Slashdot Mirror


Edward Snowden: 'The People Are Still Powerless, But Now They're Aware' (theguardian.com)

Edward Snowden has no regrets five years on from leaking the biggest cache of top-secret documents in history. He is wanted by the US. He is in exile in Russia. But he is satisfied with the way his revelations of mass surveillance have rocked governments, intelligence agencies and major internet companies. From a report Snowden, weighing up the changes, said some privacy campaigners had expressed disappointment with how things have developed, but he did not share it. "People say nothing has changed: that there is still mass surveillance. That is not how you measure change. Look back before 2013 and look at what has happened since. Everything changed."

The most important change, he said, was public awareness. "The government and corporate sector preyed on our ignorance. But now we know. People are aware now. People are still powerless to stop it but we are trying. The revelations made the fight more even."

155 comments

  1. Narrator: by DalM · · Score: 4, Funny

    Narrator: "Unable to bare the thought of his fellow Americans being spied on by their government, our hero releases the top secret documents and flees to... *pauses... squints at script...* Russia."

    1. Re:Narrator: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's just being practical. Name any developed country that 1) isn't spying on its citizens and 2) wouldn't cave to US pressure to hand Snowden over. The second consideration outweighs the first when it's your own life on the line.

    2. Re:Narrator: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...because US are full of ass and EU is full of cowards

    3. Re:Narrator: by ChromeAeonuim · · Score: 5, Interesting

      A more accurate way of putting that is that the US is so full of shit that he had to turn to Russia, of all places, for his own safety. Instead of trying to fix the problem, the US government decided to try to shoot the messenger who uncovered their criminal activity (and yes, until the Fourth Amendment is officially repealed instead of just blatantly disregarded, spying on citizens is still criminal).

    4. Re:Narrator: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True

    5. Re:Narrator: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Russia is Israel's current scapegoat for the American political system. Same as how they blamed 9/11 on the Arabs.

    6. Re: Narrator: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, he fled to Ecuador, but the State Department yanked his passport and he got stuck in Russia. People like to skip that bit...

    7. Re:Narrator: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, that is how far we have come....Americans seeking asylum in Russia for informing us about all the ways that our own government had been betraying our trust all along. Precious few authors are this good at irony.

      And of course our government did not admit guilt, render an apology, consult with Snowden on ways of cleaning up the mess. Because they don't consider it wrong to betray our trust. They are the kings of the hill, and we are just means to their ends. When little people state embarrassing things about big people, whether those things are true or not, those little people should be squashed.

      In any sort of sane world, all governments would be viewed as necessary evils, and kept on very short leashes by their people. But the world has never been sane.

    8. Re:Narrator: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...because US are full of ass and EU is full of cowards

      The US is full of cowards too; more so than the EU.

    9. Re:Narrator: by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      flees to... *pauses... squints at script...* Russia."

      What was his alternative? Residing in Russia does not imply endorsement of Russia's policies.

    10. Re:Narrator: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Narrator: "Unable to bare the thought of his fellow Americans being spied on by their government, our hero releases the top secret documents and flees to... *pauses... squints at script...* Russia."

      For God's sake. It's BEAR not bare.

      Bear: to suffer; endure; undergo:

    11. Re:Narrator: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, that's it exactly. Man, even Slashot is not safe from the uneducated Twitter/FB fuckwits. Go put your head in an oven.

      -Dallas May

    12. Re:Narrator: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...because US are full of ass and EU is full of cowards

      The US is full of cowards too; more so than the EU.

      The EU is full of healthier, better insured and happier cowards.

    13. Re:Narrator: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      US are full of ass and EU is full of c

      We agreed to give it to each other, unless giving it means a death penalty in the US for reasons other than a lack of medical insurance.

    14. Re:Narrator: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A more accurate way of putting that is that the US is so full of shit that he had to turn to Russia, of all places, for his own safety. Instead of trying to fix the problem, the US government decided to try to shoot the messenger who uncovered their criminal activity (and yes, until the Fourth Amendment is officially repealed instead of just blatantly disregarded, spying on citizens is still criminal).

      Which problem? Are US intelligence services being abusive by any objective measure? Are US law enforcement agencies abusing intelligence provided to them or gathered by them? To what extent? The problem is people like you are full of shit, and so there is no real discussion about reforming our intelligence agencies. All your blathering about spying plays out just like the gun control "debate".

      Undercover cops and confidential informants are illegal in which reality? It's not even illegal to run an ALPR on my smart phone, in America.

      It's pretty obvious that "spying" is not criminal unless you use an extremely narrow definition of spying... that happens to be illegal.

      I'll get modded down, and you up, by ... wishful thinkers? Whatever, it doesn't change reality.

    15. Re:Narrator: by king+neckbeard · · Score: 2

      Are US intelligence services being abusive by any objective measure?

      Yes.

      Are US law enforcement agencies abusing intelligence provided to them or gathered by them?

      Yes.

      To what extent?

      To an endemic extent, where the best thing we can do for national security would be to destroy the headquarters of the major intel TLAs.

      Undercover cops and confidential informants are illegal in which reality?

      Not being illegal doesn't make something okay.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    16. Re:Narrator: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, that's a really easy mistake to make. Obviously, the pronunciation is the same and "bare" is the most natural spelling of the word.

      The meaning was obvious from context, and on a forum like this, perfection isn't necessary.

      I don't see why you are so upset.

    17. Re:Narrator: by Riceballsan · · Score: 1

      well, he wanted to be able to inform the people of what he had found, and he wanted to not die in the process. He hasn't exactly hailed russia as a great place, but there just aren't exactly a lot of options.

