Slashdot Mirror


Chinese Phone Maker Huawei Risks Alienating Its Loyal Customer Base By Taking a Strong Stand Against Unlocking of Its Handsets, Users Say (irishtech.ie)

A post on Irish technology news blog, which criticizes the recent works of the world's second largest smartphone maker Huawei, is being widely circulated across several Android communities, with most people agreeing with the concerns raised in the post. From the story: Huawei is the second largest smartphone manufacturer in the world, falling second only to Samsung having recently overtaken Apple. They're huge in Ireland and across the globe. As a company, they have done a number of great things for both the enthusiast and the general user alike, but amidst privacy concerns the company has started to lash out at the community which helped get it (and especially its sub-brand Honor) off of the ground. Not only have they begun to block users from unlocking the devices which they've paid for, they are now looking to make users return their already unlocked devices to their normal state, according to numerous reports on the forums of XDA-Developers and well known Magisk developer topjohnwu. "I am informed that a new Huawei OTA will render Magisk-installed devices from booting," the developer wrote. Magisk is a popular "root" solution used which gives a user access to their device's system files.

Huawei was huge with the development community for a number of reasons, no less because their devices were some of the easiest to unlock out of all of the major manufacturers. You simply applied for your key online and promptly received it. It was a rather painless system, which allowed you to then install what's known as a "custom ROM". A custom ROM is simply just a custom version of Android, free from all of the included pre-installed applications from Huawei. They often run better too, again because of the lack of bloat.

148 comments

  1. Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Only .001% of customers unlock their handsets.

    1. Re:Who cares? by Miamicanes · · Score: 3, Interesting

      > Only .001% of customers unlock their handsets.

      Maybe, but that 0.001% has tremendous influence on the purchasing decisions of OTHERS. Who do people looking for a new phone ask for advice? The 0.001% who root & reflash their phones. If THOSE users think Huawei is now the devil & tell everyone who asks for advice that Huawei phones suck, they're unlikely to buy Huawei phones.

      Think back to how quickly Nokia went from #1 worldwide to "basically irrelevant". What happened? They made a business decision to ignore the US market since American GSM was a hot mess (T-mobile barely had enough spectrum to do 2G GSM with 19.2kbps GPRS data in most US markets, most of AT&T's high(er)-speed data was EDGE, not 3G, and AT&T's 3G was 850MHz, not 1900/2150MHz), and they didn't sell many phones in the US anyway compared to even small countries like Portugal & Ireland.

      What Nokia overlooked was mindshare & influence. America might have been a minor market, but it was a hugely INFLUENTIAL market. When Nokia phones disappeared from American stores, Nokia phones ALSO disappeared from the blogsphere, magazines, and review sites (the majority of which at the time were, in fact, American). The fact that the few Nokia phones that occasionally showed up as expensive imports in places like New York & Miami (intended mostly for foreign visitors to buy while on vacation & take home) were almost USELESS in the US just made matters worse, and got them written off as 'irrelevant' by even more American tech writers. (True story: ~10 years ago, Nokia had a store in Miami at Dadeland Mall whose primary market was visitors from Latin America. Every single one of their employees had non-Nokia phones for personal use, because they literally didn't have a single Nokia phone in the entire store that was capable of EDGE on ANY network, or 3G on AT&T. They were "1900/2150 3G + GPRS, take it or leave it" (and everyone who lived in Miami opted for "leave it").

    2. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares about freedom of speech? Not many are actually using it for much.

    3. Re:Who cares? by lucasnate1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If nerds had such influence, then Linux would have gotten more power in the desktop and Windows 10 would have failed.

    4. Re: Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This.

    5. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are things that hold Linux back.
      Lack of games and lack of Adobe productivity tools. And to very recently shitty graphics subsystems, which is pretty all right now and only getting significantly better by the day. A lot of Windows/Linux gamin titles already run better on Linux.

      You put games and Adobe tools on Linux, and watch user base migration.

      When comes to phones - Huawei does NOT have this leverage. Same as with Nokia.

    6. Re:Who cares? by Freischutz · · Score: 0

      There are things that hold Linux back. Lack of games and lack of Adobe productivity tools. And to very recently shitty graphics subsystems, which is pretty all right now and only getting significantly better by the day. A lot of Windows/Linux gamin titles already run better on Linux.

      You put games and Adobe tools on Linux, and watch user base migration.

      When comes to phones - Huawei does NOT have this leverage. Same as with Nokia.

      Gaming and Adobe graphics tools are not the two main forces that drive desktop sales, not by a long shot.

    7. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux is where it matters - basically running all of the worlds internet infrastructure and cellphones. Desktops are kinda dead. Who really cares what OS is being used in mostly irrelevant office jobs nowadays?

    8. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe, but that 0.001% has tremendous influence on the purchasing decisions of OTHERS.

      Even if they each influence a full 100 people that's still only 0.1%.

    9. Re: Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gaming is a huge factor in desktop purchases. Adobe is not.

    10. Re:Who cares? by gchat · · Score: 0

      Huh? Comparing apples with oranges it seems. So I guess Apple is also a failed company according to you. As for Linux:

      Linux is currently installed in over 3 billion smartphones
      Over 80% of the servers worldwide are build on Linux
      Linux is installed in hundreds of millions home appliances like SmartTVs, refrigerators etc.

      Almost every person on earth is using Linux, even if most of them haven't realized it. So these "nerds" opinions still have power where is matters.

    11. Re:Who cares? by houghi · · Score: 0

      The reason it does not have that is pre-installation.

      Get pre-installed machines in the stores and people will buy it, as we have seen with android. Now you can go in a store and buy an android, windows or apple product.

      The first thing people want is convinience. Why would they buy a PC and install software if they can just buy a PC?
      The majority of the people still buy a car with the audio that comes with it. Why? Convinience.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    12. Re:Who cares? by lucasnate1 · · Score: 1

      I wrote desktop, not smartphones, and not servers.

    13. Re: Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know it's difficult for spergs to understand, but having been given the choice the vast majority of people choose convenience over idealistic notions of freedom (See Google's success in essentially hiding the fact that ChromeOS and Android are Linux). The "year of the Linux desktop" is never going to happen because the "year of the desktop" is long gone- except for essentially hobbyists.

    14. Re:Who cares? by jellomizer · · Score: 2

      If you are big into [choose any topic] and want to do new and interesting things [in such named topic] then then the normal consumer version of [tool used in such topic] is often not well designed in your goal of doing the interesting thing you want to do [in topic]

      While we may want a mobile phone that we can modify to to run a company server enabling such features will only cause the general public to install malware and infect the wireless network. They are better off saying these are the Apps you got, so be happy with them. vs. giving them a tool not meant for what they want to do, and opening the door for much more problems with the consumer market.

