Slashdot Mirror


Tesla Sues Employee Alleged To Have Stolen Gigabytes of Data (arstechnica.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: On Wednesday, Tesla sued a former employee who worked in its Gigafactory in Nevada, accusing him of stealing trade secrets. The lawsuit appears to be what CEO Elon Musk was referring to recently when he said that production of the Model 3 had been sabotaged. Musk said that there are "more" alleged saboteurs.

According to the civil complaint that was filed in federal court in Nevada, Tesla accused Martin Tripp, who began working in Sparks as a "process technician" in October 2017, of exporting company data: "Tesla has only begun to understand the full scope of Tripp's illegal activity, but he has thus far admitted to writing software that hacked Tesla's manufacturing operating system ("MOS") and to transferring several gigabytes of Tesla data to outside entities. This includes dozens of confidential photographs and a video of Tesla's manufacturing systems."

153 comments

  1. And ppl want Tesla to go to CHina? LOL by WindBourne · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This will be common amongst the employees there. Of course, I would like to know who this data went to. Tesla's REAL IP has never been about the car, but how to get their manufacturing costs way down.
    And considering that only Ford has grown this fast, they have been amazing.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:And ppl want Tesla to go to CHina? LOL by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This sounds like spying/hacking not sabotage. Did the guy actually disrupt any manufacturing or not?

      Musk better get used to this stuff, every other industry has to deal with it.

    2. Re: And ppl want Tesla to go to CHina? LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      but how to get their manufacturing costs way down.

      This makes no sense. I mean, Tesla's a company that hasn't exactly been very profitable so far. Their vehicles aren't known for being inexpensive, and buyers often rely on government grants or other subsidies in order to afford them. Car manufacturing isn't a new field, and there are numerous existing competitors that have been around for decades. It's like you're saying Tesla's main strength is something that it doesn't currently seem to be very good at.

    3. Re: And ppl want Tesla to go to CHina? LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, perhaps they were very good at it. It would be a hell of a coup to simply get the information out to a competitor that "yeh, the fully automated approach worked, start building!" while at the same time convincing Tesla that it didn't work by reducing the accuracy and throughput of the machines.

    4. Re: And ppl want Tesla to go to CHina? LOL by mark_reh · · Score: 1, Troll

      Have you seen how much Teslas cost? People who buy Teslas don't need govt hand-outs in order to afford a Tesla. The govt hand-out is welfare for the rich.

    5. Re:And ppl want Tesla to go to CHina? LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thing is -- trade secret law is different than patent or copyright law. Manufacturing processes aren't a patentable. Nor are they copyrightable.

      Yet, trade secrets can't be 'stolen'.

      https://www.schiffhardin.com/Templates/media/files/publications/PDF/20150220_Prewitt_LTN.pdf

      Search for the paragraph starting:

      Prewitt: Under the law of trade secrets,

      You can't 'steal' trade secrets. You can't obtain them via spying, pretty much the ONLY way you can get them, is if the holder discloses them on purpose.

      So, no one will be able to use any 'trade secrets' that have been stolen, such as improved manufacturing methods.

      Anything patented, is patented.. such as new metallurgical methods, etc. And any code is copyrighted.

      So this is all very bizarre.

    6. Re: And ppl want Tesla to go to CHina? LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From what I have heard, Tesla has actually been doing pretty decent overall, it is just that instead of keeping their profits, they have been pouring it all right back into their company which gets wrote off and kills the way the profits look on paper.

    7. Re:And ppl want Tesla to go to CHina? LOL by GrimSavant · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Tesla's complaint says that he wrote software that hacked Tesla's manufacturing operating system in addition to the data exfiltration. So, maybe that was sabotage? Maybe not?

      We'll have to wait until they provide more evidence as to what happened, though they might not do that immediately if they are still trying to figure out what happened, especially if law enforcement is involved. Tesla will have to put up or shut up in the discovery process of the law suit if they are going to press that, though.

    8. Re: And ppl want Tesla to go to CHina? LOL by BasilBrush · · Score: 0

      It's pump priming. And it's worked. Everyone will benefit from the switch to EVs.

    9. Re: And ppl want Tesla to go to CHina? LOL by Rei · · Score: 1

      Indeed. A teardown of the Model 3 contracted by German automakers estimated that the cost to manufacture the Model 3 LR at a full production rate would be $28k.

      --
      I was watching this thing on TV about some guy named Hitler. Someone should stop him!
    10. Re:And ppl want Tesla to go to CHina? LOL by Rei · · Score: 1

      Read the lawsuit. All applicable laws are (obviously) cited.

      --
      I was watching this thing on TV about some guy named Hitler. Someone should stop him!
    11. Re: And ppl want Tesla to go to CHina? LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From what I have heard, Tesla has actually been doing pretty decent overall, it is just that instead of keeping their profits, they have been pouring it all right back into their company which gets wrote off and kills the way the profits look on paper.

      If that were the case, then the right move would be to kill R&D, cut cash burn, and focus heavily on delivering on their massive backlog. The fact is, they are *not* doing well. They've never hit their production targets, the quality reports on the Model 3 and Model X are mediocre at best, and Musk himself admits that they automated too much before they new how the production process was going to work.

      No, Tesla is a company that shouts to the rooftops that it's doing well, but now they're at sales, and supposedly mass market sales, and they have consistently under-performed.

      The timing of this situation is also quite intriguing, given that Tesla is now the subject of a shareholder lawsuit to replace the Board and Musk to try and turn their poor performance around: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-tesla-lawsuit/shareholder-lawsuit-attacks-musks-pay-seeks-to-overhaul-tesla-board-idUSKCN1J42X2

    12. Re:And ppl want Tesla to go to CHina? LOL by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      Different employee than yesterday I think. This seems to have to do with stealing trade secrets from the battery factory. That would seem to have some amount of plausibility. I seriously doubt that other automakers much give a damn about Tesla's vehicle technology. They can probably build an overpriced EV that runs into firetrucks without stealing secrets, and if they do need to know anything, they'll buy a Tesla and take it apart. But there are other Lion battery makers who might well like to know what Tesla is up to

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    13. Re:And ppl want Tesla to go to CHina? LOL by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      Seems like Musk is OK to talk about what happened. Are you suggesting he doesn't really yet know?

    14. Re: And ppl want Tesla to go to CHina? LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah?

      Tell me about that lithium mining and how that's going to work on the scale needed to have EV on the road in the same number as ICE.