    18. Re: Narrator: by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      Got stuck in Russia during a stopover on a international flight that was not supposed to pass through Russia but was redirected mid-flight allegedly to avoid a storm, the airline claimed later.

    19. Re: Narrator: by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      And your evidence for all of this is ... hey, look over there!

    20. Re: Narrator: by c6gunner · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I once tried to drive from new York to Los Angeles but accidentally got stuck in Abhu Dhabi.

    21. Re: Narrator: by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Of course not. I'm sure he will be releasing a trove of information about Russian spying programs. Aaaaany day now.

    22. Re: Narrator: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stalin-sized Gulag.

    23. Re:Narrator: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A more accurate way of putting that is that the US is so full of shit that he had to turn to Russia, of all places, for his own safety. ...

      Please tell us more about how safe he is in Russia.

    24. Re:Narrator: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Russia?

    25. Re: Narrator: by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      The FBI was abusive back when J. Edgar was sucking up dirt like another kind of Hoover. Not even counting things like almost destroying the goddamn world during the Cuvan Missile Crisis, we've even got the recent LoveInt within the NSA. We've also got parallel construction for the abuse by law enforcement.

      Jesus, how fucking stupid do you have to be to not realize that power is inherently corrupting, and anybody that can wave their hands at any criticism by saying "national security" is going to be overwhelmingly corrupt.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    26. Re: Narrator: by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      The FBI was abusive back when J. Edgar was sucking up dirt like another kind of Hoover.

      Totally. This is why I hate doctors, personally; they used to be insanely ignorant and abusive back when they were treating people with bleeding and trepanning. If there's one thing I've learned in life it's that judging people and organisations based on the actions of their predecpredecessors is the surest path to truth. A historical example or two are far more convincing than any actual evidence of contemporary wrongdoing!

      This is also why I hate the Jews; because they killed Jesus. Bet they'd do it again in a second, the heartless bastards.

      even counting things like almost destroying the goddamn world during the Cuvan Missile Crisis, we've even got the recent LoveInt within the NSA. We've also got parallel construction for the abuse by law enforcement.

      I have no idea what that meant, but I'm sure you're very passionate about it.

      Jesus, how fucking stupid do you have to be to not realize that power is inherently corrupting, and anybody that can wave their hands at any criticism by saying "national security" is going to be overwhelmingly corrupt.

      I've waived my hands and said "national security" many a time. That whole corruption thing was really great to me. I made less than the public sector, had more fucked up rules to deal with, had more hoops to jump through, and had paranoid nutbags questioning everything I said and did. I totally miss all those benefits; should have never left the public sector.

    27. Re:Narrator: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, I can haz spel Bear Naked Ladies!

    28. Re:Narrator: by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      and on a forum like this, perfection isn't necessary.

      I think, personally, that on a forum like this, precision in language is very important. On facebook, maybe not. On youtube, certainly not. But on Slashdot - I guess I'm old-fasioned - we should strive for, if nothing else, at least spelling correctly.

    29. Re:Narrator: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...our hero releases the top secret documents and flees to... *pauses... squints at script...* Russia."

      He didn't flee to Russia. He got stuck in Russia mid-flee when the US revoked his passport.

    30. Re:Narrator: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, that's the saddest part: that the countries calling themselves "advanced democracies" (U.S., but also Western European Countries: Germany, I'm looking at you) missed *this* chance of Doing The Right Thing.

      This is bitter and very disappointing.

    31. Re:Narrator: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Willful ignorance much?

      Russia wasn't his first choice, he just couldn't travel further because the US government was after him.

    32. Re:Narrator: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Till he releases anything Russia related. Then he will commit a suicide. Unless he won't be home during his suicide attempt.
      Or he will die by the drone which will be marked "Made in USA" ... in Cyrillic.

    33. Re: Narrator: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You asked opinion based questions. You may not agree with the gotcha language of "being abusive," but I don't either. It was YOUR fucking language in the first place. IF you think the abuses of the intelligence services require citation, first you're going to need someone to help you move that rock you've been living under. I'll pick just one: secret FISA courts. That one's for free, now go learn about the world on your own. How old are you? Like 8?

    34. Re:Narrator: by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Iceland.

      Snowden was actually on his way to South America for some reason... Ecuador was supposed to give him asylum, but I think I'd much rather live in Iceland.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    35. Re:Narrator: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, that's a really easy mistake to make. Obviously, the pronunciation is the same and "bare" is the most natural spelling of the word.

      The meaning was obvious from context, and on a forum like this, perfection isn't necessary.

      I don't see why you are so upset.

      It was the third time I saw it in one day. One of those times was on the website of our local newspaper.

    36. Re: Narrator: by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I once tried to drive from new York to Los Angeles but accidentally got stuck in Abhu Dhabi.

      The real news here is that you've got a goddamned flying car and you're keeping quiet about it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    37. Re:Narrator: by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Ecuador was supposed to give him asylum, but I think I'd much rather live in Iceland.

      I don't know that Ecuador actually could have done the job. That area is kind of the USA's special ops playground.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    38. Re: Narrator: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is something idiotic that smug assholes say to convince themselves and other unthinking wannabe gurus that they're smart.

    39. Re:Narrator: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      y do we evn hav languij rools @ all?!?

    40. Re: Narrator: by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      A historical example or two are far more convincing than any actual evidence of contemporary wrongdoing!

