Slashdot Mirror


Finally, It's the Year of the Linux... Supercomputer (zdnet.com)

Beeftopia writes: From ZDNet: "The latest TOP500 Supercomputer list is out. What's not surprising is that Linux runs on every last one of the world's fastest supercomputers. Linux has dominated supercomputing for years. But, Linux only took over supercomputing lock, stock, and barrel in November 2017. That was the first time all of the TOP500 machines were running Linux. Before that IBM AIX, a Unix variant, was hanging on for dear life low on the list."

An interesting architectural note: "GPUs, not CPUs, now power most of supercomputers' speed."

171 comments

  1. Linus by 110010001000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Linus has created literally trillions in economic activity. Singlehanded. But techies worship Musk. Very odd.

    1. Re:Linus by Riceballsan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Welcome to the world of business. If you want to power the world you can... but if you can look good and speak with charisma you can get more fame regardless of knowledge level. Same reason why Jobs was center stage for so long.

    2. Re:Linus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do?

    3. Re:Linus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People only seem to care about people with money and power, or at least the appearance of those two things.

      Why do you think certain rappers are treated like idols? It sure isn't the music itself, I'll tell you that.

    4. Re:Linus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's because one is a white african american.

    5. Re:Linus by admin7087 · · Score: 2

      Most techies appreciate both of them, I'd suppose.

    6. Re:Linus by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Yeah. It is pretty sad if you think of it. Github sold for $7.5 billion. The founder is now a billionaire. He wrote github in 3 months.

    7. Re:Linus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an odd motherfucker yourself. How deep in the spectrum are you?

    8. Re:Linus by Wookie+Monster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The Github that sold for $7.5B wasn't the same Github that was created in three months. Hundreds of people, working for ten years made Github worth $7.5B. That initial version wasn't worth any more than the time spent developing it.

    9. Re:Linus by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      I'll bet some guy valued the initial version at $50 billion or so. The current version of Github isn't worth $7.5B either. It is just that Microsoft has too much stock and doesn't know what to do with it.

    10. Re:Linus by orlanz · · Score: 1

      Do we even know the name of the guy who invented the wheel?

    11. Re:Linus by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      I know his name (Nisaba). But most tire guys only know names like Giovanni Battista Pirelli. I doubt Pirelli even gave Nisaba any credit for his invention.

    12. Re:Linus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His name is Linus Torvalds, and he is my god.

      And my plush Tux is my wifu.

    13. Re:Linus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worship Linus waaaay more than Musk, who I just admire (for SpaceX, not Te$la). Linus is a hero... like Woz... or Jay Miner... or Gordon Moore... or Chuck Peddle. Musk, Jobs, etc... are just suits with charisma and personality. I still like them though. When compared with other suits, they rock.

    14. Re:Linus by houghi · · Score: 1

      His name is Robert Paulson.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    15. Re:Linus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Did Torvalds make a FLAMETHROWER?

      I think not...

    16. Re:Linus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know his name (Nisaba). But most tire guys only know names like Giovanni Battista Pirelli. I doubt Pirelli even gave Nisaba any credit for his invention.

      Neither of which invented the wheel, which long predates any form of history we have.

      The guy who invented tires didn't invent the wheel.

      As evidence, I'll remind you our railroad tracks are spaced according to the wheel width of Roman chariots.

    17. Re:Linus by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Linus has created literally trillions in economic activity. Singlehanded. But techies worship Musk. Very odd.

      Singlehanded huh? So he wrote every version of Linux, every fork, every application, and every improvement was his idea?

      He is obviously the guy who kicked it all off, but to say he did it all singlehanded is selling thousands of people short.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    18. Re:Linus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linus didn't create the entire thing, moron.

    19. Re:Linus by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Do we even know the name of the guy who invented the wheel?

      Wasn't it Al Gore?

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    20. Re:Linus by CaptainDork · · Score: 0

      People jumped from the God of Abraham to prophets Jesus and Mohamed and it isn't going well, so there's a precedent of the United States and stuff.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    21. Re:Linus by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      The spectra you are alluding to are two dimensional along an x-y axis, in a bell curve that does not support your negativity.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    22. Re:Linus by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      No, I met Nisaba at a TED talk and he definitely invented the wheel. That was like 4000 years ago, but I still remember his name.

    23. Re:Linus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thor invented the wheel: https://johnhartstudios.com/bc/tag/thor-wheel-stunts/

      Thor also invented the square wheel and the triangular wheel. The triangular wheel is an improvement on the square wheel, since it eliminates one bump.

    24. Re:Linus by mlw4428 · · Score: 1

      Because oftentimes the OS is just one piece of a solution. Musk has created solutions. Put another way - I don't necessarily care what OS powers my phone, my car, my TV, my toaster, my dog, etc. I do care, however, that my Tesla can go 0 to 60 in like 2 seconds. I do care that my phone can link up with my watch and my airpods to make managing my music experience more pleasant. That's why Steve Jobs was big and it's why Musk is big. Linux for all of its benefits is simply one piece to a solution...and arguably it may not be the most important piece.

    25. Re:Linus by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

      Yep. Singlehanded.

    26. Re:Linus by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It is the difference of the creator of the infrastructure vs the creator of the implementation.

      It is like thanking the Firemen who saved your life from the burning building Vs thanking the guys who built the road to get to your home from the fire station, or the materials expert that allowed your home to maintain structure to allow the firemen to reach your home in time.

      The Linux Kernel really doesn't do anything useful, unless there are people who work with it and create with it. Linus may had made a kernel to help control these super computers but it was a team of other people who needed to work with the Kernel to make a super computer out of it.

      Does Linus deserve Credit? Yes. Do Techies worship Musk? Some may.
      However Linus is mostly focused on making the kernel better (a noble goal on its own). While Musk is trying to solve problems, and may choose to use the Linux Kernel as a tool in solving the problem.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    27. Re:Linus by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      " I don't necessarily care what OS powers my phone, my car, my TV, my toaster, my dog, etc."

      You should care, because otherwise you have no idea what that OS is doing behind your back. But most people don't, hence the infatuation with hucksters like Musk and shiny headphones.

