Slashdot Mirror


The US is Facing a Serious Shortage of Airline Pilots (cnn.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: The national security of the United States relies on a healthy airline industry. That requires modern reliable airplanes -- and highly skilled pilots to operate them. However, the United States has a shortage of pilots right now, particularly at the regional airline levels. According to the Federal Aviation Administration, there were about 827,000 pilots in America in 1987. Over the past three decades, that number has decreased by 30%. Meanwhile, during this period, there has been a tremendous increase in the demand for air travel. The International Air Transport Association predicts that, over the next 20 years, air travel will double.

This is a classic case of low supply and high demand. This mismatch has created a perfect storm that could wreak havoc on the US airline industry over the next decade. The somber news is this shortage is going to get much worse. I have not only studied and researched the airline industry since 1978, but I also was a pilot for 19 years, before going back to academia in 2006.

In the 1970s, when most of today's airline pilots like myself were growing up, piloting for an airline was considered a prestigious career. The job offered not only high salaries and nice schedules with many days off, but also a respected position in society. In the early 1990s, pilot salaries approached $300,000 in today's dollars for some international pilots. What's more, during this time, the military had a steady and consistent demand for pilots. A young aspiring aviator could go into the military to receive all of his or her flight training. Once these pilots had fulfilled their military commitment, they were almost guaranteed a good job flying for a major airline. Today, this is no longer the case. The career of the airline pilot has lost its luster.

66 of 428 comments (clear)

  1. Here's a thought: by XXongo · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Here's a thought: they could try paying pilots decently, and giving them reasonable work schedules.

    I know, that's crazy talk.

    1. Re:Here's a thought: by Nidi62 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Here's a thought: they could try paying pilots decently, and giving them reasonable work schedules.

      I know, that's crazy talk.

      The starting wage for a pilot at a major carrier is $70-80 an hour with the ability to have a contractually guaranteed minimum of 70-80 hours a month. Pilots with seniority can easily makes $250k in a year before bonuses or profit sharing. Regionals currently pay about $50-60k yearly plus sign-up and retention bonuses. The issue isn't the pay or the work rules. The issue is requiring 1000-1500 hours of flight time before you can get an ATP certification which is a requirement to work for a commercial passenger airline. Before the changes after the Colgan Air crash you only needed 250 hours to be an FO with a regional carrier.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    2. Re:Here's a thought: by brxndxn · · Score: 5, Insightful

      $50-60k/year is garbage for a skilled technical field that requires travel 100% of the time. Pay the pilots more and the shortage will go away. Also, the airlines should start paying for training programs if they really want pilots - just like other industries need to train operators for manufacturing plants, IT staff, or maintenance workers.

      --
      --- We need more Ron Paul!
    3. Re:Here's a thought: by Nidi62 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Also people who have flown their tours in the military likely have families at that point or want to become astronauts, politicians, or all of them.

      Most military pilots have enough flight time to go right to a major airline, skipping the regionals. Worst case they are in their late 30s-early 40s, are making 6 figures within 3-4 years, and have a guaranteed 25-year career. Part of the issue is the pool of military pilots is shrinking as well with the adoption of more multi-purpose aircraft and UAVs.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    4. Re:Here's a thought: by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Informative

      That is for 80 hours a month. Our normal work jobs in the us have us ordinary folks working 160 hours a month.

      The hourly rate is well into the normal 6 figure if working full time.

      Higher pay and benefits may help, but I expect the crazy hours, and being away for home on long day stretches factor in too. What is the point in making a lot of money if you are living like homeless bum, because you are never home.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    5. Re:Here's a thought: by Nidi62 · · Score: 2

      Part of the low wage problem at regionals is the constant churn at lower seniority levels with stagnation at the top. You can actually make captain much quicker at some major airlines than you can with regionals. You have some regional pilots sitting there because they they have good seniority and decent pay, but most are in and out in a few years to a major airline if they are any good.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    6. Re:Here's a thought: by sjames · · Score: 4, Insightful

      On the other hand, while it is half time work, most of your other time is spent somewhere you probably don't really want to be in yet another cookie cutter hotel room with only the contents of your suitcase.

      In other words, a lot like being at work.

    7. Re:Here's a thought: by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Trust CNN to run a "conversation" article about supply and demand devoid of actual economics.