      Yeah, because it's not as if those kinds of policies haven't persisted and continued. It's not like there is a long list of governments the US has tried to overthrow. And of course, parallel construction, which was using surveillance data in an illegal way, and covering it up by creating a different way to find the info, was cited post-Snowden, on top of all of the programs like PRISM that he leaked info on.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    41. Re: Narrator: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Civil forfeiture. The bank secrecy act. the war on drugs. eesh, want us to tell you which direction the sun rises in too?

    42. Re: Narrator: by quicks0rt · · Score: 1

      Then pass through he would have, until his passport was revoked.

      Nice try.

  2. You hear that Mr. Anderson? by zlives · · Score: 1

    That is the sound of inevitability... o wait maybe i confused inevitability with futility...

  3. Re:Thief and a traitor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sprinkle an little Po on his sandwich and just desserts are served.

  4. Hero by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Snowden gave up everything for a bunch of morons that for the most part don't give a shit. They deserve whatever comes next.

    1. Re:Hero by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1

      You're not wrong.

    2. Re:Hero by Maltheus · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I remember him once saying that he'd regret what he had done, if no reform ended up coming out of it. Not only did we not get any reform, the American people seem to have fully embraced it. Every bill that increases the power of these agencies, sails through without a hiccup.

    3. Re:Hero by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, the only thing that could happen happened: a change of government. But probably this had little impact.

      It's really a failing of (US) democracy that all possible society issues are funneled through only two choices that offer 90% the same thing. Personally, I'm a proponent of the smallest possible federal government, not because I'm into small government but because there's no democracy at the federal level. Another solution would be to elect the secretaries individually.

    4. Re:Hero by Gr8Apes · · Score: 2

      Umm, that's because a certain minority representative party has gamed the system for 30 years to enable this end-game. And end-game it is, just not the one they wanted. The GOP will disintegrate over the next year or two. It's going to be interesting.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    5. Re:Hero by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The GOP will disintegrate over the next year or two.

      People keep saying that, and then their supporters keep embracing ever-greater levels of hypocrisy and corruption.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Hero by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      The GOP will disintegrate over the next year or two.

      People keep saying that, and then their supporters keep embracing ever-greater levels of hypocrisy and corruption.

      I'm not sure they can get any worse than today and still retain the dressings of democracy.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    7. Re:Hero by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      Isn't it unfortunate that BOTH party supporters do this? Sorry, but if you look at the actual policies of both parties, they are virtually identical.

    8. Re:Hero by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Isn't it unfortunate that BOTH party supporters do this? Sorry, but if you look at the actual policies of both parties, they are virtually identical.

      Only if you ignore racism, sexism, gay, trans, and women's rights, which I notice is what you've done there

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:Hero by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      With the exception of a few nuts in BOTH parties, nothing ever changes, it's rhetoric. I'm saying what do they DO, not say.

    10. Re: Hero by CoolDiscoRex · · Score: 1
      Yes, but until recently, the Democrats at least offered the illusion of intellectual superiority and the moral high ground. Who knew that they were every bit as succeptible to moral panic as the far rightest of right wingers? I didn't actually think that they were as easy to manipulate as they've proven themselves to be, nor did I think that they would so easily take positions which were outright cruel. Alas, all it took for them to devolve into a cauldron of pathological hypocricy, was for the ruling-class to play to their narcissism. Once they did that, it was game over.

      Now we have people with IQs of 125 running around calling themselves "tolerant" before reeling off an ever-growing list of people they steadfastly refuse to tolerate. You know, because they won't tolerate intolerance.

      People who wag their fingers about Climate Change to people that don't own cars, before hopping a plane back home so mommy and daddy can pamper them for a week, before they fly back before work starts.

      They get away with it because they can always count on the ruling-class to give them a pass and look the other way. So long as they vote right and talk right, they can actually DO whatever they want.

      Both parties are duly fucked. There are no occupants of the moral high-ground anymore.

    11. Re:Hero by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      With the exception of a few nuts in BOTH parties, nothing ever changes, it's rhetoric. I'm saying what do they DO, not say.

      You can compare voting records and see that there are substantive differences between the parties in these areas. You can also see that there are no differences between them in other areas, but that doesn't change the first fact.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re: Hero by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      You have said it!

  5. So is it better by bobstreo · · Score: 1

    to not know, and continue to be blissfully ignorant, or suffer the pain of knowing, and being unable to do anything about it?

    1. Re:So is it better by zlives · · Score: 1

      there are things you can change... like not use facebook or smart phones....
      at least you make that choice knowingly.
      on the other hand.... lalalalalala... i can't hear you may be more to the liking of some.

  6. Reminder: You're not totally powerless by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    There are things you can't change, things that only our legislators can affect, but you can still take back a measure of your privacy moving forward -- you just have to be willing to do what it takes to make that happen.

    1. Re:Reminder: You're not totally powerless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. When the TLA can use even your TV to spy on you, how would you even know what they're using to spy on you?

      So, no TV's, routers, smart devices, phones, or electronics of any kind.

      Surveillance tech has become so miniaturized that it could be in anything. Even if you think you don't have any devices that could be spying on you, you could still be wrong. It should would be nice if the government just followed the rules that it creates.

    2. Re:Reminder: You're not totally powerless by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Wow, and people have accused me of being a tinfoil hat wearing conspiracy nut. Or are you trolling me? Either way you're dumb and/or wrong, depending on what part of your rant I want to address -- and I can't be bothered to sit here and pick it apart. Calm down.

    3. Re:Reminder: You're not totally powerless by eaglesrule · · Score: 2

      Vault 7, learn what it is. "Weeping Angel" in particular turned smart tvs into spy tvs.

