Slashdot Mirror


How Amazon, One of the Richest Companies in the World, Secretly Offloads Its Electricity Costs To Local Taxpayers Who Live Near Its Data Centers (bloomberg.com)

Several readers have shared this Bloomberg report: Amazon Web Services, the company's cloud computing business, is its fastest-growing and most profitable division, but it comes with a lot of upfront infrastructure costs and ongoing expenses, the biggest of which is electricity. Over the past two years, Amazon has almost doubled the size of its physical footprint worldwide, to 254 million square feet, including dozens of new data centers with vast fields of servers running 24/7. In at least two states, it's also negotiated with utilities and politicians to stick other people with the bills, piling untold millions of dollars on top of the estimated $1.2 billion in state and municipal tax incentives the company has received over the past decade.

Other companies, including Google and Tesla, have taken advantage of the power industry's hunger for growth and the relative secrecy that followed its 1990s deregulation in dozens of states. But Amazon stands out for its success in offloading its power costs and also because it dominates America's cloud business, which has gone from nonexistent to using 2 percent of U.S. electricity in about a decade. "Amazon had a huge advantage, because there weren't a lot of other sectors growing in the electricity market," says Neal Elliott, senior director of research at the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE), a green lobbying group. The company has also ratcheted up the secrecy around who's paying for electricity, says environmental advocate Greenpeace, which calls Amazon the single biggest obstacle to industry transparency.

103 of 173 comments (clear)

  1. Shocking! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    This is truly shocking...

  2. SO that's what that is! by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wondered what that huge-ass extension cord going from the side of my house towards the general direction of the Amazon data center was for!

    That and the $400k/month electric bills. I figured I just had the AC set kind of high.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:SO that's what that is! by lgw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That editorial slant was really something.

      Can't blame Amazon for taking the incentives offered to them. Sounds like some communities may need to have some sharp discussions with their city councils. Of course, they may learn there was a big win in total tax revenue that prevented their taxes from rising. Or maybe the city council was full of idiots.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    2. Re:SO that's what that is! by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      huge-ass extension cord

      Uh, that doesn't read well

    3. Re:SO that's what that is! by e3m4n · · Score: 5, Insightful

      call me jaded, disgruntled, pessimistic, or just a crochety old guy; my angle on this was not so much Amazon 'taking incentives offered' but more greasing the palms of the 5-6 people that decided, for the entire city, to cut these deals and sack the residents to augment the funds. At this point I have little faith in any level of government doing things outside of all the tricks that are nothing more than loopholes to have 'legalized bribery'.

    4. Re:SO that's what that is! by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 4, Informative

      Generally speaking what happens is that the utility does a circuit extension to the property as “general facilities” rather than “customer facilities.” If the latter, the full bill goes to the owner, but common-use services theoretically benefit all users.

      The game is that a transmission line extension generally doesn’t provide a benefit for an established community, although at times it will help improve system resilience.

    5. Re:SO that's what that is! by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      I wondered what that huge-ass extension cord going from the side of my house towards the general direction of the Amazon data center was for!

      Sucks to be you. I solved that by purchasing a giant Tesla PowerWall and moving the Amazon extension cord over to there!

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    6. Re:SO that's what that is! by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Of course, they may learn there was a big win in total tax revenue that prevented their taxes from rising.

      When these sorts of sweetheart deals have been analyzed, it's generally been found that the promised benefits to the local economy are much more anemic than hoped.

      But, yeah, it's not like Amazon is behaving any differently than any other company (or sports team, or ...).

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    7. Re:SO that's what that is! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But I thought corruption was less likely and easier to address as government gets smaller! That's what a vocal portion of the population here seems to believe, in any case...

    8. Re: SO that's what that is! by e3m4n · · Score: 5, Insightful

      RTFA. The data centers donâ(TM)t provide hardly shit for jobs. Itâ(TM)s one thing to bend over backwards when a factory opens up and youâ(TM)ve got 800 to 2000 new jobs. Itâ(TM)s entirely another when the same footprint shows up and you created 15 damn jobs

    9. Re:SO that's what that is! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It's interesting that you blame the 5-6 people instantly, but not the company. Perhaps if we removed the idea that companies are people that their bribing their way through life is unfair towards actual people, maybe we'd be in a better spot? Make it so that companies can't donate a single cent towards ANY politician at ANY level or offer a job for ANY politician until that political has been out of office for 1 decade. But then again, I find that \. seems to suck on corporate cock whenever they can...it's that Libertarian fantasy that's killing America.

