Slashdot Mirror


London Launches World's First Contactless Payment Scheme For Street Performers (theverge.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: Here's a casualty of the cashless society you might not have previously thought of: the humble street performer. After all, if more of us are paying our way with smartphones and contactless cards, how can we give spare change to musicians on the subway? London has one solution: a new scheme that outfits performers with contactless payment terminals. The project was launched this weekend by the city's mayor, Sadiq Khan, and is a collaboration with Busk In London (a professional body for buskers) and the Swedish payments firm iZettle (which was bought this month by PayPal for $2.2 billion). A select few performers have been testing iZettle's contactless readers on the streets for the past few weeks, and Khan now says the scheme will be rolled out across London's 32 boroughs.

162 comments

  1. Hooray! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now "Sorry, I don't carry cash" is no excuse. We can all donate to those unsung heroes of our society, people who do robot dances in the middle of the sidewalk.

    1. Re:Hooray! by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Informative

      Except this is not the first. WeChat and AliPay can be used to pay street performers, beggars, homeless bums, etc., and unlike this scheme, they don't require an expensive reader. Just a QR sticker that can be printed out for about 2 cents, and placed on the performer's sign.

      Now "Sorry, I don't carry cash" is no excuse.

      You can claim that your cell battery is dead.

    2. Re:Hooray! by SpankiMonki · · Score: 1

      You can claim that your cell battery is dead.

      Thanks for the...tip?

    3. Re: Hooray! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And with those, the tourists who actually stop to see the performers can pay.

      As someone who doesnâ(TM)t care much for British privacy laws, I would not register to use a government sponsored app in the UK. I can only imagine it being even more invasive than the Facebook app.

    4. Re: Hooray! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hong Konger here with access to these apps: WeChat is probably much worse than Facebook app in terms of invasivness, I uninstalled it after it tried to use camera and mic while in background a few times. Alipay so far is fine, but then they do require your ID before they'd let you pay with credit card (so I just deposit small amount of money in it for use ahead of time now...)

      You're probably better off with whatever app the UK made if you are concerned about privacy.

    5. Re: Hooray! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much to #freetommy?

    6. Re: Hooray! by shilly · · Score: 2

      It's just a point-of-sales terminal. Use Apple Pay and relax. And the London mayor is really not part of "the government"

    7. Re:Hooray! by thegarbz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Now "Sorry, I don't carry cash" is no excuse.

      You can claim that your cell battery is dead.

      Or you could just say no. Works just as well. Mind you if lying because you feel you would otherwise be a bad person makes you feel better about yourself then by all means.

    8. Re:Hooray! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sweden and The Netherlands (more specifically: Amsterdam) have been using QR codes since 2013 and 2016 respectively to donate to the homeless.

    9. Re: Hooray! by houghi · · Score: 1

      If you stop for more than a minute, you owe them. We are talking about performers, not beggars. The first will get something if they are able to entertain me. The second group I nnever give anything where I live as there is enough of a social net for me not needing to feed their alcoholism or pther addiction. There is also help for thag.
      I already pay for it vua taxes. No need to do a gesture just to make mefeel good.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    10. Re: Hooray! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you don't owe them. You are not required to 'move along', you can hang out on the streets anywhere. If they don't want freeloaders, they can use a tent or something.

    11. Re: Hooray! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct. You owe them nothing. But if you stand and watch and have a good time and don't consider throwing some cash or wish you had cash to throw, odds are you're not a good person.

      You don't have to post an angry reply and prove it. Just consider that there's a strong chance you have work to do on yourself.

    12. Re: Hooray! by Geeky · · Score: 1

      You don't have to sign up for an app. The performers are being given contactless payment readers. These work with any contactless credit card.

      You can also use Apple Pay or Google Pay if you choose.

      The point is to make it as easy as possible to give money. Making people download apps is not the way to do that. Whether you trust a card reader from a random street performer is another matter...

      Incidentally, and off topic, the app aspect is a factor with parking. Many UK councils are implementing app methods to pay for parking. Rather than something like this, that works with credit cards or phones, they seem to be adopting apps. And there are loads of them - take a long trip and you could end up being asked to install a permission hungry app for every town you stop in just to pay for parking.

      --
      Sigs are so 1990s. No way would I be seen dead with one.
    13. Re:Hooray! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the...tip?

      I was pretty sure the tip was all you could handle. We'll try for the whole thing next time.

    14. Re:Hooray! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could just say no. Works just as well. Mind you if lying because you feel you would otherwise be a bad person makes you feel better about yourself then by all means.

      As long as you don't pay them. They're more likely to go away if you don't pay them, so that's the ideal scenario.

    15. Re: Hooray! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You can also use Apple Pay or Google Pay if you choose."

      I always just use those damn Canadian coins that show up in my wallet.

    16. Re:Hooray! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, ran out of battery...

    17. Re: Hooray! by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      If you stop for more than a minute, you owe them.

      By reading this post the reader hereby declares they will send $1 via paypal to the author to compensate the time spent disputing this stupid arguement.

      I'll be waiting for my payment.

    18. Re:Hooray! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except this is not the first. WeChat and AliPay can be used to pay street performers, beggars, homeless bums, etc., and unlike this scheme, they don't require an expensive reader. Just a QR sticker that can be printed out for about 2 cents, and placed on the performer's sign.

      That doesn't invalidate the first for "contactless" method of pay. WeChat and AliPay aren't contactless but rather a different electronic payment method. I don't say that contactless is a good way. I just want to point out that the method you are talking about is different from what in TFA.

  2. It's called Steele by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And you don't have to get peed on to be tainted forever.

  3. oh no by negrace · · Score: 1

    Not the crusty jugglers. Who's next? Homeless people?