      First, the author starts by blaming deregulation and the related advent of lower cost airlines. Then the author continues by blaming regulation for artificially limiting supply, i.e. the 1500 hour rule. Finally, they author proposes his preferred solution of Airlines creating their own flight academies (trying to increase supply of pilots again), for which the author conveniently is a teaching assistant for the academy he proposes as the solution to the problem. Is he trying to get a better job with the school, but they need more students?

      If you've been following along, you might notice government regulations made air travel more expensive until it was finally loosened and airlines could compete on route and price instead of other "benefits" most customers didn't actually want to pay for. As a result, lots more people are able to fly to travel. (P.S. This is a good thing)

      Not content with that, the government then comes back later and severely restricts the supply of airline first officers, taking the existing requirement of 250 hours (commercial pilot) and multiplying it by 6 to 1500 hours (ATP pilot). Overreaction to one incident, anyone? The first fatal crash in 3 years and they multiply the requirements to be an airline pilot by 6x?

      The best part of the Wikipedia article on the crash is the description of the regulatory solution, "Although it did nothing to address the specific causes of the crash ..." Basically the pilots weren't paying attention to the instruments, according to the flight recorders, then the reacted "not according to their training" to the resulting stall.

      So the 1500 hours ATP requirement didn't even do anything to solve the problem of the crash which prompted it (both Colgan flight pilots had more than 1500 flight hours). That's pretty typical of this sort of regulation.

      The demand side is fine (we want people to fly!), so how about we take the dramatic step of just fixing the regulations causing the supply problem? Something like, oh, only requiring 250 hours to be a first officer (commercial pilot's license) and keep the 1500 ATP hours for the Captain? That way someone can get experience as an airline pilot while getting paid? Simple supply fix, undo the overreaction in regulations which is causing the supply problem?

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    8. Re:Here's a thought: by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      My advice, look up the word "shortage." You're only arguing there is no shortage.

    9. Re:Here's a thought: by michelcolman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Those 80 hours a month are flight time. That doesn’t take into account the time preparing the flight, the time on the ground between flights, and the time finishing up after the last flight. That brings you pretty close to the amount of time “ordinary folks” work, and then that doesn’t even take the crazy schedules into account. Early shifts, late shifts, weekends equivalent to weekdays,...

    10. Re:Here's a thought: by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 3, Insightful

      1. Revealed preference. Without someone stopping them, people fly more.
      2. Safety, comparing similar length trips using alternative modes of transportation.

      What are your reasons why it would be bad?

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    11. Re:Here's a thought: by Faldgan · · Score: 5, Interesting

      While your statements are factually correct they ignore several critical pieces of information that leaves readers with the wrong impression.
          The $70-$80 is for flight hours, not hours worked.
          You will spend as much time commuting and on preflight and postflight tasks as you will flying.
          You will be on standby for a lot of the non-working time as well, where you can do little else.
          Starting at a major carrier is a mid-career job, not a start of career job. You won't get this job until you have been in the industry for 10 to 15 years.

      Another semi-random note: The pilot experience requirements would not have changed the Colgan crash. The captain had 3379 hours and the first officer had 2244 hours; both were well above the proposed new minimums. I use as a basic standard for good legislation that if a new law is created in response to an incident, the incident must have been prevented if the new law had already been in effect.

      --
      Nathan Brazil?
    12. Re: Here's a thought: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Unfortunately that is no longer a thing

      Sorry, flight attendant poontang.

    13. Re:Here's a thought: by GuB-42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Also worth noting that an airline pilot has huge responsibilities. It means you can't afford not to be in perfect condition to start flying. And that's hard to keep up with all these irregular schedules.
      There is a moral responsibility and written rules. For example, there are mandatory health checkups, zero tolerance for alcohol, etc...

      There is on-call duty too, where you have to be ready to get to the airport within an hour or so.

      It used to be a demanding but rewarding job. Today, it is still demanding but less rewarding.

    14. Re:Here's a thought: by iCEBaLM · · Score: 2

      Who the hell trains IT staff? Where do I sign up?

    15. Re:Here's a thought: by DickBreath · · Score: 2

      Don't forget sleep deprivation.