    28. Re:Linus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Musk looks like a dork and stammers his way through every presentation I've seen him give.

    29. Re:Linus by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

      He also didn't promise to take us all to Mars and offer hyperloop rides for a $1. Disregard my original comment.

    30. Re:Linus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He didn't build that.

    31. Re:Linus by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      We do not know the name, but it was not a guy. It was a gal.

      She languished at the encampment, be it hut or cave, as the seasons came and went, and had access to a varying amount of small objects.

      As she laboured in her primitive lab, she had the intelligence, experience, opportunity and motive to experiment with combinations of adaptations and stumbled, early on, upon the idea that rolling was more efficient than dragging or pulling.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    32. Re:Linus by mlw4428 · · Score: 1

      Why would I care just about the OS when the entire solution may be proprietary and doing stuff behind my back? And no - I don't believe every piece of technology is going to be better/more secure by being open source. Security is only useful if *I* do the review, otherwise I'm still trusting other people. In which case I may as well trust people motivated by my wallet than those motivated by nothing more than their own ideology.

    33. Re:Linus by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Exactly.

      And just how hard is it for mankind to make a fucking ball cap?

      That was certainly achieved well before the wheel.

      The brand names proposed above refer to TYRES, not wheels.

      The brand, "Boring," applied to an invention preceding the wheel by millennia, is an idea that's slicker'n deer guts on a door knob.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    34. Re: Linus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel like I ought to demand your dog's source code now...

    35. Re:Linus by sconeu · · Score: 1
      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    36. Re: Linus by orlanz · · Score: 1

      Noooo. It was a guy! What would a woman who cooked and gathered berries have need for a wheel? It was the MEN that labored all day, rain or shine, cold or hot, to the tops of hills to roll stones down. The stone that rolled furthest was the king of the hill for that day and an aspiration to the youth.

    37. Re:Linus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Without GNU the linux kernel would not exist.

    38. Re:Linus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, actually...

      1. Christians identify Jesus with the God of Abraham (or at least His Son...depends on denomination).
      2. Muslims don't worship Muhammad.

      </actually>

    39. Re:Linus by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Mr. Axel Wheel.

      Using round things such as logs to help move heavy objects by reducing the friction coefficient was used before the wheel. But the invention of the Axel that was fixed which was the true innovation.

      I expect the Axel concept was figured out when moving heavy things for a long time, when the inside gets warn down and a bit more narrow. you were able to push the object further before having to pickup the log and move it to the front. Then they found a point where they can have it narrow enough to put in stops at the cost of more friction, but enough to be able to move it easier. However sturdy enough to hold the weight.

      Being the Wheel was considered to be invented during the bronze age. I Expect using Metal to strengthen and reduce friction was a factor as well.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    40. Re:Linus by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      You should care about the OS and the entire solution as well to make sure it is not doing stuff behind your back. But you are a consumer, so I guess it makes sense that you only care that your car goes fast and you have expensive headphones. I think I now understand why people like Musk are your idols.

    41. Re: Linus by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 1

      while (true)
      {
        if (inside)
         begToGoOut();
        if (outside)
         begToComeIn();
        if (foodAvailable())
          eat();
        if (canHearNoises())
          bark(10);
        if (canSeeMailman())
          bark(20);
        sleep(60);
      }

    42. Re:Linus by Drethon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Linus has created literally trillions in economic activity. Singlehanded. But techies worship Musk. Very odd.

      I would say enabled, rather than created. But the work Linus and those who developed Linux did is seriously underrated.

    43. Re: Linus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The boring company is literally a company to bore (drill through rocks).

    44. Re:Linus by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1, Troll

      We don't worship competence in the US. We worship wealth and the gift of self-promotion.

      Musk has made a career pretending to be Tony Stark while never delivering.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    45. Re:Linus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty sure Linus doesn't want to be worshipped. Fanatic people who worship other people are just dangerous. Just being respected among peers is probably more than enough.

    46. Re:Linus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe because we don't care about economics but we have other interests? Some might want to save the planet, some might like the idea of automated vehicles, some like the aesthetics...some love space travel.

      A kernel is not as interesting as those...

    47. Re:Linus by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Singlehanded huh? So he wrote every version of Linux, every fork, every application, and every improvement was his idea?

      By CEO compensation logic, yeah, pretty much :-P

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    48. Re:Linus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Triangle man hates person man.

    49. Re:Linus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you dismiss the work of hundreds (thousands?) of kernel contributors, utilities/application devs, etc, but I get your point.

      The difference is, Musk built a product, made a shit-ton of money, and is pouring that money back into other ventures that may or may not pan out, because he can. I think Torvalds is basically able to retire, but he'll never have the cash or clout to do what Musk is doing elsewhere. Had Torvalds figured out a way to personally benefit several billions of dollars and then turned that around and invested into other forward thinking products, we'd have a good race.

    50. Re:Linus by mlw4428 · · Score: 1

      > But you are a consumer

      No. I'm just not stupid enough to goad myself into thinking I'm some sort of 1337 haxx0r. You can't truly be safe unless everything in your solution stack has published source code. You also can't be 100% certain you're secure unless YOU review the code. You also have to have a 100% complete understanding of the code, its underpinnings, and the technical aspects of what that code is doing. Even then there's "always a chance". 99.9999% of people in the world will never do this. I choose to focus my technical efforts elsewhere. You've also seemed to have lost the point of my response. Few people care about Linus because his solution is just a piece of the puzzle.

    51. Re: Linus by fuzznutz · · Score: 1

      Your code is incomplete. You forgot:

      void ShitAllOverYard (void);

    52. Re:Linus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Musk has made a career pretending to be Tony Stark while never delivering.

      Never delivering?

      I see an awful lot of Teslas here in flyover country for someone who never delivers. And I have watched the SpaceX rocket landings. Looks to me like it delivered and returned for more.

    53. Re:Linus by AlanObject · · Score: 1

      Woah. Where is that butthurt coming from anyway?

