Slashdot Mirror


Did Russians Really Penetrate Florida's Election Systems? Maybe (nbcnews.com)

Anonymous readers share a report: Sen. Bill Nelson, a Florida Democrat, has reaped the political whirlwind in the 10 days since he proclaimed that Russian hackers had "penetrated" some of his state's county voting systems. The governor of Florida, Rick Scott, a Republican who is running against Nelson for his U.S. Senate seat this fall, has blasted his claim as irresponsible. The top Florida elections official, also a Republican, said he had seen no indication it's true. And The Washington Post weighed in Friday with a 2,717-word fact check that all but accused Nelson -- without evidence -- of making it up. However, three people familiar with the intelligence tell NBC News that there is a classified basis for Nelson's assertion, which he made at a public event after being given information from the leaders of the Senate Intelligence Committee. The extent and seriousness of the threat remains unclear, shrouded for reasons of national security.

[...] Through a spokesman, Nelson declined to comment. At a, Aug. 7 campaign event in Florida's capital, Nelson said Intelligence Committee leaders asked that he "let supervisors of elections in Florida know that Russians are inside our records." He added that Russian hackers "have already penetrated certain counties in the state and they now have free rein to move about." "Either Bill Nelson knows of crucial information the federal government is withholding from Florida election officials, or he is simply making things up," said Scott, who is seeking to take Nelson's Senate seat, which the senator has held since 2001. But Scott, who as governor has a security clearance, has not actually disputed Nelson's assertion. His spokesman said the governor had not personally called anyone at the Department of Homeland Security to seek a classified briefing to get to the bottom of the matter.

72 of 205 comments (clear)

  1. "people familiar" by cfalcon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Anonymous sources said that there's a basis that can't be disclosed or discussed or refuted. Sounds legit.

    1. Re:"people familiar" by ClickOnThis · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And the reason is classified. County-level government has no legally-enforceable national security information classifications.

      Elections are explicitly local. National security information classes are explicitly federal.

      For crying out loud, it's right in TFS and TFA:

      However, three people familiar with the intelligence tell NBC News that there is a classified basis for Nelson's assertion, which he made at a public event after being given information from the leaders of the Senate Intelligence Committee. The extent and seriousness of the threat remains unclear, shrouded for reasons of national security.

      NBC claims it has three sources who say the intel is federal, and it is classified at that level. And it is not at all uncommon for the media to keep their sources confidential.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    2. Re:"people familiar" by AHuxley · · Score: 1, Insightful

      When information is not kept secret and is allowed to be told to the media it is fiction.
      US methods that are secret and the results stay secret for decades.
      Thats what real national security is about.
      Real time results getting told to the media are just more domestic party politics.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    3. Re:"people familiar" by king+neckbeard · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's also not at all uncommon for the media to just parrot whatever the government says uncritically. that's how we ended up in Iraq.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    4. Re:"people familiar" by ClickOnThis · · Score: 2

      It's also not at all uncommon for the media to just parrot whatever the government says uncritically. that's how we ended up in Iraq.

      You're not wrong. But I'd say that bogus WMD intel and post-9/11 paranoia were stronger factors.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  2. Re:Did A/C Really Penetrate Your Sister? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Makes sense. My sister is dead, which is the only sort of woman would wouldn't be throwing up at the sight of AC's genitals.

  3. None of the stories on Slashdot are news for nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This site sucks now. Bring back CmdrTaco and the old OpenSource Tech Slashdot days. Endless political drivel now.

  4. Bring in Voter ID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's the only way to be sure.

  5. Russians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Weird that Russians are suddenly the boogie man again after Romney was lambasted for asserting the Russians were a threat.

    1. Re:Russians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You forgot the Georgia incident 2008.

  6. Amen, politics sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And there are paid writers on this site blasting with political bullshit.

    This isn't reddit - people here just want tech and will move from this site to any other blogging site pretty quickly.

    (I will, if someone recommends a good one)

  7. Does it matter? by Kohath · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Blue team people (including the news media) will repeat it if it's useful to advance blue team political goals. Red team people will disbelieve it and ridicule it if it's harmful to red team political goals. What really happened is not relevant to the response; this is America.