    1. Re:oh no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just don't mention Muslims and they should be fine.

    2. Re:oh no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They already have that, google "homeless cashless payment". But the contact system is from a charity and it's like foodstamps: they can only spend it where the charity has said it's ok.

  4. Finally, the world will be spared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The burden of Dick Van Dyke's atrocious accent.

  5. Goodbye social cohesion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People are already detached from social interaction. Do we really need this nonsense? How is the street performer going to look the person in the eye and thank them?

  6. Barriers to entry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great, yet another job where you can't just set up on your own, now you need accreditation and infrastructure to make a living.

    What's next, EFTPOS for beggars?

    1. Re: Barriers to entry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Busking in the tube (London subway) already requires registration and being allocated a specific pitch.

      The reason for that is safety, the pedestrian access tunnels are very small for the number of people using them. Before the registration system came in it was getting hard to walk past them all to get out of a station, especially around the night-life areas

    2. Re: Barriers to entry by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      When you said "a specific pitch", my mind first went to music. What a boring song that would be...

  7. Let's hope... by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...that some enterprising busker does not put the reader at waist height in a crowded area and gain hundreds of "taps" from unsuspecting passersby.

    1. Re:Let's hope... by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      I was thinking *almost* that. More like a dancer dancing among the crowd and waving her arm close to people's back pockets. Either way, same idea, different implementation.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    2. Re:Let's hope... by Nova77 · · Score: 1

      Apps connected to the card are extremely popular in London, and they immediately warn the user of an expense. If something like that were to happen you'd see a lot of unhappy bystanders!

    3. Re:Let's hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, when you are being retarded AND at the same time imply that you are smarter than other people you really should post as AC. Now people will look back at "Dog-Cow" for all eternity and say; "Oh its that retard. Do not engage him."

    4. Re:Let's hope... by tlhIngan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      ...that some enterprising busker does not put the reader at waist height in a crowded area and gain hundreds of "taps" from unsuspecting passersby.

      Which is why I have a NFC jammer in my pocket. It's just a little card that's powered by NFC and just jams the signal by responding. (Basically, in NFC, you send a clock and the card pulses to indicate a 1 or 0. The cards listen as well and if they detect a pulse they didn't send, it means a collision and the card will temporarily disable further responses until inquired again. The card that responds continue to do so unless it detects a collision from a third card. A card that successfully transmits disables itself for further inquiries while still powered).

      So this card continues to send pulses out which prevents all the other cards from responding. NFC readers don't even acknowledge something is happening - they just fail to read anything.

      Attempts to "tap" my wallet result in nothing being read.

    5. Re:Let's hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason wallets will still have bill compartments in the future economy is so that you can put a piece of tin foil there to isolate your card from rogue RFID readings

    6. Re:Let's hope... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The end result will be hundreds of errors on his screen typically that his tap didn't work (because despite what you may think the contactless payment system needs very close proximity held sustained for a second or two, ... in which case you'd be checking that he doesn't have your wallet in the first place,) and because you need to identify the single card, which means if you go up to a random person in the street and try it you'll just get an error, likely from their credit card, or their oyster card, or their parking garage ticket, or whatever.

    7. Re:Let's hope... by mjwx · · Score: 1

      ...that some enterprising busker does not put the reader at waist height in a crowded area and gain hundreds of "taps" from unsuspecting passersby.

      Yep,

      Headline says "London Launches World's First Contactless Payment Scheme For Street Performers" but what they really mean is "Thousands of Londoners are about to have their cards compromised". Glad I've disabled contactless on all of my cards (as in a hard disable, using a Stanley knife to cut the induction loop whilst keeping the chip intact)

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    8. Re:Let's hope... by PPH · · Score: 1

      Maybe. People in Seattle often use Orca cards (transit payment) by briefly tapping their wallet against the reader.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    9. Re:Let's hope... by PPH · · Score: 1

      That'll help if you get surreptitiously charged while standing and watching a street performer. But given a bit of latency, you'll never figure out who skimmed your card after you get bumped by a few hobos on the sidewalk.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    10. Re:Let's hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds... complicated. You know you can buy RFID blocking wallets, right?

    11. Re:Let's hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or turn off NFC when you don't want to use it.

    12. Re: Let's hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are signs not to do that on London underground because of "card clash" I.e. it might read a different card (debit, credit, oyster) on exit than on entry and charge you two penalty fares instead of the right one.

    13. Re:Let's hope... by knorthern+knight · · Score: 1

      Ditto for Presto Cards https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... in southern Ontario for several regional transit systems.

      --

      I'm not repeating myself
      I'm an X window user; I'm an ex-Windows user
    14. Re:Let's hope... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Maybe. People in Seattle often use Orca cards (transit payment) by briefly tapping their wallet against the reader.

      I used to do that too until bank card went contact and it all started interfereing.

    15. Re:Let's hope... by hackertourist · · Score: 1

      A wallet, being ungrounded, is never a perfect Faraday cage. You just have to turn up the gain a bit to defeat it.
      This NFC jammer sounds like a solution for that problem.

  8. Oh thank god finally!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now I don't have to risk touching the filthy beggars to make them go away with money. Can I get one on the end of a baton for maximum range? Perhaps on the end of a cane that also sprays delousing agent?

    1. Re:Oh thank god finally!!! by dgatwood · · Score: 2

      Ebenezer! When did you start posting on Slashdot?

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    2. Re:Oh thank god finally!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Humbug! You deal with all the gypsy scum, dog muck, thieving kids and crusty jugglers!

  9. Queue the taxman by ddtmm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So their modest income is now trackable by the government, if not now, very soon. It’s only a matter of time until even the oldest profession in the world is monitored by governments for taxes due.

    1. Re:Queue the taxman by Mitreya · · Score: 1

      So their modest income is now trackable by the government

      I assume it is taxable now, too.

      matter of time until even the oldest profession in the world is monitored by governments for taxes due.

