Slashdot Mirror


Commodore's Amiga Is Being Revived In Newly Updated Hardware (hothardware.com)

MojoKid writes from a report via Hot Hardware: Although it has been over three decades since the first Commodore Amigas were originally released, a fan base for the beloved systems is still going strong. In fact, today's Amiga community seems to be more active now that it has been in years, and a number of exciting new hardware projects have cropped up in recent weeks. Two relatively new projects, led by popular members of the Amiga community Paul Rezendes and John "Chucky" Hertell, are designed to breathe new life into the Amiga 4000 and Amiga 1200.

Both men set out to reverse engineer the motherboards for these systems, not only to continue the possibility of repairing existing machines that are prone to serious damage from leaky batteries and electrolytic capacitors, but to potentially spur additional customizations for the platform in the future. Though Paul and John have only made minor modifications to the Amiga 4000 and Amiga 1200 motherboard PCBs to this point, the possibility now also exists for all new variants to arrive at some point in the future for these machines as well. The first actual working motherboards populated with components based on the Amiga 4000 Replica project or Re-Amiga 1200 haven't been shown off just yet, and they may require additional revisions to work out any kinks. However, both projects are good examples of the passion that still remains for the beloved Amiga from computing glory days gone by.

94 comments

  1. We will have Amigas on Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and in flying cars. When Windows 10 is a long distant memory, we will still be using our Amigas.

    1. Re:We will have Amigas on Mars by The+New+Guy+2.0 · · Score: 1

      Your post must have been delayed on a 20-lightyear link....

  2. Typo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amigo?

    1. Re:Typo? by The+New+Guy+2.0 · · Score: 1

      No typo... Amiga was a popular graphics computer of the 80s.

    2. Re:Typo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean 2008s? That's old. Why make it?

    3. Re:Typo? by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Spotted the millennial. Shouldn't you be driving up the price of avocados or something?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Typo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      learning to use wikipedia might help more.

    5. Re:Typo? by The+New+Guy+2.0 · · Score: 1

      No, I mean 1980s.

    6. Re:Typo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some hippity-hop name for an encyclopedia?

    7. Re:Typo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You joke, but just today I paid $2.50 for a single ripe avocado at the local safeway.

      Highway robbery it is. Eight years ago they were 80 cents at the mexican grocery store... but they haven't been that cheap there in years.

    8. Re:Typo? by fuzzywig · · Score: 1
      I'm a millennial and I owned an A500 in 1991. I was 10.

      More likely the OP is a troll, or someone from whatever we're calling the generation younger than millennials (Gen Z?).

    9. Re:Typo? by aquabat · · Score: 1

      There was only one 2008.

      --
      A republic cannot succeed till it contains a certain body of men imbued with the principles of justice and honour.
    10. Re:Typo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're way too old to be a millennial these days. It's become shorthand for "under 30".

    11. Re:Typo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it isn't. Gen Y = Millennial. After Gen Y comes Gen Z.

      Right now 20s and under are Gen Z.

    12. Re:Typo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After Millennial comes Post-Millennial, then Post-Post-Millennial.

  3. What, again? by Kenja · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ah, never mind. I see this is about the same stuff as last time (Apollo etc). Sure, you could spend a bunch of money on a "new" Amiga, but at the end of the day it seems simpler to just run an emulator or FPGA system (I went with the later).

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:What, again? by Excelcia · · Score: 3, Insightful

      at the end of the day it seems simpler to just run an emulator or FPGA system

      There is some truth to this. But I would not mind having a physical system. Not sure how much I'm willing to pay for this, but there is something to be had to have an actual Amiga. But then I'm the type who has kept a pair of actual Amiga Corp joysticks back from before their purchase by Commodore.

      The Amiga was one of those crazy amazing things where things just lined up in the universe to produce something that was an engineering work of art. The way tasks were offloaded onto hardware like that amazing programmable blitter, was a decade ahead of its time. One of the reason I don't mind supporting actual hardware is to support that. Commodore made many mistakes, to be sure, but companies like Microsoft ("who would ever want to run more than one program at a time?") who were beginning their rein of terror with their counter-marketing was at least equally to blame. The Amiga is in company with the Avro Arrow and the Tucker automobile - other projects that were light years ahead of their time.

