Slashdot Mirror


President's Most Senior Technology Advisor Says the White House is Quietly Pursuing an Aggressive AI Plan (technologyreview.com)

Speaking at a conference held at MIT, Donald Trump's chief technology advisor, Michael Kratsios, said this week that the U.S. government would release any data that might help fuel AI research in the United States, although he didn't specify immediately what kind of data would be released or who would be eligible to receive the information. From a report: Kratsios, who is deputy assistant to the president and deputy US chief technology officer, said the government is looking for ways to open up federal data to AI researchers. "Anything that we can do to unlock government data, we're committed to," Kratsios told MIT Technology Review. "We'd love to hear from any academic that has any insights." Data has been a key factor behind recent advances in artificial intelligence. For example, better voice recognition and image processing have been contingent on the availability of huge quantities of training data. The government has access to large amounts of data, and it's possible that it could be used to train innovative algorithms to do new things. "Anything we can do to figure that out, we will work very hard on," Kratsios added.

The Trump administration has faced criticism for a more laissez-faire approach to artificial intelligence than many other countries have taken. Kratsios argued that the White House is quietly pushing an aggressive policy, pointing to examples of research projects that have received federal funding. When asked about the president's interest in artificial intelligence, Kratsios said, "The White House has prioritized AI, and he obviously runs the White House."

106 comments

  1. The President has prioritized AI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Wants to turn over the reins ASAP

    1. Re:The President has prioritized AI by DickBreath · · Score: 2

      AI will bring the speed and power of computers to screwing up policy decisions.

      And by AI, I mean Artificial Insanity.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    2. Re:The President has prioritized AI by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Wants to turn over the reins ASAP

      Gives him more time to golf, Tweet, and eat Happy Meals while watching TV in bed.

      T: "Alexa, get Mexico to pay for the wall, fire Mueller, and call Rocket Man a random new name. Better yet, get Mueller, Rocket Man, AND Mexico to pay for the wall!"

      Alexa: "[beep] Sure thing boss, I'm on it..."

    3. Re:The President has prioritized AI by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Wants to turn over the reins ASAP

      Gives him more time to golf, Tweet, and eat Happy Meals while watching TV in bed.

      T: "Alexa, get Mexico to pay for the wall, fire Mueller, and call Rocket Man a random new name. Better yet, get Mueller, Rocket Man, AND Mexico to pay for the wall!"

      Alexa: "[beep] Sure thing boss, I'm on it..."

      Artificial Intelligence in the White House? This is the first time there has been any intelligence in the White House in decades.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    4. Re: The President has prioritized AI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps this will result in som real intellegence in the White House?

      Who am I kidding. This too will end badly.

    5. Re:The President has prioritized AI by infolation · · Score: 1

      Spottswoode:
      Remember, there's is no I in Team America.

      I.N.T.E.L.L.I.G.E.N.C.E.:
      Yes, there is.

      Sarah:
      I.N.T.E.L.L.I.G.E.N.C.E. is down! Repeat, we have lost our I.N.T.E.L.L.I.G.E.N.C.E.!

    6. Re:The President has prioritized AI by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      What is attention getting is Cadet Bone Spurs request to have Dr. Charles Forbin head the project.

  2. Al Plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, at least it's Al Plan and not Al Qaeda.
     
    Walkawalkawalka!

    1. Re:Al Plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean Durka durka?

  3. 50% there by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Well, they perfected the first half.

  4. The new AI Code Name is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Trump Headroom

    1. Re:The new AI Code Name is.... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Trump Headroom

      It'll be h-h-h-huuuge, b-b-b-belive me! Best AI ev-v-v-v-ver!

    2. Re:The new AI Code Name is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is indeed lots of room in that head

  5. If someone shouts, "Freeze all motor functions"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...at Trump then maybe the White House "Artificial Intelligence plan" will fall quiet.

    Right now, their AI is not quiet at all...

  6. Quetly? by houghi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Quetly persuing it?
    To me that reads as if POTUS is either not aware or they try to do it behinds his back. Otherwise he would be yellling how great the AI would be. It will be a great AI, it will be the best AI. You'll see!

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    1. Re:Quetly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everything is negative to you these days, isn't it? TDS confirmed.

      It's okay. The world isn't ending. The sun will rise. You should go outside and smell the flowers. Relax a little and ignore politics until you can see the innocuous as innocuous.

