Slashdot Mirror
How Twitter Made the Tech World's Most Unlikely Comeback (buzzfeed.com)
An anonymous reader quotes a report from BuzzFeed: Two years ago, people were writing eulogies for Twitter. Rudderless and without product direction, the company was losing users and advertisers, and seemed unable to contain a metastasizing trolling crisis that was destroying its credibility. Employees left by the dozens and then got laid off by the hundreds. It tried to sell, and failed at that too. The press, Wall Street, and the public were merciless. The New Yorker declared it "The End of Twitter." Analyst Michael Nathanson said that at $14 per share there was "no compelling reason to own the stock," and his counterparts applied "sell" ratings in bunches. Over a single weekend in February 2016, more than one million people tweeted "#RIPTwitter."
But then, even as those eulogies were being published, things started changing. Twitter began beating earnings expectations. Star ex-employees trickled back in, finding a new, more positive internal culture than the toxic one they'd left. Advertisers came back too, as did users. The company finally began addressing its trolling problem. And its stock, once unappealing to analysts like Nathanson at $14, is now trading above $46. It's still somewhat taboo to say it, but it's no longer possible to deny it: Twitter is making an unexpected, somewhat miraculous comeback. It is the first major consumer social company to lose users and start growing again in a meaningful way. The report mentions four major factors that led to Twitter's resurgence: "Its acceptance it would never be Facebook, leading to a decision to focus on news as Facebook pulled back. Its move to aggressively add premium live video to its service. Its CEO Jack Dorsey's directive to its product team to rethink everything. And a key component of many great comebacks: luck."
But then, even as those eulogies were being published, things started changing. Twitter began beating earnings expectations. Star ex-employees trickled back in, finding a new, more positive internal culture than the toxic one they'd left. Advertisers came back too, as did users. The company finally began addressing its trolling problem. And its stock, once unappealing to analysts like Nathanson at $14, is now trading above $46. It's still somewhat taboo to say it, but it's no longer possible to deny it: Twitter is making an unexpected, somewhat miraculous comeback. It is the first major consumer social company to lose users and start growing again in a meaningful way. The report mentions four major factors that led to Twitter's resurgence: "Its acceptance it would never be Facebook, leading to a decision to focus on news as Facebook pulled back. Its move to aggressively add premium live video to its service. Its CEO Jack Dorsey's directive to its product team to rethink everything. And a key component of many great comebacks: luck."
How young Donald Trump was slapped and punched until he made his bed
http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/donald-trump-fellow-cadet-article-1.3401110
My last conversation with Donald Trump was at the New York Military Academy, where we were both cadets. It was 1964, the year he graduated. We were walking together near the baseball field where, he reminded me, he'd played exceptionally well. He demanded that I tell him the story of one of his greatest games.
"The bases were loaded," I told him. "We were losing by three. You hit the ball just over the third baseman's head. Neither the third baseman nor the left fielder could get to the ball in time. All four of our runs came in; we won the game."
"No," he said. "That's not the way it happened. I want you to remember this: I hit the ball out of the ballpark! Remember that. I hit it out of the ballpark!"
Ballpark? I thought. We were talking about a high school practice field. There was no park to hit a ball out of. And anyway, his hit was a blooper the fielders misplayed.
But I wasn't going to argue with Donald. What was the harm in a little embellishment, if it helped him survive New York Military Academy?
NYMA, the private boarding school where Trump's parents sent him and where mine sent me, could be a brutal place where grown men who were veterans of the real military ruled with threats and force.
Trump's first year, under the command of Major Theodore Dobias, was hellish. Dobias slapped and punched him until he learned to make his bed and polish his shoes — things that Donald, an aggressive little wiseguy, had at first refused to do.
At some point Dobias assumed that he had broken Trump and eased up. More probably, Trump had figured out Dobias' weak points and had begun to exploit them. He flattered the major and became one of his "winners" who was favored with privileges and praised.