  8. Re:None of the stories on Slashdot are news for ne by gettin2old · · Score: 2

    Agreed. Endless political drivel everywhere.

  9. USA manipulating Russian elections is a fact: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They openly bragged about it in the Washington Post:

    How they funnelled $500 million in campaign money to Yeltsin. The fat alcoholic dancing bear that NOBODY liked. Via the IMF. Versus the opponent's $3 million. Using propaganda like "If Zyuganov comes back, the gulag comes back". And whenever he wanted to go to bed in his hotel, "somebody" had cancelled his hotel room. (Very ... mature. --.--)

    Yeltsin later appointed a somebody as the new head of government... What was his name again? ... Aah, yes... VLADIMIR PUTIN!

    So if the USA thinks that Putin manipulated their elections, then ... I'll just leave you alone with that thought. :)

    1. Re:USA manipulating Russian elections is a fact: by arbiter1 · · Score: 2

      It would be a shorter list to name countries we HAVEN'T tried to manipulate an election in.

  10. It's a misdirect by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The "Russians are in our systems" is a nice misdirect that hides what's really going on.

    There's no evidence any votes were changed in the last election, but by making unsubstantiated claims and going from hackers to Russian hackers to state-sponsored Russian hackers they can gin up enough fear and outrage to justify censorship aimed at affecting the midterms.

    For example, Facebook recently banned [conservative blogger and political candidate] Avi Yemini for ‘Hate Speech’, won't tell him why he was banned, and denied his appeal. (You can view the banned page here.)

    Lots and lots and lots of conservative viewpoints are being purged online in the runup to the midterm elections, and really scary things are coming up in the news every day.

    Two terms that frequently come up in discussion are "midterm meddling" and "street fight". The first refers to all the suppression of conservative viewpoints, the second refers to the mob-mentality of striking back at people who don't toe the Liberal line.

    (For example, the judge in the Manafort case has received threats, and because the jury hasn't reached a verdict yet the MSM filed a motion to reveal the identities and home addresses of the jury members. Yikes!)

    We live in a scary time, reminiscent of the run-up to nazi Germany.

    Dissenting opinion is being suppressed, sometimes violently.

    1. Re:It's a misdirect by TigerPlish · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We live in a scary time, reminiscent of the run-up to nazi Germany.

      Loves rallies? Check. (and I don't mean WRC.....)

      Fans the flames of racial division to fire up their base? Check.

      Tars and feathers anyone who dares speak against him? Check.

      Thinks he should have final, unfettered control over everything? Check.

      Dismisses anything he disagrees with as Fake News? Check.

      Who am I speaking of? Hitler or Trump? Or both?

      Your point, I'm sad to say, is lost. The current person in the white house reminds *me* of nazi Germany.

      You're trying to equate the left with Nazi Germany, but that's not how it looks to me. The right is the one that seems like it's stolen the playbook from 1930's Germany,

      Mod me down, whatever.. you think conservatives are the only ones having their speech supressed? Look around, read /. political comments at -1. Try it. It feels like there are two warring factions in /. right now. Perfectly valid points on both sides get modded as -oblivion, Troll.

      Whatever. Bring it on. This country will burn no matter who wins, it's destined for a desconstruction and rebuilding. It's inevitable. It's just a matter of time.

      --
      The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
    2. Re:It's a misdirect by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Why fight it, why not play the game, just play it smart "OHH MY GOD, The Russians an Chinese will HACK all electronic voting, the only way to be SAFE, the only way to be SURE, MANUAL VOTING NOW". I want to make my mark in history, don't YOU, get that pen and get that vote ballot and make your mark, and if you want too, watch it being counted, every single vote, counted by people, as it was made by people and that count video recorded for the records, it is the only way to be SURE and your VOTE SAFE.

      Personally I don't see anything wrong with that, especially as all indications are, it is not a matter of who has been hacking electronic elections, it seems more a matter of who hasn't been hacking electronic elections, those POS machines need to go and pen and paper need to make a comeback, a vote made by people, should be counted by people, fuck the cost, you lying scummy fraudulent cunts (for anyone who supports electronic voting).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    3. Re:It's a misdirect by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      Only ONE side is suppressing people's speech. It's the Left. The Right is fighting hard for free speech, which a few years ago wasn't even mildly controversial.

