Slashdot Mirror


Lights Slowly Come On for Puerto Ricans in Rural Areas (csmonitor.com)

Almost a year after two hurricanes ravaged the US territory, repair crews are working to energize the more than 950 homes and businesses that remain without power in hard-to-reach areas. Puerto Ricans remain fearful that their newly returned normality could be short lived. An anonymous reader shares a report: Lights are slowly coming on for the more than 950 homes and businesses across Puerto Rico that remain without power in hard-to-reach areas. Repair crews sometimes have to dig holes by hand and scale down steep mountainsides to reach damaged light posts. Electrical poles have to be ferried in one-by-one via helicopter. It is slow work, and it has stretched nearly two months past the date when officials had promised that everyone in Puerto Rico would be energized. And even as TVs glow into the night and people like delivery man Steven Vilella once again savor favorite foods like shrimp and Rocky Road ice cream, many fear their newly returned normality could be short-lived. Turmoil at the island's power company and recent winds and rains that knocked out electricity to tens of thousands of people at the start of the new hurricane season have them worried.

101 of 163 comments (clear)

  1. 950 homes? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why not deliver a portable solar system to each in the interim until the grid can be repaired? It might not provide full capacity, but it will at least allow for basic lighting, refrigeration, etc.

    1. Re:950 homes? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 4, Informative

      To make it clear: a 600W/12V solar panel, a few 12V batteries, and a 1200W inverter can be had for under $2000.

    2. Re:950 homes? by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 2

      I'm by far not an expert, but does such a thing exist--a "portable" solar system that could provide power for 950 homes?

    3. Re:950 homes? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

      Not a single portable solar system for 950 homes. A portable solar system for EACH of 950 homes. Even if it cost $5000 with transportation and installation, the total would be under $5 million -- chump change compared to what the US spends on other things. (wars, cough, cough)

    4. Re:950 homes? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Tesla is working with them to build up minigrids with solar and batteries.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    5. Re:950 homes? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Not one- but 950 of them could. And with no transmission wires to be knocked out by a storm, would continue to do so long into the next disaster.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    6. Re:950 homes? by Revek · · Score: 1

      Hardon helper for old farts. cough cough.

    7. Re:950 homes? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      It sounds much less practical than a larger system connected to a local grid, though.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    8. Re:950 homes? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      You can set up a temporary solar system for a home in a few hours. Secure the solar panels somewhere where there's adequate light, run waterproof cable in a protective tube to an open-air location where the battery box will sit, run cable into the home and place the inverter where power is most needed. (Probably the kitchen.) Plug things into the inverter as needed. Done. It won't look sexy, but it will work and be safe.

    9. Re:950 homes? by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      Not really; if it was that hard to connect them there will never be reliability. I am surprised some ESCO didn’t sweep in and get them off-grid. With the cost of re-electrification used as a subsidy for the system, financing via “electric bill” at current rates should have stood rate of return.

    10. Re:950 homes? by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Delivering power polls by helicopter and then scaling a mountain to install the line does though?

      It's 950 houses that are remote. Solar panels are MUCH more practical.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    11. Re:950 homes? by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      both?

    12. Re:950 homes? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      This is meant to be a temporary system. Also, a 600W panel isn't that big. It can be designed to be removed and stored in a safe place when a storm is approaching. (ideally in some kind of waterproof bag or case)

    13. Re:950 homes? by giggleloop · · Score: 1

      As opposed to the completely uncorrupt federal government who spend money wisely and are not a cent in debt?

    14. Re: 950 homes? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Tesla is much cheaper and better than the crap from China.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    15. Re: 950 homes? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      $5900 just for the battery pack isn't cheaper than a $2000 emergency system. And the emergency system may actually be more modular, since it's just a few solar panels overcharging a lead-acid battery array. The parts don't need to communicate or be very well matched.

    16. Re: 950 homes? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      5900 is what you and i pay, not what Tesla was charging Puerto ricans. and an expensive 12v system with a more pollution is not a useful system.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    17. Re:950 homes? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Just how big do you think a 600W panel is? Hint at 100% efficiency you see about 1kW/square meter at noon on a clear tropical day. 12% efficiency is typical.