As the Academy's unofficial PR man, Dobias even contributed to the Trump myth, eventually telling Rolling Stone that pro scouts vied to sign Trump. As with many things Dobias asserted about Trump, this story may or may not be true.
Besides sports, most of Donald's years at the Academy were unremarkable. In his junior year, he was a supply sergeant in charge of the World War II M1s rifles we all lugged around at parade. But even in this laid-back position he was brash and assertive.
A member of the school band recallsTrump throwing shoes at him and yelling at him to shut up when this young man stood too close to the barracks trumpeting Reveille. Rumor had it that he got away with stuff like this because his father donated large sums to the school.
In his senior year, Donald was promoted to captain of A Company. Unlike other cadet captains who took an interest in the lives of the adolescents in their charge, Trump commanded at a remove. Aside from a determination that cadets in his care would always polish their brass belt buckles and keep the spit-shine on their boots, come evening he'd retreat to his room.
My friend Peter Ticktin, who was an A Company platoon sergeant, emailed me recently to say he saw Trump as someone who kept his thoughts to himself and delegated his responsibilities. "DT put his trust in me," Ticktin wrote . "(Although trust) may be too strong (a word), as I was not a confidant as to his personal thoughts. No one was. He was much to himself. A good guy, but no one's real buddy."
Trump couldn't remain aloof after one of his minions allegedly hazed a younger cadet. Ignoring the unwritten barracks rule that no report to the adult authorities be made, this cadet finked to his parents, who demanded a meeting with the superintendent. It resulted in Donald's removal as captain.
Any other cadet caught in such a scandal would have been busted to a lower rank and exiled to a different barracks. But Donald was transferred, with no loss of rank, to what was probably intended as a desk job. (He called it a promotion.)
While Donald had not succeeded as a manager of young men,
Slashdot will be the next comeback king, just as soon as netcradt confirms the year of Linux on the Desktop.
leading to a decision to focus on news as Facebook pulled back
I really don't use Twitter much, but where is the news on Twitter? Do I actively need to subscribe to news vendors?
All I ever see are posts by random tech-personalities telling me what kind of coffee they like and how their projects are travelling. Is that the 'news' they're referring to?
Twitter has been rudderless since day one. Monetization was never a viable play. They just depended on the early trendiness of social media to make their mark. Then, âwâ(TM), âoâ(TM) and trump come along, dragging massive polarization with them and suddenly twitter âseemsâ(TM) relevant.
Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But then I repeat myself. -- Mark Twain
Twitter is making over $2billion in revenue a year, which raises the question, how are they able to spend most of it running their little website.
In any case, I was going to blame Trump for this growth, but it seems that's not the case. Revenue has been mostly flat since 2015.
"First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
Since entering the Presidential race in July 2015, Twitter or Tweets have been international front page news, all day, every day, 24/7/365. The Great Orange Shitgibbon has given them unlimited free press, and hundreds of millions of people are forced to use their damn service just to see what Mister Marmalade has declared war on next.
Not really a mystery.
hookers and grits.
Honestly, I started to use it two years ago with Trumps campaign. His hilarious tweets were my daily amusement. But it became too boring and I felt flooded by tons of nonsense information pushed on me. So I pulled the plug, deleted my account and removed it from my devices.
Celebrities need a platform to share their dumb opinions.
If Trump and a few dozen stars left Twitter it would die.
People flock to Twitter to follow very famous people they like.
Every day millions login to twitter just to see what these people are up to.
Then, âwâ(TM), âoâ(TM) and trump come along, dragging massive polarization with them and suddenly twitter âseemsâ(TM) relevant.
Trump's massive polarization makes sense from the perspective of someone who is basically evil, in that he mostly cares about goals, and doesn't care about how you get there, or who or what is hurt in the process.
To him, a person who votes against him, is someone he can ignore, unless there is a chance of changing their mind and you can do it, without too much effort or costing other voters. It doesn't matter if they merely dislike him, or if they hate him with every fibre of their being's for what he is doing to the country. They are irrelevant, and they are not useful to advance his goals.
