Slashdot Mirror


China's Surveillance State Will Soon Track Cars (wsj.com)

China is establishing an electronic identification system to track cars nationwide, according to a report on WSJ, which cites records and people briefed on the matter. From a report: Under the plan being rolled out July 1, a radio-frequency identification chip for vehicle tracking will be installed on cars when they are registered. Compliance will be voluntary this year but will be made mandatory for new vehicles at the start of 2019, the people said. Authorities have described the plan as a means to improve public security and to help ease worsening traffic congestion, documents show, a major concern in many Chinese cities partly because clogged roads contribute to air pollution. But such a system, implemented in the world's biggest automotive market, with sales of nearly 30 million vehicles a year, will also vastly expand China's surveillance network, experts say. That network already includes widespread use of security cameras, facial recognition technology and internet monitoring.

51 of 113 comments (clear)

  1. 20 years behind the US... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 3, Interesting

    US has EZ-Pass, which is a defacto tracking system, even if not originally designed as such.

    1. Re:20 years behind the US... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      US has EZ-Pass, which is a defacto tracking system, even if not originally designed as such.

      EZ-Pass / FasTrak are opt-in, so not the same at all.

      They can be legally removed from the vehicle at anytime.

    2. Re:20 years behind the US... by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      The change is that the chip is now getting talked about.
      Huge police actions tracked every chip movement in and around Hong Kong for years using toll road payment chips.
      Drivers had no idea they got tracked with that police method when police moved in. Criminal groups always went looking for informants for years. Was it a person, phone, CCTV...
      Every van, truck, car can be tracked in the same way. That had been going on for many years in China. Criminal groups kept on changing methods but always got tracked.
      Re 'They can be legally removed from the vehicle at anytime."
      A car with no chip stands out in real time surrounded by other cars with a chip moving down a road...
      Removing the chip is not a way around such laws. No chip, no car trip.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    3. Re:20 years behind the US... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Re 'They can be legally removed from the vehicle at anytime."
      A car with no chip stands out in real time surrounded by other cars with a chip moving down a road...

      Most people do not have EZ-Pass or FasTrak. They are opt-in, and most people don't. You only need them if you use toll roads or drive across toll bridges regularly.

      I have a FastTrak card, but I removed it from my car several years ago when my commute changed. I only take it with me when I know I will crossing a bridge across the bay.

    4. Re:20 years behind the US... by thesupraman · · Score: 1

      Who needs that?in many counties they have been tracking the cellphone/Bluetooth /WiFi signals to Id vehicles for over a decade.
      You think they have not linked that to plates and ownership? Oh dear.
      Welcome to big data, government style.
      Its for your own good, really.
      Kind of...

    5. Re:20 years behind the US... by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      Do you also remove your license plates? In Norcal at least, FasTrak can use license plate readers for billing. No toll tag required.

      However FasTrak does still encourage users to get a toll tag. Suggesting perhaps that plate readers are less reliable than RFID.

    6. Re:20 years behind the US... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Communism is like that.

      No, Fascism is like that.

    7. Re:20 years behind the US... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Does it really make any difference, given that your car as a unique identifier written on it and licence plat recognition systems are cheap and pervasive?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re:20 years behind the US... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      A car with no chip stands out in real time surrounded by other cars with a chip moving down a road... Removing the chip is not a way around such laws. No chip, no car trip.

      Wat? EZ-Pass as a surveillance device is kinda a big fail.

      Yeah it might show that you drove past a toll both in Tuckahoe New Jersey at 4:55 p.m., but that's just incidental to the data needed to pay your toll. You're really gonna be pissed to know that there are cameras there that image your face and your license plate.

      In Florida they have a system that does away with the toll booth entirely, and takes a photo of the ass end of your car, then sends you a bill in the mail.

      Then again, there is the whole concept of the license plate that the privacy set should be up in arms about. Did you know that someone could see your license plate, give it to the police, and they could find you? What an invasion of privacy!