      A Honda Civic isn't a good car if you are interested in racing or offload driving. However it may be a good fit, if you just want to get from point A to point B in basic comfort.
      A 40 key midi keyboard isn't a good instrument if you are into classical piano. However if you are learning to play, or just want something to tinker with, or are doing some other work such as music editing. Then it may be a better fit.
      A generic brand hammer isn't good if you are carpenter. However if you just need to get a nail in a block of wood, then you should be fine.

      People will often spend a lot of money for "Professional" tools, while they lack the skills to use them, and they are much better off with the consumer version. As they may be designed to be more generically used and require less maintenance, as they have a lower tolerance level for accuracy, but you will never know because you are not an expert.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    15. Re:Who cares? by ctilsie242 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      What holds Linux back is not "games", nor Acrobat. It is a tool for massively managing desktops in a commodized fashion. Microsoft's main reason for being so entrenched in the enterprise is the entire Active Directory GPO system, which allows for a lot of flexibility. Microsoft's AD also has a lot of enterprise tools as well.

      This doesn't say that one can do similar with a masterless Puppet setup using hiera and a ton of custom manifests, or having Salt, Chef, or Ansible have clients pull the configs from a load-balanced Git repository. However, for a massive scale, AD and GPOs are definitely top dog, making it easy to manage thousands to millions of Windows desktops.

      For Linux to really hit the desktop market, there needs to be a similar mechanism that can be opened and deployed out of the box, or Linux distros should have some way of being able to be managed from an AD GPOs (where one can set password policies, Fail2ban, and other stuff.)

      Once the enterprise has mass management tools in place, home desktops will follow.

    16. Re:Who cares? by jellomizer · · Score: 0

      Linux will often not have some of the extra polish that you will see in Windows or in OS X
      When awaking from sleep, my menu options in Gnome may be garbled. Sometime a task that you would expect to click and drag to fix will not be there. Request for features or improvements will often lead to "You have the source, fix it yourself!"
      So even if I do fix it myself, perhaps taking hours or days of my work, only for my patch to go away in the next update from the mainline, trying to post my fix to be included in the branch, only to get rejected because they don't like how I handle curly braces, or such feature will slow down something else (that I may not use). Or having to maintain a separate fork of a product, just for one feature disagreement.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    17. Re:Who cares? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      So Linux which is known for being a Command Line driven interface, works best on systems that do not have keyboards attached.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    18. Re:Who cares? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Linux is currently installed in over 3 billion smartphones The Linux Kernel (or parts of it) Android is a different OS then what we call Linux or GNU/Linux which we use for our normal distributions.
      Over 80% of the servers worldwide are build on Linux This number seemed to be pulled out of you butt, even if accurate it could be interpreted differently. Being that VMWare and many virtual environments may be Linux at its core, they can be running dozens of Windows servers.
      Linux is installed in hundreds of millions home appliances like SmartTVs Which no one really uses, refrigerators etc. YEA a 64bit OS with security and processing powerer unheard of a couple decades ago, to be almost as good as a duel metal coil with a ball of mercury embedded in a glass bottle, with contact wires.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    19. Re:Who cares? by gchat · · Score: 2

      You wrote (or were implying) that nerds don't have much influence over common users and you used the desktops as an example. In my reply I wanted to counter that statement by saying that nerds have still much influence and they use it where it applies. Anyway, almost all users (even power users) can get around by using Windows instead of Linux in the Desktop. This is the main reason Linux failed on the Desktop, even though it wasn't meant for this to begin with. Now returning to smartphones (which is this topic's subject btw.), almost all power users will run into problems sooner or later which can only be overcome by unlocking their bootloader and applying various workarounds. So this is the reason nerds are recommending Linux only on very special cases (few for Desktops, many for other cases), but would never recommend locked phones over unlocked ones. This is also the reason most OEMs still allow unlocking their bootloader, even though they know very few people actually use it.

    20. Re: Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to you. For goodness sake you Americans really think the world revolves around you.

    21. Re: Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really don't care. I would rather not have shitty foul mouth Americans bitching all the time about their rights.

      Like the rest of the world's perspective is that you need freedom but it has its limits and takes balancing.

      Americans are just brain washed from young to think it's all or nothing and there is no such thing as balance.... you need to learn some balance from Europe.

      There is much more freedom when there is balanced speech.

    22. Re:Who cares? by thegreatbob · · Score: 2

      I don't believe most of us are deluded enough to believe we can fight past the battle of attrition against the dreaded "new shiny".

      --
      There is no XUL, only WebExtensions...
    23. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seriously believe that Microsoft's tools scale into the millions of desktops? Are you a paid shill or merely incompetent?

    24. Re:Who cares? by gchat · · Score: 1

      The Linux Kernel (or parts of it) Android is a different OS then what we call Linux or GNU/Linux which we use for our normal distributions.
      Strictly speaking yes you are correct, but then Linux shouldn't be mentioned in any statistic. So 3% for Linux in the Desktop should actually be x% Ubuntu Linux, y% Debian GNU/Linux, ... x100 distributions. So this is the reason when people say Linux, they actually mean operating systems which are based on the Linux kernel, even if this isn't completely correct. Why shouldn't the same apply to android which is basically a JAVA VM build over a Linux kernel?

      This number seemed to be pulled out of you butt...
      As of now, no actual "formal" numbers for server market share exist, but any person in the tech industry should more or less give you this raw estimate.

      YEA a 64bit OS with security and processing powerer unheard of a couple decades ago
      I should've used the term "smart fridges" and put an "even" in front of it, to be more precise.

    25. Re:Who cares? by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      Maybe, but that 0.001% has tremendous influence on the purchasing decisions of OTHERS. Who do people looking for a new phone ask for advice? The 0.001% who root & reflash their phones.

      Most people that I know buy a phone without asking me for permission and advice. And some of the 0.001% are honest to themselves, and that while they might like to root their phone, it might not be a good idea for their mates to do it.

      It may work for you, but not for your friends.

    26. Re:Who cares? by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Maybe, but that 0.001% has tremendous influence on the purchasing decisions of OTHERS.

      Exactly.

    27. Re:Who cares? by Raisey-raison · · Score: 1

      Only .001% of customers unlock their handsets.

      If so, why does Huawei care so much about people unlocking their phones?

    28. Re:Who cares? by imrahilj · · Score: 1

      My guess is that they are doing this to try to comply with government requirements about "security"

    29. Re: Who cares? by Raisey-raison · · Score: 1

      How exactly is Europe or the rest of the world more free as a consequence of extra censorship?

