Slashdot Mirror


Russian Shipwreck Allegedly Carrying $130 Billion In Gold Has Been Rediscovered (popularmechanics.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Popular Mechanics: A salvage company has located the remains of a Russian warship lost during the the Russo-Japanese War. The battle-damaged cruiser Dmitrii Donskoi was scuttled off the coast of Korea in 1905, reportedly carrying a cargo of gold worth an estimated $130 billion in today's dollars. An international consortium of companies plans to salvage the gold.

According to the Telegraph, the Donskoi was found less than a mile off the coast of Ulleung island, at a depth of 1,423 feet in the Sea of Japan. A submersible descended to the wreck and captured an image of the ship's name on the stern in the Cyrillic alphabet. The South Korean Shinil Group, which discovered the wreck, plans to recover the gold sometime later this year with help from companies in China, Canada, and the U.K. At the time of her sinking Donskoi was reportedly carrying 5,500 boxes of gold bars and 200 tons of gold coins with a street value today of $130 billion. That's more than twice Russia's 2017 defense budget, which was $61 billion. If the treasure does materialize, the Russian government will receive half of the recovered amount.
The money that's not going to Russia will reportedly be invested in a railroad line linking North Korea, South Korea, and Russia. A small percentage (10%) will also be invested in tourism projects on Ulleungdo Island, including a museum dedicated to the vessel.

137 of 256 comments (clear)

  1. A small percentage is still a lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I bet $13 billion buys you one hell of a museum.

  2. Why? by whoever57 · · Score: 1

    Why send a ship into battle carrying so much gold?

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    1. Re:Why? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Russia did not have an empire on the way around the world to get "free" supplies from its own ports. Russia would have to pay and buy what was needed going the long way around to get to Japan. For a lot of ships.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:Why? by gravewax · · Score: 2

      you wouldn't, and even if you did you would not leave it behind and scuttle it while the rest of the fleet steamed off. basically most sane historians believe it is just a myth/rumour and no evidence has ever been found to suggest there was ever gold on it. I guess though we will know for certain soon.

    3. Re:Why? by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      I bet Captain Murphy sent them there so that Sparks could collect on their life insurance.

    4. Re:Why? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

      No, but he’s adamant that his Happy Cake Oven is down on that ship.

      Quinn explained that it’s impossible - the ship went down a hundred years before he lost the oven. But Murph is having none of that.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    5. Re:Why? by DulcetTone · · Score: 1

      Why send a ship into battle carrying so much gold?

      Why drop armor shards when you're killed in the arena?

      It's because THAT'S HOW IT HAS ALWAYS BEEN!

      --
      tone
  3. Price of gold? by whoever57 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If the gold does exist and is recovered, what will so much gold coming onto the market do to the price of gold?

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    1. Re:Price of gold? by msauve · · Score: 2

      A better question is why should modern "Russia" get a cut of it?

      It's not like today's Russian government has any relation to Russia in 1905 - the only thing in common is geography.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    2. Re:Price of gold? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      A better question is why should modern "Russia" get a cut of it?

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Succession_of_states

    3. Re:Price of gold? by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      Maybe because Russia is strong and Korea is very close?

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    4. Re:Price of gold? by cazzazullu · · Score: 2

      Don't forget that the amount of paper gold is orders of magnitude larger than the amount of real gold. A quick google shows that around 3000 metric tons of gold are traded every day, which is about the amount in this ship. Of course, this is "virtual" gold, as none of these investors are interested in acquiring actual metal, but are merely speculating on rising/falling prices through financial instruments. In fact, there is about a hundred times more gold "in circulation" (on paper) than actually exists!

      Selling such a tremendous amount of physical gold probably isn't too much of a problem, as many actors (large states mainly, such as Russia and China) are constantly on the lookout for acquiring REAL gold (not the virtual paper variant). It might even have an opposite effect ("herd mentality").

      --
      int main(void) {while(1) fork(); return 0;}
    5. Re:Price of gold? by Moskit · · Score: 1

      Naive estimation to give you a starting point:
      World's total mined gold is estimated at 150-200 kilotons (World Gold Council).
      Ship's load is estimated at 200 tons (article).
      Gold from ship would increase this by 0.1% (math).
      Current gold price is about 1200$/ounce (KitCo).
      Price decrease could be therefore in order of -10$/ounce (math).
      0$ if we accept that gold in ship has already been accounted for in "total mined gold" number. Maybe a bit higher drop if you calculate proportion of gold in circulation, though Russia would claim (and store) half of recovered gold.

      No idea why this question was modded "insightful".