      I hope the revival is successful.

    2. Re:What, again? by Kenja · · Score: 2

      Thus the FPGA systems like MiST etc. Physical joystick ports, dedicated hardware, can be used for other things and much cheaper than a used Amiga much less a new one.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    3. Re:What, again? by golgotha007 · · Score: 1

      I understand that it's much easier (and cheaper) to emulate than to run on original hardware, but emulation doesn't bring the nostalgic factor like original hardware does and to be perfectly honest, it just isn't as cool. Also, half the fun in running old gear is keeping it clean, making repairs as needed and providing all the love necessary to keep things running clean and quiet.

      I've been collecting Commodore hardware over the last decade and have quite the Commodore museum for an office. There's nothing more satisfying than writing a daily journal using Pen Pal on an original Amiga 2000 or using Paperback Writer on a Commodore 128 in 80 column mode with a 1802 monitor and 1571 disk drive.

    4. Re:What, again? by toejam13 · · Score: 1

      I see this less as a product for people wanting to build new systems as it is a product for existing owners who want to rehab their broken systems. That may change as enhanced versions are released, but who knows with retro computing fans.

      I have a dead A3000 in my basement. If the price was right, I wouldn't mind bringing it back to life. But to be honest, I'd probably still use UAE for 99% of the time just because it is faster and easier to use.

    5. Re:What, again? by Kenja · · Score: 1

      Sure, if you want a project rebuilding an old Amiga is fun. But then you start looking at spending hundreds or even thousands of dollars on upgrades and it just gets silly. If your goal is to run Amiga OS and games, the best middle ground seems to be a dedicated FPGA system. Lets you use old accessories etc, only thing they tend to be missing is a floppy drive, which frankly I can do without... most "new" Amiga systems end up replacing the floppy with a flash drive anyhow.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    6. Re:What, again? by The+New+Guy+2.0 · · Score: 1

      Joystick ports were replaced by USB... it's easy to get a throwback joystick these days.

    7. Re:What, again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      'Rein of terror' is not really what you'd think of as being an easily marketable product, but you'd be surprised at just how wealthy the four horsemen are and how much they'd be willing to spend on horse tack.

    8. Re:What, again? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      But then you start looking at spending hundreds or even thousands of dollars on upgrades and it just gets silly.

      These days there are hundred-dollar accelerators for Amigas, with enough RAM for gaming, so it's not that bad. On the other hand, having to re-cap them is a bit of a drag, and probably not worth it to most potential users. Emulation is better in its own way, because you can emulate multiple different models of Amiga, and some games (or other software) doesn't run well or at all on some models of Amiga, even with whdload.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:What, again? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Joystick ports were replaced by USB... it's easy to get a throwback joystick these days.

      Or if you must hack hardware, you can always use an Arduino Mega to get physical ports. There's really no good reason to use a classic joystick, though. They all sucked compared to a good gamepad. Literally all of them.

      With that said, actual Amiga users who want a mediocre gamepad which plugs into their Amiga can trivially hack a six-button mega drive pad to work. All six buttons are supported in all of four or five games; more games support three buttons, and vastly more support two. It involves swapping two wires, with a resistor added in series to one of them. I forget the details, but I did post about it on some amiga forum once I found the information online.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re: What, again? by CyberRacer · · Score: 2

      You touch on the importance of the Amiga (yes, I do miss my beautiful 2000/68030), but by and large emulators do run better today than than the originals. The point that's being missed is that it was a philosophy of design that made it so special. Take the things that suck up the most CPU cycles and offload them to hardware, then seemlessly (more or less) integrate them back into the os. Today gpus, soundcards, etc perform the same functions. In order for any "new" Amiga to be anything more than than just sentimentality on steroids, it's going to require an extension of the philosophy, and not just hacking on a few more modern ports. For example, one might consider incorporating machine learning, not just in hardware, but as an integrated part of the os as well. Anything short of that simply can't be competitive in today's market. Just for the record, I still fire up uae or winfellow once in a while to relive the heavy playing, heavy drinking glory days.