    10. Re:SO that's what that is! by ranton · · Score: 1

      When these sorts of sweetheart deals have been analyzed, it's generally been found that the promised benefits to the local economy are much more anemic than hoped. But, yeah, it's not like Amazon is behaving any differently than any other company (or sports team, or ...)

      And it's not like that is different than any product sold by any company ever. Whether buying a software suite, a car, or shampoo, if you blindly go by what a salesman or marketing campaign tells you then you will be swindled every time.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    11. Re:SO that's what that is! by lgw · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Data centers don't bring many jobs, except during construction. They might make it up on property tax, if they aren't giving away an indefinite exemption (and most places don't - they'll give a discount for a few years).

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    12. Re:SO that's what that is! by lgw · · Score: 2

      It's the fundamental problem of regulation in a nutshell. The company is merely doing what's expected - we look to the local government to keep its people's interests first. When they don't, it's not obvious what could fix that, given we're starting with a government we don't trust.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    13. Re:SO that's what that is! by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      Can't blame Amazon for taking the incentives offered to them.

      Yep can't blame arseholes for being arseholes because they did it for money. That justifies everything!

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    14. Re:SO that's what that is! by pnutjam · · Score: 1
    15. Re: SO that's what that is! by rahvin112 · · Score: 2

      And 14 of those jobs are minimum wage security jobs.

    16. Re:SO that's what that is! by damnitalready · · Score: 1

      Yep, and my local rep can't hide in DC for months on end, he's right down the road. And when we find his malfeasance, he won't have the millions of dollars behind him, or the level of influence that the DC swamp-critters have.

    17. Re: SO that's what that is! by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2
      And the 15th one is the manager of security make 50% more than the minimum wage, princely 11.50 an hour.

      https://www.theatlantic.com/ma... The 9.9% is the new bourgois, the 0.1% is the new aristocrats, the 90% is the proletariat.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    18. Re:SO that's what that is! by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

      Interesting, but the whole community benefits from an improved power network - less downtime and probably cleaner power, leading to reduced electronic failure (I've had a projector die two times from logic board failures before I put it behind a power conditioner...)

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    19. Re:SO that's what that is! by Ferretman · · Score: 1

      I'm curious, were the City Council members who voted for this Democrats or Republicans?

      Ferret

      --
      Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc
    20. Re: SO that's what that is! by DamnOregonian · · Score: 1

      Can't argue with your numbers, but I fall well within the 9.9%, and well below the 0.1%, and I don't feel very bourgeoisie. I own... well, not a hell of a lot more than my car.
      I guess technically speaking, I have a shit ton of stocks managed by a 401k management agency, but who doesn't? I had that back when I was making 8.50 an hour in fast food.
      Technically speaking, I'm a lot more like a really well compensated prole, and I think quite a few people within the 9.9% are just that.

    21. Re:SO that's what that is! by DamnOregonian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's very true. I am the chief network engineer for 7 datacenters, and on the facilities side, we employ probably 5 people, depending on how you classify them.

    22. Re: SO that's what that is! by houghi · · Score: 1

      And those 15 jobs saw to it that 1500 other people lost theirs in mom and pop shops. But hey, at least I got my TV 70USD cheaper, right?

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    23. Re: SO that's what that is! by Jason1729 · · Score: 2

      But the kickbacks to the politicians making these decisions are they same for the factory or data centre. So the two type of facility are of identical benefit as far as they're concerned.

    24. Re:SO that's what that is! by nasch · · Score: 1

      Even if there is a tax benefit, that doesn't make it all better. Who benefits from tax cuts? People who pay taxes. Who doesn't pay much tax? The poor, so they don't benefit. On the other hand, who is hurt most by an electricity rate hike? The poor. And who can most easily absorb it? The wealthy. So increasing electricity rates in exchange for a tax cut is in effect shifting costs from the wealthy to the poor. As usual.

