Slashdot Mirror


China Has Withheld Samples of a Dangerous Flu Virus (nytimes.com)

For over a year, the Chinese government has withheld lab samples of a rapidly evolving influenza virus from the United States -- specimens needed to develop vaccines and treatments, according to federal health officials, The New York Times reports. From the story: Despite persistent requests from government officials and research institutions, China has not provided samples of the dangerous virus, a type of bird flu called H7N9 [Editor's note: the link maybe paywalled; alternative source]. In the past, such exchanges have been mostly routine under rules established by the World Health Organization. Now, as the United States and China spar over trade, some scientists worry that the vital exchange of medical supplies and information could slow, hampering preparedness for the next biological threat. The scenario is "unlike shortages in aluminum and soybeans," said Dr. Michael Callahan, an infectious disease specialist at Harvard Medical School. "Jeopardizing U.S. access to foreign pathogens and therapies to counter them undermines our nation's ability to protect against infections which can spread globally within days." Experts concur that the world's next global pandemic will likely come from a repeat offender: the flu. The H7N9 virus is one candidate.

239 comments

  1. So this is how Trump wind up destroying the world? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Got to admit.... didn't see that one coming. Bravo, well played.

  2. It's Only The Flu by TheAngryCat · · Score: 1

    Nothing to worry about, with good nutrition the average American will survive.

    1. Re:It's Only The Flu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why can't this virus be isolated from people who are infected with the virus?

    2. Re:It's Only The Flu by gtall · · Score: 1

      What an enlightened frame of mind. So if a few thou infants, old people, poor people, etc. die, well that's just to show they aren't average Americans with good nutrition. Hey, you should tell the CDC, they'll be happy for this information...save them a whole lot of trouble and angst. I'm sure they'd listen to you.

    3. Re:It's Only The Flu by CaffeinatedBacon · · Score: 1

      Aren't you all on food stamps and morbidly obese? Life expectancy in the US is dropping, even without this flu.

    4. Re:It's Only The Flu by mangastudent · · Score: 1

      Aren't you all on food stamps and morbidly obese?

      Not hardly. But to the extent our body weights are more than they should be, that might help a lot of our people survive, according to this comment:

      Deaths are linked to low weight (not enough fat to survive periods where it's a struggle to keep food down, and low energy to power the immune system)...

      That being true 100 years ago for most people (1918 pandemic), and today for many Asian populations where high death rates have been observed from bird flu. So we might be the best prepared in the world!

    5. Re:It's Only The Flu by CaffeinatedBacon · · Score: 1

      Interesting, but they probably didn't have as many obese people back then for a similar comparison to today. Maybe there is an ideal weight/amount of fat to store and once you go over that it's bad again.
      Depends what they mean by 'low weight' too, how low?

    6. Re:It's Only The Flu by mangastudent · · Score: 1

      There's almost certainly an ideal weight range, I can't imagine morbid obesity being consistent with higher survival rates, but I wonder if we "know". Ah, surely this has been researched with generic flu infections, you'd want to look that up. No idea on the "low weight" the guy I was quoting was talking about, most people aren't super skinny, e.g. there's a threshold below which women can't conceive. But there should be research on this as well, but that will have problems with very small populations of victims.

  3. Re:So this is how Trump wind up destroying the wor by hey! · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Oh, don't be so dramatic. Sure, China won't share the specimens with us, but all we have to do is get one of our friends to ask for it....

    Oh, wait.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  4. Re:So this is how Trump wind up destroying the wor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, China are being assholes (again) and it's Trump's fault.

  5. Re:So this is how Trump wind up destroying the wor by mangastudent · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The PRC has never "played well with others" when it comes to infectious diseases, their first instinct is to claim nothing is happening, see SARS, they exclude the ROC (Taiwan) from as much of the international health network as they can, it's what you expect from a government were politics trumps (heh) everything else, especially including human lives. They don't much care if they kill their own Han Chinese by the tens of millions, why would even they care about foreign devils?

    If, as you claim, they're doing this to spite Trump, that just further proves that they always put politics ahead of human lives.

  6. No problem by johanw · · Score: 0

    The US can buy China made vaccins. For the right price of course...

  7. quarantine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's ok, we'll just "quarantine" chinese visitors for several weeks in the hold of a ship like they do to our grain shipments. Then we'll turn them away because they are rotten and stinky.

  8. Don't worry, the Great Negotiator will get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just like his great negotiating skills have gotten Affordable Healthcare repealed, even with a majority in both the House and Senate.

    And The Wall.

    ayup.

    1. Re:Don't worry, the Great Negotiator will get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it would be too bad if its definition of 'affordable' was actually affordable. it's not, so nothing of value was lost.

    2. Re: Don't worry, the Great Negotiator will get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting that this strain came out in 2013, and they have withheld it for 5 years. But itâ(TM)s all Trumps fault.

  9. First line could use editing by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 4, Informative

    The line "For over a year, the Chinese government has withheld lab samples of a rapidly evolving influenza virus from the United States" says the virus comes from the United States. What they mean is "For over a year, the Chinese government has withheld from the United States lab samples of a rapidly evolving influenza virus."

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    1. Re:First line could use editing by sehlat · · Score: 5, Funny

      "For over a year, the Chinese government has withheld lab samples of an influenza virus from a rapidly evolving threat, the United States."

    2. Re:First line could use editing by WindBourne · · Score: 0

      WHich is actually wrong.
      What it SHOULD be saying is that United States is raising a stink about CHina not sharing information, let along samples, with other nations including the US. Europe, Russia, Japan, India, WHO, etc are not being allowed access to it. Yet, it is known that this is spreading in China rapidly and will almost certainly be one, if not the, main flu virus for the year.
      Since the world does not have an infection yet, nor samples, nor information, all that we know is based on information leaking from China, is that Chinese farmers working with Chickens are getting sick and the death rate appears to be high.

      Of course, CHina might then be responsible for a biological warfare in which they sell the vaccines.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    3. Re:First line could use editing by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      "For over a year, the Chinese government has withheld lab samples of an influenza virus from a rapidly evolving threat, the United States."

      This could be interpreted as saying that the US *is* the rapidly evolving threat, and that the Chinese are withholding lab samples from it (the US, the rapidly evolving thread.)

      No matter what, that line is FUBAR. It needs to be nuked from orbit ("it's the only way to be sure") and start from scratch.

      "For over a year, the Chinese government has withheld from the United States lab samples of an influenza virus that might constitute a rapidly evolving threat."

    4. Re:First line could use editing by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      "For over a year, the Chinese government has withheld lab samples of an influenza virus from a rapidly evolving threat, the Trump Administration of the United States."

      There, fixed that for you.

    5. Re:First line could use editing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Been a LONG time since I've scrolled Slashdot.

      Nice to know WOOOSHes still go on quite regularly.

    6. Re:First line could use editing by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

      The most reasonable way to deal with this then is to locate some sick Chinese farmers, offer them transport and state of the art medical care in the US, et voila!

      We get samples of the virus and the farmers hopefully get well on US soil. It would be a nice touch to offer them asylum also afterwards.

    7. Re:First line could use editing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CHina not sharing information, let along samples, with other nations including the US. Europe, Russia, Japan, India

      >bird flu
      >birds
      >fly
      >5 years to spread wings

      What kind of birds observe national boundaries again?
      Even bird flight to the US via Alaska is highly plausible.

    8. Re:First line could use editing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoosh

    9. Re:First line could use editing by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Just because something can fly around, does not mean that it will fly all over the globe.
      Not too many chickens fly from China to Mainland America.
      In fact, no birds that I knew of fly from China to Mainland America.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    10. Re:First line could use editing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The United States is a rapidly evolving threat? What nonsense!

      The United States is a slowly dying threat, like the Roman Empire towards the end of its existence.

    11. Re:First line could use editing by gtall · · Score: 1

      Nonsense. The Evangelicals and Trump have never evolved. They were made by G-d in His image. I guess even G-d makes mistakes. Maybe he'll get some mulligans like Trump gets when he cheats at golf.

  10. Drivel on slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    For over a year, the Chinese government has withheld lab samples...Now, as the United States and China spar over trade, some scientists worry that the vital exchange of medical supplies and information could slow... infections which can spread globally within days...Experts concur that the world's next global pandemic will likely come from a repeat offender: the flu.

    See that intentional equivocation and correlation structure? Think of news like this as code to understand it.

    The trade issues are short months old and this has been going on for over a year. The linking to a potential global pandemic within days. Classic salesmanship tactic of time pressure. Clearly intended writing to give the impression of something without directly saying it. So much bullshit hidden in the structure. So much propaganda.

    Don't fall for propaganda. Don't post it here on slashdot.

    1. Re:Drivel on slashdot by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      You must be new here.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:Drivel on slashdot by gtall · · Score: 1

      Yeah, all those comments Trump made during the campaign about how he was going to screw China? Mere noise that China could easily ignore.

  11. Re: So this is how Trump wind up destroying the wo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Sounds like bio warfare to me, should sanction China,
    If they won't share samples of infectious diseases than no Chinese nationals should be admitted to the US

  12. Rockerfeller CDC has much much more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    And they routinely spread and create diseases to the public. See HIV for an easy example of a lab created virus distributed by the CDC.

    1. Re: Rockerfeller CDC has much much more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Hey look, someone who knows what's up

      Cheers to that shit

      Fear mongering and cover stories...... yay

    2. Re:Rockerfeller CDC has much much more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And they routinely spread and create diseases to the public. See HIV for an easy example of a lab created virus distributed by the CDC.

