Slashdot Mirror


Commodore's Amiga Is Being Revived In Newly Updated Hardware (hothardware.com)

MojoKid writes from a report via Hot Hardware: Although it has been over three decades since the first Commodore Amigas were originally released, a fan base for the beloved systems is still going strong. In fact, today's Amiga community seems to be more active now that it has been in years, and a number of exciting new hardware projects have cropped up in recent weeks. Two relatively new projects, led by popular members of the Amiga community Paul Rezendes and John "Chucky" Hertell, are designed to breathe new life into the Amiga 4000 and Amiga 1200.

Both men set out to reverse engineer the motherboards for these systems, not only to continue the possibility of repairing existing machines that are prone to serious damage from leaky batteries and electrolytic capacitors, but to potentially spur additional customizations for the platform in the future. Though Paul and John have only made minor modifications to the Amiga 4000 and Amiga 1200 motherboard PCBs to this point, the possibility now also exists for all new variants to arrive at some point in the future for these machines as well. The first actual working motherboards populated with components based on the Amiga 4000 Replica project or Re-Amiga 1200 haven't been shown off just yet, and they may require additional revisions to work out any kinks. However, both projects are good examples of the passion that still remains for the beloved Amiga from computing glory days gone by.

50 of 94 comments (clear)

  1. What, again? by Kenja · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ah, never mind. I see this is about the same stuff as last time (Apollo etc). Sure, you could spend a bunch of money on a "new" Amiga, but at the end of the day it seems simpler to just run an emulator or FPGA system (I went with the later).

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:What, again? by Excelcia · · Score: 3, Insightful

      at the end of the day it seems simpler to just run an emulator or FPGA system

      There is some truth to this. But I would not mind having a physical system. Not sure how much I'm willing to pay for this, but there is something to be had to have an actual Amiga. But then I'm the type who has kept a pair of actual Amiga Corp joysticks back from before their purchase by Commodore.

      The Amiga was one of those crazy amazing things where things just lined up in the universe to produce something that was an engineering work of art. The way tasks were offloaded onto hardware like that amazing programmable blitter, was a decade ahead of its time. One of the reason I don't mind supporting actual hardware is to support that. Commodore made many mistakes, to be sure, but companies like Microsoft ("who would ever want to run more than one program at a time?") who were beginning their rein of terror with their counter-marketing was at least equally to blame. The Amiga is in company with the Avro Arrow and the Tucker automobile - other projects that were light years ahead of their time.

      I hope the revival is successful.

    2. Re:What, again? by Kenja · · Score: 2

      Thus the FPGA systems like MiST etc. Physical joystick ports, dedicated hardware, can be used for other things and much cheaper than a used Amiga much less a new one.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    3. Re:What, again? by golgotha007 · · Score: 1

      I understand that it's much easier (and cheaper) to emulate than to run on original hardware, but emulation doesn't bring the nostalgic factor like original hardware does and to be perfectly honest, it just isn't as cool. Also, half the fun in running old gear is keeping it clean, making repairs as needed and providing all the love necessary to keep things running clean and quiet.

      I've been collecting Commodore hardware over the last decade and have quite the Commodore museum for an office. There's nothing more satisfying than writing a daily journal using Pen Pal on an original Amiga 2000 or using Paperback Writer on a Commodore 128 in 80 column mode with a 1802 monitor and 1571 disk drive.

    4. Re:What, again? by toejam13 · · Score: 1

      I see this less as a product for people wanting to build new systems as it is a product for existing owners who want to rehab their broken systems. That may change as enhanced versions are released, but who knows with retro computing fans.

      I have a dead A3000 in my basement. If the price was right, I wouldn't mind bringing it back to life. But to be honest, I'd probably still use UAE for 99% of the time just because it is faster and easier to use.

    5. Re:What, again? by Kenja · · Score: 1

      Sure, if you want a project rebuilding an old Amiga is fun. But then you start looking at spending hundreds or even thousands of dollars on upgrades and it just gets silly. If your goal is to run Amiga OS and games, the best middle ground seems to be a dedicated FPGA system. Lets you use old accessories etc, only thing they tend to be missing is a floppy drive, which frankly I can do without... most "new" Amiga systems end up replacing the floppy with a flash drive anyhow.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    6. Re:What, again? by The+New+Guy+2.0 · · Score: 1

      Joystick ports were replaced by USB... it's easy to get a throwback joystick these days.

    7. Re:What, again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      'Rein of terror' is not really what you'd think of as being an easily marketable product, but you'd be surprised at just how wealthy the four horsemen are and how much they'd be willing to spend on horse tack.

    8. Re:What, again? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      But then you start looking at spending hundreds or even thousands of dollars on upgrades and it just gets silly.

      These days there are hundred-dollar accelerators for Amigas, with enough RAM for gaming, so it's not that bad. On the other hand, having to re-cap them is a bit of a drag, and probably not worth it to most potential users. Emulation is better in its own way, because you can emulate multiple different models of Amiga, and some games (or other software) doesn't run well or at all on some models of Amiga, even with whdload.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:What, again? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Joystick ports were replaced by USB... it's easy to get a throwback joystick these days.

      Or if you must hack hardware, you can always use an Arduino Mega to get physical ports. There's really no good reason to use a classic joystick, though. They all sucked compared to a good gamepad. Literally all of them.

      With that said, actual Amiga users who want a mediocre gamepad which plugs into their Amiga can trivially hack a six-button mega drive pad to work. All six buttons are supported in all of four or five games; more games support three buttons, and vastly more support two. It involves swapping two wires, with a resistor added in series to one of them. I forget the details, but I did post about it on some amiga forum once I found the information online.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re: What, again? by CyberRacer · · Score: 2

      You touch on the importance of the Amiga (yes, I do miss my beautiful 2000/68030), but by and large emulators do run better today than than the originals. The point that's being missed is that it was a philosophy of design that made it so special. Take the things that suck up the most CPU cycles and offload them to hardware, then seemlessly (more or less) integrate them back into the os. Today gpus, soundcards, etc perform the same functions. In order for any "new" Amiga to be anything more than than just sentimentality on steroids, it's going to require an extension of the philosophy, and not just hacking on a few more modern ports. For example, one might consider incorporating machine learning, not just in hardware, but as an integrated part of the os as well. Anything short of that simply can't be competitive in today's market. Just for the record, I still fire up uae or winfellow once in a while to relive the heavy playing, heavy drinking glory days.

    11. Re:What, again? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Microsoft ("who would ever want to run more than one program at a time?")

      They later changed their mind on that.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      Ah, the decade that taste forgot...

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    12. Re:What, again? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Even cheaper and easier is a Raspberry Pi. Also supports physical joystick ports and even real Amiga keyboards.

      Emulation is pretty good these days. I still like to have a real Amiga with a proper CRT monitor around though.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    13. Re:What, again? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      8/16 bit era joysticks were vastly superior to gamepads because they were right handed. For some reason we ended up with the directional controls operated with the left hand on gamepads and modern joysticks, when most people favour their right hand for precision control.

      You can get right handed arcade sticks nowadays, but the last time I saw a right handed gamepad was the Playstation era and it didn't look great.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    14. Re: What, again? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, there aren't many people today who can recognize a good design, let alone build one themselves. "Good" these days tends to mean "we managed to deploy it." Elegance isn't a thing anymore. (I should say, it's rare. Bitcoin was elegant.)

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    15. Re:What, again? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, it's really hard to even find information on these because those little gaming keyboards are now called gamepads for some reason. Stupidity, I guess. Anyhow, there is the goofy foot mod kit. The NES controller is an ergonomics train wreck, but they are still readily available and they are one of the most precise game controllers ever made...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    16. Re:What, again? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I might give that a try. A right handed Saturn pad would be amazing... But I'll probably end up with a right handed arcade stick.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  2. FCC by Guy+On+A+Sybian · · Score: 1

    Now thirty years later, have they added essential things to make these units compliant? There are much more stringent regulations that have to be met now.

    UL (kind of)
    ETL
    CE
    FCC

    It isn't cheap to sell consumer electronics anymore. Everyone wants a piece of the pie, and you'll be sued out of existence in some countries and not allowed to enter the market in others if you manage to survive the first round of development.

    1. Re:FCC by The+New+Guy+2.0 · · Score: 2

      The standards of today make computers a lot safer and easier to depose of... remember Tandys which would explode the capacitors if moved?

    2. Re:FCC by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Amiga was never that noisy. They were used in low-rent broadcasting because of this. One of the major cable channel guides used it, I remember seeing it guru meditate. The machines were wholly shielded internally, including the all-in-ones. What makes you think they couldn't pass modern standards? Probably the only change which would have to be made besides updating the power supplies (which hobbyists have already worked around, by adapting standard ATX supplies) would be solder composition, for the only initialism you didn't actually remember to mention... RoHS.

      Also, you only need UL certification to get shelf space at a major retailer. I see you knew this, hence the "sort of", but mentioning it was still silly.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:FCC by Known+Nutter · · Score: 2

      One of the major cable channel guides used it, I remember seeing it guru meditate.

      Prevue Channel

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      https://www.atlasobscura.com/a...

      --
      Beware of the Leopard.
    4. Re:FCC by Known+Nutter · · Score: 1
      --
      Beware of the Leopard.
    5. Re:FCC by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The Amiga PSUs were actually pretty good, because they were linear. Modern ones are switch mode which are smaller and lighter, but you get much more noise.

      The main issue with the Amiga ones is that they are not very powerful. I see to recall the A1200 one only being 25W, the A500 one being only a little more. You could run an accelerator but then adding an extra floppy drive was pushing it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:FCC by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The new hotness for the internal keyboard Amigas (not actually new but anyway) is to install a picopsu inside the case, the 12 volt (not wide input) units can be had for about $20 on eBay. I put one in my a1200. There is room outside of the shielding. I soldered to the legs of the power jack so that I didn't have to modify the board. Not more than I already had for the timing fix needed by the accelerator, anyway.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:FCC by nedwidek · · Score: 1

      The low RF noise was a small part of it. The main reason was because the chipset had the built in ability to genlock to an external video signal.This meant you needed minimal equipment to do titling or overlays. I bought a GVP G-Lock at the '93 Amiga World Expo in NYC and I remember it being in the $150 range. That was astoundingly cheap at that time. If I had a PC or a Mac at the time, I'd never have been able to afford to have my own video equipment as a college student. And as the video studio in the electronic arts program was always booked....

      --
      Post anonymously - For when your opinion embarrasses even you!
    8. Re:FCC by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Problem is the non-lead solder tends to whisker if you have traces with opposite polarity current next to each other. [...] Of course you would just drop it into OrCAD and it would figure it out for you.

      Or you could apply a coating to either the entire board, or to the regions where this is likely to become a problem.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  3. Why not the reverse? by Misagon · · Score: 1

    Instead of a 100 MHz CPU in FPGA running against vintage graphics and sound chips, I would much rather like to see the vintage graphics and sound chips in FPGA but the CPU being emulated, with JIT-compilation running on a fast modern ARM multi-core chip.

    That would be a really powerful Amiga, and you would be able to run other things (such as OS:es and emulation cores) on it as well.

    However, I have not found any FPGA board that has had any good interlink with any powerful ARM chip. The ones I have seen (including MiST) have used the CPU for loading cores onto the FPGA and not much more. The FPGA would need to provide an interface from the CPU to the machine's "Chip RAM" and that might be a bit too unusual?

    --
    "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
    1. Re:Why not the reverse? by Misagon · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the SoCs with many and faster ARM cores are often paired with FPGAs that are overkill for emulating the Amiga chipset and would therefore be too expensive to compete with MiST, Vampire or a Raspberry Pi.

      And then the key part: giving the FPGA its own "Chip RAM", with access from the emulator on the ARM core.

      --
      "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
  4. Re:We will have Amigas on Mars by The+New+Guy+2.0 · · Score: 1

    Your post must have been delayed on a 20-lightyear link....

  5. Re:Typo? by The+New+Guy+2.0 · · Score: 1

    No typo... Amiga was a popular graphics computer of the 80s.

  6. Re:Nostalgia by The+New+Guy+2.0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Raspberry Pi represents to our children what we were growing up with in the 90s... small processor and storage sizes, and dirt cheap hardware. There's many kid efforts in teaching computers that are just not discussed on Slashdot.

  7. Re:Typo? by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Spotted the millennial. Shouldn't you be driving up the price of avocados or something?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  8. Re:Nostalgia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm largely in agreement.

    However, I will note that an Amiga, or even a C64, was a much larger percentage of the household budget in the 1980's than today's Raspberry Pi which costs no more than a night at the (absurdly overpriced) movies.

    The Raspberry Pi and its copycats, like Odroid, are amazing computers for the price and vastly more versatile than Commodore was/is.

  9. Re:Amigas were bricked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Commodore went bankrupt in 1994 due to mismanagement. They had the Amiga 4000 with advanced video editing capabilities back then which was still used professionally many years later. I had a dude in '96 in my CS classes at university running windows emulators on his Amiga just fine.

  10. Re:Typo? by The+New+Guy+2.0 · · Score: 1

    No, I mean 1980s.

  11. Re:what else is revived by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    That SID chip music will be back :)

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  12. Re:what else is revived by TurboStar · · Score: 2

    That SID chip music will be back :)

    SID music never went away. Go to the High Voltage SID Collection (HVSC) and put 2018 in their search box. SID wasn't part of the Amiga chipset though.

  13. Re:what else is revived by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    As TurboStar said above, there was no SID in the Amiga.
    The SID chip was inside the Commodore 64.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  14. Re:Nostalgia by GuB-42 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Amigas were not cheap. About the price of a midrange gaming PC in today's money. C64 were cheaper later on but that's still closer to entry level PCs than a Raspberry Pi.

    Also, the Raspberry Pi is a powerhouse compared to these old-school computers. It changes the way it is approached. You can fully understand an Amiga or C64, know every instruction, their timing and addresses. A RPi is always used through an OS, with many abstraction layers and things happening behind your back. Basically, old-school computers forced you to understand the hardware if you wanted to go further, but it was easy, now you don't really need to, and doing so would be much harder.

  15. Meh. Still not as cool.. by zawarski · · Score: 2

    ... as my Atari 800 w/ ATR-8000 and a pair of 8-inch floppies.

    1. Re:Meh. Still not as cool.. by Misagon · · Score: 1

      From your username and your like of Atari... you are from Poland, right?

      I found recently that the Atari 8-bit is very popular there for some reason.

      --
      "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
  16. Re:Typo? by fuzzywig · · Score: 1
    I'm a millennial and I owned an A500 in 1991. I was 10.

    More likely the OP is a troll, or someone from whatever we're calling the generation younger than millennials (Gen Z?).

  17. Re:Nostalgia by sad_ · · Score: 1

    Amigas were not cheap. About the price of a midrange gaming PC in today's money.

    yes, in todays money you'd get a very decent PC, but back then the Amiga was cheap compared to PC's and offered way more (colours, sound, multitasking OS).

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
  18. Re:Typo? by aquabat · · Score: 1

    There was only one 2008.

    --
    A republic cannot succeed till it contains a certain body of men imbued with the principles of justice and honour.
  19. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  20. Re:Nostalgia by pjt33 · · Score: 1

    I and my brother bought a second-hand Amiga 500+ by saving up our pocket money. 50 GBP second-hand, and it came with dozens of games and other programs (some original, others copies). Even adjusting for inflation, that's only about 4 times the cost of a Raspberry Pi.

    It also wasn't really necessary to understand the hardware to do cool things. You could make a shoot-em-up with Blitz Basic which looked just as good as most of the stuff you got on magazine cover disks.

  21. Re:Why does the hardware matter? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Why does the hardware for Amiga matter so much, people are willing to redesign and reserve engineer to get it to work?

    Nostalgia. The Amiga (as a package) was so vastly much better than anything else available at the time that a lot of people have very strong feelings about it. It was outpaced by PCs at about the time that PCs started to get decent video acceleration, and I don't mean the 3d kind, but until then it was by far the best value in computing since its inception. It had a good CPU, a fast bus with autoconfiguration, and by far the best graphics and sound for ages.

    Am I blind in thinking that AmigaOS is better off being modernized to run on bare metal modern off the shelf hardware?

    It wouldn't give the same feeling to people trying to relive their youth. And it would be senseless to try to use AmigaOS as if it were a modern OS, because it lacks important features like memory protection — Amigas generally didn't come with a MMU, and even most accelerators don't have one. It was awesome in its day, but today there's no actual point outside of enjoyment of the experience.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  22. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  23. Former Amiga owner here by Dasher42 · · Score: 1

    What gets me excited about the Amiga hardware scene are the neat FPGA kits that drive them. It's particularly interesting when this leads to things superior to any officially produced Amiga hardware out there, like a 68080 processor core: http://www.apollo-core.com/

    It's nice to simulate an ECS or AGA chipset for old times' sake, but it's also nice that the hardware doing that is also easily used for other creative things. I'd love to see RISC-V and FPGAs become a new creative playground for programmable hardware.

  24. What again? by darth_borehd · · Score: 1

    It seems every few years there is another announcement that Amiga is returning from the dead.