Slashdot Mirror


Walmart's Newly Patented Technology For Eavesdropping On Workers Presents Privacy Concerns (buzzfeed.com)

Walmart has patented an audio surveillance system which can be used to listen to conversations between employees and customers at checkout. From a report: The "listening to the frontend" technology, as its called, is one of many futuristic ideas Walmart has sought to patent in recent years as it competes with Amazon for domination of the retail industry. While there's no guarantee that Walmart will ever build this technology, the patent shows the company is thinking about using tech not just to facilitate deliveries or make its warehouses more efficient, but also to manage its workforce, which is the largest in the United States. Walmart declined to comment on whether it plans to use audio sensors to measure the productivity of its staff in the near future, but said in a statement, "We're always thinking about new concepts and ways that will help us further enhance how we serve customers, but we don't have any further details to share on these patents at this time."

83 of 133 comments (clear)

  1. Well by DaMattster · · Score: 2, Funny

    I hope they implement this system and capture my voice saying, "Alice Walton can go fuck herself!"

    1. Re:Well by Lucas123 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, cause that would devastate them /s.

  2. Sure, this'll "Make America Great Again", LOL by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeah sure let's introduce more and more 'technologies' that produce ever-increasingly chilling effects on the daily lives of people, make them feel like convicts in prison or animals in a zoo, that'll really motivate them to be more productive and really get their creative juices flowing. After all look at how well that worked in Auschwitz! Great job Walmart, you're a shining example of the direction the United States is going, what an inspiration!

    1. Re:Sure, this'll "Make America Great Again", LOL by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh hey Walmart why stop there? Why not require shock collars on all your workers and give the remote control to the supervisors and they can give a little jolt to the workers if they're not working hard or fast enough!

    2. Re:Sure, this'll "Make America Great Again", LOL by olsmeister · · Score: 2

      Stories like this make me appreciate the fact that I'm on the back 9 of my career.

    3. Re:Sure, this'll "Make America Great Again", LOL by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 2

      Friend, stories like this, and the overall direction the world has been heading in over the last couple decades, make me marvel at the idea that anyone wants to extend human lifespan at all, let alone live forever; who the actual fuck wants to see this kind of shit happen more and more, put up with more and more fucktarded clueless people, downright evil people, and so on? Worse: fucktarded clueless people and evil people with money and power who live for hundreds of years? Forget it. I'm having a hard enough time this morning finding a reason to even be conscious.

    4. Re:Sure, this'll "Make America Great Again", LOL by houghi · · Score: 1

      I am in Urup, so that's nice as well. This shit is already illegal here.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    5. Re:Sure, this'll "Make America Great Again", LOL by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Amazon must be thrilled at this news!

    6. Re:Sure, this'll "Make America Great Again", LOL by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Okay asshole let's make sure you've got someone obviously watching and listening to you all day every day and see how you feel about it.

    7. Re:Sure, this'll "Make America Great Again", LOL by Lucas123 · · Score: 1
      "Let's introduce more and more 'technologies' that produce ever-increasingly chilling effects on the daily lives of people, make them feel like convicts in prison or animals in a zoo."

      Must have really bummed you out when stores installed surveillance cameras like 40 years ago.

      There is no expectation of privacy from a business while you're inside of a business [sans the bathroom, of course] or when you're walking around on a public street.

    8. Re:Sure, this'll "Make America Great Again", LOL by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

      I feel sorry for whichever HR flunky would get assigned to monitoring my office daily. She'd probably stroke out within hours from the shit we say and do around here.

    9. Re:Sure, this'll "Make America Great Again", LOL by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

      I think the mod decided that comparing working for Wal-Mart to being subjected to genocide at Auschwitz was unfair... to Auschwitz.

    10. Re:Sure, this'll "Make America Great Again", LOL by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Why their supervisors? You can have a computer monitor their work speed and quality. And why electro-shock them? Then they know where the line is. Better to give them push-style notifications that they're falling behind and need to catch up or get terminated, etc. Psychologists show that kind of stress is far more motivating than shock-collars.