      I believe it is already taxed -- in countries where this profession is legal, anyway.

    2. Re:Queue the taxman by youngone · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      It’s only a matter of time until even the oldest profession in the world is monitored by governments for taxes due.

      In civilized countries it already is. Why wouldn't it be? Income is liable for income tax, no matter how it was gained.
      It is only hypocritical countries, dominated by religious nuts that continue to outlaw prostitutes.

    3. Re:Queue the taxman by fafalone · · Score: 1

      Modest income? What about all those performers that will be making hundreds per day because people *really* like their act where the observer gets a prize in exchange for their generous support of the arts, at different levels like Quality Opus, or Grande. Or 8th Balcony, the perfect seat to take in 3.5 performances? The corner boys gotta adapt too after all...

    4. Re:Queue the taxman by iTrawl · · Score: 1

      Why shouldn't they pay tax on that money? In the UK the first £11,850 you make in this tax year is tax free. If they make a lot of money busking, good for them, but pay tax like everyone else.

      Those in the "oldest profession" can be self-employed (I'm still not sure what they write their business is about on the tax return form) and pay taxes and get social benefits like every other worker too. Individual prostitution is legal in the UK (kerb crawling, soliciting in the street, brothels aren't though).

      --
      "Everybody's naked underneath" -- The Doctor
    5. Re:Queue the taxman by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      So their modest income is now trackable by the government, if not now, very soon. It’s only a matter of time until even the oldest profession in the world is monitored by governments for taxes due.

      And why wouldn't it be? It's taxes. If their income is that modest well that's why the tax system is progressive including a personal allowance for income which is completely untaxed.

    6. Re:Queue the taxman by mjwx · · Score: 1

      So their modest income is now trackable by the government, if not now, very soon. It’s only a matter of time until even the oldest profession in the world is monitored by governments for taxes due.

      Erm... it already is.

      Prostitution is not illegal here in the UK. We don't have ancient puritan hangups that force it underground permitting pimps to hold girls in virtual slavery.

      The downside of this is that it's income that must be declared and taxed. Not sure about VAT (sales tax).

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    7. Re:Queue the taxman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They will accept credit card up to £11,850. And accept only cryptocurrency beyond that.

    8. Re:Queue the taxman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a very mixed grey area in the UK. Being paid for sex is not illegal. Almost anything connected to it can be. Prostitutes sharing premises for mutual safety can be considered a brothel, which is illegal.

      Pimps are very much the norm at the lower to middle end. All those ads in the back of the paper (and now online) for escort agencies? Pimps under a fancy name, running mostly eastern european women who may or may not be coerced into the job.

      That's not to say there aren't legitimate, ethical providers of sexual services who do it of their own free will (at least to the extent that anyone works for a living), but they're few and far between.

    9. Re:Queue the taxman by eionmac · · Score: 1

      Most professional ladies [and 'men'] in sex industry in UK report income for tax purposes, and deduct expenses. Some even make it into the very high tax bracket. Some such as remote video work act as limited companies and also collect VAT (sales tax). The Register had a report on this some years ago. So taxperson collected taxes both personal, sales tax and company tax. Quite normal for HMRC (Her Majesties Revenue & Customs) to tax the oldest profession.

      --
      Regards Eion MacDonald
  10. This has been in China for at least 2 years alread by natmsincome.com · · Score: 5, Informative

    It feels weird saying this but street performers in China have had QR codes for both WeChat and Alipay for a while now. It's been around so long it isn't even an a novelty any more.

  11. Trying to put homeless people on the grid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This won't solve anything. Very sad stuff.

    1. Re:Trying to put homeless people on the grid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is this sad? I wish I had something more substantive to say, but seriously, why is this sad? They'll be able to pay taxes and everything else a good proletariat is supposed to be.

    2. Re:Trying to put homeless people on the grid? by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

      Not sure what it's like in your country, but in mine if you earn below a given amount (not sure what it is) then you do not pay income tax. Never mind, went and looked it up, if you earn below 1.2 thousand USD a month, obviously converted from our own crappy currency, but you get the idea. If you are above that tax ranges from 18% up to 48% - some years I will get an increase and actually come home with less money because I moved into a new tax bracket.

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
    3. Re:Trying to put homeless people on the grid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure what it's like in your country, but in most - like the UK, for instance - it's not possible to come home with less money because you moved into a new (higher) tax bracket. That's because the higher rate only applies to the income that exceeds the threshold to get into that bracket.

      So for instance, the bottom threshold is £11,850 (below this - zero tax, above it: 20%). So if you earn £12,000, your total income tax liability isn't 20% of £12,000 - it's 20% of £150.

    4. Re:Trying to put homeless people on the grid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it needlessly raises a barrier for them

    5. Re: Trying to put homeless people on the grid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry that is not true,

      https://www.gov.uk/income-tax-rates

    6. Re:Trying to put homeless people on the grid? by PPH · · Score: 1

      Why do you assume buskers and panhandlers are homeless? In some cases, that can pay pretty well (and tax-free too, if you use cash). There's a guy who works a corner with a cardboard sign in my town. His Lexus is nicer than my car.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    7. Re:Trying to put homeless people on the grid? by sarren1901 · · Score: 1

      Moving into a new tax bracket should only affect the money that bracket starts at. At least when speaking in regards to USA federal tax income, it's in tiers. The first 10k is at one rate, then 10,000.01-20k will be taxes at a higher rate, the next 10k at a 3rd rate.

      Moving into a higher bracket just means that anything earned over the threshold will be taxes at the higher rate. Moving into a new bracket doesn't mean all your prior money is taxed at the highest possible rate.

      Maybe things are different in your country, but that's how USA federal income works.