    6. Re:Price of gold? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Quite a few descendants as well.

    7. Re:Price of gold? by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      A better question is why should modern "Russia" get a cut of it? It's not like today's Russian government has any relation to Russia in 1905 - the only thing in common is geography.

      I mean if the spanish can claim gold plundered from south america and lost at sea for centuries, why can't Russia make a claim on this gold? Probably easier to work out a deal with Russia for half than to have them take it to court.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    8. Re:Price of gold? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Using the word tonne also denotes metric ton. And if anyone doesn't recognize that the source is British, they would assume that it's 2,000 lbs.

    9. Re:Price of gold? by msauve · · Score: 1

      "Quite a few descendants as well."

      I'm pretty sure the Romanov line was killed off in 1918.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    10. Re:Price of gold? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Because legally, it still belongs to Russia, or to that Russia's heirs. Others are entitled to a cut for doing the grunt work.

      http://www.admiraltylawguide.c...

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    11. Re:Price of gold? by msauve · · Score: 2

      Dated 1989, and therefore signed by the USSR. The ship sank in 1905, and was an Imperial, not Soviet vessel. I'm pretty sure the Romanovs are all dead. The Soviets repudiated any Imperial debts, and confiscated foreign owned properties, breaking Imperial financial ties, and giving up any legitimate claim.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    12. Re:Price of gold? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Complicated, yeah, and the chain of ownership is thereby wobbly. I'm not sure how the situation as you cite falls under law or precedent (I vaguely recall that ancient Greek shipwrecks found in the Mediterranean have been claimed by modern Greece, which is functionally the same situation -- don't recall how that fell out). But I'm sure anyone who disagrees with the arrangement they've agreed to could take it up in court.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  4. Re:Someone missed a decimal point by 110010001000 · · Score: 3, Informative

    There were 5,500 boxes of gold bars and 200 tons of gold coins. On a warship. During a war.

  5. Seems unlikely by Wookie+Monster · · Score: 5, Informative

    If the ship was actually carrying that much gold, it would have been discovered years ago. I'm pretty sure Russia would like to have it back and would have started searching in 1905. And from TFA: 'Although the Shinil Group claims it saw what it thinks was a “treasure box” among the wreckage, there appears to be no confirmation the Donskoi really was carrying the reported treasure'

    1. Re:Seems unlikely by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      I thought so too initially, but the story just appeared in my Facebook feed. Since Facebook doesn't carry fake news anymore, it must be true.

    2. Re:Seems unlikely by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      A Communist revolution made that difficult. Consider the history of the Amber Room https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    3. Re:Seems unlikely by Wookie+Monster · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that this is real news. That is, there exists a team of treasure hunters that have found a ship that they think has a big treasure. This just doesn't seem to be all that newsworthy because the treasure hunter's claims are a bit too far fetched.

    4. Re:Seems unlikely by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      The treasure hunters don't really believe that either. Totally fake PR.

    5. Re:Seems unlikely by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Since "fake news" are the real version of (((reliable sources))) you should be very skeptic about it if it was Facebook approved.

      It's also kinda hilarious considering the crap Facebook has advertised for me. They care for shit being real and then give me all those scam ads?

    6. Re:Seems unlikely by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      If the ship was actually carrying that much gold, it would have been discovered years ago. I'm pretty sure Russia would like to have it back and would have started searching in 1905.

      Why would it have been discovered? There's a lot of ocean out there, it's hard enough to find something when we know where to look, let alone something that disapeared before the age of GPS.

      I'm pretty sure Russia would have been searching for it too. Do you have any evidence that they didn't?

    7. Re:Seems unlikely by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      A Communist revolution made that difficult. Consider the history of the Amber Room https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      WWII and the looter mentality of Nazi Germany is what made the Amber room disappear, not the Communist Revolution.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    8. Re:Seems unlikely by fuzzywig · · Score: 2

      Compare and contrast to the British ship, SS City of Cairo, which was torpedoed in 1942, carrying silver coins, rather than gold.
      It wasn't salvaged until three years ago (and contrary to the implication in the report, it's still being salvaged), and about $50 million has been recovered. Mind you, the City Of Cairo was about ten times deeper than this Russian ship.
      Of course, that's just half the story; once you've raised the metal from the seabed, you then have to find a way to ship it to a port where it's not just going to be confiscated. In some cases companies will stash their finds back on the sea floor at a known location until they're ready to load up and sail it back to a home port. (In this case the silver was taken to Her Majesty's Receiver of Wreck in Southampton.)

  6. Re:Someone missed a decimal point by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    No, I was pointing out that there wasn't JUST 200 tons of gold coins like the OP thought. There was also 5,500 boxes of gold too. Sorry I triggered you though, snowflake.