      Pilots get to rush to a company sleep facility that is like a crappy motel. Probably has several people sleeping there, but coming and going at all hours so that nobody really gets good sleep.

      Pilots don't get to party with alcohol.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    16. Re:Here's a thought: by bkmoore · · Score: 5, Informative

      That is for 80 hours a month. Our normal work jobs in the us have us ordinary folks working 160 hours a month....

      I'm a regional airline pilot and work well over 160 hours a month for between 80 -100 hours of flight pay. I have worked many 14+ hour days where I only get 4.5 - 5 hours of pay. The rest of the time is aircraft swaps, delays, maintenance, weather, time between legs (airport appreciation), ready reserve, etc.

      The only reason people work for low pay at a regional is the carrot of being able to move on to a legacy airline such as Delta, United, America, etc and being able to earn a middle-class living. But there's no clear path to a legacy carrier. Some promise flow through, but that seems to be the exception rather than the rule. You apply and hope to get invited for an interview and maybe a job. When the economy goes down the tubes, a lot of legacy pilots wind up back at the regionals and take a 70% pay cut to just keep flying. I'm considering going to Asia as a plan B.

    17. Re:Here's a thought: by DickBreath · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If you Don't pay the pilots more, then the pilots will move to another airline that does. You won't have any passengers because you don't have pilots to fly them. Your competitor with higher ticket prices will actually be offering flight routes that you don't and so your customers will go to your competitor.

      So is it better to pay pilots and raise ticket prices?

      If there really is a pilot shortage then ticket prices are going to rise anyway because there will be a limited number of flights that can be operated by all airlines combined.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    18. Re:Here's a thought: by sabri · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Mod parent up.

      The issue is requiring 1000-1500 hours of flight time before you can get an ATP certification which is a requirement to work for a commercial passenger airline. Before the changes after the Colgan Air crash you only needed 250 hours to be an FO with a regional carrier.

      Today, many "fresh" pilots (those with a CPL and 250 hours) need to get a CFI and train other pilots in order to get the required experience. That's nothing else than a ponzi scheme. Once they have 1500 hours, they are eligible to fly at the airlines, but by that time they're "too old" and "too demanding".

      Not to mention that a few years ago it was still very common to have young pilots pay to fly. The industry created the problem itself.

      --
      I'm not a complete idiot... Some parts are missing.
    19. Re:Here's a thought: by DickBreath · · Score: 4, Funny

      If the power supply in a production server catches fire, best practice is to schedule a meeting to determine whether DevOps should fix it, or whether the software team can issue a software patch to correct the issue.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    20. Re:Here's a thought: by prisoner-of-enigma · · Score: 5, Informative

      If there really is a pilot shortage then ticket prices are going to rise anyway because there will be a limited number of flights that can be operated by all airlines combined.

      True but what will really happen is airlines will shut down flying unprofitable or marginally profitable routes in order to concentrate on the profitable ones. There will be fewer planes (but they'll always be full instead of partially filled) needing fewer pilots. I'm not saying this is good for the average customer. I'm saying this is what will happen. I used to work at at airline so I know how they operate. They know exactly how profitable each flight is. Triage will mandate they cull money-losing routes first since they only exist to feed people to more profitable routes. Next will be the marginal routes for exactly the same reason.

      --
      In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, Make us your slaves, but feed us. - Fyodor Dostoyevsky
    21. Re:Here's a thought: by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 2

      If the power supply in a production server catches fire, best practice is to schedule a meeting to determine whether DevOps should fix it, or whether the software team can issue a software patch to correct the issue.

      The result of the meeting will be that the software team should rush out an untested patch which will set the redundant power supply on fire as well.

    22. Re:Here's a thought: by bws111 · · Score: 2

      Because there IS NO shortage. If there was actually a shortage of pilots then flights would have to be cancelled. No cancelled flights due to lack of pilots means no shortage. If it gets to the point when there is an actual shortage, THEN it will be a competitive advantage to pay more. Paying more NOW is a competitive disadvantage.

    23. Re:Here's a thought: by blindseer · · Score: 2

      time between legs (airport appreciation)

      I "appreciate" my time in airports too. The air is always bitterly cold and life sapping dry. There the vending machines are constantly empty, the coffee is overpriced, and if the shops have fruit for sale its over ripe. There's always a TV to watch for entertainment, where you can choose from CNN, Weather Channel, or Arrivals and Departures.

