plan for anything.

      You say that like it's a surprise?

  3. Well, he did promise... by GerryGilmore · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...JOBS, JOBS, JOBS! He just didn't mention that they would be Chinese jobs.

  4. Excuse... excuse... by hackingbear · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Making up excuse to punish ZTE in the first place. And now making up excuse to back down failing to get more from negotiation.

  5. ZTE knows the magic numbers... by MostAwesomeDude · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...specifically, the routing numbers for Michael Cohen's checking account~

    But seriously, did any money have to change hands, or is this just Trump showing his admiration for Xi's continuing march towards tyranny?

    --
    ~ C.
  6. Smells like BS by fred911 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ZTE had been a major international producer long before entering the US market. I doubt elimination from the US market makes it insolvent by any means. Whereas the US market may have possibly been the most profitable, they didn't play nice and got kicked off the playground. Boohoo, wake up, they're just another arm of the party.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    1. Re:Smells like BS by postmortem · · Score: 4, Informative

      It is not about US market, it is about now being illegal for US companies to license software (like Google Play) and hardware (like CPU chips) to ZTE.

  7. Makes sense! by forgottenusername · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ZTE repeatedly violated the US sanctions against Iran, and lied to the government while in remediation. Now that the US has broken it's international agreement w/Iran & is threatening sanctions against our global partners who were also part of the agreement, the only logical 5d chess move is to get ZTE back in the business of selling security-compromised devices to Americans. Using the Dept of Commerce, paid for by American tax dollars.

    I would be shocked if this was a backroom quid pro quo deal with China to expand the Trump brand business interests. Shocked I say.

    tl;dr Jobs Jobs Jobs!

    1. Re:Makes sense! by mrclmn · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's almost as though Trump thinks ZTE is a Russian company.

    2. Re:Makes sense! by Duds · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The giveaway here is that Breitbart have chosen to pretend it never happened. If even they can't spin it, you know he screwed up.

    3. Re:Makes sense! by cold+fjord · · Score: 2

      . . . the only logical 5d chess move is to get ZTE back in the business of selling security-compromised devices to Americans. Using the Dept of Commerce, paid for by American tax dollars.

      I would be shocked if this was a backroom quid pro quo deal with China to expand the Trump brand business interests. Shocked I say.

      I take it you're not a big 5d chess player either.

      We now know why Trump suddenly reversed course on sanctions against a Chinese tech giant

      President Donald Trump’s decision to reverse sanctions on Chinese telecom giant ZTE was part of a larger trade agreement, according to a new report.
      - In exchange for easing the restrictions on ZTE, the Chinese government will not impose tariffs on US agricultural products like pork and wine.
      - The agricultural tariffs were imposed by China in response to Trump’s steel and aluminum tariffs.
      - The deal is not finalized yet and details still need to be worked out.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    4. Re:Makes sense! by cold+fjord · · Score: 2

      You got me curious with that statement, so I checked. It seems you're wrong in more than one respect. Breitbart carried a story on it, and there seems to be a bigger game at play.

      Kudlow on Administration’s China Trade Actions: ‘Don’t Blame Trump, Blame China’

      We now know why Trump suddenly reversed course on sanctions against a Chinese tech giant

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  8. Backroom Deals by Stomper_Stoddard · · Score: 2

    This has backroom deal written all over it, although I am not sure why Putin wants ZTE propped up.

    Trump is not draining the swamp, he is drinking from the swamp.

  9. I don't know what's worse by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    the rampant corruption, the back pedaling on all his campaign promises (backed down on Carrier, supports Guest Worker programs & TPP, just gave Big Pharma a big present, filled his cabinet with Goldman Sach's folks that embody the swamp... I could go on) or the fact that no matter what his poll #s don't budge from 38-40%.

    The first year of this crap I could chalk up to the news cycle catching up with folks who don't watch politics. But at this point folks are sticking with him out of either stubbornness or a desire to see those "coastal elites" mad. That's some mighty fine face spiting right there, Lou.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:I don't know what's worse by whoever57 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I am convinced that Trump supporters will continue to support him, irrespective of what he does, as long as he enables their xenophobic and racist tendencies.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    2. Re:I don't know what's worse by GrimSavant · · Score: 2

      We've always been at war with Eurasia.

