Slashdot Mirror


The US is Facing a Serious Shortage of Airline Pilots (cnn.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: The national security of the United States relies on a healthy airline industry. That requires modern reliable airplanes -- and highly skilled pilots to operate them. However, the United States has a shortage of pilots right now, particularly at the regional airline levels. According to the Federal Aviation Administration, there were about 827,000 pilots in America in 1987. Over the past three decades, that number has decreased by 30%. Meanwhile, during this period, there has been a tremendous increase in the demand for air travel. The International Air Transport Association predicts that, over the next 20 years, air travel will double.

This is a classic case of low supply and high demand. This mismatch has created a perfect storm that could wreak havoc on the US airline industry over the next decade. The somber news is this shortage is going to get much worse. I have not only studied and researched the airline industry since 1978, but I also was a pilot for 19 years, before going back to academia in 2006.

In the 1970s, when most of today's airline pilots like myself were growing up, piloting for an airline was considered a prestigious career. The job offered not only high salaries and nice schedules with many days off, but also a respected position in society. In the early 1990s, pilot salaries approached $300,000 in today's dollars for some international pilots. What's more, during this time, the military had a steady and consistent demand for pilots. A young aspiring aviator could go into the military to receive all of his or her flight training. Once these pilots had fulfilled their military commitment, they were almost guaranteed a good job flying for a major airline. Today, this is no longer the case. The career of the airline pilot has lost its luster.

31 of 428 comments (clear)

  1. Here's a thought: by XXongo · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Here's a thought: they could try paying pilots decently, and giving them reasonable work schedules.

    I know, that's crazy talk.

    1. Re:Here's a thought: by Nidi62 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Here's a thought: they could try paying pilots decently, and giving them reasonable work schedules.

      I know, that's crazy talk.

      The starting wage for a pilot at a major carrier is $70-80 an hour with the ability to have a contractually guaranteed minimum of 70-80 hours a month. Pilots with seniority can easily makes $250k in a year before bonuses or profit sharing. Regionals currently pay about $50-60k yearly plus sign-up and retention bonuses. The issue isn't the pay or the work rules. The issue is requiring 1000-1500 hours of flight time before you can get an ATP certification which is a requirement to work for a commercial passenger airline. Before the changes after the Colgan Air crash you only needed 250 hours to be an FO with a regional carrier.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    2. Re:Here's a thought: by brxndxn · · Score: 5, Insightful

      $50-60k/year is garbage for a skilled technical field that requires travel 100% of the time. Pay the pilots more and the shortage will go away. Also, the airlines should start paying for training programs if they really want pilots - just like other industries need to train operators for manufacturing plants, IT staff, or maintenance workers.

      --
      --- We need more Ron Paul!
    3. Re:Here's a thought: by Nidi62 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Also people who have flown their tours in the military likely have families at that point or want to become astronauts, politicians, or all of them.

      Most military pilots have enough flight time to go right to a major airline, skipping the regionals. Worst case they are in their late 30s-early 40s, are making 6 figures within 3-4 years, and have a guaranteed 25-year career. Part of the issue is the pool of military pilots is shrinking as well with the adoption of more multi-purpose aircraft and UAVs.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    4. Re:Here's a thought: by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Informative

      That is for 80 hours a month. Our normal work jobs in the us have us ordinary folks working 160 hours a month.

      The hourly rate is well into the normal 6 figure if working full time.

      Higher pay and benefits may help, but I expect the crazy hours, and being away for home on long day stretches factor in too. What is the point in making a lot of money if you are living like homeless bum, because you are never home.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    5. Re:Here's a thought: by sjames · · Score: 4, Insightful

      On the other hand, while it is half time work, most of your other time is spent somewhere you probably don't really want to be in yet another cookie cutter hotel room with only the contents of your suitcase.

      In other words, a lot like being at work.

    6. Re:Here's a thought: by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Trust CNN to run a "conversation" article about supply and demand devoid of actual economics.

      First, the author starts by blaming deregulation and the related advent of lower cost airlines. Then the author continues by blaming regulation for artificially limiting supply, i.e. the 1500 hour rule. Finally, they author proposes his preferred solution of Airlines creating their own flight academies (trying to increase supply of pilots again), for which the author conveniently is a teaching assistant for the academy he proposes as the solution to the problem. Is he trying to get a better job with the school, but they need more students?

      If you've been following along, you might notice government regulations made air travel more expensive until it was finally loosened and airlines could compete on route and price instead of other "benefits" most customers didn't actually want to pay for. As a result, lots more people are able to fly to travel. (P.S. This is a good thing)

      Not content with that, the government then comes back later and severely restricts the supply of airline first officers, taking the existing requirement of 250 hours (commercial pilot) and multiplying it by 6 to 1500 hours (ATP pilot). Overreaction to one incident, anyone? The first fatal crash in 3 years and they multiply the requirements to be an airline pilot by 6x?