      Unrelated note, guess how Amazon runs it's warehouses.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    11. Re:Sure, this'll "Make America Great Again", LOL by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      After all look at how well that worked in Auschwitz!

      You don't even need to look back that far. The folks in East Germany whispered in public places, like restaurants, because they never knew if some Stasi "informal employees" were listening in at the next table.

      I'm thinking that someone needs to open up a Kickstarter for a "Maxwell Smart Portable Cone of Silence", that we can all carry around with us.

      Either that, or don't talk at the checkout at Walmart. Or maybe we all need to learn sign language . . .

      . . . but then the spooks will invent an AI Camera Sign Language to Text system . . . oh, well . . .

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    12. Re:Sure, this'll "Make America Great Again", LOL by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is, both Walmart and Amazon are absolute insufferable cunts to work for? Wow what a surprise.

    13. Re:Sure, this'll "Make America Great Again", LOL by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      ...for now

    14. Re:Sure, this'll "Make America Great Again", LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Devil's advocate: Say someone says stuff too often that makes the AI weight them as a union thug. They get fired, and blacklisted (trivial to do blacklists... just have a secret query to an offshore database.) The penalty for stepping out of line now becomes life without a job, similar to a felon.

      Imagine how businesses would love this. Every company from a mom and pop owner would have this technology in place, even organizations, so they can catch people looking for other jobs early on and remove them.

      Yes, it is repulsive, but it optimizes synergies, which is what C-levels crave.

      I expect this tech to be in every store within months to years.

    15. Re:Sure, this'll "Make America Great Again", LOL by afidel · · Score: 1

      Manna covered this in 2003.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    16. Re:Sure, this'll "Make America Great Again", LOL by afidel · · Score: 2

      Nope, please talk about unions, organizing, raises, strikes, etc at the checkout line in Walmart. The only way to overcome such technology isn't to hide from it, it's to make the signal to noise ratio so bad that the humans monitoring the hits from the machine can't possibly keep up or find the real data.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    17. Re:Sure, this'll "Make America Great Again", LOL by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      When you exaggerate attempting for effect or shock value you just alienate any sane person reading your post. As soon as a read you comparing Walmart to Auschwitz I knew you were either a troll or not very smart, and stopped reading.

      If you actually think Walmart working conditions are in any way comparable to Auschwitz detainees you need a history lesson. I'd imagine it's also a insulting to the memories of the people that were imprisoned or died there.

    18. Re:Sure, this'll "Make America Great Again", LOL by Dru+Nemeton · · Score: 1

      W O W ! Thanks for sharing that. Just finished Chapter 1 at lunch and his dad was right...

    19. Re:Sure, this'll "Make America Great Again", LOL by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      someone obviously watching and listening to you all day every day and see how you feel about it.

      Strawman. That is not what Walmart's system does.

      There are already cameras watching the checkout process. This just adds audio.

    20. Re:Sure, this'll "Make America Great Again", LOL by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      I think the mod decided that comparing working for Wal-Mart to being subjected to genocide at Auschwitz was unfair... to Auschwitz.

      The comparison was to the productivity at Auschwitz, which was actually pretty good, so it is indeed an unfair comparison. Murdering the slowest work crew at the end of each day cleans out the least productive, while motivating the others to do better. Maybe someone could write a book: "The Management Lessons of the Holocaust Applied to American Retailing".