    8. Re: Trying to put homeless people on the grid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That link says it is true, those are the current bands. Have you never seen a tax return form in your life?

    9. Re:Trying to put homeless people on the grid? by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

      Where I am moving into a higher tax bracket (per year) increase your percentage tax - for the year. The sliding scale determines your tax percentage, for the year. Not a sliding percentage based on brackets within that, not sure which is worse.

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
  12. Meanwhile, when visiting China by Camembert · · Score: 1

    I have seen a street performer with a QR code panel for payments.

  13. Contactless pickpocketing by Dwedit · · Score: 1

    Looks like a great way to do contactless pickpocketing?

    1. Re:Contactless pickpocketing by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Not as easy as you think. Use your phone? Doesn't work when the screen is on. Have more than one bank card, or a bank card and an oyster card, or even your swipe card for your building, or a parking ticket, the transaction fails.

      Plus you need reasonably close contact sustained for a second or so meaning a quick brush against someone won't do it either.

  14. Zelle and Venmo by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    Isn’t this the reason they exist?

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  15. Re:Picard: Who the fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In brief, get a real job.

  16. Minimize street solicitation by bosef1 · · Score: 1

    I thought one of the advantages of a cashless society was the minimization of street solicitation via restriction of payment opportunities.

    1. Re:Minimize street solicitation by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Solicitation by homeless and entertainment by street performers are two different things. Few people see the loss of the latter as an "advantage".

    2. Re:Minimize street solicitation by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 0

      Having people starve is really an advantage -- but only if you're a Evangelical Prosperity Gospel idiot who thinks that the homeless are homeless because they're "bad" people.

    3. Re:Minimize street solicitation by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      nah. They're homeless because houses cost too much, they're crazy, they're addicts, or they're just lazy. Or a combination of any of them. I've met people fitting into all these categories. Determining the percentage of each group is the tricky question.

    4. Re:Minimize street solicitation by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      I know that, you know that. But anyway, I'm not for making life harder for the homeless -- it's not like they have easy lives to begin with.

  17. Re:This is what the Mayor is worried about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also 1600+ 'acid attacks' since 2010.

  18. STOP THE ENABLEMENT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's a casualty of the cashless society you might not have previously thought of: the humble street performer

    No, I've totally thought about it... them and the bums. I have loads of cash on me but I refuse to give any of them a dime. Especially the ones who try to scam the "I need $15 for a room" No you don't... shelters are free. And the "I need $20 to get a train ticket." And they're there for weeks. You don't need no train ticket.

    STOP ENABLING THE LEECHES

    1. Re:STOP THE ENABLEMENT by another_twilight · · Score: 2

      There's a significant difference between a street performer and a beggar.

      One offers something before they ask for payment; the other just asks for payment. Some performers are crap. Some have heart but no talent. Others are superb. You get to judge the product before you pay.

      I've stood in a queue while a busker up the street played several classical pieces on the flute. He was amazing and made the wait a pleasant one. I've waited for friends and stood on the street listening to some musicians jam. Not great, but very fun. I've bought CDs from performers I liked, attended markets where the music was provided by various street performers ranging form the competent to the talented.

      I'm not sure where you've been, but I _like_ street culture. I like buskers and performers. They add to the fabric of society and asking people to donate some coin in return for what they've already given away is more than fair.

    2. Re:STOP THE ENABLEMENT by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Buskers are not leeches, they provide entertainment. It's no different to you attending a concert, or listening to the radio. If you like the performance you can make a donation, if you don't like it you can ignore it.

      I do however totally agree on the leeches who tell you some bullshit story in an attempt to get free cash from you. Most of the ones that claim to be homeless and hungry will refuse food if you offer it to them, they only want cash.

      I've offered perfectly good recently bought and unopened food to beggars claiming to be hungry, and most of them have refused it. If they were truly homeless and hungry they would happily accept food even if it wasn't very fresh or clean.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    3. Re:STOP THE ENABLEMENT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These are all good reasons not to live in a city. Buskers, beggars, con artists.
      I remember those things from living in San Diego back in the late 90s.
      No thanks.

    4. Re:STOP THE ENABLEMENT by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

      Yeah cities suck, but you can find shit there. I was living in one of our smaller coastal cities - if we wanted to go to a concert to watch an international band we had to fly to one of the bigger cities. I needed a specific audio cable - had to get it mailed from one of the larger cities - and the posting and packaging cost more than the cable. Upgraded all the families gaming PC's - was cheaper to get it from one of the larger cities. Now bear in mind I WAS living in a city, just a shitty one. Cities have their attractions, traffic is not one of them - but public transport IS.

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
    5. Re:STOP THE ENABLEMENT by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      I've read/heard about the "shelter" system in many US cities. Go to a shelter on a cold night, the shelter is full. It's 10p.m. Wait an hour to register. It's 11p.m. Wait around another hour for someone to organize a bus to an empty shelter. 12a.m. Wait another two hours to get to the next shelter. 2a.m. Wait an hour to register there 3a.m. Shower, get to sleep. 4:30am. And you're woken up at 7a.m. For those who think "shelters are free", why don't you pretend to be homeless/destitute and try the system for a night. Or volunteer at a shelter.

    6. Re:STOP THE ENABLEMENT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can also save up all the money instead of spending it on booze and drugs, buy a bus ticket out of town. How's that for an idea.

      Winter isn't a surprise. It comes rather regularly, once a year. If birds can figure out migratory patterns, so can the bums.

      It's their own fault they stay in the cold climates. Darwinism is alive and well in the community.

  19. Re:Picard: Is an angry drunk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  20. Re:This is what the Mayor is worried about? by another_twilight · · Score: 0

    the murder rate is astronomical and rising rapidly

    Looking at the graph for homicide it looks like there's a general downward trend dipping to the lowest point in 2012 and rising a little since. A note is made that the 9 people killed in the London Bridge and Finsey Park attacks are included in the 2017 figures.