      When the economy goes down the tubes, a lot of legacy pilots wind up back at the regionals and take a 70% pay cut to just keep flying. I'm considering going to Asia as a plan B.

      I hope that you choose to stay but I wish you clear skies wherever the winds take you.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    24. Re:Here's a thought: by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 2

      As usual, attempting to inject Capitalism to solve a problem created by Capitalism will be rejected as "not profitable enough"
      By people who created the underpaid, overworked burnouts in the first place.
      Thanks!

    25. Re:Here's a thought: by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      If there was actually a shortage of pilots then flights would have to be cancelled.

      Cancellations happen due to short term unpredictable things.

      For long term predictable factors there's no need to cancel, because you wouldn't (and couldn't) schedule it in the first place.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    26. Re:Here's a thought: by hawguy · · Score: 2

      But that's $50K a year for half-time work and when you only need to drive to work a few times a month (assuming you're doing long-hauls with overnight stays), you can live well outside of expensive cities.

      That makes the pay more attractive.

      Long hauls are the most desirable routes, and routes are usually bid according to seniority. A captain on an A-320 flying Detroit to Hong Kong has a very different work life than a first officer on a Bombardier regional jet working for a feeder airline, flying Chicago to Iowa City to Fargo to Duluth.

      PEDANTIC ALERT!!!!

      There is no way an A320 would ever be assigned to a Detroit-Hong Kong route. The range isn't there, and it isn't ETOPS certified.

      The distance from Detroit, MI to Hong Kong is approximately 12,620 km. The typical range of an Airbus A320 with 150 passengers is around 6,100 km.

      Any captain scheduled to fly such a route should look for a transfer immediately, not matter what the pay is!

      Since you're being pedantic, the A320 does have ETOPS-180 certification, which AFAIK is sufficient for DTW-Hong Kong.

      https://www.airbus.com/newsroo...

    27. Re:Here's a thought: by RevDisk · · Score: 2

      Na. It's geared around FAA requirements, and pretty much the expectation that you're either a former military pilot or are willing to near starve working for tiny places to rack up the hours.

      1000 flight hours charitably will cost $200,000 at $200/hour plane rental cost. For a Piper Arrow. For a smaller Cessna, half that. That's still not an insignificant investment. Oh, and every pilot is one busted medical away from being unemployable. Potentially forever as pilot.

  2. regional airlines pay very low by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2, Informative

    regional airlines pay very low

    1. Re:regional airlines pay very low by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 4, Interesting

      ^^^^ This, or so I heard. A friend of mine finally "made it to (national/international airline)" after umpteen years and it was the difference between his wife being the breadwinner and his wife staying at home with the kids.

    2. Re:regional airlines pay very low by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Whenever there's an article about a shortage of X, it's usually because the pay/conditions of X are terrible, nobody wants to do it FOR THAT WAGE, and thus there's a shortage. But the hope is that somehow this shortage will etiher drum up business for schools/certification, remove regulations that prevent unqualified people from doing the work, or otherwise prevent having to take the revenue that is lost to profit and use it for employees. Really hard to give a flying fuck.

  3. Talk about a no-brainer issue by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 4, Informative

    Airline pilot used to be a prestige job which for a system airline could be a lifetime career. Starting pilots now make $24 an hour, which is slightly higher than a Walmart greeter:
    http://fortune.com/2014/03/03/...

    Think about that the next time you roar down the runway on your way somewhere.

  4. If they're that desperate by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

    If they were that desperate they would be training pilots themselves.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  5. Getting started is horrendous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The situation has gotten absolutely miserable for student pilots, worse than trying to become a doctor in many ways (and that's saying something). And taking that risk (debt) buys you entrance to starving as a regional pilot for many years, until MAYBE you get hired on for a wage that can finally provide a life.

    And then you're still just a bus driver in the sky. Passengers certainly treat it as such, in no small part due to the airlines treating the passengers like cattle. Honestly, I think the whole US air industry is just fucked.

  6. Get rid of the 1500 hour rule... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Get rid of the idiotic 1500 hour rule, keep the rules as far as crew rest hours. Both of the pilots in the 2008 crash that precipitated the 1500 hour rule had more than 1500 hours in the cockpit. Most of the world does fine with co-pilots starting with 250 to 500 hours -- this allows them to be trained on the job.