      Here is an idea: Acknowledge and appreciate Torvalds for achievements that Torvalds has made. Acknowledge and appreciate Musk for achievements that Musk has made.

      Can you do that? Or have you been so conditioned to take a "side" on everything that this just no longer works.

      Maybe this will help: Leave worship for your church and Fox News.

    54. Re:Linus by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Both have created trillions in economic activity. And was Linus single handed? Nope. Not even close. Many of us have contributed to Linux. And Linus was considered the top for many years. He, and many others, such as Richard Stallman, Bruce Perens, Ian Murdock, Matthias Ettrich, Miguel de Icaza, Federico Mena, and many many others, are all names that are associated with making Linux what it is. In fact, even Dr. Tanenbaum deserves a lot of credit for Linux and more importantly, shaping Linus. And do not forget en Thompson, Dennis Ritchie, and Brian Kernighan, amongst others, who really were the gods that Linus stoood on.

      And as to ELon, he HAS created LITERALLY trillions of $ of economic activity.
      Prior to him, America's space program had become moribund. Europe, Russia, and China were running away with all commercial launches, so, they were no longer doing any real R&D. The reason is that they had no need to. Then along came Musk with SpaceX. Just his initial approach to launching was to keep it cheap. It was cheaper than all else. So, he helped restart not just American space, but now, we are looking at going to the moon and mars again. This was due to SPACEX. He has dropped the price SO LOW that every nation is trying to follow him. Then we have EVs. Had Tesla not come along, EVs would still be a joke. Leaf was created because of California regs as well as Tesla Roadster, at that time, but it was Tesla that forced them to get better. In fact, because of Tesla's constant growth, and they are only in about 1/3 of the world's population, they are forcing the entire INDUSTRY to switch to EVs. California and now Chinese regs really had little impact on that, other than the leaf. Li-ion batteries were R&D in America but again moved offshore and picked up by Japan. Now, it is Tesla that has not only lowered the costs of Li-ion battery, but has actually pushed the industry. Their new batteries in the M3 are a stepping stone to what is coming and yet, those batteries are better than anything sold on the market. Now, we have solar. Most Solar was/still is, R&D in America. However, China went to great lengths to get all of that moved to CHina since they want total control over it ( thankfully, trump is finally addressing this). Prior to Tesla, Solar had moved to China, Germany, and Japan, except that most R&D was still being done here (iow, we taxpayers invested billions and were getting little in return). Now, Tesla's R&D combined with Panasonic's manufacturing is producing real push on this. To be fair, it was CHina's focus on destroying America's production that really dropped the cost of cells/panels. Chinese gov says that they are spending 10s/100s of billions on solar, but most of it has been on subsidies targeting America/German compay sales. IOW, it has not been about helping solar, but about getting control of solar. Musk at one time had 2/3 of the American market. However, that was in part due to sales at HD, which meant giving them $7000 / sale, which was the highest in the industry (insane; norm is 3-4K). Basically, they were giving up most of their profits. Now, Tesla has a new roof which will very likely change the industry. It is expensve compared to putting on panels. HOWEVER, it is actually much cheaper than putting on tile, steel, stone, or even slate roofs. And it is about the same costs as putting on asphalt shingles and then covering most with panels. Finally, it will outlast ALL OF THESE roofs. Much stronger and better to withstand fires, hail, snow, rain, etc.

      So, Linus, along with many of us geeks, have created a large industry, while Musk, with his sets of armies has created MULTIPLE massive industries.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    55. Re:Linus by AlwinBarni · · Score: 1

      It isn't that bad with the recognition (I think).
      Linus is quite well known, and to be fair he was not alone, he wrote the kernel, but at the time there was quite a lot GNU software to go along and make Linux OS.

      Let's not be too harsh on the media, good for Musk a landing booster and Tesla Roadster cruising through the void are better suited for TV then Linux source code or rows and rows of computer racks.

    56. Re:Linus by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      OK, fair enough. You would have thought he would have used at least two hands though.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    57. Re:Linus by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      We do not know the name, but it was not a guy. It was a gal.

      She languished at the encampment, be it hut or cave, as the seasons came and went, and had access to a varying amount of small objects.

      As she laboured in her primitive lab, she had the intelligence, experience, opportunity and motive to experiment with combinations of adaptations and stumbled, early on, upon the idea that rolling was more efficient than dragging or pulling.

      Was she hot though?

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    58. Re: Linus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be singlehandedly. OP clearly said singlehanded. I think he was suggesting Linus jerked off while coding.

    59. Re:Linus by Megol · · Score: 1

      You are being trolled FFS. And maybe you should stop drinking the Musk cool-aid...

    60. Re:Linus by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      You don't need to be a hacker to understand why open source is important, and why you should care about Linus and not shiny headphones.

    61. Re:Linus by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Yeah no. He is launching satellites into LEO. Hardly creating trillions of activity, since many companies do that. And Tesla isn't even the largest EV manufacturer, or the largest solar manufacturer, or the largest EV battery manufacturer. You are deluded by Musk.

    62. Re:Linus by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

      Nah, the other hand was used to make the finger to nVIDIA

    63. Re: Linus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never delivered apart from all the things he delivered that is, like reusable rockets and decent electric cars

    64. Re:Linus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The oddness is resolved because the second sentence is false. Millions of people are tekkies and they have a wide variety of beliefs. Only a tiny fraction believe that SpaceX or hyperloop are absolutely necessary, or that the Singularity is immanent and we should plan our lives around it, or any other stereotype. The people pushing hyperloop are a small handful of tekkies and non-tekkies; others note that conventional high-speed rail and regional rail is more efficient at the overall goal of moving the bulk of the population where they want to go.

      Linux essentially revealed the pent-up demand for a hackable, developer-friendly, modular, free, multi-platform operating system that runs on the most common consumer PCs (IBM clones at the time). Its low barrier to entry (requiring perseverence but not hundreds or thousands of dollars of license fees) led to it being adopted in the new industries of webservers, Internet servers, and Big Data.