      I long ago came to peace with all these things that can as a side effect of using them, can ascertain where you were. My credit card can show where I was when I bought things, just buying fuel or going to a bank puts a dot on the map of my location. Even if I use cash.

      But these things are more likely to serve as a very nice alibi than an incrimination.

      I some times joke about people needing to move to Idaho, build a compound, stop SS payments and raise chickens to barter for bullets so they go incognito. but seriously, that's about what you are going to need to do to escape the tyranny you perceive when EZ-Pass is in your mind, a tracking system.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    9. Re:20 years behind the US... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Do you also remove your license plates? In Norcal at least, FasTrak can use license plate readers for billing. No toll tag required.

      However FasTrak does still encourage users to get a toll tag. Suggesting perhaps that plate readers are less reliable than RFID.

      In Florida, the toll roads that I've been on are solely Plate readers. The billing can provably be more automated with a toll tag is my guess for using both.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    10. Re:20 years behind the US... by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

      And MOST people have cellphones, and are tracked 24/7

    11. Re:20 years behind the US... by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

      Capitalism is like that
      Cellphone tracking with GPS feedback anyone?

    12. Re:20 years behind the US... by bobby · · Score: 1

      Tollgates, cops, traffic cameras, etc., are all scanning and recording license plates.

    13. Re: 20 years behind the US... by Boh00711 · · Score: 1

      Maybe I'm weird for being in Michigan, but there's no EZ Pass implemented here, my dude. Just cell phones and cars on the cell network.

    14. Re:20 years behind the US... by volmtech · · Score: 1

      For now you have the privacy to drive a car with no insurance, whoever you hit has to have uninsured motorist coverage. You have the privacy to drive with a suspended license, even if you have had five DWI's. You have the privacy to clone a tag and have some stranger in another state get all your parking tickets.

  2. Eh by fubarrr · · Score: 2

    China already has nationwide numberplate scanning network

    1. Re: Eh by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      Ubiquitous surveillance is the goal of all governments... it's just that much easier to implement in the absence of democracy.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    2. Re: Eh by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      I don't know about all - Europe/EU seems to have done a great job restricting itself with data protection rules.

    3. Re: Eh by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      I don't know about all - Europe/EU seems to have done a great job restricting itself with data protection rules.

      Folks line up around the blockchain to acquiesce their right to privacy to jester corporations that entertain them...

      Political corruption always exists. Lobbying governments is a feature of fascism, in that powerful governments are petitioned by corporations to do their bidding... but I'd sooner jack off a bobcat with a handful of broken glass than believe governments are incapable of petitioning corporations to do their bidding, quid pro quo.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    4. Re: Eh by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      False on the face of it. Germany is a great example to the exact contrary.

    5. Re: Eh by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      "Next door neighbour" means absolutely nothing. Different culture, different history, different premise.

  3. This is no different by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 5, Insightful

    than the GPS enabled " digital " license plate California wants to roll out other than the different spin put on it.

    China does it = Evil Surveillance State
    California does it = No way we'll ever use it for nefarious purposes ! We pinky swear ! We're the good guys ! :|

    1. Re:This is no different by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Everyone mocked California. Then it was explained the use case was for business vehicles (like delivery trucks) where the tracking was a feature.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    2. Re: This is no different by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Plea bargains are highly abused. But the fact that you can't distinguish between a relatively recently exploited flaw in the american system and china's complete lack of habeus corpus proves you have no god damn business commenting on either. You sound exactly like the command of cheese and dictator fellating, "You think our country's so innocent?"

  4. Re:They are already tracking cars. by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Safety" is for cowards. It would have been nice if China had been less safe during the Tiananmen Square protests 30 years ago -- tank drivers getting the Mussolini treatment from students would have been a sight for sore eyes.

  5. Well done China! \o/ by easyTree · · Score: 1

    You've caught up to the level of oppression^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hsecurity we in the UK have had for some time:
      * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  6. Rich by Excelcia · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is rich. China's surveillance state. How about the UK with ANPR - not just the UK, there are a lot of placed, even here in Canada, with ANPR now but not like the UK has. How about the NSA tapping into every internet backbone in the world? The Five Eyes have more domestic surveillance than China will ever have.