  7. Starting pay [Re:Here's a thought:] by XXongo · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's a thought: they could try paying pilots decently, and giving them reasonable work schedules.

    I know, that's crazy talk.

    The starting wage for a pilot at a major carrier is $70-80 an hour with the ability to have a contractually guaranteed minimum of 70-80 hours a month.

    So, why does the first hit on my google search for "starting pay for airline pilots" say "Starting Salaries. A regional airline pilots in the U.S. typically starts out making an hourly rate of $20 – $50 per hour, or about $20,000-$40,000 per year, depending on the airline, type of aircraft, and the pilot's experience level."

    with the ability to have a contractually guaranteed minimum of 70-80 hours a month.

    ...and, as the very same page on my google search helpfully tells me, "The average airline pilot logs 75 hours a month in the air and sometimes up to 150 hours per month performing ground duties like simulator training, maintaining records, performing pre-flight inspections, flight planning and traveling to and from hotels and airports."

    ...

  8. Not a secure future. by BitterOak · · Score: 5, Funny

    Given that the technology exists today to build passenger planes which require no flight crew at all, I can imagine why someone in their late teens/early twenties deciding on a career path would be hesitant to make the HUGE investment of time and money it requires to become a commercial airline pilot. My guess is within ten years, you will start to see automated commercial flights in which the "pilot" doesn't need to touch anything from pushback at the departing gate to pulling up at the arrival gate, and within twenty, you'll start to see flights with no flight crew on board at all. Why would anyone want to start a career in that field now? I think the pilot shortage problem is only going to get worse in the years to come, before automation takes over, and the shortage may accelerate the trend to automation.

    --
    If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
  9. Shortage of pilots willing to work for POOR WAGES by augustz · · Score: 4, Informative

    There is no shortage of pilots for those $300K/year jobs. Period.

    There is a shortage at the 36K - $40K per year level - especially now that you need 1,500 hours which takes a fair bit of time to get (and $$). Add in quality of life issues at that pay rate - yes there is a shortage.

    Put all the regional pilots on mainline contracts. Pilot shortage would go away pretty quickly.

  10. The russians did it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    We dont have enough pilots because of the russians

  11. an artificial shortage by DanDD · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I just visited with a former US Navy pilot who's been flying for Frontier for the last 20 years. He hates it. Even in some major airlines, pilots are often treated poorly, have poor schedules, and are expected to have no life. This leads to a high rate of "AIDS" - Aviation Induced Divorce Syndrome. Pay has been increasing, but quality of life isn't.

    If you work for an airline, regional or major, you have to establish 'seniority' before you can gain any sense of a normal schedule or choose a base of operations. Until you've establish seniority, a pilot is at the whim of the company. If you change companies, you give up seniority and start at the bottom all over again.

    Federally Regulated Indentured Servitude. What a rewarding career choice. Not.

    The real issues are the MBA mentality, and innovation and competition limiting FAA regulations. The airline industry and the FAA have been in bed together for decades to create regulations that go far beyond safety, and in reality limit competition and innovation. Profit and protecting the status quo comes first, everything else comes second. As a result, the US has seen a real decline in the pace of innovation in aviation. Other markets have seen dramatic increases in innovation, service, and safety. Aviation, not so much (except in safety). Yes, we have more efficient engines, better avionics, and more advanced materials (787 Dreamliner, etc.), but these innovations are in increasingly niche markets.

    General aviation special interest groups like EAA and AOPA are starting to chip away at the FAA/Airline industry monster: Basic Med is helping hobbyist pilots keep their medicals and continue flying smaller aircraft safely. And, the recent FAA Part 23 regulation re-write is helping revive general aviation engineering and production in the United States. These are drops in the bucket, but hopefully this trend continues.

    --
    "Every time I see an adult on a bicycle, I no longer despair for the future of the human race." - H. G. Wells
  12. Re:why train when they can get an 100K student loa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    You can't get student loans to cover it. Student loans are only for education, not experience. You need 1500 hours of experience. That cost is on you.

  13. Re:why train when they can get an 100K student loa by zlives · · Score: 4, Funny

    coming soon, we must increase rates... also more h1b pilots needed....