      I also find it remarkable how stable the level of support is in face of this madness. The administration has told us that 2+2=5 so many times that the opposition can't believe anything it says anymore, and so when you get reversals like this on ZTE's violation of the Iran sanctions the conclusion jumps straight to corruption, because even if there is a reasonable justification for playing nice with the Chinese there is absolutely no apparent coherence to what Trump is doing.

      And on the other side, his supporters seem to love him shouting at us that 2+2=5 because that triggers snowflakes, and nothing seems to matter anymore. Rather depressing since sometimes reality likes to assert itself in extremely unpleasant ways, whether it be after a trade war with China starts blowing up businesses both here and there, or worse if it leads to shooting war with someone like Iran.

  10. This makes no sense by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let me be clear - I do not agree with Trump’s short-sighted and backwards-thinking trade war. But isn’t the whole point of a trade war to put the hurt on the companies and consumers based in the other country, which increases the pressure on the other government to make concessions?

    Trump is basically giving away his leverage - so instead of both countries being hurt by the trade war, now it’s Americans who’ll take the brunt of the pain. Good job, “master” deal maker.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:This makes no sense by squiggleslash · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The ZTE ban has little or nothing to do with any trade war. It's a straightforward consequence of the pre-existing sanctions against Iran. ZTE sold US technologies to Iran.

      Whether we should be sanctioning Iran, or trying to build a better relationship with them (they're horrible, but in some ways they're one of the least horrible regimes in that region - still, compared to Saudi Arabia, who isn't moderately better?) is another question. But it makes little sense to have sanctions and then say "Hey, it's OK, no biggie" when someone actually violates them.

      Also worth noting: ZTE is also implicated in some spyware stuff, that's bad enough to ensure ZTE phones are banned by the US military. It's not like a friendly company committed an oopsie.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  11. Yes you do. by skam240 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "When there’s a detour because of road construction, do you continue to drive straight ahead at full speed, mowing down the road crew, because that was your original plan?"

    You do if the whole point of driving by the detour was to smash into the road crew.

    These sanctions were supposed to have the effect they are having on ZTE. They were supposed to hurt them a lot. Now he's reversing course because the sanctions actually worked? What type of example is that supposed to set for the future? "Sure, the US might put crippling sanctions on us over our actions but if we apologize they'll make it all better!"

    --
    I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    1. Re:Yes you do. by Kohath · · Score: 2

      There was no trade war. It’s a negotiation.

  12. It's the whiplash with a touch of insider trading by shanen · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Where is the insight in that tiny bit of fluff? There is an obvious peculiarity here: "Trump says America first, but NOT if it will hurt ZTE!" Not that the lie or self-contraindication is peculiar as regards Trump. The peculiar question is "Why?" Two obvious answer candidates:

    (1) Trump is begging Xi to lean on little Kim Jong-Un to play nice next month. I do think Kim is insane, but not nearly insane enough to trust Trump, and it is possible that Trump realizes how embarrassing this fiasco could become. Libya model indeed.

    (2) Someone is making money on this scam. Who did Trump telephone about this course reversal? Hint: Look for "sharp" investors who suddenly bought up a bunch of ZTE shares. In this case, we're back to the question of whether or not Trump got his own beak wet.

    Actually reminds me of the ongoing Cohen fiasco. Was Cohen keeping all the loot, or was he kicking some back to Trump? In either case, it's going to be really hard to pardon him (which means Cohen is going to flip and drag ALL of Trump's skeletons out of the closet).

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  13. Maybe this is brilliant? by MobyDisk · · Score: 2

    Maybe this is a brilliant move to show China that the US can win a trade war. He found an opportunity to bring a bring Chinese company to the edge of disaster, then calls up his counterparts in the Chinese government and says "Ya know, I *could* save ZTE, and those of us in the know could make a lot of money now that the stock sank, but here's what I want in return..."