    21. Re:Sure, this'll "Make America Great Again", LOL by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 2

      Here's an example: I have a friend who has driven trucks most of his life. He drove for Arco for a while. They have cameras and a microphone in the cab and record the driver every second of every shift. My friend is a safe driver and a good professional driver with a perfect safety record and a really nice guy overall. If you so much as make a comment under your breath about some other driver on the road, regardless of what else you may be doing at the time, you get called into a supervisors office and grilled about it, and maybe fired. If you have an expression on your face for any reason whatsoever that they don't like, you can be fired. He was eventually let go for nothing more than some comment he made on audio, wasn't even profane. How'd you like it if you had a camera and microphone at your desk all day long and anything you might mutter under your breath, regardless of it having anything to do with your job, gets you lectured by your boss? You really want to work in an environment where you're under a microscope all day long? Do you really think anyone wants that? If you think that's all okay, then justify yourself, because I don't believe you. NOBODY wants to put up with that shit, and anyone who says they're fine with it is either a fool or a liar.

    22. Re:Sure, this'll "Make America Great Again", LOL by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      No, she'd call you into her office to lecture you on your 'behavior', regardless of whether anything you muttered under your breath was company-related or not. That's why shit like this is pants-on-head stupid. Nobody wants to have to work being under a microscope all day long. It's like being a convict in prison.

    23. Re:Sure, this'll "Make America Great Again", LOL by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 2

      The only way to overcome such technology isn't to hide from it, it's to make the signal to noise ratio so bad that the humans monitoring the hits from the machine can't possibly keep up or find the real data.

      No, then they'll just implement a no-chatting policy, expecting you to work in silence like a good little robot, unless you're helping a customer, then fire you when you say one single word to another employee, or dare to talk to them on your break.

    24. Re:Sure, this'll "Make America Great Again", LOL by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      You're way too serious to be on the Internets, mister, I'd suggest you stay off it for sake of your health.

    25. Re:Sure, this'll "Make America Great Again", LOL by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Low-quality bait

      0/10

    26. Re:Sure, this'll "Make America Great Again", LOL by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      This is not an argument against recording. This is an argument against hyperbolic overreaction.

      Or more likely it is made up nonsense. If a company really fired everyone with a momentary unpleasant expression on their face, they would have zero employees by the end of the first day, and then be out of business.

    27. Re:Sure, this'll "Make America Great Again", LOL by grep+-v+'.*'+* · · Score: 1

      You can have a computer monitor their work speed and quality. ... Better to give them push-style notifications that they're falling behind and need to catch up or get terminated, etc

      Manna? Is that you? Manna? OK, I'm ready for the next task.

      --
      If the universe is someone's simulation -- does that mean the stars are just stuck pixels?
    28. Re:Sure, this'll "Make America Great Again", LOL by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 2

      But the suggestion is good for customers. I suspect that a lot of the folks who shop at Walmart stores aren't fascists. While the checker is ringing up items, the customer can extol the benefits of unionizing the workforce and mention that they (the customer) would voice support for that to Walmart management in the event of a Walmart worker strike.

    29. Re: Sure, this'll "Make America Great Again", LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The recordings are never used for training. Consider the volume of recorded content and how much content is needed for training, and you realise that line is simply the most palatable excuse available.

    30. Re:Sure, this'll "Make America Great Again", LOL by afidel · · Score: 1

      Exactly, I was talking about doing so as a customer.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  3. Reminder: Technology is just a tool by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I can think of a lot of valid and non-privacy invading uses for simply monitoring audio from a warehouse. It might help you understand where there was dead time where workers were just bored, and improve on that somehow (even if it was providing workers something to help fight boredom).

    Sure it could also go the other way into some really invasive and annoying use where it found some worker was "too sarcastic" or whatever. But I don't think it serves anyone well to automatically dismiss every new technical idea that comes to mind just because it could be used for ill, because ANY tool can be used for ill if you put your mind to it. Instead help promote positive and reasonable uses of technology and call out if it starts to stray.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Reminder: Technology is just a tool by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But, if implemented, they won't use it to the benefit of workers, they'll use to to target workers, run them like they're robots, and when they fall apart, fire them for poor job performance, then hire immigrants who will accept shitty pay and shitty conditions because at least some terrorist organization isn't trying to make them into suicide bombers, or drug lords shooting at them. There's plenty of precedent for this sort of behavior from employers and there's zero reason to believe that's going to change, especially from a company with such a poor track record of how it treats it's employees, and that has to keep wages as low as possible so they can sell their shitty goods at the lowest prices possible. There is NO GOOD USE for 'technology' like this because it ALWAYS gets abused.