      As for Fake News, they just keep providing more and more evidence. NBCâ(TM)s national affairs analyst John Heilemann said that thereâ(TM)s a decent number of Trump supporters that would be ok with the president killing their parents or grandparents.

      The mainstream media, everyone. Making shit up. How is this not Fake News?

      Here's everyone's favorite publication that just hired a racist, the New York Times:

      "[Trump] is not rounding people up and murdering them without any due process."
      Ready for Goldberg's reply? Sit back:
      "He would certainly like to."
      Seriously - that was her reply.
      The lady who is representing the New York Times.
      She wasn't fired for making things up. Just watch that video and tell me they can write a story about Trump without injecting their personal politics into it. What do you call a mainstream media that invents things out of whole cloth? Fake news.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    4. Re:It's a misdirect by davide+marney · · Score: 1

      This is mental. Do you realize just how many people voted in the 2016 Presidential election? 135 MILLION.

      Now, I want to just sit back and watch you manually count 135,180,362 individual pieces of paper, without error (oh, I guess that means we need to do a DOUBLE count just to make sure, right?). And oh, by the way, the entire country is awaiting the results, so you'd better complete that massive counting project as fast as possible, no pressure, just the entire fate of the federal government is awaiting your results.

      Man made machines for a reason. And one of those reasons is so humans would not be tasked with doing repetitive jobs that require extremely small tolerance for error.

      --
      "We receive as friendly that which agrees with, we resist with dislike that which opposes us" - Faraday
    5. Re:It's a misdirect by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Loves rallies? Check

      You're talking about Obama right?

      Fans the flames of racial division to fire up their base? Check.

      Sorry which group is using identity politics, and which group is stating that they're standing for "americans."

      Tars and feathers anyone who dares speak against him? Check.

      Welcome to politics? No really. Welcome to politics.

      Thinks he should have final, unfettered control over everything? Check.

      Sorry who's that again?

      Dismisses anything he disagrees with as Fake News? Check.

      Well if you're talking about Trump, it seems he really doesn't like CNN. And well, when you have assholes like Jim Acosta trying to ruin peace summit's, or yelling from the back of a large room then claiming "the president refused to answer" I could understand that.

      Who am I speaking of? Hitler or Trump? Or both?

      Good question. If you were talking about Trump, you'd fail pretty hard at matching that all up. On the other hand, many democrats are actively advocating for censorship for anyone that isn't a democrat. They're advocating for political censorship as well.

      Your point, I'm sad to say, is lost. The current person in the white house reminds *me* of nazi Germany.

      Out of curiosity, were you alive then? How about any family that lived through it? I'm guessing that's a no. But hey, if you want some stories, I can get them. While my grandmother is oh 10 years dead, she did live through it. My mom was born in east germany, and still remembers plenty of stuff.

      You're trying to equate the left with Nazi Germany, but that's not how it looks to me. The right is the one that seems like it's stolen the playbook from 1930's Germany,

      So which side is supporting groups like antifa? Why aren't the media reporting when they violently assault reporters or average people? Which side thinks that "punching nazis" is acceptable? Which side has watered down "nazi" to "anything that the left disagrees with." You know what's funny in this? You've got it partly right, antifa is antifa the ones from the 1930's or today. Simply communist agitators, both groups would attack people, both would trash private and public property. The media would not cover their attacks. There were plenty of politicians in the german parliment who supported them. There's plenty of democrats that openly support them, and reporters, and professors...just like then.

      The left is pushing for more censorship of the media, of platforms, of publications under the guise of hate speech. And so far, the right are still saying that free speech is best speech, even when leftists go out of their way to try and shut down public events, ruin peoples lives by mining social media for wrong think, and so on.

      Mod me down, whatever.. you think conservatives are the only ones having their speech supressed? Look around, read /. political comments at -1. Try it. It feels like there are two warring factions in /. right now. Perfectly valid points on both sides get modded as -oblivion, Troll.