    2. Re:Quetly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing wrong with a cheerleader for our country. Whats up with all the negativity?

    3. Re:Quetly? by jellomizer · · Score: 2

      It was probably one of those things, when discussed, his eyes glazed over and started tweeting on his phone. That is Nerd stuff that doesn't matter to Trump.

      I have dealt with Bosses much like Trump. Just as long as the topic isn't on his Priority Wish List or the Hate List, just as long as you made some partial argument for it, you are good to go.

      AI Research will not make Trump look great, nor will it make him look worse. If it is a success he can then call it a great success, if it fails, he will just be like it was a little side project.

      Guys like Trump are easily manipulable, avoid the trigger areas, and work on their ego, and you are the shining star, and you get to do whatever you want.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    4. Re:Quetly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Though high, that's not the dominant reason for sneaking in this administration. They sneak the most when they are doing something illegal or unethical. The ones they are hiding their actions from are the career government workers who know the rules and laws that might apply. If any of them find out, it blows the "I didn't know any better" excuse.

      What would you like to bet that this is just an excuse to accidentally release some confidential or secret data about people they don't like? It could just be a case of "whoops, guess we missed that one" after they carefully filtered out anything that would harm them and forgot that others have rights too.

    5. Re:Quetly? by HiThere · · Score: 1

      I wish the evidence didn't contradict you.
      OTOH, I do think he only makes loud, blustery noises about things he thinks his supporter will notice and approve of. Some of them he cares about, and others he doesn't.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    6. Re:Quetly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I hate leaders that talk to the people.

  7. Is your WH AI plan too slow or quiet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hillary planned to shut down all AI research and give it to China Wall Street!!!

  8. Will this include the illegally collected data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, think how fast the AI can ramp up if it gets trained on all the illegally monitored phone calls, emails, texts and mic-enabled (without the user's permission) recordings they've got stored away.

    The big data era seems to have gotten away from us. I really have to wonder who is actually happy about all of our data being collected, filtered, pilfered and ransacked for value other than a few guys that already have more money than they know what to do with.

  9. The only intelligence by Kernel+Kurtz · · Score: 5, Informative

    this White House is likely to see would be artificial. They are certainly lacking in the real kind.

    1. Re:The only intelligence by oneneo · · Score: 0

      "The White House has prioritized AI, and it obviously runs the White House."

    2. Re:The only intelligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Yeah say that about Obama or a Democrat and it gets down voted.

      Say it about another Republican (other than Bush) and it also gets downvoted. It's almost as if there is a general consensus that there are certain people most users here would consider to not be intelligent regardless of political affiliation...

    3. Re:The only intelligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, actually any praise or apologia to any GOP on /. gets downvoted. Do I need to mention Cold Fjord who would post sourced comments down-voted to oblivion because he didn't toe the party line?

      Look at any political thread most comments up-voted are ad hominem drivel.

    4. Re:The only intelligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think that every republican = dumb and every democrat = smart, than that's very telling about how gullible you are. George Bush is smarter than you - don't believe me? Read this: https://keithhennessey.com/2013/04/24/smarter/

    5. Re:The only intelligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only intelligence this White House is likely to see would be artificial. They are certainly lacking in the real kind.

      Project Scarecrow: If I Only Had a Brain.

    6. Re:The only intelligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Don't be so whiny! Take the future in your own hands, little man, and go to the comment section of Breitbart News for getting the positive comments you crave so desperately. Last time I checked there they were literally discussing how to best gas Jews. Hurry up!

    7. Re:The only intelligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can y'all PLEASE come up with some creative insults at least?

      You sound like my grandpa insulting squirrels.

    8. Re:The only intelligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think that every republican = dumb and every democrat = smart

      Which nobody in this thread said, until you did. Nice straw man.

    9. Re:The only intelligence by presidenteloco · · Score: 1

      If GWB is smart, then he was evil as fnck! for attacking Iraq "because" of their (non-existent) role in 9/11 and "because" of their (fictitious) weapons of mass destruction.
      If he was smart enough to know the stuff he and his administration were spouting about all that in the lead-up to the war was pure lies from the get-go, then as I say he was a moral vacuum.

      Perhaps (R != dumb) but (R == dumb | evil)

      --

      Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
    10. Re:The only intelligence by DivineKnight · · Score: 1

      I for one back this AC. I'm not affiliated with either party, and watching the two of you go at over the past dozen or so years has grown tiresome...at least Clinton and Bush created some humor that crossed the aisle.