    30. Re:Who cares? by PPH · · Score: 2

      Because it only takes one person digging around in their phone's innards to expose the spyware.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    31. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Show me another tool that can scale.

    32. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually see Qubes OS as the future of Linux. MS Thin Clients is where enterprise is heading. With the security vulnerabilities of Windows 10, how many more hospitals, and government offices need to be infected with ransomware before a true solution is found.

    33. Re: Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who "balances" the speech? The current ruler of China will be more than happy to take those reigns. I'm sure the local mullahs would be happy to separate all speech into halal and haram categories. Of course, the corrupt politicians wouldn't want their stuff aired.

      Didn't Europe lose a good chunk of its population by failing to learn such lessons last century? I don't think Europeans want to repeat that lesson.

    34. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dats nice, kewl story bra. none of these are my desktop.

    35. Re: Who cares? by CoolDiscoRex · · Score: 1

      Linux is the most-used OS in the world. That's why you had to cherrypick the one area where it does not make a big showing. The IQ of the average American is 98, and there are 3 OS choices verses how many phone makers? Rooting is a higher IQ endeavor, and the higher IQ generally are nore influencial than the lower. The high group contains most of the builders and creators. The people who argue for an expedited progression to idiocracy are typically in the lower group.

    36. Re:Who cares? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      If nerds had such influence, then Linux would have gotten more power in the desktop and Windows 10 would have failed.

      False. Nerds have plenty of influence when the decision is mostly irrelevant to the end user.

      Q: Which phone should I buy?
      A: Apple if you like Apple devices, ${Vendor} if you like Android. They all do mostly the same.
      Thanks mate!

      Q: Which OS should I use?
      A: Linux! You'll need to learn everything new, many people won't help you, you need all new software, you need to rethink how your files are stored and the interfaces range from the unstable to the unusable from a simplicity point of view but you'll be fine, honest!
      WTF Are you on drugs again?

    37. Re: Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are PLENTY of cheap laptops that have mint or ubuntu preinstalled. sadly, people usually format and install windows 10. they go with ehat is familiar and popular, since they have better chances to be helped when they run into trouble with the os.

    38. Re: Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Preach...this is the real reason that will lock Linux away from desktops... fragmentation and lack of a clear vision. Linux is the OS of choice for hackers and thinkerers not for the masses of users out there (that need to "get the job done" and do not give a shit about the new cool thing about the Linux kernel). Freedom is beautiful but if you hask two Linux users what's the best way to do a certain thing on Linux you will get five different answers, and this is what will scare away the user base from the OS.

    39. Re: Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Adobe is a big factor for design professionals, who are some of the more tech savvy people working in the highly influential entertainment industry. That was the whole point of the original post.
      It's not about the absolute number its about the network affect.

    40. Re:Who cares? by nasch · · Score: 1

      A Honda Civic isn't a good car if you are interested in racing or offload driving.

      Pretty much anything that moves can be raced!
      https://www.google.com/search?...
      Off roading may require more extensive modifications.
      https://www.google.com/search?...

    41. Re: Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While your account on the situation in the US is entirely agreeable, it's important to keep in mind that Nokia did not accidentally become irrelevant. Elop released the infamous Burning Platforms commentary to the public, ignoring all plans the company had for future development (such as the new Maemo/Meego platform whose sales far exceeded any expectations but was still canceled, as one of Elop's first decisions).

      For anyone paying attention, it was no surprise that the Microsoft exec drove the price of the company down for Microsoft to buy the assets cheaply, and Elop even received a hefty bonus on the condition that his running the company to the ground wasn't too obvious for EU regulators to block the acquisition.

    42. Re:Who cares? by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      Also the lack of Microsoft Office. Sure, you can mostly run it by using special compatibility layers (WINE, or its commercially supported relative CrossOver) but the experience isn't perfect. Or you can use the more limited web versions. But if you want the full Office experience you still have to run Windows.

      There are also lots of more specialized software packages that are only available for Windows or that run best there. Developers gravitate to the largest market and ignore others.

      Linux has beaten Windows in the server room. And even more dramatically in supercomputing; every one of the 500 fastest supercomputers in the world runs Linux.

  2. You can't unlock our rootkitted phones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the bok bok? Crazy dumb asia?

  3. Who is responsible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In 20 years 95% of tech news will be from China, but I don't understand why Slashdot keeps artificially pushing news stories about it in advance.

    Seriously, if you run a script that searches for the keyword China on Slashdot articles the last 3 years it's utterly ridiculous, and most of the stories are barely relevant to Slashdot. Who is causing this?

    1. Re: Who is responsible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the second story I've seen that mentions the Magisk tool. Subtle promotion for it perhaps?

  4. make sense.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    they don't want you to load a firmware doesn't have the pre-installed spyware and exploits that their government wants on the devices.

    the irony here is the company has been hacking, reverse engineering and copying foreign products since its founding.

    1. Re: make sense.. by astrofurter · · Score: 1

      Hey, fair is fair. If Uncle Sam gets to spy on everyone thanks to Big Brother Google, then Emperor Xi gets to spy on everyone thanks to the good comrades at Huawei.

    2. Re:make sense.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's cute, you think the Chinese government and their corporate proxies give one shit about your American ideals here.

    3. Re:make sense.. by Megol · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's cute, you think the concept of ownership is an American ideal. Hints: DRM, DMCA

    4. Re:make sense.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Nonsense. It's been known for decades that the real power is in the phone's radio firmware, that on most phones has full, 100% access to the same RAM your phone's main CPU uses. It can also track you without the OS knowing, as the GPS radio is controlled by that firmware.

      It can phone home, take pictures without the OS knowing, the list goes on and on and on.

      All phones have closed source firmwares these days.

      Yet everyone focuses on the OS as if it somehow gives control to the device.

    5. Re: make sense.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reverse engineering is perfectly fine as long as you are not just copying but finding another way to achieve the same results.

      Know the difference dumbass.

    6. Re:make sense.. by imrahilj · · Score: 1

      As an american - it is probably not the chinese government pushing for the spyware in western countries.

    7. Re:make sense.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not saying I love those things, but it's just someone else's ownership you're pointing to. If you want to hate on ownership, I suggest Obama's "you didn't build that" speech.

    8. Re:make sense.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The whole point of DRM and DMCA is to protect ownership of intellectual property. They may be poorly devised and used heavy-handedly by content owners, but if anything, citing the DMCA actually hurts your argument.

    9. Re:make sense.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus, when they stop releasing updates 12 months after release you'll have to buy a new phone to get updates instead of installing LineageOS or similar.