      When it comes to domestic spying, being a "tinfoil hat wearing conspiracy nut" just means you're paying attention.

    4. Re:Reminder: You're not totally powerless by sarren1901 · · Score: 2

      AC may be paranoid but that doesn't make AC necessarily wrong. Most TV's can spy on you. Your smart phone most certainly can spy on you. All those voice assistants are of course listening. We have seen different articles over the past months and years that show just that happening.

      Unless you give up modern life, you are going to be spied on. Maybe if you move to a less technical part of the world and give up all your fancy computer tech, you may gain back privacy.

      Is privacy really worth giving up that much? I may hate that the 4th is dead in all but name, but I'm not going to go live in a cave in Afghanistan just to say I have privacy. Likely that wouldn't even be true. Probably satellites watching the entire country anyway.

    5. Re:Reminder: You're not totally powerless by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Re 'things that only our legislators can affect"
      That was attempted in the 1970's. The NSA and CIA one into a private room with US politicians.
      The use of budgets and the US legal system attempted to stop illegal domestic spying.

      The CIA just went full Iran Contra to get new funds and outpace any US changes to CIA funding.
      Nothing changed to domestic US collection.

      But the world now knows about PRISM, the junk US big brand crypto. The social media spying.
      The telco spying. The illegal domestic collection.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    6. Re:Reminder: You're not totally powerless by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Can't speak for the majority but neither I nor anyone I know fell for the 'smart TV' meme, and the few who bought one don't ever connect it to the internet for any reason.

    7. Re:Reminder: You're not totally powerless by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1
      Yes yes yes I KNOW all that already and tell others the same regularly. I do not have a 'smart TV', or a smartphone, or a voice assistant, or any of the other useless toys that have been leveraged into being surveillance devices, and I have not 'given up modern life', and it's wrong of you to characterize it that way. You can be smart about some things and take back SOME of your privacy moving forward. Stay off 'social media'. Don't use a smartphone. Don't buy things with cameras and microphones that are 'always on'. Don't buy most 'IoT' devices for the same reasons. Pay CASH for all purchases you possibly can, and write checks for things you can't, instead of using plastic (which is also safer right now anyway because of constant data breaches; electronic payment systems are NOT SECURE and like having unprotected sex the more you expose yourself to them the higher your risk of getting your data stolen).

      Is privacy really worth giving up that much? I may hate that the 4th is dead in all but name, but I'm not going to go live in a cave in Afghanistan just to say I have privacy. Likely that wouldn't even be true. Probably satellites watching the entire country anyway.

      Listen, buddy: I want to slap people when they say shit like that. If you GIVE UP then THEY WIN; is that what you want? To live like an animal in a zoo, or a convict in prison, watched 24/7/365 cradle-to-grave, every move you make, word you say recorded logged scrutinized and analyzed? Is that the world you want your kids growing up in? Don't even accuse me of the 'Appeal to Emotion' fallacy because it's a real question: Do you want your own children growing up in a world where having NO PRIVACY WHATSOEVER and being surveilled constantly is the NORM? If you say anything other than a resounding "NO!" then I say you need to THINK HARDER and try again.

      If you think I'm being too harsh then consider this: It takes at least this much to get through to most people, and 'most people' are what it's going to take to reverse this trend and take back our lives.

  7. Re:People in Russia are powerless by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 0

    Russian government shilling in action.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  8. Re: Thief and a traitor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You need to shut up and toot dat ass up! You looking like a kitkat and I need to break off a piece!

  9. We are aware but overloaded. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    We are swarmed with real and fake information all the time. Real information may be used out of context, Fake information can be made to sound realistic, and if it fits into your particular world view it makes a lost of sense.

    We are no better off knowing the truth, when it is mixed in a bunch of lies, except for the fact we are now anxious about it.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:We are aware but overloaded. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right now, the problem is that we have so many propaganda sources, because the US is an open country, be it Russia, the Syrian Electronic Army, China, or any other country whose goal is to drive wedges and further incite divisiveness.

      Problem is that nobody in government gives a rat's ass. The government doesn't care, when 20 years ago, there would be company CEOs hauled off to prison for giving aide and comfort to the enemy, or disseminating enemy propaganda. Now, the politicians are asleep at the switch while the biggest psy-ops operation in history is taking place and destroying the US, potentially taking down the entire world.

    2. Re:We are aware but overloaded. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was alive twenty years ago. I don't recall a single CEO being hauled off to prison for giving aid to the enemy or disseminating enemy propaganda.

    3. Re:We are aware but overloaded. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The government doesn't care, when 20 years ago, there would be company CEOs hauled off to prison for giving aide and comfort to the enemy, or disseminating enemy propaganda.

      Assuming you're American, your governments has been helping enemies since I can remember. China, for instance, is a total US creation. In the 70's, Brazil was to be the next big power; a friendly, western, big power. But you choose to screw us and instead build China. It is happening again with Saudi Arabia and other ME powers. You're helping the enemies of the western civilization all day long.

    4. Re: We are aware but overloaded. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Typical Brazilian, blaming others for his own country's failures. Every time Brazil looks like it's going to do well, they manage to screw it up and go back down again. The cycle repeats again, and again, and again.

      As the quote says: "Brazil is the country of the future... and always will be."

  10. Google and Facebook are laughing all the way to th by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The NSA was snooping but at least they weren't selling everything to the fucking Russians and everybody else with cash.

  11. Re:People in Russia are powerless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The real agents are the people who expose Russian agents for what they are? Sure...