      The best part of the Wikipedia article on the crash is the description of the regulatory solution, "Although it did nothing to address the specific causes of the crash ..." Basically the pilots weren't paying attention to the instruments, according to the flight recorders, then the reacted "not according to their training" to the resulting stall.

      So the 1500 hours ATP requirement didn't even do anything to solve the problem of the crash which prompted it (both Colgan flight pilots had more than 1500 flight hours). That's pretty typical of this sort of regulation.

      The demand side is fine (we want people to fly!), so how about we take the dramatic step of just fixing the regulations causing the supply problem? Something like, oh, only requiring 250 hours to be a first officer (commercial pilot's license) and keep the 1500 ATP hours for the Captain? That way someone can get experience as an airline pilot while getting paid? Simple supply fix, undo the overreaction in regulations which is causing the supply problem?

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    7. Re:Here's a thought: by michelcolman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Those 80 hours a month are flight time. That doesn’t take into account the time preparing the flight, the time on the ground between flights, and the time finishing up after the last flight. That brings you pretty close to the amount of time “ordinary folks” work, and then that doesn’t even take the crazy schedules into account. Early shifts, late shifts, weekends equivalent to weekdays,...

    8. Re:Here's a thought: by Faldgan · · Score: 5, Interesting

      While your statements are factually correct they ignore several critical pieces of information that leaves readers with the wrong impression.
          The $70-$80 is for flight hours, not hours worked.
          You will spend as much time commuting and on preflight and postflight tasks as you will flying.
          You will be on standby for a lot of the non-working time as well, where you can do little else.
          Starting at a major carrier is a mid-career job, not a start of career job. You won't get this job until you have been in the industry for 10 to 15 years.

      Another semi-random note: The pilot experience requirements would not have changed the Colgan crash. The captain had 3379 hours and the first officer had 2244 hours; both were well above the proposed new minimums. I use as a basic standard for good legislation that if a new law is created in response to an incident, the incident must have been prevented if the new law had already been in effect.

      --
      Nathan Brazil?
    9. Re:Here's a thought: by GuB-42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Also worth noting that an airline pilot has huge responsibilities. It means you can't afford not to be in perfect condition to start flying. And that's hard to keep up with all these irregular schedules.
      There is a moral responsibility and written rules. For example, there are mandatory health checkups, zero tolerance for alcohol, etc...

      There is on-call duty too, where you have to be ready to get to the airport within an hour or so.

      It used to be a demanding but rewarding job. Today, it is still demanding but less rewarding.

    10. Re:Here's a thought: by bkmoore · · Score: 5, Informative

      That is for 80 hours a month. Our normal work jobs in the us have us ordinary folks working 160 hours a month....

      I'm a regional airline pilot and work well over 160 hours a month for between 80 -100 hours of flight pay. I have worked many 14+ hour days where I only get 4.5 - 5 hours of pay. The rest of the time is aircraft swaps, delays, maintenance, weather, time between legs (airport appreciation), ready reserve, etc.

      The only reason people work for low pay at a regional is the carrot of being able to move on to a legacy airline such as Delta, United, America, etc and being able to earn a middle-class living. But there's no clear path to a legacy carrier. Some promise flow through, but that seems to be the exception rather than the rule. You apply and hope to get invited for an interview and maybe a job. When the economy goes down the tubes, a lot of legacy pilots wind up back at the regionals and take a 70% pay cut to just keep flying. I'm considering going to Asia as a plan B.

    11. Re:Here's a thought: by DickBreath · · Score: 4, Funny

      If the power supply in a production server catches fire, best practice is to schedule a meeting to determine whether DevOps should fix it, or whether the software team can issue a software patch to correct the issue.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    12. Re:Here's a thought: by prisoner-of-enigma · · Score: 5, Informative

      If there really is a pilot shortage then ticket prices are going to rise anyway because there will be a limited number of flights that can be operated by all airlines combined.

      True but what will really happen is airlines will shut down flying unprofitable or marginally profitable routes in order to concentrate on the profitable ones. There will be fewer planes (but they'll always be full instead of partially filled) needing fewer pilots. I'm not saying this is good for the average customer. I'm saying this is what will happen. I used to work at at airline so I know how they operate. They know exactly how profitable each flight is. Triage will mandate they cull money-losing routes first since they only exist to feed people to more profitable routes. Next will be the marginal routes for exactly the same reason.