  7. Re:BS by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Russia has to pay in full for its all its energy use to get from Russia to Japan. A lot of nations on the way would not sell the needed supplies. Russia had to think about having an accepted method to pay along the way.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  8. Why does Slashdot link to Popular Mechanics? by blind+biker · · Score: 1

    They have among the most outrageous ad policies. You can't browse their site with an ad blocker, at all.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    1. Re:Why does Slashdot link to Popular Mechanics? by Vairon · · Score: 1, Informative

      With Firefox Quantum and uBlock Origin add-on I am able to view https://www.popularmechanics.c..., including the linked article, without seeing any ads. What browser and adblocker are you using?

      https://addons.mozilla.org/en-...

    2. Re:Why does Slashdot link to Popular Mechanics? by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes, I couldn't read their site. Here is another article (or, for all I know, the same one).

      Important points from that article: That the ship was carrying so much gold is debated. Allegedly there are some oddities about the company that says it found the ship.

      Another article. This one says they intend to raise the ship, which seems decidedly odd, compared to just trying to raise the gold. I'm wondering if there was a translation error.

      --
      Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
    3. Re:Why does Slashdot link to Popular Mechanics? by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 1

      Further to the above: The National Post article says "the stern was found at a depth of 380 metres and the bow at a depth of 430 metres" (i.e. difference of 50m). Wikipedia says the ship's length was 93.4m. This means it is either at an angle of about 32 degrees off horizontal (pretty darn steep, but not impossible) or it has broken up.

      --
      Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
    4. Re:Why does Slashdot link to Popular Mechanics? by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      Why does everyone want money?

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    5. Re:Why does Slashdot link to Popular Mechanics? by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      Why does everyone want money?

      Dude, I am not against ads if they're non-intrusive.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  9. Re:Scuttled? by gravewax · · Score: 1

    should be easy to find out as their remains should still be pinned to the ocean floor with the Gold Anchors they took with them.

  10. Re:BS by AHuxley · · Score: 2

    The "battle" was far, far away from Russian and the location of the Russian fleet. The many ships Russian sent to would need to buy what they needed on the way.
    The "war" did not work out the way Russian planed for and it had many reasons to "scuttle".

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  11. Re:BS by gravewax · · Score: 1

    yep, given the ship was basically left behind by the fleet and scuttled I would seriously doubt the gold exists. No way they would have left them behind in such a situation, nor are they likely to have put everything in one ship like that, especially a warship that would be targeted by the enemy.

  12. Re:BS by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    That makes sense. It definitely makes sense to take all that gold along in case you need to buy something. You never know what the price of sushi might be on the way to Japan for instance.

  13. Re:BS by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
    The reason why so much coal was needed, the reason why the distances got longer.
    "with difficulty obtaining coal for refuelling – as the warships could not legally enter the ports of neutral nations"
    "The Russians needed 500,000 short tons (450,000 t) of coal and 30 to 40 re-coaling sessions to reach Cam Ranh Bay."

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  14. Re:BS by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    Good point. You would need 5,500 boxes of gold and 200 tons of gold coins to pay for all of that coal.

  15. Re:BS by aliquis · · Score: 1

    What I don't see is why Russia would let others keep half?

    I mean, for one billion they could send navy ships there and say "no" and then what?

  16. Re:BS by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    It was not just coal from any port along the way. Coal was not getting provided to Russian in any way, for any reason at all the easy to use ports.
    That left the few nations able to support the Russian fleet with a way to "set" the price.
    Russian could not wait and look for a better price. Russian needed a lot of coal. Russia had to pay.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  17. Re:BS by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    The Russian Government is very generous.

  18. Re:BS by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    Good thing they had 5,500 boxes of gold and 200 tons of gold coins to pay for 500,000 tons of coal. If they had ordered it from Amazon they would have been able to get a better deal though, with free shipping.

  19. Re: BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's in Japanese waters.
    We kind of have a military base or two nearby.

  20. Re:I just realized something by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 2

    Yep. And I bet a lot of people would like to set his feet in concrete and send him to the bottom of the ocean also.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  21. google maps by wolfheart111 · · Score: 1

    totally on it :)

    --
    [($)]
  22. Re: I just realized something by aleck7 · · Score: 1

    Are you trying to hint someone âoethat sounds like a planâ?

  23. $130B by aleck7 · · Score: 1

    Should have been enough to buy a couple of countries on their way from SpB to Japan...

    1. Re:$130B by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In 1905 the total amount of mined gold was 30,000 tons. $130 billion in todays dollars is 3794 tons of gold. That means this single ship contained more than 12% of all the worlds gold at the time. And it was scuttled. Sure.

    2. Re:$130B by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      The physics at the time didn't say it was too heavy for that ship.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    3. Re:$130B by gravewax · · Score: 1

      you suck at maths. it is 3250 metric tons.