He only really seems to have cared about the kids being torn from parents, when it looked like the optics endangered himself. I think he figured he had to do something to prevent a larger change in congress so as to protect himself. At the same time he hasn't really abandoned his policy, since if he steps off the gas of racism then that too endangers him by demotivating his base.
It is just a matter of time before all of his Chickens come home to roost.
I went out to *BSD's grave on Decoration Day. The old forgotten cemetery is by the dark woods beyond the edge of town. There within olfactory distance of the municipal treatment plant you will find *BSD's final resting place.
*BSD's tombstone was shrouded by thick mosses and knots of noxious ivy. I gently pulled aside the tangled twists of thorns, and cleaned the decaying marker the best I could. My melancholy thoughts pondered that this indeed was *BSD's figurative charnel house of which so many have plaintively spoken.
Nothing is so pitiful as an untended grave, a loved one now forgotten. The short sad life of this doomed and fated OS makes us realize that there but for the grace of God go all of us.
I planted some wilting marigolds which I had found discarded behind Bud's Garden Center. By some miracle perhaps they will take root and bring a modicum of cheer to BSD's God forsaken plot. My fervent hope is that the torpid colored boy who carelessly mows the cemetery doesn't slice them down, inadvertently mirroring *BSD's own doomed encounter with death's irresistible scythe.
Funny how things work out. Linux, that brilliant novam stellam, now runs the Internet and the world's fastest computers, while *BSD lies moldering within its forgotten crypt. Let the barren silence of *BSD's tomb be a mute reminder that hubris and braggadocio were no defense on that woeful day when the Angel of Death's bleak umbra was cast upon *BSD.
"trump"
the article should have been just that one single word.
the tfa completely missed the point and relegates trump to being just a coincidence with twitter's rise from the ashes. but it's much more than that.
trump going bat shit crazy, and his legion of russian propaganda and fake news bots, **is** what 'saved' twitter.
nothing more, nothing less.
constantly being mentioned in the media is the most valuable and effective advertising... and it's not costing them a penny.
They kicked all the small-time trolls and kept the biggest of them all.
"A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
Your thoughts desires and most importantly FEAR
Twitter didn't get better. Facebook got worse. This is what really happened. With the privacy controversy surrounding Facebook, and no other real social media contender at a similar scale, investors switched their portfolios from Facebook to Twitter by default.
well, they spend a third of it running their website (!) and most of the rest goes to employee salaries, benefits and stock options, with a little profit left over.
No real UNIX/LINUX nerd would be caught dead saying "PS C:\Users\cdreimer> dir"
130 years ago they would have said "Your Slip is Showin, Ma'am."
I have yet to use twitter and have no desire too
An anonymous reader quotes a report from BuzzFeed:
[doom and gloom for Twitter]
[miraculous recovery for Twitter]
I can't believe BuzzFeed still exists.
Main cost is probably trawling the little website's contents to deduce things about their advertising targets.
For rescuing a poisonous politically biased lefty-propaganda attack platform from the dead!!
Hi, twitter here. Shut up and think how I tell you to think.
someone who is basically evil, in that he mostly cares about goals, and doesn't care about how you get there, or who or what is hurt in the process.
"How dare he try to stop a potential nuclear war if it means giving some bad guy a couple hours of his time and a little undeserved respect!!"
To him, a person who votes against him, is someone he can ignore, unless there is a chance of changing their mind and you can do it, without too much effort or costing other voters. It doesn't matter if they merely dislike him, or if they hate him with every fibre of their being's for what he is doing to the country. They are irrelevant, and they are not useful to advance his goals.
Otherwise known as 'the optimal strategy for succeeding in politics'. No politician in the history of mankind ever got anywhere trying to assuage the rabid hatred of the people obsessed with stopping them. In fact - if you haven't caught on - Trump intentionally provokes that hatred because it makes his opposition look fucking insane. Trump could have never directly damaged the media (for example) as much as they've damaged themselves over the last 2+ years.