    10. Re:make sense.. by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      Nonsense. It's been known for decades that the real power is in the phone's radio firmware, that on most phones has full, 100% access to the same RAM your phone's main CPU uses. It can also track you without the OS knowing, as the GPS radio is controlled by that firmware.

      It can phone home, take pictures without the OS knowing, the list goes on and on and on.

      All phones have closed source firmwares these days.

      Yet everyone focuses on the OS as if it somehow gives control to the device.

      I'm retired. The only pictures they can take are me watching TV or on the John. At age 80, I still have my teeth for a smile. I have a belief the spyware will only be useful for working stiffs who do finance, engineering or medicine. A teacher has no fear of spyware, neither does a housewife, or small business man. I don't give a second thought to spyware. It would only bother me if I have reduced battery life.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    11. Re:make sense.. by Megol · · Score: 1

      No. You buy a book - your have the right to the book, that instance or copy. You own that particular book just not the right to disseminate copies.
      Software, movies or music? DRM in combination with DMCA (and analogous laws elsewhere) effectively removes every right other than paying someone. Even in places where users are theoretically able to do things those are removed, even when copyright owners are unfairly compensated for theoretical economical losses - e.g. Sweden.

      DRM and DMCA is a combination that creates a new economical serfdom where one have a right to pay for a service without being able to expect to be provided that service.

  5. Reasons by beep54 · · Score: 1

    The only way I can understand why large companies have a tendency to shoot themselves in the foot is that, contrary to certain politicians, corporations are NOT people too. In fact, if they were they would, by definition, be sociopaths.

  6. Techies overrated their importance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    “Helped get it off the ground”? No way. For Huawei to rival Samsung in sales, 99.9% of those sales were to clueless users, who would not even know what custom ROM is, and had no desire to load one. These users buy a new phone every 1-3 years.

    As all the game console maker learned from PS3 boot other OS feature, and what Apple already knew, techies made up less than 0.01% of their target market. Catering for them made no business sense, and very likely cause loads of headache. Instead of bringing in more customers, they are more likely to break your system and threaten your business model. Better to shut them out right from the start.

    These techies do like to overrate their own importance and like to claim their friends look to them for recommendations. Maybe that would influence 0.1% of the users, the remaining 99.9% buy whichever phone looked best at a price they can afford.

    1. Re:Techies overrated their importance by Tough+Love · · Score: 0

      These techies do like to overrate their own importance

      Don't you wish you were a techie should you could be more important? I understand your frustration, but please let me explain it to you in two words "thought leaders". You are welcome.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    2. Re:Techies overrated their importance by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Introvert computer geeks, the prime movers in the new global modern multipolar technocracy because barring languages (tee hee) they are much the same and their internal culture tends to dominate with regard to individual thought and expression over the cultures they are immersed in but some what separated from and the meek shall inherit the earth, mwa hah hah. I tend to agree ;D.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    3. Re:Techies overrated their importance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's probably the least convincing self-pandering I'll read today, Trump included. Grats. The greatest generation, look out, we got a thought leader here! Oooh, everybody tiptoe, we don't want to anger the neo-derp autistivante garde here.

      "Tough Love" ugh, do you see yourself lol? You lead nothing, nowhere. Electric skateboard your 125 pound ass along now before you get trampled underfoot.

    4. Re:Techies overrated their importance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thought leader

      Bahahahahaha.

    5. Re: Techies overrated their importance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go home, David Brock. You've had too late to drink.

    6. Re:Techies overrated their importance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People continuously underestimate the influence of those few techies. No, they're not the people who generate most of the sales directly, obviously. But they are the people who tell others what to buy and where people go when they need help. Once they start telling people that they out of luck because they bought a Huawei phone, sales will drop. Xiaomi is where it's at, btw. Much better hardware, better third party firmware support and also cheaper.

    7. Re:Techies overrated their importance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Security experts are an even smaller group .00001%
      So are a few passengers on a shot down airplane. But size is not everything.

      Now consider the impact on say Intel chips and Facebook recently. Or Cisco,
      Or one or two US senators blackballing Chinese companies - quite effective too.
      Or one president on steel quotas.

      We dont want you looking sends out the message that you have something to hide or need hidden asap.

      Front page headlines can kill a company.The days of covering up a lone wolf pissant security researcher is no longer guaranteed - things can snowball uncontrollably - fast.
      If Taiwan can jumpstart N Korea to replace Chinese made phones as part of a deal..
      Doing nothing now looks good.

    8. Re:Techies overrated their importance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never laughed so hard in bed to be honest.

    9. Re:Techies overrated their importance by Desler · · Score: 2

      So why do people keep buying iPhones, then? You supposed "influencers" always rail against them but the general public couldn't care less. It's almost as if reality is that no one cares what you whiners think and just buy whatever they want.

    10. Re:Techies overrated their importance by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      So why do people keep buying iPhones, then? You supposed "influencers" always rail against them but the general public couldn't care less.

      First, there are plenty of influencers who are pro-iPhone, because they enjoy walled gardens which provide absolutely zero benefit, because they are dumb. Second, there are plenty of users who don't know anyone who knows anything. They don't have a geek to ask, so they just make the best purchase they can, and it usually sucks.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:Techies overrated their importance by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      These techies do like to overrate their own importance and like to claim their friends look to them for recommendations. Maybe that would influence 0.1% of the users, the remaining 99.9% buy whichever phone looked best at a price they can afford.

      I think that you are overstating the numbers here. People who root their phones likely don't have any friends to influence.

    12. Re:Techies overrated their importance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > what Apple already knew, techies made up less than 0.01% of their target market. Catering for them made no business sense, and very likely cause loads of headache.

      Lots of companies market to techies. Most of the PC manufacturers sell workstations with Xeons or something equivalent to that. Apple can only seem to manage a trash can Mac that is outdated in terms of hardware and limited ability to upgrade.

      I'd argue Apple missed a huge opportunity. People would love to use Mac OS X in a server or workstation environment, but their pigheaded hardware decisions drove away potential customers.

    13. Re: Techies overrated their importance by LocalH · · Score: 1

      There are also plenty of influencers who are pro-iPhone because Android is garbage

      --
      FC Closer
    14. Re: Techies overrated their importance by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      There are also plenty of influencers who are pro-iPhone because Android is garbage

      [citation needed]

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  7. You should have seen it coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Huawei is yet another arm of the Oligarchs and Kleptocracts who rule over 1.3B indentured servants.
    And so they lured the suckers and idiots of the West by selling cheaper phones, and simultaneously enabling "developers" to plant their malware of the day in the phone. Now that China has planted a bug in the pockets of these entitled folks, it give you the finger. Go figure.