  14. Stop Right There by sexconker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The national security of the United States relies on a healthy airline industry.

    No, it doesn't. That's absurd. The military flies its own shit.

    The economy does, sure. But that's a self-correcting problem (as long as you actually let it self-correct).
    If there's a shortage of pilots, then raise fares to either lower demand or hire more pilots to fill demand.

  15. work 'em to death, it's cheaper... by Thud457 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Nah.
    Better to make the pilots we have work more hours for the same pay.

    No possible downside to that.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:work 'em to death, it's cheaper... by XXongo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Nah. Better to make the pilots we have work more hours for the same pay.

      Can't. The FAA put a piloting limit of 1000 flight hours per year, to limit pilot fatigue.

      that meddling government, always taking profit away from businesses just because "safety". People should be allowed to fly unsafe airlines if they want to save some dollars, it's their right.

    2. Re:work 'em to death, it's cheaper... by rnturn · · Score: 2

      Taking a cue from the trucking industry. Pay peanuts so there's an incentive for drivers to stay on the road longer than they're legally allowed to be. (Sleep? Sleep is for chumps.) Nobody in management ever pays the price for what goes wrong.

      --
      CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    3. Re:work 'em to death, it's cheaper... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      It is not a right to fucking crash airplanes, you moron. That right is reserved for only the US Government when we need an impetus to attack the world nonstop and coincidentally, to strip citizens of their rights.

    4. Re:work 'em to death, it's cheaper... by tech10171968 · · Score: 2

      Taking a cue from the trucking industry. Pay peanuts so there's an incentive for drivers to stay on the road longer than they're legally allowed to be. (Sleep? Sleep is for chumps.) Nobody in management ever pays the price for what goes wrong.

      Better yet, DON'T take any advice from the trucking industry. They are also experiencing a shortage of workers. They have been for years but, in recent times, this shortage has become acute enough that it's starting to affect the logistics chain for many companies and even prices for some items in your local store. Companies are responding with 5-figure signing bonuses but it's like closing the barn door after the horse already escaped. The problems in the industry have been allowed to fester for far too long and too much damage has been done.

      --
      This space for rent!
  16. Cost by darkain · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A pilot's license doesn't make someone an active commercial pilot. I work with a bunch of guys in their 60's who in their youth were hobbyist pilots that would just go and fly for fun out of local airfields. ALL of these airfields are now gone, and the cost to take up a small plane just isn't feasible for a hobbyist anymore.

  17. No Shortages, Or Surpluses by brian.stinar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There is no such thing as a shortage, or a surplus. Those two things only exist within a price point, at a specific point in time. With enough money, you could buy ALL the pilots. I am pretty sure the very last pilot would be very expensive. Then, after a few more years, there would be even more pilots, and then they'd be even more expensive. Eventually this would stabilize, as even if there were one extremely rich person with all the money, not everyone could be a pilot. Some people would have to grow food, and work on airplanes.

    This article seems to miss an important point - regional airlines choose not to pay as much for pilots, so they will feel a 'shortage' at or below their preferred price point, for a specific time period.

  18. Re:why train when they can get an 100K student loa by clodney · · Score: 2

    coming soon, we must increase rates... also more h1b pilots needed....

    I know you were being sarcastic, but yes, this will require airlines to increase rates. Pilots aren't a huge part of an airlines labor force, but if airlines are forced to invest in training/apprenticeships to bring new pilots into the system, and to raise pay to make it a more appealing career, that will raise their costs, and they will seek to pass it along to their customers.

    Since deregulation, airlines have been a very low margin business, so they don't have lots of ability to absorb the increased costs.

    And if foreign pilots want to work with an American carrier, an H1-B would be one of the ways.

  19. Cost of pilots, cost of tickets by XXongo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Pay the pilots more and they will find they don't need pilots because nobody is flying on their airline as the tickets cost more.

    What fraction of the price of an airline ticket is the price of paying the pilot? Quick back of the envelope calculation: somewhere around 1%. I'm guessing that a 1% change in ticket prices won't make much of a difference.

    1. Re:Cost of pilots, cost of tickets by rnturn · · Score: 4, Informative

      ``I'm guessing that a 1% change in ticket prices won't make much of a difference.''