    11. Re:What, again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, if you want a project rebuilding an old Amiga is fun. But then you start looking at spending hundreds or even thousands of dollars on upgrades and it just gets silly.

      Why?

      People who are interested in gaming easily spends that on their hobby. Golfers even more so.
      The few people using C64's and Amigas these days doesn't spend time on it because it is a high end computer.
      It is clearly a hobby that is more comparable to model train building or coin collecting.
      Spending thousands of dollars on upgrades is nothing, especially not if it is one of the obscure ones.

    12. Re:What, again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The main problem with emulators is that they don't emulate the screen very well.
      Running a game designed for 50Hz on a 60Hz screen is problematic. If the program uses an interlaced screen mode you get even more distortion.
      You pretty much need a video card with composite output for the emulation to be equivalent.
      Then again, last time I looked one the Amiga 500 was emulated properly. The Amiga 1200 emulator didn't really bother with the instruction cache and stuff so anything cycle timed would be off.

    13. Re:What, again? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Microsoft ("who would ever want to run more than one program at a time?")

      They later changed their mind on that.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      Ah, the decade that taste forgot...

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    14. Re:What, again? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Even cheaper and easier is a Raspberry Pi. Also supports physical joystick ports and even real Amiga keyboards.

      Emulation is pretty good these days. I still like to have a real Amiga with a proper CRT monitor around though.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    15. Re:What, again? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      8/16 bit era joysticks were vastly superior to gamepads because they were right handed. For some reason we ended up with the directional controls operated with the left hand on gamepads and modern joysticks, when most people favour their right hand for precision control.

      You can get right handed arcade sticks nowadays, but the last time I saw a right handed gamepad was the Playstation era and it didn't look great.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    16. Re: What, again? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, there aren't many people today who can recognize a good design, let alone build one themselves. "Good" these days tends to mean "we managed to deploy it." Elegance isn't a thing anymore. (I should say, it's rare. Bitcoin was elegant.)

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    17. Re:What, again? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, it's really hard to even find information on these because those little gaming keyboards are now called gamepads for some reason. Stupidity, I guess. Anyhow, there is the goofy foot mod kit. The NES controller is an ergonomics train wreck, but they are still readily available and they are one of the most precise game controllers ever made...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    18. Re:What, again? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I might give that a try. A right handed Saturn pad would be amazing... But I'll probably end up with a right handed arcade stick.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    19. Re:What, again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate to be that guy, but a light year is a measure of distance. I agree that the Amiga was years ahead of its time.

    20. Re:What, again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes but spacetime is a continuum--maybe it's distance in the 4th dimension. So there!

  4. FCC by Guy+On+A+Sybian · · Score: 1

    Now thirty years later, have they added essential things to make these units compliant? There are much more stringent regulations that have to be met now.

    UL (kind of)
    ETL
    CE
    FCC

    It isn't cheap to sell consumer electronics anymore. Everyone wants a piece of the pie, and you'll be sued out of existence in some countries and not allowed to enter the market in others if you manage to survive the first round of development.

    1. Re:FCC by The+New+Guy+2.0 · · Score: 2

      The standards of today make computers a lot safer and easier to depose of... remember Tandys which would explode the capacitors if moved?

    2. Re:FCC by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Amiga was never that noisy. They were used in low-rent broadcasting because of this. One of the major cable channel guides used it, I remember seeing it guru meditate. The machines were wholly shielded internally, including the all-in-ones. What makes you think they couldn't pass modern standards? Probably the only change which would have to be made besides updating the power supplies (which hobbyists have already worked around, by adapting standard ATX supplies) would be solder composition, for the only initialism you didn't actually remember to mention... RoHS.

      Also, you only need UL certification to get shelf space at a major retailer. I see you knew this, hence the "sort of", but mentioning it was still silly.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:FCC by Known+Nutter · · Score: 2

      One of the major cable channel guides used it, I remember seeing it guru meditate.