      No, it was not the CDC. HIV was created by homosexual scientists at Berkeley as an act of genocide against their own people that would bring sympathy to the survivors so the gays would later be able to claim their own country.

  13. I don't blame them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US can't be trusted right now due to the toddlers who are currently running the show

    1. Re:I don't blame them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Says the sociopath who goes around insulting toddlers...

    2. Re: I don't blame them by millenial.scum.1991 · · Score: 1

      The US fascist ogliarchy can't be trusted, no matter who is running the show Emphasis on "show"

  14. Re:So this is how Trump wind up destroying the wor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    but all we have to do is get one of our friends to ask for it....

    Oh, wait.

    Exactly this ... the US is pissing off friends and allies all over the place. And while most of them probably wouldn't withhold medical stuff, America has fewer friends these days they can count on ... because those friends are tired of being blamed for everything by the Cheeto in Chief.

    I'm not actually surprised that China has said "fuck you" and decided not to play nicely.

    I won't be surprised if other countries decide similar things.

    This is one of those "be careful what you wish for" things. Trump is doing more damage to international relationships than will be easily remedied, so if suddenly other countries are a whole lot less enthusiastic about what the US wants, then we'll just get another bullshit cycle of Trump blaming everyone else.

    At some point, if the diplomatic equivalent of "bummer dude, not my problem" happens, you'll know who to blame.

  15. Send in the IMF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ethan Hunt could easily retrieve some Petri dishes. Piece of cake.

  16. Why didn't the US discover this, too? by Streetlight · · Score: 1

    Unless the birds having the virus only live in China, the US virus hunters should have found this virus already.

    --
    In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
    1. Re:Why didn't the US discover this, too? by GregMmm · · Score: 1

      Different strands of virus mutate in different parts of the world. China could have found a strand of virus and is not sharing. Hopefully they don't "share" it with us in an unfortunate way. I don't think they're doing this, I just think it's a "I'm getting back at you" kinda thing.

    2. Re:Why didn't the US discover this, too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This administration doesn't believe in science

      I wouldn't be surprised to see them put an anti-vaxxer in charge of the FDA

    3. Re:Why didn't the US discover this, too? by Gilgaron · · Score: 2

      The normal flu pattern is for the new pandemic strain to emerge in the Asian bird population and then make its way here to the US. Without getting it from China it is hard for us to manufacture enough of the vaccine in time.

    4. Re:Why didn't the US discover this, too? by Streetlight · · Score: 1

      Seriously, you very well could be right. According to GregMmm's response to my question above, viruses mutate differently in different parts of the world. This may be like an evolution event and if the administration is filled with anti-science folks who believe the world is only a few thousand years old, why would they believe in vaccination against an evolved virus.

      GregMmm - thanks for the insight.

      --
      In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
    5. Re:Why didn't the US discover this, too? by WindBourne · · Score: 0

      BINGO.
      This version is only known in CHina and was discovered back in 2013. At that time, it was not an issue and CHina was sharing some information about it, but never shared a single sample with the world.
      Now, information is leaking out of China that this IS spreading amongst their farms, and the works are getting sick with a high mortality rate. Once this leaves China, it will take a MINIMUM of 6 months to isolate it, culture it, and start building up a vaccine to it, and then build up enough supply for the world.
      Or the world could just pay CHina $100-1000 / person for an inoculation.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    6. Re:Why didn't the US discover this, too? by WindBourne · · Score: 5, Interesting

      nope. CHina found it 5 years ago and has never shared with the world. It was not an issue 5 years ago, or even last year. Problem is, that information is leaking out of CHina that this stain is spreading amongst farm workers, getting them sick and appears to have a fairly high mortality rate.

      This is NOT good.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    7. Re:Why didn't the US discover this, too? by mangastudent · · Score: 1

      Or the world could just pay CHina $100-1000 / person for an inoculation.

      What are the odds the inoculations would be any more effective than the zillions of ones made with expired ingredients manufactured by those two PRC companies that are now posing one of the greatest threats to Emperor Xi's reign?

    8. Re:Why didn't the US discover this, too? by WindBourne · · Score: 2

      One thing greg missed is that this strain has always been in China. IOW, it has not been seen outside of China. That is the problem. Right now, leaks from inside china indicate that this has spread around China and it appears that it IS jumping from human2human. With a 40% mortality rate (i.e. if you get sick, 40% chance that you will die), this is not something to sneeze at, so to speak.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    9. Re:Why didn't the US discover this, too? by Ichijo · · Score: 3, Informative

      The mortality rate is 39%. Luckily, human-to-human transmission so far is rare, it's usually poultry-to-human, but this could change as the virus evolves.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    10. Re:Why didn't the US discover this, too? by WindBourne · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Problem is, that information leaking out of CHina, that they are not sharing with the world, is that it HAS started human2human transmission. Yeah, it was zoonotic, but if the leaks are true, then it has finally made the jump. This is why CDC is screaming about it. From what I have heard, ECDC and WHO has been quietly begging for samples from China, but that is getting nowhere.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    11. Re:Why didn't the US discover this, too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Problem is, that information leaking out of CHina, that they are not sharing with the world, is that it HAS started human2human transmission. Yeah, it was zoonotic, but if the leaks are true, then it has finally made the jump.

      Would you have a link to some of the info/rumors regarding the human 2 human transmission? Not trolling, I am genuinely interested.

      Thank You, Gordon

    12. Re:Why didn't the US discover this, too? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Decades ago, I worked at CDC (79-80). I was on ground floor of HIV (knew all the interesting stuff that did not end up in 'the band played on'). Still have friends there. So, nope.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    13. Re:Why didn't the US discover this, too? by Solandri · · Score: 1

      Most flu strains originate in Asia, where there's much more interaction and contact between people and animals. The vast majority of flu strains mutate to jump species (usually from birds to people, sometimes from pigs). So the place where that's most likely to happen is where large numbers of people are still farmers raising animals in close quarters - i.e. the more densely populated regions of Asia.

    14. Re:Why didn't the US discover this, too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not a problem. And thank you for sharing some of the backroom rumors. Most appreciated.

      Thank You, Gordon

    15. Re:Why didn't the US discover this, too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not as many people in the US have sex with birds as in China.

    16. Re:Why didn't the US discover this, too? by WindBourne · · Score: 2

      To be honest, I wish that I would hear more. Gov, like businesses, have their own communication channels. the big difference is that within the gov, you have the majority of ppl that want nothing to do with the partisanship, but just want to work. However, that was not the case for what I saw. And it sounds like things have gotten worse, but I suspect that it is more a case of old age no longer looking past the BS. But who knows.

      On a side note, back when reagan got in and was screaming about Herpes, we knew about HIV (actually AIDs, still had not IDed the virus though knew it was carried in the 'homosexual' community, and suspicion was that it was a retrovirus). Had tried right at tail end of carter to get him to drop some 500M on epidemiology for this. We knew that at that time, it could not be stopped, but also knew that less than 1000 infected (later on, determined that it was less than 200 at that time). They wanted to shut down all gay bathhouses and try to really slow it down.
      Carter had already lost so his attitude was to move all decisions to next admin. reagan shot it down. Not once, but multiple times. And last attempt was my boss going to DC and talking to him. When he came back, he said that we would have nothing to do with AIDs, Nothing to do with Republican Party and had turned from a major backer of reagan to HATING the man. And this was a mormon bishop who was well known for being one of the top virologists in the world.
      Have to say that I have lost 2 cousins to HIV so to this day, I am also not a republican and esp not a reagan fan.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    17. Re:Why didn't the US discover this, too? by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be too horribly surprised to hear that the reason they're holding on to this 'flu virus' and not giving us a sample of it is because it's a weaponized version of another flu virus, or perhaps they created it from scratch themselves, and in either case it's a bioweapon and they don't want us figuring that out until it's too late.

    18. Re:Why didn't the US discover this, too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China is a virus incubator. They have pigs and chickens practically living on top of each other, surrounded by humans. The pigs can support avian and human viruses, including their own. The dice are continuously rolled year after year, incubator piggy after incubator piggy, and eventually something deadly that is also compatible with humans gets created and passed on.

    19. Re:Why didn't the US discover this, too? by CaffeinatedBacon · · Score: 1

      Why would it take 6 months when you could just buy 1 dose from China and copy that instead?

      Heck, sneak in and steal a sample, bribe a Chinese person to get one for you. You claim it's going to be worth 10's to 100's of Billions of dollars, you want to save hundreds of millions of American lives. So slip a 'researcher' a 20 and have a sample tomorrow. It's not like Chinese pharmaceutical companies are well known for their integrity.

      Or are you just anti-China fear mongering again with this?

      Or the world could just pay CHina $100-1000 / person for an inoculation.

    20. Re:Why didn't the US discover this, too? by mangastudent · · Score: 1

      Why would it take 6 months when you could just buy 1 dose from China and copy that instead?

      A dose of vaccine doesn't get you much that's useful. It should contain two proteins, the HA and NA surface ones, you'd have to "decompile" them, produce DNA sequences that would code for them, use the reverse genetics approach to get the DNA into flu strains optimized to grow in eggs, or insect cells in bioreactors for the Protein Solutions approach (and I know some other companies were working on similar modern approaches) ... and then without the real strain it would be harder to gauge efficiency, you'd certainly need many more than a single dose from the PRC.

      And all this takes time, and more difficult lab work, when it'll already be too late for 100s of millions to billions of people if an ultra lethal pandemic is raging.

      Heck, sneak in and steal a sample, bribe a Chinese person to get one for you.

      Shortly after the Obama administration took office the PRC burned our entire network of agents in the country, brutally and publicly executed 10s of them, good luck finding more now.