    1. Re: You should have seen it coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Makes a change from the septic tanks and their Russian masters spying on us I suppose.

    2. Re: You should have seen it coming by Freischutz · · Score: 1

      Makes a change from the septic tanks and their Russian masters spying on us I suppose.

      No, not really, Russia is also ruled by Oligarchs and Kleptocrats and the Chinese are spying on you too. Meanwhile the US is ruled by an egomaniac real estate mogul and a billionaire boys club and the NSA is spying on everybody.

  8. No sizable number of their customers care by batkiwi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They are the second biggest phone manufacturer.

    They shipped 150m phones in 2017 and are going to ship 200m phones in 2018.

    XDA has a total of 6.6m users in total. Lets ignore that most of those users are inactive, and that most of them won't be about huawei phones. Lets also assume people buy a phone every 2 years.

    That means that, in a completely ridiculous use case which we know is overblown, under %2 of their user base will be effected.

    It's more likely well under %0.01 of their actual handsets.

    1. Re:No sizable number of their customers care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      All the more reason to allow the rooting, and all the more reason to suspect something stinks if they change policy about a tiny fraction of their user base.

    2. Re:No sizable number of their customers care by kaizendojo · · Score: 1

      XDA has a total of 6.6m users in total. Lets ignore that most of those users are inactive, and that most of them won't be about huawei phones. Lets also assume people buy a phone every 2 years.

      That's an enormous amount of assumptions there. Based on?

    3. Re:No sizable number of their customers care by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 2

      XDA has a total of 6.6m users in total. Lets ignore that most of those users are inactive, and that most of them won't be about huawei phones. Lets also assume people buy a phone every 2 years. ... That means that, in a completely ridiculous use case which we know is overblown, under %2 of their user base will be effected.

      Besides the assumptions other have already commented on, what makes you think only active XDA users care about unlocking their phones? I don't have an account on XDA, but just the same I've passed over otherwise attractive phones before because they couldn't be unlocked without begging permission from the manufacturer. (Huawei was already disqualified due to requiring device-specific unlock codes, which they could stop providing at any time.)

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
  9. Oh? I'll find a new manufacturer then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I only buy phones that allow for my bootloader to be unlocked... easily. Good job for getting off my list.

    1. Re:Oh? I'll find a new manufacturer then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Out of curiosity, what makers allow for an unlocked bootloader? I cannot think of any.

    2. Re:Oh? I'll find a new manufacturer then by johanw · · Score: 0

      On Samsung it's relatively easy although not officially supported. Sony has the same mechanism Huawei had (mail for the unlock code), but because that wipes the Trim Area with code than increases the camera quality it is better to unlock / root a Sony device with a kernel exploit.

    3. Re: Oh? I'll find a new manufacturer then by n0nsensical · · Score: 1

      Google

  10. Re:frist post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    too late, lick the frozen pole.

  11. No sympathy for Huawei by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like Huawei is off the menu boys.

  12. Custom Roms, and Android by Zombie+Ryushu · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have always bought my Android Phones direct from Manufacturer. I have a BLU Studio 5.0. An R1 HD, and a Vivo 5, which is my current daily driver.

    The Studio 5.0C I have has no custom Rom for it. I use a modified Stock Rom with Root+XPrivacy. I do have TWRP installed. It runs Android KitKat. It never had a locked bootloader. GAPPS Removed.

    The R1 HD Has several Custom Roms. I had to use a Bootloader exploit to unlock the Bootloader, and Flash TWRP, then Flash only Rom where all the hardware works. Which is LineageOS 13.1 (Android Marshmellow.). GAPPS was not included.

    There are LineageOS 14.1 Roms for the R1 HD, they work pretty well, but, not if you want the camera to work.

      it's a problem with the drivers built into the kernel. We don't have the sources, and never will. The only option is to reverse engineer the binaries, but the amount of work required has caused pretty much everyone to abandon this phone.

    And that brings us too:
    The Vivo 5. I had to do some really risky stuff to get this thing's bootloader unlocked using SP Flash tools. But I got it, and I now run LineageOS 14.1 Android Nougat 7.1.2 and all the hardware works, I have full root control, and no GAPPS Even through there is other Android Nougat roms, there is no Oreo Rom. Which has me worried.

    1. Re:Custom Roms, and Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't we have an article a while a go where BLU (amongst others) was preloaded with crapload of malware and spyware, such that you couldn't remove them and could reinstall themselves?

    2. Re:Custom Roms, and Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you should do instead is look up the phone you're thinking of buying on the XDA developers forum and see what the status is of unlocking the bootloader, roms, kernels, rooting etc.

      Then you buy the phone that won't leave you stuck on shitty old roms after about two months time.

      Huawei of course isn't to be considered, and BLU is way down on the list where you might be able to root and remove stuff, but you're still stuck with old roms.

    3. Re:Custom Roms, and Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't care about your stupid phones.

    4. Re:Custom Roms, and Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. BLU is a mistake.

  13. Sorry, but "loyal customer base" means 1% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    the other 99% of the customers only care about a great phone at a great price. They are simply not interested in "modding" or tweaking the phone.

    1. Re:Sorry, but "loyal customer base" means 1% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      the other 99% of the customers only care about a great phone at a great price. They are simply not interested in "modding" or tweaking the phone.

      Yes, we know that most people are dumb.

      That doesn't make us want to fall in line.

  14. Caving to Google pressure by neutrino38 · · Score: 3

    I bet that they are member of the Google android manufacturer club or whatever name they use like Open Hanset Alliance. There were a number of articles documenting Google trend to reduce Android fragmentation. It leads them to go away from the open source philosophy and values.

    I bet that Huawei is simply caving on this pressure with the same effect on the open source side.

    1. Re:Caving to Google pressure by pablo_max · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The problem is that these companies, Samsung, LG, Huawei etc. think that they need their own special sauce as a differentiator in order to set their product apart from the competition.
      What they fail to understand is that people do not buy a phone BECAUSE of Touchwiz, they buy it IN SPITE of have Touchwiz.
      It's like the earlier days of PCs where OEM jammed loads of crap ware on the PC even though people just wanted a Windows machine without all the nonsense installed.
      I am sure there are some people who like Touchwiz, EMUI and all the other flavors, but in my experience people are far happier with "real" Android. This is why the Pixel sells. This was why the Nexus phones were successful. Or the Motorola "pure" editions outsold the normal variants via their online shop.
      Of course, they still don't understand it and insist to add their stupid broken versions of Android.
      I long for the day of a common phone architecture where a person can just install the OS they want.
      Phone makers are HW companies, not SW companies. Focus on that.

    2. Re:Caving to Google pressure by houghi · · Score: 1

      The reason for all the OEM crap was (and is) that it paid for the Windows licence they had to pay.
      They would get kickbacks from the companies like the anti-virus companies, because those knew that X % would actually pay for it.

      That resulted in the marketing company being force to sell it as "Includes 350 programs' as if it was a good idea.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    3. Re:Caving to Google pressure by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      What they fail to understand is that people do not buy a phone BECAUSE of Touchwiz, they buy it IN SPITE of have Touchwiz.

      While you point at Touchwiz you're really talking about buying a lexus and then complaining that the glove-compartment is a bit difficult to open. The special sauce goes far beyond their shitty home screen and any idiot happily replaces those with one of the many that are found in the app store. It's one of the primary reasons I can't get excited about Android OS upgrades. Oooooh Oreo came out with feature X. Hurrah.... My phone already did X.

      but in my experience people are far happier with "real" Android. This is why the Pixel sells. This was why the Nexus phones were successful

      Both of those were quite solid phones. On the other hand the several Play editions of Galaxy series phones were a huge flop with the vast majority of people looking at the feature list between them with their vanilla Android and comparing it with the feature list of the normal Galaxy next to it and wondering why anyone would buy less for the same money.

      Mind you... software quality rarely is written on the feature list.

    4. Re:Caving to Google pressure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And whats the excuse for doing that on Android?

  15. Xiaomi a good alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Xiaomi phones are a good alternative. They come with a locked bootloader BUT Xiaomi has an easy process to get them unlocked and install custom roms.
    Plus they are very good quality and not expensive. Tons of features. And they usually have bigger batteries thus more standby.

    1. Re:Xiaomi a good alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Xiaomi has an easy process to get them unlocked

      Props for Xiaomi of course, but truth be told the process is anything but easy. Last 3 times I did it the process involved waiting for days and reading things in Chinese.

      Motorola did it right with the Moto G. You asked for unlock and they would give you the unlock code on the spot. That's what easy looks like.

    2. Re:Xiaomi a good alternative by green1 · · Score: 1

      If it was done "right" you wouldn't need to ask for an unlock code at all. Look at OnePlus for example. No unlock code required, you simply unlock the bootloader and root as desired.

      Every manufacturer making you beg them for a code is simply trying to remind you who really owns the phone, and it's not you.

    3. Re:Xiaomi a good alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up.

      "fastboot oem unlock" or GTFO

  16. Will there be any unlockable 5g phones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or is the the point all the handset makers think they have a captive market and can lock down all the phones of the cattle?

  17. EMUI is the real issue by pablo_max · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I had the Huawei Nexus 6P.
    It was a great phone and always had the latest and greatest Android version running. Sadly, it was very slippery and I dropped it one too many times..the last one into the pool and I was never able to fully repair it.
    I liked that phone so much that I replaced it with a P20 pro.
    Boy, do I regret it.
    Compared to the 6P, it is a dumpster fire on a hot Texas summer day.
    It never occurred to me that Huawei would break so many stock Android features with their ridiculous EMUI.

    Want to interact with a notification from the lock screen? Nope, cannot do it.
    Want to pull down the top menu to enable or disable wifi from the lock screen? Nope, cannot do it.
    Want to select a wifi network directly from the pull down menu without going to wifi settings? Nope, cannot do it.
    Dismiss alarm from lock screen? Nope, cannot do it.
    Want the huawei clock alarm to sound during quiet hours? Nope, cannot do it.
    Want the google google clock alarms to work for more than 2 days without the need to turn on and off the alarm? Nope, cannot do it.
    Want to use a cellular data connection WHILE your phone is camped on a wifi network which has no data connection? Nope, cannot do it. The phone will NOT use cellular even though wifi data is impossible.
    Want to double click power button to turn on camera? Nope, cannot do it. You can use the volume down button though.
    Want to use the volume double press to turn on the camera whilst listening to audio or in a call? Nope, cannot do it.
    Want to fully disable the insane beautify mode for selfies? Nope, cannot do it.
    It goes on and on and on.
    This is really the first phone that I genuinely regret getting.
    The only good thing is the battery life. Of course, the phone is so fucking slow, it's no small wonder the battery lasts two days.

    1. Re:EMUI is the real issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      seconded, besides EMUI has the bad habit of killing power hungry applications like, for example, GPS tracking applications.

      It was always a suprise to discover that the device recorded only 1 hour of hiking out of 4.

      Worst thing is, there are many ways to disable this power "optimization" none of which works.

      So after trying each one you come to the conclusion that the only option left is to buy a different phone.

    2. Re:EMUI is the real issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Went Nexus S->Nexus Galaxy->5->6->6P->Pixel XL-> OP5

      IMHO the Oneplus is by far the best phone so far, and even more developer friendly than the Pixel XL (on release, they've totally sorted all of the A/B issues last time I checked). Unlock the bootloader, (optionally flash third-party ROM), flash TWRP, install Magisk, done. Just like any Nexus phone, but costs half as much (i.e. paid $480ish for a new 8GB/128GB when comparable pixels 2's were selling for $950ish). Stock ROM is pretty much a vanilla android experience, and it'll even do OTA on rooted phones (just takes a few seconds extra to boot into recovery and re-root the phone after the update is done)

    3. Re:EMUI is the real issue by iampiti · · Score: 1

      Now I understand your previous comment about manufaturer modifications to Android. That sounds like a really broken OS in that P20.
      Anyway, I've used both Samsung and LG phones and I don't find their modifications to Android annoying or hard to use. I guess 99% of non power users don't care either if their phone has those or pure Android.
      My point is: I don't think pure Android is better than manufacturer versions (at least those I've tried), just different.

    4. Re:EMUI is the real issue by sad_ · · Score: 1

      was interested in a Huawei device, because some have good features, are priced well and get fair updates.
      until i found out they do a custom interface (EMUI) on top of android.
      didn't want anything to do with it anymore, i've never seen any android device with a custom ui that works well.

      --
      On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
  18. Sony, too by DrYak · · Score: 1, Informative

    Sony even have an official "Open Device" program.

    To the point that they are official device used for some non-Android phone OS like Jolla's Sailfish X. (Full-blown GNU/Linux by the former Nokia "Meego/Maemo" team, that was let go once Elop happened to Nokia)

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Sony, too by gchat · · Score: 5, Informative

      Unfortunately, Sony shot themselves in the foot when they started wiping the camera DRM keys after unlocking their device. And so did Samsung when they implemented KNOX on all their devices. Both those manufacturers basically tell their customers that they are allowed to unlock their phones by permanently handicapping them.