      And saying someone's name is not humorous.

      Get off my lawn.

    11. Re:The only intelligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trolls get modded down, and fjord was nothing but a lying troll, just like you.
      Oh, wait it is you Fjord, suck it up princess. Sad.

  10. TRUMP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and artificial intelligence seem to go hand in hand

    1. Re:TRUMP by infolation · · Score: 1

      Spottswoode: Remember, there's is no I in Team America. I.N.T.E.L.L.I.G.E.N.C.E.: Yes, there is. Sarah: I.N.T.E.L.L.I.G.E.N.C.E. is down! Repeat, we have lost our I.N.T.E.L.L.I.G.E.N.C.E.!

  11. nuh way by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 4, Funny

    Unless Trump is personally checking code into the repos, that means he's an imbecile!!

  12. Please no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was hoping Trump wouldn't get seduced by governmental fads. AI right now is a 4 decade old technology, which is currently a fad. Universities have been teaching Neural Networks during the 80s, 90s, 00s, and today. It's nothing new.

    1. Re:Please no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AI has become a common part of daily lives. Stocks are bought and sold on AI pattern matching. People are assigned a social credit score in China based on what an AI chooses. People's jail/prison sentences are dictated by an AI in some states. Military and trade wars are dependant on AIs, because an AI is a far more effective general on the battlefield and able to react much quicker than human ones.

      AI work is what will make or break a country, be it with figuring out what psyops work is best for weakening an enemy country, figuring out what a country will need in 10 years as a critical resource so you can own it, and so on.

    2. Re: Please no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not entirely true. You should read more the of the latest AI literature.

    3. Re:Please no by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      That isn't AI. Those are algorithms and have been around for many decades.

    4. Re: Please no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I help write some of it.

      It's complete bully.

    5. Re:Please no by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      I agree. The should instead focus more on using more blockchain.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    6. Re:Please no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if anyone applied block chaining to deep learning... I mean... that's like the secret for....Hmm....OMG, I gotta go call a VC!

  13. AI will result in huge job losses. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trump needs to slap big tarrifs on AI to save jobs.

    1. Re:AI will result in huge job losses. by TomGreenhaw · · Score: 1

      Trump needs to slap big tarrifs on AI to save jobs.

      Tarrifs only apply to imported stuff. I think you meant taxes.

      Do you honestly think a republican pro business low tax rate government will tax robots? That's why this government really wants protectionism - the financiers want to build automated factories here. And they say anybody who disagrees with them is spewing "fake news"

      --
      Greed is the root of all evil.
  14. There's already artificial intelligence in the WH by kimgkimg · · Score: 0

    Actual intelligence would be welcome change.

  15. Taxpayer money by 110010001000 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In other words, the tech industry has convinced us to giving them even more taxpayer money based on false promises of "AI".

    1. Re:Taxpayer money by gtall · · Score: 1

      That jackass is so incompetent I wouldn't bet on anything of note happening in AI over this.

    2. Re:Taxpayer money by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      That jackass is so incompetent I wouldn't bet on anything of note happening in AI over this.

      I don't know about that; if anyone can build the ultimate insult-bot, he can.

    3. Re:Taxpayer money by Voyager529 · · Score: 1

      That jackass is so incompetent I wouldn't bet on anything of note happening in AI over this.

      What do you think is running his Twitter account?

    4. Re:Taxpayer money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jobs, foreign policy, approval numbers don't lie.

    5. Re:Taxpayer money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nailed it. Slashdot commenters are now somewhere between YouTube and Zero Hedge in maximum effective intelligence. Sad.

    6. Re:Taxpayer money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other words, the tech industry has convinced us to giving them even more taxpayer money based on false promises of "AI".

      You really have no clue how this works. I work in the federal government. Here's what this means:

      It means directives to federal agencies to make their public data more accessible for AI uses. Advisory committees and special reports from industry reps. Reviews of agency rules that could hinder private sector AI development. Speeding up regulatory review of AI systems. Deploying AI for use in federal IT systems.

      Some of these are necessary things that need to be done anyway. Others are window dressing that make people feel like the administration is doing something (see advisory committees and reports). None of it costs taxpayers money (AI deployments are by and large open source at this point, because there are not COTS products that do what govt needs).

      Federal workers are already getting paid to do their jobs. This just tells them where to focus some of their efforts.