      Or the world could just pay CHina $100-1000 / person for an inoculation.

      Most people don't take the annual flu vaccine, so the entire world wouldn't have even vaguely enough production capability. The real hope would be a Maximum Effort to use something like the Protein Sciences insect cells in bioreactors approach, and even then you'd need to conscript a bunch of bioreactors and the people who know how to use them who haven't yet succumbed to the pandemic, and still probably run out of capacity in the purification, testing and bottling steps.

      The whole reason to make a fuss now ... well, actually it's to score cheap political points against Trump for a problem that started 3 years before he became President, but after that it's the rumor that it's transmitting people to people in the PRC. The whole world needs to start preparing now , before it possibly becomes a pandemic.

    21. Re:Why didn't the US discover this, too? by CaffeinatedBacon · · Score: 1

      Agree with everything you said about the virus.

      My point was, if Windy was correct in his claim. That China is already producing a vaccine ready to sell for $100-1000 per person, then they have already done all those steps. And would be producing them by the millions. It wouldn't really be that hard to get the research out, especially given the stakes. They poison their own babies and make fake vaccines for money ffs.

      Similarly, the only reason Windy made the claim is to score cheap points against China. The situation is much more serious than his petty China hate.

    22. Re:Why didn't the US discover this, too? by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, they will in the movie.

    23. Re:Why didn't the US discover this, too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Orange baboon has stopped funding of medical science, as it contradicts with his holy book. Thoughts and prayers will surely heal any disease.

  17. Walls by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 4, Funny

    What we need is more walls to keep the birds from flying into this country and spreading flu.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    1. Re:Walls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot a piece: The walls have to be built by the chickens and paid for by the chickens.

    2. Re:Walls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not walls - more windmills. We can grow our production of renewable energy and keep the birds out! We would kill two birds with one stone. Wait a minute...

    3. Re:Walls by sit1963nz · · Score: 2

      Walls... bugger walls, according to the great orange oompaloompa in the Whitehouse the most effective thing is Wind Turbines.

    4. Re:Walls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      jus need to make sure those walls arrive to the ceiling...

    5. Re:Walls by gtall · · Score: 1

      Not to split hairs, but could he just open his mouth like during a campaign speech? He's not stopped giving those so we could just plant him in California and face him west.

  18. China Bioweapons Program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can we please call a spade a spade here and just lay it out there that China has a radically advanced WMD program that includes genetically-engineered bioweapons?

    1. Re:China Bioweapons Program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you mean lay out more baseless bullshit propaganda, than what is already being shat out from the corrupt asshole of the world, a.k.a. United States of America? No thanks. The world has had enough of you and your lies.

    2. Re:China Bioweapons Program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Viruses as they are are useless as weapons. A pathogen, machine or a technology technology in general that can't be controlled is never a weapon for military purposes. Terrorists with apocalyptic agendas are a different story. End of the world cults have been rare and limited so far, unless the people wanting to hasten the return of Jesus count.

    3. Re:China Bioweapons Program by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      You have to be kidding me. You seriously think that virus are useless as weapons?
      You obviously do not have a clue of what you are speaking of.
      H7N9 has a 40% mortality rate. More importantly, if you spread around a nation fast, and have ppl getting sick at the same time, you will likely have a massive increase in nosocomial infections, which will lead to large amounts of death. Not 40%. Probably 60-70% (though some 30% from side infections).

      And if you think that virus can do no harm, look into WWI as well as what ebola has done.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    4. Re: China Bioweapons Program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, because no one ever tried to rise to power or wealth with an implausibly optimistic plan. That's why bank robbers are always successful and never caught and happen all the time.

      Hell, if we weren't dumb and short sighted, there would never be an unplanned pregnancy.

    5. Re:China Bioweapons Program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you think anthrax was weaponized by encapsulating it in the first place? You can spread it in a particular are in a controlled way and make sure your own troops don't get affected. Yet you can deny access to an area from the enemy with it, just like a four decades lasting minefield would (assuming you can't cleanup the area). Lethality is not only about the capacity to kill, but about accuracy and the capability of accomplishing a goal or a mission.

    6. Re:China Bioweapons Program by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      For a terrorist or most communist nations, they do not care about own troops. They will sacrifice them gladly.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    7. Re:China Bioweapons Program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How are you going to spread it? Air drop a bunch of chickens?
      You seem to be saying you have to weaponize it in some way, just like the person you posted after (can hardly say responded or replied to).

    8. Re:China Bioweapons Program by mangastudent · · Score: 1

      How are you going to spread it? Air drop a bunch of chickens?

      It's influenza, it's very hard to keep it from spreading, in 1918-9 even to the most remote Pacific islands. However we'd get warning if the PRC instituted a mass inoculation effort, that's the obvious heads up if any county is about to try a genocide the rest of the world with an infectious bioweapon. Their economy also take a bit of a hit, plus they'd lose a lot of their people from starvation when they couldn't import crude oil and food.

      Oh, and if they succeeded in this? Depend on Russia, and likely the US joining them in turning most of urban mainland China into radioactive glass, and using dirty bombs upwind of as much of the rural population possible. Which is why countries don't try to pull this shit, we're worried about the PRC doing this accidentally to save face, no sir, no SARS to see here!.

  19. According to an anonymous source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets be clear, the idea that this source is not "authorized" to talk to the New York Times is questionable. It is far more likely the source doesn't want to make it easy to identify their ulterior motives in approaching the New York Times to do a story about it.

  20. Chinese Nelson Muntz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ha, Ha!!

  21. Re: So this is how Trump wind up destroying the wo by shaitand · · Score: 1

    We should simply eliminate the involved Chinese officials.

  22. Re:Why should China help US pharma take the lead.. by mangastudent · · Score: 5, Informative

    If US pharma ends up charging them more than they can afford

    If this turns out to be the next break out super-flu like the 1918 variety, every egg laying chicken in the world will be conscripted by every company in the world that can make flu vaccines so we maybe keep the death toll in the mere 100s of millions.

    In the meanwhile, it's vital that the few research labs capable of mutating raw flu strains into ones that express the vital proteins while growing well in egg membranes get going. Especially since this is particularly difficult with avian flu strains, they're much more vicious towards chicken eggs.

  23. Intellectual Property by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ""Jeopardizing U.S. access to foreign pathogens and therapies to counter them undermines our nation's ability to protect against infections which can spread globally within days.""

    Most countries have to rely on countries with more advanced medical industries. Why would China share valuable knowledge about a virus when it can develop a vaccine itself? If an American pharmaceutical company developed a vaccine based on the samples would everyone in the world be provided the ability to simply copy it free of charge?

    1. Re:Intellectual Property by mangastudent · · Score: 1

      Most countries have to rely on countries with more advanced medical industries. Why would China share valuable knowledge about a virus when it can develop a vaccine itself? If an American pharmaceutical company developed a vaccine based on the samples would everyone in the world be provided the ability to simply copy it free of charge?

      Because they wouldn't be able to provide enough vaccine for their own country if it broke out in a big way, unless they've copied approaches like the one used by Protein Sciences?

      You bet we'd provide the seed strains to grow in eggs to other counties if a worldwide pandemic broke out killing 100s of millions to billions of people, something we've been fearing since 1918. Of course, we'd first have to create those seed strains, which takes a long time to begin with for non-avian original strains, the avian ones obviously don't play well with chicken egg membranes.

    2. Re:Intellectual Property by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You bet we'd provide the seed strains to grow in eggs to other countie"

      Who is "we?" American pharmaceutical companies? I don't think so. Where is the profit in that?

    3. Re:Intellectual Property by mangastudent · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "You bet we'd provide the seed strains to grow in eggs to other countie" Who is "we?" American pharmaceutical companies? I don't think so. Where is the profit in that?

      From memory, and what I was just able to look up, there's 3 or so labs in the US that do this, St Jude Children's Research Hospital in Memphis, New York Medical College in Westchester County (maybe the top place, or maybe they just get the best press since a woman runs it), and maybe the CDC, all mustache twirling evil non-profit academic labs.

      Your worldview is severely stunted and parochial.

    4. Re:Intellectual Property by dryeo · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be too sure about any thing the Realty TV personality in charge would do.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  24. The last time samples weren't shared was because by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They were afraid us westerners would make 'loads of money' from selling vaccines to them!

  25. Specimens needed to develop next flu scare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    like a few years ago, which was nowhere as fatal as the common flu each year, and then cash in literally billions from scaring people into vaccinating.

    China is more responsible, they shouldn't let the U.S. have more dangerous viruses than they already are keeping.

  26. Re:So this is how Trump wind up destroying the wor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which dumb fuck modded this up? This is likely one of the many paid Chinese trolls here (Angel'o'sphere, CaffeinatedBacon/CrimsonTsunami, etc).

    If any of you had real English comprehension, you would realize that China has been withholding H7N9 from the rests of the world (including Europe,Russia, Iran, North Korea, etc), not just America. It is America that is carping about it. And it was discovered more than 5 years ago, which is long before Trump started his fit.

  27. wnning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    your winnng trump ....only 349999999 left on the wall

  28. Re: So this is how Trump wind up destroying the w by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nuke em from orbit, it's the only way to be sure.

  29. Re: Why should China help US pharma take the lead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yea, and where I live flushots are free for elderly and the young.

  30. Re:Why should China help US pharma take the lead.. by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

    This is why we should be investing more in modernizing flu vaccine manufacturing. If the next super flu is also highly infectious to chickens, they will be culled and burned.

  31. A super-spy could retrieve the virus by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Funny
    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re: A super-spy could retrieve the virus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Inconceivable!