    2. Re: Reminder: Technology is just a tool by nitehawk214 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You must be the most niave person in history if you think a company like Walmart will use this to "help bored workers".

      Bored? Then I guess you can go home and we don't have to pay you.

      Bored? I guess we can fire you and hire someone willing to work 15 hours a week at minimum wage and no benefits.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    3. Re: Reminder: Technology is just a tool by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 2

      Actually if you look back at that guys' commenting record it becomes more than a possibility that he's just a troll, or at least supremely clueless.

  4. Patent farming ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    ... nothing to see.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  5. Inconceivable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Just 20 years ago, it was inconceivable that a free person's location, movement, and associations with other free people would be almost universally tracked and recorded.

    Today, it is inconceivable that every word that comes out of a free person's mouth would be recorded, and that a free person would be subject to universal facial recognition and other tools of mass surviellance. But that day is very quickly approaching.

    20 years from now, it will seem inconceivable that a free person's thoughts would be recorded, universally, everywhere that person goes. That is the logical end game of mass surveillance -- mind reading. As history shows, it will get here sooner than we think.

    1. Re:Inconceivable by sarren1901 · · Score: 2

      I would expect at some point we will plunge ourselves into the dark ages through violent upheaval but then again, look at China and even more so, look at North Korea. Has the world done anything to help the typical North Korean? I think not. People can easily enough be suppressed, enslaved and killed unless a stronger group of people can stop them.

      But hey, let's give up out guns. That'll help.

    2. Re:Inconceivable by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

      President Donald J Trump offered the North Koreans a terrific real estate deal. Gorgeous beachfront condos. Stunning golf courses.

      And he offered to give Mike Pence to Kim Jong Un, as his personal manservant.

      https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/trump-agrees-to-let-kim-jong-un-have-pence-as-manservant

    3. Re:Inconceivable by dryeo · · Score: 1

      But hey, let's give up out guns. That'll help.

      Isn't that how it is in America, give guns to the people who back this shit, have an old list of a few freedoms that can be taken away for national security or to save a child and those gun toting people back the government making it that much harder to do anything about the new world order.
      Giving out guns to those who support the jack boots is not the answer.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  6. Fix actual inefficiencies first by skiingyac · · Score: 1

    Ethics aside, you would think they would fix actual horrible inefficiencies first. For example, the pickers for their online orders are only shown 1 item at a time, and the items are *randomly* ordered, so even though the customer orders 2 different pairs of socks that are next to each other, the employees aren't shown (and can't see even if they tried to) this info to be able to speed up their job and end up doing tons of extra walking.

    1. Re:Fix actual inefficiencies first by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      the pickers for their online orders are only shown 1 item at a time, and the items are *randomly* ordered

      Do you have a citation for this? Walmart spends enormous effort trying to make every aspect of their operations more efficient. It is implausible that they would fail to fix something so obvious and easy to change.

  7. As a Ex Sams ccub Manager by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If you paid your Employees correctly and took care of them you wouldn't need to worry about low morale and productivity. Costco doesn't have this problem... Either does Winco...

  8. How is this different than recording a phone call? by schwit1 · · Score: 1

    We've all heard that prerecorded notice on support calls: "This call may be monitored or recorded for quality assurances purposes."

    Same thing but without the phones.

  9. Queue the links to Manna... by turp182 · · Score: 1

    We should track the # of references to Manna on /. over time as an indicator of when our dystopian future will be upon us.

    --
    BlameBillCosby.com
  10. Re:I Hole-Hardedly Agree by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

    Wow! I am not even mad. I am actually impressed! That was amazing!