    I'll bet you think it's treasonous for me to point out that Trump has blatantly committed treason in his election campaign and his protecting and rewarding Russia for attacking our country.

  12. Re:Thief and a traitor! by ChromeAeonuim · · Score: 5, Informative

    "Privacy is Treason." Straight out of 1984 right there.

  13. Aware as ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just asked Alexa, and she assured me there has never been any mass surveillance. Which is great, because I was worried there for a minute.

    1. Re:Aware as ever by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      +1 funny

  14. Stooge and a liar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's you, OP.

  15. Willful Ignorance proves things are worse. by geekmux · · Score: 3

    Sorry, but nothing has really changed. In fact it's probably worse now.

    Users used to be unaware, and they didn't give a shit about security or privacy. Now they're fully aware, and they STILL don't give a shit about security or privacy. It's willful ignorance.

    And what people are truly powerless over, are their own internet addictions and peer pressure. It's FAR more important to overshare and generally be the internet narcissist society expects you to be than it is to recognize and respect any risk involved with that activity.

    1. Re:Willful Ignorance proves things are worse. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Snowden isn't talking about oversharing on social media.

      Get caught up.

    2. Re:Willful Ignorance proves things are worse. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've already posted it to my twitter feed!
      Thanks for sharing!

    3. Re:Willful Ignorance proves things are worse. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I shared the revelations about everyone's location data being freely available to anyone over the Internet (until the hole got plugged so only those who *pay* can get it) with friends and family and the response was "yawn?" and "yep, there is no privacy".

      People know, but they have given up. Some politicians are pretending to care and going through the motions (which will be shutdown) of trying to do something -- but the citizenry (as a whole) simply don't care. The efforts by certain politicians to capitalize on the outrage is wasted effort as there is not any outrage.

      We have a self-admitted rapist and serial liar as president who has made it clear that he will pardon any of his cronies for their crimes -- and that push come to shove he'll just pardon himself for his crimes. Our politicians are nearly universally corrupt. Corporations run this country with the thinnest veneer of an "elected" government. The government openly spies on all of its citizens. Police execute people for being of the wrong race without any meaningful consequence. While our crime rates are better than some places, our health care is on par with some of the "shit holes" our president denigrates. The middle class is shrinking and, as a whole, the population is getting poorer (the result of concentrating wealth among the wealthy).

      I'm having a hard time working up a scenario that would actually inspire moral outrage. If it came to light, with full, supporting documentation, that the government had secretly continued MK Ultra there would be some headlines, a few recriminations, and then everything would be back to "normal" talking about the latest celebrity racist tweet.

    4. Re:Willful Ignorance proves things are worse. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I shared the revelations about everyone's location data being freely available to anyone over the Internet (until the hole got plugged so only those who *pay* can get it) with friends and family and the response was "yawn?" and "yep, there is no privacy".

      People know, but they have given up. Some politicians are pretending to care and going through the motions (which will be shutdown) of trying to do something -- but the citizenry (as a whole) simply don't care. The efforts by certain politicians to capitalize on the outrage is wasted effort as there is not any outrage.

      We have a self-admitted rapist and serial liar as president who has made it clear that he will pardon any of his cronies for their crimes -- and that push come to shove he'll just pardon himself for his crimes. Our politicians are nearly universally corrupt. Corporations run this country with the thinnest veneer of an "elected" government. The government openly spies on all of its citizens. Police execute people for being of the wrong race without any meaningful consequence. While our crime rates are better than some places, our health care is on par with some of the "shit holes" our president denigrates. The middle class is shrinking and, as a whole, the population is getting poorer (the result of concentrating wealth among the wealthy).

      I'm having a hard time working up a scenario that would actually inspire moral outrage. If it came to light, with full, supporting documentation, that the government had secretly continued MK Ultra there would be some headlines, a few recriminations, and then everything would be back to "normal" talking about the latest celebrity racist tweet.

      Another one bites the dust: The US has become officially a 3rd World, shithole country [and you said that, not me, paleface].

    5. Re:Willful Ignorance proves things are worse. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a stupid argument, what is happening is overwhelm, people cannot meaningfully manage their privacy.. this has been true since the mid 90's at least, since the knowledge nessesary is not possible for even people specializing in information security, and there is essentially no recourse if they do object so stop deflecting, there is a ton of information that should never have been collected in the first place.

  16. Aware of what? by jfdavis668 · · Score: 3

    Did I miss something?

    1. Re:Aware of what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess we're not as aware as Snowden thought

    2. Re:Aware of what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, WE were always aware that the government is spying on us. As soon as there was a telegraph there was a government agency created to spy on it.

      Who IS aware of it now are the bad guys, who will go through the trouble to evade, which ultimately will lead to MORE surveillance.

      Snowden is not a hero. He sold secrets for money and fame, and nothing more. When he is of no more use to Russia, he'll get a one way trip to where he belongs. Prison.

    3. Re:Aware of what? by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1

      I can't hear you over all the government cock you're choking on.

    4. Re:Aware of what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Timmy, does your mom know you're on her computer again?

    5. Re:Aware of what? by AHuxley · · Score: 2

      PRISM https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
      DROPOUT JEEP https://www.cnet.com/news/nsa-...
      BULLRUN https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
      Lots of ways to get around junk big brand encryption and collect it all.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  17. Re: People in Russia are powerless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bet you've never done a historical study on what "treason" means in the Constitution. But you've probably watched at least 2,000 hours of MSNBC and CNN.