    65. Re:Linus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No he did not. Millions of people took Linux and created trillions in economic activity. Linux was lucky. Same as Bill Gates, same as Steve Jobs. Alone they would have done shit. Lemmings created everything. Worship is like alcohol. Consume in moderation.

    66. Re:Linus by Sique · · Score: 1

      This is what we call a false dichotomy.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    67. Re: Linus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoa!
      https://m.imgur.com/toTTnkL

    68. Re:Linus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And as to ELon, he HAS created LITERALLY trillions of cock$ucking activity.

      FTFY. Cock$uckers like yourself WindBourne.

      SpaceX is more expensive than the Progress-Soyuz for ISS supply flights (the only reason for SpaceX existence is because it's Murican so screw the subsidizing taxpayers).

      Tesla can't make a profitable product for 3x/4x the price of the competition.

      Solar City is folding like a flaccid south african penis when the Viagra wears off.

      But literally why bring Elon Musk into a supercomputer thread?
      *scratches head*

    69. Re: Linus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen. Dudes you are replying to is a poser.
      He doesn't belong here. He would be better off over at the car & truck magazine forums.

      As soon as he said "but but but I'm not a l33t hax0r" he gave himself away. A tool.

    70. Re: Linus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea because 1 out of every 10,000 cars is a Tesla. That's some serious winning.

    71. Re:Linus by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Yeah we all know that Paypal, SpaceX, and Tesla have contributed nothing to the world, definitely no economic activity ... And Linus has a vision man, a true vision. I hear he is planning a major change to the kernel .... number.

      Sarcasm aside, some very clever computer programmer's pet project becoming foundational in our world due to the dedication of 10s of thousands of people is quite a bit different from a visionary who attempts to completely change every industry he touches.

      If Linus wants to be worshiped he should actually *try* and change the world, rather than just being happen when it happens.

    72. Re:Linus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're drunk, get some sleep granpa!

    73. Re:Linus by mlw4428 · · Score: 1

      You can't seem to understand the original nature of your own fucking post. You bitched about Linus not being viewed as important as Musk. I said it was because Musk builds solutions - not parts. It's the same reason why Ford/Chevy/InsertYourFavCarBrandHere is celebrated and not the part maker who made the steering wheel cover. I don't care what powers my phone/etc in the same way people don't care who makes the bolts that bolt the engine to the car. Is it important? Yeah sure, OSes do a lot and the bolts that hold my engine in place are sort of necessary. But it's just a part of a solution. Nothing you've said refutes anything I said. You also seem to not understand that you're essentially asking why Linus isn't more popular among the tech crowd. It's really sort of a dumb thing to get upset about, no?

    74. Re: Linus by ClarkMills · · Score: 1

      Linus is one of my heros for starting, sharing and managing the kernel.

      Musk is two of my heros for SpaceX and Tesla. More so Tesla as it has accelerated the EV acceptance / transition period. Also their battery banks. This is a small step in reducing the sh*tting in our own nest that we seem to be doing.

      SpaceX puts the biggest smile on my face but it's long term environmental value is probably less.

    75. Re:Linus by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I'll remind you our railroad tracks are spaced according to the wheel width of Roman chariots.

      Bullfuckingshit.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    76. Re: Linus by bursch-X · · Score: 1

      It's "waifu" you culturally insensitive clod.

      --
      There are two rules for success:
      1. Never tell everything you know.
    77. Re: Linus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linus is more like the seed crystal of ice-9, benefiting from the ocean of other developers who participated for something greater than themselves. Elon thinks HE is greater than that ocean. Elon's report card is in the 10Ks and annual reports. Think "flame thrower"

    78. Re:Linus by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      More actually, Christians do not worship Jesus.

      Jesus himself, like Muhammad, forbade it.

      That explains the Muslim prohibition of paraphernalia relating to his likeness and the use of the name, Allah.

      That also explains the phrase, "In Jesus' name , we pray."

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    79. Re:Linus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But Trump has created 10's of Trillions, his tax cuts will create even more. Yet you don't sing his praises? Lay of the Musk cock for just a single story please.

    80. Re:Linus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's about as stupid as saying the very first version of Linux that Linus released is what drove all of this economic activity. For the GP, what kind of dingbat are you to think that Linus did this singlehandedly? The kernel is the work of a lot of people. This isn't to belittle the impact he has had - it is undoubtedly vast - but I doubt even Linus himself would have the audacity to ever claim he did it without the help of a lot of other people.

    81. Re:Linus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *waifu

    82. Re:Linus by kzwork · · Score: 1

      So you think Musk created all the rockets, electrical cars, trucks, batteries, solar roofs, boring cars etc singlehanded, some think even Bitcoin. Good luck with that thinking.

    83. Re:Linus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're one of those guys that thinks that software development in itself produces value.

      It does not.

      Code monkey.

    84. Re:Linus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a bell curve, it's exponential and it has autism along the X-axis and retardation along the Y, with you being on the wrong end of the curve.

    85. Re:Linus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, sure "CaptainDork", enlighten us more on how Christians do not worship Jesus.

    86. Re: Linus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably. We do know it was actually the English (George Stephenson) who were responsible for setting the standard, given that they invented pretty much everything and started the industrial revolution.

    87. Re:Linus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forget it. These guys are way, way too aspie to understand this. Literally. They will not pick up on this.

      It's kind of a relieve actually, if you happen to be stuck in a place filled to the brim with these arrogant asses. You can talk about whatever you want, just phrase it a certain way, go one abstraction level above tech and these spectrum motherfuckers will not even register 1% of it.

    88. Re:Linus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You bitched about Linus not being viewed as important as Musk. I said it was because Musk builds solutions - not parts. It's the same reason why Ford/Chevy/InsertYourFavCarBrandHere is celebrated and not the part maker who made the steering wheel cover.

      (OS is to computer) != (Steering wheel cover is to car)

      OS is the interface layer between you and the hardware. So if the hardware is the drivetrain (engine, transmission, tires) plus chassis, the OS is the whole cabin and car body.

    89. Re:Linus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really, so Andrew Tanenbaum and Richard Stallman provided nothing that was needed by Torvalds to create what we know today as Linux? He wrote every single tool, every single component all with his own little fingers?

