Slashdot Mirror


Video Raises Concerns About Excessive Thermal Throttling On 2018 MacBook Pro With Intel Core i9 (macrumors.com)

Last week, Apple announced new MacBook Pros, including a 15-inch model that supports Intel's 6-core 2.9GHz i9 processor. YouTube Dave Lee managed to get his hands on this top-of-the-line device early and run some tests, revealing that the laptop gets severely throttled due to thermal issues. 9to5Mac reports: Dave Lee this afternoon shared a new video on the Core i9 MacBook Pro he purchased, and according to his testing, the new machine is unable to maintain even its base clock speed after just a short time doing processor intensive work like video editing. "This CPU is an unlocked, overclockable chip but all of that CPU potential is wasted inside this chassis -- or more so the thermal solution that's inside here," says Lee.

He goes on to share some Premiere Pro render times that suggest the new 2018 MacBook Pro with Core i9 chip underperforms compared to a 2017 model with a Core i7 chip. It took 39 minutes for the 2018 MacBook Pro to render a video that the older model was able to render in 35 minutes. Premiere Pro is not well-optimized for macOS, but the difference between the two MacBook Pro models is notable. Lee ran the same test again with the 2018 MacBook Pro in the freezer, and in cooler temperatures, the i9 chip was able to offer outstanding performance, cutting that render time down to 27 minutes and beating out the 2017 MacBook Pro.

177 comments

  1. 2018 MacBook Pro - Alaska Edition by turp182 · · Score: 4, Funny

    For maximum performance, use outside during the winter.

    --
    BlameBillCosby.com
    1. Re:2018 MacBook Pro - Alaska Edition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More accurately, "For better performance, Steve Jobs micromanagement seems to actually produce benefits".

      No engineer / designed likes micromanagement, however we are now seeing the new "Good enough" Apple. In 10 years we may be back to Mac and iPhone clones...

    2. Re:2018 MacBook Pro - Alaska Edition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is apple being its curmudgeon self. See, we gave you what you wanted! You still complained! We're going to drop intel because they produce crap like this! *buy our new arm laptops*

    3. Re:2018 MacBook Pro - Alaska Edition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he put that laptop in the freezer.... was he in the freezer with the laptop?

    4. Re:2018 MacBook Pro - Alaska Edition by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      it's not what "we" wanted.

      it's what they told us that we wanted because IT IS CHEAPER TO MAKE IT LIKE THIS. there's more profit. it's just cost optimizing while making it more expensive.

      we didn't ask for unexpandable everything maximally cost minimized crap that in theory might work faster than the previous model in some situation if it's stuck in a freezer.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    5. Re:2018 MacBook Pro - Alaska Edition by mikael · · Score: 2

      "IT department have been informed that there are performance issues with the standard laptop issued to all employees due to thermal problems. As a stop-gap measure to resolve this problem, we are turning down the temperature of the office air-conditioning by 20 degrees. All staff are advised to wear thick woolly clothes including gloves and hats. Arctic jackets will be provided upon request."

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    6. Re:2018 MacBook Pro - Alaska Edition by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

      So "you're holding it wrong" became "you're holding it at the wrong location".

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re:2018 MacBook Pro - Alaska Edition by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      How cold does it get in Cupertino during the winter? You would get much better performance in Norway.

    8. Re:2018 MacBook Pro - Alaska Edition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, as long as it is thinner, and has fewer ports, I'm happy.

    9. Re:2018 MacBook Pro - Alaska Edition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And more expensive!!

    10. Re:2018 MacBook Pro - Alaska Edition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have done this before when the fan on my laptop failed and I needed to get some files off of it.
      For a side note, the second time it happened (crappy laptop) it was in the summer, so I put it in the freezer. Apparently my wi-fi can reach into the freezer...

    11. Re:2018 MacBook Pro - Alaska Edition by omnichad · · Score: 4, Funny

      On the bright side, that might make the windows visible at the new Apple campus. Whether by condensation or frost.

    12. Re:2018 MacBook Pro - Alaska Edition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was a walk-in freezer, maybe?

    13. Re: 2018 MacBook Pro - Alaska Edition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But a fucking nuclear explosion can't touch it...

    14. Re:2018 MacBook Pro - Alaska Edition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That worked for me - take the hard disk drive that is locked up due to sticktion, put it in a freezer bag, chill it down for 30 minutes, put it in a external caddy, then give it a good whack just after you power it up. That's enough to get it spinning up once, and get the data off. After that, it's well and truly gone.

    15. Re:2018 MacBook Pro - Alaska Edition by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      I consider it a feature....place burrito here. Who doesn't like a nice hot toasted burrito?

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    16. Re:2018 MacBook Pro - Alaska Edition by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      You could have just retorqued the mounting plate screws and it probably would have worked for many more years.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    17. Re: 2018 MacBook Pro - Alaska Edition by mea_culpa · · Score: 1

      And fewer USB ports!

    18. Re:2018 MacBook Pro - Alaska Edition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It will keep your Starbucks warm while you are working on your screenplay.

    19. Re: 2018 MacBook Pro - Alaska Edition by FearTec · · Score: 1

      Lol, It Winter in Australia and 1c outside (5am) and that does not work with a Mac Book Pro Mid 2012 i7 i7 @ 2.6Ghz. Does it need to be snowing too? https://fearby.com/article/cas...

    20. Re:2018 MacBook Pro - Alaska Edition by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      You're holding it wrong. Hold it in the freezer compartment.

    21. Re:2018 MacBook Pro - Alaska Edition by Aereus · · Score: 1

      There is this thing called closing the lid and this handy thing called a power cord which allows you to place it inside the freezer and close the door. It should fit in most home refrigerator freezers.

    22. Re: 2018 MacBook Pro - Alaska Edition by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      It has only one button, and they press it before it leaves the factory.

    23. Re:2018 MacBook Pro - Alaska Edition by aphelion_rock · · Score: 1

      I'm sure there is an opportunity for someone to come up with a refrigerative cooler plinth that you can sit the laptop on that will be able to supply cool air for optimum performance. Combined with a suitable battery pack, you will be able to have optimum performance on the road too.