      I'll wait. Make sure to include environmental data and pollution data from the process.

    15. Re: And ppl want Tesla to go to CHina? LOL by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1, Informative

      And yet they still lose money - even before you count spending on R&D... Or paying the interest on their debt (let alone actually paying down the debt). Or a host of other things....

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    16. Re:And ppl want Tesla to go to CHina? LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes--if you read their legal complaint, they explicitly say that they don't yet know the full scope of this.

    17. Re:And ppl want Tesla to go to CHina? LOL by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      Different employee than yesterday I think.

      That's what isn't clear.

      Anyhow, 'gigabits of data' could just be a couple of videos of drivers abusing AP.

    18. Re:And ppl want Tesla to go to CHina? LOL by GrimSavant · · Score: 1

      Musk is saying himself that they don't have the full picture, so I don't see what would be controversial about that. The possibility that he is saying or speculating too much has already been raised, that he may be going too far out on the limb to insinuate that there may outside actors involved in this. If true, that could potentially be a criminal conspiracy.

      He hasn't shown the evidence he has yet, and not publicly airing evidence in the investigation phase prior to the actual trial phase is normal, though. So maybe he's full of hot air, or maybe not, hard to say when we can't see his cards yet. The evidence will get out this if goes through the trial process instead of being settled, the defense will get their hands on it in discovery and Tesla will have to use the evidence to prove that they are owed money for damages and how much.

    19. Re:And ppl want Tesla to go to CHina? LOL by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      Makes sense. My previous response came out a bit 'snarkier' than intended. My apologies.

    20. Re:And ppl want Tesla to go to CHina? LOL by Comrade+Ogilvy · · Score: 2

      The alleged perp claims he is a whistleblower, and that is a plausible though not necessarily to be trusted story. Even if that is sincere, Musk cannot assume there is truth in such assertions. It is likely at this point the Musk has sufficient evidence that lots of data have been sent...somewhere.

      Is the intended or actual destination something "innocent" like some investigative journalists? Is the alleged perp getting paid for that? Are there other third parties willing pay? Are there any deals in the works to get a little sugar from shortsellers with timely trades when the news is about to hit the street?

      Musk does not know and should not be satisfied by assertions of the alleged perp. The reasonable answer is, in fact, to use the full force of the employee NDA and legal system to get a look at all the personal electronic devices of this person.

      I am not going to jump to any to conclusions. But Musk should not either. Lawyering up is a reasonable way to find out the truth here. What should even a non-evil CEO do?

    21. Re:And ppl want Tesla to go to CHina? LOL by fozzy1015 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Tesla's REAL IP has never been about the car, but how to get their manufacturing costs way down. "

      Haha! Oh, wait, you're serious? Let me laugh even harder. Tesla has more employees per car produced then every other manufacturer, even when taking into consideration they own their own service centers and don't depend on a dealer network. Musk wasted billions thinking he was smarter than everyone else by trying to over automate final assembly. Almost a year after the Model 3 went into production, billions have been wasted and the total number of cars built is barely over 30K. Tesla is a farce when it comes to efficient manufacturing.

    22. Re:And ppl want Tesla to go to CHina? LOL by 110010001000 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Give it up. Rei and Windborne have a lot invested in Tesla. They will never see any flaws. $10 billion in debt with no way out? No problem! Just add another "production line".

    23. Re: And ppl want Tesla to go to CHina? LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because it is estimated to cost x to manufacture doesn't mean it does. Maybe a large existing manufacturer might be able to achieve that, but expenses from an immature production can add up very quickly.

    24. Re: And ppl want Tesla to go to CHina? LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He literally said that he doesn't fully know yet, you absolute blithering fucking imbecile.

    25. Re: And ppl want Tesla to go to CHina? LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tesla's manufacturing is a disaster and they aren't able to build cheap cars at scale. Prior to the model 3 Tesla sold an expensive luxury car, that was heavily subsidized (5-8%) while still taking on huge loses, where they also skirted state laws selling directly to customers instead of going through dealers boosting their profits on each vehicle sold.

      As far as manufacturing processes I doubt there is anything Tesla is doing that Ford, GM or any of the other large car companies would want. Now software is another story, and perhaps some of the battery tech, but to be honest even it doesn't appear so high tech.

      This isn't to knock Tesla, but there is a big difference making a high priced luxury car and a car for the masses.

    26. Re: And ppl want Tesla to go to CHina? LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its all bullshit. this company needs and deserves better management. Musk is not a decent human

    27. Re:And ppl want Tesla to go to CHina? LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ummmm if maybe you missed it, but up until now Tesla's manufacturing processes have been unmitigated disasters. Tesla's IP is most definitely in the cars and batteries NOT manufacturing.

    28. Re:And ppl want Tesla to go to CHina? LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, Tesla Actually CAN and do manufacture Model 3 for less than 30K$. For how many $$$ they do sell it, that's another question. And what profit do we talk? profit from selling car? They sure are getting profit for that. But as all that money go into expanding production, Supercharger network whole company has negative financial results. Tesla have 1-3 years left before large manufacturers have finally scrambled their HUUUGE resources to try to compete with Tesla. If Tesla will not create substantial infrastructure and gain market share, they will be simply pushed out of market. So it's all or nothing game for Elon in EV market.

    29. Re:And ppl want Tesla to go to CHina? LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes lawyering up is most definitely the right thing to do, making public statements like he has done is exactly the WRONG thing to do, if there is any truth to the allegations then Musk is digging himself a grave and even if not the safest thing to do is shut up and say he doesn't comment on ongoing investigation but Tesla will make a statement when more information is known.

    30. Re:And ppl want Tesla to go to CHina? LOL by sad_ · · Score: 1

      I would like to know who this data went to.

      well, as you suggest in the subject, it probably is china.
      makes sense; tesla doesn't have a factory there yet, but china wants to compete with/copy tesla.

      --
      On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
    31. Re: And ppl want Tesla to go to CHina? LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but of course they are years away from full production rate at current pace and that excludes all the rest of the costs, 28k is purely the raw manufacturing AT VOLUME. So you can conclude from that they are taking a pretty big loss on each one at the moment.

    32. Re: And ppl want Tesla to go to CHina? LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They aren't manufacturing at full production rate though. That's why they still aren't making a profit.

    33. Re:And ppl want Tesla to go to CHina? LOL by atrex · · Score: 1

      Going public like this may be Musk's attempt at distracting the board from the huge Q2 losses.