  11. I dread this in the hands of slashdotters by nimbius · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wife: Honey what do we want to eat from the deli counter?
    Greybeard husband: Oh i dont know, maybe the square root of a zero inch submarine sandwich with extra semicolon quote semicolon and a side of drop table customers, payroll, sales.
    [incoherent screaming from the office]
    Greybeard husband: ah! looks like someone already ordered one!

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:I dread this in the hands of slashdotters by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 5, Funny

      Bobby Tables is all grown up!

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  12. wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    using a microphone and storage device to record audio that can be listened to later for various purposes. What an innovative idea, i can't believe no one has done this before it should certainly be granted a patent.

    1. Re:wow by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      using a microphone and storage device to record audio that can be listened to later for various purposes. What an innovative idea, i can't believe no one has done this before it should certainly be granted a patent.

      The patent is a little more specific than that. Claim 1 describes calculating a "performance metric" based on the number of items per bag (the system detects the beeps from items being scanned and noises that indicate a bag being used). Claim 7 describes a performance metric based on the length of the line at the register by detecting "sounds associated with guests".

    2. Re:wow by PPH · · Score: 1

      "sounds associated with guests"

      This is Walmart. Would these consist of the sound of two oversize thighs rubbing against each other?

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  13. Hmm, okay by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

    Sounds like they're rolling out the next feature of Manna. Seriously though, there's not much to worry about. If Walmart is going to be recording conversations at the checkout lines, that's only 2-3 employees even when the store is slammed, right?

    --
    Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
  14. Re:How is this different than recording a phone ca by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    That I don't exactly have to talk at Walmart. It's kinda hard to get anything done on a phone call if you don't want to talk.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  15. Re:Conversations between employees and customers? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Maybe they could install a speaker and hire someone able to translate the gibberish?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  16. Eavesdropping is a privacy concern by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    I'm shocked, I tell you, shocked! Now who would have thought that?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  17. Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Spend a little "too much" time in the bathroom?
    Go too often? (Who cares if you're on water pills for your hypertension!)

    Gee, he's not moving fast enough!

    He's not saying our scripted greetings or addressing customers to our (hokey idiotic) script!

    Ha! He's not cheering hard enough during the opening meeting cheer session!! (Really, Walmart employees have to do this ridiculous cheer because some moron somewhere is under the delusion that it makes better workers with no evidence to back it up. Typical corporate horseshit.)

    I mean I could on .... and there's things that I haven't even thought of.

    It's just another way of demeaning people.

    1. Re:Seriously? by fido_dogstoyevsky · · Score: 1

      ...Ha! He's not cheering hard enough during the opening meeting cheer session!! (Really, Walmart employees have to do this ridiculous cheer because some moron somewhere is under the delusion that it makes better workers with no evidence to back it up. Typical corporate horseshit.)...

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fik2-kgOgng

      Safe for work, unless you work for someone who wants you to cheer.

      --
      It's NOT a conspiracy... it's a plot.
  18. one requires a simple shell script by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    How hard is it to monitor employee conversations for the keywords "union", "organize", "benefits" and "raise" ?!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:one requires a simple shell script by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      I wonder how many false positives it would produce if used on developers.

      "If we use a union statement here, we can better organize this query. The benefits would be worth the raise in CPU processing in this other section."

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  19. Illegal in Two-Party Consent States by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This technology is blatantly illegal in any state that requires two party consent for recorded conversations. The moment you step into the store, you've gone from a "public place" with no expectation of privacy to "private property open to the public" where there DOES exist an expectation of privacy, especially in a close conversation.

    If Walmart is currently using this technology, it certainly deserves criminal review.

    1. Re:Illegal in Two-Party Consent States by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      This technology is blatantly illegal

      That explains why it's illegal to have security cameras at places of employment. Oh wait.

      Anyway, Random Anonymous Guy on the Internet, I'm pretty sure Walmart is on top of what's legal and what isn't when it comes to employment practices.