    25. Re:SO that's what that is! by Talderas · · Score: 1

      Based on the article, it appears that what happened was....

      1. Amazon builds datacenter and needs power.
      2. Power company was going to run overhead wires across a Civil War battlefield to supply power.
      3. Citizen protest overhead wires successfully forcing the power company to bury the wire.
      4. Power company goes to state legislature to get permission to place a fee to subscribers to pay for buying the line.
      5. Citizens see their power bill increase due to fee/surcharge.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    26. Re:SO that's what that is! by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure the city council decided something that was in their favour, not the city's.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    27. Re:SO that's what that is! by Talderas · · Score: 1

      There still is zero indication that they had any impact on the rates of nearby residents.

      You're not thinking like a household and thinking literally about rates. It doesn't matter if there rate for power is still $0.01/kWh or whatever it might be. If a surcharge for $5 has been added to the bill then to the end consumer household their power rates have gone up $5/mo and that is precisely the situation that occurred.

      Regardless, the outcome is that all residents in the state are paying this additional surcharge to secure less than two dozen jobs.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    28. Re: SO that's what that is! by lgw · · Score: 2

      Mom and Pop data centers?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    29. Re:SO that's what that is! by lgw · · Score: 1

      Everyone pays property tax. Just because it's not it's own line item on your rent don't think you're not paying.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    30. Re: SO that's what that is! by shilly · · Score: 1

      Of *course* there can be something wrong with that. The moral problems are obvious: if the 20% discount is achieved by the site behaving immorally, you are then tainted by that same immorality; all the more so if you have actually encouraged them to behave immorally in the first place.

      Out here in the real world, many companies manage their supply chains for these kinds of risks all the time. Other companies behave immorally and deliberately turn a blind eye (or actively encourage). But they are run by nasty fuckers.

    31. Re: SO that's what that is! by q4Fry · · Score: 1

      Mom and Pop data centers?

      #908

    32. Re:SO that's what that is! by nasch · · Score: 1

      OK, who pays the least property tax? People who own or rent the least space, and the least valuable space. Who is that? The poor. So they still benefit the least from a tax break.

    33. Re:SO that's what that is! by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      I wondered what that huge-ass extension cord going from the side of my house towards the general direction of the Amazon data center was for!

      That and the $400k/month electric bills. I figured I just had the AC set kind of high.

      Not living in the USA, My home 2000sq feet on 2 floors, and all our hotwater needs for 7 people cost us 307/mo. Our home is electrically heated and cooled. Our electricity is around 7.8cents / kwh

      We opted out of using natural gas for heating. Did not want to maintain a flu and chimney and the worry of a potential leak.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    34. Re:SO that's what that is! by lgw · · Score: 1

      Property tax is somewhat proportional to income as most people spend as much as they can on their rent or mortgage. Who's hurt more by an X% tax increase, rich or poor? Who benefits more from an X% tax decrease?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    35. Re:SO that's what that is! by nasch · · Score: 1

      If most of the tax break is passed to the renter then I agree they could benefit more, I hadn't thought about it that way. However the wealthy (and I know not all landlords are what you would call wealthy) have a way of keeping savings for themselves and passing along costs.

  3. Benefits by fluffernutter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I say again. After tax breaks and all other leaching, does it really make sense for us to allure these huge companies to cities if there is no net benefit for the city?

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    1. Re:Benefits by jellomizer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But they are job creators.
      JOB CREATORS.
      Governments will bend backwards so a big company goes into their town and make Jobs.

      The real winner is the town next to it. Where they have lower costs, and all the employees move there to live, and pay taxes to them.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:Benefits by lgw · · Score: 1

      I'd like my house price to double. You're welcome not to participate.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    3. Re:Benefits by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I say again. After tax breaks and all other leaching, does it really make sense for us to allure these huge companies to cities if there is no net benefit for the city?

      Luring big corporations to cities with tax money only benefits a) the company and b) the politicians who took campaign donations to lure the company in the first place.