He only really seems to have cared about the kids being torn from parents, when it looked like the optics endangered himself.
He's attempting to utilize the manufactured outrage to his advantage to advance proper immigration reform, which is the correct solution to the underlying issue anyway.
It is just a matter of time before all of his Chickens come home to roost.
>PLEASE HURRY MUELLER!! D:
womp womp
How are they spending $600M on running a website?
How many super computers are they running that shit on?
I have yet to use twitter and have no desire too
And so, by slashdot logic, no one else uses it either, right?
To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
it is just full of twats.
L'Idiot
They still haven't fixed the Democratis Party troll problem. We don't need their gay culture or their toxic anti-Trump hate speech. And we really don't need their fake news. Here's what really happend last week:
https://www.rt.com/usa/429956-caged-boy-immigration-debunk/
The one thing Twitter has not done is reorganized itself and made a public move to fair and equitable enforcement of its policies. It takes a very serious violation of Twitter's rules to get anyone on the left banned from Twitter. You can unequivocally call for someone to be raped and murdered and stand a good chance of keeping your account if Twitter's "community standards enforcers" and "Trust and Safety Council" consider you an ally. Heck, a reporter from CNN got caught putting crosshairs on the President or something like that and Twitter did not lift a finger to punish him or CNN.
(Note that this is why people on the right have started giving zero fucks when seemingly civil liberals whine about "right wing violence." I have liberal friends on Facebooks that, lacking any irony, were whining about right wing violence not long after a Bernie Bro tried to gun down dozens of republican congressmen and nearly killed Scalise. These are the same class off people who call mask-clad rioters and people who mob individuals at their homes and restaurants "protesters")
someone who is basically evil, in that he mostly cares about goals, and doesn't care about how you get there, or who or what is hurt in the process.
"How dare he try to stop a potential nuclear war if it means giving some bad guy a couple hours of his time and a little undeserved respect!!"
Didn't you hear? He didn't just try, he succeeded in every goal? In fact the problem is solved. What there is no proof they did anything significant? They had already committed to the same thing to South Korea? Trump volunteered to stop the preparedness exercises for nothing? There is no real plan? No real hard guarantee that North Korea, a known bad actor is going to keep its words to Donald J Trump, a lying sack of shit? What, our saying we likely gave them the prestige of a presidential visit for nothing? Your kidding? Your saying that when Obama talked about talking to North Korea he was excoriated for it? That makes no sense. Trump did talk, and even praised the fucking terrorist and got what? Shit? Really?
To him, a person who votes against him, is someone he can ignore, unless there is a chance of changing their mind and you can do it, without too much effort or costing other voters. It doesn't matter if they merely dislike him, or if they hate him with every fibre of their being's for what he is doing to he country. They are irrelevant, and they are not useful to advance his goals.
Otherwise known as 'the optimal strategy for succeeding in politics'. No politician in the history of mankind ever got anywhere trying to assuage the rabid hatred of the people obsessed with stopping them. In fact - if you haven't caught on - Trump intentionally provokes that hatred because it makes his opposition look fucking insane. Trump could have never directly damaged the media (for example) as much as they've damaged themselves over the last 2+ years.
A president is president of the entire country. This behaviour, that of trying to stoke hatred and rage is not the sign of a leader, unless your talking the leader of some rabid cult. The fact that your admitted it is likely intentional just proves the underlying point that he is true evil.
If we ever have world war 3, it is this attitude that will light the match.
Trump winning the elections is the best thing that has ever happened to Twitter and the worst thing that has ever happened to the world.
And we can't have free and open discussion, can we... not in a totalitarian state.
Just rename everything that isn't Left wing "Hate" speech, and that's it! Anybody who isn't Left wing is "full of hate" and therefore evil!
