Slashdot Mirror


Facebook's Android App Is Asking for Superuser Privileges, Users Say (bleepingcomputer.com)

Catalin Cimpanu, reporting for BleepingComputer: The Facebook Android app is asking for superuser permissions, and a bunch of users are freaking out about granting the Facebook app full access to their device, an understandable reaction following the fallout from the Cambridge Analytica privacy scandal. "Grants full access to your device," read the prompts while asking users for superuser permissions. These popups originate from the official Facebook Android app (com.facebook.katana) and are started appearing last night [UTC timezone], continuing throughout the day. Panicked users took to social media, Reddit, and Android-themed forums to share screengrabs of these suspicious popups and ask for advice on what's going on.

32 of 183 comments (clear)

  1. No need to freak out by DickBreath · · Score: 4, Funny

    No need to be freak outing. Just grant access for Facebook. Nothing could go wrong.

    The Facebook
    Is Your Friend
    Trust The Facebook

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    1. Re:No need to freak out by alexhs · · Score: 2, Informative

      Funny, I practically had the opposite reaction:

      No need to freak out, just say "hell no", and when their mobile usage drops close to 0, it's FaceBook that will freak out...

      It already dropped dramatically with the #deletefacebook movement, right ? Right ?

      --
      I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of killer sig, which this margin is too narrow to contain.
    2. Re:No need to freak out by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2

      No need to be freak outing.

      They should all freak themselves out for using Facebook at all in the first place.

      Hey, now they will come out with "Freakbook" . . .

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    3. Re:No need to freak out by bondsbw · · Score: 5, Informative

      Facebook needs the following permissions:

      • Vote in government elections for you
      • Full access to your bank account

      The masses: "Eh... odd, but I really need to check Facebook." [OK]

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
  2. com.facebook.katana dishonorabru! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't know if it's algorithmic, or if most of my close friends just hardly use facebook anymore, but it seems like I just rarely see anything anymore in my feed anymore that I care about. It also seems weird that what does appear is generally from people I'm very faint acquaintances with -- if I am curious about one of my actual friends I pretty much have to go straight to their profile.

    Besides that though, I think it just encourages behaviors I don't really enjoy seeing in my friends. I definitely know people who in real-life are totally cool, but their social media presence makes me question why I ever liked them in the first place. Mostly I see a lot of:

    1) very overt attention seeking for pretty lame things (like, pretty girls posting selfies of themselves doing nothing interesting, or dudes with gym photos, that kind of thing) 2) Extremely broad and poorly thought out political rants 3) sharing really vapid motivational quotes 4) people being maybe a little too vulnerable to a very broad audience, to the point where it's awkward. 5) This one is the worst of all. People taking passive aggressive swipes at individuals by posting very vague status updates. I hate stuff like that.

    I don't think of myself as a super judgmental person, but whenever I get on facebook I spend half my time just thinking "really?" and then feeling kind of gross.

    1. Re:com.facebook.katana dishonorabru! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Leave Facebook. You'll feel a lot better.

  3. Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    #deletefacebook

    Literally. Just remove that shit from your phone already! Then go out and do something more constructive with your life, rather than lazily scrolling through other people's "The best ..." life moments.

    1. Re:Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      #deletefacebook

      Oh, a "hashtag". Let's start a campaign about how shit one social network is on another shit social network.

    2. Re:Solution by mukinrestak · · Score: 5, Informative

      IIRC my stock ROM on my last phone had facebook installed as an unremovable app. Depending on the phone's bootloader situation that could mean some folks CAN'T remove spywarebook. (Or their manufacturer's homebrewed spyware either)

  4. No big deal by DogDude · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's really no big deal. What other data could they possibly collect that they don't have already? They have your location at every second of the day. They have all of your contacts. They have all of your emails and text messages. What else could they get that they don't have, already?