  14. Re:It's the whiplash with a touch of insider tradi by Kohath · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hint: Look for "sharp" investors who suddenly bought up a bunch of ZTE shares. In this case, we're back to the question of whether or not Trump got his own beak wet.

    ZTE stock has not traded since April 17th, when the ban was announced.

    Also, you should grow up and stop making up stories.

  15. Re:It's the whiplash with a touch of insider tradi by shanen · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I still think Trump's primary focus (and desperate hope) is to get Xi to lean on Kim. I read Trump as desperate to get something out of the June 12th meeting, but the most likely scenario is that Kim is teeing Trump up for a YUGE punt. Actually, Trump already defined a game of reverse chicken, by claiming he will "win" by walking out if he can't get what he wants. Under the terms of Trump's own game, I'm expecting Kim to walk out first and claim the win. China's next response to Trump will go along the lines of "Tut, tut, tut, Little Donald. Let's not do anything rash."

    That's predicated on the theory that China basically likes things as they are now. I think China sees a strong and unified Korea as a probable nuisance and possible threat. Unless China sees some substantial advantage in an actual peace treaty, they might as well leave things as they are. Meanwhile Bolton keeps braying about the "Libya model" and Kim knows exactly how that one worked out. No sane dictator would give up his nukes to follow Qaddafi's lead.

    My reasoning certainly could be flawed. I actually expected China to make a move before this. I figured the Chinese would offer Trump a deal of North Korea for Taiwan. I still think China is confident that they can integrate Taiwan with little problem and enormous profit, while South Korea would be kept busy for decades trying to heal and integrate North Korea. The lack of official peace in Korea has been mostly harmless, but the establishment of an independent Taiwan would really piss them off.

    However the troll did raise an interesting point regarding the insider trading, though I certainly can't take it on his say so. So how else could smart insiders profit from their phone calls with Trump if they don't want to be so obvious as playing with ZTE? Future contracts? Gambles on related companies, both suppliers and customers?

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  16. Re:It's the whiplash with a touch of insider tradi by LostInTaiwan · · Score: 3, Informative

    Given China lackluster record in "integrating" the hearts and minds of the Hong Kong residents, who were basically tossed to the wolves by the British after 99 years of dutifully generated revenues for the British Empire. Despite some last minute electoral reforms by the British prior to the 1997 hand over to China, Hong Kong was basically a colonial subject of the Crown without a tradition of electing its own executives.

    Taiwan, on the other hand, thanks to continuous US intervention since WWII, has blossomed into a fractious democracy, along with the requisite shares of protests, counter-protesters, counter-counter-protests.... and etc. Streets protest is almost a national past time, enjoyed by all demographic, from the young to the old, regardless of sexual orientation, or ethnic origin. Not to mentioned that unlike Hong Kong, Taiwan has its own military.

    Whether or not Taiwan's military that is being rapidly eclipsed by the Chinese military can hold its own against the Chinese is a vexing question for the island residents. However, the strategic value of loosing Taiwan to China mean loosing our pave paws radar in Taiwan, loosing our first island of defense against China and allowing China to control the sea lane that connects Japan and Korea to the half the world and their oil supply.

    Taiwan also has a fairly globalized semiconductor sector. Any disruption will be felt across the world. Any damage to Taiwan's infrastructure means rapid price inflation for anything good with semiconductor inside. Fab equipment aren't usually the type people can buy in quantities immediately.

    Given the rise of authoritarian China, the long term strategic and short term financial importance of a democratic Taiwan to people who enjoy free speech, especially in the digital medium, cannot be overstated.

    Sadly, to our smarter-than-thou president, it's all tl;dr. He is just happy to have found his NK mini-me.

    SAD . . .

  17. Why even have laws with that president? by MoarSauce123 · · Score: 2

    So this means as a company you can break trade embargoes, then whine loud enough, and then Trump will bail you out? Why bother with laws and abiding to them if they become utterly meaningless under this president?