      Prevue Channel

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      https://www.atlasobscura.com/a...

      --
      Beware of the Leopard.
    4. Re:FCC by Known+Nutter · · Score: 1
      --
      Beware of the Leopard.
    5. Re:FCC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of these days I will go to place where all the computers come from - Republic of Hot Scrags.

    6. Re: FCC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone remember the 2018 iMac Pro with the uncaged power supply? See Linus Tech Tips recent video for the details...

    7. Re:FCC by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The Amiga PSUs were actually pretty good, because they were linear. Modern ones are switch mode which are smaller and lighter, but you get much more noise.

      The main issue with the Amiga ones is that they are not very powerful. I see to recall the A1200 one only being 25W, the A500 one being only a little more. You could run an accelerator but then adding an extra floppy drive was pushing it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re:FCC by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The new hotness for the internal keyboard Amigas (not actually new but anyway) is to install a picopsu inside the case, the 12 volt (not wide input) units can be had for about $20 on eBay. I put one in my a1200. There is room outside of the shielding. I soldered to the legs of the power jack so that I didn't have to modify the board. Not more than I already had for the timing fix needed by the accelerator, anyway.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:FCC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. I moved my TRS-80 Model 1 all the time and it never ever exploded. I spilled coffee on it and part of my sandwich and it continued to run just fine. I know not of what you speak sir.

    10. Re:FCC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably the only change which would have to be made besides updating the power supplies (which hobbyists have already worked around, by adapting standard ATX supplies) would be solder composition, for the only initialism you didn't actually remember to mention... RoHS.

      If you are talking about original hardware, using leadless solder could require a PCB layout change. Problem is the non-lead solder tends to whisker if you have traces with opposite polarity current next to each other. It takes a while and is more of an issue with modern, ultra-compact layouts, but it still could be an issue with an old layout. Of course you would just drop it into OrCAD and it would figure it out for you.

    11. Re:FCC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      was the sandwich OK?

    12. Re:FCC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually only the first Amigas had linear PSUs (the "heavy" 2,5 A one), all later models (late 500 and all 600 and 1200) had pretty crude switching PSUs ranging from 3 A to 4,5 A..

    13. Re:FCC by nedwidek · · Score: 1

      The low RF noise was a small part of it. The main reason was because the chipset had the built in ability to genlock to an external video signal.This meant you needed minimal equipment to do titling or overlays. I bought a GVP G-Lock at the '93 Amiga World Expo in NYC and I remember it being in the $150 range. That was astoundingly cheap at that time. If I had a PC or a Mac at the time, I'd never have been able to afford to have my own video equipment as a college student. And as the video studio in the electronic arts program was always booked....

      --
      Post anonymously - For when your opinion embarrasses even you!
    14. Re:FCC by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Problem is the non-lead solder tends to whisker if you have traces with opposite polarity current next to each other. [...] Of course you would just drop it into OrCAD and it would figure it out for you.

      Or you could apply a coating to either the entire board, or to the regions where this is likely to become a problem.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  5. Why not the reverse? by Misagon · · Score: 1

    Instead of a 100 MHz CPU in FPGA running against vintage graphics and sound chips, I would much rather like to see the vintage graphics and sound chips in FPGA but the CPU being emulated, with JIT-compilation running on a fast modern ARM multi-core chip.

    That would be a really powerful Amiga, and you would be able to run other things (such as OS:es and emulation cores) on it as well.

    However, I have not found any FPGA board that has had any good interlink with any powerful ARM chip. The ones I have seen (including MiST) have used the CPU for loading cores onto the FPGA and not much more. The FPGA would need to provide an interface from the CPU to the machine's "Chip RAM" and that might be a bit too unusual?

    --
    "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
    1. Re:Why not the reverse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Such things are ubiquitous. Xilinx and Altera (now Intel) both sell FPGAs with integrated high-speed hard ARM cores. For example: https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/programmable/soc.html

    2. Re:Why not the reverse? by Misagon · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the SoCs with many and faster ARM cores are often paired with FPGAs that are overkill for emulating the Amiga chipset and would therefore be too expensive to compete with MiST, Vampire or a Raspberry Pi.