    34. Re: And ppl want Tesla to go to CHina? LOL by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

      I'll wait. Make sure to include environmental data and pollution data from the process.

      And will you also include the environmental and pollution data about ICE vehicles? You know, offshore platforms, fuel transport and transformation, spills, smog, etc?

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    35. Re: And ppl want Tesla to go to CHina? LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no one buying a tesla is RELYING on grants to purchase them, but yes there is a federal subsidy of 7500 per electric car for the first few hundred thousand EVs a car maker sells.

      When the car is 100k you are talking about 10% off or less... you get that at best buy if you just ask nice. Thatâ(TM)s not consequential in the purchase.

      You must be one of these people who looks at a company doing billions of dollars of money and says: wtf how did they lose track of half a million dollars.

      It may be a lot to you, but to the people running a big company, or buying and expensive car the subsidies are just a bonus.

    36. Re: And ppl want Tesla to go to CHina? LOL by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      "I am not fucking!" Drax the Slashdotter shouted angrily.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    37. Re: And ppl want Tesla to go to CHina? LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When the car is $35k, the 7500 is more than 21%. And the corporate socialism handouts are one of the most important revenue sources for the people running "big companies".

    38. Re: And ppl want Tesla to go to CHina? LOL by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      Where have you gotten a $35k Tesla? Remember those aren't being made yet.

    39. Re:And ppl want Tesla to go to CHina? LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here’s a fun fact. Tesla has lost every single lawsuit it has been involved in because they are either at fault or their claims are completely baseless.

    40. Re: And ppl want Tesla to go to CHina? LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "how great Elon is to get manufacturing costs way down". God that is the most uneducated statement ever. Tesla has burned through untold billions, you need but read their own stock reports.

    41. Re: And ppl want Tesla to go to CHina? LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Woosh.

    42. Re:And ppl want Tesla to go to CHina? LOL by drsquare · · Score: 1

      It's not a matter of wanting to, it's having to. Trump's trade war means US manufacturers will have to move production from the US to China to get around counter-tariffs.

  2. If you don't like your job by Jahoda · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Then quit.

    It never ceases to amaze me the gross sense of entitlement that certain types of people have. Tesla gave this dude a job, which he felt was beneath him. He performed that job poorly, and Tesla continued to employ him. The way he thanked Tesla was to commit corporate espionage, access systems which were not his property, make libelous statements, and steal. Now he will never be employed in his chosen field in any meaningful role, ever again. Destitute from civil financial judgement against him And that is after he gets out of prison for the criminal charges which will surely be forthcoming due to his unauthorized access of Tesla systems.

    1. Re:If you don't like your job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then quit.

      I'm sure he loved his job. Both of them.

      Probably enjoyed those acting classes too.

    2. Re:If you don't like your job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then quit.

          It never ceases to amaze me the gross sense of entitlement that certain types of people have.

      I know right... But let's not forget, the poor huddled masses of labor who are trod upon by the man Musk, making nothing but stupid cars and paltry paychecks, while Musk cleans up drawing millions as CEO.

      It occurs to me that the sense of entitlement runs deep in this country these days, especially with those who would work for Tesla.

      It also occurs to me that Tesla lacks sufficient oversight and security controls if this guy was able to do this and nobody can figure it out unless he admits to it. He loaded software into their production systems... Seriously? That kind of thing should require multiple people concurring and set off a lot of audit alarms. This was mission critical equipment, then there is the whole "transferred data" problem. How's it that a mission critical production computing system can start transferring data off site and the network guys not notice? Who's watching this stuff over at Tesla?

      Why don't you start a company, take all the risk and pay your employees millions.

    3. Re:If you don't like your job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bobbied you're a moron Trumpy.

    4. Re:If you don't like your job by Nos. · · Score: 1

      There's nothing saying he didn't like his job. In a company of any decent size, there's bound to be people, that offered the right incentives, would share company secrets with a competitor. Sometimes it's an act of revenge for perceived wrong doing, other times it's simply that the incentive is enough to overcome morals.

    5. Re:If you don't like your job by Rei · · Score: 5, Insightful

      while Musk cleans up drawing millions as CEO.

      FYI: Musk has no salary. His only compensation is his stock. And he only gets more stock if the company meets some extremely aggressive benchmarks. Otherwise, he's working for free.

      That's not to pity him; he's plenty wealthy as it is. I just wanted to correct your comment. He earns no salary from Tesla.

      ...and security controls if this guy was able to do this and nobody can figure it out unless he admits to it

      Please read the lawsuit. They found evidence that he was doing this and confronted him about it, only getting the confession after showing him the evidence they had of him doing it.

      --
      I was watching this thing on TV about some guy named Hitler. Someone should stop him!
    6. Re: If you don't like your job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like the business model, but not sure about the taking risk part or paying millions to employees...unless each employee generates like $10 million in profit...then I'm in! ;)

    7. Re:If you don't like your job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then quit.

          It never ceases to amaze me the gross sense of entitlement that certain types of people have. Tesla gave this dude a job, which he felt was beneath him. He performed that job poorly, and Tesla continued to employ him. The way he thanked Tesla was to commit corporate espionage, access systems which were not his property, make libelous statements, and steal. Now he will never be employed in his chosen field in any meaningful role, ever again. Destitute from civil financial judgement against him And that is after he gets out of prison for the criminal charges which will surely be forthcoming due to his unauthorized access of Tesla systems.

      Tesla gave him a job ... like a charity?

      Nobody gives you a job. You trade your time and energy for money. For every dollar Tesla and Musk pays someone, they probably make $5 off their work.

    8. Re:If you don't like your job by bobbied · · Score: 1

      They where not watching very close if he got gigabits of stuff transferred and had his "software" loaded on at least three systems and was looking for more and he'd only been there since October of last year. They where not watching the newbie or anybody there very close at all. I read it that he got caught trying to recruit additional conspirators to help who reported it and drew security's attention, not that the security audits or access controls caught him.

      Musk's "salary" may be zero, but his compensation is far from zero. He's just structured his compensation to fit both his narrative (working for free) and sheltering income from the tax man. A possible 2.6 BILLION in stock for 10 years is a hefty bit of pay. Yea, he may not get all of that, but he's going to get at least some of it unless Tesla files for bankruptcy between now and then.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    9. Re:If you don't like your job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's nothing saying he didn't like his job.

      the simple facts of the case would indicate that he prefers life in prison to working at Tesla

    10. Re: If you don't like your job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot. They created a job position and offered it to him. He took the job. Whether Tesla makes x verse his y is irrelevant.