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:No big deal by Ecuador · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, I guess full access would also allow them to either edit your stuff (here are some new contacts, yay!) or delete them?
      I admit I use facebook since it is the only way to keep contact with certain people, but I only have messanger installed - the app takes over 200MB on a phone which is a suspiciously large size for an app that does part of the things that a badly designed website does...

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    2. Re:No big deal by Thelasko · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The app already asks for every single permission available.

      The purpose of the Facebook app is:

      1. harvest as much data as possible
      1. bypass as many protections/ad blockers as possible

      If you absolutely must use Facebook on your phone, do it using a web browser that is well secured. You won't really miss out on anything, but Facebook will.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    3. Re:No big deal by ctilsie242 · · Score: 2

      If you read the Android manifest, the perms Facebook ask for is almost like a novel. I wouldn't be surprised if ACCESS_SUPERUSER was in there.

      I miss XPrivacy. If a generic fleshlight app asks for every permission under the sun, it can have them... except it will fetch random strings for contacts, the location would be at the same spot all the time, the microphone and camera would give static. XPrivacy Lua should be its replacement, but it has a ways to go.

      Barring that, I wish phone makers would allow for virtualization. That way, work stuff would be in one container/VM/partition, home stuff could be in another, and Facebook and other privacy-challenge apps would be in a safe space all to their own.

  5. Why do they care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Facebook users have already granted Facebook access to their life, and even parts of the lives of people around who are trying to stay out of its clutches, to boot. There is very little Facebook does not collect about you.

      Why the crocodile tears when Facebook users are the ones who have voted in surveillance clusterfuck?

  6. Shocked I tell you by Urinal+Pube · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm most surprised that someone with enough technical merit to root their phone, would install the FB app to begin with.

  7. No big deal by ArchieBunker · · Score: 2

    The app already asks for every single permission available.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  8. Got rid of the apps a long time ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I got rid of any app that basically just mimics going to a website.

    While I still use facebook (though at a limited capacity). I was tired of the app draining my battery, but also was very wary of all the stuff it was trying to get access to.

    But in general I don't understand installing an app for a service that's offered via a website.

  9. Facebook by ledow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hey Facebook.

    Make one app. That has messenger in it. With a bunch of options of what I want it to do (run all the time for messenger, read my photos, etc.).

    Try and not make it an app that literally sucks up all my storage just browsing (my gf filled her phone up twice to the brim, when we looked it was all data stored in the Facebook app - removed the app, reinstalled, all was fine again)

    Then, maybe, just maybe, I'll consider installing it. But JUST that. Nothing else. No other apps to do the same thing. And, no, you really don't require (or will ever get) one percent of the permissions your current apps demand.

    To be honest, the fact that you DELIBERATELY break the Facebook mobile website to remove messenger (when "View as Desktop Site" shows it perfectly well but in a not-nice format) pisses me off more than anything. You are literally trying to force me to use the apps and I have no interest in that.

    You know what happens when you try to force people to use products/services they have no interest in? They go elsewhere.

    Another 5 years and Facebook will be like MySpace is now.

  10. Latest News.... by niittyniemi · · Score: 4, Funny

    Apparently, Facebook are now saying that the message is clearly a bug. It was meant to say:

    "Do you want to continue to be anally raped by a multi-billion spying operation run by a dwarf with no moral compass?{Y/n]"

    For those with a room temperature IQ (in celsius) you want to hit "Yes". Everybody else wants to hit "No".

    --
    The Machine stops.
  11. We have this thread every week it seems by nimbius · · Score: 4, Informative

    1. Facebook is busted for some privacy violation users glossed over in the terms of service but are now outraged about.
    2. Facebook admits its doing the thing it said it would, but that everything is working to help users.
    3. some nameless third party chimes in and accidentally shows the meat counter to the cattle.
    4. Facebook walks back its original statement, revises its terms to explicitly refuse service to the third party that outed it, and everyones fine.