    In fact, the graphs of all violent crime show the same downward trend across the last couple of decades.

    Do you have any source of information that shows differently? The wikipedia article cautions about the difficulty of obtaining information and that the data from the police needs to be treated with caution. It's possible that there's something that's been missed, but all you have at the moment is an assertion and some vague implications about 'Muslim extremists'.

  21. Re:This has been in China for at least 2 years alr by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 0

    100% digital cash is very useful for a dictatorship. Of course China is ahead.

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
  22. You've never thrown a coin in a hat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess either A: All street performers in the world suck or B: You're some kind of blinders-on type of asshole who boasts about being anti-patronage online for... standard slashdot asshole cred points - And it's not A.

    1. Re:You've never thrown a coin in a hat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people don't want to be harassed while walking down the street and believe such behaviour should not be encouraged.

    2. Re:You've never thrown a coin in a hat? by Bert64 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It depends on the performed...
      I don't like being approached and harassed, not only when i walk down the street but also in my own home.
      However most of these street performers don't harass anyone, they sit in one location and perform, you are free to walk around and ignore them, or you can choose to stop and watch. Some of them are good, some of them suck, but it's no different than a bar or shop which has music or video playing in the window.

      If they passively perform and are good i will happily give them money sometimes...
      If they aggressively approach me demanding money, disturbing my day or intentionally blocking my path they will get nothing but a hostile stare from me. This applies not only to buskers, but anyone trying to get something from me either for free or in exchange for something.

      If your goods are on display and i like the look of them and/or ask about them thats great, if you aggressively try to sell to me i'm not interested.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    3. Re:You've never thrown a coin in a hat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess either A: All street performers in the world suck or B: You're some kind of blinders-on type of asshole who boasts about being anti-patronage online for... standard slashdot asshole cred points - And it's not A.

      Or I just don't live in a city and don't ever encounter street performers.

      Yes, I came to the comments just to point out that I don't care about this or it's implications.

    4. Re: You've never thrown a coin in a hat? by houghi · · Score: 1

      I do this in supermarkets where they trie to push food ir drinks in my face. Sometimes when I say no, they try again. One time a woman was so insisted that I asked uf she understood the concept of "No means no.".

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    5. Re:You've never thrown a coin in a hat? by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      I once put my goods on display in the street. Then I got arrested for frightening the children.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    6. Re:You've never thrown a coin in a hat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "you are free to walk around and ignore them,"

      Sorry, the sidewalks are for walking, not for some bum to hinder traffic with a performance that any 5 year old could top.
      I shouldn't have to 'walk around' morons every couple of yards.

    7. Re:You've never thrown a coin in a hat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Or I just don't live in a city and don't ever encounter street performers."

      In your part of the world they might be called bum, panhandler, vagabond, asker, borrower, deadbeat, hobo, mendicant, rustler, scrounger, supplicant, tramp, supplicator ...

    8. Re:You've never thrown a coin in a hat? by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Yes that's a good point, they should choose a location that doesn't hinder the flow of pedestrians.
      Otherwise it's no problem.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  23. Re:This is what the Mayor is worried about? by Alypius · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And they're jailing journalists for engaging in journalism.

  24. Re:This is what the Mayor is worried about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    London is being crushed by one violent knife attack after another, the murder rate is astronomical and rising rapidly - and not coincidentally, the city is almost universally known as Londonistan. The entire country is being overrun by Muslim extremists. And getting cashless payments to street bums is something they consider important?

    citation? where do you find this astronomical murder rate, from all information I can find it is the opposite.

  25. Re:Picard: Who the fuck by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

    has ever been dumb enough to give money to a street performer?

    I have, many times, and in many cities. If they put on a good show, and make me laugh, I am happy to contribute a few bucks to their livelihood and keep street culture alive.

  26. World’s First? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China has even beggars accepting WeChat Pay for at least a year or two already.

    In what way is this system “World’s First”?

    1. Re:World’s First? by CaffeinatedBacon · · Score: 1

      It's a first world first.

  27. Re:This is what the Mayor is worried about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and yet london despite its "relatively" high murder rate is still safer than most US cities. Most of those stabbings also have absolutely nothing to do with religion, the majority are just the average nightclub/bar fight.

  28. Re:This is what the Mayor is worried about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's only by focusing on specific months that happen to be outliers on both sides that the "London more dangerous than New York" claim can be made. e.g. find a month in which there was a dip in the NY murder rate and a spike in the London murder rate, and they can overlap, for just that one month.

    That's despite 2017 being a "record low" for New York, with 290 murders, while London saw 116 murders the same year.

    e.g. even the high estimate for London murders this year, assuming short-term trends continue, is less than New York had only last year. If New York is safer, that's because New York's rate has fallen so much, not because of a particularly alarming rise in London.

  29. Re:Picard: Who the fuck by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I have, many times, and in many cities. If they put on a good show

    Of course, because you're not a jerk. And you never know who the person with his instrument case open on the ground might someday become. The list of famous musicians who were once buskers is very long.

    Rod Steward, B.B. King, Steve Martin, Janis Joplin and Robin Williams were all street performers at one time. Busking is an honorable livelihood.

    People who say they would never give money to a busker simply do not have any soul whatsoever.

    And let's not forget that master musician Sonny Rollins used to walk the few blocks from his New York apartment to play on the Williamsburg Bridge. He ended up getting a famous album out of it, reigniting his career and creating an image that was later used during the introduction to The Simpsons, with Lisa playing on a bridge. I seem to recall Rollins was even in an episode of the show.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  30. Re:This is what the Mayor is worried about? by another_twilight · · Score: 1

    Thank you, I appreciate the link.