      --
      In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, Make us your slaves, but feed us. - Fyodor Dostoyevsky
  2. Talk about a no-brainer issue by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 4, Informative

    Airline pilot used to be a prestige job which for a system airline could be a lifetime career. Starting pilots now make $24 an hour, which is slightly higher than a Walmart greeter:
    http://fortune.com/2014/03/03/...

    Think about that the next time you roar down the runway on your way somewhere.

  3. Get rid of the 1500 hour rule... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Get rid of the idiotic 1500 hour rule, keep the rules as far as crew rest hours. Both of the pilots in the 2008 crash that precipitated the 1500 hour rule had more than 1500 hours in the cockpit. Most of the world does fine with co-pilots starting with 250 to 500 hours -- this allows them to be trained on the job.

  4. Re:regional airlines pay very low by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ^^^^ This, or so I heard. A friend of mine finally "made it to (national/international airline)" after umpteen years and it was the difference between his wife being the breadwinner and his wife staying at home with the kids.

  5. Starting pay [Re:Here's a thought:] by XXongo · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's a thought: they could try paying pilots decently, and giving them reasonable work schedules.

    I know, that's crazy talk.

    The starting wage for a pilot at a major carrier is $70-80 an hour with the ability to have a contractually guaranteed minimum of 70-80 hours a month.

    So, why does the first hit on my google search for "starting pay for airline pilots" say "Starting Salaries. A regional airline pilots in the U.S. typically starts out making an hourly rate of $20 – $50 per hour, or about $20,000-$40,000 per year, depending on the airline, type of aircraft, and the pilot's experience level."

    with the ability to have a contractually guaranteed minimum of 70-80 hours a month.

    ...and, as the very same page on my google search helpfully tells me, "The average airline pilot logs 75 hours a month in the air and sometimes up to 150 hours per month performing ground duties like simulator training, maintaining records, performing pre-flight inspections, flight planning and traveling to and from hotels and airports."

    ...

  6. Not a secure future. by BitterOak · · Score: 5, Funny

    Given that the technology exists today to build passenger planes which require no flight crew at all, I can imagine why someone in their late teens/early twenties deciding on a career path would be hesitant to make the HUGE investment of time and money it requires to become a commercial airline pilot. My guess is within ten years, you will start to see automated commercial flights in which the "pilot" doesn't need to touch anything from pushback at the departing gate to pulling up at the arrival gate, and within twenty, you'll start to see flights with no flight crew on board at all. Why would anyone want to start a career in that field now? I think the pilot shortage problem is only going to get worse in the years to come, before automation takes over, and the shortage may accelerate the trend to automation.

    --
    If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
  7. Re:regional airlines pay very low by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Whenever there's an article about a shortage of X, it's usually because the pay/conditions of X are terrible, nobody wants to do it FOR THAT WAGE, and thus there's a shortage. But the hope is that somehow this shortage will etiher drum up business for schools/certification, remove regulations that prevent unqualified people from doing the work, or otherwise prevent having to take the revenue that is lost to profit and use it for employees. Really hard to give a flying fuck.

  8. Shortage of pilots willing to work for POOR WAGES by augustz · · Score: 4, Informative

    There is no shortage of pilots for those $300K/year jobs. Period.

    There is a shortage at the 36K - $40K per year level - especially now that you need 1,500 hours which takes a fair bit of time to get (and $$). Add in quality of life issues at that pay rate - yes there is a shortage.

    Put all the regional pilots on mainline contracts. Pilot shortage would go away pretty quickly.

  9. an artificial shortage by DanDD · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I just visited with a former US Navy pilot who's been flying for Frontier for the last 20 years. He hates it. Even in some major airlines, pilots are often treated poorly, have poor schedules, and are expected to have no life. This leads to a high rate of "AIDS" - Aviation Induced Divorce Syndrome. Pay has been increasing, but quality of life isn't.

    If you work for an airline, regional or major, you have to establish 'seniority' before you can gain any sense of a normal schedule or choose a base of operations. Until you've establish seniority, a pilot is at the whim of the company. If you change companies, you give up seniority and start at the bottom all over again.

    Federally Regulated Indentured Servitude. What a rewarding career choice. Not.

    The real issues are the MBA mentality, and innovation and competition limiting FAA regulations. The airline industry and the FAA have been in bed together for decades to create regulations that go far beyond safety, and in reality limit competition and innovation. Profit and protecting the status quo comes first, everything else comes second. As a result, the US has seen a real decline in the pace of innovation in aviation. Other markets have seen dramatic increases in innovation, service, and safety. Aviation, not so much (except in safety). Yes, we have more efficient engines, better avionics, and more advanced materials (787 Dreamliner, etc.), but these innovations are in increasingly niche markets.