  32. Re:So this is how Trump wind up destroying the wor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The PRC has never "played well with others" when it comes to infectious diseases, their first instinct is to claim nothing is happening, see SARS, they exclude the ROC (Taiwan) from as much of the international health network as they can, it's what you expect from a government were politics trumps (heh) everything else, especially including human lives. They don't much care if they kill their own Han Chinese by the tens of millions, why would even they care about foreign devils?

    If, as you claim, they're doing this to spite Trump, that just further proves that they always put politics ahead of human lives.

    If China asked the US for a sample of an infectious disease, would the US give it to China?

  33. Re:So this is how Trump wind up destroying the wor by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The PRC has never "played well with others" when it comes to infectious diseases, their first instinct is to claim nothing is happening, see SARS, they exclude the ROC (Taiwan) from as much of the international health network as they can, it's what you expect from a government were politics trumps (heh) everything else, especially including human lives. They don't much care if they kill their own Han Chinese by the tens of millions, why would even they care about foreign devils?

    If, as you claim, they're doing this to spite Trump, that just further proves that they always put politics ahead of human lives.

    Although it is true that the PRC has never really played nice with others (I do remember the SARS kerfuffle), it does not refute the fact that this ridiculous trade war is making a bad situation worse.

  34. I see two scenerios by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. China doesn't want us to have the virus because, like the last round of bird flu, it is so virulent towards Asian people, China doesn't want the U.S. to have the virus as a potential bio-weapon against China.

    2. China doesn't want us to have the virus because, China wants to use it as a bio-weapon and doesn't want us to have an antidote.

  35. In the chinese calendar it's by goombah99 · · Score: 4, Funny

    it's the year of the Twelve monkeys

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  36. China engaging in passive biowarfaire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It isn't surprising China wants to keep a lid on it. For example, I managed to get SARS, directly from Toronto about 15 years ago. No fun (as I thought I had a flu, but a flu doesn't cause 2-3 weeks of constant coughing), and nobody talked about it. I wouldn't be surprised if another pandemic is on its way from the Middle Kingdom, and China is in a panic trying to stop it before the extent gets really known.

    With all the interest in making money, where even organizations like the WHO and CDC are considered cost centers, so people believe they should be defunded or dissolved, it is no wonder why a simple virus hits a high populated area, mutates, and becomes a pandemic, when it could have been stopped early on, if the local government actually gave a shit. This isn't just China... it is a miracle Ebola didn't spread in the US.

    I wouldn't be surprised that China hopes this mutates (or perhaps some CRISPR lab might help it along) into a true people-eating bug. Less population helps them out by cutting down the need for resources, especially in rural areas, and does a good job achieving military objectives against other countries China doesn't like.)

    1. Re:China engaging in passive biowarfaire by mangastudent · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This isn't just China... it is a miracle Ebola didn't spread in the US.

      Not really, Ebola, like this bird flue, is zoonotic, it's not adapted to us humans and kills us way too fast to spread widely and quickly, especially with minimum levels of isolation that e.g. Nigeria was capable of implementing.

      A bird flu like this might be much worse, though, since it's spread by aerosols ... but it also might no be as easily caught by humans ... except if the PRC is doing their usual thing of trying to sweep cases under the rug, they're giving it a chance to adapt better to humans (e.g. hybridization when a human or pig gets both it and a normal to them strain of the flu), although that could decrease its lethality.

    2. Re:China engaging in passive biowarfaire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Per CDC re: 2014 Ebola: "Two and a half years after the first case was discovered, the outbreak ended with more than 28,600 cases and 11,325 deaths."

      I'd hardly call that so routine and easily contained that you can wave it away. There were secondary infections in the U.S. You know, the people that were in freaking Andromeda Strain biohazard containment.

    3. Re:China engaging in passive biowarfaire by mangastudent · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'd hardly call [the 2014 Ebola outbreak] so routine and easily contained that you can wave it away. There were secondary infections in the U.S. You know, the people that were in freaking Andromeda Strain biohazard containment.

      That's because we had so few cases (most in fact health workers evacuated from Africa, right? Was there even more than 1 secondary in the US?) we could actually treat them in the dozen or less beds in the 3 of the 4 facilities that can do this (the 4th was reserved for any healthcare workers in the first 3 who contracted it, which fortunately didn't happen).

      If it gets dire in a First World country, you do essentially what the Third World does, pretend to treat it but isolate it, and let the chips fall where they may. Although as we're discovering, survivors can transmit for a long time, so we'd have to get even more strict with quarantine measures.

      The point is that, while it wasn't "routine" (except this sort of thing actually is routine in Africa), it wasn't The Big One, more people get killed in a normal flu season, let alone a pandemic one. Because, you know, Ebola is not transmitted by aerosol.

      A pandemic that's more like 1918, or worse, is what we're trying to forestall, with the PRC not cooperating at all for the last 5 years. Obviously because they knew Trump would be elected 3 years after it started breaking out in the PRC.

    4. Re:China engaging in passive biowarfaire by hey! · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes, Ebola and flu are both zoonoses, but they are not obligately so. The majority of cases are due to human to human transmission. That's pretty much the template for an emergent infectious disease: they don't come from nowhere. They smolder away slowly in some isolated animal population for millennia, then suddenly hop onto a human migration path.

      That's what happened to smallpox, which was an insignificant African rodent disease until around three thousand years ago, when evidence emerges for it in Egyptian human populations. Egyptian traders brought it into the Near East and possibly as far as India by 1500 years ago; by the 1st Century CE it was in China. Then a particularly virulent strain emerged in China a few centuries later. This kind of thing happens all the time in nature, but the more aggressive strain burns itself out. The difference here is that China had extensive trade connections that reached as far west as Rome and east to Melanesia, giving the more aggressive strain global scope. In the 8th cenutry it killed 1/3 of the population of Japan. From late Roman times to the middle ages it made periodic incursions into Europe, but only became endemic there after the Crusades.

      Human trade tilts the evolutionary playing field in favor of aggressive infectious agents. Ebola never spread anywhere before 1976, but it must have been around. It just never had access to a network of cities with hundreds of thousands of people as it did in '76. When it took weeks to travel between villages or to cross the ocean, Ebola was never going anywhere. Today you can catch Ebola in the African bush and be in New York two days later, well before any symptoms emerge.

      So while Ebola isn't something we should panic over, it's not an empty bogeyman either. The US needs forward defenses against such things, because Ebola is not the only one.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  37. Re:So this is how Trump wind up destroying the wor by DigiShaman · · Score: 2

    They don't much care if they kill their own Han Chinese by the tens of millions, why would even they care about foreign devils?

    My theory is this - China knows that if enough of their own population falls, they could be left vulnerable to invasion for regime change via outside sources. So if a pandemic takes them down, it's to their benefit the rest of the world become too debilitated to attempt such a move on China.

    MAD = Mutually Assured Death

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  38. Re:Why should China help US pharma take the lead.. by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Hard for Europe to manufacture a vaccine when they do not have a sample of it either.
    And wonderful attitude of yours. Great to see that you love killing ppl.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  39. Re:Why should China help US pharma take the lead.. by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    BTW, most of the R&D done in clean energy comes from America.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  40. Lol by SuperDre · · Score: 1

    That's what you get if you don't play nice. Ahwel you can thank Trump for that with his stupid decisions.

    1. Re:Lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They've been sitting on this for 5 years. Or were the first 3 years Obama's fault somehow?

    2. Re:Lol by mangastudent · · Score: 1

      That's what you get if you don't play nice. Ahwel you can thank Trump for that with his stupid decisions.

      It's the PRC that's never, ever played nice with the rest of the world when it comes to infectious diseases, historically one of their most consequential exports, e.g. the Black Death. Look at SARS in 2002 for an archetypal example.

      In this case, per the fine article, the PRC has been withholding samples for "over a year", i.e. before the start of the trade war. Because this is a propaganda piece attacking Trump, something you're all too happy to help with, you have to read to note it first showed up in 2013, the year after the Lightworker was reelected. I.e. if you can't find it in yourself to blame the foreign commies, blame Obama before Trump, they've been withholding it for 5 years, as many others in the discussion have noted.

    3. Re:Lol by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Uh, you think that this article is attacking Trump? Seriously?

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  41. Re:So this is how Trump wind up destroying the wor by MikeMo · · Score: 1

    But there is no direct evidence linking China's actions with the trade dispute.

  42. Re:So this is how Trump wind up destroying the wor by mangastudent · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If China asked the US for a sample of an infectious disease, would the US give it to China?

    Do you have any reason to believe we wouldn't?

    My Google and Bing fu wasn't good enough to find anything about this, but I can't recall ever hearing of such a case, we can be sure the usual suspects would scream about it, and there's also the minor detail that mainland China has been one of the biggest sources for novel diseases. Which has been true for a very long time, e.g. the Black Death is thought to have come from China.

  43. Re:So this is how Trump wind up destroying the wor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He who sows the wind, reaps the whirlwind.

  44. Re:So this is how Trump wind up destroying the wor by mangastudent · · Score: 4, Informative

    it does not refute the fact that this ridiculous trade war is making a bad situation worse.

    Citation needed, seeing as how per the report the withholding started before the trade war. If they've been doing it for 5 years as others have claimed, you ought to be blaming Obama for starting it.

  45. Re: So this is how Trump wind up destroying the wo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That is stupid. When the Chinese government falls it will be to a Chinese who becomes popular by blaming the existing Chinese government for it's failures, real or otherwise.

    #butheremails

  46. Re:Yeah. Anybody surprised? by sit1963nz · · Score: 1

    The USA seems to be ripping up treaties and trade deals too. The USA is hardly to be trusted either.