    11. Re: If you don't like your job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Demand for Tesla's products drives the creation of the job. If Tesla just gave him a job, then Tesla just be some sort of charity.

    12. Re:If you don't like your job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He'll probably end up on 4chan (or maybe /. these days) bitching about how everything is rigged against him, about how immigrants are stealing his job, and that the government is actively conspiring against him, without realizing the fault lies squarely with him. "Mom, make me a corndog!"

    13. Re:If you don't like your job by Ogive17 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm not taking sides however I just ran across this article with a story from the ex-employee. He claims to be a whistle blower and that Tesla has been lying to look better.

      http://money.cnn.com/2018/06/20/technology/tesla-sues-employee/index.html

      I'll just wait for the daily Tesla updates here on /.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    14. Re:If you don't like your job by stoborrobots · · Score: 1

      So you're saying he's gambling 2.6 billion dollars on the notion that the company won't be bankrupt in ten years?

    15. Re:If you don't like your job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It never ceases to amaze me the gross sense of entitlement certain companies have. People expect to be dealt with fairly, they don't expect to be lied to, discriminated against or retaliated against.

    16. Re:If you don't like your job by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

      "Then do it really half-assed. That's the AMERICAN way!"

      ~Homer J Simpson.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    17. Re:If you don't like your job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI: Musk has no salary. His only compensation is his stock.

      So you're saying he's a tax dodge? You did know that that particular payment strategy is employed to minimize taxes paid, right? It works like this, if you hold stocks for at least 1 year, they're considered long term gains, and are taxed at a flat 15% rather than they typical income tax rate.

    18. Re:If you don't like your job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are a Tesla shill. He doesn't need liquidity so he takes no salary, but his stock is his and his alone. His pay package is way beyond any public company CEO at $2.6B and he doesn't deserve it.

      Musk owns 22% of the company, but the company is structured that no major changes can happen without a supermajority vote. His shareholders, who as CEO he is supposed to report to, are extremely disappointed with the missed targets. When they tried to replace the Board (who should be holding him to task) and him, he blocked it because it turns out the way the Bylaws are written the Board can't be replaced without a supermajority vote; Musk alone can block it. So when his shareholders got upset, he went against them. Now Tesla is being sued by the shareholders.

      You are a shill because you believe this crap. A sordid story about a "saboteur" from Musk's email, who lists "wall street short sellers" as their enemy. All of that worked to successfully knock down the major problems Tesla is having in the news. Heck them suing this guy just saturated the news about how Tesla is being sued in a class action suit by his own shareholders! This whole thing is media.

      Major production shortfalls in Q2: https://seekingalpha.com/article/4183052-tesla-pentagon-papers-huge-q2-shortfall

      Tesla sued by shareholders over Musk compensation package and for control: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-tesla-lawsuit/shareholder-lawsuit-attacks-musks-pay-seeks-to-overhaul-tesla-board-idUSKCN1J42X2

    19. Re:If you don't like your job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Musk has used 40% of his shares as collateral for loans. You can kind of call that compensation. The lenders could be in for a bad surprise if Tesla goes BK. Worse, Tesla could free fall fast if those lenders call the loans. He would have to liquidate and when you own 25% of the company, that would cause a very fast run to zero.

    20. Re:If you don't like your job by Outta_the_way_peck! · · Score: 2

      The long term gains tax is only on the increase in value from when they were received. He would still be taxed on their value at the time they were granted.

    21. Re:If you don't like your job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he probably loved getting paid out the nose for corporate secrets. just an fyi

    22. Re: If you don't like your job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like how you threw in that it's not to pity him, when you damn well you know that statement puts him on some pedestal for being so generous.

    23. Re:If you don't like your job by rhazz · · Score: 1

      He's contacted several media outlets already and none of them have run his story (yet). I guess if any of his claims had merit then we'll see something. Personally I'm leaning more towards personal greed - he tried to sell a story to the media, they didn't bite (except CNN apparently), so he found something that Tesla's enemies wanted instead.

    24. Re:If you don't like your job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, he would claim that after getting caught in the criminal act. If he gets whistleblower protections, the charges would be reduced or even dismissed. It looks kind of like trying the insanity defense to get out of a murder charge.

  3. Russians Meddling Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Putin ordered the sleeper cells to meddle with Tesla. I heard that on TV news.

    https://www.rt.com/usa/429956-caged-boy-immigration-debunk/

  4. I don't get by TheDarkener · · Score: 1

    why anybody would want to steal this kind of information. It's almost as if they don't want Tesla to succeed.

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    1. Re:I don't get by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why anybody would want to steal this kind of information

      the chinese pay better.

    2. Re:I don't get by bobbied · · Score: 1

      why anybody would want to steal this kind of information

      the chinese pay better.

      And you are willing to buy a Tesla knock off from China? No thank you.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    3. Re: I don't get by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not willing to buy a Tesla even from Tesla. They're bland shitty cars that make GM 90s plastic crap look nice

    4. Re:I don't get by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let see, Ford, GM, Dodge, Toyota, .... UAW. Fill in the dots with any car manufacture I missed.

    5. Re: I don't get by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Uh.. Not that I'd buy one, but I know a guy who has one and has offered to let me drive it. I think they are pretty nice, but way too expensive for me to afford. I'd put them on par with a fully loaded Lexus in appearance and function, but a bit below a Mercedes in comfort and interior finishing. Where it's fun to drive, unless my ship comes in (and I live in a land locked location) there is no way I can afford it.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    6. Re:I don't get by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No but chinese people will. And there's two freaking billions of them, more than enough for a chinese maker of cheap Tesla knockoffs to be successful.

    7. Re:I don't get by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It appears he is a whistleblower rather than a thief, though Tesla will try to label him a thief it seems he was trying to go public with information that shows Tesla have been lieing to investors, a very serious allegation if true. I guess we will see in time who is telling the truth.

  5. Gigabytes... that's it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on, Slashdot... a gigabyte of data isn't an impressive amount anymore. That's like what... 45 minutes of compressed 4K video? A large CAD drawing? Maybe a few hundred large JPEG's?

    Wake me up with someone steals a few Petabytes worth of data.

    1. Re: Gigabytes... that's it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One point twenty one Gigabytes from teh Gigafactory!!!

  6. Tesla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Note to self. Elon Musk is severely paranoid and never work for him.

    1. Re:Tesla by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Note to self. Elon Musk is severely paranoid and never work for him.

