Slashdot Mirror


President's Most Senior Technology Advisor Says the White House is Quietly Pursuing an Aggressive AI Plan (technologyreview.com)

Speaking at a conference held at MIT, Donald Trump's chief technology advisor, Michael Kratsios, said this week that the U.S. government would release any data that might help fuel AI research in the United States, although he didn't specify immediately what kind of data would be released or who would be eligible to receive the information. From a report: Kratsios, who is deputy assistant to the president and deputy US chief technology officer, said the government is looking for ways to open up federal data to AI researchers. "Anything that we can do to unlock government data, we're committed to," Kratsios told MIT Technology Review. "We'd love to hear from any academic that has any insights." Data has been a key factor behind recent advances in artificial intelligence. For example, better voice recognition and image processing have been contingent on the availability of huge quantities of training data. The government has access to large amounts of data, and it's possible that it could be used to train innovative algorithms to do new things. "Anything we can do to figure that out, we will work very hard on," Kratsios added.

The Trump administration has faced criticism for a more laissez-faire approach to artificial intelligence than many other countries have taken. Kratsios argued that the White House is quietly pushing an aggressive policy, pointing to examples of research projects that have received federal funding. When asked about the president's interest in artificial intelligence, Kratsios said, "The White House has prioritized AI, and he obviously runs the White House."

51 of 106 comments (clear)

  1. The President has prioritized AI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Wants to turn over the reins ASAP

    1. Re:The President has prioritized AI by DickBreath · · Score: 2

      AI will bring the speed and power of computers to screwing up policy decisions.

      And by AI, I mean Artificial Insanity.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    2. Re:The President has prioritized AI by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Wants to turn over the reins ASAP

      Gives him more time to golf, Tweet, and eat Happy Meals while watching TV in bed.

      T: "Alexa, get Mexico to pay for the wall, fire Mueller, and call Rocket Man a random new name. Better yet, get Mueller, Rocket Man, AND Mexico to pay for the wall!"

      Alexa: "[beep] Sure thing boss, I'm on it..."

    3. Re:The President has prioritized AI by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Wants to turn over the reins ASAP

      Gives him more time to golf, Tweet, and eat Happy Meals while watching TV in bed.

      T: "Alexa, get Mexico to pay for the wall, fire Mueller, and call Rocket Man a random new name. Better yet, get Mueller, Rocket Man, AND Mexico to pay for the wall!"

      Alexa: "[beep] Sure thing boss, I'm on it..."

      Artificial Intelligence in the White House? This is the first time there has been any intelligence in the White House in decades.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    4. Re:The President has prioritized AI by infolation · · Score: 1

      Spottswoode:
      Remember, there's is no I in Team America.

      I.N.T.E.L.L.I.G.E.N.C.E.:
      Yes, there is.

      Sarah:
      I.N.T.E.L.L.I.G.E.N.C.E. is down! Repeat, we have lost our I.N.T.E.L.L.I.G.E.N.C.E.!

    5. Re:The President has prioritized AI by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      What is attention getting is Cadet Bone Spurs request to have Dr. Charles Forbin head the project.

  2. 50% there by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Well, they perfected the first half.

  3. The new AI Code Name is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Trump Headroom

    1. Re:The new AI Code Name is.... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Trump Headroom

      It'll be h-h-h-huuuge, b-b-b-belive me! Best AI ev-v-v-v-ver!

  4. Quetly? by houghi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Quetly persuing it?
    To me that reads as if POTUS is either not aware or they try to do it behinds his back. Otherwise he would be yellling how great the AI would be. It will be a great AI, it will be the best AI. You'll see!

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    1. Re:Quetly? by jellomizer · · Score: 2

      It was probably one of those things, when discussed, his eyes glazed over and started tweeting on his phone. That is Nerd stuff that doesn't matter to Trump.

      I have dealt with Bosses much like Trump. Just as long as the topic isn't on his Priority Wish List or the Hate List, just as long as you made some partial argument for it, you are good to go.

      AI Research will not make Trump look great, nor will it make him look worse. If it is a success he can then call it a great success, if it fails, he will just be like it was a little side project.