    The judge's comments seem deeply out of touch. More interesting was the the graph and some commentary around it further on in the article. Reported knife crime does seem to be making a marked climb from a recent low.

    Below the graph, the following information is provided - fatalities per year from stabbing 186, 212, and 215, respectively for 2015, 2016 and 2017. It then mentions that in the first 100 days of 2018, 53 people have been killed, some by knife. Even if we assume all 53 are knife attacks and we assume the rate remains constant, it would imply that 2018 will have a total of ~180, lower even than 2015. Why not say so? Is 'in the capital' the same as 'in London'? I'd assume so, but in that case why not make it explicit. The way the information is presented is inconsistent - I'd prefer to believe that it's just incompetence, but I'm concerned that this is designed to feed an agenda.

    I find knife bans odd for the very reason the judge acknowledges - they are ubiquitous. Banning pointed kitchen blades isn't a solution. Re-shaping a blade is trivial; making a blade is trivial - it's one of the first tools mankind made, second, perhaps, only to a hammer.

  31. Re:This is what the Mayor is worried about? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1, Insightful

    London is being crushed by one violent knife attack after another, the murder rate is astronomical and rising rapidly - and not coincidentally, the city is almost universally known as Londonistan. The entire country is being overrun by Muslim extremists.

    This is a good lesson to you younger Slashdotters out there: racism makes you stupid. Look what's happened to poor Brett Buck (811747). He was probably just like you or me at one time, and could tell the difference between a National Front/Fox News fever dream and reality. Now, all he can do is holler things that are provably untrue.

    Don't be like Brett Buck. You have your life ahead of you and there's just no coming back from racist insanity when it gets to that point.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  32. Re:This is what the Mayor is worried about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, I'm a little lost.
    Serious question; what of this was trolling?
    I'm providing evidence to support disagreement and call out that it may not be complete or unbiased. I've avoided a 'citation please' when asking for something to support the original statement. I've dismissed the race-baiting as being unrelated to the original statement.
    Or is this moderation a kind of meta-troll?

  33. Re:This is what the Mayor is worried about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't be like Brett Buck. You have your life ahead of you and there's just no coming back from racist insanity when it gets to that point.

    Awww, shoot. Here I am waitin fer the Powerball show ta come on and you go and bring me down worse'n a catfish enema. I just had ma heart set on bein narrow-minded AND short-sighted. Damn. Now I am depressed. Gladys! You fat bitch! Fetch me anudder PBR! Hey Popedude. You know PBR stands fer Putin's BeeR? Ha! I shoulda been a co-median.

    By the way, don't try that catfish enema thing, even with a mostly dead one. You'd think it'd feel interesting, but the watchword here is: serious spines.

  34. stupid terminal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why have a terminal that needs maintenance, can break down, cost money etc.. why not just use a QR sticker that linked to the performers bank account...
    In India we can pay the taxi driver, street shops etc by just scanning the QR code displayed by them...

  35. Re:This is what the Mayor is worried about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/comment/us-fantasies-of-islamised-britain-do-matter-twwxk8qfx

    The Times claims that everything you just said is totally untrue and it's not that way at all.

    Yes, it's paywalled, but you can read enough to get where the rest of that article is going.

  36. Re:This has been in China for at least 2 years alr by DogDude · · Score: 1

    I think that's a sign of a woefully broken society. People aren't meant to (not) interact like this. This isn't healthy.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  37. PublicPrivatePartnership by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In so-called "third world countries" ("emerging markets" in PCish), we call that, for some reason that currently escapes me, "Corruption".

  38. Yes, and it succeeded. by thesupraman · · Score: 1

    While you do go to some effort to take your somewhat on target point too far, let me reply.

    The WHOLE point of this is diversion.
    The people who 'feel good' from the idea of the noble busker getting money are happy.
    The people who are incensed at the local government putting its effort in to this are up in arms about this payment scheme, therefore diverting them from the things the local government would rather they did not focus on.

    So, it is basically a win win for these people.
    So yes, they consider it important, because it helps them stay in power doing what they want to do (most of which is kept carefully out of public view).

  39. Re:This has been in China for at least 2 years alr by thesupraman · · Score: 1

    Ah, but it is not controlled, and more importantly tracked, by the local government (well, it is China, I'm sure they have back door access, but hey).

    BTW, WeChat has spread a lot further than China, but not quite as commonly.

    It is hard to see how people are thick enough to think that 'cashless society' is an advantage to them.
    But people are always going out of their way to impress with their stupidity.

  40. Re:Picard: Who the fuck by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

    Aren't they always telling you not to give money to beggars too?

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  41. Re:This is what the Mayor is worried about? by shilly · · Score: 1

    Que?

  42. A magnificently pointless idea by DrXym · · Score: 1

    Who the hell is going to fish out a visa card, type a value into a reader, swipe / wave the card etc. instead of just tossing a coin in a guitar case?

    1. Re:A magnificently pointless idea by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

      You didn't even read the summary. The "point" is that fewer people are carrying cash of any kind, thus there's no coin to throw into the guitar case.

      I don't think this is an advancement, as a hobo with a guitar is still a hobo.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    2. Re:A magnificently pointless idea by jaseuk · · Score: 1

      You've missed the point on several levels. One of the novel features of this setup is it just takes a straight £2 or whatever it is charge from the tap. THe performer doesn't need to enter a price.

      I use contactless a lot, I can pay by phone, card or a keyfob. Neither really require very much fishing. I don't usually even remove my card to pay, just tap my wallet.

  43. Re:This is what the Mayor is worried about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL. Keep telling yourself that.

  44. Re:This is what the Mayor is worried about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the city is almost universally known as Londonistan.

    Never heard that term. But maybe I live beyond the stretches of the universe (30 miles)

    According to wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Londonistan) it seems to be American publications which have picked it up.