      You're right on that, of course it seems to be more-so that even out of those two warring factions on /. one group is pro-authoritarian and the other is anti-authoritarian. One side believes that illegal entry into your country is fine. The other believes in law and order still. Things like immigration laws, no-hate speech laws, 2nd amendment rights, are all "nazi positions" among the most vocal believers of the left today.

      Just like up here in Canada, making the statement that "less immigration is what is needed. The illegals entering from the US should be kicked out. And restricting gun rights will not stop criminals from committing violent gun crime" is a "nazi position." Then

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    6. Re:It's a misdirect by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      By running their cars into demonstrating people?

      The free speech you are trying to defend is the right rally a mob to kill people you don't like.

      Are you talking about charlottesville there? Ever hear of a guy named Dwayne Dixon? No? He's the guy who claims he leveled a gun at James Fields(the guy in the car), and chased him with the gun. That was mere minutes before he drove into that crowd of people. Always more to a story then you think isn't there.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    7. Re:It's a misdirect by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Hahaha I see you have stumbled upon my fake news site

      So findlaw is a fake news site?

      Anyways, "Dwayne Dixon" says hi, he's actually an editor for a couple of the sites. I hope you find some of the other made up names as believable as that one :)

      Oh I'm sure, which is why you can see the misdemeanor charges against him.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
  11. Did they really have to? by Mnemennth · · Score: 2

    It's not as if the electoral system in Florida hasn't ALREADY been hacked by the current administration. But now Gov. Nosferatu has a scapegoat.

    mnem
    If you presented American Politics as a reality TV show, nobody would watch it.

  12. We've known about their security problems by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    since the 90s. At a certain point we have to accept that it's on purpose...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  13. Re: Bring in Paper ballots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    if citizens matter so much Why is is Ok to make it more difficult for them to vote?
    Since it's been proven that there is no real problem with illegals voting, why is it Ok to disenfranchise those precious citizens 'just in case'?

  14. Yet more Neocon waffle by najajomo · · Score: 1

    No the Russians didn't penetrate Florida's election systems, it's yet more neocon waffle

  15. Election systems have to be secured... by Karmashock · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This has been brought up for decades.

    But say there is an issue with registration fraud, voter fraud, polling station security, vote counting systems, etc and suddenly you get some very suspicious push back.

    Say you want ID to make sure people aren't running around to different polling stations and pretending to be people they aren't... and you get accused of racism.

    Why? Because black people can't get ID cards apparently.

    Say you want to secure polling station security, and you'll get the assertion that polling stations where operate under very lax oversight are beyond repute... even though stories of bags full of pre-filled out voter cards exist everywhere.

    You say that vote counting systems that often use something like Microsoft Access to tabulate the votes of an entire state are perhaps not the best options... and that the digital security of the records has issues... that the underlying digital voting systems themselves in some states are open to abuse... prove it with an 11 year old busting the system... well, no action.

    Frankly, at this point, anyone arguing against this thing can't be doing it in good faith anymore. The overwhelming evidence is that we need reform.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    1. Re:Election systems have to be secured... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      if they effectively deny people the ability to vote then you have a supreme court case open and shut.

      Let that not distract you from the other elements.

      And if you refuse to deal with the obvious need for reform... I can't presume good faith.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    2. Re:Election systems have to be secured... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      There's nothing about voter ID in that.

      Look, your political axe is boring. Its tiresome. Don't bother me with your talking points.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  16. Re: Okian faggot loves to kiss Putin's dick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Trump has put more pressure on the Russians than any President

    Trump has refused to implement sanctions, has personally praised Russia and just this week recognized Russia's seizure of Crimea despite Congressional instructions to the contrary. Oh, and he met with KGB agents for intelligence on his opponent.

    Oh, and Trump has attacked the EU, Japan, and Australia, tariffs on Mexico and Canada and blamed DC for his costly military parade being cancelled. Good show. I think it is obvious. Trump would side with Cobra, Megatron and Emperor Palpatine.

    Maybe you should leave your alternate reality.

  17. Re:None of the stories on Slashdot are news for ne by Maltheus · · Score: 1

    Everything has been politicized. There is little escaping it these days unfortunately. It's ruining everything.