    24. Re:2018 MacBook Pro - Alaska Edition by Daralantan · · Score: 1

      I used to have a friend across the country who set up a filter and tube from outside to bring winter air directly into his case. It offered excellent cooling for overclocking.

    25. Re:2018 MacBook Pro - Alaska Edition by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 2

      No, Apple gave us only PART of what we wanted. A proper thermal solution is the missing part of the equation. But to do that, Apple would have had to actually put some engineering time and effort into the update of the MacBook Pro, rather than just shoving a newer processor and DDR4 RAM into the box. And they might have had to compromise the thinness and lightness of the system or make the fans louder.

    26. Re:2018 MacBook Pro - Alaska Edition by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Or go with Ryzen instead of i9. Intel's 8 core desktop parts are clearly running hot.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    27. Re:2018 MacBook Pro - Alaska Edition by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Apple just needs to release the portable freezer accessory.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    28. Re:2018 MacBook Pro - Alaska Edition by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      The i9 in the MacBook Pro is the 8950HK, a six core mobile CPU, not an eight core desktop part.

      The fastest Mobile Ryzen currently available is the 2700U, a four core CPU. Between the lower core count and fewer instructions per MHz than Intel, it is not competitive in performance with the 8950HK. A slightly higher performance 2800H has been leaked but not officially announced; it's still a four core CPU but with higher clocks and a GPU with more stream units enabled. Those tweaks still won't make it competitive with Intel's H series parts, so it's hard to imagine much market interest and it may never get released.

      The only current alternative would be to design around a downclocked desktop part like the 2700 and also include a separate GPU. (That model of MBP already has one, but using a CPU rather than an APU would mean that the GPU would have to be on full time.) That would give you eight cores and a good GPU, but the requirement to use the GPU full time would result in far worse battery life, not a tradeoff that Apple would care to make.

      AMD may have something that's competitive at the high end of laptops next year when the Zen 2 chips are released. For now, AMD isn't an option for performance laptops. The 2500U and 2700U are decent mainstream laptop processors, offering more graphics performance but less processor performance than their counterparts from Intel; systems featuring those chips have started to appear but sales seem slow so far.

  2. He's holding it wrong by Entrope · · Score: 2, Funny

    The spokesperson clearly explained that you're supposed to hold it with your fingers inside thick gloves (but not too thick, because those keys are tiny) because you're supposed to hold it inside a walk-in freezer.

  3. Usage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Isn't this why everyone spends money on a desktop for work and gaming and goes cheap on a laptop to watch videos and read news? Or are people doing it wrong?

    1. Re:Usage by mikael · · Score: 1

      They are more netbooks, tablets, phablets than laptops. They are designed to be media consumption devices, not for software development.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    2. Re:Usage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are more LCD watches than computers. That doesn't mean the computer designed to only work with a 4 digit LCD display would be in any way acceptable.

    3. Re:Usage by BeanThere · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, it's why engineers focus on thermal design as an important issue when designing laptops. Or at least, they're supposed to. I have a high-end laptop and it rarely throttles, even under constant heavy load. Why? Because it wasn't designed by amateurs. Stop making excuses for crap. This isn't rocket science, this isn't something new that humans are only just starting to figure out; engineers have been successfully designing laptops for given thermal loads since probably before you were born. If you advertise that it supports a given CPU, it better support that configuration with relatively minimal throttling, or don't advertise it as such.

    4. Re:Usage by BeanThere · · Score: 1

      To be fair, the Apple engineers may well be capable of doing the necessary design; it's possible the discussion went something like, "Well, we could do A, B and C but it's going to delay production by a year" but the business/marketing managers said, "But we want to be able to announce it offers performance level Y by next month" and went ahead. Either way, it isn't acceptable. Apple have the cash to absorb a launch delay like that, but they are probably afraid of longer-term erosion of public perception of their products.

    5. Re:Usage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More likely it was
      Engineer: "We can make it thicker, we can add visible vents and spin the fan more agressively, or we can spend 5 years figuring out an actually novel cooling system."
      Marketer: "nah, we'll just ship it as is."

      Apple has been going too far with their minimalist design for their laptops. Converting to all USB-C was a good call as it really is the objectively superior connector, but they really should be ensuring adequate cooling, and there really doesn't seem any good reason to not have a mag-safe and 2 USB ports on each side.

      IMO they went off the rails sometime shortly after the MacBook Air (which itself wasn't a bad idea) came into being as they increasingly tried to turn their whole lineup into MacBook Airs compromising utility as they go.

  4. To enjoy the product fully by AHuxley · · Score: 2

    you need a freezer and an external gpu?
    Benchmarks now need a temperature setting.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  5. More Apple crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But at least it's thin! And shiny!
    If you buy Apple you deserve everything you get. "Apple - for people who don't understand what's inside their computer."

    How many Apple PC/laptop owners understand how a computer works, and what components are actually inside one? I bet it's far fewer than PC owners.

    1. Re:More Apple crap by bobbied · · Score: 1

      But at least it's thin! And shiny! If you buy Apple you deserve everything you get. "Apple - for people who don't understand what's inside their computer."

      How many Apple PC/laptop owners understand how a computer works, and what components are actually inside one? I bet it's far fewer than PC owners.

      It just works, albeit slower than it should..

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    2. Re:More Apple crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering there are FAR more PCs out there than Macs, and there are FAR more Windows users than MacOS users, one could validly argue that there are FAR more Windows users that don't "understand how a computer works, and what components are actually inside one."

      If you buy a PC with Windows, you're a moron. "Windows - for people who don't understand how their computer can completely fuck them over."

    3. Re:More Apple crap by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      People are buying Steve Jobs...not devices. It will fade.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  6. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It looks cool AND has the best hardware, who cares about actual performance? That's not why people buy Macs, is it?

    1. Re:But... by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Apple products become more and more a fashion statement rather than something you actually use. It's like complaining that you can't fit your family luggage into the Ferrari, or that your Gucci handbag can't hold your stuff. That's not what they're here for.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that's not true. It something is called pro then it should behave like one. If Dave Lee would have using Macbook air or normal macbook then your statement would have been true.But pro is for professionals the product is bound to get tortured.

    3. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      apple does not understand the definition of pro. For Gods sakes they added pro to the end of ipad.