      And then the key part: giving the FPGA its own "Chip RAM", with access from the emulator on the ARM core.

      --
      "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
  6. Nostalgia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, I'm as nostalgic as the next guy. Maybe more so.

    I can already run an Amiga emulator on the Raspberry Pi and reminisce like its 1987 all over again.

    This is just a ridiculous waste of time. I can do much more with the $40 Raspberry Pi than I can with any Commodore anything. And for a few dollars more I can ramp up, by orders of magnitude, past the Raspberry Pi.

    1. Re:Nostalgia by The+New+Guy+2.0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Raspberry Pi represents to our children what we were growing up with in the 90s... small processor and storage sizes, and dirt cheap hardware. There's many kid efforts in teaching computers that are just not discussed on Slashdot.

    2. Re:Nostalgia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm largely in agreement.

      However, I will note that an Amiga, or even a C64, was a much larger percentage of the household budget in the 1980's than today's Raspberry Pi which costs no more than a night at the (absurdly overpriced) movies.

      The Raspberry Pi and its copycats, like Odroid, are amazing computers for the price and vastly more versatile than Commodore was/is.

    3. Re:Nostalgia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As much as it pains me as an Amiga nut, I must agree... Raspberry Pi's are the Amiga's of today... slap a Pi in an A1200 case, slap in a keyrah and finally slap in a micro sd card and voila.. you have a better Amiga than any of the classic ones...

      A modern Amiga like a stand alone Vampire V4 will be interesting, especially if make a V5 that has everything onboard (insane amounts of memory, SAGA/AGA/ECS/OCS, multiple kick roms automatically selected, USB controller, WIFI, Ethernet, support for other expansions ie. clockport? PCMCIA port? SATA? PATA? pci express cards?, system independent support for booting from USB floppy, USB stick, SD card, CF card and USB CD/DVD? system independent support of USB keyboards like SUM USB plus system independent support of USB joysticks and mice like Rys MK2 but with build in auto switching) and utilize the very latest and fastest FPGA's

      yes.. it could be interesting, but the vampire et.al. has a few miles to cover yet, before my panties will get moist enough

    4. Re:Nostalgia by GuB-42 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Amigas were not cheap. About the price of a midrange gaming PC in today's money. C64 were cheaper later on but that's still closer to entry level PCs than a Raspberry Pi.

      Also, the Raspberry Pi is a powerhouse compared to these old-school computers. It changes the way it is approached. You can fully understand an Amiga or C64, know every instruction, their timing and addresses. A RPi is always used through an OS, with many abstraction layers and things happening behind your back. Basically, old-school computers forced you to understand the hardware if you wanted to go further, but it was easy, now you don't really need to, and doing so would be much harder.

    5. Re:Nostalgia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I grew up in the 80s and 90s and I'd say that (at least in Europe) the C64 was much pervasive than the Raspberry Pi now.

      Only the first iteration was maybe a bit more expensive, but a C64 with cassette deck was well within everyone's reach. Also, after a couple of years you would just get a used one from your big brother or nephew, or get it for cheap.
      A disk drive would be as expensive as the C64 itself though. But almost all my friends had a C64 in the late 80s. I'm sure most 12 year old kids don't even know what a Raspberry Pi is.

      Amiga is a different story because it was more expensive so it definitely had less traction with the younger crowd (I couldn't afford one), and less parents were willing to pay that much for what was basically a nice gaming system for most kids. Still I had many friends as well with an Amiga and obviously loved going over to play the amazing games the system had at that time.

    6. Re:Nostalgia by sad_ · · Score: 1

      Amigas were not cheap. About the price of a midrange gaming PC in today's money.

      yes, in todays money you'd get a very decent PC, but back then the Amiga was cheap compared to PC's and offered way more (colours, sound, multitasking OS).