  18. Comical... by p4nther2004 · · Score: 1

    For example, Facebook recently banned [conservative blogger and political candidate] Avi Yemini for âHate Speechâ(TM), won't tell him why he was banned, and denied his appeal. (You can view the banned page here.)

    Except that facebook is a private entity. Just like Free Republic and TreeHouse and lots of other sites.

    But someone...ahem...want to control facebook...and say what they can allow on their site and what they can't.

    But try that with FreeRepublic or others...and...

  19. Re:Yep, only way to be sure by Mashiki · · Score: 1

    Did you just say that blacks in poor areas are violent? What a racist.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  20. Re: Bring in Paper ballots by Mashiki · · Score: 1

    if citizens matter so much Why is is Ok to make it more difficult for them to vote?

    How is it harder for them to vote? No really. EVERY western country besides the US requires ID to vote, some even require national ID cards to vote. Why is it you need ID to get welfare/social assistance, but not to vote. Why do the DNC require ID to vote in their primaries, but claim voter ID is racist.

    Since it's been proven that there is no real problem with illegals voting, why is it Ok to disenfranchise those precious citizens 'just in case'?

    Considering that some cities and states are now trying to allow illegals to vote in local elections, it seems that we already know that to be false.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  21. Re:"People familiar with the intelligence" by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

    Closing your eyes, and covering your ears saying "nananananana I cant hear you!" isnt helping you guys look like adults.

  22. Dennis Prager is Jewish by alternative_right · · Score: 1

    Dennis Prager is a Jew who has spoken out against anti-Semitism. In your alternate reality, how does that make him anti-Semitic?

  23. Communist violence put Hitler in power by alternative_right · · Score: 1

    We live in a scary time, reminiscent of the run-up to nazi Germany.

    Germans initially supported Hitler because he promised to end the rampant Communist violence in Germany.

    If Leftists do not want another Hitler, they should avoid becoming violent Communists, a variety of Leftist (the same people who sent whole families to the guillotine).

    1. Re:Communist violence put Hitler in power by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

      Hitler because he promised to end the rampant Communist violence in Germany.

      Which he made up.

  24. Misdirection by alternative_right · · Score: 1

    Lots and lots of conservative viewpoints are being purged because they are controlled from Russian addresses.

    Which ones, and what percentage of the accounts banned were these?

    Sounds like a pretext, not a diagnosis/analysis.

  25. Revisionism by alternative_right · · Score: 1

    It was literally done to terrorize blacks, latinos and hippies, and for no other reason.

    Clearly not because it was adored by the counterculture, correlates highly to morally disgusting behavior, and that most stoners are totally useless.

    Nope, couldn't be.

  26. Who votes Left? by alternative_right · · Score: 1

    If democrats are so "wildly unpopular" how did they win the popular vote by millions.

    Minorities and single women vote Leftist, as do people in cities.

    Those who could survive a night in the forest alone do not.

  27. Politics has taken over life by alternative_right · · Score: 1

    After WW2, everything went Leftist.

    Seventy years later, all of it is failing

    Our choice is to either be in denial, or to fight it.

    There really is no middle ground any longer.

    1. Re:Politics has taken over life by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

      Our choice is to either be in denial, or to fight it.

      Where "it" means ass-hats like you, right?

  28. Re: Bring in Paper ballots by Mashiki · · Score: 1

    Do those countries then remove the polling places in minority areas? Do they close the offices in minority areas to make it harder for them to get the documentation? Do they have a well documented history of trying so stop blacks from voting? Are they governed by an unpopular minority party holding on to power through disenfranchisement? No!

    Yes. Yes. "Other races" so yes. And Yes. You're so damned ignorant of the world it's surprising you don't go into culture shock just reading about it on the internet.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  29. Re:Yep, only way to be sure by Mashiki · · Score: 1

    anything to trigger the libs, eh?
    yur so clever!

    racist plays dumb when made the butt of a grim joke
    news at 11

    Progressive discovers they don't like being held to their own standards. Shows that they're not too smart up on the follow up. News at 10, and every 15 minutes.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  30. Sign of the times by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    /.'s readership has aged. What's news for nerds and stuff that matters is different when you're 40 instead of 20. Also, there's just plain less tech out there, at least of the sort that makes good fodder for a site like this. There's been a lot of device convergence. e.g. instead of lots of cool gadgets we've all got phones and a laptop. We're also starting to hit physical limits of silicone so fewer big leaps in tech.