    The only winning move is not to play. Just delete the god damn app already and leave facebook. Absolutely none of it is for your direct benefit. A multinational megacorporation has found a way to turn your friends into a carrot you'll follow into a slaughterhouse that carves up your personal information and sells it to the real customers.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  12. There is worse by volodymyrbiryuk · · Score: 5, Informative

    The fact that the shitty FB app is preinstalled on many android devices (and cannot be removet without root) is far worse.

    --
    sudo rm -r -f --no-preserve-root /
  13. No big deal by WindBourne · · Score: 5, Informative

    Say no and uninstall it.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  14. Get a better su program... by ctilsie242 · · Score: 4, Informative

    The good su apps on Android will not, by default, allow a program to present a su dialog unless the app manifest in the Google Play Store has ACCESS_SUPERUSER declared.

    What bothers me is that this is something that has to be explicitly coded. Why would an app -ever- request this by accident, is beyond me.

    1. Re:Get a better su program... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 2

      ...Why would an app -ever- request this by accident, is beyond me....

      My thoughts exactly. It was an accident only because they got caught.

  15. I'm collecting screen-shots of app whoring by pecosdave · · Score: 2

    I'm planning to make a nice-big write up about what it means to browse Facebook on a traditional browser while using a mobile phone, using screen-shots for reference. The amount of begging, strong-arming, and general "feature isolation" they pull when you use a mobile browser (that worked five years ago) is astounding. "Request Desktop Site" sometimes gets you around some of that, sometimes it causes other weird things to happen.

    Facebook is evil. I want to jettison it outright and just move to Minds and Steemit. Unfortunately Facebook is where the people are, especially family. I make my family posts there and my general posts elsewhere. I really want to move the family away.....

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
  16. Re:They what now? by religionofpeas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The problem is, in the case of Facebook (and Twitter), there is no "elsewhere" to go to. Seriously, go to what?

    Go outside ?

  17. Re:Default Android install does not allow superuse by misxn · · Score: 4, Informative

    What's going on is that the user that found this has rooted his phone and noticed that the FB app requested for privilege escalation. An Android user who hasn't rooted his phone will not see such a request (from any app) since they don't have root to begin with. This is either a bug in the code that triggered privileged escalation, OR it is intentional. You pick. :)

  18. bill_mcgonigle by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2

    I'll be shocked if this wasn't developer code that should have been ifdeffed out for the final build. Most phones can't get Superuser, and every phone that can puts up a big dialog asking for permission first - there's just literally no way to sneak Superuser permission on Android and it's a very ineffective route for spying. This probably has something to do with the really kludgy file system access permissions that Android has been enforcing for a few releases now, hasn't been fixed yet, and is useful for making development a real pain in the neck.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  19. Re:Even silly games like MonsterStrike require it by AvitarX · · Score: 2

    That's seems about right, I don't know ow the game though.

    Contacts = invite friends
    Location = ads (the only one that seems questionable
    USB = get character avatar
    Wi-fi = warn when doing a large update not on WiFi
    Network = ads
    Run at start up. = Notifications = ads (another questionable one for a random game.

    Basically permissions are worthless, since everything wants access to your photos for some stupid reason, and everything needs network and location to advertise.

    I do like that the apps ask when they use in now, so I I can see, oh yes, they want access to my photos because I'm sending a photo the first time.

    --
    Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  20. Re:They what now? by religionofpeas · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Once again, WHAT do you suggest realistically replaces Facebook for most people, today? Crickets? Yeah that's what I thought buddy

    It's like asking what you suggest to replace junk food and cigarettes. As long as you insist on exactly the same experience, nothing can replace it, obviously.

  21. Re:Laziness and incompetence. by religionofpeas · · Score: 2

    I would like an option to select exactly what kind of permissions I grant an app. If I then try to use it in a way that requires additional permissions, it would pop up a request saying that it needs permission to use such-and-such to proceed, allowing me a choice of a one-time or permanent extension of the permissions.

  22. Re: Laziness and incompetence. by tepples · · Score: 2

    Let me know when a major U.S. electronics showroom chain offers phones warranted to run LineageOS.