      Guys like Trump are easily manipulable, avoid the trigger areas, and work on their ego, and you are the shining star, and you get to do whatever you want.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:Quetly? by HiThere · · Score: 1

      I wish the evidence didn't contradict you.
      OTOH, I do think he only makes loud, blustery noises about things he thinks his supporter will notice and approve of. Some of them he cares about, and others he doesn't.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  5. The only intelligence by Kernel+Kurtz · · Score: 5, Informative

    this White House is likely to see would be artificial. They are certainly lacking in the real kind.

    1. Re:The only intelligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Don't be so whiny! Take the future in your own hands, little man, and go to the comment section of Breitbart News for getting the positive comments you crave so desperately. Last time I checked there they were literally discussing how to best gas Jews. Hurry up!

    2. Re:The only intelligence by presidenteloco · · Score: 1

      If GWB is smart, then he was evil as fnck! for attacking Iraq "because" of their (non-existent) role in 9/11 and "because" of their (fictitious) weapons of mass destruction.
      If he was smart enough to know the stuff he and his administration were spouting about all that in the lead-up to the war was pure lies from the get-go, then as I say he was a moral vacuum.

      Perhaps (R != dumb) but (R == dumb | evil)

      --

      Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
    3. Re:The only intelligence by DivineKnight · · Score: 1

      I for one back this AC. I'm not affiliated with either party, and watching the two of you go at over the past dozen or so years has grown tiresome...at least Clinton and Bush created some humor that crossed the aisle.

      And saying someone's name is not humorous.

      Get off my lawn.

  6. nuh way by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 4, Funny

    Unless Trump is personally checking code into the repos, that means he's an imbecile!!

  7. Taxpayer money by 110010001000 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In other words, the tech industry has convinced us to giving them even more taxpayer money based on false promises of "AI".

    1. Re:Taxpayer money by gtall · · Score: 1

      That jackass is so incompetent I wouldn't bet on anything of note happening in AI over this.

    2. Re:Taxpayer money by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      That jackass is so incompetent I wouldn't bet on anything of note happening in AI over this.

      I don't know about that; if anyone can build the ultimate insult-bot, he can.

    3. Re:Taxpayer money by Voyager529 · · Score: 1

      That jackass is so incompetent I wouldn't bet on anything of note happening in AI over this.

      What do you think is running his Twitter account?

    4. Re:Taxpayer money by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

      He's counting on you (and all his other opponents) to think that way going into the 2018/2020 elections.

      Glad to see you aren't letting him down.

      Following your bets above I think the DNC should run people like Elizabeth Warren, Jeremiah Wright, Alvin Green, Jonathan Edwards, and Anthony Weiner.

  8. Re:Please no by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    That isn't AI. Those are algorithms and have been around for many decades.

  9. From the three-letter-agencies.. by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    From the three-letter-agencies that brought you More Surveillance: Say "welcome!" to your new AI surveillance-data-processing overlords!

    That's about where I think this is going. Since what they keep trotting out as 'AI' is shitty, that means the analysis will be wrong part of the time, and some innocent citizens will end up dropped in a blacksite oubliette and never heard from again.

  10. Re: Please no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I help write some of it.

    It's complete bully.

  11. I could stand on fifth avenue and shoot someone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "I could stand in the middle of fifth avenue and shoot someone, and I wouldn't lose any voters."

    It's not in the White House that intelligence is lacking. It's in the collective brains of the morons who have actually voted for someone who thinks this about his electors, and says so openly and publicly.

    1. Re:I could stand on fifth avenue and shoot someone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Careful - if you point out that these people are stupid, they're going to want to stick it to you by proving just how stupid they really can be.

    2. Re:I could stand on fifth avenue and shoot someone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They already did.

  12. So, which are they planning? by whitroth · · Score: 1

    To fix Trump, or just replace him?

  13. Aggressive "AI plan" or "aggressive AI" plan? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    Hey, I'm thinkin' here!

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    1. Re:Aggressive "AI plan" or "aggressive AI" plan? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      The age of "user hostile" software is upon us! Think Siri, but with an _attitude_!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:Aggressive "AI plan" or "aggressive AI" plan? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Surli.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  14. new narrative by 1ucius · · Score: 1

    "The Trump administration has faced criticism for a more laissez-faire approach to artificial intelligence..."

    So, the R's are the pro-science / technology party now, and the D's are the luddites?