      Puerto Rico's public power company is constantly on the verge of bankruptcy. That's nobody's fault but the local government. They're the ones that try to use it as a welfare program without the government paying for the 'free power for all', just denying the power company the ability to get paid.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    18. Re:950 homes? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      That is why you put pexiglass over them.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  2. Re:lol by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Puerto Rico was failed by the USA -- no reason for them to seek closer ties to Washington as a state. Frankly, independence and membership in CARICOM might be a better solution, with a visa reciprocity agreement with the USA (they owe PR one, actually more than one).

  3. third world country by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Visited there many times.

    It's essentially a third world country, though a territory of the US. An interesting third world country, and I liked many of the people.

    Their odd state of limbo is not really our fault, unless you want to fault us for not being more authoritarian with them, which I doubt.

    There isn't even a Navy base there anymore, which was pretty much the only reason they are a US territory. It had to go, because we are such evil imperialists, ya know.

    1. Re:third world country by TigerPlish · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's essentially a third world country, though a territory of the US. An interesting third world country, and I liked many of the people.

      I lived there from 1976 - 1989. I won't call it a 3rd-world country at all. The neighborhoods I lived in / hung out at were 1st-world, all the way.

      The PR people see on TV is not all of PR. Yes, a lot of it looks like that.. but another lot of it is immaculate lawns, concrete houses with concrete roofs, pools, etc.

      The media seems obsessed with showing the tin shack side of Puerto Rico.

      Plaza Las Americas, built in 1968, is still my yardstick for malls. The malls in the US may be larger, but the malls here all look unfinished next to Plaza. My family was friends with the family that built Plaza. No expense was spared.

      The power grid, on the other hand, has always been a disgrace. By age 8 I knew how to oil, wick and trim oil lamps and cold-blast hurricane lanterns because the power went out all the time, even in the 1st-world 'hoods. Some of that was the power union -- whenever they need something done to the contract, they'd blow up a couple of large transmission towers. Blam, in the dark for 4 hours.. or all night.

      I could say South Florida is a 3rd-world country, you know. But it isn't. Same with PR.

      --
      The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
    2. Re:third world country by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's typical of developing countries, though -- a large gap between rich and poor neighborhoods. Beautiful houses and malls with tin shacks a mile away. Sadly, the rest of the US is also moving in this direction, with the rich getting richer and the poor getting scraps.

    3. Re:third world country by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Nothing is wireless "these days" other than the last mile. Cell towers, wifi, etc, all need power and connectivity. And even the last mile becomes useless without reliable electricity -- cell phone batteries only last so long.

    4. Re:third world country by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      Visited there many times.

      It's essentially a third world country...

      How many actual third world countries have you visited?

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    5. Re:third world country by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Visited there many times.

      It's essentially a third world country, though a territory of the US. An interesting third world country, and I liked many of the people.

      Their odd state of limbo is not really our fault, unless you want to fault us for not being more authoritarian with them, which I doubt.

      There isn't even a Navy base there anymore, which was pretty much the only reason they are a US territory. It had to go, because we are such evil imperialists, ya know.

      I've never been to PR but I HAVE been to third world countries. From what I can glean about PR, it isn't even *close* to third world. Haiti, now THAT'S third world.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    6. Re:third world country by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 2

      Visited there many times.

      It's essentially a third world country...

      How many actual third world countries have you visited?

      Depends on your criteria, I suppose.

      15, perhaps? Most of them, courtesy of Uncle Sam. Generally outside of touristy Potemkin villages too.

      You?

    7. Re:third world country by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      It's essentially a third world country, though a territory of the US. An interesting third world country, and I liked many of the people.

      I lived there from 1976 - 1989. I won't call it a 3rd-world country at all. The neighborhoods I lived in / hung out at were 1st-world, all the way.

      I could say the same of every third world country I've visited. All have some nice areas.