    General aviation special interest groups like EAA and AOPA are starting to chip away at the FAA/Airline industry monster: Basic Med is helping hobbyist pilots keep their medicals and continue flying smaller aircraft safely. And, the recent FAA Part 23 regulation re-write is helping revive general aviation engineering and production in the United States. These are drops in the bucket, but hopefully this trend continues.

    --
    "Every time I see an adult on a bicycle, I no longer despair for the future of the human race." - H. G. Wells
  10. Re:why train when they can get an 100K student loa by zlives · · Score: 4, Funny

    coming soon, we must increase rates... also more h1b pilots needed....

  11. Stop Right There by sexconker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The national security of the United States relies on a healthy airline industry.

    No, it doesn't. That's absurd. The military flies its own shit.

    The economy does, sure. But that's a self-correcting problem (as long as you actually let it self-correct).
    If there's a shortage of pilots, then raise fares to either lower demand or hire more pilots to fill demand.

  12. work 'em to death, it's cheaper... by Thud457 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Nah.
    Better to make the pilots we have work more hours for the same pay.

    No possible downside to that.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:work 'em to death, it's cheaper... by XXongo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Nah. Better to make the pilots we have work more hours for the same pay.

      Can't. The FAA put a piloting limit of 1000 flight hours per year, to limit pilot fatigue.

      that meddling government, always taking profit away from businesses just because "safety". People should be allowed to fly unsafe airlines if they want to save some dollars, it's their right.

  13. Cost by darkain · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A pilot's license doesn't make someone an active commercial pilot. I work with a bunch of guys in their 60's who in their youth were hobbyist pilots that would just go and fly for fun out of local airfields. ALL of these airfields are now gone, and the cost to take up a small plane just isn't feasible for a hobbyist anymore.

  14. Cost of pilots, cost of tickets by XXongo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Pay the pilots more and they will find they don't need pilots because nobody is flying on their airline as the tickets cost more.

    What fraction of the price of an airline ticket is the price of paying the pilot? Quick back of the envelope calculation: somewhere around 1%. I'm guessing that a 1% change in ticket prices won't make much of a difference.

    1. Re:Cost of pilots, cost of tickets by rnturn · · Score: 4, Informative

      ``I'm guessing that a 1% change in ticket prices won't make much of a difference.''

      Something tells me that they'd never even bother to ask the passengers whether 1% would put them off flying. According to one pizza chain, paying their employees a livable minimum wage would result in pizzas costing something like $0.17 more and the CEO claimed he'd have to lay people off because a wage increase was going to do the company in. Does anyone doubt that the airlines' C-level execs knee-jerk reaction would not be anything but screaming and shouting about government regulation?

      --
      CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  15. Re:why train when they can get an 100K student loa by bobbied · · Score: 4, Insightful

    why train when they can get an 100K student loan to cover it.

    100K isn't going to get you enough flight time to fly charters and is only a drop in the bucket towards the 1500 minimum hours to be an ATP. Especially when a small twin engine is going to run you $150+/hour and a flight instructor another $80. It's going to take YEARS to accrue enough flight time and at least $300K in flying expenses.

    By my rough calculations you will blow a quarter of a million dollars in flight time and at least 5 years of living time before you can manage to land a charter pilot gig at about 800 hours. Then, it will take you another 5 years of being a busy charter pilot to get you near 1,500 hours, but you will be destitute trying to service your debt on that salary. Once you get to 1,500, you have the option of taking a ATP job with a feeder airline, flying awful routes in shoddy old aircraft for another 5-10 years before you can land a job at one of the majors, with 15 years experience and about 3,000 hours of time.

    The pilot gig is not a comfortable one. You got to really love what you do to live like a pauper working the night shift away from home until you are 35 or older.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  16. Re:why train when they can get an 100K student loa by SumDog · · Score: 4, Insightful

    > h1b pilots

    Other countries don't have shortages because they get paid a lot more. Why the hell would anyone want to get a visa to be a pilot here?

  17. Re:Multiplication [Re:Starting pay [Re:Here's a... by DRJlaw · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm pretty sure they have other duties they are paid for. Paperwork, pre-flight checks, etc.

    AC versus NBC News. Fight!

    "A portrait of these hourly pay scales becomes even more pathetic when you consider that regional airline pilots, who are paid only from the time the airline leaves the gate to the time it arrives at the destination, only are on the clock on average about 21.5 hours per week."

    "They have a minimum pay for time on duty at some airlines, like one hour of pay minimum for every two hours on duty, and one hour of pay for every 4-5 hours away from home,' Darby says. 'These rules are often not in effect at the smaller airlines, and are always guaranteed by the larger major airlines' union contracts."

    Oooo... half-time pay, if you're lucky. Color me jealous.