      --
      On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
    7. Re:Nostalgia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. $1400.00 in todays money. Video Toaster was another $1,000.00
      It was not a cheap platform. It was also the birthplace of Modtracking. It's a lot like Loop Based Music composition systems. Modtracking evolved to use
      samples of high bit rates. It was pretty cool. Way ahead of the IBM PC. I think what drove the market is where the money was to be made for software.
      There were a lot of PCs out there. Not capable of the 4,096 color pallete that the Amiga was capable of. No where near capable of the Sound Quality either.
      When I was a teenager I wrote Multifli. I believe it was one of the first multimedia authoring tools and runtime player that synchronized sound with video frames.
      I bought an Amiga 4000/40 to start the port back in the late 1993. I was basically writing the video player first, it was based on the fli file format.
      All of a sudden Amiga dropped of the face of the earth and I stopped writing the code.
         

    8. Re:Nostalgia by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      I and my brother bought a second-hand Amiga 500+ by saving up our pocket money. 50 GBP second-hand, and it came with dozens of games and other programs (some original, others copies). Even adjusting for inflation, that's only about 4 times the cost of a Raspberry Pi.

      It also wasn't really necessary to understand the hardware to do cool things. You could make a shoot-em-up with Blitz Basic which looked just as good as most of the stuff you got on magazine cover disks.

    9. Re:Nostalgia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amiga = 80's

    10. Re:Nostalgia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't remember the hardware in the 90s being 'dirt cheap'.

    11. Re:Nostalgia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Around the 486 era before Pentium, I remember PC clones getting a LOT cheaper, though I wouldn't call them "dirt cheap."

      In the mid-80s, the C=64, introduced at $595, eventually dropped to $299. Stupidly, I didn't buy one because the Amiga had been introduced and I could see the C=64 was yesterday's news. I held out for an Amiga, but never did get one (even the A500 was too expensive for a starving student).

  7. Re:c 0m by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Crommulent!

  8. AmiMoJo is SO TRIGGERED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    right now you guys...

  9. Re:Amigas were bricked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Commodore went bankrupt in 1994 due to mismanagement. They had the Amiga 4000 with advanced video editing capabilities back then which was still used professionally many years later. I had a dude in '96 in my CS classes at university running windows emulators on his Amiga just fine.

  10. Re:what else is revived by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    That SID chip music will be back :)

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  11. Always wondered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the source code is available anywhere to the os

    1. Re:Always wondered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it leaked a while back, but the 'owner' of course doesn't want it open because of that valuable market of 5 Amiga users.

      AROS is superior in much how Linux compares to SCO XENIX.

  12. Re:what else is revived by TurboStar · · Score: 2

    That SID chip music will be back :)

    SID music never went away. Go to the High Voltage SID Collection (HVSC) and put 2018 in their search box. SID wasn't part of the Amiga chipset though.

  13. Re:Amigas were bricked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Anybody remember the Nickelodeon Saturday Morning show "Total Panic" with Steve Gibson warning about the failures of Amiga systems and other computers of the 80s in 1990?

    Google seems not to remember, so did it ever really happen?

    I’d love to see a reference for this.

    Unless you happened to see a commercial for SpinRite.

  14. Re:what else is revived by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    As TurboStar said above, there was no SID in the Amiga.
    The SID chip was inside the Commodore 64.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  15. How about we stop using BSD is dying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And post "Amiga is being brought back" as the preferred Slashdot shitpost?

  16. Re:what else is revived by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It also found its way into your crappy radio music through the SidStation
    You can clearly hear the filtered saw-tooth waveform in the beginning of Britney Spears - Gimme More

  17. Amateurs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I worked extensively with a company that shipped Amiga 4000 based products long after Amiga Technologies went kapoof. That work included re-layout of motherboards to reduce EMI/EMC emissions. Given that those products represented the tail end of single-ended, open collector parallel bus technologies I can tell you than anyone who claims to know jack about those boards and is merely keeping them alive by replacing caps and batteries is nothing but a hack. Unless you have studied the capacitance of those boards trace by trace, updating the terminating pull-up resistor values to meet timing requirements, you haven't even begun to understand the challenges involved in keeping them operational as they age. It seems the last of the true Amiga community died along with Software Hut in 2005. RIP.