  24. Re:BS by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    It wasn't a cargo ship. According to these people it was carrying about 4700 tons of gold. 4700 tons of gold. In 1905. How much mined gold do you think existed on the planet in 1905? Apparently a lot of it was on this ship.

  25. Re:BS by AHuxley · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Re 'What I don't see is why Russia would let others keep half?"

    To not be Spain. Better to get something on good terms than go full Spain in a court over a transfer of the treasure.
    Any salvage company, other nations will then be happy to work with Russian on any new project in the future.

    Should Russian need something around the other side of the world in the future a skilled salvage company will remember events like this.
    A salvage company will contrast that with what Spain can do.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  26. Re:Someone missed a decimal point by tal_mud · · Score: 1

    Besides the 200 tons of gold coins, there were 5,500 boxes of gold. If each box is a cube with a side of 1 foot, it comes out to about $130 billion

  27. Re:Someone missed a decimal point by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 2

    Some people still take ACs comments seriously ....

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  28. So by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

    How much does the 'salvage company' get if Russia receives 50%, tourism 10% and "money that's not going to Russia will reportedly be invested in a railroad line"?

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    1. Re:So by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      they realize they can fuel Cold War 2.0 with it

      I'd go with 2.1 at this time.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  29. Re:Scuttled? by AHuxley · · Score: 2

    The Dmitrii Donskoi https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... was old when facing new ships Japan was able to buy.
    Re "abandoning ship" was not as simple as it sounds. Russia sent all its fleet. Nobody wanted to suggest just sending quality. The Russian navy had to do what it was told and had to send more old and slow ships.
    New ships could do 18 knots others 15 knots.
    A real mixture of Russian ships then confronted an advanced and ready Japan.

    The Dmitrii Donskoi had to support other crews and try and escape. Then try and save its own crew.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  30. Re:BS by gravewax · · Score: 1

    it wasn't a cargo ship, it wasn't travelling between ports. It was on patrol with the fleet and was damaged in the initial battle and then left the fleet to head back to port in Vladivostok which isn't far. It really makes no sense whatsoever to have that much gold on a patrolling warship.

  31. Re: BS by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Gold is not immune to inflation. The price of gold has been going down under inflationary pressure lately. Gold, silver and platinum have been dipping since the GOP tax cut bill went into effect. And judging by the volatility, nobody's looking to start buying any time soon.

    Gold is basically 19th century Bitcoin.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  32. Re:BS by GumphMaster · · Score: 1

    Why would a single warship be carrying that much gold?

    I don't know, maybe to deny the enemy its use in the event of invasion, or to pay someone for materiel? The UK moved huge amounts of gold and other valuables to Canada in warships during World War 2, e.g. Operation Fish. None were sunk but if attacked would have fought.

    --
    Patent litigation: A doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction... in which everyone seems willing to push the button
  33. Re:BS by MrKaos · · Score: 2

    What I don't see is why Russia would let others keep half?

    I mean, for one billion they could send navy ships there and say "no" and then what?

    I think it may have something to do with international waters and salvage rights. It may also be an act of diplomacy on the part of the Koreans if the ship was in their waters. Despite having full salvage rights this way they still get a pay day and not piss Russia off, plus a railway, plus a way to ease relations with the other half of their country.

    Sounds to me like a win for everyone - good on them.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  34. Gold often shipped aboard warships by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    No. It was a warship. Warships are designed and built to be warships. Warships sometimes carry cargo, gold was sometimes used in the payment of debts between nations. Warships were used for the security of the shipment. Gold would also be regularly carried to buy goods or services in foreign ports. It might also be used for fleet payroll in foreign ports.

    Back in this era there was a devastating earthquake in Italy. The US sent gold to Italy for disaster relief and other humanitarian efforts. Guess how it was shipped, using a warship.

    Cargo ships are designed and built to carry cargo. In times of war they may mount a gun on them for self defense but that does not make them warships. Just as cargo does not make a warship a cargo ship.

    1. Re:Gold often shipped aboard warships by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      "fleet payroll?"

      I'm inclined to think they were paid in potatoes and salt.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  35. Re:BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    perhaps if you bothered to research you might learn something. The ship wasn't being escorted, it WAS the escort on a patrol, it really makes little to no sense at all for them to be patrolling with what would probably be the entire countries gold supplies onboard and then even less sense for that ship to then leave the fleet unescorted to head back to port. Every piece of information about its travels and what it was doing makes it highly unlikely that it was carrying any sort of cargo let alone an entire countries gold supply. but we will know soon enough, I suspect they will find very little on the boat but happy to be proven wrong.

  36. Re:BS by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    He said far far away from Russian. He left out the actual thing. A Russian hat, perhaps?

    Or perhaps he meant a Russian. Pretty unlikely, I'd expect there to be at least one in the crew.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  37. I agree by fireylord · · Score: 1

    This. The only parallel I can think of from my personal experience is playing Eve online (I know, a keyboard warrior playing an internet spaceship game is not really comparable to actually risking lives in wartime etc) . Heading out on patrol where you may well be in combat with unneccesary valuables in cargo in any kind of vessel (warship OR cargo/supply ship) is quite frankly an insane practice. There's some cliche about never risking anything in battle that you can't afford to lose.

  38. Gold on a warship? by trickyb · · Score: 1

    I'm unclear as to why anyone in the Russian admiralty would have loaded tons of gold onto a second-rate warship sailing straight into a battle? And where was it supposed to be carrying the gold *to*?

    1. Re:Gold on a warship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm unclear as to why anyone in the Russian admiralty would have loaded tons of gold onto a second-rate warship sailing straight into a battle? And where was it supposed to be carrying the gold *to*?

      During wartime, if Russia felt they were threatened enough, they might load their gold reserves onto a rather plain looking ship (to avoid attention) in order to hide that massive wealth and prevent the enemy from capturing it.

      That theory tends to justify why you would do such a thing. It would also explain why you would scuttle a ship if the executive order was to prevent the capture of that cargo no matter what.

    2. Re:Gold on a warship? by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      I agree. It totally makes sense to load all your country's gold into a SINGLE SHIP and send that SHIP into the ocean during wartime. Much better than storing it on land or something. You must be really good at Civilization.

  39. Re:BS by Dantoo · · Score: 1

    HMS Edinburgh. Sunk 1942. 4.5 tons of Gold.

  40. Re:BS by houghi · · Score: 1

    There must be an in-soviet-russie joke somewhere.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  41. Ulleung island - $13 billion by TJHook3r · · Score: 1

    The island is reportedly getting a 'small percentage' worth $13 billion. Any thoughts on how I may get residency there?

  42. -1$/ounce by Moskit · · Score: 1

    Math is hard, 0.1% of 1200$ is 1$, not 10$.

  43. Re:BS by Faluzeer · · Score: 1

    Good point. You would need 5,500 boxes of gold and 200 tons of gold coins to pay for all of that coal.

    Obviously the coal sellers were using surge pricing :-)

  44. Re: BS by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    So, when they don't use this 'pee tape' for billions and billions in gold, are you going to stop using the purported existence of said 'tape' to troll this forum?

    Who am I kidding?!?

  45. Re: BS by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    The only ultimate 'losers' are a bunch of US servicemen who will eventually lose their 'gravy deployment' to South Korea to continue the US occuption, after improved relations lead to Korean unification. There's always Germany, I suppose, though things are changing there as well.

  46. Re:Someone missed a decimal point by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

    If he's posted it several times he is clearly trying to promote it, not refute it.

    Oh, my sweet summer child...

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  47. Re: BS by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    'Far away from the Russian Dressing on the salad bar' should be sufficient to tone down the TDS hysteria.

    Who am I kidding; everyone knows our vital bodily fluids are at stake!

  48. Re: BS by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

    Until someone finds a way to make gold from, say, sea water, gold is one of the rare thing that represents a tangible value - it has its highs and lows but it survives wars and economic crisis.

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  49. Re:BS by mark_reh · · Score: 1

    It's more likely that you'll die chained to a wall in one of the secret dungeons being constructed at taxpayer expense at Mar-a-Lago. Don't worry, you be in excellent company with Steven Colbert, John Stewart, and Bobby DeNiro. I hear Dick Cheney will be in charge of "enhanced interrogation"...

  50. Re:BS by JonnyCalcutta · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia they'll fry your nipples and send you to the gulag?

    *rimshot*

  51. Re:BS by Coisiche · · Score: 1

    Exactly. If the gold did exist and it was on the ship then it's a safe bet that it wasn't on the ship when it was scuttled. Maybe it was a cunning plan to distribute the gold among fleet officers. They report back that the ship was lost and unrecoverable and go on to quietly enjoy their windfall.

    Now a century later the wreck has been discovered. Lots of people jump in with a claim on the gold and when none is found, who do they blame?

  52. Goldfinger by seven+of+five · · Score: 1

    If that much gold were released into the market, surely the price/weight would decrease, right?

    1. Re:Goldfinger by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Not if you were to make all the gold in Fort Knox radioactive.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  53. Re:Uh by seven+of+five · · Score: 1

    Ballast

  54. Re: BS by MiniMike · · Score: 1

    Maybe they're waiting for the Russian shipwreck full of platinum?

  55. Re:BS by Talderas · · Score: 2

    Because of risk. Salvagers were looking for the ship because it was reported to be carrying a large sum of gold. It may have been. it may have been carrying a lesser sum of gold. It may not have been carrying any gold. The salvagers have only found the wreck of the warship, and by maritime law, couldn't act on it without Russia's permission. Additionally, because of the reported gold on board it's highly probable that the individuals who located the wreck did not give Russia the location of the wreck but just provided evidence that they had found it.

    The only improvement to Russia's situation with regard to the ship is that they would know the wreck is intact. They still wouldn't know how much gold is on it or where the ship is located. Russia would need to fund expeditions to locate the wreck and the fund the salvage operation. This would all be done under the assumption of a payout worth $130bn. Russia did the right move. They get half the recovered salvage to a tune $65bn without having to pay anything and if the gold doesn't materialize or the take is considerably less than 130bn then Russia still comes out ahead.

    --
    "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
  56. Re:BS by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    I said "mined gold" not gold. So I am both semantically and correct correct.

  57. Re: BS by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2

    It's pretty straightforward to make gold from sea water. According to Nature, it currently costs about 5x the market value of the gold. On the other hand, you could likely get a bunch of other valuable things at the same time, so that might bring costs down a bit.

    Gold's value is it's rarity. It has a bit of intrinsic value for certain industrial uses, but mostly it's because it's shiny.

  58. Re:BS by Enigma2175 · · Score: 1

    And the wiki page claims: "In another Operation Fish convoy on 5 July 1940 five ships loaded with $1.7 billion (US$ 29.70 billion in 2018), the largest movement of wealth in history." So a convoy of ships moving $30 billion is the "largest movement of wealth in history" but the Russians load more than four times that amount onto a random coaler headed into a war zone? Just doesn't seem plausible.

    --

    Enigma

  59. Re: BS by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

    Not only its rarity, its properties also.

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  60. Re 'What I don't see is why Russia would let others keep half?"

    To not be Spain. Better to get something on good terms than go full Spain in a court over a transfer of the treasure.

    Any salvage company, other nations will then be happy to work with Russian on any new project in the future.

    Should Russian need something around the other side of the world in the future a skilled salvage company will remember events like this.

    No. That is definitely not the reason. You are making the classic mistake of applying western reasoning to a government that does not view the world in those terms. I can assure you that Putin and his government have no real long term vision beyond maybe a couple of years, so that's definitely not it.

    Much more likely reasons are:
    1) Russia knows the odds are really good that the gold isn't there any more (it may have been secretly salvaged by somebody a long time ago) or maybe never was, so they don't want to waste time looking for nothing. But appearing to cooperate allows them to get great positive publicity at what might be literally zero cost to them.
    2) The gold exists and they have decided that the railroad project offers them so much benefit that their real motivation is to get the railroad project done at little or not real cost to them. Shipping goods from South Korea via railroad into Russia instead of by ship might be useful to Russia.

  61. Re: BS by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

    Other than shininess, those properties are the "certain industrial uses." But industrial use doesn't drive the price of gold currently. If people got tired of the shiny, then the price would fall to a level that was driven by actual intrinsic value.

    Diamond is a good example of this, because you can't just melt down small crappy diamonds to make big nice ones. Industrial diamonds are pretty cheap, while big gem quality diamonds are orders of magnitude more expensive.

  62. Re:BS by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Russia is somewhat larger than the UK. If they wanted to stop invaders from getting something simply moving it to the other end of the country would be more than adequate.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  63. Re:Someone missed a decimal point by EvilSS · · Score: 1

    Besides the 200 tons of gold coins, there were 5,500 boxes of gold bars. I have no idea how much that comes out to.

    A "standard" gold bar weighs in at 12.4kg or 27.3lbs. Not sure how many are in a box but at minimum it's a few hundred shittons of gold.

    --
    I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
  64. Re:BS by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Not if they're the Cybermen from Doctor Who; they're allergic to it.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  65. Re: BS by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 2

    Other than shininess

    resistance to oxidation

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  66. Re:BS by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Typical cargo tonnage of a warship around 1900 is in excess of thousands of metric tons.

    Typical cargo tonnage of most warships at any point in history is close to bugger all. You cram every inch that isn't guns or engines with ammo and fuel. Fortunately half the crew are working at any given time because there isn't room for them all to even sit down at once, let alone sleep.

    According to TFA this here Donuts Donaldski was a cruiser. Given that WW2 cruisers were typically under 10,000 tons the thing probably weighed half that *in total*.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  67. Re:Someone missed a decimal point by omnichad · · Score: 1

    Actually, it was a Korean firm that released the 200 ton number, so it was likely 200 metric tons.
    http://www.ajudaily.com/view/2...

  68. Re:BS by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 2

    To get an idea of just how big a pile of BS this story is, the Donskoi was a pre-dreadnaught armoured cruiser, with one tenth the displacement of an actual battleship (Iowa class), and less than a modern (Arleigh Burke) destroyer. The amount of gold in Fort Knox is about the same order of magnitude as what's claimed in the story (depending on how much you believe is in there and what it's currently worth per ounce and what the story is actually claming was on the Donskoi, handwaving a bit here to avoid a huge long debate and calling it "same order of magnitude").

    So we have to believe that Imperial Russia loaded a Fort Knox' worth of gold that they didn't have into a (modern) destroyer-class ship, equipped it with early Tardis technology to handle the volume and mass involved, and sent it to the other side of the world, only to scuttle it when Japanese ships came near.

    Someone's running a significant salvage scam here...

  69. It's time ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... to get the Glomar Explorer out of mothballs*.

    *Actually, we can't, as it was sold to the Chinese.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  70. Re: BS by Type44Q · · Score: 1
    You think the Russians loaded hundreds or thousands of *tons of gold* so that the crew could pick up sundry essentials along the fucking way??

    Spraypaint's not for "recreational use," dude.

  71. Re: BS by DRJlaw · · Score: 1

    If people got tired of the shiny, then the price would fall to a level that was driven by actual intrinsic value.

    That's like saying if the Earth was made of cheese, then the price of food would fall to a level that was driven by actual intrinsic value.

    A multi-millenia track record indicates that people aren't going to get tired of the shiny. Jewelry value isn't going to go away and leave only "industrial use" value.

  72. Re:BS by AlanBDee · · Score: 2

    I can assure you that Putin and his government have no real long term vision beyond maybe a couple of years, so that's definitely not it.

    I disagree with this assessment. I argue that countries like China, Russia, and North Korea tend to look more long term then our representatives, who seem to only care about the time between now and the next election cycle. Here in the U.S. we do have the Supreme Court Justices who I believe do consider the long term ramifications but you're selling these other countries short to assume they only care about the short term.

    If you have not seen it, I recommend watching "Rules for Rulers" by CGPGray. https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
    It's based on a book, "The Dictator's Handbook: Why Bad Behavior is Almost Always Good Politics" https://www.amazon.com/Dictato...

    These have helped me not get so angry at politics in general and has given me a much better understanding as to why different leaders do what they do.

  73. Re: BS by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

    Nah, jewelry cleaners are pretty inexpensive. I think the owners of expensive jewelry actually enjoy cleaning it from time to time anyway.

  74. Re: BS by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

    I don't recall saying that it would. The operative word in my sentence, which you quoted, is *if*.

    However, the fact that the value of gold is extrinsic does mean that it might not respond to supply and demand as might be expected. If some space mining company dropped a megaton of gold on the market the value would drop, but gold's rarity would also be severely reduced. Everyone could walk around wearing as much gold as they wanted. The price might fall more than otherwise expected due to the loss of cachet. Again, diamonds are a good example (except in reverse) where DeBeers specifically limited the supply of gem quality diamonds in order to keep the value very high, while at the same time providing an unrestricted supply of industrial diamond.

  75. Re: BS by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

    Also note that a "multi-millenia track record" doesn't mean much in the face of new technology or supplies. Glass was once extremely highly valued (for jewelry). Once we figured out how to make it nobody valued it very much for it's shiny decorative properties. Likewise, aluminum was far more valuable than gold and used for jewelry, but now that we can make as much as we want nobody wears it much.

  76. Re:BS by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    Whatever the outcome of this ship salvage, I really hope that railway project gets built. The one peaceful way to demolish North Korea and unify the peninsula would be wide-open free trade. Once the NK common folk see what they have been missing all these years, North Korea will dissolve faster than East Germany.

  77. Re: BS by DRJlaw · · Score: 1

    Also note that a "multi-millenia track record" doesn't mean much in the face of new technology or supplies.

    And my point was that "assume a spherical cow" is a terrible argument when discussing behavioral economics. Adding more spherical cows does not improve it.

  78. Re:BS by datavirtue · · Score: 1

    The aliens agreed not to return until all people were of one race. Some people took that to mean that they are waiting on one race to conquer the others (Germans, Zionists, etc) but they are really waiting until we have all interbred to the point where no geographically distinguishing features exist. It is going to be a while.

    --
    I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  79. Re:BS by datavirtue · · Score: 1

    No. No. No. If we need to get through your country with our oil you can count yourself fucked as well.