    8. Re:third world country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's so odd to me to see this kind of comment over and over, debating whether Puerto Rico is 3rd world or not. It speaks of a total lack of context about the relative levels of wealth and societal organization that exist elsewhere in the world. Would you consider South Korea a 3rd world country? Would you consider Spain a 3rd world country? Because these countries are about in the same ballpark.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(nominal)_per_capita

      What Puerto Rico IS is small and geographically isolated... and the hurricane was really bad. Shockingly bad, much worse than Hugo was in 1989, or Georges in 1998 (I should know, since I was here for all of them). The same shitty electrical infrastructure existed then, and so the recoveries were slow, but people where getting their power back within a few weeks. The difference in the level of destruction this time around is staggering, and so we needed, you know... some help.

  4. Utilities by TwoUtes · · Score: 1

    I find it amazing that, in the 21st century, the utility we've come to rely on the most is the least reliable. Here in central Florida, we call the power company "Florida Flicker and Flash" because virtually any weather anomaly causes power fluctuations or outages. I can't imagine what it's like in PR.

    1. Re:Utilities by WindBourne · · Score: 2

      what amazes me, is that ppl down there have not pushed solar/batteries. Instead, they continue to push generators which are stolen after hurricanes.
      My dad lived in Stewart (now Jupiter), and I pushed for him to install solar. But, it turns out that the entire state of Florida makes it difficult to do that.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    2. Re:Utilities by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Why hasn't Florida run all electricity in underground waterproof cables yet?

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    3. Re:Utilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Cuz Florida's water table tends to be shallow and a large portion of the state sits on top of unstable homogenous limestone which combined results in a lot of problems with sinkholes. Some subdivisions have underground power and surprise, a sinkhole opens or the insulation on a cable gets corroded breaking the connection. Moreover it's a large state with a lot of protected wetland where digging is not allowed.

    4. Re:Utilities by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 1

      What's amazing about that? Do you not have any other experiences with government regulated monopolies to compare it against?

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
  5. Statehood would help against cruelty. by RyanFenton · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Puerto Rico should become a state. Write in a Texas-style escape clause if you want to placate your folks who dream fantasies of an island-nation empire.

    Puerto Rico is an enormously productive place - with wonderful people who are technologically capable, and an amazing history of overcoming strife.

    But right now, it is also once again a place of unprecedented cruelty imposed on it, mostly due to political demands.

    Statehood would mean senators, congressmen, shared defense (you already have many, many of your people in our armies), and yes, disaster relief with less wiggle room than our Republicans tend to always take in large disasters.

    Also, breaking that '50' magic number would also help places like Washington DC escape from a similar turmoil.

    You're more populous than most states, for goodness sake:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    Oh, and you'll help us vote against Trump more effectively this way.

    Ryan Fenton

    1. Re:Statehood would help against cruelty. by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Problem is that, if PR becomes a state, it will be liable to pay taxes to DC for DC's military adventurism, failed drug wars, etc. American military adventurism doesn't actually benefit Puerto Rico.

      Far better would be independence combined with complete debt forgiveness. Let the American banks eat it.

    2. Re:Statehood would help against cruelty. by RyanFenton · · Score: 1

      Correction: Meant many US states there, not most. My bad - but it's close, especially if you consider the percent that have taken up lives on the mainland. It definitely wouldn't have any issues on basis of population.

      Ryan Fenton

    3. Re:Statehood would help against cruelty. by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

      Puerto Rico should become a state. Write in a Texas-style escape clause if you want to placate your folks who dream fantasies of an island-nation empire.

      The problem with any State; be it Texas, or a future Puerto Rican state; they wouldn't be allowed to leave (unless the US didn't want them). I guarantee if Texas claimed independence tomorrow- they'd be being run directly from DC as a rebel occupied territory by Friday.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    4. Re:Statehood would help against cruelty. by Solandri · · Score: 1

      The reason they're not voting for statehood is because their current status as a U.S. territory means residents don't pay Federal income tax. As a territory, they get the benefits of being a state (Federal assistance and participation in Federal programs), without having to pay for it.