Twitter is making over $2billion in revenue a year, which raises the question, how are they able to spend most of it running their little website.
By holding weekly $50 million meetings deciding on who will receive or lose their blue checks.
https://techcrunch.com/2018/06/21/twitter-smytes-customers/
A president is president of the entire country. This behaviour, that of trying to stoke hatred and rage is not the sign of a leader, unless your talking the leader of some rabid cult.
Coming from a likely Democrat that is just so rich. Stoking racial divide and general victimhood is the hallmark of the Democratic party and Obama & Clinton are masters of the art.
But surely some who calls her opponents "deplorables" isn't trying to stoke hatred now are they? Obama made his entire political career on seeding racial tension. So don't talk to me about imagined hatred stoking because someone supports the rule of law. Don't like immigration law? Change it. But somehow when Democrats held the presidency and both houses of congress they had no interest in fixing immigration. Why was that? Could it be because they wanted to perpetrate the problem for political reasons?
They spend the remainder on worrying if the staff is diverse enough and all 77 genders are represented. Personally I now identify as a wine cork.
Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
Next thing you know, AOL dial-up will be the nations largest ISP.
I use it far less (especially after that policy change a while ago about multiple accounts, after which I effectively deleted an account that I used actively).
And I even once paid money to promote tweets. Awful experience. Twitter support was non-existent. It's really doubtful promoting tweets had any measurable effect. Very unlikely I'll ever pay money do do that or buy ads again.
I liked the first half of the summary.
The world would NOT be a worse place if Twitter had actually went away. And took Facebook along with it.
all 77 genders
You are so 5 minutes ago, it's 83 genders now, wait, 85, no, now it's 91..........
Celebs, politicians and other low life types, think they are hot & trendy because of how many likes, tweets, followers and what not. Not to mention mis-information gets put out on twitter, then, once corrected, no one believes the correction because they've already marched, burned, or protested the original tweet.
But but but...whatabout Clinton!? whatabout Obama!
Can you show an example of Obama seeding racial tension? I'm genuinely curious.
Everything
Trump Touches
TURNS TO G O L D.
I don't.
A president is president of the entire country. This behaviour, that of trying to stoke hatred and rage is not the sign of a leader, unless your talking the leader of some rabid cult.
Coming from a likely Democrat that is just so rich. Stoking racial divide and general victimhood is the hallmark of the Democratic party and Obama & Clinton are masters of the art.
Actually, the GP is very likely not American, if you looked closely. But even if they were, considering most (all?) of the living former Republican presidential candidates have criticized President Trump quite strongly, there's no reason to think of parties for this kind of thing.
You wouldn’t believe how bad these people are. These aren’t people, these are animals, and we’re taking them out of the country at a level and at a rate that’s never happened before.
Sorry losers and haters, but my I.Q. is one of the highest – and you all know it! Please don’t feel so stupid or insecure, it’s not your fault.
I've said if Ivanka weren't my daughter, perhaps I'd be dating her.
You know, it really doesn't matter what the media write as long as you've got a young, and beautiful, piece of ass.
The concept of global warming was created by and for the Chinese in order to make US manufacturing non-competitive.
The worst thing a man can do is go bald. Never let yourself go bald.
Clinton and Obama were what gave us Trump. Without them, he never would have been elected*. That the right is now playing the same game as the left and they don't like it is largely irrelevant. It was Clinton who back in 2008 only conceded when the DNC promised her the nomination after Obama. It was Obama who allowed the likes of Lois Lerner to smother the political opposition with the power of the tax man. It was Obama who attempted to gaslight the illegal arms numbers with Fast and Furious, only to be brought down by the death of a border agent with one of the guns in question. It was Clinton who used a corrupt FBI to cover for her ass when she got caught using a server in her bathroom to communicate with people, including the president, while in technically sophisticated countries. It was Obama who called the right "bitter clingers" while Clinton chose "deplorables". Goose gander motherfucker.