  20. where's Hank Scorpio when we need him? by Thud457 · · Score: 1
    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  21. I have to confess... by x0ra · · Score: 1

    I'm a porn addict, have been for the past 20 years, and it is the only reason I'm a software engineer today. Started with automating the clean-up of my "sessions" back in the day, and it continued over the past few years with either automated response bots on classifieds website, scrapping tools on hookup website, and lately, torrent federation. Porn and sex have been the driver of so much code !

    1. Re:I have to confess... by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      Fascinating, but are you sure you have the right thread?

    2. Re:I have to confess... by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      His particular thing is the large female customers of Walmart, specifically Florida He's been hacking the security camera feeds for years and now if they implement this patent he can hear their voices too. He's in his special place now!

  22. Opportunity.... by Paul+Neubauer · · Score: 1

    Checker: Your total is 37.46, sir.
    Customer: Thanks...Oh... and Dear Wal-Mart management, they shoot spies, don't they?

    --
    I don't subscribe to RMS's GNUtopian vision.
  23. audio sensors can be used to find union talk and t by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    audio sensors can be used to find union talk and that is a big NO NO.

  24. Two Party Consent? by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

    Some states have two party consent required for recording, so I can't see this being used in those states. I doubt WalMart will want to have their cashiers remind you every time you visit that everything you say is recorded.

  25. Re:not an inefficiency by skiingyac · · Score: 1

    This is in a warehouse

  26. Congratz Walmart... by dragon-file · · Score: 1

    Just when I think the shittiest company can't get any shitier they up and do something like this... *slow clap* Bravo...

    --
    Whenever a player quits EVE to go play WoW, the Average IQ of both games increase.
  27. I worked under this kind of surveillance. by TigerPlish · · Score: 1

    Yeah. At a convenience store. Cameras everywhere, with mikes.

    The register area was most heavily monitored, sometimes in realtime.

    Audio was used to judge one's performance.

    I hated it. Even with the store closed and me mopping the floor it felt like some kind of mythical omniscient sky-dwelling entity was watching me.

    And in my current IT job? Cameras in the fucking office..with mikes. I've seen it used against employees.

    Yes, I'm looking. Been looking for a while. I can't stand this surveillance shit, I don't care *what* line of work it is.

    Walmart can go fuck itself.

    --
    The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
  28. New and improved Panopticon! by forkfail · · Score: 1

    As if we aren't building our little personal Panopticons as fast as we can, then we get this:

    --
    Check your premises.
  29. Re:not an inefficiency by farble1670 · · Score: 1

    minimizing contact with customers is not a winning strategy

    I guess that's why online shopping and delivery have been such a flop.

  30. Pre-crime is next by emaname · · Score: 1

    I expect they're going to follow this up with a "pre-crime" (ala "Minority Report") initiative. They'll monitor people's actions, manners, and postures in the store and learn to anticipate when somebody intends to steal. Then they'll arrest them before the crime is committed and build a case based on "the intention to steal."

    --
    An effective "democracy" creates the illusion the people have a say in their government.
  31. No privacy issue by Khyber · · Score: 1

    You already walked into a store loaded with fucking security cameras, which has notice of said camera system posted in a conspicuous location.

    You already gave up your explicit right to privacy by entering that facility.

    Gotta wonder what was patent-worthy, though, because my old porno shop definitely had a microphone and camera pointed right at the counter, so the management could listen in mostly to the customer asking if we carried a specific video or product.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  32. Re:not an inefficiency by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

    minimizing contact with customers is not a winning strategy

    You need to know what business you are in. Nordstroms emphasizes the "relationship" between customers and sales associates. Walmart emphasizes low prices. Walmart's revenues are 35 times higher. Walmart's profits are 73 times higher.

    I prefer Walmart because I can shop with no one bothering me, and they have self-checkout.