  45. Re:Picard: Who the fuck by DrXym · · Score: 1

    Busking is an honorable livelihood.

    Busking & other street entertainment can be an honorable livelihood.

    It can also be thinly disguised begging / harassment, e.g. those people who board a subway train and play a song to a captive audience whether they want to hear it or not. Or costumed characters who mill around tourist spots (e.g. people dressed as Romans around the Colluseum in Rome), causing trouble for tourists or each other on a regular basis.

    The only way to separate legitimate performers from the rest is to require them to hold permits, abide by certain rules about where they may perform and have a system that prevents one group / performer from dominating a particular spot. Providing they have talent then none of these things should prove to be impediments.

  46. Re:Picard: Who the fuck by Wootery · · Score: 2

    Incidentally, London implements a licensing scheme for its public transport. I presume plenty of other cities do the same.

  47. SDtreet performers ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These are the Muzzi-Wog pestilent Brit imports that rape white teens ? They get paid how by Soros Juuboi ??

  48. Re:This is what the Mayor is worried about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not about numbers to people like this, they don't like a demographic and everything else is seen as an opportunity to blame that demographic regardless of truth or credibility. The homicide per capita rate for the USA is over 4 times London's and the US rate although high by western european standard is low; that alone says everything about how credible any American claiming London is dangerous/has astronomical murder rates is.

  49. Re:Picard: Who the fuck by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    has ever been dumb enough to give money to a street performer?

    What has dumb got to do with appreciating some dirt cheap entertainment?

    Oh yeah, the same people who will happily charge 2 pounds...oops...decimal point...200 pounds to a random person on the street.

    Just because someone is a street performer doesn't mean they are automatically criminals or arsehats. The same can not be said for some Slashdot posters.

  50. Re:Picard: Who the fuck by thegarbz · · Score: 2

    The list of famous musicians who were once buskers is very long.

    While not famous, I saw the best guitar player at our school who has gone to do great things in the local musical scene busking long after he was able to afford to live as a musician without a second job to support him.

    I asked him why, and he just said, why not. The difference between playing at home on the couch and playing here in the subway station is that I get free dinner doing it here.

  51. Re:This is what the Mayor is worried about? by thegarbz · · Score: 0

    London is fine, knife attacks are quite under control in a city of 8million, the vast majority of them never actually involve an attack, the murder rate is lower than it's been in the past and well below that of New York or Chicago, the city certainly isn't known as Londonistan to anyone other than racist fucks, and when you walk around there's no a Muslim extremist to be seen.

    Speaking of being seen you can't see me giving you the finger right now for sharing such sheer and utter stupidity. You give the human race a bad name. I hope you get murdered by a Muslim terrorist, but you probably live in London given you are so passionate about the city so the odds of that happening are sadly quite low.

  52. Re:This is what the Mayor is worried about? by thegarbz · · Score: 0

    Yeah you could see it like that. The other way of seeing it is jailing people who re-offend multiple times of being in contempt of court. Oh and fuck you for calling Tommy Robinson a journalist. He is as much of a journalist as Freddy Krueger is a surgeon. Just because you have a knife or a mic in your hand doesn't make you that profession.

  53. Re:This is what the Mayor is worried about? by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is a good lesson to you younger Slashdotters out there: racism makes you stupid.

    Except that "muslim" isn't a race.

    Who's stupid again?

  54. Re:Picard: Who the fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What people don't realise is why the UK is a powerhouse of comedy and music is because there is a very large population with lots of street and small venues to hone your skills at e.g. pubs. Edinburgh fringe being the perfect example for comedy, and the massive number of music festivals for music. Also if you are a terrible performer people will be polite, they just wont pay you any money which gives you time to improve your skills without any hostility.

    You can start off at your local pub or working mans club, making contacts and honing your skills and work your way up to rock star!..

  55. Add this to public toilets by iTrawl · · Score: 1

    Put these readers at toilets in central London (and other places) so I can use my contactless to relieve myself when I don't have coins on me. Oyser users may also appreciate it if they can use their card for this purpose too.

    --
    "Everybody's naked underneath" -- The Doctor
  56. Re: Picard: Who the fuck by houghi · · Score: 1

    I have noissue notgiving anything. But I will also not sta d there and then give nothing.
    Most of the time I do not stop and go on my way and am annoyed by the speakers they have added, so that I can not ignore it.
    If I add money when I am entertained, can I remove money when I am not and am annoyed?

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  57. Re:This is what the Mayor is worried about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the answer to "Who's stupid again?" is you. Trying to argue that you're not a cunt by saying you're a different kind of cunt still means you are a cunt.

    Nice misogyny there you woman-hater. Lock yourself up for your incessant hate-speech you criminal offender.

  58. Re:This is what the Mayor is worried about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    London is being crushed by one violent knife attack after another, the murder rate is astronomical and rising rapidly - and not coincidentally, the city is almost universally known as Londonistan. The entire country is being overrun by Muslim extremists.

    This is a good lesson to you younger Slashdotters out there: racism makes you stupid. Look what's happened to poor Brett Buck (811747). He was probably just like you or me at one time, and could tell the difference between a National Front/Fox News fever dream and reality. Now, all he can do is holler things that are provably untrue.

    Don't be like Brett Buck. You have your life ahead of you and there's just no coming back from racist insanity when it gets to that point.

    When you respond with derision instead of fact it suggests the original poster is presenting truth you don't want spoken. If it's so dumb and silly you ought to be able to refute it properly.

  59. Re:This is what the Mayor is worried about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about stating he didn't provide any sources instead of ad-hominem attack?

  60. Re:This is what the Mayor is worried about? by Alypius · · Score: 1

    He identifies as a journalist, so who are you to say otherwise, you hateful bigot?