*One of course should not discount the MSM who gave him tens to hundreds of millions worth of free non-negative publicity to Trump during the Primaries or the GOPe who was moronic enough to back Jeb fucking Bush.
They spend the remainder on worrying if the staff is diverse enough and all 77 genders are represented. Personally I now identify as a wine cork.
In the last few months I have started seeing forms with fields like "Gender Assigned at Birth". This is likely both an attempt to be somewhat "politically correct" while at the same time allowing them to move on with business as usual and not having to try to keep up with the insanity.
Crackers, not Hackers.
Testing your Cybersecurity
before the bad guys get to it !
August 16th. That's when the new Twitter API changes roll out, along with the fees they're going to charge third party developers. Twitter wants to charge $399 for up to 25 users, $629 for up to 50, $1199 for up to 100 and $2899 for up to 250 user "subscriptions". That'll be the death of the third party apps, which I'm guessing is how most people access Twitter, at least on mobile. Could put quite a crimp in Twitter's user base, if everyone doesn't switch over to the official Twitter app.
A president is president of the entire country. This behaviour, that of trying to stoke hatred and rage is not the sign of a leader, unless your talking the leader of some rabid cult.
Coming from a likely Democrat that is just so rich. Stoking racial divide and general victimhood is the hallmark of the Democratic party and Obama & Clinton are masters of the art.
Nah, they're amateurs, Trump took them to school. Of course, maybe that supports your argument, since he was a Democrat for nearly all of his life, until it became clear that the Republican party was easier to hack.
Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
This indicates to me that more than one million people turned to Twitter to demonstrate that Twitter is on the decline. What more could one do to put forward a self evident falsehood?
Disclaimer: I don't use Twitter.
Requiem for the American Dream
By arguing with him you're giving him a platform.
The rest of society has moved on, leave him in the dust with the other fragile minds who can only handle 77 genders.
Is there some way to auto-tag any post referring to politics?
I'd very much like to filter them out.
Requiem for the American Dream
Ben Norton or Naomi Klein are better people to follow.
https://twitter.com/BenjaminNorton
https://twitter.com/NaomiAKlein
Kind of both of those things.
You can follow news services. You can also follow individual journalists.
Twitter users sort of become parts of informal communities by following people. If you follow popular weird left Twitter accounts, they'll talk a lot about current events.
Often one will logon to Twitter and see that some sort of news story broke because of people will make jokes about it. From their you can look into and find out what's going on.
see subject
Just old people in Korea.
Trump Happened.
Coincidence that Twitter became relevant again ?
5 out of 6 people enjoy Russian Roulette & 6 out of 7 Dwarfs are not Happy
"hackers" are people who hack systems.
"crackers", on the other hand, are southern rednecks.
learn the difference. Few crackers are hackers, and few hackers are crackers.
...but certainly newspapers quote twitter a lot. And not just the tweeter-in-chief's
Given that a certain high-profile tweeter is tweeting tweets that regularly make headlines-- and thus giving Twitter effectively free advertising almost every day-- I think it's no surprise that Twitter is making a rally.
You can't buy that kind of advertising.
"But surely some who calls her opponents "deplorables" isn't trying to stoke hatred now are they?"
Clinton said that once in a private meeting. Trump insults Democrats on a daily bases on Twitter.
"Obama made his entire political career on seeding racial tension. "
By being black? He talked about race at times the issue came up, but not excessive.
Guess who has control of the presidency and both houses of congress and is failing to reform immigration though the House as we speak?
No. But if he had a son it would have looked like Trayvon.
Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
> You wouldn’t believe how bad these people are. These aren’t people, these are animals, and we’re taking them out of the country at a level and at a rate that’s never happened before.
Are you literally condemning deportation of violent criminals, members of an organized crime group with multiple murders to their name?
> Sorry losers and haters, but my I.Q. is one of the highest – and you all know it! Please don’t feel so stupid or insecure, it’s not your fault.