    90. Re:Linus by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Bell curves have two "wrong ends," if we define "wrong," as the fringes at some distance from the peak, or "norm."

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    91. Re:Linus by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Why?

      One reason is enough, isn't it?

      More reasons would only reinforce the one.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    92. Re:Linus by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      No, it's because the average non-technical person can easily understand what Jobs and Musk have accomplished. With Torvalds, it's not so obvious. The average non-technical person has no idea what "Linux" is.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    93. Re:Linus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You spend an inordinate amount of time talking about Tesla and Musk.

    94. Re:Linus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think about this all the time. People will get in a serious crash where the vehicle is totally pancaked, but they get off with few injuries. Usually they'll thank god or whatever, but they should really be thanking vehicle safety engineers. The people who have built the solid foundation our world runs on are rarely known or appreciated.

    95. Re:Linus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. He never delivers. There isn't a company making rockets and space vessels called SpaceX. There isn't a company building massive amounts of lithium batteries. There are no solar panels and Tesla Wall powerbanks. The cars on the road really aren't there. The company he started on a whim, hasn't won a contract with Chicago to build a tunnel. You're exactly right.

    96. Re:Linus by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      I admire Elon Musk. But I also admire Linus Torvalds for his huge contribution to the world of software. And Richard Stallman, for coming up with the key concept of free software that makes it all possible.

    97. Re:Linus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would have applauded your sentiment until your last line, where you do the exact opposite of what you said and you took sides.

    98. Re:Linus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's probably related to the fact that very little of the economic benefits from Linux has much to do with Linus, who is also a major asshole, while Elon Musk is charismatic and is, in spite of his flaws, attempting to make the world a better place.

    99. Re: Linus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The wheel? Or the movable axle?

  2. Meanwhile, at the other end of the scale ... by nickovs · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ... Linux is also taking over the world of IoT.

    I don't think that there has ever been another operating system that has been used across such a wide range of systems with such a range of scales.

    --
    If intelligent life is too complex to evolve on its own, who designed God?
    1. Re:Meanwhile, at the other end of the scale ... by Kenja · · Score: 1

      Well... there's BSD. Which is in a LOT of embedded systems as well as desktops in the form of OS X.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    2. Re:Meanwhile, at the other end of the scale ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Would you rather have Linux, Apple/Mac, or Windows take over the world of IoT?
      Linux works.
      Apple will tell you you're holding it wrong and charge you 10x what everyone else charges.
      Windows will BSOD and tell you to defrag or reinstall, then steal all your data and knock up your toaster.

    3. Re:Meanwhile, at the other end of the scale ... by orlanz · · Score: 1

      There is probably more computing power going through Minix code.

    4. Re:Meanwhile, at the other end of the scale ... by houghi · · Score: 1

      Do you have toaster that runs it? Linux does.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    5. Re:Meanwhile, at the other end of the scale ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NetBSD runs on a toaster and pretty much everywhere else:
      https://www.netbsd.org/gallery/in-Action/

    6. Re:Meanwhile, at the other end of the scale ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have toaster that runs it? Linux does.

      Intentionally? Power management was never a strong suit of Linux.

    7. Re:Meanwhile, at the other end of the scale ... by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      I don't think that there has ever been another operating system that has been used across such a wide range of systems with such a range of scales.

      Really?? Not even in all of history?

    8. Re:Meanwhile, at the other end of the scale ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      I can testify to this:

      I was tickled pink when my firewalls embraced Linux.

      Windows shops are goddam near impossible to protect from the bad nasties and, configured properly, Linux continued to become hardened over time.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    9. Re:Meanwhile, at the other end of the scale ... by Pascoea · · Score: 1

      Really?? Not even in all of history?

      All of it, since the 50s? Pretty we've got good resources to look back that far. Don't be lazy, if you want to refute their point provide a valid argument. "Nah ah!" is never a valid argument.

    10. Re:Meanwhile, at the other end of the scale ... by jellomizer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If it wern't for the AT&T lawsuits FreeBSD may be the standard for non desktop systems. Linux wasn't really superior, But being it was made without the Unix legal baggage and was free. Allowed for easy adoptions of the OS, because at the time similar OS's from Unix would cost thousands of dollars. And DOS and Windows wasn't up to snuff.

      Being a free OS, it makes it easy to be implemented by a startup into new ideas such as IoT.

      Linux had taken it lead as BSD legality was under consideration. This lead allowed fore more support/drivers and availability.

      Linux was on par with FreeBSD but not superior. Linus needs credit for what he had done, by abandoning Unix source code, but he didn't build a superior system.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    11. Re:Meanwhile, at the other end of the scale ... by sinij · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The way I see it, the fact that toasters run any OS in any form is an issue.

    12. Re:Meanwhile, at the other end of the scale ... by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      BSD has absolutely provided lots of competition to Linux AND its code is heavily borrowed into Linux. Both BSD and Linux developers really deserve credit for all that they have done. Sadly, the majority do NOT get recognition for it.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    13. Re:Meanwhile, at the other end of the scale ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I went out to *BSD's grave on Decoration Day. The old forgotten cemetery is by the dark woods beyond the edge of town. There within olfactory distance of the municipal treatment plant you will find *BSD's final resting place.

      *BSD's tombstone was shrouded by thick mosses and knots of noxious ivy. I gently pulled aside the tangled twists of thorns, and cleaned the decaying marker the best I could. My melancholy thoughts pondered that this indeed was *BSD's figurative charnel house of which so many have plaintively spoken.

      Nothing is so pitiful as an untended grave, a loved one now forgotten. The short sad life of this doomed and fated OS makes us realize that there but for the grace of God go all of us.

      I planted some wilting marigolds which I had found discarded behind Bud's Garden Center. By some miracle perhaps they will take root and bring a modicum of cheer to BSD's God forsaken plot. My fervent hope is that the torpid colored boy who carelessly mows the cemetery doesn't slice them down, inadvertently mirroring *BSD's own doomed encounter with death's irresistible scythe.