    Stories like this make me angry. Not because I think of China as being any better, but because people who write these kind of headlines are just so willfully ignorant it makes my teeth itch. We (read every resident of a Western democracy) have been living in the kind of a surveillance state for the last decade as would have given the head of the KGB at the height of the Soviet Union an absolute erection.

    1. Re:Rich by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      We (read every resident of a Western democracy) have been living in the kind of a surveillance state for the last decade as would have given the head of the KGB at the height of the Soviet Union an absolute erection.

      The East German Stasi might be a better historical parallel, and it's really not so much an argument that we're better off than China as it is a testament to the similarities between all forms of government.

      Information is power. Controlling your domestic populace is key to expanding your nation's international influence. One could successfully argue the chance of being voted out of office for being pro-surveillance in a western democracy is increasingly infinitesimal; yet, in China, the likelihood is virtually nil.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    2. Re:Rich by Tailhook · · Score: 1

      Stories like this make me angry. ... makes my teeth itch.

      The story, or at least this summary, is objective and neutral in tone about the matter; pretty much just the facts about a new Chinese surveillance state policy. The problem you're having is one of excessive self regard; you're convinced that all these non-Chinese readers are oblivious to all the surveillance they're subject to and in desperate need of your brilliant insight while they're gently fondling their 'murican flags and ARs.

      We're not. Try to calm yourself. Thanks.

      --
      Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
    3. Re:Rich by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Information is power.

      Yes. But it's not the only form of power. IOW, don't get too hung up on having it.

      Controlling your domestic populace is key to expanding your nation's international influence.

      Hmno. Point in case: As the US tracking of everyone and everything ever expands, its power and influence in the world is actually waning, the empire crumbling. China is on the rise, sure, but it isn't because of their "social score demerits for jaywalking via facial recognition" or any such malarky.

      Influencing the world isn't about string puppet control of your own citizens.

      One could successfully argue the chance of being voted out of office for being pro-surveillance in a western democracy is increasingly infinitesimal; yet, in China, the likelihood is virtually nil.

      I don't know about the former, actually: There's a growing concern that many of the surveillance tools are actually themselves breaches of trust between governement and (voting) population. The latter, well, we'll just have to see.

      But consider that the "weapons of mass destruction" argument turning out to have been a MOAB of a lie has cost the US dearly among its NATO "allies" (modern-day vassal states, really). You can only lie to your friends so much before they'll ditch you. Citizens are maybe a bit closer to family in this analogy; they'll take more domestic abuse before they'll denounce you, but they too will, eventually. The Chinese are very law-abiding, but that still doesn't mean it's a good idea to try and find out in practice just what it takes to make'em break with you.

      They are very right when they point out that our governments are not so much better than theirs, though, something many among us still find inconceivable for whatever reasons of self-delusion.

    4. Re:Rich by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How about the UK with ANPR [wikipedia.org] - not just the UK, there are a lot of placed, even here in Canada, with ANPR now but not like the UK has.

      I would say that those efforts do not compare equally with Chinese systems in either scale or scope. In China the surveillance is both more pervasive and invasive of liberty than it is even in the UK or Canada.

      How about the NSA tapping into every internet backbone in the world?

      In China they not only tap the backbones, but they automatically censor content and block VPN and other encrypted connections too. There's no automatic government mandated censoring in the United States and VPN connections still work here. The NSA may be able to break some encrypted communications but probably not all of them and wholesale blocking is not yet a thing in the United States. Incidentally, this is why everyone should use HTTPS and VPN for everything. At the very least it would force the NSA to choose their targets and consider more carefully how they spend their limited decryption resources.