      Something tells me that they'd never even bother to ask the passengers whether 1% would put them off flying. According to one pizza chain, paying their employees a livable minimum wage would result in pizzas costing something like $0.17 more and the CEO claimed he'd have to lay people off because a wage increase was going to do the company in. Does anyone doubt that the airlines' C-level execs knee-jerk reaction would not be anything but screaming and shouting about government regulation?

      --
      CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    2. Re:Cost of pilots, cost of tickets by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2

      Small businesses report increased business resulting from higher wages vastly swamps the increased cost of their own employees.

      Wages have been held too low so long that it's actually hurting the economy

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  20. Re:why train when they can get an 100K student loa by bobbied · · Score: 4, Insightful

    why train when they can get an 100K student loan to cover it.

    100K isn't going to get you enough flight time to fly charters and is only a drop in the bucket towards the 1500 minimum hours to be an ATP. Especially when a small twin engine is going to run you $150+/hour and a flight instructor another $80. It's going to take YEARS to accrue enough flight time and at least $300K in flying expenses.

    By my rough calculations you will blow a quarter of a million dollars in flight time and at least 5 years of living time before you can manage to land a charter pilot gig at about 800 hours. Then, it will take you another 5 years of being a busy charter pilot to get you near 1,500 hours, but you will be destitute trying to service your debt on that salary. Once you get to 1,500, you have the option of taking a ATP job with a feeder airline, flying awful routes in shoddy old aircraft for another 5-10 years before you can land a job at one of the majors, with 15 years experience and about 3,000 hours of time.

    The pilot gig is not a comfortable one. You got to really love what you do to live like a pauper working the night shift away from home until you are 35 or older.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  21. Views on jobs.... by Pitawg · · Score: 2

    I hear other jobs have the same issue, loss of job image, after certain poeple enter the employ.

    A recent one turned on his advisors, and on his people, taking a murderer's word over theirs' on international television. That is one job that will never look as special as it did the day before that mindless fool was voted in. Not involving transportation, but it did have a lot lives on the line.

    I have to admit, however, that job did start coming up short on good people that wanted to fill the role properly, a while before that one got the chance.

  22. Re:why train when they can get an 100K student loa by SumDog · · Score: 4, Insightful

    > h1b pilots

    Other countries don't have shortages because they get paid a lot more. Why the hell would anyone want to get a visa to be a pilot here?

  23. Obvious solution by nospam007 · · Score: 2

    We're going to need a bigger boat^h^h^h^hplane.

  24. Re:why train when they can get an 100K student loa by cayenne8 · · Score: 2

    And if foreign pilots want to work with an American carrier, an H1-B would be one of the ways.

    Hmm...have you heard about all the foreign plane crashes past few years?

    From everything I've read, at many foreign airports, especially where H1-B's would come from....they are a chaotic mess, not something we'd want to import "here"....that and language barrier between them and control towers.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  25. Re:Multiplication [Re:Starting pay [Re:Here's a... by DRJlaw · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm pretty sure they have other duties they are paid for. Paperwork, pre-flight checks, etc.

    AC versus NBC News. Fight!

    "A portrait of these hourly pay scales becomes even more pathetic when you consider that regional airline pilots, who are paid only from the time the airline leaves the gate to the time it arrives at the destination, only are on the clock on average about 21.5 hours per week."

    "They have a minimum pay for time on duty at some airlines, like one hour of pay minimum for every two hours on duty, and one hour of pay for every 4-5 hours away from home,' Darby says. 'These rules are often not in effect at the smaller airlines, and are always guaranteed by the larger major airlines' union contracts."

    Oooo... half-time pay, if you're lucky. Color me jealous.

  26. Re:why train when they can get an 100K student loa by bobbied · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Charters are going to take pilots that have turbine time and are type rated. FEW charter companies will touch you under 3,000 hours, and none will foot the bill for type ratings or check rides until you actually are their employee. That's on you. You *might* get some time flying specialized cargo or short passenger runs, but that's not going to be a regular paying job. Being a CFI would be much better for that, but that means you have to find a bunch of students with money, and all those PIC hours will mostly be single engine non-complex.