      Funny how things work out. Linux, that brilliant novam stellam, now runs the Internet and the world's fastest computers, while *BSD lies moldering within its forgotten crypt. Let the barren silence of *BSD's tomb be a mute reminder that hubris and braggadocio were no defense on that woeful day when the Angel of Death's bleak umbra was cast upon *BSD.

    14. Re:Meanwhile, at the other end of the scale ... by oakgrove · · Score: 1

      Linux came to prominence long after the BSD lawsuits were settled.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    15. Re: Meanwhile, at the other end of the scale ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The FreeBSD development team has been overrun by SJWs, so you can probably write it off. SJWs destroy everything they touch.

    16. Re:Meanwhile, at the other end of the scale ... by ArchieBunker · · Score: 0

      I'd take an Apple desktop any day over whatever garbage Gnome is churning out.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    17. Re:Meanwhile, at the other end of the scale ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dates? SCO was suing people well into the 21st century...

    18. Re:Meanwhile, at the other end of the scale ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But without Microsoft pushing and basically inventing usable operating systems, Linux would be nothing. You really have to give Bill all the credit here.

    19. Re:Meanwhile, at the other end of the scale ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about "none of the above". Seriously, throw all of the IoT bullshit in the trashcan.

    20. Re:Meanwhile, at the other end of the scale ... by antdude · · Score: 1

      Frakkin Cylons! No wonder they have a plan.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    21. Re:Meanwhile, at the other end of the scale ... by sad_ · · Score: 1

      with your reasoning, the difference being the OSS license used, so we have to thank RMS for creating GPL!

      --
      On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
    22. Re:Meanwhile, at the other end of the scale ... by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      Oh yes. The OS that a man worked for apple for free to port it over so BSD wasn't relegated to history.

      They should have said - no thanks and moved to Linux. Really bad decision on Job's part. It's really too bad. They would have SELinux, a far more secure kernel, etc.

      I did win a bet, however. A stupid professor from U of California said that the old Mac windows system didn't have an OS below it. Argued like hell with me. Then they announced it was being moved over to BSD. Yea, shut him up.

  3. Scalability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I think this has been Linux's special sauce all along. It scales to nearly anything. It runs on:

    Desktop computers
    Smartphones
    Tablets
    Smart Watches
    Pretty much every kind of IoT Device (Thermostats, AC receptacles, shade controllers)
    NAS Servers
    Supercomputers
    Mainframes
    Routers and Switches
    Nearly every kind of embedded development board and SoC
    Portable media players
    Set-top boxes
    Blu-Ray players
    Home game consoles
    Satellites
    Test Equipment (Oscilloscopes, Spectrum Analyzers, Signal Generators)

    The only places it hasn't made major inroads are in industrial control, SCADA and mission-critical systems, like health care and major financial systems (though NASDAQ runs a bunch of stuff on Gentoo) But it's probably a matter of time.

    1. Re: Scalability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Erm, most stock exchanges run Linux. Like NYSE, etc.

    2. Re: Scalability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Itâ(TM)s made it into both: GE Healthcare uses it in their MRI, and ComEd uses it to run their SCADA servers.

    3. Re:Scalability by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      The only place it hasn't made major inroads is desktop/laptop computers. It's either a major player or utterly dominant in almost every other area.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  4. Good for Linux! by QuietLagoon · · Score: 4, Informative

    And congrats to all that support and develop for it, especially one Mr Linus Benedict Torvalds.

  5. Very large and very small applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not just very large applications like supercomputers, but very small applications too. Linux runs awesome on my router, phone and android tv box: WRT32X running OpenWrt 18.06 (kernel 4.14), Pixel 2 running Android 8.1 (kernel 4.4), and Mi Box (kernel 4.9).

    It's still the medium size applications where there is no traction. Linux needs a unified packaging system, better driver support, and support for key programs like Office and gaming. If PUBG and Overwatch ran in Linux I'd probably run it on my home built rig, but alas, I use Windows 10 because it's actually a great all around OS. Easily the best there is at this medium size level for business/home/laptops.

    1. Re:Very large and very small applications by kbonin · · Score: 1

      Windows 10 is a reasonably good desktop OS as long as you don't' mind the "telemetry", aka corporate spyware uploading metadata about whats on your drive and network and how you use all of the above. This has infected their cross platform apps too, I briefly used Visual Code on Linux and Mac, and both were trying to upload far more than I'm comfortable with.

    2. Re:Very large and very small applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows 10 is a reasonably good desktop OS as long as you don't' mind the "telemetry", aka corporate spyware uploading metadata about whats on your drive and network and how you use all of the above.

      The job of an operating system is to manage resources, not embezzle them for its own purposes.

    3. Re:Very large and very small applications by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      I briefly used Visual Code on Linux and Mac, and both were trying to upload far more than I'm comfortable with.

      That's all changed with Microsoft's purchase of GitHub.

      Now they get you to upload your stuff for them . . .

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    4. Re:Very large and very small applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not spyware. If you believe that shit, grab a tub of lube and sit down for a 12 hour marathon of Infowars. Telemetry, as it's properly called, is useful to help them make Windows better. There are literally millions of idiots out there using computers. Learning how they use computers is very helpful. For example, Microsoft found a bunch of fucking idiots who would only open programs in a particular order so they'd be ordered how they wanted on the taskbar. Thus, they introduced the ability to manually pin and move programs on the taskbar.

    5. Re:Very large and very small applications by jbengt · · Score: 1

      For example, Microsoft found a bunch of fucking idiots who would only open programs in a particular order so they'd be ordered how they wanted on the taskbar. Thus, they introduced the ability to manually pin and move programs on the taskbar.

      You don't need telemetry to come up with that one.

    6. Re: Very large and very small applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ??????????? A feature we've had since windows 95? Or even Fvwm?

    7. Re: Very large and very small applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is spyware. I can open my programs in a spiral if I want to, and also have them arranged by penis on my desktop

    8. Re:Very large and very small applications by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      > It's not spyware.

      What part of "Collecting data without my consent" do you not fucking understand?