      Every administration does the same thing with whatever the hot topic du jour is. Obama was big on transparency. Then it was big data. Then it was 3d printing. Then it was open source. Then it was something else. Business as usual in the govt.

      What you're suggesting is exactly what other countries do. China, EU, and others are pouring billions o public dollars into AI research, education, company formation, and related purposes. US barely does any of that. Just whatever research funding agencies like NSF allocate, which go through their own merit-based approval process and compete with other research proposals. Which we do anyway.

      Give it 9 months and this will fade away to the next big thing. You can count on it.

    7. Re:Taxpayer money by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

      He's counting on you (and all his other opponents) to think that way going into the 2018/2020 elections.

      Glad to see you aren't letting him down.

      Following your bets above I think the DNC should run people like Elizabeth Warren, Jeremiah Wright, Alvin Green, Jonathan Edwards, and Anthony Weiner.

  16. Mein Führer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We must not allow an AI gap!

  17. Just license Microsoft's Tay and call it done... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    US-based company - check
    AI - check
    Nazi - check
    Sexbot - check

    Should accomplish all of the administrations goals, right when they need a big win!

  18. Traitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Line 'em up.

    Take aim!

  19. From the three-letter-agencies.. by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    From the three-letter-agencies that brought you More Surveillance: Say "welcome!" to your new AI surveillance-data-processing overlords!

    That's about where I think this is going. Since what they keep trotting out as 'AI' is shitty, that means the analysis will be wrong part of the time, and some innocent citizens will end up dropped in a blacksite oubliette and never heard from again.

  20. I could stand on fifth avenue and shoot someone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "I could stand in the middle of fifth avenue and shoot someone, and I wouldn't lose any voters."

    It's not in the White House that intelligence is lacking. It's in the collective brains of the morons who have actually voted for someone who thinks this about his electors, and says so openly and publicly.

    1. Re:I could stand on fifth avenue and shoot someone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Careful - if you point out that these people are stupid, they're going to want to stick it to you by proving just how stupid they really can be.

    2. Re:I could stand on fifth avenue and shoot someone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They already did.

  21. So, which are they planning? by whitroth · · Score: 1

    To fix Trump, or just replace him?

  22. Re:Moscow Donald's top priority is pardoning himse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Donald Trump is going to prison for treason, and his uneducated racist supporters can't do anything about.

    Moscow Donald is no more able to pardon himself than he is able suck his own cock.

    citation provided

    Learn yoga to suck your own cock as others

  23. Re:Sentient sexbots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod parent up. Trump isn't smart enough to understand what artificial intelligence actually is. Probably thinks it's Knight Rider, or the robot off Lost in Space.

  24. He's competent at all the wrong things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That jackass is so incompetent I wouldn't bet on anything of note happening in AI over this.

    He's incompetent at doing anything that is beneficial to this nation or its people. He is pretty competent at doing what is best for himself, and very competent at bullying and even destroying his opponents. Which is already extremely chilling, given the craven inaction of congress to hold him accountable or act as an effective check and balance to his numerous and ever-growing abuses of power. Which makes his administration's embrace of AI, particularly in the context of the surveillance state we already have, absolutely terrifying.

    1. Re:He's competent at all the wrong things by Shotgun · · Score: 1, Troll

      He is pretty competent at doing what is best for himself, and very competent at bullying and even destroying his opponents. Which is already extremely chilling, given the craven inaction of congress to hold him accountable or act as an effective check and balance to his numerous and ever-growing abuses of power. Which makes his administration's embrace of AI, particularly in the context of the surveillance state we already have, absolutely terrifying.

      At least he isn't screaming "racist" every time someone disagrees with him. And he has not yet turned the DOJ, FBI, IRS and CIA into weapons to use against his political enemies. But, heh, you got some judges from the 9th circuit to block most of his moves, so you've got that. I mean, they all get overturned by the Supreme Court, but at least you can block him for a while. Right?

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  25. "Quietly aggressive" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the pursuit of pokemans.

    Let me show you them.

  26. Aggressive "AI plan" or "aggressive AI" plan? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    Hey, I'm thinkin' here!

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    1. Re:Aggressive "AI plan" or "aggressive AI" plan? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      The age of "user hostile" software is upon us! Think Siri, but with an _attitude_!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:Aggressive "AI plan" or "aggressive AI" plan? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Surli.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  27. I would like to subscribe... APK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am intrigued by your ideas and would like to subscribe to your newsletter

    APK

    P.S. => Can these techniques allow me lick my own asshole... apk

  28. new narrative by 1ucius · · Score: 1

    "The Trump administration has faced criticism for a more laissez-faire approach to artificial intelligence..."