    --
    I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  80. Re:BS by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    I mean, for one billion they could send navy ships there and say "no" and then what?

    And then the salvage specialists say "Fuck you" and sail away and the treasure stays on the bottom.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  81. Re:BS by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

    Why would a single warship be carrying that much gold?

    The "gold" is actually just a cover story.

    Dirk Pitt and Al Giordino are actually looking for the secret stash of byzanium that is rumoured to be on board.

  82. Re:BS by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    The one peaceful way to demolish North Korea and unify the peninsula would be wide-open free trade.

    And clearly the lack of a railway is what's preventing that. They like totally want to do a customs union and all that, but it just can't possibly work with roads & trucks.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  83. Re:BS by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    If an oil tanker has a sack of letters on it does that make it a mail boat?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  84. Re: BS by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

    Spherical cows and cheese... maybe you have some local diary product brand with gold in the name? I don't think we're talking about the same thing.

  85. Re:BS by datavirtue · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    It is mono-atomic and uncorruptable. Most likely the aliens just convert it to powder and eat it.

    https://www.amazon.com/Lost-Se...

    --
    I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  86. Re: BS by datavirtue · · Score: 1

    According to standard media protocol in regard to politicians they would never run such a story. The consensus is to avoid personal stories about politicians. For example, if they discovered that a politician had a drug/alcohol problem they would not report on it...especially if they were in a treatment program. I was surprised to learn about this long ago.

    I can see a Gawker type running with it though none of the other major outlets would back them with a follow up.

    --
    I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  87. Re:BS by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Look at it another way. HMS Dreadnought was launched soon after and was the biggest baddest battleship in the world at that point. Normal load, 18,120 tons, 20,730 long tons at deep load giving 2,610 to play with.

    I can't find a definition of normal load but let's assume it includes optional little luxuries like fuel, booze, crew, ammunition and more booze. You'd still need two of the buggers to carry that much.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  88. Re:BS by datavirtue · · Score: 1

    Dude...I'm about to take out a loan and jet there myself...what do you mean: "don't want to waste time." It is over 1400 ft deep. Not a trivial recovery. Lots of professionals and equipment required and people could still die.

    --
    I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  89. Re: BS by datavirtue · · Score: 1

    Great...I can see you have a handle on the US point of view...now carefully turn your gaze and consider the other.

    --
    I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  90. Old claims against Russia / USSR to be addressed? by Bruce66423 · · Score: 1

    Given that the Soviets expropriated foreign owned property, rejected the claims of bond holders against the Imperial Russian government, and can be argued to owe the victims of their invasions in Eastern Europe billions, one can hope that it will be tied up in court indefinitely. Sadly I suspect this won't happen.

  91. Re: BS by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    No, thatâ(TM)s the conversation rate of gold relative to other currencies. The purchasing power of gold is remarkably stable. An ounce of gold will buy you the same value of goods and services as it did 100 years ago, regardless of how those prices are represented in other currencies.

    I just tested your hypothesis and tried to buy a MacBook Pro with gold bars. They laughed me out of the Apple Store.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  92. Re: BS by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    For example, if they discovered that a politician had a drug/alcohol problem they would not report on it...especially if they were in a treatment program.

    Are you suggesting Donald Trump should be in treatment for his pee problem?

    I'm not really sure what "media protocol" has to do with a foreign government having compromising dirt on a US president for the purpose of blackmail.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  93. So is this by NotPeteMcCabe · · Score: 1

    Is this the ship full of gold from the movie Black Sea, or the one from the book Cryptonomicon?

  94. Re:BS by Xolotl · · Score: 1

    Russia is the successor state to the Soviet Union, and the ship being a naval vessel rather than a private merchant ship continues to belong to them even after it is sunk. These are both well-established concepts in international law (and also the basis for the Spanish case relating to that galleon).

  95. Heist (2001) starring gene Hackman by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    It could if only [takes off shoes & socks] 2100 tons of the ship was iron & steel.

    This would also explain why it sank.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  96. Re:BS by BoogieChile · · Score: 1

    Actually it's probably be easier to make gold out of technitium, with maybe a pinch of hydrogen just to round out the flavour.

  97. Re:BS by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    I can assure you that Putin and his government have no real long term vision beyond maybe a couple of years, so that's definitely not it.

    Do you prefer Cherry or Watermelon flavor for your Hatorade?

  98. Re: BS by kenh · · Score: 1

    Who did?

    --
    Ken
  99. Re:Blow them up by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
    No NATO alliance nations are threatened by this.

    NATO's articles of constitution preclude a "first strike". It is an organisation of mutual self-defence. Not of communal offence.

    Are you one of Trump's international relations advisors?

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"