      We (read every resident of a Western democracy) have been living in the kind of a surveillance state for the last decade

      But rarely like what goes on everyday in China, even for ordinary citizens. For example, the Chinese are now deploying AI connected cameras to automatically identify people and vehicles and cross reference with databases of all known residents on a more or less continuous basis. These cameras and other sensors feed a sophisticated network of servers, databases and police handheld devices to enable persistent and aggressive targeting of the ethnic Uighur minority in the western region of Xinjiang. These new efforts by China appear to be much more systematic and comprehensive than any comparable system here in the west and the Chinese are keen on improving the technology still further and deploying it throughout China. In the long run they plan to connect these systems with their emerging "social credit" system whereby every minor transgression, like jaywalking or failure to pay your utility bill on time, follows you around everywhere permanently and prevents you from doing ordinary things like riding the train, buying a plane ticket or even having a bank account in some cases and since having friends with poor "social credit" lowers your score too, your friends are incentivized to abandon you at the first sign of trouble. Tell me, when will they be rolling out these measures in the UK?

    5. Re:Rich by larryjoe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is rich. China's surveillance state. How about the UK ...

      It's not the surveillance that's the problem. It's the willingness of the state to act upon that data in a way that violates human rights that is the problem.

      I monitor my kids in very detailed and intrusive ways (well, at least that's what they tell me). However, I don't use that information to beat my kids when they say something bad about me. China has shown a willingness to imprison, intimidate, and physically harm based on surveillance, and that is a huge difference with most Western governments.

    6. Re:Rich by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Stories like this make me angry.

      Huh, We wouold never have guessed. Perhaps a move to Northern Nunavut is advised for your peace of mind.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    7. Re:Rich by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      China has shown a willingness to imprison, intimidate, and physically harm based on surveillance, and that is a huge difference with most Western governments.

      Yes, the difference is that western governments take the time to engage in parallel construction so that it looks less like they are doing the same things.

      The primary substantive difference between China and the west (so far) is that China formally executes vastly more citizens than any western nation. It doesn't matter if you count them, or measure per capita. It's not how they make use of surveillance data.

      V2V is coming to all vehicles everywhere sooner or later, the way things are going now.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  7. Sadly, the Bryan Cranston attack won't work by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    If this is a built-in chip as opposed to a magnetic device stuck in your wheel well, you can't just stroll out of the El Pollo Loco after lunch, fish out the device from your car, and stick it onto an adjacent touristmobile to throw your pursuers off the track.

  8. most new cars have cell modems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    my 2013 chrysler has a cell modem in it which is always receiving traffic updates and weather
    my 2008 gmc had on star.
    not to mention the personal trackers we carry everywhere (cell phones)
    privacy is dead but people hardly recognize it
    parallel construction keeps the depths they track us masked

  9. Good a reason as any to do away with toll roads by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    for the same reason I want Medicare for All I'd like to see toll roads go away. Some things should just be paid for by civilization as a whole. China isn't oppressing these people for shits and giggles. They're doing it because they've got massive wealth inequality and this is how you maintain a society when you've got lots of folks who lack food security and shelter. The reason you guarantee a decent quality of life is because you can't be free when somebody controls your access to food, shelter, healthcare, education & transportation. The latter being needed to access to former. Until then you're a weeks meals or a harsh winter away from doing whatever the folks in charge of the money say.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  10. This is news? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    The UK had its ring of steel https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... using tracking in/out of a city in the early/mid 1990's

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  11. LPR Readers by speedlaw · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Already there in the US. In the NYC area, cross a bridge ? EZ pass and photos. Use most highways ? EZ pass readers "for statistical tracking". Lose your 95 yo Grandparent and they have a car ? "Elderly male missing, White Nissan Sentra, LPR hit on plate at XX location two hours ago".

    1. Re:LPR Readers by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      The US federal gov police task forces have used that for years. Every face, phone, voice prints, passengers face. Front and back image for the LPR.
      With a K9 unit to ask about citizenship as legal cover. Ask about "citizenship" is just to get everyone talking into the mic.
      About their rights and the how and why of getting asked. All great for a domestic voice print given to law enforcement for free along with LPR and a really good quality image of the face.. phone powered on too? Thats more data to collect in real time.
      Make a fuss about rights for too long and the K9 will always alert.