  18. We're aware Snowden is a traitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But powerless to arrest him.

    1. Re:We're aware Snowden is a traitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a traitor. To humanity.

  19. Re:Thief and a traitor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You may not be a thief but you're definitely a traitor to the Constitution.

  20. Re: People in Russia are powerless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know that Trump colluded with the Russian government's attacks on our country, and continues to serve and protect the Vladimir Putin.

    If that isn't treason what is?

    What do you call someone who colludes with a hostile foreign adversary's attacks on out their country?

    You tell me, what do you call an obvious traitor like Donald Trump?

  21. Not privacy left to be had in the US. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most people don't really look around and think anymore.

    Do you think Walmart, Best Buy, Malls, Gas Station chains, etc aren't funnelling all their surveillance footage to the FBI? Fuck yes they are. While big data took off faster online, since you didn't need to video side of things, the tech has finally gotten to the point where using it with video footage to identify and categorize customers has become big business. And when that footage can also be used to help you catch shoplifters and latest 'national news report of the week' and brag about how your company helped in catching REAL BAD GUY, while glossing over how you did it...

    People aren't waking up. A few of them are becoming uncomfortable when it's slapped across their face like a dead fish, but in a few weeks or months they will compromise their privacy and claimed morals again for the convenience offered, and as this continues to happen iteratively they will give up a bit more of their privacy or freedom each time.

    The only solution left for anyone who really cares about freedom or privacy is to GTFO and band together with likeminded individuals before it is too late, if it isn't already.

    1. Re:Not privacy left to be had in the US. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only solution left for anyone who really cares about freedom or privacy is to GTFO and band together with likeminded individuals before it is too late, if it isn't already.

      Use a cellphone? Your apps are pimping your data to whoever is willing to buy. Oh, you're careful about apps and permissions? Your provider is pimping your data - including location - to anyone willing to buy.

      Drive a car? You're on camera. Cop cameras. Traffic cameras. Cameras of repo men. And it's a safe bet you didn't lie on your registration.

      So on, so forth. There is no escape.

      People don't give a fuck. In truth, it's hard not to not give a fuck. Despite hysteria from the deranged fringes, we live in good times. Your chance of being Arkancided or rounded up in Big Mike's Electrocamps are slim to none. You're more likely to hit a lottery and sleep with a supermodel.

      You're important only as a collective statistic, as an individual, chances are, you're worthless.

    2. Re: Not privacy left to be had in the US. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      You Sir, are a frog on the boil.

    3. Re:Not privacy left to be had in the US. by GoTeam · · Score: 1

      To be fair, your chances of sleeping with a supermodel greatly increase when you win the lottery. Not saying it's a 90% chance, but it is much higher than the 0.0000000000000000001% chance I have right now.

    4. Re: Not privacy left to be had in the US. by CoolDiscoRex · · Score: 1
      Not only that, but we feel confident that, statistically, in a country of 300 million people, it will be a very long time before they come for us personally. I mean, it's hard to persecute the entire population at once, you have to be selective. By keeping your head down, chances are, other people will be targeted first. It's like those animal species that move in groups of hundreds of thousands though dangerous territory. The lion has a very easy time catching it's dinner, but the sheer numbers mean that, statstically, most animals will survive the journey. The lion just can't catch them all. Safety through obscurity. That's the mentality that many of us have. We know that things are messed up, and that we live in a police state.

      The police can't punish everyone, though, so if you go along with it, chances are very good that you can maintain a reasonable quality of life, even in a police state. Speak out, and your risks of being noticed by the machine go up exponentially.

      Currying favor with the machine is the best defense when you no longer control the machine. This si much easier to do when we convince ourselves that the machine is righteous and the dissenters are evil. Such notions become a very easy sell to the people when aquiesense is inevitable anyway. We all live in varying degrees of delusion. It's how we survive.

    5. Re:Not privacy left to be had in the US. by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

      Wait, wait, RECORD high labor non-participation rates and this is "Good times"?
      Not in any reality anywhere

  22. Related Note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mozilla needs to quit dicking around with Firefox privacy. You shouldn't have to about:config 500 settings before you open preferences to get rid of media.peerenabled etc.

  23. Re: People in Russia are powerless by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1

    I know that Trump colluded with the Russian government's attacks on our country, and continues to serve and protect the Vladimir Putin.

    You do? Amazing! Everyone will want to see this!
      Where's the evidence you have of this? Can I see it?

  24. Re: People in Russia are powerless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Trump Jr's treason-meeting at was explicityly to collude with the Russian government's attacks on our country.

    Donald Trump's campaign manager is under house arrest likely headed to prison for witness tampering during his house arrest.

    You can pretend not to notice the mountains of evidence of treason laid out before us, but Donald Trump's campaign manager is wearing an ankle bracelet and will soon be wearing a jumpsuit in prison.

  25. stfu traitor by Ryanrule · · Score: 0

    see above.

    1. Re:stfu traitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, you were born too late. You would have made an awesome Nazi.

  26. Re: People in Russia are powerless by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

    Trump isn't smart enough to collude with himself, and Russian intel wouldn't want an operative like him, because it jeopardize the operation.

    Russian interference in the election, for which evidence is limited to a modest budget of shit-tier memes, generally trends more anti-Clinton than pro-Trump, but overall, it's just low-level trolling. Thus, people who keep repeating "Trump is a traitor" ad nauseum are the real useful idiots.

    And for the record, my stance is that the greatest insult to American democracy was the lack of an option on the ballot to send both Clinton and Trump on a rocket headed towards the sun.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  27. "Awareness" is bullshit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The votes haven't changed one bit, and nothing else has either. His optimism is misplaced.