      Apparently not. Nobody was minding the store while this "process technician" was transferring the crown jewels to who knows where? A paranoid person would have security controls guarding this kind of thing from an insider threat and watchers assigned to make sure the worker bees didn't steal the honey.

      I think Musk is just a egotistical CEO who is ticked off that somebody dared to try this, and I think he needed a reason to give to the share holders as to why they didn't meet expiations again.

      Not that I'd work for him either. He seems to be the kind that will willingly drive the bus over his underlings to save face and has all the ego of Steve Jobs, with fewer results to justify it. But he's not offering me a job... So what difference does it make to me? None.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    2. Re:Tesla by GrimSavant · · Score: 1

      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't after you. --Joseph Heller

    3. Re:Tesla by Rei · · Score: 2

      Actually, Musk's only comment about the lawsuit on Twitter was:

      There is more, but the actions of a few bad apples will not stop Tesla from reaching its goals. With 40,000 people, the worst 1 in 1000 will have issues. That’s still ~40 people.

      --
      I was watching this thing on TV about some guy named Hitler. Someone should stop him!
    4. Re:Tesla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, the whinning of every big-time loser - "the enemy within".

  7. Re:No, moronic Trump traitor faggot Ivan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Another butthurt snowflake that is too stupid to realize Trump has nothing to do with this story.

    I've heard so many retarded comments about the president, I'll vote for him if he runs again.

    Reverse thinking making a GOP supporter out of a lifelong DEM.

    Good job dipshit!

  8. Re: No, moronic Trump traitor faggot Ivan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another case of TDS I see.

  9. Bye!! by Ozy311 · · Score: 2

    Strap him in a Tesla on a Falcon Heavy and launch his ass to Mars!

    1. Re: Bye!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After we had sent the first dummy to Mars, we were hoping to top that; and now ladies and gentlemen, we will send the first a..holenaut into space. His spacesuit will be fedexed to his home address. To save on costs, etc.

  10. Arbitration ? by zeiche · · Score: 1

    I wonder if Tesla insisted on the employee signing an arbitration agreement. If so, this case might not go the way Musk thinks.

  11. Can't steal digital data, right Slashdot? by AcidPenguin9873 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Comes up every time media copyright infringement is in the news. This guy didn't deprive Tesla of anything, so he clearly didn't steal anything, right? Information wants to be free? Let's hear all the usual tropes.

    1. Re:Can't steal digital data, right Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But but but Elon, he hurt Elon our hero. I see it all the time on /. Hypocrisy is the one thing I can count on here. And of course it looks to be simply theft and not sabotage. Just like when one of his rockets went kaboom, he blamed someone else, ULA if I remember right. The guy sounds like a total crybaby.

    2. Re:Can't steal digital data, right Slashdot? by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      While I agree you (i.e. I see value in copyrights existing, though I'll admit to not liking the direction things are going with effectively infinite terms), it's worth pointing out that there's a fundamental difference between the two situations: creating a copy of music doesn't affect whether the music is public or not, whereas creating a copy of Tesla's proprietary data affects whether that data is public. Put differently, when it comes to music, the genie is already out of the bottle; the data is already out there. Making one copy doesn't change anything fundamental to that truth. When it comes to Tesla's internal data, the genie was not out of the bottle, so exfiltrating a copy of that data changes the fundamental privacy of that data.

      Again, I don't think that any of what I just said is a valid excuse for making illicit copies of media, but I can see how someone can (reasonably, though errantly) suggest that music piracy isn't a problem while still seeing the wrong in what happened here.

    3. Re:Can't steal digital data, right Slashdot? by Knightman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I cannot fathom why anyone would mod you up as insightful.

      There is a huge difference between copyright infringement and industrial espionage.

      Theft of information can deprive someone of something - exclusivity. Theft of a song may deprive a record company or artist of a sale, but not exclusivity.

      --
      --- Reality doesn't care about your opinions, it happens anyway and if you are in the way you'll get squished.
    4. Re:Can't steal digital data, right Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I cannot fathom why anyone would mod you up as insightful.

      There is a huge difference between copyright infringement and industrial espionage.

      Theft of information can deprive someone of something - exclusivity. Theft of a song may deprive a record company or artist of a sale, but not exclusivity.

      Translation: Information wants to be free. Except Elon Musk because because... Elon Musk!

      The old Apple fanboi's are nothing compared to their new Elon counterparts.

    5. Re:Can't steal digital data, right Slashdot? by sverdlichenko · · Score: 2

      A bit of difference: Tesla never intended to publish this information, and now is deprived of exclusivity.

    6. Re:Can't steal digital data, right Slashdot? by Kjella · · Score: 0

      There is a huge difference between copyright infringement and industrial espionage.

      There's also a huge similarity, it's been copied not taken. So if you object to the word stolen when it comes to copyright infringement you should also object to the word stolen when it comes to espionage. At least unless any documents, prototypes, backup disks or similar was actually removed from Tesla's possession.

      Theft of information can deprive someone of something - exclusivity. Theft of a song may deprive a record company or artist of a sale, but not exclusivity.

      I guess you should tell these dumbasses they don't know what they're talking about:

      To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    7. Re:Can't steal digital data, right Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I cannot fathom why anyone would mod you up as insightful.

      There is a huge difference between copyright infringement and industrial espionage.

      Theft of information can deprive someone of something - exclusivity. Theft of a song may deprive a record company or artist of a sale, but not exclusivity.

      Right, and that's why uploading a song to a sharing site is akin to industrial espionage and damages on the order of (downloads * song price * some punitive factor) are a good idea.

    8. Re:Can't steal digital data, right Slashdot? by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Right, and that's why uploading a song to a sharing site is akin to industrial espionage

      You guys can stop trying to make this comparison happen. Its not going to happen.

    9. Re:Can't steal digital data, right Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Espionage is dissemination of secret information.
      Copyright infringement is dissemination of publicly available information.
      The secret makes the huge difference.

    10. Re:Can't steal digital data, right Slashdot? by AcidPenguin9873 · · Score: 1

      I should have been modded "Troll" probably.

      Your post does not address my implied point. There are countless Slashdot posters who insist that unless the owner is physically deprived of something, there was no harm done or value lost, because they still have the thing.

      As you stated, exclusivity of access to information is intangible, yet has value. It is what trade secrets and employment agreements protect. Just like how exclusivity of distribution rights to information is intangible yet has value, i.e. what copyright protects.

    11. Re: Can't steal digital data, right Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except if you're Martin Shkreli

    12. Re:Can't steal digital data, right Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I cannot fathom why anyone would mod you up as insightful.