      The Trump administration foot-dragging on the hurricane disaster response in Puerto Rico is a tactic to pressure them to hurry up and decide - do they want to become a state, or become independent as a new country? Right now, the limbo state they're in - which is supposed to be temporary to give them time to decide - is more attractive than either option, resulting in them putting off the decision for 118 years.

      So Trump's handling of Puerto Rico is in fact impartial. He's putting the country's best interest ahead of his party's best interest (since Puerto Rico would almost certainly end up a blue state).

    5. Re:Statehood would help against cruelty. by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      PR already pays most federal taxes. They do not get the benefits.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    6. Re:Statehood would help against cruelty. by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      Two problems:
      A) Many in PR don't want to be a state.
      B) Existing states don't want to let anyone become a new state. (see also Statehood movement in the District of Columbia)

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    7. Re:Statehood would help against cruelty. by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      No personal income tax AFAIK, only SocSec and FICA. DC doesn't need the ability to bleed more people dry to pay for their imperialist wars and failed moral policies.

    8. Re:Statehood would help against cruelty. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Puerto Rico can't even get a referendum passed in that country for statehood with the support of other political parties beside the ruling one(PNP). IOW, no majority of Puerto Ricans can be bothered to show up at the polls to vote for statehood. They've tried in 1967, 1993, 1998, 2012 (all during Democratic administrations), and 2017 (Obama allocated money for federal support of referendum) and failed every single time.

      http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/politics/337751-puerto-rico-statehood-bid-a-total-failure

    9. Re:Statehood would help against cruelty. by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Dominican Republic is developing fairly rapidly, Trinidad and Tobago is the third-richest country in the Western Hemisphere (after USA and Canada) due to oil and gas. Why look at one island as a worst-case example? Also, St. Lucia's outcomes aren't all that bad -- life expectancy there is basically on par with developed countries.

    10. Re:Statehood would help against cruelty. by will_die · · Score: 1

      Yep, as written by someone far smarter then those here "If there was any constitutional issue resolved by the Civil War, it is that there is no right to secede."

    11. Re:Statehood would help against cruelty. by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

      Things change. Soviet satellite states tried to secede in the 1930s, 50s, and 60s, and were brutally crushed. In the 80s and 90s, the revolutions finally succeeded. The trick was finding a time when the mother country was weak, and exploiting it, as well as exploiting world opinion. Hopefully such a time will come from the Northeastern and Western parts of the US as well. The Civil War was great in that it ended slavery in the US. But may Lincoln RIH for setting a precedent that states are chained to DC for eternity.

    12. Re: Statehood would help against cruelty. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The Trump administration foot-dragging on the hurricane disaster response in Puerto Rico is a tactic to pressure them to hurry up and decide -

      Your argument gives the Trump administration the credit to come up with such an idea, which is more vile than anything else.

    13. Re:Statehood would help against cruelty. by giggleloop · · Score: 1

      So 'all the benefits' of Federal assistance include the ability to not even get the power back on a year after a disaster? I've seen better disaster relief by the Red Cross.

    14. Re:Statehood would help against cruelty. by Gavagai80 · · Score: 2

      If a large majority (say 2/3 or 3/4ths) of the people of Texas -- or any other state -- actually wanted independence, they'd get it. Not on their preferred terms perhaps, but they'd get it because the people of the USA would be unwilling to continue occupying an unwilling state. The civil war was very different because there was no consensus among the peoples of the rebel states to leave, only among their elected officials (elected by while males only).

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    15. Re:Statehood would help against cruelty. by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      The Soviet constitution was different -- it was a supranational entity of sorts. And more importantly, it was dominated by Russia so it was easily dissolved by the choice of Russia (Yeltsin specifically). What were the other republics of the USSR going to do, invade Russia?