    There is still cool stuff going on in tech of course, but it's all really, really high level. The average /.er isn't going to understand a 50 page paper on how particle physics effects CPU die size and how such and such wavelength of lazer applied in such and such situation may someday lead to shaving off half a micron. There's nothing wrong with that, most folks (myself included) won't get that. But it means the domain of problems that are fun to blather about on a forum is smaller.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  31. Voter Id is meant to surpress votes by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    from lower income people. It's a defacto poll tax. There's been several studies on it. Anywhere it's been implemented suddenly there are DMV closures and extra fees for the Id. Also extra hoops to jump through for when women get married.

    The amount of voter fraud isn't just statistically insignificant it's laughably so. No matter what anyone tells you nobody's busing in illegals to vote for Hilary (that sounds like trolling when I write it, but it was a real conspiracy theory that had to be addressed and debunked on national news).

    Yes, there is somebody trying to steal elections. But they're doing it with voter suppression, not fraud. This is also why you will see armed police in body armor outside polling offices in poor, often black, neighborhoods. They're not there to keep the peace.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Voter Id is meant to surpress votes by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      The ids were offered at no cost to low income people. This was made clear from the start.

      Bad faith has to be assumed.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    2. Re:Voter Id is meant to surpress votes by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Nope. Your only possible problem is the expense of the ID and that was addressed many times with these voter ID laws.

      Free IDs were offered to low income people as part of the negotiations and that had no impact on people saying it was racism. The position is intellectually bankrupt and either is ignorance of the issue which you're posturing yourself to not be... or it is deceit. Either way... *shrug*

      The tribalistic talking points are boring. There are people that want to pervert the ballot box because they know their ideas actually aren't very popular or good. And that is why games like this get played.

      Anyone paying attention can see it plain as day. Sadly, a lot of people just aren't. The life blood of democracy is information and education. And there are a lot of people spreading bullshit and encouraging ignorance.

      That is how we got to this place. The corruption is easily dealt with via a few easy fixes that wouldn't hurt anyone but the corrupt. But if you find the corruption either convenient or necessary to your tribalistic political postures... So much for democracy and we'll probably regress back into some flavor of tyranny... where upon people that keep thinking like peasants will ultimately get that status again.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    3. Re:Voter Id is meant to surpress votes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Free IDs were offered to low income people as part of the negotiations and that had no impact on people saying it was racism.

      The problem isn't the financial cost of the ID, it is the actual cost of going through the process of getting it. People at the bottom of the economic ladder in this country often work multiple part time jobs and have little to no control over their own schedule. Government offices by comparison are seldom open much beyond 8-5 M-F. These people would often risk losing their jobs to try to get to these offices, and they wouldn't have any idea how long they would need to be there.

      On top of that, what type of documentation would be needed to get a voter id? Many of these people don't know where their birth certificates are or where / how to get a replacement. Few of them have passports are few of them can afford international travel.

      Also important to take into account is where they would need to go to get such an ID. Many of these people are dependent on public transportation; if the new office goes up outside the core of the city you are then placing a burden on them to get to this office. It is not uncommon for it to take 1-2 hours each way to get from the core of a large city to a suburb by public transportation. Don't suggest uber as a reasonable alternative, as these people don't necessarily have that kind of disposable funds.

      So yes, voter ID is voter suppression. Whether you want to call it racism or not is up to you, but it is without a doubt voter suppression.

    4. Re:Voter Id is meant to surpress votes by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      I'm not interested in your talking points. The entire issue is very obvious.

      They were offered free and subsidized and it basically boiled down to the argument that black people can't get ID's never mind that they do get them to drive etc.

      It is not supportable and when you make unsupportable arguments it leaves anyone judging the matter to question why you're making objectively unsupportable arguments.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    5. Re:Voter Id is meant to surpress votes by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      circular reasoning... the concept was rejected and thus fleshed out plans didn't happen... requiring the fleshed out plans when you rejected the basic concept is nonsense.