  47. Re:Why should China help US pharma take the lead.. by mangastudent · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is why we should be investing more in modernizing flu vaccine manufacturing. If the next super flu is also highly infectious to chickens, they will be culled and burned.

    It's also a very slow process, and each egg produces at most 3 doses. I was appalled with 2 'p's when the FDA tried to deny Protein Sciences a licence with the excuse the old methods were good enough. They use modern biotech, splicing the relevant antigen coding DNA into ... whatever, insect? cells that grow well in bioreactors to quickly mass produce the antigens, as I recall something like 100,000 doses in each run. Something like what they're doing would be the only real hope if we were facing a true death plague.

  48. Re:So this is how Trump wind up destroying the wor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Although it is true that the PRC has never really played nice with others (I do remember the SARS kerfuffle), it does not refute the fact that this ridiculous trade war is making a bad situation worse.

    The trade war is ridiculous. We should try to convince people that it is ridiculous. If you blame things on the trade war which started decades before the trade war, people not already on your side will conclude that you are unreasonable. Don't cry "trade war" unless you can show a relationship, unless you want people to conclude the trade war is harmless.

  49. Re:Yeah. Anybody surprised? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    yeah, what Trump is doing leaves a lot to be desired. The same is true of what W did.
    Lately, it seems like AMerica is becoming like China.

    However, if you are talking about trade deals, other than NAFTA, America has not broke any. Everything that Trump has done has not been constrained by treaties. Even with WTO, it has said that if there is more than a 10% difference in trade, that the disadvantaged nation can impose tariffs.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  50. Re:Why should China help US pharma take the lead.. by David_Hart · · Score: 2

    This is why we should be investing more in modernizing flu vaccine manufacturing. If the next super flu is also highly infectious to chickens, they will be culled and burned.

    We already have that.... One of them is a recombinant protein-based technique approved in 2013. As I understand it, the protein-based techniques are supposed to create a more consistent vaccine batch than eggs (due to the intermingling of egg DNA). Plus, some people are allergic to chicken eggs and are unable to take the flue vaccine created using the egg based techniques.

    https://www.cdc.gov/flu/protec...

  51. First: tree eating bugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next: flu will be shipped in unmarked containers to our shores from china.

    ( bug = Asian longhorned beetle )

  52. Gee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is almost like someone treated them with disrespect and they are responding in kind.

    Canadian here, America can expect a LOT more of this going forward.

    Thank your leader appropriately.

  53. Re:So this is how Trump wind up destroying the wor by mangastudent · · Score: 2

    But there is no direct evidence linking China's actions with the trade dispute.

    For the PRC and our betters in the US, this has nothing to do with science, medicine, avoiding the possible deaths of 100s of millions to billions of lives, etc., the alpha and omega is politics. The usual stuff the PRC has always done with infectious diseases like SARS, and TDS here.

  54. And these are the daft fuckers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who we're told will "fill the void in global leadership left by the United States". FFS.

  55. Maybe China should request samples of smallpox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you think the US would be willing to provide a sample?

  56. Wait... by argStyopa · · Score: 2

    ...you're suggesting that perhaps China is a SHITTY international actor, whose interests lie solely with its own people and geopolitical goals? /shock.

    For all of you who think Pax Americana has been odious and oppressive, brace yourselves. You haven't the faintest idea what it's going to be like with a TRULY racist, TRULY self-interested, TRULY ethnocentric hegemon.

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:Wait... by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Meh. Just look at history.
      It was Europe that spread the bulk of slavery around the world.
      To be fair, slavery was all over the world, just localized.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    2. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was Europe that spread the bulk of slavery around the world.

      Wrong. It was the Jews who did that.

    3. Re:Wait... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Meh. Just look at history.
      It was Europe that spread the bulk of slavery around the world.

      With over a billion people and with several "racial" groups of its own to subjugate, to date China has been able to produce all the slaves it needs right at home. Automation is replacing slavery with people starving in the streets anyway. These days, China is known less for forced labor and more for organlegging. If you cause trouble, they break you up for parts.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, some of them still think they inherit directly from Homo erectus, placing them into a separate line of human development from the rest of the world. In their minds, a superior line. We could tease them from being at the level of Homo heidelbergensis or Neanderthals to set off the racists, but since the original claim is nonsense there wouldn't be a point.

    5. Re:Wait... by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      Like everything else, the Europeans were just more advanced and well-traveled.

      To suggest that one of their bad aspects outweighs all the good is a little particularist.

      Let's recall that it was also Europe that internationalized:
      - food distribution
      - technology
      - medicine
      - education
      Largely, Europe and it's peoples basically spread the MODERN ERA to the rest of the world.

      As you point out, slavery was universal and commercialized to the extent that any society COULD do so.

      --
      -Styopa
  57. Re:So this is how Trump wind up destroying the wor by Narcocide · · Score: 1

    Replying to undo broken moderation. I selected "insightful" but it chose "redundant."

  58. Re:So this is how Trump wind up destroying the wor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they should ask for samples of smallpox.

  59. Re:Why should China help US pharma take the lead.. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    If US pharma ends up charging them more than they can afford while the European labs develop the field tests for half the price and end up manufacturing in China to boot?

    Go suck a melon America. China doesn't owe you a living you bunch of free-loaders. Get off your iPhone and TV addictions and do something productive with your time like figuring out clean green energy or something you fat bastards.

    Yours,
    The rest of the world; Trump edition.

    The US invents half the shit, including medicines, invented every year. ROW needs to be more like us, not the other way around.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  60. Re:Why should China help US pharma take the lead.. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    Deaths are linked to low weight (not enough fat to survive periods where it's a struggle to keep food down, and low energy to power the immune system) and other modern comforts and treatments.

    This was a problem for everyone 100 years ago, and rural Asian (and other) areas today. It would be in China's interest to let the US or other countries develop a vaccine as they stand to lose many, many people.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  61. Not to worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't need to guard against a global pandemic when the rest of the world is restricted from entering your country.

  62. Easy Fix by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

    Dissallow Chinese nationals from entering your country and prevent any travel to / from Mainland China until they decide to share their samples.

    Until they provide said samples, their citizens ( and any tourists ) are basically transmission vectors.

    TBH, scientific research that benefits the species as a whole really should play on a different playground than Politics and petty bickering.

    1. Re:Easy Fix by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Agreed.... Every nation should implement this border control ASAP.
      Any nation that conceals or refuses to join a mutual relationship sharing data, samples, etc about any active pathogens or vaccine data with all nations/health agencies requesting should have a restriction against travel through other countries until the situation is remedied.

  63. Re:Why should China help US pharma take the lead.. by mangastudent · · Score: 1

    Deaths are linked to low weight (not enough fat to survive periods where it's a struggle to keep food down, and low energy to power the immune system) and other modern comforts and treatments.

    Whoa, I sincerely hope you're correct, and the cytokine storm hypothesis for the lethality of the 1918 pandemic is wrong. Erk, assuming the accounts I've read are correct, how does this explain the 1918 strain preferentially killing the younger? Well, for that, there's the hypothesis that the older set had already survived a strain somewhat close to the 1918 one. And maybe the body weight one fits into it.

    Experts say this is a very hard field, a common maxim is, "If you've seen one flu pandemic, you've seen one flu pandemic."

    It would be in China's interest to let the US or other countries develop a vaccine as they stand to lose many, many people.

    As for the PRC, and North Asian counties in general like Japan, the authorities would rather have millions of their own people die than to lose face. (For the latter country, see WWII, and at smaller scales the responses to the Kobe earthquake and JAL Flight 123.)

  64. Re:So this is how Trump wind up destroying the wor by mangastudent · · Score: 1

    Maybe they should ask for samples of smallpox.

    Heh, I don't think Russia or the US would cough those up, certainly not without a very good reason. But I don't think you really need them, the DNA has been sequenced and published (and that was controversial of course), it's thought to be not terribly hard to recreate from that, certainly for a reasonably advanced nation state. One reason after 9/11 we got ourselves back into position to inoculate every one in the country if it broke out.

  65. China sees US raping Syria and wizens up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China sees what is happening in Syria, how that country is being dismantled by US/UK/FR/saudi forces on zionist command and they don't want to meet the same fate. Why give a bio-weapon to your enemy? China is not currently moving, but if Russia becomes spread too thin and gives up on Syria, they may move in alongside Iran to save Damascus.

  66. US already has so much weapons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do they want another dangerous virus?

  67. China withheld samples of influenza virus? by najajomo · · Score: 1

    Is there any truth to this, is there any verifiably third party corroborating evidence for this?

  68. Re:Why should China help US pharma take the lead.. by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is why we should be investing more in modernizing flu vaccine manufacturing. If the next super flu is also highly infectious to chickens, they will be culled and burned.

    It's also a very slow process, and each egg produces at most 3 doses. I was appalled with 2 'p's when the FDA tried to deny Protein Sciences a licence with the excuse the old methods were good enough. They use modern biotech, splicing the relevant antigen coding DNA into ... whatever, insect? cells that grow well in bioreactors to quickly mass produce the antigens, as I recall something like 100,000 doses in each run. Something like what they're doing would be the only real hope if we were facing a true death plague.

    The FDA is a scam and everyone knows it. It's job is to protect their own jobs first, big pharmas profits second, and Americans a distant third. If they cared about helping Americans we would be able to buy drugs from Canada still.

  69. Re:So this is how Trump wind up destroying the wor by easyTree · · Score: 1

    It's definitely Trump's fault. Not all the spying, black-ops / covert wars etc since the beginning of time.