      The USA is much more challenging to break apart, but fortunately I think it can be done if a popular consensus can be built for it in a couple of large states like California and Texas (that pair would be ideal for bi-partisan support). It may require a constitutional amendment, but it would be possible if enough people want it that the people of the other states will not see justification for an occupation.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    16. Re: Statehood would help against cruelty. by WindBourne · · Score: 1
      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  6. Re:lol by MikeMo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This has been a monumental task, not something that can be fixed by just throwing money at it. For example, there are only so many transformers, insulators, poles, etc. in stock, and many many of these had to be replaced. There are still parts that they are taking a long time to source. So much of the infrastructure had been ignored by the power company and Puerto Rico’s governement that most of it has to be replaced. Even if it was a state, it’s the state’s responsibility to manage local utilities.

    Add in the rugged territory (as mentioned in TFA), and it’s just plain slow going.

  7. Re:lol by MightyYar · · Score: 1

    They are the richest island in the Caribbean.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  8. Buried Lines by Only+Time+Will+Tell · · Score: 1

    It seems logical in a place prone to get hit at least once if not more a summer by a hurricane that there should be an emphasis on burying the lines, particularly the high voltage transmission backbone lines. This, along with 'micro-grids' powered by solar or other means with battery backups would help ensure the island doesn't go completely dark at once. It will be a major undertaking, but the alternative is Puerto Ricans reverting back to the 19th century every year for 9 months.

  9. Nice Clickbait msmash! by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1, Informative

    Given there are approximately 1.26 million households and 43,000 businessesin Puerto Rico, this is actually pretty much a non-issue. We're talking about 0.07% of the homes and businesses in PR that are left without power. My guess is you get close to that in any given US city just from daily work/repairs and accidents (drunks hitting power poles, etc).

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    1. Re:Nice Clickbait msmash! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      i dont think that any given city in the US lets its citizens go without power for almost a year.

      its a big difference if you do not have power for 1-2 days compared to having no power for almost a year.

      have you ever had to live a year without external power supply?
      i have not and i dont want to find out how much pain it is.

    2. Re:Nice Clickbait msmash! by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      this is actually pretty much a non-issue.

      To those 950 grid connected homes that have been without power for nearly a fucking year it is an issue. The fact that it takes close to a year to restore power to your population is likewise.

      You posted below that you lived without power for a year in a shitty little village. Making a decision to live without power is not the same as having your formerly grid connected life cut-off. Life builds around expectations. If you change the expectations it's suddenly a big problem.

  10. Re:lol by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    In terms of nominal dollars maybe -- but their ties to the US means that goods like food and cars generally cost the same as in mainland US. So real spending power is reduced compared to some of their neighbors.

    Also, isn't Trinidad the richest in terms of GDP?

  11. Re:lol by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Puerto Rico was failed by the USA -- no reason for them to seek closer ties to Washington as a state. Frankly, independence and membership in CARICOM might be a better solution, with a visa reciprocity agreement with the USA (they owe PR one, actually more than one).

    If Puerto Rico were whiter then the White House might have bothered lifting more than one finger in trying to help them.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  12. Puerto Rico should become a state by sjbe · · Score: 2

    Puerto Rico was failed by the USA -- no reason for them to seek closer ties to Washington as a state.

    You mean except for actually being able to have a voice and a vote in Congress? (5 or 6 congressional seats and two senate seats) Plus they would get to vote for President. They were failed by the current administration and congress because they lack a voice and a vote.

    Frankly, independence and membership in CARICOM might be a better solution, with a visa reciprocity agreement with the USA

    Won't happen. Frankly Puerto Rico should have petitioned to become a state a long time ago. I understand why they haven't but remaining an unincorporated territory of the US seems like a bad plan given recent events.

    1. Re:Puerto Rico should become a state by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      The dems know PR probably wouldn't vote democrat once they became a state anyway.
      (1) A Puerto Rican has one advantage over a mainland American, and one over any other Hispanic country - fluent in two languages, and US citizenship. Grant US citizenship to swaths of undocumented, and that advantage is weakened. Unlike other Hispanic communities, they have no complications in bringing someone from "back home" over - a Puerto Rican driver's license and $150 flight is all they need. Opening up immigration doesn't help Puerto Rico in the slightest, so the democrat platform is currently against their interests.
      (2) The island is overwhelmingly Catholic, which aligns more with conservatives. If the local padre tells them to vote (R), they will, no matter how flashy the ad campaign is.