    2. Re: Sony, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Itâ(TM)s possible to back up the DRM keys before you unlock.

      They also arenâ(TM)t essential to the operation of the phone

    3. Re: Sony, too by johanw · · Score: 0

      Yes but that requires an exploit to root the device, and when you do that already there's no need to unlock the bootloader anymore. I have a Z3 Compact with TWRP and root, which I rooted by downgrading the kernel, using an exploit and then upgrading the kernel again. That gave me TWRP with a locked bootloader.

  19. What's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    All these unlocked phones still don't provide their android repos, so you can't really customize shit, unless you somehow have access to all their firmware too.
    Even then you are basically stuck only replacing the kernel, and maybe some shitty parts of the OS.
    Can't replace any of the interesting parts.

  20. Nokia by DrYak · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What Nokia overlooked was mindshare & influence. America might have been a minor market, but it was a hugely INFLUENTIAL market.

    Huh... nope.
    The reason behind the downfall of Nokia is that basically Elop and Microsoft happened to them.
    Who did a tons of horribly bad decision that dragged down Nokia.

    There are some people who have written at great lenght analyzing the subject. (Basically, Nokia disappeared from the carrier's own store due to making tons of bad decisions that alienated them, and that's the reason they disappeared from the US market. They also completely neglected the market where they were dominant and thus got their lunch eaten by cheap chinese android nonames).

    It's also sweet that you think that just what a few bloggers speak about in the US will have such a big influence world-wide (though it partially happens around Apple and feature that get copied from them).
    Do you think that companies pop from the ground like mushrooms ? One of the reasons that companies like Huawei have managed to become dominant is that they had build momentum taking over other markets. They became popular in countries looking for cheap Android phone. They have built manufacturing capacity, they have worked through the various kinks of early model and have an actual offering by the time they seek to replace a vacant niche in the US market.
    They are the manufacturer who are already pushing shit tons of phones through aliexpress unto BRICS countries.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Nokia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Are you nuts? Or, sorry, that's a little rude -- but, Nokia had fallen into utter obscurity WAAY before Microsoft had anything to do with them.

      In 1994, yes 1994, Nokia was a WORLD LEADER in cell phones. They slowly and repeatedly lost market for decades, then neglected to embrace the 'new' world of the smart phone properly, much like Blackberry did. Blackberry used to be a world leader, just like Nokia... had their own variant of the 'smart phone', just like Nokia, and on and on and on.

      People are confusing historical market share, and shares in 'emerging markets' AKA cheap, with real, sustainable market share. By the time the Microsoft deal happened, and by the time Elop happened, Nokia was surviving on "old" market share, on cheap phones, and the list goes on.

    2. Re: Nokia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please mod parent down, if only for not reading the link:
      http://communities-dominate.blogs.com/brands/2012/07/the-sun-tzu-of-nokisoftian-microkia-mirror-mirror-on-the-wall-whose-the-baddest-of-them-all-waterloo.html

      Nokia was the largest smartphone manufacturer and strongest brand in many countries world wide even in 2010.

  21. Would you still receive the OTA update if... by devslash0 · · Score: 1

    ...you use a custom ROM but do not use G-Apps? Or am I asking a stupid question? (I don't know much about android dev)

    1. Re:Would you still receive the OTA update if... by pablo_max · · Score: 1

      No, you won't.

    2. Re:Would you still receive the OTA update if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...you use a custom ROM but do not use G-Apps? Or am I asking a stupid question? (I don't know much about android dev)

      You will get updates from the custom ROM if it's something like LineageOS or OmniRom (or anything else that supports updates).

      From the manufacturer? Well, no - how would the phone even check for a rom you that don't have installed anymore?

    3. Re:Would you still receive the OTA update if... by devslash0 · · Score: 1

      That was exactly my train of thought. But in the world of software you never know lol.

  22. EMUI is crap by josd · · Score: 2

    I have been using android and custom ROMs since the HTC magic (the first android device you could buy here).
    I have a P20 pro, bought it because you could unlock it, and lineage OS would run on it, and on top you could still use the stock Huawei camera app. This gives me best of both worlds, the device and the camera is fantastic, but the software is horrible (I tried to use it for 1 week before giving up):
    * they implemented some kind of process freezing that makes you lose notifications (I had this with hangouts, google photos, facebook messenger and more). Major dealbrearker, you can somehow exempt some apps from the freezing but that's very involved
    * I got a call from my girlfriend with phone in priority only. Phone din't ring. She was not amused (we have twins and needed to come asap)
    * you can not set the SMS ringtone to something else than the default notification sound (mind, this is with google's messages app, somehow they didn't implement the notification channels correctly)
    * bluetooth is buggy, strangely works better in custom ROMs
    * it's slow
    * contains lots of bloatware
    * if you want to use Google apps like calendar and contacts, you get lots of duplication, and confusion resulting from that (it will always open Huawei calendar)

    Now running a project treble ROM and loving it. There are a few drawbacks, IR doesn't work, USB audio doesn't work, in call mute doesn't work, no notch support, but none of these are bigger issues than their own EMUI rubbish.

    And as stated already here, people often come to me for buying advice for android phones, I will NOT recommend Huawei ever.

    1. Re:EMUI is crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a Huawei P Smart and I second everything you wrote. Have you also noticed that you only can open photos in the Huawei gallery app? It's also very annoying that so many apps can't be disabled (the gallery app included).

      For reference to other readers, you can change the process freezing under Settings -> Battery -> Launch and choose which apps to manage manually.

  23. Seems they took lessons from the FSF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Built freedom in, turn freedom on

    but turned it into

    Built slavery in, turn slavery on

    I'm afraid they will be more successful than FSF ever was

  24. china called by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    your a "party member" that means you have no vote

  25. The difference between Unlocking and Rooting by Frankie70 · · Score: 1

    A smartphone is essentially 2 things
    - A phone
    and
    - A computer

    Unlocking refers to the phone part of the computer. For some strange reasons Americans buy phones only from their telecom service provider (that's like buying light bulbs only from your utility company). So the telecom provider locks the phone to their network. Unlocking allows you use the phone with other networks

    Rooting is process getting admin privileges on the computer part of your smartphone

    Why are these 2 terms used interchangeably in the article and the comments?

    1. Re:The difference between Unlocking and Rooting by msauve · · Score: 4, Informative

      Because you're wrong. You're referring to carrier ("SIM") locking. On Android phones, there's also bootloader locking, which prevents installation of custom firmware.That's what the article is referring to.