      China is just getting PR for their police exports.

      Its now so low cost even big US cities are building their own networks city wide. Every car in and out of a city for real time for city PD use. No federal task force funds needed. Voice prints costs extra for now.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  12. Thanks Slashdot by fanakabob · · Score: 1

    Thanks for all of your stories over the years, but it looks as if it is time to leave this website forever. Thanks again for the stories.

  13. Stupid idea by TimMD909 · · Score: 1

    Tracking cars is helps but it's not the right solution for them. Instead they should put the chips in their population at birth just in case their cell phone dies or is turned off.

  14. A bit pointless by CaffeinatedBacon · · Score: 1

    They already track everyone's phone and have cameras everywhere taking video and pictures of just about every street in the country.

  15. Suicidal Relative saved by this by aberglas · · Score: 2

    Here in Australia, it is more the licence plate readers that are now everywhere. No need for electronic tracking.

    Scary, but I had a suicidal relative that drove off one day. Her husband rang the police, who could track her down very quickly due to number plate reading. So there is an up side.

    1. Re:Suicidal Relative saved by this by voss · · Score: 1

      A license plate reader is a passive system if your car is not on the highway or going somewhere with a toll its not tracked. What china is talking about is active tracking.

  16. Also the federally mandated tire pressure sensors by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2

    US has EZ-Pass, which is a defacto tracking system, even if not originally designed as such.

    But at least with EZ-Pass you can opt out (at some inconvenience when you travel). You can't opt out of having a radio-linked tire pressure monitoring system (TPMS) on any new car purchased in 2008 or later.

    TPMSes work by having, in each tire's valve stem, a pressure sensor with a radio transmitter and a battery (good for 7 years, after which the system nags you until you replace the senders), which periodically transmits its unique identification number and the tire pressure reading. This can be received by roadside devices with directional antennas and/or under-road loops, and the sensor I.D.(s) used to identify the car.

    It is trivial to collect the information to make the connection between TPMS I.D.s and vehicle owners by pointing a license-plate reading camera at an in-lane TPMS receiver loop, associating the license plate with any wheel squawks sent while the car is over the loop, and then adding that to a database of license plate vs. owner and insured additional drivers. (This even keeps it up to date when the transmitter batteries eventually run down and the transmitters are replaced.)

    An ongoing record of which TPMS squawks are detected where and when gives a location record for each wheel, and thus the vehicle, along with its driver and any passengers.

    So, thanks to the TREAD act, every new car sold in the US over the last ten years came equipped with four tracking transmitters. China is just catching up.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  17. Re:They are already tracking cars. by kenai_alpenglow · · Score: 1

    Folks tend to be safer in authoritarian dictatorships, as long as they tow the line and don't get in the way of those with power. The dictatorship usually doesn't like to share power with criminals, and without those pesky "Rights" getting in the way it's easier to keep them in line...

  18. Re:Also the federally mandated tire pressure senso by Type44Q · · Score: 2

    You can't opt out of having a radio-linked tire pressure monitoring system (TPMS) on any new car purchased in 2008 or later.

    RIght:

    A) Buy replacement wheels (they don't come with TPMS sensors) and tires.

    B) Mount on vehicle.

  19. Just implant trackers from birth, you bastards by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    Why go to these half measures, China? Just implant tracking chips in everyone from birth and make it a death-penalty offense to evade it. It's not like anyone actually believes you care about human rights at all.

  20. New California electronic license plates will have by Invisible+Now · · Score: 1

    Of course t he LCD screens will spare you the excruciating effort of putting on those pesky annual renewal stickers manually. Downside is the Stateâ(TM)s ability to put a BOLO notice on you carâ(TM)s plates in real time.

    --

    "Knowing everything doesn't help..."

  21. No big deal by NewYork · · Score: 1

    You're tracked when you're carrying cell phone.