    2. Re:Puerto Rico should become a state by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      That's sort of bigoted to assume that everyone in a Catholic country will vote the how "the local padre" tells them to. Also, Catholicism and American GOP conservatism don't really align, other than perhaps on abortion.

      The prosperity gospel is not a Catholic idea.
      The Catholic Church abhors the death penalty.
      The current Pope is very left-liberal as far as wealth concentration and the environment.

      Throw in a healthy dose of anti-Hispanic racism from the GOP, and good luck getting the majority of Puerto Ricans to vote Republican.

  13. Re:lol by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    Yes, so why didn't they take the opportunity to decentralize and use ambient energy?

    Some of those mountaintops should be great places to put windmills. Some of the rest should be good places to put solar battery shacks on. Deep Sea Siphoning can also provide electricity, as can wave and tidal generators, for cities and homes and hotels closer to the seashore.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  14. What?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    When the Governor decided to start trashing the USA recovery effort (because of Trump) while standing in front of huge piles of relief supplies, I lost my sympathy.

    Huge piles?

    It wasn't enough. The Trump administration really dropped the ball.

  15. Who will pay for it? by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Why not deliver a portable solar system to each in the interim until the grid can be repaired?

    Who is going to pay for it? That's the problem with all of this. Puerto Rico is broke and gets little help from the US government despite every citizen of Puerto Rico being a US citizen.

    1. Re: Who will pay for it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      We do? What do we owe them? I don't remember getting a bill. Can't they pay for themselves?

    2. Re:Who will pay for it? by jwhyche · · Score: 3

      There is the flaw in your logic my friend. It's only $5 million to those of us that can do math, but this US government math we are talking about. So in actually to get your plan in place would cost $50 billion and take 20 years.

      Other wise it a great ideal.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    3. Re:Who will pay for it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Little help? They don't pay income taxes. They're leaching from us.

    4. Re: Who will pay for it? by giggleloop · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Every (red) state is 'pay for themselves' when it's someone else. Second it's them that's hit by disaster, it instantly shifts to 'we need disaster relief!'

  16. Re:lol by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    US gave up quite a bit of property. Philippines after WW2. Their lease on the Canal Zone. Bunch of other small islands. The sun will set up the US empire too, and that will be a good thing.

  17. Buried lines are expensive by sjbe · · Score: 1

    It seems logical in a place prone to get hit at least once if not more a summer by a hurricane that there should be an emphasis on burying the lines, particularly the high voltage transmission backbone lines.

    Puerto Rico get hit by a hurricaine about every three years on average.

    As for burying lines, it's a fine idea but an expensive one. Burying lines costs about 5X as much per mile just to lay the lines. And maintenance becomes an issue when you have to dig to solve a problem. Remember that Puerto Rico has a lot of financial problems so spending extra to bury the lines is going to be difficult for purely financial reasons if nothing else.

    1. Re:Buried lines are expensive by Only+Time+Will+Tell · · Score: 1

      You're absolutely correct. It will require substantial financial help but could be a good long-term goal of getting the island covered in 15 years or so. And it would create long-term infrastructure jobs while trying to minimize a lot of the catastrophic outcomes in rural areas. Flooding and seawater would make coastal areas unlikely candidates, but perhaps inland could develop this idea.

  18. Re:lol by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    Whoever was in charge of the power company received lots of money and used it for everything but infrastructure upgrades.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  19. Re:lol by MightyYar · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you use the "PPP" purchasing power parity ranking T&T is the richest independent country in the Caribbean. Once territories are included, it changes. Puerto Rico would be at the top of that list with 2015 data of $35,291.80 vs. T&T's $32,194.28.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  20. No, not really: Katrina by DogDude · · Score: 1

    The US only cares about the White and the Wealthy. Being part of the US didn't help those thousands of people killed in New Orleans by Hurricane Katrina. PR would be better off if they left the US entirely.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:No, not really: Katrina by DanDD · · Score: 2

      I agree with your sentiment that the culture of the US has some serious problems with racism.