    Flying piston aircraft for charters or cargo is a low probability because there simply isn't enough of that kind of thing going on here in the states. Nobody flies piston aircraft for cargo or charter, not anymore. Turbine gigs for cargo are even more limited. Why? FedX requires an ATP rating, UPS is similar and they fly nearly ALL the freight out there now.

    Flying banners is an option, but there are not that many hours available for that as there are few places where this happens much. Where I live, they fly banners about 2 months out of the year because of the weather. Competition for these hours is going to be fierce because there are a LOT of guys with 500 hours dying to get PIC hours for free.

    All in all, it's *really* hard to get enough PIC time without significant amounts of debt.

    Personally, I think Airlines would be advised to supplement such business activities to get pilots enough hours to get their ratings, say supplement cargo businesses for low volume and unusual routes. Maybe they could supplement flight training schools or individual students and build a feeder program designed to get pilots hours built up at less cost to the students. Maybe provide promising pilots other working positions with suitable hours and access to low cost flight schools to allow them to quickly build hours and move into meaningful flying work sooner and faster.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  27. Re:Self flying planes by blindseer · · Score: 2

    We need self flying planes. Oh wait we already do. Pilots work for 15 minutes at takeoff and 15 minutes at landing. The rest is autopilot.

    Not even close, but let's assume that's true.

    They are getting paid to be on call. Its very much like being a Fireman.

    If you want me to be ready to put out those fires 30 minutes of every day then you have to pay me to sit on my thumbs for the rest of the day or I'll go find something else to do. My time is money. For someone with training as a pilot makes them very valuable for a lot of non-flying jobs. Airline pilots often have a college degree in mechanical engineering or something similar so they can get a jump on the technical training they'll see in flight school and look good on a resume for hiring. They'll speak English, because English is the language of international flying and other business. They will know weather patterns, mechanical systems, and just even knowing how to talk on a radio is a valuable skill. They don't have to fly a plane, they'll get a job doing something else if they think the pay is shit.

    The FAA should easily allow 2000 hours flying time each year and also allow napping in cockpits while the autopilot is flying. Problem solved.

    Do you even know how many hours are in a year? 24 * 365 = 8760. Let's go with 2500 hours of flying time, that's nearly 7 hours flying every day with no weekends, holidays, or vacation days, or sick days, off the clock. Or, that's nearly 30% of the year. A typical 9-to-5 job will have 40 hours per week for 50 weeks per year, 2000 hours.

    Flying 1000 hours in a year, with all the dead time on the ground to wait for their next flight, weather delays, time off, and so forth, sounds about right.

    --
    I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
  28. Re:why train when they can get an 100K student loa by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 2

    and, unless the Military paid for it, that cost is quite expensive.

    You want to see ludicrous ? Go price what it will cost to be a commercial helicopter pilot.

  29. Re:Multiplication [Re:Starting pay [Re:Here's a... by RevDisk · · Score: 2

    Not sure what he's basing his statement on, but I worked for five years at an aerospace manufacturing company and worked with numerous pilots. Test pilots, charter pilots, transit pilots, corporate pilots, medevac pilots, some airline pilots. He is correct. It varies, but most places pay by flight hours. Airlines near always pay by flight hour There's a lot not covered in those flight hours. The rate is set to semi accurately reflect those hours. $50 per flight hour sounds good, but that caps you at $50k/yr due to FAA regulations on max flight hours.

    It's entirely possible to fly from point A to point B with say... 4 flight hours in the air. With two hours of pre-flight, two hour flight, hour ish of post, 12 hours of sitting around, two hour pre-flight, two hours of flying, hopefully half an hour to and hour post, then home to hopefully sleep in your own bed. That's 4 hours of pay for 10-22 hours of work depending how you count it.

    Being a commercial pilot sucks until you rack up seniority. If you're not former military pilot, the system is entirely rigged against you to the point you're near insane enough to try.

  30. Re: Self flying planes by astrofurter · · Score: 2

    Developers work slave hours for increasingly shitty pay because we have no solidarity. Jealousy and infighting with our brothers in labor the airline pilots is the opposite of useful here.

  31. Re:why train when they can get an 100K student loa by Immerman · · Score: 2

    Yes, because hiring inexperience pilots to fly their $100-400 million aircraft sounds like an extremely good investment to me...

    --
    --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.