      Again... Let it go. This argument fools none but the fools.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    6. Re:Voter Id is meant to surpress votes by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Nope, Al Gore and Hillary both whined about the voting process when they didn't win.

      Look, the fact that you perceive a threat to your political power by increasing integrity of the ballot box is the smoking gun here.

      That you don't see how transparent this is... well... you need to work on your mask. It has some big gaps.

      Here is the proof to the point.

      I'll let YOU come up with the way voter ID would work. My only condition is that you ensure that the IDs are only issued to people that should be allowed to vote.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    7. Re:Voter Id is meant to surpress votes by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Both suggested changing the voting system. Argumentum ad Autism is not a valid rebuttal.

      You've proved my point by saying that the details of how it is applied don't matter. So all the ticky tacky this and that on the issue is conceded by you in that as a smoke screen.

      We could come up with literally ANY way of applying more reasonable standards to the ballot box and you'd reject them it on one specious pretense or another. Yes, specious... because you were focusing on the ticky tacky when you just conceded that isn't your real problem. You want the ballot box open to exploitation and abuse.

      You'll make any kind of false moralizing argument you think will confuse the dull witted... and move forward with this concept of gaining power by gathering together a critical mass of the unaware and gullible.

      So be it.

      You are legitimately a test for this republic. If we cannot overcome you, then we were unworthy of our freedoms and you'll cause us to slip into tyranny. Time will judge.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    8. Re:Voter Id is meant to surpress votes by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      argumentum ad autism is not a silly insult. You made a myopic rebuttal that attempted to argue against a forest with a tree.

      A trait of autism is being myopic. You made an argument that either suggested you're autistic or think I'm autistic.

      I'm not autistic... and whether you are or not... the argument fails on the previously stated basis.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    9. Re:Voter Id is meant to surpress votes by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      "we"?

      Well, MY "we" thinks you didn't understand what I was saying if you think I was making a medical diagnosis of autism. My "we" thinks you're actually doubling down on yet more myopic arguments... failing to see the forest for the trees. My "we" even explained what "we" were talking about. And yet, your "collective" didn't grasp a pretty simple observation and statement even after it was explained very plainly.

      Odd. Your collective might want to get checked out. Consistently not grasping a broader perspective and instead fixating on minor points of no relevance is a symptom of the "spectrum".

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    10. Re:Voter Id is meant to surpress votes by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      I could as easily cite you as confessing to be a pedophile as you could cite me as conceding that the voter ID issue.

      As to insults, argumentum ad autism as pointed out to you now three or four times was to address your myopic arguments. If you think it is insulting to point out an argument is myopic then you're probably one of those people that finds anyone that contradicts you to be "triggering".

      Frankly, as I said, your position is laughable and unsupportable. I even proved that you don't care about the minor ticky tacky issues by offering to let you design the system yourself. You made it clear that none of the ticky tacky issues actually matter and what actually bothers you is any system that prevents people that shouldn't be allowed to vote by law from voting.

      You conceded.

      The logic on this is really inescapable and yet... you don't see it.

      What am I to assume here if someone doesn't 1+1=2?

      Do you not understand?

      Do you understand and are trying to play some sort of game with me?

      Either way, you're not interesting and this is boring. Kindly go back to your proctor, check out a jigsaw puzzle, and enjoy your life time supply of pudding.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    11. Re:Voter Id is meant to surpress votes by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      I offered you the ability to set how it would work. You proved my point by rejecting it even if you could control all the variables.

      That's checkmate.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    12. Re:Voter Id is meant to surpress votes by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      ... So you've gone from myopic to full retard?

      Daring move in your quest to make a bigger ass of yourself with every post.

      Definition:
      https://www.dictionary.com/bro...

      "
        Ophthalmology. pertaining to or having myopia; nearsighted.
      unable or unwilling to act prudently; shortsighted.
      lacking tolerance or understanding; narrow-minded.
      "

      In any case, you're officially the python's black knight. I know I know... Only a flesh wound.

      *coconut claps off into the sunset*

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    13. Re: Voter Id is meant to surpress votes by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Actually, no.