  61. remember Bitcoin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Bitcoin were more widely adopted, it would be a simple (and cheap) matter for a street performer to tape or glue a printed QR code to a makeshift sign above the jar/hat/guitar case/etc so that those without cash can digitally transfer cryptocurrency to a waiting wallet.

    1. Re:remember Bitcoin? by Cipheron · · Score: 1

      It would not be cheap, bitcoin has a limited blocksize, e.g. a finite number of transactions per block / unit time, so you need to bid a "tip" to the transactor (miner) to get your transaction included in the next block. That can be next to nothing if there's little competition for transactions, but if the rate of transactions goes up, the average tip needed also increases.

  62. Bums in SF will rejoice by biggaijin · · Score: 1

    The beggars and street bums in San Francisco already are equipped to take credit cards, but this will really step up their game. Thanks, tech industry!

  63. EXCEPT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds great until the government decides they don't want the street performers and simply shuts it all down electronically. Or decides to take 90% of their money, or pays even more as a way to inspire more street performers.

    These schemes put too much control in government hands. next thing you know they lock up anybody that says something not liked. Somebody like TOMMY ROBINSON.

    1. Re:EXCEPT by Cipheron · · Score: 1

      ridiculous, Tommy broadcast about ongoing court proceedings. He filmed defendents entering court, livestreamed it and talked about the case. That's just contempt of court, and "perverting the course of justice" and is equivalent to things like jury tampering in seriousness. It's not valid "journalism" because doing stuff like that undermines the fairness of trials. He got what was coming to him.

      The judge blocked people talking about Tommy's case, but only because reporting on that would further jeopardize the original case that Tommy was in trouble for broadcasting details of. e.g. they were trying to avoid causing a mistrial which would mean the entire case that Tommy was talking about would have to be thrown out of court. pulling the sort of BS that Tommy did is what causes guilty people to walk free because of a mistrial. so, no, no sympathy for the asshat, he got what he deserved and the courts were only doing damage control to limit the effects of the BS he caused in the first place.

  64. Re:This is what the Mayor is worried about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a good lesson to you younger Slashdotters out there: Propaganda makes you stupid. Look with your own eyes and see what is happening. Believe none of what you hear and only half of what you see.

    Muslims are a problem, you can see it yourself.
    Politicians are silencing your voice, if you doubt me then go speak out in favor of Tommy Robinson and against islam and see what happens to you.

  65. Re:Picard: Who the fuck by gnick · · Score: 2

    e.g. people dressed as Romans around the Colluseum in Rome

    Of course the people who live in Rome dress like Romans. Pretty much by definition. People in Albuquerque dress like Albuquerquians.

    --
    He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
  66. Re:This is what the Mayor is worried about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PopeRatzo never claimed it was.

    All that was claimed is racism makes you stupid, and prone to rants like the above.

    I think cause and effect are being mixed up though. Those afraid of everything become racist because they live in constant fear and feel that it's one of the ways they can fight their fear.

  67. I don't like it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not one bit. I'm also a street performer (3 card monte) and I definitely only want cash.

  68. I'm not liking this! by hyades1 · · Score: 1

    For years, my standard response to the panhandlers infesting our downtown area has been, "Do you take debit?"

    If this catches on, I'll have to revert to my former practice of politely asking them to fuck off.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  69. Re:This is what the Mayor is worried about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously, if you say things the Muslim-cock-smoking UK government doesn't like and exposes their bigotry against their own citizens, you're not a journalist...hell, you're not even a human-fucking-being, and they can do anything they like to you because abducting and raping children and selling them as sex slaves is a Muslim Right.

  70. Re:This is what the Mayor is worried about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps actually reading what he (the judge) said might help. He did not say get rid of kitchen knives, only the point at the end of said knives, acknowledging that most people at home rarely need a pointed knife at home for cooking. He's retiring and simply stating the majority of knives used in attacks were standard chef knives in the 8-10 inch size.

    He did NOT say start dulling the blades. He did say remove the sharp tip. A very clear distinction.

    I disagree with the current trend to not allow people to carry any type of knife, and wonder how my Scouting days or my DofE expeditions would have been if we weren't carrying at least pocket knives (still have my Swiss Army knife from those days, as well as the larger fixed blade I frequently used to shave sticks for kindling and fire starters...). But I am currently back in the US, where we can own firearms, and I daily carry a folding knife (with a lock) because at least a few times a week at work it is the most useful tool to open boxes, etc.

  71. No you don't by Cyberax · · Score: 1

    You don't owe anything for unsolicited performances. Otherwise performers would owe ME money for expending energy to move away from their noise.

  72. Re:This has been in China for at least 2 years alr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So it a well-functioning public transport system (they will know where you went and when), and public health care system (they will know all about your body).

    I guess that's also why American don't have those either.

  73. Re:This is what the Mayor is worried about? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    I identify myself as the pope. Are you going to bow down before me and kiss my ring?

    Interestingly when you google his name, what do people in general identify him as? Oh that's right Political Activist. It's right there on his own wikipedia profile. Maybe if he identified himself as a journalist he would get that fixed.

    Also you calling someone bigot is a bit pot calling the kettle black don't you think? I mean until you kiss my magical pope ring you have displayed just as much biggotry in this thread as I have.

  74. Re: This is what the Mayor is worried about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jack the ripper, shut your cake hole.

  75. Re:This is what the Mayor is worried about? by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

    Racism itself doesn't make you stupid, the mental gyrations you have to go through to maintain it dull your ability to reason.
    Though some on the other side blaming racism for everything seem to have a a similar, though more limited, problem.

  76. Re:This is what the Mayor is worried about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who's stupid again?

    PopeRatzo (965947) is stupid.

    But we all know that from the illogical filth and hate he constantly spews. He's /.'s #1 trollface.