      And yes, that includes professional sports franchises. The benefits to an area are always overestimated. Every single time.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    4. Re:Benefits by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Jobs may be the reason politicians claim they make such deals, but I suspect there are often kickbacks, connections, and/or some other wink-wink shenanigans that benefit just the politicians themselves. "Jobs", "protect the children", and/or "outsiders are coming to gitcha" are political gimmicks to justify all kinds of crap.

    5. Re: Benefits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Corporate socialism is the only socialism allowed in America!

    6. Re:Benefits by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Perhaps, or perhaps most of our "Leaders" are just really stupid.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    7. Re:Benefits by SirMasterboy · · Score: 2

      You move to a lower cost area which is just as nice as your area was before the prices skyrocketed.

    8. Re:Benefits by e3m4n · · Score: 1

      dont forget establishing a 'legacy'. But otherwise, no truer statement has ever been uttered. The shit deal is these data centers only create a handful of jobs. Should require amazon to provide their own Tokamak, lol

    9. Re:Benefits by e3m4n · · Score: 1

      exactly, unless you move somewhere else where you can buy cheap again. Or retire and move to Costa Rica. With inflation going the way it has been (real cost of living increases not just what is admitted) no nest egg will let someone retire for more than 10-15 years before that same monthly amount becomes 1/2 of what it used to provide.

    10. Re:Benefits by lgw · · Score: 1

      What he said. The traffic would get ugly, so I'd be wanting to move after 5 years or so anyway. Be nice to pocket a few hundred thousand from the deal.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    11. Re: Benefits by e3m4n · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I would prefer to have none, thanks. But technically this would be closer to Fascism, where private businesses and government work hand in hand, without actual consideration of the people.

    12. Re: Benefits by TigerPlish · · Score: 1

      But technically this would be closer to Fascism, where private businesses and government work hand in hand, without actual consideration of the people.

      By some definitions we are already in a facist state.

      --
      The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
    13. Re:Benefits by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      The real winner is the town next to it. Where they have lower costs, and all the employees move there to live, and pay taxes to them.

      Given we're talking about a data center, and we're also talking about multi-million dollar tax breaks - how exactly is "the town next to it" getting those millions back?

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    14. Re:Benefits by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      Perhaps, or perhaps most of our "Leaders" are just really stupid.

      If that's the case, we really are a "representative democracy". The average person doesn't pay much attention to politics outside of headlines, and has a short memory for past screwups.

    15. Re:Benefits by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      In CA your house only gets reappraised if you add finished square footage. Otherwise it's a statutory 1% per year max appreciation.

      So six car garage with workshop it is. Sucks we don't have basements, but basements imply deep footings, which imply frost heaves. You can have them.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    16. Re:Benefits by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      Everything is negotiable. Real estate commish IS negotiable, or you find another realtor.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    17. Re: Benefits by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      That's a clear sign the definitions are broken. Ignore the people pushing such silly, historically ignorant propaganda.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    18. Re:Benefits by fermion · · Score: 1
      That is the question. When a big box store, like Wal Mart, is built, the improvement made to the area, such as roads and the like, are paid by the store. However, the store then gets a equal set of tax abatements to offset those upfront costs.The cost were incurred to bring customers to the stores, but ultimately the taxpayer cover the costs. Sure the roads are used for everyone, but we got by with small roads until Wal Mart wanted bigger ones. Just like we all benefit from power plants, so it just depends on how they are going to be paid for.

      In reality any profitable business is going to externalize costs Fracking is only profitable because they don't have to deal with proper water disposal. Trucking companies are only profitable because they do not have to cover the full damage they do to the roads. It is everywhere.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    19. Re:Benefits by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It would make an interesting experiment, simply have the corp that is claiming to be such a benefit to the community to pay their employees in $2 bills for a month and see at the end of the month how many $2 bills end up in the community.

      That is what the local AFB did in the 80s when there was some NIMBYs that wanted to shut it down, the town was so flooded with $2 bills that everyone had piles of 'em and everyone was more than happy to tell the NIMBYs to have a heaping cup of STFU.

      But it would be an easy way to tell one way or the other, if the town is crapflooded with $2 bills the money is circulating in the community, if almost nobody sees a $2 bill then the corp isn't doing squat for the local area.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    20. Re: Benefits by TigerPlish · · Score: 1

      Ignore the people pushing such silly, historically ignorant propaganda.

      Meh, I was comparing what I observe with what the definitions of faciscm are in wiki. Some match all the checkboxes one by one.

      If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, what are the chances it is actually a duck?

      --
      The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
    21. Re:Benefits by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      So you want the house you can afford to become unaffordable?

      Amazon data centers don't increase neighboring property value...

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    22. Re:Benefits by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      Everybody is falling over themselves for the Amazon 2nd HQ, like Amazon made Seattle. I always ask them why Bentonville isn't an economic powerhouse.

    23. Re: Benefits by MachineShedFred · · Score: 2

      Real Estate prices are not standardized. See: selling a tiny 900 square foot home in Berkeley and moving to Indianapolis where you can buy a 3000 square foot home with the proceeds.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    24. Re:Benefits by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Of course they're stupid, it's a requirement for the job. Plus of course, anyone who's smart can't get elected because they're too elite for the voters.

    25. Re:Benefits by Comrade+Ogilvy · · Score: 1

      It is easier to brag to voters "I brought Amazon JOBS to the state ( and will raise the electricity fees on every household in the state by $10 to pay Amazon to come here)!" then "I have been working my ass off and I think I can save every taxpayer 82 cents next year with better run gov't."

    26. Re:Benefits by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      Or just have a better contract that includes things like performance metrics or service level agreements. This is common in many industries. Ie, database is contracted to have an uptime of 99.8% or such.

      A good contract might be that in order to get $X tax breaks and benefits and the company promises $Y increase in tax revenue (because of jobs, tourism, etc), then if the tax revenue is only $Z then the penalty should be $Y-$Z up to a maximum of $X. If the company is not confident enough to make this deal then don't trust them. This could apply to sports teams and arenas as well, not just predatory companies.

    27. Re:Benefits by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      If they did have cash, beware that they may want to pay with Amazon Bucks or other sorts of scrip.

    28. Re:Benefits by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Quite a lot of theories depend upon omniscient actors, meaning that everyone has perfect knowledge of what is going on everywhere.

      As for what you're describing about corporations needing to be more involved, remember that this used to be the case. Employees were hired for the long term, and on-the-job training was the norm. Profits were based on long term results as well. So that naturally meant that good education was important, so that they would get good workers. Good health care and safety was important because you don't want to waste the expense in training those workers. There are a lot of good things that can happen when a company is more concerned about what happens twenty or thirty years down the road rather than obsessing over current quarterly results.

    29. Re:Benefits by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But never underestimate a good visual representation. Sure those kind of things might work, but nothing beats having every person in the area simply look in their pocket and count the number of bills and know where they came from.

      That is why it worked so well, the local stores were so crapflooded with $2 bills that if you bought $10 worth of stuff at a store with a $20 they would often give you five $2s simply because they ran out of other bills and just had mounds of $2s so everybody ended up with just piles of $2 bills and that meant every.single.person. in the area simply could look in their own pocket and see many $2 bills and they knew those meant an airman had spent money locally and passed hands to end up in your pocket. My local PC shop didn't even have any USAF customers and they were handing out $2 bills for weeks simply because so many people were paying their bills with them thanks to constantly getting them for change.

      Remember Joe and Jane Average might not understand performance metrics (and frankly they are easy enough to "massage" hence why the old saying "lies, damn lies and statistics") but its damned hard to deny the impact of a company when you look in your pocket and see piles of bills you know without a shadow of a doubt came from them.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    30. Re:Benefits by houghi · · Score: 1

      You still use cash. How quaint.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    31. Re:Benefits by lgw · · Score: 1

      If these magically cheaper-but-just-as-nice homes are anywhere near your current house, your current house won't appreciate in price

      Why would they need to be nearby? America is a big and beautiful country. If you think the prices are a bubble, you can also switch to renting a house when it get ridiculous - two of my friends did just that, one in FL and one in CA, at the peak of the recent real estate bubble. Worked out quite well for them.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    32. Re:Benefits by tsstahl · · Score: 1

      Bentonwho?

    33. Re:Benefits by pnutjam · · Score: 2

      Exactly! In case you are serious, Bentonville is where Walmart's HQ is located.

    34. Re:Benefits by antdude · · Score: 1

      Leeching or leaching?

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  4. Tesla by 110010001000 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Don't lump in Tesla with Google and Amazon. Tesla is a green company and has a mission to save the environment and the planet. They would never do this just to save some money.

    1. Re:Tesla by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Funny

      Don't lump in Tesla with Google and Amazon. Tesla is a green company and has a mission to save the environment and the planet. They would never do this just to save some money.

      Now that I know Elon Musk is into entheogens, I'm much more inclined to like him. I didn't really care for him before, but now that I know he's just really, really high, I think he's kind of alright.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:Tesla by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      I figured out he was high when he said that we were all living in a simulation.

    3. Re:Tesla by e3m4n · · Score: 1

      depends on who is to be believed. If we take that whistleblower's word for it, they exist to smuggle drugs into the main factory. lol

    4. Re:Tesla by e3m4n · · Score: 1

      unsure I'd call an ambien coma 'high'. Definitely out of their mind. Right now the VA still treats PTSD with ambien. Now Ambien is not an actual treatment for PTSD, but the docs figure it will help them sleep. So lets take a vet with PTSD, someone prone to night terrors, and give them a drug that lists sleep walking as a side effect. The Ft Hood shooter was a PTSD patient taking ambien. I believed Roseanne Barr when she said it was a 2am Ambien rant. Just use some cannabis and get some sleep already. Never once heard of cannabis causing sleep walking.

    5. Re:Tesla by e3m4n · · Score: 1

      What is The MATRIX?

    6. Re:Tesla by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      I have it on good authority that someone 'awake' but in an Ambien fuge will do anything you ask, and not remember it in the morning.

      Highly suggestible state. The night shift at the Tesla factory is brainwashing Elon while he sleepwalks.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    7. Re:Tesla by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Psychotropic narcotics would help explain his Twitter posts.

      Doesn't excuse them.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  5. It's at the point... by Type44Q · · Score: 1

    It's at the point where it's not just Amazon to blame; we've been informed enough that those of you who choose to still support this evil monstrosity and give it their business have a shitload to answer for as well.

    1. Re:It's at the point... by asackett · · Score: 1

      "But it's the only way I can afford to buy all this stuff!"

      I've heard some variation of that countless times when discussing some predatory retailer or other.

      --

      Warning: This signature may offend some viewers.

  6. So Amazon uses Electricity like a Grow-Op? by mykepredko · · Score: 3, Funny

    Honest officer, they're not marijuana plants, I'm running an experimental, all natural, plant based data centre for Amazon!

    1. Re:So Amazon uses Electricity like a Grow-Op? by e3m4n · · Score: 4, Funny

      but we keep having to change out memory chips on the servers. They seem to have a problem retaining short term data.

  7. Re:It's just good business. by MightyYar · · Score: 1

    Seriously though - (simplified) company puts electric rates into giant spreadsheet, sorts spreadsheet by price, opens datacenter in one of the cheapest places.

    EVIL!

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  8. hmm by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In at least two states, it's also negotiated with utilities and politicians to stick other people with the bills

    So, is this Amazon's fault, or the fault of the "utilities and politicians"?

    1. Re:hmm by CanHasDIY · · Score: 2

      Can't it be both?

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    2. Re:hmm by rainer_d · · Score: 1

      You could also ask if it's not ultimately the fault of the people who elect said politicians into office.

      --
      Windows 2000 - from the guys who brought us edlin
    3. Re:hmm by houghi · · Score: 1

      Yes.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  9. Base Loads by PPH · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... are what pay utilities bills. Fixed and predictable, they bring in revenue and utilize the transmission/distribution systems needed to feed them most efficiently. It's what makes it possible for power companies to provide you power when you fire up the Jacuzzi or stand in front of an open freezer, trying to make up your mind about ice cream flavors.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  10. Greenpeace vs the Environment by FeelGood314 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Coal would have died without Greenpeace and others like them driving up the cost of nuclear. Coal mines were going bankrupt in the late 60s and early 70s but then nuclear costs went up 10x and suddenly coal was viable again. Greenpeace is responsible for a good portion of the CO2 in the atmosphere as well as lead, arsenic and radioactive dust released from coal burning (yes, coal has radio active material in it, usually in the form of daughter particles of radon decay). Plus all the deaths from the mining of coal. Screw them and their virtue signalling about being good for the environment.

    1. Re:Greenpeace vs the Environment by The+Evil+Atheist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Two incidents. That's all you have? Why don't you count all the deaths resulting from prolonged coal mining and burning compared to the deaths from those disasters?

      Typical disaster blindness. You only notice the scary things and not the real killers.

      --
      Those who do not learn from commit history are doomed to regress it.
  11. Re:Horny Wuss knows fascism, he's a nazi faggot by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Jesus tits you are tiresome drinkypoo.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  12. Well, it's a good thing Amazon is lowering... by rnturn · · Score: 1

    ... their electrical costs. It'd be too bad if their insane power use forced an increase of the cost of Amazon Prime.

    Oh... wait...

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  13. Sure you can by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    When they lobby for them and buy off the politicians with campaign donations. This isn't just a case of town making a bad deal. It's widespread political corruption that's been legalized by multiple supreme & lower court rulings.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  14. I don't think anyone won here by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    except the politicians who got big campaign contributions. It was only a handful of jobs. Nobody's going to much notice the tax dollars. They _will_ notice their taxes go up to pay the subsidies though. But, well, I hate to say it but they'll probably blame those tax and spend liberals...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  15. That article is not convincing by magzteel · · Score: 1

    There is nothing uncommon about volume purchasers paying less per unit. Nobody runs around claiming this practice raises the cost for everyone else under some circumstances it can even reduce costs because the producer is making a large profit on the high volume.

    Statements like "AEP exempted it from surcharges other Ohioans must pay" are very vague. They don't describe what the surcharges are for. Some localities attach public transit and other public service fund surcharges to energy bills. A super high volume consumer would be paying an inordinate percentage of the total.

    Lastly, these large tech companies are investing heavily in renewable energy. Last I heard Amazon was at 50% renewable with multiple large projects under development.

  16. I'm a capitalist by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    But, that being said, I DO NOT, and NEVER have liked any "tax breaks" for ANY corporation. Blame local, state, & federal government, eager to get "them here" so they can crow about it come election time. It's CRONY capitalism, and it stinks! No tax breaks for ANY company, I don't care who they are. Pay the way and stop putting it on the backs of everyone else!

  17. No wonder their logo is a smirk by GregBryant · · Score: 1

    Stealing power is Yet Another Beautiful Thing Amazon Delivered to the world. Yabtad.

  18. Privatised profit, socialised risk—what a su by sydbarrett74 · · Score: 1

    That's the way *all* of Big Business operates. It's not restricted to Amazon.

    --
    'He who has to break a thing to find out what it is, has left the path of wisdom.' -- Gandalf to Saruman
  19. Re:It's just good business. by sjames · · Score: 1

    That's not what they did though. They got the power company and the relevant PSC to sign off on hiking residential rates to pay for the installation of an additional transmission line to service the datacenter.

    If you or I wanted a higher capacity feed, we'd get the bill for the installation.

  20. Data center proximity benefits by spinitch · · Score: 1

    Could a data center help build other infrastructure such as bandwidth, adjacent businesses that would desire ability to connect high speed/capacity links or other? A stretch but seems even if less likely at least plausible puffing that could be used to better rationalize.

  21. Re:It's just good business. by MightyYar · · Score: 1

    They got the power company and the relevant PSC to sign off on hiking residential rates to pay for the installation of an additional transmission line to service the datacenter.

    And if they didn't, they would have gone to the next-cheapest item on the list. This is a problem with the local politicians and regulatory agencies, not with Amazon. I mean, unless there is bribery or other shenanigans taking place.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.