      > they introduced the ability to manually pin and move programs on the taskbar.

      Gee, there was a 3rd party program, TaskBarEx on Windows XP that did this. You don't need fucking telemetry to know this.

      /sarcasm Yay for M$ innovation! Copying 3rd party programs since 1990.

      --
      Microsoft Windows, noun: A 64-bit compilation of 32 bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16 bit patch to an 8 bit operating system originally coded for a 4 bit microprocessor written by a 2 bit company that can't stand 1 bit of competition with 0 bit of understanding good UI.

  6. Curmudgeon factor by erp_consultant · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Let's face it, as bright and influential as Torvalds has been, and continues to be, most people would not rate him highly on the warm and fuzzy scale. He is not a man that seeks approval. He is not a man that wants to be in the spotlight.

    In some ways I think he is like Steve Wozniak. Just a shy, quiet but brilliant engineer that would rather just be left alone than doing the cocktail party circuit.

    History tends to reward the Musks and Jobs of this world who are very smart in their own right but also very adept at self promotion.

    I tend to have more respect for Linus and Woz. They are the men behind the curtain doing all the heavy lifting.

    1. Re:Curmudgeon factor by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 4, Insightful

      History tends to reward the Musks and Jobs of this world who are very smart in their own right but also very adept at self promotion.

      Very adept at self promotion? Have you seen Elon Musk speak? He's a nerd. The quintessential nerd, with a head full of facts and figures and very poor command of his tongue. People lionize him and promote him, then blame him for self promoting, when in fact he's absolutely terrible at actually promoting himself. He talks about ideas and business activities and people call that self promotion. There's very little mention of himself, except when the interviewer inevitably asks, "Why are you doing this?" Then he answers with his, "I think humanity should be a multiplanetary species." That's about the only time he says "I think". The rest of the time, he's busy telling you what his companies are doing, and people somehow interpret that as self promotion.

      As opposed to what a Kardashian is saying, which is somehow.... fine? Humans baffle me.

    2. Re:Curmudgeon factor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer the people who have the better cars. They will at least be remembered in history.

    3. Re:Curmudgeon factor by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Baloney. Musk is all about promotion. That is why he makes claims that don't make sense.

    4. Re: Curmudgeon factor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Such as?

    5. Re:Curmudgeon factor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linus is not shy. He doesn’t want to be left alone. At that cocktail party, he’s insulting people who won’t stop eating shrimp cocktail and do a fucking keg stand. In fact, he’s more likely to be insulting all of the people, the cocktails, the shrimp, and the beer in the keg before he loudly asserts “I WOULD NEVER FUCKING EAT HERE!” And storming out of the party.

      Sure, he created an OS kernel that has captured a great amount of market share, but he’s a serious asshole of a person.

      Elon is the guy at the cocktail party eating all of the shrimp, drinking all of the champagne AND the beer, and telling everyone how great he is (and THEY are). Also, roasting marshmallows with his personal flamethrower.

      So, which one of these guys to YOU want to hang out with? Mr asshole or Mr party?

    6. Re: Curmudgeon factor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Making a private company build an orbital class delivery vehicle?
      Landing that same orbital vehicle on a barge?
      Strapping THREE of those into one rocket and making it work on its maiden flight?
      Founding an electric company and promising to mass-market EV vehicles?
      Launching his own electric car into space?

      They all don't make sense! The guy is way over his head! There's no way he'll ever make these claims come true!!!

  7. Singlehanded?!? by paulpach · · Score: 2

    Linus has created literally trillions in economic activity. Singlehanded. But techies worship Musk. Very odd.

    Singlehanded?!? I guess, if you ignore all the work done on gcc, glibc, bash, systemd, other system tools, thousands of kernel developer contributors, thousands of people putting together distributions, people writing build systems, multiple languages, hardware manufactures, etc...

    Linus work is probably not even 1 millionth of the total work that went into producing your average computer, let alone super computers.

    1. Re:Singlehanded?!? by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Correct. Singlehanded.

    2. Re: Singlehanded?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you know a peculiar quirk of Linus that he uses only his left hand on the keyboard?

    3. Re:Singlehanded?!? by paulpach · · Score: 1

      Correct. Singlehanded.

      Which hand did he use?

    4. Re:Singlehanded?!? by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Both. But he only used one at a time.

    5. Re: Singlehanded?!? by TimMD909 · · Score: 1

      Lumping people who deserve respect in with the systemd crowd is unacceptable. That's like lumping the framers of the Constitution in with China's leader (Winnie the Pooh).

    6. Re:Singlehanded?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He used his LEFT hand, but it DID also take him an entire weekend!

  8. An interesting financial note... by geekmux · · Score: 0

    ...An interesting architectural note: "GPUs, not CPUs, now power most of supercomputers' speed."

    Bitcoin mining is certainly one creative way to help justify for the cost of a supercomputer...

  9. Kids these days by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 5, Interesting

    An interesting architectural note: "GPUs, not CPUs, now power most of supercomputers' speed."

    Who is this beeftopia guy who is so monumentally ignorant of the history of supercomputing? That's not an "interesting architectural note". That's supercomputing since the very beginning of supercomputing. Supercomputers are supercomputers specifically because they had vector processors, before "GPU" was even a recognizable acronym. When PCs had nothing but framebuffers, supercomputers had vector processors. That was the point of building them. Once the GPU was invented, utilizing them to build a supercomputer was an inevitability.

    And get off my lawn!

    1. Re:Kids these days by Beeftopia · · Score: 0

      This PDF from Cray shows that they base at least one of their newest supercomputers on CPUs (Xeons) and use GPUs as accelerators (see p. 3 and p. 7). Also, on their product page, Cray states, "The XC series,and our newest entry the XC50, expands our support for the latest CPU and CPU capabilities with the addition of NVIDIA’s Tesla® P100 GPUs, previously code named “Pascal.”

      So... it pretty much mirrors exactly what the article states. Your emphatic statement on architecture appears less than accurate in light of the Cray information. Fortunately ignorance is relatively easy to remedy, unlike say, personality defects.