      Signing up for voter registration could provide the ID very easily and the cost could be rendered irrelevant but bundling it with existing ID systems such as driver's licenses etc.

      That is you get issued a special version of it that signifies that you're eligible to vote.

      Pretty much everyone has a government issued ID of some description. Driver's licenses, personal state issued ID, passports, etc. We can provide a special stamp these that signifies that you're eligible to vote.

      The cost of altering the ID etc would be near zero and would not add any cost to the ID holder.

      Then we would allow polling stations to scan your ID in much the same way that a liquor store can scan your driver's license.

      What you're ultimately saying is that you want more security on alchohol in a liquior store than the ballot box at a polling station.

      You haven't a leg to stand on. You're just mouthing transparently absurd talking points you heard somewhere. You've demostrated no ability to think for yourself by not issuing a unqiue idea even once in this discussion.

      I'e been dynamic the entire time. I've been responsive and able to offer point and counter point off the top of my head. I have been willing to work with you.

      But you literally can't do that because you're not even thinking about it. You're just vomiting your sad talking points.

      You're basically a political chat bot that has failed the Turing test.

      We're done here. Good day, sir.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    14. Re:Voter Id is meant to surpress votes by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Notice how even though you spent lots of time throwing out baseless insults... you spent zero time explaining how I misused the word.

      Strange. It is almost as you have no argument. Almost... as if...

      No, just kidding... you're full of shit and know it.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    15. Re: Voter Id is meant to surpress votes by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Nope, you revealed yourself to be a liar almost immediately. And the cost of linking databases is in fact trivial. I work in that field. I link massive databases with billions of entries in them all the time to databases they've never been linked to before.

      Possibly the government has a problem with this because they're often run by idiots and the corrupt. But it isn't hard and we do it all the time.

      I say again, GOOD DAY, SIR.

      http://heeereswilly.ytmnd.com/

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  32. Russia is not a military threat by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    they're a political threat. That's the problem with the world, it's complicated. You can't just say "Russia is not a threat". That's not the entire story. But folks want a one word answer for everything. They want to go back to simpler times the never really existed...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  33. No, the Russians didn't hack the election by najajomo · · Score: 1

    No, the Russians didn't hack the election. such uttereances are part of a neocon plot to distract the American voter from who really rules America. ref ref

  34. Re:Screw You and the Nihilism You Rode in On by Kohath · · Score: 1

    We can't fix a problem if we don't talk about it.

    We can't talk productively about problems because the people who decide what gets heard only care about their partisan agenda and about sending virtue signals to their tribe. They don't value fact or truth.

  35. Re:Screw You and the Nihilism You Rode in On by Kohath · · Score: 1

    Here are people trying to talk productively...

    What's the product of all this productive talk?

  36. Re: Bring in Paper ballots by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    Citizens have the right to vote - non-citizens do not. Citizens have the right to own firearms; non-citizens do not. The first right is somehow exempt from proof of identification and ANY perception of ANY restriction; the latter is heavily restricted, requires ID, and is constantly under attack. What is good for one right is good for another.

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  37. Re:None of the stories on Slashdot are news for ne by McGruber · · Score: 1

    This site sucks now. Bring back CmdrTaco

    , Jon Katz,

    and the old OpenSource Tech Slashdot days. Endless political drivel now.

    There was a lot of drivel back then too!

  38. I'm on Reddit? by alternative_right · · Score: 1

    Let's keep the discourse useful. That usually means congenial and informative. Your message was neither.

  39. Communist violence in Weimar Germany by alternative_right · · Score: 1

    In Jan 1919, 50,000 Spartacists rebelled in Berlin, led by the Communists Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Leibknecht.
    In 1919, communist workers' councils seized power all over Germany, and a Communist People's Government took power in Bavaria.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/schools/g...

    Even before the constitution had been drawn up there was a serious challenge from the left. Many hoped to see a Russian style revolution in Germany. The left wing Spartacus movement led by Karl Liebknecht and Rosa Luxemburg began a revolt in Berlin in January 1919. They seized building throughout the city. The government fled the city.

    http://www.historyhome.co.uk/e...