    Posting AC for violation of groupthink

  28. Don't start your sentances in the Subject. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So is it better to not know, and continue to be blissfully ignorant, or suffer the pain of knowing, and being unable to do anything about it?

    Both are better than knowing and not caring, which is why nothing changed. The American people are fine with all of this.

    1. Re: Don't start your sentances in the Subject. by CoolDiscoRex · · Score: 1
      Not all of them. 10% of people are very bothered by it, 10% are moderaly bothered by it, 10% are concerned by it, and 70% don't care. The 66% of Americans that are below the critical thinking threshold of ~IQ 110, plus a little.

      The problem is, that 70% is the solid majority.

      Ruling elites love Democracy because it's easily corruptable, and they can effortly dilute the votes of the smartest citizens by out-voting them 2-1 with citizens of average and below cognition.

      Democracy gives the most intelligent segments of society quite a bit less say in governance than it does those of average and below average intellect.

      That "the masses" accept abuse is nothing new. They always have. We've just sold the smart people on the notion that Democracy somehow prevents such abuse, when the truth is, it does no such thing. Evil people will always find it trivial to manipulate the average majority, and once they've done so, those in the higher tiers who care are powerless to do anything. You know, because "the people had their say at the ballot box".

      Smart-than-average people are forced to accept what the bottom 70% will accept, and they're usually quite upset at having to do so.

      It's not a new problem.

  29. The most important change? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never being able to go home. Right, Snowden?

    With that said, Snowden deserves his exile and more. Whatever your arguments are the fact remains that Snowden is in fact a low life thief and a traitor.

    1. Re:The most important change? by MikeDataLink · · Score: 1

      Never being able to go home. Right, Snowden?

      With that said, Snowden deserves his exile and more. Whatever your arguments are the fact remains that Snowden is in fact a low life thief and a traitor.

      If you're wife were cheating on you and giving her lover money from your checking account, setting up cameras in your office at work to spy on you, and sending your kids to Nazi school instead of homeschooling them like you thought...

      Would you be pissed off and ready to hang the person that told you? Get a grip man. Snowden did the right thing, and the only thing he could do. He's more American than 99% of our politicians.

      --
      Mike @ The Geek Pub. Let's Make Stuff!
    2. Re: The most important change? by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Would you be pissed off and ready to hang the person that told you?

      No. I would get pissed off and ready to hang the fuckwit after he copied all of my personal documents, banking/financial info, browsing history, chat histories, and home-made porn collection, dumped a bunch of it randomly on the internet, and then fucked off and offered it to my neighbour in exchange for getting to hide in his house.

    3. Re:The most important change? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're wife were cheating on you and giving her lover money from your checking account, setting up cameras in your office at work to spy on you, and sending your kids to Nazi school instead of homeschooling them like you thought...

      Would you be pissed off and ready to hang the person that told you? Get a grip man. Snowden did the right thing, and the only thing he could do. He's more American than 99% of our politicians.

      Why does everyone create these completely ridiculous analogies? Snowden stole classified information. As for being more American, I don't think so.

  30. More HTTPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lots more sites use https now.

  31. NOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I once used Google mail, and even though I knew it could be intercepted, I was fascinated by all the nicely working features. Like properly working full text search.

    Now I stopped doing so, and use GMX, a quite crappy service. But it is a local one.

    I once had an FB account, now deleted.

    Then Google and Facebook engaged in all sorts of politics, which I do not like. So I decided to free myself from these monopolist corporations.

    If you think carefully about the whole Commercial Internet, you will find that the internet existed BEFORE these corporations. And it will exist AFTER them.

    We all can do something RIGHT NOW to decrease the power of the oligarchic corporations and the snooping they enable:

    http://altwissenschaft.ddnss.de/VergleichMessenger.html
    http://altwissenschaft.ddnss.de/IT_Airbus.html

    You can use Translate.yandex.com to get an English version of it. Don't use Google, they already drown in your data. No need to expand your Personal File with them.

    1. Re:NOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://altwissenschaft.ddnss.de/VergleichMessenger.html
      http://altwissenschaft.ddnss.de/IT_Airbus.html

      HTTP, really?

  32. Re: Thief and a traitor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck off, eurotrash

  33. Re: People in Russia are powerless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What attack? What treason? He's doing a great job as President. You're not making sense.

  34. Snowden bashers are all AC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems like all Snowden bashers in this thread are anonymous cowards.

    People like Snowden are the reason why it's still possible for you to remain anonymous to spew your hatred.

    Oh the irony.

    1. Re:Snowden bashers are all AC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems like all Snowden bashers in this thread are anonymous cowards.

      People like Snowden are the reason why it's still possible for you to remain anonymous to spew your hatred.

      Oh the irony.

      Invisible people have always been around, and always will. I'm watching YOU!

    2. Re:Snowden bashers are all AC by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      The AC with day jobs that have security clearances can only use the AC part of sites like this.
      To put their side of the collect it all story.
      The color of law fiction they got told that makes decades of illegal domestic spying feel legal.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    3. Re: Snowden bashers are all AC by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      The Snowden bashers are all hired trolls. All decent red blooded Americans admire national hero Snowden, and demand he be awarded the Medal of Freedom he deserves.

    4. Re: Snowden bashers are all AC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meanwhile pedophiles create alternate accounts to post under in a vain attempt to avoid revealing their real name. Isn't that right Pastor Peen?

    5. Re: Snowden bashers are all AC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Snowden bashers are all hired trolls.