  33. Violation of law by gabrieltss · · Score: 1

    From TFA - this technology would allow Wally World to to employees conversations at checkout. This ALSO means listening to customers conversations. In many states this would violate eavesdropping/wiretap laws. Where They require BOTH parties to agree to be recorded. If Wally World doesn't explicitly get customers approval to be recorded they could be in for big trouble.

    --
    The Truth is a Virus!!!
  34. Nice Patent by BrianMarshall · · Score: 1

    They patent "putting a microphone where you want to hear people"?

    Or, is it a patent on "monitoring employees"?. Does the fact that they are specifying the employees to monitor (check-out clerks) make it patentable?

    --
    "When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro" -- HST
  35. Is Walmart considered a public or a private space? by waspleg · · Score: 1

    It's a private entity that operates public buildings .. but what about the inside? What about conversations in the bathroom? What if it's aimed at someone as they open the door and it overhears something that's not? Where does this fucking end? Human nature has not caught up with technology and it's getting worse every day.

  36. Re:audio sensors can be used to find union talk an by jbn-o · · Score: 1

    Doing so is part of a trend for Walmart. "Wal-Mart: The High Cost of Low Price", Robert Greenwald's 2005 documentary, covered how Wal-Mart set up cameras on their stores aimed at the parking lots in order to let store staff monitor any union organizing going on within view of the cameras. Meanwhile, in Germany, Wal-Mart couldn't avoid the unionized workers so Wal-Mart does business with unionized staff.

    Why go to such lengths to prevent better working conditions? The same documentary tells us that a toy made in their Shenzen China factory cost $0.18 to assemble (the worker makes less than $3/day), retails at Wal-Mart for $14.96, and "Wal-Mart imported $18B from China in 2004".

    Charles Kernaghan, Director of the National Labor Committee tells us that in Bangladesh workers who sew clothing for Wal-Mart:

    [...]are getting up at 5:30 in the morning, they brush their teeth with their finger using ashes from the fire because they can't afford a toothbrush. They're forced to work from 8:00 in the morning until 10:00 at night, 14 hours a day, 7 days a week, on these wages of 13 to 17 cents an hour. These are women who are hit by their supervisors, trapped in utter misery.

    You can see more of Charles Kernaghan's work in "The Corporation" (2003) which is available online and in a 2-disc DVD set which has extended interviews with all of the interviewees. One segment of "The Corporation" features Kernaghan talking about the exploitation of children making "Kathie Lee Gifford" garments for Wal-Mart around 19m43s:

    We were in Honduras and some workers, they knew what kind of work we did, and they approached us and said conditions in our factory are horrible. Will you please meet with us. And we said we would. But you can't meet in the developing world you can't walk up in a factory with your notebook and workers come up and interview them. I mean there's goons, there's spies, the military police, so you do everything in a clandestine manner. We are about to start the meeting, and in walk three guys, very tough looking guys. The company had found out about our meeting and sent these spies. Obviously we didn't have the meeting. But these young girls were really bright. And as they were leaving, away from the eyesight of the spies they started to put their hands underneath the table. And I put my hand under there and they put into my hand their pay stubs. So we'd know who they were, what they were paid, and the labels that they made in the factory so we'd know who they worked for. So I took my hand after everyone had left. And in the palm of my hand was the face was of Kathie Lee Gifford. And on the bottom of it [a Kathie Lee garment tag] was "A portion of the proceeds from the sale of this garment would be donated to various children's charities." Very touching gets you right here [he touches his heart]. Wal-Mart is telling you if you purchase these pants and Kathie Lee is telling you if you purchase these pants you will be helping children. The problem was the people that handed us this label were 13 years of age.

  37. Edge cases are edgy by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    You must be the most niave person in history if you think a company like Walmart will use this to "help bored workers".

    I am just giving examples from two ends of the spectrum. Of course in real life the actual uses will be more in the middle - but I am pointing out, as I said, that tools can be use for bad or ill and it's a bad idea just to stop development of tools because of that fact.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley