Slashdot Mirror


Chemists Discover How Blue Light Speeds Blindness

Isao writes: It (apparently) has been known that blue light damages eyes and accelerates macular degeneration. A new article on Phys.org may have identified how this happens. It seems that unlike other light colors, blue causes a necessary molecule (retinal) to permanently kill photoreceptor cells. "The researcher found that a molecule called alpha Tocopherol, a Vitamin E derivative and a natural antioxidant in the eye and body, stops the cells from dying," reports Phys.org. "However, as a person ages or the immune system is suppressed, people lose the ability to fight against the attack by retinal and blue light." The authors will continue their research and recommend filtering and blue-light reduction in the meantime. The study has been published in the journal Scientific Reports.

73 of 144 comments (clear)

  1. Rose colored glasses by jfdavis668 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ok, from now on I'm looking at the world through rose colored glasses. That should stop all that blue light business.

    1. Re: Rose colored glasses by bobmagicii · · Score: 1

      rip anyone whose fav colour is blue. go go red. suck it blues!

    2. Re:Rose colored glasses by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I first got some prescription glasses with blue light filter in Japan maybe a decade ago, and now I see they are becoming available in Europe.

      They do rose tint everything but it's subtle. My most recent pair I didn't bother, I just set my monitor calibration to be off-white. I'd say the rose tented glasses work better though, I'll get some next time.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:Rose colored glasses by PPH · · Score: 1

      There was an upside to electing a president with orange hair! Who knew?

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  2. Excellent by rmdingler · · Score: 1

    Light activatable G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), also known as opsins, harvest light through their covalently bound chromophore 11-cis retinal (11CR), an aldehyde derivative of vitamin A1,2.

    Thanks again, /. Covalently... a new word to insert in otherwise innocuous conversation to thwart my intelligent friends' belief that they might be my mental equal.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

    1. Re:Excellent by ls671 · · Score: 1

      As well, I am not sure what blue light means in this context. Does this mean that blue screens of death make you blind?

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    2. Re:Excellent by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily, though it does inure you to the possibility that the theoretical protection of the user interface is more important than individual satisfaction with its implementation.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    3. Re:Excellent by rmdingler · · Score: 2

      Hell, I didn't know the word Khyber before Slashdot.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    4. Re:Excellent by mikael · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Blue light in this context is just that - regular blue pixels on a computer screen. There are night-safe modes which tone down these pixels.

      Your retinas has around seven layers of rods, cones and processing neurons. Light is refracted through the lens so that infra-red light hits blood vessels, red light which has a longer wavelength and travels less deeper into the retina hits the upper layers. Blue light in this context is goes into the deepest layer of the retina because the wavelength is shorter and has more energy. UV light gets filtered out by the lens (but causes cataracts in the long term).

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    5. Re:Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I thought that forte was Italian as in forte, fortissimo, piano (the inverse), pianissimo. In which case it would be "for-teh" ("for-tay")
      I'm French and in French forte is not a noun, it's the feminine of "strong". So whatever the origin you're debating a word which does not exist in French.

    6. Re:Excellent by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Hey, look, I found APKs little buddy!

      How are you doing, little child?

      Slashdot anonymity is broken, moron. How do you think I found APK and his mother's addresses?

      What a pathetic AC. Doesn't even realize they're already exposed.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    7. Re:Excellent by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      If it hasn't reduced to 'fart wars' in the cube farm, they're not really bored.

      We got to Kimchi, PBR and hard boiled eggs, stopped after that, someone was going to get hurt.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  3. Well, that's all of us done for by BoogieChile · · Score: 5, Funny

    Back to the old amber CRT, then

    1. Re:Well, that's all of us done for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That one emits (some) x-rays which fry your retinas AND your brain in the long term...

    2. Re:Well, that's all of us done for by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      CCFL is inferior because of cost, high voltage drivers, fading, and eventual failure. LEDs can be more efficient.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  4. Gonna really suck for saltwater tanks/ grow lights by Khyber · · Score: 4, Informative

    Topic says it all. LED ones are especially blue-heavy (up to 80% of the overall output in saltwater reef tanks) and that's gotta cause some issues.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  5. Go black and don't look back (if you still can!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Light text on black (not 'dark' -- BLACK!). Black text on white is CRAZY, EDDIE!

  6. Re:And here I thought... by rmdingler · · Score: 1

    Or my palms are, perhaps, busy remedying the azure state of another bodily part.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

  7. Blue light isn't the issue, getting old is... by cyn1c77 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The blurb (and even the article) is jaded and implies that blue light causes blindness to ride the anti-screen wave.

    If you read it, you find that the issue is actually that the body makes alpha Tocopherol, a Vitamin E derivative, which keeps the photoreceptor cells from dying. Some people lose the ability to make that alpha Tocopherol as they age, leading to blindness.

    So the issue isn't to avoid blue light and buy crazy glasses... (how are you really going to avoid blue light if you ever want to see white again anyway? Are you going to stop looking at white paper?) Rather it's to find a way to keep supplying alpha Tocopherol to the eye as people age.

    1. Re:Blue light isn't the issue, getting old is... by Alsn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's true. However it could also mean that in the meantime the people who suffer from the deficiency could use filter glasses to keep their sight until a permanent treatment is discovered. Assuming that their findings are correct and that blue light is the only culprit.

    2. Re:Blue light isn't the issue, getting old is... by Khyber · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Some people lose the ability to make that alpha Tocopherol as they age, leading to blindness."

      Did you just quit reading AND thinking there? Next bit clearly states that people with compromised immune systems or weakened ones from disease are also susceptible. Guess what a hospital is loaded with? Hint: Look all around one, and then look up.

      We also know (I've been fucking saying this for almost a decade, now, when I was doing global horticultural lighting design) that grow lighting is triggering macular degeneration in younger healthier population. This doesn't mean your mom and pop in their 50s+, this is happening as early as a persons 20s.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    3. Re:Blue light isn't the issue, getting old is... by Greyfox · · Score: 3, Interesting

      DMSO Tocopherol eyedrops a couple times a week? I suppose someone'll have to do a study on exactly how safe DMSO would be for eyeballs over long periods of time.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    4. Re:Blue light isn't the issue, getting old is... by mentil · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, no, you have to inject it directly into the eye twice daily. Good thing, I'm terrible at using eyedrops without blinking.

      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    5. Re:Blue light isn't the issue, getting old is... by iTrawl · · Score: 2

      I've been fucking saying this for almost a decade, now

      Citation needed? Preferably in a scientific journal.

      --
      "Everybody's naked underneath" -- The Doctor
    6. Re:Blue light isn't the issue, getting old is... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Also, blue light is linked to disruption of sleep.

      I wish Slashdot had a dark theme.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:Blue light isn't the issue, getting old is... by PPH · · Score: 2

      Are you going to stop looking at white paper?

      To an extent, your brain compensates for variations in ambient lighting. With reduced blue wavelengths, you will still perceive white paper as white. And reading is more dependent on contrast anyway. White paper vs black ink (or blue ink, which will look black) under red night vision lighting is still readable.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    8. Re:Blue light isn't the issue, getting old is... by DamnOregonian · · Score: 2

      The blurb (and even the article) is jaded and implies that blue light causes blindness to ride the anti-screen wave.

      Objection: Speculation

      If you read it, you find that the issue is actually that the body makes alpha Tocopherol, a Vitamin E derivative, which keeps the photoreceptor cells from dying. Some people lose the ability to make that alpha Tocopherol as they age, leading to blindness.

      That's certainly part of the article.

      That wasn't even the notable part- the notable part was that blue-light activated retinol is shown to by highly cytotoxic, and that there is a known statistical trend between age and your ability to get Tocopherol to the places it needs to be, which strongly correlates with the kinds of macular degeneration that are also highly age-correlated.

      So the issue isn't to avoid blue light and buy crazy glasses... (how are you really going to avoid blue light if you ever want to see white again anyway? Are you going to stop looking at white paper?) Rather it's to find a way to keep supplying alpha Tocopherol to the eye as people age.

      You're actually inserting your own bias into the paper, and you're too stupid to see it.
      They make it quite clear that you can't avoid blue light, and it would be even more ridiculous to think that finding a solution to age-related Tocopherol transport issues would be within the scope of that paper.

      In short, they're not riding the anti-screen wave, you're just virulently opposed to it, and are viewing everything you read with... blue colored glasses?

    9. Re:Blue light isn't the issue, getting old is... by Sark666 · · Score: 1

      But blue light above any other light, regulates are circadian rhythm.

    10. Re:Blue light isn't the issue, getting old is... by Khyber · · Score: 5, Informative

      https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/p...

      That's from 2006, before I started designing and selling horticultural LED lighting, from the British Journal of Ophthalmology.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    11. Re:Blue light isn't the issue, getting old is... by DamnOregonian · · Score: 1

      Actually, yes it does. Try reading it next time.

    12. Re:Blue light isn't the issue, getting old is... by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      IIRC, the body does not synthesize alpha tocopherol, one of the 8 forms of vitamin E. Being essential to human health and the body not being able to synthesize it is part of what qualifies a substance for being a vitamin.

      Alpha tocopherol is available as a cheap supplement; if you buy vitamin E whose makeup is unspecified, it's going to be mostly alpha tocopherol.

      Gamma tocopherol helps the body recycle alpha tocopherol.

      Do your own research, this is from memory.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    13. Re:Blue light isn't the issue, getting old is... by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

      I just installed this chrome extension: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/negative-revert-web-color/ohhfjfhanfnmmolddbjhfkogappmbndd and so far at least it's not bad at all.

  8. We're in an old villa and use "Warm white" bulbs.. by ClarkMills · · Score: 2

    We're in an old villa and use "Warm white" bulbs as it looks odd not to architecturally. They are on the redder (actually cooler 3000K) end of the spectrum to emulate your classic tungsten filament lighting. Not the best for reading resistor bands but at least I'll have my eyesight a bit longer... And hey, maybe my wake/sleep cycles will be better than the "Daylight" (6500K, bluer) colour balanced bulbs that everyone is using now.

  9. Re:It's harmful only if you already have a problem by magarity · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So as soon as I figure out how to stop aging I won't have this issue?

  10. Re:Correlation by Khyber · · Score: 3, Interesting

    No, as at the time of the introduction of the blue LED, efficiency and output was horrible, and even an incandescent light of equal power consumption output more light below the 470nm range than the LED did.

    Around the early 2000s is when blue LEDs began to gain in efficiency to the point where they were commercially viable for use in just about any consumer product.

    I'd suggest starting to look around 1997-2004 for the beginning of an increasing trend.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  11. Time to switch to green CRTs by OrangeTide · · Score: 4, Funny

    Time to throw away all this 4K HDR LCD garbage and go back to good old monochrome.

    P.S. - Does anyone know how I can hook up a Hercules ISA card to PCIe?

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:Time to switch to green CRTs by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      P.S. - Does anyone know how I can hook up a Hercules ISA card to PCIe?

      No need, you can hook it up to USB. It would be easier, though, to get a display card with a VGA output and fix the cable to omit the blue line. You'd still get colors, just not as many, and none of them would be at all blue.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Time to switch to green CRTs by OrangeTide · · Score: 2

      That USB adapter hack is pretty crazy. The way backlights work some amount of blue light makes it through, but maybe it isn't enough to matter.

      There are screen filters in common use that block blue light, as people have considered it to contribute to eye strain and fatigue for many years. It doesn't totally filter blue light, but it attenuates it significantly.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    3. Re:Time to switch to green CRTs by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Well, I'd propose you do use a CRT, just not a monochrome one. It's getting harder to find good cheap used ones, though, and I've gotten rid of all of mine because they take up too much space... Gonna have to live with some leakage.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  12. Re:We're in an old villa and use "Warm white" bulb by Nethead · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Nice to see that someone is still messing with resistors that have bands. You must like the old cruft like I do. My issue is the focus now. Many many years ago I was able to solder a 40 pin flat pack without glasses. Now I'm lucky to find the damn iron without technological assistance.

    --
    -- I have a private email server in my basement.
  13. WRONG ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The blurb (and even the article) is jaded and implies that blue light causes blindness to ride the anti-screen wave.

    You can say whatever you want, but the truth is BLUE LIGHT HURTS THE RETINA

    I did not know that before my retina was damaged (caused by an abrupt change of pressure due to deep sea diving)

    The retina of both my eyes were damaged - left eye gone completely dark - and after the many operations I regained only partial sight on my left eye

    Now, every time I go into a room with blue light shining both my eyes hurt

    It has nothing to do with alpha Tocopherol --- as I am still in my 20's and my body can still produce enough alpha Tocopherol

    It is that POWER came with blue light that hurts the eye

  14. Re:We're in an old villa and use "Warm white" bulb by markdavis · · Score: 1

    >"We're in an old villa and use "Warm white" bulbs as it looks odd not to architecturally. They are on the redder (actually cooler 3000K) end of the spectrum to emulate your classic tungsten filament lighting. "

    Warm/soft white is more like 2700K, which is traditional tungsten lighting. Bright white is around 3000K, cool white around 4100K, day light is around 5000K. I will admit to still buying and using mostly warm white and a bit of bright white in my house, with nothing colder. I can't seem to get used to the colder temperatures, residentially, no matter how popular it seems to be. It is just too harsh at night/evening and not pleasing.

  15. Re:Correlation by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    It's not about light output, it's about cost. When blue LEDs became cheap, everyone and their mom started using them for power indicators. They didn't have to produce otherwise useful amounts of light for that. They just had to be affordable in quantity.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  16. Re:We're in an old villa and use "Warm white" bulb by labnet · · Score: 1

    I feel you brother.
    Used to be able solder 0603 resistors with my 5cm super eyes. Now my arms are getting to short!

    --
    46137
  17. Re:We're in an old villa and use "Warm white" bulb by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

    I love my tuneable white bulbs. have set up a script to match daylight during day and the old fashioned tungsten in the evenings.

    --
    bickerdyke
  18. Amber colored glasses by Solandri · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The amber glasses used by shooters work by blocking blue light. The lens in your eye is a simple lens, so suffers from chromatic aberration. It does not focus the different colors of light onto the exact same spot. So what you see can be sharpened by blocking one end of the visible spectrum - red or blue. Your eyes are most sensitive to detail in green, less so in red, and suck at resolving blue. So blue light can be filtered out with very little effect on visual acuity (other than color accuracy). With less chromatic aberration, what you see appears slightly sharper.

    1. Re:Amber colored glasses by digitalslave · · Score: 1

      how do we get a -1 Ignorant vote?

    2. Re: Amber colored glasses by nowwith25percentmore · · Score: 1

      My eyeglasses have a coating that filters blue light. OTC reading glasses are also available with same feature and 0 diopter (optically neutral) lens; can be found on Amazon.

  19. Re:We're in an old villa and use "Warm white" bulb by Miamicanes · · Score: 2

    Be glad you don't have astigmatism, or you'd find yourself in the position of being unable to see clearly without glasses (or eventually, without multifocal lenses) at ANY distance, near OR far.

    Ever since roughly age 40, I've felt like I need a binocular microscope to solder anything smaller than 100-mil pitch... and depending on the part & lighting, even 100-mil has left me feeling like I'm "soldering blind" half the time. I've gotten to where I need a magnifying glass just to tell the difference between red and orange bands on a resistor, even WITH bright high-CRI lighting.

  20. time to sue kmart by visionlink · · Score: 2

    for all those bluelight specials...

  21. And end to all-white web pages? by Tomahawk · · Score: 1

    Will this finally put an end to all-white web pages, hopefully? And give us a less eye-straining Internet.

  22. Great by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    Millions of old people will run around with orange tinted glasses in 5, 4, 3, ...

    1. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Millions of old people will run around with orange tinted glasses in 5, 4, 3, ...

      Well, by some measures I'm an old people.

      But I've been using orange tinted glasses as my go-to outdoors eyewear for about 20 years now.

      They block the blue light (plus all of the UV), they improve colour contrast -- with them you can see a red flower in the middle of a green field whereas without them you can't, and they also improve vision in lower light as well as on cloudy days.

      I exclusively wear orange tinted lenses during the day, but for twilight or in the rain I've got a yellow set because they work even better in low light conditions (and even when it's still dark if you commute before the sun comes up).

      If you can find orange lenses, you'd be surprised at how much of an improvement they actually are in daylight. They're not common, but they do exist, and they do make a huge difference in what I can see when I'm outside.

      I've been wearing them for a long time, and I wouldn't go back.

  23. I doubt it. by Viol8 · · Score: 2

    If blue light was really as bad as they make out then we'd all go blind from looking at a blue sky.

    Interestingly however, the human retina can see UV light but it's blocked by the lens. However when people had replcement lenses put due to cataracts they could now see this UV (as the artificial lens didn't block it) and THIS caused some serious problems.

    1. Re:I doubt it. by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "If blue light was really as bad as they make out then we'd all go blind from looking at a blue sky."

      Wrong wavelength dominance. 450nm and lower is the general issue. The sky has a rough dominant peak around 483nm.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    2. Re:I doubt it. by DamnOregonian · · Score: 1

      1) People don't generally spend a hell of a lot of time gazing upward
      2) Peak wavelength of the blue sky is closer to green, peaking at pretty much the exact wavelength our eyes are least efficient at reacting to within our range (weird, right?)
      3) The sky isn't bright. Observe a shadow sometime- that's the amount of diffuse scattered sunlight hitting you from the *entire* visible sky.

  24. Citation needed by sjbe · · Score: 1

    We also know (I've been fucking saying this for almost a decade, now, when I was doing global horticultural lighting design) that grow lighting is triggering macular degeneration in younger healthier population.

    Are you seriously trying to claim that all the 20 somethings that want to get "medical" marijuana are not making shit up and are actually suffering from macular degeneration? (people growing pot are almost the only people who would give a shit about grow lights in their 20s) Either cite reputable medical studies (note the plural) or I'm calling bullshit.

    1. Re:Citation needed by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "Are you seriously trying to claim that all the 20 somethings that want to get "medical" marijuana are not making shit up and are actually suffering from macular degeneration?"

      You must fail hard at reading as I never once mentioned anything about marijuana. Perhaps you should put the joint down, yourself.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  25. Bye-bye Sky! Time to live like a mole. by nurbles · · Score: 1

    New Yorkers must have known this for a very long time ... they never look UP towards the sky, thus avoiding all of that dangerous blue coming from the sky outside.

  26. Re:6500K streetlights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Street lamps raise an interesting dilemma. Like many things in life, it's not a simple problem. Turns out that while our eyes are less sensitive to blue, we actually see blue better in low light conditions. It takes several factors fewer lumens of white light to illuminate the road compared to sulphur lighting. While day light lighting increases road safety at night, it comes at the cost of messing with sleep cycles.

  27. Re:We're in an old villa and use "Warm white" bulb by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    And hey, maybe my wake/sleep cycles will be better than the "Daylight" (6500K, bluer) colour balanced bulbs that everyone is using now.

    If you really want to help your wake sleep cycle- you would have the 6500k bulbs where you spend your mornings (if indoors) and the lower K, yellower bulbs in your bedroom, and where you spend your evenings. If you use the same bulbs 24/7 you're not really having much impact on your wake/sleep cycle.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  28. Re:I have tritanopia by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

    , which is a form of color blindness, and cannot see blue, and cannot be affected by that. Take that, normies :)

    Actually, the blue light is still going to damage your eyes- you just don't see the danger.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  29. Reese's Pieces of weasel words by epine · · Score: 1

    It (apparently) has been known that ...

    Is this the Reese's Pieces of weasel words?

    In addition to the grand (quibble) passive voice, the whole question of "since when has it (apparently) been known?" was stuffed into a long, cold drawer and is presently awaiting identification from dental records.

  30. Re:really? blue light? by PPH · · Score: 1

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the sky blue?

    We're not sure. I don't think anyone on Slashdot has ever seen the sky and reported back. We ought to mount an expedition out of our parents' basements. For research purposes.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  31. Re:really? blue light? by Sperbels · · Score: 1

    We're not evolutionarily engineered to survive long enough for this to matter.

  32. Re:We're in an old villa and use "Warm white" bulb by PPH · · Score: 1

    Wait!? Someone replaced toobs? I never got the memo.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  33. Re:We're in an old villa and use "Warm white" bulb by markdavis · · Score: 1

    >"I think you are presenting personal opinion as fact."

    Nope

    >"Fact is, 3000K is still very warm and for most people it looks yellowish."

    That might be, but the industry typically calls that color "bright white" not "warm white", which is typically 2400K to 2700K. Although it does vary by manufacturer.

    > "Cool White" is absolutely not 4000K, you can even see on the label it is above 6500K."

    Again, I didn't make up these terms. The lighting industry typically calls "cool white" 4000 to 5000K. 6000 to 6500K is defined as "day light".

  34. Re:Correlation by Khyber · · Score: 2

    No, it was about light output, as anything that could put out decent blue light even for indicators at the time just simply didn't exist until the almost mid-90s. Read about Shuji Nakamura, Nichia, and the creation of the gallium-arsenide blue LED which drove the LED industry into its heights that it is seeing today.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  35. So, not just the Blue Screen of Death by whitroth · · Score: 1

    but the Blue Screen of Blindness?

    Hey, maybe that starts in the mind, which explains the Zombie Apocalypse of Mobile Addiction....

  36. Mother was right by ChatHuant · · Score: 1

    Your mum told you long ago watching blue movies will make you blind. Well, now you know why.

  37. Re:Correlation by DamnOregonian · · Score: 1

    Na. It was definitely about cost. I worked on 3 projects in the time period where that phenomenon took off.
    We used blue lights because they looked cool, and had finally stopped costing $6 an LED.

  38. Re:Correlation by DamnOregonian · · Score: 1

    I can say that in the projects I worked on, one of which was commercialized, it was solely about price, as you said.
    We wanted them because they looked fucking cool, we didn't use them because they were insanely expensive. Once they were cheap- we used them everywhere we could... again, because they looked awesome. Blue LEDs had an otherworldly glow about them.

  39. Re:Gonna really suck for saltwater tanks/ grow lig by thoughtlover · · Score: 1

    Nope, and nope.

    Coral can, and do, thrive on blue light. When light hits the water's surface, and as you get deeper, certain wavelengths are absorbed by the water... the first (and at quite a low depth, comparatively) is red, second yellow, and finally blue at, roughly, 300' deep. After that, only non-photosynthetic corals can exist. Most coral growers/aquarium enthusiasts enjoy the most-actinic wavelength, blue. Most LED lights, specifically for growing coral, have arrays of pure white, red, green, and blue diodes.

    I grew the hell out of many SPS, LPS, and softbodied corals with mostly the blue channel on..rarely turned on the white/red/green channel.

    --
    No sig for you! Come back one year!