    2. Re:Kids these days by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      But yet we like the "supercomputer" term so much that we've conflated it with "cluster".

  10. "finally"?? by Khashishi · · Score: 2

    When was it NOT the year of the Linux supercomputer?

    1. Re:"finally"?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When was it NOT the year of the Linux supercomputer?

      Well, 1990 and before that? :P

  11. Managing your music experience better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was pairing your Bluetooth earphones too hard for you or something?

    1. Re: Managing your music experience better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Judging by the extreme shallow-ness of GP's comment, yeah, that was probably it.

  12. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  13. Yeah, but by Artem+S.+Tashkinov · · Score: 2

    This means exactly nothing for the desktop where it's most craved for.

  14. Surely you mean "Supercluster" not "Supercomputer" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why are people confusing hangars of discrete computers that do individual computations with a super computer?

  15. Coming back around by afidel · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's interesting that relatively weak CPU coupled with multiple fast vector processors that could do massive parallel calculations was basically the design of the original Cray supercomputers and we're back to that design coupled with fast interconnects to team up many, many nodes. Kinda cool to see that Seymour had it right =)

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  16. Re:Singlehanded? That's news to Mr Torvalds by shoor · · Score: 1

    Linus Torvalds didn't work in a vacuum and never claimed to. He got started using a book written by Andy Tanenbaum. He was in the right place at the right time (When the Intel 80386 came out which finally had the hardware support needed for a multi-tasking, demand paging Operating System. And yes, I know it wasn't the first chip to have that, but by then the Intel architecture dominated the market thanks to IBM choosing the Intel 8086 for it's PC, which is a different story, pardon the digression.)

    BSD Unix was available for the 80386 and Mr Torvalds said if he'd known about it, he probably wouldn't have written Linux. It boiled down finally to personality. Linus Torvalds welcomed participation by others to improve Linux and was a genial enough leader that he could herd all those cats into working together. Smart people were working on BSD Unix too. But they tended to be elitist and fought among themselves so you ended up having different flavors, FreeBSD, NetBSD and OpenBSD. If you go back through the internet archives, you can even find posts to some of the comp.os newsgroups where they are squabbling and airing their dirty linen in public.

    Why did this at least partially hobbyist OS get so popular? I think a lot of it has to do with trust. People are willing to buy supercomputers running linux because they trust linux. They can see the source code; they can see the history, the evolution of it. Part of that trust is due to Linus Torvalds style and personality. That is his contribution. Richard Stallman also made a great contribution with the GNU public license, which Linus Torvalds adopted. Many of those contribution cats would not have joined the herd without the GNU public license which protected other people from appropriating their work. Torvalds and Stallman have their differences, but I don't think Linus Torvalds ever tried to steal Stallman's thunder. Linux distributions depend not only on the kernel which Linus Torvalds wrote the original version of, but also on a lot of software from Stallman's GNU foundation. They also depend on a lot of software from other sources, like the X-Window system. It gets complicated, and maybe people should just admit that it's complicated instead of trying to reduce it all to sound bites.

    --
    In theory, theory and practice are the same; in practice they're different. (Yogi Berra & A. Einstein)
  17. Re:Singlehanded? That's news to Mr Torvalds by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
    Linus Torvalds didn't work in a vacuum

    I am glad to here it. My physician has advised me that working in a vacuum is bad for your health.

    --
    Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  18. On the spectrum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I found the aspie!

  19. Re:Singlehanded? That's news to Mr Torvalds by shoor · · Score: 1

    Alas, slashdot does not allow one to go back and edit posts. Otherwise I would change my previous post to read "doesn't work in a vacuum (metaphorically speaking)" so as not to confuse readers such as yourself. And you yourself would probably go back and edit your own post to read "glad to hear it" vice "glad to here it".

    Those are the breaks.

    --
    In theory, theory and practice are the same; in practice they're different. (Yogi Berra & A. Einstein)
  20. Personally after trying Kubuntu 18.04? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: I truly sincerely feel that the actual REAL "mythical/legendary Year of Linux on the Desktop" is going to be a reality soon enough (me saying that after being on MS products from DOS3.3/Win3x/9x/NT/2000/XP/Server2003/7 from 1991-4/2018 is a miracle in & of itself).

    * It's gotten to the point of actual desktop elegance & a good solid kernel/core + I just LOVE KDE Plasma OpenGL 3.1 too!

    (Lazarus 1.8.2 IDE + FreePascal TRULY ROCK also (all I really need is that & a MINIMAL install of the OS proper itself & I'm good to go BUT the DISCOVER tool's pretty nice as a GUI front to application repositories for things other than what comes w/ the distro FULL install itself as alternates OR new tools one may wish to try/use etc.))

    I am also GLAD to see that Linux is doing well on all things out there pretty much (BSD has a foothold in a few areas like Playstations iirc & others too) & nice to see it's "ROCKING THE 'SuperComputerWorld'" (afaik it was already there but I could be off/wrong).

    APK

    P.S.=> In the end, after trying Linux since Slackware 1.02 in 1994, RedHat in 1999, & Kubuntu 10.10 in 2010? Linux FINALLY "got ahold of me" (after I blew 2 disks in a row, both ~5 yrs. old in an Intel SSD + WD Raptor 10k rpm SATA & messing around in Windows 7 64-bit chopping, of all things, default SCHEDULED TASKS, I cut 1 that runs @ system startup I didn't like, want or NEED but turned out the OS did & she was shot - so I went to reinstall after 4-5++ yrs. outta that install & solid but my Win7 64-bit install media "bit it" after 10++ yrs. so it was TIME TO TRY Linux again - & very, Very, VERY GLAD I did - I like it))... apk

  21. RIP AIX by Only+Time+Will+Tell · · Score: 1

    I'll always have fond memories for AIX. It was my first UNIX I played with and learned. My dad worked for IBM and got an older RS/6000 to bring home. Firing that thing up with its stacks of external hard drives was like powering on the space shuttle. That experience allowed me to be the first in my college dorm to have a Linux box up and running. Good times.