    So, the R's are the pro-science / technology party now, and the D's are the luddites?

  29. Re:Moscow Donald's top priority is pardoning himse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Hahahahaha! That's nothing in comparison to the look on your face when you shoot yourself in the foot, though! :)

  30. Riiiiiiiight by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 0

    Look, after a while, you realize he has no ideas, and 95 percent of what he says he'll do, he never does.

    Now, China, they actually have a real AI program, with real funding, and real scientists.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Riiiiiiiight by HiThere · · Score: 1

      China has had a significant AI program for a decade or more. Not always a large one, and I don't know it's current status (though I could guess), but even a decade ago they were recruiting researchers.

      Now as to whether it's approaching success...I have no idea. I've got suspicions that they've diverted a lot of the work into their "social credit" scheme, but that's pure guesswork.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    2. Re:Riiiiiiiight by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

      promiseskept.com

  31. There's nothing false about it by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    it's not "AI" in the sci-fi sense. It's Job Automation & data mining. Lots of money there. It's still Tax payers paying for basic research that companies will use for their personal profit (privatize the profits, socials the costs). It's especially funny because it's the tax payers paying to put themselves out of work with automation.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:There's nothing false about it by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. It is data mining and algorithms. Nothing "AI" about it. There is no intelligence.

  32. A data! by RhettLivingston · · Score: 1

    Yes! The release of the petabytes of voice, video, etc. captured by the NSA, CIA, etc. worldwide would be awesome training data! Especially the relatively small portion that has been analyzed, professionally translated, etc. as it would have metadata added.

  33. Jobs! Jobs! Jobs! by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    For robots anyway.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  34. Artificial intelligence? by Locke2005 · · Score: 2

    No match for the president's natural stupidity!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  35. Re:Sentient sexbots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "sentient self-aware..." and "programmed to not cringe" are mutually incompatible.

  36. This is a better way to do it by Provocateur · · Score: 1

    All the current din about AI this or AI that has really been "agressive" publicity, and not enough authentic AI.

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    1. Re:This is a better way to do it by HiThere · · Score: 1

      You've been corrupted by movies. There's lots of AI being successfully used all over the place. It's not *very* intelligent, but it's still intelligent. Superhuman AI is still a bit off, but that doesn't mean that a drill-bot that positions the work properly before drilling isn't intelligent.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  37. And on the bright side... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Both his intellect and personality are quantifiable in currently existing cpu, memory, and storage capacity!

    Now we know the true reason Trump became president: Working on his plans for digital immortality!

  38. From the mouths of losers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll never understand people who claim their opponent is stupid after losing to them.

    Do none of them realize they're denigrating themselves in saying that?

    The only answer I can find is that if they were smart enough to realize that, they might've been smart enough not to lose in the first place, but it's still amazing to see how no evidence can penetrate the bubble of ignorance.

    1. Re:From the mouths of losers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Democracy is the tyrany of the masses over the thinking minority.

      The last U.S. election is a perfect example of that. But it's unfortunately not the only one.

  39. Not 'A', 'NSA' data! by RhettLivingston · · Score: 1

    Guess "NSA" can't start a subject line. Weird or spooky?

  40. Senator Armstrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If he names the AI GW, then we need to worry.

  41. How Would You Tell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A Trump Administration sponsored Artificial Intelligence? How would you tell?

  42. Can they ever stop lying? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this like their fake plans to defeat ISIS or the opioid epidemic? The stuff they make up for their dumb supporters to believe?

  43. Twitter? by TJHook3r · · Score: 1

    Let's hope the AI never gets to read Twitter, it might go haywire!

  44. Maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unlock the classified data behind the 9/11 attack. Would show good faith.

  45. Just how aggressive is this plan? by JOstrow · · Score: 1

    Are they Quietly Pursuing an Aggressive AI Plan? Or quietly and aggressively pursuing an AI plan?

  46. Camp L by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given that you don't realize the smart people have ways of getting the not-so-smart to go along with them, it's clear which camp you're in.

    1. Re:Camp L by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I bet you're on the sociopathic side of the smart people.

  47. Translation by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    President's Most Senior Technology Advisor Says the White House is Quietly Pursuing an Aggressive AI Plan

    Translation: Trump threw a PC at an intern.