  70. Re:So this is how Trump wind up destroying the wor by reboot246 · · Score: 0, Troll

    So, you would re-elect 0bama and let him go around the world bowing to everybody and apologizing for the United States?

    No thank you. I'd rather be hated and feared than run over. Our "friends" have been taking advantage of us for decades.

  71. Re:So this is how Trump wind up destroying the wor by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

    Don't go there man Trump Derangement Syndrome knows no limits.

  72. Re:Why should China help US pharma take the lead.. by mangastudent · · Score: 1

    If [the FDA] cared about helping Americans we would be able to buy drugs from Canada still.

    If that was allowed, then US drug companies would stop giving Canada's nationalized healthcare system discounts, they can well afford to lose whatever business that would cost for a population of 37 million in favor of the 335 million in the US. Especially seeing as how they and we would like to see them continuing to do drug R&D, which the US market supports since all these other wonderful government single payer systems demand prices just above the cost of goods.

  73. Re:So this is how Trump wind up destroying the wor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At some point, if the diplomatic equivalent of "bummer dude, not my problem" happens, you'll know who to blame.

    Yeah, the Americans and the Chinese. Because the equivalent of "bummer dude, not my problem" in this case is an avoidable mass casualty event caused by a virus that doesn't give a fuck about international relations or borders. Guess what? The deaths may not even happen in either of the feuding parties. It may get some good genes and spread to an unrelated third party to cause it's mayhem. Probably somewhere in Africa sadly.

    So thanks to two dick countries we can have plenty of people die needlessly, and your reaction to it is: "Who giss a fuk?" Wonderful.

  74. You would blame Trump of course by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    But the problem 100% is with China for this shitty move. Look at USSR USA cooperation in space.

    China is worse than Trump

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    1. Re:You would blame Trump of course by gtall · · Score: 1

      Hell, look at USA and Russian cooperation on the last U.S. election. Who says they cannot get along?

    2. Re: You would blame Trump of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Evidence? Just the hit piece fake dossier Hillary paid to have written. Yawn.

  75. All the evidence you need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China is planning its next world war. Get ready people... you have been warned.

  76. Re:So this is how Trump wind up destroying the wor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Evidently you missed the part about China withholding the medical data for over a year. A year ago the US-China relationship was no better or worse than when Obama left office.

    And honestly the US has never had "friends" or even worthwhile allies. All of these friends expect trade agreement that require the US to make all the sacrifices. Why does Germany get to impose a 6% import tariff on US automobiles but the US is only allowed to impose 4% on German imports? Why does the Canadian government get to subsidize their lumber and dairy industries to set prices and the US cannot take them to the WTO for violating the rules against using the government subsidizing their main industries and then slapping on tariffs for any exports to the US? Why does China negotiate trade agreements and blatantly violate currency manipulation statutes along with a high level of government subsidizes to create artificially low export prices?

    Trump didn't damage international relationships he has just pointed out how the US has gotten screwed over the years. All the countries complaining about tariffs are not doing so because they think the agreements are fair the are complaining because Trump has publicized the one sided agreements.

    Every country in the world uses the US as their domestic boogeyman every time they run into problems. "It's not our fault we can't run our country it is the US's fault". The international community expects the US to deal with every problem in the world and then they have the gall to complain about how the US goes about trying to solve the problems. The US tried diplomacy and the world complains. The US tries military solutions and the same people complain about that. The Iranian nuclear deal showered benefits on all the players except for the US. Europe, Russia, and China received the go ahead to do business with Iran resulting in windfalls for all. Iran got all the sanctions lifted and the return of their seized assets. The US received nothing but a pinky promise that Iran would stop building nuclear weapons. And Iran has just postponed their nuclear warhead program and put their resources into their ballistic missile program so they will have a delivery mechanism once the restart their nuclear program.

      So why should the US not use it's considerable power to look out for number one? And people still do not realize that the US has not been losing it's power or influence it just stopped using the power it has.

    And I am not a Trump supporter. However, the world has needed a reality check when it comes US-International relationships. Trump is certainly not a politician but he has said things that many of his predecessors wanted to say. But as bad as Trump is he still beat all of his Republican and Democratic challengers to gain the WH. That says more about his adversaries than it does about Trump. If Trump is so bad how bad did Clinton have to be to lose to him? She had the money, press, and seasoned diplomatic experience and she lost.

  77. Re:Why should China help US pharma take the lead.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Or, maybe we could put all of those research grants, and patents they jack prices up for to better use. Instead of allowing a bunch of selfish assholes to demand tribute from the sick.

    Healthcare can do without the profit motive, it will literally never run out of sick people to treat otherwise.

  78. Re:Why should China help US pharma take the lead.. by dryeo · · Score: 2

    Canada has one of the highest drug costs in the world, so it isn't like we get much of a discount. The way things are going, we'll be back to pre-NAFTA and manufacturing our own drugs. That will get the pharmaceutical companies attention, which will turn on Trump. Right now they're trying to do the TPP bullshit, but with NAFTA instead.

    --
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  79. Re: So this is how Trump wind up destroying the wo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except that Obama caused this in 2013.

  80. WindBourne's fact check - ANTI-CHINA TROLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    claim with no evidence - treaties
    claim with no evidence - biological weapon

    verdict - anti-China, mostly troll

  81. Re:Why should China help US pharma take the lead.. by mangastudent · · Score: 1

    Or, maybe we could put all of those research grants, and patents they jack prices up for to better use. Instead of allowing a bunch of selfish assholes to demand tribute from the sick.

    Yeah, let's kill the Golden Goose, that trick always works!

    Seriously, show us on the doll where the capitalist touched you, for you'd rather have millions of people die year in, year out, until, maybe, some day, Western Civilization manages to reappear, that let any one of them "demand tribute from the sick".

    You specifically wish me dead, for without these vile profiteers spending billions and billions on drug research and development I'd be dead decades ago, or probably before starting grade school, pretty sure I was prescribed antibiotics for my one bought with pneumonia after playing around in the dirt too energetically. Hmmm, and my father as well, from his current problem, or back around 1950 plus or minus when he was injected every 4 hours with what had to be procaine penicillin to save him from pneumonia. Probably quite a few people you know. And I hope you've never been prescribed an antibiotic for an infection that would have otherwise killed you.

    You socialists killed way more than 100 million people in the 20th Century, will you ever be satisfied?

  82. Re: So this is how Trump wind up destroying the w by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The vast majority of the Chinese aren't that informed outside of official new (CCP propaganda). If you live in a major Chinese city and work among other wealthy progressive Chinese, than I hate to tell you but your myopic view is in the minority. Unfortunately.

  83. Hong Kong going rogue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not too many chickens fly from China to Mainland America.

    According to TFA:

    At least four research institutions have relied upon... H7N9 samples from cases in Taiwan and Hong Kong.

    If the chickens flew to Taiwan, they surely made it to Korea and Japan.
    I understand Xi, but what's the deal with Moon and Abe withholding samples?

    That said, Hong Kong going rogue against Beijing is actually the bigger story.

    1. Re:Hong Kong going rogue by mangastudent · · Score: 2

      H7N9 is just a general subtype of the influenza A species, here we're talking about a particular strain in the PRC. New strains are generated all the time, especially in the PRC where men, birds and pigs live in very close proximity, and after one of them causes a pandemic, it's subtype generally becomes a or the dominant subtype till there's another pandemic of another subtype. E.g. historically, the 1918 flu was H1N1, and the recent 2009 swine derived flu was also of that subtype. In between, H3N2 for example caused the 1968 pandemic, and became established alongside H1N1 (all this partly from memory and double checked a bit with Wikipedia). There are many, many other type A subtypes.

    2. Re:Hong Kong going rogue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      H7N9 is just a general subtype of the influenza A species, here we're talking about a particular strain in the PRC.

      What were the birds carrying to Taiwan, Hong Kong, Korea, Japan, Russia, India,,,? Cheap fakes? They're the same exact shit.

    3. Re:Hong Kong going rogue by mangastudent · · Score: 1

      H7N9 is just a general subtype of the influenza A species, here we're talking about a particular strain in the PRC.

      What were the birds carrying to Taiwan, Hong Kong, Korea, Japan, Russia, India,,,? Cheap fakes? They're the same exact shit.

      Just like the 1918, 1976 (Ford's swine flu), 1977 (best guess from a Russian biolab), and 2009 H1N1 strains were "the same exact shit"? And the annual Northern hemisphere vaccine strains were Brisbane/59/2007 before the 2009 pandemic, then for it and many following years California/7/2009, and then last year Michigan/45/2015?

      You know nothing about the science.

    4. Re:Hong Kong going rogue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Listen closely you fucking idiot. Stop masturbating to wikipedia,and use your fucking ears.
      A fucking bird is not going to whip out the fucking chemistry kit to make sure it's not carrying away fucking Chinese state secrets.
      If h7n9 is in China, it's in Hong Kong, Taiwan, Korea, Japan, Russia...

    5. Re: Hong Kong going rogue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "hur dur, I don't understand birds and migratory patterns n, and think birds fly all over the fucking place for no reason at all. My misunderstanding birds makes you an idiot. Just shut up and tell me I'm right, I'm too fragile to admit I'm a giant buffoon"

  84. Re:So this is how Trump wind up destroying the wor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, you would re-elect 0bama and let him go around the world bowing to everybody and apologizing for the United States?

    Umm ... did we witness the same Obama?

    No thank you. I'd rather be hated and feared than run over.

    Ah, there we have it ... the justification of tyrants. So you think America should be feared? By it's allies? To what end?

    Our "friends" have been taking advantage of us for decades.