  7. Don't know what to do by Kokuyo · · Score: 1

    When I started work here, I had the choice between a Macbook Pro and a Surface.

    The Surface had Win10 and came only in 13 inch. So I went with the Macbook.

    Now don't get me wrong, it's quite usable, but there are so many annoyances that I might just as well have bit the bullet and gone with Win10.

    When it's time for new hardware, I just wonder whether there'll be a Surface that doesn't try to be a Macbook or perhaps I'll be allowed to buy from another brand.

    Bang for buck wise, neither option makes me tingly all over unless you count my left arm...

    1. Re:Don't know what to do by chrism238 · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, you'll get all tingly with your gorilla arm, from using the Surface's touch screen.

    2. Re:Don't know what to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trust me, the Surface series isn't remotely trying to be a Macbook, it's an x86 tablet that happens to support a usable keyboard that doubles as a screen protector and runs full-blown Windows apps.

      I'd avoid the series 3 and 4 like the plague due to their thermal issues just like this article for the MacBooks, but the new 'Go' model is getting VERY good marks for that because it can get a reasonable CPU w/ a large enough amount of RAM to not bottleneck, and with how cheap it is don't be surprised if work offers those next cycle.

      - WolfWings, too lazy to login to /. in way too many years.

    3. Re:Don't know what to do by Holi · · Score: 1

      What Surface in any way tries to be a MacBook?

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    4. Re:Don't know what to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well there's Surface Go with 4GB and 8GB, 8GB is probably enough but 4GB sucks balls.

    5. Re:Don't know what to do by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      No, it doesnt. I have been using a Surface 3 (non pro) for 3 years with 4 GB RAM. Its fine. The Surface Go is just a retooled Surface 3.

      --
      Good-bye
    6. Re:Don't know what to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What Surface in any way tries to be a MacBook?

      Are you kidding me?

    7. Re:Don't know what to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry to have not seen your message till now. I have a Win 10 laptop with 4GB RAM (till I upgrade it) and it's a shit show. You run a browser with a hundred tabs and it's swapping and you can't do much else (save run notepad or a video player) because you're fucking out of RAM.
      How come my browser only uses 2.5GB RAM and it's swapping left and right and the task manager is trying to lie to me.

  8. Not surprised by ReneR · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Issues like this, the keyboard, lack of ports, sd card slot, overpriced, usually outdated, and they are even internally hiding the iGPU on dedicated GPU models form OtherOS, so they consume more battery: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    1. Re:Not surprised by blindseer · · Score: 1

      Then don't buy it.

      I'm trying to understand the problem here. One is looking for a laptop that runs their favorite flavor of Linux, has long battery life, USB-A ports, SD card slot, go out and spend many kilobux on an Apple, then complain it does nothing what they wanted it to do and cost too much money. At what point in this did it become anyone's fault but their own?

      I didn't watch the entire video you linked to but the guy started out with saying he wanted to run MacOS but was experimenting with Linux. He also said he's had some success in running Linux inside a virtual machine on that same Apple. But when he tries running Linux on the metal he gets sub-optimal video and poor battery life. That's a very glass half empty version of events. Maybe he should be happy it works as well as it does.

      Again, he's loading an unsupported OS on his hardware, and found out all the hardware works except one of the two GPUs. That's sounds rather successful to me for someone that wants to run MacOS and Linux on the same hardware. What would happen if he tried dual booting a laptop that came supported by Linux and tried installing MacOS on it? I'm guessing the results would be similar.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
  9. Portable freezer for the Mac Fanbois by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No problem. All the Mac Fanbois will just pay through the nose for a portable freezer so their fashion accessory can reclaim bragging right of being able to do work.

    1. Re: Portable freezer for the Mac Fanbois by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      apples coolest dongle yet!

  10. Wow by SocietyoftheFist · · Score: 1

    They sure are making it easy for me to get a Dell and throw Mint on it. Looks like my last MPB will be my 2011. This is simply unacceptable.

    1. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you read the same YouTuber's review of the Dell XP 15 and thermal problems.

      Nope, apparently you did not.

  11. Re:Apple is never about performance... by SocietyoftheFist · · Score: 1

    That's not true, my first MPB in 2007 killed any other laptop at the time. I was more than willing to pay the $2k+ for it.

  12. Technical Comment by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    yeah, yeah, so thin ... but:

    Isn't this the point of the eGPU strategy? To offload real computational work onto a dedicated device that is properly chassied for the job?

    The real question might be why spend the money on an unlocked i9 instead of an eGPU. If you want an ultrathin laptop that can rip through any video and not get hot you might be living in 2029.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re: Technical Comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple has shitpiles of cash in the bank, yet can't even engineer a laptop properly. For sure, their stock will go higher.

      What is fucking wrong with this world where failure is rewarded? My failure to understand this failure wasn't the success I was expecting, and that's a failure in of itself.

    2. Re:Technical Comment by Theaetetus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      yeah, yeah, so thin ... but:

      Isn't this the point of the eGPU strategy? To offload real computational work onto a dedicated device that is properly chassied for the job?

      The real question might be why spend the money on an unlocked i9 instead of an eGPU.

      This... I've got a 2015 MBP, but I'm running 3 monitors off a GTX 1060 in an external case. At this rate, I'm thinking my next machine should be the lightest, smallest, longest battery life laptop out there for traveling purposes, with a pair of eGPUs at my home and office.

    3. Re:Technical Comment by datavirtue · · Score: 0

      This is a precursor to a move that will see GPU rendering offloaded to iCloud. It only makes sense.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    4. Re:Technical Comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, yeah, so thin ... but:

      Isn't this the point of the eGPU strategy? To offload real computational work onto a dedicated device that is properly chassied for the job?

      The real question might be why spend the money on an unlocked i9 instead of an eGPU.

      This... I've got a 2015 MBP, but I'm running 3 monitors off a GTX 1060 in an external case. At this rate, I'm thinking my next machine should be the lightest, smallest, longest battery life laptop out there for traveling purposes, with a pair of eGPUs at my home and office.

      The XPS 13 is nice for this.

    5. Re:Technical Comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wah?? "It only makes sense."

      Ah, no. Well OK, if you are doing offline rendering, like they do in Hollywood for CGI in feature films, then it could make sense. At least some of the time.

      However for any realtime GPU rendering, no it certainly does not make sense! For gaming, for CAD walkthroughs, for VR/AR, literally for anything interactive requiring JIT rendering, cloud rendering is a terrible architecture. You are adding network latencies, that are (at minimum!) on the order of thousands of times greater than required to talk to any in-system iGPU/dGPU. And no, having access to thousands of GPUs in some server farm thousands of km away, does not remotely make up for that. Not even close.

      I'm all for distributed and parallel processing, wherever and whenever it can be done and makes sense. This makes no sense.

    6. Re:Technical Comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It runs Windows or Linux, not MacOS, so not really a suitable option.

  13. Re:Apple's lack of focus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lol, wtf is wrong with you Americans.

  14. Re:Apple's lack of focus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    -2007
    When the 15" MacBook Pro had a frame with hinges attached to it instead of them sensibly being attached to a backplate, so they constantly broke like paperclips.

    -2008
    When the graphics chips were dying on all the Apple computers. Apple was forced to help by a class action lawsuit. How that worked? They put an Apple diagnostic disc into your computer to decide whether they may or may not help you, based on whether the test passes. Of course, it can't work if you don't have a functional graphics chip.

    -2009
    "Unibody" 15" MacBook Pro. Except it was made out of 2 pieces stuck together with adhesive. Not only that, it was so well designed with such build quality, the fan exhausting the heat these MacTurd Pros built up, was positioned to exhaust into the adhesive directly. End result: Computers falling apart everywhere.

    -2010
    A1286 model with the 2850 board, which was failing because the sensors would keep the fans at 1000 RPM when FinalCut Pro was rendering and running a video for 20 minutes straight.

    -~2010
    iPhone 4 comes out. $600 phone that you could not hold in your hand without dropping a call. Apple is not at fault, it's your fault for not holding the phone correctly on your fucking face!!!

    -2011
    820-2915 board comes out. Throttling the CPU out of the box with no dust, at 70 fahrenheit room temp. A $2000 machine, throttling and functioning worse than a shitty $300 Acer at that time.

    -2013
    Apple TrashCan Pro gets released. 2015 models start having major graphical issues that may cause distorted video, no video, system instability, freezing, restarts, shut downs, or may prevent system start up. AMD's FirePro D500 (high-end model) and D700 (built-to-order) GPUs are affected. Apple launches repair program in Feb 2016...

    -2011-2013 line of MacBook Pros including Rentina line between 2012-2013 having premature death caused by design flaw with the GPU, which lead to a Class Action Suit, which lead to a repair program only 4 years after the facts.

    -2016
    Apple shitPhone 6 and 6 Plus with the "Touch Disease" due to shitty soldering system of the Touch IC chips.

    -2018
    MacBook and MacBook Pro keyboard design flaws which only get a repair program officiated 8 months after mass complaints.
    https://theoutline.com/post/5052/apple-admits-its-computers-are-broken

    I can keep going and going and going.

    Apple experience and quality.
    Apple users: The wife who gets beaten at home and calls it love.

  15. Once again by smooth+wombat · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you want to do real work for extended periods of time, you get a desktop.

    Unfortunately, Apple has crippled their desktops so you're out of luck there as well.

    It's almost as if Apple doesn't understand what a computer is for.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:Once again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's almost as if Apple doesn't understand what a computer is for.

      They don't even know what a computer is, so how would they know what it is for? ;)

    2. Re:Once again by geekmux · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's almost as if Apple doesn't understand what a computer is for.

      Based on how many they still sell, I'd say they know exactly what a computer is for; their target audience*

      * = Actual computer skill not required. Packaged by fashion, not function. Contents may settle after shipping.

    3. Re:Once again by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      They still seem to have a lot of momentem in the graphic design/print. I don't get it frankly, they're rapidly changing print system leaves them with some annoyances, Adobe was slower to embrace GPU acceleration on them, they lack affordable mid range solutions.

      All of that, they still seem to be the more popular option.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    4. Re:Once again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's almost as if Apple doesn't understand what a computer is for.

      What's a computer?

    5. Re:Once again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For graphic design, web, print, you need Adobe.

      If you need Adobe, your only two OS choices are Windows and macOS.

      Most of those people are not computer nerds. They know the difference between RAM and storage, etc. But they just want the computer to work and do what it needs to do, not fiddle or even fight with the damn OS*.

      So Macs are the only choice.

      * I use Windows 10 on my gaming PC. I use this PC maybe 24 hours per month and even then it really pissed me off more than a dozen times already in less than a year.

    6. Re:Once again by AvitarX · · Score: 2

      The thing is, there was a significant time where OSX was more of a nuisance than Windows (transition to Intel had significant times when you couldn't be sure what software would run ideally, same for transition to OSX).

      Multiple times where print driver broke between versions

      Print drivers in general suck on OSX (eg large format Epson and HP printers)

      This is more prepress related, but Inability to print to PDF with acrobat distiller is an issue

      Lack of GPU accelerated filters in Photoshop was an annoyance

      64 but support a year earlier was a pretty big deal too (CS4 on Windows).

      Adobe, that one needs, treats Apple as a second class citizen, and has for a long while.

      None of these are geek things, they're just works things.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    7. Re:Once again by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      My Thinkpad P71 is more than capable of doing real work. Xeon processor, 64 GB RAM, 16 GB Quadro graphics card, 1 TB SSD, 4K screen... It's a great CAD platform. Oh, and it's a laptop!

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    8. Re: Once again by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      I've yet to find an OS that "just works" whether that be Windows, Linux or Mac OS. They're all infuriating in different ways. For example UI designers might one day realise that when the user is typing, the UI should not interfere with that by giving focus to any other windows or dialog boxes.

    9. Re:Once again by tepples · · Score: 2

      It's what people use to make the apps you run on your iPad.

    10. Re:Once again by Luthair · · Score: 1

      I mean they think that an ipad can replace a computer so it shouldn't come as a surprise.

    11. Re:Once again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And costs more than a used car. For the price you could get two equivalent desktops with six times the screen real estate. You know, what you would want if you were a real CAD professional.

    12. Re:Once again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I suspect the reality is that they think they understand their market because they haven't run out of momentum yet and they are continuing trends that worked in the past, but that in fact they are burning goodwill rapidly and it will bite them soon.

      Apple's market is people who want a computer as a means to an end, and to not have to do a ton of research or matiannce.
      How this plays out in reality is their sales are highly sensitive to word of mouth but not so much to actual reviews or technical specs, as those kind of people will just ask their peers for their opinion and buy primarily based on that. Given the 5-10 year lifespan of some Apple laptops, chances are this means that right now anyone considering buying a new laptop who asks their fried if they like their macbook gets an answer based on a mackbook from anywhere from 2008 to 2013.

      As the portion of people who say "yeah i love it I've had it for years and it juts keeps working the battery is all but dead but it's 6 years old what do you expect" becomes increasingly "Oh god no, it's constantly slowing down, i could fry an egg on it, and they keyboard gets stuck randomly, My next computer is going to be a Surface or something" Apple will start to feel the cosequences of their recent bad designs. But We're probably a couple years from that tipping point yet.

    13. Re:Once again by Howitzer86 · · Score: 1

      Apple computers are for writing Apple apps for Apple iPhones.

    14. Re:Once again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their desktops are made out of laptop parts

    15. Re:Once again by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Nah, it was about $3000. Unless you buy REALLY cheap used cars. And whilst a desktop is definitely nice (I have a 27" monitor at my home office), that desktop is hardly portable now, is it? Meaning when I'm on the road (which is about 70% of the time) I cannot actually do work. Yes, you can get desktop-class laptops, and no, they do not cost a huge amount - as long as it's not Apple, that is...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    16. Re: Once again by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      My biggest frustration on OSX (posting to hopefully be corrected) is the lack of copy paste in Finder Windows.

      On Windows with explorer and Linix with any file manager I've used, I can select the address bar, copy that text, then paste it into any open or save browser. I use this dozens of times a day, and in OSX, I need to browse my open and closes each and every time (the location changes).

      Also, less frequent, but very useful, is being able to type the address into the file management window (for example when I'm browsing a directory tree where multiple levels up the path is a date and I want to look at different versions of the folder I'm in).

      And an always on top setting, I miss the hell out of that when using Windows or OSX.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    17. Re:Once again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's a computer?

    18. Re:Once again by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      Yes. Sometimes I wonder if they're infected with the dreaded Harvard MBA disease. They come in and screw all kinds of companies. The more of them you have, the worse off the company is.

  16. Buy more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So? Just buy two different MacBooks. One for winter and one for the other seasons.

    Plus you'll save money on heating. You can render videos in bed at night.

  17. Counterpoint - two reviews that had no issues. by macbass · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. Re:Counterpoint - two reviews that had no issues. by GoRK · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Austin Mann didn't do any real performance tests at all beyond some HEVC video conversion that on the latest hardware is done almost entirely on the GPU (and doesnt take that long)

      Craig Hunter's review quite clearly shows once there is a CPU bound task working on >= 3-5 cores in his particular workload the expected per-core performance scaling demonstrated on comparable CPUs in the iMacs is not achieved. He kind of gives this a pass since is comparable to their previous (equally shit) design, but this is due to thermal throttling. The only other thing he benchmarks is eGPU workloads which is not relevant to the issue at hand.

      There is no doubt that Apple could have delivered a better thermal solution, a better keyboard, more ports, lower engineering costs, lower assembly cost, a more competitive supply chain, (and probably a lot of other better t hings) if they were not after the eternal conquest to build something that is so stupidly thin for a group of users who are asking for the opposite.

  18. Mojave by null+etc. · · Score: 1

    The Mojave desert can get as hot as 130 degrees. Clearly, Apple Mojave is more than just a marketing moniker - it's an aspiration!

  19. Re:Apple's lack of focus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To put it lightly, Apple never was focused on building quality products, just shiny and visually pleasing ones that sell to complete idiots and retards.
    The only redeeming point about Apple is the Operating System, but if it has to go bundled with their hardware then it's better to just not have it at all and get a UNIX/Linux alternative.

  20. Re: Apple is never about performance... by Holi · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Intel issue my left nut. Intel had nothing to do with Apple's decision on what processor to use or how to design their thermal solutions. It's rich how you try and blame Intel for something that is entirely Apple's fault.

    --
    Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  21. I are samrt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PC users are no more intelligent than the average Apple user.

    1. Re:I are samrt by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      They needn't be. Not only do they not have to find workarounds for the shortcomings of their machines, the problems that do arise can trivially be solved with the aid of Google, simply because the user base is large enough that it's almost certain someone else already solved the problem. If only because you CAN actually solve the problem without having to send in your system, accept the loss of all your data and pray that the fix isn't going to brick your system with the next update of the OS.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  22. Apple is losing it by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    New iPhones 8 are thicker and heavier than the 7 (to include inductive charging among other things), new design consists of removing ports, new features are made of animoji and face recog... Then they had to upgrade the Macbook internals, because people complained, and result is something that cannot keep up with its own engine. Have they even _seriously_ tested the thing before selling it? Like they tested Apple Maps 6 years ago ...

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    1. Re: Apple is losing it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Itâ(TM)s not uncommon for PC manufacturers to throttle hardware when fitting it into slimmer bodies. For instance, Asusâ(TM) Zephyrus line throttles their GPUs to allow the cooling system to keep up. All I see are bandwagon Apple haters with no apparent reason to hate Apple other than its trendy.

    2. Re:Apple is losing it by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      and result is something that cannot keep up with its own engine

      This is nothing new. There are a large number of devices on the market which thermally throttle. That said it is all Apple's fault since they were the ones that fetishised thinness. The Macbook Air performed horribly compared to laptops with the same CPU on CPU bound tasks for this reason. They aren't the only ones either. I get a 40% speed improvement on CPU bound tasks by pointing a fan at the back of my Surface Pro 3. The benefits are less good on the SP4 where I only get a 5% increase but none the less if your laptop is thin chances are you will thermally throttle.

      The only real WTF is why anyone thought a chassis which already has problems should have an i9 in it. It's like putting a Ferrari engine in a Fiat 500 and keeping the original radiator.

    3. Re:Apple is losing it by geekmux · · Score: 1

      New iPhones 8 are thicker and heavier than the 7...

      Uh, after Bendgate, making that form factor slightly thicker probably isn't a bad idea. Just saying.

    4. Re: Apple is losing it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference in the PC world is that if you don't like the admittedly crappy designs Asus puts out, you can go buy something else. With Apple you have no other choice.

    5. Re:Apple is losing it by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      Hmm you must be working for Apple. Now and before comparison:
      Now:
      - Tim, we tried a lot, but we can't implement this feature without adding that thickness / removing that thing / losing this ....
      - Ok, you did your best, let's add that thickness / remove that thing / lose this ....
      Before:
      - Steve, we tried a lot, but we can't implement this feature without adding that thickness / removing that thing / losing this ....
      - Try more.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  23. Concerned by tsa · · Score: 2

    My deity Apple, look where you are now. Your phones are too thin and fragile, your laptops are too thin, your keyboards are too thin and now your laptops are too hot too. Nobody sane wants your stuff anymore! I think my 13" 20111 MacBook Pro was the best laptop you ever made. Why not take a good look at it and learn from that?

    --

    -- Cheers!

    1. Re:Concerned by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

      I think my 13" 20111 MacBook Pro was the best laptop you ever made. Why not take a good look at it and learn from that?

      You may complain all you like, visitor from the future, but Apple does not currently have a time machine.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:Concerned by tsa · · Score: 1

      Hahaha, I hadn't spotted that one! Drat :)

      --

      -- Cheers!

    3. Re:Concerned by danomac · · Score: 1

      He probably typed it on an Apple keyboard.

  24. Apple pricing by Gabest · · Score: 1

    In the video at 0:23, he configures the machine from i7 to i9. The price jumps by $300, but the price difference between i9-8950HK and i7-8850H is only $188.

    1. Re:Apple pricing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly there is no change in supporting chipsets required.

    2. Re:Apple pricing by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You forgot to factor in the Apple-Tax, then it adds up.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Apple pricing by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      Well yeah, configure a phone and then look up the costs of flash memory...

    4. Re:Apple pricing by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Not surprising. And have you seen how much they charge for extra soldered-in RAM? They have a captive audience.

    5. Re:Apple pricing by x0 · · Score: 1

      In the video at 0:23, he configures the machine from i7 to i9. The price jumps by $300, but the price difference between i9-8950HK and i7-8850H is only $188.

      Different CPUs, different sockets. Different sockets means a different logic board. What are the chances the i9 logic board costs more?

      m

      --
      In the immortal words of Socrates, who said; 'I drank what?'
    6. Re:Apple pricing by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2

      They're both the same socket, BGA 1440. (It would be crazy to have two different motherboard designs in the same laptop model.)

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    7. Re:Apple pricing by x0 · · Score: 1

      Nevermind, apparently they both use FCBGA1440 sockets...

      --
      In the immortal words of Socrates, who said; 'I drank what?'
    8. Re:Apple pricing by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      mmmmm tasty profit!!

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  25. iCaddyshack by geekmux · · Score: 1

    "...ran the same test again with the 2018 MacBook Pro in the freezer, and in cooler temperatures, the i9 chip was able to offer outstanding performance, cutting that render time down to 27 minutes and beating out the 2017 MacBook Pro."

    So, the answer is to put all the fanbois in the freezer?

    Correct me if I'm wrong Sandy, but if I kill all the fanbois, they're gonna lock me up and throw away the key. - Carl Spackler

  26. Re:Apple is never about performance... by monkeyxpress · · Score: 1

    That's not true, my first MPB in 2007 killed any other laptop at the time. I was more than willing to pay the $2k+ for it.

    I agree. I bought a 2013 MBP after a succession of Thinkpads. At the time I bought it you couldn't get another laptop with the hidef screen, aluminium chassis, battery life, weight and SSD for a comparable price. It was expensive, but you got a lot of stuff you couldn't get otherwise for that price.

    In the time since, other laptops have caught up on those features, but Apple prices kept their premium. For me the value is not there now, but I guess they have decided that appealing to pro users just isn't worth their time anymore.

  27. Core i9 problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They all run hot because of the shit TIM under the heat spreader.

  28. It is the i9 problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many have complained of cooling issues with the i9 in other laptops as well. Not an Apple issue except they should not have chosen this chip. But let us hear from the anti Apple slashdot nerd asshole crowd and watch them faceplant with each new uninformed comment.

  29. for fuck sake apple wtf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you know there is no one to save you arse this time, right?

  30. No news here by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

    Every Macbook Pro has had thermal issues since the very first one, and I think all have had a recall of some sort for the GPU getting cooked. To keep the A E S T H E T I C , they do their best to keep the vents as non-existent as possible.

    1. Re:No news here by Raenex · · Score: 1

      I'd guess it has more to due with a lack of proper heat sinks than vents. There's only so much you can do with such a thin chassis.

  31. Re:Apple's lack of focus by Arashi256 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, so if I'm reading this right: - Thermal issues on new laptop line == pushing the gay agenda. Americans are....interesting.

  32. According to Apple, they are not at fault by bobbied · · Score: 1

    It's Intel's fault you know.. That I9 chip dissipates too much heat for the heat sink and fan.

    (sarc off)

    Seriously, I think that this is a symptom of Intel's recent FAB issues. Where they not trying to move to a smaller process and having issues getting their yield up high enough to turn a profit? I'm guessing that Apple designed for the expected power/performance and got disappointed. Then the marketing decision was made to release the I9 based systems regardless of the heat buildup performance roll back.

    But in reality, who's using their MacBook to render stuff? Wrong tool for that job.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    1. Re:According to Apple, they are not at fault by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Yeah, there's honestly no reason to put an i9 in a laptop form factor. But even their desktop computers have roughly the same airflow and use laptop parts.

    2. Re:According to Apple, they are not at fault by avandesande · · Score: 1

      If Intel was competent they would design a cpu that doesn't generate any heat.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    3. Re:According to Apple, they are not at fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it should absorb heat and power the computer

  33. Re: Apple is never about performance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    11! years ago...

  34. So maybe..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So maybe if you want to do the most computationally-intensive tasks, maybe just maybe do not choose the smallest, least heat-sunk of computers?

  35. Can't innovate my ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    apple has managed to take their patented thermal throttling they developed for the mac pro and shrink it down to fit inside the macbook pro.
    What an amazing company.

  36. Re:Apple is never about performance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could have bought a 2011 Sony Vaio Z. (Not aluminum. But...) it'd been cheaper and out spec the mbp by a lot. (More ports. Lighter. Faster. Cheaper). And of course the option for a 2nd battery and external gpu/optical drive.

  37. Re: Apple is never about performance... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0

    Apple has form on this too. There was a model back in the Core 2 days that had way too much thermal paste installed so overheated. And then they undersized the charger to make it smaller, relying on the battery to provide extra power under load (and thus shortening its life, and it was glued in of course.

    Many of their products seem to be a mixture of marginal design for aesthetic purposes, user hostile policies and poor testing.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  38. Re:Apple's lack of focus by omnichad · · Score: 1

    Sounds hot.

  39. Re:Apple's lack of focus by omnichad · · Score: 1

    My last Macbook Pro was 2006. And it had a Core Duo CPU and was obsoleted only a few years later due to not having 64-bit EFI support.

  40. Re: Apple's lack of focus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi lious!

  41. duh by homer1972 · · Score: 1

    Breaking news!!!! Laptops can't cool off processors!!!! More at 11... come on people. This is why Apple is moving back to RISC, if people weren't so ignorant we would have never been on these stupid processors anyway.

  42. It's not just the new i9s. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    When I replaced a former software engineer at a startup, I was given his old MacBook Pro with an i7 in it. During unit tests, the i7 got so hot that it was thermal throttling down to about 15% of its normal capacity. I was picking up the laptop and flailing it through the air to make the unit tests run faster since as far as I can tell the aluminum chassis of the laptop was being used as a heatsink for the CPU.

    Finally, I disabled thermal throttling at the OS level (I'd installed Ubuntu rather than MacOS as a matter of personal preference) and within a week destroyed the thing and had it replaced with a proper laptop.

    1. Re:It's not just the new i9s. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had to get a gigantic water cooler for my AMD FX-8350. Awesome processor but hot as the hot parts of Hell. So it sounds like a problem everyone suffers from.

    2. Re: It's not just the new i9s. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First up, no you didn't.
      The 8350 could be cooled by a stock hyper212 hsf, which was about $30 when it came out by the Phenom time period. Cheap, quiet and all around great performer, especially for the price.

      I love that the new (as of two years ago) ryzens are faster per core and have twice as many cores and draw barely a quarter the power per core (so 200% performance for %50 the power budget.

  43. Re:Apple's lack of focus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If a man does anal with a woman it's okay, but if it's two guys it's not?

    Americans are weird.

  44. Perfect Example by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

    This is a great example of why you don't buy the brand new shiny object the day it's released.
    ( Applies to all things electronic, games, etc. )

    Be patient and let the unpaid beta-testers find all the problems with it first.

    Will save you a lot of headache.

  45. Engineers needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too many liberal arts students work at apple. Maybe they need to hire more engineers :)

  46. You're using it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clearly you're supposed to sit in a walk-in freezer while you're using the new Macbook Pro.

  47. Re:Apple's lack of focus by Raenex · · Score: 2

    Is that you, Louis?

  48. Apologies to Godwin by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    So, the answer is to put all the fanbois in the freezer?

    Using a furnace had already been taken...

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    1. Re:Apologies to Godwin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Build more furnaces.

  49. Re:Apple's lack of focus by Tuidjy · · Score: 2

    The operating system is based on BSD, which makes it as good as it is. But Apple's contributions make it worse, up to the point where the OS itself is becoming unsuitable for some tasks.

    To add to your long list of example, there are timing issues with certain video cards which make it unsuitable for precise tasks. Quite a few software vendors have issued warnings against the latest OsX versions.

    I've encountered them in my work with computer vision as applied to robotic CNC-cell control. My wife has encountered them in her work in research psychology. This is, for example, a direct quote from http://psychtoolbox.org/requirements for Psychtoolbox-3, one of the foremost tools for vision and neuroscience research:

    Use on Apple Mac OS X is still supported but strongly discouraged if you need any kind of reliable timing for visual stimulus presentation or trustworthy visual stimulation at all, due to the large number of bugs in the Apple operating system.

    There was a time where I would happily convert my wife's Apple laptops into Linux boxes. I really liked the hardware. Now, even the hardware is becoming substandard.

    --
    No good deed goes unpunished...
  50. Re: Apple's lack of focus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nope. Doing anal to a woman is also weird.

  51. Now you need iFreezer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    iFreezer 2018 come with nice Apple logo on it
    It can let your yogurts at exact temperature they need, you can watch them remotely using your Apple watch !
    Also, with the Thunderbolt port on iFreezer 2018, just plug your screen, and you'll use your macbookpro securely from outside the iFreezer !
    Only 4399$ !

  52. Be Still, My Beating Heart! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A single model from a single vendor has thermal problems! By George, you've made your case and there's no coming back from it!

    The PC space has no laptops with proper thermal design and neither does Apple. Woe betide us all, we are doomed to throttling! Will a Champion not arise and defend our dignity?!

    Forsooth, I have detected a Fanboy.

  53. Not a new poblem by Solandri · · Score: 1

    The Macbooks have been thermal limited for close to a decade now for one simple reason: Apple refuses to cut ventilation grilles into the bottom of the laptop because it would mar their precious aesthetics. This is why the 15" MBP has always relied on special CPUs (28W TDP versions instead of the regular 45W TDP version) and can only handle a low-to-mid grade GPU. And why Apple ditched the GPU in the 13" version and went with a souped-up version of Intel integrated graphics.

  54. FFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, throttling is bad, but the bad guy here is Adobe that always writes shit programs. If one uses Appleâ(TM)s Final Cut Pro X itâ(TM)s fast and fluid and shit like that wonâ(TM)t happen; unfortunately thereâ(TM)s ALSO bug in FCPX that stops it from utilizing the new eGPU that one can buy from Apple, but at least itâ(TM)s not a monstrosity of shit like Premiere. Adobeâ(TM)s developers just suck donkey dicks, for instance https://www.zdnet.com/article/adobe-fixes-over-100-vulnerabilities-in-latest-security-patch-update/

  55. no..its a new OS to blame by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 1

    they installed the latest by mistake: macOS Denali

  56. Re: Apple's lack of focus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Poopycock, all this time I thought that's where god wanted us to stick it.

  57. MacRumors Double-Speak by MatthiasF · · Score: 1

    [quote]Premiere Pro is not well-optimized for macOS, but the difference between the two MacBook Pro models is notable. [/quote]

    Article about the latest model has thermal issues and they randomly take a swipe at the software used in testing. Yet, isn't the issue going to be a problem for all software?

    Sites like these can't help but be bias. Triggers me when writers let it leak out like that.

  58. Re: Apple's lack of focus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, it's so very, very OK. It's just a bit difficult to find a woman that likes it.

  59. You are all missing the point by sit1963nz · · Score: 1

    Macs are now "fashion: items, they have to look pretty, and come in different colours.

    Think of them like dumb blondes, no one actually cares if they are incapable of doing a job, just so long as they look pretty and in a couple of years you can replace them with the next new model.

    Hey Tim, takes your eyes off the bloody small screen, yeah you know the iPhone. LOOK for gods sake.
    I have used Mac since the mid 1980's, I have now bought a PC laptop and run Linux on it.
    I am am about to replace 200 Macs with PCs because we need ethernet, USB-A, Video out and we are NOT going to buy bloody dongles, adaptors and other crap over and above your already high prices. We have already replaced all of out 27" maxed out iMacs with Linux boxes for number crunching.

    Tim, you have 3 options, do it right, sell it off, close it down. Currently you are NOT doing it right, and this time there is no Steve to save you. I went through the PPC 7300 years of garbage machines.

    My shift to Linux has meant my Music is no longer iTunes, my Apps are no longer the App Store , my books are no longer the Apple store.... do you get it Tim, that eco system will DIE without the Mac and Apple becomes simply a one trick pony and will go the same way as Blackberry.

    1. Re:You are all missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think of them like dumb blondes, no one actually cares if they are incapable of doing a job, just so long as they look pretty and in a couple of years you can replace them with the next new model.

      And you are an asshole, sir

  60. Not okay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hasnâ(TM)t Apple learned? Itâ(TM)s only okay for PC manufacturers to throttle their hardware. If Apple does it theyâ(TM)re insta-stupid.

  61. Re:Apple's lack of focus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OSX had potential, which has been increasingly squandered by Apple's focus the shiny superficial bits while neglecting functionality and leaving the foundational technologies to rot. "UNIX" is just a feature at Apple, and doesn't preserve even a shadow of the stability and quality of any BSD or Linux.

    The only things of value left are the etched glass multi-touch pad and 16:10 fused glass retina displays, and Microsoft has outdone Apple with 3:2 displays. The OS is only tolerable as the alternatives are also awful, and none are made more attractive by overpriced soldered RAM and storage, in port-less machines that are glued together.

  62. Re:Apple's lack of focus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been subbed to Louis for ~6 months now. Everyone should, as he shows what complete dolts Apple is, and how they threaten everyone in the industry. Linus is worth a sub too.

  63. Re:Apple's lack of focus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you do support for a place that used Apple products by any chance?
    I find most people with this attitude have had the misfortune of having to support these things at some point.

  64. Re:Apple's lack of focus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ouch! The other little notes in that section are scary for pros...

    "macOS is the most buggy and hazardous operating system you could use for visual stimulation, or DAQ digital/analog i/o, so running real data collection using macOS will likely bring you a world of pain (and possibly irreproducible research)."

  65. Re:Apple's lack of focus by rpstrong · · Score: 1

    Are you taking double penetration?

  66. Re:Apple's lack of focus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like the software engineers don't have the chops to make quality software on Apple systems. This problem seems very limited to a few companies. The rest aren't having these issues.

    I suggest hiring better quality software engineers lmao

  67. It's the Courage! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It wouldn't be an Apple without a serious design flaw. Apple as a brand has become kind like old Alfa Romeos -- sexy an alluring but frustrating, annoying, and not really worth it.

    Must be all that courage and only the really smart people can understand.

  68. Re:Apple's lack of focus by Macdude · · Score: 1

    Now tell me the computer manufacturer(s) who have never had issues with their computers. Go on, I'm waiting.

    --
    "Grab them by the pussy" -- President of the United States of America
  69. Re:Apple's lack of focus by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

    Guess I'm just damn lucky. I've owned a couple of their phones. The first one the only problem was after years it was dropped on a cement garage floor and managed to land right on top of a stone. It still worked, however. I still use the replacement. It's been many years, still holds a charge well. Way better than my Android. It works so much better that I'm considering blowing off android entirely. Companies simply refuse to update their phones and other android stuff. I moved to an Ipad 4 for that reason as well for aviation use. Now after years I'll probably have to pay the $300 to get the battery replaced. I'd rather do that than get another android.

    Macbook pro - wife uses it, has used it for many years. When we take it in because the disk finally broke they're like - whoa! This is old!

    Macbook air - Daughter's to replace her windows laptop that was constantly being infected with something. No more viruses, no more problems, it's been many years and it's still rock solid. She hasn't even backed it up in years.

    I'm not encouraged by the company however. Their rain maker is gone and they don't seem to realize they need a new one. They probably already have one working for the company, another Jobs. They're too stupid to find him, or her. Maybe they have, they just don't want to make that person king of the hill at their expense.

  70. Re:Apple's lack of focus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heh. The problem seems to be limited to companies who expect precision within milliseconds. Do you have a list of companies that get that kind of precision on modern Apple systems?

    If the C code works well on a dozen Unix-like systems, and craps out on one out of a dozen BSD system, of course we should blame the C programmers.

  71. Re:Apple's lack of focus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're going to charge premium prices and go on and on about your superior design, expect to be called out on it.

  72. Re: Apple is never about performance... by SocietyoftheFist · · Score: 1

    Yes, and it was the same with my 2011 MBP.