    1. Re:Amateurs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These are boards to replace those damaged by leaking components or shipping incidents. I'm sure the work you did on reworking the A4000 was to a high standard (although I can only think of one or two companies who used the chipsets in other devices after AT folded) but to say someone is an amateur because they're not doing unnecessary work.... well.

      I've had 20+ years "hacking", repairing, modifying and working with Amigas. Aside from a few known timing issues and factory faults there's no reason to go around replacing passives that are simply old. I'm not associated with these Paul or Chucky but I do recognise that they've reverse engineered boards in a matter of a few weeks and will make the layouts available to all.... that's far more supportive to the community than the likes of commercial vendors like Phase 5 who are constantly promising expensive hardware and not delivering.

  18. Meh. Still not as cool.. by zawarski · · Score: 2

    ... as my Atari 800 w/ ATR-8000 and a pair of 8-inch floppies.

    1. Re:Meh. Still not as cool.. by sheramil · · Score: 0

      You could have saved this comment for the thread about "they're reviving the Atari 800"...

      ...oh? They aren't? Huh. Imagine that.

    2. Re:Meh. Still not as cool.. by Misagon · · Score: 1

      From your username and your like of Atari... you are from Poland, right?

      I found recently that the Atari 8-bit is very popular there for some reason.

      --
      "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
  19. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  20. Re:Why does the hardware matter? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Why does the hardware for Amiga matter so much, people are willing to redesign and reserve engineer to get it to work?

    Nostalgia. The Amiga (as a package) was so vastly much better than anything else available at the time that a lot of people have very strong feelings about it. It was outpaced by PCs at about the time that PCs started to get decent video acceleration, and I don't mean the 3d kind, but until then it was by far the best value in computing since its inception. It had a good CPU, a fast bus with autoconfiguration, and by far the best graphics and sound for ages.

    Am I blind in thinking that AmigaOS is better off being modernized to run on bare metal modern off the shelf hardware?

    It wouldn't give the same feeling to people trying to relive their youth. And it would be senseless to try to use AmigaOS as if it were a modern OS, because it lacks important features like memory protection — Amigas generally didn't come with a MMU, and even most accelerators don't have one. It was awesome in its day, but today there's no actual point outside of enjoyment of the experience.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  21. Re:Why does the hardware matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You had to be there to understand it.

  22. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  23. Re:Why does the hardware matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah. My mates didn't even consider PCs until there were decent graphics cards. PCs were "business computers". As soon as command and conquer came out though, the tech was there for PCs to kick the arse of everything else.

  24. Former Amiga owner here by Dasher42 · · Score: 1

    What gets me excited about the Amiga hardware scene are the neat FPGA kits that drive them. It's particularly interesting when this leads to things superior to any officially produced Amiga hardware out there, like a 68080 processor core: http://www.apollo-core.com/

    It's nice to simulate an ECS or AGA chipset for old times' sake, but it's also nice that the hardware doing that is also easily used for other creative things. I'd love to see RISC-V and FPGAs become a new creative playground for programmable hardware.

  25. What again? by darth_borehd · · Score: 1

    It seems every few years there is another announcement that Amiga is returning from the dead.

  26. The Firebee is a new Atari compatible computer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For balance of powers, there is the Amiga computer, and there is the Atari computer.

    The FireBee is a New Atari compatible computer.

    http://firebee.org/fb-bin/index?&lng=EN

  27. This Is Not A Revival by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is not an Amiga revival, it's not new life, it's not a Renaissance.

    This is a couple of hobbyists fooling around with some old hardware, replacing some damaged components to get the machine working again. I never used an Amiga but I thought it was a fine idea and I give props to the people who loved them. And that's all this is; some Amiga owners working on a weekend project.

    Know what an Amiga revival would really look like? New Amiga models with new CPUs, development work on the OS, software appearing for the system that never existed before.

    Time and circumstance have passed the Amiga by. It was good in it's day and it's day is done. Same goes for the Commodore 64, same for the DEC Rainbow, same for the TRS-80, same for all old computers. Reminiscing about the Good Old Days is fine as long as you know that's all it is.