Looking at the retorts, I have to give him that point.
> I've said if Ivanka weren't my daughter, perhaps I'd be dating her.
You mean Ivanka is ugly, stupid and terrible??
> You know, it really doesn't matter what the media write as long as you've got a young, and beautiful, piece of ass.
I dare you to say this is not the reality in show-business.
All you can do with 140 characters is tweak the reader's autobiographical memory to construct an emotionally laden simulacrum. This is basic information theory. The densest compression possible requires the receiving side to have a detailed model of the message space (descriptive world) in which the communication is embedded.
Twitter is a lot like a quarterback calling an audible at the line of scrimmage. "17 cobra 56 blue 88 hut hut." To some degree the QB can fashion entirely unique plays: "cobra" might be a direction to the wide receiver, "blue" might be a direction to the running backs, "88" might be a blocking pattern for the offensive line. But every one of these elements is previously rehearsed.
Twitter is also a lot like Mr Potato Head, where you also work with a fixed palette, but (to some degree) obtain novel permutations and combinations.
The other half of Twitter is to inject some wit at the seams—clever ideas, like listing out multiple Potato Head mustache codes to reference John R. Bolton, while arranging those codes to resemble some other snide cliche. Har har.
And the cherry on top is timing. First is good. Waiting to pounce on the obvious har har is also good. Immediately one-upping the counter-punch is also good. You know, all that stuff, all that stuff that was the real subject of grade eight, while we all got Cs and Bs is actual English class. (Turns out, a lot of people pine for the glory days of their high-school varsity trophies.) We just all need to know who's got the drop, or we couldn't possibly sort ourselves into a cohesive snideathon.
In theory, Twitter could rise to the level of poetry, and I'm sure it sometimes does. But the cherry-chasers will barely notice, and surely won't invest the mental energy required to unpack real poetry, so again, Twitter probably trades in simulacrum poetry—pseudo-poetry that potently reminds you of the real thing, but without demanding actual work.
But the raindrops, you say, they form a pattern. Illumination by eternal storm watching. I've looked at clouds from both sides now ... Nice gig.
My gig is inherent calibration: long-form messages from which one can adduce the author's competence and validity entirely on internal grounds (as a first term). This is, of course, a complete waste of time ... until you get further along, building taller towers.
Water finds its own level. Distinguishing one droplet from another makes little difference at the end of the day.
Twitter people are water folk; it's a kind of dolphin-circus Mermaid culture for people who hate stairs. TheRealNewton: if I have seen farther than others, it's because I have stood on the nose of a breaching Humpback whale.
Followed by a giant spray of a billion tiny drops.
I tried Twitter out several years ago, but it sure feels like I'm trying to drink from a firehose.
I work on a computer all day long, so I'm not too interested in spending any more time than necessary using them during my down time. I'm definitely not one of these people walking around staring at their phones or constantly checking for updates during the day.
Those of you who do use Twitter, how do you deal with the deluge of messages and improve the signal to noise ratio?
Does this include promoting GNU/Linux and bashing "M$"? And whatever happened to DeadZero anyway?
A good manual filter would be to ignore any post that contains "Trump" in the subject. That filter will have lots of false negatives, but very few false positives.
Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
I never saw the point in using Twitter, other than reading peoples and celebrities rants and other meaningless social attitudes like Instagram. I'm pretty fine without it, for the last 3 and half years.
>Clinton said that once in a private meeting. It was a campaign fundraising event. >Trump insults Democrats on a daily bases on Twitter. When has he anything disparaging about 1/2 American citizens who voted for her? Trumps tweets are about fake news media (dems and repubs) and the Democrats in government. >Guess who has control of the presidency and both houses of congress and is failing to reform immigration though the House as we speak? Guess who had control of all of congress and the presidency from 2009-2010 and didn't fix anything immigration related? Wake up dayum.
They are wrong far more than they are right. People need to start taking all this conjecture with a grain of salt.