      There is a huge difference between copyright infringement and industrial espionage.

      Theft of information can deprive someone of something - exclusivity. Theft of a song may deprive a record company or artist of a sale, but not exclusivity.

      No, there is no difference. Copying is copying, you can not have two separate bodies of law addressing the same thing, that violates the right to ethical practice of law by creating avoidable complexity in the legal system, thus creating an artificial demand for the services of lawyers.

      Furthermore, a right to long term public oversight over business arises under the 9th Amendment, as a result of the fact that huge numbers of businesses have been caught doing illegal stuff over the last century. As such, an employee may copy and retain copies of information for purposes of providing that public oversight, to support any whistle-blowing that may be required in the public interest, and to protect themselves from being made scapegoats for the actions of business owners and executive (many of whom are sociopaths and are perfectly willing to let somebody else take the fall for their own actions).

      The only legitimate legal issue here is determining when that information can be released - and whether or not it can be released for pay.

      As members of the press are in the business of transferring information from those who have it to those that do not - and they do get paid for this - that question is not trivial. Further, such copying of information and the associated transfer can also be seen as an exercise of freedom of the press, which Congress can pass NO LAW infringing under the 1st Amendment, and hence they really should be amending the Constitution for Congress to have ANY authority over this matter.

      The authority of Congress to regulate interstate commerce ends when the authority of the Bill of Rights comes into play as a matter of legal ethics: the Bill of Rights is the highest law in the land. Any law or precedent to the contrary is illegal, and hence any action taken under such a law is a criminal infringement of fundamental rights "under the colour of law", as well as a violation of the right to ethical practice of law.

      As the right to long term public oversight over business arises under the Bill of Rights issue, it supersedes contract and property law. Any contract provision that attempts to interfere with the exercise of this right is thus an illegal provision, no different from attempting to contract a murder.

  12. This is what you get with short selling. by blind+biker · · Score: 0

    There's just too fucking much motivation in having a company not do well. It's a perverse motivation on a massive scale. Even if 99.99% of shorters are ethical people, there is still going to be that 0.01% of shorts that aren't.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  13. Why does Tesla get a pass? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Why is everyone posting on here Tesla's side of the story?

    The employee is speaking out now, claiming his actions were part of a whistle-blowing effort. If this was GM or Ford, the Slashdot community would trust the whiste-blower; why are people here trusting the corporation instead?

    http://money.cnn.com/2018/06/20/technology/tesla-sues-employee/index.html

    1. Re:Why does Tesla get a pass? by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

      Exactly. It is the cult of Musk. Tech people like Rei and Windbourne and Bruce think that "technologists" are going to solve all our problems. The real fact is that Musk is a flim flam artist who made a lot of money selling a scummy company we all hated (PayPal).

    2. Re:Why does Tesla get a pass? by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 2

      Fair enough, and Musk has a darn good publicist.

      But, from the information available, I am much more likely to believe Tesla than this guy. The one thing that does jump out though is if he was capable of doing what Tesla claims, he was grossly under appreciated, and if he did it in 6-9 months they do not have adequate controls in place.

    3. Re:Why does Tesla get a pass? by phantomfive · · Score: 1
      Here is what he says:

      "I am being singled out for being a whistleblower. I didn't hack into system. The data I was collecting was so severe, I had to go to the media,"

      It's hard to take him seriously when he didn't go to the media until now.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    4. Re:Why does Tesla get a pass? by GrimSavant · · Score: 1

      There's quite a bit of asymmetry in this, in multiple ways. In raw dollar value terms, the downside risk for Tesla is a lot bigger, and if they defame him they could be on the hook for a whole lot more money than Tesla could ever hope to win in a lawsuit, for no more complicated reason than he would go bankrupt over far smaller sums of money than Tesla would. Tesla's reputation, for good or ill, also has a bigger stake than the reputation of the ex-employee, and if they abuse the legal system to slander a genuine whistle-blower then that will have much more wide ranging effects.

      Conversely, if Tesla is trying to break this guy and either leave him destitute or in a prison cell, then he has everything to lose, even if "everything" is a smaller number from a context free standpoint. And he is almost surely going to be outmatched in available resources to handle drawn out litigation and the associated legal fees.

      Since they are both making pretty strong claims, I'd recommend to wait and see what the evidence is, rather than have a kneejerk reaction siding with one or the other. If one or both of them are full of shit, in the parlance of our times, then they have quite a bit to lose in the legal process and its aftermath.

    5. Re:Why does Tesla get a pass? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      If this was GM or Ford, the Slashdot community would trust the whiste-blower; why are people here trusting the corporation instead?

      Because /. is heavily infested with the Faithful, members and True Believers in the divinity of His Holiness Elon Musk.

    6. Re:Why does Tesla get a pass? by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The real fact is that Musk is a flim flam artist

      So despite reaching a massive milestone in rocketry with SpaceX, you still call him a flimflam artist? Damn dude, what does someone have to do to convince you that they're legit?

      His timelines are overly optimistic but he's always managed to accomplish what he claimed. But hey, facts are annoying when they get in the way of illogical hatred, right?

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    7. Re:Why does Tesla get a pass? by EnsilZah · · Score: 1

      "And he claims that Tesla inflated the number of Model 3's it made when it said it had built 2,020 of the cars in the seven days prior to a much anticipated April 3 report. Tripp said the actual number is closer to 1,900."

      A true whistleblower, the world needs to know!
      Think of all those poor shareholders being lead astray.

    8. Re:Why does Tesla get a pass? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Knowingly lying in reports to the market is kind of a big deal.

    9. Re:Why does Tesla get a pass? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite possible he did go to the media, members of which are sitting on the data to dole it out in such a way as to be to their greatest profit. No sense tipping Tesla off before they know they have a leak.

    10. Re:Why does Tesla get a pass? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the lawsuit happened AFTER he went to the media with it.

    11. Re:Why does Tesla get a pass? by bloodhawk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      if true it is actually a massive deal and if proven will result in very serious fines or imprisonment for execs for securities fraud, The SEC takes intentionally providing false information to the market very seriously.

    12. Re:Why does Tesla get a pass? by froggyjojodaddy · · Score: 1

      If he was a whistle-blower, would he not be providing evidence or data to a government agency instead of a competitor?

    13. Re:Why does Tesla get a pass? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is what he says:

      "I am being singled out for being a whistleblower. I didn't hack into system. The data I was collecting was so severe, I had to go to the media,"

      It's hard to take him seriously when he didn't go to the media until now.