    God you people are fucking delusional if you believe that shit.

    Son, you need some serious help ... you seem to think America needs be feared by its allies, and that the allies aren't really allies. So, I assume the enemies aren't really enemies and should not fear America? Maybe because America has plans to be just like her notional enemies, and nothing at all like her notional friends?

    That would certainly explain why Trump is sucking up to dictators, and acting like an asshole and pissing off friends.

    When America figures out who its friends are, and who has been taking advantage of whom ... it might be a bit of a shock to realize there are no more friends left.

    America has spent the last 7 decades trying to stack the deck to look out for her interests. And in very short order, they've suddenly decided they don't need any friends.

    Good luck with that, I look forward to the day that your friends turn their backs on you.

  85. slashdot running NYT articles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .... what has this site come to?

    1. Re:slashdot running NYT articles by mangastudent · · Score: 1

      Like Google dropping their Don't be evil shtick, you won't find the word "nerd" on the front page, the About page, or the FAQ.

  86. WindBourne's fact check - ANTI-CHINA TROLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    claim with no evidence - spreading rapidly
    claim with no evidence / lie - main flu virus
    claim with no evidence - farmers,chickens, high deathrate
    claim with not evidence - biological warefare
    claim with no evidence - profiting from bio warfare

    verdict - anti-China troll

  87. WindBourne's fact check - ANTI-CHINA TROLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    logic - never shared but wasn't an issue, why the need to share 5 years ago or last year
    claim with no evidence - leaking info

    verdict - illogical, slight troll

  88. WindBourne's fact check - TROLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    claim with no evidence / lie - always been in china
    claim with no evidence - leaks

    verdict - anti-China fear mongering

  89. Re:Yeah. Anybody surprised? by dryeo · · Score: 2

    Breaking the largest trade block in the world by breaking treaties (as if Canada is a security threat) is something especially when the guy breaking them doesn't even know anything. He actually thinks Mexico is the US's largest trade partner and doesn't consider the huge advantage the US has with services negating the couple of percent advantage Canada has in material goods currently.
    There's also the softwood treaty that America breaks regularly, driving up housing costs for Americans.
    And then there is bringing the worst part of the TPP under NAFTA.

    --
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  90. WindBourne's fact check - TROLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    personal attack - don't have a clue
    lie - they did have a clue
    claim with no evidence - 60-70% 30%, all numbers basically
    logic - spread it fast hard to transfer to humans
    moving goalposts - doing harm / useful as weapons without modifying

    verdict - didn't understand the post he replied to, troll

  91. WindBourne's fact check - LIAR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    claim with no evidence - information leaks
    lie - started human to human
    lie - CDC isn't screaming
    claim with no evidence - begging for samples

    verdict - usual lies and unsubstantiated claims

  92. Re:So this is how Trump wind up destroying the wor by rtb61 · · Score: 1

    The USA has not friends, at least in the current US diplomatic climate, only frenemies https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... and it will abuse any relationship for practically any reason, ego, greed, domination, have to repeat that one cause they said it out aloud, 'DOMINATION', yeah, friends don't dominate friends because we they do, they ain't friends and never have been.

    The US lies so much, that well, people have stopped paying attention and working to reduce interaction to only when they have to. It's like over there, it's rotting under the weight of it's own corruption, just humour it, prop it up a little, so that it implodes gracefully, rather than explodes in conflict either internal or external.

    If the US government asks nicely, I am sure the government of China will hand over information this time and if the US government asks nicely next time etc. no more worthless treaties with the US, they break them anyhow. Quite simply the US has become to chaotic for anything other than relations at a polite polite distance, any plots and schemes of impact thwarted as much as possible, a propped up a little so the collapse is more subdued.

    The US has become the drug addled, brain damaged prize fighter, to dumb to quit and only brain damage feeds the desire to fight and lose, again and again and again and the drugs, the corruption, creates the illusion of winning. So the rest of the world might well treat the US like an idiot toddler on a sugar rush with loaded gun, let it pretend it owns everything but stop it from breaking things whilst keeping it calm enough to not start pulling the trigger, eventually it will sugar crash on it's own after it's sugar supply has been cut off (that would be the funny money US dollar).

    The US blaming everyone else for it's failings but it is all down to failure to prosecute corruption at all levels, that weight of corruption, collapsing the fabric of the US socio-economic system.

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  93. WindBourne's fact check - LIAR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lie - Trump treaties
    lie / claim with no evidence - 10% difference
    moving goalposts / double standard - there is no 'treaty' to share viruses

    verdict - usual WindBourne lies and misdirection

  94. WindBourne's fact check - TROLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    claim with no evidence - no sample
    lie / claim with no evidence / personal attack / logic - Europe could develop it cheaper and save more people

    verdict - troll

  95. H7N9 avian flu viruses brought into Japan via ille by Zartan+the+Great · · Score: 2

    Perhaps Japan can or is sharing some of theirs: http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news...

  96. Re: So this is how Trump wind up destroying the wo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > We invented computers, the internet, electricity, automobiles, healthcare, medicine, space travel, air travel and nuclear weapons.

    I am estimating this list to be half untrue and half inaccurate. You are a true American!

  97. WindBournes's fact check - TROLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    claim with no evidence

  98. WindBourne's fact check - TROLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lie / claim with no evidence - most

    verdict - American cheerleader

  99. Re:Why should China help US pharma take the lead.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    are you sure? you can't even provide your own actors for films

  100. WindBourne's fact check - TROLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lie / claim with no evidence - bulk of slavery

    verdict - trolling American cheerleading

  101. WindBourne's fact check - TROLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    moving goalposts - outside China / USA
    moving goalposts - birds / chickens

    verdict - troll

  102. Re: So this is how Trump wind up destroying the wo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Moron, no country has friends/allies or enemies. Only interests, you twit.

    Go read 1984 and think reaaaaaaaaally hard about what Orwell was talking about in this area when he said, We have always been at war with Eurasia.

    Since you are obviously an illiterate dumb fuck, it means what I said above about country interests. Not whatever the fuck your high school English teacher told you to think.

    Idiot.

  103. Re: So this is how Trump wind up destroying the wo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow! You ranted for half a page without so much as a single data item much less a fact. Complete absolute unbacked raw emotion driven opinion.

    Bravo for managing to emote at such length yet say nothing of value! Feeling any better getting all that out?

  104. WindBourne's fact check - LIAR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lie - terrorists care
    lie - communists care
    lie - not gladly

    verdict - usual WindBourne lies

  105. Why do you lie about some 10% rule? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do you lie about some 10% rule?

  106. started? by CaffeinatedBacon · · Score: 1

    started

    most human infections were in people who'd had contact with live poultry or visited markets where the birds were sold.

    Why not read the article instead of relying on your 'secret sources'

  107. Why beg China for that virus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We need not beg the chicoms for that virus when there is a surefire way to obtain it, for free !

    The United States government should start mass importation of refugees from China .

    Surely some of those pooe Chinese Refugees would have some of those H7N9 virus inside their body.

    Take a page from the Japanese bio-warfare unit 731 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... - all CDC needs to do is to dissect those Chinese Refugees alive and to obtain those critically acclaimed virus, absolutely free of charge !!

  108. It's a biological weapon now? by CaffeinatedBacon · · Score: 1

    Please don't give it to Trump.

    What was the name of this treaty by the way? Sounds interesting.

  109. Re:Why should China help US pharma take the lead.. by CaffeinatedBacon · · Score: 1

    Why are you still much dirtier than Europeans then?
    Sounds fishy, do you have a link for that claim?

  110. Bullshit Windy by CaffeinatedBacon · · Score: 1

    The Steel and aluminium taffifs are against the WTO rules.

    What 10% difference bullshit are you talking about Windy? You never found it the last few times you claimed it was a rule.

    1. Re:Bullshit Windy by gtall · · Score: 1

      Trump is angling to get rid of the WTO. They won't bow to his grand overblown hair do.

    2. Re:Bullshit Windy by mangastudent · · Score: 1

      If you had even read the article, you would know at least 4 research institutions have samples.

      Not of this particular H7N9 strain! See e.g. this comment of mine on how strains of the same subtype change and can become drastically more lethal, as seen in 1918 and in the recent pandemic, all H1N1 strains.

      And while you're commended for "doing the math", you need to use pandemic infection rates to get the high end of possible deaths, not just normal flu season ones which represent the low end. Then apply a range of lethalities, a more transmissible H7N9 is likely to be more adapted to humans, and might be less lethal.

      And your probably right that it's not in epidemic state in the PRC, the concern is that it's moving that way with rumored human to human transmission. As for getting samples from travelers, if it's that far along, it's probably too late. Also hard to pull off logistically, unless they're promptly dying after arrival, at which point it is too late.

    3. Re:Bullshit Windy by CaffeinatedBacon · · Score: 1

      You seem to know more about this than me so you are probably right. Windy just has a habit of making shit up, often outrageously absurd claims. So I question him.

      Isn't the seasonal flu vaccine based on the prevalent strains from the previous 6 months. Norther hemisphere given to the Southern and vice versa. That would tend to imply 6 months is enough time for some large level of vaccination to be done. But obviously not enough for everyone as not everyone takes it now.

      3 million people visited America from China in 2016. So 8000+ a day, probably a similar level comming back home from a trip to China. If it was at all widespread in China routine CDC flu monitoring would have picked it up by now. But yes, too late for America.
      Best bet is to move to Australia or New Zealand and be rich enough to be at the head of the queue when the vaccine is ready. Hope they enjoy their (short) time as leaders of the free world.