      How much of a solipsistic narcissist do you have to be to think that people can't legitimately believe other than the way you do? What's next? Anybody who triggers you is also a Russian troll farmer?

  35. Re: People in Russia are powerless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not sure about CNN these days but MSNBC never called Trump a traitor or treasonous. The technical term we all know only applies to actual enemies and not hostile 3rd parties that we haven't actually declared war over.

    It is safe to say that the President and those around him lack actual patriotism since they are doing what is best for Russia when it is clearly against our own interests. Same goes with this stupid trade war. Arguing our deal with Canada and Mexico wasn't fair is beyond the pale. Russia sows decent, it's their M.O. You see Trump using a lot of the same tactics but he doesn't understand the scale on which he is playing. Putin most probably does. It's the same reason we aren't likely to see anything happen with North Korea, Trump is outclassed by his opponents left and right.

    The scary part is that it is not known publicly if Trump is helping Putin on purpose because he's corrupt or by accident because he's incompetent. There is good evidence in either direction at this point.

  36. Re: People in Russia are powerless by Narcocide · · Score: 1

    There is good evidence in either direction at this point.

    Stop arguing as though these two things are mutually exclusive. It's just as possible that he's helping Putin on purpose because he's incompetent, rather than in spite of it.

  37. No offense, but by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

    being aware and powerless isn't much different than having power, yet being unaware.

    The end result is the same.

    Nothing changes.

    1. Re: No offense, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but if you know something you still have the potential to do something about it; If you don't know something, you have no potential to do something about what you are unaware of.

    2. Re:No offense, but by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      People can now LOL at the "crypto" experts the big US brands use.
      The academics that assured the world their special crypto was a standard, tested and totally safe.
      The legal teams who invited "other agencies" to connect their brand up to US collect it all spying.
      The power of spying is gone.
      People cannot change the illegal domestic spying but the academics and big brands experts are now a joke.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    3. Re:No offense, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The power of spying is gone? Laughably stupid and naive. Though soon if the academics are a joke narrative plays out future generations might just be dumb enough to agree. Win-win for big government!

  38. Re:Google and Facebook are laughing all the way to by Narcocide · · Score: 1

    We don't know that for sure.

  39. Can I rob a bank and move to Russia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then I would post a message on the internet explaining I robbed the bank to show the USAian public just how insecure their banking system is.

    I feel that would be a real good feel good humanitarian deed. People have to know

  40. Russia My Ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This motherfucker pedophile is in Brazil, laughing at US. And I bet that motherfucker communista of Michel Temer is hiding this motherfucker.

  41. medal of freedom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Snowden is all American hero. He deserves the Medal of Freedom.

  42. The fight is more even? They have all the guns. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure you have your little collection of handguns and long guns, but they have TANKS. PLANES. BOMBS. Good luck.

  43. Re:Thief and a traitor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The NSA, an agency that spies on everything, is spying on you! If you needed Snowden to tell you this than to come to the conclusion on your own then that's just sad. Shouldn't there be a newspiece to write when he says to install a firewall, put a password on your wifi router, or to update your software? All which can be broken into and your encryption keys compromised?

  44. Re:Thief and a traitor! by another_twilight · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "An individual who breaks a law that conscience tells him is unjust, and who willingly accepts the penalty of imprisonment in order to arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing the highest respect for law." - Martin Luther King Jr.

  45. The reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that no body cares. The Tax man knows a whole lot of stuff about me and is far more dangerous to me (if I donâ(TM)t pay my taxes) than some government entity monitoring global telecommunications to trace and intercept potential threats to the establishment. The same establishment that has built the closest thing we have to public order.

  46. Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The information is to be made public, so no need to encrypt using this super complex HTTPS pseudo-security.

  47. Yes Hillary ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Old White men cooperating against the moneychanger elite and their Mohammedist brute friends is "collusion" !

    We all know the white people must be displaced by brownies and their nice culture of head-chopping !

  48. Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that the best of shilling NSA can muster ?

  49. Da, Comrade! by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

    Comrade Snowden has spoken and thus it is true!!

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  50. Re:Thief and a traitor! by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

    He didn't say that so you are a lying sack of shit. He rightly pointed out that Snowden is a traitor in the pay of Russians who have been interfering in U.S. politics and using the information they got from Snowden to do it.

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  51. Re: People in Russia are powerless by CoolDiscoRex · · Score: 1
    lol, one of two corporate-owned puppets != control

    it's the illusional of control

    The average IQ of the USA is 98. Those with IQ's > 120 represent single digit percentages of the population.

    True critical or abstract thinking begins around 110.

    Roughly 2/3rds of Americans are under this. They far outnumber the votes of those who think critically. How do people without critical thinking learn? Via repetition. This is why candidates buy ads, and run them frequently.

    Democracy is idiot rule. Okay, that's a bit extreme, it's actually rule by those of average intelligence. That's kind of scrary in and of itself, though, as history has proven repeatedly that masses cannot effectively govern themselves, and their ability to choose governors is not significantly better. Some of the worst actors have been popularly elected.

  52. Thanks, Eddy!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We would still be in the dark if it wasn't for you!
    Could we find someone to do a similar public service every 5 years or so?

    Or maybe we could just give up on the Forth Amendment.....

  53. I Have To Say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought the Snowden revelations would have had more impact. On official policy.

    Perhaps we can claim that Tech's resistance to the Panopticon was at least bolstered by the disclosures. Apple, Google and Microsoft have supported privacy against government spying, even if several of those perform a lot of corporate spying.

    Being aware but powerless isn't a very satisfactory outcome.