      Which is exactly how Musk operates. he beat him to the media and discredited him before he got going. Musk is a master at controlling the story.

    14. Re:Why does Tesla get a pass? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SpaceX is not profitable, and has a long chance of being a sustainable business: https://www.fool.com/investing/2017/02/05/how-profitable-is-spacex-really.aspx

      Solar City is profitable but has extremely poor financial returns and is barely sustainable.

      Tesla is immensely non-profitable and has no profitability in sight, as they need to get to 5,000 cars per week to do so and have consistently underperformed there.

      So no, thus far Elon Musk has promised a lot of things, and has not delivered. Even SpaceX, it's done some remarkable technical feats, but unless it can do those with a sustainable business, those technical feats will whither and die.

    15. Re:Why does Tesla get a pass? by Train0987 · · Score: 1

      The SEC has civil jurisdiction, not criminal. They can only levy fines and even then rarely do so.

    16. Re:Why does Tesla get a pass? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Why is everyone posting on here Tesla's side of the story?

      The employee is speaking out now, claiming his actions were part of a whistle-blowing effort.

      And? Whistleblowing doesn't make exfiltrating data any more right. This is a private company here not some secret government agency that has spent years hiding from the public eye doing shady shit.

      If this was GM or Ford, the Slashdot community would trust the whiste-blower;

      Oh I trust the Whistleblower for GM or Ford too. I trust that he would be prosecuted in the same way. I trust that the response against him would be the same. Tough shit, he got caught. Just because he works for a company that spends a lot of time in the limelight.

      why are people here trusting the corporation instead?

      Trusting with what? With firing an employee that got caught misshandling data and admitted to it? Suing the employee? Why wouldn't you trust that response, it is precisely what a normal corporation would do, and the motivations of the employee in question are completely irrelevant.

      Now that said, I don't believe the employee for a second, but even if I did, tough shit, don't get caught next time. If you want praise then jump on a plane to Russia and post an incredible leak on wikileaks.

    17. Re:Why does Tesla get a pass? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real fact is that Musk is a flim flam artist

      So despite reaching a massive milestone in rocketry with SpaceX, you still call him a flimflam artist? Damn dude, what does someone have to do to convince you that they're legit?

      His timelines are overly optimistic but he's always managed to accomplish what he claimed. But hey, facts are annoying when they get in the way of illogical hatred, right?

      Pssh, fake news!

    18. Re:Why does Tesla get a pass? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was Thomas Edison "Americas Greatest Inventor" (Wikipedia) or was he a ruthless businessman? I'd suggest the answer is yes to both, depending on what parts of his life you look at.

      About Musk, the more businesses a person starts, the more likely it is that some of them will fail. Yes, Musk seems on track to reduce the cost to put satellites in orbit by a large factor, and to be able to deliver large payloads to Mars. On the other hand, as much as I dislike the current car dealership model and would like to see it disrupted, Tesla is having difficulties with ramping up production and bringing down costs. Will they succeed as spectacularly as spacex, or fail miserably, or somewhere in between, only time will tell for sure. You talk about spacex, binary talks about paypal. You both may very well be correct.

      As far as always managed to accomplished what he claims, I would really like to see currently produced Teslas become self driving with nothing more than a software update. OTOH I would also like to see manned missions to Mars.

    19. Re:Why does Tesla get a pass? by EnsilZah · · Score: 1

      Sure, if true it's an issue for the SEC, and an incredibly stupid and pointless act of fraud for a company already under fire from many directions.

      Does it seem like the kind of thing to weigh on a person's conscience to turn whistleblower? Misreporting sales by 120 units? Having more scrap widgets than expected?

    20. Re:Why does Tesla get a pass? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he was a whistle-blower, would he not be providing evidence or data to a government agency instead of a competitor?

      What competitor? He said he was providing it to the investors because Tesla management wasn't being honest.

    21. Re:Why does Tesla get a pass? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the SEC rarely fines? you are living in a fucking hole, they are issuing them on a daily basis, most don't make the press but they are constantly doing them. While they may not have criminal jurisdiction they work hand in hand with the justice department to recommend prosecutions and securities fraud is something they regularly prosecute.

    22. Re:Why does Tesla get a pass? by gravewax · · Score: 1

      misreporting manufacturing capacity by 5%, huge deal. more scrap than expected probably minor. the manufacturing misreporting if true is market affecting and outright fraud if true.

    23. Re:Why does Tesla get a pass? by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      Edison was a great inventor. Greatest? Nope. So far that would be Nikola Tesla. That's a hell of a high bar to get over. Who else has stuff they did being used throughout the world and is a part of every day life that we depend on. AC electric, AC electric motors.. and on and on and on. Edison was a great inventor, I don't want to diminish that. Even if JP Morgan just about enslaved him.

    24. Re:Why does Tesla get a pass? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dont think Tesla could be easily described as the 'greatest inventor'. Yes, he had
      some good inventions and ideas. But so did a lot of others. Just looking at electric
      motors for instance. His contributions were way down the history list. There were lots
      of commercially successful motors before he got involved. Sturgeon was probably
      the guy who can best be said to have invented the electric motor (DC rather than
      AC). Tesla's was incrementally better than the competition and solved some problems.
      But that's all in this case.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_electric_motor

    25. Re:Why does Tesla get a pass? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He didn't provide to a competitor, he provided to the press.

    26. Re:Why does Tesla get a pass? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WindBourne is a tech person now, god help us.

  14. Re:No, moronic Trump traitor faggot Ivan... by Hognoxious · · Score: 0

    I've heard so many retarded comments about the president, I'll vote for him if he runs again.

    Hot diggetty dang, I'll vote for him the time after that!

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  15. Peak Tesla fanboi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have now reached peak Tesla fanboi.

    1. Re: Peak Tesla fanboi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They just don't get it. Always a rise always a fall.