      Rooting is a different thing. Custom firmware isn't necessarily rooted.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    2. Re:The difference between Unlocking and Rooting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hackers.
      No point.

    3. Re:The difference between Unlocking and Rooting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It goes even further than this: So called "unlocking" has two flavors. One thing is unlocking a phone for using with any telco. Other thing is unlocking the phone bootloader, that is what really enables flashing custom firmwares.

      You can have a unlocked Telco agnostic phone, but still be unable to flash custom roms. My guess is that the author don't have experience with any of it, and thus naturally make a mess of it all.

    4. Re:The difference between Unlocking and Rooting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aaaannd, you can have a phone rooted and still be unable to flash custom firmwares.

      My guess is the author is in fact a long time iPhone user and never touched Android. The text shows he isn't knowledgeable about unlocking, bootloader, Magisk, rooting, flashing or anything about it.

    5. Re:The difference between Unlocking and Rooting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      For some strange reasons Americans buy phones only from their telecom service provider

      At least until a few years ago, there was general financial incentive to do so, as Verizon/Sprint/AT&T offered low prices on phones with new plans as well as 18 month/2 year "free" upgrades, plus they tended to be diligent with warranty repairs. At the same time, the non-major carriers tended to have godawful coverage, forced users to spend far more up front and provided next to no support.

      Then around 2013 or so, with smartphones becoming the norm over all telecommunications devices, the major carriers started lowering their subsidies on smartphones and cutting back on data plans, while the MVNOs managed to start offering more consistent coverage and heavily advertised their BYOP plans, which gave lots of people an out from their $100+/month plans. Granted, adoption of MVNOs has been slow by most Americans who are content to let the major carriers handle things for them (for a price), but compared to a decade ago MVNOs have made quite a bit of progress.

  26. Don't forget the innate distrust of Chinese makers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget the innate distrust for Chinese makers after news articles about spyware, unknown apps sending info to China, the fact that the US government had security concerns about their devices, and that US carriers will not touch Huawei with a ten foot pole.

    Common sense here. A phone maker where people who know what they are talking about should be avoided... coupled with the fact that they are locking down their ROMs, brings about a conclusion that they want to keep stuff hidden.

    One aside: The Chinese government requires all ventures on their soil be 51% owned by a domestic (Chinese) partner. All Chinese companies have Chinese government military and intel staffers as part of the company board. It would be like a US company having to have a representative from the Army, the NSA, and the DHS, and they have the final say for any company decisions.

    Now, with this in mind, do you trust a Chinese company trying to hide stuff? Where there is smoke, there is fire. There are far better, and more trustworthy brands out there. If a handset maker doesn't trust people with their stuff, then why should I trust them? A typical phone has a -lot- of sensitive data on it, and if a brand starts being hush-hush about what they have, especially a Chinese brand that has been warned against by people who know what they are doing... that ensures I won't be buying it.

  27. People listen to techies though... by ctilsie242 · · Score: 2

    No, people may not be interested in building a custom ROM, or even rooting a device, but if their techie friend warns them that the phone from FooTel will ship with adware and spyware that they can't get rid of, and uploads their intimate pictures to some site overseas, they will eschew that phone for something more trustworthy.

    I have had people ask a brand provider recommendation more than once, and privacy is a big concern, even for the people who are relatively clueless about tech stuff. They may not be rooting their phones, but they will be looking for advice from people who do.

  28. Closed system by p51d007 · · Score: 2

    Maybe they are going the Apple route. Hoping a closed off, walled off ecosystem is the best way. Sorry, I've had 3 of their phones. Excellent phones, great battery life. I've never felt the "need" to root any of their phones, but, I had the OPTION. Them taking away the OPTION is not good. Their biggest issue with me is lack of patch updates. I'm not so much concerned about which version of Android is on my device, but I would like to have the monthly security updates. With Huawei, even those can get bogged down unless you live in the Asia area. Now that the USA has pretty much kicked them out, I've moved on to the Essential PH-1 for now, given how dirt cheap it was. Great little phone, got Android 9 the minute I powered it up.

  29. MVNO by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    I switched from AT&T, to Straight Talk about 4-5 years ago and haven't looked back! I still use the at&t towers ;)

  30. Biting the hand that feeds them by sremick · · Score: 1

    I'm "the tech guy" in my family, my extended family, and my huge circle of friends and professional colleagues. I'm also a higher-tier tech professional with influence both for my day job and as my side business.

    Every single Android phone I've owned I've had root on.
    Every single Android phone I've owned I've had an unlocked bootloader.
    Every single Android phone (and most of my cell phones before) had MicroSD card slots.

    These features are not only critical for the sort of stuff I need my phone to do, but also allow me to extend the useful life of the phone far past whenever the mfr arbitrarily decides to stop offering their own Android updates in the hopes of bullying me into prematurely buying a replacement.

    Manufacturers beware: My family, friends, co-workers, and clients buy based upon my recommendations. Piss me off, and I don't recommend your shit.

  31. Premise invalid. Conclusion wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Premise invalid. Conclusion wrong.

  32. I'm Joe Q. Public by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I'm Joe Q. Public, I don't give a rats ass about 'thought leaders'. I don't have time for that. I want a phone that works. Period. I have reality tv to watch, or football. I have to labor in a factory/whse/whatever and can't care what a 'thought leader' is. I'm far more concerned about getting home from work, then dinner, beer/drugs, tv/video games, bed. Rinse repeat.

    I am Joe Q. Public. Hear me roar.

  33. Every Android Manufacturer will have to go by rainer_d · · Score: 1

    full Apple or corporate will not take a look at them.

    iPhones are more manageable and more secure than Android phones (people who manage these devices at scale will tell you that).
    Also iOS has better support for Exchange / O365 than Android and longer support for updates, which means you can draw out the replacement-cycle or at least re-issue the phones to "lower-tier" employees.

    So, it's simple as that: get used to the unroot-able phone. If that is what draws you to Android because you can "fix stuff that Google doesn't fix" or for whatever reason then start complaining to Google that they fix stuff instead of launching yet another messenger or pissing away money on moonshot-projects that go nowhere.

    --
    Windows 2000 - from the guys who brought us edlin
  34. Unlocking still a must for me. by renegadesx · · Score: 1

    I have been pretty happy with Xiaomi phones because there is such a simple process to unlock the bootloader. As for custom ROM's, what is everyone else using these days?

    --
    Make SELinux enforcing again!
  35. This is exactly the sort of outcome by themusicgod1 · · Score: 1

    The GPLv3 was supposed to prevent. Linus, by keeping Linux GPLv2, this is the future you signed us up for.

    --
    GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.