      However, the language and intent of the US Constitution, Bill of Rights, and Amendments actually provide some real weapons in fighting racism.

      As a reference and example, as poor as it is, it is still quite relevant: The American Civil War

      While the US has problems, at least it has the ability and track record for ongoing self repair and improvement.

      --
      "Every time I see an adult on a bicycle, I no longer despair for the future of the human race." - H. G. Wells
  21. Re:lol by nospam007 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They are the richest island in the Caribbean.“

    Only the richest Port.

  22. Re:lol by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    Purchasing Power Parity for all of the Caribbean and Latin America nations (thus not including Puerto Rico). Trinidad and Tobago are tops with around $32,200 PPP. For Puerto Rico we find a PPP around $35,000. Indeed, Puerto Rico is the richest place in the Caribbean, even by purchasing power parity.

    T&T has a GDP around $44 billion; PR has a GDP around $105 billion.

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  23. Re:lol by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    > If Puerto Rico were whiter then the White House might have bothered lifting more than one finger in trying to help them.

    So Houston and Florida are "white" now? What utter deranged nonsense.

    Whiter than Puerto Rico by a long way- and majority English speaking.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  24. Re:lol by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 3

    Puerto Rico was failed by the USA -- no reason for them to seek closer ties to Washington as a state.

    They were 'failed' because many, many Americans don't know that Puerto Ricans are also Americans.

    If PR was a state at least a few more Americans would realize PRs are citizens, too.

  25. Re:lol by MightyYar · · Score: 1

    LOL. Well played.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  26. Re:lol by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    PPP isn't necessarily that accurate -- it assumes the same goods and purchasing habits between countries.

    For one example: cars in Puerto Rico are subject to onerous US regulations, driving prices up. Meanwhile, Trinidad has different regulations that may allow import of cheaper used cars from Europe and Asia.

    Diets may also not be the same across countries and regions.

  27. Re:lol by bobbied · · Score: 1

    Money does not grow on trees.

    But light poles do....

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  28. Re:lol by MightyYar · · Score: 1

    The point is that you can pick any metric you like and Puerto Rico is at or near the top in the Caribbean.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  29. Re:lol by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

    Whiter than Puerto Rico by a long way- and majority English speaking.

    Have you actually BEEN to TX lately?!?!?

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  30. Re:lol by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sadly, Slashdot has been infested with Trump-supporting racists, authoritarians, and Russian trolls recently. Yes, it's a shame how far ./ has fallen. I remember it in the late 90s and early 00s as a bastion of tolerance and also as being skeptical of authority.

  31. Re:lol by MightyYar · · Score: 1

    Cuba. We gave up Cuba after they voted for independence. Puerto Rico has never asked to be independent, or they'd have it.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  32. Low Math IQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The homes without power are systematically without power. The daily work/repairs and accident number is on top of that.

  33. Re:lol by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

    Transformers are a built to order item. That's why when we bid a job thugs don't show up until the end of the job. There are large(months) lead time on things like transformers, switch gear and electrical panels. And money won't really help unless you want to pay 4x as much to get them a few weeks sooner.

  34. Re:lol by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    What metric, then, do you choose to use that will change the data? PPP tries to equalize for things like cost of goods, regulatory, etc. via a basket-of-goods comparison basis.

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  35. Re:lol by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

    The USA never truly had Cuba. If a military occupation counts as ownership, you might as well say the USA gave up France and West Germany and Iraq.

    --
    This space intentionally left blank
  36. Re:lol by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

    Puerto Rico is extremely white for a Hispanic island, and they also speak English pretty well. The radio DJs code switch, and if you only know one language you can't follow the conversation. It's basically the US's Quebec. If you even attempt to speak anything other than Caribbean Spanish to them, they will speak only English back if they know it - PR is pretty useless for practicing your Spanish. I suspect the reason they don't let more English into signage and whatnot is to scare off people who might turn it into the East Coast's Hawaii (incl Hawaiian prices).