  16. GBs of data?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GBs of data?! Someone stole one raw image file? News articles always like to use the data quantities to suggest a large number of discrete items. Someone stole 10^892457 atoms of matter from the store!!!!11!1

  17. Alleged To Have Stolen Gigabytes of Data by L+S+Colby · · Score: 1

    So when is it that "employee alleged to have stolen" is changed to "employee who has admitted stealing." The Cambridge English dictionary defines allege as: - to say that someone has done something illegal or wrong without giving proof: To Allege is to imply doubt. There is no doubt. Mr. Tripp has admitted to "writing software that hacked Tesla’s manufacturing operating system ("MOS") and to transferring several gigabytes of Tesla data to outside entities. This includes dozens of confidential photographs and a video of Tesla’s manufacturing systems." It is alleged that: - beyond the misconduct to which Tripp admitted - he also wrote computer code to periodically export Tesla’s data off its network and into the hands of third parties. His hacking software was operating on three separate computer systems of other individuals at Tesla so that the data would be exported even after he left the company and so that those individuals would be falsely implicated as guilty parties. It is my opinion, BeauHd, after reading many, but not all of your posts on this site pertaining to Tesal/Elon Musk, is that you never miss an opportunity to cast aspersions on Mr. Musk, Tesla, or SpaceX. - So what is it. Is using "alleged", which is factually incorrect, just an oversight on your part, in the face of the admissions by Mr. Tripp, or do you think there are real reasons to doubt that Mr. Tripp has admitted anything . if so, what are your doubts based on. Do you believe Mr. Musk is hatching a plot to divert attention from the model 3 production problems widely reported and speculated on by "the usual list" of what passes for journalists these days. And how bout those shadowy others, who received the data that Mr. Tripp has admitted he stole from Tesla.. No reason to speculate on that, when every day there's a new story of a Tesla car catching fire or crashing while on auto-whatever, or a fire on the production line or quality control problems. I'm not saying none of these things have happened. However, after years of producing some 300,000 electric cars, why now, when Tesla is on the verge of success in the - Best Made in America Tradition - are these things all over the news. Oh yeah. That's right. Anyone who knows anything about markets and finance (and who received 16 Trillion dollars from the American people in 2008, because of their great market wisdom) - knows. You can't make anything in America any more. Electric cars. File that away with airplanes and cold fusion and other wild speculation by impractical dreamers. Why if there were anything like mass produced electric cars, what would happen to all those internal combustion engine factories at those places where they know how to make things that are really important, like - spreadsheets and 10k reports. Could there be some connection to the production problems at Tesla and those who have received - who knows what - from - who knows how many people inside Tesla - who were paid to work at Tesla, but not for the work, such as it may have been, they did while employed there. That's the real story. A story worth speculating on, for what it would reveal about those who are paid to sprinkle radioactive free market pixie dust on any signs of real competition developing.

  18. You can break into someone's computer though... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the submitter you may remember as "I don't believe in imaginary property" from a time when Slashdot let you fill in any name you wished and before there was a concerted effort to blacklist certain submitters by voting them into binspam shortly after their posts show in the firehose.

    I agree that the IP laws are bogus. And that "stealing" is the wrong word in general. That said, Tesla has alleged that this guy committed sabotage and that he may be working with others who are manipulating the stock price--stealing actual money from shareholders.

    There's a bit more than "imaginary property is bad" going on here. It is bad, but that's only half the story. I can give a pass to people merely using the system--even the GPL does this to effect its ends--more so than those abusing it. Continuing to own property you sold to others is the real problem, because they end up owning us and attacking our freedom to compute. Breaking into someone else's computer to steal their files is more like why we hate DRM than why we had imaginary property, though, especially when the complaint alleges that he tried to pin the blame for that on others.

    Since even I have more nuance than this, I think the real problem is that you don't understand why people object to imaginary property.

    1. Re:You can break into someone's computer though... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lot's of pseudo-intellectual rambling. Little substance beyond imaginary property is bad... unless we're discussing Tesla. Then it's different.

  19. wonka by bugs2squash · · Score: 3, Funny

    he should throw out all the employees and close the factory until he can re-staff it with oompa-lumpas.

    --
    Nullius in verba
    1. Re:wonka by elrous0 · · Score: 2

      Oompa Loompas are hard to find these days. Turns out that LoompaLand species never evolved a natural immunity to polio or most STD's. And those little fuckers are all anti-vaxxers and just WILL NOT wear condoms. So they've taken a pretty hard hit on their numbers. Wonka even had to start begging for H1B's.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    2. Re:wonka by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      he should throw out all the employees and close the factory until he can re-staff it with oompa-lumpas.

      Err why? Are you somehow implying that exactly the same response wouldn't occur at any other company?

  20. Can't steal trade secrets, right Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's also the difference between those two and a trade secret as well.

  21. Not so much when patents are involved by Uberbah · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There's also a huge similarity, it's been copied not taken. So if you object to the word stolen when it comes to copyright infringement you should also object to the word stolen when it comes to espionage. At least unless any documents, prototypes, backup disks or similar was actually removed from Tesla's possession.

    Scenario A: Joe Blow makes a high-quality rip of Black Panther a week before it was released on blue ray and torrents it. Out of the ten thousand people that download it, 800 would have otherwise bought the disk. 800 x $25 = Disney is out $20,000 on a movie approaching $1.4 billion at the box office.

    Scenario B: Joe Blow is a research assistant at Merck, and realizes his team is on the verge of a breakthrough on a cancer drug. Rather than get a pat on the back from his boss, he takes his findings to try and sell to his buddy who's an executive at Pfizer. If the corporate espionage is successful and Pfizer gets the patent first, Merck is out a hundred million in profits.

    Still think corporate espionage is "hugely similar" to copyright infringement?

    1. Re:Not so much when patents are involved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot this important part:
      Scenario A: Disney sues Joe Blow for statutory damages on their copyrighted work, to the tune of $10,000 per violation * 10,000 downloads = $100,000,000. Yes, $100 million. When he gets out of jail, he owns the clothing on his back.

      Scenario B: Joe Blow is defended by the Pfizer lawyers. You see, his buddy at Pfizer got him a high ranking job at Pfizer. The court case drags out for a number of years, and finally Pfizer and Merck settle for a huge sum of money (but less than Pfizer is making off the patent) and admits no guilt. Exec buddy made the company a billion dollars on the patent (after the settlement) and his stock options are very very valuable. Joe Blow is enjoying his huge yearly bonuses working for his buddy, doing very little (his buddy happens to know he will commit corporate espionage, so he isn't really allowed to do anything besides run up the expense account).

  22. Re:No, moronic Trump traitor faggot Ivan... by Killall+-9+Bash · · Score: 1

    anyone with differing political views is a traitor and should go to prison....... but TRUMP is the nazi.

    --
    "Prediction: within 10 years, Windows will be a Linux distribution." Me, 7-6-2016
  23. Re:No, moronic Trump traitor faggot Ivan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Colluding with Russia isn't a political view