  15. Re:Moscow Donald's top priority is pardoning himse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Hahahahaha! That's nothing in comparison to the look on your face when you shoot yourself in the foot, though! :)

  16. Re:Please no by Shotgun · · Score: 1

    I agree. The should instead focus more on using more blockchain.

    --
    Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
    Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  17. Re:He's competent at all the wrong things by Shotgun · · Score: 1, Troll

    He is pretty competent at doing what is best for himself, and very competent at bullying and even destroying his opponents. Which is already extremely chilling, given the craven inaction of congress to hold him accountable or act as an effective check and balance to his numerous and ever-growing abuses of power. Which makes his administration's embrace of AI, particularly in the context of the surveillance state we already have, absolutely terrifying.

    At least he isn't screaming "racist" every time someone disagrees with him. And he has not yet turned the DOJ, FBI, IRS and CIA into weapons to use against his political enemies. But, heh, you got some judges from the 9th circuit to block most of his moves, so you've got that. I mean, they all get overturned by the Supreme Court, but at least you can block him for a while. Right?

    --
    Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
    Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  18. There's nothing false about it by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    it's not "AI" in the sci-fi sense. It's Job Automation & data mining. Lots of money there. It's still Tax payers paying for basic research that companies will use for their personal profit (privatize the profits, socials the costs). It's especially funny because it's the tax payers paying to put themselves out of work with automation.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:There's nothing false about it by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. It is data mining and algorithms. Nothing "AI" about it. There is no intelligence.

  19. A data! by RhettLivingston · · Score: 1

    Yes! The release of the petabytes of voice, video, etc. captured by the NSA, CIA, etc. worldwide would be awesome training data! Especially the relatively small portion that has been analyzed, professionally translated, etc. as it would have metadata added.

  20. Jobs! Jobs! Jobs! by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    For robots anyway.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  21. Artificial intelligence? by Locke2005 · · Score: 2

    No match for the president's natural stupidity!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  22. Re:TRUMP by infolation · · Score: 1

    Spottswoode: Remember, there's is no I in Team America. I.N.T.E.L.L.I.G.E.N.C.E.: Yes, there is. Sarah: I.N.T.E.L.L.I.G.E.N.C.E. is down! Repeat, we have lost our I.N.T.E.L.L.I.G.E.N.C.E.!

  23. This is a better way to do it by Provocateur · · Score: 1

    All the current din about AI this or AI that has really been "agressive" publicity, and not enough authentic AI.

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    1. Re:This is a better way to do it by HiThere · · Score: 1

      You've been corrupted by movies. There's lots of AI being successfully used all over the place. It's not *very* intelligent, but it's still intelligent. Superhuman AI is still a bit off, but that doesn't mean that a drill-bot that positions the work properly before drilling isn't intelligent.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  24. Not 'A', 'NSA' data! by RhettLivingston · · Score: 1

    Guess "NSA" can't start a subject line. Weird or spooky?

  25. Re:AI will result in huge job losses. by TomGreenhaw · · Score: 1

    Trump needs to slap big tarrifs on AI to save jobs.

    Tarrifs only apply to imported stuff. I think you meant taxes.

    Do you honestly think a republican pro business low tax rate government will tax robots? That's why this government really wants protectionism - the financiers want to build automated factories here. And they say anybody who disagrees with them is spewing "fake news"

    --
    Greed is the root of all evil.
  26. Twitter? by TJHook3r · · Score: 1

    Let's hope the AI never gets to read Twitter, it might go haywire!

  27. Just how aggressive is this plan? by JOstrow · · Score: 1

    Are they Quietly Pursuing an Aggressive AI Plan? Or quietly and aggressively pursuing an AI plan?

  28. Re:Riiiiiiiight by HiThere · · Score: 1

    China has had a significant AI program for a decade or more. Not always a large one, and I don't know it's current status (though I could guess), but even a decade ago they were recruiting researchers.

    Now as to whether it's approaching success...I have no idea. I've got suspicions that they've diverted a lot of the work into their "social credit" scheme, but that's pure guesswork.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  29. Translation by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    President's Most Senior Technology Advisor Says the White House is Quietly Pursuing an Aggressive AI Plan

    Translation: Trump threw a PC at an intern.

  30. Re:Riiiiiiiight by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

    promiseskept.com