    The difference in response was logistics - you can drive trucks from all over the US to the problem spots on the mainland. But try and get things to PR, nightmare. The infrastructure was also trashed to the point where few people could even get to the docks to unload the supplies and equipment that were arriving. Outside the cities, other than the three unsigned (partially built) interstates, PR is two lane roads on flat land and 1.5 lanes in the mountains (where you must honk when taking blind turns and downward traffic must pull off to the side of the road to let traffic travelling up continue at speed). Those roads have dips that flood 3-4 feet deep during run of the mill rainstorms. After Maria there were probably marine ecosystems developing in those huge pockets of deep water.

  37. Just in time! by gatfirls · · Score: 1

    ...for this hurricane season.

  38. Re:lol by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

    The Filipinos probably want to know what their grandparents were smoking when they voted on that... they went from territory to being a country that requires a lengthy visa application/interview process even for tourists trying to visit the US.

    And now the descendants of the guys responsible for the Bataan Death March are the most prominent investors trying to improve their infrastructure. Funny how that works...

  39. Re:lol by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

    No, please. The US is about the only reason cartels and local corruption haven't ruined the island like they have so many other places. I mean, they are also the reason cartels ruined other places, but who says the guy who cut off your leg can't also be the one holding the tourniquet on?

  40. Re:lol by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    OTOH, it's the perfect revenge on Japan -- take their money, build your country up, then default one fine morning.

  41. Re:lol by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 2

    Don't worry, I'm sure the local Democratic politicians have thought ahead to the inevitable storms in the area and ensured the government controlled utilities and roads and such are all prepared properly for anything likely to hit Puerto Rico.

    If not, it's not like they're going to blame other people who aren't in charge of their local emergency preparedness for their problems, instead, they'll be properly humble and grateful if they ever need to ask others for additional help.

    Heck, the local population even has a guaranteed minimum wage much closer to where the local median wage is at then the rest of the country. Their economy is of course super-charged with tons of extra jobs as a result.

    --
    The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
  42. Re:lol by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 1

    China is the most prominent investor in PH. Japan is probably not in the top 5.

  43. Catholic church dogma by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Also, Catholicism and American GOP conservatism don't really align, other than perhaps on abortion.

    Not true at all nor that simple. A majority of white catholics have voted republican in every presidential election since 2000 roughly 55-65% so clearly there is alignment there. The hispanic catholics on the other hand vote democrat rather strongly - about 70% of them. This probably has less to do with religion and more to do with race since the republican party has systematically driven away voters who aren't white. Also the majority of the conservative justices on the Supreme Court are catholic. (Clarence, Roberts, Alito)

    The prosperity gospel is not a Catholic idea.

    Really? Have you seen the amount of gold leaf in the Vatican? Not exactly a monument to austerity and modest living. Get real. While I hesitate to paint with to broad a brush in many cases, I feel entirely comfortable saying that they catholic church is VERY comfortable with money. They might not be as gauche about it as some of their evangelical counterparts but make no mistake that they care about money a LOT.

    The Catholic Church abhors the death penalty.

    That has not been their policy for most of their history nor is it their official position even today. The Catechism of the Catholic Church states that the death penalty is permissible in certain cases if the "guilty party's identity and responsibility have been fully determined". Never mind the crusades, the inquisition, countless religious wars, executions of heretics, etc... The catholic church has a long and storied history of support for capital punishment.

    The current Pope is very left-liberal as far as wealth concentration and the environment.

    No he is not. He's just not as ridiculously far right as the previous popes but don't make the mistake of thinking he's some left leaning hippie. I know a lot of people like him but let's not pretend he's really changing how the catholic church operates or what they stand for. He's at most shaving off some of the pointy bits.

  44. Re:lol by MightyYar · · Score: 1

    Good point, though technically the US maintained control over Cuba until the 30s via the Platt Amendment (and related treaties), including a 2nd occupation. In retrospect it seems to have been a poor policy, but hey, it was 1900.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.