    4. Re:Bullshit Windy by mangastudent · · Score: 2

      Isn't the seasonal flu vaccine based on the prevalent strains from the previous 6 months.

      Plus wild guesswork, which is often wrong, i.e it was mostly so for the prevalent circulating A strain or strains in the last season's Northern hemisphere vaccine. The 6 months is to create new seed strains if needed, and to produce millions of doses in the old fashioned way with eggs, max 3 doses per egg ... and for the elderly, they're now preferring to use 4 times the normal dosage to better insure a sufficient immune system reaction. Plus you need to do this 3 to 4 times, one each for the A H1N1 and H3N2 strains, then for 1 or 2 less lethal but still bad B strains.

      As for my knowledge, I've got a strong for a non-specialist biology and medical background (major was chemistry), and studied this intensively when the 2009 swine flu pandemic happened.

    5. Re:Bullshit Windy by CaffeinatedBacon · · Score: 1

      You are right again about all the techniques.

      You would probably skip most of that though, and just focus on the strain that's killing everyone...

  111. Re: So this is how Trump wind up destroying the wo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Countries are competing entities by their nature. Alliances exist but usualy are against some other country.
    No one is "friends" with the US.

  112. Bullshit Windy by CaffeinatedBacon · · Score: 1
    If you had even read the article, you would know at least 4 research institutions have samples. Just get them from there.

    in Asia - 766 cases were reported, almost all in China

    So ask the countries that weren't China for their samples.

    How about the rest of your silly claims
    It's the main flu virus for the year...and it's 40% fatal. Lets check here . 5-20% of Americans get the flu each year. Lets assume its the same for China. so 5-20% of Chinese people get it and it's 40% fatal. So 2% - 8% of the population, 28 million to 112 million Chinese people, died from flu just this year, and the government kept it a secret?
    Half that number again infected who didn't die, many of them travelling the world and you couldn't get a sample?

  113. you admitting Taiwan is part of China now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So are you admitting Taiwan is part of China now...
    Or admitting to your lies?

  114. Economic advantage? Damn Capitalists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They want an economic advantage? Those, damn dirty Capitalists

  115. Re:Why should China help US pharma take the lead.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this turns out to be the next break out super-flu...

    Wonderfully reasonable argument. The same goes for global warming and solar / nuclear energy development. How did the Trump administration worked those out again? Oh right. He does exactly what China blocks and withholds technology and denies the problem. Hence, the signature "Trump edition".

    That's the problem with deteriorating global geopolitics when you have global geopolitical problems threatening your existence.

  116. Re:So this is how Trump wind up destroying the wor by gtall · · Score: 1

    I don't believe it is Trump causing the friends of the U.S. to think twice, it is the fact that a significant portion of the U.S. electorate support el Presidente Tweetie that has them concerned. They now realize just how stupid the U.S. electorate can be and that problem is not going be fixed soon. There's no fixing stupid (to reuse a Ron White phrase).

  117. Re:So this is how Trump wind up destroying the wor by gtall · · Score: 2

    More likely than your conspiracy imagination is that the many flus start in S. China where contact between humans and animals is less than sterile...pigs and chickens. The PRC, knowing they have no real legitimacy, is reluctant to allow that sort of bad press come out if they can avoid it. The fact that those diseases could kill millions never enters into the calculation.

    And they aren't worried about invasion. Japan cannot and wouldn't want China. Russia cannot even manage their own country. There is no one else. Also, there isn't much China has that anyone wants except access to their domestic markets. And no invasion could supply that.

  118. Re: Yeah. Anybody surprised? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    I know. The treaties he has broken is with our 2 most important trade partners ;Canada and Mexico. And accusations against Canada, a 5 eye partner and one of most trusted allies, just insane. All I can say is I hope Mueller gets more than enough to put him prison for rest of life.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  119. Re: Why should China help US pharma take the lead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hollywood actors is NOT something you want to lay claim to. Perhaps Hollywood is so fucked up BECAUSE it has so many foreign actors from socialist shitholes who bring their broken ideology here?

  120. Re:So this is how Trump wind up destroying the wor by mangastudent · · Score: 1

    If the US government asks nicely, I am sure the government of China will hand over information this time

    The US when Obama was president didn't ask nicely from 2013 to 2016? No one else in the world has asked the PRC nicely? The Europeans for example also make flu vaccines, some of their firms are the biggest in the world at doing that, like France's Sanofi. When looking for US seed strain producing labs, I also noted there are 1 or more in the U.K.

    And producing seed strains now is one of the most important things that can be done, it normally takes a long time, hybridizing the original strain with ones that grow well in chicken egg membranes so they aren't pathogenic but express the 2 important original strain antigens, which is particularly hard with avian original strains since they tend to attack other bird cells.

    Ignore the propaganda slant the NYT put on the issue and focus on a) this being a 2013 strain and b) this being a world wide issue if it breaks out. The PRC is treating this like SARS, it's a political issue were their leaders would rather have 100s of millions to billions of people die than to lose face.

  121. Re:So this is how Trump wind up destroying the wor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China may hold on to their viruses, but the country is still open to tourism & business. So Americans could simply open hospitals/clinics in selected Chinese cities, and collect virus samples themselves. Or go the tourist route, and collect viruses from people returning from trips.

    More work than having the samples handed over, but easy enough. It is not a closed country.

  122. Re:So this is how Trump wind up destroying the wor by mangastudent · · Score: 1

    So Americans could simply open hospitals/clinics in selected Chinese cities, and collect virus samples themselves.

    So you don't know that Americans can't actually do that "simply"? It's theoretically possible in "encouraged" sectors, requires a local "partner" for "restricted" sectors, and then there are the "forbidden" ones. With such a transparent motive, I can't imagine it being simple, but a quick check tells us that there are some.

    But you're ignoring the whole point of the article, if you wait until it's a generally circulating super-flu epidemic in the PRC, it's too late, it's probably also circulating outside of the mainland, and only weeks from becoming a pandemic.

    Even with modern technology it takes time to brew the antigens, purify the mess, bottle and test it, distribute it, a week or more for a vaccine recipient to get protected, etc. etc. etc. And we aren't geared up to do this for 100s of millions to billions of people. To do it with old egg technology ... forget about it, by the time you've developed seed strains, grown it in zillions of eggs (at most, 3 doses per egg), then go through the purification etc. process, most of the world will have been exposed to it, absent catastrophically stringent quarantine measures.

  123. Re:Why should China help US pharma take the lead.. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    This was a problem for everyone 100 years ago, and rural Asian (and other) areas today. It would be in China's interest to let the US or other countries develop a vaccine as they stand to lose many, many people.

    That assumes the Chinese leadership would be upset if hundreds of millions of Chinese died. But the fact is that they don't give one shit about human life in China, that's why you can get the death penalty for cheating on your taxes, and why they harvest the internal organs from those given the death penalty. Those organs are worth quite a bit of money, you see. All they care about is their own enrichment. And China's economic growth is slowing now, which means their middle class will stop growing. Growing economic prosperity is the only thing that's been keeping them from revolution, and now the growth has stopped. The only way to make sure that the living will have jobs is to kill many of them off. Letting a couple hundred million Chinese citizens die is a win-win for Winnie the Pooh.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  124. Read about the worst influenza pandemic in history by voxelman · · Score: 1

    For an in-depth read of the potential dangers of an influenza pandemic see: The Great Influenza: The Story of the Deadliest Pandemic in History
    by John M. Barry. Although medical science has certainly advanced since 1918 it is doubtful that we have overcome many of the social limitations that made the 1918 virus so deadly.

  125. Fine I'll do it myself. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know. The treaties he has broken are with our 2 most important trade partners ;Canada and Mexico. And accusations against Canada, a 5 eye partner and one of our most trusted allies, is just insane. All I can say is I hope Mueller gets more than enough to put him in prison for the rest of his life.
    --
    Everyone knows there is no honour in "u" WindBourne.

  126. Stop arguing like children by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a matter of health, stop being sooo petty stupid governement and share...
    This is madening...

  127. Re:So this is how Trump wind up destroying the wor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, you would re-elect 0bama and let him go around the world bowing to everybody and apologizing for the United States?

    No thank you. I'd rather be hated and feared than run over. Our "friends" have been taking advantage of us for decades.

    Well,true.. but Trump's pissing off our *enemies* .. the two biggest boys on the block .. And hey.. since 20 years or so ago.. all the commanders in chief have been dangerous loonies.. Trump is just worse. He scares me, and in fact most of the rest of the world. Not a fear based on respect, but "when's he gonna cause WW3"...

  128. Re:So this is how Trump wind up destroying the wor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You need to get your ego in check.

  129. WindBourne's fact check - ICONCLUSIVE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    verdict - Too much gibberish, see if an English version shows up

  130. Re:So this is how Trump wind up destroying the wor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, China are being assholes (again) and it's Trump's fault.

    There's a cost to narcissistic xenophobia. You retard rednecks can get all uppity and pound the table, but it's not free. The rest of the world see and reacts.

  131. Re:So this is how Trump wind up destroying the wor by dcw3 · · Score: 1

    Although it is true that the PRC has never really played nice with others (I do remember the SARS kerfuffle), it does not refute the fact that this ridiculous trade war is making a bad situation worse.

    That is like you and I getting into a spat about who owes who money, and me pulling out a Glock just daring you to say another word. No, the trade issues should be treated as completely unrelated, and that's all on China.

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
  132. Future Bioweapon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    39% mortality would be pretty good as a bioweapon. Research it privately in China to stabilize it enough for a dispersal and hold all samples back from the international community so you can utilize it if you ever need to.

  133. Another sample needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want to know where i can get my H1Z1 sample